Vietnam has temporarily suspended operations of Chinese online retailer Temu after the company failed to meet a business registration deadline set for the end of November. The trade ministry announced the move as part of broader efforts to regulate foreign e-commerce platforms, citing concerns over heavy discounting and potential counterfeit sales.
Temu, owned by China’s PDD Holdings, began serving Vietnamese shoppers in October but must now complete its registration process to resume operations. The platform’s Vietnamese-language options were removed, and Temu confirmed it is working with authorities to comply but gave no timeline for its return.
Shein, another Chinese retailer affected by the deadline, also had its Vietnamese site disabled, though it remains unclear if its operations were officially suspended. The crackdown comes amid Vietnam’s push for stricter tax regulations, including ending value-added tax exemptions for low-cost imported goods, a change expected to impact foreign e-commerce platforms significantly.
Turkey‘s competition board has concluded its investigation into Meta Platforms regarding data-sharing practices between Threads and Instagram. The inquiry, launched last year over potential competition law violations, ended after Meta addressed concerns through commitments deemed satisfactory by the authority.
Meta pledged that Threads users in Turkey will be able to access the platform without needing an Instagram account, once Threads becomes available again. Additionally, the company assured that data from Threads accounts will not be merged with Instagram unless users explicitly choose to link their profiles.
In April, Meta temporarily suspended Threads in Turkey to comply with an interim order from regulators. The resolution paves the way for the app’s reinstatement while easing concerns over anti-competitive practices.
The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) is receiving complaints related to the Digital Services Act (DSA), but it currently lacks formal authority to act until the law is fully transposed by the national parliament. The DSA, which aims to regulate large online platforms and protect users, became applicable in February 2024, but enforcement will only begin once the Netherlands passes the necessary implementing legislation.
Martijn Snoep, Chairman of the ACM, highlighted that enforcement under the DSA is expected to lead to clashes between regulators and Big Tech leaders, although he plans to approach this more neutrally. The ACM focuses on three main areas: ensuring platforms comply with basic rules, protecting minors online, and tackling irresponsible hosting providers. While the Dutch regulator is investigating non-compliant companies, it cannot yet take enforcement actions against foreign firms or force them to share information.
The ACM has received 227 complaints, mostly regarding companies based outside the Netherlands, and while it can redirect these to other regulators, it cannot yet act on them. Snoep emphasised that, despite challenges, the Netherlands is preparing to enhance its regulatory capacity to ensure fair compliance, though he prefers waiting before introducing new legislation on emerging issues like online child safety or advertising.
Despite the slow start, the ACM is confident that over time, as the industry adapts to a more regulated environment, digital platforms will gradually become more compliant with the DSA’s requirements.
Wise, the British money transfer firm, has enacted a formal remediation plan following a regulatory review by the Belgian National Bank (BNB) regarding anti-money laundering compliance. In early 2022, the BNB identified that Wise lacked proof of address for hundreds of thousands of customers.
The company worked closely with the regulator to address the issues, implementing a plan requiring customers to provide proof of address within weeks. Non-compliant accounts were frozen as part of the measures. Wise stated it has fully resolved the concerns.
Founded in 2011, Wise aims to simplify international money transfers and is listed on the London Stock Exchange. The BNB declined to comment further on the matter.
Canada’s Competition Bureau has filed a lawsuit against Google, accusing the tech giant of abusing its dominant position in online advertising. The bureau seeks an order for Google to divest two ad tech tools and pay a penalty to ensure compliance with competition laws.
The investigation, launched in 2020, found that Google controls key aspects of the ad tech stack in Canada and allegedly employed tactics to entrench its market power. Google disputes the claims, arguing that the online ad market remains competitive.
The case mirrors global scrutiny of Google’s advertising practices, including a similar lawsuit in the United States and ongoing EU investigations. Google’s earlier offer to sell an ad exchange failed to satisfy European publishers.
The United States has imposed its third major round of export controls on China’s semiconductor industry in three years, targeting 140 companies with restrictions on chipmaking equipment, software, and advanced memory chips. Among those affected are prominent firms like Naura Technology, ACM Research, and SiCarrier Technology, as well as entities linked to Huawei, a key player in China’s chip advancements.
The measures, aimed at stalling China’s progress in AI and military technologies, also introduce new licensing requirements for US and foreign companies shipping equipment with US components to China. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo stated the restrictions are intended to block China’s military modernisation. Despite the sanctions, Chinese officials condemned the move as “economic coercion” and vowed countermeasures.
The rules also impact allies, with restrictions extending to chipmaking equipment from countries like Singapore and South Korea, while Japan and the Netherlands are exempt. Some global players, including Dutch firm ASML, downplayed the immediate impact but acknowledged potential long-term effects. These actions come as China accelerates efforts toward self-sufficiency in semiconductor production, though it remains years behind industry leaders like Nvidia and ASML.
This latest crackdown follows the sweeping 2022 curbs on high-end chips and manufacturing tools under the Biden administration, reflecting a sustained US effort to curtail China’s access to critical technologies.
Mexico’s recent constitutional reform, which dissolves the Federal Telecommunications Institute (IFT) and six other regulatory agencies, has drawn criticism for potentially undermining regulatory independence. Passed by the Senate and awaiting state legislature approval, the reform shifts oversight responsibilities from autonomous bodies to federal executive control, sparking fears of inefficiency and diminished regulatory effectiveness.
The IFT, instrumental in modernising Mexico’s telecommunications and broadcasting sectors, warned that eliminating institutional autonomy could disrupt competition enforcement and sector regulation. Critics, including the Mexican Association for the Right to Information (Amedi), argue the changes risk political interference, jeopardising impartiality in decision-making.
The reform also raises concerns about Mexico’s adherence to international agreements, such as the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which mandates independent regulators for telecommunications. The government has suggested transferring the IFT’s responsibilities to existing ministries or creating a new agency, leaving the sector’s future regulatory framework uncertain.
Stakeholders stress the need for technical expertise, impartiality, and clarity in upcoming secondary legislation to avoid inefficiencies and ensure compliance with domestic and international obligations.
Australia has proposed a law to curb anti-competitive practices by major tech companies, including fines of up to A$50 million ($33 million) for suppressing competition or preventing consumers from switching services. The move builds on recent efforts by the Labor government to regulate Big Tech, including a ban on social media use for children under 16 passed last week.
Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones highlighted the dominance of platforms like Apple, Google, and Meta, warning that their practices stifle innovation, limit consumer choice, and inflate costs. The proposed law, inspired by the European Union’s Digital Markets Act, aims to make it easier for users to switch between services such as social media platforms, internet browsers, and app stores.
The law would empower Australia’s competition regulator to enforce compliance, investigate digital market practices, and impose fines. It prioritises oversight of app stores and ad tech services, targeting practices like promoting low-rated apps and favouring in-house services over competitors. Consultation on the legislation will run until February 14, with further discussions to refine the draft.
Big Tech companies, which dominate Australia’s digital market, have yet to comment on the proposal. Government reports reveal Google controls up to 95% of online search, Apple’s App Store handles 60% of app downloads, and Facebook and Instagram account for 79% of social media services in the country.
The United States will implement sweeping new restrictions on semiconductor exports to China starting Monday, targeting 140 Chinese firms to curb Beijing’s technological advancements, especially in AI and military applications. The measures, part of the Biden administration’s continued crackdown on China’s chip industry, include export controls on high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips, 24 chipmaking tools, and advanced semiconductor equipment manufactured in countries like Singapore and Malaysia.
Among the companies affected are major Chinese chip equipment makers such as Naura Technology Group and Piotech, alongside firms tied to Huawei, which remains central to China’s chipmaking ambitions. Nearly two dozen additional semiconductor and investment firms will be added to the US Entity List, severely restricting their access to American technology. In response, Chinese officials criticised the move, claiming it undermines global trade and supply chains while vowing to protect their firms’ interests.
The restrictions also expand the foreign direct product rule, giving the US authority to regulate exports to China of equipment containing even minimal American technology. This move could disrupt global suppliers, although Japan and the Netherlands are exempt due to their collaboration with the US on similar controls. The crackdown follows a broader US strategy to limit China’s ability to compete in advanced technologies, building on export curbs introduced in 2022.
Despite China’s efforts to become self-reliant in semiconductors, it remains years behind global leaders like Nvidia and ASML. Meanwhile, the restrictions are expected to hit companies such as Lam Research, Applied Materials, and Samsung, which derives a significant share of its HBM chip revenue from China. With the upcoming administration of Donald Trump expected to maintain a hardline stance on China, the latest measures underscore ongoing US efforts to preserve its technological edge.
Meta Platforms, the owner of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, is set to face trial in Spain in October 2025 over a €551 million ($582 million) lawsuit filed by 87 media companies. The complaint, led by the AMI media association, accuses Meta of unfair competition in advertising through its alleged misuse of user data from 2018 to 2023.
The media companies argue that Meta’s extensive data collection provides it with an unfair advantage in crafting personalised ads, violating EU data protection regulations. Prominent Spanish publishers, including El Pais owner Prisa and ABC publisher Vocento, are among the plaintiffs. A separate €160 million lawsuit against Meta was also filed by Spanish broadcasters last month on similar grounds.
The lawsuits are part of a broader effort by traditional media to push back against tech giants, which they claim undermine their revenue and fail to pay fair fees for content use. In response to similar challenges in other countries, Meta has restricted news sharing on its platforms and reduced its focus on news and political content in user feeds.
Meta has not yet commented on the Spanish lawsuits, which highlight ongoing tensions between digital platforms and legacy media seeking to safeguard their economic interests.
