Representatives from more than 20 Latin American and Caribbean countries have met in Santo Domingo for a regional summit on AI ethics and governance.
The Third Ministerial and High-Level Authorities Summit on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Latin America and the Caribbean took place on 25 and 26 June in the Dominican Republic. It was organised by UNESCO, the Dominican Republic’s Government Office of Information and Communication Technologies (OGTIC), and CAF – Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean.
The summit brought together ministers, senior government officials, multilateral organisations, academics, private-sector representatives and civil society to strengthen regional cooperation and accelerate the implementation of public policies aligned with the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
UNESCO said the meeting builds on earlier summits held in Santiago in 2023 and Montevideo in 2024, as well as ongoing work to develop a shared regional roadmap for responsible AI governance.
Anne Lemaistre, Director of the UNESCO Regional Office in Havana, said AI presents significant opportunities but also challenges that require coordinated regional action.
Raquel Peña, Vice President of the Dominican Republic, said the region had decided to come together to address one of the greatest challenges of the time. She said the task is to harness AI’s potential while upholding the principles that should guide its development and use.
Peña also reaffirmed the Dominican Republic’s commitment to a human-centred approach to AI. She said AI must be developed and governed with ethics, responsibility, and a profoundly human vision.
Christian Asinelli, Corporate Vice President of Strategic Programming at CAF, said Latin America and the Caribbean should play a stronger role in shaping global AI governance rather than simply adapting to international developments.
Raúl Fuentes, European Union Ambassador to the Dominican Republic, said the EU wants to work with the region on practical solutions as well as shared principles. He said the AI component of the EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Digital Alliance is supporting knowledge exchange, innovation, sovereignty, and a human-centred approach.
During the summit, Dominican authorities announced the forthcoming adoption of a national Artificial Intelligence Code of Ethics, developed with input from government, academia, civil society and the private sector, and aligned with international standards.
Edgar Batista, Director General of OGTIC, said the initiative reinforces the Dominican Republic’s commitment to digital transformation centred on public value. He said the country will contribute actively to the development of regional standards for digital governance.
Delegations are discussing AI governance, institutional capacity, responsible innovation, and regional cooperation. The talks aim to support ethical and regulatory frameworks for safe, inclusive, and trustworthy technological development.
The Dominican Republic will also assume the Pro Tempore Presidency of the regional mechanism, reinforcing its role in promoting ethical, inclusive and sustainable AI governance across Latin America and the Caribbean.
Why does it matter?
The summit reflects growing efforts by Latin American and Caribbean countries to develop a shared approach to AI governance based on ethics, inclusion and sustainable development. Regional cooperation can help governments build institutional capacity, align regulatory approaches and ensure AI policies reflect local priorities rather than relying solely on frameworks developed elsewhere.
The meeting also highlights the increasing importance of regional voices in global AI governance. By grounding discussions in UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and strengthening collaboration among governments, international organisations and other stakeholders, the region is seeking to play a more active role in shaping international norms for trustworthy AI.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Firms across the euro area are increasingly adopting AI, but only a small share are integrating it deeply enough to generate meaningful productivity gains. Data from the European Central Bank’s SAFE survey shows that although more than 70% of firms report using AI in some form, only 7% have integrated it deeply into their core operations.
Firms that use AI intensively are more likely to embed it in core business processes rather than limiting it to routine or experimental tasks. They are also more likely to innovate, expand their product offerings and align AI investments with long-term growth strategies.
Competitive pressure is also driving deeper AI adoption, particularly among established firms responding to technologically advanced rivals. However, skills shortages, legacy systems and financing constraints continue to limit many companies’ ability to scale AI effectively.
Why does it matter?
The findings suggest that simply adopting AI is not enough to generate significant economic benefits. Productivity gains appear to depend on integrating AI into core business functions, innovation strategies and long-term investment plans rather than using it only for isolated or experimental tasks.
The survey also highlights structural challenges facing Europe’s digital transformation. Without investment in skills, financing and modern digital infrastructure, many firms may struggle to move beyond basic AI adoption, potentially widening the productivity gap between AI leaders and businesses that lack the resources to scale the technology.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!
China has regained the world’s leading position in supercomputing after the LineShine system became the fastest computer in the latest TOP500 ranking, replacing the US’s El Capitan at the top of the list.
The achievement marks China’s return to first place for the first time since 2017 and highlights the growing strategic importance of high-performance computing in the AI era.
Unlike many recent AI-focused supercomputers that rely heavily on graphics processing units (GPUs), LineShine achieves exascale performance using conventional central processing units (CPUs).
Beyond topping benchmark rankings, the system is expected to support scientific research, advanced simulations, climate modelling, pharmaceutical development and the training of increasingly sophisticated AI models.
The announcement also reflects the broader ambition of China to strengthen technological leadership while presenting its innovation ecosystem as a contributor to global technological development.
The growing investment in supercomputers reflects how computing infrastructure is increasingly being treated as a strategic asset alongside semiconductors, cloud infrastructure and advanced data centres.
As governments increasingly link AI capabilities with economic competitiveness, scientific leadership and national security, access to world-class computing resources is becoming one of the defining factors shaping the global technology balance.
Why does it matter?
The latest TOP500 ranking underline that computing capacity is becoming a defining factor in AI development and scientific competitiveness. As frontier AI models require ever-greater computational resources for training and inference, access to world-class supercomputers is emerging as a strategic advantage alongside semiconductor manufacturing and cloud infrastructure.
China’s return to the top of the rankings also highlights the geopolitical dimension of high-performance computing. At the same time, continued European investment in AI factories and supercomputing infrastructure reflects a broader effort to strengthen technological sovereignty and reduce dependence on external computing resources as countries compete for leadership in AI and advanced research.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Chinese Vice Premier Liu Guozhong has called for stronger development of the biomedicine sector and brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies, describing them as strategic industries that will support the Healthy China initiative and China’s future industrial development.
During a visit to Jiangsu Province, Liu called for greater use of AI, big data, and other digital technologies in pharmaceutical research and development to boost innovation and accelerate high-quality growth in the biomedicine sector.
Liu also described brain-computer interfaces as a frontier technology and a strategic area of international competition. Liu called for stronger interdisciplinary collaboration, expanded brain science research, faster breakthroughs in core technologies, and greater original innovation capacity.
The remarks reinforce China’s broader strategy of promoting AI-enabled innovation and emerging technologies to strengthen industrial competitiveness and modernise its healthcare sector.
Why does it matter?
China’s emphasis on AI-powered biomedicine and brain-computer interfaces reflects its strategy of combining healthcare innovation with industrial policy. By encouraging the use of AI in drug discovery while investing in frontier technologies such as BCIs, Beijing is seeking to strengthen domestic innovation and compete in sectors expected to play an important role in future economic growth.
The remarks also underscore the growing geopolitical significance of advanced health technologies. As countries invest in AI, biotechnology and neurotechnology, these fields are increasingly viewed not only as drivers of scientific progress but also as strategic capabilities linked to economic competitiveness, technological sovereignty and national resilience.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Africa’s place in an evolving digital governance landscape
As AI, cybersecurity, and digital technologies become increasingly central to international policymaking, African countries are seeking to strengthen their role in shaping global digital governance. Questions of representation, digital sovereignty, capacity development, and regional coordination are becoming more prominent as governments prepare for negotiations on AI governance, cybersecurity, telecommunications, and internet governance.
These issues formed the focus of a recent Diplo webinar on Cyber Diplomacy in Africa: Regional, National and Continental Initiatives, moderated by Mwende Njiraini, African Initiative Coordinator at Diplo and Chair of the ITU-T Study Group 17 Regional Group for Africa on security. The discussion brought together policymakers, diplomats, academics, and regional organisations to examine how African interests can be more effectively represented in international digital governance processes.
Although the discussion focused on Africa, many of the issues raised, including AI governance, digital sovereignty, capacity development, and multistakeholder cooperation, reflect broader challenges facing digital governance worldwide.
From cyber diplomacy to diplomacy in the AI era
Opening the discussion, Kurbalija suggested that the distinction between cyber diplomacy, digital diplomacy, and technology diplomacy is becoming less significant as digital technologies permeate virtually every area of international relations. Rather than focusing on terminology, he argued that the central question is how countries, communities, and citizens represent their interests in an increasingly digital world.
‘Cyber diplomacy, digital diplomacy, or AI diplomacy is ultimately diplomacy. It is about representing interests, negotiating, and finding common solutions.’, he said.
According to Kurbalija, technological developments are no longer confined to specialised policy discussions. AI, cybersecurity, digital infrastructure, and data governance increasingly influence trade, security, education, healthcare, humanitarian action, and economic development, making digital issues part of mainstream diplomacy.
This evolution also raises questions about whether Africa is sufficiently represented in international discussions shaping the future of digital technologies.
Image via Magnific
Kurbalija noted that African diplomats are becoming more active in negotiations related to AI, cybersecurity, and internet governance, but argued that stronger participation will be necessary to ensure that the continent’s priorities are reflected in emerging international frameworks.
Rather than approaching these meetings individually, Kurbalija encouraged participants to prepare coordinated positions that reflect African priorities across different policy areas.
Regional coordination remains a work in progress
A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the gap between continental ambitions and national implementation.
However, she questioned whether these processes consistently translate into practical outcomes across the continent.
To illustrate this point, Getao presented the results of a live audience poll measuring familiarity with African digital governance initiatives. While approximately half of the participants recognised the AU Convention on Cyber Security and Personal Data Protection (the Malabo Convention), significantly fewer were familiar with other continental initiatives, including the AU Digital Transformation Strategy and the African Union’s position on international law in cyberspace.
The findings suggested that awareness of Africa’s existing digital governance architecture remains uneven, even among participants engaged in digital policy discussions.
Ambassador Bitange Ndemo argued that implementation presents an even greater challenge than awareness. He observed that agreements adopted at the African Union level often take considerable time to influence national policymaking, with countries frequently developing their own legal and regulatory approaches rather than building on common continental frameworks.
Using the Malabo Convention as an example, Ndemo suggested that many governments introduced separate data protection legislation without fully integrating broader continental approaches. According to him, one contributing factor is reliance on external funding for many regional digital initiatives.
‘If we continue depending on external partners to finance our priorities, ownership becomes more difficult’, Ndemo added.
Ndemo argued that stronger African investment in digital governance initiatives would improve both implementation and long-term sustainability.
Getao echoed this concern, noting that important achievements at the continental level do not always ‘percolate’ effectively to national implementation.
Building common African positions
Despite these challenges, speakers highlighted several examples of growing regional coordination.
Meriem Slimani described how the African Telecommunications Union (ATU) has worked to strengthen cooperation among member states in preparing common African positions for international telecommunications negotiations.
When she joined the organisation in 2015, Slimani recalled, many countries submitted proposals independently at international meetings, often without consulting neighbouring states.
ATU responded by creating a coordination platform through which member countries discuss priorities, identify common interests, exchange experiences, and gradually develop shared positions before major international conferences.
‘Our objective has been to ensure that Africa speaks with one voice where common interests exist.’
Image via Magnific
According to Slimani, this collaborative approach has become particularly important in preparation for major meetings of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), where coordinated regional positions can strengthen Africa’s influence during negotiations.
While acknowledging that implementation challenges remain, he argued that progress has been more visible in some sectors than others.
In particular, COMESA has advanced several practical digital trade initiatives, including electronic trade documentation, digital logistics systems, electronic certificates of origin, and simplified digital trade procedures designed to facilitate cross-border commerce.
Governance issues such as cybersecurity and cybercrime, however, have generally progressed more slowly because they often involve more politically sensitive discussions and require broader legal coordination among participating states.
Chinemhute suggested that smaller regional organisations can sometimes move more quickly than continental institutions because they involve fewer actors and more focused policy priorities.
Looking ahead
While speakers approached Africa’s digital future from different institutional and regional perspectives, several common priorities emerged throughout the discussion. These included strengthening Africa’s participation in global digital governance processes, improving coordination among national, regional, and continental initiatives, investing in capacity development, and ensuring that digital policies reflect local realities and priorities.
The discussion also highlighted that digital governance extends beyond technology. Questions of AI, cybersecurity, connectivity, language, education, and financing were presented as interconnected challenges that require cooperation among governments, regional organisations, academia, the private sector, and civil society.
Image via Magnific
As international discussions on AI and digital governance continue through forums such as the AI for Good Global Summit, the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)+20 process, and the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), speakers stressed that African participation will be most effective when supported by coordinated regional positions and sustained investment in local expertise and digital capabilities.
Ultimately, the webinar underscored that Africa’s role in shaping the future of digital governance will depend not only on engagement in international negotiations but also on translating continental ambitions into practical national implementation and ensuring that African perspectives contribute to global debates on AI, cybersecurity, and digital development.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Australia’s Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency has published a paper on how higher education institutions can assure quality learning in a future shaped by generative AI.
The paper, ‘Assuring quality learning in a GenAI-integrated future: The role of adaptive capabilities’, argues that universities need to rethink how they define, assess and evidence student learning as generative AI becomes embedded in education.
The authors say generative AI and automated decision-making systems challenge traditional approaches to academic integrity and assessment. Rather than focusing only on securing final submissions, institutions should clarify what students need to learn in AI-integrated environments and how that learning can be demonstrated.
The paper identifies adaptive capabilities as central to graduate learning. These include digital literacy, distributed cognition, hybrid metacognition and life-long learning, grounded in disciplinary knowledge and supported by student agency and regulation.
The authors warn that narrow AI literacy may not be enough, as operational skills linked to current tools can quickly become outdated. Adaptive capabilities can help students evaluate new technologies, use AI ethically and continue learning as systems evolve.
The paper also highlights risks linked to generative AI, including overreliance on AI-generated explanations, reduced effortful learning and excessive cognitive offloading. It says higher education should preserve practices that support deeper learning, such as retrieval practice, spaced revision and generating answers before receiving explanations.
Assessment reform is a major theme. The paper calls for greater attention to evidence of learning processes rather than only to final products. Possible approaches include portfolios, learning journey documentation, reflective tasks, trace data and structured self-assessments.
TEQSA says the paper is not prescriptive and does not form part of its formal guidance notes. Instead, it is intended to support institutional thinking about how quality assurance may need to change as generative AI becomes a normal part of higher education.
Why does it matter?
Generative AI is weakening the reliability of product-based assessment, especially when final essays, reports, or problem solutions are produced or heavily shaped by AI tools. TEQSA’s focus on adaptive capabilities points towards a different quality assurance model: one that values student judgement, process evidence, ethical AI use and deep disciplinary understanding. That matters for universities because they will increasingly need to prove not only that students produced work, but that they learned, reasoned and exercised agency while using AI.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) will honour 12 public sector initiatives at the 2026 UN Public Service Awards for advancing the Sustainable Development Goals through more inclusive, transparent and participatory public services.
The awards attracted more than 700 applications from 62 countries and recognise projects ranging from digital document verification and public procurement monitoring to improving education access and supporting coastal women.
According to UN DESA, several winning initiatives leverage digital government tools, information and communication technologies (ICTs) and AI to improve service delivery and strengthen public administration capacity.
The awards ceremony will be held during the UN Public Service Forum in Tbilisi, Georgia, following the commemoration of UN Public Service Day.
Why does it matter?
The awards highlight how governments are increasingly using digital technologies and AI to improve public service delivery, strengthen administrative capacity and advance sustainable development objectives. From digital verification systems to more transparent procurement processes, technology is becoming an important tool for making public institutions more efficient, accountable and accessible.
The initiative also demonstrates the growing role of digital transformation in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. By recognising successful public-sector innovations from around the world, the awards provide examples of how governments can use technology to address social, economic and governance challenges while promoting inclusion, transparency and citizen participation.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
As AI reshapes economies, societies, and governance systems worldwide, Geneva is increasingly emerging as one of the most important global centres for discussions on the future of digital technologies.
In a recent interview, Diplo Executive Director Jovan Kurbalija described Geneva as a place where multiple dimensions of AI governance intersect. From technical standards and international trade to human rights, humanitarian action, and diplomacy, the city hosts institutions and processes that shape how digital technologies are developed, governed, and used worldwide.
According to Kurbalija, a significant share of global discussions on AI and digital governance takes place within a relatively small area surrounding Geneva’s international district. The concentration of international organisations, diplomatic missions, standards-setting bodies, and expert communities has positioned the city as a unique meeting point for addressing the opportunities and challenges associated with AI.
A hub for global digital governance
Geneva’s importance in digital governance stems largely from the presence of international organisations whose work directly affects the digital ecosystem.
Among them is the World Trade Organization (WTO), which plays a role in shaping the global rules governing trade, supply chains, e-commerce, and the international movement of goods and services that underpin the digital economy. Decisions and discussions within the WTO influence the broader environment in which digital technologies are produced, exchanged, and deployed.
Another key institution is the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the UN specialised agency for information and communication technologies. ITU has long served as a forum for international cooperation on telecommunications and digital technologies, and today plays an increasingly prominent role in discussions related to AI and digital governance.
Although often invisible to users, technical standards play a fundamental role in ensuring interoperability, connectivity, and trust in digital systems. As AI technologies become more integrated into everyday life, standards are expected to play an increasingly important role in areas such as safety, transparency, and accountability.
From Frankenstein to AI: Geneva’s intellectual legacy
Kurbalija also highlighted a less visible but equally important dimension of Geneva’s role in AI governance, its intellectual and historical heritage.
He referred to what Diplo describes as the EspriTech de Genève, the intersection between technological developments and ideas that have emerged from thinkers associated with Geneva throughout history.
One of the most notable examples is Mary Shelley, who wrote Frankenstein near Lake Geneva in 1816. Often regarded as one of the earliest works of science fiction, the novel explores the relationship between creators and their creations, raising questions about responsibility, unintended consequences, and the limits of human control.
More than two centuries later, similar questions continue to shape contemporary debates on AI governance. Discussions surrounding increasingly capable AI systems frequently return to concerns about human oversight, accountability, and the potential consequences of technologies that may act in ways not fully anticipated by their creators.
Kurbalija also pointed to the work of Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges, whose reflections on knowledge, information, and human cognition continue to resonate in an era characterised by large-scale data processing and machine-generated content.
The intellectual traditions associated with Geneva provide a broader context for understanding contemporary AI debates, linking present-day governance questions to longer-standing discussions about technology, knowledge, and humanity.
Geneva as a centre for AI diplomacy
Beyond its historical and institutional significance, Geneva has become an increasingly active venue for international discussions on AI governance.
The city hosts a growing number of meetings, conferences, and policy dialogues dedicated to the governance of AI and other emerging technologies. Among the most prominent is the annual AI for Good Summit, organised by ITU in partnership with other UN agencies and stakeholders. The event brings together governments, international organisations, researchers, private sector representatives, and civil society to explore the societal implications of AI and identify opportunities for international cooperation.
Geneva also hosts a range of other initiatives focused on AI governance, including policy dialogues, expert consultations, and multistakeholder discussions addressing issues such as human rights, health, humanitarian action, sustainable development, trade, and technical standards.
Image via freepik
According to Kurbalija, AI is now on the agenda of many international organisations based in Geneva. Whether addressing healthcare, humanitarian assistance, trade, education, telecommunications, or development, institutions increasingly examine how AI affects their respective mandates and policy objectives.
This growing presence reflects the recognition that AI is not solely a technological issue. Instead, it spans multiple policy domains, requiring coordination among technical experts, policymakers, diplomats, regulators, and affected communities.
Reducing ‘lost in translation’ in AI governance
As AI discussions become more widespread, one challenge frequently identified by policymakers and international organisations is the gap between technological developments and policy understanding.
Kurbalija argues that many stakeholders remain ‘lost in translation’ when trying to understand the implications of AI. Technical terminology, rapidly evolving technologies, and complex governance debates often create barriers for diplomats, policymakers, and officials who are expected to make decisions about AI despite not having technical backgrounds.
To address this challenge, Diplo combines research, capacity development, and practical experimentation.
The organisation conducts research on both the historical roots of AI-related thinking and contemporary governance challenges. At the same time, it develops tools and educational programmes designed to help policymakers better understand the technology and its implications.
A central component of this effort is Diplo’s AI Apprenticeship programme.
Rather than teaching AI solely through theory, the programme encourages participants to learn by building AI applications themselves. Diplomats and officials from different countries work directly with AI tools, gaining practical experience with concepts such as neural networks, large language models (LLMs), and AI systems development.
According to Kurbalija, direct engagement with AI technologies allows participants to move beyond abstract discussions and develop a more practical understanding of how these systems function and where their limitations lie.
Where technology meets humanity
Kurbalija described Geneva as a place where several distinct but interconnected forces converge.
The first is the technological dimension, represented by organisations working on telecommunications, standards, digital infrastructure, and emerging technologies.
The second is the historical and intellectual dimension, reflected in the ideas of thinkers associated with Geneva and the broader region, whose work continues to inform contemporary discussions about technology and society.
Image via Freepik
The third is the diplomatic dimension. Geneva remains one of the world’s most active centres of multilateral diplomacy, hosting permanent missions and representatives from nearly every country. Discussions in Geneva frequently shape global approaches to issues ranging from trade and humanitarian affairs to digital governance and AI.
The fourth is what Kurbalija describes as the human dimension. Many Geneva-based institutions focus on protecting and advancing human welfare through work on human rights, humanitarian action, health, labour, migration, and development.
Together, these dimensions create an environment in which technological innovation can be discussed alongside its social, ethical, economic, and political implications.
Looking ahead
As governments, international organisations, and societies continue to grapple with the opportunities and risks associated with AI, Geneva’s role as a centre for digital governance is likely to become increasingly significant.
The city’s unique combination of technical expertise, standards-setting institutions, diplomatic networks, and human-centred governance traditions provides a platform for addressing complex questions that no single actor or sector can solve alone.
For Kurbalija, this convergence of technology, diplomacy, and humanity represents one of Geneva’s defining characteristics. In a period marked by rapid technological change and growing uncertainty, the city continues to serve as a place where different perspectives can meet to shape the future of AI governance.
As debates around AI evolve, Geneva is likely to remain one of the key venues where those discussions are translated into international cooperation, governance frameworks, and practical solutions with global impact.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The UK government has announced two new AI research labs led by University College London and the University of Oxford, backed by up to £60 million in funding and access to large-scale computing power.
The labs will work on next-generation AI systems that are cheaper to run, more reliable and easier for businesses, researchers and public services to use. Funding will be provided through UK Research and Innovation’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council over six years.
The announcement expands the government’s original plan from one AI lab to two, increasing planned funding from £40 million to up to £60 million. The labs will also receive access to computing resources valued at tens of millions of pounds.
The Science of Fundamental AI Research Lab, or SOFAIR, will be led by Professor David Barber at UCL, with researchers from Cambridge, Oxford and Edinburgh. It will focus on open-source AI technologies that can run on widely available hardware, aiming to reduce dependence on a small number of model providers.
The British Open-ended Learning and Discovery Lab, known as BOLD, will be led by Associate Professor Jakob Foerster at Oxford, in collaboration with UCL and Imperial College London. It will explore AI systems that can learn more efficiently, adapt to new situations and operate in physical environments.
Each lab will receive £2 million to recruit at least 10 doctoral students, supporting the UK’s AI talent pipeline. The labs will also work with existing UK AI research organisations, including the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs.
The funding forms part of UKRI’s wider AI strategy, a £1.6 billion plan to strengthen the UK’s AI research and innovation capacity over the next four years.
Why does it matter?
The investment shows the UK trying to compete in AI through fundamental research, open-source methods and efficient systems rather than only through larger datasets and more computing. By funding labs focused on reliability, lower-cost deployment and widely available hardware, the government is trying to make advanced AI more usable beyond large technology companies. The policy also links AI research to national capability, resilience and a domestic talent pipeline.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Open-source AI startup Reflection has signed a major compute agreement with SpaceXAI, giving the company access to Colossus 2 data centre capacity as it works to develop frontier AI models.
According to Axios, Reflection will begin paying $150 million per month from 1 July 2026 for access to the infrastructure through 2029. The deal is intended to give the Nvidia-backed startup the computing power needed to compete with leading AI companies.
Reflection is developing open-source AI models at a time when access to advanced chips and large-scale data centre capacity has become a major barrier to frontier model development.
The agreement highlights the growing importance of specialised AI infrastructure providers. Rather than building all capacity internally, AI developers are increasingly relying on large compute partnerships to secure the resources needed for training and operating advanced models.
It also points to SpaceXAI’s expanding role in the AI infrastructure market. The company has been offering access to Colossus data centre capacity to AI developers, turning large-scale compute into a strategic asset within the AI ecosystem.
The deal reflects a broader shift in the AI race, where access to GPUs, power, data centres and long-term infrastructure contracts can be as important as model design or software talent.
Why does it matter?
The Reflection-SpaceXAI deal shows how compute access is becoming a decisive factor in AI competition. Open-source AI developers may benefit from wider access to large-scale infrastructure, but such deals also concentrate strategic power among companies that control chips, energy, data centres and financing. That makes AI infrastructure a governance issue, not only a business or engineering concern.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
