Epic Games has accused Google and Samsung of conspiring to protect Google’s Play Store from competition through Samsung’s Auto Blocker feature. The gaming company plans to file a lawsuit in a United States court, alleging that the Auto Blocker, introduced in late 2023, deters users from downloading Android apps from sources outside Google’s Play Store or Samsung’s Galaxy Store.
Epic argues that Samsung’s Auto Blocker was made the default setting in mid-2024 to reduce the impact of a 2023 US court ruling that required Google to make it easier for users to access apps from alternative sources. Epic claims this action violates US antitrust laws by reducing consumer choice and stifling competition, which would otherwise drive down app prices.
Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, described the lawsuit as part of a larger global effort to defend competition and its benefits for consumers. The company also plans to raise these concerns with regulators in the European Union, which has scrutinised Google’s business practices in the past.
Epic previously sued Google in 2020, accusing the tech giant of maintaining an illegal monopoly over app distribution and payments. The lawsuit follows the verdict in that case, where a US court found Google had acted unlawfully.
Microsoft has updated its consumer AI assistant, Copilot, giving it a friendlier voice and the ability to analyse web pages while users browse. This enhancement is part of a broader initiative led by Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, who noted that a diverse team of creative professionals, including psychologists and comedians, is refining Copilot’s tone and style to set it apart in the crowded AI market.
In a demonstration of the upgraded Copilot, the AI suggested a housewarming gift by recommending popular olive oils after engaging in a conversation about the user’s preferences. This update, which started rolling out on Tuesday, marks one of the initial efforts from Suleyman’s newly established division dedicated to consumer products and technology research.
Although Microsoft is well-known for its business software, it is encountering significant competition in the consumer market, particularly from Google’s search engine. Launched last year, Copilot seeks to attract more users with its improved voice capabilities, making interactions feel more engaging and responsive. New features for Copilot Pro subscribers, such as ‘Think Deeper,’ will enable users to assess their options, while the upcoming ‘Copilot Vision’ function will allow users to interact with content in their Microsoft Edge browser without retaining any data.
Suleyman envisions Copilot as a digital companion that continuously learns from users’ interactions across different Microsoft platforms, such as Word and Windows, with their consent. He noted that Bill Gates is excited about the AI’s capabilities, especially the potential for Copilot to read and parse emails, suggesting that these features are on the horizon.
Amazon has secured a partial victory in a US antitrust case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The federal court ruled in favour of Amazon’s request to dismiss some of the claims, though others will proceed. The ruling, issued in Seattle, has not yet been fully disclosed.
The FTC initially accused Amazon of using unfair tactics to maintain its dominance in the online market. The lawsuit claimed Amazon’s algorithms raised prices, costing US households over $1 billion. The company has stated it ceased using the controversial pricing system in 2019.
Although the court granted some of Amazon’s requests, other parts of the case remain active. Judge John Chun ruled that the trial would proceed in two phases, separating evidence on violations and proposed remedies. The FTC continues to pursue remaining claims.
Amazon, along with other tech giants like Meta, Apple, and Google, is facing increased scrutiny from antitrust regulators. FTC Chair Lina Khan has been vocal in challenging Amazon’s practices, citing longstanding concerns about its market influence.
As Google‘s trial on allegations of monopolising the advertising technology market draws to a close, experts believe the financial risk to the tech giant is minimal. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) and a coalition of states accuse Google of illegally controlling the markets used by advertisers and publishers to buy and sell online ads. However, analysts point out that the ad tech business at the centre of the trial, Google Network, is declining and represents a smaller portion of the company’s overall revenue compared to its dominant search business.
In 2023, advertising made up over 75% of Google’s $307.4 billion revenue, though the Network division, which is central to the DOJ case, contributed just $31.4 billion. The DOJ is pushing for the divestiture of Google Ad Manager, but analysts believe that even if Google loses, the financial impact would be small, with revenue losses potentially under 10%. Google has defended itself by highlighting strong competition from other platforms, especially in mobile apps and streaming ads, which could undermine the DOJ’s argument.
The more significant worry for Google lies in the potential consequences of a ruling in favour of the DOJ, as it could facilitate easier transitions for advertisers and publishers between platforms. A successful case might establish a legal precedent that holds tech companies accountable for monopolistic practices. However, the overall impact will hinge on the trial’s outcome and the remedies the court proposes in the upcoming months.
Germany’s competition watchdog has designated Microsoft as a ‘company with paramount cross-market significance for competition,’ allowing for stronger regulatory actions against the tech giant. Andreas Mundt, head of the Bundeskartellamt, emphasised that Microsoft’s products are essential across various sectors, making its ecosystem more interconnected than ever.
This classification also extends to Apple, Google, and Meta, indicating that Microsoft will undergo heightened scrutiny and may face restrictions on anti-competitive practices. A spokesperson for Microsoft expressed the company’s commitment to promoting a competitive environment and working cooperatively with the Bundeskartellamt.
The designation follows antitrust charges against Microsoft by the European Commission in June, which accused the company of unfairly bundling its Teams app with the Office suite, putting rivals like Slack at a disadvantage. The German authority clarified that its increased oversight will apply to Microsoft as a whole, rather than focusing solely on individual services or products.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reached a settlement with Mango DAO and Blockworks Foundation regarding the unregistered sale of MNGO tokens, which are classified as securities. The settlement also addresses charges against Mango Labs for functioning as an unregistered broker in connection with various crypto assets on the Mango Markets platform. The SEC’s complaint asserts that these entities deprived investors of crucial protections guaranteed by federal securities laws by avoiding necessary registration requirements.
The SEC reports that Mango DAO and Blockworks Foundation raised more than $70 million from unregistered sales of MNGO tokens beginning in August 2021, targeting investors globally, including those in the US. The agency alleges that Blockworks Foundation and Mango Labs operated as unregistered brokers by soliciting users to trade securities, offering investment advice, and facilitating transactions on the Mango Markets platform.
Jorge Tenreiro, Acting Chief of the SEC’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, emphasised that being labelled a decentralised autonomous organisation does not exempt entities from registration requirements. As part of the settlement, Mango DAO, Blockworks Foundation, and Mango Labs have agreed to pay nearly $700,000 in civil penalties, destroy their MNGO tokens, and stop soliciting trading for these tokens, pending court approval. The investigation and litigation were overseen by members of the SEC’s Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit.
A federal judge has scaled down a privacy lawsuit against Apple, which alleged the company collected personal data from iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch users without permission. The lawsuit targets Apple’s apps, including the App Store, Apple Music, and Apple TV. US District Judge Edward Davila dismissed most claims involving the “Allow Apps to Request to Track” setting, clarifying that it only governs data collection by third-party apps and websites, not Apple’s in-house apps.
Despite dismissing many claims, the judge allowed some to proceed related to Apple’s ‘Share [Device] Analytics’ setting. The plaintiffs claim that Apple continued collecting data even after users disabled the setting, despite promises that it would stop data sharing. Judge Davila agreed, noting that users could reasonably assume they had withdrawn consent based on Apple’s own disclosure that disabling the option would prevent data collection.
This lawsuit is part of a broader trend of legal actions against major tech companies like Google and Meta, accusing them of gathering user data without proper consent. Neither Apple nor the plaintiffs’ lawyers have responded to requests for comment on the case as it unfolds.
Starting 1 October 2024, UK mobile operators like Three, Vodafone, EE, and O2 will be required to comply with new Ofcom regulations designed to protect consumers from unexpected roaming charges while abroad. These rules mandate that mobile providers send clear notifications when customers begin roaming, outlining costs, potential data limits, and steps to avoid overspending on mobile services. This comes after Ofcom found that many users were unaware of potential extra charges when traveling.
Although most operators have reintroduced roaming fees in Europe, Ofcom’s new rules ensure customers receive timely information to help them manage their mobile bills. The new regulations also address “inadvertent roaming,” where users unintentionally connect to French networks, particularly along the UK’s coastal areas. This can lead to unexpected bills even when customers believe they are still in the UK. To combat this, operators will need to provide alerts to help users manage their roaming expenses, including the option to set spending limits.
Additionally, the guidance issued by Ofcom will help mobile providers ensure compliance and promote good practices for informing customers. This initiative aims to create more transparency in roaming services, ultimately giving consumers the tools they need to avoid mobile bill shocks during their travels.
Appario, a former top seller on Amazon India, has petitioned a court to dismiss an antitrust investigation that concluded Amazon and several sellers breached local competition laws. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleges that Amazon, Walmart’s Flipkart, and certain smartphone brands favoured select sellers and prioritised specific listings. These accusations were based on a 2021 Reuters investigation, which exposed Amazon’s internal practices. Despite the findings, Amazon continues to deny any misconduct.
Appario, which has ceased selling on Amazon, is contesting the CCI’s findings in the Karnataka High Court, asserting that the report implicating it should be “set aside.” This legal action marks the first challenge to the CCI’s ongoing investigation, initiated in 2020, and poses a significant obstacle for Amazon in India, one of its most important markets.
The CCI previously conducted raids on Appario and other sellers during its investigation. Court records indicate that Appario is also challenging a CCI order that requires it to submit financial statements following the investigation. Neither Amazon nor Appario has commented on the ongoing legal proceedings.
A political consultant has been fined $7.7 million by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for using AI to generate robocalls mimicking President Biden’s voice. The calls, aimed at New Hampshire voters, urged them not to vote in the Democratic primary, sparking significant controversy.
Steven Kramer, the consultant behind the scheme, worked for a challenger to Biden in the primaries. He admitted to paying $500 for the calls to highlight the dangers of AI in political campaigns. Kramer’s actions violated FCC regulations prohibiting misleading caller ID information.
The FCC has given Kramer 30 days to pay the fine, warning that further legal action will follow if he fails to comply. The commission continues to raise concerns over AI’s potential misuse in elections, pushing for stricter regulations to prevent fraud.
