Cybersecurity Archives | Page 222 of 368 | Digital Watch Observatory

EMSA given broader powers for digital maritime threats

The European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) is set to take on an expanded role in maritime security, following a provisional agreement between the European Parliament and the Council.

Instead of focusing solely on traditional safety tasks, EMSA will now help tackle modern challenges, including cyber attacks and hybrid threats that increasingly target critical maritime infrastructure across Europe.

The updated mandate enables EMSA to support EU member states and the European Commission with technical, operational and scientific assistance in areas such as cybersecurity, pollution response, maritime surveillance and decarbonisation.

Rather than remaining confined to its original scope, the agency may also adopt new responsibilities as risks evolve, provided such tasks are requested by the Commission or individual countries.

The move forms part of a broader EU legislative package aimed at reinforcing maritime safety rules, improving environmental protections and updating inspection procedures.

The reforms ensure EMSA is equipped with adequate human and financial resources to handle its wider remit and contribute to strategic resilience in an increasingly digital and geopolitically unstable world.

Created in 2002 and based in Lisbon, EMSA plays a central role in safeguarding maritime transport, which remains vital for Europe’s economy and trade.

With more than 2,000 marine incidents reported annually, the agency’s modernised mandate is expected to strengthen the EU’s ability to prevent disruptions at sea and support its broader green and security goals.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

The EU lawmakers investigate Italian surveillance case

A delegation from the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee (LIBE) will visit Rome on 30 May to examine the unfolding controversy surrounding the use of Paragon’s spyware in Italy.

The mission will be led by Sandro Ruotolo, a member of the European Parliament, and will include meetings with surveillance victims, press representatives, and members of the parliamentary committee responsible for intelligence oversight, known as COPASIR.

The Israeli-developed surveillance software, Graphite, produced by Paragon, is at the centre of the investigation. Reports allege that the tool was used to monitor investigative journalists and NGO activists in Italy, sparking national concern and leading to the termination of Italy’s agreement with the company.

Despite public pressure for clarity, the Italian government has declined to release additional information, stating that any clarifications would be delivered exclusively to COPASIR, which is currently evaluating the claims.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Customer data exposed in Adidas cyber attack

Adidas has confirmed a cyber attack that led to the compromise of customer data held by a third-party service partner.

According to the company, unauthorised access was gained to consumer contact details submitted during previous interactions with its customer service help desk. Payment credentials and passwords were not affected.

Affected individuals are now being notified directly, with the company expressing sincere regret for any concern caused. Contact information, such as names and email addresses, appears to be the primary type of data exposed.

Steps were taken immediately to contain the incident, with cybersecurity experts brought in to assist in a detailed investigation. Adidas stressed its commitment to safeguarding user data and is reviewing its systems to prevent similar breaches in future.

This incident adds to a growing list of cyber attacks targeting major UK retailers. Recent breaches involving Marks & Spencer, Co-op, and Harrods have caused operational disruption, prompting a wider investigation by the National Crime Agency into possible links among the attacks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Taiwan rebuffs China’s hacking claims as disinformation

Taiwan has rejected accusations from Beijing that its ruling party orchestrated cyberattacks against Chinese infrastructure. Authorities in Taipei instead accused China of spreading false claims in an effort to manipulate public perception and escalate tensions.

On Tuesday, Chinese officials alleged that a Taiwan-backed hacker group linked to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had targeted a technology firm in Guangzhou.

They claimed more than 1,000 networks, including systems tied to the military, energy, and government sectors, had been compromised across ten provinces in recent years.

Taiwan’s National Security Bureau responded on Wednesday, stating that the Chinese Communist Party is manipulating false information to mislead the international community.

Rather than acknowledging its own cyber activities, Beijing is attempting to shift blame while undermining Taiwan’s credibility, the agency said.

Taipei further accused China of long-running cyberattacks aimed at stealing funds and destabilising critical infrastructure. Officials described such campaigns as part of cognitive warfare designed to widen social divides and erode public trust within Taiwan.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Iranian hacker admits role in Baltimore ransomware attack

An Iranian man has pleaded guilty to charges stemming from a ransomware campaign that disrupted public services across several US cities, including a major 2019 attack in Baltimore.

The US Department of Justice announced that 37-year-old Sina Gholinejad admitted to computer fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, offences that carry a maximum combined sentence of 30 years.

Rather than targeting private firms, Gholinejad and his accomplices deployed Robbinhood ransomware against local governments, hospitals and non-profit organisations from early 2019 to March 2024.

The attack on Baltimore alone resulted in over $19 million in damage and halted critical city functions such as water billing, property tax collection and parking enforcement.

Instead of simply locking data, the group demanded Bitcoin ransoms and occasionally threatened to release sensitive files. Cities including Greenville, Gresham and Yonkers were also affected.

Although no state affiliation has been confirmed, US officials have previously warned of cyber activity tied to Iran, allegations Tehran continues to deny.

Gholinejad was arrested at Raleigh-Durham International Airport in January 2025. The FBI led the investigation, with support from Bulgarian authorities. Sentencing is scheduled for August.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU extends cybersecurity deadline for wireless devices

The European Commission has extended the deadline for mandatory cybersecurity requirements targeting wireless and connected devices sold within the EU.

Under the Delegated Act (2022/30) of the Radio Equipment Directive, manufacturers must embed robust security features to guard against risks such as unauthorised access and data breaches. The rules will now take effect from 1 August 2025.

A broad range of products will be affected, including mobile phones, tablets, cameras, and telecommunications devices using radio signals.

Internet of Things (IoT) items—such as baby monitors, smartwatches, fitness trackers, and connected industrial machinery—also fall within the scope. Any device capable of transmitting or receiving data wirelessly may be subject to the new requirements.

The deadline extension aims to give manufacturers additional time to adopt harmonised standards and integrate cybersecurity into product design. The Commission emphasised the importance of early action to avoid compliance issues when the rules become binding.

Despite the grace period, businesses are urged to act now by reviewing development cycles and addressing potential vulnerabilities well ahead of the implementation date.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU workshop gathers support and scrutiny for the DSA

A packed conference centre in Brussels hosted over 200 stakeholders on 7 May 2025, as the European Commission held a workshop on the EU’s landmark Digital Services Act (DSA).

The pioneering law aims to protect users online by obliging tech giants—labelled as Very Large Online Platforms and Search Engines (VLOPSEs)—to assess and mitigate systemic risks their services might pose to society at least once a year, instead of waiting for harmful outcomes to trigger regulation.

Rather than focusing on banning content, the DSA encourages platforms to improve internal safeguards and transparency. It was designed to protect democratic discourse from evolving online threats like disinformation without compromising freedom of expression.

Countries like Ukraine and Moldova are working closely with the EU to align with the DSA, balancing protection against foreign aggression with open political dialogue. Others, such as Georgia, raise concerns that similar laws could be twisted into tools of censorship instead of accountability.

The Commission’s workshop highlighted gaps in platform transparency, as civil society groups demanded access to underlying data to verify tech firms’ risk assessments. Some are even considering stepping away from such engagements until concrete evidence is provided.

Meanwhile, tech companies have already rolled back a third of their disinformation-related commitments under the DSA Code of Conduct, sparking further concern amid Europe’s shifting political climate.

Despite these challenges, the DSA has inspired interest well beyond EU borders. Civil society groups and international institutions like UNESCO are now pushing for similar frameworks globally, viewing the DSA’s risk-based, co-regulatory approach as a better alternative to restrictive speech laws.

The digital rights community sees this as a crucial opportunity to build a more accountable and resilient information space.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

China blames Taiwan for tech company cyberattack

Chinese authorities have accused Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party of backing a cyberattack on a tech company based in Guangzhou.

According to public security officials in the city, an initial police investigation linked the attack to a foreign hacker group allegedly supported by the Taiwanese government.

The unnamed technology firm was reportedly targeted in the incident, with local officials suggesting political motives behind the cyber activity. They claimed Taiwan’s Democratic Progressive Party had provided backing instead of the group acting independently.

Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council has not responded to the allegations. The ruling DPP has faced similar accusations before, which it has consistently rejected, often describing such claims as attempts to stoke tension rather than reflect reality.

A development like this adds to the already fragile cross-strait relations, where cyber and political conflicts continue to intensify instead of easing, as both sides exchange accusations in an increasingly digital battleground.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Hackers are selling 94 billion stolen cookies on Telegram

Cybercriminals are trading nearly 94 billion stolen browser cookies on Telegram, with over 20% still active and capable of granting direct access to user accounts.

These cookies, essential for keeping users logged in and websites functioning smoothly, are being repurposed as tools for account hijacking, bypassing login credentials and putting personal data at risk. Security experts warn that hundreds of millions of users globally could be exposed.

The data, revealed by cybersecurity firm NordVPN, shows that the theft spans 253 countries, with Brazil, India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the US among the most affected.

Google services were the prime target, with over 4.5 billion stolen cookies linked to Google accounts, followed by YouTube, Microsoft, and Bing. Many of these cookies contain session IDs and user identifiers, which allow hackers to impersonate users and access their online accounts without detection.

The surge in cookie theft marks a 74% increase over the previous year, driven largely by the spread of malware. Redline, Vidar, and LummaC2 are among the most prolific infostealers, collectively responsible for over 60 billion stolen cookies.

These malware strains extract saved data from browsers and often act as gateways for more advanced cyberattacks.

New strains like RisePro, Stealc, Nexus, and Rhadamanthys are also emerging, designed to steal browser credentials and banking data more efficiently.

Many of these stolen cookies are being exchanged on Telegram channels, raising alarm about the app’s misuse. In response, Telegram stated:

‘The sale of private data is expressly forbidden by Telegram’s terms of service and is removed whenever discovered. Moderators empowered with custom AI and machine learning tools proactively monitor public parts of the platform and accept reports to remove millions of pieces of harmful content each year.’

With cookie theft becoming an increasingly common tactic, experts urge users to regularly clear cookies, use secure browsers, and consider additional protective measures to guard their digital identity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI regulation fight heats up over US federal moratorium

The US House of Representatives has passed a budget bill containing a 10-year moratorium on the enforcement of state-level artificial intelligence laws. With broad bipartisan concern already surfacing, the Senate faces mounting pressure to revise or scrap the provision entirely.

While the provision claims to exclude generally applicable legislation, experts warn its vague language could override a wide array of consumer protections and privacy rules in the US. The moratorium’s scope, targeting AI-specific regulations, has triggered alarm among concerned groups.

Critics argue the measure may hinder states from addressing real-world harms posed by AI technologies, such as deepfakes, discriminatory algorithms, and unauthorised data use.

Existing and proposed state laws, ranging from transparency requirements in hiring and healthcare to protections for artists and mental health app users, may be invalidated under the moratorium.

Several experts noted that states have often acted more swiftly than the federal government in confronting emerging tech risks.

Supporters contend the moratorium is necessary to prevent a fragmented regulatory landscape that could stifle innovation and disrupt interstate commerce. However, analysts point out that general consumer laws might also be jeopardised due to the bill’s ambiguous definitions and legal structure.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!