Cybersecurity

Kenya restricts presidential website after cybersecurity incident

Kenya temporarily restricted access to the President’s official website after detecting a cybersecurity incident, the Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy announced.

The ICT Authority activated its established incident response procedures after reports of the attack. Access to the website was restricted as a precaution to support containment, forensic analysis and restoration.

The ministry said mitigation measures had already been implemented and work to restore the website was underway. Officials added that there was no evidence of unauthorised access to sensitive data, data exfiltration or information loss, and that other government systems and digital services remained secure and operational.

The ICT Authority of Kenya is continuing to work with government agencies and technical partners to investigate the incident and determine its full scope and cause.

Why does it matter?

Government websites are high-profile targets because they provide official public information and can influence trust in state institutions even when no sensitive systems are compromised. Temporary restrictions and forensic investigations are standard measures that help contain potential threats while authorities assess the scope of an incident.

The case also highlights the importance of transparent incident reporting. Confirming what was, and was not, affected can help maintain public confidence while allowing investigators time to establish the cause and strengthen future cyber resilience.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

IWF partners with Tuteliq to strengthen child online safety

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has partnered with Swedish behavioural detection technology company Tuteliq to strengthen the early detection of online grooming and child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

As a new IWF Member, Tuteliq will integrate the organisation’s URL List and Image Hash List into its detection platform, enabling online services to identify and block known CSAM more effectively.

Unlike traditional moderation systems that analyse individual messages or files, Tuteliq’s technology examines how conversations evolve over time to identify behavioural patterns associated with grooming, coercion and online sexual exploitation before abuse occurs.

The platform analyses text, voice, images and video across 27 languages and is intended for youth-focused apps, gaming platforms, sports organisations and other online communities.

The partnership combines Tuteliq’s behavioural analysis with the IWF’s verified databases of known CSAM, aiming to strengthen prevention alongside detection by enabling earlier intervention before harmful content is created or shared.

Tuteliq said its platform retains no user data, is hosted within the EU and is designed to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)..

Beyond the technical integration, Tuteliq will also draw on the IWF’s research, policy expertise and threat intelligence to further develop its detection models. According to the organisations, the collaboration reflects a broader shift towards combining behavioural analysis with verified intelligence to improve online child protection.

Why does it matter?

The partnership reflects a broader shift from reactive content moderation towards preventing online abuse before illegal material is created or shared. Behavioural AI capable of identifying grooming patterns could allow platforms to intervene earlier, potentially reducing harm before exploitation escalates.

At the same time, expanding behavioural detection raises important questions about transparency, privacy and accountability. As platforms increasingly analyse patterns of user behaviour rather than individual pieces of content, ensuring appropriate safeguards and oversight will become an important part of child online safety governance.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Germany and France strengthen AI safety and digital sovereignty cooperation

Germany and France have agreed to deepen cooperation on AI, AI safety and digital sovereignty following the Franco-German Ministerial Council, reinforcing their joint role in shaping Europe’s technology agenda.

The partnership centres on closer collaboration between France’s AI safety institute, INESIA, and Germany’s newly established AI Safety and Security Institute to strengthen the evaluation and secure deployment of advanced AI models.

The two governments will coordinate AI safety research, institutional expertise and risk assessments while supporting implementation of the European AI Office’s work under the AI Act. They also reaffirmed their commitment to advancing AI safety cooperation through the EU, NATO and the United Nations, positioning it as a shared strategic priority.

Beyond AI safety, Germany and France agreed to strengthen digital sovereignty by jointly shaping the forthcoming EU Tech Sovereignty Package, building on their common definition of digital sovereignty presented at VivaTech 2026.

They also called on the European Commission to reinforce the Digital Fitness Check, deepen cooperation on public sector modernisation and promote a coordinated European spectrum policy to support secure and competitive satellite communications.

The agreement builds on earlier cooperation under the Treaty of Aachen and the Franco-German economic and technological sovereignty agenda. By strengthening collaboration on AI governance, digital infrastructure and strategic technologies, both countries aim to reinforce Europe’s technological resilience and influence over global AI governance.

Why does it matter?

The agreement reflects a broader European effort to strengthen technological sovereignty by combining AI governance, industrial policy and security cooperation. Rather than treating AI safety as a purely technical issue, Germany and France are positioning it as part of Europe’s wider strategy for digital resilience and strategic autonomy.

By coordinating national AI safety institutes while supporting EU institutions such as the AI Office, the partnership could also contribute to a more coherent European approach to evaluating advanced AI systems and shaping international AI governance.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Meta adds suicide prevention safeguards to AI chats for teens

Meta has announced new safety measures for teenagers using Meta AI, including parental alerts when supervised teens show signs of suicide or self-harm during conversations with the chatbot. The company said alerts will be sent only after manual review and will include guidance to help parents support their child.

The company is also developing a system to notify emergency services when AI conversations indicate someone may face an imminent risk of suicide. The approach builds on the company’s existing practice of referring serious suicide risks identified on Facebook and Instagram to emergency responders.

Meta said it worked with more than 75 mental health clinicians to improve how its AI responds when teenagers discuss suicide or self-harm. The updated responses are intended to acknowledge users’ feelings while directing them towards appropriate offline support and crisis services.

The company is also extending its stricter ‘Limited Content’ setting to Meta AI chats, restricting a wider range of sensitive conversations for supervised teens. The parental alerts are now available in the US, UK, Australia and Canada, with global rollout planned by the end of the year.

Why does it matter?

The measures illustrate how AI safety is expanding beyond preventing harmful content to managing situations in which users may face immediate risks to their wellbeing. As conversational AI becomes more widely used by teenagers, developers are increasingly expected to incorporate safeguards, human oversight and access to professional support into their systems.

The announcement also highlights the growing convergence between AI governance and child online safety. Features such as parental notifications, clinically informed responses and emergency escalation suggest that AI assistants are beginning to adopt safety frameworks previously developed for social media platforms, raising new questions about privacy, duty of care and appropriate intervention.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Researchers demonstrate prompt injection attacks on Gemini

Kaspersky security researchers have demonstrated new attack techniques that could manipulate Google’s Gemini AI assistant into performing unauthorised actions via prompt injection. The study found that malicious instructions hidden in calendar invites, emails or text messages could bypass safeguards by exploiting how large language models process information.

According to the research, attackers could combine indirect prompt injection, memory poisoning and delayed execution to influence Gemini’s behaviour. Potential outcomes include sending emails, launching applications, controlling compatible smart home devices, displaying false information or embedding malicious instructions into the assistant’s long-term memory, provided the user has granted the necessary permissions.

Researchers also warned that smartphones significantly expand the potential attack surface because Gemini can access notifications containing SMS messages, instant messages and social media alerts. Although Google has addressed the specific vulnerabilities identified in the research, the report argues that prompt injection remains a fundamental challenge for AI systems and that new attack methods are likely to emerge.

The researchers recommend reducing Gemini’s access to notifications, connected apps and system functions where possible, turning off unnecessary AI features and limiting permissions to minimise the impact of future attacks. They also advise users to review AI assistant settings regularly as security protections continue to evolve.

Why does it matter?

Prompt injection represents a major challenge for AI security because it targets how large language models interpret and prioritise information. As AI assistants gain broader access to personal data and connected devices, stronger safeguards will be needed to reduce potential risks.

The research highlights the importance of developing more robust AI security frameworks, including improved permission management and continuous testing, to ensure reliable and responsible adoption of AI technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

ONS reports growing concern about AI in Great Britain

Public concern about AI is growing across Great Britain, with more adults believing its risks outweigh its benefits, according to new data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The survey found that 38% of adults believed AI’s risks outweighed its benefits, up from 25% in August 2024. Only 13% said the benefits outweighed the risks, while 43% considered them broadly balanced.

Despite growing concerns, 36% of respondents said AI would benefit them personally, although 27% disagreed, the highest share recorded since the ONS began asking the question in November 2023. Younger adults remained considerably more optimistic than older respondents.

Misinformation, privacy and security emerged as the public’s main concerns. Around 81% of respondents believed AI would make fake information harder to identify, 77% worried personal data could be used without consent and 63% expected greater exposure to cybercrime.

Nearly half of adults under 50 also believed AI could threaten their jobs, while trust remained very low for high-impact uses such as government decision-making (4%) and caregiving (5%).

Public concern contrasted with more limited expectations of personal benefit. While respondents identified education, workplace assistance and household support as AI’s main advantages, 41% said the technology would have no positive impact on their own lives.

Why does it matter?

The findings suggest that public acceptance of AI is becoming a key governance challenge alongside technological development. Growing concerns about misinformation, privacy, cybersecurity and employment could make citizens less willing to embrace AI unless governments and companies demonstrate that effective safeguards are in place.

The survey also highlights a widening gap between rapid AI deployment and public confidence. As AI becomes more deeply integrated into public services and everyday life, trust, transparency and accountability may prove just as important as technical capability in determining how quickly the technology is adopted.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

South Korea strengthens investigations into AI and semiconductor technology leaks

South Korea has restructured its specialised intellectual property investigation system to strengthen efforts against leaks of advanced technologies, including semiconductors and AI, amid growing concerns over economic security.

The reforms establish new investigative and analytical divisions while expanding the technology police force from 27 to 61 officers.

A new Technology Divulgence Police Division will investigate trade secret theft and the leakage of advanced technologies. Its 21 investigators will include specialists in electrical, chemical and mechanical engineering alongside patent examiners, attorneys and other technical experts.

The government also plans to expand investigative authority to cover violations involving National Core Technologies and National High-Tech Strategic Technologies.

A separate Intellectual Property Protection Analysis Division will use patent data and other intelligence to identify technologies, companies and institutions at high risk of technology leakage.

It will also cooperate with businesses, research organisations and law enforcement agencies to detect warning signs, support intelligence-led investigations and strengthen security awareness, particularly among smaller companies.

The restructuring creates an Intellectual Property Protection Standards Division responsible for investigative procedures, oversight and human rights safeguards.

Planned reforms in South Korea include clearer rules for compulsory investigations, external review through a Criminal Investigation Review Committee, stronger access to legal counsel, wider use of video recording and regular updates for parties involved in investigations.

Why does it matter?

As geopolitical competition increasingly centres on semiconductors, AI and other strategic technologies, governments are treating intellectual property protection as a matter of economic and national security. South Korea’s reforms aim to strengthen its ability to detect, investigate and prevent technology leakage before commercially valuable innovations are transferred abroad.

The restructuring also reflects a broader trend towards combining specialised technical expertise with intelligence-led enforcement and stronger procedural safeguards. This approach seeks to improve both the effectiveness and accountability of investigations involving advanced technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU orders Google to open Android AI features

The European Commission has issued two sets of binding measures under the Digital Markets Act requiring Google to improve competition in AI assistants and online search.

The first decision requires Google to give competing AI services access to 11 key Android features on terms equivalent to those available to its own services, including Gemini.

Users will be able to activate their preferred AI assistant via voice commands and have it to perform tasks across apps, such as sending messages, booking services, or retrieving contextual information.

Alternative providers will also gain access to features covering device context, background execution, on-device models, system integration and automated actions, subject to user consent and security safeguards.

Google must implement most of the measures in Android 18 and no later than 1 August 2027. Concurrent voice activation for multiple AI assistants must be introduced with Android 19 by August 2028.

The second decision requires Google to share anonymised search data with eligible third-party search engines, including AI chatbots that provide online search functions.

The data may include queries, rankings, clicks and views that Google uses to improve its own search service. Recipients may use it to develop search technology, improve retrieval and ground AI-generated answers in current online information.

The measures do not require Google to share its search algorithms, and recipients cannot use the data to train general-purpose AI models or for advertising and consumer profiling.

Google must also establish a transparent application process and a pricing model based primarily on the costs of providing access.

The Commission said the measures are intended to expand consumer choice and prevent Google’s advantages in Android and search from limiting competition in AI services.

Why does it matter?

The decisions apply established DMA interoperability and data-access rules directly to the emerging AI market. Rival assistants could gain deeper access to Android, while search providers and AI chatbots may use Google’s data to improve retrieval and compete more effectively. The measures could lower barriers created by control over operating systems and search data, although implementation will require careful protection of privacy, cybersecurity and commercially sensitive information.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Canada signs UN convention against Cybercrime

Canada has signed the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime, joining an international framework designed to strengthen cooperation against serious crimes committed through information and communications technologies. The government said the treaty provides a legal basis for cross-border investigations, electronic evidence sharing and coordinated responses to cybercrime.

The government said the convention forms part of Canada’s broader efforts to protect citizens and businesses from increasingly sophisticated transnational cyber threats. It is expected to strengthen international law enforcement cooperation, accelerate investigations and improve support for victims of cybercrime.

Canada also highlighted the convention’s safeguards for human rights, privacy and child protection. It said the treaty includes provisions intended to ensure that international criminal justice cooperation remains grounded in the rule of law while allowing meaningful participation from civil society and other stakeholders.

The convention was adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 2024 and opened for signature in Hanoi in October 2025. Canada became the 79th signatory, while the treaty will enter into force once 40 states have ratified it. At the time of the announcement, three countries had completed ratification.

Why does it matter?

Cybercrime investigations increasingly involve suspects, victims, digital infrastructure and electronic evidence spread across multiple jurisdictions. The convention seeks to provide a common legal framework for international cooperation, helping authorities investigate offences more efficiently and coordinate cross-border enforcement.

Its long-term impact, however, will depend on how widely it is ratified and how consistently countries implement its procedural safeguards. The effectiveness and legitimacy of the framework will be closely linked to maintaining strong protections for human rights, privacy and due process during international cooperation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Rome Declaration calls for human control over AI and nuclear weapons

Nobel laureates, scientists, religious leaders and former heads of state and government have signed the Rome Declaration for an Unarmed and Disarming Peace in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and Autonomous Weapons, New Digital Protocols, and Emerging Models of Digital Development.

The declaration was adopted on 16 July on Rome’s Capitoline Hill following the Global Nobel Laureates Assembly on Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear War, hosted by the Vatican.

The declaration calls for renewed international cooperation to address the challenges posed by AI, nuclear weapons and other emerging technologies. It stresses that decisions concerning life and death, peace and war, and the future of humanity should remain under meaningful human control, while highlighting the importance of ensuring that technological progress is guided by ethics, responsibility and respect for human dignity.

The declaration concludes the Global Nobel Laureates Assembly, which brought together more than 200 participants from research institutions, international organisations and civil society. The organisers said the initiative seeks to encourage dialogue on the governance of AI, nuclear weapons and other technologies with significant implications for international peace and security.

Why does it matter?

The declaration reflects growing international efforts to address AI alongside nuclear risks and other emerging technologies through a common governance framework. It also adds to ongoing discussions about maintaining meaningful human control over decisions involving the use of force and other technologies with potentially existential consequences.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Diplo chatbot can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.