Samsung’s upcoming XR headset is expected to feature a 4K micro-OLED display from Sony, according to recent reports.
The 1.35-inch screen is slightly smaller than Apple’s Vision Pro but offers a higher resolution and a wider colour gamut.
The Vision Pro has struggled to gain mass appeal due to its high price, leaving space for rivals to introduce alternatives.
Samsung’s device is likely to be positioned as a direct competitor, offering premium features at a potentially more accessible price point.
Other companies are also preparing to challenge Apple in the XR space. Sony’s high-end model is already available, and Meta is reportedly expanding its Quest lineup. Samsung has hinted at additional smart glasses, though details remain scarce.
Apple may respond with an updated Vision Pro, adding to the competition in the XR market. With several key players developing new headsets, 2025 could be a defining year for immersive technology.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Malaysian authorities are investigating whether local laws were breached in the shipment of servers that may have contained advanced AI chips subject to U export controls.
The case is linked to a fraud investigation in Singapore, where three men were recently charged over transactions involving servers supplied by US firms. The equipment was allegedly transferred to Malaysia and may have included Nvidia’s artificial intelligence chips.
The Malaysian government confirmed it is working closely with the United States and Singapore to determine whether US-sanctioned chips were involved. Authorities aim to find effective measures to prevent such transactions from violating trade regulations.
Singapore has not specified whether the chips in question fall under US export restrictions but acknowledged they were used in servers that passed through Malaysia.
US officials are also examining whether DeepSeek, a Chinese AI firm whose technology gained attention in January, has been using restricted US chips.
Washington has tightened controls on AI chip exports to China, and any unauthorised shipments could lead to further scrutiny of supply chains in the region.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk did not meet the high standards required to block the move. However, the judge indicated that she would expedite a trial on the matter, which is expected to take place later this year.
Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 but left before its major success, argued that OpenAI had initially sought his charitable funding to create AI for the public good, but has since shifted its focus towards making profits.
His lawyer, Marc Toberoff, expressed satisfaction that the judge had agreed to a swift trial, claiming that the case involves urgent public interest concerns.
OpenAI, which is seeking to become a for-profit entity to attract the necessary capital for its AI projects, welcomed the court’s decision.
The company emphasised that its goal is to develop advanced AI models to benefit society. Musk’s legal action, which also includes antitrust claims, stems from his frustration with OpenAI’s shift in direction since he departed from the organisation.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Britain’s competition regulator has approved Synopsys’ $35 billion acquisition of Ansys after the companies addressed concerns about the potential negative impact on innovation and pricing.
In December, the regulator raised alarms that the deal could reduce competition in the chip design software market, possibly leading to higher prices and less innovation.
However, following negotiations and the companies’ offer of remedies to mitigate these concerns, the regulator decided not to refer the deal for an in-depth phase-2 investigation.
Synopsys, a major player in the chip design software industry, announced the acquisition in January. The deal, which will be a mix of cash and stock, aims to strengthen Synopsys’ portfolio and expand its offerings in the design and development of complex products.
Ansys, a well-established provider of simulation software, is used by a range of industries, from aerospace to sports equipment, to design and optimise products like aeroplanes and tennis rackets.
The acquisition marks a significant move for Synopsys, enhancing its capabilities in the design and development of advanced technology.
The deal is expected to bring together the strengths of both companies, allowing them to offer a broader set of solutions to customers in various sectors, from semiconductor manufacturing to engineering and consumer goods.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Donald Trump has called for the repeal of the CHIPS and Science Act, a key piece of legislation passed in 2022 to support semiconductor manufacturing in the US.
Trump criticised the law during a speech to Congress, describing it as a waste of hundreds of billions of dollars and suggesting the funds should instead be used to reduce national debt. His remarks mark his most forceful criticism of the act to date.
The CHIPS Act, signed by President Joe Biden, allocated $39 billion in subsidies for US semiconductor production and related industries, along with $75 billion in government-backed loans.
The initiative was part of a broader strategy to reduce reliance on foreign-made chips and address national security concerns.
Trump argued that rather than offering financial incentives, the government could avoid imposing tariffs to encourage semiconductor companies to build factories in the US.
However, the program has garnered support from officials, including Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, who played a key role in securing investments from leading global semiconductor firms like Samsung, Intel, and TSMC.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul defended the CHIPS Act, emphasising its role in bringing significant investment and job creation to the state, including Micron’s $100 billion investment in Central New York.
Trump’s comments have raised concerns about the future of these grants and the potential impact on such developments.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has agreed to dismiss its lawsuit against cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, marking a significant shift in regulatory oversight under the new administration.
Kraken, which was accused of operating as an unregistered securities exchange, announced that the case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. The company maintained that the lawsuit was politically motivated and hindered innovation in the crypto sector.
Kraken stated that the dismissal involved no admission of wrongdoing, no penalties, and no required changes to its business model.
The SEC had sued Kraken in 2023 as part of a broader crackdown on crypto firms under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. However, the regulator has since scaled back its enforcement efforts, also ending a similar case against Coinbase and considering a resolution in its fraud case against entrepreneur Justin Sun.
The decision follows United States President Donald Trump’s appointment of Paul Atkins, a lawyer with a pro-crypto stance, to lead the SEC. Kraken remains one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, ranking 10th globally in trading volume and liquidity.
The outcome signals a shift in the regulatory landscape, with growing support for digital assets under the current administration.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
A court in India has ordered an Amazon unit to pay $39 million in damages for trademark infringement after unauthorised ‘Beverly Hills Polo Club’ garments were sold on its platform.
The ruling marks one of the highest damages awarded against a US company in an Indian trademark case. Lifestyle Equities, the owner of the Beverly Hills Polo Club brand, filed the lawsuit in 2020, alleging that Amazon’s Indian website was selling apparel with nearly identical branding at lower prices.
The Delhi High Court found that the infringing brand was owned by Amazon Technologies and sold directly on the platform. Judges noted that the logos were ‘hardly distinguishable’ and stated that Amazon was aware of the brand’s exclusive rights, citing previous legal disputes in the United Kingdom.
The ruling includes a permanent injunction, barring Amazon from selling counterfeit products with the Beverly Hills Polo Club branding. The company has denied wrongdoing, and its representatives have not commented on the decision.
Amazon has faced similar legal battles before, including a trademark dispute in London, where it lost an appeal last year. Critics have long accused the e-commerce giant of engaging in predatory practices, with a 2021 Reuters investigation alleging that Amazon manipulated search results to promote its own private brands in India.
The recent court decision has reignited calls for stricter enforcement of trademark laws and fair business practices in the country.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
A group of US lawmakers is raising concerns over the potential involvement of SpaceX CEO Elon Musk in a $2.4 billion Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) telecommunications contract originally awarded to Verizon.
Musk, who owns satellite company Starlink, has been critical of the FAA’s existing telecom system and has reportedly sought to replace Verizon’s contract with his own company’s services.
Senator Maria Cantwell and other lawmakers have expressed alarm over what they see as potential interference in a competitive bidding process. The FAA, which awarded the 15-year contract to Verizon in 2023, is now reportedly reviewing the agreement.
Musk recently admitted to making false claims about Verizon’s role in aviation safety, further fuelling concerns about his influence.
The controversy has led to bipartisan scrutiny, with senators and representatives questioning whether the government is prioritising private interests over public safety. The FAA, meanwhile, has stated it has not yet made any decision regarding the contract.
Reports indicate that Starlink terminals are being tested in Alaska, raising further speculation about Musk’s involvement in the project.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Singapore‘s government is investigating a fraud case involving servers supplied by US companies, potentially containing Nvidia’s advanced chips. Three men, including a Chinese national, were charged last week in connection with the alleged illegal transfer of these AI chips from Singapore to Chinese firm DeepSeek. Singapore’s Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam confirmed that the servers were provided by Dell Technologies and Super Micro Computer to local firms before being sent to Malaysia.
Authorities are still unsure whether Malaysia was the final destination, but they are working with US officials to determine if the servers contained restricted US export-controlled items. The US is already investigating whether DeepSeek has used banned Nvidia chips, which could lead to violations of export laws. The case forms part of a broader probe into suspected smuggling activities linked to AI chips being moved from countries like Singapore to China.
Singapore, a key market for Nvidia, is also examining allegations that DeepSeek may have acquired thousands of advanced Nvidia chips illegally. However, DeepSeek has denied these claims, stating that it only used legally purchased chips, including the Nvidia H800 model. The investigation is ongoing, with Singapore continuing to cooperate with US authorities.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Britain’s privacy regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), has launched an investigation into the child privacy practices of TikTok, Reddit, and Imgur. The ICO is scrutinising how these platforms manage personal data and age verification for users, particularly teenagers, to ensure they comply with UK data protection laws.
The investigation focuses on TikTok’s use of data from 13-17-year-olds to recommend content via its algorithm. The ICO is also examining how Reddit and Imgur assess and protect the privacy of child users. If evidence of legal breaches is found, the ICO will take action, as it did in 2023 when TikTok was fined £12.7 million for mishandling data from children under 13.
Both Reddit and Imgur have expressed a commitment to adhering to UK regulations. Reddit, for example, stated that it plans to roll out updates to meet new age-assurance requirements. Meanwhile, TikTok and Imgur have not yet responded to requests for comment.
The investigation comes amid stricter UK legislation aimed at safeguarding children online, including measures requiring social media platforms to limit harmful content and enforce age checks to prevent underage access to inappropriate material.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
