Disappointment and confusion swept across TikTok users in the United States as news broke that ByteDance, the app’s Chinese owner, plans to shut down the platform for its 170 million US users by Sunday. The move comes in response to a federal ban requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US assets by January 19 due to national security concerns. While some users hold out hope for a last-minute reprieve, many are preparing for the worst.
Content creators, many of whom have built careers and followings on TikTok, expressed frustration and sadness. Some vowed to boycott rival platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and X, while others scrambled to save their content. True crime creator Amber Goode, from Colorado, criticised the government for “playing with us,” while other users shared instructions on migrating to alternative platforms, including China-based apps like RedNote.
TikTok has maintained that it does not and would never share US user data with China, arguing that the ban violates First Amendment rights. Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, users attempting to open the app on Sunday will be redirected to a shutdown information page. President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly exploring executive actions to delay the ban, but the outcome remains uncertain.
The shutdown has sparked mixed emotions globally, with some international users relieved that American social media issues may no longer dominate their feeds. However, for US creators like Ishpal Sidhu, who stands to lose her livelihood, the uncertainty has cast a shadow over what was once a thriving platform.
Austrian advocacy group Noyb has filed privacy complaints against six Chinese companies, including TikTok, Shein, and Xiaomi, alleging illegal transfers of European user data to China. The group, known for targeting US tech giants like Apple and Meta, said this is its first case against Chinese firms. Complaints have been filed in four EU countries, seeking fines of up to 4% of each company’s global revenue.
Noyb claims that companies such as Alibaba’s AliExpress and Tencent’s WeChat transfer EU citizens’ data either directly to China or undisclosed ‘third countries,’ which are likely China. Under EU data protection laws, such transfers are prohibited if the destination country fails to meet the bloc’s strict privacy standards. A Noyb lawyer emphasised that China’s status as a ‘surveillance state’ makes such transfers clearly unlawful.
The allegations add to mounting regulatory challenges for Chinese tech firms. TikTok, already under scrutiny in Europe for election interference concerns, faces a potential US ban starting Sunday over national security fears. Regulators in multiple regions continue to ramp up pressure on Chinese companies amid growing global concerns over data privacy and security.
Brazil’s government has expressed serious concerns over Meta’s recent changes to its hate speech policy, warning that the adjustments may not comply with national legislation. The social media giant, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has eased restrictions on discussions around sensitive topics such as immigration and gender identity while also ending its fact-checking programme in the United States. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva previously called the policy shift “extremely serious,” prompting officials to demand clarification from Meta.
Meta has responded by stating that fact-checking changes currently apply only in the United States and that adjustments to its community standards remain limited to hate speech policy. The company argues that the revisions aim to promote greater freedom of expression, but Brazil’s solicitor general’s office believes the changes are insufficient to protect fundamental rights. Government ministries have raised concerns that Meta’s updated terms of use may violate Brazilian law, particularly in relation to online discourse and misinformation.
A public hearing will be held later this week to discuss the potential impact of Meta’s policy changes. The government is engaging experts to assess whether the new rules align with Brazil’s legal framework and ensure that social media platforms uphold protections against hate speech. Authorities are monitoring how the changes affect digital content regulation as they consider further action to address concerns over online safety and misinformation.
The US Supreme Court will hear a challenge on Wednesday regarding a Texas law that mandates adult websites verify the age of users before granting access to potentially harmful material. The law, which is part of a broader trend across Republican-led states, requires users to submit personal information proving they are at least 18 years old to access pornographic content. The case raises significant First Amendment concerns, as adult entertainment industry groups argue that the law unlawfully restricts free speech and exposes users to risks such as identity theft and data breaches.
The challengers, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Free Speech Coalition, contend that alternative methods like content-filtering software could better protect minors without infringing on adults’ rights to access non-obscene material. Texas, however, defends the law, citing concerns over the ease with which minors can access explicit content online.
This case is significant because it will test the balance between state efforts to protect minors from explicit content and the constitutional rights of adults to access protected expression. If the Supreme Court upholds the law, it could set a precedent for similar age-verification measures across the US.
A French interior designer, identified as Anne, has fallen victim to a sophisticated scam in which she was tricked into believing she was in a relationship with actor Brad Pitt. Over the course of a year, the scammer, using AI-generated images and fake social media profiles, manipulated Anne into sending €830,000 for purported cancer treatment after a fabricated story involving the actor’s frozen bank accounts.
The scam began when Anne received messages from a fake ‘Jane Etta Pitt,’ claiming the Hollywood star needed someone like her. As Anne was going through a divorce, the AI-generated Brad Pitt sent declarations of love, eventually asking for money under the guise of urgent medical needs. Despite doubts raised by her daughter, Anne transferred large sums, believing she was saving a life.
The truth came to light when Anne saw Brad Pitt in the media with his current partner, and it became clear she had been scammed. However, instead of support, her story has been met with cyberbullying, including mocking social media posts from groups like Toulouse FC and Netflix France. The harassment has taken a toll on Anne’s mental health, and police are now investigating the scam.
The case highlights the dangers of AI scams, the vulnerabilities of individuals, and the lack of empathy in some online responses.
TikTok has reassured its 7,000 US employees that their jobs, pay, and benefits will remain secure even if the Supreme Court upholds a law requiring the sale or ban of the platform in the United States. In an internal memo seen by Reuters, the company emphasised its commitment to employee wellbeing and maintaining operations, despite the looming January 19 deadline for the law to take effect.
The law, passed in April, targets the US operations of TikTok, owned by China-based ByteDance, amid concerns over data security and national security. Although President-elect Donald Trump has called for an extension to seek a ‘political resolution,’ the Supreme Court appears inclined to uphold the legislation. If the court does not intervene, TikTok downloads from app stores will be banned, and the app’s functionality could degrade over time as companies are prohibited from supporting its services.
TikTok’s leadership stated that the law impacts only the US user experience, not the employment of its staff, and reaffirmed its dedication to protecting employees and the platform’s 170 million American users. ‘Our leadership team remains laser-focused on planning for various scenarios and navigating the path forward,’ the memo said.
For now, TikTok’s offices will remain open, and the company continues to explore strategies to adapt to the evolving situation while ensuring continuity for its employees and users.
Google’s NotebookLM, an AI-driven podcast platform, recently faced a surprising issue: its virtual hosts sounded irritated when users interrupted them. The problem emerged after the launch of an interactive feature allowing users to “call in” and ask questions during AI-generated discussions. Users reported that the hosts would sometimes make snippy comments like ‘I was getting to that,’ creating an oddly confrontational experience.
To address the issue, Google’s team implemented a ‘friendliness tuning’ process. They revised the prompts used to guide the AI hosts, studying how human speakers handle interruptions more politely. The adjustment was announced with a light-hearted post on the platform’s social media.
The change seems to be working. In tests, the AI hosts now react to interruptions with polite curiosity rather than frustration. NotebookLM’s refined approach highlights the importance of human-like interaction in AI products, ensuring users feel more engaged and welcomed in conversations.
Meta may be forced to halt or modify features in India after an antitrust ruling banned its WhatsApp messaging service from sharing user data with Meta for advertising purposes. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a $24.5 million fine and a five-year ban on the practice, accusing the company of abusing its dominance and coercing WhatsApp users into accepting a 2021 privacy policy that allegedly expanded data sharing unfairly.
India, Meta’s largest market with over 500 million WhatsApp users and 350 million Facebook users, is crucial for the company’s operations. The data-sharing ban could impact Meta’s ability to offer personalised ads on Facebook and Instagram, the company said in its court filing. Meta argued that this restriction could harm businesses, such as fashion brands, that rely on personalised ads to connect with customers. The US firm also warned the ruling could threaten its commercial viability in the region.
Meta has publicly defended its 2021 policy changes but criticised the CCI’s decision in a 2,000-page tribunal appeal, claiming the watchdog lacks the technical expertise to assess the implications of its ruling. The Indian appeals tribunal is set to hear Meta’s case, with the possibility of pausing the CCI directive while the legal process unfolds.
This challenge in India adds to Meta’s global struggles, including prior accusations in the EU over unclear privacy policy changes. The CCI’s ruling now requires WhatsApp to give users the choice to opt out of data sharing with Meta, signaling a broader push for greater transparency and user control in data practices worldwide.
TikTok plans to disable its app for all US users on Sunday if the Supreme Court does not block a federal ban, according to a report by The Information. This action would go beyond the law’s requirement, which mandates a ban only on new downloads from Apple and Google app stores while allowing existing users to continue using the app temporarily.
Under TikTok’s plan, users attempting to access the app will be redirected to a website explaining the ban. The company also intends to allow users to download their data for future use. TikTok and its parent company ByteDance have yet to comment on these developments.
The ban stems from a law signed by President Joe Biden in April 2024, requiring ByteDance to sell its US assets by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. TikTok has challenged the law, arguing that it violates First Amendment protections. In a recent court filing, the company warned that a month-long ban could result in one-third of its 170 million US users leaving the platform permanently.
This potential shutdown reflects the escalating tensions surrounding TikTok’s operations in the United States, as debates over data security and free speech continue.
A Russian court has imposed an 8 billion rouble ($78 million) fine on Google for failing to comply with previous penalties related to administrative offences, according to the Moscow courts’ press service. The fine marks a sharp increase from the usual smaller penalties issued to foreign tech companies operating in Russia.
Russia has repeatedly demanded that foreign platforms, including YouTube, remove content it deems illegal. Critics argue that the government’s pressure on YouTube, once a major platform in Russia, is aimed at limiting access to dissenting voices. YouTube’s daily users in Russia have plummeted from 50 million to 12 million amid growing restrictions and alleged speed disruptions.
The Kremlin denies any deliberate interference with YouTube, instead blaming Google for failing to upgrade its infrastructure in the country, a claim the tech giant disputes. Meanwhile, President Vladimir Putin has accused Google of acting as a tool for US political influence, further straining relations.
