ECB researchers use LLMs to measure geoeconomic tension

The European Central Bank (ECB) researchers have published a working paper introducing a Large Language Model-based method for measuring geopolitical and geoeconomic tensions in the euro area.

The paper develops the LLM Geoeconomic and Geopolitical Tension index, or LGPT, using a large dataset of European newspaper articles in local languages.

Researchers analysed almost 20 million articles from newspapers in France, Germany, Italy and Spain, covering the period from 1999 to 2025.

The methodology combines a fine-tuned multilingual BERT model with GPT-4o in a two-stage classification process.

BERT is used to filter articles likely to relate to geopolitical or geoeconomic tension, while GPT-4o classifies relevant articles and extracts structured information.

The index distinguishes narrower geopolitical tensions from geoeconomic tensions, including economic policy or the use of resources for geopolitical purposes.

It also breaks geoeconomic tension into four sources: trade, energy, finance and technology.

The authors argue that the multilingual LLM approach can capture nuance that dictionary-based methods may miss, while providing more granular data for economic analysis.

They also show how the index can be integrated into macroeconomic modelling to assess the effects of geoeconomic tensions on output and inflation in the euro area.

Why does it matter?

The paper shows how LLMs can be used as analytical tools for economic policymaking, not only as chatbots or productivity software. Measuring geoeconomic tension more precisely matters because trade conflict, energy security, financial fragmentation and technology restrictions can affect inflation, output and financial stability in different ways. A multilingual approach is especially relevant for the euro area because it captures local-language reporting from major member states rather than relying only on English-language media or keyword lists.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Australia’s National AI Centre lists Microsoft Copilot training sessions for workers

Australia’s National AI Centre has listed two in-person Microsoft Copilot training sessions in Queensland aimed at helping participants build practical workplace AI skills.

The first session, Intro to Copilot, is scheduled for 7 July from 10:00 to 11:00 at The Precinct in Fortitude Valley. It is designed as an introductory session covering Microsoft Copilot Chat features, strengths and practical workplace uses for people with personal or business accounts.

The second session, Microsoft Copilot Workshop, will be held later the same day from 17:30 to 19:00 at the same venue. It is intended for people who already have access to Copilot at work but use it infrequently or want to build confidence using the tool.

Both Microsoft Copilot training sessions cover the fundamentals of generative AI, Copilot access, interface features, differences between personal and business versions, chat management, prompting techniques, Pages, Agents and responsible AI use. Participants in the workshop are asked to bring a device for hands-on exercises.

The events are hosted by the Queensland Government, with early-bird tickets priced at AUD 25 and general admission at AUD 40. The National AI Centre notes that registration is handled through third-party websites and that it does not endorse or take responsibility for their content.

Why does it matter?

The training sessions reflect a broader shift from introducing generative AI to helping employees use it effectively in day-to-day work. As tools such as Microsoft Copilot become more widely available, organisations are increasingly investing in practical skills such as prompting, workflow integration and responsible AI use.

The initiative also highlights the growing importance of AI literacy as a workforce capability. Building confidence in using AI tools may help organisations improve productivity while encouraging safer and more informed adoption across different sectors.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

NVIDIA unveils RTX Spark for the AI-powered PC era

NVIDIA and Microsoft have introduced RTX Spark, a new Windows PC platform designed for personal AI agents.

NVIDIA describes RTX Spark as a 1-petaflop superchip that combines its AI and graphics stack with Windows-native agent capabilities.

NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture powers the platform and supports up to 128GB of unified memory.

According to NVIDIA, RTX Spark will allow users to run local AI agents, large language models, creative workflows and advanced games on laptops and compact desktop PCs.

The company said the platform can run 120-billion-parameter large language models with up to 1 million tokens of context locally.

NVIDIA and Microsoft are also introducing new Windows security primitives and NVIDIA OpenShell to help agents run securely on primary devices.

OpenShell will allow users to define what agents can and cannot do, route queries to local models according to privacy policies and mask personal information when cloud models are used.

RTX Spark-powered laptops and compact desktops are expected to be available this autumn from manufacturers including ASUS, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Microsoft Surface and MSI, with Acer and GIGABYTE models to follow.

Why does it matter?

RTX Spark reflects the industry shift towards AI-native personal computers, where more AI processing happens locally on the device. Running agents and large models on PCs could improve privacy, reduce latency and make advanced AI tools less dependent on cloud access. The governance question is whether local agents can operate with clear user permissions, strong containment and meaningful accountability as they gain the ability to search files, interact with apps and execute tasks across a personal device.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

AI is reshaping work more through job transformation than job loss, WSIS panel hears

AI is changing the world of work in more complex ways than simply replacing workers, according to experts speaking at the WSIS Forum 2026. Panellists from the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) argued that while AI will automate some tasks, its broader impact will be felt through changing job quality, workplace surveillance, recruitment practices and skills requirements, making human-centred policies essential to ensure workers benefit from the digital transition.

The discussion highlighted that governments, employers and workers all have a role in shaping the future of work, with speakers calling for stronger labour protections, social dialogue and investment in digital skills to prevent AI from deepening existing inequalities.

AI is changing tasks and working conditions more than eliminating jobs

Sher Verick, Head of the Employment Strategies Unit in the Employment Policy Department of the ILO, challenged the widespread narrative that AI will trigger mass unemployment. Presenting findings from the ILO’s AI exposure index, he said around one in four workers worldwide are exposed to AI, yet only 3.3% of global employment falls into occupations that are highly vulnerable to automation.

‘The focus shouldn’t only be on job losses,’ Verick argued, explaining that AI is transforming how work is organised rather than simply eliminating occupations. Jobs involving a diverse range of tasks are more likely to change than disappear, while new roles are already emerging across AI supply chains, including data annotation and other support functions.

He stressed that the most significant impact may be on job quality rather than job numbers. Automated recruitment systems, algorithmic task allocation and AI-driven performance monitoring are already reshaping working conditions across sectors, while productivity gains could eventually create new employment opportunities through wider economic growth.

Algorithmic management raises new concerns for workers

Uma Rani Amara, Senior Economist at the Research Department of the ILO, argued that the conversation about AI should extend well beyond generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to include the algorithmic management systems increasingly used across workplaces.

Drawing on examples from manufacturing and healthcare, she explained that AI-powered surveillance tools, CCTV systems and digital performance dashboards are allowing employers to monitor workers more closely than ever before. While companies often present these technologies as efficiency tools, she warned that they can increase workplace stress, intensify workloads and reduce workers’ autonomy.

In hospitals, digital workflow management systems may improve patient scheduling and resource allocation, but they also place nurses and doctors under greater pressure by increasing workload intensity and extending on-call responsibilities. Even commonly used tools such as messaging applications can create new privacy risks when sensitive information is shared outside secure systems.

Rani also drew attention to what she described as AI’s ‘invisible workforce’, the millions of people, largely based in the Global South, who label data, moderate content, and perform other essential tasks that allow AI systems to function.

‘We should stop calling it AI and start calling it ‘human-in-the-loop intelligence’,’ she said, arguing that AI’s apparent autonomy obscures the human labour underpinning every stage of its development.

She called for stronger protections for these workers through measures such as fair labour standards, mandatory disclosure of AI supply chains and certification systems showing where training data originates and under what working conditions it was produced.

Governments must shape the future of work

Juan Chacaltana, Senior Employment Policies Specialist at ILO, argued that technological change should not be viewed as an inevitable force to which societies simply adapt.

‘The future of work should be shaped through policy,’ he said, presenting findings from an ILO review of 75 employment policy documents that found governments increasingly integrating digital technologies into employment services, labour market information systems and skills programmes.

However, he cautioned against viewing digital tools as a solution in themselves. While technologies can help modernise public employment services and support labour market formalisation, they cannot replace traditional drivers of economic development such as productivity growth, investment and strong institutions.

Chacaltana also warned that governments should avoid using digital tools primarily for surveillance or enforcement. Instead, introducing digital identity systems, AI-assisted public services and labour market technologies should involve workers, employers and other stakeholders through meaningful social dialogue.

The discussion also highlighted groups facing particular risks during the AI transition. Rani warned that young workers could lose the entry-level jobs that traditionally provide experience and career progression, while women risk a ‘double whammy’ of displacement from automation alongside discrimination embedded in biassed AI recruitment systems. Older workers and people in informal employment could also face new forms of exclusion or reduced autonomy as algorithmic systems increasingly influence workplace decisions.

Skills and cooperation are key to an inclusive AI transition

Praachi Kumar, Capacity Development Officer at ITU, said demand for AI-related training has grown rapidly, with interest in AI courses through ITU Academy tripling over the past five years.

The Academy now serves more than 115,000 ICT professionals, the majority from developing countries, while ITU’s Digital Transformation Centres initiative has reached around 700,000 people in underserved communities through digital skills programmes.

Kumar said lifelong learning must remain human-centred, combining technical knowledge with practical experience and peer learning. She also highlighted new multilingual AI governance courses developed in partnership with UNESCO to help address widening skills gaps.

Throughout the discussion, speakers agreed that preparing workers for AI requires far more than technical training. They called for coordinated action across labour, education and technology ministries, alongside stronger partnerships between governments, employers, trade unions and international organisations.

Closing the session, moderator Maria Prieto Berhouet said the debate had consistently returned to one central principle: AI should serve people, not the other way around. Rather than allowing technological change to dictate the future of work, participants argued that governments and social partners must actively shape AI’s role so it enhances productivity while protecting workers’ rights, dignity and opportunities.

Track all key moments from the WSIS Forum 2026 on our dedicated WSIS page.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

WSIS panel calls for a broader approach to youth mental health online

A WSIS Forum 2026 session called for a broader approach to young people’s mental health online, warning that screen time alone is an insufficient measure of digital well-being.

The session, ‘Young people’s mental health in an online world’, examined the impact of digital devices and social media on young people’s mental health, with speakers addressing regulation, education, psychological support and legal remedies.

Alexandre Carette, Information Specialist at the UN in Geneva and moderator of the session, said digital use is not only a concern for young people or experts, but for everyone who relies on digital tools. He linked the discussion to wider UN debates on access, privacy and the role of digital technologies in everyday life.

Niels Weber, a psychologist and psychotherapist in Switzerland specialising in hyperconnectivity, said screen time gives only limited information about young people’s mental health. He argued that the more important questions are what young people do on screens, what they do away from screens, and how digital practices fit into their wider development.

Weber also cautioned against describing most problematic digital use as addiction. He said many platforms are designed to prolong use, but that such a design should be understood as a retention problem rather than automatically as addiction. In clinical terms, he said the more relevant marker is suffering, either for the young person or for families who experience digital use as a constant source of conflict.

Tatiana Debrabandere, Project Manager at the High Council for Media Literacy in Belgium, said that francophone Belgium’s media education framework allows authorities and educators to study children’s and young people’s digital practices across life stages. She said young people are often informed and can have positive online experiences, but that policy debates still focus too much on limiting time online rather than understanding what they actually do there.

Debrabandere said media education should start from young people’s own practices, including what they watch, whom they follow and how they access information. She pointed to influencers and content creators as an important area for media literacy, especially where young people may struggle to distinguish journalism, opinion and commercial promotion.

Daniella Esi Darlington, CEO and co-founder of Alleina AI in Ghana and a member of ITU Secretary-General’s Youth Advisory Board, said young people are among the most active internet users and are therefore often exposed to digital harms. She argued that many platforms are not designed safely enough for young users and that algorithms are built to keep people engaged for long periods.

Darlington also stressed that technology can be part of the response. She cited awareness-raising, advocacy, reporting tools, access to counsellors and AI systems that can help identify cyberbullying as examples of how digital tools can support young people when combined with human oversight.

The panel also discussed loneliness and AI companions. Darlington warned that chatbots should not replace qualified professionals when young people discuss depression, anxiety or other forms of distress. Instead, she said systems should redirect users towards appropriate support and keep humans involved.

Speakers favoured education, dialogue and co-created policy over blanket bans. Debrabandere described political moves in Belgium towards smartphone bans in schools and possible social media restrictions, while Darlington argued that banning social media or internet access would not address the root causes of harm. She said young people also use the internet for research, business, opportunities and communication.

Darlington called for stronger governance frameworks, including child-specific human rights impact assessments in AI and digital policy. She said young people, parents, schools, governments, industry and other stakeholders should be involved in designing safer digital environments.

Weber gave a practical example from therapy, explaining that video games can sometimes help rebuild dialogue between young people and families. By opening a game during a therapy session, he said adults can better understand young people’s emotions, relationships and digital experiences.

Audience interventions raised additional concerns, including neurodivergent children, cyberbullying, individualised media consumption and peer accompaniment models. A participant from Colombia’s regulator asked whether there is sufficient evidence about technology’s impact on mental health and how platforms could be made to take greater responsibility.

Carette said science often shows correlation rather than clear causality, but warned that waiting for definitive proof could delay action. He argued that the lack of transparency in platform business models and algorithms is already a sufficient reason for regulatory attention, not only for young people but for society as a whole.

The session concluded that young people’s digital well-being should be understood in context, taking account of platform design, family life, education, loneliness, social pressure and access to support. Rather than relying only on bans or addiction labels, speakers pointed to media literacy, dialogue, youth participation and stronger accountability for technology providers.

Track all key moments from the WSIS Forum 2026 on our dedicated WSIS page.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

UN pension fund case study highlights ServiceNow CRM rollout

An AI for Good Global Summit 2026 session will examine how the UN Joint Staff Pension Fund used AI and ServiceNow-based CRM tools to support digital services for more than 250,000 beneficiaries.

The session, titled How AI + ServiceNow powers UNJSPF for 250K+ beneficiaries, is scheduled for 7 July on the Solutions Stage.

According to the session description, the case study will focus on how AI and ServiceNow CRM were combined through NPSM, described as an AI-native platform built on ServiceNow.

Organisers say the implementation supported unified workflows, intelligent automation, improved visibility and a better user experience.

The session will also examine how the platform was designed to meet the security, scale and operational requirements of a UN system serving diverse stakeholders worldwide.

The case study is expected to offer lessons for nonprofits and humanitarian organisations seeking to move away from fragmented systems and simplify service delivery.

It will frame AI-enabled CRM and workflow automation as tools for reducing operational complexity and enabling organisations to allocate more resources to mission delivery.

Why does it matter?

The session shows how AI-enabled CRM and workflow tools are moving into large public-interest institutions, not only commercial customer service. For UN agencies, pension funds and nonprofits, the main question is whether such platforms can simplify operations while preserving security, accountability, data protection and reliable service delivery on a global scale. The case is useful, but it should be read as a platform case study rather than independent proof of measured impact.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UNCTAD says digital divide goes beyond internet access

UNCTAD has warned that closing the digital divide now requires more than expanding internet access, as AI reshapes trade, production and development prospects.

The organisation said digital inclusion increasingly depends on whether developing countries can use digital tools and AI to build productive capacity, support local firms, create jobs and expand trade opportunities.

Its analysis argues that digital skills, institutional capacity, data governance and fairer participation in the digital economy must match connectivity.

UNCTAD said developing countries need stronger local expertise and greater influence over how data is governed, rather than relying only on digital trade arrangements shaped by larger economies.

Building domestic AI and data capacity through skills development, technology transfer and policy support could reduce long-term dependence on foreign platforms, infrastructure and funding.

The article also points to examples of national capacity-building, including Ghana’s efforts to develop local technical expertise for digital policy.

UNCTAD also pointed out its work on e-commerce, digital trade, data governance and the digital economy supports countries in identifying policy options suited to their development needs.

The organisation also highlighted tools such as its Frontier Technologies Readiness Index and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Reviews as ways to help governments assess readiness and strengthen digital policy.

Why does it matter?

UNCTAD’s framing shows that the digital divide is becoming a question of capability rather than connectivity alone. Countries may have internet access but still lack the skills, institutions, data governance and domestic technology base needed to benefit from AI-driven economic change. The issue is therefore moving from infrastructure policy into trade, development, technology transfer and digital sovereignty debates. For developing countries, the risk is not only being offline, but also being dependent on external platforms and excluded from shaping the rules and value chains of the AI economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI governance must move from principles to practical action, UN dialogue hears

Bridging the global AI divide will require much more than expanding access to AI tools, participants heard during a thematic session of the United Nations Global Dialogue on AI Governance. Speakers argued that countries need digital infrastructure, reliable electricity, skilled workforces, trusted institutions and governance capacity if they are to shape AI on their own terms rather than simply consume technologies developed elsewhere.

Throughout the discussion, governments, UN agencies, academics and industry representatives stressed that the next phase of AI governance should focus on implementation. They called for stronger international cooperation, investment in local capabilities and practical measures to ensure AI contributes to sustainable development instead of reinforcing existing inequalities.

Capacity building means creating AI, not just using it

Opening the session, Robert Opp of the UN Development Programme (UNDP) argued that the world is moving from a digital divide to an AI divide, one shaped not only by access to technology but also by countries’ ability to adopt, govern and develop AI responsibly.

Loretta Hieber Girardet of the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) added that governments need trusted institutions, robust data systems and technical expertise if AI is to improve disaster resilience and public services.

The session’s co-chairs, Rashid Khan, Co-Founder of Yellow.ai, and Mark Alexandre Doumba, Gabon’s Minister of Digital Economy and Innovation, reinforced that message by arguing that AI governance should now move beyond high-level principles towards practical action. Khan said the challenge is no longer agreeing that AI should be inclusive and trustworthy, but creating the standards, infrastructure and skills needed to make those principles meaningful.

Doumba argued that developing countries should not try to replicate the resource-intensive path taken by major AI powers. Instead, they should build AI ecosystems suited to their own economies, languages and cultural contexts.

‘We should not measure success by who builds the biggest models,’ he suggested, but by whether AI creates jobs, improves public services and supports local innovation.

Several participants also stressed that capacity development must extend far beyond basic AI literacy. Shikoh Gitau argued that countries should become creators of AI rather than passive users, describing the goal as building AI ‘for us, by us’. That requires investment not only in technical skills, but also in research, standards, financing and local entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Government representatives echoed that assessment. Speakers from South Africa, Bangladesh, Nepal, Oman and Ethiopia all identified electricity, connectivity, computing power, public-sector capacity and access to quality data as essential foundations for meaningful AI participation.

Environmental sustainability moves to the centre of AI governance

One of the strongest themes throughout the discussion was that environmental sustainability should no longer be treated as a secondary issue in AI governance.

The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) argued that AI depends on extensive use of electricity, water, minerals and manufacturing while also generating growing volumes of electronic waste. Because these impacts extend across entire supply chains, speakers said governance should address AI’s full environmental lifecycle rather than focusing solely on the operation of AI models.

Participants also highlighted questions of environmental justice. Several speakers warned that many of the environmental costs associated with AI infrastructure, including mining, water consumption and waste, are disproportionately borne by communities in developing countries that receive relatively few of AI’s economic benefits.

Rather than assuming AI will automatically solve environmental challenges, panellists called for internationally comparable methods to measure AI’s environmental footprint, greater transparency from technology companies and stronger accountability across supply chains.

The discussion reflected a broader shift in international AI policy debates, with environmental sustainability increasingly treated as a core governance issue alongside safety, human rights and economic development.

Local languages and cultures must shape AI development

Another recurring message was that AI will only become genuinely global if it better reflects the world’s linguistic and cultural diversity.

Estonian President Alar Karis described how Estonia has invested heavily to ensure that AI systems can operate effectively in the Estonian language, despite the country’s relatively small population. Alongside partnerships with companies such as OpenAI and Google, Estonia has focused on training teachers, integrating AI into education and ensuring that modern Estonian-language content remains available for future AI systems.

Other speakers argued that similar efforts are needed worldwide. They noted that current AI models overwhelmingly favour dominant languages, leaving thousands of languages and many indigenous knowledge systems largely excluded from the AI ecosystem.

Several participants warned that countries lacking local datasets, evaluation benchmarks and language resources risk becoming dependent on technologies designed for entirely different cultural contexts.

The discussion also highlighted the importance of standards and international cooperation. UNESCO presented its ongoing work to implement its Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence through large-scale training programmes, language-diversity initiatives and AI competency frameworks for teachers and public officials.

Meanwhile, standards experts argued that participation in international standard-setting should itself be viewed as a form of capacity development, enabling developing countries to help shape the technical foundations of future AI systems.

Trust, children’s rights and implementation now take priority

Beyond infrastructure and capacity, speakers repeatedly argued that trust will determine whether AI delivers a broad public benefit. Participants emphasised that trustworthy AI requires transparent governance, accountable institutions and meaningful public oversight rather than technical performance alone.

Children’s rights received particular attention during the session. UNICEF warned that children are adopting AI technologies faster than adults are learning to regulate them, creating new risks around privacy, safety and development. Representatives called for child-centred benchmarks, stronger safeguards for children’s data and mandatory child-rights impact assessments for AI systems deployed in education, healthcare and other public services.

Several speakers also argued that governance should focus more on AI deployment than on frontier model development alone, ensuring that systems remain accountable throughout their lifecycle and can be adapted to local social and institutional realities.

Closing the session, Khan and Doumba returned to the discussion’s central message: that AI governance should ultimately be judged by practical outcomes rather than technological competition. Countries need the capability to shape AI according to their own priorities, they said, while international cooperation should ensure that no society is left behind.

Participants were encouraged to leave Geneva not simply with new principles, but with concrete commitments on financing, infrastructure, skills and cooperation that can be reviewed when the Global Dialogue reconvenes in 2027.

Track all key moments from the Global Dialogue on AI Governance inaugural meeting on our dedicated page.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Germany launches Agentic AI Hub for public administration

Germany is testing agentic AI in public administration through a federal programme that brings startups and municipalities together to automate routine administrative work.

The Federal Ministry runs the Agentic AI Hub for Digital Transformation and Government Modernization and DigitalService.

The initiative focuses on autonomous systems that can review requests, analyse documents and prepare decision proposals.

BMDS and DigitalService selected 20 pilot projects involving 19 municipalities and nine startups from almost 600 applications.

The pilots cover five areas: citizen interaction, social benefit and care applications, internal administrative processes, digital tools and infrastructure for sovereign AI applications.

Examples include support for housing entitlement certificates, housing assistance, long-term care assistance, naturalisation processes, meeting transcription, request pre-sorting and AI orchestration layers.

The pilots ran from March to the end of May 2026 and are being assessed for effectiveness and scalability.

DigitalService says the programme is intended to identify legal, organisational and technological conditions for broader use of agentic AI in public administration.

Why does it matter?

Germany’s Agentic AI Hub shows how governments are beginning to test AI agents in real administrative workflows, not only in strategy papers or chatbots. Municipalities are a critical testing ground because they often face staff shortages, high case volumes and legacy processes. The key policy question is whether agentic AI can reduce administrative burdens while preserving legality, accountability, human oversight, data protection and digital sovereignty.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Portugal links AI literacy to lifelong digital skills strategy

Portugal has linked Europe’s new digital education agenda with its national efforts to expand AI literacy and lifelong digital skills.

The government’s digital portal said digital education is becoming a strategic priority for both the EU and Portugal, as technology becomes more central to schools, work, public services and civic participation.

The update follows the annual event of the European Digital Education Hub, an initiative of the European Commission under the Digital Education Action Plan.

One focus was the new AI Literacy Framework, developed by the European Commission and the OECD with support from international experts.

The framework is designed for primary and secondary education and aims to help schools, teachers and policymakers integrate AI responsibly into learning environments.

It is structured around four areas: engaging with AI, creating with AI, managing AI, and designing and shaping AI.

Portugal said AI education should include personal data protection, critical thinking, the fight against misinformation and the ethical, safe and responsible use of AI tools.

The national agenda is linked to the Portugal Digital Strategy and the Digital Skills Pact, which aims to train 2.8 million people by 2030.

Planned measures include Community Digital Agents, mobile digital training units and a digital training wallet integrated into the Gov.pt app, with particular attention to vulnerable groups, rural areas and citizens aged 45 to 70 with lower education levels.

Why does it matter?

Portugal’s approach shows how AI literacy is becoming part of wider digital inclusion policy, not only school curricula. Linking the EU AI Literacy Framework with lifelong digital-skills programmes could help citizens use digital public services, participate more confidently online and understand AI-related risks such as privacy, misinformation and unsafe use. The strategy also reflects a broader European shift from basic digital skills towards continuous training across education, employment and public administration.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!