South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission has fined Moncler Korea 88 million won ($63,200) over a large-scale customer data breach.
The regulator said a cyberattack in December 2021 exposed the personal details of about 230,000 customers. Hackers gained access by compromising an administrator account and installing malware on the company’s servers.
The stolen information of the South Korean customers included purchase-related data, though names, dates of birth, emails and card numbers were not part of the leak.
According to officials, Moncler Korea only became aware of the breach a month later and delayed reporting it to both customers and the regulator.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
During her annual State of the Union address, von der Leyen said the Commission is closely monitoring Australia’s approach, where individuals under 16 are banned from using platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat.
‘I am watching the implementation of their policy closely,’ von der Leyen said, adding that a panel of experts will advise her on the best path forward for Europe by the end of 2025.
Currently, social media age limits are handled at the national level across the EU, with platforms generally setting a minimum age of 13. France, however, is moving toward a national ban for those under 15 unless an EU-wide measure is introduced.
Several EU countries, including the Netherlands, have already warned against children under 15 using social media, citing health risks.
In June, the European Commission issued child protection guidelines under the Digital Services Act, and began working with five member states on age verification tools, highlighting growing concern over digital safety for minors.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The contact details of rail passengers have been stolen in a cyberattack affecting London North Eastern Railway (LNER). The company stated that it had been notified of unauthorised access to files managed by a third-party supplier and advised customers to be vigilant against phishing attempts.
LNER stressed that no bank details, card numbers, or passwords had been compromised. The York-based operator stated that it was collaborating with cybersecurity experts and the supplier to investigate the breach and ensure necessary safeguards.
The company did not confirm the number of passengers affected. The incident comes as LNER reported revenues exceeding £1 billion, yet it continues to rely on government support since its nationalisation in 2018.
Passenger complaints rose 12.2 percent in 2025, reaching 24,015, and competition from private operators is driving losses—online ticket platforms such as Trainline direct passengers to cheaper rivals, costing LNER significant revenue.
The breach follows other attacks on UK transport services, including a 2024 incident in which the bank details of 5,000 Transport for London customers were exposed, resulting in weeks of disrupted online services.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has confirmed that data was affected in a cyberattack that has kept its UK factories idle for more than a week. The company stated that it is contacting anyone whose data was involved, although it did not clarify whether the breach affected customers, suppliers, or internal systems.
JLR reported the incident to the Information Commissioner’s Office and immediately shut down IT systems to limit damage. Production at Midlands and Merseyside sites has been halted until at least Thursday, with staff instructed not to return before next week.
The disruption has also hit suppliers and retailers, with garages struggling to order spare parts and dealers facing delays registering vehicles. JLR said it is working around the clock to restore operations in a safe and controlled way, though the process is complex.
Responsibility for the hack has been claimed by Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters, a group linked to previous attacks on Marks & Spencer, the Co-op, and Las Vegas casinos in the UK and the US. The hackers posted alleged screenshots from JLR’s internal systems on Telegram last week.
Cybersecurity experts say the group’s claim that ransomware was deployed raises questions, as it appears to have severed ties with Russian ransomware gangs. Analysts suggest the hackers may have only stolen data or are building their own ransomware infrastructure.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
OpenAI has finalised a record $300 billion deal with Oracle to secure vast computing infrastructure over five years, marking one of the most significant cloud contracts in history. The agreement is part of Project Stargate, OpenAI’s plan to build massive data centre capacity in the US and abroad.
The two companies will develop 4.5 gigawatts of computing power, equivalent to the energy consumed by millions of homes.
Backed by SoftBank and other partners, the Stargate initiative aims to surpass $500 billion in investment, with construction already underway in Texas. Additional plans include a large-scale data centre project in the United Arab Emirates, supported by Emirati firm G42.
The scale of the deal highlights the fierce race among tech giants to dominate AI infrastructure. Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Meta are also pledging hundreds of billions of dollars towards data centres, while OpenAI faces mounting financial pressure.
The company currently generates around $10 billion in revenue but is expected to spend far more than that annually to support its expansion.
Oracle is betting heavily on OpenAI as a future growth driver, although the risk is high given OpenAI’s lack of profitability and Oracle’s growing debt burden.
A gamble that rests on the assumption that ChatGPT and related AI technologies will continue to grow at an unprecedented pace, despite intense competition from Google, Anthropic and others.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The US Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA 2015), which grants liability protection to firms that voluntarily share cyber threat data with peers and the federal government, is set to lapse at the end of the month unless Congress acts swiftly.
The potential loss of this law could leave companies, especially small and mid-sized organisations, isolated in defending against cyberattacks, including those powered by emerging technologies like agentic AI. Companies may revert to lengthy legal reviews without liability protection or avoid information-sharing altogether.
On 3 September 2025, the House Homeland Security Committee unanimously approved a bill to extend these protections, but it still needs full congressional approval and the president’s signature.
According to Bloomberg, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has suffered budget cuts and workforce reductions under the Trump administration. Despite the administration’s criticism of the agency, its nominee to lead CISA, Sean Plankey, has publicly supported extending CISA 2015.
Industry leaders warn that losing these protections could slow down vital threat coordination. ‘This is the last line of defence,’ said Carole House, a former White House cybersecurity advisor.
With the potential expiration of CISA 2015, industry-focused Information Sharing and Analysis Centres (ISACs), now numbering at least 28 in the USA, may serve as a fallback for cybersecurity collaboration.
While some ISACs already offer legal protections like NDAs and anonymous sharing, experts warn that companies may hesitate to participate without federal liability protections.
Complex legal agreements could become necessary, potentially limiting engagement. ‘You run the risk of some companies deciding it’s too risky,’ said Scott Algeier, executive director of the IT-ISAC, despite hopes for continued collaboration.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Apple is rolling out Memory Integrity Enforcement on the iPhone 17 line and iPhone Air, an always-on set of protections aimed at blocking memory-safety exploits used by mercenary spyware.
MIE builds on ARM’s Enhanced Memory Tagging Extension in Apple’s A19 chips, alongside secure allocators and tag-confidentiality measures.
Older devices without the new tagging hardware also receive memory-safety upgrades. Apple says new Spectre V1 leak mitigations arrive with virtually no CPU penalty.
Comparable ideas exist elsewhere, such as Windows 11’s memory integrity (HVCI) and Android’s MTE support on Pixel 8, but Apple’s approach is enabled by default across key attack surfaces. Security reporters note the move significantly complicates spyware operations.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
OpenAI is set to argue in an Ontario court that a copyright lawsuit by Canadian news publishers should be heard in the United States. The case, the first of its kind in Canada, alleges that OpenAI scraped Canadian news content to train ChatGPT without permission or payment.
The coalition of publishers, including CBC/Radio-Canada, The Globe and Mail, and Postmedia, says the material was created and hosted in Ontario, making the province the proper venue. They warn that accepting OpenAI’s stance would undermine Canadian sovereignty in the digital economy.
OpenAI, however, says the training of its models and web crawling occurred outside Canada and that the Copyright Act cannot apply extraterritorially. It argues the publishers are politicising the case by framing it as a matter of sovereignty rather than jurisdiction.
The dispute reflects a broader global clash over how generative AI systems use copyrighted works. US courts are already handling several similar cases, though no clear precedent has been established on whether such use qualifies as fair use.
Publishers argue Canadian courts must decide the matter domestically, while OpenAI insists it belongs in US courts. The outcome could shape how copyright laws apply to AI training and digital content across borders.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Researchers at NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering have demonstrated how large language models can be utilised to execute ransomware campaigns autonomously. Their prototype, dubbed Ransomware 3.0, simulated every stage of an attack, from intrusion to the generation of a ransom note.
The system briefly raised an alarm after cybersecurity firm ESET discovered its files on VirusTotal, mistakenly identifying them as live malware. The proof-of-concept was designed only for controlled laboratory use and posed no risk outside testing environments.
Instead of pre-written code, the prototype embedded text instructions that triggered AI models to generate tailored attack scripts. Each execution created unique code, evading traditional detection methods and running across Windows, Linux, and Raspberry Pi systems.
The researchers found that the system identified up to 96% of sensitive files and could generate personalised extortion notes, raising psychological pressure on victims. With costs as low as $0.70 per attack using commercial AI services, such methods could lower barriers for criminals.
The team stressed that the work was conducted ethically and aims to help defenders prepare countermeasures. They recommend monitoring file access patterns, limiting outbound AI connections, and developing defences against AI-generated attack behaviours.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The EU’s digital transformation and the rise of trusted digital identities
The EU, like the rest of the world, is experiencing a significant digital transformation driven by emerging technologies, with citizens, businesses, and governments increasingly relying on online services.
At the centre of the shift lies digital identity, which enables secure, verifiable, and seamless online interactions.
Digital identity has also become a cornerstone of the EU’s transition toward a secure and competitive digital economy. As societies, businesses, and governments increasingly rely on online platforms, the ability for citizens to prove who they are in a reliable, secure, and user-friendly way has gained central importance.
Without trusted digital identities, essential services ranging from healthcare and education to banking and e-commerce risk fragmentation, fraud, and inefficiency.
However, it quickly became clear that further steps were necessary to improve adoption, interoperability, and user trust.
In May 2024, the updated framework, eIDAS 2 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183), came into force.
At its heart lies the European Digital Identity Wallet, or EDIW, a tool designed to empower EU citizens with a secure, voluntary, and interoperable way to authenticate themselves and store personal credentials.
By doing so, eIDAS 2 aims to strengthen trust, security, and cross-border services, ensuring Europe builds digital sovereignty while safeguarding fundamental rights.
Lessons from eIDAS 1 and the need for a stronger digital identity framework
Back in 2014, when the first eIDAS Regulation was adopted, its purpose was to enable the mutual recognition of electronic identification and trust services across member states.
The idea was simple (and logical) yet ambitious: a citizen of one EU country should be able to use their national digital ID to access services in another, whether it is to enrol in a university abroad or open a bank account.
The original regulation created legal certainty for electronic signatures, seals, timestamps, and website authentication, helping digital transactions gain recognition equal to their paper counterparts.
For businesses and governments, it reduced bureaucracy and built trust in digital processes, both essential for sustainable development.
Despite the achievements, significant limitations emerged. Adoption rates varied widely across member states, with only a handful, such as Estonia and Denmark, achieving robust national digital ID systems.
Others lagged due to technical, political, or budgetary issues. Interoperability across borders was inconsistent, often forcing citizens and businesses to rely on paper processes.
Stakeholders and industry associations also expressed concerns about the complexity of implementation and the absence of user-friendly solutions.
The gaps highlighted the need for a new approach. As Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasised in 2020, ‘every time an app or website asks us to create a new digital identity or to easily log on via a big platform, we have no idea what happens to our data in reality.’
Concerns about reliance on non-European technology providers, combined with the growing importance of secure online transactions, paved the way for eIDAS 2.
The eIDAS 2 framework and the path to interoperable digital services
Regulation (EU) 2024/1183, adopted in the spring of 2024, updates the original eIDAS to reflect new technological and social realities.
Its guiding principle is technological neutrality, ensuring that no single vendor or technology dominates and allowing member states to adopt diverse solutions provided they remain interoperable.
Among its key innovations is the expansion of qualified trust services. While the original eIDAS mainly covered signatures and seals, the new regulation broadens the scope to include services such as qualified electronic archiving, ledgers, and remote signature creation devices.
The broader approach ensures that the regulation keeps pace with emerging technologies such as distributed ledgers and cloud-based security solutions.
eIDAS 2 also strengthens compliance mechanisms. Providers of trust services and digital wallets must adhere to rigorous security and operational standards, undergo audits, and demonstrate resilience against cyber threats.
In this way, the regulation not only fosters a common European market for digital identity but also reinforces Europe’s commitment to digital sovereignty and trust.
The European Digital Identity Wallet in action
The EDIW represents the most visible and user-facing element of eIDAS 2.
Available voluntarily to all EU citizens, residents, and businesses, the wallet is designed to act as a secure application on mobile devices where users can link their national ID documents, certificates, and credentials.
For citizens, the benefits are tangible. Rather than managing numerous passwords or carrying a collection of physical documents, individuals can rely on the wallet as a single, secure tool.
It allows them to prove their identity when travelling or accessing services in another country, while offering a reliable space to store and share essential credentials such as diplomas, driving licences, or health insurance cards.
In addition, it enables signing contracts with qualified electronic signatures directly from personal devices, reducing the need for paper-based processes and making everyday interactions considerably more efficient.
For businesses, the wallet promises smoother cross-border operations. For example, banks can streamline customer onboarding through secure, interoperable identification. Professional services can verify qualifications instantly.
E-commerce platforms can reduce fraud and improve compliance with ‘Know Your Customer’ requirements.
By reducing bureaucracy and offering convenience, the wallet embodies Europe’s ambition to create a truly single digital market.
Cybersecurity and privacy in the EDIW
Cybersecurity and privacy are central to the success of the wallet. On the positive side, the system enhances security through encryption, multi-factor authentication, and controlled data sharing.
Instead of exposing unnecessary information, users can share only the attributes required, for example, confirming age without disclosing a birth date.
Yet risks remain. The most pressing concern is risk aggregation. By consolidating multiple credentials in a single wallet, the consequences of a breach could be severe, leading to fraud, identity theft, or large-scale data exposure. The system, therefore, becomes an attractive target for attackers.
To address such risks, eIDAS 2 mandates safeguards. Article 45k requires providers to maintain data integrity and chronological order in electronic ledgers, while regular audits and compliance checks ensure adherence to strict standards.
Furthermore, the regulation mandates open-source software for the wallet components, enhancing transparency and trust.
The challenge is to balance security, usability, and confidence. If the wallet is overly restrictive, citizens may resist adoption. If it is too permissive, privacy could be undermined.
The European approach aims to strike the delicate balance between trust and efficiency.
Practical implications across sectors with the EDIW
The European Digital Identity Wallet has the potential to reshape multiple sectors across the EU, and its relevance is already visible in national pilot projects as well as in existing electronic identification systems.
Public services stand to benefit most immediately. Citizens will be able to submit tax declarations, apply for social benefits, or enrol in universities abroad without needing paper-based procedures.
Healthcare is another area where digital identity is of great importance, since medical records can be transferred securely across borders.
Businesses are also likely to experience greater efficiency. Banks and financial institutions will be able to streamline compliance with the ‘Know Your Customer’ and anti-money laundering rules.
In the field of e-commerce, platforms can provide seamless authentication, which will reduce fraud and enhance customer trust.
Citizens will also enjoy greater convenience in their daily lives when signing rental contracts, proving identity while travelling, or accessing utilities and other services.
National approaches to digital identity across the EU
National experiences illustrate both diversity and progress. Let’s review some examples.
Estonia has been recognised as a pioneer, having built a robust e-Identity system over two decades. Its citizens already use secure digital ID cards, mobile ID, and smart ID applications to access almost all government services online, meaning that integration with the EDIW will be relatively smooth.
Denmark has also made significant progress with its MitID solution, which replaced NemID and is now used by millions of citizens to access both public and private services with high security standards, including biometric authentication.
Germany has introduced BundID, a central portal for accessing public administration services, and has invested in enabling the use of national ID cards via NFC-based smartphones, although adoption is still limited compared to Scandinavian countries.
Italy has taken a different route by rolling out SPID, the Public Digital Identity System, which is now used by more than thirty-five million citizens to access thousands of services. The country also supports the Electronic Identity Card, known as CIE, and both solutions are being aligned with wallet requirements.
Spain has launched Cl@ve, a platform that combines permanent passwords and electronic certificates, and has joined several wallet pilot projects funded by the European Commission to test cross-border use.
France is developing its France Identité application, which allows the use of the electronic ID card for online authentication, and the project is at the centre of the national effort to meet European standards.
The Netherlands relies on DigiD, which provides access to healthcare, taxation, and education services. Although adoption is high, the system will require enhanced security features to meet the new regulations.
Greece has made significant strides in digital identity with the introduction of the Gov.gr Wallet. The mobile application allows citizens to store digital versions of their national identity card and driving licence on smartphones, giving them the same legal validity as physical documents in the country.
These varied examples reveal a mixed landscape. Countries such as Estonia and Denmark have developed advanced and widely used systems that will integrate readily with the European framework.
Others are still building broader adoption and enhancing their infrastructure. The wallet, therefore, offers an opportunity to harmonise national approaches, bridge existing gaps, and create a coherent European ecosystem.
By building on what already exists, member states can speed up adoption and deliver benefits to citizens and businesses in a consistent and trusted way.
Risks and limitations of the EDIW
Despite the promises, the rollout of the wallet faces significant challenges, several of which have already been highlighted in our analysis.
First, data privacy remains a concern. Citizens must trust that wallet providers and national authorities will not misuse or over-collect their data, especially given existing concerns about data breaches and increased surveillance across the Union. Any breach of that trust could significantly undermine adoption.
Second, Europe’s digital infrastructure remains uneven. Countries such as Estonia and Denmark (as mentioned earlier) already operate sophisticated e-ID systems, while others fall behind. Bridging the gap requires financial and technical support, as well as political will.
Third, balancing innovation with harmonisation is not easy. While technological neutrality allows for flexibility, too much divergence risks interoperability problems. The EU must carefully monitor implementation to avoid fragmentation.
Finally, there are long-term risks of over-centralisation. By placing so much reliance on a single tool, the EU may inadvertently create systemic vulnerabilities. Ensuring redundancy and diversity in digital identity solutions will be key to resilience.
Opportunities and responsibilities in the EU’s digital identity strategy
Looking forward, the success of eIDAS 2 and the wallet will depend on careful implementation and strong governance.
Opportunities abound. Scaling the wallet across sectors, from healthcare and education to transport and finance, could solidify Europe’s position as a global leader in digital identity. By extending adoption to the private sector, the EU can create a thriving ecosystem of secure, trusted services.
Yet the initiative requires continuous oversight. Cyber threats evolve rapidly, and regulatory frameworks must adapt. Ongoing audits, updates, and refinements will be necessary to keep pace. Member states will need to share best practices and coordinate closely to ensure consistent standards.
At a broader level, the wallet represents a step toward digital sovereignty. By reducing reliance on non-European identity providers and platforms, the EU strengthens its control over the digital infrastructure underpinning its economy. In doing so, it enhances both competitiveness and resilience.
The EU’s leap toward a digitally sovereign future
In conclusion, we firmly believe that the adoption of eIDAS 2 and the rollout of the European Digital Identity Wallet mark a decisive step in Europe’s digital transformation.
By providing a secure, interoperable, and user-friendly framework, the EU has created the conditions for greater trust, efficiency, and cross-border collaboration.
The benefits are clear. Citizens gain convenience and control, businesses enjoy streamlined operations, and governments enhance security and transparency.
But we have to keep in mind that challenges remain, from uneven national infrastructures to concerns over data privacy and cybersecurity.
Ultimately, eIDAS 2 is both a legal milestone and a technological experiment. Its success will depend on building and maintaining trust, ensuring inclusivity, and adapting to emerging risks.
If the EU can meet the challenges, the European Digital Identity Wallet will not only transform the daily lives of millions of its citizens but also serve as a model for digital governance worldwide.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
