Child safety online Archives | Page 9 of 81

European Commission urges fast rollout of EU age verification app

The European Commission has adopted a recommendation urging member states to accelerate the rollout of the EU age verification app and make it available by the end of the year. The recommendation says the app can be deployed either as a standalone solution or integrated into a European Digital Identity Wallet.

According to the Commission, the app is intended to let users prove they meet a required age threshold without disclosing their exact age, identity, or other personal details. The Commission has also published a blueprint for the system, leaving it to member states to customise and produce the app for their citizens.

The recommendation sets out actions for member states to support rapid availability and interoperability, including implementation plans and coordination to ensure the swift rollout of the solution across the EU.

The measure forms part of the EU’s wider approach to protecting minors online under the Digital Services Act, which requires online platforms to ensure a high level of privacy, safety, and security for minors.

Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen said: ‘Effective and privacy-preserving age verification is the next piece of the puzzle that we are getting closer to completing, as we work towards an online space where our children are safe and empowered to use positively and responsibly without restricting the rights of adults.’

Why does it matter?

The move takes age verification in the EU from a general policy objective to a more concrete implementation phase. Rather than leaving platforms and member states to develop separate solutions, the Commission is trying to steer the bloc towards a common privacy-preserving model that can work across borders.

That matters for both child protection and regulatory coherence, because if countries adopt incompatible systems or move at very different speeds, enforcement under the Digital Services Act could become uneven in practice.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK House of Commons backs amendments in lieu on Children’s Wellbeing Bill with online safety provisions

The UK House of Commons has backed government amendments instead of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, after insisting on its disagreement with the Lords’ amendments and proposing its own amendments in lieu. In the debate, ministers said the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill will place a statutory duty on the Secretary of State to act following the consultation, changing the wording from ‘may’ to ‘must’.

Education minister Olivia Bailey told MPs that the government is consulting on the mechanism, but that ‘under any outcome’ it will impose ‘some form of age or functionality restrictions for children under 16’. She added that curfews would be considered in addition to, not instead of, those restrictions.

Bailey said the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill now requires a statutory progress report three months after Royal Assent, with regulations to be laid within 12 months after that. She said the government intends to move faster and aims to lay the regulations by the end of the year, while describing any further six-month extension as a backstop for ‘exceptional and unforeseen circumstances’ only.

Opposition MPs and Liberal Democrats argued that the timetable remained too slow. Conservative frontbencher Laura Trott said the revised proposal was ‘a huge step forward’ but warned that ‘every month of delay just leaves children more exposed to the harms of social media online’.

Liberal Democrat spokesperson Munira Wilson said the overall timeline could still amount to 21 months before action. The House later voted by 272 to 64 to insist on its disagreement with the Lords’ amendments and to approve the government’s amendments in lieu. Lords amendment 105C was also agreed to, allowing the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to move forward with the revised online safety provisions.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta faces EU Digital Services Act breach finding over under-13 access

The European Commission has preliminarily found Meta’s Instagram and Facebook in breach of the Digital Services Act over failures to adequately prevent children under 13 from accessing the platforms. The finding remains provisional and does not prejudge the outcome of the investigation.

According to the Commission, Meta’s existing measures do not effectively enforce its own minimum age requirement of 13. The preliminary findings say children below that age can still create accounts by entering false birth dates, while the company’s reporting tool for underage users is difficult to use and often does not result in effective follow-up.

The Commission also considers Meta’s risk assessment to be incomplete and arbitrary. It says the company failed to identify and assess the risks properly posed to children under 13 who access Instagram and Facebook, despite evidence from across the EU suggesting that a significant share of children under 13 use one or both services. This wording is best kept cautious unless you are quoting the exact percentage directly from the Commission text.

At this stage, the Commission says Meta must revise its risk assessment methodology and strengthen its measures to prevent, detect, and remove children under 13 from the platforms. It also says the company must better counter and mitigate the risks those children may face and ensure a high level of privacy, safety, and security for minors.

The preliminary findings form part of formal proceedings opened against Meta in May 2024 under the DSA. The Commission says the investigation has included analysis of Meta’s risk assessment reports, internal data and documents, and the company’s responses to requests for information, with support from civil society organisations and child protection experts across the EU.

If the Commission’s preliminary view is confirmed, it may adopt a non-compliance decision and impose a fine of up to 6% of the provider’s total worldwide annual turnover, as well as periodic penalty payments. Meta now has the opportunity to reply before any final decision is taken.

Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy, said Meta’s own terms and conditions already state that its services are not intended for children under 13, but that the company appears to be doing too little in practice to prevent them from gaining access.

Why does it matter?

The case matters because it goes to the heart of how the Digital Services Act is expected to work in practice: not only by requiring large platforms to set rules for child safety, but by obliging them to enforce those rules effectively. If the Commission’s preliminary view is confirmed, the Meta case could become an important benchmark for how the EU treats age assurance, risk assessments, and platform accountability in cases involving minors, with wider implications for other services that rely on self-declared age checks and weak reporting tools.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Europol’s IOCTA 2026 shows growing cyber threats across Europe’s digital landscape

The 2026 Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment has been released by Europol, outlining the growing complexity of cybercrime across Europe. The report identifies encryption, proxies, and AI as key drivers behind the increasing scale and sophistication of digital threats.

According to Europol, criminal networks are adapting rapidly, using fragmented online environments and encrypted communication channels to evade detection. The report highlights cybercrime enablers, online fraud schemes, cyber-attacks, and online child sexual exploitation as central areas of concern in the EU threat landscape.

AI is playing a growing role in cyber-enabled crime by making fraud, deception, and other forms of online abuse more scalable and more convincing. Europol presents this as part of a wider shift in which digital threats are becoming more adaptive, more accessible, and harder to disrupt through traditional law enforcement methods alone. This is an inference based on Europol’s framing of AI as a major force expanding cybercrime.

The report also points to continued risks in cyber-attacks and online child sexual exploitation, underlining how technological change is affecting both financially motivated crime and harms involving vulnerable users. In that sense, IOCTA 2026 presents Europe’s cyber challenge not as a series of isolated incidents, but as a broader digital threat environment shaped by enabling technologies and rapidly evolving criminal tactics. This is an inference grounded in Europol’s description of the report’s main threat areas.

These developments reinforce the need for stronger operational cooperation, more advanced investigative capabilities, and continued adaptation across Europe’s law enforcement and regulatory systems. Europol’s overall message is that cybercrime is becoming more sophisticated, more industrialised, and more deeply embedded in the wider digital ecosystem. This is an inference based on the report’s scope and framing.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

IWF and Immaterialism expand efforts to combat child abuse content online

Immaterialism has joined the Internet Watch Foundation to strengthen efforts against the spread of child sexual abuse material online.

The partnership introduces IWF tools designed to accelerate the identification of harmful domains and enable faster intervention when abusive activity is detected. By adopting Registrar Alerts and related datasets, the registrar aims to improve its ability to respond to criminal content across the domains under its management.

The collaboration reflects a broader shift towards more proactive action at the domain infrastructure layer. By integrating intelligence tools into operational processes, the initiative aims to disrupt both the deliberate distribution of abusive material and the continued availability of domains linked to it.

The IWF says the volume of detected child sexual abuse material continues to rise, reinforcing the need for coordinated responses between safety organisations and private-sector actors. In that sense, the partnership points to closer alignment between domain service providers and specialist online safety groups working to strengthen protections for children online.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Greece accelerates digital governance with AI enforcement and social media age restrictions

Greece is moving to tighten online child protection and expand AI-based public enforcement as part of a broader digital governance agenda, Digital Governance and Artificial Intelligence Minister Dimitris Papastergiou has said.

Under the plan, social media platforms would, from 2027, be required to block access for users under 15 using age verification systems rather than self-declared age data. However, AI is already being used in road safety enforcement, with smart cameras issuing digital fines through government platforms.

The policy includes tools such as Kids Wallet, built on privacy-preserving verification methods that share only age eligibility. Authorities say the aim is to address risks linked to digital addiction while strengthening protections for minors across online environments.

Alongside these measures, AI is already being deployed in road safety enforcement. Smart cameras are being used to issue digital fines through government platforms, with a nationwide rollout planned to expand monitoring and improve compliance.

These measures form part of a wider effort to digitise public administration, reduce inefficiencies, and strengthen accountability. By embedding technology more deeply into everyday governance, Greece is trying to reshape how citizens interact with the state while also addressing long-standing systemic problems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Australia aligns privacy and online safety regulation

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner have signed a new agreement to strengthen cooperation on online privacy and safety regulation.

The Memorandum of Understanding formalises coordination between the two bodies as digital risks increasingly overlap across their respective mandates.

The agreement focuses on joint oversight of age-assurance technologies and compliance with social media minimum-age requirements. Both regulators say they want to ensure that systems designed to protect children from harmful or inappropriate content also respect privacy obligations under Australian law.

Officials also highlighted the growing complexity of online risks, particularly with the rapid development of AI and other emerging technologies. The framework is intended to support more consistent regulatory responses by improving communication, information sharing, and enforcement coordination.

Why does it matter?

Officials from both agencies said closer collaboration will help address digital harms more effectively while ensuring privacy protections remain central to online safety measures. The initiative reflects a broader shift towards more integrated regulation of technology-driven risks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta expands parental oversight with new AI conversation insights for teens

Meta has introduced new supervision features that allow parents to see the topics their teenagers discuss with its AI assistant across Facebook, Messenger, and Instagram.

The update provides visibility into activity over the previous seven days, grouping interactions into areas such as education, health and well-being, lifestyle, travel, and entertainment. Parents can review these themes through a new Insights tab, although they will not see the exact prompts their teen sent or Meta AI’s responses.

The feature forms part of Meta’s broader effort to strengthen safeguards for younger users as AI becomes more embedded in everyday digital experiences. For more sensitive issues, including suicide and self-harm, Meta says it is developing additional alerts to notify parents when teens try to engage in those types of conversations with its AI assistant.

Meta has also partnered with external experts, including the Cyberbullying Research Centre, to develop structured conversation prompts to help families talk about AI use. The company says these tools are intended to support informed, non-judgemental dialogue rather than passive monitoring.

Alongside these updates, Meta has created an AI Wellbeing Expert Council to provide input on the development of age-appropriate AI systems for teens. The move reflects a wider shift towards embedding safety, transparency, and parental involvement into AI-driven platforms.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Online safety agreement signed by eSafety and OAIC in Australia

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner have signed a memorandum of understanding to strengthen cooperation on issues where online safety and privacy intersect.

The agreement formalises communication pathways between the two regulators and builds on existing collaboration. It covers matters including age-assurance requirements under Australia’s online industry codes and standards, as well as compliance by age-restricted platforms with Social Media Minimum Age obligations.

eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant stated: ‘Both regulators have always recognised that combatting certain harms requires privacy and safety to go hand in hand. For example, at eSafety we knew from the outset our implementation of the Social Media Minimum Age would need to recognise important rights, including the right to privacy.’

She added: ‘Our commitment to continue working collaboratively with the OAIC gives formal recognition to that principle and sets out how we will balance and promote privacy and safety for everyone.’

Inman Grant also linked the agreement to emerging risks associated with new technologies and wider regulatory requirements around age assurance. Grant expanded: ‘It comes at an important time, when the proliferation of new technologies like artificial intelligence is amplifying risks and we are increasingly requiring industry to deploy age-assurance technologies that meet their regulatory obligations and respect privacy in the Australian context.’

Australian Information Commissioner Elizabeth Tydd said the memorandum would support the OAIC’s work in monitoring and responding to emerging online privacy risks and help both agencies deliver their statutory functions under the Online Safety Act.

Tydd added: ‘With this memorandum, we’re not only formalising cooperation, but building a foundation where privacy protections and online safety initiatives can better address specific harms side by side, ensuring Australians can be protected when interacting online.’

Why does it matter?

A growing number of online safety measures now depend on systems that also raise privacy questions, especially age-assurance tools and other platform controls involving personal data. The agreement gives both regulators a clearer basis for coordinating oversight as Australia expands enforcement around child safety, platform obligations, and emerging technologies such as AI.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

IWF data shows 63% of global child abuse content hosted in the EU

New data from the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) points to a stark imbalance in global online child protection, with the EU member states hosting the majority of confirmed child sexual abuse material URLs identified by the organisation. In 2025, IWF analysts actioned 310,437 URLs, with 63% traced to hosting services in the EU member states.

A small cluster of countries, including Bulgaria and the Netherlands, accounted for a large share of that hosting concentration, highlighting structural vulnerabilities in hosting infrastructure and uneven enforcement across jurisdictions. The IWF notes that such concentrations often reflect a combination of high-volume sites, migration between hosting locations, and inconsistent takedown speeds.

These findings come shortly after the EU failed to preserve legal continuity for the temporary framework that had allowed companies to carry out certain voluntary detection measures while negotiations on a permanent child sexual abuse law continued. That lapse has intensified concerns about a widening gap between the scale of online abuse and the legal tools available to detect and disrupt it.

The IWF argues that fragmented regulation and uneven infrastructure responses make it easier for criminal content to persist online. Where abuse material remains concentrated on a few high-volume sites in jurisdictions with slower or less consistent takedown practices, it stays accessible for longer and is more likely to be copied, redistributed, or reposted elsewhere.

By contrast, takedown performance can vary sharply across jurisdictions. The UK accounted for just 951 actioned URLs in 2025, or 0.30% of the total, a figure the IWF links to a much stronger domestic removal framework and closer operational cooperation.

The broader message of the data is that child sexual abuse material cannot be tackled effectively through fragmented national responses alone. The IWF is using the figures to press for a more coherent international framework for detection, reporting, and removal, warning that without aligned rules and stronger accountability, systemic weaknesses in digital governance will continue to leave serious gaps in child protection.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!