The Power of Youth Voices to Reshape the Data Economy (Datasphere Initiative)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Audience

The analysis explores the power dynamics surrounding youth and decision-making in both developed and developing economies. It examines the factors that influence youth empowerment and highlights the differences between these two categories of economies.

In the developed world, there is a negative sentiment regarding the level of power held by youth in decision-making processes. Past youth movements, such as the one in ’68, have not translated into sustained influence for young people. Despite previous efforts to amplify the voices of young individuals, there is still a prevailing lack of power in decision-making structures.

In contrast, in developing economies, cultural and traditional norms act as barriers preventing youth from gaining power in decision-making. These norms impose constraints on young individuals’ ability to participate fully in decision-making processes. This observation reflects a negative sentiment towards the cultural and traditional norms that hinder youth empowerment.

However, there is also a positive sentiment when it comes to the potential for youth to gain power in developing economies due to their demographic advantage. The majority of the population in these economies falls into the youth category. With half of the population belonging to this age group, there is considerable potential for the youth to leverage their numbers and demand increased decision-making power.

Moreover, the analysis suggests that developed and developing economies require different strategies for youth and policy-making. This notion reflects a neutral sentiment, acknowledging the need for tailored approaches to address the specific challenges faced by youth in each category of economy. The analysis notes the presence of different demographic structures between developed and developing economies, which may necessitate distinct approaches to youth engagement in decision-making processes.

Overall, the analysis provides insights into the power dynamics surrounding youth and decision-making in developed and developing economies. It highlights the persisting lack of power for youth in the developed world, the influence of cultural and traditional norms hindering youth empowerment in developing economies, and the potential for youth to gain power in such economies due to their demographic advantage. Additionally, the analysis emphasizes the need for tailored strategies to address youth participation in decision-making processes based on the unique characteristics of each economy.

Nicholas Field

Nicholas Field draws attention to the lack of youth representation in various domains, such as data governance, law-making, and data policymaking. He argues that the voices of young people should be included in these processes to ensure a more inclusive and equitable society. Field highlights the underrepresentation of youth in these areas and points out that only 2.6% of parliamentarians worldwide are under 30 years old, emphasising the need for greater youth involvement.

One initiative working towards addressing this issue is the DataSphere Initiative. This initiative focuses on building agile frameworks for responsible data use and aims to unlock the value of data for all individuals. It does this by amplifying voices, conducting research on data challenges and opportunities, and experimenting with data sharing solutions. Field outlines the mission of the DataSphere Initiative, highlighting its goal of creating a more inclusive and accessible data environment.

Field also discusses the evolving relationship between youth and technology. He notes that technological advancements have shaped different generations, such as the introduction of telephone lines a century ago and the advent of colour TVs for parents’ generation. Field expresses excitement about the future of technology and how it will impact today’s youth, who are growing up with smartphones and iPads. He believes that young people have the potential to make significant contributions to innovation and infrastructure.

In addition to advocating for youth involvement, Field emphasises the importance of project continuity. He highlights the negative impact of a lack of continuity in certain projects, which can lead to knowledge and experience loss. Field suggests that maintaining continuity is crucial for preserving valuable expertise and preventing setbacks.

In conclusion, Field’s arguments and observations highlight the underrepresentation of youth in various sectors, including data governance and policy-making. He advocates for their inclusion and active participation, emphasising the role of young people in decision-making processes and ensuring an equitable data economy. The DataSphere Initiative is one initiative aiming to address this issue by creating more accessible data frameworks. Moreover, Field is optimistic about the transformative potential of technology for youth and stresses the importance of project continuity to prevent knowledge loss. Overall, there is a strong call for actively engaging youth in policy discussions and advocating for their involvement and representation to build a more inclusive and innovative society.

Sylvia Poll

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is committed to achieving universal, meaningful connectivity by addressing the global digital divide. Currently, there are 2.6 billion people without internet access, and the ITU aims to bridge this gap and provide equal opportunities for everyone.

The ITU focuses on the inclusion of youth as key stakeholders in decision-making processes and shaping digital policies. Recognizing the significant role young people play in driving innovation and addressing digital challenges, initiatives like Generation Connect directly engage global youth and encourage their meaningful participation in digital change. Programs such as intergenerational dialogues and the Generation Connect Youth and Voice initiative provide platforms for youth to express their views, challenges, and ideas on subjects like cybersecurity and artificial intelligence.

Digital skills are crucial for young people to fully utilize connectivity. While access to devices is important, many individuals, particularly young ones, may lack the necessary skills to effectively navigate the digital world. The ITU emphasizes the need to equip young people with the digital skills required for active participation in the digital economy.

Digital inclusion is a priority for the ITU. Recognizing the specific needs of different groups, including children, young people, older persons, persons with disabilities, women, and girls, the ITU supports initiatives that ensure safe internet use for children, bridge the digital divide for persons with disabilities, and address connectivity issues for women and girls, especially during the ongoing pandemic.

Equitable connectivity for young people is necessary as they are the most digitally inclined generation and can leverage their skills and knowledge to advance the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Statistics from the ITU’s latest Facts and Figures report reveal that approximately 80% of youth aged 15 to 24 are online compared to 65% of other age groups. However, it is essential to note that approximately 20% of global youth have never connected to the internet. Collaborations with organizations like Huawei have resulted in programs such as the Youth Leadership Program, aiming to bridge this gap.

Youth also play a significant role in the development and implementation of data policies. They bring a fresh perspective and have the potential for innovation, leading to new policy ideas. Their awareness of topical issues and advocacy for fairness, equality, and transparency can enhance the effectiveness and equity of data policies.

Inclusion of youth in discussions and developments is crucial for future innovation while ensuring the preservation of human rights. The ITU recognizes the importance of listening to young people and valuing their perspectives. The organization finds value in having young interns who bring a unique perspective to the table. Additionally, the success of decisions and policies should be evaluated from the perspective of young people.

The definition of youth varies across regions and cultures. The UN Youth Envoy’s Office identifies youth as individuals aged 15 to 24, but the ITU acknowledges different definitions, such as the African region’s, which includes individuals up to 35. This highlights the need for flexibility in addressing the specific mandates and requirements of different organizations.

In conclusion, the ITU actively works towards achieving universal, meaningful connectivity by addressing the digital divide and ensuring the inclusion of all individuals, especially youth, in the digital revolution. The organization recognizes the potential of youth and the importance of their participation in decision-making processes, the development of digital skills, and the shaping of data policies. By engaging and empowering young people, the ITU aims to create a more equitable and inclusive digital future for all.

Céliane Pochon

The analysis explores different perspectives on the involvement of young people in digital governance and decision-making processes. Switzerland is highlighted as a country actively promoting the concept of digital self-determination and placing value on inclusive global data governance arrangements. The country has established a national network comprising public administration, universities, industry, and civil society to collaborate on the development of shared approaches to data control.

However, concerns arise regarding the limited input young people have in the development and research process of digital technology, with their involvement often limited only to the final product. This lack of inclusion raises questions about the ability of young people to contribute to the creation of digital tech and potentially excludes their unique perspectives from shaping advancements in this field.

Additionally, the digital divide is highlighted as a challenge, especially for young people in developing countries. With 90% of the world’s youth residing in these regions, the lack of inclusivity in the digital realm can have profound impacts on their future opportunities. Bridging this divide is crucial for ensuring equal access to digital technologies and empowering young people to participate fully in the digital era.

On a positive note, the analysis acknowledges that young people bring valuable contributions to various areas through youth-led solutions. These contributions encompass significant issues such as health and well-being, climate action, and equality. Their digital proficiency, innovation, creativity, and determination to make a meaningful impact make them key stakeholders in shaping the future.

In the context of policy-making and digital governance, it is emphasized that young people must be included and represented at all levels. Switzerland sets an example by hosting an annual Internet Governance Forum where youth are included, and the significance of youth perspectives in policy-making is emphasized by individuals such as Céliane Pochon. Including their voices allows for a broader representation of the population and ensures that decisions made are genuinely inclusive.

Partnerships with youth organizations are identified as a means to enhance the inclusion of young people in policy-making processes. Collaboration between these organizations and governmental bodies can create avenues for meaningful youth involvement and ensure that their perspectives are considered in shaping policies that affect them.

Education and training programs on data governance are advocated as an essential step in preparing young people for future policy-making roles. By introducing these programs in schools and universities, young people can gain the necessary knowledge and skills to contribute effectively to the development and implementation of policies regarding data governance.

Finally, the analysis highlights the importance of including young people’s voices in important discussions, despite their potential lack of expertise or experience. It recognizes the unique perspective that young people can bring to the table and acknowledges the value of their contributions. By fostering a belief in themselves and their ability to contribute, young people can play a vital role in shaping policies and decisions that impact their lives and the lives of others.

In summary, the analysis emphasizes the need for greater inclusion of young people in digital governance and decision-making processes. Switzerland’s active promotion of digital self-determination and inclusive global data governance arrangements sets a positive example. However, there are concerns about limited young people’s involvement in the development of digital tech and the challenges posed by the digital divide, particularly in developing countries. On a positive note, young people’s contributions in various domains, their digital skills and creativity, and their potential to shape the future world are recognized. The analysis underscores the importance of including youth perspectives in policy-making and digital governance, advocating for their representation at all levels. Partnerships with youth organizations and the introduction of education and training programs on data governance are recommended as strategies to enhance youth involvement. Overall, the analysis highlights the necessity of including young people’s voices in important discussions, recognizing their unique perspectives and contributions.

Andrea Palomino Flores

The discussions revolve around the importance of meaningful engagement with young people in decision-making processes. The participants highlight complaints about token participation, where young people feel their involvement is minimal and insignificant. Additionally, personal experiences from youth summits demonstrate the necessity of their engagement. To address these concerns, it is argued that young people should have a role in decision-making, as their perspectives may differ from those of the decision-makers. This diversity in viewpoints can lead to more comprehensive and inclusive outcomes.

To further encourage engagement, member states are encouraged to include young people in their delegations, providing them with mentoring and leadership development opportunities. By involving young people in the decision-making process, member states can benefit from fresh ideas, alternative perspectives, and innovative solutions.

The importance of youth involvement in policy discussions and decision-making is also highlighted in relation to data governance and the data economy. The Datasphere Initiative’s project, “Youth for a Data Future,” aims to enhance youth participation and involvement in data governance through interactive labs. These labs will provide young people with the opportunity to actively contribute to policy discussions surrounding data privacy and mental health. This involvement recognises the potential of youth voices in shaping the data economy, which is important for achieving sustainable development goals related to decent work, economic growth, and reduced inequalities.

The analysis underscores the sentiment of positivity surrounding the importance of meaningful engagement with young people in decision-making processes. It is evident that there is a growing recognition of the value and potential of young people’s involvement in shaping policies and discussions. This extended summary highlights the main points, arguments, and evidence presented, emphasizing the need for meaningful youth engagement and the potential benefits it can bring.

Dunola Oladapo

The analysis highlights the importance of youth engagement and inclusion in policy-making processes, particularly in the areas of data policy-making and digital development. The speakers argue that young people are seeking higher and deeper levels of engagement and inclusion beyond mere consultations. They believe that youth have unique perspectives that can effectively contribute to the development of equitable policies. They also note that advocacy activities can lead to impactful results for youth in policymaking spaces. The youth declaration during the LDC5 in Doha, which called for engagement at all levels of programming, is highlighted as evidence.

However, the analysis acknowledges that young people are disproportionately affected during adverse situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Millions of students were unable to connect for school and access necessary information, highlighting the digital inequalities faced by young people. This negative impact on youth’s health, education, and access to information is a significant concern.

Furthermore, the analysis highlights the severe underrepresentation of youth in discussions and decision-making processes. The term ‘youth’ needs to be intentionally used in discussions due to their severe underrepresentation. For instance, there were instances where panels, especially in the digital sphere, would be dominated by men, leaving young voices unheard. The need for greater inclusion of youth in all aspects of policymaking, including digital development and data policy-making, is emphasized to reduce inequalities.

Despite the challenges, the speakers express optimism for a future where the labeling of ‘young delegates’ separately will not be necessary. They look forward to a time when there won’t be a need to label ‘young delegates’ separately, indicating a future where youth will have equal representation and participation in decision-making processes.

The analysis raises important points about the need for youth engagement and inclusion in policymaking, while also highlighting the challenges and inequalities faced by young people. It emphasizes the necessity of intentionally including and actively involving youth in shaping effective and equitable policies.

João Moreno Falcão

The analysis explores various perspectives on the role of youth in digital policymaking and the potential challenges associated with digital technology. The summary provides a comprehensive overview of the main points discussed and their supporting evidence.

One of the key arguments is that youth are keen innovators and digital natives, bringing valuable insights to digital policymaking. They possess a unique perspective that recognizes the integration of the real and digital worlds as interconnected. The analysis highlights the fact that youth are enthusiastic about trying to innovate and address complex problems related to the data universe.

However, there are concerns about addiction to digital technology and over-reliance on online resources, which may lead to insecurity and potential health issues. The increasing prevalence of a surveillance economy is also highlighted as a negative consequence of our digital lives. The analysis indicates that we have become anxious about not constantly checking our phones, reflecting the potential negative impact of excessive digital reliance on our well-being.

Another significant challenge is the potential misuse of data and online surveillance, which poses a threat to privacy. It is stressed that we need to take advantage of the data economy without succumbing to a surveillance economy. This highlights the importance of addressing privacy concerns and ensuring that data is used responsibly and ethically.

On a positive note, digital technology is acknowledged for providing opportunities in areas such as education, skill development, and remote work. It is emphasized that being connected has been crucial in navigating the challenges of a pandemic, and current professional practices were not possible just a few years ago.

The analysis also touches upon the problem of misinformation in the digital age. With the abundance of information online, it is challenging to discern reliable sources. This highlights the need for critical thinking skills and the importance of developing reliable information sources.

The inclusion of youth in the policymaking process is considered essential, with a focus on developing their opportunities and capabilities equally. The analysis highlights the success of youth ambassador initiatives and emphasizes the need for youth participation in decision-making bodies. It also encourages support for youth-driven initiatives and proactive engagement through consultations and focus groups.

In terms of policy development, the analysis underscores the need for inclusivity and diversity when building digital systems and products. Recognizing the different consumption patterns of diverse individuals is essential for understanding emerging trends and promoting digital literacy.

Continuity in projects is identified as vital, as the lack of it can result in a loss of knowledge and experience. The importance of integrating all individuals, particularly in work and learning contexts, is also recognized. The analysis stresses the desire to integrate all workers and learners, highlighting the significance of reducing inequalities and promoting decent work and economic growth.

Overall, the analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the role of youth in digital policymaking, the challenges posed by digital technology, and the importance of inclusivity and continuity in these domains. It emphasizes the need for responsible data usage, critical thinking, and the development of reliable information sources. Additionally, it underscores the value of youth participation and the equitable development of their capabilities, as well as the integration of all individuals in digital initiatives.

Victoria Tianyi Wang

The discussion focused on the importance of youth perspectives in shaping the future of the digital economy. The youth consultation project, conducted in collaboration with the UNCTAD Youth network, played a crucial role in incorporating the views of young people from diverse backgrounds. This project consisted of three stages and aimed to be inclusive, welcoming youths from different backgrounds. The consultation process began in October with the World Investment Forum held in the United Arab Emirates. The results of the consultation are expected to be incorporated into a youth declaration as part of the outcome of the UNCTAD e-week. This declaration will contribute to Agenda 2030, correspond to the United Nations Secretary-General’s (UNSGs) common agenda, and also contribute to next year’s UN Summit of the Future.

One of the main arguments proposed was that youth bring unique characteristics such as innovation, technology, and adaptability to the digital world. Being a generation born with technology, they easily adapt to the digital environment. Additionally, youth were seen as instrumental in driving the digital economy forward due to their ability to bring innovation, technological advancements, and flexibility.

It was acknowledged that the digital economy presents both challenges and opportunities. While the digitalization of various sectors has transformed interactions, consumption, and business operations, there are significant inequalities in accessing the digital economy. Currently, only 20% of the population in the least developed countries have access to the internet, and even after connecting, they often face slower speeds or higher prices. It was argued that digital inclusion should be at the centre of the digital economy to ensure that all individuals, regardless of their background or location, can participate, contribute, and benefit from the digital revolution.

Another important point highlighted was the need for inclusivity in the digital economy. Currently, 2.6 billion people are offline, with youth and other marginalized groups facing greater barriers in the process of digitalization. Digital inclusion was seen as crucial for sustainable development, and it was emphasized that governments have a responsibility to ensure that the policy-making process around digital development is inclusive and sustainable. The active participation of youth in this process was stressed as essential for achieving inclusion and empowerment.

A set of recommendations were proposed to promote digital inclusion and digital development. These included fostering partnerships, facilitating skill development, providing training and capacity-building initiatives, and creating platforms and portals for collaboration. The importance of a multi-stakeholder approach in decision-making and the need for specific programs, such as UNCTAD’s e-commerce digital economy program and E-Trade for Women, were also highlighted as examples of capacity-building initiatives.

The structure of data governance was identified as an area in need of improvement, with suggestions that it should be led by the United Nations. It was argued that the UN, as a neutral actor, can play a crucial role in ensuring inclusivity and taking youth inclusion into account during this process. Furthermore, it was stressed that a holistic and whole-of-government approach is needed in designing digital policies. Policymakers need to focus not only on economic growth but also on creating resilient and inclusive designs to address the challenges and harness the opportunities brought by the digital economy.

In conclusion, the dialogue emphasized the indispensable role of youth perspectives in shaping the future of the digital economy. The consultation project served as a platform for youth to voice their opinions and contribute to the broader global agenda. It was recognized that while the digital economy brings both challenges and opportunities, digital inclusion needs to be prioritized to ensure equal access and benefits for all. The involvement of youth in policy-making processes, partnerships, skill development, and capacity-building initiatives were identified as key elements for promoting inclusivity and sustainability in the digital world. Moreover, the structure of data governance and the design of digital policies should be improved to be more inclusive and holistic. Overall, it was agreed upon that youth can play a vital role in driving a more inclusive and sustainable digital development.

A

Audience

Speech speed

169 words per minute

Speech length

417 words

Speech time

148 secs

AP

Andrea Palomino Flores

Speech speed

171 words per minute

Speech length

816 words

Speech time

286 secs

CP

Céliane Pochon

Speech speed

184 words per minute

Speech length

1134 words

Speech time

369 secs

DO

Dunola Oladapo

Speech speed

189 words per minute

Speech length

1480 words

Speech time

469 secs

JM

João Moreno Falcão

Speech speed

114 words per minute

Speech length

1524 words

Speech time

805 secs

NF

Nicholas Field

Speech speed

198 words per minute

Speech length

2208 words

Speech time

671 secs

SP

Sylvia Poll

Speech speed

186 words per minute

Speech length

2590 words

Speech time

837 secs

VT

Victoria Tianyi Wang

Speech speed

142 words per minute

Speech length

2708 words

Speech time

1141 secs

The Gig Economy: Positioning Higher Education at the Center of the Future of Work (USAID Higher Education Learning Network)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Audience

Online learning has experienced a significant increase in popularity, with platforms like Coursera making education more accessible by offering free courses. This development is seen as a positive step towards achieving SDG 4, which focuses on Quality Education. The availability of online courses has opened up opportunities for individuals to enhance their skills and knowledge from the comfort of their own homes, regardless of geographical location or financial limitations.

Furthermore, the rise of online learning has also raised important questions about its potential to address the needs of individuals who aspire to participate in the gig economy. SDG 8, which aims to promote Decent Work and Economic Growth, highlights the importance of providing opportunities for people to join the labour market on their own terms. As the gig economy continues to expand, there is a growing demand for workers with specialised skills and expertise. Online learning can potentially fill this gap by providing flexible and affordable training options for individuals seeking to acquire the necessary skills to thrive in this dynamic sector.

While there is strong support for the potential of online learning to contribute to both SDG 4 and SDG 8, it is important to note that the sentiment towards online learning remains neutral. This may indicate that further research and analysis is needed to fully understand the impact and effectiveness of online education in achieving these sustainable development goals.

In conclusion, the growth of online learning, exemplified by platforms like Coursera, has brought about positive changes in making education more accessible. It is also raising important questions about its role in addressing the needs of individuals in the gig economy. While there is optimism about its potential contribution to achieving SDG 4 and SDG 8, further investigation is required to fully gauge its effectiveness. Nonetheless, online learning has given individuals the opportunity to acquire new skills and knowledge, creating more inclusive learning environments and potentially advancing progress towards these important global goals.

Jack Elliot

Summary:

Higher education has the potential to play a central role in shaping the future of work. It can address the crisis of underemployment and unemployment by actively involving business and industry in curriculum development to ensure its relevance. By doing so, higher education can equip students with the necessary skills and knowledge to meet the demands of the evolving job market. It is important to prioritize relevance over prestige in higher education to bridge the gap for the gig economy and skills polarization. Online learning also presents opportunities, but challenges like limited Wi-Fi access need to be addressed through innovative solutions. Building a sense of community and engagement in online education is crucial, as is recognizing the significance of informal education through platforms like social media. Higher education institutions can prepare students for the gig economy by emphasizing teaching and curriculum relevance. Focusing on unique strengths and resources is important, as well as addressing the needs of local communities and making systemic changes to be more relevant. It is necessary to prioritize practical experience, critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and integrate content-focused delivery with process-oriented strategies.

Jennifer Lebron

The analysis of the speakers’ presentations reveals several key points regarding the role of higher education and the challenges posed by skills polarization and the gig economy in the world of work. Firstly, it was highlighted that higher education plays a crucial role in educating and equipping future workers with the necessary skills. The inherent prestige and stable infrastructure of higher education institutions were also noted, emphasizing their significance in workforce development.

Furthermore, the analysis delved into the impact of skills polarization and the gig economy on the labour market. Skills polarization refers to the disappearance of middle-skilled jobs, with highly skilled and low-skilled work gaining prominence. The gig economy, characterized by non-traditional employment arrangements like platform work and short-term consultancies, was also discussed as a defining aspect of the evolving work landscape.

Consequently, these changes challenge the traditional role of higher education and have a more pronounced effect on certain individuals. The analysis raises important questions about how skills polarization and the gig economy undermine the relevance of higher education in the world of work. Additionally, it explores the individuals who are most affected by these dynamics.

During the panel discussion, gratitude was expressed towards the panelists and attendees, with the absence of panelist Alan noted due to technical difficulties. This acknowledgement showcased a positive sentiment towards the event and the contributions made.

The analysis also highlighted promotional aspects, including upcoming features on Alan in the newsletter and an invitation for participants to join the Higher Education Learning Network (Helen). This network provides a platform for ongoing dialogue and engagement on topics such as employability, higher education, and the future of work.

Lastly, the USAID Higher Education Learning Network encouraged active participation in the discussions, reflecting a positive sentiment towards fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing among its members.

Overall, the analysis sheds light on the important role of higher education in skill development and its challenges in the face of skills polarization and the gig economy. It underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and collaboration to ensure that higher education remains relevant in preparing individuals for the ever-changing world of work.

Jennifer DeBoer

Higher education institutions play a crucial role in shaping the future of work. They generate new knowledge and conduct research, keeping them at the forefront of innovation to meet the changing demands of the job market. Universities also act as vehicles for social mobility, providing opportunities for individuals to improve their socio-economic status through education and training that prepares them for the evolving work landscape.

In addition, universities foster global connectedness by facilitating international conversations and collaborations, enabling the exchange of ideas and expertise on a global scale. However, to stay relevant, higher education institutions must adapt to the changing demands of learners and industries. This includes offering flexible and tailored learning options, recognizing acquired skills, and being responsive and adaptive to learner-driven demands.

A challenge faced by universities is the disconnect between the skills and knowledge they provide and the skills demanded by employers. This can lead to underemployment or unemployment for graduates. Universities need to rethink their traditional value proposition to bridge this gap and meet the expectations of graduates.

There is also a growing movement towards open knowledge creation and widening access to elite knowledge. This includes initiatives that allow refugee researchers to contribute to research questions, reducing inequalities and empowering marginalized communities.

Universities hold the power of credential verification, but they need to balance this with meeting the needs of private employers for skilled workers. Collaboration between higher education institutions and private employers is crucial to address skill gaps and ensure graduates are job-ready.

Access to online learning is important, but it must be accompanied by the necessary support for true inclusivity. This includes providing devices, data connectivity, language proficiency support, and childcare to ensure access for all.

Online learning can also promote communal understanding and the application of solutions. Through digital inclusion, students from different backgrounds can collaborate on finding solutions to common challenges.

Higher education institutions demonstrate strong connectivity across national borders, facilitating collaboration and knowledge exchange. This global perspective promotes cross-cultural understanding.

Challenges exist in the transferability of credentials and skills, especially when individuals move to different contexts. Standardized and portable credentialing systems are needed to validate skills across different settings.

Research institutes are gaining importance in bridging academia and industry. Operating separately from universities, these institutions provide agile structures and foster collaborations, enhancing innovation in various sectors.

The rise of gig work presents challenges in terms of worker protections. Universities and higher education institutions should engage with policymakers to develop policies that ensure gig workers are protected and have fair working conditions.

In conclusion, higher education institutions shape the future of work through knowledge generation, social mobility, and global connectedness. Adapting to learner and industry demands, addressing the gap between education and job market expectations, and promoting inclusivity and collaboration are essential for universities to navigate the challenges and opportunities of the future of work.

Adetomi Soyinka

This series of arguments and stances emphasizes the crucial role that higher education plays in preparing young Africans for future job opportunities. The statistics provided indicate the significant representation of young Africans in the global youth population, with projections showing that by 2030, they will make up 42% of the youth population. Moreover, it is predicted that by 2050, over half of the global youth population will be African. Furthermore, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts that in the next decade, a majority of the global labor force will be in Africa. These figures highlight the importance of equipping young Africans with the necessary knowledge and skills to meet the demands of an evolving job market.

While the importance of higher education is acknowledged, concerns were raised about the readiness of universities to adapt to changing career paths desired by young people. The argument is made that universities need to provide a robust infrastructure that ensures young Africans acquire the knowledge, skills, and expertise needed for the future. Nelson Mandela’s quote is referenced, suggesting that education is seen as a pathway out of poverty, further reinforcing the significance of higher education institutions in building job capabilities.

There is a recognition that the landscape of career aspirations has shifted, as young people now aspire to careers such as dancers, writers, and entrepreneurs, indicating a more diverse range of interests. The readiness of universities to adapt to these external changes is questioned. The need for universities to produce and transmit knowledge that meets the needs of young people is emphasized, as the gap between academia and employers continues to grow. The risk of universities becoming irrelevant if they fail to keep up with societal needs and produce relevant knowledge is also stated.

The effectiveness of online learning is explored in this analysis. Concerns about quality assurance mechanisms are raised, and the acceptance of online credentials is highlighted as being employer-driven. It is argued that quality assurance and formal qualifications are crucial factors for the success of online learning. Additionally, it is noted that the effectiveness of online learning also depends on an individual’s learning style, as some individuals perform better in physical communities of learners.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential of online learning, with the analysis suggesting that it can effectively be implemented on a large scale. The rapid transition to online learning during the pandemic is presented as evidence of its viability. This positive sentiment towards online learning complements the broader discussion on higher education’s adaptability to a fast-changing world.

The role of government in higher education is recognized, with examples given of governments facilitating conversations between employers, academia, and policymakers to address youth employment and education concerns. A triple helix approach involving government, academia, and industry is supported as a means to address higher education challenges. An example from Nigeria is noted, where this approach is being used to formulate policies and actions to combat underemployment and unemployment.

The need for systemic changes in higher education is asserted, with a focus on shifting from content delivery to critical thinking and problem-solving strategies. The importance of providing practical experience to students is highlighted, as less than 10% of business school graduates have high-impact practical experience.

Lastly, the analysis suggests a more inclusive approach involving the greater stakeholder community, not just government and universities. This observation underscores the idea that addressing higher education challenges requires collaboration and input from various stakeholders.

In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis stresses that higher education is fundamental in preparing young Africans for future job opportunities. It highlights the need for universities to adapt to changing career paths and produce relevant knowledge. The potential of online learning, the role of government, and the necessity of systemic changes are also explored. The overall argument calls for a collaborative and inclusive approach within the stakeholder community to address higher education challenges effectively.

Ghazala M. Syed

Higher education is facing the challenge of aligning itself with the needs of the gig economy. To address this, it is crucial for higher education institutions to provide education and training programs that equip students with the skills and knowledge required to thrive in the gig economy. These programs should focus on developing skills such as adaptability, entrepreneurship, and problem-solving.

To cater to the evolving needs of students, higher education institutions should become more flexible and agile. This can be achieved by offering short-term courses and certificates that allow for upskilling and reskilling. By providing opportunities for students to acquire new skills or enhance existing ones, higher education institutions can empower them to meet the demands of the gig economy.

Moreover, there is a growing recognition of the importance of soft skills in the gig economy. Higher education institutions should place more emphasis on developing these skills, which include communication, collaboration, and critical thinking. By nurturing these abilities, students will be better prepared to succeed in the gig economy, where project-based work and remote collaboration are common.

Online learning has emerged as a potential solution to provide access to education, particularly for marginalized individuals who face challenges related to distance or cultural security. It has been observed that online learning has played a significant role in ensuring quality education, especially during the COVID-19 crisis when traditional forms of education were disrupted. Initiatives such as the use of online learning by USAID to reach marginalized students demonstrate the potential of this approach to bridge gaps in access to higher education.

However, it is important to note that online learning may not consistently meet quality standards in some countries due to the lack of regulation. Different types of institutions offering online education require proper regulation to ensure that students receive the education they need and deserve. Stricter regulation can help maintain the quality and credibility of online learning platforms and programs.

The relevance of higher education, in terms of providing employment opportunities, varies depending on the economy of the region. In contexts where opportunities are limited or economies are less developed, higher education may not immediately translate into employment prospects. In such cases, the emergence of the gig economy enables workers to access employment opportunities across borders and find work that suits their skills and interests.

In order to adapt to the changing landscape of upskilling and reskilling, higher education should take the lead in driving the policy dialogue. It should actively participate in shaping policies to ensure that they align with the needs of students and the demands of the gig economy. Developing policies that recognize the importance of lifelong learning and the value of prior learning can contribute to creating an environment where individuals can continuously enhance their skills and remain relevant in the evolving job market.

In conclusion, higher education institutions must adapt to the needs of the gig economy by providing education and training programs that equip students with the skills and knowledge required. This can be achieved through flexibility, offering short-term courses and certificates for upskilling and reskilling, and focusing on the development of soft skills. Online learning can help provide access to marginalized students, although proper regulation is necessary to ensure quality. The relevance of higher education in employment opportunities depends on the regional economy. Higher education should drive the policy dialogue to adapt to the developments in upskilling and reskilling, while also supporting lifelong learning and the recognition of prior learning.

A

Audience

Speech speed

187 words per minute

Speech length

199 words

Speech time

64 secs

AS

Adetomi Soyinka

Speech speed

172 words per minute

Speech length

1843 words

Speech time

644 secs

GM

Ghazala M. Syed

Speech speed

138 words per minute

Speech length

1385 words

Speech time

602 secs

JE

Jack Elliot

Speech speed

157 words per minute

Speech length

1382 words

Speech time

528 secs

JD

Jennifer DeBoer

Speech speed

137 words per minute

Speech length

1878 words

Speech time

824 secs

JL

Jennifer Lebron

Speech speed

208 words per minute

Speech length

2960 words

Speech time

852 secs

The postal sector: a key partner for sustainable and digital development – discussion around the State of the Postal Sector report (UPU) UPU TradePost Forum

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Jose Anson

A robust postal system plays a pivotal role in promoting economic development by facilitating trade and increasing e-commerce penetration. Countries with well-established postal systems demonstrate higher levels of trade facilitation and enjoy increased e-commerce activities. Furthermore, investing in postal infrastructure and fostering innovation within the sector contributes to both economic prosperity and social inclusion.

However, there exist significant disparities in postal development across the world, resulting in economic disadvantages and missed opportunities for inclusive growth. While 49 out of 172 countries analysed in the report exhibit a positive growth trajectory for postal development, there are notable differences between nations. This disparity in postal development hinders economic progress and perpetuates inequalities.

In response to the changing landscape of communication and delivery services, the postal sector must adapt and innovate. Traditional letter volumes are decreasing, leading to a decline in associated postal income. In contrast, parcels, logistics, and digital services are emerging as new frontiers in the industry. To thrive in this evolving environment, postal services must emphasise the need for innovation and adaptability.

To meet these challenges, the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and a hyper-collaborative approach is recommended. By leveraging generative AI and embracing hyper-collaboration, most operational inefficiencies within the postal sector can be eliminated, and pricing can be optimised. Furthermore, adopting an ecosystemic business model approach will ensure that postal services remain relevant and competitive in the modern marketplace.

In addition to innovation, ensuring postal reliability and reducing postage prices are essential factors for a resilient postal ecosystem. Unfortunately, there has been a decline in end-to-end reliability in international logistics and postal exchanges when compared to the pre-pandemic period. This decrease in reliability has negatively impacted international postal traffic. Furthermore, the doubling of shipping rates for international postal services has exacerbated the situation, causing a significant decrease in such services.

In conclusion, a robust postal system is vital for economic development, trade facilitation, and e-commerce penetration. However, disparities in postal development worldwide pose economic disadvantages and hinder inclusive growth. To navigate the changing landscape, the postal sector must embrace innovation, adopting AI and a hyper-collaborative approach. Ensuring postal reliability and reducing postage prices are also critical to maintain a resilient postal system. Efforts towards addressing these challenges will contribute to a more equitable, adaptable, and future-ready postal ecosystem.

Moderator

The State of the Postal Sector Report highlights the crucial role of the postal sector in economic development and resilience. It emphasizes that better postal systems contribute to an increase of nearly 7% in GDP. Additionally, it states that countries with higher levels of postal services have experienced greater post-pandemic economic recovery. This highlights the economic importance of developing and maintaining efficient postal systems.

However, the report also highlights the disparities in postal development between nations. These disparities can lead to economic disadvantages for countries with underdeveloped postal systems. It suggests that addressing these disparities is essential to ensure fair and equal opportunities for economic growth.

The report argues that investing in postal infrastructure and innovation is crucial for economic prosperity and social inclusion. It explains that the postal sector plays an essential role in driving a wide range of economic activities. By investing in postal infrastructure and innovation, countries can enhance their economic growth potential and promote social inclusion.

Moreover, the report emphasizes the potential of adopting a hyper-collaborative approach involving artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics. It suggests that this approach can greatly improve the efficiency and sustainability of the postal sector. By leveraging AI and data analytics, postal services can optimize pricing, design predictable services, and monetize decarbonization efforts. This highlights the need for technological advancements and collaborations to enhance the postal sector’s capabilities.

Furthermore, the report advocates for better governance of international postal and logistics data to facilitate cross-border e-commerce. It states that improved data governance can eliminate operational inefficiencies, optimize pricing, and ensure more predictable postal services. This highlights the importance of international cooperation and partnerships to streamline and enhance cross-border e-commerce.

In conclusion, the report emphasizes the significance of investing in the postal sector for overall economic prosperity and social inclusion. It highlights the positive impact of efficient postal systems on GDP growth and post-pandemic economic recovery. By addressing disparities in postal development, investing in infrastructure and innovation, and adopting a hyper-collaborative approach involving AI and data analytics, countries can enhance their postal sector’s efficiency, sustainability, and contribution to economic development. Additionally, better governance of international postal and logistics data can facilitate cross-border e-commerce and further boost the sector’s growth.

Audience

The analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the postal sector, highlighting several key points and arguments. One of the main points raised is the need to inform policymakers about the current state of the sector. Currently, policymakers only receive updates during council sessions, indicating a lack of regular communication and awareness about the postal sector. It is argued that there is a need to pass on the message to decision-makers to ensure they are well-informed and can make informed decisions regarding the sector. Another important aspect highlighted in the analysis is the role of data in stimulating economic growth in the postal sector. Unlike other sectors, the postal sector has real-time data, which can be utilized to demonstrate the advantages of investing in postal infrastructure. However, the usage of data is currently limited due to competitive fears among operators. It is suggested that if operators share strategic data, it can help in the development of the sector. Technological solutions, such as algorithms, can be utilized to protect the competitiveness of operators while allowing for the sharing of valuable data. The importance of investment in postal infrastructure is another key argument put forward in the analysis. It is stated that investing in postal infrastructure can stimulate economic growth and also help in reducing inequalities between different regions. This highlights the potential impact that sufficient investment can have on the overall development of the postal sector. Additionally, the analysis also emphasizes the insufficiency of advocacy efforts in the postal sector. It is suggested that current advocacy work does not go far enough, despite the significant impact that post offices have on people’s lives and their potential to stimulate economic development. It is argued that more robust advocacy efforts are needed to raise awareness and garner support for the postal sector. In conclusion, the analysis sheds light on various aspects of the postal sector. Policymakers need to be better informed about the state of the sector, and data plays a crucial role in stimulating economic growth. Furthermore, there is a need for sharing strategic data among operators, while ensuring competitiveness is protected. Investment in postal infrastructure is essential for the sector’s growth, and advocacy efforts need to be strengthened. These findings provide valuable insights into the current state of the postal sector and offer recommendations for its development and improvement.

A

Audience

Speech speed

117 words per minute

Speech length

837 words

Speech time

428 secs

JA

Jose Anson

Speech speed

146 words per minute

Speech length

6239 words

Speech time

2562 secs

M

Moderator

Speech speed

156 words per minute

Speech length

1367 words

Speech time

527 secs

The digital economy in the age of AI: Implications for developing countries (UNCTAD)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Teki Akuetteh

The discussion centered around the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on developing nations, particularly African countries. It highlighted the transformative influence of AI technologies on African economies, addressing issues related to poverty, social impact, and sustainability. However, challenges were also identified, such as the high costs associated with AI development and the influence of big tech companies. The need for global cooperation, equitable access to resources, and supportive infrastructure were emphasized. Recognizing and compensating data contributors, careful regulation, and inclusivity were also deemed crucial for responsible and equitable AI development in developing nations.

Uma Rani

Uma Rani, an employee at the International Labour Organization (ILO), strongly advocates for digital worker rights. She has conducted extensive research on the impact of AI in developing countries, shaping her belief in the importance of protecting workers in the digital era. However, some perceive her as biased due to her background as a development economist and her work in the platform economy.

The adoption of AI in workplaces has not yet reached a large scale, but there has been significant investment in AI-related tools. This has led to the automation or outsourcing of tasks in various industries, raising concerns about the replacement of specific tasks rather than entire jobs. This argument suggests that AI adoption may result in increased productivity and efficiency, but there is a risk of certain tasks becoming obsolete.

One of the worries associated with AI adoption is the potential de-skilling of highly educated workers. In some cases, individuals with advanced degrees are assigned mundane tasks related to AI development, such as cleaning and feeding data to AI systems. Additionally, examples exist of IT graduates working on removing objectionable material from the web, which indicates a potential waste of their expertise and skills.

Content moderators, who are responsible for moderating online content, often experience psychosocial impacts and are unable to discuss their work due to non-disclosure agreements. This lack of communication and support can lead to the internalization of stress and negative mental health consequences. There have been calls for authorities to intervene and address these issues surrounding content moderation, as exemplified by a case involving Meta in Kenya.

Understanding the data value chain is crucial, and Uma Rani argues that worker empowerment can be achieved by fighting for data rights. She emphasizes the need for complete transparency in the collection, cleaning, analysis, and outcome of data. This would ensure that workers have control and ownership over the data they contribute. Furthermore, discussions on fiduciary or data trust have been initiated, asserting the right of everyone to the data they contribute and its usage.

Transparency in algorithms is also a key concern. It is argued that algorithm transparency is necessary to address fair practices and equity issues. By providing transparency, biases and potential discrimination embedded in algorithms can be identified and mitigated. This contributes to a more just and equitable use of AI and data-driven technologies.

The development of AI requires ethical regulation, as insufficient attention is currently being given to the process. The argument asserts the importance of considering ethical implications in the development and use of AI to ensure it aligns with societal values and upholds ethical standards. This includes addressing issues such as privacy, bias, and accountability.

Contrary to the widespread fear of job displacement, it is highlighted that artificial intelligence and emerging technologies do not necessarily result in job losses for developers and computer programmers. While AI has streamlined and facilitated certain programming tasks, human developers are still required for further development and innovative thinking. The argument suggests that rather than replacing jobs, AI can enhance and support the work of developers and programmers.

In light of technological advancements, there is a need to revisit and reframe industrial and employment policies. The advent of AI and platforms like GitHub has led to a shift from formal jobs to more informal arrangements. This raises concerns about de-skilling and the need to develop products that benefit our own societies and economies. Policies should be updated to provide support and address the challenges posed by technological revolutions.

Finally, the ethical development and use of AI is crucial. There is a risk that AI could be used for monitoring, surveillance, and work intensification, leading to worse working conditions. It is argued that clear regulation of AI is necessary to protect workers throughout its development and use. This includes safeguarding against unethical practices, ensuring privacy, and promoting fairness and respect for worker rights.

Overall, the expanded summary highlights the various arguments and perspectives concerning digital worker rights, AI adoption, the data value chain, algorithm transparency, ethical regulation, and the impact of AI on job displacement. Noteworthy observations include the need for worker empowerment, the importance of revisiting industrial and employment policies, and the risks and challenges associated with AI’s development and use.

Jovan Kurbalija

The analysis of perspectives on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact reveals several interesting and important insights.

One perspective emphasizes the significance of accessible and distributed knowledge worldwide. This viewpoint highlights the belief that knowledge is still fairly distributed worldwide. It is argued that AI should be found not just in big centers but also in niches, flea markets, and favelas. The aim is to make AI accessible to all, regardless of their location or resources. This perspective aligns with the principles of reducing inequalities and promoting industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

Another viewpoint raises concerns about the risks associated with AI. One such risk is “knowledge slavery,” where a centralized system could codify and control access to historical and current knowledge. This perspective acknowledges that while AI has a higher chance of resulting in positive impacts, there are significant risks that need to be addressed urgently. It particularly highlights the immediate risks of AI exacerbating the digital divide and leading to knowledge slavery.

The analysis also reveals concerns about monopolies and misinformation in the AI space. It is argued that these issues pose a bigger immediate risk than extinction. Monopolies can curtail fair market competition, while misinformation can generate false identities. This perspective emphasizes the importance of peace, justice, and strong institutions in combating these challenges.

Another intriguing observation is the mention of fear-mongering surrounding AI. The argument is made that fear-mongering can create unnecessary confusion and diversion from addressing the real issues related to AI’s understanding and usage. It is suggested that a more measured and informed approach is required.

The analysis also brings up the need for open, honest, and frank discussions about AI. Currently, discussions around AI and its implications are often steeped in secrecy and confusion. Transparency is highlighted as crucial for gaining a better understanding of the technology and its processes.

Additionally, it is noted that AI systems have evolved over time. From attempts to codify human logic, AI has transitioned to a basis on probability due to the complexity of human logic. It is mentioned that AI systems are not capable of simple mathematics as they are not based on logic but on probability.

The analysis also touches upon the need for clarity in regulations and law regarding the digital space. It is argued that there should be more clarity in regulations and laws governing the digital space, particularly in addressing cybercrimes and establishing punishment systems.

In conclusion, the analysis of perspectives on AI and its impact reveals a complex landscape. While some highlight the importance of accessible and distributed knowledge, others raise concerns about the risks associated with AI, such as knowledge slavery and the digital divide. The need for open discussions, addressing monopolies and misinformation, and clarity in regulations is also emphasized.

Isabelle Kumar

During the discussion, the speakers delved into various aspects of AI and its impact on our lives. They highlighted that AI is already transforming our lives and that its landscape is continuously changing. This points towards the fact that we are just at the beginning stages of this technological advancement, and significant progress is expected in the future.

The crucial nature of the current stage of AI development was emphasized. The decisions being made now will deeply affect our collective futures. This insight underscores the need for careful consideration and strategic decision-making to ensure that AI is harnessed for the benefit of all.

Furthermore, the speakers stressed the need for equity in AI development, particularly in relation to developing nations. They discussed how developing nations can position themselves to participate fully in the AI revolution rather than being left marginalized. This calls for efforts to bridge the gap and provide equal opportunities for all countries to leverage AI for their progress and development.

Another important point of discussion was the potential impact of AI systems on existing inequalities and biases. It was essential to harness the potential of AI systems while ensuring that they do not exacerbate or create new forms of inequalities. This highlights the need for responsible development and implementation practices that consider the social impact of AI technologies.

The speakers also explored the essential and controversial topic of AI governance. The discussion focused on questions and debates surrounding AI governance, such as who should be involved in decision-making processes and how to strike a balance between regulation and innovation. Establishing a multi-stakeholder and international framework for AI governance was identified as crucial to fostering responsible and ethical AI practices on a global scale.

The importance of upholding worker rights in the context of AI, specifically in the content moderation industry, was also highlighted. The speakers pointed out that workers in this industry often sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), which can lead to psychosocial impacts due to their inability to discuss their work with family and friends. The need to prioritize worker rights and ensure decent working conditions in AI-related industries emerged as an important ethical concern.

Lastly, the speakers discussed the unique challenges and varying stages of digital infrastructure in Africa in relation to AI regulation. As Africa consists of 55 countries, each with its own level of digital advancement, it was emphasized that there cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach to AI rules for the continent. This observation underscores the importance of tailoring AI regulations to the specific context and needs of each African country.

Overall, the discussion shed light on the transformative power of AI and the need for responsible, equitable, and inclusive approaches to its development and implementation. It highlighted the importance of considering the potential social, economic, and ethical implications of AI technologies, as well as the necessity of multi-stakeholder collaboration and international cooperation in governing AI.

Gabriela Ramos

Gabriela Ramos, Assistant Director General for Social and Human Sciences at UNESCO, has highlighted the unique mandate of UNESCO in relation to emerging technologies. She emphasises the need to view these technologies through ethical lenses, considering their potential impact on society. UNESCO has developed a recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence, which was adopted by 193 countries in 2021. The recommendation aims to ensure that AI technologies are aligned with human rights, human dignity, fairness, and inclusiveness.

Ramos expresses concern about the misuse and abuse of AI technologies, which could pose existential threats. Therefore, she emphasises the importance of governance and regulations for the development, usage, and potential pitfalls of AI technologies. The recommendation serves as a guideline for policymakers and stakeholders to navigate the ethical dimensions of AI.

In addition to ethical considerations, the recommendation also addresses the underrepresentation of women in the development of AI technologies. It specifically calls for affirmative action and investment in businesses that are led by women. Currently, women make up only 22% of professionals in the AI tech sector, and there are issues of recognition and discrimination against women in this field.

The recommendation acknowledges the transformative potential of technology in education and highlights the need for teachers to be trained to maximise its advantages. It recognises that technology is omnipresent and advancing rapidly, which poses challenges that need to be addressed in order to adapt effectively.

Countries around the world are concerned about staying competitive in terms of technology. During the initial phase of launching national AI strategies, the focus was mainly on technological competition. However, there is now a growing concern about the downsides of AI and the need to regulate its use. Governments are considering who should be in charge when something goes wrong with AI, what kind of liability regimes are needed, and what institutions should regulate AI. There is an ongoing debate on whether AI should be regulated by a regulatory institution, an institute, or a specific government body.

The recommendation also highlights the importance of introducing ethical guardrails in national AI strategies. Increasing emphasis is being placed on the ethical considerations surrounding the development and use of AI technologies. Effective institutions are seen as crucial for framing these technologies and ensuring they protect human rights and human dignity.

Importantly, the recommendation acknowledges the need for government investment and incentivisation in AI technologies. Governments are encouraged to invest in the competencies of their officials to better understand how these technologies work. The United States, for instance, has adopted various bills to organise and regulate the use of AI.

In conclusion, UNESCO’s recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence is a significant step towards promoting the responsible development and use of AI technologies. It emphasises the alignment of AI with human rights, dignity, fairness, and inclusiveness. The recommendation calls for governance and regulations, investment in AI technologies, and the underrepresentation of women in the field. It highlights the importance of training teachers to maximise the advantages of technology in education and addresses the challenges posed by the rapid advancement of technology. The recommendation also recognises the need to regulate AI and protect human rights and dignity through effective institutions. Overall, it provides a comprehensive framework for navigating ethical considerations in the development, implementation, and regulation of AI technologies.

Audience

In the discussions surrounding the evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the participants have delved into various aspects. One area of interest is the historical development of AI and how it has progressed over time. Understanding the origins and transformation of AI into the technology we witness today is a subject of curiosity.

Another focal point is the impact of AI development on data requirements. A 2019 article from the Harvard Business Review predicts that future advancements in AI will rely less on extensive datasets and place more emphasis on top-down reasoning. This implies that AI algorithms could become more proficient in making complex decisions based on high-level knowledge and reasoning, thereby reducing the need for vast amounts of data.

However, alongside the potential benefits of AI, concerns have been raised about the potential de-skilling of workers, particularly in developing countries. Many nations are actively promoting job opportunities and skills development in tech-related fields to keep pace with the demands of the digital economy. Conversely, developed countries have implemented policies to re-skill their workforce, acknowledging the need to adapt to the changing landscape of AI and technology.

The discussions underscore the importance of striking a balance between AI advancements and the need for quality education and infrastructure development. While AI has the potential to reshape industries and enhance efficiency, it is crucial to ensure that the workforce is equipped with the necessary skills to thrive in an AI-driven world. This aligns with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education and Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

In conclusion, the discussions have examined the evolution of AI by exploring its historical development, impact on data requirements, and concerns about worker de-skilling. They highlight the significance of fostering quality education and infrastructure development to harness the benefits of AI while preparing the workforce for the accompanying changes.

Pedro Manuel Moreno

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionise industries, enhance efficiency, and support innovation across various sectors. It offers innovative pathways to address global challenges such as poverty, inequality, climate change, and resource management. The applications of AI range from advanced data analytics and automation to augmenting human capabilities in healthcare, agriculture, and education. This highlights the positive impact AI can have on society and its potential to drive progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

However, the pervasive integration of AI into our lives also raises critical questions and concerns. Privacy, data security, and the ethical use of technology become paramount as AI becomes more widespread. The unchecked expansion of AI technologies can potentially compromise personal privacy, leading to breaches in data security. There is a growing need to address these ethical considerations to ensure that AI is used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

Moreover, there is a negative aspect to the development of AI. There are concerns that AI may disrupt labour markets, leading to the displacement of traditional jobs and creating new forms of inequality. The potential impact on employment raises questions about how society will adapt to these changes and ensure decent work and economic growth, as stated in SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. Additionally, the dominance of countries like the United States, China, and the United Kingdom in AI research, patent ownership, and data control exacerbates global inequalities and deepens digital divides. This further highlights the need to address these disparities and foster inclusivity to mitigate the potential adverse effects of AI development.

Furthermore, the unchecked expansion of AI technologies also has potential environmental implications. The environmental impacts of AI are yet to be fully understood, and there is a need for careful consideration of the potential consequences. It is crucial to ensure that the development of AI is aligned with SDG 13: Climate Action and does not contribute to further environmental harm.

In conclusion, while AI holds tremendous potential to revolutionise industries, enhance efficiency, and tackle global challenges, its integration must be accompanied by careful considerations. The ethical use of technology, privacy, data security, and environmental impacts need to be addressed to ensure the responsible and inclusive development of AI. Involving developing countries in discussions about AI is vital to foster inclusivity and avoid excluding them from shaping the future. By addressing the challenges and considering the potential risks, we can harness the full potential of AI while minimising its negative impacts.

Paul-Olivier Dehaye

The analysis of the arguments from the speakers reveals several key points about artificial intelligence (AI). Overall, AI is seen as a powerful tool that can be applied in both positive and negative ways. It has the potential to revolutionise reasoning and knowledge and can be compared to the cognitive architecture for the world. This implies that AI has the ability to pull and push fragments of reasoning, similar to how the internet allows us to fetch and disseminate information. The potential of AI to manipulate cognitive elements like reasoning suggests that it can be a transformative force in various aspects of society.

One of the key concerns raised by the speakers is the need for inclusive entry into the new age of AI. There is a risk that many people may be de-skilled by new technologies, highlighting the urgency to act in order to ensure that the benefits of AI are accessible to all. This suggests the importance of adopting a collective perspective and taking proactive measures to protect and empower individuals in the face of AI advancements.

The speakers emphasise the need to protect data about social relations and the way people trust each other. They propose adopting a collective approach to safeguarding this information and creating systems that can be controlled by individuals themselves. By doing so, the speakers argue that it is possible to foster a culture of trust and ensure the responsible use of data in AI systems.

The analysis also highlights the significance of data exclusivity in AI. The speakers argue that small groups and populations can collect and curate data to build intelligence. This suggests that the inclusivity of AI can be enhanced by allowing broader access to curated data, rather than relying solely on large entities and corporations.

In addition, the speakers propose the concept of a circular economy of intelligence. This entails leveraging expertly curated data from smaller groups and populations to drive local and focused intelligence. By encouraging and supporting the development of such localised intelligence, AI can contribute to the goal of decent work and economic growth.

The analysis also emphasises the need for computing power and data processing to be made accessible to developing countries. The speakers argue for the establishment of a transparent and inclusive platform where individuals from around the world can process data according to rules and traceability. This would enable greater participation from developing countries and promote a fair distribution of AI capabilities.

Technical knowledge in data protection and management is highlighted as essential in order to avoid falling into dynamics dictated as the only technical way of doing things. Emphasising the importance of technical expertise, the speakers suggest that a comprehensive understanding of data protection and management is crucial for responsible and effective AI implementation.

Legal expertise is also emphasised as necessary for protecting datasets and preventing the capture of scientific outputs by larger entities. The speakers mention the French initiative called ‘Usage Rights’, which focuses on preserving scientific outputs and preventing their exploitation by big corporations. This highlights the need for legal frameworks that can safeguard the interests of individuals and promote peace, justice, and strong institutions in the context of AI development.

Transparency is a recurring theme throughout the analysis. The speakers argue that AI systems should be more transparent, with user participation and engagement in the design process. This can be facilitated by allowing users to export their data and observe how they interact with AI systems. Transparency in sourcing and methodologies used in AI systems is also underscored as a critical factor in building trust and accountability.

The analysis also draws attention to the potential of AI to advance fields beyond its own domain. The blend of human and machine intelligence observed in advanced mathematics is seen as the new core of intellectual endeavours. This suggests that the integration of AI and human intelligence can have far-reaching implications, particularly in the fields of education, industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

In conclusion, the analysis of the speakers’ arguments sheds light on various aspects of AI and its impact on society. The key takeaways include the transformative power of AI, the need for inclusive entry into the AI age, the importance of protecting data and adopting a collective perspective, the significant role of data exclusivity and circular economy of intelligence, the importance of accessible computing power and data processing, the need for technical and legal expertise, the value of transparency in AI systems, and the potential of AI to influence multiple fields.

A

Audience

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

379 words

Speech time

174 secs


Arguments

Enquiry about the evolution of AI

Topics: AI, Evolution


The risk of de-skilling, particularly in developing countries

Supporting facts:

  • Many developing countries are pushing for job and skills development in tech related fields
  • Developed countries have policies in place to re-skill their workforce

Topics: AI, digital economy, skill development


The impact of AI development on the need for data

Supporting facts:

  • A 2019 Harvard Business Review article predicted that future AI development will rely less on vast amounts of data, and more on top-down reasoning

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, data


Report

In the discussions surrounding the evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the participants have delved into various aspects. One area of interest is the historical development of AI and how it has progressed over time. Understanding the origins and transformation of AI into the technology we witness today is a subject of curiosity.

Another focal point is the impact of AI development on data requirements. A 2019 article from the Harvard Business Review predicts that future advancements in AI will rely less on extensive datasets and place more emphasis on top-down reasoning. This implies that AI algorithms could become more proficient in making complex decisions based on high-level knowledge and reasoning, thereby reducing the need for vast amounts of data.

However, alongside the potential benefits of AI, concerns have been raised about the potential de-skilling of workers, particularly in developing countries. Many nations are actively promoting job opportunities and skills development in tech-related fields to keep pace with the demands of the digital economy.

Conversely, developed countries have implemented policies to re-skill their workforce, acknowledging the need to adapt to the changing landscape of AI and technology. The discussions underscore the importance of striking a balance between AI advancements and the need for quality education and infrastructure development.

While AI has the potential to reshape industries and enhance efficiency, it is crucial to ensure that the workforce is equipped with the necessary skills to thrive in an AI-driven world. This aligns with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Quality Education and Sustainable Development Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure.

In conclusion, the discussions have examined the evolution of AI by exploring its historical development, impact on data requirements, and concerns about worker de-skilling. They highlight the significance of fostering quality education and infrastructure development to harness the benefits of AI while preparing the workforce for the accompanying changes.

GR

Gabriela Ramos

Speech speed

185 words per minute

Speech length

1571 words

Speech time

509 secs


Arguments

Gabriela Ramos is the assistant director general for social and human sciences at UNESCO

Supporting facts:

  • This is the sector that has a very interesting and unique mandate
  • UNESCO looks at the emerging technologies through the ethical lenses

Topics: UNESCO, Social and Human Sciences


UNESCO developed a recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence

Supporting facts:

  • The recommendation was negotiated and adopted by 193 countries in 2021
  • The implementation of the recommendation is now being deployed

Topics: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, UNESCO


The development, usage and misuse of AI technologies need governance and regulations.

Supporting facts:

  • The recommendation by UNESCO was adopted by 194 countries
  • The development of these technologies is highly concentrated in few countries and firms
  • There is a lack of representation in the data
  • Misuse and abuse of AI could lead to existential threats

Topics: AI Technologies, Governance, Regulations


AI technologies should be developed to enhance human rights, dignity, fairness and inclusiveness.

Supporting facts:

  • The adoption of the recommendation provides a general narrative to improve the delivery of these technologies
  • The accountability mechanisms, transparency, rule of law, and explainability are crucial

Topics: AI Technologies, Human Rights, Fairness, Inclusiveness


Government should incentivise and invest in AI technologies.

Supporting facts:

  • The recommendation includes policies, regulations, and legislations

Topics: AI Technologies, Investment, Government


The underrepresentation of women in the development of AI technologies needs to be addressed.

Supporting facts:

  • Women make up 22% of professionals in the AI tech sector
  • These technologies have issues with regards to recognition and discrimination against women
  • The recommendation specifically calls for affirmative action and investment in businesses that are led by women

Topics: AI Technologies, Gender Equality, Women


Teachers need to be trained to maximize the advantages of technology

Supporting facts:

  • Technology is omnipresent and advancing rapidly

Topics: Technology in education, Professional Development for teachers


During the initial phase of launching national AI strategies, the focus was mainly on technological competition

Supporting facts:

  • Countries were concerned about how much investment, skills and infrastructure they need to stay competitive in terms of technology

Topics: AI Strategies, Technological Competition


There is a growing concern about the downsides of AI and the need to regulate its use

Supporting facts:

  • Governments are now considering who should be in charge when something goes wrong with AI, what kind of liability regimes are needed and what institutions should regulate AI

Topics: AI Ethics, AI Regulation


Identifying the institutions that should regulate AI is a key focus

Supporting facts:

  • There is a debate on whether AI should be regulated by a regulatory institution like the ones for telecom or electricity, an institute, or the Federal Drug Administration

Topics: AI Regulation, Institutional Innovation


Need for effective institutions to regulate AI

Supporting facts:

  • Governments need to understand how these technologies work.
  • Countries are using these technologies to administer their welfare systems or their health systems or education system.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Governance, Regulations


Importance of investing in competent governments

Supporting facts:

  • There is a need to invest in the competencies of governments to understand how these technologies work.
  • In the US, they have adopted many bills to organize this work.

Topics: Government, Investment


Report

Gabriela Ramos, Assistant Director General for Social and Human Sciences at UNESCO, has highlighted the unique mandate of UNESCO in relation to emerging technologies. She emphasises the need to view these technologies through ethical lenses, considering their potential impact on society.

UNESCO has developed a recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence, which was adopted by 193 countries in 2021. The recommendation aims to ensure that AI technologies are aligned with human rights, human dignity, fairness, and inclusiveness. Ramos expresses concern about the misuse and abuse of AI technologies, which could pose existential threats.

Therefore, she emphasises the importance of governance and regulations for the development, usage, and potential pitfalls of AI technologies. The recommendation serves as a guideline for policymakers and stakeholders to navigate the ethical dimensions of AI. In addition to ethical considerations, the recommendation also addresses the underrepresentation of women in the development of AI technologies.

It specifically calls for affirmative action and investment in businesses that are led by women. Currently, women make up only 22% of professionals in the AI tech sector, and there are issues of recognition and discrimination against women in this field.

The recommendation acknowledges the transformative potential of technology in education and highlights the need for teachers to be trained to maximise its advantages. It recognises that technology is omnipresent and advancing rapidly, which poses challenges that need to be addressed in order to adapt effectively.

Countries around the world are concerned about staying competitive in terms of technology. During the initial phase of launching national AI strategies, the focus was mainly on technological competition. However, there is now a growing concern about the downsides of AI and the need to regulate its use.

Governments are considering who should be in charge when something goes wrong with AI, what kind of liability regimes are needed, and what institutions should regulate AI. There is an ongoing debate on whether AI should be regulated by a regulatory institution, an institute, or a specific government body.

The recommendation also highlights the importance of introducing ethical guardrails in national AI strategies. Increasing emphasis is being placed on the ethical considerations surrounding the development and use of AI technologies. Effective institutions are seen as crucial for framing these technologies and ensuring they protect human rights and human dignity.

Importantly, the recommendation acknowledges the need for government investment and incentivisation in AI technologies. Governments are encouraged to invest in the competencies of their officials to better understand how these technologies work. The United States, for instance, has adopted various bills to organise and regulate the use of AI.

In conclusion, UNESCO’s recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence is a significant step towards promoting the responsible development and use of AI technologies. It emphasises the alignment of AI with human rights, dignity, fairness, and inclusiveness. The recommendation calls for governance and regulations, investment in AI technologies, and the underrepresentation of women in the field.

It highlights the importance of training teachers to maximise the advantages of technology in education and addresses the challenges posed by the rapid advancement of technology. The recommendation also recognises the need to regulate AI and protect human rights and dignity through effective institutions.

Overall, it provides a comprehensive framework for navigating ethical considerations in the development, implementation, and regulation of AI technologies.

IK

Isabelle Kumar

Speech speed

167 words per minute

Speech length

2805 words

Speech time

1008 secs


Arguments

AI is significantly transforming our lives and its landscape is continuously changing.

Supporting facts:

  • AI is already transforming our lives and we’ve only just taken the first few steps first few tentative steps in this technology which is really a never evolving landscape.

Topics: AI technology, Technology changes


We are at a crucial point in AI development, and the decisions being made will deeply affect our collective futures.

Supporting facts:

  • We are at a crossroads today though and that’s why meetings like this is so important because decisions that are take being taken today are going to be of critical importance for the collective futures we’re going to live tomorrow.

Topics: AI evolution, Future technology implications


Need for equity in AI development.

Supporting facts:

  • Our first session now is going to look at ai through the prism of equity and that is just crucial where developing nations fit in and how they can best position themselves to be excluded and not marginalized in this ai revolution.

Topics: Developing nations in AI, AI revolution


AI systems need to be harnessed so that they do not exacerbate existing inequalities or create new ones.

Supporting facts:

  • How we harness the potential of ai systems while ensuring that they do not exacerbate already existing inequalities and biases or even create new ones has to be central to our discussions.

Topics: AI systems, Inequalities


AI governance is essential and controversial.

Supporting facts:

  • We’re going to examine the essential and hotly debated questions and almost controversial in some respects of ai governance.

Topics: AI governance, Politics of AI


The need for a multi-stakeholder and international framework for AI governance.

Supporting facts:

  • What a multi-stakeholder and international framework when it comes to ai governance what that might actually look like.

Topics: AI governance, International framework


It’s essential to uphold worker rights in content moderation

Supporting facts:

  • Workers in the content moderation industry sign NDAs, preventing them from discussing their work with family and friends, potentially causing psychosocial impacts.

Topics: Worker Rights, Content Moderation, AI


Report

During the discussion, the speakers delved into various aspects of AI and its impact on our lives. They highlighted that AI is already transforming our lives and that its landscape is continuously changing. This points towards the fact that we are just at the beginning stages of this technological advancement, and significant progress is expected in the future.

The crucial nature of the current stage of AI development was emphasized. The decisions being made now will deeply affect our collective futures. This insight underscores the need for careful consideration and strategic decision-making to ensure that AI is harnessed for the benefit of all.

Furthermore, the speakers stressed the need for equity in AI development, particularly in relation to developing nations. They discussed how developing nations can position themselves to participate fully in the AI revolution rather than being left marginalized. This calls for efforts to bridge the gap and provide equal opportunities for all countries to leverage AI for their progress and development.

Another important point of discussion was the potential impact of AI systems on existing inequalities and biases. It was essential to harness the potential of AI systems while ensuring that they do not exacerbate or create new forms of inequalities.

This highlights the need for responsible development and implementation practices that consider the social impact of AI technologies. The speakers also explored the essential and controversial topic of AI governance. The discussion focused on questions and debates surrounding AI governance, such as who should be involved in decision-making processes and how to strike a balance between regulation and innovation.

Establishing a multi-stakeholder and international framework for AI governance was identified as crucial to fostering responsible and ethical AI practices on a global scale. The importance of upholding worker rights in the context of AI, specifically in the content moderation industry, was also highlighted.

The speakers pointed out that workers in this industry often sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), which can lead to psychosocial impacts due to their inability to discuss their work with family and friends. The need to prioritize worker rights and ensure decent working conditions in AI-related industries emerged as an important ethical concern.

Lastly, the speakers discussed the unique challenges and varying stages of digital infrastructure in Africa in relation to AI regulation. As Africa consists of 55 countries, each with its own level of digital advancement, it was emphasized that there cannot be a one-size-fits-all approach to AI rules for the continent.

This observation underscores the importance of tailoring AI regulations to the specific context and needs of each African country. Overall, the discussion shed light on the transformative power of AI and the need for responsible, equitable, and inclusive approaches to its development and implementation.

It highlighted the importance of considering the potential social, economic, and ethical implications of AI technologies, as well as the necessity of multi-stakeholder collaboration and international cooperation in governing AI.

JK

Jovan Kurbalija

Speech speed

164 words per minute

Speech length

2058 words

Speech time

755 secs


Arguments

Emphasizes on finding AI in niches, flea markets, places, favelas, and not in the big centers

Supporting facts:

  • Created his first AI system for international law in 1992.
  • Believes that knowledge is still fairly distributed worldwide.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Distribution


Artificial Intelligence(AI) has a higher chance of resulting in good impact but also holds significant risk in causing knowledge slavery.

Supporting facts:

  • Jovan sees a 60% chance of AI having a positive impact.
  • The risk of ‘knowledge slavery’ indicates a situation where a centralized system could codify and control access to knowledge, both historical and current.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Digital Divide, Knowledge Slavery


Immediate risks of AI, including exacerbation of the digital divide and knowledge slavery, are real and need urgent attention.

Supporting facts:

  • Digital divide is expected to increase in the short term.
  • Jovan mentions a concern where some big systems could codify and control our common heritage of mankind, including written and oral culture.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Slavery, Digital Divide


There’s a difference between open source AI and open AI

Supporting facts:

  • Open AI is not open source AI
  • Lama and Falcon are examples of open platforms

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Open AI, Open Source AI


AI is in its core very simple and politicians should not be confused by its technical terminology

Supporting facts:

  • Politicians should understand their role as protectors of their peoples’ interests
  • Request for protection from a Nashville congressman for the local music industry

Topics: AI, Politics, Monopolies, Misinformation


Fear-mongering over AI’s understanding and usage should be avoided

Supporting facts:

  • Fear-mongering can create unnecessary confusion and diversion

Topics: AI, Fear-mongering, Politics


Providing computing power to developing countries.

Supporting facts:

  • The international organization, CERN, among others, can contribute towards this objective.
  • Swiss made an initiative announcement to give computing power to developing countries.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Computing Power, Developing Countries


Creating an open-source, bottom-up platform for transparent, fair, inclusive data processing.

Supporting facts:

  • The platform’s users can be small actors from all over the world, including Kenya or a small village in Switzerland.
  • The Global Digital Compact can be announced along with this special project.

Topics: Data Processing, Open Source, Inclusivity, Transparency


The transparency of AI algorithms, particularly around weight allocation, is crucial

Supporting facts:

  • Weights in AI refer to the importance given to certain parameters or data in the decision-making process
  • Absolute transparency in this regard is currently lacking and needs to be improved

Topics: AI Transparency, Algorithmic Bias


There is a need for more open, honest, and frank discussions about AI

Supporting facts:

  • Currently, the discussion around AI and its implications is steeped in secrecy and confusion
  • A more transparent discussion about the technology and its processes will be beneficial for everyone involved

Topics: AI Ethics, AI Transparency


AI has evolved through iterations of AI winter, AI spring, AI summer, moving from attempts to codify human logic to a basis on probability due to the complexity of human logic

Supporting facts:

  • Charles Bonnet theorized 300 years ago that machines could think like humans
  • In 1956, AI was first introduced
  • Last 10 years have seen fast computers and a lot of data due to blockchain

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Probability, Human Logic, AI Evolution


AI systems are not capable of doing simple mathematics as they are not based on logic, but on probability

Supporting facts:

  • AI systems are inspired by the Austrian philosopher, Wittgenstein, who abdicated mathematical logic for probability

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Mathematics, Probability


Combining computing power, processing, probabilistic, symbolic logic and good chess skills can make every chess player achieve more than a grandmaster

Supporting facts:

  • Kasparov introduced playing games with one chess player and two computers, and the winners were two relatively unknown players

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Chess, Computing Power, Symbolic Logic


Report

The analysis of perspectives on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact reveals several interesting and important insights. One perspective emphasizes the significance of accessible and distributed knowledge worldwide. This viewpoint highlights the belief that knowledge is still fairly distributed worldwide.

It is argued that AI should be found not just in big centers but also in niches, flea markets, and favelas. The aim is to make AI accessible to all, regardless of their location or resources. This perspective aligns with the principles of reducing inequalities and promoting industry, innovation, and infrastructure.

Another viewpoint raises concerns about the risks associated with AI. One such risk is “knowledge slavery,” where a centralized system could codify and control access to historical and current knowledge. This perspective acknowledges that while AI has a higher chance of resulting in positive impacts, there are significant risks that need to be addressed urgently.

It particularly highlights the immediate risks of AI exacerbating the digital divide and leading to knowledge slavery. The analysis also reveals concerns about monopolies and misinformation in the AI space. It is argued that these issues pose a bigger immediate risk than extinction.

Monopolies can curtail fair market competition, while misinformation can generate false identities. This perspective emphasizes the importance of peace, justice, and strong institutions in combating these challenges. Another intriguing observation is the mention of fear-mongering surrounding AI. The argument is made that fear-mongering can create unnecessary confusion and diversion from addressing the real issues related to AI’s understanding and usage.

It is suggested that a more measured and informed approach is required. The analysis also brings up the need for open, honest, and frank discussions about AI. Currently, discussions around AI and its implications are often steeped in secrecy and confusion.

Transparency is highlighted as crucial for gaining a better understanding of the technology and its processes. Additionally, it is noted that AI systems have evolved over time. From attempts to codify human logic, AI has transitioned to a basis on probability due to the complexity of human logic.

It is mentioned that AI systems are not capable of simple mathematics as they are not based on logic but on probability. The analysis also touches upon the need for clarity in regulations and law regarding the digital space. It is argued that there should be more clarity in regulations and laws governing the digital space, particularly in addressing cybercrimes and establishing punishment systems.

In conclusion, the analysis of perspectives on AI and its impact reveals a complex landscape. While some highlight the importance of accessible and distributed knowledge, others raise concerns about the risks associated with AI, such as knowledge slavery and the digital divide.

The need for open discussions, addressing monopolies and misinformation, and clarity in regulations is also emphasized.

PD

Paul-Olivier Dehaye

Speech speed

174 words per minute

Speech length

2046 words

Speech time

704 secs


Arguments

AI is a powerful tool that will be applied in both good and bad ways

Supporting facts:

  • AI is seen as a powerful transformational tool, not necessarily for good or bad
  • AI’s application and effects span far and wide, in good and bad ways

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Technological Impact


We need to act urgently to ensure that the entry into the new age is inclusive

Supporting facts:

  • Many people risk being de-skilled by new technologies
  • Adoption of a collective perspective on protecting information about populations, subpopulations, groups, social networks is required

Topics: Inclusion, Worker Rights, Technological Advancement


Technological field can be moved with small investments and curated data.

Supporting facts:

  • The exclusivity of data is very important. Small groups, small populations can collect and curate data to build intelligence.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Data, Economy


It is possible to have a circular economy of intelligence that is more local and focused.

Supporting facts:

  • A circular economy of intelligence is possible, leveraging expertly curated data from smaller groups and populations.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Economy, Local Development


Paul-Olivier Dehaye supports the suggestion to give computing power to developing countries and provide a platform for data processing

Supporting facts:

  • The suggestion was made to have a space for individuals from all around the world to come with a data model and do processing according to rules, traceability, etc.
  • This would be done in a transparent, fair and inclusive way

Topics: Data Processing, Developing countries, Computing Power


Paul-Olivier Dehaye believes in the need for technical know-how to avoid entering into dynamics narrated as the only technical way to do things

Supporting facts:

  • It was suggested that the technical expertise in data protection and management should be emphasized

Topics: Technical Knowledge, Data Processing


We need to build a culture of collective probing of AI systems

Supporting facts:

  • Uber drivers collectively reclaimed their data to calculate what they are owed

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Collective Action, Transparency


Data is pivotal in identifying how users interact with AI systems and should be evaluated collectively

Supporting facts:

  • ChatGPT allows users to export their data for observation

Topics: Data Use, Artificial Intelligence, User Experience


Transparency is crucial in AI systems, especially regarding the sourcing and methodologies used

Supporting facts:

  • Uber drivers were able to calculate what they owed using their reclaimed data

Topics: Transparency, Artificial Intelligence, Data Sourcing


Paul-Olivier Dehaye emphasizes the need to pay attention to the advances in mathematics, particularly the blending of traditional symbolic logic and probabilistic approach to combine human and machine intelligence.

Supporting facts:

  • Nobel Prize equivalent mathematicians are using the combination of symbolic logic and probabilistic approach for the formalization of proofs.
  • This blend of human and machine intelligence is seen as the new core of intellectual endeavors.

Topics: AI, Mathematics, Human-Machine Collaboration


Report

The analysis of the arguments from the speakers reveals several key points about artificial intelligence (AI). Overall, AI is seen as a powerful tool that can be applied in both positive and negative ways. It has the potential to revolutionise reasoning and knowledge and can be compared to the cognitive architecture for the world.

This implies that AI has the ability to pull and push fragments of reasoning, similar to how the internet allows us to fetch and disseminate information. The potential of AI to manipulate cognitive elements like reasoning suggests that it can be a transformative force in various aspects of society.

One of the key concerns raised by the speakers is the need for inclusive entry into the new age of AI. There is a risk that many people may be de-skilled by new technologies, highlighting the urgency to act in order to ensure that the benefits of AI are accessible to all.

This suggests the importance of adopting a collective perspective and taking proactive measures to protect and empower individuals in the face of AI advancements. The speakers emphasise the need to protect data about social relations and the way people trust each other.

They propose adopting a collective approach to safeguarding this information and creating systems that can be controlled by individuals themselves. By doing so, the speakers argue that it is possible to foster a culture of trust and ensure the responsible use of data in AI systems.

The analysis also highlights the significance of data exclusivity in AI. The speakers argue that small groups and populations can collect and curate data to build intelligence. This suggests that the inclusivity of AI can be enhanced by allowing broader access to curated data, rather than relying solely on large entities and corporations.

In addition, the speakers propose the concept of a circular economy of intelligence. This entails leveraging expertly curated data from smaller groups and populations to drive local and focused intelligence. By encouraging and supporting the development of such localised intelligence, AI can contribute to the goal of decent work and economic growth.

The analysis also emphasises the need for computing power and data processing to be made accessible to developing countries. The speakers argue for the establishment of a transparent and inclusive platform where individuals from around the world can process data according to rules and traceability.

This would enable greater participation from developing countries and promote a fair distribution of AI capabilities. Technical knowledge in data protection and management is highlighted as essential in order to avoid falling into dynamics dictated as the only technical way of doing things.

Emphasising the importance of technical expertise, the speakers suggest that a comprehensive understanding of data protection and management is crucial for responsible and effective AI implementation. Legal expertise is also emphasised as necessary for protecting datasets and preventing the capture of scientific outputs by larger entities.

The speakers mention the French initiative called ‘Usage Rights’, which focuses on preserving scientific outputs and preventing their exploitation by big corporations. This highlights the need for legal frameworks that can safeguard the interests of individuals and promote peace, justice, and strong institutions in the context of AI development.

Transparency is a recurring theme throughout the analysis. The speakers argue that AI systems should be more transparent, with user participation and engagement in the design process. This can be facilitated by allowing users to export their data and observe how they interact with AI systems.

Transparency in sourcing and methodologies used in AI systems is also underscored as a critical factor in building trust and accountability. The analysis also draws attention to the potential of AI to advance fields beyond its own domain. The blend of human and machine intelligence observed in advanced mathematics is seen as the new core of intellectual endeavours.

This suggests that the integration of AI and human intelligence can have far-reaching implications, particularly in the fields of education, industry, innovation, and infrastructure. In conclusion, the analysis of the speakers’ arguments sheds light on various aspects of AI and its impact on society.

The key takeaways include the transformative power of AI, the need for inclusive entry into the AI age, the importance of protecting data and adopting a collective perspective, the significant role of data exclusivity and circular economy of intelligence, the importance of accessible computing power and data processing, the need for technical and legal expertise, the value of transparency in AI systems, and the potential of AI to influence multiple fields.

PM

Pedro Manuel Moreno

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

641 words

Speech time

283 secs


Arguments

AI has the potential to revolutionize industries and enhance efficiency and support innovation

Supporting facts:

  • Applications range from advanced data analytics and automation to augmenting human capabilities in healthcare, agriculture and education.
  • AI offers innovative pathways to tackle global challenges such as poverty, inequality, climate change and resource management.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Innovation, Efficiency


AI also presents complex ethical, social and economic considerations

Supporting facts:

  • The pervasive integration of AI into our lives raises critical questions about privacy, data security and the ethical use of technology.
  • There is growing concern about AI’s potential to disrupt labor markets, displace traditional jobs and create new forms of inequality.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Economy


The unchecked expansion of AI technologies could lead to unforeseen environmental impacts

Supporting facts:

  • The unchecked expansion of AI technologies could lead to unforeseen environmental impacts.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Environment, Technology


The rapid growth of AI risks increasing already significant disparities in digitalization between and within countries

Supporting facts:

  • Countries at the forefront of AI development such as the United States, China and the United Kingdom are making significant strides whereas the least developed countries are struggling to keep pace.
  • U.S., China, the United Kingdom dominate AI research. They hold nearly half of all AI-related patents. Moreover, the United States and China collectively account for half of the world’s hyperscale data centers, over 90% of funding for AI startups, and 70% of all AI researchers.
  • Titans like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, IBM, Meta, Microsoft, Alibaba, Tencent have privileged access to and control over data flows and digital service revenues which may exacerbate global inequities and deepen digital divides.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Digital Divide, Inequality


Report

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionise industries, enhance efficiency, and support innovation across various sectors. It offers innovative pathways to address global challenges such as poverty, inequality, climate change, and resource management. The applications of AI range from advanced data analytics and automation to augmenting human capabilities in healthcare, agriculture, and education.

This highlights the positive impact AI can have on society and its potential to drive progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. However, the pervasive integration of AI into our lives also raises critical questions and concerns.

Privacy, data security, and the ethical use of technology become paramount as AI becomes more widespread. The unchecked expansion of AI technologies can potentially compromise personal privacy, leading to breaches in data security. There is a growing need to address these ethical considerations to ensure that AI is used responsibly and for the benefit of all.

Moreover, there is a negative aspect to the development of AI. There are concerns that AI may disrupt labour markets, leading to the displacement of traditional jobs and creating new forms of inequality. The potential impact on employment raises questions about how society will adapt to these changes and ensure decent work and economic growth, as stated in SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth.

Additionally, the dominance of countries like the United States, China, and the United Kingdom in AI research, patent ownership, and data control exacerbates global inequalities and deepens digital divides. This further highlights the need to address these disparities and foster inclusivity to mitigate the potential adverse effects of AI development.

Furthermore, the unchecked expansion of AI technologies also has potential environmental implications. The environmental impacts of AI are yet to be fully understood, and there is a need for careful consideration of the potential consequences. It is crucial to ensure that the development of AI is aligned with SDG 13: Climate Action and does not contribute to further environmental harm.

In conclusion, while AI holds tremendous potential to revolutionise industries, enhance efficiency, and tackle global challenges, its integration must be accompanied by careful considerations. The ethical use of technology, privacy, data security, and environmental impacts need to be addressed to ensure the responsible and inclusive development of AI.

Involving developing countries in discussions about AI is vital to foster inclusivity and avoid excluding them from shaping the future. By addressing the challenges and considering the potential risks, we can harness the full potential of AI while minimising its negative impacts.

TA

Teki Akuetteh

Speech speed

133 words per minute

Speech length

1636 words

Speech time

740 secs


Arguments

AI has transformed economies and improved issues around poverty in developing nations

Supporting facts:

  • Technologies have transformed the economies of African countries.
  • Technologies have improved issues around poverty, social impact, and sustainable issues.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Developing Nations, Economic Transformation, Poverty Alleviation


African countries face challenges in AI development due to costs and influence of big tech companies

Supporting facts:

  • The cost for a seat at an AI producing company is an average of $200.
  • Many AI developing companies in Africa are being funded and supported by the big tech companies.

Topics: African AI Development, Technology Monopoly, AI Production Costs


Developing nations need global cooperation for benefiting from AI

Supporting facts:

  • To develop beneficial AI tools, companies in developing nations have to leapfrog on these resource tools, which control these resources.
  • AI is a profit-making issue, and it’s a very critical resource where globally everybody that is contributing to these resources can effectively benefit.

Topics: Global Cooperation, AI Benefits


AI ecosystem should be a resource for everybody

Supporting facts:

  • The AI ecosystem is similar and different in terms of its structure and governance
  • Existing resources are recognized in economies
  • Suggests a similar structure to how the Internet is governed

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Accessibility, Resource Allocation


AI should be seen as an enabler not just a technology

Supporting facts:

  • AI is used to enable various sectors
  • AI regulator may not be an effective regulator for the sectors it enables like healthcare or education

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Vision, Regulation


Contributors of data sets to AI should be recognized and properly compensated

Supporting facts:

  • Suggests concept of a trust where contributors decide what data is made available and in what context

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, Data contribution, Recognition, Compensation


The single action Teki Akuetteh thinks needs to take place is making AI resources equitably available to all

Topics: AI Equity, Inclusivity in AI


Report

The discussion centered around the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on developing nations, particularly African countries. It highlighted the transformative influence of AI technologies on African economies, addressing issues related to poverty, social impact, and sustainability. However, challenges were also identified, such as the high costs associated with AI development and the influence of big tech companies.

The need for global cooperation, equitable access to resources, and supportive infrastructure were emphasized. Recognizing and compensating data contributors, careful regulation, and inclusivity were also deemed crucial for responsible and equitable AI development in developing nations.

UR

Uma Rani

Speech speed

172 words per minute

Speech length

2537 words

Speech time

883 secs


Arguments

Uma Rani believes in digital worker rights

Supporting facts:

  • Uma Rani works at the research department of the ILO and has done extensive research in the area of AI in developing countries

Topics: digital worker rights, platform economy, AI in developing countries


AI adoption in the workplace leads to more task replacement than job replacement

Supporting facts:

  • AI has not yet been adopted on a large scale in most workplaces
  • Tasks in many industries are being automated or outsourced to AI technologies
  • There’s been significant investment in AI-related tools

Topics: AI Adoption, Labor Market, Task Replacement


Content moderators are exposed to psychosocial impacts

Supporting facts:

  • Content moderators can’t talk about their work due to NDAs, leading to internalization of stress
  • There’s a case in Kenya involving Meta and content moderation

Topics: Content Moderation, Psychosocial Impact


Understanding the data value chain is crucial

Supporting facts:

  • Complete transparency is needed in the collection, cleaning, analysis, and outcome of data.
  • Worker empowerment can be achieved by fighting for data rights.

Topics: data value chain, data rights


Transparency in algorithms is crucial

Supporting facts:

  • Transparency in data and algorithms is needed to address fair practices and equity issues.

Topics: algorithm transparency, fair practices


AI development requires ethical regulation

Supporting facts:

  • Insufficient attention is being given to the development process of AI.
  • AI development should be regulated ethically.

Topics: AI development, ethical regulation


Artificial Intelligence and emerging technologies do not necessarily signify the end of jobs for developers and computer programmers

Supporting facts:

  • Programming and development tasks have been streamlined and facilitated by AI but cannot be fully replaced
  • ChatGPT can generate multiple solutions but a human developer is still required for further development
  • Existing layers of programming help speed up the process, but innovative thinking for development is still necessary

Topics: Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, GitHub, Software Development, Employment


Ethical development and use of AI

Supporting facts:

  • There’s a huge risk of AI being used for monitoring and surveillance
  • AI could lead to work intensification and worse working conditions

Topics: AI, Ethics, Development


Report

Uma Rani, an employee at the International Labour Organization (ILO), strongly advocates for digital worker rights. She has conducted extensive research on the impact of AI in developing countries, shaping her belief in the importance of protecting workers in the digital era.

However, some perceive her as biased due to her background as a development economist and her work in the platform economy. The adoption of AI in workplaces has not yet reached a large scale, but there has been significant investment in AI-related tools.

This has led to the automation or outsourcing of tasks in various industries, raising concerns about the replacement of specific tasks rather than entire jobs. This argument suggests that AI adoption may result in increased productivity and efficiency, but there is a risk of certain tasks becoming obsolete.

One of the worries associated with AI adoption is the potential de-skilling of highly educated workers. In some cases, individuals with advanced degrees are assigned mundane tasks related to AI development, such as cleaning and feeding data to AI systems.

Additionally, examples exist of IT graduates working on removing objectionable material from the web, which indicates a potential waste of their expertise and skills. Content moderators, who are responsible for moderating online content, often experience psychosocial impacts and are unable to discuss their work due to non-disclosure agreements.

This lack of communication and support can lead to the internalization of stress and negative mental health consequences. There have been calls for authorities to intervene and address these issues surrounding content moderation, as exemplified by a case involving Meta in Kenya.

Understanding the data value chain is crucial, and Uma Rani argues that worker empowerment can be achieved by fighting for data rights. She emphasizes the need for complete transparency in the collection, cleaning, analysis, and outcome of data. This would ensure that workers have control and ownership over the data they contribute.

Furthermore, discussions on fiduciary or data trust have been initiated, asserting the right of everyone to the data they contribute and its usage. Transparency in algorithms is also a key concern. It is argued that algorithm transparency is necessary to address fair practices and equity issues.

By providing transparency, biases and potential discrimination embedded in algorithms can be identified and mitigated. This contributes to a more just and equitable use of AI and data-driven technologies. The development of AI requires ethical regulation, as insufficient attention is currently being given to the process.

The argument asserts the importance of considering ethical implications in the development and use of AI to ensure it aligns with societal values and upholds ethical standards. This includes addressing issues such as privacy, bias, and accountability. Contrary to the widespread fear of job displacement, it is highlighted that artificial intelligence and emerging technologies do not necessarily result in job losses for developers and computer programmers.

While AI has streamlined and facilitated certain programming tasks, human developers are still required for further development and innovative thinking. The argument suggests that rather than replacing jobs, AI can enhance and support the work of developers and programmers. In light of technological advancements, there is a need to revisit and reframe industrial and employment policies.

The advent of AI and platforms like GitHub has led to a shift from formal jobs to more informal arrangements. This raises concerns about de-skilling and the need to develop products that benefit our own societies and economies. Policies should be updated to provide support and address the challenges posed by technological revolutions.

Finally, the ethical development and use of AI is crucial. There is a risk that AI could be used for monitoring, surveillance, and work intensification, leading to worse working conditions. It is argued that clear regulation of AI is necessary to protect workers throughout its development and use.

This includes safeguarding against unethical practices, ensuring privacy, and promoting fairness and respect for worker rights. Overall, the expanded summary highlights the various arguments and perspectives concerning digital worker rights, AI adoption, the data value chain, algorithm transparency, ethical regulation, and the impact of AI on job displacement.

Noteworthy observations include the need for worker empowerment, the importance of revisiting industrial and employment policies, and the risks and challenges associated with AI’s development and use.

Strengthening the positive and mitigating the negative impacts for the environment of digitalisation regulations ( Transnational Institute)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Auidence

The discussion focused on the regulation and governance of the digital economy, touching upon various viewpoints. One argument stated that liability should not be automatically attributed for actions in the digital economy. The example of Facebook being exempt from responsibility for content shown on its marketplace was cited. This argument advocated for a more nuanced approach to assigning liability.

Another speaker emphasized the significance of considering existing regulatory frameworks and international organizations in mitigating the impact of the digital economy. The Kyoto Protocol was mentioned as an example, as it provides regulations for waste disposal and has provisions for countries to abide by. The speaker argued for the development of similar frameworks to regulate the digital economy. Existing policies and protocols that can guide decision-making were also emphasized, with references to UPOB 91, a charter recognizing seed patents and restricting countries’ seed policies, and the UN Seed Protocol, which protects indigenous people’s rights in seed harvesting and cultivation.

However, it was acknowledged that not all international policies and protocols are equal. Trade rules were identified as potential underminers of policy spaces, and violating these rules can result in dispute settlements with financial consequences.

The importance of not allowing private companies to solely determine harmful content was highlighted. Laws exist to delegate judgment on such matters, and if a company denies the harm of certain content, they can be held liable if a judge orders otherwise.

Lastly, the discussion emphasized the need for global-scale solutions to address global-scale problems. Established international conventions, such as the Kyoto Protocol, were suggested as tools to regulate the digitalization process. The idea of creating a model treaty on digitalization and engaging in discussions to mitigate problems at a global scale rather than focusing on specific sectors was also presented.

Overall, the discussion provided diverse perspectives on the regulation and governance of the digital economy, highlighting arguments for nuanced liability approaches, consideration of existing frameworks, and the significance of global-scale solutions. The examples and evidence presented added depth to the conversation, illustrating the potential applicability of existing policies and protocols in addressing the challenges of the digital economy.

Sofia Scasserra

The analysis raises several concerns about the impact of the digital revolution on the environment and logistics. It argues that the increased international trade and accelerated logistics associated with the digital revolution have led to a significant environmental burden. The rise in trade has resulted in more shipments and movements of packages, which further contribute to carbon emissions and unsustainable resource consumption. This negative sentiment is supported by evidence that highlights the need for a more sustainable approach to the transportation and delivery of goods.

Additionally, the free flow of data principle, which promotes the unrestricted movement and transfer of data, is seen as having negative consequences for the environment. Data centres, which are essential for storing and processing large amounts of digital information, require vast amounts of water and energy, leading to increased pollution. Additionally, the majority of data centres are located in tax havens or large cities, which may not be environmentally friendly. This geographic concentration of data centres in populated areas exacerbates housing problems and puts further strain on urban infrastructure. The argument suggests that the unchecked growth of data centres should be addressed to mitigate their environmental impact.

The analysis also highlights concerns regarding the impact of the digital revolution on social and ethical standards. It argues that the prohibition of restrictions on source code transfers, a characteristic of the digital revolution, has implications for environmental and social standards. The argument posits that without proper regulation and oversight, technologies cannot be guaranteed to adhere to these standards. Additionally, artificial intelligence, a key component of the digital revolution, is expected to meet ethical standards, including considering environmental factors. Therefore, the analysis argues for the importance of incorporating and enforcing environmental and social standards within the digital sphere.

Another area of concern raised in the analysis is the moderation of content on social media platforms. It is noted that illegal trade of animals, plants, and minerals at risk of extinction has been facilitated through Facebook groups. The analysis emphasises the need for effective content moderation measures to combat this issue and ensure environmental conservation efforts are not undermined.

Moreover, the analysis identifies the preclusion of customs duties on electronic transmissions as a significant loss of revenue for countries. This omission is seen as a disadvantage, as countries miss out on collecting significant fiscal terms from the growing digital economy. The argument suggests that the current approach to customs duties on electronic transmissions needs to be reevaluated to ensure fair taxation and revenue generation.

On a more positive note, the analysis underscores the urgent need for digital solutions in an increasingly digitised world. It recognises that the digital sphere is a rapidly growing sector that not only affects us today but will continue to expand exponentially in the future. This observation highlights the importance of addressing the impact of the digital revolution on the environment, logistics, and other social and ethical domains.

Additionally, the analysis suggests that giving states room to regulate and enforce better practices within the digital sphere is crucial. This approach acknowledges the role of governments in shaping policies and regulations that can guide companies towards more sustainable and responsible practices.

Furthermore, it is argued that the verification of compliance with environmental and social standards, even if it may slow down the economy, is necessary. This observation stresses the importance of holding companies accountable for their actions and ensuring they adhere to established standards to safeguard the environment.

Notably, the analysis supports the idea of a regulated digital sphere and the need to preserve policy space for countries. The argument proposes that instead of imposing extensive rules on the digital economy, it is essential to carefully consider what policy space countries require to effectively navigate the challenges posed by the digital revolution.

Lastly, the analysis raises concerns about the enforceability of rules within the digital sphere. The global digital compact at the UN and the UNESCO principles of Ethics on AI are recognised as important frameworks, but the analysis highlights the need for more robust enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with ethical and environmental standards.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the environmental burden and negative impact associated with the digital revolution, emphasising the need for sustainable approaches to logistics, data centres, source code transfers, and content moderation. It advocates for the enforcement of environmental and social standards, revenue generation through customs duties, and the regulation of the digital sphere to preserve policy space and ensure responsible practices. The analysis also recognises the urgent need for digital solutions in an increasingly digitised world while calling for the accountability of companies and the enforceability of rules and standards.

Ana Romero Cano

Peru has signed 22 trade agreements, many of which are still in effect despite their expiration. However, these agreements have resulted in numerous global demands, making Peru the country with the most demands worldwide for two consecutive years. This indicates that Peru’s trade agreements and bilateral investment treaties have led to significant challenges and disputes.

One major concern raised by civil society organizations is the impact of Peru’s commercial policies. These policies do not guarantee sustainability, human rights, and citizen participation. This raises questions about the effectiveness of Peru’s approach to commercial policy and its ability to balance economic interests with social and environmental concerns.

Peru also faces significant environmental issues such as water abuse, deforestation, pesticide use, and oil spills. In 2020 alone, Peru lost 203,000 hectares of forest, the highest figure in recent decades. Additionally, monitoring in Peru has revealed that over 21 food items are highly contaminated with pesticides. The Repsol oil spill further affected more than 10,300 people involved in fishing activities. These environmental concerns highlight the need for stronger regulations and sustainable practices in Peru.

Another issue is the commercial policy implemented in the Andean region, which reinforces primary exporting countries and leads to asymmetric trade without technology transfer. This means that Peru’s exports lack higher added value or a higher technological level. Additionally, this policy has resulted in more flexibility in environmental norms, which can have adverse effects on sustainability and economic growth.

In light of these challenges, it is imperative for Peru to promote trade that contributes to sustainable development. With political, economic, and climatic crises affecting the country, linked trade that addresses social, environmental, and economic concerns becomes an urgent need. It is essential for Peru to re-evaluate its trade agreements, commercial policies, and environmental regulations in order to achieve enduring and sustainable development.

Overall, Peru’s trade agreements, commercial policies, and environmental concerns raise questions about the country’s approach to sustainable development and the balance between economic growth and environmental protection. It is crucial for Peru to address these challenges and promote trade that supports long-term sustainability and contributes to the well-being of its citizens and the global community.

Fernando Hernandez Espino

The digital economy is rapidly growing and becoming the dominant sector of the global economy. Trade itself is also evolving into a more digital format. However, concerns have been raised regarding the implications of the digital economy within the context of trade negotiations.

One argument is that trade applies not only to material aspects of the economy but also to the digital economy. The increasing digitisation of trade has significant environmental implications. The production of technology hardware and its waste contribute to pollution. Additionally, data centres require substantial energy and water resources while also contributing to housing issues in urban areas.

Another concern is that the current digital governance model is accelerating international trade and logistics, resulting in more environmental damage. The accelerated growth of international trade requires increased energy consumption, fuel consumption, and resource usage. Moreover, the storage and processing of data have a significant environmental cost.

Furthermore, the provision prohibiting the transfer of algorithms and source codes in digital trade agreements is seen as problematic. Access to technology is crucial for a sovereign and just transition to greener technologies. It is argued that artificial intelligence and automation systems must adhere to certain ethical standards, including environmental standards.

Regulations should be in place for tech products to ensure they respect the environment, fundamental human rights, and national sovereignty. For instance, the illegal sale of protected animals or plants on platforms such as Facebook is harmful. Additionally, the management of pesticides through technological means like drones should be checked and controlled through access to the source code.

On the other hand, levying taxes on electronic transmissions could provide the necessary resources for states to address climate change. The implementation of taxes can help countries invest in renewable energy, strengthen their control capabilities, and raise awareness through campaigns. Developing countries are losing billions in potential revenue due to the lack of customs duties on electronic transmissions.

The rapid growth of the digital economy necessitates the need for regulation in the ever-evolving technology sector. The impact of technology on the economy and the environment can have massive implications. While technology progress is inevitable, it must be handled responsibly to avoid exacerbating global inequalities and leading to environmental exploitation.

The current trade rules have been criticised for perpetuating economic disparities and a pattern of exploitation. Companies like Amazon have made significant profits but paid little to no taxes in developing countries. Moreover, the existing rules protect intellectual property and allow powerful multinationals to monopolise resource-rich regions.

Protocols and policy spaces do exist, but they do not offer the same level of protection. The WTO rules have been influential in undermining policy spaces. For instance, if a country violates trade rules, it can lead to a dispute settlement that will cost them money.

The UPOB 91, which recognises the patenting of seeds, has been seen as a problematic space. The European Union pushes for countries to join the UPOB 91 through trade agreements. If a country like Mexico decides to join, it becomes liable for lawsuits if it fails to implement certain policies.

In conclusion, the growth of the digital economy and the increasing digitisation of trade present both opportunities and challenges. Concerns have been raised about the environmental impact, the need for regulations to protect the environment and human rights, as well as the current trade rules perpetuating economic disparities. The discussion around these issues highlights the importance of responsible handling of technology to avoid exacerbating global inequalities and environmental exploitation. Moreover, there is a need for more comprehensive and protective protocols and policy spaces to address these concerns and strive for a more sustainable and equitable digital economy.

Deborah James

The ongoing debate centres around the necessity of implementing digital economy regulations and their potential impact on government control and corporate interests. One perspective argues that these regulations tend to limit government control while favouring corporations. It is claimed that big tech companies evade regulations and taxes through their business models. Additionally, trade disciplines are said to restrain governments’ ability to control foreign corporations. Proposed digital trade rules have come under scrutiny for granting excessive power and profit to tech corporations while hampering the effectiveness of government regulation. It is highlighted that these rules would allow tech giants like Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft to access tax evasions, the non-disclosure of proprietary algorithms, and unrestricted data flows. The United States has recently withdrawn its support for some of these proposals due to the recognition of the need for further regulation. Furthermore, it is argued that the existing digital trade rules do not align with the development objectives set forth by developing countries.

On the other hand, proponents of maintaining regulatory space for future digital innovations contend that it is crucial to ensure countries have the capacity to regulate emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). They caution against tying up regulatory space in trade agreements, as it could inhibit future governance and hinder the ability to effectively regulate new technologies.

Regarding social media platforms, Facebook’s business model is criticised for promoting misinformation. Whistleblowers have exposed the lack of monitoring of misinformation in certain regions. It is alleged that Facebook’s business model enables electoral manipulation and the fomenting of violence and discrimination for the sake of generating more profits.

In terms of online content liability, the viewpoint is that online platforms should be held accountable for illegal or harmful content. Several supporting facts underpin this argument, including cases where harm was caused, such as a girl committing suicide due to continuous exposure to harmful content. In another instance, the trafficking of women and children was facilitated electronically, highlighting the lack of regulation in the digital realm compared to the physical world.

The exemption of online intermediaries from liability, similar to the physical world, is deemed problematic. This exemption is instated by Section 230 of telecommunications law in the United States. It has been pointed out that such an exemption leads to prohibited actions, like trafficking, being conducted online with minimal consequences.

Concerns are raised about the lack of enforceable regulation in the digital sphere. The only negotiated rules in the digital domain are found within free trade agreements, while principles of ethics on AI and global digital compacts lack enforceability, functioning primarily as good practices.

Lastly, the necessity of fair trade, anti-monopoly rules, pro-competition, and global taxation is acknowledged, but it is highlighted that these rules are often deemed non-binding due to the significant power held by large corporations. Big tech companies are purportedly advocating for self-regulation, while developing countries face challenges in achieving fair tax rules for digitalisation, primarily due to resistance from developed countries.

Overall, the debate on digital economy regulations encompasses a range of viewpoints and considerations. It is evident that balancing government control, corporate interests, regulation of emerging technologies, and liability for online content pose significant challenges. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, finding effective solutions that promote equitable and responsible digital governance remains a pressing issue.

AR

Ana Romero Cano

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

1158 words

Speech time

568 secs

A

Auidence

Speech speed

153 words per minute

Speech length

574 words

Speech time

225 secs

DJ

Deborah James

Speech speed

211 words per minute

Speech length

3957 words

Speech time

1126 secs

FH

Fernando Hernandez Espino

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

3700 words

Speech time

1286 secs

SS

Sofia Scasserra

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

3897 words

Speech time

1349 secs

Startup 4 Inclusion – The Role of Startup20 under G20 India (ERIA)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Moderator

The Femtech market is expected to double in size within the next five years, focusing on areas such as pregnancy, nursing, reproductive and menstrual health, and contraception. This growth is partly due to the accelerated rise and adoption of digital health solutions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Additionally, women of working age are 75% more likely than men to use digital tools for healthcare, indicating their greater engagement and interest in leveraging technology for managing their health.

However, despite the positive growth prospects, many Femtech offerings still face societal stigma due to their association with taboo subjects. This stigma hinders the widespread acceptance and usage of these products and solutions.

Another concern is the limited development of the Femtech market in the developed world, leaving out significant portions of the global population and creating an inequality in access to innovative healthcare technologies and solutions.

To address these challenges and promote inclusivity, initiatives like Startup20 have emerged. Startup20, as the first engagement group under the Indian presidency of G20, empowers task forces to develop key priorities for the global startup ecosystem. One particular task force, Include, focuses on promoting startups that address the challenges faced by underrepresented groups.

In the context of Femtech and breastfeeding, providing comprehensive support and education for mothers is crucial. Etta Watts Russell, an advocate in this field, emphasises the importance of solutions like Lactamo, which has achieved a 100% clinical validation rate and aims to improve the support available to mothers.

Furthermore, there has been a shift in society’s perception of women’s health and priorities. Industry statistics project a doubling of opportunities in women’s health over the next five years. Technology enables better access to health solutions, particularly for women in remote or rural areas.

In conclusion, the Femtech market is poised for significant growth, driven by digital solutions and innovations addressing various aspects of women’s health. However, challenges related to societal stigmas and limited accessibility need to be addressed to ensure a more inclusive and global impact. Initiatives like Startup20 and the advocacy of individuals like Etta Watts Russell play a vital role in promoting equality and proactive approaches to women’s health.

Etta Watts Russell

The Femtech market, which encompasses technology-based solutions catering to women’s health needs, is projected to double in size within the next five years. This growth is primarily focused on areas such as pregnancy, nursing, reproductive and menstrual health, and contraception. Advanced maternal care is identified as a key component of Femtech, highlighting the importance of providing comprehensive healthcare solutions for expectant mothers.

One significant aspect of the Femtech market is its ability to empower women to track and manage their own health by utilizing their personal data. By empowering women to take control of their health, Femtech plays a crucial role in promoting gender equality and supporting SDG 5 (Gender Equality).

The rapid growth of Femtech is also breaking down societal barriers and overcoming stigmatization associated with women’s health issues. Breastfeeding, for example, is stigmatized in many parts of the world. However, the growth of Femtech is gradually removing the barriers by providing support and education to mothers. In addition, social media platforms have implemented policies to restrict educational content on women’s health, but the development of the Femtech market challenges these restrictions and provides valuable resources and information for women.

Furthermore, inclusive startups, particularly those focusing on underrepresented communities, have the potential to stimulate economic growth and contribute to SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Activation of underrepresented communities has been linked to an increase in GDP, highlighting the positive impact of inclusive startups on the economy.

Etta Watts Russell, a prominent advocate for the integration of Femtech in the healthcare sector, emphasizes the importance of addressing stigmatized women’s health issues and empowering underrepresented communities. She underscores the economic benefits of investing in breastfeeding and the significant market potential for Femtech.

Establishing a Femtech startup comes with its own set of challenges. Obstacles such as intellectual property (IP), clinical validation, market validation, regulatory compliance, funding, and manufacturing impact the success of such ventures. However, government grant funds and support from the startup ecosystem can prove instrumental in overcoming these barriers.

The international platform Startup20 provides an opportunity for diverse startups to learn from each other. Through engagement meetings, various countries present their strengths and weaknesses in the startup space, promoting global interactions and the exchange of knowledge. The diversity of delegates, ranging from founders to venture capitalists and professional firms, adds richness to the startup ecosystem.

Support and education are crucial for the success of Femtech solutions. Etta Watts Russell emphasizes the need for educating mothers and raising awareness about solutions like Lactamo. Without proper support, the ability of Femtech products to improve breastfeeding statistics and women’s health outcomes may be limited.

The future of the Femtech sector looks promising, with industry statistics predicting a significant evolution in the next 5-10 years. Taboo subjects related to women’s health are emerging as focus areas, highlighting the growing recognition and acceptance of previously neglected issues. The use of data in women’s health gives power to women, enabling them to make informed decisions about their well-being.

Femtech solutions promote proactive approaches to healthcare, countering negative trends and bridging gaps in access to healthcare services. By empowering women to handle their own health issues, Femtech contributes to SDG 3 (Good Health and Wellbeing).

Digitalization has the potential to revolutionize the Femtech space. By providing digital solutions, women can comfortably discuss their health concerns and find support. The use of technology can also aid in tackling fertility journeys, pregnancy, and postpartum experiences.

Overall, the growth and development of the Femtech market present numerous opportunities to address women’s health needs, break down societal barriers, and empower underrepresented communities. By integrating Femtech solutions into the healthcare sector, prioritizing education and awareness, and embracing digitalization, significant progress can be made towards achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

EW

Etta Watts Russell

Speech speed

163 words per minute

Speech length

2584 words

Speech time

954 secs

M

Moderator

Speech speed

216 words per minute

Speech length

407 words

Speech time

113 secs

Shaping the Future: Harnessing E-commerce for Sustainable Development in the ECOWAS Region (ECOWAS)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Shamira Ahmed

In West Africa, e-commerce growth is hindered by several challenges. Access to stable energy grids is lacking, resulting in access deficits. Reliable internet and mobile connectivity are also limited, leading to digital divides in the region. Moreover, there are obstacles related to the access and use of these technologies. The lack of standardisation in cross-border payment systems further impedes e-commerce development. Additionally, there is a need to equip citizens with the necessary digital capabilities, and the region faces significant cybersecurity threats.

To address these challenges, a comprehensive approach is advocated. This approach includes fostering regional integration, enhancing economic diversification, promoting job creation, and ensuring inclusivity. The ECOWAS Vision 2050 and ongoing digital reforms aim to tackle these issues. The strategy outlined by ECOWAS includes strengthening institutions, securing trust in e-commerce supply chains, and providing e-commerce intelligence. It also emphasises the importance of including marginalised groups such as women, youth, people with disabilities, informal cross-border traders, and rural communities. This inclusive approach recognises the importance of creating equal opportunities for all in the digital economy.

Collaborative efforts in regulatory harmonisation are vital for creating a conducive environment for digital trade. By aligning regulations across borders, barriers to cross-border e-commerce can be reduced. Furthermore, robust legal frameworks for data privacy, cybersecurity, and intellectual property are crucial for safeguarding e-commerce transactions and protecting digital assets.

While regulations and legal aspects are important, it is essential to consider the entire ecosystem within which e-commerce operates. This broader perspective takes into account not only the regulatory and legal aspects but also the various stakeholders, networks, and infrastructure that contribute to a thriving e-commerce ecosystem.

A governance approach, rather than solely relying on a regulatory framework, is advocated for e-commerce. This approach provides the necessary flexibility and adaptability to keep pace with rapid technological changes. It ensures that regulatory frameworks remain collaborative and effective across borders. By adopting a governance approach, the evolving nature of e-commerce can be better accommodated, enabling innovation and growth in the digital economy.

Shamira Ahmed emphasises the need for a vibrant e-commerce ecosystem in the ECOWAS region. This includes political will, adaptability, and a shared vision to drive the development and adoption of e-commerce. Structural inequalities need to be addressed, and digital and data-driven technologies should be leveraged to foster economic growth and job creation.

Furthermore, it is crucial to be cautious and ensure that no one is left behind in shaping the region’s digital future. Consideration should be given to existing endowments and capabilities, as well as institutional variations and financial mechanisms. By promoting inclusivity and reducing inequalities, the benefits of e-commerce can be more widely distributed throughout society.

In conclusion, e-commerce in West Africa faces multiple challenges, but these can be overcome through a comprehensive approach that includes regional integration, economic diversification, job creation, and inclusivity. This approach should be supported by regulatory harmonisation, robust legal frameworks, and a governance approach to adapt to the evolving nature of e-commerce. By addressing these challenges and leveraging digital technologies, the ECOWAS region can create a vibrant e-commerce ecosystem that fosters economic growth, job opportunities, and inclusivity for all its citizens.

Kolawole Sofola

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) has partnered with ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States) in the development of the ECOWAS e-commerce strategy, demonstrating their commitment to promoting e-commerce growth in the region. Kolawole Sofola expresses gratitude for UNCTAD’s collaboration in the strategy development, acknowledging the importance of this partnership. Additionally, Shamika from UNCTAD confirms their dedication to supporting the implementation of the ECOWAS e-commerce strategy, further cementing the commitment of both organizations.

The collaboration between UNCTAD and ECOWAS goes beyond the ECOWAS region, as there is ongoing development work in the Pacific region associated with UNCTAD. Shamika mentions this development work during her speech, indicating the expansion and impact of UNCTAD’s initiatives.

In the ECOWAS region, UNCTAD has conducted nine e-trade readiness assessments, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the region’s readiness for e-commerce. Furthermore, UNCTAD has formulated two regional assessments and strategies, underlining their proactive approach to promoting e-commerce in the region. Shamika emphasizes the importance of implementation in her speech, highlighting the commitment to translating strategies and assessments into action.

The ECOWAS e-commerce strategy is built on four pillars: institution, trust, market intelligence, and inclusion. These pillars ensure a comprehensive approach to fostering sustainable and inclusive e-commerce growth in the region.

Digitalization plays a crucial role in ECOWAS Vision 2050, with support for collaboration and digitalization being formally endorsed by the Council of Ministers of ECOWAS. This reflects the region’s commitment to harnessing the potential of digital transformation to achieve long-term goals.

The strategy’s formulation aims to capitalize on the potential for e-commerce and digital transformation in the ECOWAS region. The regional e-commerce readiness assessment, which is reflected in the strategy, serves as a foundation for identifying areas of improvement and implementing necessary recommendations. Progress is already being made, with countries like Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire starting to implement recommendations and measures from ECOWAS’s e-commerce strategy.

Access to the internet is recognized as critical infrastructure rather than a luxury. Living in a digital technological revolution, individuals need internet access to fully participate in the digital economy and leverage powerful technologies like AI in sectors such as health, agriculture, and education.

Governments play a crucial role in providing the necessary ICT infrastructure. The importance of ICT infrastructure is emphasized, highlighting that internet connectivity is not optional. Governments need to ensure that there is adequate infrastructure in place to support digital transformation and promote inclusive economic growth.

A holistic approach to e-commerce beyond legal and regulatory frameworks is essential. The e-Trade for All initiative advocates for comprehensive e-commerce development, including trade facilitation and digital skills development within the sector.

When developing policies, a user-centric approach is crucial. This means considering the needs and perspectives of the private sector, as they are key users of e-commerce. Involving the private sector in policy formulation allows for policies that better meet their requirements.

Entrepreneurship and inclusive economic growth are significant factors in driving economic development. Support mechanisms for scaling up innovative sustainability are also important, ensuring strategies and initiatives that promote sustainable entrepreneurship.

The private sector’s involvement in policy formulation is vital, and smaller organizations and businesses should also be included to ensure a comprehensive approach that represents the diverse needs and interests of all stakeholders.

Some challenges exist, such as the high credit rates from financial institutions that hinder business scalability. Governments should enable the private sector to do what it does best, recognizing the importance of private sector efficiency and innovation.

In conclusion, the collaboration between UNCTAD and ECOWAS in developing the ECOWAS e-commerce strategy highlights their commitment to fostering e-commerce growth in the region. The strategy’s pillars, emphasis on digitalization, and focus on collaboration reflect the region’s ambitious goals. Additionally, the importance of internet access, ICT infrastructure, a holistic approach to e-commerce development, the role of the private sector, and support mechanisms are all crucial considerations for sustainable and inclusive economic growth in the region.

Shamika N. Sirimanne

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has achieved a significant milestone by formulating the first regional e-commerce strategy in West Africa. This strategy aligns with the African Union’s e-commerce strategy, showcasing the strong partnership between ECOWAS and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) over the past decade. This partnership has led to the development of not only the ECOWAS e-commerce strategy but also support for two e-commerce strategies in the ECOWAS region.

Africa, with its young and rapidly growing population, holds immense potential for e-commerce and digital economy growth. The continent boasts the world’s youngest and fastest-growing population, making it a prime market for e-commerce opportunities. However, the implementation of digital reforms presents challenges as they must be coordinated with high-priority tasks such as vaccinations, education, and agricultural production.

To fully leverage the potential of e-commerce and digital economy growth, affordable internet access is essential. Access to internet connectivity is now considered a basic necessity rather than a luxury in today’s digital technological revolution. It enables not only access to e-commerce but also to the broader digital economy, including applications such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare, agriculture, and education.

The development of digital infrastructure is equally important. Digital infrastructure, including internet access and connectivity, must be prioritised alongside traditional infrastructure in order to fully participate in the digital revolution. While some argue that sophisticated internet technologies are unnecessary in developing countries, practical examples demonstrate that digital platforms can operate successfully even in the least developed countries, despite challenges posed by unreliable electricity supply.

Building relevant skills and adapting to available technologies can drive progress in the digital realm. UNCTAD, as part of its program, has made strides in building skills in least developed countries (LDCs), enabling individuals to acquire essential coding skills necessary for participation in the digital economy.

Despite the monopolistic nature of digital technologies, ECOWAS has established an e-commerce strategy, recognising the short windows of opportunity to harness their power. This strategy acknowledges the significance of a coherent regional approach to attract development partners and retain private sector involvement in order to facilitate successful implementation.

In conclusion, ECOWAS’s formulation of a regional e-commerce strategy in West Africa, aligned with the African Union’s strategies, reflects a deep partnership between the organisation and UNCTAD. With its young and fast-growing population, Africa holds immense potential for e-commerce and digital economy growth. However, implementing digital reforms alongside other pressing tasks poses challenges, and affordable internet access and digital infrastructure development are critical requirements. It is crucial not to miss the opportunity to leverage the power of digital technologies, adopting a coherent regional strategy to attract development partners and retain private sector involvement. Africa must seize this opportunity, ensuring it does not miss out on the digital technological revolution, just as it did with the Green Revolution in the past.

Birame Sock

Birame Sock, the founder of Qweli, has created an innovative initiative aimed at assisting local producers in Africa in connecting to global markets. Qweli, a B2B marketplace, works directly with local producers, particularly women, to provide them with access to international markets. They also offer support in packaging, labelling, and meeting FDA standards, ensuring that these local products can meet the quality requirements necessary for global trade.

Having a conducive business environment is crucial for increasing the availability of localized products within and beyond Africa. Birame is actively working towards creating such an environment for local suppliers to make their products available on the international stage.

In Africa, e-commerce takes on a different form compared to other regions. It often occurs through personal networks and mobile technology rather than dedicated websites or apps. This unique approach presents both opportunities and challenges for startups in the ECOWAS region, with standardization across countries being a significant challenge for e-commerce businesses.

Another obstacle faced by e-commerce startups in Africa is the lack of storage and warehousing facilities. The absence of sufficient infrastructure hinders the scaling of e-commerce operations in the region. Increased investment in warehousing and storage facilities is needed to enable local suppliers to store raw materials when they are in season.

Female entrepreneurs in Africa are making significant contributions to inclusive economic growth and addressing social challenges. They are aware of the impact their work has on employment and gender inclusion, and they actively work towards creating a more equitable and prosperous society.

Including the private sector from the beginning is crucial while discussing initiatives and policies. The private sector often finds itself reacting to decisions that have already been made, rather than being involved in the decision-making process. Including the private sector from the start ensures that their expertise and insights are fully utilized, leading to more effective and sustainable initiatives.

Access to finance remains a significant challenge for entrepreneurs in Africa. The lack of adequate financial support hampers the growth and development of small businesses. To foster entrepreneurship and economic growth, it is essential to address this issue and provide entrepreneurs with the necessary financial resources to thrive.

Inclusive decision-making is also vital, and the voice of small businesses, particularly those owned by women, should be included in meetings. Their unique perspectives and experiences can provide valuable insights into creating policies and initiatives that cater to the needs and challenges faced by small businesses.

Partnerships and collaboration between diverse stakeholders are crucial for implementing e-commerce strategies in Africa. Engaging with various private sector stakeholders within the ECOWAS region can provide valuable feedback and concrete steps towards ensuring the success of e-commerce initiatives. Birame suggests establishing and strengthening partnerships for better implementation of e-commerce strategies, and involving private sector stakeholders in the implementation phase.

In conclusion, Birame Sock’s Qweli initiative showcases the potential and challenges of e-commerce in Africa. By working directly with local producers, providing support and access to international markets, and advocating for improvements in the business environment, Qweli is driving positive change. However, challenges such as standardization, lack of storage facilities, and limited access to finance need to be addressed to fully harness the potential of e-commerce in Africa. The inclusion of female entrepreneurs, the private sector, and the voice of small businesses in decision-making processes and partnerships are pivotal towards creating a more inclusive and prosperous future for African economies.

Audience

At a conference on e-commerce and digital transition in the ECOWAS region, speakers discussed various key points regarding the progress, challenges, and potential solutions in the field. While acknowledging the progress made, it was noteworthy that numerous challenges still persist in the region. This emphasised the urgency to find effective solutions to these issues.

Among the discussed topics was the need to enhance capacity building for digital technologies in the region. Participants recognised that the ECOWAS region needs to catch up with other regions in terms of digital transition. It was highlighted that the late enhancement of capacity building for digital technologies in Senegal was a concern. Therefore, participants emphasised the importance of prioritising the enhancement of capacity building in this area.

Another crucial point emphasised by speakers was the need to prioritise production and productivity for e-commerce growth within the region. They recognised the necessity of having regional data centres that can provide services to small and medium enterprises. However, it was acknowledged that the high cost of setting up cloud computing and other digital infrastructures pose a challenge in achieving this goal.

The conference highlighted the significance of involving policymakers in implementing solutions. Participants discussed the need for policy makers to play a more effective role in addressing the challenges faced in the region. The active engagement of policy makers in problem-solving was a topic of discussion, and suggestions were made on how to ensure their involvement.

The formalisation of inter-border trade was another important point raised by the participants. They noted that formalising such trade can enhance operational effectiveness, especially in the context of the ECOWAS strategy. It was noteworthy that this stance was communicated in French, suggesting the diverse representation of participants at the conference.

The importance of ongoing training and capacity building for representatives in e-commerce was also emphasised. Participants mentioned that the CDAO organises various types of training whenever meetings take place. This highlights the need to continuously train and build the capacity of permanent representatives to understand their roles in e-commerce effectively.

Efforts to support the growth of e-commerce in Africa were discussed as a vital area of focus. Participants highlighted the need for more initiatives and support in Africa to ensure the successful growth of e-commerce.

The analysis also revealed concerns over potential conflicts arising from e-commerce. Although no specific details or examples were provided, speakers expressed their concerns about this issue.

Taxation in e-commerce was mentioned as an area of discussion, where the sentiment was neutral. However, no specific evidence or supporting facts were provided to expand on this point.

Lastly, the need for clarity and distinction in change management was discussed. Although no specific evidence or supporting facts were provided regarding this topic, it was mentioned that it is important to have clear guidelines and understanding when changes occur in different countries.

In conclusion, the conference on e-commerce and digital transition in the ECOWAS region highlighted the progress made, the challenges that persist, and the potential solutions required to address those challenges. The importance of enhancing capacity building in digital technologies, prioritising production and productivity for e-commerce growth, and involving policymakers in implementing solutions were among the key points discussed. The formalisation of inter-border trade, ongoing training and capacity building, efforts to support e-commerce growth in Africa, conflicts arising from e-commerce, taxation issues, and the need for clarity and distinction in change management were also mentioned during the conference.

Muhammadou Kah

E-commerce is seen as critical for reinvigorating economies and addressing trade challenges. It offers various advantages, such as reducing carbon risks and allowing for the sharing and distribution of creations and content, which can generate wealth. The efficient reach of goods and services to a broader market is facilitated through digital connectivity. However, for e-commerce to thrive, there is a need for strong digital and data infrastructure, as well as the necessary skills and competencies.

Trade heavily relies on digital connectivity, and therefore, effective harnessing of e-commerce depends on the availability and reliability of connectivity across countries. Policy space also plays a crucial role in ensuring the success of cross-border trade. It needs to be coherent and agile to address the challenges that arise in the realm of e-commerce.

The logistics of supply chains need to be rethought to adapt to the digital and electronic nature of e-commerce. Current trade facilitation mechanisms may not be sufficient for the digital trading realm, and therefore, close negotiations for harmonization are required.

Access to affordable green technologies is critical for e-commerce to take root. The use of such technologies can contribute to the achievement of environmental goals outlined in the SDGs. Additionally, legislative frameworks and tax regimes need to be revisited to encourage digital innovation and ensure compatibility with the digital realm.

Engagement in WTO negotiations and discussions on e-commerce is crucial for countries to avoid being subjected to unfavorable terms. Without being part of the discussions, countries may miss out on important opportunities and benefits that arise from e-commerce.

In order to create wealth from e-commerce, a focus on skills and competencies is essential. This highlights the importance of quality education and training programs to equip individuals with the necessary digital skills and capabilities.

The payment systems used in e-commerce should be adaptable and facilitate cross-border transactions. The existence of affordable and efficient homegrown payment mechanisms is essential, as they cater to the needs of actors and agents in the region.

Data governance cannot be ignored when discussing cross-border e-commerce. Issues related to data ownership, privacy, and intellectual property need to be addressed to ensure trust and security in cross-border transactions.

The private sector, particularly startups, plays a crucial role in driving the digital change and innovation. However, their success is hindered by challenges in accessing sustainable capital. Governments need to provide a conducive, smart, and agile regulatory framework that encourages growth and investment in infrastructure, while leaving the businesses to the private sector.

Digital and technology developments require action rather than excessive talk and deliberation. Rapid changes are made, and any mistakes are fixed promptly to ensure progress.

The youth and the private sector are driving forces in the digital change and e-commerce landscape. Creating investments and capital for startups are important to foster entrepreneurial cultures and hubs.

Intellectual property protection is crucial in the digital trade realm. It goes beyond copyright and trademarks; it aims to protect creators and ensure their marketability.

The existence of data centers in Africa presents opportunities in the e-commerce ecosystem. Shifting geopolitics and the realities of climate change offer possibilities for greener data centers, with countries like Senegal already investing in data center infrastructure.

Capacity building is needed for effective digital trade and e-commerce. This requires a focus on education, particularly in STEM fields, and the development of high-order digital skills and capabilities. It is crucial to view STEM education as more than just a footnote in the education continuum.

In conclusion, e-commerce is considered critical for reinvigorating economies and addressing trade challenges. To fully harness its potential, strong digital and data infrastructure, as well as the necessary skills and competencies, are necessary. Policies, including those related to connectivity, supply chain logistics, green technologies, legislative frameworks, tax regimes, data governance, and payment systems, need to be revisited and adapted to suit the digital realm. Governments should provide a conducive regulatory framework while leaving businesses to the private sector, which plays a significant role in driving digital change. Additionally, capacity building in digital skills and education is essential for the success of digital trade and e-commerce.

Massandjé Toure-Liste

In the ECOWAS region, there are significant obstacles that prevent widespread internet use. One of the major challenges is the high costs associated with internet access. Currently, 70% of all revenues need to be allocated to the spread of the internet. This means that the resources required to make the internet more accessible and affordable are substantial. Additionally, the internet is not yet widespread in the ECOWAS region, further hindering its use.

Despite these challenges, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is actively prioritizing the development and proliferation of digital commerce. They have set digitalisation as a priority and are collaborating with the African Union to make Africa prosperous in this area. This shows a positive stance towards embracing the potential benefits of digital commerce in the region.

To further support their objectives, ECOWAS has developed a comprehensive strategy for e-commerce in collaboration with the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). The strategy aims to identify economic opportunities and propose measures to alleviate the identified constraints in e-commerce. It focuses on bolstering institutions, instilling confidence in e-transactions, improving statistics, and promoting inclusion. This demonstrates a positive commitment to addressing the challenges and creating an enabling environment for e-commerce in the region.

Furthermore, ECOWAS strongly believes in the potential of partnerships to overcome regional e-commerce challenges. They are committed to working with partners, including UNCTAD and the World Bank. This highlights their recognition of the value of collaboration and cooperation in achieving their goals.

In conclusion, while significant obstacles hinder widespread internet use in the ECOWAS region, ECOWAS is actively working towards the development and proliferation of digital commerce. They have set digitalisation as a priority, collaborated with the African Union and UNCTAD in developing a comprehensive e-commerce strategy, and emphasise the importance of partnerships to overcome challenges. It is encouraging to see such dedication and commitment towards promoting inclusive and sustainable digital development in the region.

A

Audience

Speech speed

113 words per minute

Speech length

920 words

Speech time

487 secs

BS

Birame Sock

Speech speed

184 words per minute

Speech length

1633 words

Speech time

533 secs

KS

Kolawole Sofola

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

3449 words

Speech time

1250 secs

MT

Massandjé Toure-Liste

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

597 words

Speech time

304 secs

MK

Muhammadou Kah

Speech speed

123 words per minute

Speech length

2853 words

Speech time

1390 secs

SN

Shamika N. Sirimanne

Speech speed

167 words per minute

Speech length

2316 words

Speech time

834 secs

SA

Shamira Ahmed

Speech speed

139 words per minute

Speech length

918 words

Speech time

397 secs

The digital economy and enviromental sustainability

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Gerry McGovern

The analysis identifies multiple key points regarding the environmental impact of digital tools and technology. Firstly, it highlights the significant negative environmental impact of digital tools. The manufacturing process of devices like smartphones and laptops contributes to CO2 emissions and generates toxic waste and excessive water usage. The manufacturing of cloud servers, essential for data storage and online services, also adds to the environmental burden. Each cloud server is estimated to release between one and two metric tonnes of CO2 emissions, generate between five and ten metric tonnes of toxic mining waste, and consume hundreds of thousands of litres of water.

Another concerning aspect is the alarming growth of electronic waste or e-waste. E-waste is the fastest-growing waste stream globally. By 2050, it is projected that the amount of mining waste generated would be equivalent to the size of Mount Everest each year. This emphasizes the urgent need for proper e-waste management and sustainable practices.

The role of digital platforms like Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook in promoting overconsumption is also highlighted. These platforms contribute to rampant consumerism and excessive consumption patterns, depleting resources and exacerbating the environmental impact of manufacturing and disposal processes.

The analysis raises concerns about the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in contributing to environmental issues. While AI has the potential to aid in environmental preservation, the current focus of AI systems on advertising purposes rather than environmental considerations is problematic. There is also a risk of creating larger amounts of unnecessary data through AI, further adding to the environmental burden.

On a positive note, the analysis emphasizes the importance of wisdom and behavioral changes as solutions to the climate crisis. This includes adopting sustainable practices such as increasing walking and cycling and reducing overall consumption. The excessive accumulation of data is also identified, with 90% of stored data remaining unused after three months. This highlights the need for purposeful and efficient use of data, rather than its indiscriminate accumulation.

Furthermore, the analysis underscores the importance of holding big tech companies accountable and implementing regulations. Self-regulation by big tech monopolies is deemed unsatisfactory, considering their negative environmental impact. It is necessary to rein in their activities to ensure more sustainable practices.

A data tax is also suggested as a means to incentivize responsible and efficient data use. Much of the data produced currently is of little value and contributes to inefficiency. A data tax could promote more responsible data practices.

Moreover, the analysis emphasizes the need for international standards and cooperation. Incorporating environmental goals into trade agreements and digital ecosystems is crucial for ensuring responsible consumption and production patterns. Given the global nature of digital ecosystems, collective efforts are necessary to address environmental challenges effectively.

The analysis also highlights the outsourcing of environmental damage to poorer countries. The manufacturing of digital products often leads to mining waste and damage to societies, particularly indigenous communities. Additionally, poorer countries bear the brunt of e-waste dumping, exacerbating environmental and social issues.

Lastly, the analysis reveals the unequal distribution of responsibility for climate damage. The top 10% of the world’s population is responsible for 60% of climate damage, while 50% of the poorest people contribute to only 10% of the damage. This emphasizes the urgency of holding top contributors accountable and striving for a more equitable distribution of environmental responsibility.

In conclusion, the analysis presents a comprehensive overview of the significant negative environmental impacts of digital tools and technology. It calls for accountability, regulation, and changes in behavior to address these issues. Sustainable consumption and production patterns, international cooperation, and data responsibility are crucial in navigating the environmental challenges of the digital era.

Virginie Le Barbu

Lenovo, a global technology company, is committed to achieving net zero targets by 2050. This commitment has been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTI), and Lenovo has been on their sustainability journey for the past 18 years. They are actively working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

To achieve their climate goals, Lenovo is focusing on circular economy principles. They are developing solutions that consider the design, use, and return levels of their products. By implementing circular economy practices, Lenovo aims to reduce waste and promote the reuse and recycling of materials.

In terms of packaging, Lenovo is actively developing innovative and sustainable options. This approach aligns with SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, which emphasizes the need to reduce waste and promote sustainable packaging practices. By prioritising sustainable packaging, Lenovo is demonstrating their commitment to responsible consumption and production.

Lenovo is also aware of the importance of responsible procurement in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They have found that 56% of their emissions are linked to their upstream ecosystem, and 46% are linked to their downstream ecosystem. To address this, Lenovo is asking its suppliers to disclose emission and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) data. They are also promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy practices among their suppliers. Through these efforts, Lenovo aims to reduce emissions throughout their supply chain.

Collaboration is another key aspect of Lenovo’s sustainability approach. They recognise that 46% of their emissions come from the way people use their products. Therefore, they believe that collaboration between the private sector and larger organisations is crucial for achieving environmental sustainability. By working together, these entities can share knowledge and resources to promote sustainable practices.

Lenovo acknowledges the changing expectations of consumers. They have observed that consumers now consider ESG criteria when selecting suppliers. This means that consumers prioritize environmentally responsible and socially conscious business practices. In response to this shift, Lenovo emphasizes the importance of training consumers to use their devices and solutions efficiently. This not only reduces energy consumption but also extends the lifespan of their products.

Policy advancement is another area of focus for Lenovo. They believe that policy initiatives are necessary to enhance collaboration between the private, public, and institutional sectors. Lenovo emphasizes the need for new policies and rules that can support and accelerate the transition towards a more sustainable digital economy. By aligning policies across sectors, there is potential for greater collaboration and unified efforts towards environmental sustainability.

In conclusion, Lenovo is committed to sustainability and has set ambitious net zero targets for the future. They are incorporating circular economy principles into their solutions, developing sustainable packaging options, and working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through responsible procurement. Lenovo recognizes the importance of collaboration across sectors and emphasizes the need for training consumers to use their products efficiently. They also advocate for policy advancements to foster collaboration and accelerate the transition towards a sustainable digital economy.

Laura Létourneau

The use of digital technologies and data is considered necessary to bridge the implementation gap in ecological planning and transition. These technologies play a crucial role in combating climate change and biodiversity loss. It is recognized that an efficient and fair ecological transition requires the incorporation of digital technologies and the utilization of data.

However, it is important to regulate the risks associated with these technologies. Privacy concerns, issues related to artificial intelligence, and the digital divide need to be addressed to ensure the responsible and ethical use of digital technologies. Regulations should be put in place to mitigate these risks, approaching the development of digital technologies from an ethical, citizen-oriented, and humanist framework.

Furthermore, the implementation of public platform theory, which operates similarly to a city, is proposed for effective data management in ecological planning. Just as public authorities develop rules and regulations for urbanization and traffic control, digital technologies and infrastructure should be regulated in the same manner.

The importance of regulation and evaluation is emphasized in implementing an effective data management plan. Regular evaluations are planned to ensure efficient data management, and innovative solutions are sought. This approach addresses the challenges and complexities of managing data in ecological planning.

To accomplish the ecological planning plan, a collective journey involving all stakeholders from different sectors is necessary. This includes representation from local levels, such as regions and cities, as well as engagement with external stakeholders such as private companies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and agencies. Collaboration and involvement of all parties are crucial for the plan’s success.

While digital technologies and data play vital roles, it is important to balance their use with their impact on the environment and privacy. The French government acknowledges the need to find a balance between the opportunities offered by digital technologies and the protection of data needed for effective ecological planning. The government is concerned with ensuring that the shared data is necessary for implementing green technologies and minimizing environmental impact.

It is also highlighted that changes in consumption behaviors are of significant importance. Seeking technological solutions alone, without addressing the need for changes in consumption patterns, can overlook crucial aspects of sustainability. Information needs to be shared for effective planning, including identifying appropriate locations for renewable energy implementation.

Regulation is necessary to ensure the private sector adheres to rules, ethics, interoperability, and security. There is recognition of the need to regulate private sector practices to ensure the responsible and ethical use of digital technologies. Europe is working on implementing regulations, such as the Data Act Regulation and DMA and GSA, to ensure compliance among private sector entities.

Building alternative public platforms is suggested to aid in regulation and encourage compliance in the private sector. Such platforms can help guide the private sector in using the right data and methods while respecting ethical and quality standards.

Additionally, public platforms can support the private sector’s transition to greener practices. By leveraging digital components and data sharing infrastructure, the private sector can develop innovative environmental services and contribute to sustainable practices.

France emphasizes the importance of an efficient and fair green transition. The country recognizes its responsibility, along with developed countries, in addressing climate impact due to their past actions. It is crucial to focus efforts on an ecological and fair transition.

The issue of climate change is highlighted as a complex and systemic problem that requires integrated responses. It affects all demographic groups and regions, making holistic and interdisciplinary approaches essential.

Digital technology is regarded as playing a significant role in addressing climate change. Its potential is recognized in areas such as data collection, monitoring, and modeling climate change. By leveraging digital technologies, more sustainable practices can be developed to contribute to an efficient and fair green transition.

In conclusion, the use of digital technologies and data is necessary to fill the implementation gap in ecological planning and transition towards a sustainable future. Although risks are associated with these technologies, such as privacy concerns and the digital divide, regulation and ethical frameworks are essential. A collective journey involving all stakeholders, regulation, and public platform theory are means to ensure effective data management and encourage compliance in the private sector. Balancing the use of digital technologies with environmental impact and privacy considerations, alongside changes in consumption behaviors, is vital. The emphasis on an efficient and fair green transition, acknowledging responsibility, addressing climate change as a complex issue, and recognizing the role of digital technology in fighting climate change and biodiversity loss are key takeaways from the analysis.

Isabelle Kumar

The discussions highlight the interconnectedness between the digital economy and sustainability, acknowledging that they have a complex relationship. On one hand, the digital economy shows promise in reducing emissions and contributing to the goals set in the Paris Climate Accords. It has the potential to help reach the 1.5-degree targets, but this potential must be harnessed carefully to avoid adverse environmental consequences.

Sustainability is argued to be a crucial aspect that should be at the heart of all discussions and actions regarding the digital economy. This is particularly important given the current era of accelerated digital transformation. It is emphasized that sustainability needs to be the primary focus during this period of rapid technological advancement.

Infrastructure plays a vital role in digital regulation. The discussions highlight the importance of comprehensive regulation, which includes alternatives to existing infrastructure. It is suggested that infrastructure should be adapted to support digital regulation effectively. The development of the public platform theory, based on Laura’s experience in RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership), is seen as a valuable step in this direction. The public platform theory aids in enforcing rules and ethics on the private sector and provides a mechanism to observe compliance. It is argued that comprehensive regulation is required to address the diverse aspects of the digital economy, such as digital ethics, security, and infrastructure.

There is support for a balanced approach between the public platform and the private sector. The public platform is seen as an effective tool for regulating the private sector and achieving compliance. Additionally, it is believed that the private sector can benefit from becoming more ‘greener’ and providing newer environmental services. The discussions highlight the potential for public-private partnerships in achieving sustainability goals.

Collaboration is emphasized as a crucial element in the pursuit of sustainability. It is acknowledged that no single entity can achieve sustainability alone. The provision of infrastructure is seen as a catalyst for collaboration and progress. Collaborative efforts are essential in addressing the challenges associated with sustainability and achieving the desired goals.

In conclusion, the discussions underline the intricate relationship between the digital economy and sustainability. While the digital economy has the potential to contribute to environmental goals, careful management is necessary to mitigate risks. Sustainability should be a central consideration in all discussions and actions related to the digital economy, especially during the current era of accelerated transformation. Infrastructure plays a crucial role in digital regulation, requiring comprehensive regulations and alternatives to existing infrastructure. Collaboration is identified as a key element in achieving sustainability, and infrastructure provision can facilitate collaboration and progress towards sustainability goals.

Torbjörn Fredriksson

Digital technologies and innovations, such as the Internet of Things, robotics, and artificial intelligence, have the potential to revolutionize energy management, enhance efficiency, and facilitate the adoption of low-emission technologies. These advancements were highlighted by one speaker who emphasized their role in reshaping the energy sector and supporting sustainable practices in addressing environmental challenges. By incorporating digital technologies into energy management systems, it becomes possible to optimize resource use, reduce CO2 emissions, and improve overall operational efficiency. This has the potential to drive progress towards SDG 9, which focuses on industry, innovation, and infrastructure, as well as SDG 13, which aims to combat climate change.

However, the rapid digital transformation also brings about concerns regarding its environmental impact. Another speaker expressed worries about issues such as raw material depletion, energy and water usage, air quality, pollution, and waste generation. It was noted that global data centres alone accounted for approximately 1.3% of global electricity consumption in 2022, highlighting the significant energy demand associated with digital activities. Furthermore, it was highlighted that digital devices, data centres, and ICT networks account for a substantial portion, ranging from 6% to 12%, of global energy use. These concerns suggest the need for careful management and sustainable practices to mitigate the growing environmental footprint of digitalisation.

To address these concerns, it was emphasised that embracing sustainable practices is crucial in lessening the environmental impact of digitalisation and promoting ecological sustainability. The inclusion of energy efficiency, responsible resource management, renewable energy generation, and e-waste recycling was highlighted as essential components of managing digital transformation sustainably. Additionally, supporting least developed countries and small island developing states was deemed crucial in helping them navigate the challenges and leverage the opportunities presented by digital technologies. This aligns with SDG 7, which promotes affordable and clean energy, SDG 12, which advocates for responsible consumption and production, and SDG 13, which addresses Climate Action.

Multiple stakeholders were called upon to collaborate and work together in tackling the challenges associated with digitalisation. By fostering partnerships and leveraging collective expertise, these stakeholders can effectively address the multifaceted aspects of digital transformation, including environmental concerns. This collaboration aligns with SDG 17, which emphasises the importance of partnerships for achieving sustainable development goals.

It was also highlighted that developing countries face unique challenges and downsides in relation to digitalisation. These countries often lack the capabilities to fully take advantage of digital opportunities, which can exacerbate inequalities on a global scale. Furthermore, developing countries often receive significant amounts of e-waste, posing environmental and health risks. These observations reiterate the need for inclusive and equitable digitalisation, as well as support for developing nations to bridge the digital divide and ensure that they can reap the benefits of the digital revolution.

Tech platforms were recognised for playing a significant role in shaping digital transformation. With privileged access and control over massive data resources, these platforms hold considerable power in influencing the direction of digitalisation. It is important to monitor and regulate their practices to ensure that the benefits of digitalisation are equitably distributed and that privacy concerns are adequately addressed.

Global dialogue and collaboration were emphasised as vital in managing the changes brought about by digitalisation. By accelerating the discussion and sharing best practices, stakeholders can collectively navigate the challenges and uncertainties associated with digital transformation. Finding a balanced approach, rather than viewing digitalisation as a black-or-white situation, was highlighted as a crucial solution. This resonates with SDG 16, which aims to establish peace, justice, and strong institutions.

In conclusion, digital technologies offer immense potential in transforming energy management, improving efficiency, and supporting sustainable practices. However, the rapid pace of digital transformation also presents environmental challenges that must be carefully managed through the adoption of sustainable practices. Collaboration among multiple stakeholders is essential in addressing these challenges and ensuring that digitalisation benefits all nations, particularly developing countries. By embracing a balanced and inclusive approach, we can harness the power of digital technologies while minimizing their negative impact and fostering a sustainable and equitable digital future.

Golestan (Sally) Radwan

The discussions at COP28 focused on the need for a global environmental data strategy. It was acknowledged that there is a significant amount of fragmented and inadequate data available. To ensure effective decision-making, data needs to be reliable and suitable for specific applications. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of data interoperability, as it allows for the layering and combination of data, leading to more comprehensive analysis and better decision-making. It was argued that a global environmental data strategy is necessary to address issues around fair distribution and benefit extraction from data.

The United Nations (UN) was expected to take the lead in developing and implementing the global environmental data strategy. Stakeholders expressed their expectation that the UN should play a crucial role in this process. There was an overall sense of optimism from COP28, indicating progress in addressing environmental issues through data and technology.

The discussions also highlighted the potential of emerging technologies, such as generative AI. These technologies have the capability to provide dynamic and custom analysis. Non-technical staff can use a natural language interface to express their needs, and generative AI can generate various forms of information, including text, videos, images, and geo-spatial data.

Countries and stakeholders expressed their desire for sophisticated analyses and decision support for digital environmental issues. They emphasized the need for visualizing data on maps and other platforms, as well as the importance of flexibility to accommodate the varying needs of policymakers.

The role of the private sector in environmental sustainability was another important topic of discussion. While technology can be a useful tool in addressing environmental challenges, there is a need to hold the private sector accountable for any potential environmental damage caused by their solutions. However, it was also recognized that the private sector has shown a willingness to contribute to preserving the environment, and closer collaboration between public and private sectors is necessary.

Consumers were encouraged to demand transparency and accountability from businesses to prioritize environmental issues. It was noted that businesses primarily exist to make money, and without consumer demand for responsible consumption and production, environmental concerns may not be prioritized by the private sector.

In conclusion, the discussions at COP28 highlighted the importance of a global environmental data strategy, data interoperability, and the use of emerging technologies for comprehensive analysis. The UN is expected to take the lead in the global environmental data strategy, and there is a sense of optimism regarding progress in addressing environmental challenges. Closer collaboration between public and private sectors, as well as consumer demand for transparency and accountability, are crucial in prioritizing environmental issues. The role of technology as both a tool and a potential source of environmental damage was recognized, calling for a balanced approach that promotes environmental responsibility.

Audience

The discussions centred around various topics concerning the digital economy and the environment. One argument highlighted that data centres are mostly located in tax havens, rather than in energy-efficient locations. These tax havens attract data centres due to their economic benefits, but this raises concerns about the environmental impact and energy consumption of these centres. The presence of data centres in tax havens emphasises the need to consider energy efficiency when deciding on their locations.

Another argument emphasised the need to incorporate environmental considerations into free trade agreements. The current agreements do not adequately address environmental concerns, disregarding the potential negative effects of trade activities on the environment. This underlines the importance of ensuring that trade agreements account for environmental impacts and promote sustainable practices.

The dire state of the planet was highlighted by pointing out various indicators, including CO2 levels, global average temperature rise, glacier retreat, and the expansion of desert areas. These indicators provide compelling evidence of serious environmental problems, highlighting the urgent need for action to address climate change and mitigate its impact.

However, a speaker challenged the notion that more data is necessary to understand the state of the environment. Instead, they argued for the importance of wisdom and action based on existing data. This perspective suggests that while data is valuable, it should not hinder necessary measures to protect the environment.

It was noted that significant changes often occur in response to global crises, such as the recent cutbacks in air travel prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and energy price shocks. This observation underscores the reactive nature of society and the need for substantial global events to drive major behavioural shifts.

In a positive light, one speaker advocated for a shift towards traditional values and a slower pace of living. They shared their personal experience of choosing train travel over flying, promoting the idea that contentment should take precedence over mere productivity. This perspective aligns with the sustainable consumption and production goals of the United Nations.

The acceleration of global warming was a cause for concern, with evidence indicating that it is happening at an alarming rate. Global warming has doubled in speed since 1981, highlighting the need for immediate action to combat climate change and prevent further harm to the planet.

The discussions also touched on the need for legislation in the digital ecosystem. The upcoming ministerial conference in February was highlighted as a platform for further discussions and decision-making. The question of whether legislation should be implemented at the national or international level was raised, calling for clarity on the jurisdiction responsible for regulating the digital ecosystem.

France was commended for its sustainable data value chains; however, concerns were raised regarding the historical context of France’s energy practices. The reliance on nuclear energy, with significant uranium extraction in Africa, notably Niger, raised questions about the overall sustainability of France’s data practices. This highlights the importance of considering the broader environmental impacts associated with data value chains.

Lastly, there was advocacy for a greener future in the digital economy, where data flows ensure that countries receive economic value from their data. This perspective emphasises the need for a fair distribution of economic benefits and calls for policies that enable countries to fully utilise the economic potential of their data.

Overall, the discussions emphasised the need to address environmental concerns in the digital economy and the importance of sustainable practices in trade agreements and data management. The urgency of taking action on climate change and the significance of making informed decisions based on existing data were also prominent themes. These insights provide valuable considerations for policymakers, businesses, and individuals as they navigate the intersection of the digital economy and environmental sustainability.

Foluso Ojo

The discussions revealed several noteworthy points regarding sustainability and the logistics sector in Africa. It was noted that Africa’s sustainability efforts are still at a basic stage, with a primary focus on waste management, recycling, and reducing fossil emissions. This suggests that there is room for improvement in implementing more comprehensive and sustainable practices.

On a positive note, the logistics sector in Africa presents boundless opportunities. Solutions such as trip aggregation and route optimization technology have been found to enhance efficiency in the sector. This indicates that there is potential for growth and innovation within the industry.

However, it was brought to attention that the logistics sector in Africa is plagued by gender discrimination. Many decisions and activities exclude women, and an overwhelming 99.1% of the drivers on the truck.ng platform, for example, are male. This highlights the need for increased gender inclusivity and equal opportunities within the logistics sector.

Another important point emphasized during the discussions is the need for sustainability solutions to be developed with a global perspective. It was noted that the challenges faced across different continents and worlds are different, and therefore, sustainable practices must take into account these variations.

Furthermore, it was argued that governmental investment in creating environmental awareness and infrastructure is crucial. Businesses find it difficult to embrace environmental practices without proper support and infrastructure. Public-private partnerships were also highlighted as essential for the effective implementation of sustainable practices.

Digital literacy among businesses was identified as essential for understanding environmental practices. It was emphasized that businesses must comprehend the impact of their actions on the environment and possess awareness and understanding to make informed decisions.

Enforcement of sustainability laws and rewarding businesses for sustainable practices were seen as important measures. It was noted that practices and rules supporting environmental sustainability are not adequately enforced, and offering incentives for sustainable practices can encourage wider participation.

Adequate awareness of climate change and carbon emissions was stressed as necessary. Both individuals and businesses need to be properly informed about these issues to take appropriate actions. It was acknowledged that businesses and individuals cannot combat what they do not know.

In conclusion, the discussions highlighted the need for Africa to further develop its sustainability efforts, address gender discrimination in the logistics sector, adopt a global perspective in sustainable practices, invest in environmental awareness and infrastructure, promote digital literacy for businesses, enforce sustainability laws, and raise awareness of climate change and carbon emissions. These insights can serve as valuable guidance for policymakers, businesses, and individuals who aim to contribute to a more sustainable future in Africa.

A

Audience

Speech speed

174 words per minute

Speech length

1443 words

Speech time

499 secs

FO

Foluso Ojo

Speech speed

197 words per minute

Speech length

1077 words

Speech time

328 secs

GM

Gerry McGovern

Speech speed

152 words per minute

Speech length

1148 words

Speech time

453 secs

G(

Golestan (Sally) Radwan

Speech speed

161 words per minute

Speech length

1551 words

Speech time

578 secs

IK

Isabelle Kumar

Speech speed

177 words per minute

Speech length

3101 words

Speech time

1051 secs

LL

Laura Létourneau

Speech speed

152 words per minute

Speech length

3167 words

Speech time

1248 secs

TF

Torbjörn Fredriksson

Speech speed

167 words per minute

Speech length

1579 words

Speech time

567 secs

VL

Virginie Le Barbu

Speech speed

209 words per minute

Speech length

1194 words

Speech time

343 secs

Securing access to financing to digital startups and fast growing small businesses in developing countries ( MFUG Innovation Partners)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Ruzgar Barisik

Ruzgar Barisik is a technology investor and partner at Next Billion Ventures. His investment strategy focuses on delivering strong financial returns while supporting companies that have a high impact on populations, such as households, women, and SMEs. Specializing in technology investments, he primarily invests in technology and technology-enabled companies across emerging markets.

Ruzgar’s investment philosophy is driven by the potential for impact at large scales. He believes that digital tools are essential in accessing the next two to three billion consumers and SMEs. As such, he targets his investments towards local technology companies that serve these populations, particularly in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and South America – major population centers. However, he excludes China and Eastern Europe due to the preferences and specialties of the investors.

In addition to his work at Next Billion Ventures, Ruzgar also collaborates with Swiss asset manager Responsibility. He believes that development finance institutions (DFIs) play an important role in attracting more investments. He emphasizes the need for DFIs to be comfortable with taking risks and bringing other investors into the market. Ruzgar advocates for innovation and the use of first loss guarantees and the seal of approval to attract investment in challenging markets.

When it comes to startups, Ruzgar understands that venture capital may not be suitable for every startup at every stage. He advises startups to ensure product-market fit not only for their product but also when approaching investors. Additionally, he mentions that reputable investors rarely withdraw from agreements after signing contracts.

Through his experience and expertise, Ruzgar highlights the importance of technology-enabled businesses that provide essential goods and services to large populations in a commercially sustainable way. He believes that these business models are key drivers of financial inclusion. He also emphasizes the need for alignment between management teams and investors’ impact mandates to achieve successful execution of business models.

In conclusion, Ruzgar Barisik, a technology investor and partner at Next Billion Ventures, focuses on delivering strong financial returns while supporting companies that have a high impact on populations. His investment strategy centers around technology investments in emerging markets and the potential for impact at large scales. He emphasizes the use of digital tools to access untapped markets and the role of DFIs in attracting more investments. Ruzgar’s insights shed light on the importance of product-market fit, alignment between management teams and investors, and reputable investors in the startup and investment landscape.

Atsushi Yamanaka

Atsushi Yamanaka, a Senior Advisor of Digital Transformations at the Office of Science and Technology Innovation and Digital Transformation at Japan International Cooperation Agency (JAICA), plays a key role in promoting digital transformations within the agency. JAICA, as the implementing arm of Japan’s official development assistance, has successfully executed projects in over 115 countries.

During an event, Yamanaka expressed regret for being unable to attend in person and had to participate remotely from Manila. This highlights the challenges faced by individuals trying to connect and engage with global events in the digital age.

Yamanaka argues that startups have the potential to address development issues where governments have limited resources and capabilities. He believes that the private sector, particularly startups, have the technology and ability to create jobs and stimulate economic growth. Moreover, startups can raise their own funds and create sustainable business models, contributing to a country’s overall development.

However, Yamanaka acknowledges that startups in developing countries face significant hurdles, with initial funding being a major challenge. Startups struggle to translate their technical solutions into viable business models and often have difficulty identifying market needs and challenges. Additionally, obtaining the necessary funding, especially in early stages of development, is a daunting task. Yamanaka highlights the need for access to seed capital and mitigating the initial risks faced by startups, suggesting that development agencies like JAICA can play a crucial role in this regard.

To overcome these challenges, Yamanaka emphasizes the importance of collaboration between startups, governments, development partners, and venture capitalists. He encourages startups to engage and lobby their respective governments for support, while also engaging with agencies like JAICA to foster growth. Open innovation challenges and acceleration programs can provide valuable opportunities for such collaborations.

Yamanaka’s insights also highlight the need for a clear growth path for startups and small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Different stages of a startup’s growth require distinct forms of support. Initially, development partners like JAICA can provide assistance, followed by the involvement of venture capitalists and accelerators in subsequent stages.

In conclusion, Yamanaka’s perspective sheds light on the intersection of startups, development agencies, governments, and venture capitalists in addressing development challenges. He advocates for the provision of seed capital, the mitigation of initial risks, and collaborative efforts to create a conducive ecosystem for startup growth. These efforts have the potential to bolster economic growth, create employment opportunities, and contribute to overall sustainable development.

Che Wang

The session on Secure Assessed Financing for Digital Startups and Fast-Growing Small Businesses in Developing Countries aimed to address the challenges faced by digital startups and SMEs in securing financing. The moderator, Qiu from MEFG Innovation Partners, introduced the session as a panel discussion, emphasizing the need for interactivity. Qiu invited participants to share their projects and raise questions during the Q&A session.

The session began with a discussion on the increasing presence of digital startups in developing countries and the potential of their technology and innovation to address development objectives in those regions. The main focus of the discussion was the key challenge of securing assets to finance these startups and SMEs. The panel consisted of investors, entrepreneurs, and government officials who provided their insights on the opportunities and obstacles in developing countries and discussed public-private partnerships in facilitating technical assistance and access to finance.

Two venture capital investors were asked about the geographies they actively invest in within emerging markets and the opportunities they see in those regions. The panelists highlighted the potential of digital startups to facilitate local economies and promote financial inclusion. They recognized the difficulties faced by startups and SMEs in accessing financing and acknowledged the need for innovative solutions.

Two startup founders also shared their experiences in building financial solutions for SMEs, focusing on financial inclusion. They discussed the challenges faced by startups and SMEs in accessing finance and highlighted the importance of technology innovation in addressing the credit gap. The founders discussed how their solutions aimed to tackle the lack of credit information and the difficulties in raising equity.

The panelists discussed the alternative avenues startups can consider in challenging markets and provided advice on financing. They emphasized the importance of collaboration between the public and private sectors in addressing the issue of access to financing. The role of government organizations, such as JICA, in collaborating with digital startups and empowering SMEs through funding and technical collaborations was also highlighted.

The session concluded with a Q&A session, during which participants engaged with the panelists and posed further questions. The panelists expressed their gratitude for the thoughtful questions and encouraged participants to reach out to them for further discussions.

Overall, the session provided valuable insights into the challenges faced by digital startups and SMEs in securing financing in developing countries. It emphasized the opportunities in these regions and the importance of public-private partnerships in addressing the issue. The session aimed to promote knowledge sharing and encourage further dialogue on the topic.

Henda Kwik

FAST, a financial services company, has made significant changes in how businesses operate amidst the pandemic. It started the FASt company itself, aiming to provide financial services to businesses. FAST has expanded across Southeast Asia, starting from Singapore, reflecting its ambition to reach a wider customer base and support economic growth. By digitizing payment methods, FAST has innovatively adapted to the online shift caused by the pandemic, aligning with Sustainable Development Goal 9. Additionally, FAST collaborates with traditional banks like MUFG in Indonesia, promoting financial inclusion for businesses. Its services have also benefited online and street shops, previously reliant on paper-based transactions, providing them with banking services and access to credit. FAST’s focus on building a financial system for SMEs in emerging markets helps bridge the data gap between banks and SMEs, improving access to credit and supporting SDGs 8 and 9. Despite macroeconomic volatility, access to financing remains possible for startups and SMEs, emphasizing the importance of exploring multiple avenues for funding. Caution should be exercised, considering the potential impacts of macroeconomic factors and avoiding over-optimism. FAST utilizes technology in credit assessment, enhancing the creditworthiness of businesses. Information gathering is crucial for understanding creditworthiness, and FAST actively supports this. Innovative approaches like using business platform accounts as collateral and implementing payment systems ensure repayment and increase credit limits, supporting reduced inequalities. overall, FAST’s commitment to digital transformation in banking and its focus on financial inclusion and innovative financial solutions have positively impacted businesses.

Tingting Peng

M.O.V.E. is an African-born global mobility startup that aims to provide financial services to mobility entrepreneurs. The company has successfully expanded its operations to seven countries across Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. This expansion highlights the company’s growing influence in the global market.

One of M.O.V.E.’s key focuses is the electrification of transportation. Recognising the importance of moving towards cleaner and more sustainable transportation solutions, M.O.V.E. is investing in the ecosystems required to enable and support the electrification of transportation. This demonstrates the company’s commitment to creating a greener future.

In addition to driving environmental change, M.O.V.E. is also dedicated to promoting gender equality. The company recognises transportation as a key economic driver and believes that facilitating access to financial services for female drivers and entrepreneurs can help empower women and contribute to greater gender equality. By developing opportunities for female drivers and entrepreneurs to access financial services throughout their mobility journey, M.O.V.E. is actively working towards this goal.

The lack of credit accessibility in Sub-Saharan Africa is a significant challenge that M.O.V.E. is addressing. This issue has resulted in low car ownership levels and high road fatality rates. By partnering with Uber, M.O.V.E. is able to underwrite customers whom traditional banks are unable to serve. This innovative solution not only increases access to credit but also aims to increase car ownership and reduce road fatalities, addressing two critical issues simultaneously.

M.O.V.E. offers a range of financial services, including vehicle finance, health, and life insurance. Their primary focus is to help customers generate sustainable income through vehicle ownership. This approach allows individuals to earn a living through mobility entrepreneurship while also providing them with the necessary financial protection.

The success and viability of M.O.V.E.’s model outside of Nigeria have been demonstrated through their expansion into South Africa, Ghana, Kenya, and even outside of Africa, like in the UK. This highlights the potential applicability of their services in other countries facing similar challenges related to credit invisibility.

The early-stage ecosystem in Africa and Southeast Asia has witnessed significant growth in pre-seed and seed investments in recent years. However, raising debt financing remains a challenging task for startups. This observation underscores the need for further support and innovation in this area to ensure the sustainability and growth of early-stage ventures.

Moreover, M.O.V.E. understands the importance of maintaining affordable prices and sustainable margins in the face of increasing input costs and inflation. By managing their finances and margins sustainably, the company aims to provide affordable vehicles to customers while ensuring their own growth and profitability.

Leveraging technology, M.O.V.E. assesses creditworthiness by looking at information related to trips and driver performance data. This approach allows them to redefine what constitutes good credit standing, addressing the lack of financing in small businesses. It also demonstrates the potential of technology and alternate data sources in solving financial challenges.

While fintech innovation has brought about significant benefits, it is crucial to strike a balance between innovation and customer protection. M.O.V.E. recognises this and strives to implement customer protection mechanisms and ethical product design to prevent debt traps. This responsible approach ensures the sustainability of their business model and protects customers from falling into financial difficulties.

Furthermore, M.O.V.E.’s founder, Tingting Peng, is an angel investor who supports female founders. She is aware of the funding gap that exists for women and believes in giving them equal opportunities to prove themselves. Tingting also strives to involve more female leaders within the investor group, promoting workplace diversity and gender equality.

Effective communication plays a critical role in securing funds after contracts are signed. It is important to maintain open lines of communication and provide updates to investors to ensure the timely delivery of funds. This ensures smooth fundraising processes and enhances the reputation of investors, which in turn impacts their ability to source future investment opportunities.

In conclusion, M.O.V.E. is a global mobility startup that is making significant strides in providing financial services to mobility entrepreneurs across the globe. Their focus on the electrification of transportation, promotion of gender equality, and addressing credit accessibility challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa showcases their commitment to driving positive change. Through partnerships and a range of financial services, M.O.V.E. is pioneering innovative solutions that empower individuals and create a more sustainable future.

Audience

The panel discussion revolved around investment opportunities in Africa, Asia Pacific, and the MENA region, with each speaker highlighting different aspects and concerns.

One speaker expressed concern about the investment gap for female-led companies and advocated for more intentional investment in female-founded businesses in Africa and emerging markets. They highlighted the noticeable data gap from seed to series A,B,C, and D funding rounds for female-led companies, stating that there are no female-led unicorns in Africa or emerging markets compared to 83 in the US. They emphasised the need for investors to view female founders as more than just SME founders and provide sufficient support for their growth. The speaker, working with the Itrait for Women organisation, is actively involved in advocating for female founders in the Anglophone region.

Another speaker focused on the need for investment in harder markets such as Burundi, Malawi, and Nigeria, as well as in smaller countries like Tonga or Samoa where digital business models do not work well. They discussed the challenges faced in these markets and the potential for investment to create opportunities for decent work and economic growth.

A founder highlighted the importance of capital injection for achieving sustainable profitability in startups. They mentioned encountering different expectations from investors regarding growth and profitability. The founder emphasised that while profitability can be achieved by cutting certain business functions, it may not be sustainable in the long run. They emphasised the need for capital injection during periods of negative profitability for sustainable growth.

The potential of the MENA region and Africa for high growth and low default rates was mentioned. The speakers cited the highest growth rates among all continents and a default rate for financing of less than 1%. The nascent nature of these markets and their high growth potential make them attractive for investment.

There was also a discussion on the decision-making process of investors and bankers. One founder believed that the data points towards investing in the MENA region and Africa, and questioned why bankers may not be fully capitalising on this potential.

Lastly, the audience expressed concern about Venture Capitalists terminating deals even after signing agreements. They sought advice from the speaker to help avoid such pitfalls and ensure the security of the financing process.

Overall, the panel discussion shed light on the investment opportunities and challenges in Africa, Asia Pacific, and the MENA region. The need for intentional investment in female-founded businesses, investment in harder markets, and the importance of capital injection for sustainable profitability were among the key takeaways. The discussion also highlighted the potential of the MENA region and Africa for high growth and low default rates. The audience’s concerns regarding Venture Capitalist termination of deals underscored the need for transparency and security in the financing process.

Moderator

During the conversation, both participants confirm their ability to hear and see each other, establishing clear communication. The speaker acknowledges their visual perception of the other person but notes their limited field of vision, as they are unable to see the audience. They express gratitude for the help provided.

The speaker mentions the arrival of someone, suggesting a new participant joining the conversation. They indicate the need to wait for additional participants before proceeding, possibly planning to call someone outside to notify or invite them to join the ongoing discussion.

The phrases “switch” and “let’s see” imply a potential change in topic or activity, indicating a forthcoming transition in the conversation. The speaker concludes with agreement by affirming “okay.”

Takashi Sano

MEFG Innovation Partners is a leading global corporate venture capital firm that focuses on investing in startups with potential for partnership as a banking group. Over the past five years, they have made investments in more than 40 companies worldwide. With assets under management, MEFG is ranked as the 7th or 8th largest financial group globally.

Takashi Sano, the Chief Investment Officer of MEFG Innovation Partners, strongly supports fostering partnerships with startups and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) on a global scale. He firmly believes in investing in their potential and aims to work together with these companies to achieve mutual growth and success.

MEFG Innovation Partners places heavy emphasis on investing in Asian markets, particularly in Indonesia and India. They recognise the immense potential for growth and development in these regions.

Startups and fintech companies are seen as instrumental in addressing the challenges faced in these markets. They have the ability to provide risk capital and complement the traditional banking groups. By enabling faster movement and innovative solutions, fintech startups can bridge the gaps in the financial industry.

However, SMEs and startups in emerging markets continue to face challenges in accessing finance. The traditional banking sector is often slow-moving and heavily regulated, making it difficult for these businesses to obtain the necessary funding. Additionally, the focus on past profitability and sustainability has led to a reduction in mega-rounds of funding over $100 million.

In discussions about business growth, startups and investors are seen as equal partners. The founders and investors have an equal stake in determining how the business can expand and reach new heights. Seeking equity investments is thus a collaborative process aimed at charting the course for growth.

Institutional backing plays a crucial role in supporting emerging managers operating in underrepresented markets. These managers often face difficulties in raising funds due to their lack of track record or being the first of their kind in a specific market. Small institutional investments can help legitimise these managers and attract further investments.

The gender imbalance in the venture capital sector remains a concern. Increasing female participation is seen as vital to bridge the gap between female founders and smaller emerging markets. The development of female investors who understand these dynamics is essential for fostering gender equality within the sector.

Large institutions are encouraged to take on more risk and invest in emerging markets. By providing stakes in relatively small or emerging markets, these institutions can contribute to the market’s growth and reduce economic inequality.

Understanding potential investors and their investment strategies is crucial for founders seeking financing. Conducting thorough due diligence, research, and dialogue with potential investors can help founders align with investors’ risk profiles and expectations.

Lastly, a balanced approach to financing is emphasised. Equity financing is essential for exponential growth, while debt financing provides stability. Striking a balance between the two can contribute to building a strong and successful company.

Overall, MEFG Innovation Partners and Takashi Sano advocate for fostering partnerships, investing in potential, and supporting the growth of startups and SMEs globally. They recognise the need for collaboration between traditional banking groups, startups, and fintech companies to address challenges and drive sustainable economic growth.

AY

Atsushi Yamanaka

Speech speed

151 words per minute

Speech length

2258 words

Speech time

898 secs

A

Audience

Speech speed

169 words per minute

Speech length

1499 words

Speech time

531 secs

CW

Che Wang

Speech speed

153 words per minute

Speech length

1281 words

Speech time

502 secs

HK

Henda Kwik

Speech speed

216 words per minute

Speech length

2827 words

Speech time

785 secs

M

Moderator

Speech speed

61 words per minute

Speech length

125 words

Speech time

123 secs

RB

Ruzgar Barisik

Speech speed

170 words per minute

Speech length

2936 words

Speech time

1034 secs

TS

Takashi Sano

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

3067 words

Speech time

1242 secs

TP

Tingting Peng

Speech speed

174 words per minute

Speech length

2654 words

Speech time

915 secs

Rethinking Africa’s digital trade: Entrepreneurship, innovation, & value creation in the age of Generative AI (depHub)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Shamira Ahmed

The integration of data-driven digital technologies, including AI and generative AI, holds significant potential to shape the future of digital transformation and trade in Africa. This argument was put forward in a discussion led by Shamira Ahmed, the Executive Director of the Data Economy Policy Hub. Ahmed is associated with an independent think tank founded by indigenous African women in South Africa.

The session highlighted the various challenges, opportunities, and risks associated with the influence of AI on digital transformation and trade. While acknowledging the transformative capabilities of AI, it was stressed that a multidimensional exploration of these aspects is necessary.

To delve deeper into the topic, a panel discussion was proposed, consisting of experts from various domains. The diverse panel aimed to provide insights into the role of digital technologies in shaping Africa’s digital services trade landscape, with specific emphasis on the creative economy, digital services trade, global governance, and the ethics of digital transformation.

Addressing the need for responsible governance, Shamira Ahmed emphasized that generative AI and other data-driven technologies, if not governed responsibly, could create a range of new issues. These include challenges in the regulatory and policy environment, connectivity, distributional effects, and disinformation.

Furthermore, Ahmed expressed interest in exploring the most promising use cases of generative AI in Africa and other developing countries. Specifically, she sought examples that demonstrate how these technologies can enhance human capital, productivity, and cross-border trading services.

While recognizing the positive impacts of AI, Shamira Ahmed cautioned against the risks that might contribute to inequality and wealth concentration in the tech space. Responsible governance, both at national and international levels, was highlighted as crucial to effectively mitigate these risks.

In conclusion, the integration of data-driven technologies such as AI and generative AI has the potential to reshape digital transformation and trade in Africa. However, it is essential to fully understand and address the multidimensional challenges, opportunities, and risks they bring forth. Responsible governance plays a pivotal role in maximizing the benefits of these technologies while mitigating potential pitfalls. Through panel discussions and exploration of diverse perspectives, valuable insights into the role of digital technologies in Africa’s digital services trade landscape can be gained.

Emily Jones

The analysis explores various aspects of AI innovation, trade agreements, AI governance, data privacy, and AI regulation. It raises concerns about the equitable distribution of AI innovation, highlighting its dominance by a few countries. Although African and other developing countries participate in AI innovation, challenges related to access and competition persist.

Trade agreements are scrutinised for potentially reinforcing the power of large companies without redistributing the benefits. The rapid development of trade agreements has implications for AI and digital ecosystems, with a particular concern for the influence of dominant companies in the AI space. This raises questions about the representation of smaller industry players, labour, and consumers in AI governance discussions.

The analysis emphasises the importance of addressing the harmful aspects of AI, including precarious work conditions, potential consumer harm, and data access and transparency concerns. Stronger regulations and proactive measures are needed to mitigate these issues.

There is a need for trade agreements that level the playing field for developing countries. Developing countries face challenges in the AI ecosystem, such as limited access to resources and unbalanced relationships with big tech companies. Current trade agreements may not effectively address issues related to competition, consumer protection, and labour rights in the digital economy.

The analysis highlights the lack of inclusivity in AI governance debates. Exclusive spaces such as the G7, OECD, US, EU, and Trade and Technology Council often exclude low-income and many developing countries. It suggests that developing countries can pool resources at regional levels to ensure a more inclusive approach to global AI governance.

Geopolitical tensions significantly influence AI governance spaces and can complicate discussions, creating barriers to inclusivity.

The analysis also raises concerns about the dominating presence of Big Tech in the AI space. Issues such as data ownership, control over infrastructure, and marketplace influence are highlighted, questioning fairness and competition within the industry.

Enforcement of data privacy laws is identified as a major issue, with difficulties faced by smaller countries in regulating large technology companies. A global solution for data privacy enforcement is proposed to address these challenges.

Governments worldwide are struggling to regulate AI. The concentration of AI expertise within the industry makes it challenging for the public sector to effectively regulate. The pooling of resources is suggested to bridge the gap between government and industry.

The analysis concludes by advocating for a more holistic and inclusive conversation about AI. It highlights the importance of diverse perspectives, including ethical experts, in AI discussions and regulations.

Overall, the analysis demonstrates the multifaceted challenges and complexities of AI innovation, trade agreements, AI governance, data privacy, and AI regulation. It emphasises the need for equity, inclusivity, and addressing the harmful aspects of AI. Strong regulations, global cooperation, and diverse perspectives are crucial in shaping the future of AI.

Katalin Bokor

Frontier technologies, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), have the power to bring about transformative changes in socioeconomic development. These technologies are already being used in sectors such as education, agriculture, and manufacturing, improving efficiency and productivity. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing countries are leveraging these technologies to enhance logistics, communication, and e-commerce platforms, facilitating their access to global markets.

New technologies are promoting financial inclusion, providing millions of people in developing countries with access to mobile money and formal financial accounts. This accessibility empowers individuals and contributes to poverty reduction and economic empowerment.

However, challenges remain, such as the digital divide where a significant portion of the global population lacks internet access, with Africa being particularly affected. Bridging this gap is crucial for ensuring equitable opportunities for all.

Efficiently utilizing frontier technologies requires implementing frameworks that manage competition issues, create fair markets, and invest in necessary infrastructure. These measures are essential for achieving equitable and sustainable development.

AI is revolutionizing the creative industries, reducing the costs of producing audiovisual content and enabling more individuals to make a living from creative pursuits. The use of AI applications is also increasing productivity and competitiveness for entrepreneurs in developing countries.

In the education sector, AI is enhancing the learning process through gamification and personalized experiences. Egyptian company, Vord, has developed educational games used in over 120 schools, benefiting more than 30,000 students.

Online marketplaces are connecting African artisans with global markets, overcoming infrastructural barriers and expanding their customer base.

Trade agreements are evolving to focus on sustainability, inclusiveness, and gender issues, ensuring trade benefits all stakeholders while promoting equality and environmental protection.

Global and regional cooperation is crucial for effectively harnessing the potential of frontier technologies, developing frameworks, building capacities, and ensuring equitable distribution of benefits.

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are vital for fostering innovation and respecting human rights in the context of AI technologies. Striking a balance in the legal framework is necessary to promote advancement while upholding ethical standards.

Overall, there is a positive sentiment towards frontier technologies and their potential for socioeconomic development. Stakeholders are actively working to overcome challenges and ensure the equitable distribution of these transformative technologies.

Javier Lopez Gonzalez

The analysis of the speakers’ arguments reveals several important points related to digital connectivity, trade, regulations, and ethical issues. One key point is the role of digital connectivity in boosting both international and domestic trade. The argument presented with a positive sentiment suggests that simple gravity modeling analysis demonstrates the crucial role of digital connectivity in increasing trade. More internet connections lead to a greater volume of domestic trade, outweighing the impact on international trade. This highlights the significance of digital connectivity in driving economic growth.

Regarding regulations, there are mixed views regarding the regulatory environment. The analysis suggests that while OECD countries have lower barriers, African countries face higher regulatory barriers. However, it is noted that African countries are making efforts to reduce their regulatory barriers at a faster pace than OECD countries. One key supporting fact is that significant regulatory reform in Africa can be as impactful as removing a 20% tariff on exports. This implies that the regulatory environment plays a crucial role in determining the export potential of African countries, and further improvement is needed.

The analysis also discusses the maintenance of the moratorium on applying customs duties on digital transmissions. The argument presented with a negative sentiment suggests that applying customs duties on digital transmissions could create more barriers for African countries, particularly in creative industries, when trying to enter global markets. It is highlighted that digitally deliverable services are growing at a rate of 8% annually, but African countries represent a small share. Therefore, maintaining the moratorium is seen as essential to facilitating the participation of African countries in the global digital economy.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and digital technology for trade is seen as beneficial. The analysis provides examples where the use of AI at customs and blockchain technology enhances international trade. Additionally, it is highlighted that foreign services help gain domestic and international competitiveness. However, there is a negative sentiment associated with concentration in two countries, which is viewed as detrimental to achieving a more balanced global trade landscape.

The importance of market openness to access technology and services is emphasized with a positive sentiment. It is supported by evidence that coding principles rely on drawing from online sources to create products, and high tariffs on digital devices in Africa hinder technology adoption. The argument suggests that market openness is crucial for countries to fully benefit from technological advancements.

Openness to data and talent is also considered important. The analysis suggests that without a data protection policy, data transfer is hindered due to a lack of trust. Additionally, it is noted that talent may be better found abroad, implying the need for countries to be open to talent mobility. Both these points are presented with a positive sentiment.

The analysis highlights the need for an integrated global digital market rather than autarky. It is argued that digital markets are globally interdependent, and smaller countries may not have the market size to make digital products economically viable. Therefore, an integrated digital market is viewed as crucial for promoting the growth of digital products.

There is a negative sentiment associated with purpose bounds on data, indicating that such bounds may inhibit innovation. It is argued that the value of data often comes from its multiple uses, which may not be foreseen at the point of collection. However, it is also acknowledged that there needs to be a balance to ensure individuals are sufficiently informed about data use.

The analysis suggests that trade agreements may not be sufficient to tackle ethical issues. While trade agreements do include considerations and flexibilities for moral purposes, there is a negative sentiment that more needs to be done. The EU-Japan data flows agreement is cited as an example of considering ethics in trade agreements.

The struggle to regulate AI is highlighted with a negative sentiment. It is mentioned that both developing and developed countries are grappling with the challenges of regulating AI. Executive orders in the US and the AI Act in the EU are examples of attempts to regulate AI, but it is noted that there is no solid answer yet on how to effectively regulate it.

The effectiveness of enforcement mechanisms in privacy rights is viewed positively. The reference to the EU and GDPR with larger fines is seen as a potential deterrent to violations of privacy rights.

Caution is recommended when involving international systems in domestic dispute resolution. The analysis suggests that unless an international company is involved, the involvement of international systems in domestic disputes may not be appropriate.

The need for problem-solving and cooperation is viewed neutrally, highlighting the vast opportunities and challenges faced in finding solutions. Additionally, the belief in breaking silos and bringing multiple perspectives to find appropriate solutions is presented with a positive sentiment.

Finally, the analysis questions the effectiveness of trade agreements with exceptions and flexibilities. It suggests that such trade agreements may not be the best solution, and presents a neutral sentiment on this matter.

In conclusion, the analysis of the speakers’ arguments reveals various viewpoints on digital connectivity, trade, regulations, and ethical issues. While digital connectivity is seen as crucial for boosting both international and domestic trade, there are mixed views on the regulatory environment. The maintenance of the moratorium on customs duties on digital transmissions is deemed necessary to avoid creating barriers for African countries. The use of AI and digital technology is considered beneficial, but concentration in two countries is viewed negatively. Market openness to access technology and services is emphasized, along with openness to data and talent. The creation of an integrated global digital market is argued to be essential. There is concern that purpose bounds on data may hinder innovation and that trade agreements may not adequately address ethical issues. The struggle to regulate AI is recognized, and the effectiveness of enforcement mechanisms in privacy rights is acknowledged. Caution is advised when involving international systems in domestic dispute resolution. The need for problem-solving and cooperation is highlighted, along with the importance of breaking silos and embracing multiple perspectives. Lastly, the effectiveness of trade agreements with exceptions and flexibilities is questioned.

Peter Kirchschlaeger

The analysis of the speakers’ arguments regarding AI and generative AI reveals several concerns. There is a negative sentiment towards the reinforcement of existing economic structures, where certain individuals benefit while others suffer human rights violations in the entire value chain. The argument is made that AI and generative AI have led to the same people enjoying economic benefits, while the same people suffer the consequences, including human rights violations. The speakers question who is enjoying the upsides of AI and generative AI and who is suffering under the downsides.

Ethical risks related to privacy, data protection, copyright violations, and disinformation are highlighted. It is pointed out that companies are constantly breaking laws regarding data protection and copyrights with no consequences. There is a risk of disinformation campaigns and deepfakes that can undermine political systems. The argument put forward is that generative AI increases these ethical risks, hence the need to address them.

Extended screen time due to AI and generative AI is seen as posing risks to physical and mental health. It is argued that screen time equals manipulation, going beyond mere influence. This manipulation can occur in both the economic sphere, affecting customers and decision-makers, and the political sphere, affecting citizens and politicians. The concern is that AI and generative AI open up the scope for manipulation in these fields.

Criticism is directed towards big tech companies for their exploitation of developing countries’ data for their own profit. The argument is that there is injustice when these companies expect developing countries to use their technologies, while the collected data is used outside these countries for profitable business opportunities. It is proposed that local talent should be utilized to work on local data infrastructure and develop specific contextualized solutions.

The analysis also underlines the need to avoid intensifying colonial power structures with technological innovation. The speakers stress the injustice faced by developing countries in the era of big tech and emphasize the need for utilizing local talent and data for local benefits.

On a positive note, it is argued that ethical considerations and human rights protections should be prioritized in the application of AI and digital transformation. The speakers give an example of purpose-bound data use in medical settings, where personal information is shared with physicians only for the purpose of addressing health issues.

There is a call for global regulatory efforts to be pooled to effectively handle the unique challenges of AI and digital transformation. It is stated that AI and digital transformation are global phenomena and should be addressed as such.

The responsibility of technology companies to adhere to laws and ethical use of technology is emphasized. The speakers refer to tech companies breaking laws as long as the gains outweigh the sanctions. The argument is made that technology companies need to act responsibly and comply with laws and ethical use of technology.

The creation of an International Database Systems Agency at the UN is proposed as a solution to monitor human rights violations, regulate access to markets, and facilitate technological cooperation. The speakers draw parallels to the establishment and function of the International Atomic Energy Agency in their argument.

Trade agreements are seen as an opportunity to address ethical issues. The suggestion is made to incorporate ethics research in the creation process of trade agreements, as they have the potential to address ethical considerations, injustices, or divides.

The importance of balancing innovation with human rights and respecting human rights laws is stressed. It is argued that purpose-bound data use is not meant to hinder innovation but it is important to strike a balance. The speakers highlight the importance of informed consent in data use for promoting innovation while respecting human rights.

There is potential for technology-based solutions to facilitate transparent and constant flow of information about how the user’s data is being used. It is proposed that instant transparent information can help users understand and potentially agree or disagree on how their data is used.

The speakers argue that doing things differently in the AI space could ensure respect for human rights and foster innovation. It is suggested that striving for different ways to work with AI in the future can help promote innovation while also preserving human rights.

It is stated that national efforts are necessary in trying to regulate AI and generative AI. Additionally, regional initiatives for effective regulation are also suggested, as pooling efforts in regional initiatives may lead to more effective AI regulation.

The need to aim for creating a global regulatory framework for AI is emphasized. The speakers contend that AI is a global phenomenon and therefore needs a global regulatory framework.

The establishment process of the framework and international database systems agency AIDA is discussed. The argument is made that initiatives taken so far should be integrated into the establishment process of AIDA.

The conclusion drawn from the analysis is that there is a need for a holistic and inclusive global framework to regulate AI. The speakers believe that such a framework should prioritize ethical considerations, human rights protections, and the involvement of university-based experts in regulatory committees. They also stress the importance of interdisciplinary, international, and inclusive dialogue in addressing the challenges posed by AI and generative AI. Finally, support is expressed for the establishment of the International Database Systems Agency at the UN.

Audience

The analysis covers various arguments and stances on data protection, privacy, and ethical concerns. One argument raises concerns regarding the protection of data and ethical collection practices. It is reported that a company collected IRIS data from 2 million people in Nairobi, despite the government’s order to cease. This data collection occurred without clear information or consent from the individuals, leading to ethical concerns, especially as the individuals were paid for their data.

Another argument highlights the importance of safeguarding people’s rights while promoting innovation. The supporting facts indicate that the company collecting the data did not disclose how the data is being used, resulting in the violation of people’s rights. This argument expresses a negative sentiment towards the situation.

The analysis also addresses the upsurge of digital money lending in Nigeria due to COVID-19 restrictions. The supporting facts suggest that the restrictions implemented in Nigeria in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were effective. However, these restrictions led to a need for financial aid and assistance to individuals, resulting in an increase in digital money lending. This argument conveys a negative sentiment, emphasizing the impact of the restrictions on individuals’ financial circumstances.

The violation of privacy and misuse of personal data by digital money lenders are discussed as well. The supporting facts indicate numerous instances of privacy and data violations. Digital lenders have resorted to harassing techniques to pursue loan repayments, prompting an investigation by the Commission. This argument conveys a negative sentiment, highlighting the seriousness of privacy and data misuse concerns.

Furthermore, the importance of establishing a global and regional regulatory framework for data protection is emphasized. The speaker suggests leveraging regional initiatives to address these issues and references ongoing discussions on global regulatory efforts. This argument carries a neutral sentiment, underscoring the need for international collaboration to protect data and privacy.

Lastly, the analysis explores the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI) in regulatory compliance. The speaker seeks advice on how AI can assist with regulatory compliance. This argument is neutral, emphasizing the need for further exploration and discussion to fully comprehend the benefits and challenges of AI in this context.

In summary, the analysis raises critical concerns regarding data protection, privacy, and ethical considerations. It underscores the importance of obtaining clear information and consent when collecting data, the financial impact of COVID-19 restrictions, the necessity for robust privacy and data protection regulations, and the potential role of AI in regulatory compliance. These findings underscore the significance of ethical data practices and the need for comprehensive regulations to safeguard individual rights in the evolving digital landscape.

A

Audience

Speech speed

155 words per minute

Speech length

728 words

Speech time

282 secs

EJ

Emily Jones

Speech speed

215 words per minute

Speech length

3668 words

Speech time

1023 secs

JL

Javier Lopez Gonzalez

Speech speed

200 words per minute

Speech length

3150 words

Speech time

945 secs

KB

Katalin Bokor

Speech speed

142 words per minute

Speech length

1389 words

Speech time

585 secs

PK

Peter Kirchschlaeger

Speech speed

174 words per minute

Speech length

4698 words

Speech time

1622 secs

SA

Shamira Ahmed

Speech speed

157 words per minute

Speech length

1807 words

Speech time

689 secs