Competition regulation

SEC lawsuit against Elon Musk sparks political debate

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted 4-1 to sue Elon Musk over his delayed disclosure of Twitter shares, a move that has sparked political controversy.

Republican Mark Uyeda, now the agency’s acting head, opposed the lawsuit, while the remaining commissioners, including fellow Republican Hester Peirce, supported it.

Uyeda reportedly asked enforcement staff to confirm the case was not politically motivated, but they declined, citing SEC procedures.

Musk’s failure to disclose his Twitter stake within the required timeframe allegedly saved him $150 million by allowing him to buy shares at lower prices.

The SEC attempted to settle the case in December, but Musk refused, accusing the agency of giving him an unreasonable deadline. Legal experts have questioned why the case took so long to be filed, with some suggesting the delay has undermined the SEC’s credibility.

The lawsuit is the latest in Musk’s long-running feud with the SEC, dating back to 2018 when the agency sued him over his tweets about taking Tesla private. He has until 4 April to respond to the summons.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has ordered a review of investigations conducted under Joe Biden, adding further political weight to the case.

Critics argue the SEC must enforce market rules consistently, while others see the timing as a potential sign of selective enforcement.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Malaysia under scrutiny over semiconductor exports to China

Malaysia plans to tighten regulations on semiconductor shipments following US concerns over the potential transfer of high-end Nvidia chips to China.

Trade Minister Zafrul Aziz stated that the United States has urged Malaysia to closely monitor shipments, ensuring that advanced AI chips do not end up in unauthorised locations.

The move comes amid increasing global scrutiny over AI-related technology exports.

Authorities in Malaysia are also investigating whether local laws were breached in a case involving servers linked to a Singapore fraud investigation.

The case involves transactions worth $390 million, and reports suggest that some servers may have contained Nvidia chips subject to US export controls. Singapore media have linked the matter to potential transfers to Chinese AI company DeepSeek.

The United States has been tightening restrictions on advanced semiconductor exports to China, particularly chips crucial to AI development.

Malaysia’s role as a key semiconductor hub has drawn greater attention, with US officials pushing for stricter oversight.

The government is expected to introduce measures to ensure compliance with international regulations while maintaining its position in the global chip supply chain.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

MetaAI rolls out in Europe after regulatory hurdles

MetaAI, Meta’s AI chat function, is set to launch across Europe after delays caused by regulatory scrutiny regarding the use of personal data to train its models.

The European Commission is reviewing a risk assessment from Meta to ensure that the new feature complies with the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA). However, this regulation mandates companies to submit risk assessments in advance of deploying new functions.

MetaAI was first launched in the US in September 2023, followed by India in June 2024, and the UK in October.

However, its European rollout was delayed last summer after the Irish Data Protection Commission raised concerns about using data from Facebook and Instagram users for AI training.

Meta faced criticism over Europe’s regulatory approach, with company officials, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, expressing frustration with the delays.

Despite the regulatory hurdles, Meta is now moving forward with its plans to bring MetaAI to the EU, with the company noting that the process has taken longer than expected due to Europe’s complex regulatory landscape.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Google and Apple risk fines under EU’s Digital Markets Act

Google has been charged with two violations of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), while Apple has been ordered to allow greater interoperability with rival devices.

The European Commission accused Google of restricting app developers from promoting external offers outside its Play Store and favouring its own services, such as Google Flights, over competitors in search results. If found guilty, the company could face fines of up to 10% of its global annual revenue.

The Commission also directed Apple to make its iPhones and iPads more accessible to rival smartphone and accessory makers. Additionally, Apple must respond to app developers’ requests for interoperability with its systems within a set timeframe.

Both companies pushed back against the EU’s findings, with Google arguing that compliance could harm consumers and businesses, while Apple claimed the rules would slow innovation and unfairly benefit competitors.

Regulators have intensified their crackdown on Big Tech despite warnings from the United States government against targeting American firms.

Google has already been fined over €8 billion for previous antitrust violations in Europe, and failure to comply with the latest orders could lead to further penalties for both tech giants.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Amazon considers further appeal after losing GDPR case

Amazon has lost its appeal against a €746 million fine imposed by Luxembourg’s data protection regulator for breaching EU privacy laws.

The country’s administrative court upheld the penalty in a ruling on 18 March, siding with the National Commission for Data Protection (CNPD), which found Amazon had unlawfully processed personal data under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The fine remains the largest issued under the EU privacy rules.

The CNPD also ordered Amazon to implement corrective measures, although enforcement will be suspended during the appeal period.

Amazon criticised the decision, arguing the fine was based on subjective legal interpretations without prior guidance from regulators. The company confirmed it is considering further legal action.

Europe has taken a strict stance on data privacy violations, with GDPR setting a global benchmark for consumer protections.

The ruling against Amazon reinforces the EU’s commitment to holding major tech companies accountable for their handling of personal data.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Google acquires Wiz in $32 billion deal

Google has finalized a $32 billion acquisition of Israeli cybersecurity firm Wiz, sealing the deal just weeks after Donald Trump’s inauguration.

The agreement, a significant increase from Google’s initial $23 billion offer, was aided by the expectation of a friendlier antitrust review under the new administration, sources familiar with the negotiations said.

Wiz had considered an IPO before returning to the negotiating table, with new Chief Financial Officer Fazal Merchant playing a key role in shaping the deal alongside CEO Assaf Rappaport.

Google’s cloud chief, Thomas Kurian, was also instrumental in the agreement, which includes an unusually high $3.2 billion breakup fee should regulatory issues derail the transaction.

With Wiz boasting 70% annual revenue growth and over $700 million in annualized revenue, Google viewed the premium price as justified.

However, concerns remain over potential antitrust scrutiny, particularly given Google’s ongoing legal battles with the US Department of Justice over its dominance in search and ad technology.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Shareholders’ lawsuit against Amazon rejected with prejudice

A US judge has dismissed a lawsuit accusing Amazon of misleading shareholders about its treatment of third-party sellers and its expansion plans, which ultimately led to an antitrust case by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

The ruling by Judge John Chun in Seattle was made with prejudice, meaning the lawsuit cannot be refiled. Lawyers representing the shareholders did not immediately comment on the decision.

Investors had alleged that Amazon hid an algorithm that ensured its own products were priced lower than competitors’ and failed to disclose the risks of overexpanding its fulfilment network.

However, Judge Chun found no compelling evidence that Amazon executives, including former CEO Jeff Bezos and current CEO Andy Jassy, intentionally misled investors.

The court ruled that Amazon’s actions were more likely driven by profit-focused business strategies rather than fraud.

The FTC filed an antitrust case against Amazon in September 2023, accusing the company of using its market power to suppress competition and inflate prices.

Eighteen US states and Puerto Rico have joined the lawsuit, with a nonjury trial set for October 2026. The shareholder lawsuit covered Amazon stockholders from February 2019 to April 2022.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Apple loses appeal against German regulators

Apple has lost its appeal against a regulatory decision that could impose stricter controls on the company in Germany.

The Federal Court of Justice upheld a 2023 ruling by the country’s competition authority, which classified Apple as a company of ‘paramount cross-market significance for competition,’ placing it under closer scrutiny.

A decision like this means Apple will face potential regulatory measures similar to those imposed on tech giants such as Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and Facebook’s owner, Meta.

The ruling follows a judge’s earlier indication in January that the court would side with the regulator. Apple had attempted to involve the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, but the request was denied.

In Europe, Apple’s App Store has come under increasing scrutiny, with regulators expressing concerns over how the company collects and utilises vast amounts of user data. This latest setback adds to Apple’s ongoing legal and regulatory challenges in the region.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

US administration in talks with multiple buyers for TikTok

US Vice President JD Vance expects the broad terms of a deal to resolve TikTok’s ownership dispute to be in place by the April 5 deadline, according to White House officials.

The platform’s future has been uncertain since a law requiring its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell the app or face a ban was enacted in January. President Donald Trump signed an executive order delaying the law’s enforcement by 75 days, allowing time for negotiations.

The White House has assigned Vance and national security adviser Michael Waltz to oversee the potential sale. Trump confirmed that discussions were ongoing with four interested groups.

Vance, speaking to NBC News, expressed confidence that an agreement would be reached to create an independent US-owned TikTok while addressing national security concerns. Some details of the deal may still require further negotiation after the April deadline.

Neither TikTok nor ByteDance has commented on the ongoing discussions. The proposed sale comes amid broader concerns about data security and foreign ownership of social media platforms.

The Biden administration had previously attempted to push for divestment, but legal challenges delayed action. The latest developments suggest that Washington is moving closer to a resolution on the issue.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Turkey investigates Netflix, Disney, and Amazon for competition law violations

The Turkish Competition Board has opened an investigation into major subscription-based, on-demand video service providers, including Netflix, Disney, and Amazon. This decision follows a preliminary inquiry into whether these global streaming platforms have violated Turkey‘s competition laws.

The board is particularly focused on examining their business practices within the Turkish market and assessing whether any anti-competitive behaviour has occurred. The investigation highlights Turkey’s increasing scrutiny of digital platforms operating within its borders.

The inquiry comes at a time when subscription-based streaming services are growing rapidly in Turkey, with Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video among the most popular platforms in the country. The Turkish Competition Board’s investigation aims to ensure that the market remains competitive and that no service provider is unfairly dominating the sector.

By looking into the practices of these major players, the board seeks to protect consumers and maintain a level playing field for all companies involved in the digital entertainment industry.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.