Competition regulation

EU regulators seek common approach on DSA

The Coimisiún na Meán has warned that differing interpretations of the Digital Services Act (DSA) by EU regulators are hindering a unified approach to online platform regulation.

Maria Donde, Director of International Affairs at Coimisiún na Meán, highlighted the challenges of aligning various regulators’ approaches to the DSA, which has left room for interpretation.

She emphasised the importance of finding common ground, especially as the DSA, which came into effect last February, imposes transparency and election integrity requirements on platforms.

The DSA requires each EU member state to appoint a Digital Services Coordinator as a point of contact for platforms. Ireland, home to major platforms like TikTok and X, is at the forefront of enforcement.

Donde stressed the need for a consistent voice within the EU, particularly as the law faces criticism globally. The US government has condemned the EU’s regulatory approach, calling it a threat to free speech and accusing Europe of sidelining US tech companies.

The European Commission has already initiated several investigations under the DSA, targeting platforms such as X, TikTok, and Temu. These probes are ongoing, with potential fines for non-compliance reaching up to 6% of a company’s global turnover.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

TikTok ban threatens 170 million American users

The US is just days away from imposing a ban on TikTok unless a deal is struck with its Chinese parent company ByteDance. The ban, set to take effect on Saturday, would affect 170 million American users of the popular app.

However, President Donald Trump has expressed confidence that an agreement will be reached in time. He extended the deadline from January to April 5 to give ByteDance more time to find a non-Chinese buyer for TikTok’s US operations.

Trump mentioned that there is significant interest from potential buyers, with private equity firm Blackstone reportedly evaluating a minority investment in TikTok’s US business.

The discussions are centred on ByteDance’s existing non-Chinese shareholders, including Susquehanna International Group and General Atlantic. Washington’s main concern is that TikTok’s ownership by ByteDance allows the Chinese government to potentially influence the app and collect data on Americans.

Despite the pressure, TikTok has yet to comment on the situation. If no agreement is reached by the deadline, TikTok faces the risk of being banned, though the app would remain on users’ devices if already installed. However, new users would not be able to download it.

The app is already banned in countries like India over similar national security concerns.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

WhatsApp wins support in EU fine appeal

WhatsApp has gained support from an adviser to the European Court of Justice in its fight against a higher fine imposed by the EU privacy watchdog.

The Irish Data Protection Authority fined WhatsApp 225 million euros ($242.2 million) in 2021 for privacy breaches.

The fine was increased after the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) intervened.

A lower tribunal had rejected WhatsApp’s challenge, saying the company lacked legal standing. However, WhatsApp appealed to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Advocate General Tamara Capeta disagreed with the tribunal, recommending that the case be referred back to the General Court for further review.

The CJEU usually follows the adviser’s recommendations, and a final ruling is expected soon. This case could have significant implications for the fine imposed on WhatsApp.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

US tightens controls on China’s tech sector amid security fears

The United States has added six subsidiaries of China’s leading cloud computing firm, Inspur Group, along with dozens of other Chinese entities, to its export restriction list.

Washington accuses the companies of aiding China’s military by developing supercomputers and advanced AI technologies. The move is part of a broader strategy to curb China’s progress in high-performance computing, quantum technology, and hypersonic weapons development.

Other companies from Taiwan, Iran, Pakistan, South Africa, and the UAE were also included in the latest restrictions. China has strongly condemned the US decision, calling it an attempt to ‘weaponise trade and technology.’

The Chinese foreign ministry has vowed to take necessary measures to protect its firms, while the Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence, which was also targeted, called for the restrictions to be withdrawn.

Companies added to the US Entity List require special licences to access American technology, which are unlikely to be granted. The restrictions could impact major Chinese tech firms linked to AI and computing, such as Huawei and Sugon.

The United States Commerce Department argues that these measures are necessary to prevent China and other countries from using American technology for military applications. Officials insist they will not allow adversaries to strengthen their military capabilities with US-made components.

The latest crackdown follows a 2023 decision to blacklist Inspur Group, which led to scrutiny of its business ties with major US chipmakers such as Nvidia and AMD. Washington also aims to block Iran’s procurement of drone and missile technology as part of its broader national security efforts.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Cerebras IPO faces further delays

Cerebras Systems’ plans for a public listing remain in limbo as a national security review by the US government continues to delay the AI chipmaker’s IPO.

The review, conducted by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), is assessing a $335 million investment from Abu Dhabi-based AI firm G42, which has faced scrutiny over its past ties to China.

While executives had hoped for a smoother process under President Trump, delays in filling key political positions have further complicated approval.

Without clarity on G42’s stake, investors remain cautious, making it difficult for Cerebras to move forward. The situation reflects a broader reality for Wall Street, as expectations of a more deal-friendly environment under Trump have yet to materialise.

Analysts suggest that instead of rolling back Biden-era policies, the administration is likely to maintain or even expand scrutiny on foreign investments, particularly those linked to China.

Instead of a setback, Cerebras remains optimistic that the deal will be approved, with plans to proceed with its IPO once clearance is granted.

The company, valued at $8 billion last year, has seen its worth nearly double since then. Meanwhile, G42 has distanced itself from Huawei and secured a national security agreement with the US in an effort to gain regulatory approval.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Chinese refiners hesitate as US targets Venezuela oil buyers

Chinese oil traders and refiners have temporarily halted purchases of Venezuelan crude after the United States threatened to impose 25% tariffs on countries importing from Caracas.

The sudden announcement by President Donald Trump created uncertainty in the market, leaving buyers cautious as they await further clarity on how the order will be enforced.

Venezuela’s largest oil customer, China, had been processing a significant share of its crude through independent refiners, commonly known as teapots, who now find themselves reassessing their supply strategy.

Beijing strongly opposed the US move, calling it an example of Washington’s ‘illegal unilateral sanctions’ and interference in other nations’ internal affairs. While Chinese refiners are hesitant, industry insiders suggest that purchases may resume once traders understand how to work around the restrictions.

Many teapots, reliant on cheaper crude from Venezuela amid tightening profit margins, are expected to find alternative ways to continue buying, especially if the Chinese government does not formally instruct them to stop.

The United States has ramped up pressure on Chinese imports through additional tariffs and sanctions on entities linked to oil shipments.

Some refiners affected by past US measures have already adapted, with reports indicating that certain state-linked firms continue to bring in Venezuelan crude under agreements tied to debt repayments.

Analysts believe that unless China officially restricts purchases, independent refiners will find ways to maintain their supply, despite the latest US threats.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

US trade war escalates with new tariffs and secondary duties

US President Donald Trump announced that new automobile tariffs are imminent, though not all levies set for 2 April will be implemented immediately.

The move comes as Washington seeks to balance its aggressive trade policies with potential exemptions for certain nations. While the administration has indicated some flexibility, officials maintain that strong reciprocal tariffs will remain a key priority.

Wall Street responded positively to the prospect of a more selective approach, with US stocks climbing on optimism that the measures may be less severe than initially expected.

New tariffs will target key industries, including autos, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors, with duties expected to reach 25%. Trump defended the tariffs, stating they are essential for national security and economic independence.

Meanwhile, the White House announced a 25% secondary tariff on any country purchasing oil or gas from Venezuela, a move that sent oil prices rising.

Countries with large trade surpluses and non-tariff barriers are expected to face the most scrutiny, with Washington focusing on a list of high-priority nations dubbed the ‘Dirty 15.’

Despite international concerns, Trump remains steadfast in his efforts to shrink the United States trade deficit, which he claims is fuelled by unfair foreign practices.

While some nations, including the United Kingdom and India, have pushed for exemptions, officials suggest that avoiding tariffs entirely will be difficult.

The administration has also signalled further investigations into other sectors, raising the likelihood of additional trade restrictions in the near future. Experts believe that while some measures may be delayed, the overall direction of US trade policy remains aggressive and unpredictable.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

EU regulators to drop Apple probe after compliance changes

EU antitrust regulators are preparing to close their year-long investigation into Apple’s web browser options on iPhones.

The inquiry, launched under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), examined whether Apple’s design restricted users from easily switching to rival browsers or search engines.

Changes implemented by the company have addressed the concerns of the European Commission, leading regulators to conclude the case.

The probe, which began in March last year, was part of the EU’s broader effort to ensure fair competition in digital markets.

Apple made modifications to its browser settings to comply with the new regulations, avoiding potential fines or further legal action. These changes align with the goal of the European Union to prevent dominant technology firms from imposing unfair restrictions on users.

Regulators are expected to officially close the investigation soon, marking a significant step in enforcing the DMA. The outcome highlights the EU’s growing influence over global tech policies, compelling major companies like Apple to adjust their practices to meet stricter competition standards.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

US-India trade negotiations intensify over tariff disputes

India is prepared to lower tariffs on over half of US imports worth $23 billion in a bid to ease trade tensions and prevent harsh reciprocal tariffs from Washington.

With US President Donald Trump set to impose new worldwide tariffs from 2 April, Indian officials fear the move could impact 87% of the country’s exports to the United States, prompting urgent negotiations between the two nations.

Trade talks are scheduled to begin this week, led by US Assistant Trade Representative Brendan Lynch.

While India is willing to make significant tariff cuts on a wide range of goods, government sources indicate that the concessions will depend on securing relief from US duties.

Sensitive items such as meat, wheat, maize, and dairy products remain off the table, but reductions may be possible for almonds, pistachios, and certain grains. India is also pushing for a phased reduction of its automobile tariffs, which currently exceed 100%.

Despite efforts by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to strengthen ties with Washington, Trump has repeatedly criticised India’s tariff policies, labelling the country a ‘tariff abuser.’

The Modi administration is weighing broader tariff reforms but faces domestic political challenges in implementing sweeping reductions. Experts suggest that while external pressure from the US might drive some changes, major across-the-board cuts remain unlikely in the short term.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

SEC lawsuit against Elon Musk sparks political debate

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted 4-1 to sue Elon Musk over his delayed disclosure of Twitter shares, a move that has sparked political controversy.

Republican Mark Uyeda, now the agency’s acting head, opposed the lawsuit, while the remaining commissioners, including fellow Republican Hester Peirce, supported it.

Uyeda reportedly asked enforcement staff to confirm the case was not politically motivated, but they declined, citing SEC procedures.

Musk’s failure to disclose his Twitter stake within the required timeframe allegedly saved him $150 million by allowing him to buy shares at lower prices.

The SEC attempted to settle the case in December, but Musk refused, accusing the agency of giving him an unreasonable deadline. Legal experts have questioned why the case took so long to be filed, with some suggesting the delay has undermined the SEC’s credibility.

The lawsuit is the latest in Musk’s long-running feud with the SEC, dating back to 2018 when the agency sued him over his tweets about taking Tesla private. He has until 4 April to respond to the summons.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has ordered a review of investigations conducted under Joe Biden, adding further political weight to the case.

Critics argue the SEC must enforce market rules consistently, while others see the timing as a potential sign of selective enforcement.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.