Secret passwords could fight deepfake scams

As AI-generated images grow increasingly lifelike, a cyber security expert has warned that families should create secret passwords to guard against deepfake scams.

Cody Barrow, chief executive of EclecticIQ and a former US government adviser, says AI is making it far easier for criminals to impersonate others using fabricated videos or images.

Mr Barrow and his wife now use a private code to confirm each other’s identity if either receives a suspicious message or video.

He believes this precaution, simple enough for anyone regardless of age or digital skills, could soon become essential. ‘It may sound dramatic here in May 2025,’ he said, ‘but I’m quite confident that in a few years, if not months, people will say: I should have done that.’

The warning comes the same week Google launched Veo 3, its AI video generator capable of producing hyper-realistic footage and lifelike dialogue. Its public release has raised concerns about how easily deepfakes could be misused for scams or manipulation.

Meanwhile, President Trump signed the ‘Take It Down Act’ into law, making the creation of deepfake pornography a criminal offence. The bipartisan measure will see prison terms for anyone producing or uploading such content, with First Lady Melania Trump stating it will ‘prioritise people over politics’

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Texas considers statewide social media ban for minors

Texas is considering a bill that would ban social media use for anyone under 18. The proposal, which recently advanced past the state Senate committee, is expected to be voted on before the legislative session ends June 2.

If passed, the bill would require platforms to verify the age of all users and allow parents to delete their child’s account. Platforms would have 10 days to comply or face penalties from the state attorney general.

This follows similar efforts in other states. Florida recently enacted a law banning social media use for children under 14 and requiring parental consent for those aged 14 to 15. The Texas bill, however, proposes broader restrictions.

At the federal level, a Senate bill introduced in 2024 aims to bar children under 13 from using social media. While it remains stalled in committee, comments from Senators Brian Schatz and Ted Cruz suggest a renewed push may be underway.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Ransomware gang leaks French government emails

A ransomware gang has published what it claims is sensitive data from multiple French organisations on a dark web forum.

The Stormous cartel, active since 2022, posted the dataset as a ‘comprehensive leak’ allegedly involving high-profile French government bodies.

However, researchers from Cybernews examined the information and found the data’s quality questionable, with outdated MD5 password hashes indicating it could be from older breaches.

Despite its age, the dataset could still be dangerous if reused credentials are involved. Threat actors may exploit the leaked emails for phishing campaigns by impersonating government agencies to extract more sensitive details.

Cybernews noted that even weak password hashes can eventually be cracked, especially when stronger security measures weren’t in place at the time of collection.

Among the affected organisations are Agence Française de Développement, the Paris Region’s Regional Health Agency, and the Court of Audit.

The number of exposed email addresses varies, with some institutions having only a handful leaked while others face hundreds. The French cybersecurity agency ANSSI has yet to comment.

Last year, France faced another massive exposure incident affecting 95 million citizen records, adding to concerns about ongoing cyber vulnerabilities.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

West Lothian schools hit by ransomware attack

West Lothian Council has confirmed that personal and sensitive information was stolen following a ransomware cyberattack which struck the region’s education system on Tuesday, 6 May. Police Scotland has launched an investigation, and the matter remains an active criminal case.

Only a small fraction of the data held on the education network was accessed by the attackers. However, some of it included sensitive personal information. Parents and carers across West Lothian’s schools have been notified, and staff have also been advised to take extra precautions.

The cyberattack disrupted IT systems serving 13 secondary schools, 69 primary schools and 61 nurseries. Although the education network remains isolated from the rest of the council’s systems, contingency plans have been effective in minimising disruption, including during the ongoing SQA exams.

West Lothian Council has apologised to anyone potentially affected. It is continuing to work closely with Police Scotland and the Scottish Government. Officials have promised further updates as more information becomes available.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Half of young people would prefer life without the internet

Nearly half of UK youths aged 16 to 21 say they would prefer to grow up without the internet, a new survey reveals. The British Standards Institution found that 68% feel worse after using social media and half would support a digital curfew past 10 p.m.

These findings come as the government considers app usage limits for platforms like TikTok and Instagram. The study also showed that many UK young people feel compelled to hide their online behaviour: 42% admitted lying to parents, and a similar number have fake or burner accounts.

More worryingly, 27% said they have shared their location with strangers, while others admitted pretending to be someone else entirely. Experts argue that digital curfews alone won’t reduce exposure to online harms without broader safeguards in place.

Campaigners and charities are calling for urgent legislation that puts children’s safety before tech profits. The Molly Rose Foundation stressed the danger of algorithms pushing harmful content, while the NSPCC urged a shift towards less addictive and safer online spaces.

The majority of young people surveyed want more protection online and clearer action from tech firms and policymakers.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US bans nonconsensual explicit deepfakes nationwide

The US is introducing a landmark federal law aimed at curbing the spread of non-consensual explicit deepfake images, following mounting public outrage.

President Donald Trump is expected to sign the Take It Down Act, which will criminalise the sharing of explicit images, whether real or AI-generated, without consent. The law will also require tech platforms to remove such content within 48 hours of notification, instead of leaving the matter to patchy state laws.

The legislation is one of the first at the federal level to directly tackle the misuse of AI-generated content. It builds on earlier laws that protected children but had left adults vulnerable due to inconsistent state regulations.

The bill received rare bipartisan support in Congress and was backed by over 100 organisations, including tech giants like Meta, TikTok and Google. First Lady Melania Trump also supported the act, hosting a teenage victim of deepfake harassment during the president’s address to Congress.

The act was prompted in part by incidents like that of Elliston Berry, a Texas high school student targeted by a classmate who used AI to alter her social media image into a nude photo. Similar cases involving teen girls across the country highlighted the urgency for action.

Tech companies had already started offering tools to remove explicit images, but the lack of consistent enforcement allowed harmful content to persist on less cooperative platforms.

Supporters of the law argue it sends a strong societal message instead of allowing the exploitation to continue unchallenged.

Advocates like Imran Ahmed and Ilana Beller emphasised that while no law is a perfect solution, this one forces platforms to take real responsibility and offers victims some much-needed protection and peace of mind.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Kick faces investigation after ignoring Ofcom risk assessment request

Ofcom has launched two investigations into Kick Online Entertainment, the provider of a pornography website, over potential breaches of the Online Safety Act.

The regulator said the company failed to respond to a statutory request for a risk assessment related to illegal content appearing on the platform.

As a result, Ofcom is investigating whether Kick has failed to meet its legal obligations to complete and retain a record of such a risk assessment, as well as for not responding to the regulator’s information request.

Ofcom confirmed it had received complaints about potentially illegal material on the site, including child sexual abuse content and extreme pornography.

It is also considering a third investigation into whether the platform has implemented adequate safety measures to protect users from such material—another requirement under the Act.

Under the Online Safety Act, firms found in breach can face fines of up to £18 million or 10% of their global revenue, whichever is higher. In the most severe cases, Ofcom can pursue court orders to block UK access to the website or compel payment providers and advertisers to cut ties with the platform.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Instagram calls for EU-wide teen protection rules

Instagram is calling on the European Union to introduce new regulations requiring app stores to implement age verification and parental approval systems.

The platform argues that such protections, applied consistently across all apps, are essential to safeguarding teenagers from harmful content online.

‘The EU needs consistent standards for all apps, to help keep teens safe, empower parents and preserve privacy,’ Instagram said in a blog post.

The company believes the most effective way to achieve this is by introducing protections at the source—before teenagers download apps from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store.

Instagram is proposing that app stores verify users’ ages and require parental approval for teen app downloads. The social media platform cites new research from Morning Consult showing that three in four parents support such legislation.

Most parents also view app stores, rather than individual apps, as the safer and more manageable point for controlling what their teens can access.

To reinforce its position, Instagram points to its own safety efforts, such as the introduction of Teen Accounts. These private-by-default profiles limit teen exposure to messages and content from unknown users, and apply stricter filters to reduce exposure to sensitive material.

Instagram says it is working with civil society groups, industry partners, and European policymakers to push for rules that protect young users across platforms. With teen safety a growing concern, the company insists that industry-wide, enforceable solutions are urgently needed.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google to roll out Gemini AI for kids under 13

Google has announced plans to introduce its Gemini AI platform to children under 13, a move that has sparked mixed reactions.

Parents recently received notifications about the rollout, with Google stating that children will be able to use Gemini for tasks such as homework help, answering general questions, and even bedtime stories.

The announcement has triggered concern among some organisations due to the risks associated with young users interacting with AI.

Critics point out that AI models have previously struggled to maintain child-appropriate safeguards and worry that children may not fully grasp the implications of engaging with such technology. Despite these issues, others have applauded Google’s decision to keep parents closely involved.

Taylor Barkley, Director of Public Policy at the Abundance Institute, praised Google for prioritising parental involvement. He noted that while risks exist, the best approach is not to impose strict bans but to work collaboratively with parents and caregivers to manage children’s AI usage.

‘Google should be applauded for proactively notifying parents,’ Barkley said in a statement. ‘When it comes to new technologies, parents come first.’

To ensure parental oversight, Google will require children’s access to Gemini to be managed through Family Link, its parental control platform. Family Link allows parents to monitor device usage, manage privacy settings, share location, and establish healthy digital habits for their families.

As AI continues to permeate everyday life, Google’s decision highlights the delicate balance between offering educational opportunities and ensuring the safe and responsible use of technology among younger users.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Gemini AI now accessible to kids via Family Link

Google has announced that children under the age of 13 will soon be able to access its Gemini AI chatbot through Family Link accounts. The service will allow parents to monitor their child’s use, set screen time limits, and disable access if desired.

Gemini, designed to assist with tasks like homework and storytelling, includes safeguards to prevent inappropriate content and protect child users. Google acknowledged the possibility of errors in the AI’s responses and urged parental oversight.

Google emphasised that data collected from child users will not be used to train AI models. Parents will be notified when their child first uses Gemini and are advised to encourage critical thinking and remind children not to share personal information with the chatbot.

Despite these precautions, child safety advocates have voiced concerns. Organisations such as Fairplay argue that allowing young children to interact with AI chatbots could expose them to risks, citing previous incidents involving other AI platforms.

International bodies, including UNICEF, have also highlighted the need for stringent regulations to safeguard children’s rights in an increasingly digital world.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot