Spain reports higher removal of online hate speech content

Spain’s Observatory on Racism and Xenophobia identified 31,003 pieces of hate speech and discriminatory content on social media in May 2026, according to its monthly monitoring report.

The Observatory, known as OBERAXE, said digital platforms removed 65% of notified content, up from 56% in April. TikTok, X and Instagram recorded the highest removal rates, while the Trusted Flagger route continued to perform better than ordinary user reporting.

Trusted Flagger notifications accounted for 53% of removed content, compared with 48% in April. Content reported through ordinary user channels reached a removal rate of 12%, up from 8% the previous month.

The report found that 73% of detected content presented targeted groups as a threat, while dehumanising and severely degrading messages increased sharply compared with April. It also recorded frequent use of aggressive language and growing reliance on images, videos, memes and coded expressions.

People from North Africa remained the main target of online hate speech, followed by African and Afro-descendant people and Roma people. Narratives linked to citizen insecurity accounted for the largest share of detected content, followed by content related to social benefits and access to public resources.

OBERAXE said continued cooperation with digital platforms is essential to improve detection, removal procedures and policies aimed at combating discrimination online.

Why does it matter?

The report shows how hate speech monitoring is becoming part of platform governance and anti-discrimination policy. Spain’s data suggest that trusted reporting channels can improve removal rates, but the scale and persistence of hostile narratives show the limits of reactive moderation. The findings also raise wider questions about transparency, platform accountability and how governments can address online hate while protecting freedom of expression.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Cybercriminals exploit World Cup hype with phishing schemes

Cybercriminals are exploiting World Cup interest through fake streaming platforms, phishing campaigns, counterfeit online stores and betting-related scams, according to Kaspersky researchers.

The security company said it had identified more than 336 fake websites designed to imitate official World Cup pages. Many scams target fans looking for cheaper tickets, free match streams or tournament merchandise.

Some fake streaming sites ask users to register and pay for access to matches, sometimes using cryptocurrency. Others collect personal data that can later be used in further phishing attacks.

Kaspersky also identified counterfeit merchandise shops, fraudulent betting schemes and phishing emails promoting fake offers or paid predictions. Some scams rely on urgency, limited-time claims and professional-looking websites to pressure users into sharing payment or personal information.

The company warned that AI-generated websites and more polished scam designs are making fraudulent pages harder to distinguish from legitimate services during high-demand events.

Kaspersky advised fans to use official sources, check website addresses carefully and avoid offers that promise free access, unrealistic discounts or guaranteed betting results.

Why does it matter?

Major sporting events create ideal conditions for online fraud because demand, urgency and emotion are all high. World Cup scams show how criminals combine phishing, fake e-commerce, streaming fraud and social engineering to steal money and personal data. The use of polished or AI-generated websites also reflects a wider challenge for consumer protection: scams are becoming easier to create at scale and harder for users to recognise.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Malaysia moves to strengthen laws against AI-enabled crimes

Malaysia is moving to strengthen its legal framework to address AI-enabled offences, including deepfakes, identity impersonation and AI-generated child sexual abuse material, according to Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo.

Speaking in the Dewan Rakyat, Gobind said Malaysia already has legal protections in several areas, particularly those involving children, but that the country’s regulatory framework must evolve to keep pace with emerging AI-related risks, especially those affecting young people.

The minister said the government is pursuing a two-pronged strategy that combines safety-by-design measures during AI development with stronger enforcement mechanisms when AI-generated content violates existing laws.

Gobind added that the government is consulting academics, religious leaders and other stakeholders as part of its review process to ensure future regulations remain effective as AI technologies continue to evolve.

Why does it matter?

The initiative reflects a growing challenge facing governments worldwide: adapting legal systems to address harms created or amplified by AI technologies. Deepfakes, synthetic identities and AI-generated abuse material are creating new enforcement challenges that often do not fit neatly within existing legal frameworks designed for earlier digital technologies.

Malaysia’s approach also highlights an emerging policy trend that combines prevention and enforcement. Rather than relying solely on criminal penalties, governments are increasingly exploring safety-by-design requirements, risk management measures and stakeholder consultation to reduce harm before it occurs. The outcome of Malaysia’s review could influence how other countries in the region approach AI governance, online safety and digital rights.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

UK licenses NCSC-developed SilentGlass cyber security device for global use

The UK government has licensed SilentGlass, a cybersecurity device developed by the National Cyber Security Centre, for global manufacture and sale.

SilentGlass is a plug-and-play hardware device designed to protect connected devices from attacks delivered through digital display connections. It sits between a laptop and a screen, monitoring HDMI and DisplayPort connections and blocking unexpected or malicious activity.

The technology was developed by the NCSC to address risks linked to modern smart monitors and shared display environments. It has already been deployed across government estates and is now being made available more widely.

The Government Office for Technology Transfer supported the commercialisation process, including intellectual property strategy, market assessment and licensing. Following a competitive process, a global licence was awarded to the UK-based cybersecurity company Goldilock Labs.

The government said the project shows how public-sector intellectual property can be commercialised to support wider cyber resilience and UK cybersecurity innovation.

The NCSC said the agreement could serve as a model for bringing more government-developed technologies to market.

Why does it matter?

SilentGlass highlights a less visible part of cyber risk: physical and hardware-layer connections between workplace devices. As smart displays, shared workspaces, and hybrid working environments become more common, video and peripheral links can become attack surfaces. The case also shows how governments can move cybersecurity capabilities developed for public-sector use into the commercial market through licensing and technology transfer.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Prime Minister Modi promotes human-centred AI governance at G7

Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for a human-centric approach to AI development while addressing a G7 Summit outreach session focused on the safe, rapid and efficient deployment of AI.

Modi said AI has the potential to reshape human civilisation but should be guided by principles of inclusivity, security and the public good. He highlighted India’s human-centric ‘MANAV’ vision for AI and referenced the country’s recent AI Impact Summit as part of its broader efforts to promote responsible AI development.

The Prime Minister of India said democratic countries should have access to advanced AI models capable of protecting critical information infrastructure and supporting responses to cybersecurity threats. He also called for an integrated approach that addresses safety, speed and efficiency together.

He argued that AI systems should be safe by design, supported by common standards and regulatory frameworks, and reinforced through international cooperation to address challenges such as deepfakes, misinformation and cyber fraud. The remarks were delivered at the G7 Summit in Evian, France.

Why does it matter?

Modi’s remarks reflect a growing international effort to shape AI governance around principles of safety, trust and public benefit. As governments seek to harness AI’s economic and societal potential, questions around security, misinformation, critical infrastructure protection and equitable access are becoming central to global policy discussions.

The intervention also highlights the increasing role of middle and emerging powers in AI governance debates. By promoting a human-centric approach and calling for common standards and international cooperation, India is positioning itself as an active participant in efforts to shape global norms for AI development and deployment.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Ireland strengthens AML framework with focus on crypto-asset risks

Ireland has launched a new National Risk Assessment and a 30-point action plan aimed at strengthening its response to money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing risks. The framework identifies crypto-assets as a significant emerging vulnerability, reflecting their increasing use in complex and cross-border financial crime schemes.

The action plan introduces enhanced safeguards for digital finance, including stricter due diligence requirements when crypto-assets are used as a source of funds. The Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland has been tasked with developing standards to ensure firms verify the legitimacy and origin of crypto-related funds, with implementation expected by 2027.

Authorities also plan to strengthen supervisory powers, improve transparency around beneficial ownership and enhance coordination between financial crime and tax enforcement bodies. The approach targets evolving criminal methods combining cash-based laundering with digital tools, including crypto-assets and cross-border layering techniques.

The initiative also forms part of Ireland’s preparation for its 2028 international anti-money laundering evaluation.

Why does it matter?

The new framework reflects a broader regulatory shift toward treating crypto-assets as embedded components of financial crime risk rather than isolated instruments. By integrating digital asset controls into its AML framework, Ireland is improving detection of hybrid laundering schemes combining cash flows with blockchain transfers and aligning with international assessments.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Meta expands AI-powered teen safety protections across its platforms

Meta has announced new teen safety updates across Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger, including expanded age-appropriate content settings, AI-powered age detection, and new parental notification tools.

Meta said the updates are designed to ensure teens receive appropriate protections by default, give parents greater visibility into online activity and strengthen safeguards that support young people’s well-being.

Meta said its 13+ default content setting, recently introduced in India, is now rolling out globally across Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger. The setting is designed to limit exposure to age-inappropriate content by default, drawing on established content-rating principles and parent feedback.

On Facebook, the 13+ default setting is intended to hide content considered inappropriate for teens in areas such as Feed and Reels. It also limits teens’ ability to interact with Profiles, Pages, Groups, and Events that primarily post inappropriate content.

On Messenger, the 13+ default setting limits teens’ ability to view links to inappropriate Facebook content or chat with accounts that primarily share it.

Meta is also expanding its use of AI-powered age estimation systems to identify accounts that may belong to underage users. The company said the system analyses profile context, including birthday celebrations, school-grade mentions, posts, comments, bios, and captions, to assess whether an account is likely to belong to someone underage.

The company said it is adding visual analysis as another detection technique. According to Meta, the technology analyses photos and videos for general indicators associated with age, such as physical characteristics, but does not identify individuals and does not use facial recognition.

Meta said combining visual signals with text and interaction analysis could increase the number of underage accounts it identifies and removes. The technology will be expanded across additional parts of its apps, including Instagram Reels, Instagram Live, and Facebook Groups.

Instagram will also notify supervising parents if a teen repeatedly searches for terms related to suicide or self-harm within a short period, subject to supervision settings. Meta said the feature has been rolled out to supervising parents in the EU, Brazil, and India, with parents and teens receiving notifications that the alerts are on the way.

Parents using supervision can now manage their teens’ activity through Meta’s Family Center across Instagram, Meta Horizon, Facebook, and Messenger. Meta said parents will also be able to see a more holistic view of teen activity across its apps in the coming months, including aggregated time spent.

Why does it matter?

The announcement reflects a broader shift towards age-appropriate design, where platforms increasingly rely on default protections and automated systems rather than expecting young users or parents to configure safety settings themselves. AI-based age detection is becoming a central tool in efforts to identify underage users and enforce platform safeguards at scale.

The update also highlights ongoing debates about the balance between child protection, privacy and platform accountability. While automated age-estimation technologies may help improve online safety, regulators and civil society groups continue to scrutinise their accuracy, transparency and potential impact on users’ rights. As governments around the world consider stricter child online safety requirements, platform approaches such as Meta’s may influence future regulatory expectations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EDPS and EU data protection officers focus on AI, cybersecurity and compliance

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and data protection officers (DPOs) from EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies met in Brussels on 18 June to discuss emerging data protection priorities and compliance challenges.

The 58th meeting of the EDPS-DPO network was hosted by the Executive Agencies of the European Commission. The meeting brought together DPOs from across the EU administration at a time of significant regulatory and technological change.

European Data Protection Supervisor Wojciech Wiewiórowski opened the meeting by emphasising the importance of safeguarding DPO independence in practice. He pointed to recent EDPS action, guidance, and procedures intended to safeguard the role of DPOs across EU institutions.

Wiewiórowski also reviewed key developments from 2025, including the closure of the EDPS investigation into the European Commission’s use of Microsoft 365, a rise in complaints, and the growing impact of AI-generated submissions. He noted that regulatory simplification should reduce unnecessary administrative burdens without undermining fundamental rights protections.

Thomas Zerdick, Head of the EDPS Supervision and Enforcement Unit, introduced a follow-up tracker designed to maintain continuity between EDPS-DPO meetings. The first tracker focused on EDPS supervisory guidance on the role of DPOs in EU institutions and the EDPS decision on prior consent to DPO dismissal.

Zerdick also presented recent developments in supervision and enforcement, including complaint handling, compliance issues affecting several EU institutions, and practical guidance on international transfers and data protection impact assessments. The update also covered work linked to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, including audits, opinions, and preparations for upcoming systems.

Luis Velasco, Head of the EDPS Technology and Privacy Unit, outlined initiatives to help EU institutions meet compliance requirements for automated systems and AI. He announced that an updated version of the EDPS guidance on risk management for AI systems is expected to be published later this summer.

Velasco also referred to a practical checklist on human intervention, intended to help organisations establish effective safeguards for automated systems. He warned that cyberattacks targeting EU institutions pose a growing threat and pose serious risks to individuals’ personal data.

The discussion also addressed the response to a personal data breach. Velasco stressed that individuals affected by a personal data breach should be informed without undue delay when a breach is likely to pose a high risk to their rights and freedoms.

A practical workshop focused on developing a common data protection impact assessment template under the EU Data Protection Regulation. Participants tested a draft template through a case study and discussed issues, including necessity, proportionality, and risk assessment.

The afternoon sessions included a discussion of the 2024 data breach at the European Agency for Law Enforcement Training. The CEPOL DPO and the EDPS Data Breach Notification Team shared lessons with the wider DPO community, highlighting that major data breaches create organisational and human challenges as well as compliance obligations.

The meeting also included a session on privacy and data protection case law, presented by Zerdick. The session focused on the EDPS’s interpretation of recent judgments and their practical implications for supervisory work and controllers.

Participants also received an update on the EDPS Website Compliance Awareness Campaign. Following pilot phases in 2024 and 2025, the Technology and Privacy Unit presented preliminary findings from the first wave of the campaign’s second phase, which involved automated scans of public-facing websites of EU institutions.

The EDPS said the meeting demonstrated the value of bringing together the EU’s DPO community to address shared challenges, exchange practical experience and strengthen compliance across institutions. The discussions focused on practical cooperation, support for compliance, and stronger data protection safeguards across the EU administration.

Why does it matter?

The meeting highlights how data protection within EU institutions is evolving beyond traditional compliance issues toward broader challenges involving AI governance, cybersecurity, automated decision-making and digital service oversight. As public administrations increasingly adopt AI-enabled systems and process larger volumes of personal data, data protection officers are playing a more strategic role in managing operational and regulatory risks.

The discussions also illustrate a growing emphasis on practical implementation. Common templates, coordinated guidance and shared lessons from data breaches can help institutions apply data protection rules more consistently across the EU administration. This is particularly important as regulators seek to align privacy requirements with emerging frameworks governing AI, cybersecurity and digital public services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Sweden warns of growing criminal exploitation of digital payment systems

Sweden’s financial regulator, Finansinspektionen, has warned that organised criminal networks are increasingly exploiting weaknesses in payment systems and digital banking infrastructure. The assessment points to a more challenging risk environment driven by faster transactions, cross-border financial flows and increasing technological complexity.

Financial institutions across the Nordic region are expected to adopt more proactive and intelligence-led compliance approaches.

Retail banks remain primary targets because of their high transaction volumes and role in the initial placement of illicit funds. Criminals rely on shell companies and layered ownership structures to conceal beneficial ownership and bypass standard due diligence.

Regulators now expect stronger analytical capabilities and more robust identity verification processes, particularly within automated onboarding systems that may be vulnerable to fraud and mule-account creation.

Payment service providers and crypto-asset platforms are facing increased scrutiny because they enable the rapid movement of funds across jurisdictions. Authorities stress that real-time screening is now essential, as post-transaction analysis is no longer sufficient.

Crypto-related risks are amplified by mixing tools and decentralised systems, requiring strict origin-of-wealth checks and full compliance with travel rule standards.

Supervisory findings also highlight risks from professional enablers and compromised SMEs used to bypass controls. Insider involvement and distressed businesses can mask illicit activity through seemingly legitimate operations.

Finansinspektionen said stronger sanctions screening, continuous monitoring, and executive-level compliance oversight are essential to address evolving money laundering and illicit financing risks.

Why does it matter? 

The warning reflects a broader shift in financial crime, where criminal organisations increasingly exploit the speed, scale and interconnected nature of modern financial systems. As digital payments, instant transfers and crypto-assets become more widely used, traditional compliance approaches based on retrospective reviews may struggle to keep pace with rapidly moving illicit funds.

The assessment also highlights the growing convergence of financial regulation, cybersecurity and digital governance. Financial institutions are increasingly expected to deploy advanced analytics, real-time monitoring and stronger identity verification controls to detect criminal activity before transactions are completed. Similar regulatory trends are emerging across Europe and other jurisdictions as authorities seek to strengthen resilience against money laundering, fraud and sanctions evasion.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

Japan and Australia deepen cybersecurity cooperation through policy dialogue

Japan and Australia held their seventh Cyber Policy Dialogue in Tokyo on 18 June, bringing together senior government officials to discuss cybersecurity strategy, emerging technologies and bilateral cooperation.

The whole-of-government meeting was co-chaired by Miyake Fumito, Japan’s Ambassador in charge of Cyber Policy and Deputy Director-General of the Foreign Policy Bureau at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Jessica Hunter, Australia’s Ambassador for Cyber Affairs and Critical Technology at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Officials from Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, National Cybersecurity Office, National Police Agency, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry took part in the dialogue.

Australia was represented by officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Department of Industry, the Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre and the Department of Home Affairs.

The dialogue followed Japan’s enactment of the Cyber Response Capability Strengthening Act and the adoption of a new national Cybersecurity Strategy, providing an opportunity for both sides to exchange views on evolving cyber policy frameworks. Both sides exchanged views on their respective cybersecurity strategies and policies, as well as cooperation at bilateral and multilateral levels.

The meeting also built on the Japan-Australia Strategic Cyber Partnership, which Japanese Prime Minister Takaichi Sanae and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese agreed to launch during their May summit.

Discussions covered defence and deterrence against cyber threats, capacity-building initiatives, public-private partnerships, AI-related security challenges and broader cybersecurity cooperation. Both governments reaffirmed their commitment to continued cooperation on cyber issues through bilateral mechanisms, including the Japan-Australia Cyber Policy Dialogue.

Why does it matter?

The dialogue reflects the growing strategic importance of cybersecurity in the Indo-Pacific region. As cyber threats increasingly target governments, critical infrastructure and advanced technologies, countries are placing greater emphasis on international cooperation to strengthen resilience, share expertise and coordinate responses to emerging risks.

The inclusion of AI alongside traditional cybersecurity issues also highlights the changing nature of digital security. AI is becoming both a tool for cyber defence and a potential source of new threats, making policy coordination increasingly important. Closer cooperation between Japan and Australia may help strengthen regional cybersecurity governance while supporting broader efforts to address technological and security challenges in multilateral forums.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!