Vietnam has warned Chinese online retailers Shein and Temu to register with the government by the end of November or face potential blocks on their websites and apps. The move follows concerns from Vietnam’s government and local businesses about the impact of foreign e-commerce platforms on local markets, especially regarding deep discounts and counterfeit goods. Deputy Trade Minister Nguyen Hoang Long stated that if Shein and Temu do not comply, technical measures will be taken to restrict access to their platforms.
Shein has been active in Vietnam for two years, while Temu only recently launched in the country. Shein expressed its commitment to adhering to Vietnam’s regulations, but Temu has yet to respond. This registration requirement comes amid broader scrutiny of ultra-low-cost foreign retailers in Southeast Asia, as governments like Indonesia’s have asked app stores to block Temu to support small businesses.
Vietnam’s e-commerce market, the third largest in Southeast Asia at $22 billion, is rapidly growing. Alongside Shein and Temu, the market features popular platforms like Shopee, Lazada, and local players Tiki and Sendo.
India’s antitrust regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), has found that food delivery giants Zomato and Swiggy violated competition laws by favouring select restaurants on their platforms. According to the CCI’s investigation, Zomato used ‘exclusivity contracts’ to offer lower commissions to certain partners, while Swiggy promised growth to restaurants that listed exclusively with them. These practices, the report states, hinder market competition, as they prevent smaller players from gaining a fair foothold.
The investigation, which began in 2022 following a complaint by the National Restaurant Association of India, also highlights restrictive pricing practices on both platforms. Zomato imposed conditions to maintain price and discount parity across online platforms, even threatening penalties for non-compliance. Swiggy, on the other hand, pressured some partners by suggesting their ranking on the app would drop if they failed to match prices elsewhere. Swiggy later claimed that it discontinued its exclusivity program in 2023 but has plans to launch similar initiatives in smaller cities.
The probe has potential implications for Swiggy’s $1.4 billion IPO and lists the CCI investigation as an “internal risk” in its prospectus. Both companies have faced additional scrutiny recently, as India’s largest retail distributors have urged the CCI to investigate alleged predatory pricing in their quick-commerce grocery services. The CCI’s final decision on penalties or required changes to Zomato’s and Swiggy’s business practices is expected in the coming weeks, though the companies may challenge the findings.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has charged Sitejabber, an online review platform, for violating its new rules on fake reviews. This marks one of the agency’s first enforcement actions under updated regulations designed to curb deceptive practices. The FTC alleges that Sitejabber misled consumers by using point-of-sale reviews—feedback collected before customers had received any products or services—to falsely inflate businesses’ review scores.
The company allowed its clients to publish these premature reviews, giving a false impression that they reflected actual customer experiences. The FTC has now ordered Sitejabber to stop this practice and prohibited it from assisting other businesses in misrepresenting reviews. The new rules, which took effect last month, aim to tackle deceptive online review practices, including those involving AI-generated reviews and fake review websites masquerading as independent.
The FTC’s crackdown is part of a broader effort to address the rising problem of fake reviews on e-commerce platforms like Amazon. With the new regulations in place, the agency intends to prevent misleading online content that could deceive consumers into making purchasing decisions based on false information.
Donald Trump is expected to scale back some of the antitrust policies introduced under President Joe Biden, including potentially softening the approach to breaking up large tech companies like Google. While Trump is likely to continue pursuing cases against Big Tech, such as the ongoing Department of Justice (DOJ) cases against Google and Apple, his recent comments indicate a more cautious stance. Trump questioned whether breaking up Google would destroy the company, suggesting that fairer practices could be achieved without drastic measures like a breakup.
The DOJ’s cases against Google over its dominance in online search and advertising technology are still in progress, with potential remedies, including divesting parts of its business, yet to be decided. The trial over these remedies won’t happen until 2025, providing Trump the opportunity to influence how the cases proceed. Additionally, Trump is expected to ease policies that have frustrated dealmakers, including the Biden administration’s strict merger review guidelines.
Trump’s approach to antitrust enforcement is likely to be less aggressive than Biden’s, especially regarding mergers and acquisitions. While he may ease restrictions on noncompete clauses and other regulatory measures, such as those championed by FTC Chair Lina Khan, his policies are expected to maintain some level of antitrust action.
The United States has renewed pressure on Italy to scrap its domestic web tax, sources say, warning that ignoring the request could lead to retaliatory tariffs. Introduced in 2019, the Italian tax imposes a 3% levy on digital transactions for tech giants like Meta, Google, and Amazon, yielding under €500 million annually. While Washington views the tax as unfairly targeting US firms, Italy has held firm, awaiting clarity on the stance of the incoming US administration.
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s 2025 budget proposal includes expanding the tax’s reach by removing revenue minimums, which could bring in an additional €51.6 million. Italy’s Treasury hopes this adjustment, which would require more companies to pay, might address US concerns about the tax’s perceived bias. However, some Italian lawmakers argue for keeping the focus on large US tech companies, with proposed amendments aimed at raising the tax rate but maintaining protections for small and medium enterprises.
Forza Italia Senator Maurizio Gasparri supports stronger regulations on ‘web giants’ but acknowledges the risk of a backlash from the US if the changes move forward.
Apple is set to face its first fine under the European Union‘s Digital Markets Act (DMA) for breaching the bloc’s antitrust regulations, according to sources familiar with the matter. This comes after EU regulators charged Apple in June for violating the new tech rules, which are designed to curb the dominance of big tech companies. The fine, expected to be imposed later this month, adds to Apple’s ongoing antitrust challenges in the EU.
In March, Apple was hit with a €1.84 billion fine for restricting competition in the music streaming market through its App Store policies. The company also faces additional investigations related to new fees on app developers and potential violations of the DMA, which could result in penalties of up to 10% of its global annual revenue.
The Digital Markets Act, which came into effect earlier this year, mandates Apple to make changes, such as allowing users to choose default browsers and permitting alternative app stores on its operating systems. Apple has not commented on the impending fine, and the European Commission has yet to provide a response.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has temporarily halted the proposed £762 million acquisition of UK logistics firm Wincanton by American logistics company GXO, citing potential competition risks. This decision follows the CMA’s preliminary investigation, which raised concerns about the merger’s impact on the already competitive contract logistics services sector.
An interim enforcement order (IEO) is now in effect, preventing any integration of the two firms during the review process. The CMA’s phase 1 investigation indicated that the merger could reduce competition in a market valued at £16 billion in the UK, where GXO and Wincanton are key players competing for contracts with major retailers. Naomi Burgoyne, senior director of mergers at the CMA, warned that diminished competition could lead to higher costs for consumers reliant on efficient delivery services.
GXO has five days to propose solutions to address the CMA’s concerns. If the proposals are found inadequate, the regulator will proceed to a more detailed phase two investigation. In response to the CMA’s announcement, a GXO spokesperson stated that they are reviewing the decision and are committed to collaborating with the CMA to achieve a favourable outcome, asserting that the acquisition would benefit logistics customers across the UK and support government initiatives for economic growth.
The European Union’s (EU) antitrust regulators are set to review Apple’s iPad operating system to ensure it aligns with the bloc’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA), designed to curb the power of major tech companies. This assessment comes after Apple submitted a compliance report for iPad OS, which the EU had designated as a crucial ‘gateway’ for businesses to reach consumers. Apple’s obligations under the DMA include enabling alternative app stores, allowing users to set their preferred web browser, and supporting third-party device features like headphones and pens.
In a statement, the European Commission confirmed that it would ‘carefully assess’ Apple’s compliance measures for iPad OS. Feedback from stakeholders, including other tech companies and consumer advocates, will be considered during the review process. Apple has not yet commented on the EU’s latest scrutiny of its iPad software.
The DMA, introduced earlier this year, represents the EU’s latest effort to prevent monopolistic practices among large tech firms. Non-compliance with these rules could result in hefty fines, up to 10% (and 20% for repeat offences) of a company’s global revenue, adding pressure on Apple to meet the standards set by EU regulators.
Google has won a trademark lawsuit brought by Shorts International, a British company specialising in short films, over the use of the word ‘shorts’ in YouTube‘s short video platform, YouTube Shorts. London’s High Court found no risk of consumer confusion between Shorts International’s brand and YouTube’s platform, which launched in 2020 as a response to TikTok‘s popularity.
Shorts International, known for its short film television channel, argued that YouTube Shorts infringed on its established trademark. However, Google’s lawyer, Lindsay Lane, countered that it was clear the ‘Shorts’ platform belonged to YouTube, removing any chance of brand confusion.
Judge Michael Tappin ruled in favour of Google, stating that the use of ‘shorts’ by YouTube would not affect the distinctiveness or reputation of Shorts International’s trademark. The court’s decision brings the legal challenge to a close, dismissing all claims of infringement.
Chinese online retailer Temu is exploring joining a European Union-led initiative to combat counterfeit goods, which includes major retailers such as Amazon, Alibaba, and brands like Adidas and Hermes. Temu is scheduled to present at an upcoming meeting on 11 November as a ‘potential new signatory’ to the Memorandum of Understanding on counterfeits, a voluntary anti-counterfeit agreement supported by the European Commission.
Temu’s interest in the initiative coincides with increasing regulatory pressure from the European Union. The European Commission recently launched an investigation into Temu over potential breaches of EU laws prohibiting the sale of illegal goods, following an earlier request for information under the Digital Services Act (DSA), a law governing large online platforms. In May, the Commission designated Temu a ‘very large online platform,’ requiring it to take stronger measures against illegal content and counterfeits.
As a subsidiary of China‘s PDD Holdings, Temu has rapidly expanded in Europe and the United States, luring customers with low prices and a ‘shop like a billionaire’ slogan. Its platform offers items like clothing and accessories that often resemble popular branded products at significantly lower prices. Some industry insiders have expressed concerns that Temu’s entry into the anti-counterfeit network could impact the credibility of the initiative.
