Google warns adversaries are industrialising AI-enabled cyberattacks

Google Threat Intelligence Group says cyber adversaries are moving from early AI experimentation towards the industrial-scale use of generative models across malicious workflows.

In a new report, GTIG says it has identified, for the first time, a threat actor using a zero-day exploit that it believes was developed with AI. The criminal actor had planned to use the exploit in a mass exploitation campaign involving a two-factor authentication bypass, but Google said its proactive discovery may have prevented the campaign from going ahead.

The findings describe several uses of AI in cyber operations. Threat actors linked to the People’s Republic of China and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea have used AI for vulnerability research, including persona-based prompting, specialised vulnerability datasets and automated analysis of vulnerabilities and proof-of-concept exploits.

Other actors have used AI-assisted coding to support defence evasion, including the development of obfuscation tools, relay infrastructure and malware containing AI-generated decoy logic. Google said these uses show how generative models can accelerate development cycles and make malicious tools harder to detect.

Google also highlights PROMPTSPY, an Android backdoor that uses Gemini API capabilities to interpret device interfaces, generate structured commands, simulate gestures and support more autonomous malware behaviour. The company said it had disabled assets linked to the activity and that no apps containing PROMPTSPY were found on Google Play at the time of its current detection.

AI systems are also becoming direct targets. Google says attackers are compromising AI software dependencies, open-source agent skills, API connectors and AI gateway tools such as LiteLLM. The report warns that such supply-chain attacks could expose API secrets, enable ransomware activity or allow intruders to use internal AI systems for reconnaissance, data theft and deeper network access.

Why does it matter?

Google’s findings suggest that AI-enabled cyber activity is moving beyond basic phishing support or faster research. Generative models are now being used in vulnerability discovery, exploit development, malware obfuscation, autonomous device interaction, information operations and attacks on AI infrastructure itself. That could make some attacks faster, more adaptive and harder to detect, while also turning AI platforms, integrations and supply chains into part of the cyberattack surface.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

New research initiative targets biology with quantum computing and AI

Google has launched REPLIQA, a life sciences and quantum AI research programme backed by a $10 million commitment to five universities. The initiative aims to apply advanced quantum science and AI to biological research, with a long-term focus on improving understanding of human biology and health.

Google Quantum AI and Google.org lead the programme and will support research into complex molecular interactions, including biological processes such as protein folding and cellular responses to new drugs. Google says classical computers often struggle to simulate such interactions accurately, while quantum technologies operate according to the same physical principles that govern molecules.

The funding will support work at Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of California, San Diego, the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the University of Arizona. Google says the programme is intended to build a shared scientific ecosystem around quantum science, AI and life sciences.

The initiative will focus on foundational tools such as quantum sensors and quantum-enhanced AI algorithms that could support future discoveries in biological science and drug development. Google describes REPLIQA as a long-term research effort rather than a programme expected to produce immediate results.

Why does it matter?

REPLIQA points to growing interest in combining quantum science, AI and life sciences to address biological problems that are difficult for classical computing to model. Its significance lies less in immediate health applications and more in the research infrastructure it aims to build: sensors, algorithms and academic partnerships that could eventually improve biological simulations and support future medical discovery.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

UNESCO explores how AI and design can reshape culture and creativity

UNESCO’s Regional Office for East Asia has launched a global call for good practice cases on how AI and design are being used to support culture, creativity, education, sustainability and social inclusion.

The call invites submissions from organisations, institutions, practitioners, educators and innovators using AI together with design approaches to create positive outcomes in cultural and creative sectors. UNESCO says the initiative is looking for practical examples that support culture, creativity, livelihoods, learning, sustainability and social inclusion.

The call focuses on four thematic areas: cultural heritage protection, documentation and interpretation; cultural tourism and visitor experience design; fashion and creative industry innovation; and design education and capacity development.

Selected projects may receive UNESCO recognition, be included in a publication or catalogue, participate in exhibitions or showcases, receive invitations to talks or events, and gain visibility through UNESCO communication channels.

The initiative reflects growing international interest in how AI can support creative and cultural sectors beyond industrial productivity. UNESCO’s framing places design principles such as inclusion, accessibility, cultural relevance and people-centred use at the centre of responsible AI deployment in cultural and educational contexts.

Submissions are open until 15 June 2026, with selected cases scheduled to be announced on 15 July 2026. Applications may be submitted in English or Chinese and are expected to demonstrate practical examples of AI supporting learning, livelihoods, creativity or sustainable development through design-oriented approaches.

Why does it matter?

The call points to a wider effort to shape AI use in culture and creativity around public value rather than solely on automation. By focusing on heritage, tourism, fashion and design education, UNESCO is encouraging examples where AI supports local knowledge, creative livelihoods, cultural access and inclusive innovation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Canada invests in AI and quantum technology firms in British Columbia

Gregor Robertson, Minister of Housing and Infrastructure and Minister responsible for Pacific Economic Development Canada (PacifiCan), announced more than C$17.3 million in funding for eight British Columbia technology companies to accelerate the commercialisation and adoption of AI and quantum technologies.

Through PacifiCan, the federal government is supporting projects focused on robotics, semiconductor manufacturing, AI infrastructure, and quantum supply chains as part of a broader strategy to strengthen domestic innovation and sovereign technology capabilities.

A major share of the investment will support Human in Motion Robotics, which received CAD$3 million to commercialise its AI-powered XoMotion wearable robotic exoskeleton. The company plans to integrate AI into mobility systems, expand manufacturing, and move the technology beyond clinical environments into homes and community settings for people with spinal cord injuries and neurological conditions.

Another funded company, Dream Photonics, will receive more than CAD$1.1 million to establish pilot manufacturing for optical interconnect technologies used in AI and quantum chips. The project aims to strengthen Canada’s domestic semiconductor and quantum ecosystem while creating skilled technology jobs in British Columbia.

The announcement also highlighted the rapid expansion of British Columbia’s AI ecosystem, which now includes nearly 600 AI companies. Canadian officials linked the investments to broader efforts to secure domestic compute infrastructure, strengthen AI supply chains, and position Canada competitively in emerging technologies ahead of events such as Web Summit Vancouver.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Canada advances sovereign AI data centre strategy with TELUS

The Canadian government and TELUS are advancing plans to develop large-scale sovereign AI infrastructure as part of Ottawa’s broader strategy to strengthen domestic compute capacity and support the country’s AI ecosystem.

The initiative was announced by Evan Solomon (Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario) and focuses on a proposed AI data centre project in British Columbia designed to support researchers, businesses, and academic institutions.

A project that forms part of Canada’s ‘Enabling large-scale sovereign AI data centres’ initiative, which was introduced under Budget 2025. Ottawa stated that sovereign compute infrastructure is increasingly important for maintaining national competitiveness in AI while ensuring Canadian data, intellectual property, and economic value remain within the country.

The government also confirmed that no formal funding commitments have yet been distributed, with discussions currently progressing through non-binding memoranda of understanding with selected industry participants.

Local officials argued that large-scale compute infrastructure has become a strategic economic requirement as governments worldwide race to expand AI processing capabilities. Canada believes it holds competitive advantages due to its colder climate, sustainable energy resources, and network infrastructure, all of which could help attract future AI investment and hyperscale data centre development.

Why does it matter?

The race for sovereign AI infrastructure is rapidly becoming one of the most important geopolitical and economic competitions of the digital era. The Canada-TELUS partnership illustrates how countries are moving beyond AI model development alone and shifting focus towards the physical infrastructure required to sustain future AI ecosystems, including data centres, energy capacity, semiconductors, and domestic compute networks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Joint cybersecurity agencies publish guidance on secure adoption of agentic AI

Cybersecurity agencies from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States have published joint guidance on the careful adoption of agentic AI services in organisational IT environments.

The guidance is intended to help organisations design, develop, deploy and operate agentic AI systems, and to make informed risk assessments and mitigations. It primarily focuses on large-language-model-based agentic AI systems.

The publication examines threats to and vulnerabilities within agentic AI systems, including risks introduced through system components, integrations and downstream use. It also considers broader risks arising from agentic AI behaviour in IT environments.

The guidance covers wider agentic AI security considerations, specific security risks, best practices for securing agentic AI systems and steps organisations can take to prepare for emerging and future threats.

It was co-authored by the Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the US National Security Agency, the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, the New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre and the UK National Cyber Security Centre.

Why does it matter?

Agentic AI systems can act with greater autonomy than conventional software tools, including by interacting with other systems, using integrations and taking steps towards defined goals. That creates new cybersecurity risks when such tools are embedded in organisational IT environments. The joint guidance shows that major cyber agencies are treating agentic AI as an emerging operational security issue, not only as a question of AI policy or experimentation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Health New Zealand issues guidance on use of generative AI and large language models

Health New Zealand has published new guidance on generative AI and large language models for healthcare settings.

The guidance states that the National Artificial Intelligence and Algorithm Expert Advisory Group evaluates the use of generative AI tools and LLMs and recommends caution in their application across Health New Zealand environments. It notes that further data is needed to assess risks and benefits in the New Zealand health context.

Employees and contractors are prohibited from entering personal, confidential or sensitive patient or organisational information into unapproved LLMs or generative AI tools. The guidance also says such tools must not be used for clinical decisions or personalised patient advice.

Staff using generative AI tools in other contexts must take full responsibility for checking the information generated and acknowledge when generative AI has been used to create content. Anyone planning to use generative AI or LLMs is also asked to seek advice from the advisory group.

The guidance highlights potential risks including privacy breaches, inaccurate or misleading outputs, bias in training data, lack of transparency in model outputs, data sovereignty concerns and intellectual property risks. It also notes that generative AI systems may not adequately support te reo Māori and other minority languages spoken in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Why does it matter?

The guidance shows how health systems are beginning to set practical boundaries for generative AI before its use becomes routine in clinical and administrative settings. By prohibiting unapproved tools for patient data, clinical decisions and personalised advice, Health New Zealand is drawing a clear line between limited productivity uses and high-risk healthcare applications. In contrast, its references to Māori data sovereignty and language support widen the governance frame to include equity, cultural rights and data protection concerns that standard technology policies may not fully address.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

WEF report says HR leaders will shape the success of AI transformation

AI is reshaping how companies organise labour, distribute decision-making and redesign internal operations, making workforce strategy a central part of AI adoption.

Writing for the World Economic Forum, Al-Futtaim Group HR director David Henderson argues that many AI projects fail because organisations focus too heavily on technology while neglecting the need to change work, accountability, and operational processes.

The article says successful AI adoption depends on how effectively businesses combine human judgement with machine-driven systems, rather than treating automation as a standalone software rollout.

Using Garry Kasparov’s ‘advanced chess’ model after his 1997 defeat to IBM’s Deep Blue as an example, Henderson highlights how humans working alongside computers eventually outperformed both machines and grandmasters operating independently.

He suggests the same principle is now emerging across modern enterprises, where stronger results come from integrating AI directly into operational workflows rather than isolating it in technical departments.

The article identifies four major responsibilities for HR leaders during AI transformation. As ‘design architects’, Chief Human Resources Officers are expected to redefine which decisions remain human-led, which become AI-assisted and how accountability is distributed across organisations. As ‘capability stewards’, they must build continuous AI learning systems rather than rely on occasional employee training programmes.

HR leaders are also described as ‘adoption catalysts’, responsible for helping frontline employees integrate AI into daily workflows, and as ‘transition guardians’, tasked with managing concerns linked to surveillance, bias, fairness, employability and workforce trust.

Several companies are cited as examples of that transition. Procter & Gamble embedded AI engineers and data scientists directly within operational business units rather than centralising them within analytics teams.

Zurich Insurance developed enterprise-wide AI learning systems focused on transferable skills and workforce redeployment, while Al-Futtaim enabled frontline retail teams to develop AI-supported customer recommendation systems through agile operational groups rather than top-down executive planning.

Why does it matter?

AI competitiveness increasingly depends on organisational adaptability instead of access to technology alone. Workforce redesign, reskilling systems, internal trust, and operational flexibility are becoming critical strategic advantages as automation expands across industries. WEF’s argument highlights how HR departments are evolving from administrative functions into central actors shaping AI governance, labour transformation, and long-term business resilience.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Young users’ reliance on ChatGPT raises questions over AI advice and autonomy

Sam Altman has described a generational divide in how people use ChatGPT, saying younger users are integrating the tool more deeply into learning, planning and everyday decision-making.

Speaking at Sequoia Capital’s AI Ascent 2025, the OpenAI CEO said older users tend to treat ChatGPT more like a search tool, while people in their 20s and 30s often use it as a personal advisor. College students, he said, are going further by treating ChatGPT almost like an operating system, connecting it to files, tasks and complex workflows.

The remarks point to a shift in how AI tools are being embedded into daily routines, particularly among students and younger adults. Business Insider reported that a February 2025 OpenAI report found US college students were among the platform’s most frequent users, while a Pew Research Centre survey found that 26% of US teens aged 13 to 17 used ChatGPT for schoolwork in 2024, double the share recorded in 2023.

Altman’s comments also raise questions about dependence, accuracy and boundaries as AI systems move closer to advisory roles. While users may benefit from private spaces to test ideas, organise tasks and prepare decisions, concerns remain over over-reliance, data privacy and the shifting role of human relationships in decision-making.

Why does it matter?

The trend suggests that AI is becoming more than an information tool for younger users. As ChatGPT and similar systems become part of studying, planning and personal decision-making, they influence not only how information is consumed, but also how habits, confidence and judgement develop.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

European Commission moves to standardise AI transparency obligations

The European Commission has published draft guidelines outlining how transparency obligations under Article 50 of the AI Act should be applied across certain AI systems. The guidance is intended to help competent authorities, providers and deployers ensure compliance in a consistent, effective and uniform manner.

Prepared in parallel with a separate Code of Practice on the marking and labelling of AI-generated content, the draft guidelines clarify the scope of legal obligations and address areas not covered by the code. The focus is on helping users identify when they are interacting with AI systems or encountering AI-generated content.

A targeted consultation is open until 3 June, allowing stakeholders to provide feedback on the draft framework. The consultation will inform the final version of the guidelines, which are intended to support more consistent implementation and enforcement of Article 50 obligations across the EU.

The initiative reflects a broader regulatory push in the European Union to strengthen oversight of AI transparency, particularly as generative AI tools become more widely used in content creation, communication and digital services.

Why does it matter?

Transparency obligations are central to the AI Act‘s approach to trust in digital environments. Clear disclosure and labelling requirements can help users understand when they are interacting with AI systems or encountering AI-generated material, reducing risks linked to manipulation, misinformation and misplaced reliance on machine-generated outputs.

Consistent guidance also matters for legal certainty. Providers and deployers need clearer expectations on how Article 50 applies in practice, while regulators need a common basis for enforcement across member states.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!