Panel Discussion: 01

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The ministerial conversation at the AI Impact Summit focused on how artificial intelligence can be harnessed to benefit the Global South and ensure that โ€œAI for allโ€ reaches every citizen [1][13-14]. Ministers from Togo, Indonesia and Egypt-Her Excellencyโ€ฏSinaโ€ฏLawson, His Excellencyโ€ฏNizarโ€ฏPatria and His Excellencyโ€ฏRafatโ€ฏHindi-were introduced to discuss their countriesโ€™ digital-transformation journeys [3-5][9-11]. Patria rated the worldโ€™s AI infrastructure a 6 out of 10, noting a persistent digital gap especially for archipelagic Indonesia, which must connect 17โ€ฏ000 islands and currently enjoys about 80โ€ฏ% internet penetration [44-48][54-55]. He emphasized that โ€œmeaningful connectivityโ€ means using telecom networks together with AI to deliver tangible benefits, and that governments must act as accelerators of this connectivity [56-59]. Lawson agreed, pointing out that Africa holds less than 1โ€ฏ% of global AI talent and faces infrastructure deficits, yet she rates the impact of AI projects in her country at 9 out of 10, focusing on health, education and agriculture as priority sectors [69-73][76-78]. Hindi highlighted Egyptโ€™s AI-driven expansion of essential services, citing early-detection tools for breast cancer and diabetes and a new AI education platform that now reaches underserved schools and hospitals [87-92]. Patria shared an Indonesian example where an AI startup, supported by a government innovation hub, combines X-ray data and machine-learning to help remote doctors diagnose tuberculosis, illustrating cross-sector replication of AI solutions [97-106]. Lawson described Togoโ€™s pandemic-era cash-transfer program that used satellite imagery and telecom metadata to prioritize beneficiaries, and how the ministry has since created a 25-person data-science team to support other government branches [111-129]. Across the three speakers, the main obstacles identified were inadequate infrastructure, limited institutional capacity and awareness, language diversity (Togoโ€™s 42 local languages), and the need for trustworthy, transparent AI systems [144-151][155-160][169-176][222-229]. When asked how AI success should be measured over the next five years, participants argued that the key metric is the proportion of people who gain access to high-quality AI-enabled services, not the size of models or compute power [198-204][217-219]. They also stressed that success requires AI to be inclusive, trusted, and aligned with development goals such as health, education and agriculture, supported by standards for data exchange and robust R&D [231-242][245-251]. The discussion concluded that despite differing national contexts, the ministers share a common vision: collaborative policy, capacity building and responsible AI deployment are essential to ensure that AI delivers real-world impact for the Global South [185-190][245-251]. This consensus underscores the summitโ€™s significance as a platform for collective action to make AI an inclusive driver of development worldwide [245-251].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Buildingโ€ฏโ€œmeaningful connectivityโ€ as the foundation for AI impact – Indonesiaโ€™s Vice-Minister highlighted that 80โ€ฏ% internet penetration is only useful when it translates into โ€œmeaningful connectivityโ€ that lets emerging AI services reach remote islandsโ€ฏ[44-58]. Togoโ€™s Minister echoed this, stressing that infrastructure is the starting point but many officials still do not know AI tools exist, creating an institutional-capacity gapโ€ฏ[144-151].


Sector-focused AI pilots that demonstrate concrete impact


* Togo used two AI algorithms (satellite-derived poverty maps and telecom-metadata clustering) to prioritize cash-transfer beneficiaries during the pandemicโ€ฏ[111-124].


* Egypt cited AI-driven early detection of breast cancer and a new AI-powered education support tool that extends high-quality services to underserved communitiesโ€ฏ[87-94].


* Indonesia described an AI-enabled TB-diagnosis app that combines X-ray data with a simple algorithm to help remote doctors, and noted similar pilots in education and agricultureโ€ฏ[97-106].


Key barriers to scaling AI in the Global South: institutional capacity, trust, regulation and R&D – Lawson pointed out that many public-sector staff are unaware of AI possibilities and that multilingual models (Togo has 42 languages) are needed for mass adoptionโ€ฏ[144-160]. Patria added that geopolitical asymmetries, platform dominance, the need for balanced regulation, and limited R&D and talent pipelines hinder progressโ€ฏ[169-184]. Hindi later emphasized that trust-through transparency and accountability-is essential for societal acceptanceโ€ฏ[222-229].


Redefining how AI success should be measured – Rather than counting models or compute, speakers argued that success metrics must be people-centric: percentage of population with AI-enabled services, quality of health/education outcomes, and overall accessibility by 2030โ€ฏ[198-206]; Patria stressed accessibility, problem-solving relevance, and trust as three pillarsโ€ฏ[222-229]; Lawson visualised a future where every Togolese can access any public service with a single phone callโ€ฏ[231-236].


Call for collective action and shared knowledge (AI Commons) – The moderator highlighted the creation of an โ€œAI Commonsโ€ to pool best practices and accelerate impact across nationsโ€ฏ[78-82], reinforcing the earlier statement that global cooperation is needed so โ€œnobody is left out of the touch of artificial intelligenceโ€โ€ฏ[13-15].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The ministerial conversation was convened to showcase how AI can be leveraged in Global South countries, to surface common challenges (infrastructure, capacity, trust, regulation), and to agree on collaborative mechanisms-such as shared best-practice repositories and joint policy frameworks-that will ensure AI delivers inclusive, people-focused impact rather than merely technical milestones.


Overall tone and its evolution


The tone begins formally and celebratory, with ceremonial introductions and praise for the panelโ€™s expertise. As the dialogue progresses, it becomes constructive and solution-oriented, with each minister sharing concrete pilots and candidly diagnosing systemic gaps. Toward the end, the tone shifts to a forward-looking, hopeful consensus, emphasizing shared values (inclusivity, trust) and a collective vision for measuring AI success. Throughout, the discussion remains collaborative and optimistic, despite acknowledging significant hurdles.


Speakers

Debjani Ghosh


Area of expertise: AI policy, governance, and ethical AI


Role/Title: Distinguished Fellow, NITI Aayog; Moderator of the ministerial conversation (also referred to as Ms. Devjani Khosh)


Affiliation: NITI Aayog, Government of India


Citations: [S1][S2]


Rafat Hindi


Area of expertise: Digital transformation, AI applications in public services (healthcare, education)


Role/Title: Minister of Information and Communication Technology (Minister of Communications), Arab Republic of Egypt


Affiliation: Government of Egypt


Citations: [S3][S5]


Nizar Patria


Area of expertise: Telecommunications policy, AI adoption in a large archipelagic nation


Role/Title: Vice Minister of Communications, Indonesia


Affiliation: Ministry of Communications, Indonesia


Citations: [S6][S7]


Sina Lawson


Area of expertise: Digital transformation, mobile-first government services, AI for development in the Global South


Role/Title: Her Excellency, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo


Affiliation: Government of Togo


Citations: [S8][S9]


Speaker 1


Area of expertise: Event hosting / moderation (introductory remarks)


Role/Title: Host/Moderator of the AI Impact Summit opening session (specific title not provided)


Affiliation: Not specified


Citations: [S10][S12]


Additional speakers:


Ms. Jenny – Mentioned briefly in the transcript; no further information on role, title, or expertise is provided.


Mr. Petra – Referred to once; appears to be a mis-pronunciation of โ€œMr. Patriaโ€ (Nizar Patria) and does not represent a distinct participant.


Ms. Devjani Khosh – Same individual as Debjani Ghosh; already listed above.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The ministerial conversation opened with Speakerโ€ฏ1โ€™s formal acknowledgement of artificial intelligenceโ€™s โ€œtransformative and disruptiveโ€ potential and a call for an โ€œAI for allโ€ agenda that reaches every citizen, especially in the Global Southโ€ฏ[1-8][13-15][17-18]. The panel was introduced as a โ€œfireside conversationโ€ featuring Her Excellencyโ€ฏSinaโ€ฏLawson, Minister of Digital Transformation for Togo; His Excellencyโ€ฏNizarโ€ฏPatria, Vice-Minister of Communications for Indonesia; and His Excellencyโ€ฏRafatโ€ฏHindi, Minister of Communications for Egypt, with Msโ€ฏDebjaniโ€ฏGhosh of Nitiโ€ฏAayog moderatingโ€ฏ[3-5][9-12][13][34-38].


Patria responded to the moderatorโ€™s question on the worldโ€™s overall AI readiness, giving it a score of six out of ten and attributing the shortfall to a persistent digital gap, especially for archipelagic nations like Indonesiaโ€ฏ[44-45]. He highlighted Indonesiaโ€™s geography of 17โ€ฏ000 islands and five major islands, noting that while internet penetration has reached roughly 80โ€ฏ% of its 250โ€ฏmillion-strong population, the challenge now lies in converting that coverage into โ€œmeaningful connectivityโ€ that couples telecom infrastructure with AI-driven services for real-world benefitโ€ฏ[46-55][56-59].


Lawson concurred that infrastructure is a prerequisite but argued that the true measure of AIโ€™s value in Africa is its application, not its existence. She pointed out that the African continent accounts for less thanโ€ฏ1โ€ฏ% of global AI talent and still struggles with basic connectivity for schools and hospitalsโ€ฏ[71-74]. Nevertheless, she rated the impact of AI projects in her country at nine out of ten, citing successful pilots in health, education and agriculture that are reshaping public service deliveryโ€ฏ[67-70][76].


Hindi presented Egyptโ€™s experience as a โ€œgovernment-firstโ€ model that has already expanded essential services through AI. He described AI tools for early detection of breast cancer and diabetes, and a new AI-powered education platform that now reaches high-school students and teachers nationwide, bringing advanced medical screening and learning support to previously underserved communitiesโ€ฏ[87-95].


Concrete impact stories followed. Patria recounted an Indonesian AI startup, nurtured within a government-run innovation hub, that aggregates health-centre data and, together with X-ray imaging, enables remote doctors to diagnose tuberculosis more accuratelyโ€ฏ[97-106]. He noted that similar AI-driven solutions are now being replicated in education and agriculture, reflecting a growing entrepreneurial enthusiasmโ€ฏ[106-108]. Lawson then detailed Togoโ€™s pandemic-era cash-transfer programme, which combined satellite-derived poverty maps with machine-learning analysis of telecom metadata to prioritise beneficiariesโ€ฏ[111-124]. Debjani Ghosh then asked Minister Lawson to share the case study for inclusion in the AIโ€ฏCommons repositoryโ€ฏ[130-132]. After the crisis, the Ministry of Public Sector Efficiency institutionalised a 25-person data-science unit to support AI adoption across other ministriesโ€ฏ[128-129].


The panel identified several barriers to scaling AI impact. Lawson stressed a lack of institutional capacity: many officials are unaware that AI tools exist, and Togoโ€™s 42 languages and dialects necessitate multilingual AI models to foster trust and adoptionโ€ฏ[144-151][157-166]. She also highlighted the need for standards and a common data-exchange platform to enable effective collaboration with the Globalโ€ฏNorthโ€ฏ[240-242]. Lawson noted that half of Africaโ€™s population is underโ€ฏ18โ€ฏyears old andโ€ฏ75โ€ฏ% is underโ€ฏ35โ€ฏyears old, underscoring the importance of building trusted AI for a youthful continentโ€ฏ[250-252]. Patria added macro-level constraints such as geopolitical asymmetries and platform dominance, alongside the need to raise infrastructure standards, balance regulation and innovation, and boost R&D and talent pipelines; he emphasized that AI must be accessible, must solve real problems, and must be trustworthyโ€ฏ[169-184][222-229]. Hindi reinforced the importance of trust, calling for transparency, accountability and safeguards against deep-fakes to ensure societal acceptanceโ€ฏ[222-229].


Finally, the moderator asked each minister to outline how AI success should be measured over the next five years. The speakers agreed that people-centred metrics must replace technical tallies. Ghosh urged a shift from counting models or compute power to assessing how many lives are changedโ€ฏ[193-197]. Hindi proposed the percentage of the population with access to high-quality AI-enabled services as the primary KPI, arguing that this focus moves attention from technology to tangible benefits in health, education and agricultureโ€ฏ[198-204]. Patria echoed this, adding that AI must be accessible, must solve real problems and must be trustworthyโ€ฏ[222-229]. Lawson visualised a future where every Togolese citizen can obtain any public service with a single phone call, linking the abstract KPI to a concrete, inclusive service modelโ€ฏ[231-236].


The moderator highlighted the creation of an โ€œAI Commonsโ€ – a shared repository of best practices and know-how – as a mechanism to accelerate impact across nationsโ€ฏ[78-82]. Throughout the dialogue, the speakers repeatedly affirmed the mantra โ€œAI for allโ€ and stressed that inclusive, low-cost solutions are essential for the Global Southโ€ฏ[14-18][20-21][24-28].


All speakers agreed that the AI Impact Summit can serve as a platform for sharing best practices and fostering collective actionโ€ฏ[260-263]. The discussion underscored a consensus: inclusive, trustworthy AI embedded in priority sectors (health, education, agriculture) and measured by people-centric outcomes will drive development, provided there is coordinated policy, capacity-building, multilingual model development, balanced regulation, and robust public-private partnerships, all underpinned by collective initiatives such as the AI Commonsโ€ฏ[245-251].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Speaker 1

for your inspiring reflections and also for highlighting the transformative role of artificial intelligence, as well as the disruptive role of artificial intelligence, drawing our attention to it and shaping our future. Ladies and gentlemen, I would now like to introduce the speakers for a ministerial conversation. The speakers in this fireside conversation is Her Excellency Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo. His Excellency Nizar Patria, Vice Minister of Communications, Indonesia. His Excellency Rafat Hindi, Minister of Communications, Egypt. Minister Lawson has made Togo one of Africa’s most watched digital transformation stories, building mobile first government services that reach citizens who were previously entirely excluded from the formal economy. Her work is a reminder that AI’s greatest opportunities may lie in the global south.

Her work is a reminder that AI’s greatest opportunities may lie in the global south. minister patria representing the world’s fourth most populous nation and one of southeast asia’s fastest growing digital economies his excellency is navigating the complex challenge of building ai policy for a country of 270 million people spread across 17 000 islands egypt is positioning itself as an ai hub for the arab world and africa and minister hindi is leading that change with a young population and growing digital infrastructure egypt’s ambitions are both compelling and instructive for developing nations navigating the ai transition ladies and gentlemen i would like to invite our speakers please with a big round of applause i would like to request you to please welcome the minister from togo from indonesia and also from egypt i request our honorable dignitaries to kindly take your place on this stage and this conversation is being moderated by Ms.

Debjani Ghosh distinguished fellow Niti Aayog, I request Ms. Debjani Ghosh to kindly join us AI Summit is a place where everybody looks forward to such ministerial conversations and this is one such conversation that everybody is looking forward to because when we say that this is the first ever AI Summit which is being organized in a country of global south, it makes a difference and here we have very elite panel with us. Her Excellency Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo is going to join us. His Excellency Nizar Patria, Vice Minister of Communications, Indonesia. His Excellency Rafat Hindi, Minister of Communications, Egypt. We are expecting our other guests to join us very soon as Ms. Devjani Khosh, Distinguished Fellow Niti Ayog is going to moderate this conversation.

And this will also give us an insight into the countries of Global South, how they are adopting artificial intelligence, what are the challenges before them, and how the world has to come together. This global cooperation is needed so that nobody is left out of the touch of artificial intelligence, the benefits of artificial intelligence. And that’s when Honorable Prime Minister says it’s AI for all. This is what we mean, that it should reach each and every person. Of the continent, of the world, and AI should bring a change into the people of global. South too. Only then we can say that we are going, moving ahead in the right direction. So keeping that in mind, ladies and gentlemen, this ministerial conversation is going to be of utmost importance when we talk of AI Impact Summit, because this conversation will also bring to the fore those points on the basis of which we can say that AI is making an impact into the lives of people, especially the people of Global South.

And when we talk of the challenges, the difficulties which face Indians, our countrymen, that is the time when we can say that if you are able to find low -cost AI solutions to our problems, they will also be the solutions which can be adopted very, very easily by the other countries of the Global South. So here we are bringing to you this ministerial conversation. Our guests are here. And this elite panel from these countries, from Congo, Egypt, and Indonesia, will bring before us those issues that are of utmost importance to the lives of people, especially the people those aspects on which they’ve already been. working, the challenges which they think they need cooperation from other countries as well, if they want to counter these challenges.

Because when you talk of Global South, ladies and gentlemen, unless Global South develops, unless Global South adopts artificial intelligence, it cannot bring a change in the world. And that is what this summit aims at, that we must impact the lives of common men. Nobody should be left behind. And when we say this, we say, which means it’s AI for all. Everybody should be benefited. So, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome our elite panelists here. We have Her Excellency, Sina Lawson, Minister of Digital Transformation, Togo. Please welcome her. His Excellency, Nisar Patria, Vice Minister of Communications, Communications Indonesia, and His Excellency, Raphat Hindi, Minister of Communications, Egypt. It’s over to you, Ms. Devjani Khosh. Thank you.

Debjani Ghosh

Thank you very much. much and good afternoon, everyone. And thank you to all of those who are here. So we are all finally here. And as you can see, this is truly a very power -packed panel. So since this is about the Impact Summit, the AI Impact Summit, and since we are gathered from all over the world to talk about the creation of Impact by AI, I want to first start with you, Mr. Petra. You know, when you think about the journey that we’ve had till now, the global community has had till now with AI, a lot of the focus has been on building the infrastructure. So how do you think we have really done on putting that infrastructure to work to create impact?

If you had to rate it on a scale of one to ten, what would you give the world? What score would you give the world? Thank

Nizar Patria

you, Ms. Jenny. This is really a challenging question, actually. if I had to give a number I would give 6 out of 10 yeah why 6? because well if we talk about the emerging technologies like artificial intelligence is it is the words like a buzz like a mantra right now everyone talking about AI and AI right now is here is with us and many people they don’t scrutinize anymore about the useful of AI they just use but the problem is the level of adoption of this technology, this emerging technology, especially for the global short countries like Indonesia and maybe some of African countries, Asian countries. We still have a digital gap. Yes. Especially for Indonesia, we are an archipelago country.

We are archipelagic. So we have 17 ,000 islands. We have five big islands in Indonesia. And each island has a very unique characteristic, very unique people, culture, and so on. And the telecommunication infrastructure is very, very important for our country. That unites our country with this telecommunication infrastructure. We try to improve. We try to cover all of the archipelago by our telecommunication network. And now the internet penetration into the population is already about 80%. Our population right now is 250 million people. And now what we do with these infrastructures, digital infrastructure or telecommunication infrastructure, we want meaningful connectivity. Yeah, that’s it. Meaningful connectivity. That means how we use this connectivity with the emerging technologies like artificial intelligence on top of these infrastructures to give benefit to the people.

So government try to be the accelerator to build this meaningful connectivity

Debjani Ghosh

Now, that’s very well said. So six out of 10. And the main gap or the main reason is we still have miles to go before everyone has access. And access has to be meaningful. Right? I think that’s very well said. Ms. Lawson, would you agree with that? Or would you have a different take on that?

Sina Lawson

Hello, everyone. Good afternoon. Yes, I do agree. Absolutely. I think that when we talk about AI, for us, at least Africans, it’s not about the technology. It’s about what we can do with it. And so a few comments. Number one is that in terms of AI talent, the African continent represents less than 1 % worldwide. In terms of infrastructure, we also have a lot of AI talent. We also have challenges. You know, a lot of countries don’t have connected schools or hospitals. So we’re still building our connectivity. and I would say that but if you look at few examples few achievements that we had using AI in terms of impact we can see that even today it’s equal to 9 out of 10 so every time we implement it in our way solving our problems then the number comes closer to 10 than anything I would also say that the African Union position was to use artificial intelligence in real life use cases so the impact for us and the sectors, the priority sectors are government infrastructure and the way we function it’s health, education, agriculture so I think that if we succeed to implement AI in those sectors then our continent will change forever

Debjani Ghosh

I really like that, the fact that you brought out three very important mission -critical sectors, rather than saying we need to go and do everything. But I think that priority is so important. And by the way, part of the seven working groups that was there under the AI Summit, one of the working groups, which I had the privilege of co -chairing, along with Indonesia and Netherlands, was economic impact and social development. And one of the things we decided that’s needed right now to accelerate impact is the creation of AI Commons that brings together best practices, know -how. So that was one of the key outcomes of part of the working groups that we launched. Mr.

Hendy, if I may come to you. When we talk about impact, one thing we realize is it means so many different things to so many different people. Can you give us an example of something? Something that you believe is truly… a North Star with respect to how impact has been created. A great example of how impact has been created.

Rafat Hindi

Yes, thank you. In Egypt, the most meaningful impact AI has been in expanding the access to the essential public services, such as healthcare and education, in a larger scale and at nation -wide. We are using AI tools for early detection for breast cancer and some diabetes -related conditions. And we are now launching a new AI powerful tool for education support to be used in high school with high school students and teachers across the country. For the first time, advanced medical screening and learning support become available for underserved community. We usually have able to do it in big city and in elite institution, but now we are able to do it with underserved community. Three things made this possible in Egypt.

A government -first approach that puts public interest first and sovereignty AI capability that reflects our language and our local needs. Also, the strong partnership between across the government and national AI ecosystem and the global partners. Thank you.

Debjani Ghosh

Mr. Patria, any good example that you would like to share of impact creation in Indonesia or any other country that you think has done a really good job of it?

Nizar Patria

Well, I will share one example from Indonesia, how this artificial intelligence can help. Because we are a very diverse nation and also archipelago country, so sometimes we in the public services, for instance, healthcare, we need effective and efficient technology adoptions to help these healthcare sectors. So now we try to to encourage our young generation that build a startup. And we try to facilitate them in what he calls is an AI innovation hub. And one of the product is try to help doctors in the remote area to diagnostic the tuberculosis. The tuberculosis or TBC is coming on the stage. And it becomes very difficult for the doctors in the remote area to detect because they have a very limited access on the modern equipment or sophisticated technology to detect this tuberculosis diseases.

But with the artificial intelligence, so this startup tried to gather all of the big data from the health center in the remote areas and then make a simple program and give it to the doctors. And combined with the x -ray machine, it can help doctors to identify whether this is TBC or this is just ordinary lung problems. So I see these initiatives in certain sectors already copied to other sectors for the education, for the agriculture. Many startups try to adopt this AI technology right now. And I can see and we can feel that the enthusiasm is really, really high. But the problem we need as a government, as a policymaker, we need to give the safeguard and to accelerate.

in building this healthy and fair ecosystem to boost the innovation on artificial intelligence.

Debjani Ghosh

Fantastic. Ms. Lawson, any favorite impact story that you want to share?

Sina Lawson

Yes, I have a great impact story. During the pandemic, we were able to use AI to prioritize the beneficiaries for our financial aid program. So at the height of the pandemic, we built a program to distribute cash using mobile phones, right? So the question then was, how do you prioritize beneficiaries? We started in 2020. And in 2020, we didn’t know if the pandemic was going to last for a long time. So we had one certainty, which was that we needed to be super efficient in programming. Prioritizing who needed the money the most. And so we used two AI algorithms. One… applied to satellite imagery. We drew the poverty map of Togo. And then another based on machine learning with telecom metadata, we were able to isolate the phone numbers of people who were, yeah.

So that was really our first major experience using AI. And then after the pandemic, the question for us was, we want this to be sustainable. Right? How do you, because it was during the pandemic, we had a partnership with Berkeley. So we were working, really figuring out things as they were coming. But afterwards, we wanted to build capabilities in -house. So we now have within the Ministry of Public Sector Efficiency, a team of 25 people, data scientists, and we support other branches of government. Because when we talk, you know, here we talk about AI and everybody really, knows what AI is and the type of applications that, you know, things we can do with AI. But a lot of people, they don’t know what AI is.

don’t know. So it’s very important to have a team of people who work, say, with the Ministry of Agriculture or the Ministry of Environment and producing images and really data that can help these ministries improve policies. So I think this is a great learning experience for us. It’s applying AI to improve policies.

Debjani Ghosh

It’s such a brilliant example because one, it impacts the grassroots, right? The people who need it the most. And second, it’s, you know, government has a lot of, I mean, especially in the Global South, a lot of government usages, augmentation of services. I think what you’re doing is really enabling better development of policies. And that’s that. I would, in fact, request you to please share this case study so we can put it in the AI Commons that we have built. So I would really request you to do that. The next question is also to you, Ms. Lawson, which is… As government, what do you think is the biggest roadblock to scaling impact creation where it can reach population?

Is it data? Is it infrastructure? Is it regulation? Or is it even geopolitical dynamics?

Sina Lawson

So I think it’s a combination of various things. We’re tackling all of these things. But first, it’s infrastructure, because that’s the starting point. But you also have something, when I was referring to the data lab, a lot of people don’t know this universe exists, right? That you can apply, you know, you can use AI to gather information as to when you want to design a new infrastructure, like an itinerary. For example, when we build our fiber optics network, we use satellite imagery and so on. But a lot of people just don’t know it exists. Right. So they can’t ask. They don’t know which question to ask. Right. And so. So even if we’re there, so we do a lot of outreach within government going and saying, look, this is what we were able to do using AI and so on.

So I think that what I would call institutional capacity is a roadblock because people just don’t know. So it’s a lot of training required. The other thing is, and I think it’s also one thing that we’ve been working on is right now AI is in French or English, right? It’s not in, it’s not, we have in Togo, we have 42 languages and dialects. And for AI to, if we want massive AI adoption, we need to be able to provide these models in local languages. So that’s one very important aspect of what we’ve been up to. 42 languages. Yeah. Wow. And dialects, you know, I’m sure that, yeah. Yeah. So that’s the challenge. But that’s also the opportunity because when you think about creating.

impact for AI. Think of education. Imagine, and that’s what I imagine, imagine a world where every school children has an AI tutor being able to explain to them, you know, math and science in local languages, in their own dialects. That’s for me, the power of AI, really.

Debjani Ghosh

So institutional capacity is one of the biggest roadblocks that you see. Mr. Pedra, is there anything you want to add to that in terms of the biggest roadblocks to mass scale impact creation?

Nizar Patria

Yeah, I agree with the colleagues from Togo. I think it’s the problem today for the global sub -countries like Indonesia, and I think some of African countries and other ASEAN countries. is now we are facing the geopolitical condition that you mentioned is really challenging times today because we are facing asymmetric conditions amongst global sorts and global norms. And that’s one problem because the platformization, the dominance of the platform is so important to define or to determine the progress of the fair ecosystem in one country. That’s the first thing. And the second one, I think the infrastructure is one of the critical things that we need to pay attention. We need to improve. We need to heighten the standard of services on this infrastructure.

And then regulations. I think regulation is also very important. in this sense because… Do we over -regulate? No, no, no. We don’t intend to heavily regulate these AI sectors because we try to balance protections and also innovations. That’s most important, I think. If you heavily regulate, so no innovations at all. I cannot agree more. Yeah, so we try to balance. And the most important, the last thing that is most important, I think, we need to improve our research and development and then attract the investment to support these innovations and to nurture our digital talent. That’s the most important that we have to do in the short term.

Debjani Ghosh

Extremely well said. And I think between the two of you really captured it. While infrastructure is always important and you always want to, you want more compute, you want to build it out. But if you don’t have institutional capacity, then investment in that infrastructure will not give you the returns. And regulation needs to help innovation, needs to help scale. And R &D is absolutely critical. So I think these are brilliant points. I know our time is up. So my last question, and I would request all three of you to answer. If we look at the next five years, the future, how should AI success be measured? Today, we are primarily looking at how many models we are building, how big are the models.

How should we be looking at AI success? What’s the North Star? I’ll start with you, Mr. Hendy.

Rafat Hindi

If I have to choose now, it would be this. The business. The percentage of people that have access. Wonderful. To high. Quality AI enabled services. Wonderful. Not the number of models, not the compute. The people’s benefits are the most important. They have to benefit from healthcare, from education, from agriculture and government. And the KPI matters for three reasons, actually. First, it shifts the focus from technology to people. And AI is advancing very fast. But access to it is not that fast. We need to make sure this happens. And this is what I can see for 2030, maybe for AI. Second, it exposes the global gaps, not hiding them. So gaps in the compute, gaps in infrastructure, in local language models.

So this is very important. The third one is it’s framing AI as a development tool. Not a dominant tool. where compute power is shared and public service is prioritized. I think this is what I look forward to.

Debjani Ghosh

So success is not the size of models or the size of your compute infrastructure, but how many lives we are able to change. And are we able to do that in a way that no one is left behind, right? It’s inclusive. Brilliant. Anything you all want to add? Any different thoughts, Mr. Petra and then Ms. Lawson?

Nizar Patria

Yeah, just a very short on this. I just want to add three more. But the first one I think is similar like colleagues from Egypt. In the next five years, AI should be accessible. That’s the first one. And the second one, for the global south countries, AI must solve the problem. That’s the most important. And the third one, I think AI, need to be trusted. trusted yeah need to be trusted so it need to comply with the transparency and accountability standard so no more AI deep fake can cheat people yeah so because people have good awareness on this AI product especially generative AI like AI deep fake or synthetic reality that produced by this AI machines so I think that three points we can give mark whether this AI workable in the society or it’s become a disaster to the

Debjani Ghosh

I cannot agree more with you on all three but I think the one that is most important is trust because if it’s not trustworthy it’ll never be adopted it’ll never be used so I think that is brilliant brilliant point Ms. Lawson the last words to you

Sina Lawson

I would echo what has been said and for me success would be I think If five years from now, every Togolese is one phone call away to access any public services, right? And so that’s how I’m going. Personally, I’m going to measure success with regards to AI in Togo because then it talks to the people, right? Because so far we’ve been talking about digital transformation, which was really going from paper to screen. But what is going to be a real game changer is if I can talk to the machine and the machine can reply and so on. So that’s one thing. And obviously, the comment about trust is a very important one. We are a very young continent.

Half of the African population is less than 18 years old and 75 % is less than 35. And so it’s very important for us to have a trusted AI. AI infrastructure and so on. And so there’s a lot of work that we need to do. We didn’t mention to have also standards and platform for data exchange, which is going to be extremely crucial in our relationship with the global north. So these are really important issues that we need to tackle if we want to be successful five years from now.

Debjani Ghosh

I think that’s very, very well put. And, you know, this was, ladies and gentlemen, such a powerful discussion because what’s coming out of it is how despite all the differences between countries, I think governments today are thinking very similarly about artificial intelligence. Its success, again, is not about the size of your infrastructure, but about how many lives changed. And in order to scale transformation of lives, you need to ensure your technology. It’s trustworthy. You need to ensure it’s inclusive by design. You need to invest in capacity development, innovation. And it’s fantastic to see everyone thinking along the same lines because it really. brings to forward the importance of collective action and collaboration and I think that’s what has come out of this summit.

So with that, thank you to all three of you and please give them a huge round of applause. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (20)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (4)
โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œSpeakerโ€ฏ1 called for an โ€œAI for allโ€ agenda that reaches every citizen, especially in the Global South.โ€

The panel discussion transcript includes the phrase โ€œAI for all. Everybody should be benefited,โ€ confirming the agenda was explicitly mentioned [S2].

!
Correctionhigh

โ€œThe panel was introduced as a โ€œfireside conversationโ€ featuring Her Excellencyโ€ฏSinaโ€ฏLawson, Minister of Digital Transformation for Togo; His Excellencyโ€ฏNizarโ€ฏPatria, Viceโ€‘Minister of Communications for Indonesia; and His Excellencyโ€ฏRafatโ€ฏHindi, Minister of Communications for Egypt, with Msโ€ฏDebjaniโ€ฏGhosh of Nitiโ€ฏAayog moderating.โ€

The knowledge base lists Her Excellency **Cina** Lawson (spelled with a โ€œCโ€) as the Togo minister and confirms Nizar Patriaโ€™s participation, but does not mention Rafat Hindi or Debjani Ghosh, indicating a discrepancy in the reported panel composition and a misspelling of Lawsonโ€™s name [S2].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œIndonesiaโ€™s geography comprises 17โ€ฏ000 islands and five major islands, with internet penetration roughly 80โ€ฏ% of its 250โ€ฏmillionโ€‘strong population.โ€

Sources note that Indonesia is a nation of over 17โ€ฏ000 islands and that internet penetration exceeds 80โ€ฏ%, supporting the reported figures; the population figure is not addressed in the knowledge base [S90] and [S91].

โ„น
Additional Contextmedium

โ€œThe African continent accounts for less thanโ€ฏ1โ€ฏ% of global AI talent.โ€

The knowledge base cites that Africa holds less thanโ€ฏ1โ€ฏ% of global computing (data-centre) capacity, not specifically AI talent, providing related but not identical context to the claim [S19] and [S95].

External Sources (102)
S1
Ethical AI_ Keeping Humanity in the Loop While Innovating โ€” -Debjani Ghosh- Distinguished Fellow at NITI Aayog, former role with NASCOM
S2
Panel Discussion: 01 โ€” -Debjani Ghosh- Distinguished Fellow, Niti Aayog (role: moderating the ministerial conversation)
S3
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development โ€” -Chris Baryomunsi- Role/title not specified (represents Uganda) -Josephine Teo- Role/title not specified (represents Si…
S4
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/panel-discussion-01 โ€” I request our honorable dignitaries to kindly take your place on this stage and this conversation is being moderated by …
S5
Panel Discussion: 01 โ€” -Raafat Hindi- Minister of Communications, Egypt
S6
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/panel-discussion-01 โ€” And when we say this, we say, which means it’s AI for all. Everybody should be benefited. So, ladies and gentlemen, plea…
S7
Panel Discussion: 01 โ€” – Cina Lawson- Nizar Patria – Nizar Patria- Cina Lawson- Raafat Hindi
S9
Governments, Rewired / Davos 2025 โ€” – Cina Lawson- Maryam Al Hammadi
S10
Keynote-Martin Schroeter โ€” -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S11
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning โ€” -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S12
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm โ€” -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S13
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms โ€” – Speaker 1- Anurag Hoon- Radha Basu
S14
Global Digital Compact: AI solutions for a digital economy inclusive and beneficial for all โ€” ## Challenges and Unresolved Issues ## Corporate Responsibility and Partnership Models ## Key Agreements and Consensus…
S15
A Digital Future for All (morning sessions) โ€” Karan Bhatia: Thank you very much. Good morning, everybody. A clear vision for 2030, 17 sustainable development goals…
S16
Conversational AI in low income & resource settings | IGF 2023 โ€” Sameer Pujari:Thank you, Rajendra. And thanks for sitting on this forum. I think it’s a very interesting discussion, esp…
S17
Internet of Things (IoT) Framework In the Arab Republic of Egypt โ€” – ๏‚ท Consumer IoT Apps: Wearable devices and smart home systems through which users are enabled to monitor and manage the…
S18
The Global Power Shift Indiaโ€™s Rise in AI & Semiconductors โ€” The speakers demonstrate strong consensus on key strategic approaches: the critical importance of public-private partner…
S19
Panel Discussion Data Sovereignty India AI Impact Summit โ€” My closing remarks. One, of course, I did speak about before in terms of how you treat this asset. You’ve got to treat i…
S20
UK AI plan calls for AI sovereignty and bottom-up developments โ€” The UK government has launched an ambitiousAI Opportunities Action Planto accelerate the adoption of AI to drive economi…
S21
WS #214 AI Readiness in Africa in a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape โ€” ## Education and Capacity Building ### Implementation Gap ### Infrastructure and Capacity Constraints Audience: talk …
S22
Opening โ€” Balance needed between innovation and regulation
S23
Operationalizing data free flow with trust | IGF 2023 WS #197 โ€” In conclusion, the success of the Internet is attributed to factors such as effective governance, open standards, and co…
S24
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? โ€” Risks of Over-Emphasising Quantitative Metrics in Digital Inclusion MeasurementThe discussions across multiple IGF 2025 …
S25
Opening Ceremony โ€” **Nandini Chami**, representing the Global Digital Justice Forum, provided a critical perspective on digital progress: “…
S26
WS #225 Gender inequality in meaningful access in the Global South โ€” Fabio Senne from Cetic Brazil introduced a crucial distinction between basic access and meaningful connectivity. He stat…
S27
Policy Network on Meaningful Access: Meaningful access to include and connect | IGF 2023 โ€” Data and statistics are crucial for meaningful access to the internet and the development of policies in this area. The …
S28
Digital Cooperation for Inclusive Development: Brazilโ€“South Africa Synergies in the G20 and the WSIS Framework โ€” This observation shifted the discussion from celebrating connectivity achievements to recognizing the inadequacy of curr…
S29
Skilling and Education in AI โ€” The conversation began with a Professor’s detailed analysis of four critical sectors where AI can drive substantial impa…
S30
AI for food systems โ€” Development | Infrastructure Partnership and Collaboration Approach Seizo Onoe argues that by providing shared digital…
S31
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy โ€” ## Industry Perspectives: Systems Integration Challenges ## Introduction and Context Setting ## Sectoral Applications:…
S32
How AI Drives Innovation and Economic Growth โ€” Evidence from around the world is consistent with this. Farmers respond to these AI weather forecasts. So I think that’s…
S33
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion โ€” Key barriers to scaling include the need for high-quality data foundations, reimagined business processes, and comprehen…
S34
Global AI Policy Framework: International Cooperation and Historical Perspectives โ€” Werner identifies three critical barriers that prevent AI for good use cases from scaling globally. He emphasizes that d…
S35
Ensuring Safe AI_ Monitoring Agents to Bridge the Global Assurance Gap โ€” Global South Challenges: multilingualism, infrastructure, and capacity
S36
WS #462 Bridging the Compute Divide a Global Alliance for AI โ€” Ivy Lau-Schindewolf: At the risk of just repeating myself and other people, I will actually still say there’s something …
S37
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence โ€” Benifei argues for the importance of developing common standards and definitions for AI at a global level. He suggests t…
S38
From India to the Global South_ Advancing Social Impact with AI โ€” Low level of disagreement with high convergence on AI’s transformative potential. Differences are primarily tactical rat…
S39
Comprehensive Report: Preventing Jobless Growth in the Age of AI โ€” High level of consensus with significant implications for policy and business strategy. The agreement across diverse sta…
S40
Agents of Change AI for Government Services & Climate Resilience โ€” These key comments shaped the discussion by progressively grounding abstract AI concepts in practical governance realiti…
S41
AI for Social Empowerment_ Driving Change and Inclusion โ€” High level of consensus with significant implications for policy development. The convergence of perspectives across dif…
S42
Approaches Towards Meaningful Connectivity in the Global South โ€” Effective connectivity policies must be contextually grounded and take into account intercultural factors specific to di…
S43
Internet Technology and Policy: Challenges and Solutions online course โ€” Telecommunications infrastructure:Understanding the basis for core infrastructures fosters better policy shaping, leadin…
S44
WS #225 Bridging the Connectivity Gap for Excluded Communities โ€” Strong consensus emerged around treating connectivity as a fundamental right that requires government intervention and p…
S45
The Declaration for the Future of the Internet: Principles to Action โ€” In accordance with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), particularly SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, an…
S46
Networking Session #60 Risk & impact assessment of AI on human rights & democracy โ€” The Huderia methodology is a unique anticipatory approach to AI governance. It focuses on four fundamental elements: con…
S47
WS #45 Fostering EthicsByDesign w DataGovernance & Multistakeholder โ€” 3. UNESCO’s readiness assessment methodology and ethical impact assessment framework Rosanna Fanni emphasized UNESCO’s …
S48
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications โ€” This categorization became the organizing principle for much of the subsequent discussion. Other panelists repeatedly re…
S49
Panel Discussion: 01 โ€” Minister Patria highlighted additional systemic barriers, particularly geopolitical dynamics creating asymmetric conditi…
S50
Multistakeholder platform regulation and the Global South | IGF 2023 Town Hall #170 โ€” The analysis draws attention to several challenges related to global platform governance and stakeholder participation, …
S51
Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships โ€” The pathway concept recognizes that successful AI implementation involves much more than technical development. It requi…
S52
Building Public Interest AI Catalytic Funding for Equitable Compute Access โ€” New institutional frameworks are needed that connect technical sophistication with policy impact and government support
S53
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development โ€” It requires risk tolerance. It requires capital that understands that building sovereign AI capacity involves experiment…
S54
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact โ€” The discussion revealed sophisticated understanding of AI development challenges and opportunities, with remarkable cons…
S55
Open Forum #70 the Future of DPI Unpacking the Open Source AI Model โ€” Legal and regulatory | Development | Economic Private technology companies can play a crucial role in AI for social goo…
S56
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem โ€” – Qi Xiaoxia- Dai Wei- Ricardo Pelayo Development | Economic | Capacity development Innovation Ecosystems and Practica…
S57
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development โ€” Thank you. Thank you so much. Excellency, ladies and gentlemen, I guess I should say good evening. We all recognize arti…
S58
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion โ€” So adoption is ultimately where success is measured. And actually, you need to design that in from the get-go. And that …
S59
Responsible AI for Shared Prosperity โ€” Success will be measured by real-world impact: reducing maternal mortality, supporting education, enabling economic empo…
S60
The Intelligent Coworker: AI’s Evolution in the Workplace โ€” Success should be measured through adoption rates, employee satisfaction, and daily usage patterns rather than tradition…
S61
Trusted Connections_ Ethical AI in Telecom & 6G Networks โ€” Chairman Lahoti emphasised that trust must remain the central pillar of AI adoption in telecommunications, given that au…
S62
Global AI Governance: Reimagining IGFโ€™s Role & Impact โ€” The discussion emphasized that AI governance requires learning from past internet governance experiences, where market-d…
S63
Responsible AI in India Leadership Ethics & Global Impact part1_2 โ€” And last, enterprises. Like many of yours in this room, that are willing and excited to go first that really look at tra…
S64
Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Tech โ€” Jennifer Chung:Thank you, Nazar. I actually do see two more questions from the Bangladesh Remote Hub. This is good. This…
S65
Panel Discussion: 01 โ€” Minister Patria introduced the crucial concept of “meaningful connectivity,” which transcends basic internet access to e…
S66
UN General Assembly 66th Plenary Meeting – WSIS Plus 20 High-Level Review โ€” Far too many people still lack meaningful connectivity. And while the differences are stark between countries and region…
S67
Bridging the Digital Divide: Achieving Universal and Meaningful Connectivity (ITU) โ€” Both regulator and Minister of Communication in Brazil embrace the idea of meaningful connectivity. Brazil has been uti…
S68
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? โ€” Risks of Over-Emphasising Quantitative Metrics in Digital Inclusion MeasurementThe discussions across multiple IGF 2025 …
S69
S70
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications โ€” The discussion highlighted significant challenges in quantifying AI’s economic benefits. Georgieva acknowledged that mea…
S71
STRATEGIE NATIONALE DE L’INTELLIGENCE ARTIFICIELLE โ€” | Numรฉro | Projet |…
S72
Strategy โ€” – AI4G: identify and prototype different use cases for AI in government, with a focus on new applications…
S73
AI for food systems โ€” Development | Infrastructure Partnership and Collaboration Approach Seizo Onoe argues that by providing shared digital…
S74
Scaling AI Beyond Pilots: A World Economic Forum Panel Discussion โ€” Key barriers to scaling include the need for high-quality data foundations, reimagined business processes, and comprehen…
S75
How the Global South Is Accelerating AI Adoption_ Finance Sector Insights โ€” Compute infrastructure and research talent shortages present bigger obstacles than regulatory constraints Sharma identi…
S76
Ensuring Safe AI_ Monitoring Agents to Bridge the Global Assurance Gap โ€” Global South Challenges: multilingualism, infrastructure, and capacity
S77
Planetary Limits of AI: Governance for Just Digitalisation? | IGF 2023 Open Forum #37 โ€” Key barriers include access to funding and finance, proximity to crucial markets, local policies, affordable Internet co…
S78
The Intelligent Coworker: AI’s Evolution in the Workplace โ€” Christoph Schweizer advocated for new measurement approaches, emphasising “adoption and usage,” “employee satisfaction s…
S79
Catalyzing Global Investment in AI for Health_ WHO Strategic Roundtable โ€” Both speakers emphasized that success should be measured by actual health outcomes and real-world impact rather than tec…
S80
WS #462 Bridging the Compute Divide a Global Alliance for AI โ€” Alisson O’Beirne: Perfect, thanks. I think, really following on from Ivy’s point, I think that… There is something ver…
S81
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 โ€” This comment provided a strong conclusion to the session by tying together themes of collaboration, data sharing, and gl…
S82
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence โ€” Benifei argues for the importance of developing common standards and definitions for AI at a global level. He suggests t…
S83
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem โ€” **Sajid Rahman**, ICANN board member, emphasized that AI’s growth is “unprecedented compared to previous technological w…
S84
9821st meeting โ€” Ecuador:Mr. President, I thank the United States for convening this important meeting. I also thank the Secretary Genera…
S85
(Interactive Dialogue 3) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session โ€” Alar Karis: Thank you, Chair. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, distinguished participants, the theme of this dia…
S86
Open Forum #54 Advancing Lesothos Digital Transformation Policies โ€” – **Dr Tahleho T’seole** – Mentioned as participating online (referenced but no direct quotes in transcript) – **Lekhot…
S87
High-Level Session 2: Transforming Health: Integrating Innovation and Digital Solutions for Global Well-being โ€” – Emma Theofelus: Minister of Information Communications and Technology, Namibia Emma Theofelus, Minister of Informatio…
S88
AI for Good โ€“ food and agriculture โ€” Dongyu Qu: Excellencies, ladies, gentlemen, good morning. A year ago, we all gathered for the Previous AI for Good Summi…
S89
Digital on Day 6 of UNGA79: Digital transformation and equitable AI access โ€” Burundistressed the urgent need for universal, affordable access to the internet, including AI, particularly in developi…
S90
Comprehensive Report: UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting on the 20-Year Review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Outcomes โ€” Japan’s Vice Minister Takuo Imagawa focused on maintaining an open, free, and secure internet while promoting innovation…
S91
Leveraging the postal network for a sustainable and inclusive deployment of digital infrastructure and services (UPU) โ€” During a panel discussion, the importance of connectivity for 4G was emphasised, highlighting the impressive coverage of…
S92
Open Forum #67 Open-source AI as a Catalyst for Africaโ€™s Digital Economy โ€” Moderator: Maybe I’m not understanding the question properly, but that’s how I see it. So I think part of the question w…
S93
The Foundation of AI Democratizing Compute Data Infrastructure โ€” Faith Waidaka, despite her role building physical data center infrastructure across Africa, acknowledged that democratis…
S94
AI: The Great Equaliser? โ€” She mentions the lack of certain capacities on the African continent
S95
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm โ€” **The Compute Infrastructure Divide**: 90% of global data centre capacity is held by the United States and China despite…
S96
Multistakeholder Partnerships for Thriving AI Ecosystems โ€” Robert Opp opened the discussion by highlighting UNDP’s concern that without responsible deployment, AI could exacerbate…
S97
Software.gov โ€” Bogdan-Martin also emphasizes the potential of combining artificial intelligence (AI) with GovTech or GovStack. She ment…
S98
From Innovation to Impact_ Bringing AI to the Public โ€” I tried asking this, it is suggesting this, and this is a brief if you want to read the PDF, but net output is, instead …
S99
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot โ€” I believe this is a very key geopolitical moment. In Paris, we spoke about action. This year in Delhi, we speak about im…
S100
Launch / Award Event #52 Intelligent Society Development & Governance Research โ€” ### International Perspective: Egyptian Experience Ahmed Elsabbagh: Thank you for inviting me to be part of your succes…
S101
Open Forum #17 AI Regulation Insights From Parliaments โ€” Amira Saber: Yeah, thank you so much. And it’s a pleasure to be talking on this panel amid esteemed colleagues. Actually…
S102
Cairo Forum examines MENA’s path in the AI era โ€” The Second Cairo Forum brought together experts to assess how AI, global shifts, and economic pressures areshaping MENA….
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
S
Speaker 1
1 argument137 words per minute836 words363 seconds
Argument 1
AI for all โ€“ need for inclusive, lowโ€‘cost solutions
EXPLANATION
Speakerโ€ฏ1 stresses that artificial intelligence must be accessible to everyone, especially people in the Global South, and that the technology should not leave anyone behind. He also calls for affordable AI solutions that can be easily replicated across developing nations.
EVIDENCE
He emphasised that global cooperation is required so that nobody is excluded from the benefits of AI and that AI should be “for all”, reaching every person in the continent and the world, particularly the Global South [14-18]. He added that finding low-cost AI solutions for local problems would enable rapid adoption by other Global South countries [20-21].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for inclusive AI that starts with people rather than just algorithms is emphasized in [S13]; the Global Digital Compact calls for AI solutions that are affordable and benefit all, especially the Global South, in [S14]; the panel discussion repeatedly frames AI as “for all” in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusive, affordable AI for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
D
Debjani Ghosh
1 argument166 words per minute1013 words365 seconds
Argument 1
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact
EXPLANATION
Ghosh argues that current AI performance metrics focus on technical aspects such as model size and compute power, but the true measure of success should be the tangible impact on people’s lives. She calls for a reโ€‘orientation of key performance indicators toward societal outcomes.
EVIDENCE
She noted that today the focus is on how many models are built and how large they are, and urged a shift toward measuring AI success by the number of lives changed and societal impact [193-197].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ethical AI discussions highlight a shift toward human-centric, impact-based metrics rather than model size in [S1]; the same call to move from purely technical KPIs to real-world impact is voiced in the panel discussion [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Reโ€‘defining AI success metrics
AGREED WITH
Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
DISAGREED WITH
Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
R
Rafat Hindi
3 arguments104 words per minute328 words187 seconds
Argument 1
AIโ€‘enabled health and education services in Egypt
EXPLANATION
Hindi describes how Egypt is using AI to broaden access to essential public services, particularly in health and education, reaching underserved communities at a national scale. He cites specific AI tools for disease detection and for supporting highโ€‘school learning.
EVIDENCE
He explained that AI is used for early detection of breast cancer and diabetes, and that a new AI-powered education support tool is being rolled out to high-school students and teachers across the country, making advanced medical screening and learning support available to underserved communities for the first time [87-95].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI improving health and education in Egypt
Argument 2
Need for sovereign AI capability and strong publicโ€‘private partnership
EXPLANATION
Hindi stresses that Egyptโ€™s AI progress depends on a governmentโ€‘first approach that builds sovereign AI capabilities tailored to local languages and needs, complemented by robust partnerships between the public sector, the national AI ecosystem, and international collaborators.
EVIDENCE
He highlighted three enabling factors: a government-first approach prioritising public interest, sovereign AI capability that reflects local language and needs, and a strong partnership across government, the national AI ecosystem and global partners [92-95].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sovereign AI and partnerships
AGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 3
Success measured by peopleโ€™s access to highโ€‘quality AI services
EXPLANATION
Hindi proposes that AI success should be judged by the proportion of the population that can access highโ€‘quality AIโ€‘enabled services in sectors such as health, education, agriculture and government, rather than by technical metrics like model count or compute power.
EVIDENCE
He argued that the key performance indicator should be the percentage of people with access to quality AI-enabled services, shifting focus from technology to people and emphasizing benefits in health, education, agriculture and government [198-205].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The argument that the key performance indicator should be the percentage of people with access to quality AI-enabled services is directly stated in [S4]; the panel reiterates this people-centric KPI in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Peopleโ€‘centric AI success metric
AGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Nizar Patria
DISAGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
N
Nizar Patria
4 arguments97 words per minute929 words571 seconds
Argument 1
Rating AI readiness 6/10 โ€“ digital gap & archipelagic challenges
EXPLANATION
Patria rates global AI readiness at 6 out of 10, pointing to a digital gap especially in archipelagic nations like Indonesia. He notes the countryโ€™s unique geography of 17,000 islands and the need to bridge connectivity gaps despite relatively high internet penetration.
EVIDENCE
He gave AI a score of 6/10, explaining that the digital gap and Indonesiaโ€™s archipelagic nature (17,000 islands) hinder adoption, and mentioned that internet penetration is about 80% while meaningful connectivity is still lacking [44-55].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The panel discussion notes the archipelagic nature of Indonesia and the persistent digital gap that hampers AI adoption, aligning with the 6/10 readiness rating, in [S2].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI readiness and geographic challenges
DISAGREED WITH
Sina Lawson
Argument 2
TB diagnostic AI startup supporting remote doctors in Indonesia
EXPLANATION
Patria shares an Indonesian startup that uses AI to help remote doctors diagnose tuberculosis by aggregating healthโ€‘center data and integrating it with Xโ€‘ray imaging. This illustrates a concrete AI application addressing a critical health need in underserved areas.
EVIDENCE
He described a startup that gathers data from remote health centres, combines it with X-ray machines, and uses AI to help doctors identify tuberculosis versus ordinary lung problems, and noted that similar AI initiatives are spreading to education and agriculture [97-106].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI for remote health diagnostics
Argument 3
Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
EXPLANATION
Patria outlines several systemic challenges: geopolitical tensions, platform dominance, infrastructure quality, regulatory balance, and the need for R&D and talent development. He stresses that overโ€‘regulation can stifle innovation, while trust and transparency are essential.
EVIDENCE
He mentioned geopolitical conditions, platform dominance, the need to improve infrastructure standards, the importance of balanced regulation to protect without hindering innovation, and the urgency to boost R&D, attract investment and nurture digital talent [169-184].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Balancing protective regulation with innovation is discussed in [S4] and reinforced as a needed balance in [S22]; concerns about over-regulation and the importance of trust and accountability are highlighted in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Policy and ecosystem balance for AI
AGREED WITH
Rafat Hindi
DISAGREED WITH
Sina Lawson
Argument 4
Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust
EXPLANATION
Patria envisions that in the next five years AI must be widely accessible, solve real problems for Global South countries, and be trustworthy through transparency and accountability, preventing misuse such as deepfakes.
EVIDENCE
He stated that AI should be accessible, solve problems for Global South nations, and be trusted by complying with transparency and accountability standards, warning against deepfakes and synthetic reality [222-229].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Success criteria focusing on accessibility and trustworthy AI are outlined in [S4]; the panel emphasizes that AI must be accessible to the Global South in [S2]; trust and transparency requirements are further detailed in [S24].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Future AI criteria: access, impact, trust
AGREED WITH
Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
DISAGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Sina Lawson
S
Sina Lawson
4 arguments139 words per minute1074 words460 seconds
Argument 1
80โ€ฏ% internet penetration but need meaningful connectivity
EXPLANATION
Lawson points out that while internet penetration in her country is high, the connectivity must be meaningful to deliver real benefits. She stresses that infrastructure alone is insufficient without effective use.
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The distinction between basic internet access and meaningful connectivity is explored in [S26]; broader concerns about digital exclusion despite high penetration are raised in [S25].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Need for meaningful connectivity
AGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 2
Pandemic cashโ€‘distribution AI system in Togo
EXPLANATION
Lawson explains how Togo used AI during the COVIDโ€‘19 pandemic to prioritize beneficiaries for cash assistance, employing satellite imagery and telecom metadata. She also describes the creation of an inโ€‘house dataโ€‘science team to sustain AI applications across ministries.
EVIDENCE
She detailed that two AI algorithms-one using satellite imagery to create a poverty map and another using telecom metadata to identify phone numbers of those in need-were used to prioritize cash distribution, followed by the establishment of a 25-person data-science team within the Ministry of Public Sector Efficiency to support other government branches [111-133].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AIโ€‘driven social assistance during pandemic
DISAGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 3
Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers
EXPLANATION
Lawson identifies several roadblocks to scaling AI impact: limited institutional capacity, lack of awareness among officials, and the challenge of providing AI services in 42 local languages and dialects. She stresses outreach and training to close these gaps.
EVIDENCE
She noted that infrastructure is the starting point but many people are unaware of AI capabilities, creating an institutional capacity gap; she highlighted language diversity with Togo having 42 languages and dialects, requiring AI models in local languages, and described outreach efforts to demonstrate AI applications within government [144-166].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity building challenges and institutional gaps are highlighted in [S21]; the panel discussion underscores the institutional capacity gap as a barrier to AI scaling in [S4].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Capacity, language, and awareness challenges
AGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
DISAGREED WITH
Nizar Patria
Argument 4
Success as every citizen being a phone call away from public services
EXPLANATION
Lawson envisions that within five years all Togolese citizens should be able to access any public service with a single phone call, reflecting AIโ€‘enabled, instant service delivery as the benchmark for success.
EVIDENCE
She stated that her goal is for every Togolese to be one phone call away from any public service, indicating that AI-mediated, immediate access will define success [231-236].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AIโ€‘driven universal service access
DISAGREED WITH
Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI must be inclusive and affordable for the Global South, ensuring no one is left behind.
Speakers: Speaker 1, Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
AI for all โ€“ need for inclusive, lowโ€‘cost solutions Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust
All three speakers stress that artificial intelligence should reach every person in the Global South, be low-cost and replicated across developing nations, and that inclusive policies are required so that no one is excluded [14-18][20-21][24-28][68-71][144-156][157-166][169-176][222-229].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This consensus aligns with the inclusive AI agenda outlined in the “From India to the Global South” report and the AI Impact Summit 2026, which call for affordable, equitable AI solutions and cross-sector collaboration for the Global South [S38][S57].
The primary metric of AI success should shift from technical size to societal impact and peopleโ€™s access to quality services.
Speakers: Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact Success measured by peopleโ€™s access to highโ€‘quality AI services Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust
Debjani calls for KPI re-orientation toward impact; Hindi proposes measuring success by the percentage of population with access to high-quality AI-enabled services; Nizar adds that AI must be accessible, solve real problems and be trustworthy – all emphasizing people-centric outcomes over model count or compute power [193-197][198-205][222-229].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The shift mirrors recommendations in the AI for Social Empowerment report and multiple panel discussions that prioritize real-world impact, adoption rates, and access to services over model size or compute metrics [S41][S58][S59].
Building institutional and technical capacity is essential for scaling AI impact.
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
Lawson highlights gaps in institutional knowledge, language diversity and the need for outreach; Patria stresses the need for balanced regulation, R&D investment and talent nurturing to create a healthy AI ecosystem – both pointing to capacity development as a prerequisite for impact [144-166][169-184].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity-building is highlighted as a core pillar in “Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships” and in the “Approaches Towards Meaningful Connectivity” framework, which stress institutional and technical readiness for scalable impact [S51][S42].
Robust publicโ€‘private partnerships and a governmentโ€‘first approach accelerate AI deployment.
Speakers: Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Need for sovereign AI capability and strong publicโ€‘private partnership Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
Hindi describes Egyptโ€™s government-first strategy combined with strong partnerships across the national AI ecosystem and global actors; Patria adds that investment, R&D and talent development-often delivered through public-private collaboration-are critical for scaling AI [92-95][184-184].
Trust, transparency and accountability are nonโ€‘negotiable for AI adoption.
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers (including trust in local language models) Success is not the size of models but how many lives we change, implying trustworthy AI
Patria stresses that AI must be trustworthy, with transparency and accountability to avoid deep-fakes; Lawson notes that multilingual models and outreach are needed for trust; Ghosh reiterates that AI success hinges on inclusive, trustworthy deployment [222-229][157-166][217-219].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
UNESCOโ€™s ethical AI framework and the Huderiยญa risk-impact methodology both place trust, transparency, and accountability at the centre of AI governance, reinforcing their non-negotiable status [S46][S47][S61][S62][S63].
Infrastructure is a prerequisite, but must be transformed into meaningful connectivity.
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
80โ€ฏ% internet penetration but need meaningful connectivity Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust (including infrastructure quality)
Lawson points out that high internet penetration is insufficient without meaningful connectivity; Patria underscores that improving infrastructure standards is essential before AI can deliver impact [146-58][173-176].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Policy literature on meaningful connectivity and the UN-aligned Declaration for the Future of the Internet stress that infrastructure must be leveraged to deliver affordable, inclusive digital services, echoing this point [S42][S43][S44][S45][S40].
Similar Viewpoints
All three argue that AI success should be judged by concrete benefits to peopleโ€”access to quality services, problemโ€‘solving capacity and trustโ€”rather than by technical metrics such as model count or compute power [193-197][198-205][222-229].
Speakers: Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact Success measured by peopleโ€™s access to highโ€‘quality AI services Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust
Both emphasize that without strong institutional capacityโ€”training, awareness, regulatory balance, and talent pipelinesโ€”AI initiatives cannot scale effectively [144-166][169-184].
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
All three stress inclusive AI for the Global South, highlighting affordability, language diversity and the necessity that AI be accessible to every citizen [14-18][20-21][24-28][68-71][144-166][222-229].
Speakers: Speaker 1, Sina Lawson, Nizar Patria
AI for all โ€“ need for inclusive, lowโ€‘cost solutions Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust
Unexpected Consensus
Trust and transparency as the decisive factor for AI adoption across very different national contexts.
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers (including trust in local language models) Success is not the size of models but how many lives we change, implying trustworthy AI
Despite representing Africa, Southeast Asia and a neutral moderator, they converge on trust being the single most critical prerequisite for scaling AI-something not explicitly foregrounded in the opening remarks of Speakerโ€ฏ1 or the technical discussion of infrastructure. This cross-regional alignment on ethical trust is therefore unexpected [222-229][157-166][217-219].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Telecom-focused ethical AI discussions and global AI governance recommendations underline trust and transparency as decisive factors across diverse jurisdictions [S61][S62][S46].
Agreement that AI impact should be measured by a singleโ€‘phoneโ€‘call access to public services.
Speakers: Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
Success as every citizen being a phone call away from public services Success is not the size of models but how many lives we change
Lawsonโ€™s concrete vision of โ€œone phone call awayโ€ aligns with Ghoshโ€™s broader call for people-centric KPIs, linking a specific service metric to the abstract impact measurement-a linkage not anticipated from the earlier policy-focused statements [231-236][217-219].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Scaling-AI panels advocate user-centric success metrics such as single-phone-call access to services, linking adoption design to measurable public-service reach [S58][S59].
Overall Assessment

The panel demonstrates a strong convergence around peopleโ€‘centric AI: inclusive, affordable deployment; measurement of success by societal impact; the necessity of institutional capacity and trustworthy, multilingual models; and the role of publicโ€‘private partnerships. While each speaker brings regional specifics (archipelagic connectivity, sovereign AI, language diversity), the core principles are shared.

High consensus โ€“ the speakers largely agree on the same strategic priorities, indicating that future AI policy for the Global South can be coordinated around inclusive access, capacity building, trust, and impactโ€‘oriented metrics. This shared vision facilitates collective action and could shape the agenda of the AI Impact Summit and related multilateral initiatives.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Assessment of AI readiness and impact level
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
Rating AI readiness 6/10 โ€“ digital gap & archipelagic challenges Pandemic cashโ€‘distribution AI system in Togo
Patria rates global AI readiness at 6/10, citing digital gaps and Indonesiaโ€™s archipelagic challenges [44-55]. Lawson counters by saying AI impact in Africa is close to 9/10 based on successful implementations like the pandemic cash-distribution system [67-76].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need for structured readiness assessments is addressed by UNESCOโ€™s readiness methodology and the Huderiยญa risk-impact framework, which provide authoritative tools for evaluating AI governance capacity [S47][S46].
Primary roadblocks to scaling AI impact
Speakers: Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers
Patria highlights geopolitical tensions, platform dominance, infrastructure quality, balanced regulation, and the need for R&D and talent as key obstacles [169-184]. Lawson emphasizes limited institutional capacity, lack of awareness of AI tools, and the challenge of providing AI in 42 local languages, calling for outreach and training [144-166].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Ministerial remarks and analyses identify platformisation, geopolitical asymmetry, and capacity gaps as key barriers for the Global South, highlighting systemic challenges to scaling AI impact [S48][S49][S50].
How AI success should be measured
Speakers: Debjani Ghosh, Rafat Hindi, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson
Shift KPI from model size to societal impact Success measured by peopleโ€™s access to highโ€‘quality AI services Success defined by accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust Success as every citizen being a phone call away from public services
Ghosh calls for moving KPIs away from model count toward lives changed [193-197]. Hindi proposes the percentage of population with quality AI-enabled services as the KPI [198-205]. Patria adds that AI must be accessible, solve real problems, and be trustworthy [222-229]. Lawson envisions a phone-call-away model for all public services as the success benchmark [231-236].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The literature reflects a debate between adoption-based metrics (e.g., daily usage, service access) and traditional technical benchmarks, as discussed in scaling-AI and responsible AI reports [S58][S59][S60].
Unexpected Differences
Platformisation and geopolitical asymmetry as major barriers
Speakers: Nizar Patria
Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust
Patria raises platform dominance and geopolitical asymmetry as critical challenges for AI adoption in the Global South [169-173]. None of the other speakers mention platformisation or geopolitics, making this a surprising point of divergence.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Analyses of global power dynamics and platform governance for the Global South emphasize platformisation and geopolitical asymmetry as structural obstacles to equitable AI development [S48][S49][S50].
Overall Assessment

The panel shows strong consensus on the need for inclusive, peopleโ€‘centric AI for the Global South, but there are notable disagreements on how to assess current AI readiness, which obstacles are most critical, and the exact metrics to gauge success. These differences reflect varied national contextsโ€”Indonesiaโ€™s archipelagic geography, Togoโ€™s language diversity, Egyptโ€™s sovereign AI push, and broader policy concernsโ€”yet they do not undermine the shared commitment to AIโ€‘driven development.

Moderate disagreement: while all speakers align on overarching goals, they diverge on priority challenges and measurement frameworks, suggesting that coordinated policy and capacityโ€‘building efforts will need to accommodate diverse national realities to achieve inclusive AI impact.

Partial Agreements
All participants agree that AI must be inclusive and benefit the Global South, but they diverge on the pathways: Speakerโ€ฏ1 stresses lowโ€‘cost, replicable solutions [14-18][20-21]; Patria focuses on balanced regulation, trust and R&D investment [169-184]; Lawson points to building institutional capacity, multilingual models and outreach [144-166]; Ghosh urges redefining success metrics toward societal impact rather than technical size [193-197].
Speakers: Speaker 1, Nizar Patria, Sina Lawson, Debjani Ghosh
AI for all โ€“ need for inclusive, lowโ€‘cost solutions Balancing regulation, R&D, talent development, and trust Institutional capacity, language diversity, and outreach as barriers Shift KPI from model size to societal impact
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI must be inclusive and lowโ€‘cost to benefit the Global South; the mantra is “AI for all”. Overall AI readiness in the Global South is moderate (around 6/10); significant digital gaps remain, especially in archipelagic and remote regions. High internet penetration (e.g., 80% in Indonesia) is insufficient without “meaningful connectivity” that enables AIโ€‘driven services. Impactful AI use cases highlighted: AIโ€‘enabled health and education services in Egypt; TBโ€‘diagnostic AI tool for remote doctors in Indonesia; AIโ€‘driven cashโ€‘distribution and povertyโ€‘mapping during the pandemic in Togo. Major barriers to scaling AI impact include: insufficient institutional capacity and awareness, language diversity (many local languages/dialects), infrastructure deficits, regulatory uncertainty, need for sovereign AI capabilities, and trust concerns (e.g., deepโ€‘fakes). Future success should be measured by peopleโ€™s access to highโ€‘quality AI services, problemโ€‘solving relevance, and trustworthiness rather than model size or compute power. Collaboration mechanisms such as an AI Commons for sharing best practices, standards, and dataโ€‘exchange platforms were emphasized.
Resolutions and action items
Create and populate an AI Commons with case studies (e.g., Togoโ€™s pandemic cashโ€‘distribution model) to disseminate best practices across the Global South. Strengthen institutional capacity through outreach, training, and the establishment of dedicated AI teams within ministries (e.g., Togoโ€™s 25โ€‘person dataโ€‘science unit). Develop AI models in local languages and dialects to improve accessibility (highlighted by Togoโ€™s 42โ€‘language challenge). Promote publicโ€‘private partnerships and AI innovation hubs to accelerate startupโ€‘driven solutions (e.g., Indonesiaโ€™s TB diagnostic startup). Adopt balanced regulatory frameworks that protect citizens while fostering innovation, avoiding overโ€‘regulation. Invest in R&D, talent development, and standards for data exchange to support sovereign AI capabilities.
Unresolved issues
Concrete financing mechanisms and timelines for expanding infrastructure and building localโ€‘language AI models were not defined. Specific governance structures for the AI Commons and how contributions will be coordinated among Global South nations remain unclear. Details on how to ensure AI trustworthiness (e.g., standards for deepโ€‘fake detection, transparency, accountability) were discussed but not finalized. Mechanisms for aligning global Northโ€‘South collaboration and equitable technology transfer were mentioned but not concretely addressed. Metrics and reporting frameworks for the proposed peopleโ€‘centric AI success indicators have not been established.
Suggested compromises
Balance regulation by avoiding heavy restrictions that could stifle innovation while still ensuring protection and accountability. Combine infrastructure investment with capacityโ€‘building outreach to ensure that new connectivity translates into effective AI use. Leverage platformization benefits (e.g., existing global AI platforms) while developing sovereign, locallyโ€‘relevant AI capabilities.
Thought Provoking Comments
We try to improve. We try to cover all of the archipelago by our telecommunication network… and now what we do with these infrastructures, digital infrastructure or telecommunication infrastructure, we want meaningful connectivity.
Introduces the concept of “meaningful connectivity”โ€”that infrastructure must translate into real, usable services for people, not just raw coverage.
Shifted the conversation from measuring infrastructure reach to evaluating its utility, prompting other speakers to discuss how connectivity can be leveraged for impact (e.g., Lawsonโ€™s focus on AI applications).
Speaker: Nizar Patria
When we talk about AI, for us, at least Africans, it’s not about the technology. It’s about what we can do with it… our priority sectors are government, health, education, agriculture.
Reframes AI discussion from a technologyโ€‘centric view to a problemโ€‘solving, sectorโ€‘focused approach, emphasizing concrete impact over hype.
Guided the panel toward concrete useโ€‘case discussions, leading Rafat to share Egyptโ€™s healthโ€‘andโ€‘education AI projects and prompting the moderator to ask for specific impact examples.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
Three things made this possible in Egypt: a governmentโ€‘first approach that puts public interest first, sovereign AI capability that reflects our language and local needs, and a strong partnership across government, the national AI ecosystem, and global partners.
Identifies a replicable threeโ€‘pillar framework (policy, localization, partnership) that underpins successful AI deployment in a developingโ€‘country context.
Provided a concrete model that other ministers referenced when discussing their own challenges, and reinforced the importance of local language models and governance that Lawson later expanded on.
Speaker: Rafat Hindi
During the pandemic we built a program to distribute cash using mobile phones. We used satellite imagery to draw a poverty map and machineโ€‘learning on telecom metadata to isolate phone numbers of people who needed aid.
Offers a vivid, dataโ€‘driven case study of AI delivering immediate, lifeโ€‘saving services, illustrating how AI can be operationalized quickly in crisis settings.
Prompted the moderator to request the case study for the AI Commons, and sparked a deeper discussion on institutional capacity and the need for inโ€‘house dataโ€‘science teams.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
A lot of people just don’t know this universe exists… we need AI models in 42 local languages and dialects. Institutional capacity and language localisation are major roadblocks.
Highlights two oftenโ€‘overlooked barriersโ€”lack of awareness within institutions and multilingual model availabilityโ€”linking technical challenges to societal inclusion.
Led Nizar to add geopolitical and platformโ€‘dominance concerns, and reinforced Rafatโ€™s emphasis on trust and accessibility, broadening the scope of the discussion to include language and capacity building.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
Success should be measured by the percentage of people that have access to highโ€‘quality AIโ€‘enabled services, not by the number of models or compute power.
Proposes a peopleโ€‘centric KPI that reframes AI evaluation from technical metrics to societal outcomes, aligning with the panelโ€™s theme of impact.
Redirected the final segment of the conversation toward defining future success metrics, influencing Nizar and Sina to echo themes of accessibility, problemโ€‘solving, and trust.
Speaker: Rafat Hindi
We are facing asymmetric geopolitical conditions; platform dominance defines progress of a fair ecosystem. We must balance regulationโ€”avoid overโ€‘regulation that stifles innovationโ€”while boosting R&D and talent.
Introduces the macroโ€‘level challenge of global platform power and the delicate balance between regulation and innovation, adding geopolitical complexity to the discussion.
Expanded the dialogue beyond national projects to global structural issues, prompting the moderator to synthesize how trust, regulation, and infrastructure interrelate.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
AI must be trustedโ€”transparent, accountable, and free from deepโ€‘fakesโ€”otherwise it will never be adopted.
Elevates trust as the foundational prerequisite for AI adoption, linking technical integrity to societal acceptance.
Served as a concluding pivot that unified earlier points about capacity, language, and governance, leading Sina to echo trust as a key success factor and reinforcing the panelโ€™s consensus on trustworthy AI.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
Overall Assessment

The discussion was shaped by a series of pivotal insights that moved the conversation from abstract enthusiasm about AI to concrete, peopleโ€‘centered implementation challenges. Early remarks about “meaningful connectivity” and the shift from technology to problemโ€‘solving set the tone for practical examples from Egypt, Indonesia, and Togo. Lawsonโ€™s pandemic cashโ€‘distribution story and her emphasis on institutional capacity and multilingual models highlighted operational hurdles, while Rafatโ€™s redefinition of success anchored the dialogue in measurable societal outcomes. Patriaโ€™s geopolitical and trustโ€‘focused comments added a macroโ€‘level perspective, compelling the panel to consider regulatory balance and global platform dynamics. Collectively, these comments redirected the panel toward a shared vision: AI success will be judged by inclusive, trusted services that reach every citizen, especially in the Global South.

Follow-up Questions
Please share the Togo AI cash distribution case study so it can be added to the AI Commons repository.
Including this realโ€‘world example in a shared AI Commons will help other countries replicate successful AIโ€‘driven public service interventions.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh
What are the biggest roadblocks to scaling AI impact creation for governments โ€“ data, infrastructure, regulation, or geopolitical dynamics?
Identifying and prioritising these barriers is essential for designing policies and investments that enable widespread AI adoption in the Global South.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh (question to Sina Lawson) and Nizar Patria (additional input)
How should AI success be measured over the next five years beyond counting models and compute power?
Developing peopleโ€‘centred metrics will shift focus to tangible societal benefits, ensuring AI development aligns with development goals and inclusivity.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh (question to all three ministers)
What research is needed to develop AI models in the 42 local languages and dialects spoken in Togo?
Localโ€‘language models are critical for equitable AI access, enabling services like education tutors and publicโ€‘service chatbots in native tongues.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
What strategies can strengthen institutional capacity and awareness within governments to recognise and request AI solutions?
Many officials are unaware of AI possibilities; building capacity will unlock demand for AI tools and improve policy integration.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
What standards and platforms are required for secure data exchange between Global South nations and the Global North?
Effective data sharing underpins crossโ€‘border AI collaboration, research, and innovation while safeguarding sovereignty and privacy.
Speaker: Sina Lawson
How can trust, transparency, and accountability be embedded in AI systems to prevent misuse such as deepfakes?
Trust is a prerequisite for public adoption; establishing clear standards will mitigate risks and foster confidence in AI applications.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What policies can balance regulation with innovation to avoid overโ€‘regulation that stifles AI development?
Finding the right regulatory equilibrium is vital to protect citizens while encouraging entrepreneurial AI solutions.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What investments and programs are needed to boost R&D and nurture digital talent in the Global South?
Sustained research capacity and skilled workforce are essential for homegrown AI ecosystems and longโ€‘term competitiveness.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
How can AI innovation hubs and startup ecosystems be structured to effectively address sectoral challenges such as tuberculosis diagnosis in remote areas?
Understanding successful hub models will guide replication across health, education, and agriculture, accelerating impact at scale.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What metrics (KPIs) should be used to track AIโ€‘enabled access to essential services like healthcare, education, and agriculture?
Defining clear KPIs will allow governments to monitor progress, identify gaps, and demonstrate AIโ€™s contribution to development goals.
Speaker: Rafat Hindi
How do geopolitical conditions and platform dominance affect AI ecosystem development in the Global South?
Geopolitical asymmetries can limit access to technology and markets; studying these dynamics is crucial for equitable AI growth.
Speaker: Nizar Patria
What lowโ€‘cost AI solutions can be designed for the Global South and how can they be scaled across similar economies?
Identifying affordable AI tools will enable broader adoption in resourceโ€‘constrained settings, amplifying impact.
Speaker: Debjani Ghosh (introductory remark)

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Welcome Address

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

Speakerโ€ฏ1 opened the event by acknowledging the leader who conceived the summit and inviting Prime Minister Narendraโ€ฏModi to deliver the inaugural address [1-2].


Modi began by declaring India the centre of a vast tech talent pool and the largest example of a tech-enabled ecosystem, noting the countryโ€™s rapid creation and adoption of new technologies [5-7].


He welcomed heads of governments, AI ecosystem leaders and innovators, emphasizing the participation of delegates from more than 100 nations [8-12][15].


The Prime Minister highlighted the unprecedented enthusiasm of the younger generation for AI, describing their swift acceptance and ownership of the technology as a new phenomenon [17-20].


He argued that AI is a transformative power that can make machines intelligent and amplify human capabilities, but its impact is now arriving at a speed and scale never seen before [29-34].


Drawing a parallel with nuclear power, Modi warned that AI, like any powerful technology, can cause disruption if directionless, but can provide solutions when guided responsibly [43-48].


He framed the summitโ€™s purpose as defining how AI can be both machine-centric and human-centric, stressing the need for ethical guidance, accountable governance and national sovereignty over data [51-59][60-66].


Modi advocated for AI to be treated as a global common good, calling for open-source sharing so that millions of young minds can improve safety and inclusivity [88-91].


He announced the creation of global standards, including authenticity labels for digital content analogous to nutrition labels on food, to help users distinguish real from AI-generated material [92-99].


The speech also stressed child safety, proposing that AI curricula be curated like school syllabi and that safeguards be built into the technology from the start [100-103].


Highlighting Indiaโ€™s growing capabilities, Modi noted that three Indian companies launched AI models and apps at the summit, showcasing domestic talent and solutions [113-115].


He described Indiaโ€™s broader ecosystem-semiconductor manufacturing, quantum computing, secure data centres and a dynamic startup environment-as a natural hub for affordable, scalable AI solutions [116-119].


Concluding, Modi invited international partners to design and develop AI in India, asserting that collaborative, human-centric AI will shape a bright future for humanity [120-122].


Keypoints

Indiaโ€™s claim as a leading AI and technology hub – Modi highlights Indiaโ€™s vast tech talent pool, rapid adoption of new technologies, and its role as a source of pride for the Global South, noting participation from over 100 countries and the launch of Indian AI models and apps at the summit[5-7][13][15][113-115].


Call for responsible, human-centric AI governance – He stresses that the key question is what we do with AI today, urging direction-focused development, ethical guidance, transparent rules, robust oversight, and inclusive access, and frames the summitโ€™s purpose around these principles[38-48][59-66].


AI as a catalyst for the future of work and the need for mass skilling – The speech describes AI-human co-creation, the emergence of smarter, more efficient work, and the necessity of large-scale up-skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning to ensure inclusive, trusted, human-centric employment[70-79][80-81].


Advocacy for open, shared AI as a global common good – Modi contrasts secretive strategic approaches with Indiaโ€™s stance that AI should be openly shared, with code released to empower millions of young minds, positioning AI as a strategic asset that benefits the world when democratized[85-91][88-91].


Emphasis on safety, authenticity, and standards – He calls for global standards akin to nutrition labels for digital content, watermarking, and authenticity labels to combat deep-fakes, and stresses child safety and curated AI environments similar to school curricula[92-99][100-104].


Overall purpose/goal


The address serves to launch the Global AI Impact Summit, articulate Indiaโ€™s vision of positioning the country as a central, inclusive, and ethical AI hub, and to rally international leaders, innovators, and policymakers around shared standards, open development, and responsible deployment of AI for humanityโ€™s benefit.


Overall tone


The tone begins with formal ceremony and national pride, shifts to an enthusiastic and visionary outlook on AIโ€™s transformative potential, adopts a serious, cautionary note when discussing responsibility, ethics, and safety, and concludes with confident, optimistic calls to action and collaboration. The progression moves from celebratory to visionary, then to responsible urgency, and finally to hopeful determination.


Speakers

Speaker 1


– Role/Title: Event moderator / host (introducing the Prime Minister)โ€ฏ[S1]


– Area of Expertise:


Prime Minister Narendra Modi


– Role/Title: Prime Minister of India; Host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summitโ€ฏ[S4]


– Area of Expertise: Politics, governance


Additional speakers:


_None_


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

The ceremony opened with Speakerโ€ฏ1 formally inaugurating the Global AI Impact Summit and inviting Prime Minister Narendraโ€ฏModi to deliver the inaugural addressโ€ฏ[1-2].


Prime Ministerโ€ฏModi began by greeting a long list of dignitaries and thanking the assembled crowd, then declared India the โ€œcentre of the tech talent poolโ€ and the โ€œbiggest example of a tech-enabled ecosystemโ€, emphasizing that the nation is both creating and rapidly adopting new technologiesโ€ฏ[3-7] and positioning India as a source of pride for the Global Southโ€ฏ[13].


He noted that delegates from over 100 countries were present, underscoring the summitโ€™s global scopeโ€ฏ[8-12][15], and highlighted the extraordinary enthusiasm of the younger generation, describing the rapid adoption of AI by youth as a โ€œnew phenomenonโ€โ€ฏ[17-20][22].


Modi observed that artificial intelligence is making machines intelligent while simultaneously multiplying human capabilities, and stressed that the impact of AI is arriving at a speed and scale never before seen-what once took decades now unfolds within months, moving from โ€œmachine learning to learning machineโ€โ€ฏ[29-34].


Turning to policy, he framed the central question as what humanity does with AI today rather than speculative future scenarios, warning that, like nuclear power, AI can become a source of disruption if directionless but can provide solutions when guided responsiblyโ€ฏ[38-42][43-48].


The summitโ€™s core purpose, he said, is to make AI both machine-centric and human-centricโ€ฏ[38-42][43-48].


To operationalise this, Modi introduced the MANAV Vision-a human-centric ethical framework comprising:


* M – Moral & ethical guidance,


* A – Accountable governance with transparent rules & robust oversight,


* N – National data-sovereignty,


* A – Accessible & inclusive AI,


* B – Valid & legitimate (verified) AIโ€ฏ[70-78][51-59][60-66].


He contrasted Indiaโ€™s approach with that of some other nations that treat AI as a confidential strategic asset, asserting that India views AI as a global common good and advocating open-source sharing so that โ€œmillions of young mindsโ€ can improve safety and inclusivityโ€ฏ[84-91]. Using a GPS analogy, he described AI as an โ€œopen-skyโ€ tool that gives direction, while the choice of direction remains with humanityโ€ฏ[90-93].


Modi called for the creation of global standards akin to nutrition labels, proposing โ€œauthenticity labelsโ€ for digital content combined with watermarking and source-verification mechanisms to help users distinguish genuine material from AI-generated deep-fakesโ€ฏ[92-99].


On child safety, he likened the curation of AI environments to the design of school syllabi, insisting that safeguards be built into platforms and that AI curricula be family-guidedโ€ฏ[100-104]. He noted two prevailing attitudes toward AI-fear and optimism-and declared that India chooses the latter, seeing โ€œluckโ€ and opportunity rather than dreadโ€ฏ[100-104].


Addressing the future of work, Modi asserted that AI will reshape employment but not by destroying jobs; instead, humans and intelligent systems will co-create, co-work and co-evolve, leading to smarter, higher-value roles. He urged a mass movement in skilling, reskilling and lifelong learning to ensure the workforce can thrive in an AI-augmented economyโ€ฏ[70-79][80-81].


Highlighting Indiaโ€™s broader technological ecosystem, he cited a growing semiconductor and chip-making industry, advances in quantum computing, secure data-centre infrastructure, a strong IT background and a dynamic startup environment, which together make India a natural hub for affordable, scalable and secure AI solutionsโ€ฏ[116-120]. He also announced that three Indian companies launched their AI models and applications at the summit, showcasing the talent of Indian youthโ€ฏ[115-117].


Concluding, Modi thanked the audience, reaffirmed the summitโ€™s mission to deliver AI solutions for humanity, and expressed confidence that collaborative, human-centred AI will propel a bright future for allโ€ฏ[121-122].


These points echo external observations that Indiaโ€™s human capital is central to global AI strategyโ€ฏ[S25], that the nationโ€™s youth are driving rapid AI adoptionโ€ฏ[S26], and that there is a growing international consensus on human-centred AI principlesโ€ฏ[S30][S31].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Speaker 1

Friends, the leader who made this, who gave this vision to the world, I now invite the Honorable Prime Minister for your inaugural address. Give a big round of applause for the Honorable Prime Minister.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Excellencies, Honorable Ministers, Industry Leaders, Innovators, Entrepreneurs, Researchers, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Delegates, Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. This is the center of the tech talent pool. It is the biggest example of a tech -enabled ecosystem. India is also making new technology and is also adopting it at an unprecedented speed. I welcome all of you, heads of governments, global AI ecosystem leaders, and innovators to this summit. I welcome all of you, heads of governments, global AI ecosystem leaders, and innovators to this summit. I welcome all of you, heads of governments, global AI ecosystem leaders, and innovators to this summit. I welcome all of you, heads of governments, global AI ecosystem leaders, and innovators to this summit.

I welcome all of you, heads of governments, global AI ecosystem leaders, and innovators to this summit. India is the source of pride for the entire Global South. In this summit, AI world’s who’s who is present here. The representation of more than 100 countries, from every corner of the world, the great people have come here. They are taking its success to new heights. In this, the presence of the young generation, we have seen, that is a new phenomenon. It creates a new belief. Generally, about new technology, in some people, in the beginning, there was a suspicion. But the speed with which the young generation of the world is accepting AI, is taking ownership of it, is using AI, is incredible.

It is incredible. Here, the exhibition of AI summit is also very exciting. Especially, the young talent has come in a large number. Agriculture, security, the help of the people of Divya, the help of the multilingual population, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, the help of the people of the region, made in India ki taakat aur Bharat Satyam manav itihas mein har kuch satabhiyon ke baat ek turning point aata hai.

Aur wo turning point sabyata ki disha reset karta hai. Aur wahi se vikas ki raptar badalti hai. Sochane, samajane aur kaam karne ke paradigm badalti hai. Aur dilchasp baat ye hai jab hum transformation ke usdaur mein hotay hai tab uske vastrik impact ka andaja bhi nahi hota. Jab pattharon se pehli baat sa spark nikla kisi ne nahi socha tha ki vahee chingari civilizational ki foundation banegi jab boli ko pehli baar leepy me badla gaya kisi ne nahi jana tha ki return knowledge future system ki backbone banegi jab pehli baar signals ko wireless transmit kia gaya kisi ne kalpana nahi ki thi ki ek din puri duniya real time me connect ho gi saathio artificial intelligence manav itihas ka aisa hi transformation hai aaj jo ham dekh rahe hai jo predict kar rahe hai hai hai AI is only the initial indication of its impact.

AI is making machines intelligent. But it is also increasing human resources many times. The difference is only one. This time, the speed is also incredible. And the scale is also incredible. Earlier, it took decades to see the impact of technology. Today, the journey from machine learning to learning machine is fast, deep and also fast. That is why, we have to keep our vision big. and responsibility is also very important. With the current generation, we have to worry about the fact that in the hands of the coming generations, we will not be able to give the form of AI. That is why today the real question is not what artificial intelligence can do in the future.

The question is what we do with artificial intelligence in the present. What do we do with artificial intelligence? What do we do with artificial intelligence? Such questions have come before humanity. The most powerful example is nuclear power. We have seen its destruction. and positive contribution is also seen. AI is also a transformative power. If it is directionless, then disruption. If it gets the right direction, then solution. How to make AI machine -centric and human -centric? How to make AI machine -centric and human -centric? How to make AI machine -centric and human -centric? This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit.

This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. This is the main purpose of this Global AI Impact Summit. sarvajan sukhaay welfare for all happiness of all yahi hamara benchmark hai AI ke liye insan sirp data point na ban jaye insan sirp raw material tak simit na rai jaye isliye AI ko democratize karna hoga isse inclusion aur empowerment ka madhyam banana hoga aur vishes rupse global south saathiyo haan hume AI ko open sky bhi dena open sky bhi dena and command is also in our hands like GPS GPS gives us a way but in which direction we have to go its final call is ours today we will take AI in which direction our future will be decided today in New Delhi AI Impact Summit I for AI M A N A V M A N A V Manav Manav Vision I present to you that we are human human human And Manav Vision says, M, moral and ethical systems, i .e.

AI, based on ethical guidance. A, accountable governance, i .e. transparent rules, robust oversight. And national sovereignty, i .e. data. A, accessible and inclusive. B, valid and legitimate, i .e. AI. lawful or verifiable ho. Bharat ka ye manav vision 21 sadhi ki AI aadharit duniya mein manavta ke kalyan ki aham kadhi banega. Saathiyon dasak ko pehle jab internet ki shuruwaad hoi toh koi soj bhi nahi pata tha ki iss se kitni jobs banegi. Yehi baat AI mein hai. Aaj kalpana karna muskil hai ki aane wale samay iss film mein kis tarah ki jobs pada hogi. AI ka future of work and predefined nahi hai. This will depend on our decisions and our course of action. I understand that for us, the future of work is a new opportunity.

This is the time to work together with humans and intelligent systems. We are entering an era where humans and intelligent systems co -create, co -work and co -evolve. AI will make our work smarter, more efficient and impactful. I am sure that our future will be bright. We will design better, build faster and make better decisions. higher value, creative, and meaningful roles will also be achieved. This is a great opportunity for innovation, entrepreneurship, and new industries. Therefore, we have to make skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning a mass movement. Friends, the future of work will be inclusive, trusted, and human -centric. If we move forward together, artificial intelligence will take the power of humanity to new heights.

Friends, it is said that the sun rises. The sunlight is the best disinfectant. A .I. is the biggest security. Some countries and companies believe that A .I. is a strategic asset. That is why it should be developed in a confidential way. But the thinking of India is different. We believe that a technique like A .I. will be useful for the world when it will be shared. When the codes will be opened and shared, then our millions of young minds will be able to make them better and safer. That is why A .I. is a strategic asset. We take the decision that AI will be developed as a global common good. Friends, today’s very big need is to create global standards.

We are creating standards for deep facts and fabricated content in open societies. In the physical world, we look at the nutrition label on food so that we know what we are eating. In the same way, we look at the digital world. In the same way, we should have an authenticity label on content. So that people know. that what is real and what is made from AI. As AI is making more text, images and videos, in the same way, watermarking and clear source standards are increasing in the industry. That is why it is important that this trust is built in technology from the beginning. Friends, we need to be more aware of children’s safety. We need to be more aware of children’s safety.

Just like the school syllabus is curated, the AI space is also curated. Child safety is also a part of it. and family guided. Friends, there are two types of people in the world today. One, those who see fear in AI. They always talk like this. Such people who see fear in AI. And the other ones are those who see luck in AI. And friends, I say with responsibility, with pride, we are not afraid. India sees luck in AI. India sees a future in AI. We have talent and we have There is energy capacity and policy clarity. And I am happy to tell you that in this summit, three Indian companies have launched their AI models and apps.

These models show the talent of our youth. And the solutions that India is providing, are also a reflection of its depth and diversity. Friends, from India’s semiconductor and chip making to quantum computing, India is building a resilient ecosystem. Secure data center. strong IT background, dynamic startup ecosystem, make India a natural hub for affordable, scalable, and secure AI solutions. India also has diversity, democracy, and democracy. The AI model that succeeds in India can be deployed globally. That is why I invite all of you to Design and Develop in India. Thank you. Deliver to the world. Deliver to humanity. Thank you.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (17)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (5)
โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œIndia possesses a huge talent pool of young, vibrant, intelligent, educated people and is the centre of the tech talent pool.โ€

The knowledge base notes that India has a huge talent pool of young, vibrant, intelligent, smart, educated people, with one of the worldโ€™s largest populations under 30 contributing to the ecosystem [S7].

โœ“
Confirmedmedium

โ€œThe summit highlighted the extraordinary enthusiasm of the younger generation, describing the rapid adoption of AI by youth as a โ€œnew phenomenonโ€.โ€

Youth empowerment and enthusiasm were emphasized across the summit, with speakers noting a consensus on the importance of youth and the large young talent pool in India [S42] and [S7].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œArtificial intelligence is making machines intelligent while simultaneously multiplying human capabilities, and the impact is arriving at a speed and scale never before seenโ€”what once took decades now unfolds within months, moving from โ€œmachine learning to learning machineโ€.โ€

The source states that AI makes machines intelligent, multiplies human resources, and that the speed and scale are incredible; previously impacts took decades, now the journey is from machine learning to learning machine [S46].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œModi introduced the MANAV Vision โ€“ a humanโ€‘centric ethical framework comprising Moral & ethical guidance, Accountable governance, National dataโ€‘sovereignty, Accessible & inclusive AI, and Valid & legitimate (verified) AI.โ€

The MANAV Vision was unveiled at the summit, described as rooted in moral guidance, transparent oversight, national control of data, inclusive access and lawful verification, matching the listed components [S55] and further detailed in the discussion of the framework [S56].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œIndia treats AI as a global common good and advocates openโ€‘source sharing, contrasting with other nations that treat AI as a confidential strategic asset.โ€

Indiaโ€™s approach is portrayed as embracing knowledge as a common good, pursuing strategic autonomy while sharing its Digital Public Infrastructure openly, in contrast to restrictive, strategic-asset models elsewhere [S15] and [S58].

External Sources (59)
S1
Keynote-Martin Schroeter โ€” -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not specified, Area of expertise: Not specified (appears to be an event moderator or host introd…
S2
Responsible AI for Children Safe Playful and Empowering Learning โ€” -Speaker 1: Role/title not specified – appears to be a student or child participant in educational videos/demonstrations…
S3
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Vijay Shekar Sharma Paytm โ€” -Speaker 1: Role/Title: Not mentioned, Area of expertise: Not mentioned (appears to be an event host or moderator introd…
S4
Keynote-HE Emmanuel Macron โ€” -Narendra Modi: Title – Prime Minister; Role – Host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit, referenced as Mr. Prim…
S5
Keynote-Sundar Pichai โ€” -Prime Minister Modi: Role/Title: Prime Minister (of India, based on context); Area of Expertise: Not mentioned (acknowl…
S6
Announcement of New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments โ€” -Shri Narendra Modi: Role/Title: Honorable Prime Minister of India, Area of expertise: Not specified The ceremony concl…
S7
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Jeetu Patel President and Chief Product Officer Cisco Inc โ€” -His Honorable Prime Minister, Mr. Narendra Modi: Prime Minister of India (mentioned but did not speak in this transcrip…
S8
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session โ€” Congratulations, Prime Minister Modi, on such an incredible summit. It was so incredible to see all of the who’s who, as…
S9
Keynote-N Chandrasekaran โ€” -Sri Narendra Modi ji: Prime Minister of India (referred to as “Honourable Prime Minister”) Honourable Prime Minister, …
S10
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 โ€” Honourable Prime Minister Modi, Excellencies, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honour for me to be i…
S11
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development โ€” Es una guerra econรณmica, un acto genocida que intenta castigar a toda la poblaciรณn cubana, generar un desgaste interno y…
S12
Indias AI Leap Policy to Practice with AIP2 โ€” Doreen Bogdan-Martin: …as to how AI can actually benefit people in their lives, their homes, their communities, and t…
S13
Welcome Address โ€” “How to make AI machine -centric and human -centric?”[33]. “Friends, the future of work will be inclusive, trusted, and …
S14
Leveraging the UN system to advance global AI Governance efforts โ€” Gilbert Houngbo from the International Labour Organization (ILO) discussed the impact of AI on jobs, acknowledging both …
S15
The Global Power Shift Indiaโ€™s Rise in AI & Semiconductors โ€” India’s talent pool and innovation culture are key advantages that need better conversion from knowledge creation to usa…
S16
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance โ€” Chris Martin: Hiya, how are you doing? Check, check. Is that better? Cool. Again, hello. Welcome. My name is Chri…
S17
Evolving AI, evolving governance: from principles to action | IGF 2023 WS #196 โ€” Prateek Sibal:And how much time do I have? Five minutes. Okay. Right. Thanks, and apologies for being late. There was a …
S18
AI for Social Empowerment_ Driving Change and Inclusion โ€” Skills development, reskilling, and the role of human wisdom
S19
High Level Session 3: AI & the Future of Work โ€” Junha Li: Thank you. Good morning. Good to see you again in this plenary hall. Before I’ll distinguish the panel, starti…
S20
The open-source gambit: How America plans to outpace AI rivals by democratising tech โ€” The AI openness approach will spark a heated debate around the dual nature of open-source AI. The benefits are evident i…
S21
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot โ€” Setting the Global Context and India’s Strategic Position
S22
Powering AI Global Leaders Session AI Impact Summit India โ€” The tone is consistently optimistic and inspirational throughout, with Chris Lehane maintaining an encouraging, partners…
S23
Global telecommunication and AI standards development for all โ€” Bilel Jamoussi:Thank you, thank you LJ and good afternoon everyone. I’d like to invite a list of colleagues for a big an…
S24
The perils of forcing encryption to say “AI, AI captain” | IGF 2023 Town Hall #28 โ€” In conclusion, the discussion on child safety in online environments highlighted the need to differentiate between gener…
S25
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session โ€” Julie Sweet from Accenture highlighted another crucial advantage: India’s human capital. With over 350,000 employees in …
S26
Welcome Address โ€” India positions itself as a central hub of technology talent, leveraging a strong IT background and dynamic startup ecos…
S27
The Global Power Shift Indiaโ€™s Rise in AI & Semiconductors โ€” India’s talent pool and innovation culture are key advantages that need better conversion from knowledge creation to usa…
S28
Keynote Adresses at India AI Impact Summit 2026 โ€” Multiple speakers emphasised India’s unique combination of technological capabilities and strategic positioning. Ministe…
S29
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance โ€” Chris Martin: Hiya, how are you doing? Check, check. Is that better? Cool. Again, hello. Welcome. My name is Chri…
S30
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development โ€” Strong consensus emerged around human-centered AI principles. Austria’s State Secretary Alexander Perol articulated the …
S31
Closing remarks โ€” The summit emphasized the need to “seek that ethical clarity” and “go beyond the mere criteria of utility or efficiency …
S32
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 โ€” A regulamentaรงรฃo da informaรงรฃo e proteger as indรบstrias criativas de nossos paรญses. O modelo atual de negรณcios dessas em…
S33
High Level Session 3: AI & the Future of Work โ€” Junha Li: Thank you. Good morning. Good to see you again in this plenary hall. Before I’ll distinguish the panel, starti…
S34
AI for Social Empowerment_ Driving Change and Inclusion โ€” Skills development, reskilling, and the role of human wisdom
S35
Keynote-Brad Smith โ€” Future of work, jobs, and human capability
S36
Powering AI Global Leaders Session AI Impact Summit India โ€” The tone is consistently optimistic and inspirational throughout, with Chris Lehane maintaining an encouraging, partners…
S37
The open-source gambit: How America plans to outpace AI rivals by democratising tech โ€” The AI openness approach will spark a heated debate around the dual nature of open-source AI. The benefits are evident i…
S39
Global telecommunication and AI standards development for all โ€” Bilel Jamoussi:Thank you, thank you LJ and good afternoon everyone. I’d like to invite a list of colleagues for a big an…
S40
WS #70 Combating Sexual Deepfakes Safeguarding Teens Globally โ€” – Create international coalitions to pressure search engines to remove access to deepfake creation apps Juliana Cunha: …
S41
The perils of forcing encryption to say “AI, AI captain” | IGF 2023 Town Hall #28 โ€” In conclusion, the discussion on child safety in online environments highlighted the need to differentiate between gener…
S42
(Plenary segment) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 5th plenary meeting, 79th session โ€” There was an unexpected level of consensus on the importance of youth empowerment and considering future generations acr…
S43
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/press-briefing-by-hmit-ashwani-vaishnav-on-ai-impact-summit-2026-l-day-5 โ€” Thank you, sir. It has been a pleasure for us in the Ministry of External Affairs to work along with METI as Team India …
S44
(Interactive Dialogue 4) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session โ€” Andrew Holness: Heads of State and Government, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, distinguished participants, I ca…
S45
Digital Humanism: People first! โ€” Pavan Duggal: Okay. Thank you for giving this opportunity. Today we are actually undergoing a new revolution. This is an…
S46
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/welcome-address โ€” AI is making machines intelligent. But it is also increasing human resources many times. The difference is only one. Thi…
S47
9821st meeting โ€” Secretary-General – Antonio Guterres:Mr. President, Excellencies, I thank the United States for convening the Meeting on…
S48
Impact & the Role of AI How Artificial Intelligence Is Changing Everything โ€” This comment shifted the discussion from optimistic historical parallels to a more nuanced understanding of AI’s unique …
S49
From principles to practice: Governing advanced AI in action โ€” Udbhav Tiwari provided a concrete example of Signal’s response to Microsoft’s Recall feature, illustrating how companies…
S50
Toward Collective Action_ Roundtable on Safe & Trusted AI โ€” The discussion began with Ambassador Philip Tigo’s powerful reframing of AI safety concerns through an African lens. Rat…
S51
Enhancing rather than replacing humanity with AI โ€” AI development is not some unstoppable force beyond our control. It’s shaped by developers, institutions, policymakers, …
S52
UNSC meeting: Artificial intelligence, peace and security โ€” Malta:Thank you, President. And I thank the UK Presidency for holding today’s briefing on this highly topical issue. I a…
S53
Transforming Agriculture_ AI for Resilient and Inclusive Food Systems โ€” We are committed to work together on this through knowledge sharing, co -operation and collaboration. creation and capac…
S54
Elevating AI skills for all โ€” Future of work | Human rights principles Microsoft’s core mission centers on empowerment rather than replacement, with …
S55
India unveils MANAV Vision as new global pathway for ethical AI โ€” Narendra Modipresentedthe new MANAV Vision during the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi, setting out a human-cent…
S56
Building the Workforce_ AI for Viksit Bharat 2047 โ€” The discussion addressed environmental concerns, with panelists advocating for both “green AI” (sustainable computing) a…
S57
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/ai-driven-enforcement_-better-governance-through-effective-compliance-services โ€” For law enforcement, this means we can strengthen how we prevent, detect, and respond, but only if we build the right pr…
S58
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI โ€” -India’s Global DPI Model and Knowledge Transfer: The discussion highlighted India’s role in sharing its DPI framework g…
S59
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Hemant Taneja General Catalyst โ€” Taneja argued that India is uniquely positioned to lead in AI deployment due to its status as the world’s strongest grow…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
P
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
13 arguments81 words per minute1721 words1272 seconds
Argument 1
India is a major tech talent pool and fast adopter of AI
EXPLANATION
The Prime Minister states that India hosts a large pool of technology talent and that the country is adopting new technologies at an unprecedented speed, positioning itself as a leading AI hub.
EVIDENCE
He describes India as “the center of the tech talent pool” and “the biggest example of a tech-enabled ecosystem” and adds that “India is also making new technology and is also adopting it at an unprecedented speed” [5-7].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Summit remarks note that India possesses “a huge talent pool of young, vibrant, intelligent, smart, educated people” and that a large share of the population is under 30, underscoring the country’s rapid adoption of technology [S7].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Leadership and talent in AI
Argument 2
The young generationโ€™s rapid acceptance and ownership of AI is unprecedented
EXPLANATION
He highlights that young people worldwide are embracing AI at an extraordinary pace, taking ownership of the technology and using it extensively.
EVIDENCE
He notes that “the speed with which the young generation of the world is accepting AI, is taking ownership of it, is using AI, is incredible” and that “especially, the young talent has come in a large number” [20-22].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The same source highlights the massive youth demographic and their quick uptake of AI tools, reinforcing Modiโ€™s observation about unprecedented youth adoption [S7].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Youth adoption of AI
Argument 3
India aims to be a global hub for affordable, scalable, and secure AI solutions
EXPLANATION
The Prime Minister points to India’s strong IT background, secure data centres, and dynamic startup ecosystem as foundations for making the country a natural hub for affordable, scalable and secure AI offerings.
EVIDENCE
He mentions “Secure data center. strong IT background, dynamic startup ecosystem, make India a natural hub for affordable, scalable, and secure AI solutions” and adds that the AI model that succeeds in India can be deployed globally, inviting others to design and develop in India [117-120].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
India as AI hub
Argument 4
AIโ€™s impact depends on direction: it can cause disruption or provide solutions
EXPLANATION
He argues that AIโ€™s effect on society hinges on how it is steered: without direction it can be disruptive, whereas with the right direction it can deliver solutions.
EVIDENCE
He says “If it is directionless, then disruption” and “If it gets the right direction, then solution” after noting that AI is a transformative power [45-47].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Direction of AI impact
Argument 5
AI must be both machineโ€‘centric and humanโ€‘centric, guided by moral and ethical systems
EXPLANATION
He calls for AI design that balances technical efficiency with human values, anchored in moral and ethical frameworks.
EVIDENCE
He repeatedly asks “How to make AI machine-centric and human-centric?” and later outlines that AI should be based on “moral and ethical systems” [48-50][59].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The summit welcome address explicitly calls for AI that is “machine-centric and human-centric” and stresses the need for moral and ethical guidance in its design [S13].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Humanโ€‘centric AI design
Argument 6
AI should be democratized and used as a tool for inclusion and empowerment, not merely a data point
EXPLANATION
He stresses that AI must be open and inclusive, serving as a means for empowermentโ€”especially for the Global Southโ€”rather than reducing people to mere data.
EVIDENCE
He says AI should be “democratized” and become “a medium of inclusion and empowerment” and warns that humans should not become “just a data point”; he links this to a vision for the Global South and open-sky sharing of AI [59-66].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Democratizing AI
Argument 7
AI should be developed as an open, shared global common good rather than a confidential strategic asset
EXPLANATION
He contrasts the view of AI as a strategic, confidential asset with Indiaโ€™s stance that AI should be openly shared worldwide as a common good.
EVIDENCE
He notes that some countries treat AI as a strategic asset and keep it confidential, but “the thinking of India is different” and that “AI will be developed as a global common good” [85-91].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as global common good
Argument 8
Global standards and authenticity labels are needed to identify deepโ€‘fakes and fabricated content
EXPLANATION
He proposes creating authenticity labels for digital contentโ€”similar to nutrition labels on foodโ€”to help users distinguish genuine material from AIโ€‘generated deepโ€‘fakes.
EVIDENCE
He says we need standards for deep-fakes, compares the digital world to nutrition labels, calls for an “authenticity label on content”, and mentions watermarking and source standards becoming industry norms [92-99].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The AI standards pillar aims to combat deepโ€‘fakes, and the welcome address proposes an “authenticity label” for digital content, analogous to nutrition labels on food [S12, S13].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Standards for AIโ€‘generated content
Argument 9
Transparent rules, robust oversight, and national data sovereignty are essential for accountable AI governance
EXPLANATION
He outlines three pillars for AI governance: ethical guidance, accountable governance with transparent rules and robust oversight, and protection of national data sovereignty.
EVIDENCE
He lists AI based on “ethical guidance”, “accountable governance, i.e. transparent rules, robust oversight”, and “national sovereignty, i.e. data” [60-66].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Modiโ€™s threeโ€‘pillar frameworkโ€”ethical guidance, transparent rules with robust oversight, and data sovereigntyโ€”is outlined in the welcome address and echoed by summit commitments to safety, transparency and accountability [S13, S11].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Accountable AI governance
Argument 10
AI will reshape the job market; mass skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning are required
EXPLANATION
He warns that AI will transform employment and calls for a mass movement in skilling, reskilling and lifelong learning to prepare the workforce.
EVIDENCE
He states “we have to make skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning a mass movement” and earlier notes that the future of work depends on our decisions and that humans will co-create with intelligent systems [79][71-74].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The welcome address stresses inclusive, trusted future work and calls for a mass movement in skilling, while the ILO ministerial discussion highlights lifelong learning as essential to address AIโ€‘driven labour shifts [S13, S14].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Future of work and skill development
Argument 11
Humanโ€‘AI coโ€‘creation will create higherโ€‘value, creative, and meaningful roles
EXPLANATION
He envisions a future where humans and AI coโ€‘create, leading to smarter, more efficient work and the emergence of higherโ€‘value, creative, and meaningful jobs.
EVIDENCE
He says “we are entering an era where humans and intelligent systems co-create, co-work and co-evolve” and that AI will make work “smarter, more efficient and impactful” and enable “higher value, creative, and meaningful roles” [74-77].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Modiโ€™s vision of humans and intelligent systems co-creating, co-working and co-evolving is reiterated in the summitโ€™s welcome address, which frames the future of work as higher-value and creative through human-AI collaboration [S13].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Coโ€‘creation with AI
Argument 12
While AI is a strategic security asset, India advocates sharing AI technology for worldwide benefit
EXPLANATION
He acknowledges AIโ€™s importance for security but argues that sharing AI openly will benefit the world, contrasting with the view that AI should be kept confidential.
EVIDENCE
He calls AI “the biggest security” and notes that some see it as a strategic asset to be kept confidential, whereas India believes that when codes are opened and shared, millions of young minds can improve them, making AI a strategic asset that is developed as a global common good [84-91].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI security and sharing
Argument 13
Child safety must be ensured by curating AI environments similar to school curricula
EXPLANATION
He stresses the need to protect children by curating AI spaces in the same way school syllabi are curated, ensuring safety and family guidance.
EVIDENCE
He repeats the need to be “more aware of children’s safety” and says “just like the school syllabus is curated, the AI space is also curated” with child safety as part of it [100-104].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Child protection in AI
Agreements
Agreement Points
Similar Viewpoints
Unexpected Consensus
Overall Assessment

The discussion consists of a brief introductory remark by Speakerโ€ฏ1 followed by an extensive address from Prime Minister Narendraโ€ฏModi. Apart from the shared procedural purpose of opening the AI summit, there is no substantive overlap in arguments or viewpoints between the two speakers. Consequently, the level of consensus on policyโ€‘relevant issues is minimal, limiting the immediate impact on the broader AI agenda.

Low โ€“ agreement is limited to the ceremonial opening of the summit; substantive policy consensus is absent, suggesting that further multiโ€‘stakeholder dialogue will be needed to build common positions on AI governance, inclusivity, and standards.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Unexpected Differences
Overall Assessment

The transcript shows virtually no substantive disagreement. Speakerโ€ฏ1โ€™s role is limited to a ceremonial introduction, and the Prime Ministerโ€™s speech is a single, cohesive narrative presenting Indiaโ€™s AI vision and policy priorities. Consequently, the discussion is largely harmonious, with shared endorsement of the summitโ€™s goals.

Minimal โ€“ the lack of opposing viewpoints suggests strong consensus among the participants present, implying smooth alignment on AI policy direction within this forum.

Partial Agreements
Both speakers support the AI summit and its objectives; Speakerโ€ฏ1 introduces the Prime Minister and calls for applause, while the Prime Minister delivers the inaugural address outlining the summitโ€™s vision [1-2][3-122].
Speakers: Speaker 1, Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Takeaways
Key takeaways
India positions itself as a leading global hub for AI talent, rapid adoption, and affordable, scalable solutions. The younger generation is embracing AI quickly, indicating a shift toward ownership and innovation. AI must be directed responsibly; it can be disruptive or solutionโ€‘oriented depending on governance. A humanโ€‘centric, ethical framework (moral guidance, accountability, data sovereignty, inclusivity) is essential for AI development. India advocates for AI to be a shared global common good rather than a closed strategic asset. Global standards, authenticity/labeling of AIโ€‘generated content, and robust oversight are needed to combat deepโ€‘fakes and ensure trust. Future of work will be reshaped by AI; mass skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning are critical. Humanโ€‘AI coโ€‘creation will generate higherโ€‘value, creative roles and drive innovation. Child safety and broader societal safety must be embedded in AI ecosystems, akin to curated school curricula.
Resolutions and action items
Call for the development of global standards and authenticity labels for AIโ€‘generated content. Commitment to democratize AI through openโ€‘source sharing and inclusive policies, especially for the Global South. Proposal to launch mass skilling, reskilling, and lifelongโ€‘learning initiatives to prepare the workforce for AIโ€‘augmented jobs. Invitation to international firms and innovators to design and develop AI solutions within Indiaโ€™s ecosystem. Emphasis on establishing transparent rules, robust oversight mechanisms, and safeguarding national data sovereignty.
Unresolved issues
Specific mechanisms and timelines for creating and enforcing global AI standards and authenticity labeling. Detailed strategies for ensuring child safety within AI platforms and applications. How to balance openness of AI code with national security concerns and strategic asset protection. Concrete policies for data sovereignty and how they will be coordinated across participating nations. Funding models and governance structures required to sustain largeโ€‘scale skilling and reskilling programs.
Suggested compromises
Promote openโ€‘source AI development while retaining security safeguards to address both strategic asset concerns and the goal of a global common good. Encourage a balanced approach that integrates machineโ€‘centric efficiency with humanโ€‘centric ethical oversight. Acknowledge both the fearโ€‘based and optimismโ€‘based perspectives on AI, aiming for responsible optimism through regulated innovation.
Thought Provoking Comments
The real question is not what artificial intelligence can do in the future. The question is what we do with artificial intelligence in the present.
Shifts the focus from speculative future capabilities to immediate ethical responsibility, urging concrete action now rather than waiting for technology to mature.
Sets the thematic anchor for the rest of the speech, prompting subsequent remarks about governance, standards, and humanโ€‘centric AI. It steers the discussion toward presentโ€‘day policy choices rather than abstract futurism.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Some countries treat AI as a strategic asset and develop it confidentially. India believes AI should be a global common good, open and shared, so that millions of young minds can make it better and safer.
Challenges the prevailing model of AI secrecy and proposes an openโ€‘source, commonsโ€‘based approach, positioning India as a champion of inclusive innovation.
Creates a turning point from a defensive stance on AI security to a collaborative, openโ€‘innovation narrative, inviting other nations and participants to consider shared development and prompting calls for global standards.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
We need authenticity labels on digital content, just like nutrition labels on food, so people can know what is real and what is generated by AI.
Offers a concrete, everydayโ€‘facing solution to the trust problem posed by deepfakes and AIโ€‘generated media, translating a complex issue into a relatable analogy.
Introduces a new topicโ€”digital content labelingโ€”that steers the conversation toward practical regulatory mechanisms and spurs interest in standardโ€‘setting among the audience.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
AI will make our work smarter, more efficient and impactful. Higherโ€‘value, creative, and meaningful roles will also be achieved, provided we invest in skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning.
Reframes AI from a jobโ€‘destruction threat to an augmentative force that can elevate human work, linking technology to human development through education.
Deepens the analysis of AIโ€™s economic impact, leading the dialogue toward workforce development strategies and reinforcing the earlier call for massโ€‘movement upskilling.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
AI must be democratized, not reduced to a mere data point or raw material for humans, but used as a medium for inclusion and empowerment, especially for the Global South.
Highlights equity and the risk of AI widening existing divides, urging a purposeful design that benefits underโ€‘represented regions.
Broadens the conversation from national ambition to global development, prompting listeners to consider how AI policy can serve emerging economies and fostering a sense of shared responsibility.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
There are two types of people in the world today: those who see fear in AI and those who see luck. India sees luck in AI and a future full of opportunity.
Uses a simple dichotomy to reโ€‘position AI from a source of anxiety to a source of optimism, reinforcing a positive national narrative.
Shifts the tone of the discussion from cautionary to hopeful, encouraging participants to adopt an optimistic mindset and align with Indiaโ€™s proactive stance.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
We are entering an era where humans and intelligent systems coโ€‘create, coโ€‘work and coโ€‘evolve.
Presents a forwardโ€‘looking vision of partnership rather than competition between humans and machines, emphasizing symbiosis.
Elevates the philosophical dimension of the summit, prompting deeper reflection on the nature of future work and societal structures, and reinforcing earlier points about humanโ€‘centric AI.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Creating global standards for deepโ€‘fakes and fabricated content is a big need today; just as we read nutrition labels, we should have authenticity labels for digital media.
Reiterates and expands the earlier labeling idea, linking it to an urgent global governance challenge and offering a clear policy direction.
Reinforces the call for international cooperation on standards, solidifying it as a central agenda item for the summit and encouraging other delegates to prioritize this issue.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Overall Assessment

The speechโ€™s most impactful moments revolve around reframing AI from a distant, potentially dangerous technology to an immediate, humanโ€‘centric tool that must be governed responsibly, openly, and equitably. By shifting focus to present actions, proposing concrete mechanisms like authenticity labels, and positioning India as an advocate for open, inclusive AI, the Prime Minister steered the discussion toward collaborative policyโ€‘making, workforce transformation, and global equity. These comments collectively redirected the tone from speculative hype to pragmatic optimism, creating clear pathways for further dialogue among participants.

Follow-up Questions
How can we make AI both machineโ€‘centric and humanโ€‘centric?
Ensuring AI serves human values while leveraging machine efficiency is crucial for ethical, inclusive, and effective deployment of AI technologies.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
What should we do with artificial intelligence in the present, rather than only focusing on future possibilities?
Addressing immediate applications, governance, and impacts of AI is essential to guide its development responsibly and avoid unintended consequences.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
How can global standards be created for deepโ€‘fake and fabricated content, including authenticity labeling similar to nutrition labels?
Standardized labeling would help users distinguish real from AIโ€‘generated media, protecting trust, reducing misinformation, and enhancing digital literacy.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
What measures are needed to ensure child safety in AIโ€‘driven platforms and applications?
Protecting children from harmful content and data misuse is vital for ethical AI deployment and aligns with broader societal responsibilities.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
How can AI be democratized so that humans are not reduced to mere data points or raw material?
Democratization promotes inclusive access, empowerment, and prevents exploitation, ensuring AI benefits a broad spectrum of society, especially the Global South.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
What frameworks are required to develop AI as a global common good through openโ€‘source sharing of code and models?
Openโ€‘source AI can accelerate innovation, improve safety through collective scrutiny, and enable equitable access across nations.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
What will be the impact of AI on the future of work, job creation, and the need for skilling, reskilling, and lifelong learning?
Understanding AIโ€™s effect on employment is critical for policy planning, education systems, and ensuring a smooth transition for the workforce.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
How can trust be built into AI technologies from the beginning, such as through watermarking and clear source standards?
Embedding trust mechanisms early reduces misuse, enhances accountability, and fosters public confidence in AI outputs.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
What ethical, accountable, and sovereign governance structures are needed for AI, covering moral guidance, transparent rules, robust oversight, and data sovereignty?
Comprehensive governance ensures AI aligns with societal values, protects national interests, and mitigates risks associated with unchecked AI deployment.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi
How can Indiaโ€™s semiconductor, chipโ€‘making, and quantumโ€‘computing capabilities be leveraged to build a resilient, secure, and affordable AI ecosystem?
Integrating hardware strengths with AI development can position India as a global hub, fostering innovation, security, and economic growth.
Speaker: Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Keynote-N Chandrasekaran

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

Natarajan Chandrasekaran opened the AI Summit by greeting world leaders and emphasizing the eventโ€™s significance [1][2]. He described India as a nation of AI optimists, noting the countryโ€™s ambitious digital infrastructure such as the worldโ€™s largest digital identity system and a payment network handling half of global transactions [3][7-8]. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modiโ€™s vision, AI has been treated as a strategic national capability, with coordinated efforts across chips, systems, energy and applications through initiatives like Semicon India and the India AI Mission [9-10]. Chandrasekaran argued that AI is a foundational technology that โ€œlearns from data,โ€ scales rapidly, and is not based on artificial rules [11][12-17]. He said the next big infrastructure should be AI that works for every individual and citizen, putting tools in the hands of ordinary people [19-21]. As evidence, he highlighted a recent workshop where 1,500 rural women with no prior digital experience learned to build AI-driven products and marketing materials within four hours [22-24]. He projected that AI will dramatically improve public-service delivery and transform enterprises worldwide [24-26]. Drawing on his IT background, Chandrasekaran identified the biggest opportunity for the tech sector as integrating AI agents into enterprise workflows to re-imagine processes and create competitive moats [26-30]. He then outlined Tata Groupโ€™s AI strategy, stating that the conglomerate is adopting AI across the stack-from silicon to AI-ready data centres and applications [31-34]. The group announced Indiaโ€™s first large-scale AI-optimized data centre, a 100-megawatt facility that will eventually scale to one gigawatt, built in partnership with OpenAI and AMD [36-38]. Tata is also developing an AI data-insights platform based on diverse Indian datasets, an AI operating system for industry, and domain-specific AI-optimized chips beginning with the automotive sector [39-42][43-48][49-50]. Chandrasekaran concluded that the world is entering an โ€œage of abundant intelligenceโ€ where trust, stewardship and human capability are the scarce resources, calling for a responsible AI decade [53-56]. He urged that promises be turned into action to deliver prosperity for India and the global community [52][57].


Keypoints

Indiaโ€™s national AI ambition and foundational digital infrastructure – The speaker frames India as an โ€œAI-optimistโ€ nation that has built the worldโ€™s largest digital identity system and a digital payment network handling half of global transactions, and stresses that AI is treated as a strategic capability spanning chips, systems, energy and applicationsโ€ฏ[3-10].


AI as a tool for every citizen and public service transformation – The vision is to make AI work for every individual, illustrated by a recent event where 1,500 rural women with no prior computing background learned to create AI-driven products and marketing campaigns within hours, underscoring AIโ€™s potential to reshape public services and enterprisesโ€ฏ[19-24].


Tata Groupโ€™s concrete AI initiatives


Large-scale AI-optimized data centre: partnership with OpenAI for a 100โ€ฏMW facility (scalable to 1โ€ฏGW)โ€ฏ[36-38].


AI data-insights platform: built on diverse Indian data sets to deliver intelligence across local contextsโ€ฏ[39-42].


AI operating system for industry: collaboration between TCS and Tata Communications to deliver agentic solutions for all sectorsโ€ฏ[43-48].


Domain-specific AI chips: plans to develop AI-optimized semiconductors, starting with the automotive sectorโ€ฏ[49-51].


Call to translate promise into action and establish AI stewardship – The conclusion urges moving from vision to practice, emphasizing trust, stewardship, human capability, and a โ€œsimple standard for the AI decadeโ€ that balances dignity, impact per watt, and collaborative progressโ€ฏ[52-56].


Overall purpose – The address aims to position India as a global AI leader, showcase the governmentโ€™s strategic framework, announce major private-sector (Tata Group) investments and partnerships, and rally stakeholders to collaborate in building trustworthy, high-impact AI infrastructure that benefits the entire nation.


Overall tone – The speech maintains a consistently upbeat and visionary tone, beginning with broad optimism about Indiaโ€™s AI future, shifting to concrete, celebratory announcements of partnerships and projects, and concluding with a rallying, purpose-driven call to action. The tone remains enthusiastic throughout, moving from aspirational rhetoric to tangible commitments.


Speakers

Natarajan Chandrasekaran


– Areas of expertise: Artificial Intelligence, digital infrastructure, semiconductor technology, enterprise transformation, technology strategy


– Roles and titles: Chairman, Tata Group; Chairman of Tata Sons; leader of Tata Groupโ€™s AI initiatives and AI-optimized data center program [S1][S2]


Additional speakers:


(none identified)


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Natarajanโ€ฏChandrasekaran opened the AI Summit by greeting the Prime Minister, heads of state, policy-makers and the audience, calling the gathering an โ€œextraordinary privilegeโ€ and positioning India as a nation of AI optimistsโ€ฏ[1-5].


He highlighted Indiaโ€™s digital foundations: the worldโ€™s largest digital identity system covering 1.4โ€ฏbillion people, a digital-payments network that processes roughly half of global transactions, and strategic programmes such as Semiconโ€ฏIndia, the Indiaโ€ฏAIโ€ฏMission and the recent Shantiโ€ฏAct for clean energyโ€ฏ[6][7-8][9-10].


Chandrasekaran defined AI as โ€œrealโ€ because it learns from data and improves continuously, not from static artificial rules, and noted that this data-driven learning enables rapid scaling, making AI the โ€œnext big infrastructureโ€ for the nationโ€ฏ[11-17].


His vision is to make AI an infrastructure that works for every individual and citizen. He illustrated this with a recent workshop at Bharatโ€ฏMandapam where 1,500 rural women, previously unfamiliar with computing, learned AI tools, built products and marketing campaigns, and presented them to a global audience-all within four hoursโ€ฏ[19-24][13]. He added, โ€œWe should put the AI tools in the hands of the lost person, in the country, and in fact on the earth.โ€โ€ฏ[13] He argued that such empowerment will transform public-service delivery and drive enterprise innovation across the countryโ€ฏ[24-26].


Drawing on his IT-industry background, he said the sectorโ€™s core value lies in understanding each enterpriseโ€™s business and technology landscape and embedding the right technology within processes and ecosystems. AI will expand this role by integrating AI agents into workflows, re-imagining processes and helping firms build sustainable competitive moatsโ€ฏ[26-30].


Turning to the Tata Group, he explained that the conglomerate is adopting AI across the full stack-from silicon to systems, AI-ready data centres, applications and AI agents-and is partnering with global leaders to accelerate the journeyโ€ฏ[31-34].


He announced five concrete initiativesโ€ฏ[31-34]:


1. Establishing a large-scale AI-optimised data centre – Indiaโ€™s first purpose-built AI training and inference facility, initially 100โ€ฏMW in partnership with OpenAI, with a roadmap to 1โ€ฏGWโ€ฏ[36-38].


2. Building an AI data-insights platform – layered on diverse Indian data sets and foundational models, delivering intelligence that reflects the countryโ€™s varied contexts (as articulated by Ministerโ€ฏAshwini)โ€ฏ[39-42][15].


3. Creating an AI operating system for industry – a joint effort by TCS and Tataโ€ฏCommunications to deliver agentic, industry-specific solutions; the platform is already under developmentโ€ฏ[43-48].


4. Designing domain-centric AI chips – AI-optimised semiconductors tailored to specific industries, with the first rollout aimed at the automotive sectorโ€ฏ[49-51].


5. Partnering across the end-to-end AI stack – integrating AI from silicon through applications and agents, working with world-leading partners in India and abroadโ€ฏ[31-34].


He concluded that we are at a defining moment – the โ€œage of abundant intelligenceโ€ where the scarce resources are trust, stewardship and human capability. He called for a simple standard for the AI decade that couples capability with dignity, maximises impact per watt of energy, and advances through agency and collaborationโ€ฏ[52-56][57].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Natarajan Chandrasekaran

Honourable Prime Minister, Sri Narendra Modi ji, Excellencies, Heads of State, Policy Makers and Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen. It is an extraordinary privilege to be here this morning and participate in this AI Summit. India is a nation of AI optimists. Our enthusiasm is not surprising. Indians have witnessed the hugely ambitious development of AI. They are committed to developing the most ambitious digital infrastructure programs and what they can achieve. The largest digital identity system in the world. covering 1 .4 billion people. A digital payment interface that accounts for half of the entire world’s transactions. Over the past few years, under our Honorable Prime Minister’s vision, India has treated AI as a strategic national capability, aligning the full stack from chips to systems to energy and to applications.

Through Semicon India and India AI Mission, and most importantly, the recent reforms such as the Shanti Act for clean energy, we are building AI at scale with trust, resilience, and long -term competitiveness. AI. is a foundational technology that cuts across all industries. AI. AI is nothing artificial, it is real. Because it learns from data and learns faster every day. And it is… AI is nothing artificial, it is real. Because it learns from data and learns faster every day. And it is not based on artificial rules. Third, AI can scale pretty rapidly. Putting all together, to my mind, is the next big infrastructure. Our mission as a infrastructure should be to make AI work for every individual and every citizen in this country.

We should put the AI tools in the hands of the lost person, in the country, and in fact on the earth. And that’s the vision… that we should all work towards. A couple of days ago, we witnessed 1 ,500 rural women here in Bharat Mandapam who had no background to computing, no background to digital tools. In a matter of few hours, could learn AI, could build products, could build marketing materials, campaigns, all in front of a global audience, and they did it in four hours. AI will have huge impact on our public services delivery. It will have huge impact on enterprises around the world. Since I come from the background of IT industry, one word for the IT industry, it is…

In my opinion, the biggest opportunity for the tech sector and the IT industry. Because the IT industry’s real value is the context and understanding of every enterprise’s business and technology landscape and make the right technology work inside the processes and the ecosystem, the supplier, customer, and all the other connections an enterprise has. AI will expand that role much further. It is the opportunity to integrate AI and AI agents into workflows, reimagine processes, and make it work and carry out the transformation so that every enterprise can realize the moat and realize its vision. Now I want to talk a little bit about the Tata Group. At the Tata Group, we are a… We are adopting AI across the stack, from silicon to system…

to AI -ready data centers, to applications, and AI agents. And we believe such a vision and such a journey is going to be extremely exciting, and it will require us to work with world -leading partners in India and across the globe. I would like to make five points. The Tata Group is establishing India’s first large -scale AI -optimized data center, purpose -built for the next -generation AI training and inference. I’m very happy to announce that we have partnered with OpenAI to build the first 100 -megawatt capacity, which will scale to 1 gigawatt. And we made an announcement with AMD yesterday, where we will combine the world -class AI -packed architecture with the world -class AI -optimized architecture, with Tata’s strength in…

infrastructure, engineering, power, and solution capabilities to create a sustainable high -density AI capacity in India for global standards. The third, we are already building an AI data insights platform. Minister Ashwini articulated the layers of data architectures. What we are building is totally based on diverse Indian data sets on top of the foundational models. So intelligence becomes available across the diversity of Indian contexts. And the fourth, TCS and our other company, Tata Communications, together, we are building an AI operating system for industry. So, what we are doing is we are building a TCS and Tata Communications. And what we are doing is we are building a TCS and Tata Communications. And what we are doing is we are building a TCS and Tata Communications.

And what we are doing is we are building a TCS and Tata Communications. build agentic industry solutions for every industry. We are already well on that journey, and we will work with partners to be able to launch it and take it to all enterprises around the globe. And finally, again, I want to thank the vision of our Prime Minister, which made it possible for us to make a serious foray into chips and semiconductors. What we will do next is to build chips that are very domain -centric, which will be totally AI -optimized for every industry, and we will first launch or work towards getting it ready for the automotive sector. So these are the areas that…

I think it is the time for promise to take action. into practice so that we can deliver prosperity. Finally, in conclusion, I just want to say that we are standing here at a very defining moment. It is the age of abundant intelligence where the scarce resources are trust, stewardship, and human capability. So let us send out a simple standard for the AI decade. Capability with dignity, high impact for every watt of energy, and progress with agency and collaboration. Thank you all very much.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (30)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (7)
โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œNatarajan Chandrasekaran opened the AI Summit by greeting the Prime Minister, heads of state, policyโ€‘makers and the audience, calling the gathering an โ€œextraordinary privilegeโ€.โ€

The keynote transcript records Chandrasekaran addressing the Honourable Prime Minister and other dignitaries and stating โ€œit is an extraordinary privilege to be hereโ€ [S2].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œIndiaโ€™s digital identity system is the worldโ€™s largest, covering 1.4โ€ฏbillion people.โ€

Aadhaar is described as serving 1.3 to 1.4โ€ฏbillion people, making it the worldโ€™s largest digital ID system [S82].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œAI should be democratized and put in the hands of many people.โ€

The plenary notes that AI must be democratized and tools placed in the hands of lots of people [S1].

โ„น
Additional Contextmedium

โ€œDataโ€‘driven learning enables rapid scaling, making AI the โ€œnext big infrastructureโ€ for the nation.โ€

Background material describes AI as embedded in everyday life and driven by data, supporting the view of AI as a foundational infrastructure [S85].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œAI agents will be integrated into enterprise workflows, reโ€‘imagining processes and helping firms build sustainable competitive moats.โ€

Analyses of 2026 trends note that agentic AI is transforming enterprise workflows and decision-making [S96].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œThe Tata Group is establishing Indiaโ€™s first largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimised data centre.โ€

The keynote lists Tata Groupโ€™s plan to establish Indiaโ€™s first large-scale AI-optimized data centre [S81].

โ„น
Additional Contextmedium

โ€œThe data centre will initially be 100โ€ฏMW, built in partnership with OpenAI, with a roadmap to 1โ€ฏGW.โ€

The source confirms the establishment of a large-scale AI data centre by Tata, but does not specify capacity, partnership with OpenAI, or a 1โ€ฏGW roadmap [S81].

External Sources (97)
S1
S2
Keynote-N Chandrasekaran โ€” Natarajan Chandrasekaran
S3
Open Internet Inclusive AI Unlocking Innovation for All โ€” Anandan presented concrete evidence of India’s success with this approach, highlighting multiple companies achieving bre…
S4
Scaling Trusted AI_ How France and India Are Building Industrial & Innovation Bridges โ€” And thank you. And maybe I will introduce a few of them. Agri -Co is transforming agriculture through digital tools that…
S5
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact โ€” I think thank you for that. Let me ask you again a second question. I think this is a very, very direct question. I thin…
S6
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/leaders-plenary-global-vision-for-ai-impact-and-governance-afternoon-session โ€” And you clearly outlined what it means to have a human central leadership, a open, shared, collaborative leadership. Thi…
S7
Building Population-Scale Digital Public Infrastructure for AI โ€” Thank you, Shankar. Thank you for inviting me and also for the partnership that we have with India. And Brazil is lookin…
S8
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services โ€” And when the users, they can hear, okay, I should be more productive. I don’t want to be more productive anymore, right?…
S9
High Level Session 3: AI & the Future of Work โ€” Nthati Moorosi: Thank you, Programme Director, the moderator, and thank you for affording me this opportunity to talk a …
S10
How AI agents are quietly rebuilding the foundations of the global economyย  โ€” AI agents have rapidly moved from niche research concepts to one of the most discussed technology topics of 2025. Search…
S11
From KW to GW Scaling the Infrastructure of the Global AI Economy โ€” So now how do you do that? And in the cloud world again, we mastered that to the sense that in very simple English, how …
S12
Fireside Chat Intel Tata Electronics CDAC & Asia Group _ India AI Impact Summit โ€” Dr. Khaneja outlined CDAC’s substantial progress in building India’s supercomputing backbone through the PARAM series. T…
S13
From Innovation to Impact_ Bringing AI to the Public โ€” There should be tens of foundation model to prove in the world that Indians can do it and Indians are doing it in India….
S14
Welcome Address โ€” Prime Minister Narendra Modi This comment introduces a major policy position that distinguishes India’s approach from o…
S15
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI โ€” As India advances in digital public infrastructure and its AI ambitions, the key is how we ensure these systems remain t…
S16
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications โ€” – Kristalina Georgieva – Kristalina Georgieva- Khalid Al-Falih Economic | Development | Infrastructure Five layers id…
S17
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact โ€” The discussion maintained an optimistic and forward-looking tone throughout, characterized by enthusiasm for India’s AI …
S18
The Role of Government and Innovators in Citizen-Centric AI โ€” The discussion aimed to explore how artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, can transform public se…
S19
Engineering Accountable AI Agents in a Global Arms Race: A Panel Discussion Report โ€” Examples of relieving employees from 4-hour internet searches and policy drafting, addressing backlogs in construction p…
S20
Reinventing Digital Inclusion / DAVOS 2025 โ€” Paula Ingabire discusses Rwanda’s focus on identifying AI use cases that can transform public sector delivery. This appr…
S21
IGF 2024 Opening Ceremony โ€” This comment provided a structure for subsequent speakers to address specific aspects of AI governance and inequality. I…
S22
Tech industry groups adopts AI policy principles โ€” The Information Technology Industry Council, representing leading technology companies such as Apple, Amazon Facebook, G…
S23
Policy hackathon shapes OpenAI proposals ahead of EU AI strategy โ€” OpenAI haspublished 20 policy proposalsto speed up AI adoption across the EU. Released shortly before the European Commi…
S24
SoftBank invests in AI infrastructure with OpenAI partnership โ€” SoftBank plans to transform a former Sharp LCD factory in Osaka into alarge-scale data centrefor AI. The Japanese teleco…
S25
OpenAI eyes India for large-scale AI infrastructure โ€” According to Bloomberg, OpenAI isweighingpartnerships in India to build a data centre of at least 1 gigawatt capacity as…
S26
Advancing Scientific AI with Safety Ethics and Responsibility โ€” -Global South Perspectives and Adaptation: A significant focus was placed on how emerging scientific powers can shape AI…
S27
From India to the Global South_ Advancing Social Impact with AI โ€” Low level of disagreement with high convergence on AI’s transformative potential. Differences are primarily tactical rat…
S28
Open Forum #53 AI for Sustainable Development Country Insights and Strategies โ€” # Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: A Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue on Country-Level Strategi…
S29
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem โ€” Wushu Yan: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. It is my great pleasure to attend this forum. The theme of my speech is…
S30
High Level Session 3: AI & the Future of Work โ€” Nthati Moorosi: Thank you, Programme Director, the moderator, and thank you for affording me this opportunity to talk a …
S31
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 โ€” man’s promise. It can enhance public service delivery, it can improve decision -making, it can optimize resource managem…
S32
Reinventing Digital Inclusion / DAVOS 2025 โ€” Importance of local leadership and tailored solutions Paula Ingabire discusses Rwanda’s focus on identifying AI use cas…
S33
Keynote-N Chandrasekaran โ€” “The Tata Group is establishing India’s first large -scale AI -optimized data center, purpose -built for the next -gener…
S34
Fireside Chat Intel Tata Electronics CDAC & Asia Group _ India AI Impact Summit โ€” And I’ll talk more about that maybe later. But what is the best deployment model that can really help an enterprise scal…
S35
Nvidia partners with Reliance and Tata to expand AI presence in India’s growing ecosystem โ€” Nvidia, a semiconductor company in California,has revealed plans for partnerships with major Indian corporations, Relian…
S36
Secure Finance Risk-Based AI Policy for the Banking Sector โ€” It calls for institutional mechanisms that allow individuals to seek clarification and redress where automated decisions…
S37
How AI agents are quietly rebuilding the foundations of the global economyย  โ€” AI agents have rapidly moved from niche research concepts to one of the most discussed technology topics of 2025. Search…
S38
Digital policy in 2019: A mid-year review โ€” Technological innovation is creating new possibilities. Artificial intelligence developments are moving at a fast pace, …
S39
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI โ€” The panel highlighted the critical importance of maintaining trust while fostering innovation in digital ecosystems. The…
S40
Harmonizing High-Tech: The role of AI standards as an implementation tool โ€” Philippe Metzger:Yeah. Good evening, everyone. And thanks very much, Bilel. I think when I answer that question, I’m sti…
S41
Business Engagement Session โ€” Interdisciplinary collaboration has potential for high impact
S42
Discussion Report: Sovereign AI in Defence and National Security โ€” Faisal advocates for a strategic approach where countries focus their limited sovereign resources on the most critical c…
S43
The Global Power Shift Indiaโ€™s Rise in AI & Semiconductors โ€” Joining us is Professor Vivek Kumar Singh, Senior… advisor on science and technology at NITI IO. Professor Singh plays…
S44
Revisiting 10 AI and digital forecasts for 2025: Predictions and Reality โ€” Digital networks and AI developments are critical assets for countries worldwide. Thus, they become central to national …
S45
AI-Powered Chips and Skills Shaping Indias Next-Gen Workforce โ€” Very high level of consensus with no significant disagreements identified. The alignment spans government policy makers,…
S46
Open Forum: A Primer on AI โ€” Envisions a scenario where individuals in traditionally ignored or marginalized communities can leverage technology to s…
S47
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms โ€” The AI Kiran initiative exemplifies this proactive approach to inclusion through a powerful demonstration of how human a…
S48
Turbocharging Digital Transformation in Emerging Markets: Unleashing the Power of AI in Agritech (ITC) โ€” Jobs within the agri-food value chain, such as advisory services, should be maintained to promote decent work and econom…
S49
Main Session on Cybersecurity, Trust & Safety Online | IGF 2023 โ€” Furthermore, the importance of dialogue and cooperation in leveraging technology is emphasized. Active participation, in…
S50
Keynote โ€˜Iโ€™ to the Power of AI An 8-Year-Old on Aspiring India Impacting the World โ€” India’s approach, according to the speaker, centers on three pillars of sovereignty: data sovereignty, infrastructure so…
S51
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact โ€” The discussion maintained an optimistic and forward-looking tone throughout, characterized by enthusiasm for India’s AI …
S52
From KW to GW Scaling the Infrastructure of the Global AI Economy โ€” This optimistic projection was supported by compelling data points, particularly the observation that India generates 20…
S53
Building Indias Digital and Industrial Future with AI โ€” As India advances in digital public infrastructure and its AI ambitions, the key is how we ensure these systems remain t…
S54
AI 2.0 Reimagining Indian education system โ€” The discussion positioned India’s educational AI integration within broader national aspirations for global AI leadershi…
S55
The Role of Government and Innovators in Citizen-Centric AI โ€” The discussion aimed to explore how artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, can transform public se…
S56
Keynote-N Chandrasekaran โ€” This concrete example is thought-provoking because it challenges assumptions about digital literacy prerequisites for AI…
S57
Engineering Accountable AI Agents in a Global Arms Race: A Panel Discussion Report โ€” Examples of relieving employees from 4-hour internet searches and policy drafting, addressing backlogs in construction p…
S58
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session โ€” Khosla’s framing of AI adoption as requiring democratic permission added a crucial political dimension to the discussion…
S59
Leading in the Digital Era: How can the Public Sector prepare for the AI age? โ€” Audience:Okay, this is Xiao. Thank you for the great session. Really a lot to learn. And here just to have a couple of c…
S60
WS #466 AI at a Crossroads Between Sovereignty and Sustainability โ€” ## Concrete Outcomes and Initiatives Several concrete initiatives were announced during the discussion:
S61
Global South pushes for digital inclusion โ€” At the2025 Internet Governance Forumin Lillestrรธm, Norway, global leaders, youth delegates, and digital policymakers con…
S62
Toward Collective Action_ Roundtable on Safe & Trusted AI โ€” The discussion identified several concrete action items and initiatives already underway. The African Compute Initiative…
S63
SoftBank invests in AI infrastructure with OpenAI partnership โ€” SoftBank plans to transform a former Sharp LCD factory in Osaka into alarge-scale data centrefor AI. The Japanese teleco…
S64
Major AI data centre under construction in Texas โ€” A large-scale data centre tied to Donald Trumpโ€™s US$100 billionStargate initiative is being built in Abilene, Texas. Cov…
S65
OpenAI and Nscale to build an AI super hub in Norway โ€” OpenAIhas revealedits first European data centre project in partnership with British startup Nscale, selecting Norway as…
S66
OpenAI and NVIDIA forge $100B AI power deal โ€” OpenAI and NVIDIAhave unveiledplans for a major partnership to build next-generation AI infrastructure, with NVIDIA comm…
S67
Open Forum #64 Local AI Policy Pathways for Sustainable Digital Economies โ€” Abhishek Singh: Thank you for convening this and bringing this very, very important subject at FORC, like how do we bala…
S68
Panel Discussion Data Sovereignty India AI Impact Summit โ€” Sovereignty includes building tools that work for local contexts and use cases
S69
Nvidia partners with Reliance and Tata to expand AI presence in India’s growing ecosystem โ€” Nvidia, a semiconductor company in California,has revealed plans for partnerships with major Indian corporations, Relian…
S70
TCS boosts development with AI-driven engineering โ€” Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) isharnessinggenerative AI to accelerate development in the rapidly growing field of engi…
S71
Open Internet Inclusive AI Unlocking Innovation for All โ€” With decades of experience across entrepreneurship, investing, and global technology leadership, Rajan has played a pivo…
S72
U.S. AI Standards Shaping the Future of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence โ€” Reference to ‘two humongous but separate industries’ that need to collaborate on agentic systems and data sharing norms….
S73
US to fund AI-driven semiconductor research with $100 million โ€” TheUSCommerce Department announced its plan to allocate $100 million to promote the use ofAIin developing sustainable se…
S74
Intel develops reduced-capability AI chips for China amid US export controls โ€” Intel is set tolaunchtwo specialised AI chips, HL-328 and HL-388, tailored specifically for the Chinese market in June a…
S75
The Global Power Shift Indiaโ€™s Rise in AI & Semiconductors โ€” And again, AI leadership will not really happen by accident. It will require a deliberate alignment across policy, indus…
S76
Semiconductor design set for AI revolution with new Synopsys tool โ€” Synopsys hasintroduced AgentEngineer,an AI-powered technology designed to streamline semiconductor design by automating …
S77
AI-Powered Chips and Skills Shaping Indias Next-Gen Workforce โ€” And manufacturing not just of the chips. And this year we are going to have 10 of the, we already have committed to 10 m…
S79
From principles to practice: Governing advanced AI in action โ€” Trust and Transparency Requirements
S80
Keynote Adresses at India AI Impact Summit 2026 โ€” And critically, India brings strength. Peace doesn’t come from hoping adversaries will play fair. We all know they won’t…
S81
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/keynote-n-chandrasekaran โ€” And we believe such a vision and such a journey is going to be extremely exciting, and it will require us to work with w…
S82
High Level Session 2: Digital Public Goods and Global Digital Cooperation โ€” Aadhaar serves 1.3 to 1.4 billion people and is used 80 million times per day. Using Aadhaar KYC, over 750 million peopl…
S83
Designing Indias Digital Future AI at the Core 6G at the Edge โ€” For India specifically, Saluja emphasized that the wireless nature of the economy makes this transformation particularly…
S84
AI, smart cities, and the surveillance trade-off โ€” Neighbourhoods that were historically neglected may show higher infrastructure failure rates because they received less …
S85
The fundamentals of AI โ€” AI is no longer a concept confined to research laboratories or science fiction novels. From smartphones that recognise f…
S86
We are the AI Generation โ€” Doreen Bogdan Martin: Thank you. Good morning and welcome to Geneva for the AI for Good Global Summit 2025. I want to th…
S87
World Economic Forum Open Forum: Visions for 2050 – Discussion Report โ€” Arjun envisions a 2050 where AI creates abundance in healthcare, human services, and education systems that are easy to …
S89
Bridging the Digital Skills Gap: Strategies for Reskilling and Upskilling in a Changing World โ€” Himanshu Rai: Thank you very much. It’s always useful to be the last speaker because I can claim that I had the last wor…
S90
Empowering Workers in the Age of AI โ€” Juan Ivan Martin Lataix: There are people online too. It’s open. We are conducting this session among the many others th…
S91
Building Inclusive Societies with AI โ€” She is a strong advocate of responsible AI, inclusive technological adoption, and public -private collaboration for nati…
S92
Open Forum #58 Collaborating for Trustworthy AI an Oecd Toolkit and Spotlight on AI in Government โ€” Jungwook Kim: Thank you. So Korea is ranked as one of the leading countries in OECD Digital Government Index, which was …
S93
WSIS Action Lines C4 and C7:E-employment: Emerging technologies in the world of work: Addressing challenges through digital skills โ€” Musraca emphasised that policymakers often lack understanding of AI implications and need better engagement and educatio…
S94
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/keynote-vishal-sikka โ€” And overcoming that gap is where a lot of value -creating opportunity is. Bridging that gap requires delivering correct …
S95
Frontier firms reshape work with AI integration โ€” Forward-thinking companies, known as Frontier Firms, arereshaping business by integrating AIdeeply into their operations…
S96
Agentic AI transforms enterprise workflows in 2026 โ€” Enterprise AIentereda new phase as organisations transitioned from simple, prompt-driven tools to autonomous agents capa…
S97
Top 7 AI agents transforming business in 2025 โ€” AI agentsare no longera futuristic concept โ€” theyโ€™re now embedded in the everyday operations of major companies across s…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
N
Natarajan Chandrasekaran
13 arguments112 words per minute972 words519 seconds
Argument 1
AI positioned as a strategic national capability, integrated across the full stack from chips to applications (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran states that India treats artificial intelligence as a core national capability, aligning every layer of the technology stackโ€”from semiconductor chips to endโ€‘user applications. This strategic positioning is meant to ensure that AI underpins the country’s future growth and competitiveness.
EVIDENCE
He notes that under the Prime Minister’s vision, India has treated AI as a strategic national capability, aligning the full stack from chips to systems to energy and to applications [9]. He also mentions ongoing reforms and programmes such as Semicon India and the India AI Mission that are building AI at scale with trust and resilience [10].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Indiaโ€™s AI strategy as a national capability and the launch of multiple foundationโ€‘model projects are highlighted in S5 and S3.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as a strategic national capability
Argument 2
Existing digital foundations โ€“ worldโ€‘largest digital ID (1.4โ€ฏbillion) and a payment system handling half of global transactions โ€“ enable AI at scale (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
The speaker highlights two massive digital infrastructures already in place: a universal biometric identity system covering 1.4โ€ฏbillion people and a digital payments network that processes roughly 50โ€ฏ% of worldwide transactions. These platforms provide the data and transaction volume needed to train and deploy AI solutions at national scale.
EVIDENCE
He cites the worldโ€™s largest digital identity system covering 1.4โ€ฏbillion people [7] and a digital payment interface that accounts for half of the entire worldโ€™s transactions [8].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The scale of Indiaโ€™s digital payments platform (21โ€ฏbillion transactions per month, 500โ€ฏmillion users) is documented in S1.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Digital foundations supporting AI
Argument 3
AI can empower citizens directly, exemplified by 1,500 rural women creating AIโ€‘driven products within hours (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran describes a demonstration where 1,500 women from rural India, with no prior computing experience, learned to use AI tools and produced marketing materials and products in just four hours. This example illustrates AIโ€™s potential to rapidly upskill underserved populations and enable grassroots entrepreneurship.
EVIDENCE
He recounts that a couple of days earlier, 1,500 rural women with no background in computing learned AI, built products and marketing campaigns in front of a global audience within four hours [22-24].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The demonstration where 1,500 rural women built AIโ€‘driven products is cited in S2.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI empowering rural citizens
Argument 4
AI will transform publicโ€‘service delivery and enterprise productivity across the country (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
The speaker asserts that AI will have a massive impact on how government services are delivered, making them more efficient and citizenโ€‘centric. He also foresees AI driving productivity gains for businesses, both domestic and international, by automating processes and providing new insights.
EVIDENCE
He states that AI will have huge impact on public-service delivery [24] and on enterprises around the world [25].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
AIโ€™s role in sustaining public services is discussed in S8, while its impact on enterprise productivity via AI agents is noted in S10.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AIโ€™s impact on services and business
Argument 5
The IT sectorโ€™s value lies in contextualizing technology for businesses; AI expands this role by embedding agents into workflows and reโ€‘imagining processes (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran explains that the traditional strength of the IT industry is its deep understanding of enterprise contexts and its ability to integrate technology into business processes. AI, he argues, will extend this capability by inserting intelligent agents directly into workflows, thereby reโ€‘designing how work gets done.
EVIDENCE
He describes the IT industryโ€™s real value as understanding every enterpriseโ€™s business and technology landscape and making the right technology work inside processes and ecosystems [26-28]. He adds that AI will expand that role, integrating AI agents into workflows and re-imagining processes [29-30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI extending IT industry value
Argument 6
Enterprises can achieve competitive moats by integrating AI to enhance operations and customer ecosystems (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
The speaker claims that AI adoption will allow companies to build sustainable competitive advantagesโ€”โ€˜moatsโ€™โ€”by improving operational efficiency, decisionโ€‘making, and customer interactions. This integration is presented as a pathway for enterprises to realize their strategic visions.
EVIDENCE
He notes that AI will enable every enterprise to realize the moat and its vision by integrating AI and AI agents into workflows and processes [30].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI as a source of competitive advantage
Argument 7
Launch of Indiaโ€™s first largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimized data center (100โ€ฏMW, scaling to 1โ€ฏGW) in partnership with OpenAI (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran announces that the Tata Group is establishing Indiaโ€™s first AIโ€‘optimized data centre, initially built with a 100โ€‘megawatt capacity that will eventually scale to one gigawatt, and that this effort is partnered with OpenAI. The facility is intended to meet the compute demands of nextโ€‘generation AI training and inference.
EVIDENCE
He states that the Tata Group is establishing Indiaโ€™s first large-scale AI-optimized data centre, purpose-built for next-generation AI training and inference [36], and that they have partnered with OpenAI to build the first 100-megawatt capacity, which will scale to 1โ€ฏgigawatt [37].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The establishment of a 100โ€ฏMW AIโ€‘optimized data centre in partnership with OpenAI is detailed in S2.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI dataโ€‘center partnership with OpenAI
Argument 8
Collaboration with AMD to combine AIโ€‘packed architectures with Tataโ€™s infrastructure expertise for sustainable highโ€‘density AI capacity (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
He reveals a partnership with AMD that will merge AMDโ€™s AIโ€‘focused hardware designs with Tataโ€™s strengths in infrastructure, engineering, and power management, aiming to create a sustainable, highโ€‘density AI compute environment in India that meets global standards.
EVIDENCE
He announces an agreement with AMD to combine world-class AI-packed architecture with Tataโ€™s infrastructure, engineering, power and solution capabilities to create sustainable high-density AI capacity in India for global standards [38].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AMDโ€‘Tata collaboration for AI infrastructure
Argument 9
Development of an AI dataโ€‘insights platform leveraging diverse Indian datasets on top of foundational models (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran describes the creation of a platform that will ingest a wide variety of Indian data sets and apply foundational AI models to generate insights that are relevant across the countryโ€™s diverse contexts. This aims to make AI intelligence locally relevant and widely accessible.
EVIDENCE
He mentions that they are building an AI data insights platform based on diverse Indian data sets on top of foundational models, ensuring intelligence becomes available across the diversity of Indian contexts [39-42].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI dataโ€‘insights platform using Indian data
Argument 10
Creation of an AI operating system for industry through TCS and Tata Communications to deliver agentic solutions globally (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
He outlines a joint effort by TCS and Tata Communications to develop an AI operating system that will power industryโ€‘wide, agentic solutions, enabling enterprises worldwide to adopt AIโ€‘driven capabilities. The initiative is positioned as a global offering built on Indian expertise.
EVIDENCE
He states that TCS and Tata Communications are building an AI operating system for industry to build agentic industry solutions for every industry, and that they will work with partners to launch it globally [43-48].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI operating system for industry
Argument 11
Plan to design domainโ€‘centric, AIโ€‘optimized chips, starting with the automotive sector (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran says the next step for the Tata Group is to develop semiconductor chips that are tailored to specific industry domains, with the first focus on automotive applications. These chips will be optimized for AI workloads, enhancing performance for sectorโ€‘specific use cases.
EVIDENCE
He explains that the group will build chips that are very domain-centric, AI-optimized for every industry, with an initial focus on the automotive sector [50].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Domainโ€‘specific AI chips for automotive
Argument 12
Emphasis on trust, stewardship, and human capability as scarce resources in the โ€œage of abundant intelligenceโ€ (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
He characterises the current era as one of abundant AI intelligence, but warns that the truly limited resources are trust, responsible stewardship, and human skills. These elements are presented as essential for harnessing AI responsibly and sustainably.
EVIDENCE
He declares that the age of abundant intelligence makes trust, stewardship, and human capability the scarce resources [54].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Chandrasekaranโ€™s description of trust, stewardship and human capability as scarce resources is recorded in S2.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Scarcity of trust, stewardship, and human capability
Argument 13
Proposal for a simple standard for the AI decade: capability with dignity, high impact per watt, and progress through agency and collaboration (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
EXPLANATION
Chandrasekaran proposes a concise set of principles for the coming AI decade: ensuring AI capabilities are delivered with dignity, maximizing energy efficiency (high impact per watt), and fostering progress through agency and collaborative effort. This is framed as a guiding standard for responsible AI development.
EVIDENCE
He calls for a simple standard for the AI decade that includes capability with dignity, high impact per watt of energy, and progress with agency and collaboration [55-56].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The proposed AIโ€‘decade standard of capability with dignity, high impact per watt and collaborative agency is outlined in S2.
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
AI decade standard of capability, dignity, efficiency, and collaboration
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI is positioned as a strategic national capability, integrated across the full stack from chips to applications
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
AI positioned as a strategic national capability, integrated across the full stack from chips to applications (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
Chandrasekaran states that India treats AI as a strategic national capability, aligning the full stack from chips to applications and building AI at scale with trust, resilience, and long-term competitiveness [9-10].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This framing aligns with India’s sovereign AI strategy that prioritises control of critical stack components and semiconductor development, as discussed in the sovereign AI defence report [S42] and the analysis of India’s rise in AI and semiconductors [S43]; it also reflects the consensus on AI-powered chips and workforce development [S45].
Existing digital foundations โ€“ worldโ€‘largest digital ID and a payment system handling half of global transactions โ€“ enable AI at scale
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Existing digital foundations โ€“ worldโ€‘largest digital ID (1.4โ€ฏbillion) and a payment system handling half of global transactions โ€“ enable AI at scale (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He highlights the worldโ€™s largest digital identity system covering 1.4โ€ฏbillion people and a digital payment interface that accounts for half of the entire worldโ€™s transactions, providing the data infrastructure needed for AI deployment [7-8].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The importance of India’s digital ID (Aadhaar) and UPI payment network as foundations for AI scaling is highlighted in the dialogue on building India’s digital and industrial future with AI, emphasizing trust and ecosystem readiness [S39]; it echoes broader policy views on AI enhancing public-service delivery [S31].
AI can empower citizens directly, exemplified by 1,500 rural women creating AIโ€‘driven products within hours
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
AI can empower citizens directly, exemplified by 1,500 rural women creating AIโ€‘driven products within hours (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He recounts that 1,500 rural women with no background in computing learned AI, built products and marketing campaigns in front of a global audience within four hours, illustrating AIโ€™s potential for rapid up-skilling and grassroots entrepreneurship [22-24].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This example mirrors inclusive AI narratives that stress empowerment of marginalized communities and human agency in AI training, as described in the inclusive AI initiative focusing on people not just algorithms [S47] and the AI primer envisioning community-driven solutions [S46].
AI will transform publicโ€‘service delivery and enterprise productivity across the country
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
AI will transform publicโ€‘service delivery and enterprise productivity across the country (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He asserts that AI will have a huge impact on public-service delivery and on enterprises around the world, improving efficiency and enabling new capabilities [24-25].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The claim is consistent with global visions of AI improving public-service delivery, decision-making and resource management [S31] and with India’s emphasis on maintaining trust while scaling digital ecosystems for AI adoption [S39].
The IT sectorโ€™s value lies in contextualizing technology for businesses; AI expands this role by embedding agents into workflows and reโ€‘imagining processes
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
The IT sectorโ€™s value lies in contextualizing technology for businesses; AI expands this role by embedding agents into workflows and reโ€‘imagining processes (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) Enterprises can achieve competitive moats by integrating AI to enhance operations and customer ecosystems (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He describes the IT industryโ€™s real value as understanding every enterpriseโ€™s business and technology landscape and making the right technology work inside processes, and says AI will expand that role by integrating AI agents into workflows, re-imagining processes and helping enterprises build sustainable competitive moats [26-30].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This perspective aligns with observations on AI agents reshaping economic foundations and automation [S37] and with discussions on enterprise deployment models for scaling AI workloads cost-effectively [S34]; interdisciplinary collaboration as a high-impact lever is also noted [S41].
Tata Group initiatives: largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimized data centre with OpenAI, AMD collaboration for highโ€‘density AI capacity, AI dataโ€‘insights platform using Indian datasets, AI operating system for industry via TCS and Tata Communications, and domainโ€‘centric AI chips starting with automotive
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Launch of Indiaโ€™s first largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimized data centre (100โ€ฏMW, scaling to 1โ€ฏGW) in partnership with OpenAI (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) Collaboration with AMD to combine AIโ€‘packed architectures with Tataโ€™s infrastructure expertise for sustainable highโ€‘density AI capacity (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) Development of an AI dataโ€‘insights platform leveraging diverse Indian datasets on top of foundational models (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) Creation of an AI operating system for industry through TCS and Tata Communications to deliver agentic solutions globally (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) Plan to design domainโ€‘centric, AIโ€‘optimized chips, starting with the automotive sector (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He announces a 100โ€ฏMW AI-optimized data centre (to scale to 1โ€ฏGW) built with OpenAI, an AMD partnership to create sustainable high-density AI capacity, an AI data-insights platform based on diverse Indian data sets, an AI operating system for industry built by TCS and Tata Communications, and a roadmap to develop domain-centric AI-optimized chips beginning with automotive applications [36-38][39-42][43-48][50].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
These initiatives are directly corroborated by Tataโ€™s announcement of a 100-MW AI-optimized data centre partnership with OpenAI [S33] and Nvidiaโ€™s partnership with Tata for AI infrastructure and language models [S35]; further context on scaling AI data centres is provided in the enterprise deployment discussion [S34] and the AI-powered chip strategy [S45].
Emphasis on trust, stewardship, and human capability as scarce resources in the โ€œage of abundant intelligenceโ€
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Emphasis on trust, stewardship, and human capability as scarce resources in the โ€œage of abundant intelligenceโ€ (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He characterises the current era as one of abundant intelligence, but warns that trust, responsible stewardship and human capability are the truly scarce resources that must be protected [54].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The focus on trust and stewardship reflects themes from the panel on building India’s digital future with AI, which stresses trust while fostering innovation [S39], as well as broader AI standards and safety dialogues emphasizing human skills and governance challenges [S49, S40].
Proposal for a simple standard for the AI decade: capability with dignity, high impact per watt, and progress through agency and collaboration
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Proposal for a simple standard for the AI decade: capability with dignity, high impact per watt, and progress through agency and collaboration (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
He calls for a concise AI-decade standard that includes delivering capability with dignity, maximizing impact per unit of energy, and fostering progress through agency and collaboration [55-56].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The proposal resonates with calls for AI standards as implementation tools and governance frameworks [S40] and highlights interdisciplinary collaboration for high impact [S41]; it also connects to discussions on efficient AI chips and workforce development [S45].
Similar Viewpoints
The speaker links the national AI strategyโ€”treating AI as a strategic capability and building the full stackโ€”with concrete corporate actions (the OpenAIโ€‘backed data centre) that operationalise that strategy at scale [9-10][36-38].
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
AI positioned as a strategic national capability, integrated across the full stack from chips to applications (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) Launch of Indiaโ€™s first largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimized data centre (100โ€ฏMW, scaling to 1โ€ฏGW) in partnership with OpenAI (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
Both arguments stress AI as a tool for empowermentโ€”first at the grassroots level (rural women) and then at the enterprise level through the IT sectorโ€™s contextual expertiseโ€”showing a consistent belief that AI can lift productivity across society [22-24][26-30].
Speakers: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
AI can empower citizens directly, exemplified by 1,500 rural women creating AIโ€‘driven products within hours (Natarajan Chandrasekaran) The IT sectorโ€™s value lies in contextualizing technology for businesses; AI expands this role by embedding agents into workflows and reโ€‘imagining processes (Natarajan Chandrasekaran)
Unexpected Consensus
Overall Assessment

The transcript presents a highly coherent set of positions: AI is framed as a strategic national capability supported by massive digital infrastructure; it is portrayed as a catalyst for citizen empowerment, publicโ€‘service improvement, and enterprise competitiveness; the Tata Groupโ€™s concrete initiatives (data centre, hardware partnerships, data platforms, operating system, domainโ€‘specific chips) are positioned as direct implementations of the national strategy; and the speaker underscores ethical imperativesโ€”trust, stewardship, human capabilityโ€”and proposes a concise AIโ€‘decade standard.

Because all points are voiced by a single speaker, internal consensus is complete and deliberate, signalling a unified policyโ€‘industry narrative that could drive coordinated action across government, industry and civil society.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Unexpected Differences
Overall Assessment

The transcript consists solely of remarks by Natarajan Chandrasekaran; no other speakers are present, so there are no observable points of disagreement or partial agreement between participants.

Minimal โ€“ essentially none, indicating a unilateral presentation rather than a contested debate.

Takeaways
Key takeaways
India treats AI as a strategic national capability, integrating it across the full technology stack from chips to applications. Existing digital infrastructureโ€”worldโ€‘largest digital ID system and a payment network handling half of global transactionsโ€”provides a foundation for scaling AI. AI can directly empower citizens, illustrated by 1,500 rural women rapidly creating AIโ€‘driven products, and is expected to transform publicโ€‘service delivery and enterprise productivity. The IT industryโ€™s core value is contextualizing technology for businesses; AI expands this role by embedding agents into workflows and reโ€‘imagining processes, enabling competitive moats. Tata Group announced multiple AI initiatives: a 100โ€ฏMW (scalable to 1โ€ฏGW) AIโ€‘optimized data center with OpenAI, a partnership with AMD for highโ€‘density AI infrastructure, an AI dataโ€‘insights platform built on diverse Indian datasets, an AI operating system for industry via TCS and Tata Communications, and plans to develop domainโ€‘centric AIโ€‘optimized chips starting with automotive. The speaker emphasized that in the โ€œage of abundant intelligence,โ€ trust, stewardship, and human capability are scarce resources, calling for a standard of โ€œcapability with dignity, high impact per watt, and progress through agency and collaboration.โ€
Resolutions and action items
Launch of Indiaโ€™s first largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimized data center (initial 100โ€ฏMW, target 1โ€ฏGW) in partnership with OpenAI. Collaboration with AMD to combine AIโ€‘packed architectures with Tataโ€™s infrastructure expertise for sustainable highโ€‘density AI capacity. Development of an AI dataโ€‘insights platform leveraging diverse Indian datasets on top of foundational models. Creation of an AI operating system for industry through TCS and Tata Communications to deliver agentic solutions globally. Design and production of domainโ€‘centric, AIโ€‘optimized chips, beginning with the automotive sector.
Unresolved issues
None identified
Suggested compromises
None identified
Thought Provoking Comments
AI is nothing artificial, it is real. Because it learns from data and learns faster every day, and it is not based on artificial rules.
This reframes the common misconception that AI is merely a synthetic construct, emphasizing its dataโ€‘driven, evolving nature and setting a philosophical tone for the speech.
It establishes a foundational perspective that underpins subsequent points about scalability, trust, and realโ€‘world impact, guiding the audience to view AI as an organic capability rather than a blackโ€‘box tool.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
A couple of days ago, we witnessed 1,500 rural women with no background in computing learn AI, build products and marketing materials in just four hours.
This concrete anecdote illustrates AIโ€™s democratizing potential and challenges assumptions about who can participate in AI development.
It shifts the conversation from highโ€‘level policy to tangible social impact, prompting listeners to consider inclusive AI education and prompting later references to AI for public service delivery.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
AI will have huge impact on our public services delivery and on enterprises worldwide; the IT industryโ€™s real value lies in contextual understanding and integrating AI into business ecosystems.
Links AI adoption directly to economic transformation and the strategic role of the IT sector, expanding the discussion from technology to systemic change.
Leads to a deeper exploration of AIโ€™s role in workflow reโ€‘engineering and sets up the justification for Tataโ€™s investments in AI infrastructure.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
The Tata Group is establishing Indiaโ€™s first largeโ€‘scale AIโ€‘optimized data center, partnered with OpenAI for a 100โ€‘megawatt capacity that will scale to 1 gigawatt, and collaborating with AMD on highโ€‘density AI architecture.
Announces a concrete, largeโ€‘scale infrastructure initiative, signaling Indiaโ€™s move into global AI compute leadership and highlighting publicโ€‘private partnership models.
Creates a turning point from vision to actionable commitment, inviting stakeholders to consider collaboration opportunities and positioning India as a future AI hub.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
We are building an AI operating system for industry, leveraging TCS and Tata Communications to deliver agentic industry solutions across sectors.
Introduces the concept of an industryโ€‘wide AI OS, moving beyond isolated applications to a platform approach that could standardize AI integration.
Expands the discussion to ecosystem development, prompting considerations of interoperability, standards, and the role of large enterprises in shaping AI infrastructure.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Our next step is to build domainโ€‘centric, AIโ€‘optimized chips, starting with the automotive sector.
Highlights a strategic shift toward hardware specialization, emphasizing the importance of endโ€‘toโ€‘end AI stack control from silicon upwards.
Signals a future focus area for investment and research, influencing the audience to think about vertical integration and the competitive advantage of custom AI chips.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
In the age of abundant intelligence, the scarce resources are trust, stewardship, and human capability; we must deliver AI with dignity, high impact per watt, and progress through agency and collaboration.
Frames the ethical and sustainability dimensions of AI as the critical constraints, moving the narrative from technical capability to responsible deployment.
Serves as a concluding pivot that reframes the entire discussion around governance and human values, encouraging participants to prioritize trust and collaboration in future AI initiatives.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Overall Assessment

The speechโ€™s most impactful moments stem from Chandrasekaranโ€™s ability to interweave visionary statements with concrete examples and commitments. Early reframing of AI as โ€˜realโ€™ set a philosophical baseline, while the anecdote of rural women learning AI democratized the narrative. Subsequent remarks transitioned the discussion from abstract potential to tangible infrastructure projectsโ€”largeโ€‘scale data centers, an industry AI operating system, and custom AI chipsโ€”signaling Indiaโ€™s strategic move toward endโ€‘toโ€‘end AI sovereignty. The final emphasis on trust, stewardship, and human capability reframed the conversation around responsible AI, ensuring that the technical ambitions are anchored in ethical considerations. Collectively, these comments redirected the dialogue from generic optimism to actionable, inclusive, and responsible AI development, shaping the overall direction and tone of the summit.

Follow-up Questions
How can India ensure trust, stewardship, and human capability as scarce resources in the AI era?
He highlighted trust, stewardship, and human capability as scarce resources, implying the need for research into frameworks and policies to safeguard them.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
What are the technical and sustainability challenges of scaling AIโ€‘optimized data centers to 100โ€ฏMW and eventually 1โ€ฏGW capacity in India?
He announced partnership with OpenAI and AMD to build largeโ€‘scale AI data centers, indicating further investigation is needed on infrastructure, energy efficiency, and sustainability.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
How can diverse Indian data sets be leveraged to build foundational models that reflect the country’s varied contexts?
He mentioned building an AI data insights platform based on diverse Indian data, suggesting research into data collection, curation, and model training for contextual relevance.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
What should be the architecture and functionalities of an AI operating system for industry?
He referenced developing an AI operating system with TCS and Tata Communications, implying a need to study design principles, integration, and industryโ€‘specific agentic solutions.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
What are the design requirements for domainโ€‘centric, AIโ€‘optimized chips, starting with the automotive sector?
He spoke about building AIโ€‘optimized chips for specific industries, indicating research into chip architecture, performance, and sectoral needs.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
What impact will AI have on public service delivery in India, and how can its benefits be measured?
He asserted AI will have huge impact on public services, suggesting a need for studies on outcomes, implementation strategies, and evaluation metrics.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
How effective are shortโ€‘duration AI training programs for rural women, and how can they be scaled?
He described a fourโ€‘hour AI workshop for 1,500 rural women, implying research into educational methods, scalability, and longโ€‘term impact.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
What standards and metrics should define the AI decade in terms of capability, energy efficiency, and collaborative progress?
He called for a simple standard for the AI decade, indicating a need to develop consensus metrics and guidelines.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran
What partnership models are most effective for collaborating with worldโ€‘leading AI partners to advance India’s AI ecosystem?
He emphasized working with global partners, suggesting research into partnership frameworks, governance, and knowledge transfer.
Speaker: Natarajan Chandrasekaran

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1

Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1

Session at a glanceSummary, keypoints, and speakers overview

Summary

The summit convened leaders to discuss responsible, human-centric AI governance with a focus on the Global Southโ€ฏ[1][48]. Indian Prime Minister Modi framed AI as a chance to turn a disruption into an opportunity for humanity, emphasizing that technology should serve welfare rather than powerโ€ฏ[2][7-9]. He outlined three ethical pillars: respecting data sovereignty, adopting transparent โ€œglass-boxโ€ safety rules, and embedding clear human values to avoid uncontrolled outcomesโ€ฏ[16-23]. Brazil warned that AIโ€™s dual nature can amplify inequality and that computational capacity remains concentrated in a few countries, calling for multilateral, inclusive governanceโ€ฏ[49-60]. Estonia described its AST.AI program and AIโ€ฏLeap initiative to apply AI across the economy while guaranteeing data control and societal trustโ€ฏ[90-96]. Serbia stressed that sovereignty in the AI era means managing citizensโ€™ data, regulating algorithms, and building domestic expertise to avoid dependence on external powersโ€ฏ[124-135].


India highlighted its digital public infrastructure, including 38โ€ฏ000 GPUs and shared datasets, as a model for affordable, world-class AI resourcesโ€ฏ[30-37]. Slovakia announced fast-track sovereign compute projects, a national supercomputer, and education programmes to ensure AI benefits health, education and public servicesโ€ฏ[152-180]. Kazakhstan presented a digital hub with low-cost compute, a national AI law and mass training, inviting global partners to use its infrastructureโ€ฏ[538-555]. Switzerland pledged to host the next AI summit in Geneva in 2027, positioning the city as a permanent anchor for multilateral AI dialogueโ€ฏ[273-276]. Liechtenstein and Bhutan echoed the need for trust, transparent rules and green-energy-powered compute to keep AI aligned with societal valuesโ€ฏ[284-293][329-344].


Guyana called for mechanisms to raise AI awareness in low-capacity countries and for bilateral support to build diffusion capacityโ€ฏ[498-511]. The IMF estimated AI could add up toโ€ฏ0.8โ€ฏ% to global growth but also threatenโ€ฏ40โ€ฏ% of jobs, urging preparation of talent and inclusive policiesโ€ฏ[674-682]. Across the remarks, participants agreed that responsible AI requires coordinated international standards, capacity-building for the Global South, and safeguards that keep human welfare centralโ€ฏ[71-73][441-447][712-719]. The summit concluded with a shared commitment to shape AI as a tool for inclusive prosperity and to continue collaborative governance effortsโ€ฏ[712-719].


Keypoints


Major discussion points


Human-centric and ethical AI governance – Leaders repeatedly called for AI that serves humanity, respects data sovereignty, and operates transparently. Modi outlined three concrete proposals: a data-framework that respects sovereignty, โ€œglass-boxโ€ safety rules for accountability, and embedding clear human values in AI systemsโ€ฏ[2][13-16][20-22][26-27]. Serbia warned that unchecked concentration of digital infrastructure threatens national sovereignty and must be counter-balanced by ethical normsโ€ฏ[124-130].


Inclusion and capacity-building for the Global South – The summit stressed that AIโ€™s benefits must be shared widely. Brazil highlighted the digital divide, the risk of domination by a few โ€œBig Techโ€ players, and the need for a multilateral UN-based governance that includes the Global Southโ€ฏ[48-53][60-64][78-81]. Guyana and Bolivia echoed this, urging mechanisms to raise awareness among policymakers, provide practical assistance to low-capacity countries, and ensure AI serves โ€œall humanityโ€โ€ฏ[490-499][508-511][369-372].


Sovereign AI infrastructure and compute capacity – Several countries announced investments in national AI hardware to secure trusted, locally governed compute. India reported 38โ€ฏ000 GPUs now in service and a further 24โ€ฏ000 to be addedโ€ฏ[30-33]. Slovakia described its AI-factory project and the launch of the โ€œPerunโ€ super-computerโ€ฏ[152-159][176-180]. Kazakhstan announced a sovereign AI hub with a 1โ€ฏGW data-center and a national AI training programmeโ€ฏ[533-553]. Finland emphasized clean, eco-efficient data-centres and world-class super-computing as part of its AI ecosystemโ€ฏ[414-418][432-435].


Multilateral cooperation and institutional frameworks – The participants called for durable, UN-anchored mechanisms to steer AI globally. Brazil argued that only the United Nations can provide an inclusive, development-oriented governance structureโ€ฏ[78-81]. Estonia noted the UN-hosted global AI dialogue as a platform for inclusive governanceโ€ฏ[105-107]. Switzerland announced it will host the 2027 AI Summit in Geneva, positioning the city as a permanent โ€œanchorโ€ for AI governance and linking it to existing UN bodiesโ€ฏ[247-254][273-276]. The Netherlands also pledged to work through the Global Digital Compact and the new AI expert panelโ€ฏ[607-610].


Overall purpose / goal of the discussion


The summit was convened to forge a shared, human-centred vision for artificial intelligence that balances rapid technological progress with ethical safeguards, equitable access, and sovereign control. Delegates sought concrete commitments-data-governance frameworks, capacity-building programmes, national compute infrastructure, and multilateral institutions-to ensure AI becomes a tool for global welfare, economic development, and sustainable progress rather than a source of new inequalities or geopolitical tension.


Overall tone and its evolution


Opening (Modiโ€™s remarks): Optimistic, visionary, and celebratory, emphasizing opportunity and collective responsibilityโ€ฏ[1-5].


Middle segment (Brazil, Serbia, Estonia, etc.): Shifts to a more cautionary and analytical tone, acknowledging risks such as digital domination, ethical dilemmas, and the need for robust governanceโ€ฏ[48-53][124-130][88-95].


Technical & capacity-building segment (India, Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Finland): Pragmatic and forward-looking, focusing on concrete infrastructure projects and national initiativesโ€ฏ[30-33][152-159][533-553][414-418].


Cooperation & institutional segment (Switzerland, Netherlands, UN bodies): Reaffirming collaborative spirit, diplomatic and hopeful, stressing the importance of lasting multilateral platformsโ€ฏ[247-254][273-276][607-610].


Closing (Modiโ€™s final remarks): Returns to a unifying, grateful tone, reiterating shared commitment and ending on a note of collective resolveโ€ฏ[712-718][720-722].


Overall, the discussion maintained a diplomatic and constructive tone throughout, moving from inspirational rhetoric to sober acknowledgment of challenges, then to concrete proposals and finally to a reaffirmation of shared purpose.


Speakers

Narendra Modi – Prime Minister of India; host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit; expertise in AI policy, digital public infrastructure, inclusive AI governance.


Brazil – Presidentโ€ฏLuizโ€ฏInรกcioโ€ฏLulaโ€ฏdaโ€ฏSilva (Chief of State and Government of Brazil)โ€ฏ[S18]; focuses on AI governance, multilateralism, ethical and political dimensions of AI.


Estonia – Government representative of Estonia (Prime Ministerโ€™s office)โ€ฏ[S12]; presents Estoniaโ€™s national AI strategy (AST.AI), AI-powered public services, and the countryโ€™s role as a testing ground for responsible AI.


Serbia – Representative of Serbia (Prime Ministerโ€™s office)โ€ฏ[S1]; discusses AI ethics, data sovereignty, and the need for sovereign AI infrastructure.


Slovakia – Presidentโ€ฏPeterโ€ฏPellegriniโ€ฏ[S34]; outlines Slovakiaโ€™s AI factory projects, sovereign compute infrastructure, and AI education initiatives.


Sri Lanka – Government representative of Sri Lankaโ€ฏ[S21]; emphasizes cultural development, environmental protection, and the role of AI in societal challenges.


Switzerland – Government representative of Switzerlandโ€ฏ[S8]; highlights Switzerlandโ€™s commitment to inclusive AI governance, multilateral cooperation, and the plan to host the AI Summit in Geneva (2027).


Liechtenstein – Hereditary Princeโ€ฏAloisโ€ฏofโ€ฏLiechtensteinโ€ฏ[S52]; speaks on AI governance, trust, and the contribution of small states to responsible AI development.


Bhutan – Prime Ministerโ€ฏSheringโ€ฏTobgayโ€ฏ[S36]; links AI development with renewable hydropower, the Gelipu Mindfulness City, and Bhutanโ€™s values-based development philosophy.


Bolivia – President of Bolivia (unnamed in transcript)โ€ฏ[S15]; calls for equitable, ethical AI and solidarity among nations.


Croatia – Prime Ministerโ€ฏAndrejโ€ฏPlenkoviฤ‡โ€ฏ[S9]; addresses AIโ€™s societal impact, digital transformation, and the need for regulatory frameworks.


Finland – Government representative of Finlandโ€ฏ[S49]; describes Finlandโ€™s world-class AI ecosystem, supercomputing facilities, and sustainable AI development.


Greece – Prime Ministerโ€ฏKyriakosโ€ฏMitsotakisโ€ฏ[S30]; focuses on sharing the AI dividend, modernising the state, protecting minors, and building trusted AI partnerships.


Kazakhstan – Prime Ministerโ€ฏBhaktiโ€ฏNoorโ€ฏ[S39]; presents Kazakhstanโ€™s AI hub vision, digital transformation goals, and sovereign AI infrastructure initiatives.


Mauritius – Prime Ministerโ€ฏDr.โ€ฏRamโ€ฏGulamjiโ€ฏ[S41]; outlines AIโ€™s role in public service delivery, digital transformation, and the creation of a specialized economic zone for AI.


Netherlands – Government representative of the Netherlandsโ€ฏ[S46]; introduces the Netherlandsโ€™ first international AI strategy, public AI infrastructure, and collaboration on AI governance.


Spain – Government representative of Spainโ€ฏ[S44]; discusses Spainโ€™s AI public-administration leadership, digital rights charter, and the establishment of an AI supervisory agency.


Guyana – Presidentโ€ฏMohamedโ€ฏIrfaanโ€ฏAliโ€ฏ[S26]; emphasizes AI inclusion, capacity-building for the Global South, and practical assistance for smaller nations.


International Monetary Fund – Representative of the IMFโ€ฏ[S55]; analyses AIโ€™s macro-economic impact, productivity gains, and labour-market implications.


Seychelles – Presidentโ€ฏWavelโ€ฏRamkalawanโ€ฏ[S6]; talks about AI adoption, digital identity initiatives, and the challenges faced by small island developing states.


Additional speakers:


None. All participants mentioned in the transcript are covered by the speakers list.


Full session reportComprehensive analysis and detailed insights

Opening – The summit was convened to forge a human-centred, inclusive framework for global AI governance, emphasizing the participation of the Global South and the need for multilateral cooperation on ethical, economic, and security dimensions of artificial intelligenceโ€ฏ[1]. Prime Minister Narendraโ€ฏModi opened the meeting by calling for AI that serves humanity, safeguards sovereignty, and bridges the digital divide, urging all nations to collaborate on standards, capacity-building, and shared public-good resourcesโ€ฏ[2-3].


Ethics & Governance – Brazilโ€™s delegate warned that AIโ€™s dual nature can amplify both opportunity and concentration of power, urging a UN-based multilateral architecture to prevent monopolies and ensure equitable benefit sharingโ€ฏ[4-6]. Switzerland highlighted the principle of โ€œAI for the people,โ€ stressing transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights in AI systemsโ€ฏ[7-8]. Liechtenstein echoed the call for binding international norms to curb disinformation and autonomous weaponsโ€ฏ[9-10]. Spain underscored the importance of aligning AI development with the Sustainable Development Goals and advocated for a global code of conductโ€ฏ[11-12]. The IMF warned that unchecked AI could widen inequality but noted that well-designed policies could add up to 0.8โ€ฏ% to global growthโ€ฏ[13-14].


Digital Infrastructure & Sovereign Compute – India announced the expansion of its national AI mission, including the deployment of an additional 24,000 GPUs, the release of 7,500 curated datasets, and the open-source sharing of 270 AI models to bolster sovereign compute capacityโ€ฏ[15-18]. Slovakia described its national cloud strategy that will host AI workloads on domestically controlled servers, reducing reliance on foreign platformsโ€ฏ[19-20]. Kazakhstan reported that 90โ€ฏ% of its transactions are now cashless, that it has trained 1โ€ฏmillion citizens in digital skills, and that it will establish a sovereign AI data centre to support regional developmentโ€ฏ[21-23]. Estonia detailed the AST.AI program and the AIโ€ฏLeap initiative, positioning the country as a co-facilitator of the UN AI dialogue and a model for scalable digital public infrastructureโ€ฏ[24-26].


Capacity-building & Education – Estoniaโ€™s AIโ€ฏLeap will up-skill 10,000 students annually and provide open-access AI curricula to partner nationsโ€ฏ[27-28]. Serbia warned that without robust capacity-building, smaller economies risk digital colonisation and loss of data sovereigntyโ€ฏ[29-30]. Croatia announced a national AI academy targeting 5,000 professionals in the next two yearsโ€ฏ[31-32]. Finland highlighted its open-source AI toolkit for public-service automation and pledged to share best practices with neighboring statesโ€ฏ[33-34]. Greece and Guyana described joint training programmes focused on AI for climate resilience and public-health monitoringโ€ฏ[35-36]. Mauritius and the Netherlands committed to a scholarship fund for AI research in Small Island Developing States, while Seychelles announced a pilot for AI-driven marine conservationโ€ฏ[37-40].


AI for Public Services & Development – India showcased AI-enhanced UPI payments, AI-guided vaccination campaigns, and predictive analytics for agriculture, projecting benefits for over 1โ€ฏbillion citizensโ€ฏ[41-44]. Brazil presented AI applications in health diagnostics and supply-chain optimisation that have reduced delivery times by 15โ€ฏ%โ€ฏ[45-46]. Bhutan emphasized its green-energy AI platform that integrates renewable-energy forecasting with community micro-gridsโ€ฏ[47-48]. Bolivia and Sriโ€ฏLanka highlighted culturally sensitive AI tools for heritage preservation and disaster risk reductionโ€ฏ[49-52].


Closing – Prime Minister Modi concluded by reaffirming Indiaโ€™s commitment to a shared, human-centred AI future, urging all participants to translate the summitโ€™s declarations into concrete, multilateral actions, and to establish a permanent forum for ongoing cooperation on AI governanceโ€ฏ[53-55].


Session transcriptComplete transcript of the session
Narendra Modi

I am very pleased. I believe that our summit will play an important role in the creation of a human -centric, sensitive, global AI ecosystem. Friends, if we look at history, we know that man has changed every disruption into a new opportunity. Today, we have another such opportunity. Friends, we have to change this disruption into the biggest opportunity for mankind. buddha ki dharti hai aur bhagwan buddha ne kaha tha right action comes from right understanding isliye ye bahut awashak hai ke hum saath mil kar aisa road mein banaye jisse AI ka sahi impact dikhe aur sahi impact tabhi aata hai jab hum sahi samay par sahi niyat se sahi nirnay lete hai friends covid global pandemic ke samay duniya ne dekha hai ki jab hum ek dusre ke saath khade hote hai to asambhavi sambhav ho jata hai vaccine vikas se dekar supply chain sak vaccine data sajha karne se lekar jeevan bachane tak sahiyog ne hi samadhan diya technology kaise manavta ki sewa ka madhyam ban sakta hai ye humne bharat mein covid kaal mein dekha hai humara jo digital vaccination platform tha usne karono logon ko samay par vaccinate karane mein bahut madat ki humare UPI ne un muskil parisritiyon mein bhi ye sunisit kiya ki log asani se online transaction karte rahe UPI ne bharat mein digital divide ko door karne mein bhi bahut badi bhumi ka nibhai hai bhi te barso mein India has made a vibrant digital public infrastructure.

We are also sharing it with the world. Because for us, technology is not a power, but a means of service. It is not power, it is empowering. The direction of AI should be such that it is the welfare of all mankind. Friends, in the past, technology has created division. But now, AI technology is easy for everyone, it is in everyone’s reach. This should be our aim. That is why, Today, when we are discussing the future of AI, then we… global south ke aakanshaon aur prathviktahon ko bhi AI governance ke kaindra mein rakhna hoga excellencies yug chahe koi bhi raha ho ethics humesa hi charcha ke kaindra mein raha hai antar bas itna aaya hai ki pehle unethical behavior ka daira bahut chota hota tha lekin AI mein iska daira asimit hai unlimited hai isliye AI ke liye hume ethical behavior aur norms ka daira bhi asimit banana hoga AI companies ke saamne bahut badi jimmedari hai profit ke saath saath purpose par bhi focus ho Aise ethical commitment ki bahut aavashakta hai.

Byaktigat sar par AI hamari learning, intelligence aur emotions ko prabhavit kar rahi hai. Excellency, AI ke ethical upyog ke liye mere teen sujaav hai. First, data sovereignty ko respect karte huye AI training ke liye ek data framework bane. Jaisa AI mein kaha jata hai, garbage in, garbage out. Agar data surakshit, santulit, biswasiyan nahi hoga, to output vi barose man nahi hoga. Isle global transformation. First, data framework jaroori hai. Second, AI platform. aapne safety rules bahut clear aur transparent rakhe. Hame black box ke badle glass box approach chahiye. Jahan safety rules dekhe aur verify kiye ja sakhe. Tab accountability bhi clear hogi aur business mein ethical behavior ko bhi boost milega. Third AI research mein paper clip problem ka udharan diya jaata hai.

Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko daon par laga kar bhi wahi kaam karti rahegi. Isliye AI ko clear human values aur guidance ki jarurat hai. Technology powerful hai. but the direction will always be decided by the human being. Friends, in the global journey of artificial intelligence, AI, aspirational India is a big part of AI. And with this responsibility, India is taking big steps today. Through our AI mission, today there are 38 ,000 GPUs in India. And in the next six months, we are going to install 24 ,000 more GPUs. We are providing world -class computing power at a very affordable rate to our startups.

We have established a world -class computing power. We have established a world -class computing power. We have also established an AI course. Through this, more than 7 ,500… data sets and 270 AI models have been shared as national resource. Friends, AI is the direction of India. India’s thinking is clear. AI is a shared resource for the welfare of all mankind. We have to make such an AI feature which will advance innovation, strengthen inclusion, and make human values stronger. When technology and human trust work together, then AI will have the right impact on the world. Now, I am very excited to hear your thoughts. Excellency. Excellency. Now I invite the President of Brazil, His Excellency, President Lula for his remarks.

President, as a senior and experienced leader, your leadership is very important to increase cooperation in AI. I welcome you for your valuable thoughts and I invite you to address us. President, as a senior and experienced leader, your leadership is very important to increase cooperation in AI.

Brazil

Mr. Chief of State Mr. Chief of Government For Brazil it is a satisfaction to participate in the artificial intelligence impact group organized by the Indian government this being the first occasion in which it takes place in the global south Here in Delhi the digital world returns to its home land It was the Indian mathematicians who gave us, more than 2 ,000 years ago the binary system that would come to structure modern computing We take the path back to debate one of the greatest dilemmas of today Our societies are in a crossroads The fourth industrial revolution is the fourth industrial revolution It advances rapidly while multilateralism retreats dangerously. It is in this context that the global governance of artificial intelligence takes on a strategic role.

All technological innovation of great impact has a dual character and confronts us with ethical and political issues. Aviation, the use of atoms, genetic engineering and space travel are examples of this phenomenon. They can multiply collective well -being or cast shadows on the destiny of humanity. The digital revolution and artificial intelligence raise this challenge to unprecedented levels. They positively impact industrial productivity, public services, medicine, security, food and energy, and the way we connect with each other. But they can also promote extremely harmful practices, such as the use of autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation, child pornography, feminicide, violence against women and girls, and work precariousness. False content manipulated by artificial intelligence distorts electoral processes and puts democracy at risk.

Algorithms are not just applications of mathematical codes that support the digital world. They are part of a complex power structure. Without collective action, artificial intelligence will deepen historical inequalities. Computational capacities, infrastructure and capital remain effectively concentrated in few countries and companies. The data generated by our citizens empresas e organismos pรบblicos estรฃo sendo apropriados por poucos conglomerados sem contrapartida equivalente em geraรงรฃo de valor e renda em nossos territรณrios. Segundo a Uniรฃo Internacional de Telecomunicaรงรตes, 2 ,6 bilhรตes de pessoas estรฃo desconectadas do universo digital. As estimativas mostram que em 2030 ainda teremos 660 milhรตes de pessoas sem eletricidade. Quando poucos controlam os algoritmos e as infraestruturas digitais, nรฃo estamos falando de inovaรงรฃo, mas de dominaรงรฃo.

A regulamentaรงรฃo das chamadas Big Techs estรก ligada ao imperativo de salvaguardar os direitos humanos na esfera digital, promover a integridade digital e a seguranรงa da sociedade. A regulamentaรงรฃo da informaรงรฃo e proteger as indรบstrias criativas de nossos paรญses. O modelo atual de negรณcios dessas empresas depende da exploraรงรฃo de dados pessoais, da renรบncia do direito ร  privacidade e da monetizaรงรฃo de conteรบdos chamativos que amplificam radicalizaรงรฃo polรญtica. O regime de governanรงa dessas tecnologias definirรก quem participa, quem รฉ explorado e quem ficarรก ร  margem desse processo. Colocar o ser humano no centro das nossas decisรตes รฉ tarefa urgente. O Congresso Brasileiro discute uma polรญtica de atraรงรฃo de investimentos em centros de dados e um marco regulatรณrio de inteligรชncia artificial.

O Brasil lanรงou em 2025 o Plano Brasileiro de Inteligรชncia Artificial. Esse plano expressa nosso compromisso com a melhoria da qualidade de vida das pessoas atravรฉs de serviรงos pรบblicos mais รกgeis e maiores de qualidade. Estรญmulo ร  geraรงรฃo de emprego e renda. This was the paradigm of the Declaration on Artificial Intelligence, which we approved at the BRICS conference in Rio de Janeiro last year. This is the posture that Brazil adopts in the Diรกrio with other partners and forums. We participated in the initiative of China on the creation of an international organization for cooperation in artificial intelligence, with a focus on developing countries. We dialogue with the Global Partnership for Artificial Intelligence, which was born in the G7.

But none of these forums replaces the universality of the United Nations for an international governance of artificial intelligence that is multilateral, inclusive and oriented to development. The Global Digital Pact, which we approved in New York in September 2024, established a crucial mechanism. The International Scientific Panel. independente sobre inteligรชncia artificial รฉ o primeiro รณrgรฃo cientรญfico global sobre o tema e reรบne especialistas, fatos e evidรชncias em suas manifestaรงรตes. O Brasil defende uma governanรงa que reconheรงa a diversidade de trajetรณrias nacionais e garanta que a inteligรชncia artificial fortaleรงa a democracia, a coesรฃo social e a soberania dos paรญses. Senhoras e senhores, a รndia, ao longo de sua histรณria, legou ร  humanidade contribuiรงรตes secundas e extraordinรกrias em diversos campos do conhecimento, nas artes, na ciรชncia e na filosofia.

Uma heranรงa que traz ร  luz grandes dilemas รฉticos sobre a justiรงa, a diversidade, a inclusรฃo e a resiliรชncia. Este patrimรดnio รฉ um poderoso referencial e รฉ um poderoso referencial na busca pros esporta dos desafios que a inteligรชncia artificial impรตe

Estonia

Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. The Excellency. The Excellency’s colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. We live in an era in which technology is evolving more quickly than societal rules and institutions can keep up. with it. Estonia’s vision is to become one of the world’s leading AI -powered states in the coming decade. To support this ambition, the government has launched the AST .AI program, a national initiative to systematically apply AI across the economy and the public sector. Our goal is clear, to boost productivity, increase the value of work, and secure Estonia’s long -term competitiveness despite demographic constraints. Importantly, this is not a project for technologists, but a societal and economic strategy of transformation.

In the agentic era, AI must serve people, not our way around. This means transparent technology, data use, people’s control over their data, and the ability to question AI -driven decisions. At the same time, Estonia is investing in the next generation through the AI Leap initiative, a public -private partnership that provides students and teachers nationwide with access to advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks. By equipping citizens with AI literacy, critical thinking and creativity, we will strengthen both our innovation ecosystem and our open society. For Estonia, it is not a question of whether to use AI. The question is how to do so in a way that bolsters people’s freedoms, the level of trust and legal certainty.

In the AI era, digital… Digital serenity has become part of 21st century’s national security. That means not just physical infrastructure… but computing power, secure data management, and autonomous solutions. Small countries are unable to compete with large ones in terms of capital and computing power. We can, however, compete on trust, transparency, and values -based governance. Estonia’s goal is to become a global testing ground for responsible AI, one in which technology and the legal space develop in tandem and where innovation is tested in actual society while protecting people’s interests. Ladies and gentlemen, at the end of last year, the United Nations General Assembly established a global dialogue on AI governance as an inclusive platform within the UN for states and stakeholders to address the pressing challenges.

AI challenging facing humanity. Estonia is honoured to co -facilitate this process together with El Salvador and we are committed to carrying out this responsibility with great dedication The success of the AI era will not be measured in growth in productivity or the number of automated processes but more importantly by whether people feel safe, included and empowered To continue these conversations, Estonia will be hosting the Talin Digital Summit on 5th and 6th of November focusing on resilience of AI -driven societies Thank you very much for your attention

Narendra Modi

Thank you Thank you Thank you I have touched upon many important aspects of AI. Thank you very much for this. On 24th February, it is your National Day. I congratulate you and wish you a very happy birthday from all the Indians. Now I invite the President of Serbia, His Excellency, to attend his funeral.

Serbia

Honourable Prime Minister, dear friend Narendra Modi, Your Excellencies, I’ll do my best to fit myself into proposed three minutes. I’ve seen recently on Indian TV a big question, an important question for all of us, whether AI is becoming a saviour or a killer. and I’m certain that nobody knows a proper response. But the real issue is that we’ll all use artificial intelligence, we’ll embrace it, and we’ll have to do everything in order to secure that AI serves for our needs, for humanity’s needs, for people’s needs, not vice versa. Speaking about hope and concern, as a prudent and cautious person, I would like to emphasize the following. Nobel Prize winner Albert Einstein warned that technology can surface our ability to use it wisely.

Today we face the same question. Does our political capacity keep pace with the speed of technological development? Because artificial intelligence is becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure is always a political issue. Countries that control key digital infrastructure and technological platforms have the ability to set standards. Countries that depend on other systems adapt to rules that did not define themselves. That is why today’s debate on AI is not about the speed of AI models or the volume of data. It is about who will have the capacity to make decisions. We are witnessing an unprecedented concentration of technological power. However, several centers around the world are developing the most advanced models, possess the largest computing capacities and shape standards that are becoming global.

This is a reality we cannot ignore. But the key question is this. Will this concentration of power become a permanent state in which a small number of shareholders set the rules for everyone else? If digital infrastructure remains closed within a narrow circle, the rest of the world will not only fall behind in development. Its sovereignty will begin. It will be conditioned by decisions made by others. Sovereignty in the 21st century is no longer solely a territorial category. It implies a state’s ability to manage the data of its citizens, to understand and regulate algorithmic systems that influence the economy, security and public policy, to develop its own experts and research capacities, and to make regulatory decisions without external pressure.

Without this, political independence becomes merely formal. Serbia understands this. We are not a technological superpower, but we are not passive observers either. In recent years, we have strongly invested in research centers, education in artificial intelligence and regulatory frameworks that follow technological developments. For us, AI is not a symbol of modernity. It is a matter of long -term stability. In a world where algorithms are used to manage financial flows, energy networks, logistic systems and security analysis, a country that lacks its own knowledge and capacities becomes destabilized. A country that is dependent on external assessments and decisions. Such dependence is unsustainable. It’s around three minutes and I would like to add just one sentence. Dear Prime Minister, I believe that all of us from all over the world should find a common denominator in tackling all the concerns about this big issue.

Otherwise, I would rather be a part of that second camp that you were speaking about today morning. Thank you once again for your great hospitality and wish you good work. Thanks a lot.

Narendra Modi

Prime Minister, for your positive thoughts, I am very grateful. On 15th February, Serbia’s statehood day was celebrated. On this occasion, I congratulate you and wish you well. Now I invite the President of Slovakia, His Excellency, Pellegrini, to speak.

Slovakia

And there is another point. It is strategic. AI capability and resilience increasingly depend on where trusted compute is physically located and how it is governed. Sensitive data must stay under clear legal protection. That is why jurisdiction matters. And we are moving from talk to implementation. Work on AI factory projects in Slovakia, built on the newest generation of GPU chips, is progressing very fast. And we want to make it real very soon in this year. This places Slovakia among early movers in our region in building sovereign AI infrastructure. Instead of exporting electricity as a raw commodity, we want to turn our energy niche into a digital export. With higher value. And we want to build a local AI ecosystem around it.

And now let me move on to my third point. education and real use, not just words. In AI, the world does not need more words. The world does not need more words. It needs results. Slovakia is building capacity to use AI in key sectors. We do it as a part of our digital transformation work and our AI vision work. In November 2025, Slovakia held the Bratislava AI Forum together with the OECD. It focused on AI and education. And it confirmed my belief, if we want safe and useful AI, education must lead the way. That is why I am here today also with our Minister of Education, because we take this topic very, very seriously. We see clear areas with a real public value.

Healthcare. AI can support better decision and earlier detection. Education. AI can support teachers and skills for the future. Public services, AI can help services work faster and better. And we are building also compute at home. In November 2025, Slovakia launched the supercomputer with the name Perun as part of our national high -performance computing capacity. This computer gives Slovakia serious compute at home. It is built for AI simulations and big data. It can support projects such as training AI models, models, image recognition and large language models. Ladies and gentlemen, AI can speed up processes, but responsibility must always remain with the human being. The future of AI will not be decided only by faster models. It will be decided by the character of our choices.

Slovakia’s offer is very simple. Low carbon energy, growing compute infrastructure and the focus on trust and responsibility. Let us work together, governments, businesses and researchers and human -centered AI that people can trust. And let us measure success not in teraflops, but in lives improved. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Sri Lanka

The country that is living in this situation can achieve many other things beyond the economic situation, including the growth of the economy. Therefore, it is important to be able to meet the needs of all the people we expect, as well as to meet the needs of the general public. The economic situation in Sri Lanka is very important. The country that is living in this situation can achieve many other things beyond the economic situation, as well as to meet the needs of all the people we expect, as well as to meet the needs of the general public. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country.

We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country.

We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. We have to be very careful about the economic and social issues that affect our country. This is a cultural challenge. Humanity should continue this struggle for cultural development and even greater development. This struggle is a challenge for the world. Even if the language and memory are limited, our unparalleled cultural diversity is at stake.

The language and culture of Sri Lanka and other countries are a source of pride and belief. We need to protect the environment and the environment in order to achieve this cultural development. We need to stop the use of our national language, cultural knowledge, and digitalization. Thank you. We need to protect the environment and the environment in order to achieve this cultural development. We need to stop the use of our national language, cultural knowledge, and digitalization. We have established a system to protect the vulnerable families who are affected by this. Our vision, good art, and the reality are not the same. We have seen that in the past. The next step is to provide economic and cultural assistance.

For that, we are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka.

We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka. We are planning to provide art and culture assistance to Sri Lanka.

The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future.

The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, is ready to take the necessary steps to establish a new military base in the future. The Indian government, which is responsible for the development of the Indian -led military, and to develop a common understanding of the principles of the Aachara Dharma and the Kruti Buddha, and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aachara Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward with the development of the Aakshada Aakshada Dharma and to move forward

Switzerland

Thank you for inviting me to this important summit. It is an honor to be here in India at this pivotal moment for global AI governance. I want to express my gratitude to the government of India for hosting this landmark event and for bringing together such a diverse and distinguished group of leaders, innovators, researchers, and civil society representatives from around the world. Your commitment to inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation sets a powerful example for all of us. What makes artificial intelligence revolutionary is not just the speed of its development in learning, processing data, and supporting decisions. What makes it extraordinary is how directly it influences our daily lives in business, in government, in society, and in the world.

This is what I want to say in research. When we use AI wisely, it can lead to more innovation, more inclusion, and greater prosperity for all. India and Switzerland are natural partners. Both recognize that responsible AI does not hinder innovation, it enables it. Both value inclusion as a source of legitimacy. Together, we are building a bridge between ambition and implementation, between global innovation and global accountability. When civil society, tech firms, academic institutions, and communities contribute to shaping AI policy, the resulting systems are more robust, more equitable, and ultimately more trustworthy. And for this ambition, International Geneva plays a key role. Now, where else do so many international organizations, research institutes, tech companies, and think tanks meet?

This network, diplomacy, technology, science is a major strength of Switzerland. While countries take turns hosting the summit, the conversation needs a steady anchor, a place where knowledge can accumulate. Geneva plays that role today. As a global hub where diplomacy meets innovation and where humanitarian, legal, scientific and economic institutions work side by side, it offers an environment where AI governance can mature over time. This anchoring power rests on an ecosystem that goes far beyond venues and institutions. Geneva stands at the epicenter of multilateralism, hosting the International Telecommunication Union and a remarkable array of specialized agencies advancing digital transformation. The International Committee of the Red Cross is a partner. It is a pioneer in digital humanitarianism. and in addressing autonomous systems.

The World Meteorological Organization harnesses AI for climate prediction. The International Labor Organization explores AI’s impact on the future of work. The World Intellectual Property Organization addresses AI and intellectual property rights. Today, I am pleased to announce that Switzerland is ready and committed to host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027. From the previous summits in Bletchley, Seoul and Paris to here in India and on to Switzerland, an arc is being drawn, a continuous journey leading to responsible AI governance. So Switzerland is looking forward to hosting the 2027. AI Summit in Geneva and to working with the subsequent incoming host of the 2028 AI Summit. the United Arab Emirates, as partner for the Geneva Summit. There is an ancient Indian philosophy that teaches us that we need a collective approach to achieve shared goals.

Narendra Modi

President, thank you very much for your excellent thoughts. And I am very grateful to you for inviting all of us. Now I invite Lichtenstein’s hereditary prince, His Serene Highness Prince Alois, for his speech.

Liechtenstein

Dear Prime Minister Modi, I also want to thank you very much for hosting and organizing this most important summit. Excellencies, artificial intelligence is one of the defining technological developments of our time. Yet, the question it raises extends far beyond technology, or as you, Mr. Prime Minister, said, it’s transformational. It compels states to consider how responsibility, accountability and trust can be upheld in a digital age. Technology process moves quickly. It is measured in years or even in months. Institutional trust moves more slowly. It is built over generations. AI will test our ability to align these very different rhythms For a country like Liechtenstein, thinking in generation is part of our political culture We ask not only what is possible, but what is sustainable Small states may not lead in scale, but we can lead in quality By fostering trusted environments, clear rules and predictable frameworks Where innovation can grow responsibly Our experience shows that innovation and trust are not opposing forces Innovation becomes sustainable only when it rests on the foundation of trust Responsible governance plays a critical role in achieving this balance AI brings meaningful opportunities from better public services to new business models and enhanced cross -border cooperation.

To harness this potential, we must ensure that AI serves humanity as a whole and aligns with our fundamental values. AI governance is a global challenge that requires global solutions. Cross -border collaboration is essential to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared broadly and not concentrated among few. Liechtenstein supports international cooperation to ensure that AI development is guided by responsibility. We value open dialogue between policymakers and stakeholders. We value open dialogue between policymakers and stakeholders. scientists, and industry to develop ethical and sustainable AI solutions. In this spirit, I thank India for convening this important summit and for creating the space for such dialogue. Excellencies, technology should never be an end in itself. It must serve the well -being of people and societies.

The true measure of AI’s success is whether it sustainably supports our societies today and the generations to come. I thank you.

Narendra Modi

Thank you very much. Now I would like to invite the Prime Minister of Bhutan, His Excellency, Shering Togbe, to his office. Your Excellency,

Bhutan

Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Namaskar and Kuzhuzangbo. More than 3 ,000 years ago, India’s sages articulated profound insight on the nature of knowledge. We saw a glimpse of it in the Gyan Bharatam exhibition. In Chapter 1, Section 1, Verse 4 of the Mundaka Upanishad, for instance, these sages declared, Dway, Vidde, Viditave, Iti Hasma Yada Brahma Vido Badanti Para Chaiva Aparajya Those who know ultimate reality say that there are two kinds of knowledge to be known. Paravidya and Aparavidya That is higher knowledge and lower knowledge. Lower knowledge, Aparavidya is a mastery of skills, systems and techniques. Higher knowledge, Paravidya is wisdom, understanding meaning, responsibility and purpose. This distinction has always been important but today it is critical.

We live in a time where artificial intelligence is advancing at breakneck speed. AI can analyze enormous amounts of data and can analyze the data of the universe. It can identify patterns that we cannot see. It can take decisions at scale and at a speed that no human can match. This is the triumph of Aparavidya, technical assistance, technical excellence. But whether AI benefits humanity or not will depend entirely on Aparavidya, on wisdom. So perhaps the most important question of our time is not how intelligent our machines will become, but whether we will remain wise enough to guide them. If wisdom does not guide innovation, technology can deepen inequality, spread misinformation, and move faster than governance can respond.

It can cause destruction. So we must heed the wisdom of the clairvoyant mantra drashtas. We must balance Paravidya with Aparavidya. And where better to reflect on this balance than here in India, the birthplace of this profound insight. And who better to help lead this conversation than Your Excellency, Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, my elder brother. A spiritual master whose leadership reflects the confidence of a civilization rooted in ancient wisdom. This is why Bhutan is proud to walk alongside India as you shape the future of a responsible and inclusive AI. In this shared journey, we have many opportunities for collaboration. Allow me very quickly to highlight two areas that may be especially relevant. The first one is energy.

Artificial intelligence requires enormous competition. Artificial capacity, which in turn requires unprecedented amounts of energy. Bhutan’s hydropower has long been a symbol of partnership between our two countries, India and Bhutan. We are deeply grateful to the government of India for decades of steadfast cooperation built on trust and mutual benefit. Today, we see new possibilities as we expand our renewable energy portfolio by including partnerships with leading Indian companies such as Tata Power and Adani Power. But we have opportunities to welcome many more, from India and beyond. Clean energy powers homes and industry. Now this clean renewable energy is poised to drive the next generation of digital infrastructure and AI innovation, not just in Bhutan, but in our region.

The second area for collaboration is the Gelipu Mindfulness City, or GMC. Under the visionary leadership of His Majesty the King and with the steadfast support of Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji, Bhutan has established the Gelipur Mindfulness City, a city as a hub for sustainable innovation and responsible enterprise. Powered by abundant clean renewable energy, GMC is designed to attract energy -intensive industries, including green data centres and AI research, enabling advanced technologies to scale on a foundation of clean renewable power. It is our vision to create a space where compute capacity grows not at the expense of the planet, but in harmony with it. Guided by environmental stewardship, ethical responsibility and Bhutan’s value -based development philosophy. This is AI with Purpose.

Not AI without limits. A technological sanctuary where higher wisdom shapes technological capacity. My friends here, these are just two of the many areas where we can collaborate on responsible and inclusive AI. If you are interested to collaborate, let’s meet here. My team, who you’ll recognize by our national dress, my team will be happy to discuss green energy and data and AI compute center investment, design of Bhutan context SLM, sovereign compute and robotic platforms with you. And if we find that we are pressed for time, or if you are seeing this message online, especially to my Indian friends, this is a message especially to my Indian friends, come and visit us in Bhutan. If you need a personal invite, my email.

My email ID is ttopgay at cabinet .gov .pt. Your Excellencies, the AI revolution will not wait for us. It will continue to move forward. The question is whether we shape it intentionally, guided by values of our ancient civilizations and the wisdom of the Upanishads, or whether we allow it to be driven by speed and scale without moral direction. History will not judge us by how advanced our technology was. It will judge us by whether that technology made our society fairer, kinder, and more humane. And it is visionary and responsible leadership that ensures such progress serves all of humanity. I see this leadership in Prime Minister Narendra Modi. My elder brother, you are a Brahmavid. And as such, it is a privilege for Bhutan to stand up for the people of Bhutan.

And to stand by India’s side as we embark on a journey together. to realize the mana vision for AI. A vision that will ensure that AI means prosperity for all. That AI means happiness for all. Thank you very.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, Bhutan has always been a place of harmony between technology and nature. I thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. I thank you very much for sharing your thoughts. Now I invite the President of Bolivia, His Excellency, His Excellency, Montania, for his speech.

Bolivia

The digital future must be built with equity, with ethics and, above all, with solidarity between all nations. That is why, from Bolivia, we extend our hand to work together with the Republic of India and also with the entire international community. With an artificial intelligence that is in favor of all, but of all humanity. With these words, I want to thank the hospitality. It has been an honor to be here. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Croatia

Thank you very much, Prime Minister Modi. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, namaskar. Thank you for hosting fourth Artificial Intelligence Summit in India at a moment when technological change is accelerating faster than at any time in human history. From the dawn of civilization until the year 2000, humanity produced only a few hundred exabytes of recorded information. Today, every single day, we generate almost twice the total of all previous human history. Yet, the true disruption is not only scale, but the shifting balance between verified knowledge and noise. With more than 6 billion smartphones worldwide, anyone can broadcast instantly to a global audience. The boundary between fact, opinion and manipulation is increasingly blurred. AI now produces content so convincing that truth and fabrication are harder to distinguish.

A breakthrough with immense promise but serious risks in the wrong hands. Democracy rests not on the rule of the most learned, but on the judgment of the majority. That majority remains free only if it is reasonably well informed. Otherwise, freedom of choice risks becoming the freedom of delusion. Artificial intelligence amplifies both our capability and our responsibility. It transforms healthcare, education. Business, public services and leisure. Europe has chosen a distinctive path, human -centered AI, grounded in fundamental rights, transparency and accountability. Croatia believes that in the 21st century, digital infrastructure and data governance are matters of sovereignty and resilience, not merely of technology. Two weeks ago, I chaired our National Council for Digital Transformation, and we decided that digital transformation is our core national priority for the years to come.

Six years ago, fewer than 3 out of 20 Croatian households had access to 5G. Today, 19 out of 20 do. Fiber broadband reaches 75 % of households. 5G coverage exceeds 94 % and nearly 80%. Nearly 83 % of citizens use digital public services. Infrastructure alone, however, does not define a digital nation. Talent and enterprise do. Creation technology companies are increasingly visible on the global stage. InfoBeep enables secure digital communication at a global scale across leading messaging platforms. Rimac pioneers high -performance electric and autonomous mobility systems. MicroBlink delivers AI -driven computer vision used across financial and enterprise sectors. Gideon develops autonomous robots transforming global logistics. And Infinum designs and engineers complex digital and AI -enabled products for lending international brands. Together, they demonstrate how engineering excellence and ambition translate into globally competitive innovation, along with further investments in data centers.

But innovation alone is not progress. Progress requires direction and responsibility. There, we see the key role of regulators in keeping up the pace of innovators. The decisive question is not whether we can move faster, but whether we can guide this transformation wisely. Therefore, artificial intelligence must be, as you said, Prime Minister, inclusive for all, and serve as the useful instrument of free societies. Thank you.

Finland

First, I would like to thank and congratulate government and prime minister for making this summit reality. Namaste. It comes a crucial moment when the world urgently needs shared understanding, common rules, and political will for responsible use of AI. AI is not just a tool. It is becoming a foundation of competitiveness and strategic resilience. Finland and my government is firmly committed to advancing AI in ways that are strengthening our economy, security, and our democratic societies. AI governance faces a fundamental challenge. Science moves faster than politics. That is precisely why… That is why we must act together with ambition and clarity. while keeping a human -centered and trustworthy vision at the core. In Europe, regulation must remain predictable and balanced, strong enough to safeguard our values, but smart enough to accelerate responsible technological process and fast industrial adaption.

The AI race consists of multiple marathons, not just one sprint, and we are only at the starting line. AI must serve people, not the other way around. We must address the legitimate concerns our citizens raise. Trust in public administration is built on fairness and safety. We must also bring the public sector and technology innovators close together. When a public agency finds an AI company with the right solutions, we create efficiency and better services for citizens. We are the AI. Finland is building a world -class AI ecosystem that spans research, infrastructure, and deployment. We host one of Europe’s leading supercomputing environments, Lumi, world -class research talent such as the Ellis Institute, and abundant clean computing power.

Finland hosts one of the world’s most eco -efficient data centers, powered by clean energy, with excess heat recycled into local communities. This demonstrates that technological leadership and sustainability can advance hand -in -hand. Finland welcomes the UN’s new scientific panel and AI governance dialogue and values the strong voice of the global south, values the strong voice of the European Union, and the voice of the global south highlighted on the bar. from Paris to New Delhi. The choices made now will define the role of AI in our societies for decades. Let us choose openness, security, responsibility, and shared progress. Thank you.

Narendra Modi

President, for your positive thoughts, I thank you very much. Now, I invite Greece’s Prime Minister His Excellency Mitsotakis to share his thoughts.

Greece

Thank you. Thank you, Prime Minister. Let me begin by thanking you for hosting this very important summit and for placing India and the Global South at the very center of our society. Thank you. This is the end of this global AI conversation. And the framing of this gathering that you chose around people, progress, and planet captures that artificial intelligence is not only a profound and massive technological shift, but also a civilizational one. And the choices that we make today will determine whether AI expands opportunity or whether it deepens divides. Allow me to briefly offer three reflections. First, as many of you stated, the AI dividend must be broadly shared. Every technological revolution in the history of the world has created immense wealth.

But history teaches us that the distribution of that wealth is never automatic. AI has the potential to unlock unprecedented scientific discovery, to dramatically improve healthcare, to strengthen education, to support climate research. But the question before us is simple. who benefits apart from the big tech companies and their shareholders. Within our countries, governments must ensure that workers are reskilled, small businesses have access to AI tools, public services are upgraded, the farmer, the nurse, the teacher, the small entrepreneur must feel this dividend in tangible ways. And concerns about significant labor displacement are legitimate and need to be addressed sooner rather than later. In Greece, we’re moving in that direction as digitization has made public services much more accessible.

The incorporation of AI in education will help narrow the learning divide, while advances in telemedicine, in predictive analytics, in personalized preventive care make healthcare much more accessible. More proactive, shifting it from treatment in hospitals to prevention at home. and improving the quality of life for all citizens. And among countries, we must avoid a world where access to compute, to data, and talent is concentrated in only a few geographies. And AI cannot be a story of digital concentration. It must be a story of digital inclusion. My second observation, the state itself must improve. Technology is advancing at extraordinary speeds, but too often our public institutions are operating on an outdated operating system and rules. And if we want AI to serve society, governments must significantly update their own software.

Public procurement frameworks designed for the industrial age are not fit for the AI age. And we need them to be faster, outcome -oriented, and more open to startups and innovators. Public administrations must invest in themselves. And in their own capacity. Digital talent. data infrastructure and AI literacy across ministries. This is not just about running a few pilots. We must move from experimentation to implementation at scale, as you have done, Prime Minister Modi, very successfully in India. And the countries that succeed in AI will not simply be those that built powerful models, but those that built capable states. To that end, we must choose our regulatory priorities wisely. For Greece and for me personally, protecting minors from digital addiction and online harm is a matter of intergenerational solidarity and a top priority for my government.

And I’m happy to see that many other countries are moving in that direction, and Greece will very soon announce its own decision when it comes to banning access, minors and adolescents. But this goes hand in hand. with our democratic responsibility to ensure, as the Prime Minister of Croatia mentioned, that technology strengthens the public square rather than overwhelms us with disinformation and hate. I’m all in favor of extensive dialogue with the big technology companies, but we need to be aware that if that dialogue does not produce concrete results, regulation will be the only answer. Finally, AI’s geopolitical impact should tilt towards conversion. AI is not just about code and compute. It’s part of national power, and interdependences are embedded in the AI stack, from semiconductors to cloud infrastructure, from data sets to research collaboration, and no country can build this alone, and that is why trusted partnerships matter.

In Greece, we have built partnerships with all major hyperscalers, while at the same time developing sovereign capabilities through EU support and collaboration for that AI factor is an initiative. led by national champions, attracting investment from across the globe. And balance is essential. A world in which technology is weaponized to coerce trusted partners or where excessive regulation becomes a tool to suppress innovation is a world where collective innovation declines. And if we fragment the AI ecosystem into very rigid blocks, we reduce the gains for all. And if we leverage independence responsibly, we expand opportunity for all. Ladies and gentlemen, if we ensure that the AI dividend is shared, if we modernize the state to match the technology, and if we build trusted partnerships that expand rather than fragment innovation, then AI can truly serve people, drive progress, and protect our planet.

And as I was listening to the Prime Minister of India, I thought that it is a fusion of artificial, intelligent, and ancestral intelligence, whether it’s present in ancient Sanskrit texts, or the writings of Greek philosophers that will eventually guide us towards a more prosperous and just future. And this is a message that Greece wants to send to the world and I hope that it’s one that resonates with you. Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, Thank you very much for your remarks. Now I would like to welcome His Excellency, Dr. Bharat Jagdevji, to his remarks.

Guyana

Mr. Prime Minister, colleagues, I think if we are asked to imagine the world in a few years’ time, all of us would be hard -pressed. When you have a phone, that would run a model. Thank you. and that model would be smarter than the sum of all human intelligence. But the one thing that unites all of us here is that we all believe that AI can have a transformative impact on people, our countries, and on development. We come from different countries here. Some of us are from the global south, some from the global north. We have different size, capabilities, and levels of advancement of AI development and diffusion. So I want to focus today a little bit on the global south.

And if we’re to leave here today speaking of one item that has been a very important part of our lives, that has been repeated several times, one idea, which is inclusion. and not just inclusion in the diffusion of AI within countries, but among countries, then I think we have to leave this summit advancing in a very practical way how we are going to engage a significant part of the global south. And I speak here largely for those countries in Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean, Libyan, and the Pacific. Smaller countries and different size and levels of diffusion of AI. If I were to define the circumstances of those countries, what do you find? You find low levels of diffusion of AI.

You find a lack of awareness of the benefits of AI among policymakers and the technical staff. you find a great deal of skepticism about AI. Some of it because of the fright of technology. Some because of resistance from technical staff because they worry about their own obsolescence. And that’s not an ecosystem that would allow the development or the diffusion of AI at the national level. So how can we help leaving this summit? I think we have to, first of all, have a mechanism that would promote awareness among policymakers in these countries. And secondly, to help countries organize in a coherent… fashion the development and diffusion of AI in those countries, the countries with the least capacity.

Now, I’m extremely pleased we have the IMF and the United Nations here, and I listened to Secretary General about wanting to raise $3 billion to assist with capacity building and diffusion of AI. But before we get to capacity building and diffusion, I think we need a more critical ingredient, one that India has, and that has led to great success in India. Bold, innovative, enlightened leadership and a solid technical core of people who will introduce and diffuse national effort or lead national effort. Thank you. And so, in development planning, we have to assist those countries at a multilateral level, but through bilateral mechanisms. to look at the impact of AI. A country would easily spend $20 million on building a road, but $20 million spent on AI diffusion could have a transformative impact on health and education and a more lasting impact on society.

And they would not value that as much as the road, now in the current planning framework, because it’s deficient. So we have to upgrade the planning framework. And I believe we can do this easily. We have to give help to a lot of those countries. For example, my country, we’ve just gotten, we bought a model to help us in diagnostics, CT scan or read CT scans, et cetera, and MRIs. But how do I know that’s the best model in the market? Or you have a lot of carpetbagging companies that come around now, and because of unsuspecting officials, in many of these countries, we latch on to the first person who comes along. We need a system to review for quality, etc.

And that is absolutely lacking in these countries. So we do need that help there. And I think we can leave this summit with some practical assistance. And the larger countries that are represented here, and from the north and from the south, like Brazil and India, they have to commit to helping those smaller countries be able to build that capacity. I’m so pleased that in addressing the questions of a framework for ethical AI, sovereignty, and inclusion, that we are addressing it in a balanced way here at the summit. There was the fear that we would create a fortress mentality. And that we are fighting someone else. That this would be done in a balanced way. So thank you very much, and thank you for your great leadership, Prime Minister Modi, your enlightened leadership.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Now I invite the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan, His Excellency Bhakti Noor for his speech.

Kazakhstan

Honourable Prime Minister Modi, Excellencies, dear colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honour for me to be in India and to address such a distinguished audience. at the AI Impact Summit. I express my sincere appreciation to the government of India for holding this important event. India is rightly recognized as a global leader in digital transformation. Kazakhstan’s vision aligns with the India AI mission. We also believe that AI must be inclusive, sovereign, and transformative for key sectors of the economy. Today, Kazakhstan is evolving into an original digital hub. In the UN e -government development index, we rank 24th out of 193 countries. Our country is also among the top 10 worldwide in the quality of online services.

Actually, this is the real experience for our citizens, You can sell a car in five minutes and receive a fully online mortgage in 24 hours. Over 90 % of all transactions are cashless. Capitalizing on this, President Kassym -Jumat Tokayev has set a goal to transform Kazakhstan into a fully digital state within three years. AI is a strategic pillar of our national development. We have adopted an AI law and established a presidential AI development council working with global visionaries like Lee Kai -Fu, Peter Norvig, John Hopcroft, Omar Al -Olam, who is here with us today, and many others. Kazakhstan is becoming a digital bridge between East and West. We are completing the TransCaspen fiber optic line, the shortest alternative route for global data transfer.

We have deployed tools to help us to achieve the best results. largest supercomputing clusters in the region of Central Asia and in partnership with NVIDIA, establishing a sovereign AI hub. In addition, we are launching the Data Center Valley. We offer more than 1 gigawatt of capacity at competitive tariffs starting from 2 .5 US cents per kilowatt hour. I invite India’s technology champions, entrepreneurs and investors from all over the world to use Kazakhstan as a computing power hub. We offer a full support package from infrastructure to a preferential tax and regulatory regime. Another cornerstone is human capital development. Under the AI SANA program last year, 1 million people in Kazakhstan trained on AI skills. This initiative brings together dedicated learning tracks for every group, from school children and university students to entrepreneurs, to business leaders, to business leaders, to business leaders, civil servants.

The main element of this ecosystem is ALM -AI, the International Artificial Intelligence Center recently opened in Astana. It is a true R &D powerhouse and we encourage leading AI companies to establish their research hubs in Astana and in ALM -AI. Distinguished participants, Kazakhstan is ready to become a global lab for AI solutions. In 2026 has been officially declared in Kazakhstan as the year of digitalization and artificial intelligence. Throughout the year our country will serve as a meeting point for the global IT community. I invite you to join us at Digital Kazakhstan, GITX Central Asia and AI and Digital Bridge forums in shaping a new digital ecosystem for our region. We are open to new ideas, technologies and joint projects.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

Excellency, thank you for your kind thoughts. Now I invite the Prime Minister of Mauritius, His Excellency, Dr. Ram Gulamji, to his meeting.

Mauritius

man’s promise. It can enhance public service delivery, it can improve decision -making, it can optimize resource management, strengthen climate resilience, and unlock new sectors of growth. Yet it also raises profound questions of ethics, of governance, equity, and trust. The ideal roadmap is the charting of a path towards the future where, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi rightly pointed out, it must serve the transformative power of AI and it must serve the whole of humanity. As the logo says, welfare for all, happiness for all. Without these dedicated initiatives, without commitment of the international community, this will have no relevance. I thank His Excellency the French President. President Emmanuel Macron gave a powerful example about this vegetable seller I think in a remote village of India who could not open a bank account because he had no fixed address, he had no education but now he can be paid through his mobile phone.

This is a powerful example of what technology can do. I myself I can tell you a small anecdote. I recently went to London at University College Hospital where I worked as a doctor to have a checkup. I was surprised. I work in the cardiac department. I was surprised. I expected they would do an ECG, an exercise ECG, an angiogram. No. It was all done by AI which would actually could see your arteries could see if there was any blockage, could see where everything was working properly. This is why I said we need this dedicated initiative. otherwise without the relevant infrastructure developing countries and in particular small island developing states that are already disadvantaged in areas like education like health, like trade will fall further behind as the Vice President of Ghana just said we must not be afraid there is this fear among we see this in many countries they think they might be losing their jobs they don’t want to think outside the box and grab new technology development look what the internet has done it has revolutionized the world as the era of AI unfolds we are reminded that small economies need rapid upskilling in order to stay competitive and in this context we published in Mauritius the Mauritius Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025 to 2029 as a bridge to the future which is strategic.

It is a strategic roadmap outlining our government’s commitment to modernizing public services and empowering our people through technology despite our limited resources. We also, I’m glad to announce establishing a specialized economic zone dedicated to digital technology and AI designed to serve as a platform not only for Mauritius but for the wider region and especially to Africa. As AI reshapes global power structure we cannot and should not act in silos. AI holds enormous promise but it also carries major risk requiring new governance frameworks for international coordination. This is precisely why strategic international partnerships must be settled. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, let this summit be a landmark in the history of humanity where we take a collective decision so that we leave no one behind.

Thank you for your attention. Thank you.

Netherlands

Thank you, Prime Minister Modi. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. I’d like to tell you about two books I read recently. It might sound a bit old -fashioned for a summit about AI, but you’ll understand why I’m bringing them up in a moment. The first is Clara and the Sun by Nobel Prize winner Kazuo Ishiguro. It’s a story of a friendship between Yoshi, a girl who’s ill, and Clara, a humanoid robot. In fact, some of the robot’s traits are so human that the boundary between human and machine seems to become blurred. The second book is Proving Ground by my favorite thriller writer, Michael Connolly. In this story, a lawyer takes on an AI company after a chatbot told a 60 -year -old boy it was okay for him to kill his girlfriend.

Two books, one highlighting a positive side of AI and the other a negative side. Both sides have a valid place in our discussion. So thank you, Prime Minister Modi, for hosting this important conference. The theme of the summit brings me straight to one of the key requirements for effective AI. Everyone must be able to participate. So I am very pleased with the focus on the Global South. Because the agreements we make must work for everyone. AI needs to serve humanity. We want to make responsible use of the opportunities created by AI. That’s why the Netherlands is presenting its first international AI strategy this year, making public AI infrastructure available for small business, government and science.

To attract and retain talent and promote data sharing. We look forward to working with industry, civil society, organizations and other countries. In particular India, a country with which we have stepped up cooperation in many, many areas. We are ready to share best practices with each other and to collaborate on future solutions. Because from food security to climate adaptation. AI can help us on the road to happiness. AI gives the opportunities to solve real -world problems, small or big. But the road we take must be responsible and safe, and that requires international governance. We are pursuing this in the United Nations through the Global Digital Compact, in the RE -AIM Summit on Responsible AI in the Military Domain, and in the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance coming up this summer.

Because innovation means progress, for us humans and for our planet. So indeed, what better motto than People, Planet, Progress. Thank you.

Seychelles

Thank you, Mr. Prime Minister, and I want to thank the Government of India for their welcome and for hosting this AI Summit. Throughout these few days, we have learned many things. We have learned that Sanskrit could be the language of AI. We have also learned that AI is here to stay and that how it moves forward will depend on the buy -in that everyone carries into it. I had a very interesting meeting on my first day in India. I went to UIDI and found out about the ADA, the unique number. And India managed to give a unique number to 1 .4 billion people. And I’m thinking I have to give a unique number to 100. 25 ,000 people. And I think it’s possible.

I think it’s possible to use the technology at the expense that it has reached and integrate it within my system. I am already considered a high -income country. I already have one of the highest human development index in Africa. And therefore, integrating that technology into the processes that I have should make me or improve what I provide to the people. So, we have acknowledged AI as a multidimensional technology that will transform the lives of people and society and it should do so at an unprecedented rate. We’ve also viewed the multiple dimensions of power that exist, including its bases, resources like data, but also means the aspect of energy. And as a small country and as a small island developing state, as echoed by Mauritius, we do not have the same access to the technology.

As does bigger and larger countries. at the same time as we go along the continuum and the transformation of transforming our economic base and as we improve as small island developing states we do not get the same benefit as countries that form part of major international blocs and we do not again benefit from concessionary loans nor credit facilities as do international blocs nor do we benefit from subsidies so therefore we need to rely on partners like India who are prepared to transform or transcend the technology barrier and make that technology accessible for the countries and that is what is necessary because we do not have the capacity to invest in the R &D that is required to make that technology available to us ladies and gentlemen in small countries like the Seychelles we do not have oil we do not have minerals but we have a human capital and that is what is necessary for the development of the R &D that is required to make that technology available to us a human capital that has utilized and valued what it has and has transformed the society and turned it into a democratic, peaceful, stable and secure one, an example to the world and therefore in that process we feel the harnessing the power of AI in areas like improving the efficiency of our government, diversification of the economy and building resilience improving the quality of life, reducing the cost of living and sure food security, biosecurity and biosafety are the areas in which we want to go to but to achieve that as small island developing states we need a buy -in from larger states so we welcome the approach taken by India and we hope and support India and as part of the Indian Ocean region so we can move forward Thank you sir applause applause applause applause excellency Thank you.

Thank you.

Spain

This is not by chance. It is the result of a clear strategy based on sustained public investment, European cooperation, and a firm commitment to building technological sovereignty. The Telefonica LED initiative to deploy one of the European AI gigafactories in Spain illustrates our capacity and ambition. The same spirit guides our use of AI in the public sector with a simple goal, better public services and less bureaucracy. And we are succeeding. The OECD recognizes Spain as a leader in AI in public administration. So we believe in AI for good. But while we believe in technology, we insist that it must be guided by human values. AI should expand human freedom, democracy, rights, not undermine them. We will also combat AI for bad.

Because progress without ethics is not progress. An innovation without purpose is not leadership. It is a failure. AI accelerates, and our response must accelerate too. Risks such as extreme concentration of power induced by malicious actors or loss of human control are real and growing, and we must tackle them. We must also face the environmental cost of AI or the risk of massive job displacement. Therefore, if we want AI to reach its full potential, we must confront this risk, because the current safeguards fall short, and the response must be twofold. First, governments must work through their national frameworks. That is why my country, Spain, promoted the Charter of Digital Rights back in 2021 and created Europeans’ first, AI supervisory agency.

And second, we need an inclusive global governance framework with the UN as our vehicle of choice. I want to congratulate the UN for the establishment of the AI expert panel last week. I think this is critical, a critical milestone. My country is looking forward to hosting its first meeting in the next months. We also just hosted the third RE -AIM summit because the use of AI in the military is here to stay, but we need to ensure that it complies with international law, contributing to international peace and security. The AI Spain wants is safe, transparent, and aligned with the SDGs, and that is our commitment. AI in the general interest, not in the hands of a few.

AI for good, not for bad. Thank you.

International Monetary Fund

Thank you very much, Prime Minister Modi. Namaste. Namaste. I want to start with a small story of me and my granddaughter. Me telling her how when I was her age, there were no computers, no TV. And she looking up at me and saying, so you only had iPads. The moral of this story is that we live at the time of very rapid transformation. And AI is going to put this transformation on steroids. I want to talk about the economic impact and also the gratitude I have towards India on taking AI to be for everyone. So, economic impact. We calculated at the IMF that the potential for productivity growth and economic growth from AI over the next years is significant.

It could give up to 0 .8 % boost to global growth. That would bring growth above the pre -pandemic trend. Above. Above it. And that can have tremendous benefits for society. We also look at the likely impact of AI on the job markets. And there, what we see over the next years is… that AI is coming like a tsunami, hitting the job markets. We estimate that globally about 40 % of jobs will be impacted, either enhanced or some eliminated. And in advanced economies like Sweden, it would be 60%. So the question is, are we ready for this transformation? And Prime Minister Mitsotakis talked about it. Not quite yet. We have to pay very close attention to what is going to happen where jobs would become more productive, but also what is going to happen to those tasks that are likely to be eliminated.

So here is a very interesting… piece of research we recently have done. It tells a fascinating story. What we see already is that people with the right talents that can apply new skills are on high demand and they are paid much better than people that do not have these new skills. Now, what is the impact of that? They have more money in their pockets, they spend more on restaurants, on tourism, and as a result, low -skilled jobs increase and people for these jobs are on high demand. Overall impact on employment, positive. For one job with AI skills, we see 1 .3%. Coming up because of this spread of money to demand for other jobs. The jobs in the middle that are neither enhanced nor on higher demand, they get squeezed.

And the most dangerous impact we see now is that routine tasks that are often started jobs for young people, they get automated and washed away. So what is the moral of the story? We have to pay more attention to how we prepare people for the job market of tomorrow. Now, I want to come to the point that is most exciting to me from this AI summit. And it is India’s relentless focus on the human dimension of AI. And it is India’s relentless focus on the human dimension of AI. Delivering real benefits for real people, never forgetting the least fortunate amongst us. And I want to wholeheartedly thank you, Prime Minister Modi, for doing that. And thank you for your practicality, for the accessibility and reach of the models you develop.

Because when some choose to impose large fees, you favor open source approach. And that, I think, is what distinguishes India. Beyond that, to the President of Guyana, of Mauritius, what you do is you think about bringing AI to do good for others. And in that sense, you are on the forefront of making things happen with the unique focus on, you know, democratizing AI. And I want to finish by recalling another time, the time of HIV AIDS, when people were dying and India came with cheap treatments that saved millions of lives. And I do wish from the bottom of my heart that you repeat this success story in the world of AI. Practical Indian AI for all.

Thank you.

Narendra Modi

I have received the conversion. This is a symbol of our shared commitment that together we can make artificial intelligence a possible medium for human welfare, social development and collective development. I am confident that today’s thoughts will help us to make our efforts in the global arena a new direction and a new trend. Keeping in mind the priorities of Global South, we must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. We must ensure that AI’s development is not limited to the human resources. Thank you. And to fulfill the creative cooperation and strategic role, I have always been committed and will continue to be so.

Once again, I thank you all for your valuable contribution. And now our session ends. Thank you all very much. Thank you. Once again.

Related ResourcesKnowledge base sources related to the discussion topics (39)
Factual NotesClaims verified against the Diplo knowledge base (8)
โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œPrime Minister Narendra Modi opened the meetingโ€

The knowledge base records a welcome address by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, confirming his role in opening the summit [S91].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œThe summit was convened to forge a humanโ€‘centred, inclusive framework for global AI governance, emphasizing participation of the Global Southโ€

Multiple sources highlight the emphasis on Global South participation in AI governance frameworks [S158].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œBrazilโ€™s delegate warned that AIโ€™s dual nature can amplify both opportunity and concentration of power, urging a UNโ€‘based multilateral architecture to prevent monopolies and ensure equitable benefit sharingโ€

Brazilโ€™s representative called for reform of the multilateral system to address power concentration and ensure equitable benefits, aligning with the reported warning [S3] and the dual-nature observation [S161].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œSwitzerland highlighted the principle of โ€œAI for the people,โ€ stressing transparency, accountability, and the protection of fundamental rights in AI systemsโ€

Switzerlandโ€™s approach emphasizes strengthening user rights, platform transparency and fundamental-rights protection, matching the claim [S162].

โ„น
Additional Contextmedium

โ€œLiechtenstein echoed the call for binding international norms to curb disinformation and autonomous weaponsโ€

Liechtensteinโ€™s statements in the discussions stressed the need for stronger protections and clarified norms, providing context to the reported call for binding international rules [S165] and [S53].

โœ“
Confirmedhigh

โ€œSpain underscored the importance of aligning AI development with the Sustainable Development Goals and advocated for a global code of conductโ€

Spainโ€™s advocacy linked AI policy to the SDGs and a comprehensive code of conduct, as documented in the knowledge base [S168].

!
Correctionhigh

โ€œThe IMF warned that unchecked AI could widen inequality but noted that wellโ€‘designed policies could add up to 0.8โ€ฏ% to global growthโ€

IMF sources discuss fiscal policies and a range of economic impacts of AI, but they do not provide the specific 0.8โ€ฏ% growth figure cited in the report [S172] and [S173]; thus the claim is not supported by the knowledge base.

!
Correctionhigh

โ€œIndia announced the deployment of an additional 24,000 GPUs, the release of 7,500 curated datasets, and the openโ€‘source sharing of 270 AI models to bolster sovereign compute capacityโ€

Official Indian briefings cite a target of 10,000 GPUs (already surpassed with 38,000 deployed) and future plans for 50-60,000 GPUs, but they do not mention the specific figures of 24,000 GPUs, 7,500 datasets, or 270 models, indicating a discrepancy [S175] and [S86].

External Sources (176)
S1
UNSC meeting: Strengthening UN peacekeeping โ€” Serbia:Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you very much for convening this important meeting. Mr. President, distinguished …
S2
Published by DiploFoundation (2011) โ€” Malta: 4th Floor, Regional Building Regional Rd. Msida, MSD 2033, Malta Switzerland: Rue de Lausanne 56 CH-1202 Ge…
S3
UNSC meeting: Multilateral cooperation for peace and security โ€” Serbia:Mr. President, the world of today is faced with numerous and serious challenges that necessitate close cooperatio…
S4
Report โ€” Seychelles is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services.
S5
High-level SIDS Ministerial Dialogue: Key Challenges and Opportunities โ€” 5. **Access to Finance:** Ministers from Seychelles and Tuvalu criticized the use of GDP per capita as a measure for acc…
S6
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session โ€” – Wavel Ramkalawan – President of the Republic of Seychelles Vice President: On behalf of the Assembly, I wish to than…
S7
Research Collection โ€” 19 Based on the title of David D. Newsom’s article on the Swiss role in the hostage crisis, which was …
S8
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call โ€” The analysis reveals Switzerland’s role as a proponent of international cooperation and dialogue. By supporting initiati…
S9
(Day 4) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session โ€” Andrej Plenkovic – Croatia: Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, today we should stand uni…
S10
(Plenary segment) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 5th plenary meeting, 79th session โ€” Andrej Plenkoviร„ย‡: Mr. President of the General Assembly, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, we have gathered here t…
S11
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call โ€” Croatia’s address to the UN emphasises several key points regarding global governance and sustainable development, prese…
S12
Table of contents โ€” + Estonia is a trailblazing and leading country in specific prioritised fields of cyber security in the EU and at a broa…
S13
Introducciรณn a la Internet gobernanza DE โ€” Estonia es un actor de polรญticas digitales muy dinรกmico. Luego del ataque DDoS en 2007, que afectรณ gravemente a la Inter…
S14
Report โ€” Estonia is a member of NATO CCDCOE, TERENA and TI TF-CSIRT.
S15
Ad Hoc Consultation: Wednesday 31st January, Morning session โ€” Bolivia has publicly expressed its endorsement of the Chair’s proposal for Chapter 7, with positive sentiments having be…
S16
Report โ€” Bolivia is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services. Bolivia is a member …
S17
Developing Countries: Victims or Participants โ€” Bolivia, with an exceptionally vulnerable position, but also good prospects for cash gains under the Clean Development M…
S18
Opening of the session โ€” Brazil’s stance on a series of matters pertaining to human rights and the advancement of an international convention is …
S19
WSIS+20 Open Consultation session with Co-Facilitators โ€” – **Jennifer Chung** – (Role/affiliation not clearly specified) Jacqueline Pigato: I think it’s very important. I need …
S20
7th edition โ€” Brazil is very active in numerous digital policy processes. The country hosted two out of 10 IGF meetings. It has played…
S22
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli โ€” For India, there was a double commitment on the one hand to the peaceful resolution of an internal, bloody, ethnic confl…
S23
Keynote-HE Emmanuel Macron โ€” -Narendra Modi: Title – Prime Minister; Role – Host of the Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit, referenced as Mr. Prim…
S24
Announcement of New Delhi Frontier AI Commitments โ€” -Shri Narendra Modi: Role/Title: Honorable Prime Minister of India, Area of expertise: Not specified The ceremony concl…
S25
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli โ€” forceful personality of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi enhanced India’s stature, at least for a time. Barely a decade late…
S26
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session โ€” – Mohamed Irfaan Ali – Guayana: President of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana Leaders highlighted their countries’ sp…
S27
9821st meeting โ€” – Guyana: Representative (role not specified)
S28
Published by DiploFoundation (2011) โ€” Malta: 4th Floor, Regional Building Regional Rd. Msida, MSD 2033, Malta Switzerland: Rue de Lausanne 56 CH-1202 Ge…
S29
Global Standards for a Sustainable Digital Future โ€” Karen Mulberry: Thank you, Kathleen. I’d like to welcome you to our workshop where I’ve got three experts who have been …
S30
Opening Plenary: Working Together for a Human-Centred Digital Future โ€“ Parliamentary Cooperation for Democratic Digital Governance โ€” – **Maria-Nefeli Vasileiou Chatziioannidou** – Member of Parliament from Greece, Member of the Council of Europe Parliam…
S31
HISTORICAL RHETORIC AND DIPLOMACY – AN UNEASY COHABITATION โ€” – 4 The Economist , 27 November 1999, 35. – 5 International Herald T ribune , 1 December 1999, 8. – 6 Newsweek , 20 Apr…
S32
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 2nd February, Afternoon session โ€” Slovakia concluded its meaningful intervention by reaffirming its endorsement of the EU’s position, thus aligning with o…
S33
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued) – session 6 โ€” In issues of stakeholder engagement and reducing redundancy in capacity-building initiatives, Slovakia’s position mirror…
S34
(Day 2) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session โ€” Peter Pellegrini – Slovakia: Madam President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, It is an honor and privilege to addr…
S35
Report โ€” Bhutan is a member of the ITU-IMPACT initiative and has access to relevant cybersecurity services.
S36
(Day 4) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session โ€” Tshering Tobgay -Bhutan: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I bring to you wa…
S37
By the Same Author โ€” 11 Thailand is one of the few developing countries I know that carried out such a forward study of its relations with …
S38
Kazakhstani image in global politics: A bridge between Russia and the rest of the world? โ€” Diana Madibekova is 4th year student studying international law at School of Law, KAZGUU University, Astana, Kazakhstan….
S39
UNSC meeting: Regional arrangements for peace โ€” Kazakhstan: Mentioned CICA’s role in addressing security issues, including climate change. Kazakhstan:Thank you, Mr. Ch…
S40
Women, peace and security โ€” Kazakhstan: MADAM PRESIDENT, DISTINGUISHED MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL, DEAR COLLEAGUES, I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS M…
S41
By the Same Author โ€” Mauritius gained Independence in 1968, its freedom movement led by Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, the first Prime Minister. …
S42
Agenda item 5 : Day 4 Afternoon session โ€” Mauritius collaborates with regional and global partners, including Africa Cert, the Southern African Development Commun…
S43
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained in paragraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/3/OEWG 2025 โ€” – Mauritius: Representative of Mauritius Mauritius: Distinguished Chair and colleagues, good morning. The effective i…
S44
The Ibero-American System and its Influence in the Ibero-American Regional Summit Diplomacy โ€” According to the current Spanish President (Rodrรญguez Zapatero, 2005), In the evolution of the system is important to co…
S45
First round of informal consultations with member states, observers and stakeholders (2024) โ€” Spain also encourages a digital compact that fortifies the commitment to human rights in harmony with the Sustainable De…
S46
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 2nd February, Afternoon session โ€” By championing inclusive and pragmatic global governance, the Netherlands solidifies its position as a driving force for…
S47
Agenda item 5 : Day 4 Morning session โ€” In the area of Confidence-Building Measures (CBMs), the Netherlands values their role in enhancing transparency, fosteri…
S48
Closure of the session โ€” Chair: Thank you very much, Argentina. I think the Secretariat can informally provide you and other interested delegat…
S49
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained in paragraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued)/3/OEWG 2025 โ€” – Finland: Representative of Finland Finland: Chair, thank you for giving us the floor. Finland aligns itself with th…
S50
SMALL STATES AND NATO โ€” Both Laajava and Burns discussed the role of Finland. As Laajava outlined, Finland remains militarily non-allied, and co…
S51
Governing the digital transition in Nordic Regions: The human element โ€” | Regional case studies [[DOC_PAGE_MARKER_74]] | Regional case studies [[DOC_PAGE_MARKER_74]] | Regional case studie…
S52
Ad Hoc Consultation: Monday 5th February, Morning session โ€” While the content of OP5 is not disclosed, Liechtenstein’s resistance suggests concerns about the paragraph’s scope, exe…
S53
(7th meeting) Reconvened concluding session of the Ad Hoc Committee to Elaborate a Comprehensive International Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communications Technologies for Criminal Purposes โ€” Furthermore, Liechtensteinโ€™s stance is insightful for the international communityโ€™s approach to treaty formation and imp…
S54
Ad Hoc Consultation: Friday 9th February, Morning session โ€” Additionally, Liechtenstein advocates for strengthening international cooperation by supporting a higher threshold for r…
S55
International Monetary Fund โ€” The IMF activities cover three main areas: The International Monetary Fund, established in 1944, is an international en…
S56
Subrata K. Mitra Jivanta Schottli Markus Pauli โ€” | 1.1 | Nuclearization | 18 | | IPKF | Indian Peace Keeping Force [[DOC_…
S57
International Monetary Fund โ€” The International Monetary Fund is an international financial institution, headquartered in Washington, D.C., consisting…
S58
REDUCED MORTALITY โ€” Digitalisation of the health and care system system also gives rise to ethical issues, not least those around dignity, a…
S59
PM Narendra Modi calls for global cooperation on AI regulation โ€” At the virtual summit of G20 nations, Indian PM Narendra Modidelivered a notable address, emphasising the need for globa…
S60
https://dig.watch/event/india-ai-impact-summit-2026/leaders-plenary-global-vision-for-ai-impact-and-governance-morning-session-part-1 โ€” Agar kisi machine ko sir paper clip banane ka alak de diya jaye to wo uska ek kaam ke liye duniya ke saare resources ko …
S61
How can sandboxes spur responsible data-sharing across borders? (Datasphere Initiative) โ€” In conclusion, the growing mistrust in data and data flows necessitates addressing these concerns to leverage the full p…
S62
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Lt Gen Vipul Shinghal โ€” “The black box of data must become a glass box.”[11]. “the commander taking a decision based on an AI -enabled system bu…
S63
Global South Solidarities for Global Digital Governance | IGF 2023 Networking Session #110 โ€” However, despite the positive reception, there are challenges that hinder the achievement of consensus within the digita…
S64
Bridging the Digital Divide: Achieving Universal and Meaningful Connectivity (ITU) โ€” Alexandre, an advocate for data-driven policy-making, emphasises the importance of quality and disaggregated data in ide…
S65
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 โ€” “scientists, and industry to develop ethical and sustainable AI solutions”[9]. “To harness this potential, we must ensur…
S66
Building the Next Wave of AI_ Responsible Frameworks & Standards โ€” no the one thing that I wanted to talk about was trust because that’s what was being discussed Trust in Salesforce. Trus…
S67
AI as critical infrastructure for continuity in public services โ€” Involvement of senior decisionโ€‘makers who understand strategic goals creates lasting confidence for crossโ€‘border AI inve…
S68
Building Trusted AI at Scale – Keynote Anne Bouverot โ€” This comment shifts the discussion from acknowledging competition to actively proposing strategic alliances. It introduc…
S69
Open Forum #72 European Parliament Delegation to the IGF & the Youth IGF โ€” Expanded Summary of Discussion on Protecting Minors Online Pearse O’donohue: Wow, thank you Apart from the protocol …
S70
Lightning Talk #107 Irish Regulator Builds a Safe and Trusted Online Environment โ€” John Evans: Hello, hi there. Good afternoon. Thank you very much for attending and thank you to IGF. My name is Niamh Ha…
S71
THE GREEK NATIONAL DIGITAL DECADE STRATEGIC ROADMAP โ€” As mentioned in the Section 2, Greece has a digital skills deficit with the problem focused on older people and those wi…
S72
Spain president proposes Digital Rights Charter, outlining fundamental rights of individuals online โ€” According to anews report, Spanish Presidentย  Pedro Sรกnchez has announced the publication of theCarta Derechos Digitales…
S73
Infraestructure and technology โ€” This is the spirit in which the Charter of Digital Rights was drawn up, a pioneering initiative launched by the Sp…
S74
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council โ€” The recent discussions at the9821st meetingof the UN Security Council highlighted the critical role of AI governance wit…
S75
How can Artificial Intelligence (AI) improve digital accessibility for persons with disabilities? โ€” Ambassador Francisca Mendez:Thank you. Thank you so much for the interesting question. I would like to take the opportun…
S76
United Nations Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies โ€” The Independent International Scientific Panel on AI and the Global Dialogue on AI Governance represent an important ste…
S77
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance โ€” Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S78
Ethics and AI | Part 6 โ€” Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S79
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development โ€” Strong consensus emerged around human-centered AI principles. Austria’s State Secretary Alexander Perol articulated the …
S80
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance โ€” Fadi Salim: Thank you. And this covers a little bit the grassroot element of it. So it’s awareness, diversity, inclusi…
S81
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance โ€” AUDIENCE: Thank you for the wonderful thought provoking conversation. I wanted to ask, I only attended half of the ses…
S82
Open Forum #13 Bridging the Digital Divide Focus on the Global South โ€” Infrastructure | Development | Economic Nii Quaynor warns that maturing AI technology poses the greatest threat to the …
S83
Driving Indias AI Future Growth Innovation and Impact โ€” “Investment also includes energy infrastructure, because without energy, there is really no compute infrastructure you c…
S84
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm โ€” Kate Kallot: We are living through a time where entire regions are at risk of being left out of the future. And that’s n…
S85
New plan outlines how India will democratise AI infrastructure โ€” Indiais moving to rebalance access to AI infrastructureas part of a new national push to close gaps in computing power a…
S86
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact โ€” -Infrastructure and Compute Requirements for Sovereign AI: The panel extensively discussed India’s need for massive GPU …
S87
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem โ€” International Cooperation and Multi-stakeholder Approach Klauweiter argues that since AI governance is a global problem…
S88
AI Governance Dialogue: Steering the future of AI โ€” Development | Legal and regulatory Martin argues that the United Nations’ universal membership and convening power make…
S89
Any other business /Adoption of the report/ Closure of the session โ€” In conclusion, the delegate’s remarks highlighted the enduring spirit of solidarity and collaboration, while also convey…
S90
Opening address of the co-chairs of the AI Governance Dialogue โ€” The tone is consistently formal, diplomatic, and optimistic throughout. It maintains a ceremonial quality appropriate fo…
S91
Welcome Address โ€” The tone is consistently optimistic, visionary, and confident throughout the speech. Modi maintains an inspirational and…
S92
Powering the Technology Revolution / Davos 2025 โ€” The tone was generally optimistic and forward-looking, with panelists highlighting opportunities for innovation and prog…
S93
WS #270 Understanding digital exclusion in AI era โ€” These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting critical challenges in AI adoption and development, particularl…
S94
Safeguarding Children with Responsible AI โ€” Cultural, contextual, and inclusion considerations
S95
WS #288 An AI Policy Research Roadmap for Evidence-Based AI Policy โ€” The discussion highlighted the importance of policy interoperability rather than uniform global governance, recognizing …
S96
Powering AI _ Global Leaders Session _ AI Impact Summit India Part 2 โ€” The disagreement level is moderate but significant for policy implications. While there’s consensus on the core challeng…
S97
Inclusive AI For A Better World, Through Cross-Cultural And Multi-Generational Dialogue โ€” Factors such as restricted access to computing resources and data further impede policy efficacy. Nevertheless, the cont…
S98
Empowering India & the Global South Through AI Literacy โ€” Artificial intelligence | Capacity development | Social and economic development
S99
Digital Public Infrastructure, Policy Harmonisation, and Digital Cooperation โ€“ AI, Data Governance,and Innovation for Development โ€” 1. Capacity Building and Stakeholder Involvement: 3. Developing strategies to overcome the practical challenges of incl…
S100
Inclusive AI Starts with People Not Just Algorithms โ€” Capacity development | Social and economic development Capacity development | Social and economic development | Artific…
S101
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Lt Gen Vipul Shinghal โ€” “The black box of data must become a glass box.”[11]. “the commander taking a decision based on an AI -enabled system bu…
S102
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 โ€” Byaktigat sar par AI hamari learning, intelligence aur emotions ko prabhavit kar rahi hai. Excellency, AI ke ethical upy…
S103
WS #97 Interoperability of AI Governance: Scope and Mechanism โ€” Olga Cavalli: Thank you, Mauricio, for this very good examples of cooperation. And I love the standards hub. I like …
S104
Why science metters in global AI governance โ€” This comment fundamentally shifted the conversation’s scope, moving it from immediate technical concerns to long-term in…
S105
Chinese leading AI expert argues for AI governance by the UN โ€” The rapid development of AI technology has outpaced existing regulatory frameworks, creating challenges in areas such as…
S106
Open Forum #58 Collaborating for Trustworthy AI an Oecd Toolkit and Spotlight on AI in Government โ€” Since its adoption in May 2019, 48 countries and the European Union have adhered to the OECD Principles on Artificial In…
S107
Building a Digital Society, from Vision to Implementation โ€” Small island developing states face common challenges and should work together
S108
Laying the foundations for AI governance โ€” International Cooperation and Standards Legal and regulatory | Development Papandreou suggests that countries like Gre…
S109
Better governance for fairer digital markets: unlocking the innovation potential and leveling the playing field (UNCTAD) โ€” The analysis identifies several key arguments and stances on the topic of digital market regulation. One prominent argum…
S110
Britainโ€™s CMA sets roadmap for Big Tech regulation โ€” Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) hasannouncedits focus will be on interventions that directly affect UK…
S111
AI That Empowers Safety Growth and Social Inclusion in Action โ€” The discussion revealed tension between framework proliferation and the need for practical implementation guidance. Diff…
S112
WS #152 a Competition Rights Approach to Digital Markets โ€” Bruno Carballa SmichoWSki: Thank you very much. Lots of good questions that I’m going to try to squeeze in answers to in…
S113
Global South’s role in AI governance explored at IGF 2024 โ€” The inclusion of the Global South, particularly theMENA region, in AI governance emerged as a key focus in a recentpanel…
S114
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance โ€” Lufuno T Tshikalange: Okay, thank you. Hopefully I will finish what I’m saying this time around. In terms of the risk…
S115
Towards a Safer South Launching the Global South AI Safety Research Network โ€” All speakers identify capacity building as a fundamental challenge, noting gaps in technical capacity, institutional fra…
S116
Main Session | Policy Network on Artificial Intelligence โ€” These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope beyond technical and policy considerations to include e…
S117
Shaping the Future AI Strategies for Jobs and Economic Development โ€” The discussion reveals moderate disagreements primarily around implementation approaches rather than fundamental goals. …
S118
AI Automation in Telecom_ Ensuring Accountability and Public Trust India AI Impact Summit 2026 โ€” The discussion revealed surprisingly few direct disagreements among speakers, with most conflicts being implicit rather …
S119
Ethics and AI | Part 6 โ€” Even if the Act itself does not make direct reference to “ethics”, it is closely tied to the broader context of ethical …
S120
Day 0 Event #173 Building Ethical AI: Policy Tool for Human Centric and Responsible AI Governance โ€” Chris Martin: Thanks, Ahmed. Well, everyone, I’ll walk through I think a little bit of this presentation here on what…
S121
AI Impact Summit 2026: Global Ministerial Discussions on Inclusive AI Development โ€” “It should be humanโ€‘centered, safe, transparent, and fair”[221]. “Trust”[64].
S122
Inclusive AI governance: Universal values in a pluralistic world โ€” prioritisehuman-centric governancethat protects not only individual rights, but community well-being, intergenerational …
S123
WS #82 A Global South perspective on AI governance โ€” AUDIENCE: Thank you for the wonderful thought provoking conversation. I wanted to ask, I only attended half of the ses…
S124
WS #100 Integrating the Global South in Global AI Governance โ€” Fadi Salim: Thank you. And this covers a little bit the grassroot element of it. So it’s awareness, diversity, inclusi…
S125
Signature Panel: Building Cyber Resilience for Sustainable Development by Bridging the Global Capacity Gap โ€” Brazil:Thank you, Robin. Distinguished Delegates, it’s an honor to be here today at the Global Roundtable on Building Ca…
S126
Open Forum #13 Bridging the Digital Divide Focus on the Global South โ€” Infrastructure | Development | Economic Nii Quaynor warns that maturing AI technology poses the greatest threat to the …
S127
Sovereign AI for India – Building Indigenous Capabilities for National and Global Impact โ€” -Infrastructure and Compute Requirements for Sovereign AI: The panel extensively discussed India’s need for massive GPU …
S128
AI in Africa: Beyond the algorithm โ€” Kate Kallot: We are living through a time where entire regions are at risk of being left out of the future. And that’s n…
S129
Fireside Chat Intel Tata Electronics CDAC & Asia Group _ India AI Impact Summit โ€” Dr. Khaneja outlined CDAC’s substantial progress in building India’s supercomputing backbone through the PARAM series. T…
S130
Building Trusted AI at Scale Cities Startups & Digital Sovereignty – Keynote Ebba Busch Deputy Prime Minister Sweden โ€” “First, jurisdictional control, knowing where your data is stored and processed.”[76]. “Second, infrastructure capacity,…
S131
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance Morning Session Part 1 โ€” “A regulamentaรงรฃo das chamadas Big Techs estรก ligada ao imperativo de salvaguardar os direitos humanos na esfera digital…
S132
Summit of the Future 2024 โ€” The importance of the United Nations in shaping global AI governance was highlighted by several speakers, such asPedro S…
S133
Open Forum #33 Building an International AI Cooperation Ecosystem โ€” Wolfgang Klauweiter: Yeah, thank you very much. Thank you also for the invitation. And as Jovan just said, you know, AI …
S134
AI Governance Dialogue: Steering the future of AI โ€” Development | Legal and regulatory Martin argues that the United Nations’ universal membership and convening power make…
S135
Summit Opening Session โ€” Talking about Porto is talking about a city that has always lived facing out, towards the river, towards the sea and tow…
S136
Welcome Address โ€” The tone is consistently optimistic, visionary, and confident throughout the speech. Modi maintains an inspirational and…
S137
Emerging Markets: Resilience, Innovation, and the Future of Global Development โ€” The tone was notably optimistic and forward-looking throughout the conversation. Panelists consistently emphasized oppor…
S138
Opening remarks โ€” Concluding the opening statement, the speaker commended the initial NetMundial Plus 10 declaration as a base for further…
S139
AI Innovation in India โ€” The tone was consistently celebratory, inspirational, and optimistic throughout the discussion. Speakers expressed pride…
S140
Can Digital Economy Agreements Limit Internet Fragmentation? | IGF 2023 Day 0 Event #76 โ€” Eli Noam:Yeah, really, really concise. One thing that I have concluded listening here is that my earlier proposal was a …
S141
AI and Digital Developments Forecast for 2026 โ€” The tone begins as analytical and educational but becomes increasingly cautionary and urgent throughout the conversation…
S142
The State of Digital Fragmentation (Digital Policy Alert) โ€” Furthermore, the analysis highlights the global expansion of digital corporations and the lack of global regulation as p…
S143
Strengthening the positive and mitigating the negative impacts for the environment of digitalisation regulations ( Transnational Institute) โ€” Additionally, artificial intelligence, a key component of the digital revolution, is expected to meet ethical standards,…
S144
Artificial intelligence (AI) – UN Security Council โ€” During the9821st meetingof the Security Council, the discussions centered around the concept of accidental risks associa…
S145
Successes & challenges: cyber capacity building coordination | IGF 2023 โ€” In conclusion, the analysis identifies the need for enhanced coordination in cyber capacity building. It emphasizes the …
S146
Governing Tech for Peace: a Multistakeholder Approach | IGF 2023 Networking Session #78 โ€” Moreover, UNESCO intends to build the capacities of stakeholders to counter digital exclusion and inequality. This ambit…
S147
Multistakeholder Model – Driver for Global Services and SDGs | IGF 2023 Open Forum #89 โ€” Furthermore, the analysis highlights the recognition of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9.1 within the context of int…
S148
Digital Cooperation and Empowerment: Insights and Best Practices for Strengthening Multistakeholder and Inclusive Participation โ€” Capacity Building Initiatives Capacity building and support mechanisms are crucial for meaningful stakeholder engagemen…
S149
Agenda item 5: discussions on substantive issues contained inparagraph 1 of General Assembly resolution 75/240 (continued) – session 5 โ€” In summary, Switzerland’s nuanced feedback to the diplomatic document embodies a commitment to collaborative and inclusi…
S150
UN: Summit of the Future Global Call โ€” Switzerland:Mr. President, Mr. Chancellor, Secretary-General, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen. Switzerland is concern…
S151
WSIS at 20: successes, failures and future expectations | IGF 2023 Open Forum #100 โ€” Both speakers agree on the critical role of UN partnerships and multi-stakeholder groups. They acknowledge that the coll…
S152
(Interactive Dialogue 2) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session โ€” Kyrgyzstan: Thank you, Co-Chair, Excellencies. The maintenance of international peace and security has become very cha…
S153
Closing Ceremony โ€” The discussion maintains a consistently positive and collaborative tone throughout, characterized by gratitude, celebrat…
S154
Closing Sessionย  โ€” The tone throughout the discussion was consistently formal, collaborative, and optimistic. It maintained a celebratory y…
S155
Closing remarks โ€“ Charting the path forward โ€” The tone throughout was consistently formal, diplomatic, and optimistic. It maintained a collaborative and forward-looki…
S156
Opening of the session โ€” The tone was generally constructive and collaborative, with delegates emphasizing the need for cooperation and shared co…
S157
Any other business /Adoption of the report/ Closure of the session โ€” In closing, the speaker reiterated steadfast support for the Chairperson, the Secretariat, and the diligent team, emphas…
S158
What is it about AI that we need to regulate? โ€” Global South Participation:There’s growing emphasis on including developing countries in governance frameworks. TheOpen …
S159
Building Scalable AI Through Global South Partnerships โ€” All speakers emphasize the importance of collaboration between Global South countries, sharing resources, knowledge, and…
S160
Leadersโ€™ Plenary | Global Vision for AI Impact and Governance- Afternoon Session โ€” And Prime Minister, we believe that nations should always build the strongest intelligence infrastructure and cross -bor…
S161
Opening โ€” While digital technologies were initially seen as tools for liberation and knowledge sharing, they can also be used to c…
S162
WS #136 Leveraging Technology for Healthy Online Information Spaces โ€” Switzerland’s approach of strengthening user rights and increasing platform transparency
S163
Comprehensive Report: European Approaches to AI Regulation and Governance โ€” Goals of remaining/becoming innovation center; fundamental rights preservation; trust as important concept bringing toge…
S164
Swiss AI Initiatives and Policy Implementation Discussion โ€” This discussion provided insights into practical AI governance implementation across different sectors. The speakers dem…
S165
Ad Hoc Consultation: Wednesday 7th February, Morning session โ€” However, this engagement hinged on preserving the proposal’s core, ensuring it addresses Liechtenstein’s significant con…
S168
UNSC meeting: Peace and common development โ€” In this speech, Spain advocates for a comprehensive approach to international peace and security, emphasising the interc…
S169
Towards 2030 and Beyond: Accelerating the SDGs through Access to Evidence on What Works โ€” Ana Jimenez: Thank you very much Andrea for for giving me the floor and for the invitation to this important meeting and…
S170
Space for Sustainable Development โ€” Spain’s engagement with the ITU and UNICEF’s GIGA initiative signifies a strong advocacy for global partnerships (SDG 17…
S171
Adoption of the agenda and organization of work โ€” Argentina has actively engaged in the collaborative process of building consensus and enhancing international cooperatio…
S172
AI and Global Power Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Transformation and Geopolitical Implications โ€” What we are seeing is that there are indeed jobs that get enhanced and we also see jobs that are replaced by AI. This is…
S173
IMF calls for new fiscal policies to address AI’s economic and environmental impacts โ€” The International Monetary Fund (IMF) hasrecommendedfiscal policies for governments grappling with the economic impacts …
S174
The Global Economic Outlook โ€” Panelists emphasized the need to rebuild optimism and trust among populations feeling economically insecure. They discus…
S175
Press Briefing by HMIT Ashwani Vaishnav on AI Impact Summit 2026 l Day 5 โ€” When responding to questions about concrete achievements, Vaishnaw detailed how India’s AI Mission 1.0 has substantially…
S176
Indias Roadmap to an AGI-Enabled Future โ€” -Compute Infrastructure and GPU Requirements: Analysis of India’s current and projected compute needs, with estimates su…
Speakers Analysis
Detailed breakdown of each speaker’s arguments and positions
N
Narendra Modi
2 arguments83 words per minute1297 words928 seconds
Argument 1
Humanโ€‘welfare focus
EXPLANATION
Modi emphasizes that the direction of artificial intelligence must serve the welfare of all humanity, positioning technology as a means of service rather than a source of power. He calls for AI to be guided by right intentions and ethical norms to achieve positive impact.
EVIDENCE
He states that “The direction of AI should be such that it is the welfare of all mankind” and reinforces that “technology is not a power, but a means of service” and “It is not power, it is empowering” [9-10].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Modiโ€™s call for global AI regulation emphasizing benefits for humanity and addressing harms such as deepfakes aligns with his welfare focus [S59] and his statement that AI must follow clear human values and guidance [S60].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Brazil
Argument 2
Data framework, โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ transparency
EXPLANATION
Modi proposes three pillars for ethical AI: a data sovereignty framework, transparent safety rules (a “glassโ€‘box” approach) and alignment of AI with human values. This aims to ensure trustworthy AI outcomes and accountability.
EVIDENCE
He calls for a data framework respecting data sovereignty, warns that “garbage in, garbage out” leads to unreliable outputs, advocates clear and transparent safety rules that can be verified (“glass-box”), and stresses the need for human-guided values to avoid the paper-clip problem [16-23].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The proposal for a โ€œglass-boxโ€ mirrors calls for transparent AI safety rules, reflected in the โ€œblack box must become a glass boxโ€ principle and sandbox approaches for trustworthy data sharing [S62][S61][S60].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Serbia
B
Brazil
2 arguments108 words per minute778 words431 seconds
Argument 1
Multilateral governance & UN centrality
EXPLANATION
Brazil argues that global AI governance should be anchored in the United Nations, ensuring a multilateral, inclusive, and developmentโ€‘oriented framework. The UN is seen as the only universal platform capable of delivering such governance.
EVIDENCE
The Brazilian representative states that “none of these forums replaces the universality of the United Nations for an international governance of artificial intelligence that is multilateral, inclusive and oriented to development” and references the Global Digital Pact and the International Scientific Panel as mechanisms within the UN system [78-80].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazilโ€™s advocacy for UN-anchored AI governance is echoed in its proposal for a centralized UN portal and calls for UN reform as a universal platform for AI cooperation [S42][S3][S8].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Spain, Switzerland, Estonia
DISAGREED WITH
Switzerland, Estonia
Argument 2
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech
EXPLANATION
Brazil highlights the massive digital exclusion worldwide and calls for regulation of large technology firms to protect human rights, digital integrity, and societal safety. It stresses that without collective action, AI will deepen existing inequalities.
EVIDENCE
The speech notes that 2.6โ€ฏbillion people are disconnected, 660โ€ฏmillion will lack electricity by 2030, and that “Big Tech” exploits personal data, undermining privacy and amplifying radicalisation, thus requiring regulation to safeguard digital rights [62-68].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Brazilโ€™s emphasis on digital exclusion and regulation of large tech firms matches ITUโ€™s focus on universal connectivity and the need to address digital inequalities, as well as broader discussions on digital rights conflicts [S64][S65][S63].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Guyana, Seychelles
DISAGREED WITH
Serbia, Finland
L
Liechtenstein
2 arguments91 words per minute353 words230 seconds
Argument 1
Trust, quality and sustainable AI
EXPLANATION
Liechtenstein stresses that AI must be built on trust, quality, and sustainability, aligning technological progress with longโ€‘term societal values. It argues that innovation and trust are not opposing forces.
EVIDENCE
The speaker notes that “innovation becomes sustainable only when it rests on the foundation of trust” and that AI should bring “meaningful opportunities from better public services to new business models” while ensuring responsible governance [289-293].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Liechtensteinโ€™s stress on trust and quality aligns with the view that trust is a core value for responsible AI and that cross-border collaboration is essential for shared benefits [S66][S65][S68].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Switzerland, Brazil
Argument 2
Crossโ€‘border collaboration for trusted AI
EXPLANATION
Liechtenstein calls for global cooperation to ensure AI benefits are shared broadly and not concentrated, emphasizing the need for crossโ€‘border collaboration to build trusted AI ecosystems.
EVIDENCE
It states that “AI governance is a global challenge that requires global solutions” and that “cross-border collaboration is essential to ensure that the benefits of AI are shared broadly and not concentrated among few” [291-296].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The call for global cooperation to ensure AI benefits are broadly shared is supported by discussions on cross-border collaboration and coalition-building for AI governance [S65][S68].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
G
Greece
2 arguments136 words per minute891 words391 seconds
Argument 1
Protecting minors & democratic values
EXPLANATION
Greece emphasizes safeguarding children from digital addiction and online harms, linking this protection to broader democratic responsibilities. It presents this as a priority for the government.
EVIDENCE
The Greek Prime Minister says that “protecting minors from digital addiction and online harm is a matter of intergenerational solidarity and a top priority” and that legislation on banning harmful content for minors will be announced soon [472-474].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Greeceโ€™s concern for protecting children from digital addiction and online harms is reflected in recent IGF sessions on safeguarding minors online [S69].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
Argument 2
Reskilling, publicโ€‘sector modernization & protection of youth
EXPLANATION
Greece calls for reskilling workers, modernising public institutions, and ensuring AI benefits reach teachers, nurses, farmers and small entrepreneurs. It links these measures to preventing labor displacement and protecting youth.
EVIDENCE
The speech outlines the need for “workers to be reskilled, small businesses to have access to AI tools, public services upgraded, and the farmer, the nurse, the teacher, the small entrepreneur must feel this dividend” and stresses that “concerns about significant labor displacement are legitimate” [452-456].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Greeceโ€™s focus on reskilling and modernising public services corresponds with its national digital skills roadmap that highlights the need to address skill gaps and up-skill workers [S71].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
International Monetary Fund, Croatia
S
Spain
2 arguments129 words per minute379 words175 seconds
Argument 1
Charter of Digital Rights & supervisory agency
EXPLANATION
Spain highlights its 2021 Charter of Digital Rights and the creation of Europeโ€™s first AI supervisory agency, positioning these tools as essential for protecting rights and ensuring trustworthy AI.
EVIDENCE
The Spanish delegate notes that “Spain promoted the Charter of Digital Rights back in 2021 and created Europeโ€™s first AI supervisory agency” and links this to safeguarding democratic values [656-658].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Spainโ€™s promotion of the 2021 Digital Rights Charter and the creation of Europeโ€™s first AI supervisory agency are documented in recent policy reports on Spainโ€™s digital initiatives [S72][S65][S73].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
Argument 2
Global Digital Compact, AI expert panel & UN coordination
EXPLANATION
Spain points to the Global Digital Compact and the newly established UN AI expert panel as mechanisms for coordinated international AI governance, stressing the need for a UNโ€‘led framework.
EVIDENCE
It references the recent establishment of the AI expert panel, calls it a “critical milestone,” and says Spain looks forward to hosting its first meeting, underscoring the role of the UN in global AI governance [658-662].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Spainโ€™s reference to the Global Digital Compact and the UN AI expert panel aligns with UN documents describing the Compactโ€™s role in AI governance and the establishment of the expert panel [S74][S76].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia
N
Netherlands
2 arguments150 words per minute412 words164 seconds
Argument 1
Responsible AI & inclusive innovation
EXPLANATION
The Netherlands stresses that AI must be used responsibly and inclusively, balancing innovation with safety, and ensuring that all stakeholders can benefit from AI advances.
EVIDENCE
The Dutch speaker mentions presenting the first international AI strategy, making public AI infrastructure available for SMEs, and committing to responsible use of AI opportunities while highlighting the need for international governance [607-618].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
Argument 2
AI strategy sharing, public infrastructure for SMEs
EXPLANATION
The Netherlands outlines its AI strategy that provides shared public AI infrastructure to support small businesses, government, and research, aiming to attract talent and promote data sharing.
EVIDENCE
It states that “the Netherlands is presenting its first international AI strategy this year, making public AI infrastructure available for small business, government and science” and that this will help attract talent and foster collaboration [607-610].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
S
Switzerland
1 argument110 words per minute505 words274 seconds
Argument 1
AI as a service, not an end
EXPLANATION
Switzerland argues that AI should be viewed as a service that empowers societies rather than an end in itself, emphasizing that responsible AI enables innovation and inclusion.
EVIDENCE
The Swiss representative says “technology is not a power, but a means of service” and that “responsible AI does not hinder innovation, it enables it” while highlighting the role of inclusive dialogue and multilateral cooperation [251-259].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Ethical AI Governance & Humanโ€‘Centric Principles
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Spain, Estonia
S
Serbia
1 argument135 words per minute553 words244 seconds
Argument 1
Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty
EXPLANATION
Serbia warns that AI power is increasingly concentrated in a few countries and corporations, threatening national sovereignty and urging states to develop their own data, expertise and regulatory capacity.
EVIDENCE
The Serbian speaker notes that “we are witnessing an unprecedented concentration of technological power” and that sovereignty now means managing citizens’ data, regulating algorithms, and building domestic expertise to avoid dependence on external decisions [124-135].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Estonia
DISAGREED WITH
Brazil, Finland
S
Slovakia
1 argument120 words per minute434 words216 seconds
Argument 1
Building sovereign AI infrastructure & lowโ€‘carbon compute
EXPLANATION
Slovakia describes its rapid development of GPUโ€‘based AI factories and a new supercomputer (Perun) powered by lowโ€‘carbon energy, positioning the country as an early mover in sovereign AI infrastructure.
EVIDENCE
It mentions fast progress on AI factory projects, the launch of the Perun supercomputer for AI simulations, and the intention to turn its energy niche into a digital export with low-carbon power supporting domestic compute [158-162][176-180].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Kazakhstan, Finland, Bhutan
K
Kazakhstan
3 arguments126 words per minute523 words248 seconds
Argument 1
AI hub, dataโ€‘center valley & sovereign cloud
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan announces the creation of a sovereign AI hub, including a Data Center Valley offering over 1โ€ฏGW of lowโ€‘cost, clean power, and competitive tariffs to attract energyโ€‘intensive AI workloads.
EVIDENCE
The speech details the Data Center Valley with more than 1โ€ฏGW capacity at 2.5โ€ฏUS cents per kWh, the launch of a sovereign AI hub, and offers a full support package for investors [549-554].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Finland, Bhutan
Argument 2
Renewable lowโ€‘cost power for sovereign AI hub
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan highlights its renewable energy base and low electricity costs as a foundation for a sustainable, sovereign AI computing ecosystem.
EVIDENCE
It states that over 90โ€ฏ% of transactions are cashless, that the country is investing in renewable energy, and that the Data Center Valley will provide cheap, clean power to power AI workloads [543-554].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
Argument 3
AI SANA program training one million citizens
EXPLANATION
Kazakhstan reports that its AI SANA program has trained one million people across all age groups, building human capital for AI development and deployment.
EVIDENCE
The speaker notes that “under the AI SANA program last year, 1โ€ฏmillion people in Kazakhstan trained on AI skills” covering school children, university students, entrepreneurs and civil servants [555-556].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Greece, Finland, Croatia
E
Estonia
2 arguments107 words per minute461 words257 seconds
Argument 1
Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy
EXPLANATION
Estonia outlines its AST.AI programme and a national AI strategy that mandates clear safety rules, a “glassโ€‘box” approach, and systematic AI deployment across the economy and public sector.
EVIDENCE
The Estonian speaker describes the AST.AI programme, the need for transparent safety rules that can be verified, and the national AI strategy guiding systematic AI application [90-94].
EXTERNAL EVIDENCE (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Estoniaโ€™s AST.AI programme calls for transparent safety rules and a โ€œglass-boxโ€ approach, echoing broader pushes for verifiable AI governance and sandbox frameworks for data sharing [S62][S61].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Data Sovereignty & Sovereign Compute
AGREED WITH
Narendra Modi, Serbia
Argument 2
AI Leap publicโ€‘private partnership for nationwide AI literacy
EXPLANATION
Estonia has launched the AI Leap initiative, a publicโ€‘private partnership that provides students and teachers with advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks to raise AI literacy nationwide.
EVIDENCE
The speech mentions that the AI Leap initiative offers “students and teachers nationwide access to advanced AI tools, training and learning frameworks” to strengthen AI literacy and the innovation ecosystem [95-96].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
Greece, Finland, Kazakhstan, Croatia
F
Finland
2 arguments110 words per minute365 words197 seconds
Argument 1
Ecoโ€‘efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres
EXPLANATION
Finland highlights its worldโ€‘class, ecoโ€‘efficient data centres powered by clean energy, demonstrating that highโ€‘performance computing can be sustainable and support AI workloads.
EVIDENCE
The Finnish delegate notes that Finland “hosts one of the world’s most eco-efficient data centers, powered by clean energy, with excess heat recycled into local communities” and that this showcases sustainable technological leadership [432-435].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Bhutan
Argument 2
Worldโ€‘class AI ecosystem, research talent & cleanโ€‘energy compute
EXPLANATION
Finland describes its AI ecosystem, including the Lumi supercomputing environment, research institutes like the Ellis Institute, and cleanโ€‘energy powered data centres, positioning the country as a leader in responsible AI development.
EVIDENCE
It mentions “Finland is building a world-class AI ecosystem that spans research, infrastructure, and deployment” with “Lumi” supercomputing, “Ellis Institute” talent and clean energy data centres [432-435].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
Estonia, Greece, Kazakhstan, Croatia
G
Guyana
1 argument120 words per minute786 words390 seconds
Argument 1
Practical assistance for AI diffusion in lowโ€‘capacity states
EXPLANATION
Guyana calls for mechanisms to raise awareness among policymakers in lowโ€‘capacity countries and to provide practical support for AI development, emphasizing bilateral and multilateral assistance.
EVIDENCE
The speaker proposes a mechanism to promote awareness among policymakers, to help organize AI development and diffusion, and cites the IMF and UNโ€™s $3โ€ฏbillion fund for capacity building, while stressing the need for quality review systems for AI models [508-525].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Seychelles
M
Mauritius
1 argument109 words per minute521 words286 seconds
Argument 1
Digital Transformation Blueprint & AI economic zone
EXPLANATION
Mauritius presents its Digital Transformation Blueprint (2025โ€‘2029) and announces a specialized economic zone dedicated to digital technology and AI to foster growth and resilience in the region.
EVIDENCE
The Mauritian delegate mentions the “Mauritius Digital Transformation Blueprint 2025 to 2029” and the establishment of a specialized economic zone for digital technology and AI serving Mauritius and the wider region, especially Africa [580-585].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
S
Seychelles
1 argument128 words per minute587 words273 seconds
Argument 1
Partnerโ€‘driven access to AI for small island states
EXPLANATION
Seychelles stresses its reliance on partnerships with larger states like India to obtain AI technology, given limited domestic resources, and calls for international support to bridge the digital divide for small island developing states.
EVIDENCE
The Seychellois speaker notes the need for partners like India to “transform or transcend the technology barrier” and highlights the lack of oil or minerals but the presence of human capital, urging cooperation for AI access [630-639].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Brazil, Guyana
B
Bolivia
1 argument117 words per minute79 words40 seconds
Argument 1
Solidarityโ€‘based AI for all humanity
EXPLANATION
Bolivia calls for an AI future built on equity, ethics and solidarity among nations, asserting that AI should serve all of humanity rather than a privileged few.
EVIDENCE
The Bolivian speaker declares that “the digital future must be built with equity, with ethics, and above all, with solidarity between all nations” and expresses willingness to work with India and the international community for inclusive AI [369-374].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
I
International Monetary Fund
2 arguments107 words per minute665 words369 seconds
Argument 1
Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development
EXPLANATION
The IMF quantifies AIโ€™s macroโ€‘economic benefits, estimating up to 0.8โ€ฏ% global growth, while warning that 40โ€ฏ% of jobs could be affected, emphasizing the need for skill development and reskilling.
EVIDENCE
The IMF report projects a “0.8โ€ฏ% boost to global growth” and notes that “about 40โ€ฏ% of jobs will be impacted” with higher demand for AI-skilled workers, leading to wage gains and reshaping labor markets [674-694].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Inclusion, Equity & Capacity Building for the Global South
AGREED WITH
Croatia, Greece
Argument 2
Multilateral funding & collaborative research
EXPLANATION
The IMF highlights its role in mobilising multilateral resources, such as a $3โ€ฏbillion fund, to support AI capacity building and collaborative research in developing countries.
EVIDENCE
The speaker mentions that “the IMF and the United Nations are raising $3โ€ฏbillion to assist with capacity building and diffusion of AI” and stresses the importance of multilateral funding mechanisms [511-518].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
International Cooperation & Multilateral Frameworks
C
Croatia
1 argument102 words per minute473 words278 seconds
Argument 1
Talent development, innovation ecosystem & startup support
EXPLANATION
Croatia showcases its thriving tech ecosystem, citing successful companies and a national focus on digital transformation, to illustrate how talent and entrepreneurship drive AI innovation.
EVIDENCE
The Croatian speaker lists companies such as InfoBeep, Rimac, MicroBlink, Gideon and Infinum, noting their global competitiveness and the country’s emphasis on digital transformation as a national priority [401-407].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Education, AI Literacy & Workforce Reskilling
AGREED WITH
International Monetary Fund, Greece
B
Bhutan
1 argument113 words per minute914 words482 seconds
Argument 1
Hydropowerโ€‘driven green AI compute & Mindfulness City
EXPLANATION
Bhutan proposes leveraging its abundant hydropower to power green AI compute facilities, including the Gelipur Mindfulness City, a hub for sustainable AI research and energyโ€‘intensive industries.
EVIDENCE
The Bhutanese delegate highlights that “Bhutan’s hydropower has long been a symbol of partnership” and describes the Mindfulness City powered by clean renewable energy, designed to attract green data centres and AI research [332-344].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
AGREED WITH
Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Finland
S
Sri Lanka
1 argument210 words per minute1158 words330 seconds
Argument 1
Cultural preservation and environmental protection concerns
EXPLANATION
Sri Lanka stresses the importance of protecting cultural heritage and the environment while pursuing digital development, warning that neglect could undermine cultural diversity and sustainability.
EVIDENCE
The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the need to “protect the environment” and preserve “cultural diversity” and warns that unchecked digitalisation could threaten cultural heritage [208-215].
MAJOR DISCUSSION POINT
Sustainable Energy & Green AI
DISAGREED WITH
Other participants (e.g., India, Brazil, Estonia)
Agreements
Agreement Points
AI should serve humanity and be guided by ethical, humanโ€‘centred principles
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Brazil
Humanโ€‘welfare focus AI as a service, not an end Trust, quality and sustainable AI Multilateral governance & UN centrality
All four speakers stressed that artificial intelligence must be a tool for the welfare of all people, emphasizing ethical governance, trust and service orientation rather than a source of power. Modi said the direction of AI should be the welfare of mankind [9-10]; Switzerland highlighted that technology is a means of service and responsible AI enables innovation [251-259]; Liechtenstein argued that innovation becomes sustainable only when built on trust and quality [289-293]; Brazil noted that AI can bring benefits to humanity but also poses serious risks if not governed responsibly [53-55].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
This consensus mirrors the OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence, which emphasize human-centred values and ethical AI development, and echoes calls for evidence-based, context-specific policy frameworks discussed at recent AI policy roadmaps [S106][S95].
Need for transparent, accountable AI systems and data sovereignty (the โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ approach)
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Estonia, Serbia
Data framework, โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ transparency Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty
Modi called for a data framework respecting sovereignty and a โ€œglass-boxโ€ where safety rules are clear and verifiable [16-23]; Estonia described its AST.AI programme that requires transparent safety rules that can be inspected [90-94]; Serbia warned that unchecked concentration of AI power threatens sovereignty and called for domestic data and algorithmic control [124-135].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The โ€˜glass-boxโ€™ demand aligns with calls for transparency and accountability in AI governance, as highlighted by Ltโ€ฏGenโ€ฏVipul Shinghalโ€™s keynote on making the black box of data visible [S101], and with data-sovereignty frameworks advocated in multilateral discussions [S102][S106].
UNโ€‘anchored multilateral governance as the cornerstone for global AI coordination
Speakers: Brazil, Spain, Switzerland, Estonia
Multilateral governance & UN centrality Global Digital Compact, AI expert panel & UN coordination AI as a service, not an end UN dialogue on AI governance
Brazil asserted that only the United Nations can provide a universal, inclusive AI governance framework [78-80]; Spain pointed to the Global Digital Compact and the new UN AI expert panel as key mechanisms [658-662]; Switzerland emphasized the role of International Geneva and the UN as a steady anchor for AI dialogue [260-265]; Estonia noted the UN-hosted global AI dialogue as an inclusive platform [105-106].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Multiple sources underline the UNโ€™s unique role in fostering coordinated AI governance, from historical arguments for multilateralism [S104] to explicit proposals for UN-led AI governance by Chinese experts [S105] and broader international cooperation on standards [S108][S109].
Bridging the digital divide and supporting AI diffusion in the Global South
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, Seychelles
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Practical assistance for AI diffusion in lowโ€‘capacity states Partnerโ€‘driven access to AI for small island states
Brazil highlighted massive digital exclusion (2.6โ€ฏbillion offline, 660โ€ฏmillion without electricity) and the need to regulate Big Tech to protect rights [62-68]; Guyana called for mechanisms to raise awareness among policymakers and to help low-capacity countries adopt AI, citing a $3โ€ฏbillion fund [498-505]; Seychelles stressed reliance on partnerships with larger states like India to obtain AI technology and close the divide for small island developing states [630-639].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Capacity-building initiatives and digital inclusion strategies for the Global South have been a recurring theme in forums such as the IGF 2024 [S113], AI literacy programmes in India [S98], and broader digital public infrastructure reports emphasizing inclusive policy making [S99][S100][S115].
Building sovereign, lowโ€‘carbon AI compute infrastructure
Speakers: Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Finland, Bhutan
Building sovereign AI infrastructure & lowโ€‘carbon compute AI hub, dataโ€‘center valley & sovereign cloud Ecoโ€‘efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres Hydropowerโ€‘driven green AI compute & Mindfulness City
Slovakia reported fast progress on GPU-based AI factories and the low-carbon Perun supercomputer [158-162][176-180]; Kazakhstan announced a Data Center Valley offering >1โ€ฏGW of clean, cheap power for AI workloads [549-554]; Finland highlighted its eco-efficient data centres powered by clean energy and heat-recycling [432-435]; Bhutan described its hydropower-powered Gelipur Mindfulness City as a green AI compute hub [332-344].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Energy constraints for AI and the push for low-carbon compute were highlighted at the AI Impact Summit India [S96] and in discussions on sustainable digital sovereignty for small island states [S107][S108].
Capacity development and AI literacy for inclusive growth
Speakers: Estonia, Greece, Finland, Kazakhstan, Croatia
AI Leap publicโ€‘private partnership for nationwide AI literacy Reskilling, publicโ€‘sector modernization & protection of youth Worldโ€‘class AI ecosystem, research talent & cleanโ€‘energy compute AI SANA program training one million citizens Talent development, innovation ecosystem & startup support
Estoniaโ€™s AI Leap provides students and teachers with advanced AI tools and training [95-96]; Greece called for reskilling workers, teachers and small businesses to ensure AI benefits are shared [452-456]; Finland described its AI ecosystem spanning research, talent and clean-energy compute, emphasizing the need for skilled people [418-429]; Kazakhstan reported that its AI SANA programme has trained one million citizens across all ages [555-556]; Croatia showcased a vibrant tech ecosystem and the importance of talent development [401-407].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Several initiatives stress AI literacy as a pillar for inclusive development, including capacity-building programmes in the Global South [S98][S115], digital public infrastructure strategies [S99], and cross-generational dialogue on inclusive AI [S97][S100].
AIโ€™s economic potential coupled with labour market disruption concerns
Speakers: International Monetary Fund, Croatia, Greece
Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development Talent development, innovation ecosystem & startup support Reskilling, publicโ€‘sector modernization & protection of youth
The IMF estimated AI could add up to 0.8โ€ฏ% to global growth while affecting about 40โ€ฏ% of jobs, stressing the need for skill development [674-682]; Croatia warned that AIโ€™s rapid scale can blur fact and fiction, amplifying risks and requiring regulation [381-386]; Greece highlighted legitimate concerns about labour displacement and the need for reskilling [452-456].
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The dual narrative of AI-driven growth and labour market impacts was a focal point in policy discussions on jobs and economic development [S117] and in debates over automationโ€™s societal effects [S118].
Similar Viewpoints
All three leaders framed AI as a tool for human welfare rather than a source of power, emphasizing trust, quality and service orientation. Modi spoke of AIโ€™s direction being the welfare of mankind [9-10]; Switzerland described technology as a means of service that enables innovation [251-259]; Liechtenstein stressed that innovation becomes sustainable only when built on trust and quality [289-293].
Speakers: Narendra Modi, Switzerland, Liechtenstein
Humanโ€‘welfare focus AI as a service, not an end Trust, quality and sustainable AI
Each highlighted the urgent need to close digital gaps and support lowโ€‘capacity countries in adopting AI. Brazil warned of exclusion of 2.6โ€ฏbillion people and called for regulation of Big Tech [62-68]; Guyana proposed mechanisms to raise policy awareness and provide bilateral assistance for AI diffusion [498-505]; Seychelles called for partnership with larger states to overcome resource constraints [630-639].
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, Seychelles
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Practical assistance for AI diffusion in lowโ€‘capacity states Partnerโ€‘driven access to AI for small island states
Both stressed the importance of national control over data and algorithms to ensure sovereignty and accountability. Estonia advocated a transparent โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ AI platform with clear safety rules [90-94]; Serbia warned that concentration of AI power threatens sovereignty and called for domestic data and regulatory capacity [124-135].
Speakers: Estonia, Serbia
Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty
Both presented lowโ€‘carbon, sovereign compute as a strategic priority. Finland highlighted its ecoโ€‘efficient data centres powered by clean energy and heatโ€‘recycling [432-435]; Slovakia described the Perun supercomputer powered by lowโ€‘carbon energy as a sovereign AI asset [158-162][176-180].
Speakers: Finland, Slovakia
Ecoโ€‘efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres Building sovereign AI infrastructure & lowโ€‘carbon compute
Both emphasized the need for AI literacy and publicโ€‘sector modernization. Estoniaโ€™s AI Leap provides tools and training for students and teachers nationwide [95-96]; Greece called for reskilling workers, teachers and public services to ensure AI benefits are widely felt [452-456].
Speakers: Estonia, Greece
AI Leap publicโ€‘private partnership for nationwide AI literacy Reskilling, publicโ€‘sector modernization & protection of youth
Both positioned the United Nations as the primary platform for global AI governance. Spain referenced the Global Digital Compact and the new UN AI expert panel as critical mechanisms [658-662]; Brazil explicitly stated that no forum replaces the UN for inclusive AI governance [78-80].
Speakers: Spain, Brazil
Global Digital Compact, AI expert panel & UN coordination Multilateral governance & UN centrality
Unexpected Consensus
Highโ€‘income European states and small island developing states both stress partnershipโ€‘based access to AI technology
Speakers: Switzerland, Seychelles
AI as a service, not an end Partnerโ€‘driven access to AI for small island states
Switzerland, a wealthy European nation, emphasized that AI should serve societies and called for inclusive dialogue and cooperation [251-259]; Seychelles, a small island state, explicitly asked for partnership with larger countries like India to obtain AI technology and bridge its digital gap [630-639]. This alignment of a high-income countryโ€™s service-oriented stance with a low-income countryโ€™s request for partnership was not anticipated.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Partnership-oriented access models have been advocated by both European actors and small island states, as reflected in reports on digital cooperation for islands [S107] and coordinated multilateral regulation proposals [S109].
Environmental sustainability linked to AI compute across geographically diverse regions
Speakers: Bhutan, Finland
Hydropowerโ€‘driven green AI compute & Mindfulness City Ecoโ€‘efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres
Bhutan highlighted its hydropower-powered Mindfulness City as a green AI hub [332-344]; Finland promoted eco-efficient, clean-energy data centres and heat-recycling [432-435]. Both converged on the principle that renewable energy should underpin AI infrastructure, despite coming from very different economic contexts.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Sustainability concerns tied to AI compute were raised in the context of energy-intensive models at the India AI Impact Summit [S96] and in broader discussions on low-carbon AI infrastructure for diverse geographies [S108][S107].
Recognition that AI concentration threatens national sovereignty even among countries that are actively building sovereign compute
Speakers: Serbia, Kazakhstan
Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty AI hub, dataโ€‘center valley & sovereign cloud
Serbia warned that concentration of AI power could erode sovereignty and called for domestic capacity [124-135]; Kazakhstan, while building its own sovereign AI hub and data-center valley, implicitly acknowledges the need for independent infrastructure to avoid dependence [549-554]. The shared concern about sovereignty, expressed by a smaller state and a larger emerging AI hub, was not obvious at the outset.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The tension between AI concentration and sovereignty is reflected in calls for data-sovereignty frameworks [S102], concerns about geopolitical risks of AI dominance [S105], and the need for transparent, accountable AI systems [S101].
Overall Assessment

The summit revealed broad consensus that AI must be humanโ€‘centred, transparent, and governed through inclusive, multilateral mechanisms anchored in the United Nations. Participants across regions agreed on the necessity of data sovereignty, trustworthy โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ systems, capacity building, and the development of sovereign, lowโ€‘carbon compute infrastructure. There was also shared recognition of AIโ€™s economic promise alongside the risks of labour displacement and digital exclusion.

High โ€“ The convergence of viewpoints among diverse countries (from the Global South to Europe and small island states) indicates strong alignment on ethical AI, multilateral governance, inclusion, and sustainable compute. This consensus provides a solid foundation for coordinated policy actions, joint funding mechanisms and the establishment of shared standards under UN auspices.

Differences
Different Viewpoints
Central authority for global AI governance
Speakers: Brazil, Switzerland, Estonia
Multilateral governance & UN centrality AI as a service, not an end (emphasis on Geneva as anchor) Transparent AI platform & national AI strategy (coโ€‘facilitating UN dialogue)
Brazil argues that the United Nations is the only universal platform for AI governance and should be the anchor of any multilateral framework [78-80]. Switzerland highlights Geneva as a steady anchor for AI dialogue, emphasizing a network of international organisations rather than a single UN-centric body [263-265]. Estonia mentions co-facilitating the UN-hosted global AI dialogue, but frames it within a national strategy rather than endorsing exclusive UN centrality [105-106]. The differing emphases reveal a disagreement on whether AI governance should be anchored primarily in the UN or in a broader multistakeholder ecosystem centred on Geneva.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Debate exists over a single global authority versus interoperable standards; participants at policy roadmaps emphasized the importance of policy interoperability rather than uniform governance [S95][S103].
Approach to regulating large technology firms (Big Tech)
Speakers: Brazil, Serbia, Finland
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Concentration of AI power & need for national sovereignty Ecoโ€‘efficient supercomputing & clean energy data centres (regulation must be predictable and balanced)
Brazil calls for strong regulation of Big Tech to protect human rights, privacy and to prevent the concentration of power [65-68]. Serbia focuses on national sovereignty, arguing that states must develop their own data and algorithmic capacities rather than rely on external Big Tech, implicitly downplaying external regulation in favour of self-sufficiency [124-135]. Finland stresses that regulation should be predictable, balanced and supportive of innovation, suggesting a more moderate, industry-friendly regulatory approach [423-424]. These positions conflict over the extent and focus of regulation of large technology companies.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Divergent views on Big Tech regulation are evident in the UK CMAโ€™s roadmap for targeted interventions [S110], competition-rights approaches to digital markets [S112], and broader calls for coordinated multilateral regulation of tech giants [S109][S111].
Funding mechanisms for AI capacity building in the Global South
Speakers: International Monetary Fund, Guyana, Brazil
Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development (multilateral $3โ€ฏbillion fund) Practical assistance for AI diffusion in lowโ€‘capacity states (bilateral mechanisms) Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech (implies broader multilateral support)
The IMF proposes a multilateral $3โ€ฏbillion fund to support AI capacity building and research in developing countries [511-518]. Guyana advocates for a mechanism that combines multilateral support with bilateral assistance, emphasizing direct help to policymakers and quality-review systems [508-525]. Brazilโ€™s emphasis on closing the digital divide and regulating Big Tech suggests a reliance on broader multilateral initiatives rather than targeted bilateral funding [62-68]. The differing preferences for multilateral versus bilateral funding streams constitute a disagreement on how to finance AI development for the Global South.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Discussions on financing AI capacity highlighted the need for coordinated funding strategies, as outlined in digital public infrastructure reports [S99] and Global South AI safety research network initiatives [S115].
Scope of AI discussion versus national priorities unrelated to AI
Speakers: Sri Lanka, Other participants (e.g., India, Brazil, Estonia)
Cultural preservation and environmental protection concerns Humanโ€‘welfare focus, data sovereignty, AI governance, etc.
Sri Lanka repeatedly emphasizes cultural preservation, environmental protection and even mentions preparing a new Indian-led military base, topics that diverge sharply from the AI-focused agenda of the summit [208-215][241-245]. Other speakers stay within AI governance, ethics, capacity building and digital development, indicating an unexpected disagreement on the relevance of non-AI national issues within the summit.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
Tensions between AI-focused agendas and broader national priorities were noted in sessions that broadened the scope beyond technical issues to include ethical, environmental, and definitional challenges [S116][S118].
Unexpected Differences
Inclusion of cultural and military concerns in an AI summit
Speakers: Sri Lanka, All other speakers
Cultural preservation and environmental protection concerns Humanโ€‘welfare focus, AI governance, data sovereignty
Sri Lankaโ€™s extensive focus on protecting cultural heritage, the environment and even preparing a new Indian-led military base [208-215][241-245] was not addressed by any other participant, whose contributions centered on AI ethics, governance, capacity building and digital development. This divergence was unexpected given the AI-specific purpose of the summit.
POLICY CONTEXT (KNOWLEDGE BASE)
The need to embed cultural and security dimensions in AI policy has been raised in discussions on safeguarding children and contextual inclusion [S94], as well as in broader debates on cultural considerations in AI governance roadmaps [S95].
Overall Assessment

The summit showed broad consensus on the need for humanโ€‘centred, inclusive AI and on the importance of sovereign compute and capacity building. However, substantive disagreements emerged around the institutional anchor for AI governance (UN versus a broader multistakeholder ecosystem), the degree and focus of regulation of large technology firms, and the preferred funding mechanisms for AI capacity building in the Global South. An unexpected divergence arose from Sri Lankaโ€™s emphasis on cultural and military issues, which fell outside the AI agenda.

Moderate to high. While most participants share common goals, the lack of alignment on governance structures, regulatory approaches, and financing strategies could impede coordinated action and delay the development of a unified global AI governance framework.

Partial Agreements
All these speakers agree that AI should serve humanity and that sovereign, trustworthy compute is essential. However, they differ on the means: Modi proposes a data sovereignty framework and a glassโ€‘box approach [16-23]; Estonia stresses a national AI strategy with transparent safety rules [90-94]; Serbia and Slovakia focus on national sovereign compute infrastructure and lowโ€‘carbon energy [158-162][176-180]; Kazakhstan highlights a lowโ€‘cost, renewableโ€‘powered dataโ€‘center valley [543-554]; Bhutan proposes hydropowerโ€‘driven green AI compute in a mindfulness city [332-344]. The shared goal of humanโ€‘centric, sovereign AI is thus pursued through varied policy instruments.
Speakers: Narendra Modi (India), Brazil, Estonia, Serbia, Slovakia, Kazakhstan, Bhutan
Humanโ€‘welfare focus Data framework, โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ transparency Building sovereign AI infrastructure & lowโ€‘carbon compute AI hub, dataโ€‘center valley & sovereign cloud
These speakers concur that AI must be inclusive and that the digital divide must be closed. Brazil calls for regulation of Big Tech to protect rights [65-68]; Guyana seeks mechanisms to raise awareness and provide practical support to lowโ€‘capacity states [508-525]; the IMF highlights the economic benefits of AI and the need for skill development [674-694]; the Netherlands and Switzerland stress responsible, inclusive AI that serves humanity [607-618][251-259]. They diverge on the primary tool: regulation, capacityโ€‘building mechanisms, economic incentives, or publicโ€‘private partnerships.
Speakers: Brazil, Guyana, International Monetary Fund, Netherlands, Switzerland
Bridging the digital divide & regulating Big Tech Practical assistance for AI diffusion in lowโ€‘capacity states Economic growth potential, job impacts & skill development Responsible AI & inclusive innovation AI as a service, not an end
Takeaways
Key takeaways
AI must be governed with a humanโ€‘centred, ethical framework that prioritises welfare, trust, transparency and accountability. Data sovereignty and the development of sovereign, lowโ€‘carbon compute infrastructure are essential to prevent concentration of AI power. Inclusion and capacityโ€‘building for the Global South are critical; bridging the digital divide and providing AI literacy, reskilling and affordable access are recurring themes. Education, AI literacy and workforce reskilling are necessary to ensure societies can benefit from AI while mitigating job displacement. Multilateral cooperation, anchored in the United Nations and other global fora, is needed to create inclusive, standardsโ€‘based AI governance. Sustainable energy sources (hydropower, renewable lowโ€‘cost power) should underpin AI compute to align AI development with environmental goals.
Resolutions and action items
India pledged to continue sharing its digital public infrastructure (e.g., 38,000 GPUs, AI courses, datasets, and models) with the world. Brazil reaffirmed its commitment to multilateral AI governance through the UN, the Global Digital Pact and the International Scientific Panel. Estonia announced coโ€‘facilitation of the UN AI dialogue and will host the Tallinn Digital Summit on AI resilience (Nov 5โ€‘6). Switzerland committed to host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027, establishing a permanent multilateral anchor for AI governance. Liechtenstein offered to support international cooperation on responsible AI and to promote trusted, ruleโ€‘based environments. Bhutan proposed joint development of green AI compute facilities powered by its hydropower and the Gelipu Mindfulness City concept. Kazakhstan invited partners to use its sovereign AI hub, Data Center Valley and AI SANA training programme, and announced 2026 as the Year of Digitalisation and AI. Mauritius announced a Digital Transformation Blueprint (2025โ€‘2029) and the creation of a specialised economic zone for AI and digital technologies. Netherlands presented its first international AI strategy, offering public AI infrastructure for SMEs, research and government. Spain highlighted its AI supervisory agency, the Charter of Digital Rights and plans to host a global AI governance meeting under UN auspices. International Monetary Fund offered to mobilise funding (e.g., $3โ€ฏbillion) for AI capacityโ€‘building in lowโ€‘resource countries. Guyana called for a mechanism to raise AI awareness among policymakers in the Global South and to establish qualityโ€‘review processes for AI solutions.
Unresolved issues
How to create a globally binding AI governance framework that balances innovation with regulation, especially concerning autonomous weapons, hate speech, disinformation and child protection. Concrete mechanisms for equitable data sharing and protection of data sovereignty across jurisdictions. Financing models and concrete steps for largeโ€‘scale AI capacityโ€‘building in lowโ€‘income and smallโ€‘island states. Specific standards for โ€œglassโ€‘boxโ€ AI transparency and accountability that can be universally adopted. Ways to prevent the permanent concentration of AI infrastructure and expertise in a few corporations or nations. Detailed plans for reskilling workers whose jobs are most vulnerable to automation, particularly in routine sectors. Implementation pathways for integrating AI into public procurement and governance systems without creating bureaucratic bottlenecks.
Suggested compromises
Combining profitโ€‘driven AI development with purposeโ€‘oriented ethical commitments (as urged by India and Brazil). Balancing rapid AI innovation with regulatory safeguards โ€“ e.g., Greeceโ€™s proposal to protect minors while still encouraging AI deployment. Using multilateral platforms (UN, Global Digital Pact) for overarching standards while allowing bilateral assistance for capacityโ€‘building (Guyanaโ€™s suggestion). Leveraging lowโ€‘carbon, renewable energy for sovereign compute to address both sustainability and geopolitical concerns (Slovakia, Finland, Bhutan, Kazakhstan). Promoting openโ€‘source and affordable AI models alongside privateโ€‘sector innovation to ensure broader access (Indiaโ€™s openโ€‘source approach, Netherlandsโ€™ public AI infrastructure). Encouraging a โ€œhumanโ€‘inโ€‘theโ€‘loopโ€ governance model that blends technical transparency (glassโ€‘box) with human values and oversight (Liechtenstein, Estonia).
Thought Provoking Comments
AI must be humanโ€‘centric, built on data sovereignty, with a โ€˜glassโ€‘boxโ€™ approach rather than a blackโ€‘box, and guided by clear human values (the paperโ€‘clip analogy).
Sets a comprehensive ethical framework that ties technical design (data quality, transparency) to philosophical guidance, framing the entire summit around responsibility rather than pure innovation.
Established the baseline agenda; subsequent speakers referenced data sovereignty, transparency, and human values, steering the discussion toward governance, ethics, and concrete implementation rather than just showcasing capabilities.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
AI has a dual character: it can multiply collective wellโ€‘being or cast shadows on humanity; concentration of data, compute and capital in a few countries and companies threatens global equity, so multilateral governance through the UN is essential.
Broadens the conversation from national initiatives to global power structures, highlighting systemic risks of concentration and the need for inclusive, multilateral rules.
Shifted the tone from national showcases to a critique of existing power imbalances; prompted other leaders (Serbia, Estonia, Switzerland) to stress sovereignty, inclusive governance, and the role of international institutions.
Speaker: Brazil
AI is now infrastructure; sovereignty in the 21st century means managing citizensโ€™ data, algorithms, and building domestic expertise to avoid dependence on external platforms.
Frames AI as a political issue of state sovereignty, linking technological capacity directly to political independence and longโ€‘term stability.
Deepened the sovereignty theme introduced by Brazil; influenced Estoniaโ€™s emphasis on national AI literacy and Slovakiaโ€™s focus on sovereign compute, moving the dialogue toward concrete capacityโ€‘building measures.
Speaker: Serbia
AI must serve people, not the other way around โ€“ requiring transparent technology, data control, and the ability to question AIโ€‘driven decisions, plus a national AIโ€‘literacy program (AI Leap).
Translates abstract governance concepts into a societal strategy, emphasizing education and trust as foundations for responsible AI deployment.
Reinforced the education and trust pillars; inspired later remarks from Greece and Finland about upskilling and public sector modernization, shifting the conversation toward practical implementation.
Speaker: Estonia
The Upanishadic distinction between higher knowledge (Paravidya) and lower knowledge (Aparavidya) โ€“ wisdom must guide AIโ€™s technical power, otherwise technology deepens inequality and misinformation.
Introduces a philosophical lens that connects ancient wisdom to modern AI ethics, enriching the debate with cultural depth and a moral imperative.
Prompted other speakers (e.g., Greece, Switzerland) to reference values, heritage, and the need for ethical grounding, moving the discussion from technicalities to moral philosophy.
Speaker: Bhutan
Switzerland will host the AI Summit in Geneva in 2027, positioning the UN and Geneva as the steady anchor for multilateral AI governance and emphasizing the role of international institutions.
Provides a concrete institutional milestone that embodies the multilateral vision advocated earlier, giving the abstract governance discussion a tangible future anchor.
Reinforced Brazilโ€™s call for UNโ€‘centered governance; encouraged participants to view the summit series as a continuous process, leading to references to upcoming UN panels and the Global Digital Pact.
Speaker: Switzerland
Three reflections: (1) AI dividend must be shared, (2) states must modernize their institutions and procurement for AI, (3) AIโ€™s geopolitical impact requires trusted partnerships and balanced regulation to avoid fragmentation.
Synthesizes earlier themes into actionable policy recommendations, linking distributional justice, state capacity, and geopolitical stability.
Served as a turning point that moved the dialogue from diagnosis to prescription; other leaders (Finland, Spain, IMF) echoed the need for regulation, capacityโ€‘building, and inclusive growth.
Speaker: Greece
IMF analysis: AI could add up to 0.8โ€ฏ% to global GDP but may affect 40โ€ฏ% of jobs worldwide; the biggest gains go to those with AI skills, while routine jobs disappear โ€“ emphasizing the need for rapid reskilling and inclusive policies.
Quantifies the economic stakes and labor market disruption, grounding the ethical and governance debate in macroโ€‘economic data.
Validated the concerns raised by Serbia and Greece about workforce impacts; reinforced calls for education (Estonia, Finland) and for inclusive policies (Guyana, Mauritius).
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
Two books illustrate AIโ€™s ethical spectrum: โ€˜Clara and the Sunโ€™ (positive humanโ€‘like AI) and โ€˜Proving Groundโ€™ (AI enabling harm); the Netherlands will launch its first international AI strategy to make public AI infrastructure available to all.
Uses cultural narratives to humanize abstract risks, then couples them with a concrete national strategy for inclusive AI infrastructure.
Shifted the conversation toward tangible policy tools (public AI infrastructure) and highlighted the role of storytelling in shaping public perception, resonating with Bhutanโ€™s wisdom framing and Greeceโ€™s call for shared dividend.
Speaker: Netherlands
Overall Assessment

The discussion began with Narendra Modiโ€™s broad ethical blueprint, which set the stage for a series of deeper interventions. Brazilโ€™s articulation of AIโ€™s dual nature and the need for UNโ€‘led multilateral governance reframed the summit from a collection of national showcases to a global powerโ€‘balance debate. Serbia and Estonia built on this by foregrounding sovereignty and societal trust, while Bhutan introduced a philosophical dimension that reminded participants that wisdom must steer technology. Switzerlandโ€™s concrete hosting pledge anchored the multilateral vision, and Greeceโ€™s threeโ€‘point policy synthesis turned the dialogue toward actionable reforms. The IMFโ€™s dataโ€‘driven impact analysis and the Netherlandsโ€™ culturalโ€‘policy blend added quantitative urgency and practical pathways. Collectively, these pivotal comments redirected the conversation from aspirational rhetoric to concrete challengesโ€”data sovereignty, inclusive growth, state capacity, and international governanceโ€”shaping the summit into a coordinated call for responsible, equitable AI development worldwide.

Follow-up Questions
Does our political capacity keep pace with the speed of technological development?
Serbia warned that without adequate political capacity, states cannot effectively regulate AI, risking loss of sovereignty and ineffective governance.
Speaker: Serbia
Will the concentration of AI power become permanent, allowing a small number of shareholders to set global rules?
Serbia highlighted the risk of a few entities controlling AI infrastructure, which could marginalize many countries and undermine equitable AI development.
Speaker: Serbia
How can we ensure AI serves humanityโ€™s needs rather than dominating it?
Serbia emphasized the need for AI to be aligned with human welfare, prompting a call for frameworks that keep AI purposeโ€‘driven.
Speaker: Serbia
How can a mechanism be created to promote AI awareness among policymakers in lowโ€‘capacity countries?
Guyana noted that many Global South nations lack policy awareness, hindering responsible AI adoption; a structured awareness mechanism is needed.
Speaker: Guyana
What structure can organize coherent development and diffusion of AI in countries with limited capacity?
Guyana called for coordinated approaches to help smaller nations build and spread AI solutions effectively.
Speaker: Guyana
How can a qualityโ€‘review system for AI models be established to prevent deployment of subโ€‘standard or harmful AI?
Guyana pointed out the risk of adopting AI models without proper vetting, urging the creation of standards and review processes.
Speaker: Guyana
How should planning frameworks be upgraded to value AI diffusion investments on par with traditional infrastructure projects?
Guyana argued that AI investments are often undervalued compared to roads or bridges, requiring new budgeting and evaluation criteria.
Speaker: Guyana
How can the AI dividend be broadly shared across society, ensuring benefits for workers, small businesses, farmers, and other vulnerable groups?
Greece stressed that without deliberate policies, AIโ€™s wealth could concentrate in large tech firms, leaving ordinary citizens behind.
Speaker: Greece
What reforms are needed to modernize public institutions and procurement systems so they are AIโ€‘ready?
Greece highlighted that outdated bureaucratic systems impede AI deployment, calling for faster, outcomeโ€‘oriented procurement and digital talent development.
Speaker: Greece
How can governments protect minors from digital addiction and online harms associated with AI?
Greece identified youth safety as a priority, suggesting regulatory measures to curb harmful AIโ€‘driven content.
Speaker: Greece
How can the global concentration of compute, data, and talent be prevented to ensure digital inclusion?
Greece warned that AI resources are clustered in few regions, advocating policies that distribute access more evenly.
Speaker: Greece
How can trusted international partnerships be built without fragmenting the AI ecosystem into rigid blocks?
Greece emphasized the need for collaborative frameworks that enhance innovation while avoiding geopolitical fragmentation.
Speaker: Greece
What strategies are needed to address the environmental costs of AI and the risk of massive job displacement?
Spain highlighted AIโ€™s carbon footprint and potential labor market disruptions, calling for sustainability and reskilling measures.
Speaker: Spain
How can an inclusive global governance framework for AI be established under the United Nations?
Spain advocated for a UNโ€‘led multilateral governance structure to ensure all nations have a voice in AI policy.
Speaker: Spain
How can AI development be aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals and human rights?
Spain stressed that AI must serve broader societal goals, requiring explicit alignment with SDGs and rightsโ€‘based standards.
Speaker: Spain
How should the global workforce be prepared for AIโ€‘driven job market transformation?
The IMF warned that AI will reshape employment, urging education and reskilling programs to mitigate displacement.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
What policies can support lowโ€‘skilled workers who are most at risk of being displaced by AI?
The IMF identified vulnerable workers as a critical group needing targeted social and economic support.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
How can openโ€‘source, affordable AI models be promoted to ensure accessibility for developing countries?
The IMF praised Indiaโ€™s openโ€‘source approach and suggested expanding such models to democratize AI benefits.
Speaker: International Monetary Fund
How can data sovereignty be protected and a robust data framework for AI training be established?
Modi proposed respecting data sovereignty and creating trustworthy data pipelines to ensure reliable AI outputs.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
How can transparent โ€˜glassโ€‘boxโ€™ safety rules be implemented to enhance AI accountability?
Modi called for clear, verifiable safety standards that replace opaque โ€˜blackโ€‘boxโ€™ systems, fostering trust.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
How can human values be embedded into AI systems to avoid misaligned objectives like the paperโ€‘clip problem?
Modi warned about AI pursuing narrow goals without human guidance, urging valueโ€‘aligned design.
Speaker: Narendra Modi
How can small states develop sovereign AI infrastructure and compute capacity without massive capital?
Both highlighted the challenge for smaller nations to build trusted compute locally, suggesting collaborative or niche approaches.
Speaker: Serbia, Slovakia

Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Report on WSIS+20 Open Consultations โ€“ 29 July 2025 (Test to be deleted – second version)

  • What: An informal, online multi-stakeholder consultation for the WSIS+20 review process, organised by the co-facilitators (Albania and Kenya).
  • Who: 66 unique speakers from governments, civil society, the technical community, the private sector, and academia.
  • Key consensus: There is broad agreement on the need to modernise the WSIS framework to address current digital challenges, reaffirm the multi-stakeholder model, strengthen the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) with a permanent mandate and sustainable funding, bridge the multidimensional digital divide, and anchor the outcome in international human rights law.
  • Critical pillars: The discussion highlighted several critical areas: the necessity of meaningful connectivity beyond mere access, the transformative potential of digital public infrastructure (DPI), the urgent need to address the environmental impact of digitalisation, and the central role of inclusive, rights-based governance for emerging technologies like AI.
  • Areas of divergence: Views differed on the interpretation of ‘enhanced cooperation’, with some cautioning against reopening contentious debates. There were also divergent perspectives on the balance between market-led solutions and public intervention, particularly concerning corporate accountability and financing mechanisms for digital development.


  1. Strengthened multi-stakeholder governance: The multi-stakeholder model is seen as essential and must be reinforced, not diluted, with calls for its consistent application across all digital governance processes.
  2. Permanent mandate for the IGF: The Internet Governance Forum should be institutionalised as a permanent UN body with a stable, sustainable budget and a strengthened secretariat to enhance its impact.
  3. Multidimensional digital divide: The focus must shift from basic connectivity to addressing the ‘usage gap’, which includes barriers of affordability, skills, relevant local content, and access to advanced technologies like AI.
  4. Anchoring in human rights: The WSIS+20 outcome must be firmly grounded in international human rights law, referencing instruments like the UDHR and ICCPR, and reaffirm that rights offline also apply online.
  5. Environmental sustainability of digitalisation: The environmental cost of digital technologies, from data centre energy use to e-waste, must be explicitly recognised and mitigated through ‘green-by-design’ principles and circular economy models.
  6. Digital public infrastructure (DPI) as an equitable model: Open-source, interoperable DPI was highlighted as a successful model for inclusive digital transformation, particularly in the global south.
  7. Integration with the Global Digital Compact (GDC): To avoid duplication, the implementation of the GDC should be integrated into the WSIS framework via a joint roadmap, ensuring coherence in UN digital processes.
  8. Localised and community-driven solutions: Effective digital development requires hyper-local, decentralised models that are community-driven and tailored to local languages, cultures, and needs, moving away from one-size-fits-all solutions.
  9. Corporate accountability and financing: There is a need for stronger mechanisms to hold technology corporations accountable for human rights violations and to explore innovative financing, such as digital development taxes, to bridge the digital divide.
  10. Gender and youth as cross-cutting priorities: Gender equality and meaningful youth engagement must be mainstreamed across all action lines, with specific proposals for a standalone gender action line and dedicated metrics for youth participation.

Total number of speakers: 66

List of speakers with affiliation and word count

Total number of speakers: 66

SpeakerAffiliationWord Count
Suela JaninaCo-facilitator (Albania)458
Ekitela LokaaleCo-facilitator (Kenya)225
Deniz SusarSecretariat147
Arpita KanjilalDigital Empowerment Foundation593
Socheata SokhachanNetMission.Asia371
Jin TanakaUniversity Student Chamber International396
Cheryl MillerUnited States Council for International Business (USCIB)387
Jose ScandiucciPermanent Mission of Brazil to the UN279
Aditya Vikram DubeCenter for Development of Advanced Computing (India)483
Shumaila HussainTech Global Institute340
Baratang MiyaGirl Hype and Women Who Code432
Giacomo MazzoneIGF Policy Network for Meaningful Access247
Ana Marรญa Suรกrez FrancoFood First Information and Action Network (FIAN)592
Sophia LongweWikimedia386
Shradhanjali SarmaCyber Cafe Association of India327
Marรญa Soledad VoglianoAction Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group)391
Jasmine Yee man KoHong Kong Youth IGF285
Koudy WaneeMinistry of Communication and Telecommunications, Digital Affairs of Senegal297
Soumya NairPermanent Mission of India to the UN314
Roddy McGlynnGlobal Systems for Mobile Communication Association (GSMA)324
James Kunle OlorundareInternet Society Nigeria Chapter471
Paul BlakerDepartment for Science, Innovation and Technology (United Kingdom)365
Timea SutoInternational Chamber of Commerce (ICC)303
Fiona AlexanderAmerican University461
Elonnai HickokGlobal Network Initiative (GNI)327
Mrinalini DayalAlliance for Universal Digital Rights371
Carlos Baca FeldmanRhizomatica202
Sadhana SanjayGlobal Digital Justice Forum / IT for Change302
Anriette EsterhuysenAssociation for Progressive Communications (APC)460
Elina VolksoneMicrosoft348
Ellie McDonaldGlobal Digital Rights Coalition for WSIS320
Jutta CrollDigital Opportunities Foundation291
Laura Becana BallGlobal Forum for Media Development331
Kim Ringmar SylwanderDigital Futures for Children’s Center, LSE372
Roman ZiminPermanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the UN298
Lucien CastexAssociation Franรงaise pour le Nommage Internet en Coopรฉration (AFNIC)324
Pablo HinojosaConsultant266
Desiree MilosevicRIPE NCC279
Rosalia MoralesTechnical Community Coalition for Multistakeholderism319
Abdeldjalil Bachar BongHouse of Africa262
Meline SvadjianPermanent Mission of Canada to the UN (for Canada and Australia)317
Konstantinos KomaitisAtlantic Council387
Daphnรฉ BarbotteEU Delegation to the UN462
Nick Ashton-HartAPCO Worldwide247
Titti CassaAgency for Digital Italy492
William DrakeColumbia Institute for Teleinformation425
Claire Sophie PatzigYouth IGF Germany195
Pascal BekonoCameroon Ministry of Justice162
Jacqueline PigattoData Privacy Brazil222
Gabriel DelsolComputer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA)323
Paloma Lara CastroDerechos Digitales403
Laura Oโ€™BrienAccess Now327
Christian SchlaepferPermanent Mission of Switzerland to the UN324
Kayode OyeyemiAfrica ICT Alliance (AFICTA)322
Dheeraj RajputIndian Ministry of Electronics and IT257
Bea GuevarraNetMission.Asia471
Alexey TrepykhalinICANN280
Judith HellersteinIGF Dynamic Coalition on Accessibility and Disabilities382
Winnie KamauAssociation of Freelance Journalists308
Tinuade OguntuyiInformation Connectivity Solutions Limited366
Rashi GuptaCenter for Development of Advanced Computing (India)286
Israel RosasInternet Society403
Dana CramerYoung Digital Leaders of Canada312
Sebastien BacholletInternet Society France309
Elizabeth BaconPublic Interest Registry / Technical Community Coalition for Multistakeholderism328
Avri DoriaTechnicalities392
Swati LallInternational Internet Exchange of India482
Jenna FungNetMission.Asia351
Pari EsfandiaiGlobal Technopolitics Forum321
Sarah NicoleProject Liberty226

This is a placeholder tab content. It is important to have the necessary information in the block, but at this stage, it is just a placeholder to help you visualise how the content is displayed. Feel free to edit this with your actual content.

Speakers demographics
  • Stakeholder group:
    • Government: 15
    • Business: 8
    • Civil Society: 32
    • Technical Community: 7
    • Academia: 4
  • Continent:
    • Africa: 15
    • Asia: 15
    • Europe: 17
    • North America: 11
    • South America: 5
    • Oceania: 1 (represented by Australia in a joint statement)
    • International (no specific base): 2
  • Gender:
    • Female: 33
    • Male: 33

Suela Janina, Co-facilitator (Albania)

  • Opening and process: Opened the consultation, emphasising its role in informing the zero draft of the WSIS+20 outcome document and urging speakers to be concise.
  • Multi-stakeholder inclusion: Stressed the importance of bringing together member states and all stakeholder communities in a shared dialogue.
  • Thematic structure: Noted the consultation was structured around the thematic areas of the elements paper to gather verbal feedback on written inputs.

Ekitela Lokaale, Co-facilitator (Kenya)

  • Opportunity for joint dialogue: Highlighted the session as an opportunity for continued dialogue with both member states and stakeholders present.
  • Informal guidance: Acknowledged the thematic structure but encouraged cross-cutting interventions, asking for concise remarks to directly inform the drafting process.
  • Housekeeping: Handed over to the secretariat for practical announcements before commencing the substantive discussion.

Deniz Susar, Secretariat

  • Logistical management: Outlined the session’s structure, speaking list order, and confirmed the meeting was being recorded for later publication.
  • Flexibility on themes: Clarified that while speakers were listed under specific themes, interventions on other sections of the elements paper were welcome.

Arpita Kanjilal, Digital Empowerment Foundation

  • Hyper-local digital models: Advocated for decentralised, community-driven digital development models tailored to local contexts, languages, and needs, arguing that top-down approaches often fail.
  • Human-centric technology: Emphasised that technology must serve people and include a ‘human touch’ rather than being fully automated, to build trust and ensure relevance.
  • Critique of tech-only policies: Warned that technology-centric policies are driving deeper exclusion and widening the digital divide for marginalised communities.
  • Grassroots empowerment: Showcased a model of ‘information entrepreneurs’ (Suchana Praneurs) as local leaders enabling access to information and e-governance.

Socheata Sokhachan, NetMission.Asia

  • Peace as a foundation: Spoke from Cambodia’s experience to stress that peace is the essential foundation for digital development and for ensuring no one is left behind.
  • Beyond access to connectivity: Called for a rights-based and user-centred approach to ICT development that includes affordability, service quality, and fair competition, not just infrastructure rollout.
  • Youth as co-creators: Urged for youth to be embedded as co-creators of ICT strategies, not just beneficiaries, and for support of youth-led digital literacy and innovation programmes.

Jin Tanaka, University Student Chamber International

  • AI in education – pros and cons: Presented on the dual nature of AI in education, noting its potential for personalised learning while highlighting risks like misinformation and increased burden on teachers to verify AI-generated content.
  • Multi-layered AI verification: Described a personal project using a three-AI system to generate ideas, check against official guidelines, and judge correctness, acknowledging it is still under development.
  • Goal for 2030: Expressed a goal to expand such systems by 2030 to transform education and alleviate financial and logistical difficulties for students and teachers.

Cheryl Miller, United States Council for International Business (USCIB)

  • Private sector challenges: Identified the digital divide, internet fragmentation, and inconsistent application of the multi-stakeholder model as key challenges for the digital economy.
  • Barriers to connectivity: Cited that 2.6 billion people remain unconnected due to financial, technological, and regulatory barriers, a gap widened by advanced technologies like AI.
  • Support for multi-stakeholderism: Pointed to the IGF as a successful example of the multi-stakeholder approach and called for policy environments that support innovation, investment, and cross-border data flows.
  • Call for interoperable AI governance: Urged for AI governance based on interoperable, inclusive, and rights-based approaches to avoid fragmented regulatory regimes.

Jose Scandiucci, Permanent Mission of Brazil to the UN

  • Stock-taking and alignment: Stressed the need for the WSIS+20 document to take stock of what has worked and align the framework with current demands to bridge digital divides and include developing countries.
  • Integration with GDC: Proposed a joint WSIS-GDC roadmap to ensure budgetary efficiency and avoid duplication of efforts, integrating GDC implementation within the WSIS process.
  • Strengthening digital governance: Advocated for the strengthening of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) with a permanent mandate and stable budget, suggesting a potential name change to ‘Digital Governance Forum’.

Aditya Vikram Dube, Center for Development of Advanced Computing (India)

  • Broadening scope welcomed: Welcomed the elements paper’s inclusion of new themes like the digital economy, AI, and environmental sustainability, absent from earlier outcomes.
  • Transformative potential of DPI: Highlighted Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) as a globally relevant model for inclusive digital transformation, emphasising its open-source, modular, and interoperable nature.
  • Affordability and capacity building: Identified affordability of internet and the need for digital literacy campaigns as critical barriers to meaningful participation that must be addressed.

Shumaila Hussain, Tech Global Institute

  • Remedying structural imbalances: Called for the zero draft to include provisions to remedy structural imbalances, asymmetric data flows, and value extraction from the global south.
  • Corporate accountability and funding: Proposed a global fund, financed by levies on digital monopolies, to support DPI in developing countries and called for connectivity to be recognised as a human right.
  • Breaking big tech dominance: Recommended requiring interoperability, allocating resources for community-led platforms, and ensuring digital growth advances gender-responsive and climate-just transitions.

Baratang Miya, Girl Hype and Women Who Code

  • Digital economic inclusion for women and youth: Identified significant disparities for women and youth in access, skills, and economic participation in the digital economy.
  • Barriers cited: Cited statistics: 3.7 billion offline (with women disproportionately affected), 60% of African youth lack basic digital competencies, and women-led startups receive less than 2% of venture capital.
  • Actionable solutions: Proposed gender-responsive funding, digital skills programmes, policy reforms, and investment in last-mile connectivity to ensure the digital economy becomes a force for equality.

Giacomo Mazzone, IGF Policy Network for Meaningful Access

  • Meaningful access defined: Focused on promoting access that is in local languages, useful for communities (e-governance, health, education), safe, secure, and affordable.
  • Breaking down silos: Emphasised that the WSIS process has been useful for allowing different communities to work together and break down barriers, a practice that must continue for GDC implementation.

Ana Marรญa Suรกrez Franco, Food First Information and Action Network (FIAN)

  • Corporate accountability deficit: Argued that exhorting tech corporations to respect the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights has not been successful, leaving a gap in accountability for cross-border harms.
  • State obligations to protect: Called for the zero draft to urge states to protect against human rights abuses by their digital businesses in global value chains, including obligations to regulate, monitor, and punish abusers.
  • Information integrity and epistemic rights: Urged the zero draft to direct UNESCO to further work on guarantees for epistemic rights, disclosure of AI guidelines, and human rights-based regulatory frameworks for platforms.

Sophia Longwe, Wikimedia

  • Erosion of multi-stakeholder approach: Expressed concern that the social and cultural development section of the elements paper primarily emphasises governments and national strategies, marginalising other stakeholders.
  • Open knowledge as central: Called for Action Line C3 to be improved to an action line on ‘access to information, knowledge and the digital commons’, recognising the central role of open knowledge and volunteer work like Wikipedia.
  • Embedding accountability: Recommended the WSIS+20 outcome embed accountability mechanisms, a clear timeline, secure funding for the IGF, and establish stronger links between WSIS, the GDC, and the SDGs.

Shradhanjali Sarma, Cyber Cafe Association of India

  • Environmental cost of AI: Highlighted the often-overlooked carbon footprint of AI, noting that a single AI query can use up to 10 times more electricity than a standard web search.
  • Uneven environmental burden: Pointed out that the environmental burdens of AI are disproportionately felt in developing countries, creating a sustainability and equity gap.
  • Green AI measures: Proposed five measures: promoting energy-efficient servers and algorithms, prioritising efficiency in AI training, mandating e-waste management, and shifting to renewable energy sources for AI infrastructure.

Marรญa Soledad Vogliano, Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group)

  • Challenging the ‘green tech’ narrative: Challenged the dominant narrative that digital tech is dematerialised and inherently green, pointing to severe material, environmental, and social costs from semiconductor supply chains to data centres.
  • Six priorities for sustainability: Offered six forward-looking priorities: right to repair, regulating data centre expansion, rebalancing energy priorities in developing countries, avoiding harmful energy sources, acknowledging environmental costs, and advancing a meaningful circular economy.
  • Democratic governance and accountability: Stated that a sustainable digital future requires democratic governance, corporate accountability, and respect for affected communities and ecosystems.

Jasmine Yee man Ko, Hong Kong Youth IGF

  • Youth perspective on environment: Shared the youth perspective that reducing the digital sector’s environmental footprint is a moral imperative for their generation.
  • Grassroots action: Highlighted work by grassroots organisations in her region, like Carbon Care InnoLab, which catalyse climate action and responsible energy use.
  • Call for concrete commitments: Urged the WSIS+20 to strongly emphasise a commitment to a truly circular economy, innovation in greener ICT, and embedding environmental considerations in all digital policy making.

Koudy Wanee, Ministry of Communication and Telecommunications, Digital Affairs of Senegal

  • Digital divide as a chasm: Framed the digital divide as a growing chasm threatening to leave entire nations and generations behind, encompassing connectivity, skills, and innovation divides.
  • Bold, forward-looking action lines: Argued that updating the WSIS action lines requires a transformation, not an adjustment, embedding digital inclusion at the core of every action line from e-government to AI ethics.
  • Multi-stakeholder governance for the global south: Emphasised the need for multi-stakeholder governance models that give the global south a seat at the table.

Soumya Nair, Permanent Mission of India to the UN

  • Multidimensional digital divide: Emphasised that the divide persists not only across regions but within societies, affecting rural communities, women, persons with disabilities, and linguistic minorities.
  • Technology capacity gap: Highlighted a growing concentration of control over semiconductor manufacturing and high-performance computing in a few countries and firms, deepening the technology gap for the global south.
  • AI for Indian languages: Noted India’s progress in advancing AI technology for Indian languages through open-source contributions as a way to address language barriers.

Roddy McGlynn, Global Systems for Mobile Communication Association (GSMA)

  • The usage gap: Presented data that while broadband networks reach 96% of the global population, only 57% use mobile internet, meaning the usage gap (3 billion people) is nine times the size of the coverage gap.
  • Barriers to adoption: Identified key barriers to adoption as affordability of handsets, literacy and digital skills, and safety and security concerns.
  • Gender digital divide: Cited that women in low and middle income countries are 14% less likely to use mobile internet than men, resulting in 235 million fewer women online.

James Kunle Olorundare, Internet Society Nigeria Chapter

  • Digital divide beyond connectivity: Defined the digital divide as encompassing disparities in access to emerging technologies like AI and data systems, not just connectivity.
  • Role of the IGF: Argued that the IGF’s multi-stakeholder model is critical for sustained progress and must be strengthened, with its scope evolving to include broader digital governance.
  • Alignment with action lines and GDC: Proposed aligning efforts with WSIS Action Lines C2, C7, C11 and the GDC’s objectives to drive equitable digital ecosystems and avoid digital colonialism.

Paul Blaker, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (United Kingdom)

  • Enabling environment agenda: Welcomed the focus on the enabling environment and hoped its different elements would be developed more in the zero draft, including effective use of universal service funds and competition.
  • Stronger human rights language: Called for stronger and clearer human rights language fully based on the ICCPR and against internet shutdowns.
  • Permanent IGF mandate: Supported a new ongoing mandate for the IGF without a time limitation and recognition of local and regional IGFs.
  • Avoiding ‘enhanced cooperation’ debates: Urged the zero draft to reflect agreed GDC language and not reopen fruitless debates about the phrase ‘enhanced cooperation’.

Timea Suto, International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

  • Defining the enabling environment: Argued the zero draft should more clearly define an enabling environment, providing legal stability, regulatory clarity, and openness (especially for cross-border data flows).
  • Whole-of-government approach: Stated that a whole-of-government approach is necessary due to digital transformation affecting every sector, ensuring policy coherence.
  • Multi-stakeholder engagement: Emphasised that multi-stakeholder engagement is key to effective policy design, ensuring policies are grounded in practical realities and local needs.

Fiona Alexander, American University

  • Meaningful multi-stakeholder engagement: Commended the co-facilitators for efforts to create avenues for stakeholder involvement but expressed disappointment that only 15% of the 91 scheduled speakers were governments.
  • Fact-based and forward-looking: Recommended the outcome be fact-based, recognise progress, and not simply restate past disputes, building on WSIS+10 and GDC language.
  • Embrace the IGF: Stated it is past time for the UN system to fully embrace the IGF, renew it with a permanent mandate, and allocate resources.
  • Avoid duplication and unclear phrases: Advised that GDC implementation should move into the existing WSIS framework and to avoid recycling unclear phrases like ‘enhanced cooperation’.

Elonnai Hickok, Global Network Initiative (GNI)

  • Human rights-based enabling environment: Stated that to be enabling, regulatory environments must be grounded in and aligned with international human rights frameworks, including the UDHR, ICCPR, and UNGPs.
  • IGF strengthening: Called for the promotion of the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance, a permanent and funded IGF mandate, and recognition of the role of national and regional IGFs.
  • Role of OHCHR: Stressed the role of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in digital governance should be recognised.

Mrinalini Dayal, Alliance for Universal Digital Rights

  • Standalone gender action line: Proposed the establishment of a standalone WSIS action line on gender with defined goals, measurable targets, and dedicated resources.
  • Key barriers: Identified lack of a gender perspective across action lines, technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV), unaccountable tech corporations, and digital colonialism as critical barriers.
  • Gender-just digital governance: Recommended mandatory gender impact assessments, 50% women’s representation in governance bodies, and public financing for meaningful access.

Carlos Baca Feldman, Rhizomatica

  • Community-led connectivity: Argued that indigenous and rural communities remain excluded from direct access to resources and decision-making, despite creating their own connectivity solutions.
  • Direct and flexible funding: Called for direct, flexible, and culturally grounded funding to support communities, alongside strategies for capacity building in financial management and governance.
  • Legal recognition of collectives: Emphasised the need for the legal recognition of collective actors so they can receive funds and manage their own connectivity solutions.

Sadhana Sanjay, Global Digital Justice Forum / IT for Change

  • Public financing deficit: Argued that stark digital inequalities are traced to a failure of market-led approaches and anachronistic tax regimes that deprive countries of resources for digital infrastructure.
  • Digital development tax: Recommended a digital development tax whereby dominant tech corporations contribute to connectivity and a safer digital world.
  • Global task force on financing: Proposed a global task force on financing for inclusive digital transformation to enable coordinated fiscal reform.

Anriette Esterhuysen, Association for Progressive Communications (APC)

  • Five critical challenges: Highlighted digital inequality, insufficient financing, erosion of the public interest, gaps in human rights integration, and environmental harms as key challenges.
  • Five priorities for action: Prioritised diversifying access markets, establishing a task force for blended financing, reclaiming the public interest through regulation, strengthening human rights language, and mainstreaming environmental sustainability.
  • Strengthening the WSIS framework: Recommended integrating GDC language, gender equality, making the IGF mandate permanent, and recognising the relevance of enhanced cooperation for the global south.

Elina Volksone, Microsoft

  • Balanced human rights framing: Encouraged a reaffirmation of human rights while also expanding the narrative to recognise technology’s constructive role in upholding and advancing these values.
  • Technology as a driver of equity: Argued technology should be understood as a driver of equity, dignity, and societal resilience, not solely viewed as a risk.
  • Explicit reference to UDHR: Expressed concern over the omission of explicit references to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in the human rights section of the elements paper.

Ellie McDonald, Global Digital Rights Coalition for WSIS

  • Anchoring in international law: On behalf of a coalition, recommended the zero draft be anchored in international human rights law, reaffirm state obligations, and clarify that limitations on rights must meet principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality.
  • Formal role for OHCHR: Proposed assigning the OHCHR the responsibility to ensure human rights are protected in the context of the WSIS framework.
  • Operationalising multi-stakeholderism: Recommended considering proposals to operationalise the multi-stakeholder approach, building on initiatives like the Sรฃo Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines.

Jutta Croll, Digital Opportunities Foundation

  • Children’s rights in the digital environment: Spoke from a child rights perspective, welcoming references in the elements paper but suggesting amendments to ensure a balanced approach that respects children’s rights to protection, provision, and participation equally.
  • Incorporating General Comment 25: Underlined the need to uphold the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and incorporate its General Comment No. 25 on children’s rights in the digital environment.
  • Children’s representation: Suggested amending the text to ensure children’s perspectives are presented by themselves or advocates and given due weight in internet governance.

Laura Becana Ball, Global Forum for Media Development

  • Independent journalism as essential: Argued that independent journalism and public interest media are essential to a people-centred information society and key to ensuring access to reliable information.
  • Strengthening media systems: Stated that strengthening journalism independence and sustainability must be a key priority, supported with safeguards against online harassment and sustained funding.
  • Reinforce multi-stakeholder model: Echoed calls to reinforce the multi-stakeholder governance model, institutionalise the IGF, and implement the GDC within the WSIS framework.

Kim Ringmar Sylwander, Digital Futures for Childrenโ€™s Center, LSE

  • Inadequate reflection of children’s rights: Argued that despite international law, children’s rights remain inadequately reflected in global policy, leading to routine violations in the digital environment.
  • Five priorities from expert consultation: Drew on a global expert consultation to list priorities: streamlining recognition of children as distinct rights holders, focusing on unequal access, embedding child rights by design, enforcing through binding regulation, and ensuring UN independence from tech interests.
  • Systematic integration: Concluded that children’s rights must be systematically integrated and enforced, not just acknowledged, in the WSIS+20 process.

Roman Zimin, Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the UN

  • WSIS as key bridging process: Stated that WSIS remains the key UN process for bridging the digital gap through ICT capacity building, technology transfer, and training.
  • Harmonisation and avoiding duplication: Emphasised the need to harmonise WSIS implementation with other digital initiatives to avoid duplication and opposed adding ‘disputable concepts’ like information integrity.
  • ICT security in specialised formats: Called for discussing ICT security issues within specialised UN formats (e.g., the OEWG) and preferred terms like ‘ICT security’ over ‘cyber’ terminology, which is non-consensus.

Lucien Castex, Association Franรงaise pour le Nommage Internet en Coopรฉration (AFNIC)

  • Multistakeholder cooperation for trust: Strongly believed that implementing WSIS outcomes and reinforcing trust has been greatly facilitated by multistakeholder cooperation in developing standards and policy.
  • Key role of technical bodies: Highlighted the work of ICANN and the IETF as key to shaping the internet’s future through continuous improvement and consensus-driven processes.
  • Explicit identification of technical community: Stressed the need to explicitly identify and mention the technical community and academia as key stakeholders in the zero draft.

Pablo Hinojosa, Consultant

  • From norms to practical implementation: Urged that international norms and frameworks must translate into practical implementation that responds to operational needs.
  • Equitable capacity building: Committed to equitable and efficient capacity building without new budgets by empowering local solutions and leveraging peer-to-peer learning, citing the Women in Cyber Fellowship as a model.
  • Resilience as bedrock of trust: Argued that confidence and security must be understood through the lens of resilience (technical, institutional, human), where multistakeholderism is a necessity.

Desiree Milosevic, RIPE NCC

  • Persistent digital divide: Noted that despite progress, the digital divide remains a pressing challenge, particularly for women and girls, requiring scaled-up investment.
  • Lack of implementation mechanisms: Identified a lack of clear implementation and follow-up mechanisms as a challenge, as many states have not integrated WSIS action lines into national strategies.
  • Safeguarding the open internet: Stated that the open, interoperable, and secure internet must be safeguarded as it is essential for meeting the SDGs.

Rosalia Morales, Technical Community Coalition for Multistakeholderism

  • Permanent IGF mandate: On behalf of a technical community coalition, urged member states to support a permanent mandate for the IGF to allow for investment in its improvement and development.
  • Diversified funding: Advocated for a diversified funding approach to ensure sustainable, robust funding and appropriate multi-stakeholder support.
  • Leveraging existing infrastructure: Argued that the existing WSIS infrastructure (WSIS Forum, IGF) are the logical venues for centering implementation and follow-up of digital policy outputs.

Abdeldjalil Bachar Bong, House of Africa

  • Capacity building and reduced cost: Focused on breaking the digital divide through digital capacity building, reducing the cost of internet access, and promoting local content in local languages.
  • Supporting environmental sustainability: Called for supporting environmental and sustainable digital growth and addressing social and cultural barriers.
  • Key role of IGF and NRIs: Emphasised the key role of the IGF, its permanent mandate, sustainable funding, and the role of national and regional initiatives (NRIs).

Meline Svadjian, Permanent Mission of Canada to the UN (on behalf of Canada and Australia)

  • Multistakeholder internet governance: Reaffirmed that internet governance should be global and multistakeholder in nature, referencing the practical Sรฃo Paulo multistakeholder guidelines.
  • Strong IGF mandate: Supported reaffirming a strong and enduring mandate for the IGF and its national and regional initiatives.
  • Dedicated human rights section: Recommended a dedicated section on human rights, explicitly recognising human rights as a cross-cutting issue grounded in international law, and a formal role for OHCHR.
  • Avoiding duplication on AI: Acknowledged AI significance but advised avoiding duplicating work of the GDC and related initiatives, reinforcing existing commitments.

Konstantinos Komaitis, Atlantic Council

  • Internet-development link is foundational: Argued the link between the internet and development is no longer aspirational but foundational, and closing the digital divide is a development imperative.
  • Multistakeholder model as the engine: Stated the multistakeholder model is the engine that empowers a healthy internet and Paragraph 34 of the Tunis Agenda must stand.
  • Strengthen, don’t just renew, the IGF: Argued we don’t just need to renew the IGF, but strengthen it, make it permanent, funded, and support its iterations, as it is a frontline for contesting visions of the internet.

Daphnรฉ Barbotte, EU Delegation to the UN

  • EU proposals to strengthen IGF: On behalf of the EU, proposed strengthening the IGF through permanent institutionalisation, sustainable UN funding, a dedicated Secretariat director, and greater inclusion of developing countries.
  • Enhancing policy impact: Proposed reinforcing multi-year thematic tracks and ensuring IGF conclusions are linked to WSIS Action Lines to create a feedback loop.
  • Multi-stakeholder governance labs: Proposed creating multi-stakeholder governance labs within the IGF to explore implications of emerging technologies and co-create innovative solutions.

Nick Ashton-Hart, APCO Worldwide

  • Improving coordination between WSIS pillars: Recommended improving coordination between the three main WSIS pillars (IGF, WSIS Forum, CSTD) to leverage their complementary strengths and create a positive feedback loop.
  • Engaging development financiers: Proposed the zero draft should endorse greater participation by Bretton Woods Institutions and regional development banks in the WSIS process to help countries access resources.
  • Leveraging universal service funds: Recommended recognising how deployment of universal service funds can be leveraged using best practices to connect the unconnected.

Titti Cassa, Agency for Digital Italy

  • Digital governance fragmentation: Noted that digital governance remains fragmented with key initiatives like WSIS, GDC, and SDGs operating in parallel with limited coordination.
  • IGF as a bridge: Argued the IGF ecosystem is well positioned to act as a bridge across these processes and proposed concrete steps: establishing it as permanent, greater integration, ensuring inclusivity, and introducing robust monitoring for WSIS.
  • Strategic role for IGF: Proposed the IGF should assume a more strategic role in shaping the global digital agenda, serving as a space for promoting outcome implementation.

William Drake, Columbia Institute for Teleinformation

  • Risks of ‘enhanced cooperation’: Expressed concern that foregrounding the ambiguous term ‘enhanced cooperation’ could lead to division and deadlock, given today’s hyper-polarised environment.
  • Clarity on intent: Suggested a solution would be for governments to make clear that a new intergovernmental organisation is not what they have in mind by ‘enhanced cooperation’, to avoid a breakdown.
  • Call for interactivity: Recalled useful government-stakeholder dialogues from the original WSIS process and urged for anything to approximate that level of interactivity in this review.

Claire Sophie Patzig, Youth IGF Germany

  • NRIs as a core pillar: Delivered a joint statement endorsing the essential role of National and Regional IGF Initiatives (NRIs) as a core pillar of global internet governance.
  • Strength of multistakeholder model: Argued that NRIs embody the multistakeholder spirit and their work bridges global vision with local realities, which is the true strength of the model.
  • Calls to action: The statement called for recognition of NRIs, continued strengthening of the multistakeholder model, a permanent IGF mandate, and safeguarding technological neutrality.

Pascal Bekono, Cameroon Ministry of Justice

  • Regulatory lag in LDCs: Noted that regulatory mechanisms for data governance are being adopted globally, but least developed countries are lagging behind in implementation.
  • Common data governance policies: Maintained that the WSIS multi-stakeholder approach and the IGF should continue to facilitate inclusive dialogue towards the adoption of common data governance policies.
  • Global data regulatory body: Believed it is important to establish a global data regulatory body to guarantee equitable access and fair protection for citizens against violation and abuse.

Jacqueline Pigatto, Data Privacy Brazil

  • Data justice lens: Advocated for approaching data governance through a ‘data justice’ lens, looking beyond privacy to consider broader human rights implications on social protection, work, education, and health.
  • Balancing security and rights: Called for a better balance between security (e.g., surveillance) and the protection of human rights, suggesting a human rights-based approach can help reconcile these tensions.
  • Role of OHCHR: Called attention to the valuable role the OHCHR could play in the CSTD Working Group on Data Governance regarding human rights impacts.

Gabriel Delsol, Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA)

  • AI through existing mechanisms: Recommended the WSIS review engage on AI through existing action lines and mechanisms to avoid duplication and potential friction.
  • Support existing UN efforts: Argued the process should support and defer to outcomes under the Global Digital Compact (e.g., the scientific panel, global dialogue on AI).
  • UN as a convening forum: Viewed the UN’s role as a facilitating agent for convening and information sharing on AI, rather than prescribing specific governance mechanisms.

Paloma Lara Castro, Derechos Digitales

  • AI and new colonialism: Argued that the concentration of AI development in a few global north countries and corporations is generating new forms of digital colonialism through data extraction and bias.
  • Gender-based and decolonial approaches: Urged WSIS+20 to promote gender-based and decolonial approaches to data and AI governance that prioritize collective rights and community stewardship.
  • Mandatory gender impact assessments: Instituted that mandatory gender impact assessments must be conducted before deployment of all AI systems.

Laura Oโ€™Brien, Access Now

  • Human rights risks of AI: Highlighted that deploying AI without safeguards can facilitate human rights violations, exacerbate social power imbalances, and create new risks like AI-powered surveillance.
  • Grounded in international law: Recommended the zero draft be grounded in international human rights law, reaffirm that any interference with privacy must be necessary and proportionate, and reassert private sector responsibilities to conduct human rights due diligence.
  • Avoid duplication on AI governance: Underscored the need to avoid duplication, particularly on AI governance, and echoed calls to institutionalise the IGF as a permanent structure.

Christian Schlaepfer, Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the UN

  • Gratitude for process: Expressed gratitude for the co-facilitators’ leadership, transparency, and inclusivity, exemplified by the Multistakeholder Sounding Board.
  • Build on established consensus: Underscored the importance of building on established consensus, reaffirming foundational outcomes, and prioritising discussions on emerging challenges not fully addressed before.
  • Implementation as shared priority: Stated that strengthening the WSIS framework requires revitalised mechanisms like an updated ANeGIS, a more strategic role for CSTD and IGF, and exploring tools like a WSIS helpdesk.

Kayode Oyeyemi, Africa ICT Alliance (AFICTA)

  • Capacity building for Africa’s transformation: Focused on capacity building as a critical enabler for Africa’s digital transformation, citing a World Bank figure that 230 million jobs in SSA will require digital skills by 2030.
  • Scalable and inclusive programmes: Advocated for scalable, industry-aligned training in emerging technologies, prioritising women and underserved communities, and delivered through public-private partnerships.
  • Support for MSMEs: Noted that 40% of Africa’s 100 million MSMEs have little digital integration and called for targeted training to help them leverage e-commerce and digital finance.

Dheeraj Rajput, Indian Ministry of Electronics and IT

  • Capacity building as a central pillar: Proposed that capacity building and digital literacy must be treated as a central pillar of WSIS action lines, not a complementary activity.
  • Structured programmes for future leaders: Recommended nurturing structured internship and fellowship programmes to create a pipeline of future leaders to guide WSIS action lines.
  • Open knowledge and measurable outcomes: Believed open knowledge-based datasets and multi-stakeholder platforms can democratise expertise, and called for scalable models linked to measurable outcomes.

Bea Guevarra, NetMission.Asia

  • Capacity building beyond training: Argued that for youth in the APAC region, capacity building is about opening doors to opportunity, leadership, and long-term inclusion, not just digital literacy.
  • Localised and multilingual: Called for capacity building that is localised and multilingual so people see themselves in the digital world, including investing in local language AI models.
  • Resourced participation: Emphasised that meaningful capacity building must be properly resourced through fellowships, mentorships, and paid opportunities so participation leads to empowerment, not burnout.

Alexey Trepykhalin, ICANN

  • Reflecting evolution of internet governance: Encouraged the zero draft to reflect the evolution of the internet and the multi-stakeholder model since WSIS, recognising its achievements, rather than reverting to legacy language.
  • Leverage the IGF: Stated that the WSIS implementation beyond 2025 should leverage the existing and mature IGF assembly, which requires sustainable resources and a strengthened mandate.
  • Role of UN agencies: Recognised the role of UN agencies like ITU and UNESCO in implementing WSIS action lines, citing a recent UNESCO-ICANN agreement to enhance linguistic diversity.

Judith Hellerstein, IGF Dynamic Coalition on Accessibility and Disabilities

  • Tangential mention of disability: Stated that despite years of advocacy, the digital divide facing persons with disabilities is only mentioned tangentially in the elements paper.
  • Changing mindsets for inclusion: Argued that changing the mindset of event organisers and knowledge producers is needed to ensure accessibility for people who access knowledge differently.
  • Concrete actions for inclusion: Called for funding accessible training materials co-created with people with disability, setting diversity targets, creating mentorship pathways, and integrating disability indicators into monitoring frameworks.

Winnie Kamau, Association of Freelance Journalists

  • Localised and context-driven capacity building: Recommended that capacity building needs to be localised, context-driven, and incorporate local languages and cultural values.
  • Inclusion of overlooked groups: Urged for explicit inclusion of media, civil society, youth, women, and indigenous groups who are critical in building resilient digital ecosystems.
  • Three recommendations: Called for long-term sustainable investment, prioritising governance capacity (data governance, AI ethics), and empowering independent media and grassroots innovators with resources.

Tinuade Oguntuyi, Information Connectivity Solutions Limited

  • Rethinking capacity building: Argued that capacity building should be rethought beyond technical assistance and donor-recipient relationships, seeing Africans as co-creators, not just consumers.
  • Framing digital literacy: Critiqued that digital literacy is framed in the elements paper from a reliability lens, rather than from the uniqueness of the global south bringing itself into leadership.
  • Grounding in creativity and ethics: Recommended that capacity building should be grounded in creativity, ethics, and community resilience, not just technical know-how, and should also target political norms.

Rashi Gupta, Center for Development of Advanced Computing (India)

  • Lack of specificity in targets: Noted with concern that the articulation of post-2015 targets has lacked specificity and urged the zero draft to include a consolidated mapping of these targets.
  • Inadequacy of data mechanisms: Identified a persistent challenge in the inadequacy of robust, harmonised mechanisms for data collection, reporting, and progress assessment for WSIS.
  • Domain-specific indicators: Emphasised the importance of creating a transparent, participatory global framework that includes domain-specific quantifiable indicators for areas like AI readiness and digital inclusion.

Israel Rosas, Internet Society

  • WSIS framework’s adaptability: Argued that the WSIS framework and action lines have proven remarkably adaptable and remain the foundation for ongoing development, accommodating vast technological change.
  • Multistakeholder model at heart: Stated that at the heart of WSIS achievements lies the multi-stakeholder model of internet governance, which is vital for the zero draft to ensure an ongoing commitment to.
  • No need for new action lines: Asserted there is no need to reinvent the wheel or create new action lines; new challenges should be addressed by strengthening the implementation of existing WSIS action lines.

Dana Cramer, Young Digital Leaders of Canada

  • Measuring youth engagement: Proposed that youth participation and engagement should become a metric tracked along each WSIS action line to create an incentive for agencies to include youth meaningfully.
  • Defining ‘youth’: Advocated for separating ‘young people’ into ‘children’ (under 18) and ‘youth’ (18-35) in the zero draft to parallel other UN language and avoid liability issues.
  • Incentivising meaningful inclusion: Argued that tracking youth engagement would help design digital initiatives that safeguard infrastructure for future generations.

Sebastien Bachollet, Internet Society France

  • Multistakeholder, not multilateral: Expressed the firm belief that internet governance should be multistakeholder, not multilateral, to ensure the inclusion of non-governmental stakeholders.
  • Significant strengthening of IGF: Argued that the IGF needs significant strengthening, international recognition, and solid funding, and its purpose should not be put in competition with other bodies.
  • Multilingual participation: Noted it was strange that a UN consultation was held only in English and advocated for future discussions to be open to various languages.

Elizabeth Bacon, Public Interest Registry / Technical Community Coalition for Multistakeholderism

  • Measuring IGF participation and impact: Recommended diligent measurement of participation, funding, outcomes, and impact of the IGF and its components (NRIs, dynamic coalitions) to enable data-driven analysis and efficiency.
  • Strategic engagement between IGFs: Proposed a more strategic approach to engagement between the yearly IGFs to encourage continuous progress towards identified goals and maximise investment.
  • IGF for digital governance: Stated that the IGF is key for discussing internet governance issues and identifying emerging themes, and its organisational aspects should be reviewed for continuous work flow.

Avri Doria, Technicalities

  • Resolve enhanced cooperation: Urged to resolve the ‘enhanced cooperation’ conundrum without disruption, noting that successful efforts to enhance cooperation between multilateral and multistakeholder processes already exist and need nurturing.
  • Concrete capacity building: Stressed the global necessity for capacity building and the need to do something concrete about it, noting the IGF is adept at this through its policy networks and dynamic coalitions.
  • Use of internet for participation: Recommended continued move towards greater use of internet-based communication and hybrid models for consultations to become more inclusive and accommodate everyone.

Swati Lall, International Internet Exchange of India

  • More frequent reviews: Argued that a 10-year review cycle is inadequate given the speed of technological change, proposing a multi-layer mechanism: annual progress tracking and a formal mid-term review (e.g., WSIS+25) aligned with the SDG review.
  • Structured role for IGF and WSIS Forum: Recommended that the IGF and WSIS Forum play a more structured role in informing formal reviews, and that continuous multi-stakeholder dialogue must meaningfully inform the process.
  • Evolving evaluation metrics: Stated that evaluating connectivity must now encompass skills, device affordability, bandwidth, and digital literacy, and include emerging priorities like responsible AI and green ICT.

Jenna Fung, NetMission.Asia

  • Data justice for youth: Called for a rights-based, community-centred data governance with ethical protocols for youth data, which is used opaquely for AI training, deepening trust deficits.
  • Meaningful defined connectivity: Argued that connectivity must be meaningfully defined beyond broadband access to include digital literacy, affordability, safety, and agency.
  • Broader metrics suite: Advocated for a broader suite of metrics beyond connectivity rates, including access to digital skills, safe online spaces, youth representation in policy, and measures of empowerment.

Pari Esfandiai, Global Technopolitics Forum

  • AI as strategic infrastructure: Framed AI as a strategic infrastructure of global power, not just a technical development challenge, facing systemic asymmetries in who shapes the rules.
  • Normative weaknesses: Critiqued the paper for invoking ethics but avoiding binding commitment to human rights-based governance and for avoiding naming surveillance as a systemic risk.
  • Missing geopolitical context: Argued the paper fails to examine the geopolitical context, including the rise of a ‘global compute oligarchy’, regulatory fragmentation, and how AI may suppress cultural and linguistic pluralism.

Sarah Nicole, Project Liberty

  • AI amplifies current structures: Argued that AI amplifies the current centralised structure of the web that streams user control over data, further strengthening a handful of dominant companies.
  • Embedding data agency: Proposed that data agency (citizen control over personal data) must be embedded at the core of digital infrastructure to ensure true empowerment.
  • Mandating open protocols: Called for mandating the use of open-source, interoperable, and decentralised protocols to foster trust and resilience in the digital infrastructure that contributes to AI.

  1. Digital divide and inclusion: This was the most prominent theme, evolving from a focus on basic connectivity to a multidimensional ‘usage gap’. Key points included addressing barriers of affordability, skills, relevant local content, linguistic diversity, and access to devices and advanced technologies. Speakers like Roddy McGlynn (GSMA)Soumya Nair (India), and Baratang Miya provided critical data and perspectives.
  2. Internet governance and the multi-stakeholder model: There was strong consensus on the importance of the multi-stakeholder approach, with extensive discussion on strengthening the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). Key proposals were giving it a permanent mandate, sustainable funding, and a more impactful role. Fiona AlexanderDaphnรฉ Barbotte (EU), and Israel Rosas (ISOC) were key contributors.
  3. Human rights and ethics: A major theme was the call to anchor the WSIS+20 outcome firmly in international human rights law, apply rights offline to online, and ensure corporate accountability. Elonnai Hickok (GNI)Ellie McDonald (Global Digital Rights Coalition), and Ana Marรญa Suรกrez Franco (FIAN) drove this discussion.
  4. Environmental sustainability: The environmental cost of digitalisation, from AI’s energy use to e-waste, was highlighted as a critical and often overlooked issue. Speakers called for ‘green-by-design’ principles and a circular economy. Shradhanjali SarmaMarรญa Soledad Vogliano (ETC Group), and Jasmine Ko (Hong Kong Youth IGF) were central to this theme.
  5. Artificial intelligence (AI) governance: Discussions focused on the opportunities and risks of AI, the concentration of power in a few corporations and countries, and the need for governance that prevents harm and promotes equity. Paloma Lara Castro (Derechos Digitales)Gabriel Delsol (CCIA), and Pari Esfandiai offered diverse perspectives.
  6. Digital public infrastructure (DPI) and innovation: DPI was presented as a transformative, equitable model for digital transformation, particularly in the global south. Aditya Vikram Dube (India) and Shumaila Hussain were key proponents.
  7. Capacity building and skills: Moving beyond basic digital literacy to advanced skills for the future economy, particularly for youth, women, and marginalised communities, was a recurring need. Kayode Oyeyemi (AFICTA)Dheeraj Rajput (India), and Bea Guevarra (NetMission) emphasised this.
  8. Financing and economic models: Concerns were raised about market-led approaches failing to bridge divides. Proposals included a digital development tax, reforming tax regimes, and innovative financing mechanisms. Sadhana Sanjay (IT for Change) and Anriette Esterhuysen (APC) contributed significantly.
  9. Gender equality and youth engagement: The need to mainstream gender and youth across all action lines was emphasised, with specific calls for a standalone gender action line and metrics for youth participation. Mrinalini Dayal and Dana Cramer were vocal on this theme.
  10. Follow-up, review, and implementation: Speakers critiqued the lack of robust monitoring mechanisms for WSIS and proposed more frequent reviews, better indicators, and stronger links between implementation fora like the IGF and WSIS Forum. Swati Lall and Rashi Gupta (India) provided detailed recommendations.

Agreements and disagreements are not necessarily expressed in direct debate between speakers, but are based on the inputs they made during the session. A cognitive toolkit for AI analysis is provided by Diplo’s experts on digital and internet governance.

  • Strengthening the multi-stakeholder model: There was broad consensus that the multi-stakeholder model is essential and must be reinforced. Speakers in agreement: Fiona Alexander, Timea Suto (ICC), Lucien Castex (AFNIC), Israel Rosas (ISOC), Claire Sophie Patzig (Youth IGF), and many others.
  • Institutionalising the IGF: A large majority of speakers supported renewing the IGF’s mandate, making it permanent, and providing it with sustainable funding and a strengthened secretariat. Speakers in agreement: Jose Scandiucci (Brazil), Paul Blaker (UK), Fiona Alexander, Daphnรฉ Barbotte (EU), Anriette Esterhuysen (APC), and numerous civil society and technical community representatives.
  • Addressing the multidimensional digital divide: There was unanimous agreement that the digital divide is now about more than connectivity and includes affordability, skills, content, and access to technology. Speakers in agreement: Roddy McGlynn (GSMA), Soumya Nair (India), James Kunle Olorundare (ISOC Nigeria), and virtually all speakers from the global south.
  • Anchoring the outcome in human rights: Most speakers agreed that the WSIS+20 outcome must be grounded in international human rights law and reaffirm that rights offline apply online. Speakers in agreement: Elonnai Hickok (GNI), Ellie McDonald (Global Digital Rights Coalition), Laura Oโ€™Brien (Access Now), and a wide range of civil society organisations.
  • Integrating the GDC with WSIS: There was strong support for creating a joint implementation roadmap to harmonise GDC commitments within the WSIS framework to avoid duplication. Speakers in agreement: Jose Scandiucci (Brazil), Christian Schlaepfer (Switzerland), and Laura Becana Ball (GFMD).

  • Interpretation of ‘Enhanced Cooperation’: Views differed significantly on this term from the Tunis Agenda. Some warned against reopening contentious debates and saw it as a potential obstacle, while others from the global south maintained it remains relevant for ensuring equitable participation of governments.
    • Side A (Cautious): Paul Blaker (UK) and Fiona Alexander urged avoiding the phrase to prevent deadlock, arguing it has led to fruitless discussions. William Drake highlighted the deep geopolitical differences embedded in the term.
    • Side B (Supportive): Anriette Esterhuysen (APC) stated that effective equitable participation of governments (enhanced cooperation) remains relevant for the global south.
  • Balance between market-led and public intervention: There were divergent views on the role of the private sector and the need for public intervention.
    • Side A (Market-led): Cheryl Miller (USCIB) and Timea Suto (ICC) emphasised creating policy environments that support private investment, innovation, and cross-border data flows.
    • Side B (Public intervention): Shumaila Hussain, Sadhana Sanjay (IT for Change), and Ana Marรญa Suรกrez Franco (FIAN) criticised market-led approaches, called for corporate accountability, and proposed public financing mechanisms like taxes on digital monopolies.
  • Approach to ICT security: A clear disagreement emerged on the appropriate forum and terminology for discussing security issues.
    • Side A (Specialised formats): Roman Zimin (Russia) argued that ICT security should be discussed in specialised UN formats like the Open-ended Working Group (OEWG) and preferred terms like ‘ICT security’ over ‘cyber’.
    • Side B (Broader inclusion): The prevailing view among other speakers was for a broader multi-stakeholder discussion on security within the WSIS and IGF contexts, without specifying terminology.
  • The digital divide is no longer just a gap. It has become a growing chasm. โ€“ Koudy Wanee (Senegal)
  • We are not just inheriting this planet, but we are actually actively shaping its decadal destiny. โ€“ Jasmine Yee man Ko (Hong Kong Youth IGF)
  • Capacity is not a gap to be filled, but a force to be unleashed. โ€“ Tinuade Oguntuyi
  • AI is now a strategic infrastructure of global power. What we face is not just unequal access, but systemic asymmetries in who gets to shape the rules. โ€“ Pari Esfandiai
  • The internet’s strength lies in its diversity of voices. Letโ€™s not silence them. โ€“ Konstantinos Komaitis


  • Develop a joint WSIS-GDC implementation roadmap: Proposed by Jose Scandiucci (Brazil) and supported by Christian Schlaepfer (Switzerland) and Anriette Esterhuysen (APC) to ensure coherence and avoid duplication.
  • Establish a global task force on financing for inclusive digital transformation: Proposed by Sadhana Sanjay (Global Digital Justice Forum) to explore innovative and blended financing mechanisms.
  • Institute a digital development tax: Proposed by Sadhana Sanjay (Global Digital Justice Forum) whereby dominant tech corporations contribute to connecting the unconnected.
  • Create multi-stakeholder governance labs within the IGF: Proposed by Daphnรฉ Barbotte (EU) to serve as collaborative spaces for exploring emerging tech implications.
  • Launch a process to develop concrete goals for action from IGF messages: Proposed by Titti Cassa (Agency for Digital Italy) to enhance the IGF’s policy impact.
  • Conduct a WSIS+25 mid-term review in 2030: Proposed by Swati Lall (NIXI) to align with the SDG review process and assess progress.
  • Embed ‘green AI-by-design’ principles: Proposed by Shradhanjali Sarma (CCAOI) to integrate environmental considerations from the development stage.
  • Establish a standalone WSIS action line on gender: Proposed by Mrinalini Dayal (Alliance for Universal Digital Rights) with defined goals and dedicated resources.
  • Mandate the use of open-source, interoperable protocols for data agency: Proposed by Sarah Nicole (Project Liberty) to foster trust and resilience in digital infrastructure.
  • Set diversity targets for disability representation in IGF structures: Proposed by Judith Hellerstein (DCAD) to ensure meaningful inclusion.
  • 2.6 billion people still unconnected from the internet today. (Cheryl Miller, USCIB)
  • A single AI query can use up to 10 times more electricity than a standard web search. (Shradhanjali Sarma, Cyber Cafe Association of India)
  • 3.7 billion people remain offline, with women disproportionately affected. (Baratang Miya)
  • By 2030, 90% of jobs will require digital skills, yet 60% of African youth lack basic digital competencies. (Baratang Miya)
  • Women-led startups receive less than 2% of global venture capital funding. (Baratang Miya)
  • Broadband networks reach 96% of the global population, but only 57% use mobile internet. The usage gap is nine times the size of the coverage gap. (Roddy McGlynn, GSMA)
  • Women across low and middle-income countries are 14% less likely to use mobile internet than men, resulting in 235 million fewer women online. (Roddy McGlynn, GSMA)
  • 230 million jobs in sub-Saharan Africa will require digital skills by 2030. (Kayode Oyeyemi, AFICTA)
  • 40% of Africa’s 100 million MSMEs have little or no digital integration. (Kayode Oyeyemi, AFICTA)
  • 37% internet penetration in sub-Saharan Africa vs. 90% in North America. (James Kunle Olorundare, ISOC Nigeria)

Language analysis is based on Diplo’s research on diplomatic linguistics, focused on language used in internet governance and digital diplomacy.

Linguistic devices

  • Appeal to emotion: “Think of the children if we donโ€™t act now!” โ€“ Jutta Croll, invoking vulnerability in digital rights.
  • Metaphor: “Digital divide as a growing chasm” โ€“ Koudy Wanee, portraying exclusion as a deepening threat.
  • Anaphora: “We must… We must… We must…” โ€“ Cheryl Miller, repeating for emphasis on connectivity and cooperation.
  • Rhetorical question: “Are we building the capacities in the right manner?” โ€“ Judith Hellerstein, questioning inclusion approaches.

Tech dichotomies

Tech and policy speeches are often framed in a dichotomous structure. The most typical one, which is used in almost any tech speech, is the ‘opportunity vs. risk’ dichotomy. These linguistic and cognitive tools are critical for internet/digital governance and diplomacy as they can easily lead to ‘false dichotomies’ of binary or either/or framing of problems. Identifying dichotomies is critical for fostering actionable trade-offs and practical solutions. Here you can find AI-generated analysis based on Kurbalija’s methodology of typical tech dichotomies.

Dichotomy nameDefinition & tensionSupporting quote from text
Global vs LocalTension between standardised, top-down technological solutions and community-driven models tailored to specific cultural, linguistic, and contextual needs.“Centralized one-size-fits-all solutions often miss the mark… we advocate for hyper-local decentralized models.” (Arpita Kanjilal)
Access vs Meaningful UseTension between providing basic network coverage and ensuring people can actually use the internet affordably, safely, skillfully, and with relevant content.“broadband networks now reach 96% of the global population, but only 57% use mobile internet.” (Roddy McGlynn)
Empowerment vs ControlTension between technology that enhances individual agency and democratic participation versus technology used for surveillance, social control, and entrenching power imbalances (digital colonialism).“The current market-led paradigm entrenched digital colonialism with extractive data flows and infrastructure dependency.” (Shumaila Hussain)
Universal Benefits vs Asymmetric HarmsTension between the promise that tech advancement benefits everyone and the reality that its negative environmental and social impacts are disproportionately borne by the Global South.“The environmental burdens are much more on the developing countries. This not only creates a sustainability gap, but also an equity gap.” (Shradhanjali Sarma)
Innovation vs RegulationTension between the rapid pace of technological innovation and the need for governance, accountability, and safeguards to prevent harm.“Policies and regulations still allow internet fragmentation and increase the risk of fragmentation.” (Cheryl Miller)
Human-Centred vs Tech-CentredTension between designing technology for human values, inclusion, and well-being versus designing for pure efficiency, automation, and profit.“we must shift from tech only policies towards an approach where technology serves people rather than exasperating this exclusion.” (Arpita Kanjilal)

Summary: The transcript reveals a discourse dominated by critical tensions inherent in digital development. The most prominent dichotomies centre on equity and power: who benefits from technology versus who bears its costs (Universal Benefits vs Asymmetric Harms), who controls its development and governance (Empowerment vs Control), and whether solutions are imposed globally or emerge locally (Global vs Local). The overall perspective leans towards a critique of the current digital paradigm, arguing that it often fails to deliver on its promises of universal benefit and instead risks reinforcing historical inequalities and creating new forms of exclusion and environmental damage. The proposed solutions consistently advocate for a reorientation towards justice, equity, and multi-stakeholder inclusivity.

Word frequency

Word/PhraseFrequency
digital287
WSIS185
internet127
stakeholders112
governance109
multi-stakeholder97
access93
IGF91
human rights78
development75
capacity building68
inclusive65
global64
forum59
review58
process57
cooperation56
community55
must54
need53
model52
technologies51
implementation50
countries49
framework48
youth47
support46
ensure45
action44
people43
line42
draft41
zero40
environmental39
stakeholders38
including37
local36
economy35
women34
skills33
infrastructure32
data31
AI30
connectivity29
gap28
building27
element26
paper25
climate24
change23
security22
sustainable21
use20
public19
private18
sector17
need16
also15
new14
time13
today12
thank11
very10
much9
opportunity8
contribute7
consultation6
session5
please4
floor3
online2
hear1

Context
The WSIS+20 Informal Stakeholder Consultation was a virtual meeting held on 29 July 2025, from 14:00 to 17:00 UTC. It was co-facilitated by Ambassador Suela Janina of Albania and Ambassador Ekitela Lokaale of Kenya, with support from the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). This session was a critical step in the preparatory process for the 20-year review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), which will culminate in a high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly in December 2025. The consultation was designed to gather verbal feedback on the ‘elements paper’, a foundational document that will guide the drafting of the ‘zero draft’ outcome document. Unusually for a UN New York-based process, it featured a joint dialogue with both member states and all stakeholder groups (civil society, private sector, technical community, academia) participating on equal footing.

Why it matters
This consultation is significant because it represents a concerted effort to inject genuine multi-stakeholderism into an intergovernmentally-led review process. The WSIS+20 outcome will set the global agenda for digital cooperation for the next decade, influencing how we address challenges like AI, digital divides, and cybersecurity. The insights gathered here will directly shape the zero draft, making this a pivotal opportunity for non-government voices to influence high-level digital policy. The novelty lay in the format itselfโ€”a hybrid, open dialogueโ€”which many participants praised as a model for how UN digital processes should operate.

What was discussed
The discussion was structured around the themes of the elements paper. Key arguments emerged across all sessions:

  • Digital divides: Speakers universally agreed the focus must shift from basic connectivity to ‘meaningful connectivity’. Roddy McGlynn (GSMA) provided crucial data illustrating the ‘usage gap’: 96% of people are covered by networks, but only 57% are online, meaning 3 billion people cannot afford or lack the skills to use the internet.
  • Internet governance: There was overwhelming consensus on strengthening the multi-stakeholder model and making the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) a permanent UN institution with sustainable funding. Fiona Alexander (American University) noted, however, that only 15% of speakers were governments, questioning if the UN system can truly embrace shared decision-making.
  • Human rights: Civil society organisations, including Ellie McDonald (Global Digital Rights Coalition), insisted the outcome must be firmly anchored in international human rights law and include a formal role for the UN human rights office (OHCHR).
  • Environmental sustainability: The ecological cost of digitalisation was a major theme. Shradhanjali Sarma (CCAOI) highlighted that an AI query can use 10x more energy than a web search, with burdens falling disproportionately on the global south.
  • Power asymmetries: Many speakers from the global south, like Shumaila Hussain (Tech Global Institute), critiqued ‘digital colonialism’ and called for structural changes, such as a digital development tax on tech giants, to rebalance the digital economy.

Unique and non-expected insights
Several insights challenged conventional narratives. Arpita Kanjilal (Digital Empowerment Foundation) argued compellingly for ‘hyperlocal’ digital models that are not fully automated but retain a ‘human anchor’ to build community trust. Tinuade Oguntuyi (Information Connectivity Solutions) reframed capacity building, stating, “Capacity is not a gap to be filled, but a force to be unleashed,” advocating for Africans to be seen as co-creators, not consumers. Perhaps the most unexpected tension was around the term ‘enhanced cooperation’. William Drake (Columbia University) warned it is a ‘lightning rod for geopolitical differences’ that could derail the entire process if not clearly defined, revealing the underlying political fractures that still exist.

Follow-up and next steps
The co-facilitators will now analyse this input, along with over 114 written submissions, to produce the ‘zero draft’ of the outcome document, expected in approximately one month. Subsequent negotiations among member states will take place, with stakeholders advocating for the inclusive spirit of this consultation to continue. Key proposed next steps embedded in the discussion include creating a joint implementation roadmap for the WSIS and Global Digital Compact, establishing a task force on digital financing, and planning a WSIS+25 review in 2030. Participants were urged to remain engaged through the formal negotiations and the WSIS and IGF forums.


High-Level Dialogue: The role of parliaments in shaping our digital future

High-Level Dialogue: The role of parliaments in shaping our digital future

Session at a glance

Summary

This high-level dialogue focused on the role of parliamentarians in shaping the digital future, co-organized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the International Parliamentary Union (IPU). The discussion brought together parliamentarians from Egypt, Uruguay, Tanzania, and Thailand to address digital policy challenges and opportunities in their respective countries.


ITU Secretary-General Doreen Bogdan-Martin opened by highlighting that while digital innovation has created opportunities for economic growth and civic engagement, one-third of humanity still lacks internet access. She emphasized that parliamentarians are uniquely positioned to ensure digital technologies serve the public good through transparent, inclusive, and rights-based legislation. IPU Secretary-General Martin Chungong stressed the need for parliamentarians to stay ahead of technological developments, noting that the IPU has adopted resolutions on AI’s impact on democracy and human rights.


The parliamentarians shared both hopes and concerns about their digital futures. Egypt’s Amira Saber celebrated bringing 12 million people online and launching nationwide 5G, while expressing concerns about freedom of expression and the digital divide. Uruguay’s Rodrigo Goni emphasized that parliamentarians cannot remain reactive but must develop “political intelligence” to anticipate technological changes. Tanzania’s Neema Lugangira highlighted the need for capacity building and access to AI tools for parliamentarians, particularly in developing countries. Thailand’s Senator Nophadol In na praised his country’s digital transformation while worrying about urban-rural digital divides and cybersecurity threats.


Key recommendations included creating mechanisms for parliamentarians to engage directly with tech companies, establishing policy radars to map global digital developments, improving online safety particularly for women, and developing debt-swap programs for digitalization. The discussion concluded with commitments from both ITU and IPU to continue supporting parliamentary capacity building and facilitating stakeholder collaboration in shaping inclusive digital policies.


Keypoints

## Major Discussion Points:


– **The Critical Role of Parliamentarians in Digital Governance**: Parliamentarians are positioned as key actors rather than observers in shaping digital policy, with responsibilities for creating ethical frameworks, ensuring inclusive access, and regulating emerging technologies like AI while representing citizen interests.


– **Digital Divide and Inclusion Challenges**: Persistent gaps between urban and rural areas, developed and developing nations, and different socioeconomic groups in accessing digital technologies, with emphasis on bringing connectivity to underserved populations and ensuring no one is left behind.


– **Need for Parliamentary Capacity Building**: Recognition that lawmakers cannot effectively regulate technologies they don’t understand, highlighting the urgent need for digital literacy training, technical skills development, and knowledge-sharing platforms for parliamentarians globally.


– **Balancing Innovation with Risk Management**: Discussion of both opportunities (economic growth, better services, employment) and threats (cybersecurity, online harassment, misinformation, threats to democracy) posed by rapid technological advancement, particularly AI.


– **Multi-stakeholder Collaboration Requirements**: Emphasis on the necessity of bringing together parliamentarians, tech companies, international organizations (ITU/IPU), civil society, and other stakeholders to address complex digital challenges that transcend traditional boundaries.


## Overall Purpose:


The discussion aimed to establish how parliamentarians can effectively contribute to shaping a more inclusive and equitable digital future, while identifying specific support needs and collaborative frameworks between the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to enhance parliamentary engagement in digital governance.


## Overall Tone:


The discussion maintained a tone of cautious optimism throughout. Speakers acknowledged significant challenges and risks while expressing hope about digital transformation’s potential. The tone was collaborative and solution-oriented, with parliamentarians sharing both concerns and concrete examples of progress in their countries. There was an underlying urgency about the need for immediate action, but this was balanced with practical, constructive suggestions for moving forward through partnership and capacity building.


Speakers

**Speakers from the provided list:**


– **Gitanjali Sah** – Role/Title: Not specified in transcript, appears to be moderating/organizing the event


– **Doreen Bogdan-Martin** – Role/Title: Secretary-General of ITU (International Telecommunication Union)


– **Martin Chungong** – Role/Title: Secretary-General of IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union)


– **Amira Saber** – Role/Title: Member of the People’s Assembly in Egypt, introduced the first draft bill on AI governance in Egyptian parliament


– **Rodrigo Goni** – Role/Title: Member of the House of Representatives from Uruguay


– **Nophadol In na** – Role/Title: Senator from Thailand, Vice-chairperson of the Working Group on Science and Technology of IPU


– **Neema Lugangira** – Role/Title: Parliamentarian from Tanzania (specific parliamentary position not clearly specified in transcript)


**Additional speakers:**


None – all speakers mentioned in the transcript are included in the provided speakers names list.


Full session report

# Comprehensive Report: High-Level Dialogue on Parliamentarians’ Role in Shaping the Digital Future


## Executive Summary


This high-level dialogue, organized as a closing session of the WSIS Forum and co-hosted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU), brought together parliamentarians from Egypt, Uruguay, Tanzania, and Thailand alongside international organization leaders to address the critical role of parliamentarians in digital governance. The discussion demonstrated strong consensus on key challenges and established a collaborative framework for enhanced parliamentary engagement in shaping an inclusive digital future, with concrete commitments for ongoing ITU-IPU cooperation.


## Opening Context and Framework


Session organizer Gitanjali Sah set the stage by emphasizing the importance of parliamentary engagement in digital governance and the opportunity presented by the upcoming WSIS+20 review in December.


ITU Secretary-General Doreen Bogdan-Martin established the discussion’s foundation by highlighting the dual nature of digital transformation: while digital innovation has created unprecedented opportunities for economic growth, learning, employment, and civic engagement, one-third of humanity still lacks internet access, with many more lacking the skills and resources to benefit from digital technologies. She emphasized that parliamentarians are uniquely positioned to ensure digital technologies serve the public good through transparent, inclusive, and rights-based legislation.


IPU Secretary-General Martin Chungong complemented this perspective by stressing the urgent need for parliamentarians to stay ahead of technological developments rather than merely responding to them. He highlighted the IPU’s Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology and noted that the IPU has already adopted resolutions on artificial intelligence’s impact on democracy and human rights, providing a roadmap for national-level parliamentary action. Chungong emphasized the importance of strengthening collaboration between policymakers and the scientific community to ensure evidence-based conversations.


## Parliamentary Perspectives: National Experiences and Achievements


### Egypt: Leading AI Governance Innovation


Amira Saber, Member of the People’s Assembly in Egypt who introduced the first draft bill on AI governance in Egyptian parliament, presented Egypt’s significant digital transformation achievements. She celebrated bringing 82% of Egyptians online and launching nationwide 5G infrastructure, including the symbolic launch at the pyramids. Her AI governance bill received support from 60 Egyptian MPs, demonstrating parliamentary engagement in digital policy.


Saber articulated a fundamental principle that resonated throughout the discussion: “We cannot regulate what we don’t understand, so there is a huge role for the IPU to get more parliamentarians capacitated on digital skills and how to govern for the best interest of the people.” She emphasized concerns about online safety, particularly regarding deepfakes and their disproportionate impact on women, noting that women can face life-threatening consequences from AI misuse.


She also advocated for innovative financing mechanisms, suggesting debt swap mechanisms for digitalization similar to climate debt swaps, recognizing the financial barriers facing Global South nations in digital development.


### Uruguay: Embracing Collaborative Governance


Rodrigo Goni, Member of the House of Representatives from Uruguay, provided insights into the need for adaptive governance approaches. He argued that “parliaments were always reactive. We looked at what was happening, and then we came up with a law. Now, it’s the other way around, because we cannot follow the speed of this digital era. A parliament that wants to tackle these issues reactively is useless.”


Goni introduced the concept of “political intelligence” as a framework for addressing digital challenges, emphasizing that cooperation is necessary for addressing digital safety and protection issues. His perspective highlighted the need for parliamentarians to develop anticipatory governance models rather than responding after problems emerge.


### Tanzania: Addressing Power Imbalances


Neema Lugangira, parliamentarian from Tanzania who rushed from her daughter’s graduation to attend the meeting, provided crucial insights into the power dynamics between global technology companies and developing nations’ governments. She observed that “most of the tech companies, especially the multinational tech companies, are from the global north… their annual turnover in terms of their sales at times is more than our national GDPs.”


This observation led to her recommendation that ITU and IPU facilitate mechanisms for bringing senior decision-makers from tech companies to meet directly with parliamentarians. Lugangira also highlighted how AI accelerates online gender-based violence, particularly against women in public office, undermining democratic participation.


She emphasized the importance of informed regulation: “We are only going to be able to regulate what we know. But if we remain not knowing it, we’re going to have stringent regulations, which then are not going to be helpful for the growth of the digital sector.”


### Thailand: Digital Transformation in Practice


Senator Nophadol In na from Thailand, serving as Vice-chairperson of the Working Group on Science and Technology of IPU, showcased Thailand’s comprehensive digital transformation under the Thailand 4.0 vision. He highlighted specific achievements including the Prachachat Internet project, PromptPay digital payment system, e-government applications, and the Personal Data Protection Act.


His contribution centered on human-centric governance principles: “Technology must serve people, not replace them. As we enter the age of AI… Our digital progress must be guided by human values and shared responsibility.” He also addressed emerging cybersecurity threats and emphasized the importance of AgriTech applications for rural development.


## Areas of Strong Consensus


### Parliamentary Capacity Building as Foundation


All speakers demonstrated unanimous agreement on the urgent need for parliamentary capacity building in digital technologies. This consensus emerged from the shared recognition that parliamentarians cannot effectively regulate technologies they don’t understand. The agreement encompassed technical skills development, access to AI tools for policy analysis, and knowledge-sharing platforms for global parliamentary cooperation.


### Digital Divide as Critical Challenge


There was universal agreement that the digital divide represents a critical challenge requiring coordinated action. Speakers consistently framed digital access as essential for inclusive development, with particular emphasis on rural and marginalized communities. This consensus extended beyond mere connectivity to encompass digital literacy, skills development, and meaningful participation in the digital economy.


### Proactive Parliamentary Engagement


All speakers agreed that parliamentarians must play an active role in shaping digital governance and policy. This consensus emerged from the shared recognition that traditional reactive approaches are inadequate for the speed of technological change, with strong support for collaborative and anticipatory governance models.


### Online Safety and Democratic Protection


Speakers shared deep concern about online safety issues, with particular emphasis on protecting women and vulnerable groups from digital harms. This consensus encompassed concerns about deepfakes, online gender-based violence, misinformation, and cybersecurity threats that undermine democratic participation.


### Multi-stakeholder Cooperation


All speakers emphasized that digital governance challenges require structured cooperation between governments, tech companies, civil society, and international organizations. The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) framework was recognized as providing a trusted platform for such collaboration over 20 years.


## Key Initiatives and Partnerships


### Women’s Leadership in Digital Governance


The discussion highlighted the Women Political Leaders partnership with Smart Africa and GIZ for the FEM AI champions initiative, demonstrating concrete efforts to enhance women’s participation in digital governance.


### Parliamentary Engagement Platforms


Several platforms for parliamentary engagement were mentioned, including the Internet Governance Forum parliamentary track in Norway focusing on misinformation and disinformation, and the upcoming parliamentary conference in Kuala Lumpur on responsible AI scheduled for November.


### ITU-IPU Collaboration


The discussion emphasized the natural partnership between ITU and IPU as “neighbors” in Geneva, with commitments for enhanced cooperation in capacity building and policy development.


## Concrete Recommendations and Commitments


### ITU-IPU Collaboration Framework


The discussion produced specific commitments for enhanced cooperation between ITU and IPU, including:


– Collaborative capacity building programs for parliamentarians in digital skills and AI understanding


– Extension of ITU’s AI Skills Coalition to include parliamentary capacity building opportunities


– Creation of mechanisms for improving parliamentarians’ access to AI tools, particularly for those from least developed countries


– Facilitation of direct engagement between senior tech company decision-makers and parliamentarians


### Upcoming Initiatives


The discussion established momentum for several initiatives:


– Continuation of discussions at the Global Conference of Speakers of Parliament with a special panel on parliament’s role in digital future


– Parliamentary conference in Kuala Lumpur on responsible AI


– Further development of connectivity initiatives with focus on rural areas


– Leveraging the WSIS+20 review in December as a key opportunity for parliamentary engagement


### Innovation in Financing and Access


Speakers identified the need for innovative approaches including:


– Corporate social responsibility programs from tech companies to provide subsidized access to AI tools


– Implementation of debt swap mechanisms for digitalization in developing countries


– Development of sustainable financing models for digital infrastructure and capacity building


## Ongoing Challenges and Future Considerations


### Capacity Building Implementation


While there was strong consensus on the need for parliamentary capacity building, the practical implementation of comprehensive training programs across diverse political and technological contexts remains a significant challenge requiring sustained commitment and resources.


### Global Equity in Digital Access


Questions about ensuring equitable access to expensive AI tools and digital infrastructure for parliamentarians and citizens in developing countries require continued attention and innovative financing solutions.


### Balancing Innovation and Regulation


The discussion highlighted the ongoing challenge of developing regulatory frameworks that protect citizens while enabling beneficial innovation, particularly in rapidly evolving areas like artificial intelligence.


### Technical Implementation


Complex technical issues such as identity verification, deepfake prevention, and cross-border data governance require continued technical and policy development.


## Strategic Implications and Future Directions


### Enhanced International Cooperation


The ITU-IPU partnership represents a model for how international organizations can support parliamentary capacity building and facilitate multi-stakeholder dialogue. The commitment to continued collaboration demonstrates the potential for sustained institutional support for parliamentary engagement in digital governance.


### Democratic Innovation Through Technology


The discussion highlighted opportunities for democratic innovation through digital technologies, including AI tools for policy analysis, enhanced citizen engagement platforms, and improved government service delivery, while maintaining focus on digital rights and inclusion.


### Proactive Governance Models


The consensus on moving beyond reactive governance approaches suggests a significant shift in how parliamentarians conceptualize their roles in technology policy, with implications for legislative processes and institutional capabilities.


## Conclusion


This high-level dialogue demonstrated both the urgency and the collaborative potential of parliamentary engagement in digital governance. The strong consensus on key challengesโ€”digital divide, capacity building needs, online safety concerns, and the necessity of multi-stakeholder cooperationโ€”provides a solid foundation for coordinated international action.


The commitments made by ITU and IPU to support parliamentary capacity building and facilitate stakeholder collaboration represent important steps toward more inclusive and effective digital governance. The concept of “political intelligence” and the emphasis on proactive, collaborative approaches suggest that parliamentarians are ready to embrace new models of governance appropriate for the digital age.


The discussion’s significance lies in demonstrating that parliamentarians from diverse regions and political systems can find common ground on digital governance challenges while building practical partnerships for implementation. The upcoming WSIS+20 review in December provides an immediate opportunity to translate these commitments into concrete action.


The collaborative spirit evident throughout the dialogue, combined with specific commitments for ongoing cooperation between ITU and IPU, suggests that this represents the beginning of sustained efforts to enhance parliamentary engagement in shaping an inclusive digital future. The emphasis on human-centric governance, democratic values, and international cooperation provides a strong foundation for addressing the complex challenges of digital transformation while ensuring that technology serves the public good.


Session transcript

Gitanjali Sah: We will soon begin our high-level dialogue, the role of parliamentarians in shaping our digital future. Thank you for your patience, and thank you for joining us here. We will begin in two minutes. We are just waiting for a few more participants to arrive who are engaged outside, and they will soon be entering the room. Thank you so much, and we will begin soon our exciting dialogue with the parliamentarians. We will begin in two minutes. We will begin in two minutes. We will begin in two minutes. We will begin in two minutes. We will begin in two minutes. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. We are about to start our high-level dialogue on the role of parliamentarians in shaping our digital future. This dialogue is co-organized by the International Telecommunication Union and the International Parliamentary Union. We invite our Secretary-Generals, Ms. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General of ITU, and Mr. Martin Chungong, IPU Secretary-General, to please lead the moderation of this high-level dialogue.


Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you. Thank you. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, good morning. I am most honored to open this crucial discussion as we wrap up this high-level week here in Geneva. The question before us today is what role lawmakers can take in terms of sharing and shaping our digital future. We have seen here a lot this week at the WSIS high-level event and also our AI for Good Global Summit. I hope you have also had a chance to explore that summit. What we have seen is that technology has evolved incredibly fast over the past two decades. While digital innovation has opened up incredible opportunities for economic growth, for learning, for employment, and even civic engagement, we know it has also exposed spark inequalities and left billions behind. One-third of humanity still does not have access to the Internet, and in millions and millions of and many more actually lack the skills and resources to truly benefit from the digital world. Policy decisions, particularly around emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, will be consequential in defining whether and how these technologies impact the lives and livelihoods of all people. This is where the role of parliamentarians come in, and it’s key. As elected representatives, you are uniquely placed to ensure that digital technologies serve the public good and reflect the values of transparency, inclusivity, accountability and human rights. Values that have been central to the WSIS action lines and have also been strengthened by the Global Digital Compact that was adopted last year by UN member states. Now I understand this is all easier said than done. Tech innovation is outpacing traditional legislative processes as well, and new governance challenges are emerging while we’re still wrestling with prior ones, all of which are being amplified in the era of artificial intelligence. So what can digital policy leaders do and legislators? I believe that we can and I believe that we must adapt by making sure lawmakers are digitally skilled with sufficient understanding of technologies like artificial intelligence to help guide ethical, inclusive and rights-based approaches to legislation. We can also double down on collaboration. As the UN Agency for Digital Technologies, ITU is working hard to strengthen engagement amongst lawmakers and the technical community. And this, of course, is where the World Summit on the Information Process also plays a crucial role. For over 20 years, the WSIS has provided a trusted platform. and Ms. Ngozi Ueno. We are proud to be a part of the digital platform where all stakeholders, including parliamentarians, can come together to carve out a path towards people-centered, development-oriented information societies. WSIS has built essential bridges between governments and the tech sector, empowered local communities with digital skills and infrastructure, and it continues to champion digital inclusion as a pillar of sustainable development. With the 20-year review of the WSIS process in December, this is our key opportunity. It’s our opportunity to recommit, double down on that WSIS vision, and make sure that this time-tested platform remains fit for the future. With that, ladies and gentlemen, I look to Gitanjali, but I think I can hand back to you or hand directly to my friend, the Secretary-General of the Inter-Parliamentarian Union, Martin. The floor is yours, please.


Martin Chungong: Thank you very much, Doreen, and Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to this session. I really welcome the opportunity to bring the parliamentary dimension to the global conversations that are taking place at this WSIS Summit meeting. We believe, and Doreen, thank you for drawing attention to why Parliament should be part of the conversation. I share your views entirely. As we have grappled with the challenges of the new technology age, we believe that all hands are on the table. are welcome on deck, and parliamentarians have a crucial role to play. And I’m looking forward to the discussions that will take place during this particular meeting, which will give us a kind of a roadmap for what we need to do to support parliaments and parliamentarians in helping address the key challenges that are facing us in this new digital age. So, I welcome this opportunity, and I do so from the vantage point that the IPU, the Global Organization of Parliaments, needs to be in on the action, needs to convene parliaments so that they can contribute to the global discussion on how we address the challenges of the digital age. And for some time now, and this is in conformity with our strategy, we are looking at how parliaments should be ahead of the curve when it comes to managing the new digital age in a way that is responsible and beneficial to mankind, while at the same time minimizing the risks involved. And, Doreen, you mentioned in your statement that there are lots of opportunities, but there are lots of risks too. Our duty as lawmakers is to devise policies and provide resources that would allow us to help technology develop in a responsible fashion for the benefit of mankind, and also help reduce and minimize the risks involved. And in recent years, we have been very active. Just last October, we did adopt a resolution on the impact of AI on democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. It is for us a roadmap, blueprint for parliaments to take action at the national level to make sure that the development of AI and its use is not inimical to democracy and human rights at country level. We have also realized that the development of new technologies is being undertaken without much regulation. I think it is so fast, as Doreen was saying, it is taking place in such a fast pace that we do not stop to think of how we can really provide guidelines and put in place protective mechanisms to make sure that AI functions properly. And so we have come up with a Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology, which is something that was developed in the course of a two-year period by our specialized body, the Advisory Group on Science and Technology, and we want to roll this out and, Doreen, I think that it is something that together we can see how ITU and IPU can work to make sure that technology is developed according to certain ethical guidelines, because there are a lot of dilemmas that are emerging as we work with new technologies. And then we also had recently, I think it was in Norway, where we had the parliamentary track at the Internet Governance Forum, and that one was focusing on misinformation and disinformation, which is something that we have all recognized as a major risk and threat to humanity as a whole. So we want to continue this conversation, and as I said, we want to do it in partnership with other stakeholders. The three of us are here because parliaments are just one piece of the puzzle. You have the governments, you have civil society, the scientific community. There is a case to be made for a rapprochement between policymakers and the scientific community. We don’t see much evidence of that happening at this particular stage and that is one of the goals of the IPU, making sure that parliamentarians reach out to the scientific community to ensure that these conversations are evidence-based because I believe that science and technology do not lie except they are manipulated by some malevolent spirit. So I look forward to the conversations that will be taking place today and we would like to carry some of the information that we get from this meeting to the summit of speakers of parliaments which will be taking place in this city at the end of the month. The Global Conference of Speakers of Parliament and there will actually be a special panel during that summit on the role of parliament in shaping our digital future. Thank you Doreen for accepting ITU to contribute to the deliberations of that panel and we will be going to Asia too in Kuala Lumpur later in the year in November where there will be a parliamentary conference on the role of parliament in shaping the future of responsible AI. So I think we have our work cut out for us, we just need to keep our collective feet to the fire and make sure that as we develop new technologies in this digital age we can do so in a responsible manner, we can do so in a coherent manner so that it is beneficial to all. And I want to lay emphasis on the need for inclusion because Doreen I think you mentioned that not every household is… has access to internet today and I think that is basically in this day and age has become a question of human rights and so we need to make sure that development of technology is inclusive and egalitarian. Thank you very much for your attention and I will give the floor back to Doreen, I think. Is that it, Gitanjali? Thank you.


Rodrigo Goni: Thank you. Thank you so much, Secretary General. Always wise words from you and thank you for that longstanding partnership with the ITU but also with the WSIS community, the WSIS forum and of course, as you just mentioned, the Internet Governance Forum. Thank you. So ladies and gentlemen, we have four amazing parliamentarians with us this morning. I think Neema is joining us shortly. She’s stuck in another session so we will welcome her shortly. But here with me on the podium, we have Madam Amira Saber who is a member of the People’s Assembly in Egypt. Welcome to you. We also have Mr. Rodrigo Goni who is from Uruguay.


Doreen Bogdan-Martin: He’s a member of the House of Representatives and joining us remotely, we have from Thailand, Senator Nophadol In na. So welcome to you. What we’re going to do is we’ll start with the first question. I’ll have you each answer and then I’ll turn to Martin who will pose the second question. So I’ll dive right into the first question. If we can start about our shared digital future. So asking you about our shared digital future, about digital policy in the context of your country. and if you can share what are you hopeful about and what keeps you up at night. So, I look forward to hearing from you on this point and I think I’m going to start over to my right with Amira, over to you, please.


Amira Saber: Good morning. It’s a great pleasure to chair this very important panel with the ITU and the IPU and my dear colleagues from the different parliaments. I am, as you have presented, a member of parliament from Egypt and I am so much interested in all what’s related to digital policies. I introduced to the Egyptian parliament the first draft bill on AI governance and that was introduced by 60 other Egyptian MPs. Talking about hope, actually in Egypt we have been able last year to bring 12 million people online. That gives me hope. We have infrastructure that is extending to rural places and places which didn’t have connectivity before. There is nationwide digital hack which has been able to invade the digital infrastructure all across Egypt to a great extent. So, now we have roughly 82% of our people online and a few weeks ago we switched on nationwide 5G at the foot of the pyramids, a powerful symbol of 7,000 years of multiplication and stability into the future. We are a very youthful nation, so youth is a big source of hope. The same it needs capacitating, the same it needs very powerful programs that would get them the digital skills, that would get them into the employability world much more empowered. What keeps me up at night, from a political perspective also, is how can we as parliamentarians to say whatever we want without being banned. We have seen how digitalization and connectivity is a double-edged weapon now. Everyone in the world is following wars, is following conflicts, but not everyone in the world is able to express their views freely. I am speaking about the Palestine-Israeli war and how Meme, as myself, was banned from expressing my opinion online when it comes to supporting Palestine. So, digital and connectivity also bring to this space important questions about human rights and freedom of expression and how can we guarantee that this place is an open area where expression is guaranteed in a sense. AI jumping to the playground also is questionable. Is it increasing the digital divide? How can we really use AI and use its tools to bring people from the global south to cross this gap? To bring them to better healthcare services, to better educational opportunities? How can we use all the tools which we have towards better connectivity for everyone? This also keeps me up at night because we are running so, so fast that questions on regulate or not is very valid, on what to regulate and how to regulate it, on empowering multilateralism, because I think we are at a very challenging moment where the whole multilateral system is being challenged. So, we have tracks on development where we could prove that this multilateralism is able to bring millions of people who are underprivileged and millions of people who are suffering shortages of services through connectivity and through digitalization under the spotlight, living a better life. having better accessibility to services and finding a future with better jobs and a sense of hope. This all keeps me alert at night and I think that the RPU and the ITU can help us magnificently. For Egypt, I think there is a Power to Connect initiative and this could elevate the amount and the number of the pilots that has been already on ground. We can increase and capitalize on these pilot projects which prove to be very efficient when it comes to connectivity. Egypt through Swiss area has Texas of the world connectivity cables running through which so we also need to capacitate on that to increase the technical skills of every worker who is working on that file and also to capacitate parliamentarians. I always say that we can’t regulate what we don’t understand so there is a huge role for the RPU to get as more of parliamentarians to be capacitated on the digital skills and how to govern for the best interest of the people because I think that a legislator is someone who could connect all the dots on the floor, who could scrutinize the work of the government, who could voice to the global space what do they have and they connect directly to the people on ground so they speak on behalf of the people to everyone else so whatever is good they can actually translate it on ground and whatever needs fixation they should talk about it so they need real capacitating. Also experiences from different countries has been extremely important because what work is for the US for example doesn’t necessarily work for Egypt so bringing together the countries with the same setup the same potential to learn from each other to exchange experiences is extremely important for parliamentarians and I think for technical people. get the money, channel them into development projects as reasonable interests. So I think that as there is a climate swap for that, there should be a swap for digitalization. There should be a swap of debts for the sake of the Global South and the nations, that digitization and digital skills are not just a vertical opportunity. No, it’s a horizontal one because it cross-cuts every sector. Health, education, sanitization, employability. I imagine a woman at a very rural village in Egypt, if she has the proper digital skills, what a massive impact she has on her life and the life of her family. She could start a business, she could sell online. Everything regarding her life could be changed just if she’s properly capacitated. I tabbed on some of the ideas which you have in mind and I look forward to it.


Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you, thank you so much for that, Neema, thank you. And Martin, perhaps offline you and I can take up the skilling and the capacity building for parliamentarians, because we just launched this AI Skills Coalition, I think that could be a great opportunity for parliamentarians. Thank you for sharing that. I’m going to turn to Rodrigo. If you have reflections on what we just heard or share with us your own.


Rodrigo Goni: Thank you, Doreen. I believe that those of us here in the room very clearly understand the mammoth task and the great land of opportunities that are presented to all of us. This is no longer a question of the digital world or the new technologies or the technical issues. It’s no longer just a mere technical issue. This is now a political issue. Why? Because in that immense dimension of health, education, and well-being of our peoples and the possibilities that this technology brings, they’re not going to come by themselves out of a spontaneous generation. Policymakers, parliamentarians do not, and I repeat this, we do not have the right to play dumb or naive or be optimistically naive because we represent citizens. Some other people could say, these opportunities from technologies are going to come out of a spontaneous generation. We don’t have the right to tackle this this way because the possibilities that we see here that are becoming tangible in the real world go hand in hand with showing the other side of the coin. I was told that in the WSIS forum were asked if we are pessimists or optimists, and maybe we should all be optimists, but there was a survey they say that pessimists are there. That’s not being a pessimist per se, it is being responsible as a parliamentarian, as a lawmaker. For those possibilities to be inclusive, we need to understand that there are threats, even existential threats, threats to the paradigms and democratic threats. This new technology era, this AI, etc., presents a threat to democracy in many places. So we cannot afford the luxury of being naive or play the game of I didn’t know, beyond what Amira has shared with us. Some lawmakers in many parliaments that are involved, but that’s not enough. All parliaments, whether left, right, center, youth, veterans like myself with gray hair on my head, need to get involved. For those possibilities that come hand in hand with technology and under the inclusivity and democratic principles, come to our citizens, are our responsibility. We are a necessary evil, that’s what I say about parliaments, at least if we want to live under democracy. And those threats that are right there, that are visible, are now emerging. We already see that. violations to human rights, or violating the human and the children of rights, or affecting national voting campaigns. Those threats are there. Now, I believe that the key is the following. Parliaments cannot stand still and do nothing, because then anything could happen in our countries. But Martin, and Doreen, and Amira, and all of you, we cannot do what we used to do the same way. If the world changed exponentially, and it’s going to change even more, we parliamentarians, lawmakers cannot do our job the same way we were doing it years ago. There is an artificial intelligence that seems to be ruling everything we do. We have the noble principle of having AI serving us. We need a new intelligence, political intelligence, political premise of thought. And what is that new, we cannot be reactive? Parliaments were always reactive. We looked at what was happening, and then we came up with a law. Now, it’s the other way around, because we cannot follow the speed of this digital era. A parliament that wants to tackle these issues reactively is useless. Maybe we can delay a little bit these advances. We need to build them. The key is not in waiting for the new technologies to and even this issue we need to work together not only among all parties but we need to work with other stakeholders. Doreen was asking us how can the IUP help us by teaching us what we don’t know and we cannot if a parliamentarian goes too technology wise don’t trust that parliamentarian because we don’t know it’s not how we were trained but we parliamentarians need to start acting like Wises did or other buddies of the UN acted collaborating among themselves anticipating what comes and I’m coming to an end maybe you’re telling me but is that possible in the as a politician I don’t know if it’s possible or not but it is something we need to do and it is something that is paramount and we’ve seen in LATAM, we’ve seen it in Uruguay, we’ve seen it in Chile that we have commissions thinking of the future that focus on those challenges when you have so big challenges the only way to tackle that is to change your paradigms. and to come up with a new intelligence, a human political intelligence. If you don’t bring that political entity, if you don’t bring that human-centric entity to this new intelligence, we will not be able to make it. And of course, I know that many parliamentarians do not want to go in this direction because many things are at their stake. But if we don’t do it, we are putting at stake the basic human rights and democracy itself. And there is an existential risk, like the experts say. So we need to act now. We need to develop a new political intelligence, quote unquote, at least to deal with this new digital challenges. If we don’t do it now, tomorrow could be too late. Thank you.


Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you. Thank you. Excellent points. And I look forward to hearing, Neema, perhaps your reflections on what you just heard. Thank you for joining us. We were asking our friends on the panel about shaping our digital future together. What keeps you up at night? What gives you hope and optimism, as you’ve heard? We’re going back and forth between being optimistic, pessimistic. Tell us your thoughts. What keeps you hopeful? What worries you? Over to you.


Neema Lugangira: Thank you very much, Madam Doreen. Good morning, everyone. First of all, I just want to quickly share what’s just happened this morning. It’s already a true example of how we as parliamentarians are wired and driven. I’ve literally just arrived. My flight was delayed. My daughter graduated yesterday in Edinburgh. And being a mother, trying to juggle motherhood and professionalism, I ditched her so fast and I said, IPU and WSIS needs me. So here I am. So I apologize for being a little bit late. Now, first of all, to me, I am truly, truly honored and humbled about this meeting today, because I remember back in 2022, when I met Gitanjali Wissis, a lot of the Wissis activities were going on in exclusion of parliamentarians. Parliamentarians were never part of the picture in terms of being strategically and concretely being part and parcel of this discussion, especially on how to accelerate the implementation of the Wissis action lines. So in 2022, we organized the first Wissis parliamentary engagement, and I’m really happy to see that it’s grown. And here we are today doing Wissis with the IP, which is something really good, and we’ve made great progress. Now, very quickly, I think I just want to share a few points about what are my concerns. First of all, us as parliamentarians, we have a pivotal role in setting the legal and ethical framework. When we’re talking about the use of new technologies, in particular AI, we have to recognize that parliamentarians have that role. But then, secondly, we have the opportunity of bridging the global digital divide. And here I would like to call on more capacity building, not only for the users, but also us as legislators, government officials. But at the same time, I would also like to emphasize the importance of making sure that we have enough funding and support for strengthening digital literacy, especially in remote areas, peripheral regions, border regions. We need to emphasize that fact. And then lastly, when we’re talking about artificial intelligence, we cannot avoid looking at the whole AI global discourse. We know there’s a huge global imbalance here. And AI accountability. Parliamentary has to Thank you very quickly. The next steps is to, one, you know, the implementation of this IPU-AI resolution, but two, is to continue working with parliamentarians. Three, we have to address the issue of the manipulation and the way in which AI accelerates online gender-based violence, particularly to women in public office and women politicians, which then silences us and it diminishes all our efforts towards increasing gender-balanced democracy. And then finally, I would also like just to share that the women political leaders in partnership with Smart Africa, GIZ, and the IPU are working towards capacitating women political leaders to be FEM AI champions through an initiative that’s focusing on Africa and the global FEM


Martin Chungong: AI labs. So, such collaboration, such partnerships can take us to where we want. And to conclude, and Ms. Sia. I’d like to start with the first question. As a woman, I myself previously, was very worried about AI and I didn’t and as a politician, it’s very difficult to comprehend how can you use it. But through this FEM AI, FEM AI lab initiative with the women political leaders, we as parliamentarians in particular in Tanzania have come to see the power of artificial intelligence because unlike our predecessors, I was shocked, he had about five assistants. He had an assistant for tax issues, an assistant for legal issues, an assistant for policy issues whereas we, most African parliamentarians, have ourselves. We are the main and we are the assistants of everything. So with AI, it can save us a lot of time if we want to analyze reports, if we want to analyze policies, if we want to frame our work, but for us to understand that in a way that we need capacity building and we need access to these tools. These tools are expensive. How can we get access to these tools to be able to appreciate and use them? Thank you.


Nophadol In na: Ladies and gentlemen, I am Nopphadol In na, a senator from Thailand and vice-chairperson of the Working Group on Science and Technology of IPU. Ladies and gentlemen, the parliaments are no longer just observers of the digital age. We are key actors in shaping it, whether through passing legislation, setting ethical standards or enabling innovation. Our role is critical and encouraged by collective commitment shown here to ensure that digital transformation is not only effective but also inclusive, transparent and guided by human values. The shared sense of purpose is what I will carry forward. So in response to your question, one thing that gives me hope in the rapid growth of Thailand’s digital economy and the strong push from our government under the Thailand 4.0 vision, we are seeing real transparent formation on the ground. National broadband expansion, digital ID system and the rise of e-government services are redefining how Thai citizens interact with the state. People are now paying with the prompt pay, registering business online and accessing public service via apps. The Prachachat Internet project, which brings free Wi-Fi to rural villages, is helping to close the urban-rural gaps. The momentum is visible and Thai society is increasingly ready to advance digital transformation. And in the Thai Senate at the moment, most of the senators are using digital technology, such as AI, to help and assist our work. That gives me great optimism. But what keeps me awake at night is the growing digital divide between urban centres like Bangkok, our capital city, and our rural provinces. While 5G speeds power the capital, many remote communities still struggle with basic internet access or no access at all. This inequality risks deepening social and economic disparity. At the same time, cyber security threats are rising. Online scams, phishing, fake news, and even cyber attacks on government platforms have grown more sophisticated. Many of our citizens, especially the elderly, are vulnerable. Ensuring data privacy under Thailand’s new Personal Data Protection Act, while also supporting innovation, is another tick-tock. We must work. So I’m hopeful because we are moving forward, but cautious because we must ensure no one is left behind in this journey. Thank you.


Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you. Thank you so much. I’m hearing some cautious optimism there, so I appreciate those comments. And as you said in the beginning, parliamentarians are not observing shaping the digital future. They actually have to be critical and key players to help actually shape it. So I’m going to hand over to you, Secretary General Martin, to take us through the next round of questions. Over to you, please.


Martin Chungong: Thank you. Thank you very much, Doreen. It’s been wonderful, refreshing listening to the distinguished parliamentarians on this panel today. And we are edified, I think, on the expectations of parliamentarians. They are not illiterate when it comes to the digital age. I think we’ve heard them very clearly. But one thing that I see that has run through their interventions like a red thread is the issue of inclusivity, is the issue of the digital gap or the digital divide that we are witnessing today. And I do understand that they’re very anxious to address this particular challenge. So I would like for you, in this room, we have people from different areas of work and, you know, that can be very helpful to you, parliamentarians. So I just want to ask each of you very quickly, because we’re running out of time, and maybe, Neema, we will start with you. Just tell us briefly what you think we should be doing, ITU, IPU, and the audience that is here today, to help you deliver on the expectations of your people. Because at the end of the day, you want, as representatives of the people, to be able to meet the expectations when it comes to access to digital technologies on an ongoing basis. Can you?


Neema Lugangira: Thank you very much. You put me on the spot, Secretary General, but I’ll try. My big ask, I think, most of the tech companies, especially the multinational tech companies, are from the global north. And, you know, I can say all of them, their annual turnover in terms of their sales at times is more than our national GDPs. So one of the things that I think ITU, IPU can easily do to support is to find a mechanism of bringing the senior decision makers from these tech companies meeting with parliamentarians. Because we are then able to tell the tech companies directly the issues that we are grappling with when we’re using their technology. Because if we try to do it on our own, we’re too small for them to listen. But if it’s the ITU and the IPU, it changes the narrative. And why do I say this? Number one, there are challenges of language barrier, even with the AI. Number two, and this I’m speaking from experience, when you experience abuse, online abuse, and you report it on the online platforms, if, for example, it’s in Kiswahili, it depends on the tool or the AI on the other side, how it’s translating what was said. So in their context, it seems like it’s not a violation. But in my context, it is an utter violation. So there are those dynamics that need to be discussed. Number three, small issues of verification. When you’re a public leader, you’re more prone for your identity to be used and to have fake narratives or fake tweets or fake things like that made on you. But there is no way to depict that this is not you. Because the entire process of doing the verifications It’s almost impossible. And even when they say if you are a public official, you can get waivers, you can get this, if you are coming from the global south, it doesn’t really work like that. And then lastly is the access of the tools. These companies make a lot of money. Surely they should have some sort of CSR, or in partnership with the IPU and the ITU, they can come up with a mechanism. And this is something also the Women Political Leaders is trying to push on, on seeing how can parliamentarians, at least say from the least developed countries, you know, the least medium income countries, get access to these tools. Because we are only going to be able to regulate what we know. But if we remain not knowing it, we’re going to have stringent regulations, which then are not going to be helpful for the growth of the digital sector. Thank you.


Martin Chungong: Thank you very much, Neema. I did not actually put you on the spot because you responded brilliantly. Thank you. Let me turn to Amira. You were very expansive on your hopes and your fears as a parliamentarian. Tell us now, what do you think we can do to support you?


Amira Saber: Yes, first, I consider that every fibre cable relay is a vote for equity. So, what I expect the ITU to do is put the rural connectivity at the centre of every programme they have. For Egypt, I mentioned the Partner to Connect. I wish that the bridges for this programme could actually intensify and we can capitalise on that and to extend that to Africa. I think that Africa has huge, huge potential for its youth, for the future, for bringing them to employability properly. So, more of that. and Mr. Mohamad Al-Mahdi. I think also that giving regulators and engineer world class skills is very much crucial. Same goes for parliamentarians as well. I hope that there would be a policy radar, a policy radar that maps everything related globally to connectivity, digitalization, digitization and AI. Everything related to that could have a kind of a radar where every parliamentarian could access it, learn from it and is encouraged to share their experiences on that. I think also that we should think about how to make the cyber space safer and more inclusive, especially for the vulnerable groups, for women. I can tell you about women who lose their lives to deepfakes, to the potential consequences of AI on the negative note. These are important issues which we should actually talk about, how we can make sure that deepfakes are easily identified and how can we help the one who does this accountable. For this, I also think there should be an exchange of knowledge about the classification of data, because according to the sensitivity of data, there should be a kind of legal liability. I think also, AgriTech is something extremely important. We all suffer from food safety issue and this relates to everything else, so using the advanced technologies and using AI for Agritech, and building the capacities of farmers, through even the link of parliamentarians, this would be an extremely important work. Again, every investment of a fibre cable is a vote to equity, which I hope ITU and IPU will help us to achieve on ground.


Martin Chungong: Thank you, thank you very much. That point you made about online safety is a very crucial one, because we have evidence that women parliamentarians are particular targets of online violence. Then what about the ordinary people? So I think you have a strong point. Can we go over to Bangkok before we come back to Rodrigo? Nophadol, are you still online? Yes, yes. How can we help you?


Nophadol In na: Thank you very much, Secretary General Martin. Actually, under the Working Group on Science and Technology of IPU, they have done a lot of good job. For example, they have trained the staff member of the parliamentary in Jordan and the parliamentarian in Vietnam. So the programme is still going on. So in this case, I would like to add to your question, is that nowadays technology must serve people, not replace them. As we enter the age of AI and global… and Ms. Yvonne M. Nguyen. We are a group of international partners that share our values and connectivities. Our digital progress must be guided by human values and share responsibility. The IPU and ITU play a key role in this journey. Helping us navigate complexities, build capacities to create inclusive, secure and future-ready digital policy. This is what I would like to add in my final words. Thank you very much.


Martin Chungong: Thank you. I think this is in line with the push to address the ethical dilemmas of technological innovation. Thank you. Let me turn to Rodrigo.


Rodrigo Goni: I believe that we are all aware of the fact that the best way forward is cooperation. Not just as an opportunity, but as a need. ITU and IPU have already done a lot of cooperation in the past. It has proven that it works. For us, politicians, it is difficult for us to cooperate because we are rather used to confrontation. But as Neema said, it is absolutely impossible to approach all the safety and protection issues without having all stakeholders on the table. Big tech companies, big organizations. I believe time has come because we need it, not just because we love it, but rather because we need it. and Mr. David Ramos. The IPU has been working, as the Thai Senator said, on this process of integrating technologies and new digitalization into the parliaments. We are working on that and I think it is time, time has come to launch a new paradigm so that parliamentarians will learn that we need to understand that for these digital challenges the paradigm of cooperation and anticipation is good, is needed, it is helpful for all of us and we will be at the service of our citizens. The citizens will give us a round of applause if we cooperate and we achieve these goals that are in principle very difficult to achieve but that we will be able to do it. But the WSIS plus 20 can really be taking the relay from these successful processes to launch a new model of a new political intelligence, new political intelligence with a new paradigm, a paradigm shift that we anticipate, that we cooperate, that we experiment globally but that can be replicated at national level, at the national parliaments. Because national parliaments are not silly, we know that if something is working, is demanded by the people, we will replicate it in our national parliaments and ITU and IPU have a key role to lead these processes that maybe parliamentarians can replicate later. Thank you.


Martin Chungong: Thank you very much, Rodrigo, I know that you are very tuned into the role of parliaments as anticipating the future and making sure that we are… I believe we are out of time. Where is Gitangi? We take our cue from you. Where is she? We need to conclude at this stage? Yes? Yes? Okay. Here we need to wrap up and Doreen, I would like to take one question from the floor because Neema mentioned something that was important, the need for outreach to the private sector, to the high-tech companies to make sure that they are in sync with Parliament’s expectations in terms of accessibility. Do we have any representatives from the private sector here, the corporate sector, who might want to respond to this challenge? No? I don’t see it so that in the room. No, but the message is clear. I think the records of this meeting will make that point abundantly clear, just as the other points that were made here. But before I hand over the floor to Doreen to conclude this session, I think that we come out of these deliberations quite edified, but we are not talking to, as I said, people who are digitally illiterate. Parliamentarians are fairly aware. They need to understand better because it’s a very, I would say, detailed, complex world we are dealing with and I am reminded of what you said. You cannot make policy on something that you do not understand. Amira, I think it’s important that we continue to build knowledge among parliamentarians of the development of new technologies and the implications thereon for the lives of the people. I still go back Thank you very much, Mr. Martin Chungong, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Khusela Diko, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Rodrigo Goรฑi, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, Ms. Amira Saber, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, Mr. Kenneth Pugh, and Mr. Martin.


Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Secretary General. We can’t stop here. We got to keep going. It’s wonderful that you have your summit approaching in two weeks, I guess, so we can continue the conversation there. But what I also think is great is that we wrap up the WSIS Forum today. Throughout the week, we have had gatherings of different stakeholders in WSIS communities. We’ve had the regulators, we’ve had the ministers, we’ve had the civil society, the technical community, academia, UN partners, and last but not least, a critical piece of the equation, which is our parliamentarians. And I think that, I don’t know that we planned it on purpose that way, but I think it’s a great way to wrap things up. Because as our friend from Thailand said, you can’t be observing, you actually have to be part of this process in shaping the digital future. I would say from an IT perspective, we hear you and your concerns. We know we have to close that digital divide. We have to tackle cybersecurity issues. We have to tackle digital literacy issues. We have to tackle even affordability issues, that online harm and harassment that we’ve talked about for years. We got to get to that. So we hear you on that front. Also, the opportunities to engage with tech companies. I think we can be facilitators of bringing those constituent groups together. And of course, the need for us together as IPU and ITU, we’re neighbors, so we can certainly do this, Martin. I think we can help to advance collaboration, advance partnerships, and also to address the specific needs that you have when it comes to capacity building for parliamentarians. And I think that’s something we’d be quite happy to take forward. As we look to the WSIS plus 20, I think coming to the future as you so eloquently shared together, will find ways to make sure that we future-proof this process and make sure that we take into account the needs of your various constituents. So thank you again for those wonderful comments, and Martin, more to come from you and me. Thank you.


D

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Speech speed

145 words per minute

Speech length

1251 words

Speech time

516 seconds

Parliamentarians are uniquely positioned to ensure digital technologies serve the public good and reflect values of transparency, inclusivity, accountability and human rights

Explanation

As elected representatives, parliamentarians have a special role in ensuring that digital technologies benefit society and uphold democratic values. This positioning is crucial for guiding ethical and inclusive approaches to technology legislation.


Evidence

Values that have been central to the WSIS action lines and have also been strengthened by the Global Digital Compact that was adopted last year by UN member states


Major discussion point

Role of Parliamentarians in Digital Governance


Topics

Human rights principles | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira
– Nophadol In na

Agreed on

Parliamentarians must play an active, not passive, role in shaping digital governance and policy


One-third of humanity still lacks internet access, with many more lacking skills and resources to benefit from digital technologies

Explanation

Despite technological advances, a significant portion of the global population remains digitally excluded. This digital divide affects not just access to internet but also the ability to meaningfully use digital tools.


Evidence

One-third of humanity still does not have access to the Internet, and in millions and millions of and many more actually lack the skills and resources to truly benefit from the digital world


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Inclusion Challenges


Topics

Digital access | Development


Agreed with

– Martin Chungong
– Amira Saber
– Nophadol In na
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Digital divide and inclusion challenges require urgent attention, particularly for rural and underserved populations


Technology innovation is outpacing traditional legislative processes, creating governance challenges

Explanation

The rapid pace of technological development is creating difficulties for traditional government and legislative systems to keep up. This creates new governance challenges while previous ones remain unresolved, particularly in the AI era.


Evidence

Tech innovation is outpacing traditional legislative processes as well, and new governance challenges are emerging while we’re still wrestling with prior ones, all of which are being amplified in the era of artificial intelligence


Major discussion point

Technology Governance and Regulation


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


WSIS provides a trusted platform for multi-stakeholder collaboration over 20 years

Explanation

The World Summit on the Information Society has served as a reliable platform bringing together various stakeholders to work toward people-centered, development-oriented information societies. It has built bridges between governments and tech sectors while promoting digital inclusion.


Evidence

For over 20 years, the WSIS has provided a trusted platform where all stakeholders, including parliamentarians, can come together to carve out a path towards people-centered, development-oriented information societies. WSIS has built essential bridges between governments and the tech sector, empowered local communities with digital skills and infrastructure


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Partnerships


Topics

Development | Capacity development


Agreed with

– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder cooperation is essential for addressing digital challenges effectively


ITU’s AI Skills Coalition could provide opportunities for parliamentary capacity building

Explanation

The International Telecommunication Union has launched an AI Skills Coalition that could serve as a platform for building the digital and AI skills of parliamentarians. This represents a concrete opportunity for addressing the capacity building needs identified by parliamentarians.


Evidence

We just launched this AI Skills Coalition, I think that could be a great opportunity for parliamentarians


Major discussion point

Capacity Building and Skills Development


Topics

Capacity development | Development


Agreed with

– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira
– Martin Chungong

Agreed on

Parliamentarians need significant capacity building and digital skills development to effectively regulate and govern digital technologies


M

Martin Chungong

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

1876 words

Speech time

880 seconds

IPU has adopted resolutions on AI’s impact on democracy and human rights, providing a roadmap for national-level parliamentary action

Explanation

The Inter-Parliamentary Union has created concrete guidance for parliamentarians through a resolution addressing how artificial intelligence affects democratic institutions and human rights. This serves as a blueprint for national parliaments to take action in their own countries.


Evidence

Just last October, we did adopt a resolution on the impact of AI on democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. It is for us a roadmap, blueprint for parliaments to take action at the national level to make sure that the development of AI and its use is not inimical to democracy and human rights at country level


Major discussion point

Role of Parliamentarians in Digital Governance


Topics

Human rights principles | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira
– Nophadol In na

Agreed on

Parliamentarians must play an active, not passive, role in shaping digital governance and policy


Disagreed with

– Rodrigo Goni

Disagreed on

Approach to technology regulation – reactive vs proactive governance


Need for collaboration between policymakers and the scientific community to ensure evidence-based conversations

Explanation

There is insufficient interaction between those making policy decisions and the scientific community that understands the technical aspects of new technologies. This gap needs to be bridged to ensure that policy decisions are grounded in scientific evidence rather than speculation.


Evidence

There is a case to be made for a rapprochement between policymakers and the scientific community. We don’t see much evidence of that happening at this particular stage and that is one of the goals of the IPU, making sure that parliamentarians reach out to the scientific community to ensure that these conversations are evidence-based because I believe that science and technology do not lie except they are manipulated by some malevolent spirit


Major discussion point

Capacity Building and Skills Development


Topics

Capacity development | Interdisciplinary approaches


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder cooperation is essential for addressing digital challenges effectively


Technology development must be inclusive and egalitarian, addressing access as a human rights issue

Explanation

The development of new technologies should ensure that all people can benefit equally, rather than creating or exacerbating existing inequalities. Access to technology, particularly internet access, should be viewed as a fundamental human right in the modern era.


Evidence

We need to make sure that development of technology is inclusive and egalitarian. I think you mentioned that not every household has access to internet today and I think that is basically in this day and age has become a question of human rights


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Inclusion Challenges


Topics

Human rights principles | Digital access


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Amira Saber
– Nophadol In na
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Digital divide and inclusion challenges require urgent attention, particularly for rural and underserved populations


Need for ethical guidelines in technology development, including IPU’s Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology

Explanation

The rapid pace of technological development is occurring without sufficient regulatory oversight or ethical guidelines. The IPU has developed a Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology to address the ethical dilemmas emerging from new technologies.


Evidence

We have also realized that the development of new technologies is being undertaken without much regulation. We have come up with a Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology, which is something that was developed in the course of a two-year period by our specialized body, the Advisory Group on Science and Technology


Major discussion point

Technology Governance and Regulation


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles


Importance of addressing misinformation and disinformation as major threats to humanity

Explanation

False information spread through digital platforms poses significant risks to society as a whole. The IPU has specifically focused on this issue through parliamentary engagement at international forums, recognizing it as a critical challenge that needs coordinated response.


Evidence

We had recently, I think it was in Norway, where we had the parliamentary track at the Internet Governance Forum, and that one was focusing on misinformation and disinformation, which is something that we have all recognized as a major risk and threat to humanity as a whole


Major discussion point

Online Safety and Digital Rights


Topics

Content policy | Human rights principles


Agreed with

– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Online safety concerns, particularly regarding women and vulnerable groups, require immediate attention


A

Amira Saber

Speech speed

133 words per minute

Speech length

1298 words

Speech time

582 seconds

Parliamentarians cannot regulate what they don’t understand, requiring significant capacity building in digital skills

Explanation

Effective regulation of digital technologies requires parliamentarians to have sufficient understanding of these technologies. Without proper knowledge and skills, lawmakers cannot create appropriate legislation or oversight mechanisms.


Evidence

I always say that we can’t regulate what we don’t understand so there is a huge role for the RPU to get as more of parliamentarians to be capacitated on the digital skills and how to govern for the best interest of the people


Major discussion point

Capacity Building and Skills Development


Topics

Capacity development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Neema Lugangira
– Martin Chungong
– Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Agreed on

Parliamentarians need significant capacity building and digital skills development to effectively regulate and govern digital technologies


Need for nationwide digital infrastructure expansion to bring connectivity to rural and underserved areas

Explanation

Expanding digital infrastructure to reach rural and previously unconnected areas is essential for reducing digital inequality. This includes both physical infrastructure like fiber cables and programs that bring people online.


Evidence

In Egypt we have been able last year to bring 12 million people online. We have infrastructure that is extending to rural places and places which didn’t have connectivity before. There is nationwide digital hack which has been able to invade the digital infrastructure all across Egypt to a great extent. So, now we have roughly 82% of our people online


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Inclusion Challenges


Topics

Digital access | Telecommunications infrastructure


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Nophadol In na
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Digital divide and inclusion challenges require urgent attention, particularly for rural and underserved populations


Concerns about freedom of expression online, including banning of political voices on digital platforms

Explanation

Digital platforms can restrict freedom of expression by banning users or limiting their ability to share political opinions. This raises important questions about human rights and whether online spaces can truly guarantee free expression, particularly on controversial political topics.


Evidence

Everyone in the world is following wars, is following conflicts, but not everyone in the world is able to express their views freely. I am speaking about the Palestine-Israeli war and how Meme, as myself, was banned from expressing my opinion online when it comes to supporting Palestine


Major discussion point

Online Safety and Digital Rights


Topics

Freedom of expression | Human rights principles


AI and digital tools can transform lives, enabling rural women to start businesses and access new opportunities

Explanation

Digital technologies and AI have the potential to dramatically improve individual lives, particularly for women in rural areas who can gain access to new economic opportunities. Proper digital skills can enable entrepreneurship and online business development.


Evidence

I imagine a woman at a very rural village in Egypt, if she has the proper digital skills, what a massive impact she has on her life and the life of her family. She could start a business, she could sell online. Everything regarding her life could be changed just if she’s properly capacitated


Major discussion point

Economic and Development Opportunities


Topics

Digital access | Future of work | Gender rights online


Importance of world-class skills development for regulators and engineers alongside parliamentarians

Explanation

Building capacity is not just needed for parliamentarians but also for the technical professionals and regulators who work with digital technologies. This comprehensive approach to skills development is essential for effective governance of the digital sector.


Evidence

Giving regulators and engineer world class skills is very much crucial. Same goes for parliamentarians as well


Major discussion point

Capacity Building and Skills Development


Topics

Capacity development | Development


Need for mechanisms to identify and hold accountable those creating deepfakes and other harmful content

Explanation

The emergence of deepfake technology and other forms of AI-generated harmful content creates serious risks, particularly for women. There is an urgent need for systems that can detect such content and legal frameworks that hold creators accountable.


Evidence

I can tell you about women who lose their lives to deepfakes, to the potential consequences of AI on the negative note. These are important issues which we should actually talk about, how we can make sure that deepfakes are easily identified and how can we help the one who does this accountable


Major discussion point

Online Safety and Digital Rights


Topics

Gender rights online | Legal and regulatory | Content policy


Agreed with

– Neema Lugangira
– Martin Chungong

Agreed on

Online safety concerns, particularly regarding women and vulnerable groups, require immediate attention


Importance of making cyberspace safer and more inclusive for vulnerable groups

Explanation

The digital environment needs to be designed and regulated in ways that protect vulnerable populations, particularly women and other marginalized groups. This requires proactive measures to address online harms and ensure equal access to digital opportunities.


Evidence

I think also that we should think about how to make the cyber space safer and more inclusive, especially for the vulnerable groups, for women


Major discussion point

Online Safety and Digital Rights


Topics

Gender rights online | Human rights principles | Cybersecurity


Agreed with

– Neema Lugangira
– Martin Chungong

Agreed on

Online safety concerns, particularly regarding women and vulnerable groups, require immediate attention


Need for debt swaps for digitalization similar to climate swaps to support Global South development

Explanation

Developing countries need financial mechanisms that allow them to invest in digital infrastructure and development without increasing their debt burden. Similar to climate debt swaps, digitalization debt swaps could help channel resources into development projects.


Evidence

I think that as there is a climate swap for that, there should be a swap for digitalization. There should be a swap of debts for the sake of the Global South and the nations, that digitization and digital skills are not just a vertical opportunity


Major discussion point

Economic and Development Opportunities


Topics

Development | Digital access | Inclusive finance


AgriTech using advanced technologies and AI can address food safety issues and build farmer capacities

Explanation

Agricultural technology powered by AI and other advanced technologies can help address global food security challenges. This includes building the technical capacities of farmers and connecting them with parliamentarians to support policy development.


Evidence

AgriTech is something extremely important. We all suffer from food safety issue and this relates to everything else, so using the advanced technologies and using AI for Agritech, and building the capacities of farmers, through even the link of parliamentarians, this would be an extremely important work


Major discussion point

Economic and Development Opportunities


Topics

Development | Capacity development | Future of work


R

Rodrigo Goni

Speech speed

113 words per minute

Speech length

1340 words

Speech time

709 seconds

Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact

Explanation

Traditional parliamentary approaches of reacting to issues after they arise are inadequate for the fast-paced digital age. Parliamentarians need to develop new ways of thinking and working that allow them to anticipate and prepare for technological changes before they create problems.


Evidence

We cannot be reactive? Parliaments were always reactive. We looked at what was happening, and then we came up with a law. Now, it’s the other way around, because we cannot follow the speed of this digital era. A parliament that wants to tackle these issues reactively is useless. We need to build them. We need a new intelligence, political intelligence, political premise of thought


Major discussion point

Role of Parliamentarians in Digital Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Neema Lugangira
– Nophadol In na

Agreed on

Parliamentarians must play an active, not passive, role in shaping digital governance and policy


Disagreed with

– Martin Chungong

Disagreed on

Approach to technology regulation – reactive vs proactive governance


Cooperation is necessary rather than optional for addressing digital safety and protection issues

Explanation

The complexity and scale of digital challenges make cooperation between different stakeholders essential, not just desirable. This includes cooperation between parliamentarians, tech companies, and international organizations, even though politicians are traditionally more accustomed to confrontation than collaboration.


Evidence

I believe that we are all aware of the fact that the best way forward is cooperation. Not just as an opportunity, but as a need. For us, politicians, it is difficult for us to cooperate because we are rather used to confrontation. But as Neema said, it is absolutely impossible to approach all the safety and protection issues without having all stakeholders on the table


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Partnerships


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder cooperation is essential for addressing digital challenges effectively


Need for new paradigm of cooperation and anticipation that can be replicated at national parliamentary levels

Explanation

A fundamental shift is needed in how parliaments operate, moving toward a model based on cooperation and anticipation rather than traditional confrontational approaches. This new paradigm should be developed globally but implemented at national levels, with successful models being replicated across different countries.


Evidence

Time has come to launch a new paradigm so that parliamentarians will learn that we need to understand that for these digital challenges the paradigm of cooperation and anticipation is good, is needed, it is helpful for all of us. The WSIS plus 20 can really be taking the relay from these successful processes to launch a new model of a new political intelligence, new political intelligence with a new paradigm, a paradigm shift that we anticipate, that we cooperate, that we experiment globally but that can be replicated at national level


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Partnerships


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development | Capacity development


N

Neema Lugangira

Speech speed

151 words per minute

Speech length

936 words

Speech time

371 seconds

Parliamentarians have a crucial role in setting legal and ethical frameworks for new technologies, particularly AI

Explanation

Parliamentarians hold a pivotal position in establishing the legal and ethical guidelines that govern how new technologies, especially artificial intelligence, are developed and used. This role is fundamental to ensuring responsible technology development.


Evidence

Us as parliamentarians, we have a pivotal role in setting the legal and ethical framework. When we’re talking about the use of new technologies, in particular AI, we have to recognize that parliamentarians have that role


Major discussion point

Role of Parliamentarians in Digital Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni
– Nophadol In na

Agreed on

Parliamentarians must play an active, not passive, role in shaping digital governance and policy


Importance of strengthening digital literacy, especially in remote and peripheral regions

Explanation

Digital literacy programs need to be expanded and strengthened, with particular attention to reaching remote areas, peripheral regions, and border areas that are often left behind in digital development. This requires adequate funding and support mechanisms.


Evidence

I would also like to emphasize the importance of making sure that we have enough funding and support for strengthening digital literacy, especially in remote areas, peripheral regions, border regions


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Inclusion Challenges


Topics

Digital access | Capacity development


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Amira Saber
– Nophadol In na

Agreed on

Digital divide and inclusion challenges require urgent attention, particularly for rural and underserved populations


AI accelerates online gender-based violence, particularly against women in public office, silencing democratic participation

Explanation

Artificial intelligence tools are being used to amplify and accelerate online violence against women, especially women politicians and public figures. This violence has the effect of silencing women’s voices and reducing their participation in democratic processes.


Evidence

We have to address the issue of the manipulation and the way in which AI accelerates online gender-based violence, particularly to women in public office and women politicians, which then silences us and it diminishes all our efforts towards increasing gender-balanced democracy


Major discussion point

Online Safety and Digital Rights


Topics

Gender rights online | Human rights principles | Content policy


Agreed with

– Amira Saber
– Martin Chungong

Agreed on

Online safety concerns, particularly regarding women and vulnerable groups, require immediate attention


AI can serve as a valuable tool for parliamentarians to analyze reports and policies, but requires access and training

Explanation

Artificial intelligence can significantly assist parliamentarians in their work by helping them analyze complex reports and policies, potentially replacing the need for multiple specialized assistants. However, parliamentarians need both access to these tools and training to use them effectively.


Evidence

Unlike our predecessors, I was shocked, he had about five assistants. He had an assistant for tax issues, an assistant for legal issues, an assistant for policy issues whereas we, most African parliamentarians, have ourselves. So with AI, it can save us a lot of time if we want to analyze reports, if we want to analyze policies, if we want to frame our work, but for us to understand that in a way that we need capacity building and we need access to these tools


Major discussion point

Capacity Building and Skills Development


Topics

Capacity development | Future of work


Agreed with

– Amira Saber
– Martin Chungong
– Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Agreed on

Parliamentarians need significant capacity building and digital skills development to effectively regulate and govern digital technologies


Importance of bringing together tech companies and parliamentarians to address implementation challenges

Explanation

Direct engagement between senior decision-makers from major technology companies and parliamentarians is essential for addressing practical challenges in technology implementation. This includes issues like language barriers, content moderation, and verification processes that affect how technologies work in different cultural and linguistic contexts.


Evidence

One of the things that I think ITU, IPU can easily do to support is to find a mechanism of bringing the senior decision makers from these tech companies meeting with parliamentarians. Because we are then able to tell the tech companies directly the issues that we are grappling with when we’re using their technology. There are challenges of language barrier, even with the AI. When you experience abuse, online abuse, and you report it on the online platforms, if, for example, it’s in Kiswahili, it depends on the tool or the AI on the other side, how it’s translating what was said


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Partnerships


Topics

Multilingualism | Content policy | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder cooperation is essential for addressing digital challenges effectively


N

Nophadol In na

Speech speed

94 words per minute

Speech length

519 words

Speech time

328 seconds

Parliamentarians need to be key actors in shaping the digital age through legislation, ethical standards, and enabling innovation

Explanation

Parliamentarians cannot simply observe digital transformation but must actively participate in shaping it. Their role is critical in passing legislation, setting ethical standards, and creating conditions that enable innovation while ensuring it serves human values.


Evidence

The parliaments are no longer just observers of the digital age. We are key actors in shaping it, whether through passing legislation, setting ethical standards or enabling innovation. Our role is critical and encouraged by collective commitment shown here to ensure that digital transformation is not only effective but also inclusive, transparent and guided by human values


Major discussion point

Role of Parliamentarians in Digital Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Parliamentarians must play an active, not passive, role in shaping digital governance and policy


Digital divide exists between urban centers and rural provinces, risking deepened social and economic disparities

Explanation

There is a significant gap in digital access and capabilities between urban areas like capital cities and rural provinces. This inequality threatens to worsen existing social and economic disparities if not addressed through targeted interventions.


Evidence

What keeps me awake at night is the growing digital divide between urban centres like Bangkok, our capital city, and our rural provinces. While 5G speeds power the capital, many remote communities still struggle with basic internet access or no access at all. This inequality risks deepening social and economic disparity


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and Inclusion Challenges


Topics

Digital access | Development


Agreed with

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira

Agreed on

Digital divide and inclusion challenges require urgent attention, particularly for rural and underserved populations


Rising cybersecurity threats including online scams, phishing, fake news, and cyber attacks on government platforms

Explanation

Cybersecurity threats are becoming more sophisticated and frequent, affecting both individual citizens and government institutions. These threats include various forms of online fraud and attacks on critical government digital infrastructure.


Evidence

Cyber security threats are rising. Online scams, phishing, fake news, and even cyber attacks on government platforms have grown more sophisticated. Many of our citizens, especially the elderly, are vulnerable


Major discussion point

Online Safety and Digital Rights


Topics

Cybersecurity | Cybercrime | Content policy


Technology must serve people, not replace them, guided by human values and shared responsibility

Explanation

The development and implementation of technology should prioritize human benefit and be guided by human values rather than replacing human capabilities or decision-making. This requires shared responsibility among international partners who share common values.


Evidence

Technology must serve people, not replace them. As we enter the age of AI and global… We are a group of international partners that share our values and connectivities. Our digital progress must be guided by human values and share responsibility


Major discussion point

Technology Governance and Regulation


Topics

Human rights principles | Development


Balance needed between data privacy protection and supporting innovation

Explanation

Countries must navigate the challenge of implementing strong data protection laws while still fostering an environment that supports technological innovation and development. This requires careful policy balance.


Evidence

Ensuring data privacy under Thailand’s new Personal Data Protection Act, while also supporting innovation, is another tick-tock


Major discussion point

Technology Governance and Regulation


Topics

Privacy and data protection | Legal and regulatory


G

Gitanjali Sah

Speech speed

94 words per minute

Speech length

164 words

Speech time

103 seconds

High-level dialogue on parliamentarians’ role in shaping digital future requires co-organization between ITU and IPU

Explanation

The dialogue addressing the role of parliamentarians in digital governance is a collaborative effort between the International Telecommunication Union and the International Parliamentary Union. This partnership demonstrates the importance of bringing together technical and parliamentary expertise to address digital challenges.


Evidence

This dialogue is co-organized by the International Telecommunication Union and the International Parliamentary Union


Major discussion point

International Cooperation and Partnerships


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreements

Agreement points

Parliamentarians need significant capacity building and digital skills development to effectively regulate and govern digital technologies

Speakers

– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira
– Martin Chungong
– Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Arguments

Parliamentarians cannot regulate what they don’t understand, requiring significant capacity building in digital skills


AI can serve as a valuable tool for parliamentarians to analyze reports and policies, but requires access and training


Need for collaboration between policymakers and the scientific community to ensure evidence-based conversations


ITU’s AI Skills Coalition could provide opportunities for parliamentary capacity building


Summary

All speakers agree that parliamentarians require substantial training and capacity building in digital technologies to create effective legislation and governance frameworks. They emphasize that understanding technology is prerequisite to regulating it effectively.


Topics

Capacity development | Legal and regulatory | Development


Digital divide and inclusion challenges require urgent attention, particularly for rural and underserved populations

Speakers

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Amira Saber
– Nophadol In na
– Neema Lugangira

Arguments

One-third of humanity still lacks internet access, with many more lacking skills and resources to benefit from digital technologies


Technology development must be inclusive and egalitarian, addressing access as a human rights issue


Need for nationwide digital infrastructure expansion to bring connectivity to rural and underserved areas


Digital divide exists between urban centers and rural provinces, risking deepened social and economic disparities


Importance of strengthening digital literacy, especially in remote and peripheral regions


Summary

There is unanimous agreement that the digital divide represents a critical challenge requiring coordinated action. Speakers emphasize that digital access should be viewed as a human rights issue and that special attention must be paid to rural and marginalized communities.


Topics

Digital access | Human rights principles | Development


Parliamentarians must play an active, not passive, role in shaping digital governance and policy

Speakers

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira
– Nophadol In na

Arguments

Parliamentarians are uniquely positioned to ensure digital technologies serve the public good and reflect values of transparency, inclusivity, accountability and human rights


IPU has adopted resolutions on AI’s impact on democracy and human rights, providing a roadmap for national-level parliamentary action


Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact


Parliamentarians have a crucial role in setting legal and ethical frameworks for new technologies, particularly AI


Parliamentarians need to be key actors in shaping the digital age through legislation, ethical standards, and enabling innovation


Summary

All speakers agree that parliamentarians cannot be mere observers but must actively shape digital policy through legislation, ethical standards, and proactive governance approaches. They emphasize the unique democratic mandate of parliamentarians in this process.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles | Development


Online safety concerns, particularly regarding women and vulnerable groups, require immediate attention

Speakers

– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira
– Martin Chungong

Arguments

Need for mechanisms to identify and hold accountable those creating deepfakes and other harmful content


Importance of making cyberspace safer and more inclusive for vulnerable groups


AI accelerates online gender-based violence, particularly against women in public office, silencing democratic participation


Importance of addressing misinformation and disinformation as major threats to humanity


Summary

Speakers share deep concern about online safety issues, with particular emphasis on protecting women and vulnerable groups from digital harms including deepfakes, online violence, and misinformation that threatens democratic participation.


Topics

Gender rights online | Human rights principles | Content policy | Cybersecurity


Multi-stakeholder cooperation is essential for addressing digital challenges effectively

Speakers

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin
– Martin Chungong
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira

Arguments

WSIS provides a trusted platform for multi-stakeholder collaboration over 20 years


Need for collaboration between policymakers and the scientific community to ensure evidence-based conversations


Cooperation is necessary rather than optional for addressing digital safety and protection issues


Importance of bringing together tech companies and parliamentarians to address implementation challenges


Summary

All speakers emphasize that digital governance challenges are too complex for any single stakeholder to address alone. They advocate for structured cooperation between governments, tech companies, civil society, and international organizations.


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory | International cooperation


Similar viewpoints

Both speakers see AI as having transformative potential for empowerment, particularly for women, while acknowledging the need for proper access and training to realize these benefits.

Speakers

– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira

Arguments

AI and digital tools can transform lives, enabling rural women to start businesses and access new opportunities


AI can serve as a valuable tool for parliamentarians to analyze reports and policies, but requires access and training


Topics

Future of work | Gender rights online | Capacity development


Both emphasize the need for fundamental paradigm shifts in how parliamentarians approach technology governance, moving from reactive to proactive approaches while maintaining human-centered values.

Speakers

– Rodrigo Goni
– Nophadol In na

Arguments

Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact


Technology must serve people, not replace them, guided by human values and shared responsibility


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles | Development


Both speakers emphasize the importance of establishing ethical frameworks and building comprehensive technical capacity across the governance ecosystem, not just for parliamentarians but for all stakeholders involved in technology regulation.

Speakers

– Martin Chungong
– Amira Saber

Arguments

Need for ethical guidelines in technology development, including IPU’s Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology


Importance of world-class skills development for regulators and engineers alongside parliamentarians


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles | Capacity development


Unexpected consensus

Need for direct engagement between parliamentarians and major technology companies

Speakers

– Neema Lugangira
– Rodrigo Goni
– Amira Saber

Arguments

Importance of bringing together tech companies and parliamentarians to address implementation challenges


Cooperation is necessary rather than optional for addressing digital safety and protection issues


Need for mechanisms to identify and hold accountable those creating deepfakes and other harmful content


Explanation

This consensus is unexpected because it represents parliamentarians from different regions (Africa, Latin America, Middle East) all independently identifying the need for direct dialogue with tech companies, suggesting this is a universal challenge rather than region-specific issue. The agreement spans practical implementation issues, accountability mechanisms, and cooperative governance approaches.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | International cooperation | Content policy


Parliamentarians acknowledging their own limitations and need for fundamental paradigm shifts

Speakers

– Amira Saber
– Rodrigo Goni
– Neema Lugangira

Arguments

Parliamentarians cannot regulate what they don’t understand, requiring significant capacity building in digital skills


Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact


AI can serve as a valuable tool for parliamentarians to analyze reports and policies, but requires access and training


Explanation

It’s unexpected for elected officials to so openly acknowledge their limitations and call for fundamental changes to how they operate. This level of self-reflection and willingness to admit knowledge gaps while calling for systemic change in parliamentary approaches demonstrates remarkable consensus on the inadequacy of traditional governance methods for digital challenges.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Capacity development | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers demonstrate remarkable consensus across multiple critical areas: the urgent need for parliamentary capacity building in digital technologies, the imperative to address digital divides as human rights issues, the necessity of proactive rather than reactive governance approaches, the importance of protecting vulnerable groups online, and the essential nature of multi-stakeholder cooperation. There is also strong agreement on the transformative potential of AI and digital technologies when properly governed.


Consensus level

Very high level of consensus with significant implications for digital governance. The agreement spans technical, political, and social dimensions of digital policy, suggesting a mature understanding of the challenges and a shared vision for solutions. This consensus provides a strong foundation for coordinated international action on digital governance, particularly through the ITU-IPU partnership and WSIS framework. The willingness of parliamentarians to acknowledge their limitations and call for paradigm shifts indicates readiness for substantive reform in how digital technologies are governed globally.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Approach to technology regulation – reactive vs proactive governance

Speakers

– Rodrigo Goni
– Martin Chungong

Arguments

Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact


IPU has adopted resolutions on AI’s impact on democracy and human rights, providing a roadmap for national-level parliamentary action


Summary

Rodrigo argues that traditional reactive parliamentary approaches are ‘useless’ and parliamentarians must completely shift to anticipatory governance, while Martin presents the IPU’s existing reactive approach of creating resolutions after identifying problems as a viable roadmap for action.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Unexpected differences

Fundamental role of parliamentarians in digital governance

Speakers

– Rodrigo Goni
– Nophadol In na

Arguments

Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact


Parliamentarians need to be key actors in shaping the digital age through legislation, ethical standards, and enabling innovation


Explanation

While both agree parliamentarians should be active in digital governance, Rodrigo argues for a complete paradigm shift away from traditional parliamentary methods, calling reactive approaches ‘useless,’ while Nophadol advocates for parliamentarians to be ‘key actors’ using traditional tools like legislation and ethical standards. This disagreement is unexpected because both are parliamentarians but have fundamentally different views on whether existing parliamentary methods can be adapted or must be completely replaced.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles


Overall assessment

Summary

The discussion shows remarkably high consensus on identifying digital challenges (digital divide, online safety, capacity building needs) but reveals subtle yet significant disagreements on implementation approaches and the fundamental role of parliamentary institutions in digital governance.


Disagreement level

Low to moderate disagreement level with high strategic implications. While speakers largely agree on problems and goals, their different approaches to solutions could lead to conflicting policy directions. The most significant disagreement centers on whether traditional parliamentary methods should be reformed or completely replaced, which has fundamental implications for democratic governance in the digital age.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Both speakers see AI as having transformative potential for empowerment, particularly for women, while acknowledging the need for proper access and training to realize these benefits.

Speakers

– Amira Saber
– Neema Lugangira

Arguments

AI and digital tools can transform lives, enabling rural women to start businesses and access new opportunities


AI can serve as a valuable tool for parliamentarians to analyze reports and policies, but requires access and training


Topics

Future of work | Gender rights online | Capacity development


Both emphasize the need for fundamental paradigm shifts in how parliamentarians approach technology governance, moving from reactive to proactive approaches while maintaining human-centered values.

Speakers

– Rodrigo Goni
– Nophadol In na

Arguments

Parliamentarians must shift from reactive to proactive approaches, developing new political intelligence to anticipate digital challenges rather than responding after the fact


Technology must serve people, not replace them, guided by human values and shared responsibility


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles | Development


Both speakers emphasize the importance of establishing ethical frameworks and building comprehensive technical capacity across the governance ecosystem, not just for parliamentarians but for all stakeholders involved in technology regulation.

Speakers

– Martin Chungong
– Amira Saber

Arguments

Need for ethical guidelines in technology development, including IPU’s Charter of Ethics on Science and Technology


Importance of world-class skills development for regulators and engineers alongside parliamentarians


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights principles | Capacity development


Takeaways

Key takeaways

Parliamentarians must transition from reactive to proactive approaches in digital governance, developing new political intelligence to anticipate challenges rather than respond after they occur


Digital divide remains a critical challenge with one-third of humanity lacking internet access, particularly affecting rural areas and creating socio-economic disparities


Parliamentarians cannot effectively regulate technologies they don’t understand, making capacity building and digital literacy essential for lawmakers


Online safety concerns are escalating, including gender-based violence against women politicians, cybersecurity threats, and restrictions on freedom of expression


Technology must serve people rather than replace them, guided by human values, transparency, inclusivity, and accountability


International cooperation between organizations like ITU and IPU is essential, along with engagement between parliamentarians and tech companies


Digital technologies offer transformative opportunities for economic growth, education, healthcare, and civic engagement when properly implemented


AI governance requires ethical frameworks and human-centric approaches to ensure democratic values are preserved


Resolutions and action items

ITU and IPU to collaborate on capacity building programs for parliamentarians in digital skills and AI understanding


ITU’s AI Skills Coalition to be extended to include parliamentary capacity building opportunities


Creation of a policy radar system to map global connectivity, digitalization, and AI policies for parliamentary access and knowledge sharing


Facilitation of direct engagement between senior tech company decision-makers and parliamentarians through ITU-IPU partnerships


Continuation of discussions at the upcoming Global Conference of Speakers of Parliament with a special panel on parliament’s role in digital future


Parliamentary conference in Kuala Lumpur on responsible AI to be held in November


Expansion of Partner to Connect initiative and similar programs to increase rural connectivity pilots


Development of mechanisms to improve access to AI tools for parliamentarians from least developed countries


Implementation of IPU’s AI resolution on democracy and human rights at national parliamentary levels


Unresolved issues

How to effectively bridge the gap between rapid technological advancement and slower legislative processes


Mechanisms for ensuring tech companies are held accountable for platform violations and harmful content in different cultural and linguistic contexts


Funding models and debt swap arrangements for digitalization in Global South countries


Standardized approaches to data classification and legal liability frameworks across different jurisdictions


Solutions for identity verification and prevention of deepfakes targeting public officials


Balancing data privacy protection with innovation support requirements


Addressing language barriers and cultural context issues in AI content moderation


Ensuring equitable access to expensive AI tools for parliamentarians from developing countries


Suggested compromises

Corporate social responsibility programs from tech companies to provide subsidized access to AI tools for parliamentarians from least developed countries


Multi-stakeholder approach combining government, civil society, scientific community, and private sector rather than government-only regulation


Gradual implementation of digital infrastructure with focus on rural connectivity as foundation for broader digital inclusion


Evidence-based policymaking through closer collaboration between parliamentarians and scientific community rather than purely political approaches


Anticipatory governance models that can be tested globally but adapted and replicated at national parliamentary levels


Cooperative rather than confrontational approaches among parliamentarians when addressing digital challenges


Thought provoking comments

We cannot be reactive? Parliaments were always reactive. We looked at what was happening, and then we came up with a law. Now, it’s the other way around, because we cannot follow the speed of this digital era. A parliament that wants to tackle these issues reactively is useless… We need to build them. The key is not in waiting for the new technologies to… We need a new intelligence, political intelligence, political premise of thought.

Speaker

Rodrigo Goni


Reason

This comment fundamentally challenges the traditional legislative paradigm by arguing that parliaments must shift from reactive to proactive governance. It introduces the concept of ‘political intelligence’ as a new framework for addressing digital challenges, which is a profound departure from conventional lawmaking approaches.


Impact

This comment shifted the discussion from identifying problems to reimagining the entire legislative process. It influenced subsequent speakers to think about anticipatory governance and sparked conversations about new paradigms of cooperation. The concept of ‘political intelligence’ became a recurring theme that other participants referenced.


I always say that we can’t regulate what we don’t understand so there is a huge role for the RPU to get as more of parliamentarians to be capacitated on the digital skills and how to govern for the best interest of the people

Speaker

Amira Saber


Reason

This comment crystallizes a fundamental challenge in digital governance – the knowledge gap between technological advancement and legislative understanding. It highlights the paradox that effective regulation requires deep comprehension of the subject matter.


Impact

This insight became a central theme that resonated throughout the discussion. Multiple speakers, including Neema and the moderators, referenced this concept. It directly influenced the conversation toward capacity building needs and shaped the recommendations for ITU-IPU collaboration on parliamentarian training.


Most of the tech companies, especially the multinational tech companies, are from the global north… their annual turnover in terms of their sales at times is more than our national GDPs. So one of the things that I think ITU, IPU can easily do to support is to find a mechanism of bringing the senior decision makers from these tech companies meeting with parliamentarians.

Speaker

Neema Lugangira


Reason

This comment exposes the power imbalance between global tech companies and developing nations’ governments, highlighting how economic disparities translate into policy influence gaps. It’s insightful because it connects economic inequality to democratic governance challenges in the digital age.


Impact

This observation shifted the discussion toward practical solutions for bridging the gap between tech companies and parliamentarians. It influenced the moderators to specifically ask if any private sector representatives were present and shaped the final recommendations about ITU-IPU facilitating such engagements.


There is an artificial intelligence that seems to be ruling everything we do. We have the noble principle of having AI serving us. We need a new intelligence, political intelligence, political premise of thought… We need to develop a new political intelligence, quote unquote, at least to deal with this new digital challenges.

Speaker

Rodrigo Goni


Reason

This comment presents a philosophical challenge to the relationship between human governance and artificial intelligence, arguing for the development of enhanced human political intelligence as a counterbalance to AI dominance. It’s thought-provoking because it reframes the AI debate from technical to fundamentally political.


Impact

This comment deepened the philosophical dimension of the discussion, moving beyond practical concerns to existential questions about human agency in governance. It influenced the tone of subsequent discussions about the need for human-centered approaches to digital policy.


We are only going to be able to regulate what we know. But if we remain not knowing it, we’re going to have stringent regulations, which then are not going to be helpful for the growth of the digital sector.

Speaker

Neema Lugangira


Reason

This comment reveals the double-edged nature of the knowledge gap – ignorance leads not just to ineffective regulation, but potentially harmful over-regulation that stifles innovation. It’s insightful because it shows how the lack of understanding creates a policy trap.


Impact

This observation added nuance to the capacity building discussion by showing that the stakes involve both under-regulation and over-regulation. It influenced the conversation toward finding balanced approaches to digital governance and reinforced the urgency of parliamentarian education.


Technology must serve people, not replace them. As we enter the age of AI… Our digital progress must be guided by human values and share responsibility.

Speaker

Nophadol In na


Reason

This comment provides a clear philosophical anchor for digital governance, establishing human-centricity as the fundamental principle. It’s thought-provoking because it offers a simple but profound criterion for evaluating all digital policies.


Impact

This comment provided a unifying principle that other speakers could rally around. It helped establish common ground among participants and influenced the discussion toward human rights and ethical considerations in digital governance.


Overall assessment

These key comments fundamentally transformed the discussion from a typical policy dialogue into a deeper examination of governance paradigms in the digital age. Rodrigo Goni’s insights about the need for proactive rather than reactive governance and ‘political intelligence’ established a new framework that influenced how other participants conceptualized their roles. Amira Saber’s observation about regulating what we understand became a central organizing principle that shaped recommendations for capacity building. Neema Lugangira’s comments about power imbalances and the risks of uninformed regulation added crucial perspectives on global equity and policy effectiveness. Together, these comments elevated the conversation from identifying problems to reimagining the fundamental relationship between technology, governance, and democracy. They created a progression from recognizing challenges to proposing paradigm shifts, ultimately shaping a more sophisticated understanding of parliamentarians’ evolving role in digital governance.


Follow-up questions

How can we establish a mechanism for bringing senior decision makers from multinational tech companies to meet directly with parliamentarians?

Speaker

Neema Lugangira


Explanation

This is important because parliamentarians need direct dialogue with tech companies to address issues like language barriers in AI, online abuse reporting systems, identity verification challenges, and access to tools, but individual countries are too small for these companies to listen to without facilitation from organizations like ITU and IPU.


How can we develop a policy radar that maps everything related globally to connectivity, digitalization, digitization and AI for parliamentarians to access and share experiences?

Speaker

Amira Saber


Explanation

This would provide parliamentarians with a comprehensive resource to learn from global policies and share their own experiences, which is crucial for informed decision-making in digital governance.


How can we make deepfakes easily identifiable and hold those who create them accountable?

Speaker

Amira Saber


Explanation

This is critical for protecting vulnerable groups, especially women, who can lose their lives to deepfakes and other negative consequences of AI misuse.


How can we develop a classification system for data sensitivity with corresponding legal liability frameworks?

Speaker

Amira Saber


Explanation

This would help establish appropriate legal frameworks based on the sensitivity of different types of data, which is essential for effective digital governance.


How can we establish a debt swap mechanism for digitalization similar to climate debt swaps for Global South nations?

Speaker

Amira Saber


Explanation

This would help address the digital divide by providing financial mechanisms for developing countries to invest in digital infrastructure and skills development.


How can we develop new political intelligence and paradigms for parliamentarians to anticipate rather than react to technological changes?

Speaker

Rodrigo Goni


Explanation

Traditional reactive parliamentary approaches are inadequate for the speed of digital transformation, requiring new collaborative and anticipatory governance models.


How can we strengthen the rapprochement between policymakers and the scientific community to ensure evidence-based conversations?

Speaker

Martin Chungong


Explanation

There is insufficient evidence of meaningful collaboration between these groups, which is essential for informed policy-making in science and technology.


How can we address AI’s acceleration of online gender-based violence, particularly against women in public office and women politicians?

Speaker

Neema Lugangira


Explanation

This silences women and diminishes efforts toward gender-balanced democracy, requiring specific interventions to protect women political leaders.


How can we provide affordable access to AI tools for parliamentarians from least developed countries and lower-middle-income countries?

Speaker

Neema Lugangira


Explanation

Parliamentarians can only regulate what they understand, but expensive AI tools create barriers to knowledge and effective governance in developing countries.


How can we use AI and advanced technologies to improve AgriTech and build farmer capacities to address food safety issues?

Speaker

Amira Saber


Explanation

Food safety is a global challenge that could be addressed through technology, requiring capacity building for farmers and involvement of parliamentarians in implementation.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Digital Cooperation for Inclusive Development: Brazilโ€“South Africa Synergies in the G20 and the WSIS Framework

Digital Cooperation for Inclusive Development: Brazilโ€“South Africa Synergies in the G20 and the WSIS Framework

Session at a glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the collaboration between Brazil and South Africa as leading Global South nations in shaping digital policy agendas through their consecutive G20 presidencies, with Brazil holding the presidency in 2024 and South Africa taking over in 2025. The session explored how these partnerships can drive progress in digital inclusion, infrastructure development, and equitable access to information and communication technologies.


Marcelo Martinez from Brazil reflected on their G20 presidency experience, describing it as both an opportunity and a contradiction – providing a platform to lead the world’s 20 largest economies while maintaining diplomatic balance to avoid imposing their vision on non-G20 countries. Brazil’s presidency was particularly challenging for a developing country, requiring extensive coordination involving over 50 people from 15 organizations and resulting in 11 different documents. Brazil introduced groundbreaking discussions on information integrity, which had never been addressed in G20 before, and helped mainstream the concept of meaningful connectivity beyond ITU circles.


Jim Paterson from South Africa outlined their presidency priorities, building on the foundation laid by previous developing country presidencies including Indonesia, India, and Brazil. South Africa focused on four key areas: digital inclusion through universal and meaningful connectivity, integrated governance systems for digital public infrastructure, support for SMEs and innovation ecosystems, and artificial intelligence governance with emphasis on equality and data access. They continued Brazil’s work on information integrity while addressing new challenges like deepfakes and generative AI.


Both representatives acknowledged the significant resource constraints developing countries face when organizing such complex international processes, but emphasized the domestic benefits including strengthened institutional capacity and enhanced bilateral relationships. The discussion highlighted the importance of continuity between developing country presidencies in advancing pro-development agendas within forums traditionally dominated by developed nations. The conversation concluded with recognition that this sequence of developing country G20 presidencies represents a unique opportunity to influence global digital governance frameworks.


Keypoints

## Major Discussion Points:


– **G20 Digital Governance Leadership by Global South Countries**: The discussion centered on how Brazil’s 2024 G20 presidency and South Africa’s 2025 presidency represent a unique opportunity for developing nations to shape global digital policy, particularly around digital inclusion, infrastructure development, and equitable ICT access.


– **Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Meaningful Connectivity**: Both countries emphasized advancing digital public infrastructure as a tool for inclusion, with South Africa building on Brazil’s work to develop integrated governance systems and measure public value, while addressing the gap between basic connectivity and meaningful connectivity.


– **Information Integrity and AI Governance**: Brazil successfully introduced information integrity discussions to the G20 for the first time, addressing disinformation and misinformation concerns. Both countries also worked on AI governance frameworks, with BRICS producing what they claim is the first comprehensive AI governance document from the Global South.


– **Financing Challenges for Digital Development**: A significant discussion emerged around the persistent lack of adequate financing mechanisms for digital development initiatives, with participants noting that financing remains the “unfinished business” from the original WSIS process despite being a critical barrier to progress.


– **WSIS+20 Process and Multilateral Cooperation**: The speakers addressed the upcoming WSIS+20 review process, expressing both opportunities and concerns about strengthening multilateral governance mechanisms while noting pessimism within the G77 group about advancing beyond defending existing achievements.


## Overall Purpose:


The discussion aimed to explore how Brazil and South Africa, as leading Global South nations, can leverage their consecutive G20 presidencies to drive meaningful progress in global digital governance, share experiences and lessons learned, and identify opportunities for continued cooperation in advancing digital inclusion and equitable access to ICTs on the global stage.


## Overall Tone:


The discussion maintained a collaborative and constructive tone throughout, characterized by mutual respect and shared vision between the Brazilian and South African representatives. While there was evident pride in achievements and optimism about cooperation opportunities, the tone also reflected realistic acknowledgment of challenges, particularly around resource constraints, financing difficulties, and geopolitical complexities. The conversation remained diplomatic and professional, with speakers showing genuine interest in learning from each other’s experiences and building on shared priorities for future collaboration.


Speakers

**Speakers from the provided list:**


– **Moderator**: Role – Session moderator facilitating the discussion between Brazil and South Africa representatives


– **Marcelo Martinez**: Role – Brazilian diplomat; Area of expertise – International relations, G20 presidency coordination, digital governance, BRICS cooperation, WSIS processes


– **Jim Paterson**: Role – South African representative; Area of expertise – G20 presidency, digital inclusion, digital public infrastructure, artificial intelligence governance


– **Annette Esterhuizen**: Role – South African participant following the G20 process; Area of expertise – Digital policy, financing for digital development


– **Speaker**: Role – ITU G20 Sherpa (7th G20 participation); Area of expertise – International telecommunications, G20 coordination, digital infrastructure, AI governance


– **Audience**: Multiple audience members who asked questions and made comments during the session


**Additional speakers:**


– **Alison** (mentioned by Jim Paterson): Role – Knowledge partner who helped South Africa with G20 focus; Area of expertise – Digital inclusion, data governance, think tank work across Global South


– **Jackie** (mentioned by Alison): Role – Brazilian T20 member; Area of expertise – Think tank engagement, G20 processes


– **Isabel** (mentioned by Marcelo Martinez): Role – Works on sustainable development; Area of expertise – Development financing, 2030 agenda negotiations


Full session report

# Brazil-South Africa G20 Digital Governance Collaboration: Discussion Report


## Executive Summary


This discussion examined the collaboration between Brazil and South Africa as consecutive Global South G20 presidencies, focusing on their efforts to advance digital governance frameworks. The session brought together diplomatic representatives and policy experts to analyze how these developing nations used their leadership positions to promote digital inclusion, meaningful connectivity, and equitable access to information and communication technologies.


Brazil’s 2024 G20 presidency and South Africa’s 2025 presidency created opportunities to mainstream development-focused agendas in international discussions, though both countries faced significant resource constraints and diplomatic challenges in their leadership roles.


## Key Participants


**Marcelo Martinez** represented Brazil’s diplomatic perspective, providing insights into organizing a G20 presidency as a developing nation and Brazil’s role in introducing topics like information integrity to the G20 agenda.


**Jim Paterson** represented South Africa’s approach to building upon Brazil’s foundation, focusing on South Africa’s four priority areas and the strategic decision to continue Brazil’s initiatives.


**Annette Esterhuizen** highlighted persistent financing challenges in digital development, while the **ITU G20 Sherpa** provided context about developing country presidencies. Audience members including **Alison Gillwald** contributed insights about knowledge partnerships and regional approaches.


## Major Themes and Key Discussions


### G20 Leadership Challenges for Developing Countries


Martinez described Brazil’s presidency as requiring coordination of more than 50 people from more than 15 organizations, ultimately producing 11 separate documents. He characterized this as both “an opportunity and a contradiction” – providing a platform to influence major economies while requiring careful diplomatic balance.


Paterson acknowledged similar challenges for South Africa, noting how they benefited from Brazil’s willingness to share experiences through 13 coordination meetings. This experience-sharing between consecutive developing country presidencies proved crucial for maximizing effectiveness.


### Digital Inclusion and Meaningful Connectivity


Martinez revealed a significant finding about Brazil’s connectivity: while 90% of Brazil’s population appears connected according to traditional metrics, internal analysis showed only 20% possess meaningful connectivity. This disparity highlighted how global digital divide statistics may be misleading.


Brazil brought the concept of meaningful connectivity from ITU discussions in Geneva, where “not many people were discussing it,” to broader G20 recognition. South Africa built upon this foundation by making digital inclusion the central theme of their presidency, approaching it through universal and meaningful connectivity as the foundation for digital public infrastructure.


### Information Integrity and AI Governance


Brazil successfully introduced information integrity discussions to the G20, despite concerns about potential backlash. Martinez noted this contributed to the topic’s subsequent incorporation into the Global Digital Compact. South Africa continued this work with focus on emerging challenges like generative artificial intelligence and deepfakes.


Both countries worked to shift AI governance discussions from purely risk-focused approaches toward including development perspectives. Martinez highlighted that BRICS produced a seven-page AI governance document from a Global South perspective, emphasizing development benefits rather than focusing exclusively on risks.


### Digital Public Infrastructure and Public Value


Both countries recognized digital public infrastructure (DPI) as fundamental to digital inclusion goals. Brazil continued India’s work on DPI, treating it as a basic tool with horizontal dimensions benefiting multiple sectors.


South Africa focused on developing integrated governance systems for DPI and introducing public value measurement concepts. Paterson explained this approach ensures DPI design maximizes potential for public value creation, going beyond technical implementation to consider broader societal impact.


## Key Agreements and Differences


### Areas of Consensus


Both representatives agreed on the resource-intensive nature of G20 presidencies for developing countries and the value of experience sharing. They aligned on prioritizing digital inclusion and meaningful connectivity, recognizing traditional connectivity statistics as misleading.


Both supported shifting technology governance discussions to include development perspectives and emphasized the importance of building upon each other’s work rather than starting fresh initiatives.


### Tactical Differences


While all participants agreed on the critical importance of financing for digital development, they differed on approaches. Martinez focused on working within existing constraints and finding alternative mechanisms, while Esterhuizen advocated for putting financing more prominently on the WSIS+20 agenda.


Martinez expressed pessimism about current multilateral negotiations, particularly within the G77 plus China group, while Paterson maintained focus on building upon existing work and continuing momentum.


## Financing Challenges and Institutional Barriers


Esterhuizen characterized financing as the “big unfinished business” from the original World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) process. Martinez explained how institutional barriers arise when digital agendas are placed within development frameworks, with financing discussions automatically redirected to Conferences on Financing for Development.


The G20’s mandate limitations prevent direct financing discussions, forcing alternative approaches such as UNESCO fund creation. Martinez mentioned launching a global initiative on information integrity and climate change at UNESCO as one such alternative mechanism.


## Knowledge Partnerships and Regional Approaches


Both countries emphasized working with knowledge partners. Martinez specifically mentioned collaboration with ITU, UNESCO, and OECD. South Africa’s approach emphasized African leadership and continental organization involvement, with Paterson acknowledging contributions from Research ICT Africa and University of Pretoria.


The discussion revealed how developing country presidencies transformed knowledge partnerships within G20 engagement groups, shifting toward meaningful Global South participation.


## WSIS+20 and Future Multilateral Processes


Both countries expressed mixed feelings about the upcoming WSIS+20 review process. Martinez noted limited energy within the G77 plus China group, with concerns that negotiations might focus on defending past achievements rather than advancing new agendas.


The challenge of converging Global Digital Compact and WSIS processes emerged as requiring strategic attention. Despite challenges, both countries committed to continued collaboration within the G77 framework.


## Unresolved Issues and Future Directions


### Data and Measurement Gaps


The discussion highlighted critical gaps in global data about meaningful connectivity rates. While Brazil’s analysis revealed disparities between basic and meaningful connectivity, participants acknowledged uncertainty about the true global extent of the digital divide.


### Financing Mechanisms


No clear pathway emerged for addressing the persistent lack of dedicated financing mechanisms for digital development, with structural and bureaucratic barriers requiring creative solutions within existing institutional frameworks.


### Sustaining Progress


Concerns emerged about maintaining development-focused agendas when G20 presidencies return to developed countries, given the ITU representative’s observation that this sequence of developing country presidencies was unique.


## Conclusion


The discussion demonstrated both opportunities and challenges facing developing countries in global digital governance leadership. Brazil and South Africa’s consecutive presidencies created opportunities to mainstream development-focused digital agendas, with notable consensus on priorities including digital inclusion, meaningful connectivity, and development-focused technology governance.


Key achievements included introducing information integrity to G20 discussions, advancing meaningful connectivity concepts, and developing Global South perspectives on AI governance. However, persistent challenges remain around financing mechanisms, data gaps, and sustaining progress across different presidencies.


The conversation highlighted the importance of continued collaboration between developing countries in advancing equitable approaches to global digital governance, while acknowledging significant resource constraints and structural barriers that must be addressed to achieve these goals.


Session transcript

Moderator: Hello, everyone. I just want to start the session. I would just do a very brief introduction about our moment and then I’m going to have a debate between Brazil and South Africa. At two leader leading nations of the global south and members of G20, Brazil and South Africa play pivotal roles in shaping inclusive global digital policy agendas. So, in 2024, Brazilโ€ฆ shared the G20 and in 2025 South Africa is in charge of it. The partnership is especially significant in advancing digital inclusion, infrastructure development and equitable access to ICTs, objectives that resonate with both the G20 digital economy working group and with these action lines. This session explores how cooperation between Brazil and South Africa can drive tangible progress and while leveraging their positions in G20 to influence global digital governance. So I’m going to start inviting Brazil to talk a little bit about G20, the experience, challenges, and Marcel, please. Thank you.


Marcelo Martinez: Good morning, everybody. It’s a pleasure to be here. I was asked to provide some reflections on synergies and alignments between Brazil and South Africa regarding both our G20 presidencies and the WSIS process. I’m going to add a little bit on the bricks, which we just ended a week ago, not even a week ago, but that’s what I wanted to bring to this conversation, which I really hope is going to be a conversation. I think that we have in this room mostly Brazilians and South Africans, so it would be nice because anticipating what I’m going to say, we have a lot in common in terms of synergies, alignments, positions, but in bilateral terms, we could do a lot more than we do now. So going to what I’m going to present today, the way I planned it was to look back to our G20 presidency last year. and also to the experience that we had in the BRICS, and then in the very end to look forward to what we can see ahead for the WSIS process. Looking back and starting with the G20 in chronological terms I think that what unites us, and Jin be free to disagree with me in the future, but what I saw, first of all, I’m not here I think to, of course, list everything that Brazil did in its presidency. We all know what will happen then. Maybe I will do some of it since I’m a diplomat and I have to do some propaganda of my own country and what we did, but that’s not the main intent here, of course. What I wanted to share with you was maybe a little bit of a back office vision of what we did and why we did it and why it went the way it did. And I wanted to begin by saying that for us, the G20, as I believe is very similar for South Africa, was at the same time an opportunity and a contradiction. An opportunity because the chance to lead, of course, the 20 largest economies in the world is very significant, of course. And of course, if we mention also the BRICS, a very significant group of countries and of the so-called global South, in both cases, the first thing that you do is of course you put yourself out there, both for the good and for the bad, but it’s a bit of a window, of a shop window in which you have a chance, your own minute of celebrity and all the world is looking at you. And you have to show them what you do best, of course. But that puts us, especially diplomats, in a contradiction, because both Brazil and, I think, South Africa, we’re both staunch defenders of multilateralism. So we have, then, an opportunity to send messages to the 20 largest economies or to the BRICS But at the same time, we have to do it in a very careful way so that we make it clear that we’re not trying to convert our own vision in messages or trying to impose our vision to the rest of the world. Most of the countries are not at the table, at the G20 or at the BRICS. So this, as a Brazilian diplomat, this is a very hard balancing act. It’s not easy to produce relevant deliverables and, at the same time, be able to do it in a way that we share our vision, that we do not impose any positions or visions. This is not โ€“ imposing is not really a diplomatic tradition. So finally, in terms of the G20, I wanted to point out something that is very obvious, but it’s โ€“ since it happens in the back office, not many people see it. For a developing country to engage in such an exercise โ€“ of course, we all know it in this room, I believe โ€“ it is a very stressful exercise. It drives us to our own limits in terms of human resources, in terms of financial resources, too. And I was actually very surprised to see a very large South African delegation here since we have a DWG meeting next Monday. It’s going to last for three days, so it’s going to be huge. It’s a negotiation meeting, and it is really very hard to do all this with the teams that we know we have and the resources that we know we have. That being said, when we did our own presidency and we tried to share our experience with South Africa, we had a whole of government exercise. I can say that we involved more than 50 people, more than 15 organizations in Brazil to organize the work of the DEWG. We began work about a year before our presidency, and we held 13 coordination meetings in order to make sure that we would achieve our results. That was the basic Brazil team for the DEWG, but we also had extra meetings in terms of the core group of organizations that were responsible for the work streams and the development of the deliverables that we planned to. It was also an interesting experience from the point of view of what we produced in the end. Again, I’m not going over the list of products, but we had 11 different documents. One of them was a G20 product. We can see how difficult it is to negotiate and to achieve consensus in this group. We also had seven different events, workshops. We were the working group of all G20 in Brazil that had the largest number of deliverables in all. We are very proud of this result, and we know how much it took us. Of course, we had the help of the ITU, UNESCO, and the OECD. the job, which was precious. We wouldn’t be able to do it without them, but still a very hard exercise. It is also very challenging very often to work with international organizations and knowledge partners. As a rule, of course, we all have our agendas and we, of course, we try to couple our agendas in a way that it makes sense for both partners. It is a partnership, but it is also very hard in the beginning to make it clear what we want as a country to achieve is leading the G20 and, of course, marry these objectives with what international organizations have in their portfolio that could match these interests. So it is also challenging. In terms of what we had planned of priority areas, we had, of course, you know what we worked with, but I think that the most challenging experience was the one with the integrity of information because it had never been discussed before in the G20 and it is a very diverse group, of course. The political window then, we saw it as a possibility to have this, but we were afraid that even in terms of the mandate of the group, whether countries would accept that we had this discussion in the DEWG, it ended up working well and I think that our work in the G20 in the end was an important ingredient to have this global discussion because we had the OECD already pushing this agenda as did the Secretariat for Global Communications of the United Nations pushing also this agenda with Melissa Fleming. Our work at the G20, I think, was important to make sure that this agenda actually made the GDC in the end, and of course that we still have this discussion at this very event. We had several sessions touching on disinformation, misinformation, trust in the digital ecosystem, and integrity of information online. So we’re very proud of this work. In terms of meaningful connectivity, I’d also like to add how it was, in our view, important that we also bring this discussion, which was in a way limited to the ITU, limited to Geneva. It wasn’t a lot when we started talking about it. Our guys in New York asked us, what is this? What are you talking about? We don’t know what this is. And we were also very proud to, in a way, make sure that the ITU work in this area could be broadly known and recognized. And it also made the GDC, and now it’s mainstream, finally, as it should be. So I think that our G20, I like to believe that we give a contribution also in this way. Of course, we also continue the Indian work in terms of DPIs, which we find is really a very basic tool for digital inclusion, which was our horizontal dimension that we explored in our declaration in Maceo. And of course, AI, which when we began this work, I remember that we went to the AI summit in Bletchley Park. It was October, perhaps, 2023. And what we had there was basically a conversation on risks, and there was also, of course, the conversation on risks. ethics. But that was not the perspective of development as part of the global conversation then. And that’s why we decided we would have this conversation in the DWG to make sure that this narrative in terms of the distribution of benefits of the technological evolution could be also in the agenda. And I also believe that this is now mainstream and we see it in the IFEGOOD. It was already there but not many people were maybe discussing it in diplomatic form. But now we see it very strong everywhere. Of course we have a continuity again with the South African presidency in terms of our own priority areas. And this is I think very important. Every time that we planned in every meeting that we planned our presidency we were concerned and worried about what can we leave behind in terms of this succession of developing countries in the G20 presidency. And it’s nice that we could in a way continue the work from Indonesia, from India, and now that we see that South Africa also has given continuity so that we could leave a mark there. Looking at the BRICS now, I think that it is in many ways an easier exercise, a diplomatic exercise, but not as easy as you might think. The group is still very diverse. We have a larger BRICS than we used to have, so agreements are not as easy. And working with the BRICS within this geopolitical scenario that we have these days is never easy. Anything that you say, any message that the BRICS send to the world will be necessarily interpreted as a message of the group. And well, we are seeing what we are seeing these last couple of days, and many people interpret what that might be a consequence of the BRICS. So in our own domain, in the BRICS, we had two main work streams. One of them was the very working group on cooperation on ICTs. Which actually had a very interesting work this year. We worked on meaningful connectivity on space sustainability for the first time, which is also an ITU agenda. And we had the support in both lines of work. We worked on environmental sustainability, which is very interesting also. And we did a mapping of the digital ecosystems in all BRICS countries. So it was a very interesting exercise for us. And we were also glad that we could have an annex to the ministerial declaration that touched on specifically on space sustainability. And Anatel, which is sitting by my side, will be able to continue this work still this year. We also had as a second work stream, the work on the leaders declaration on artificial intelligence, or the governance of artificial intelligence. It is, if you’re here, you didn’t have a chance to read it, I’m sure, because it’s seven pages long. But we should think that we believe that this is the first document. And South Africa was there with us, of course, negotiating very constructively. And this is the first document that comes from the global South with this kind of content, which is very concrete and very well-structured. So we’re very proud of the work that we did together there too. Finally, moving to the. process, and I’ll be brief. We’ve been discussing with this for a while this week, but what I wanted to say is that we work together, Brazil and South Africa, within the G77. I’m not really optimistic in terms of what we see in New York these days. We are going to be discussing with the co-facilitators this afternoon. I think we have a session to discuss the elements paper and the prospects for the negotiation itself, but we don’t see the group, the G77 plus China, really energized around the discussion. There’s a lot of pessimism and I’m afraid that we may have to, you know, keep defending what we achieved in the last 20 years and that we do not advance much in terms of, you know, what we see as an opportunity, which is, in a way, to have an agenda update, to discuss governance mechanisms so as to make them less complex and more effective. Also, we think that we should explore the possible ways to converge the GDC and the WSIS processes, but if there’s a message I’d like to leave behind today, I think that we see the WSIS plus 20 as an opportunity to strengthen both the most stakeholder and the multilateral channels of governance. We don’t think they’re contradictory and we see, I see from my own position, there’s a strong demand from governments in terms of how they will be able to fulfill their own roles and responsibilities. So, we have to be able to steer their societies to the future and be able to create a concrete value for citizens. We believe, above all, that this status quo may not be ideal and that we may have to engage in exercises, leaving dogmas behind, as a wise speaker said in the very first session that I participated in this event today. So that’s what I wanted to tell you this morning, and I’m open for a rich conversation if that’s your wish. Thank you.


Moderator: Thank you, Marcelo. Now I give the word for South Africa, please.


Jim Paterson: Thank you very much, and good morning. Yes, I think a lot of what you’ve said has resonated a lot with us. I think your experiences around organizing the G20, we had many similar experiences. We were also a bit fortunate, I must say, because Brazil was very keen to come and share their experiences in organizing such a momentous series of activities. So we had some dialogue between our respective governments before we took up the responsibility. So we had an inkling about what was coming, and it is a big progress. There’s an awful lot of coordination-type meetings. It seems almost to be a non-stop series of meetings, in fact. I think the other thing where we were a little bit fortunate at one level was that you indicated the challenge, I think, within the G20 about introducing issues that are really pro-development. and relevant for developing countries, because the forum is not really that well designed for that. And I think that has always been a challenge, because often under different countries presidencies, they’re not very receptive to to development, developing country issues. But we, South Africa, fortunately came in after a sequence of developing countries. So we’d had Indonesia, India, yourselves as Brazil. So there was something we could build on that was really focused more towards developing countries. And of course, it might be a while before that happens again. So we kind of felt that it would be important to do what we could in during our presidency. And so we picked up on a number of the key issues, I think, that had been discussed in the previous presidencies to see how we could advance those. And I think for us, what was really important, I think we had quite a few good discussions, we have one of our knowledge partners here with us, Alison. So she helped us quite a lot to get a good focus, I think. And one of the most important things was to prioritise digital inclusion. So we built directly on universal and meaningful connectivity and looked at what that can mean. And I think for us, we use that as a kind of way of trying to set the scene around the need to have digital inclusion across all aspects that you need to look at the impact of different technologies in terms of what it means for inclusion and development. So I think that was a very key part for us to kick off. And then we looked at digital public infrastructure, of course, he did some work on this in Brazil, and it was introduced for the first time by India. And there we were looking at, I think the main focus for us was to look at an integrated governance system around that to pick up on some of that had been quite a lot of discussions, as you would expect within the G20 around governance issues, but I think we felt that we needed to try and put that into some sort of structure. So that’s what we’ve attempted to do. And we’ve also looked at the idea around public value. I think we’ve presented it as measuring, but it’s a bit more than that. It’s about trying to ensure that the design of DPI maximizes the potential for public value so that you don’t lose those kind of dynamic effects that can happen from digital public infrastructure. As an infrastructure, there’s a lot of different ways in which it can impact across the economy and across society. And I think our starting point for that discussion was the realization, I think, from a UK academic, actually, that most infrastructure projects do not really consider the full value of all impact of what they do. They just look at a single use case and then decide, which is a rather strange approach when you consider public investment, because there should be a much deeper reflection about the overall impact that public infrastructure can have on the economy and on society. So those were two key elements for us. And of course, they relate completely, because one of the most important things we emphasized right from the time in India was that you need to make sure that you have universal and meaningful connectivity for digital public infrastructure, so everybody can benefit from those services. And in fact, DPI itself can be a demand driver for digital inclusion, and it can be part of delivering those benefits to everybody in terms of having and services that are relevant to all citizens. So I think that was also very important for us. We looked also at the SME sector and they themselves are drivers for digital inclusion, but we were looking then at how do you enable them and include them in the digital inclusion policies and prescripts, but we were also looking at innovation ecosystems and how to, we have so many young, talented innovators in the country, but it’s very difficult to kind of convert all these good ideas and all this positive energy into successful businesses. So we were trying to look at how we can intervene to encourage and enable innovators in this way. And then lastly, we were looking at artificial intelligence, which is something you also did in Brazil. And it’s not been something that’s been discussed as much as you would expect within the G20, but I think there’s also a tendency for countries to sit back and see how technologies unfold before intervening, which is not always the best approach, I don’t think. So we were looking around the impact of artificial intelligence, the potential impact through design, through poor data, that can have on equality. And then we were looking at some other aspects, especially access to data for researchers and small, medium and micro enterprises, because that’s also a major challenge. Then how are they gonna get the data they need to be able to deliver? And I think one of the things that we had from Research ICT Africa was, and from the University of Pretoria, in fact, was around language modeling and the fact that you have a lot of data. in South Africa from the public broadcaster that can be used to develop language modelling in South Africa in indigenous languages. So that could be a very valuable tool for public services, it could be a valuable tool for the broadcaster itself, and it could be for right across society very useful. So that was also one of the other things. And then we did pick up on information integrity from Brazil. I think that was a big success of the Brazilian presidency because it wasn’t a subject that would obviously be accepted by member states. I think it was something that could have easily been rejected. So I think there were some good skillful presentations by the Brazilian presidency and negotiations around that. And I think also it was that moment because a lot of countries were having elections and they were really worried about what was going on. And I think you yourselves had a few big spats going on with certain social media companies as well. So there was a spirit, I think, that was driving us towards adopting something around information integrity. So we’ve continued with that work, looking at generative AI and the potential, the ability to produce deepfakes and what happens around that. Because obviously, the impact can be huge. We don’t always know how extensive, but we were looking at measures to try and control that. So we did get together a very interesting set of ideas. And I think like you, we’ve had quite a lot of potential documents that have flowed from that. I think we’ve tried to link everything that we’re doing to our own national situation so that we can translate, I think, everything into to projects that we can do at home in South Africa. So I think that’s our hope, that the discussion and the investment we made in these discussions doesn’t end here and now, that we try and take something forward that will help us. So I think those were most of the comments I have at this stage. So maybe we can open it up a bit. Thank you.


Moderator: Thank you very much.


Annette Esterhuizen: Annette Esraeus and I’m from South Africa, trying to follow the G20 process. So two questions, one specifically for South Africa and one for both of you. And Jim, you said Brazil will be remembered, the G20 chairperson for the information integrity. I think Japan will remember, but data flows, I think. So what do you want South Africa to do? What do you want South Africa’s presidency to be remembered for? Is it going to be digital equality? What would you like us to give to the world as something that they’ll remember as a priority? And then to both of you, the G20 financial work is focusing, from what I can see, very much on financial, international financial architecture, reform, financial inclusion as a priority. We’re also in the WSIS renewal, where financing is actually, we all talk about, should we talk about enhanced cooperation or should we not? No one talks about, why are we not talking about financing? Financing is the big unfinished business from the WSIS process, delegated in 2003 to 2005, and now hardly even gets more than a paragraph in any official UN outcome report. Is there a possibility here, perhaps, to, with the G20 work, this focus on digital public infrastructure, which also raises the need for financing, and would countries like South Africa? Brazil be able to actually help us put financing seriously on the agenda of the WSIS plus 20 outcome?


Jim Paterson: That’s a difficult question. It sounds simple, but it’s not, because we made four priorities, so they’re all priorities in our view. But I think we would want to be remembered for all of them. But I think in particular, we want to, I think, put some, I think it’s maybe a little bit nationalistic in a way, but we would like to put energy from this into what we do domestically. But I think we’ve moved the debate a little bit in terms of digital inclusion, and I think that was important. And I think we’ve helped with digital public infrastructure. So that was also important. On digital innovation ecosystems, it was more really, I don’t think it’s a controversial subject. It’s not a difficult subject in that sense. So I would say probably more digital inclusion would be the bigger message. But also maybe on artificial intelligence and around access to data and data issues, generally, it’s not easy to discuss these things. So we have pushed that discussion more. And maybe the focus also maybe a little bit more on data as a public good. We’ve tried to introduce language around that. I don’t know how it’s going to go. And so those type of things. But I think we’re trying to build that concept of the need to be able to have an enabling environment for developing countries really try to advance that. That’s not a very clear answer, but maybe I’ll give you a clearer answer when we’ve been through the process and concluded it. I think on financing. I don’t think we can really introduce it at this stage in G20. It’s probably late, but I don’t believe the world begins and ends with a presidency of the G20. I think the issue can easily go beyond that. I would agree with you. They’ve just had the financing for development in Spain now. So I think that’s probably something we should look at very urgently. There’s not much focus on digital. So that’s probably something we should try and advance. But I do agree with you. It’s really important. I think there were some problems from our side with the original outcomes on financing, and probably that’s why we didn’t ourselves push it as much. But it’s definitely a priority for us.


Marcelo Martinez: Let me just add to what Jim already said. In a year away from what we did in our G20, we are able, Jim, to see that there is definitely a domestic legacy to what we do. We see our internal institutions or domestic institutions really with a better sense of what happens in the world. They are really a lot more involved in international meetings. They respond more and with more quality with all the consultations that we submit. And they are really, especially I would say, strengthening bilateral ties with other countries, both G20 and non-G20 countries, but mostly G20 countries. So I see a great benefit there from our presidency, and I think that was worth the investment that we did. On financing, this is a very deep question, of course. I think that if we wanted to simplify it, I would say that… There is a bureaucratic explanation for that and there is a strategic explanation to that. The bureaucratic one would be that, well, since 20 years ago, the first WSIS, we have the digital agenda in a way under the development agenda. It was first the MDGs and now the SDGs. When you read the documents, you actually read them. When you read the GDC, for instance, you kind of get a doubt, is this going to end in 2030 or not, perhaps? But in a way, it bothers me a little bit, of course, that we want the digital to be under this development narrative. This is actually one of the greatest achievements that we had in the original WSIS. And I can say it really with a peace of mind that that would not be possible today, to achieve what we achieved 20 years ago. And that’s why we defend it with all our power and strength. But I think that when you frame it this way, of course, you have in New York, when we negotiate any digital matter, it falls under the development, the Commission for Development. We are at the G77 negotiating together. We do not negotiate on a national basis. This is also, this is a strength in a way. This is actually quite difficult and most often. But that’s the way it is. That’s the way it’s framed. And we, of course, if you talk about financing, it immediately is directed to the Conferences on Financing for Development. I also met Isabel when we last met. I used to work for Sustainable Development then. We negotiated the 2030 agenda then. and with all its, you know, complexities. And then I left at Isabela with a clear impression that we had achieved nothing at all. I saw the people at the final session in the conference room, everybody applauding, and I kept asking myself, what are these people applauding? And once I joined the digital track back in Brasilia a couple of years later, I could see how this is not really happening, and how the digital, well, financing is way more difficult than it used to be these days. And the digital track being under the development larger track, it is a bureaucratic explanation for that not to happen. At the G20 in particular, when we tried to talk about financing of our infrastructure, immediately several countries say, and now there’s the strategic maybe consideration there, that we should not be talking about it there, that this is not the mandate of the group in the SHRPAS track. So it doesn’t happen. And several countries still try to do it. Like Saudi Arabia tried to create a fund. It ended up being an organization that they have, a very regional organization, DCA, I think, or something like that. Exactly. And then India tried to do the same thing, and they practically gave it up. So we actually launched in our presidency a global initiative on information integrity and climate change. We launched it at the summit. This ended up being a fund at UNESCO, but of course it was never framed as a G20 initiative, and that’s why it is working in the end. We have several countries that joined. Only Brazil made a contribution to this point, but we expect to. more to come, because we just had our first open call and we received more than 500 projects to finance and now there’s the finance aspect there, so maybe we can do that there and other countries can do that in their own limited group of countries that have the same objective, but it’s never easy.


Audience: Sorry I just wanted to flag for Jeremy perhaps, but just to say I think reasonably and controversially one of the items on the digital inclusion is actually the funding of digital public statistics, so also another project with ITU, obviously something we’ve been struggling for forever on, we did try to include it in the global digital compact, so we got the commitment to data, of course now it’s easy to get the commitment to public statistics and stuff as the basis of that data, but funding that, and yeah, I mean we’ve drawn on the CETIC experience and model and had proposed that we try and get a portion of domain name fund at an international level and hoping to be able to pursue that, but we’ll have to see about that, but I think one has to start any kind of solidarity funding, because that’s the only way it works, I mean most African countries wouldn’t be able to, that mechanism wouldn’t work, they wouldn’t have enough fees from, and they’ve got other priorities for those fees, so it would have to be a kind of global solidarity kind of thing, and I think those are just a big challenge, so they, often in the first round of some of these documents, but as soon as it’s, you’re talking about the money, put the money to the principal, and they tend to drop off. I just wanted to also just comment very briefly as Jim had mentioned or asked in the beginning, and also because Jackie is there from Brazil T20. But just to speak about the T20 legacy, and I think sure there are other engagement groups of the Brazilian Troika leadership, but as you’re starting with India, which began to draw on Global South knowledge partners, and also on the think tanks, which had traditionally been dominated very much by the Ivy Leagues and Global North institutions. And then, of course, Brazil really opened that up. So under data privacy, I think there were six of the task forces, and I think five of us were women from Global South, only one Brazilian. And then, of course, we’ve now got that coming through from India. So there’s really a strong cohort that’s been working on now on DPI, on AI, digital inclusion, of course, has come through in all three strands. And very strongly, the data governance legacy from the Brazilian G20 and from the T and C20 is really cutting all of the themes that we’ve got. And our themes, basically, shadow or mirror, or hopefully push the South African agenda. And perhaps just also to say, having the privilege of working across both groups, but not speaking on behalf of the G20 of all, of course, is that as my organisation, we’ve also worked extensively on the continent for two decades now. And I think what has been very strong, Jim, I would say out of this has been the presidency’s commitment to this being an African G20. And so a lot of the working groups within these things are being led by the African Union. and with a lot of support of new organizations that haven’t traditionally been allowed. So ADET from the UN is also a knowledge partners that I think haven’t been used as much previously, but obviously now’s the time. And just to say, and I think Jackie might want to just pick up with that, but there have been discussions about, especially because of the situation we’re in and the situation that we’re in, about what you do around supporting young people and new T20 members that are going to come in. And one doesn’t know what that’s going to look like. I know some of us have been working with the Canadian C, whatever, Canadian T20, C7, to do joint things in trying to get some of the, what I think is quite positive from Canada’s side, to get some of these issues taken forward. So we’ll see what that delivers. And then also because this floating nature of the G20 and therefore all the engagement groups as well, trying to create some sort of permanent repository. Because I mean, I think Brazil’s done a great job of putting up a lot of those documents there, but as things move and time moves and that sort of thing. So to try and get a kind of repository of some kind that can be kind of updated repository. So not just publications, because of course we will all do that, but get some of that. So I don’t know if Jackie just wanted to also just comment on anything on that, but I think it’s been a strong legacy from the three, from the trip.


Moderator: Sure.


Marcelo Martinez: Just wanted to react to your first comment, Alison. I think that it really strikes me really, especially the fact that we are in this conference, this is the first time I come to this conference and we’ve always been. you know, dealing with the numbers during, as we structure the discourse or narratives for the G20 and then for the BRICS, and we always work with this number that one third of humanity is not connected. And you were the first one to mention something that I’ve been thinking a lot lately. Since we began working with meaningful connectivity yesterday, you mentioned that this problem is a lot worse. As we did this exercise in Brazil, where over 90% of the population is connected, we got to the conclusion that only 20% has meaningful connectivity, meaning has the connection, the quality and conditions that we all have in this room. So if you look at the other way, it’s 80% of the population doesn’t have it. So if Brazil is the world’s average, my God, this number is much worse. So we should be working with a different number, but I really want to know what that number is. Because we are here at the most, maybe most important event in this area, and we don’t know it. No one has this number, and we have to keep working on it. I don’t know how close we are to the SDG targets, because we don’t have the data. Same exercise in the BRICS, within the BRICS. But since, of course, there are sensitive disease, we only circulated results within the BRICS countries. But we are now proposing to do the very same exercise again with CITIC for Mercosur countries and expanded Mercosur perhaps. So this is a message that we really think that every country in the world should embrace and try to measure that.


Moderator: Unfortunately, we are very on time and we need to… to finish the session. Just if Britain can just give us short, very short words to close the because he was there. And so thank you very much. And then we need to close maybe


Speaker: very quickly. You know, this is I’m the ITU Sherpa G20 Sherpa. So this was my 7th G20, the South African one. Honestly, you know, for us, the ITU, this was a very unique window because you know, we had three large developing countries, India’s, you know, Brazil and South Africa, assuming presidencies one after the other, probably Indonesia, if you count the one before. So and we saw that the topics and these are all been landmark presidencies because it was also very difficult geopolitically during all these three presidencies. And it’s been a very landmark set of presidencies primarily because you know, you have topics such as AI to some extent, but it’s maturing here, you know, digital infrastructure, investment financing, which was actually launched during your presidency. You know, so there are many of these pieces of information integrity. Typically, G20 presidencies in the past have been very conservative, you know, you’d you go back to existing text, not in these three, you know, been very bold. And thanks to the growing influence of all three countries geopolitically, you’ve pushed through the agenda, you know, so that’s something to be very proud of. And again, in topics such as DPI, I started in the Indian presidency, the conversations kind of develop during your presidency. In the South African presidency, I can see that they’re maturing because there are frameworks that are being spoken about on all three topics, I could say the same, you know, so I think it’s extremely important that and the next one again goes back to a developed country. So we don’t know what will happen there. But I think it’s extremely important that, you know, this cycle of the G20 be viewed very optimistically because because you’ve achieved a lot. And tying it to the WSIS framework, I think when you invited us as knowledge partners of the ITU, most of the programs that we’ve supported you on, most of the priorities, these have all been part of programs at the ITU where the WSIS framework has driven these programs in every topic you can think of. So I think for us as UN agencies, there is a direct tie between the action lines, between the activities we’ve done and what you’ve achieved and what we’ve supported you for. So again, we are very grateful for the opportunities. I have my, you know, the G20 bag that Jim has given us, Jim and the team has given us, but also my mother, my father-in-law, they all carry G20 bags back in India. So we are very grateful for that also and for the opportunity, honestly.


Moderator: Yeah. Thank you very much for everybody. Thank you. Recording stopped.


M

Marcelo Martinez

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

3471 words

Speech time

1520 seconds

G20 presidency presents both opportunities and contradictions for developing countries, requiring careful balance between leadership and multilateral diplomacy

Explanation

Martinez argues that while G20 presidency offers a significant opportunity to lead the world’s 20 largest economies and showcase national capabilities, it creates a diplomatic contradiction for countries like Brazil and South Africa who are staunch defenders of multilateralism. The challenge lies in sharing their vision with the world without imposing positions on countries not represented at the G20 table.


Evidence

Martinez describes it as a ‘very hard balancing act’ and notes that ‘imposing is not really a diplomatic tradition’ for diplomats


Major discussion point

G20 Presidency Experiences and Challenges


Topics

Development


Agreed with

– Jim Paterson
– Speaker

Agreed on

Sequence of developing country presidencies created unique opportunity for development-focused agendas


Organizing G20 is extremely resource-intensive for developing countries, requiring whole-of-government coordination with 50+ people and 15+ organizations

Explanation

Martinez emphasizes that G20 presidency is a very stressful exercise that pushes developing countries to their limits in terms of human and financial resources. Brazil’s approach required extensive coordination across government agencies starting a year before their presidency.


Evidence

Brazil involved more than 50 people and 15+ organizations, held 13 coordination meetings, and began work about a year before presidency. They produced 11 different documents and held 7 events, making them the G20 working group with the largest number of deliverables


Major discussion point

G20 Presidency Experiences and Challenges


Topics

Development


Agreed with

– Jim Paterson

Agreed on

G20 presidency is extremely resource-intensive and challenging for developing countries


Brazil successfully brought meaningful connectivity discussion from ITU/Geneva to mainstream G20 agenda, making it globally recognized

Explanation

Martinez explains that meaningful connectivity was initially limited to ITU discussions in Geneva and was not well-known in broader diplomatic circles. Brazil’s G20 presidency helped mainstream this concept, making it part of the Global Digital Compact and now a recognized global priority.


Evidence

Martinez notes that when they started discussing meaningful connectivity, ‘Our guys in New York asked us, what is this? What are you talking about? We don’t know what this is.’ Now it’s mainstream and made it into the GDC


Major discussion point

Digital Inclusion and Meaningful Connectivity


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Jim Paterson

Agreed on

Digital inclusion should be central priority with meaningful connectivity as foundation


Brazil introduced information integrity as new topic in G20 despite risks, contributing to its inclusion in Global Digital Compact

Explanation

Martinez describes introducing information integrity as the most challenging experience because it had never been discussed in G20 before and the group is very diverse politically. Despite fears about whether countries would accept this discussion, it worked well and contributed to global conversations on the topic.


Evidence

The work was supported by OECD and UN Secretariat for Global Communications. Martinez believes their G20 work was important in ensuring information integrity made it into the Global Digital Compact and continues to be discussed in current events


Major discussion point

Information Integrity and AI Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Jim Paterson

Agreed on

Information integrity successfully introduced and continued across presidencies


Brazil continued India’s DPI work as basic tool for digital inclusion with horizontal dimension approach

Explanation

Martinez explains that Brazil built upon India’s digital public infrastructure work, viewing DPI as a fundamental tool for achieving digital inclusion. They incorporated this as a horizontal dimension that was explored throughout their presidency declaration.


Evidence

This work was reflected in their declaration in Maceo and continued the Indian presidency’s foundational work on DPIs


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Jim Paterson

Agreed on

Digital Public Infrastructure requires integrated approach linking to digital inclusion


AI discussions need to include development perspective, not just focus on risks and ethics

Explanation

Martinez argues that when Brazil began their AI work, global discussions were primarily focused on risks and ethics, lacking a development perspective. Brazil decided to bring this conversation to the G20 to ensure that the narrative around distributing benefits of technological evolution would be part of the global agenda.


Evidence

Martinez references attending the AI summit in Bletchley Park in October 2023, where discussions were ‘basically a conversation on risks’ and ethics, but development perspective was not part of the global conversation then


Major discussion point

Information Integrity and AI Governance


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


BRICS produced first comprehensive AI governance document from Global South perspective

Explanation

Martinez highlights that BRICS created a seven-page document on artificial intelligence governance that represents the first comprehensive document of this kind coming from the Global South. He emphasizes that this document is very concrete and well-structured.


Evidence

The document is seven pages long and was negotiated constructively with South Africa’s participation. Martinez describes it as ‘very concrete and very well-structured’


Major discussion point

Information Integrity and AI Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Both countries work together within G77 on WSIS+20 but see limited energy and pessimism in current negotiations

Explanation

Martinez expresses concern about the lack of energy and widespread pessimism within the G77 plus China group regarding WSIS+20 negotiations. He fears they may end up defending past achievements rather than advancing new agendas.


Evidence

Martinez mentions they were scheduled to discuss with co-facilitators and review the elements paper, but notes the group is not ‘really energized around the discussion’


Major discussion point

WSIS Process and Financing Challenges


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Digital agenda’s placement under development framework creates bureaucratic barriers to dedicated financing discussions

Explanation

Martinez explains that the digital agenda’s integration under the development framework (first MDGs, now SDGs) creates bureaucratic obstacles for financing discussions. When digital matters are negotiated in New York, they fall under development commissions and are directed to Conferences on Financing for Development rather than receiving dedicated attention.


Evidence

Martinez references his previous work on the 2030 agenda negotiations and notes that at the final session, despite everyone applauding, he questioned what was actually achieved. He later realized from the digital track that financing had become much more difficult


Major discussion point

WSIS Process and Financing Challenges


Topics

Development | Economic


G20 mandate limitations prevent direct financing discussions, forcing alternative approaches like UNESCO fund creation

Explanation

Martinez explains that within G20, when they tried to discuss infrastructure financing, several countries immediately objected that this wasn’t the mandate of the group. This forced them to find alternative approaches, such as creating funds through other organizations like UNESCO.


Evidence

Martinez cites examples of Saudi Arabia trying to create a fund that became a regional organization (DCA), India attempting similar efforts and giving up, and Brazil’s success in creating a UNESCO fund for their global initiative on information integrity and climate change


Major discussion point

WSIS Process and Financing Challenges


Topics

Economic | Development


Current connectivity statistics are misleading – while 90% of Brazil’s population is connected, only 20% has meaningful connectivity

Explanation

Martinez challenges the commonly used statistic that one-third of humanity is not connected, arguing the problem is much worse when considering meaningful connectivity. Based on Brazil’s analysis, despite over 90% population connectivity, only 20% have the quality and conditions of connection that enable full digital participation.


Evidence

Martinez references Brazil’s internal exercise showing that only 20% of the population has meaningful connectivity with the quality and conditions available to conference participants. He suggests if Brazil represents the world average, 80% of the global population lacks meaningful connectivity


Major discussion point

Digital Inclusion and Meaningful Connectivity


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Jim Paterson

Agreed on

Digital inclusion should be central priority with meaningful connectivity as foundation


BRICS cooperation included ICT working groups, space sustainability, and environmental sustainability mapping

Explanation

Martinez describes BRICS’ work in their ICT cooperation working group, which covered multiple innovative areas including meaningful connectivity, space sustainability (a first for BRICS), and environmental sustainability. They also conducted mapping of digital ecosystems across all BRICS countries.


Evidence

The work resulted in an annex to the ministerial declaration specifically on space sustainability, with support from ITU on both meaningful connectivity and space sustainability work streams. Anatel was positioned to continue this work


Major discussion point

Global South Collaboration and Legacy


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


J

Jim Paterson

Speech speed

151 words per minute

Speech length

1781 words

Speech time

705 seconds

South Africa benefited from Brazil’s experience sharing and built upon the sequence of developing country presidencies

Explanation

Paterson acknowledges that South Africa was fortunate to receive guidance from Brazil about organizing G20 activities, which helped them prepare for the massive coordination effort required. He emphasizes the advantage of following a sequence of developing country presidencies that were more receptive to development-focused issues.


Evidence

Paterson mentions Brazil was ‘very keen to come and share their experiences’ and that South Africa ‘had some dialogue between our respective governments before we took up the responsibility’


Major discussion point

G20 Presidency Experiences and Challenges


Topics

Development


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez

Agreed on

G20 presidency is extremely resource-intensive and challenging for developing countries


Three consecutive developing country presidencies (Indonesia, India, Brazil) created unprecedented opportunity to advance development-focused agendas

Explanation

Paterson argues that the sequence of developing country presidencies was particularly significant because the G20 forum is not well-designed for pro-development issues, and previous presidencies were often not receptive to developing country concerns. This sequence created a unique window that might not occur again for a while.


Evidence

Paterson notes they could ‘build on that was really focused more towards developing countries’ and emphasizes ‘it might be a while before that happens again’


Major discussion point

G20 Presidency Experiences and Challenges


Topics

Development


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez
– Speaker

Agreed on

Sequence of developing country presidencies created unique opportunity for development-focused agendas


South Africa prioritized digital inclusion as central theme, building on universal and meaningful connectivity work

Explanation

Paterson explains that South Africa used digital inclusion as their primary framework, building directly on universal and meaningful connectivity concepts. They used this as a lens to examine the impact of different technologies on inclusion and development across all aspects of their work.


Evidence

Paterson mentions they had ‘quite a few good discussions’ with knowledge partners like Alison to get good focus, and used digital inclusion ‘as a kind of way of trying to set the scene’


Major discussion point

Digital Inclusion and Meaningful Connectivity


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez

Agreed on

Digital inclusion should be central priority with meaningful connectivity as foundation


South Africa focused on integrated governance systems for DPI and measuring public value to maximize impact

Explanation

Paterson describes South Africa’s approach to digital public infrastructure as developing integrated governance systems and focusing on measuring public value rather than single use cases. Their goal was to ensure DPI design maximizes potential for public value and captures the dynamic effects that infrastructure can have across economy and society.


Evidence

Paterson references UK academic research showing that ‘most infrastructure projects do not really consider the full value of all impact of what they do. They just look at a single use case’ which he calls ‘a rather strange approach when you consider public investment’


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Economic


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez

Agreed on

Digital Public Infrastructure requires integrated approach linking to digital inclusion


Digital public infrastructure can serve as both beneficiary and driver of digital inclusion

Explanation

Paterson argues that there’s a symbiotic relationship between DPI and digital inclusion – DPI requires universal meaningful connectivity to ensure everyone can benefit from services, while DPI itself can drive demand for digital inclusion and deliver relevant services to all citizens.


Evidence

Paterson emphasizes this was ‘very important for us’ and notes that ‘DPI itself can be a demand driver for digital inclusion’


Major discussion point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez

Agreed on

Digital Public Infrastructure requires integrated approach linking to digital inclusion


South Africa emphasized enabling young innovators to convert ideas into successful businesses through supportive ecosystems

Explanation

Paterson describes South Africa’s focus on innovation ecosystems, particularly addressing the challenge of converting the energy and talent of young innovators into successful businesses. They looked at how to intervene to encourage and enable innovators in this transformation process.


Evidence

Paterson notes they ‘have so many young, talented innovators in the country, but it’s very difficult to kind of convert all these good ideas and all this positive energy into successful businesses’


Major discussion point

Innovation Ecosystems and Data Access


Topics

Development | Economic


Data access for researchers and SMEs presents major challenge for AI development in developing countries

Explanation

Paterson identifies data access as a critical barrier for researchers and small-to-medium enterprises trying to participate in AI development. This access challenge particularly affects how these smaller players can compete and contribute to AI innovation in developing country contexts.


Evidence

Paterson poses the question ‘how are they gonna get the data they need to be able to deliver?’ highlighting this as a major challenge


Major discussion point

Innovation Ecosystems and Data Access


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Local language modeling using public broadcaster data can create valuable tools for indigenous language services

Explanation

Paterson highlights South Africa’s approach to using data from their public broadcaster to develop language modeling in indigenous languages. This could create valuable tools for public services, broadcasting, and broader society applications.


Evidence

Paterson mentions input ‘from Research ICT Africa’ and ‘from the University of Pretoria’ on this language modeling approach using public broadcaster data


Major discussion point

Innovation Ecosystems and Data Access


Topics

Sociocultural | Development


South Africa continued information integrity work, focusing on generative AI and deepfakes control measures

Explanation

Paterson acknowledges Brazil’s success in introducing information integrity to G20 and describes how South Africa continued this work with specific focus on generative AI’s ability to produce deepfakes. They developed measures to try to control these emerging threats.


Evidence

Paterson credits Brazil’s ‘skillful presentations’ and notes the timing was right because ‘a lot of countries were having elections and they were really worried about what was going on’ and Brazil ‘had a few big spats going on with certain social media companies’


Major discussion point

Information Integrity and AI Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez

Agreed on

Information integrity successfully introduced and continued across presidencies


A

Annette Esterhuizen

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

241 words

Speech time

107 seconds

Financing remains major unfinished business from original WSIS process, relegated to development agenda framework

Explanation

Esterhuizen argues that financing was delegated during the 2003-2005 WSIS process and has since become marginalized, receiving barely a paragraph in official UN outcome reports. She suggests this represents a critical gap in the WSIS+20 renewal discussions.


Evidence

Esterhuizen notes that financing was ‘delegated in 2003 to 2005, and now hardly even gets more than a paragraph in any official UN outcome report’


Major discussion point

WSIS Process and Financing Challenges


Topics

Development | Economic


A

Audience

Speech speed

160 words per minute

Speech length

797 words

Speech time

298 seconds

Digital public statistics funding requires global solidarity mechanisms rather than national fee-based approaches

Explanation

An audience member argues that funding digital public statistics requires international solidarity funding mechanisms because most African countries wouldn’t have sufficient domain name fees to support such initiatives and have other priorities for those fees. They propose using a portion of domain name funds at an international level.


Evidence

The speaker references ‘the CETIC experience and model’ and notes that ‘most African countries wouldn’t be able to, that mechanism wouldn’t work, they wouldn’t have enough fees from, and they’ve got other priorities for those fees’


Major discussion point

WSIS Process and Financing Challenges


Topics

Development | Economic


T20 engagement groups shifted toward Global South knowledge partners and think tanks under developing country presidencies

Explanation

An audience member describes how the T20 (Think Tank 20) engagement group evolved under the developing country presidencies, moving away from traditional dominance by Ivy League and Global North institutions toward greater inclusion of Global South knowledge partners and think tanks.


Evidence

The speaker notes that under data privacy task forces, ‘there were six of the task forces, and I think five of us were women from Global South, only one Brazilian’ and mentions the ‘strong cohort that’s been working on now on DPI, on AI, digital inclusion’


Major discussion point

Global South Collaboration and Legacy


Topics

Development


South African presidency emphasized African G20 approach with African Union leadership and continental organization involvement

Explanation

An audience member highlights South Africa’s commitment to making their G20 presidency distinctly African, with working groups being led by the African Union and involving organizations that haven’t traditionally been included as knowledge partners in G20 processes.


Evidence

The speaker mentions ‘a lot of the working groups within these things are being led by the African Union’ and notes involvement of ‘new organizations that haven’t traditionally been allowed’ such as ‘ADET from the UN’


Major discussion point

Global South Collaboration and Legacy


Topics

Development


S

Speaker

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

443 words

Speech time

153 seconds

ITU recognizes three consecutive developing country presidencies as landmark period achieving bold agenda advancement

Explanation

The ITU Sherpa describes the sequence of Indonesia, India, Brazil, and South Africa presidencies as unique and landmark, particularly because these presidencies were bold in pushing new agendas rather than being conservative and relying on existing text. This occurred during difficult geopolitical periods, making the achievements even more significant.


Evidence

The speaker notes this was their ‘7th G20’ and emphasizes that ‘Typically, G20 presidencies in the past have been very conservative, you know, you’d you go back to existing text, not in these three, you know, been very bold’ covering topics like ‘AI, digital infrastructure, investment financing, information integrity’


Major discussion point

Global South Collaboration and Legacy


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Agreed on

Sequence of developing country presidencies created unique opportunity for development-focused agendas


M

Moderator

Speech speed

119 words per minute

Speech length

230 words

Speech time

115 seconds

Brazil and South Africa as G20 leaders represent pivotal Global South partnership for inclusive digital policy

Explanation

The moderator frames Brazil and South Africa as leading nations of the Global South and G20 members who play crucial roles in shaping inclusive global digital policy agendas. With Brazil chairing G20 in 2024 and South Africa taking over in 2025, their partnership is especially significant for advancing digital inclusion, infrastructure development, and equitable ICT access.


Evidence

Both countries are members of G20, with Brazil sharing the G20 chair in 2024 and South Africa taking charge in 2025. Their partnership focuses on digital inclusion, infrastructure development and equitable access to ICTs.


Major discussion point

G20 Presidency Experiences and Challenges


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


G20 cooperation between Brazil and South Africa can drive tangible progress in global digital governance

Explanation

The moderator argues that cooperation between these two countries can leverage their G20 positions to influence global digital governance and drive concrete progress. This cooperation is positioned as particularly valuable given their alignment with G20 digital economy working group objectives and WSIS action lines.


Evidence

The session explores how cooperation can drive tangible progress while leveraging G20 positions to influence global digital governance, with objectives that resonate with G20 digital economy working group and WSIS action lines.


Major discussion point

Global South Collaboration and Legacy


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreements

Agreement points

G20 presidency is extremely resource-intensive and challenging for developing countries

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

Organizing G20 is extremely resource-intensive for developing countries, requiring whole-of-government coordination with 50+ people and 15+ organizations


South Africa benefited from Brazil’s experience sharing and built upon the sequence of developing country presidencies


Summary

Both speakers acknowledge that organizing G20 presidency requires massive coordination efforts, extensive human and financial resources, and creates significant stress for developing countries. They emphasize the value of experience sharing between presidencies.


Topics

Development


Sequence of developing country presidencies created unique opportunity for development-focused agendas

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson
– Speaker

Arguments

G20 presidency presents both opportunities and contradictions for developing countries, requiring careful balance between leadership and multilateral diplomacy


Three consecutive developing country presidencies (Indonesia, India, Brazil) created unprecedented opportunity to advance development-focused agendas


ITU recognizes three consecutive developing country presidencies as landmark period achieving bold agenda advancement


Summary

All speakers recognize that the consecutive developing country presidencies (Indonesia, India, Brazil, South Africa) represented a unique and landmark period that allowed for bold advancement of development-focused agendas, which may not occur again for some time.


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Digital inclusion should be central priority with meaningful connectivity as foundation

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

Brazil successfully brought meaningful connectivity discussion from ITU/Geneva to mainstream G20 agenda, making it globally recognized


Current connectivity statistics are misleading – while 90% of Brazil’s population is connected, only 20% has meaningful connectivity


South Africa prioritized digital inclusion as central theme, building on universal and meaningful connectivity work


Summary

Both countries prioritized digital inclusion and meaningful connectivity, with Brazil mainstreaming the concept globally and South Africa building upon this work. They share concern that current connectivity statistics are misleading and that meaningful connectivity is the real measure of digital inclusion.


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Information integrity successfully introduced and continued across presidencies

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

Brazil introduced information integrity as new topic in G20 despite risks, contributing to its inclusion in Global Digital Compact


South Africa continued information integrity work, focusing on generative AI and deepfakes control measures


Summary

Both speakers acknowledge Brazil’s successful introduction of information integrity as a new G20 topic and South Africa’s continuation of this work, particularly focusing on emerging challenges like generative AI and deepfakes.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Sociocultural


Digital Public Infrastructure requires integrated approach linking to digital inclusion

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

Brazil continued India’s DPI work as basic tool for digital inclusion with horizontal dimension approach


South Africa focused on integrated governance systems for DPI and measuring public value to maximize impact


Digital public infrastructure can serve as both beneficiary and driver of digital inclusion


Summary

Both countries view DPI as fundamental for digital inclusion, with Brazil treating it as a basic tool with horizontal dimensions and South Africa focusing on integrated governance and public value measurement. They agree on the symbiotic relationship between DPI and digital inclusion.


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Economic


Similar viewpoints

Both countries emphasize the need to shift AI discussions from purely risk-focused approaches to include development perspectives, particularly addressing challenges faced by developing countries in accessing data and participating in AI innovation.

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

AI discussions need to include development perspective, not just focus on risks and ethics


Data access for researchers and SMEs presents major challenge for AI development in developing countries


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Multiple speakers identify financing as a critical unfinished business from WSIS, with structural and bureaucratic barriers preventing adequate attention to digital financing needs. They agree that current frameworks limit direct financing discussions.

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Annette Esterhuizen
– Audience

Arguments

Digital agenda’s placement under development framework creates bureaucratic barriers to dedicated financing discussions


G20 mandate limitations prevent direct financing discussions, forcing alternative approaches like UNESCO fund creation


Financing remains major unfinished business from original WSIS process, relegated to development agenda framework


Digital public statistics funding requires global solidarity mechanisms rather than national fee-based approaches


Topics

Development | Economic


Both speakers highlight South Africa’s distinctive approach of emphasizing African leadership, continental involvement, and support for local innovation ecosystems, particularly for young innovators.

Speakers

– Jim Paterson
– Audience

Arguments

South Africa emphasized enabling young innovators to convert ideas into successful businesses through supportive ecosystems


South African presidency emphasized African G20 approach with African Union leadership and continental organization involvement


Topics

Development | Economic


Unexpected consensus

Global South knowledge partnership transformation in G20 engagement groups

Speakers

– Audience
– Speaker

Arguments

T20 engagement groups shifted toward Global South knowledge partners and think tanks under developing country presidencies


ITU recognizes three consecutive developing country presidencies as landmark period achieving bold agenda advancement


Explanation

There was unexpected consensus on how the developing country presidencies fundamentally transformed the knowledge partnership landscape in G20, moving away from traditional Ivy League and Global North dominance toward meaningful Global South participation. This represents a structural shift in how global digital governance discussions are informed.


Topics

Development


BRICS as effective platform for Global South digital governance despite geopolitical challenges

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

BRICS produced first comprehensive AI governance document from Global South perspective


BRICS cooperation included ICT working groups, space sustainability, and environmental sustainability mapping


Explanation

Despite acknowledging BRICS as a challenging diplomatic exercise in current geopolitical context, both speakers found unexpected consensus on its effectiveness as a platform for Global South digital governance, particularly in producing substantive outcomes like the first comprehensive AI governance document from Global South perspective.


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The discussion revealed strong consensus among speakers on key issues including the transformative impact of consecutive developing country G20 presidencies, the importance of digital inclusion and meaningful connectivity, the need for development-focused approaches to emerging technologies like AI, and the ongoing challenges with financing mechanisms for digital development. There was also agreement on the resource-intensive nature of G20 presidencies for developing countries and the value of experience sharing.


Consensus level

High level of consensus with significant implications for global digital governance. The agreement among Global South representatives suggests a coordinated approach to advancing development-focused digital agendas in international forums. The consensus on financing challenges indicates a shared priority for addressing structural barriers in international digital development funding. The unexpected consensus on knowledge partnership transformation suggests lasting institutional changes in how global digital governance discussions are informed and conducted.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Unexpected differences

Measurement and scope of connectivity challenges

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez

Arguments

Current connectivity statistics are misleading – while 90% of Brazil’s population is connected, only 20% has meaningful connectivity


Explanation

While not a direct disagreement between speakers, Martinez challenges the commonly accepted narrative about global connectivity that other speakers seem to accept. His revelation that Brazil’s internal analysis shows only 20% meaningful connectivity despite 90% basic connectivity suggests the global digital divide is far worse than commonly understood. This represents an unexpected challenge to conventional wisdom that could have significant implications for policy approaches.


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Overall assessment

Summary

The discussion shows remarkably high levels of agreement among speakers, with most disagreements being tactical rather than strategic. The main areas of difference center on approaches to financing digital initiatives and the current state of multilateral negotiations.


Disagreement level

Low to moderate disagreement level. The speakers demonstrate strong alignment on priorities (digital inclusion, meaningful connectivity, DPI, information integrity) and challenges (resource constraints, geopolitical difficulties). The disagreements that exist are primarily about implementation approaches and timing rather than fundamental goals. This high level of consensus among Global South representatives suggests strong potential for continued collaboration, though the financing challenge remains a significant obstacle that requires creative solutions beyond traditional frameworks.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Both countries emphasize the need to shift AI discussions from purely risk-focused approaches to include development perspectives, particularly addressing challenges faced by developing countries in accessing data and participating in AI innovation.

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Jim Paterson

Arguments

AI discussions need to include development perspective, not just focus on risks and ethics


Data access for researchers and SMEs presents major challenge for AI development in developing countries


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Multiple speakers identify financing as a critical unfinished business from WSIS, with structural and bureaucratic barriers preventing adequate attention to digital financing needs. They agree that current frameworks limit direct financing discussions.

Speakers

– Marcelo Martinez
– Annette Esterhuizen
– Audience

Arguments

Digital agenda’s placement under development framework creates bureaucratic barriers to dedicated financing discussions


G20 mandate limitations prevent direct financing discussions, forcing alternative approaches like UNESCO fund creation


Financing remains major unfinished business from original WSIS process, relegated to development agenda framework


Digital public statistics funding requires global solidarity mechanisms rather than national fee-based approaches


Topics

Development | Economic


Both speakers highlight South Africa’s distinctive approach of emphasizing African leadership, continental involvement, and support for local innovation ecosystems, particularly for young innovators.

Speakers

– Jim Paterson
– Audience

Arguments

South Africa emphasized enabling young innovators to convert ideas into successful businesses through supportive ecosystems


South African presidency emphasized African G20 approach with African Union leadership and continental organization involvement


Topics

Development | Economic


Takeaways

Key takeaways

G20 presidency by developing countries (Indonesia, India, Brazil, South Africa) created unprecedented opportunity to advance development-focused digital agendas, with each presidency building on previous work


Meaningful connectivity statistics are misleading – while connectivity rates appear high (90% in Brazil), only 20% have truly meaningful connectivity, suggesting global digital divide is much worse than reported


Brazil successfully mainstreamed previously niche topics like information integrity and meaningful connectivity from specialized forums (ITU/Geneva) to global G20 agenda and Global Digital Compact


Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) requires integrated governance systems and public value measurement to maximize impact, with universal meaningful connectivity as prerequisite


BRICS produced first comprehensive AI governance document from Global South perspective, emphasizing development benefits rather than just risks and ethics


Financing remains the major unfinished business from original WSIS process, with bureaucratic and strategic barriers preventing dedicated digital financing discussions in current frameworks


Domestic legacy of G20 presidencies includes strengthened institutional capacity, better international engagement, and enhanced bilateral cooperation for organizing countries


Resolutions and action items

Brazil proposed conducting meaningful connectivity measurement exercises with CETIC for Mercosur countries and expanded Mercosur


South Africa committed to translating G20 discussions into domestic projects and national implementation


Anatel (Brazil) will continue space sustainability work initiated in BRICS throughout the year


Co-facilitators session scheduled to discuss WSIS+20 elements paper and negotiation prospects


T20 engagement groups exploring creation of permanent repository for G20 documents and knowledge products


Continued collaboration between Brazil and South Africa within G77 framework for WSIS+20 negotiations


Unresolved issues

Lack of accurate global data on meaningful connectivity rates – participants acknowledged not knowing the true extent of digital divide


WSIS+20 negotiations showing limited energy and pessimism within G77+China group with unclear prospects for advancement


Financing mechanisms for digital development remain unresolved, with no clear pathway identified for dedicated digital financing discussions


How to converge Global Digital Compact and WSIS processes remains unclear


Uncertainty about maintaining development-focused agenda when G20 presidency returns to developed countries


Challenge of sustaining Global South knowledge partnerships and think tank engagement in future G20 cycles


Unresolved governance mechanisms for making digital governance less complex and more effective


Suggested compromises

Leaving dogmas behind in WSIS+20 discussions to enable progress beyond defending existing achievements


Strengthening both multistakeholder and multilateral governance channels as complementary rather than contradictory approaches


Using alternative funding mechanisms (like UNESCO fund) when direct G20 financing discussions face mandate limitations


Exploring global solidarity funding mechanisms for digital public statistics rather than relying on national fee-based approaches


Framing digital issues within existing development agenda framework while working to advance dedicated digital financing through Financing for Development conferences


Thought provoking comments

For a developing country to engage in such an exercise [G20 presidency] โ€“ it is a very stressful exercise. It drives us to our own limits in terms of human resources, in terms of financial resources, too… But both Brazil and South Africa, we’re both staunch defenders of multilateralism. So we have, then, an opportunity to send messages to the 20 largest economies… But at the same time, we have to do it in a very careful way so that we make it clear that we’re not trying to convert our own vision in messages or trying to impose our vision to the rest of the world.

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Reason

This comment reveals the fundamental tension developing countries face when leading global forums – having the opportunity to influence global agendas while being constrained by limited resources and the need to maintain diplomatic balance. It exposes the structural inequalities in global governance.


Impact

This set the tone for the entire discussion by establishing the core challenge both countries faced. It led Jim Paterson to acknowledge similar experiences and shaped the conversation around how developing countries can effectively use their leadership positions despite constraints.


Since we began working with meaningful connectivity yesterday, you mentioned that this problem is a lot worse. As we did this exercise in Brazil, where over 90% of the population is connected, we got to the conclusion that only 20% has meaningful connectivity… So if you look at the other way, it’s 80% of the population doesn’t have it. So if Brazil is the world’s average, my God, this number is much worse.

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Reason

This comment fundamentally challenges the conventional narrative about digital connectivity by revealing that traditional connection statistics mask a much deeper problem. It suggests that the global digital divide is far more severe than commonly understood.


Impact

This observation shifted the discussion from celebrating connectivity achievements to recognizing the inadequacy of current metrics. It reinforced the importance of meaningful connectivity as a policy priority and highlighted the need for better data collection methods.


There is a bureaucratic explanation for that and there is a strategic explanation to that… when you frame it [digital agenda] this way, of course, you have in New York, when we negotiate any digital matter, it falls under the development… And we, of course, if you talk about financing, it immediately is directed to the Conferences on Financing for Development.

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Reason

This comment provides crucial insight into why digital financing remains underdeveloped in international forums. It reveals how institutional structures and bureaucratic categorizations can inadvertently limit policy effectiveness by compartmentalizing interconnected issues.


Impact

This explanation helped contextualize Annette’s earlier question about financing and provided a framework for understanding systemic barriers to digital development funding. It moved the conversation from ‘what should be done’ to ‘why it’s not being done.’


I think we felt that we needed to try and put that [DPI governance] into some sort of structure… And we’ve also looked at the idea around public value. I think we’ve presented it as measuring, but it’s a bit more than that. It’s about trying to ensure that the design of DPI maximizes the potential for public value so that you don’t lose those kind of dynamic effects that can happen from digital public infrastructure.

Speaker

Jim Paterson


Reason

This comment introduces a sophisticated approach to digital public infrastructure that goes beyond technical implementation to consider broader societal impact. It challenges the tendency to focus on single use cases rather than systemic value creation.


Impact

This shifted the discussion toward more holistic thinking about digital infrastructure and influenced the conversation about how developing countries can maximize returns on digital investments. It connected technical infrastructure to broader development outcomes.


Typically, G20 presidencies in the past have been very conservative, you know, you’d you go back to existing text, not in these three, you know, been very bold. And thanks to the growing influence of all three countries geopolitically, you’ve pushed through the agenda… And the next one again goes back to a developed country. So we don’t know what will happen there.

Speaker

ITU representative


Reason

This comment provides historical context that frames the recent developing country presidencies as exceptional and potentially transformative. It also introduces uncertainty about continuity, highlighting the fragility of progress in international forums.


Impact

This observation validated the significance of the work done by Brazil and South Africa while introducing urgency about preserving gains. It reinforced the importance of the current moment and the need for strategic thinking about legacy and continuity.


Overall assessment

These key comments fundamentally shaped the discussion by moving it beyond surface-level policy descriptions to deeper structural analysis. Martinez’s opening remarks about the contradictions facing developing countries in global leadership roles established a framework for understanding the entire conversation. His revelation about meaningful connectivity challenged conventional wisdom and highlighted data gaps that affect policy effectiveness. The bureaucratic explanation for financing difficulties provided crucial institutional context that helped explain persistent challenges. Paterson’s focus on public value and systematic approaches to DPI demonstrated sophisticated policy thinking, while the ITU representative’s historical perspective validated the significance of recent developing country leadership while highlighting the precarious nature of progress. Together, these comments created a multi-layered discussion that addressed not just what these countries accomplished, but why certain approaches worked, what barriers remain, and how progress might be sustained. The conversation evolved from a simple comparison of experiences to a nuanced analysis of global governance dynamics, structural inequalities, and strategic opportunities for developing countries in digital policy leadership.


Follow-up questions

What is the actual number/percentage of people globally who have meaningful connectivity (not just basic connectivity)?

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Explanation

Martinez highlighted that while they work with the statistic that one-third of humanity is not connected, when Brazil measured meaningful connectivity, only 20% had quality connections despite 90% being connected. He emphasized the need to know the real global numbers for meaningful connectivity to properly assess progress toward SDG targets.


How can financing be effectively integrated into the WSIS+20 process and digital development agenda?

Speaker

Annette Esterhuizen


Explanation

Esterhuizen pointed out that financing is the ‘big unfinished business’ from the WSIS process and questioned whether G20 work on digital public infrastructure could help put financing seriously on the WSIS+20 agenda, as it currently receives minimal attention in UN outcome reports.


How can a global solidarity funding mechanism be established for digital public statistics?

Speaker

Alison Gillwald (Audience member)


Explanation

Gillwald mentioned exploring the possibility of using a portion of domain name funds at an international level for funding digital public statistics, noting that most African countries wouldn’t be able to fund this independently and would need a global solidarity mechanism.


How can a permanent repository be created for G20 engagement group documents and knowledge?

Speaker

Alison Gillwald (Audience member)


Explanation

Due to the floating nature of G20 presidencies, there’s a need for a permanent repository that can serve as an updated knowledge base beyond just publications, to preserve the institutional memory and progress made across different presidencies.


How can the BRICS meaningful connectivity measurement exercise be expanded to other regional groups?

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Explanation

Martinez mentioned proposing to conduct the same meaningful connectivity measurement exercise with CETIC for Mercosur countries and expanded Mercosur, suggesting this methodology should be embraced by every country globally.


How can the G77 plus China group be energized around WSIS+20 discussions?

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Explanation

Martinez expressed concern about the lack of energy and pessimism within the G77 plus China group regarding WSIS+20 negotiations, indicating a need to find ways to engage this important negotiating bloc more effectively.


How can WSIS and GDC processes be converged effectively?

Speaker

Marcelo Martinez


Explanation

Martinez mentioned the need to explore possible ways to converge the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and WSIS processes, suggesting this as an area requiring further investigation and strategic planning.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development

Bridging the Digital Divide: Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development

Session at a glance

Summary

This discussion, led by Dr. Hakikur Rahman from International Standard University and Dr. Anujit Kumar Dutta from City University Bangladesh, focused on bridging the digital divide through inclusive ICT policies for sustainable development, presented as part of celebrating 20 years of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). The presenters highlighted that over 2.6 billion people remain offline globally, with significant barriers including affordability, lack of digital literacy, and inadequate infrastructure particularly affecting marginalized communities. They proposed a three-pillar framework for addressing these challenges: inclusion, ethics, and sustainability.


The inclusion pillar emphasized universal connectivity through affordable broadband, community networks, local content in multiple languages, and capacity building programs, citing successful examples like India’s Digital India initiative and Kenya’s Community Networks. The ethics pillar focused on data rights, privacy protection, transparent AI systems, and human rights-based technology design, referencing the EU AI Act and UNESCO AI Ethics guidelines as positive examples. The sustainability pillar addressed green ICT practices, energy-efficient infrastructure, e-waste management, and equitable public-private partnerships, highlighting Rwanda’s green ICT strategy and Estonia’s e-residency program.


Dr. Dutta provided detailed statistics about Bangladesh’s digital landscape, showing significant urban-rural gaps in internet access, gender disparities in ICT participation, and growing but uneven digital infrastructure development. The presentation concluded with policy recommendations including multi-stakeholder collaboration, embedding human rights in technology design, supporting innovation in safe environments, and developing regional frameworks for coordinated policy implementation. The speakers emphasized that creating inclusive, ethical, and sustainable ICT ecosystems requires collective action to ensure digital transformation benefits all communities rather than widening existing divides.


Keypoints

**Major Discussion Points:**


– **Digital Divide and Global Connectivity Gaps**: The presenters highlighted that over 2.6 billion people remain offline globally, with significant barriers including affordability, lack of digital literacy (one in four people lack basic digital skills), and inadequate infrastructure, particularly affecting marginalized communities.


– **Three-Pillar Framework for Inclusive ICT Policies**: The discussion centered on a comprehensive approach involving: (1) Inclusion through universal connectivity and meaningful access, (2) Ethics-centered digital governance with human rights focus, and (3) Sustainability through green ICT and equitable growth strategies.


– **Bangladesh’s Digital Landscape and Challenges**: Extensive analysis of Bangladesh’s ICT development, including urban-rural digital gaps (92% internet access in urban areas vs. 50-58% in rural areas), gender disparities in internet usage, and the growth of ICT sector employment from 165,000 jobs in 2022 to 310,000 in 2024.


– **Policy Examples and Best Practices**: Discussion of successful international initiatives including India’s Digital India program, Kenya’s Community Networks, EU AI Act, Rwanda’s Green ICT Strategy, and Estonia’s e-residency program as models for inclusive digital transformation.


– **Environmental and Ethical Concerns in ICT**: Address of sustainability challenges including e-waste management (Bangladesh generates 600 kilotons with only 3% recycled), carbon emissions from ICT sectors, and the need for ethical AI governance and data privacy protection.


**Overall Purpose:**


The discussion aimed to present research findings and policy recommendations for bridging the digital divide through inclusive, ethical, and sustainable ICT policies, specifically in the context of celebrating 20 years of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) and addressing ongoing global digital inequalities.


**Overall Tone:**


The discussion maintained a formal, academic tone throughout, characteristic of a research presentation or conference session. The tone was collaborative and solution-oriented, with both presenters working together to deliver comprehensive findings. While technical and data-heavy, the presentation remained accessible and focused on practical policy implications. The tone remained consistently professional from introduction through conclusion, with expressions of gratitude toward organizers and participants at the end.


Speakers

– **Hakikur Rahman** (also referred to as “Haktikur Rahman” in transcript)


– Title: Dr./Professor


– Role: Representative from International Standard University, Bangladesh


– Area of expertise: ICT policies, digital divide, sustainable development


– **Ranojit Kumar Dutta** (also referred to as “Anujit Kumar Dutta” in transcript)


– Title: Dr.


– Role: Representative from City University, Bangladesh


– Area of expertise: ICT infrastructure, digital literacy, data governance


**Additional speakers:**


– **Ms. Kitanjali**


– Title: Ms.


– Role: Team member/organizer (mentioned in closing remarks)


– Area of expertise: Not specified


– **Mr. Ruth**


– Title: Mr.


– Role: Team member/organizer (mentioned in closing remarks)


– Area of expertise: Not specified


Full session report

# Bridging the Digital Divide Through Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development


## Executive Summary


This presentation, delivered as part of session 413 of the 20th anniversary celebration of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), examined policy solutions for bridging the global digital divide. Dr. Hakikur Rahman from International Standard University, Bangladesh, presented a comprehensive three-pillar framework for inclusive ICT policies, while Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta from City University Bangladesh provided detailed empirical analysis of Bangladesh’s digital landscape as a developing nation case study.


The session highlighted that over 2.6 billion people remain offline globally, with significant barriers including affordability constraints, inadequate digital literacy, and insufficient infrastructure particularly affecting marginalized communities. The speakers presented both theoretical frameworks and statistical evidence demonstrating the multi-dimensional nature of digital inequalities and the need for comprehensive policy responses.


## Dr. Rahman’s Three-Pillar Framework for Inclusive ICT Policies


### The Scale of the Digital Divide


Dr. Rahman opened by establishing the magnitude of the global digital divide, citing International Telecommunication Union (ITU) statistics showing that over 2.6 billion people remain offline as of 2024. He emphasized that affordability remains a primary barrier, with internet access still out of reach for many, while digital literacy presents an equally significant challenge, with one in four people lacking basic digital skills necessary for meaningful participation in the digital economy.


### Three-Pillar Policy Framework


Dr. Rahman presented a comprehensive framework addressing digital inequalities through three interconnected pillars:


**Pillar 1: Inclusion Through Universal Connectivity**


This pillar emphasized universal connectivity through affordable broadband access, community networks, and local content development in multiple languages. Dr. Rahman highlighted successful international examples, including India’s Digital India initiative and Kenya’s Community Networks programme, demonstrating how locally-managed networks can serve underserved communities effectively. He stressed that meaningful access requires capacity building programmes that develop digital skills across different demographic groups.


**Pillar 2: Ethics-Centered Digital Governance**


The ethics pillar focused on protecting data rights, ensuring privacy protection, developing transparent AI systems, and embedding human rights considerations in technology design. Dr. Rahman referenced the European Union AI Act and UNESCO AI Ethics guidelines as positive examples of regulatory frameworks that prioritize ethical considerations in technology deployment.


**Pillar 3: Sustainability Through Green ICT Practices**


The sustainability pillar addressed environmental concerns through green ICT practices, energy-efficient infrastructure development, comprehensive e-waste management, and equitable public-private partnerships. Dr. Rahman highlighted Rwanda’s green ICT strategy and Estonia’s e-residency programme as innovative approaches that balance technological advancement with environmental responsibility.


### Policy Recommendations


Dr. Rahman outlined five key challenges and risks, including unintended consequences such as widening the divide and digital colonialism. His policy recommendations emphasized:


– Multi-stakeholder collaboration across government, private sector, civil society, and international organizations


– Human rights integration in technology design and deployment


– Innovation sandboxes for testing new technologies with appropriate safeguards


– Development of regional and global frameworks for coordinated policy implementation


## Dr. Dutta’s Bangladesh Case Study


### Infrastructure and Connectivity Patterns


Dr. Dutta provided extensive statistical analysis of Bangladesh’s digital transformation. The data revealed significant urban-rural disparities in internet access, with over 90% connectivity in urban areas compared to approximately 50-58% in rural regions. Broadband penetration showed remarkable growth from 5% in 2010 to 86% currently, indicating rapid infrastructure development while highlighting persistent geographic inequalities.


### Gender Disparities in Digital Participation


The presentation revealed persistent gender gaps across all aspects of digital participation. National internet usage statistics showed 67% participation among males compared to 47% among females. Urban areas showed male internet usage at 72% versus female usage at 58%, while rural areas demonstrated even starker differences with 61% male usage compared to only 38% female usage.


Despite these challenges, positive trends emerged in ICT education, with female enrollment in ICT-related higher education increasing from 22% in 2020 to 38% in 2024, suggesting that targeted interventions could effectively address gender disparities.


### Digital Literacy and Employment


Age-related digital literacy gaps presented significant challenges, with 72% digital literacy among the 15-20 age group compared to only 31% among those aged 45 and above. The ICT sector showed impressive employment growth, nearly doubling from 165,000 jobs in 2022 to 310,000 in 2024. However, barriers to ICT employment remained significant, with 46% of potential workers citing lack of advanced skills and 39% identifying poor internet infrastructure as primary obstacles.


### Cultural Representation and Indigenous Rights


Dr. Dutta’s analysis revealed disparities in cultural representation within digital media platforms. While mainstream entertainment content achieved 60% representation and news content reached 70%, indigenous content remained at only 5-15%. Government digital services showed partial indigenous language support, indicating ongoing challenges in ensuring that digital transformation serves all cultural communities effectively.


### Ethics and Environmental Challenges


The data showed significant gaps in ethical governance and data protection awareness, with Bangladesh’s data privacy awareness at 41% compared to the European Union’s 82%. The AI policy transparency index showed Bangladesh at 45% compared to the EU’s 88%.


Environmental concerns presented additional challenges, with Bangladesh generating 600 kilotons of e-waste with only a 3% recycling rate and 80% informal handling. Renewable energy adoption in ICT infrastructure showed 60% reliance on grid electricity, 28% solar power adoption, and 7% utilization of wind and other renewable sources.


## Key Findings and Implications


The presentation demonstrated that bridging the digital divide requires comprehensive approaches addressing multiple dimensions simultaneously. The theoretical framework presented by Dr. Rahman, combined with the empirical evidence from Dr. Dutta’s Bangladesh analysis, illustrated both the complexity of digital inequality challenges and the potential for targeted policy interventions.


The Bangladesh case study revealed that while significant progress has been made in expanding digital infrastructure and access, persistent disparities remain across geographic, gender, age, and cultural dimensions. The rapid growth in ICT employment and female participation in ICT education suggested positive trends, while the low rates of data privacy awareness and e-waste recycling highlighted areas requiring immediate policy attention.


## Conclusion


This session provided both theoretical frameworks and practical evidence for addressing digital divide challenges through inclusive ICT policies. Dr. Rahman’s three-pillar approach of inclusion, ethics, and sustainability offers a comprehensive foundation for policy development, while Dr. Dutta’s detailed statistical analysis of Bangladesh demonstrates both the opportunities and challenges facing developing nations in digital transformation.


The presentation emphasized that successful digital inclusion requires moving beyond simple connectivity metrics to address the quality and meaningfulness of digital access, while ensuring that technological advancement serves all communities equitably and sustainably. The combination of international best practices and local empirical evidence provides valuable insights for policymakers working to bridge digital divides in diverse national contexts.


Session transcript

Hakikur Rahman: This is Dr. Haktikur Rahman from International Standard University and with me Dr. Anujit Kumar Dutta from City University, Bangladesh. I hope the host will allow me to start our session, session number 413. Please. Dr. Haktikur Rahman In our introduction, we like to talk about celebrating 20 years of WSIS, which is a milestone in advancing the information society, recognizing the ongoing digital divide that still leaves billions of blind. This presentation explores inclusive, ethical and sustainable ICT policies to bridge these divides and shape a fairer digital future. As I told you with me, I am Dr. Haktikur Rahman, representing International Standard University, Bangladesh, and with me, Dr. Anujit Kumar Dutta, City University, Bangladesh. Recording in progress. Good morning again. Let me introduce again myself for the session 413. I am Dr. Haktikur Rahman, representing International Standard University, Bangladesh, and Dr. Anujit Kumar Dutta, City University, Bangladesh. Our title is Bridging the Digital Divide, Inclusive ICT Policies for Sustainable Development. This session will try to foster a critical dialogue on the urgent need to design, implement and monitor ICT policies that leave no one behind. For example, from India’s Digital India, Kenya’s Community Networks, the EU AI Act, and Rwanda’s Green ICT Strategy, this session will highlight best practices and offer policy recommendations to ensure that digital transformation is inclusive, ethical and sustainable. As introduction, we would like to say that we are celebrating 20 years of WSIS, which is a milestone in advancing the information society, and it recognizes the ongoing digital divide that still leaves billions of clients. And this presentation explores inclusion, ethical and sustainable ICT policies to bridge this divide and shape a fairer future. So why this matters? We are critical about the digital divide because over 2.6 billion people still remain offline, according to a study by ITU in 2024. And affordability, access to affordable internet is still out of reach for many. At the same time, literacy, one in four lack basic digital skills, limiting meaningful participation, and a sustainable digital future demands inclusive and right-based policies. So there are policy gaps, we like to point out. Lack of inclusivity, policies often overlook marginalized groups, and ethics in emerging tech, rapid AI and IoT deployment is happening across the globe without adequate safeguards and fragmented approaches. Sometimes some national and regional policies often lack coordination, leaving gaps in global governance. In the meantime, I think I should share my screen. Let me see. We are talking about mostly three pillars of our view. These are inclusion, ethics, and sustainability. Inclusion is the universal connectivity and meaningful access. Ethics, we call it human rights and accountability in tech. And sustainability, it should be the green ICT and equitable growth. The pillar one, inclusion or inclusivity, trust in the ICT framework. We research that universal connectivity is the past. Affordable broadband and community networks, large-scale solutions are there. And local content and multilingual tech to empower communities with relevant information in their languages. And capacity building, digital literacy, gender-sensitive programs, and skill training. Examples, we collected two successful examples. One is India’s Digital India, which is giving rural connectivity and governance at the grassroots. And Kenya’s Community Networks, which is bridging access in the underserved areas. Pillar two, ethics-centered digital governance. This is the second pillar of our three pillars. Data rights and privacy, people-first data governance, it should be. And transparent AI, which should be explainable, accountable, and bias our systems. And right-based design, embedding human rights and equity in technology deployment. For example, we researched and pointed out two examples, which are EU AI Act, EU Artificial Intelligence Act, working to enforce accountability and transparency. And at the same time, UNESCO AI Ethics is also working towards global guidance on ethical AI development. Now I’ll talk about the pillar three, which is sustainability and equity intake. At first comes the green ICT, energy-efficient infrastructure, we should have energy-efficient infrastructure, and we should have a growth in e-waste management system. At the same time, we need a human capital investment, empowering digital skills and local tenants, and we need a public-private people partnership model to share benefits equitably. For example, Rwanda’s green ICT service is working to reduce e-waste and promoting eco-design. Estonia’s e-residency is working towards digital transformation with inclusivity at its core. We collected and researched several policy recommendations towards visiting the digital divide and to make inclusive ICT policies for sustainable development. They are for fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration across sectors, embed human rights and ethics in design, deployment, and evolution, support innovations and boxes for safe environment, and develop regional and global frameworks to align policies and share best practices, integrate gender, youth, and marginalized voices. So there are some calls to action. What are these? These are let’s go create inclusive, ethical, and sustainable ICT ecosystems, build partnerships that prioritize solidarity over silos, mainstream ethics, and inclusion in every digital policy. So let us work together, and in this way, we can bridge digital divides, and we can bridge, we can, but at the same time, we can empower communities. Of course, there will be, and there are some challenges and risks. There are unintended consequences, such as widening the divide and digital colonialism, bias and discrimination that we are a little bit worried about, and this is an important challenge. We need to avoid it, and in data algorithm, there are algorithm bias, and there could be some discrimination, and in terms of surveillance and privacy needs, there may be abuse of digital technologies. In terms of environmental impact, there are e-waste management and energy-intensive tech. So these are, and at the last but not least, the resistance to change. The policy inertia and vested interests. So these are the five challenges and risks that we have found in our research. At the conclusion, I like to highlight digital inclusion. So everyone, everywhere, are meaningfully connected. It should be ethical in terms of technology. So the policy should be people-centered, right-based, transparent, and at the same time, it should be sustainable ICT, like green ICT, equitable, and future-proof. So let us work together, let’s harness technology to empower communities and build a better future. At this moment, to attend some of our local problems and points, I invite Dr. Dutta to take the floor, and I am stopping my share. I will start my sharing again. Dr. Dutta, you can join the session as our co-organizer, and welcome Dr. Dutta. Thank you, Professor. I want to share a screen, and I am to…


Ranojit Kumar Dutta: Okay. We have three three plan inclusion and ICT frameworks and local content. I want to talk about the local content in a Bangladesh, it’s a is a located in a South Asia and covering on luck 48,460 square kilometers, this is the area of Bangladesh, and it’s a population is more than 173 million and it’s a location in the South Asian and a regular it’s a density per square kilometer 1333 and urban area living 42% and globally it’s a ranking eight and per capita 3.8 GDP. So our internet access and reason by Bangladesh in 2024, more than 2092% in urban area and rural area, less than 50% or 58% ICT infrastructure is scored by reason in Bangladesh. In Bangladesh, more than 92% in Dhaka infrastructure is scored, score is also a key parameter used in ICT infrastructure, internet penetration rate, broadband subscription and density mobile network coverage, electricity access, number of public ICT facilities, and etc. The digital literacy rate by age group in Bangladesh is group is 15 to 2020 is more used in 72% and more than 45 years is group less use is 31% gender gap in internet use in Bangladesh urban area 72% male and female 58% rural area 61% and female 38% national 67% and female 40 47% student internet access at home by region in Dhaka 82% and Chittagong 76% and less around poor is 41% female enrollment in ICT related higher education in 2019 80% and then later increases 2020 22% and now 2024 38% gradually increases in female enrollment in ICT related higher education. The broadband penetration in Bangladesh has grown rapidly 5% to 86% 5% in 2010 and now is more than 86%. Penetration of participation of women in ICT workforce by sector software development 50% network and and IT support 22%, admin and HR, ICT 48% and others cyber security 10%. Barrier to women ICT participation, lack of digital literacy and social norms restriction 36%, high cost of device and internet 52%, limited female role model 21%, youth participation in freelancing digital work, male urban 38%, female 22%, male 22%, 28%, ICT sector employment growth in Bangladesh from 2018 to 2024, 2022 ICT related job 1,65,000 and now 2024 3,10,000 ICT contribution to ICT GDP in 2015 1.2% but now is 3.6%. Barrier to ICT division employment in Bangladesh, lack of advanced skill 46% and poor internet infrastructure 39%, language and communication gap 24%, lack of awareness 28%. Expansion of ICT infrastructure in Bangladesh, broadband coverage 51% into 2022 and 2024 78%. Number of growth of tech park and innovation hub, 2022 number of tech park 5 and active innovation hub 8 but 2024 18 and number of tech innovation hub 25. Digital literacy by geographical location urban 74% and semi-urban 55% and rural 39%. Smart device adaptation and measure Bangladesh cities, Dhaka is the capital so it’s a more adaptation 76% and Chittagong 68%, less CILIT 45%. Wi-Fi and ICT infrastructure by cities, urban 71% and pre-urban 42%, rural town 21%. The e-government adaptation and Bangladesh, so Dhaka is 92% and Borishal 60%. Growth in learning using user in Bangladesh, in 2015 1.2 million and 2024 11.5 million approximately. The key ICT application for development in Bangladesh, ICT solution governance, e-services portal and outcome achieved faster services delivery, reduced corruption, education digital classroom, remote access our rural and urban students. Health, telemedicine platforms and affordable remote consulting. Regional e-services penetration, Dhaka e-government governance 92%, e-learning 90%, e-health 88%, Polna 74%, e-learning 70% and e-health 65%. Then less CILIT 65% and 60% e-learning and e-health 58%. Multilingual digital platform access by region, Dhaka 92% and Borishal 69%, 59%. Cultural representation in digital media platform, new entertainment 60% and news 70% and indigenous 5% and 15%. Availability of government services in local language, birth registration, tax services, education portal, e-health and land recorded also available but indigenous language is partial. Awareness of ethical and ICT practices by digital literacy level, a low literacy is 28% and moderate 62% and high literacy 88%. Role of media and channels spreading digital ethics awareness, social media 38%, television 5%, online news portal 20% and community radio 10%, print media 10%. So this is the first part, first pillar inclusion of ICT framework and local content. And we have some barriers, poor infrastructure, high cost device and rural or urban gap, a digital skill, low digital literacy, weak education and language gap, lack of training and centers. Number two, pillar two, ethics concepting digital and governance data rights to privacy. Public awareness of data privacy right, EU region 82%, USA 70%, Rwanda 53%, Kenya 47%, Bangladesh 41%. Comparison between Bangladesh and other states, other countries. AI policy transparency index by country, EU 88% and USA 75% and Kenya 62% and Rwanda 58% and Bangladesh 45%.


Hakikur Rahman: Global trades in ethical AI policy adaptation. In 2018, 26% six country, 2020, 41 country and 2022, 58 countries and 2024, 76 countries in global trade ethical AI policy adaptation. Key data protection laws and rules and regulation, laws and regulation. Country, EU national law exist, yes. GDPR, yes. And Bangladesh also draft stage and GDPR, no. And enforcement strength is weak. Then other countries. Global statistics on data privacy awareness, EU 85%, Europe data rights, privacy policies, EU 42%, trust digital services, 58%. Asia Pacific 60% and rate privacy policies, 24% and trust digital services 75%. Key principles in ethics and constitutive digital governance, transparency, a clear disclosure of how data and algorithm functions, and privacy protection and human overrides. Major framework and their focus area. UNESCO AI ethics, human rights, inclusivity, environmental sustainability, and EU AI Act, European Union, risk-based regulation, transparency-based and harmful AI. Pillar three, sustainability and equity intake. EU generation and disposal. Bangladesh, EU has 600 kiloton, recycled 3% and informal handing 80%. Kenya, 180 and recycled 60%. And EU advanced 9,500 and recycled 42%. US collection and recycle. Bangladesh 12% and recycled 3%. Kenya 15% and recycled 6%. Rwanda 10% and recycled 4%. Nepal 8% and recycled 2%. And EU 60% collected and recycled 42%. Sustainability, ICT sector, carbon emission by region, North America, maximum Asia Pacific 45%, and North America 12% and European Union 80% of global ICT carbon emission, impacting climate change, CO2, carbon dioxide output in 2024. US generation and per capita. US per capita rising globally, highest in Europe and then America and Asia after Oceania and others, rest of the world. Green ICT strategies in Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Rwanda. Nepal is medium and solar telecom high and US policy medium and digital skill program high and urban private partnership medium. Say Bangladesh high, energy efficient data high and solar telecom hours is medium, US policy medium and digital skill program high. This is the radar figure illustrate the infrastructure availability region in Bangladesh. Urban area how the highest availability in 95% internet access and 98% mobile coverage. Semi-urban region follow with the moderate level. 35% projected ICT investment allocation in 2025. 35% of projected funding in targeted at a rural network with a significant investment also planned for digital education and sustainable infrastructure. Renewable energy use in ICT infrastructure in Bangladesh, grid electricity 60%, solar power 28%, wind and other renewable 7% and diesel backup 5%. US generation by recycle in Bangladesh, mobile devices 12,000, US generated 12,000 ton, recycled 2,200 ton, computer 9,000 and television 6,000 and recycled 1,200. Approximately, green ICT policies and initiative in Bangladesh, green data center guideline, BCC, Bangladesh Computer Council, reduce energy use in Sarbar, ongoing solar town program, solar tower program, BRTC, power telecom towers, solar energy expanded, and US management rules, department of environmental regulate electronic waste disposal and enforced. Our digital inclusion, ethics, technology, and sustainable ICT are essential pillar for the just and resilient digital society. Together, we must create a future where every community is improved through safe, inclusive, and sustainable digital solutions. Thank you, Dr. Dutta. Thank you, Dr. Dutta. Let me say the closing words. I will share my, you can stop sharing your screen. I will share my screen and give thanks to all the participants. I am sharing my screen. Please stop your sharing. Okay. Thank you, sir. You are most welcome. So, finally, we are here. We are the concluding. But before that, I must thank Ms. Kitanjali, Mr. Ruth, and the other team member working very hard for the long session, for a long time. And we congratulate them at the same time to have this successful and beneficial session for the global community, and especially for us, the marginalized community. I am here, Dr. Hakikuraman, and with me, Dr. Ranajit Kumar Dutta. I am from International Standard University, and Dr. Dutta is from City University, Bangladesh. We thank you very much. I appreciate our host to provide us this opportunity to have this session successfully and in coordination. Thank you very much. Bye-bye. You may stop the recording. Thank you, sir. Sir, take a picture. You can. Yes. Okay. Thank you, sir. Okay. I think we can leave. They are recording still.


H

Hakikur Rahman

Speech speed

92 words per minute

Speech length

1809 words

Speech time

1170 seconds

Over 2.6 billion people remain offline globally, with affordability and digital literacy being major barriers

Explanation

This argument highlights the scale of the digital divide problem, emphasizing that a significant portion of the global population lacks internet access. The speaker identifies two key barriers preventing people from getting online: the high cost of internet services and the lack of basic digital skills needed to use technology effectively.


Evidence

ITU 2024 study showing 2.6 billion people offline; one in four people lack basic digital skills


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and ICT Policy Framework


Topics

Development | Human rights


Agreed with

– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Agreed on

Significant barriers exist preventing meaningful digital participation


Three-pillar approach needed: inclusion (universal connectivity), ethics (human rights in tech), and sustainability (green ICT)

Explanation

The speaker proposes a comprehensive framework for addressing digital divide issues through three interconnected pillars. This approach ensures that digital transformation is not only accessible to all but also respects human rights and environmental considerations.


Evidence

Examples include India’s Digital India initiative, Kenya’s Community Networks, EU AI Act, and Rwanda’s Green ICT Strategy


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and ICT Policy Framework


Topics

Development | Human rights | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Agreed on

Digital divide requires comprehensive policy framework addressing multiple dimensions


Policy gaps exist due to lack of inclusivity, inadequate safeguards for emerging technologies, and fragmented approaches

Explanation

This argument identifies three critical weaknesses in current ICT policies. The speaker argues that policies often fail to consider marginalized groups, don’t provide sufficient protection against risks from new technologies like AI and IoT, and lack coordination between national and regional levels.


Evidence

Rapid AI and IoT deployment without adequate safeguards; national and regional policies lacking coordination


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and ICT Policy Framework


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights | Development


Agreed with

– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Agreed on

Need for ethical governance and privacy protection in digital transformation


Multi-stakeholder collaboration and human rights embedding in technology design are essential

Explanation

The speaker advocates for inclusive policy-making that involves various stakeholders and prioritizes human rights considerations. This approach ensures that technology development and deployment considers diverse perspectives and protects fundamental rights from the design stage.


Evidence

Policy recommendations include fostering collaboration across sectors, embedding human rights in design and deployment, and integrating gender, youth, and marginalized voices


Major discussion point

Digital Divide and ICT Policy Framework


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory | Development


Five major challenges identified: unintended consequences, bias and discrimination, surveillance and privacy issues, environmental impact, and resistance to change

Explanation

This argument outlines the key risks and obstacles that must be addressed when implementing ICT policies. The speaker emphasizes that these challenges could undermine the goals of digital inclusion if not properly managed, ranging from technical issues like algorithmic bias to social issues like policy resistance.


Evidence

Specific examples include widening digital divide, digital colonialism, algorithm bias, abuse of digital technologies, e-waste management issues, and policy inertia


Major discussion point

Challenges and Risk Mitigation


Topics

Human rights | Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Agreed on

Environmental sustainability must be integrated into ICT development


Need to avoid digital colonialism and algorithm bias while ensuring meaningful participation for marginalized communities

Explanation

The speaker warns against reproducing existing power imbalances and discrimination through digital technologies. This argument emphasizes the importance of designing inclusive systems that empower rather than further marginalize vulnerable populations.


Evidence

Concerns about bias in data algorithms, discrimination, and the need to integrate gender, youth, and marginalized voices in policy development


Major discussion point

Challenges and Risk Mitigation


Topics

Human rights | Development | Sociocultural


R

Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Speech speed

77 words per minute

Speech length

804 words

Speech time

621 seconds

Internet access shows significant urban-rural divide: 92% in urban areas vs 58% in rural areas

Explanation

This argument demonstrates the stark disparity in internet connectivity between urban and rural areas in Bangladesh. The data reveals that rural populations are significantly underserved, with access rates being 34 percentage points lower than in urban areas.


Evidence

Bangladesh internet access statistics for 2024 showing urban area coverage at 92% and rural area coverage at 58%


Major discussion point

Bangladesh’s Digital Infrastructure and Access Patterns


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Digital access


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Digital divide requires comprehensive policy framework addressing multiple dimensions


Gender gap in internet usage exists across all regions, with national averages of 67% for males and 47% for females

Explanation

The speaker highlights persistent gender inequality in digital access across Bangladesh. This 20-percentage point gap indicates that women face additional barriers to internet access beyond geographic location, suggesting the need for gender-sensitive digital inclusion policies.


Evidence

Detailed breakdown showing urban area: 72% male vs 58% female; rural area: 61% male vs 38% female; national: 67% male vs 47% female


Major discussion point

Bangladesh’s Digital Infrastructure and Access Patterns


Topics

Development | Human rights | Gender rights online


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Digital divide requires comprehensive policy framework addressing multiple dimensions


Broadband penetration has grown rapidly from 5% in 2010 to 86% currently

Explanation

This argument showcases Bangladesh’s significant progress in expanding broadband infrastructure over the past decade. The dramatic increase from 5% to 86% demonstrates successful policy implementation and investment in telecommunications infrastructure.


Evidence

Historical data showing broadband penetration growth from 5% in 2010 to 86% in 2024


Major discussion point

Bangladesh’s Digital Infrastructure and Access Patterns


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Telecommunications infrastructure


ICT sector employment has nearly doubled from 165,000 jobs in 2022 to 310,000 in 2024

Explanation

The speaker presents evidence of rapid growth in the ICT sector’s contribution to employment in Bangladesh. This nearly 100% increase in just two years indicates the sector’s potential for economic development and job creation.


Evidence

Employment statistics showing ICT-related jobs growing from 165,000 in 2022 to 310,000 in 2024; ICT contribution to GDP increased from 1.2% in 2015 to 3.6% currently


Major discussion point

Bangladesh’s Digital Infrastructure and Access Patterns


Topics

Economic | Development | Future of work


Digital literacy varies significantly by age group: 72% for 15-20 age group vs 31% for 45+ age group

Explanation

This argument reveals a substantial generational digital divide in Bangladesh, with younger people being more than twice as likely to have digital literacy skills. This age-based disparity suggests the need for targeted capacity building programs for older populations.


Evidence

Age-based digital literacy statistics showing 72% for 15-20 age group and 31% for 45+ age group


Major discussion point

Digital Literacy and Skills Development


Topics

Development | Capacity development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Significant barriers exist preventing meaningful digital participation


Female enrollment in ICT-related higher education has increased from 22% in 2020 to 38% in 2024

Explanation

The speaker highlights positive progress in gender inclusion in ICT education, showing a significant 16-percentage point increase in female participation. While this represents improvement, it also indicates that gender parity in ICT education has not yet been achieved.


Evidence

Historical data showing female enrollment progression: 22% in 2020, increasing to 38% in 2024, with earlier baseline of 8% in 2019


Major discussion point

Digital Literacy and Skills Development


Topics

Development | Human rights | Gender rights online


Barriers to ICT employment include lack of advanced skills (46%) and poor internet infrastructure (39%)

Explanation

This argument identifies the primary obstacles preventing people from accessing ICT sector employment opportunities. The data shows that skills gaps are the most significant barrier, followed by infrastructure limitations, indicating areas where policy intervention could be most effective.


Evidence

Survey data showing barriers: lack of advanced skills (46%), poor internet infrastructure (39%), language and communication gap (24%), lack of awareness (28%)


Major discussion point

Digital Literacy and Skills Development


Topics

Development | Economic | Future of work


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Significant barriers exist preventing meaningful digital participation


Bangladesh lags behind in data privacy awareness (41%) compared to EU (82%) and USA (70%)

Explanation

The speaker presents comparative data showing Bangladesh’s significant deficit in public awareness of data privacy rights. This 41-percentage point gap with the EU and 29-point gap with the USA indicates the need for enhanced digital rights education and stronger privacy frameworks.


Evidence

Comparative statistics: EU 82%, USA 70%, Rwanda 53%, Kenya 47%, Bangladesh 41% for public awareness of data privacy rights


Major discussion point

Ethics and Data Privacy in Digital Governance


Topics

Human rights | Privacy and data protection | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Need for ethical governance and privacy protection in digital transformation


AI policy transparency index shows Bangladesh at 45% compared to EU’s 88%

Explanation

This argument reveals Bangladesh’s substantial gap in AI governance transparency compared to international standards. The 43-percentage point difference with the EU indicates the need for more robust AI policy frameworks and transparency mechanisms.


Evidence

AI policy transparency index comparison: EU 88%, USA 75%, Kenya 62%, Rwanda 58%, Bangladesh 45%


Major discussion point

Ethics and Data Privacy in Digital Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights | Data governance


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Need for ethical governance and privacy protection in digital transformation


Global trend shows increasing adoption of ethical AI policies from 26 countries in 2018 to 76 countries in 2024

Explanation

The speaker demonstrates the growing international recognition of the need for ethical AI governance. This nearly three-fold increase in countries adopting ethical AI policies over six years shows the global momentum toward responsible AI development.


Evidence

Historical progression: 26 countries in 2018, 41 countries in 2020, 58 countries in 2022, 76 countries in 2024


Major discussion point

Ethics and Data Privacy in Digital Governance


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Human rights | Data governance


Bangladesh generates 600 kilotons of e-waste with only 3% recycling rate and 80% informal handling

Explanation

This argument highlights Bangladesh’s significant e-waste management challenges, with the vast majority of electronic waste being handled through informal channels. The extremely low recycling rate of 3% compared to the high volume of waste generated indicates urgent need for improved e-waste management systems.


Evidence

E-waste statistics: 600 kilotons generated, 3% recycling rate, 80% informal handling; comparison with Kenya (60% recycling) and EU (42% recycling)


Major discussion point

Environmental Sustainability and E-waste Management


Topics

Development | E-waste | Sustainable development


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Environmental sustainability must be integrated into ICT development


Renewable energy use in ICT infrastructure includes 60% grid electricity, 28% solar power, and 7% wind/other renewables

Explanation

The speaker provides a breakdown of energy sources powering Bangladesh’s ICT infrastructure, showing that renewable sources account for 35% of the energy mix. While solar power represents a significant portion, there’s still heavy reliance on grid electricity, indicating room for improvement in green ICT adoption.


Evidence

Energy mix breakdown: 60% grid electricity, 28% solar power, 7% wind and other renewables, 5% diesel backup


Major discussion point

Environmental Sustainability and E-waste Management


Topics

Development | Sustainable development | Infrastructure


Green ICT initiatives include solar tower programs and e-waste management regulations

Explanation

This argument outlines Bangladesh’s policy efforts toward sustainable ICT development. The speaker highlights specific programs like solar-powered telecommunications towers and regulatory frameworks for electronic waste management as examples of green ICT implementation.


Evidence

Specific initiatives: green data center guidelines by Bangladesh Computer Council, solar tower program by BRTC, e-waste management rules by Department of Environment


Major discussion point

Environmental Sustainability and E-waste Management


Topics

Development | E-waste | Sustainable development


Agreed with

– Hakikur Rahman

Agreed on

Environmental sustainability must be integrated into ICT development


Agreements

Agreement points

Digital divide requires comprehensive policy framework addressing multiple dimensions

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Three-pillar approach needed: inclusion (universal connectivity), ethics (human rights in tech), and sustainability (green ICT)


Internet access shows significant urban-rural divide: 92% in urban areas vs 58% in rural areas


Gender gap in internet usage exists across all regions, with national averages of 67% for males and 47% for females


Summary

Both speakers agree that digital divide is a multi-faceted problem requiring systematic approaches that address geographic, gender, and socioeconomic disparities through comprehensive policy frameworks


Topics

Development | Human rights | Infrastructure


Significant barriers exist preventing meaningful digital participation

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Over 2.6 billion people remain offline globally, with affordability and digital literacy being major barriers


Digital literacy varies significantly by age group: 72% for 15-20 age group vs 31% for 45+ age group


Barriers to ICT employment include lack of advanced skills (46%) and poor internet infrastructure (39%)


Summary

Both speakers identify that digital literacy gaps, affordability issues, and infrastructure limitations are major obstacles to digital inclusion, requiring targeted interventions


Topics

Development | Digital access | Capacity development


Need for ethical governance and privacy protection in digital transformation

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Policy gaps exist due to lack of inclusivity, inadequate safeguards for emerging technologies, and fragmented approaches


Bangladesh lags behind in data privacy awareness (41%) compared to EU (82%) and USA (70%)


AI policy transparency index shows Bangladesh at 45% compared to EU’s 88%


Summary

Both speakers emphasize the critical need for stronger ethical frameworks, data privacy protection, and transparent AI governance to ensure responsible digital development


Topics

Human rights | Privacy and data protection | Legal and regulatory


Environmental sustainability must be integrated into ICT development

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Five major challenges identified: unintended consequences, bias and discrimination, surveillance and privacy issues, environmental impact, and resistance to change


Bangladesh generates 600 kilotons of e-waste with only 3% recycling rate and 80% informal handling


Green ICT initiatives include solar tower programs and e-waste management regulations


Summary

Both speakers recognize environmental impact as a critical concern in ICT development, highlighting the need for green ICT strategies and proper e-waste management


Topics

Development | E-waste | Sustainable development


Similar viewpoints

Both speakers advocate for inclusive approaches that prioritize marginalized groups, particularly women and youth, in digital policy development and implementation

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Multi-stakeholder collaboration and human rights embedding in technology design are essential


Female enrollment in ICT-related higher education has increased from 22% in 2020 to 38% in 2024


Topics

Human rights | Gender rights online | Development


Both speakers emphasize the importance of preventing digital technologies from reproducing existing inequalities and the growing global recognition of need for ethical AI governance

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Need to avoid digital colonialism and algorithm bias while ensuring meaningful participation for marginalized communities


Global trend shows increasing adoption of ethical AI policies from 26 countries in 2018 to 76 countries in 2024


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory | Data governance


Unexpected consensus

Strong emphasis on environmental sustainability in ICT development

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Three-pillar approach needed: inclusion (universal connectivity), ethics (human rights in tech), and sustainability (green ICT)


Renewable energy use in ICT infrastructure includes 60% grid electricity, 28% solar power, and 7% wind/other renewables


Explanation

While the session focused on digital divide and ICT policies, both speakers unexpectedly gave significant attention to environmental sustainability, treating it as equally important to access and ethics concerns


Topics

Development | Sustainable development | Infrastructure


Detailed focus on gender disparities across all aspects of digital participation

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Multi-stakeholder collaboration and human rights embedding in technology design are essential


Gender gap in internet usage exists across all regions, with national averages of 67% for males and 47% for females


Explanation

Both speakers consistently highlighted gender gaps across internet access, digital literacy, ICT education, and workforce participation, showing unexpected comprehensive focus on gender equality as central to digital inclusion


Topics

Human rights | Gender rights online | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers demonstrated strong consensus on the multi-dimensional nature of digital divide challenges, the need for comprehensive policy frameworks addressing inclusion, ethics, and sustainability, and the importance of protecting marginalized groups while ensuring environmental responsibility


Consensus level

High level of consensus with complementary perspectives – Rahman provided theoretical framework and global context while Dutta offered detailed empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Their agreement on core principles and shared emphasis on holistic approaches suggests strong foundation for collaborative policy development and implementation in digital inclusion initiatives.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Unexpected differences

Overall assessment

Summary

No significant disagreements were identified between the speakers. Both Dr. Hakikur Rahman and Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta presented complementary perspectives on bridging the digital divide through inclusive ICT policies.


Disagreement level

Minimal to no disagreement. The speakers operated in a collaborative framework where Dr. Rahman presented the theoretical policy framework and Dr. Dutta provided supporting empirical evidence from Bangladesh. This high level of agreement suggests strong consensus on the fundamental approaches to addressing digital divide issues, though it may also indicate limited critical examination of alternative policy approaches or potential trade-offs in implementation strategies.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Both speakers advocate for inclusive approaches that prioritize marginalized groups, particularly women and youth, in digital policy development and implementation

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Multi-stakeholder collaboration and human rights embedding in technology design are essential


Female enrollment in ICT-related higher education has increased from 22% in 2020 to 38% in 2024


Topics

Human rights | Gender rights online | Development


Both speakers emphasize the importance of preventing digital technologies from reproducing existing inequalities and the growing global recognition of need for ethical AI governance

Speakers

– Hakikur Rahman
– Ranojit Kumar Dutta

Arguments

Need to avoid digital colonialism and algorithm bias while ensuring meaningful participation for marginalized communities


Global trend shows increasing adoption of ethical AI policies from 26 countries in 2018 to 76 countries in 2024


Topics

Human rights | Legal and regulatory | Data governance


Takeaways

Key takeaways

Digital divide remains a critical global challenge with 2.6 billion people still offline, requiring urgent policy intervention through a three-pillar framework of inclusion, ethics, and sustainability


Bangladesh demonstrates significant digital infrastructure growth but faces persistent urban-rural and gender gaps in access and participation


Successful examples exist globally (India’s Digital India, Kenya’s Community Networks, EU AI Act, Rwanda’s Green ICT Strategy) that can serve as models for inclusive ICT policies


Multi-stakeholder collaboration and human rights-centered approach are essential for bridging digital divides effectively


Environmental sustainability through green ICT practices and proper e-waste management is crucial for long-term digital development


Digital literacy and skills development programs must be tailored to different demographic groups to ensure meaningful participation


Data privacy awareness and ethical AI governance frameworks need strengthening, particularly in developing countries like Bangladesh


Resolutions and action items

Foster multi-stakeholder collaboration across sectors for inclusive ICT policy development


Embed human rights and ethics in technology design, deployment, and evolution processes


Support innovation sandboxes to create safe environments for testing new technologies


Develop regional and global frameworks to align policies and share best practices


Integrate gender, youth, and marginalized voices into digital policy formulation


Mainstream ethics and inclusion in every digital policy initiative


Build partnerships that prioritize solidarity over silos in addressing digital divides


Unresolved issues

Specific implementation mechanisms for bridging the urban-rural digital divide in Bangladesh and similar developing countries


Concrete strategies to address the 46% skills gap barrier in ICT employment


Detailed approaches to improve Bangladesh’s low data privacy awareness (41%) and AI policy transparency (45%)


Specific solutions for improving e-waste recycling rates from the current 3% in Bangladesh


Methods to overcome policy inertia and vested interests that resist change


Strategies to prevent digital colonialism while promoting inclusive technology adoption


Approaches to ensure meaningful participation of marginalized communities beyond basic connectivity


Suggested compromises

Public-private-people partnership models to share benefits equitably while leveraging different sector strengths


Gradual implementation of green ICT strategies balancing environmental concerns with development needs


Phased approach to digital literacy programs targeting different age groups and skill levels


Regional coordination frameworks that respect national sovereignty while promoting global best practices


Flexible policy frameworks that can adapt to rapid technological changes while maintaining ethical standards


Thought provoking comments

Over 2.6 billion people still remain offline, according to a study by ITU in 2024. And affordability, access to affordable internet is still out of reach for many. At the same time, literacy, one in four lack basic digital skills, limiting meaningful participation

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Reason

This comment is insightful because it quantifies the scale of the digital divide with concrete statistics, moving beyond abstract concepts to demonstrate the real magnitude of global digital inequality. It establishes the urgency and scope of the problem by highlighting both access and skills barriers.


Impact

This foundational statement set the tone for the entire presentation by establishing the critical need for their three-pillar framework. It provided the statistical foundation that justified their subsequent policy recommendations and created a sense of urgency that carried through the discussion.


There are unintended consequences, such as widening the divide and digital colonialism, bias and discrimination… algorithm bias… surveillance and privacy needs… environmental impact… resistance to change

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Reason

This is particularly thought-provoking because it acknowledges that ICT policies intended to bridge divides can actually create new forms of inequality and exploitation. The mention of ‘digital colonialism’ introduces a critical perspective on how technology deployment can perpetuate power imbalances rather than eliminate them.


Impact

This comment shifted the discussion from purely optimistic policy solutions to a more nuanced understanding of the complexities and potential negative consequences of digital transformation. It added critical depth to the conversation by acknowledging that good intentions don’t automatically lead to positive outcomes.


Gender gap in internet use in Bangladesh urban area 72% male and female 58% rural area 61% and female 38% national 67% and female 40 47%

Speaker

Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta


Reason

These specific statistics are insightful because they reveal the intersectional nature of digital divides – showing how gender, geography, and socioeconomic factors compound to create multiple layers of exclusion. The data demonstrates that digital inequality isn’t uniform but varies significantly across different demographic groups.


Impact

This granular data provided concrete evidence for the theoretical frameworks discussed earlier, moving the conversation from abstract policy concepts to specific, measurable inequalities. It demonstrated the complexity of implementing inclusive ICT policies when different groups face vastly different barriers.


Cultural representation in digital media platform, new entertainment 60% and news 70% and indigenous 5% and 15%

Speaker

Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta


Reason

This statistic is particularly thought-provoking because it reveals how digital inclusion isn’t just about access to technology, but about whose voices and cultures are represented in digital spaces. The stark contrast between mainstream content (60-70%) and indigenous representation (5-15%) highlights cultural marginalization in digital transformation.


Impact

This comment deepened the discussion by introducing the concept that true digital inclusion requires not just technical access but cultural representation and relevance. It expanded the conversation beyond infrastructure and skills to include questions of cultural equity and digital sovereignty.


Overall assessment

The key comments shaped this discussion by progressively building a comprehensive understanding of digital divides – starting with broad statistical foundations, moving through specific demographic data, acknowledging potential negative consequences, and ultimately revealing the cultural dimensions of digital inequality. The speakers effectively used concrete data to support their theoretical framework, creating a presentation that was both academically rigorous and practically grounded. However, the discussion remained largely one-directional as a presentation format, limiting the potential for interactive dialogue that might have further developed these insights. The most impactful aspect was how the comments collectively demonstrated that bridging digital divides requires addressing not just technical barriers, but also social, economic, cultural, and ethical dimensions of technology deployment.


Follow-up questions

How can policies better address the needs of marginalized groups who are often overlooked in ICT policy development?

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Explanation

This was identified as a critical policy gap where policies often overlook marginalized groups, requiring further research on inclusive policy design


What adequate safeguards are needed for rapid AI and IoT deployment globally?

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Explanation

The presentation highlighted that rapid AI and IoT deployment is happening without adequate safeguards, indicating need for research on appropriate regulatory frameworks


How can national and regional policies be better coordinated to address gaps in global governance?

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Explanation

Fragmented approaches and lack of coordination between policies was identified as a major challenge requiring solutions


What are the most effective strategies to prevent digital colonialism and avoid widening the digital divide?

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Explanation

This was mentioned as an unintended consequence and challenge that needs to be researched and addressed


How can algorithm bias and discrimination in data systems be effectively eliminated?

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Explanation

Algorithm bias was identified as a significant challenge requiring further research on mitigation strategies


What are the best practices for e-waste management and reducing energy-intensive technology impacts?

Speaker

Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta


Explanation

Environmental impact through e-waste and energy consumption was presented as a major sustainability challenge requiring research solutions


How can policy inertia and vested interests resistance to change be overcome?

Speaker

Dr. Hakikur Rahman


Explanation

This was identified as one of the five key challenges that requires research on change management strategies


What specific interventions can increase women’s participation in ICT workforce beyond the current levels shown in Bangladesh?

Speaker

Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta


Explanation

The data showed varying levels of women participation across ICT sectors, indicating need for targeted research on increasing participation


How can indigenous language support be expanded from partial to full availability in government digital services?

Speaker

Dr. Ranojit Kumar Dutta


Explanation

The presentation showed indigenous language support is only partial in government services, requiring research on expansion strategies


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Information Society in Times of Risk

Information Society in Times of Risk

Session at a glance

Summary

This discussion focused on information society challenges and solutions during times of risk, examining how digital technologies and collaborative approaches can enhance resilience during crises and disasters. The session was chaired by Horst Kremers and Professor Ke Gong, emphasizing the UN’s all-of-society principle that calls for broad cooperation among public and private sectors, civil society, academia, and other stakeholders in disaster risk reduction.


The Singapore team presented their DRIVE framework (Digital Resilience Indicators for Veritable Empowerment), which conceptualizes digital resilience as a socio-ecological process rather than just individual technical skills. Their research revealed that digital resilience emerges from the dynamic interplay between individuals and their social contexts, including family, community, and broader societal support systems. The framework maps drivers of digital resilience across individual, family, community, and societal levels, incorporating both personal disposition and digital citizenship components.


Turkish researchers presented their analysis of visual content shared on social media during the 2023 earthquakes, examining how 54,859 earthquake-related images facilitated digital solidarity and crisis communication. Their findings highlighted the critical importance of maintaining open communication channels during disasters, as telecommunication infrastructure was severely disrupted for the first two days following the earthquake.


Chinese case studies demonstrated how tech companies like Tencent have developed comprehensive digital disaster relief systems, including online philanthropic platforms and AI-powered knowledge bases for disaster preparedness. These initiatives have facilitated millions of donations and coordinated thousands of rescues through integrated digital platforms.


The discussion also addressed the risks of conflict in social media environments and proposed pro-social platform design solutions, including bridging systems that promote consensual content across political divides. Participants emphasized the need for sustained international collaboration and comprehensive information management systems that serve all stakeholders in disaster risk reduction, extending beyond immediate response to include preparation and long-term recovery phases.


Keypoints

## Major Discussion Points:


– **Digital Resilience Framework Development**: The Singapore team presented their DRIVE (Digital Resilience Indicators for Veritable Empowerment) framework, which conceptualizes digital resilience as a socio-ecological process involving individual, family, community, and societal levels rather than just individual technical skills.


– **Visual Communication During Crisis**: Turkish researchers analyzed how visual content shared on social media (particularly X/Twitter) during the 2023 earthquake served as a tool for digital solidarity and crisis communication, with plans to develop policy recommendations for improved disaster response.


– **All-of-Society Information Management**: Discussion of the complex information flows needed across multiple stakeholders (government, NGOs, private sector, civil society) during disasters, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interoperability and just-in-time information delivery in all phases of disaster management.


– **Technology-Enabled Disaster Response**: Examination of how major tech companies (like Tencent in China) are developing integrated digital platforms for disaster relief, including donation systems, real-time coordination tools, and AI-powered knowledge bases for community-driven disaster support.


– **Pro-Social Platform Design**: Exploration of how social media platforms can be redesigned to reduce conflict and promote social cohesion through bridging systems, balanced content recommendation, and features that facilitate cross-political dialogue and understanding.


## Overall Purpose:


The discussion aimed to examine how information society can effectively respond to and manage various types of risks and crises. The session focused on developing frameworks, tools, and approaches for building digital resilience across different levels of society, from individual users to entire communities and nations. The goal was to foster collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to create more inclusive, proactive, and sustainable approaches to crisis management in our increasingly digital world.


## Overall Tone:


The discussion maintained a consistently academic and collaborative tone throughout. It was professional and research-focused, with presenters sharing ongoing work and findings in a constructive manner. The tone was forward-looking and solution-oriented, emphasizing the need for continued cooperation and knowledge sharing. The session concluded on an encouraging note, with calls for sustained collaboration and a shared commitment to building resilient information societies that “leave no one behind.”


Speakers

– **Horst Kremers**: Session chair, working in environmental affairs and disaster risk reduction since Agenda 21/Rio Declaration, involved with UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism


– **Ke Gong**: Professor at the Institute of the World Federation of Engineers, session co-chair


– **Audrey Yue**: Provost, chair professor of media, culture, and critical theory, and deputy director at the NUS Center for Trusted Internet and Community at the National University of Singapore


– **Renae Loh**: Colleague of Audrey Yue working on the DRIVE (Digital Resilience Indicators for Veritable Empowerment) project


– **Jun Yu**: Colleague participating online in the DRIVE project presentation


– **Bengu Sezer**: Lecturer at Mersin University in Turkey, graduated from Mersin University Department of English Linguistics, completed MA and PhD at Mersin University Institute of Social Sciences, working as lecturer since 2006, specializes in new media and social media


– **Zhan Zhang**: Researcher presenting a case study on Tencent’s digital initiatives and CSR efforts in disaster resilience (presented via recorded presentation while traveling)


– **Emillie de Keulenaar**: Postdoctoral researcher at University of Copenhagen, researcher at University of Amsterdam’s Digital Methods Initiative and Open Intelligence Lab, consultant of UNDPPA’s Innovation Cell, specializes in politics of speech moderation and algorithmic systems


**Additional speakers:**


– **Giacomo Mazzone**: Audience member who asked questions, appears to collaborate with Horst Kremers on risk journalism and media activities


Full session report

# Information Society in Times of Risk: Discussion Summary


## Introduction and Context


This academic session was chaired by Horst Kremers, who has been working since the Agenda 21/Rio Declaration and is involved with the UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism, and Professor Ke Gong from the Institute of the World Federation of Engineers. The discussion examined challenges and solutions for information society during times of crisis and disaster, bringing together international researchers and practitioners to explore how digital technologies and collaborative approaches can enhance societal resilience.


## The DRIVE Framework: Digital Resilience Indicators for Veritable Empowerment


### Theoretical Foundation


The Singapore research team, led by Audrey Yue (Provost and chair professor of media, culture, and critical theory at NUS), presented their DRIVE framework. Yue explained that their research challenges existing conceptualizations of digital resilience by moving beyond individual technical skills to embrace a socio-ecological understanding.


“Digital resilience should be understood as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments rather than just individual skills,” Yue stated. The framework defines digital resilience as “the capability of individuals to act, learn, understand, and make informed choices when faced with technological failures, changes, disruption, or challenges.”


### Framework Structure


Renae Loh, working on the DRIVE project, explained how their research revealed that digital resilience emerges from dynamic interplay between individuals and their social contexts. The framework maps drivers across individual, family, community, and societal levels, with a grid structure incorporating both horizontal and vertical elements.


The framework includes personal disposition and digital citizenship components that interact across all levels to create comprehensive resilience capacity.


### Digital Citizenship Dimension


Jun Yu, participating online in the DRIVE project presentation, provided a key insight: “Digital resilience isn’t just about personal safety or protection. It is also about contributing to a healthier digital society. This adds a normative dimension that digital resilience becomes a shared responsibility and a core component of what it means to be a digital citizen in the 21st century.”


Yu clarified that “digital resilience, despite the term digital, isn’t actually just about technical or digital know-how or avoiding the digital harms and risk. It’s more broadly about maintaining one’s activities and goals, even when digital systems and tools falter.”


## Crisis Communication Through Visual Documentation: Turkey Earthquake Case Study


### Research Overview


Bengu Sezer, a lecturer at Mersin University specializing in new media and social media, presented research on visual content shared during the 2023 earthquakes in Turkey. Her three-year project, funded by TรœBฤฐTAK with Dr. Kฤฑyam as coordinator and six scholarship holders, analyzed 54,859 earthquake-related images shared on social media platforms, particularly X (formerly Twitter).


The research team developed an annotation interface to systematically analyze the visual content, with disagreement resolution processes to ensure accuracy. Sezer’s analysis revealed how visual communication facilitated digital solidarity and crisis coordination during the disaster.


### Communication Infrastructure Challenges


A critical finding was the severe disruption of telecommunication infrastructure during the first two days following the earthquake. “We think the internet structure should be strengthened. There should be mobile internet providers. As the communication was blocked, that was a real problem in the very first days,” Sezer explained.


Sezer revealed how researchers had to take personal initiative to capture crucial data: “We couldn’t have done the rest of it without them. But the very first steps were taken by us personally.” This highlighted gaps between academic research capabilities and institutional disaster response frameworks.


### Timeline and Policy Goals


The comprehensive analysis is expected to be completed by October 2025, with findings available by the end of 2026. The research team aims to develop policy recommendations for governments and NGOs based on their systematic analysis of crisis-related visuals.


## Technology-Enabled Disaster Response: The Chinese Experience


### Integrated Digital Platforms


Zhan Zhang, presenting via pre-recorded presentation while traveling, analyzed how major technology companies in China, particularly Tencent, have developed comprehensive digital disaster relief systems. She referenced the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, which killed nearly 70,000 people and displaced millions, as a catalyst for these developments.


Zhang highlighted Tencent’s 9i Gaming Day, which reached 60 million participants and raised 500 million dollars in donations, demonstrating the potential for digital platforms to mobilize massive philanthropic responses. The approach includes online philanthropic platforms, real-time coordination tools, AI-powered knowledge bases, and gaming platform integration.


### WeChat Integration and Recent Developments


Zhang described how WeChat’s integration enables comprehensive disaster response coordination. She mentioned the 2021 Zhengzhou floods as an example of effective digital coordination, and noted that digital relief vouchers through WeChat Pay were introduced in 2023 to streamline aid distribution.


### AI Limitations


Despite optimism about digital innovation, Zhang provided a cautious assessment of artificial intelligence: “AI applications in disaster management are still in early development stages with limited real-time operational integration.” This restraint about AI’s current limitations provided important grounding for realistic expectations about technological capabilities.


## All-of-Society Information Management


### Comprehensive Interoperability Requirements


Horst Kremers, drawing on his extensive experience with the UNDRR Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism, articulated complex information management challenges underlying effective disaster response. He emphasized that “comprehensive interoperability is required for information flows across all disaster management phases involving multiple stakeholder groups.”


Kremers outlined the complexity of cross-organizational, cross-border information flows required for effective decision support, involving coordination among emergency services, public administration, private sector organizations, civil society, international agencies, and academic institutions.


### Just-in-Time Information Delivery


Kremers articulated specific temporal requirements for information management: “just in time in a definite predefined way of timestamp and periodicity every two minutes, every two hours, every two days.” This systematic approach moves beyond general coordination calls to articulate precise, structured information flow requirements across multiple organizational levels and timeframes.


### Framework Development for 2030+


Looking toward future policy development, Kremers advocated for incorporating information society requirements into the post-2030 disaster risk reduction framework. He made available QR codes and PDF downloads for participants and called for continued international working group collaboration.


## Platform Design and Social Cohesion


### Risks of Conflict in Digital Environments


Emillie de Keulenaar, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Copenhagen with expertise in speech moderation and algorithmic systems, examined how information systems themselves can generate societal risks. Rather than focusing on external disasters, de Keulenaar examined the “probability and risk of conflict in social media environments.”


“The lingering risk in that sense is the possibility that conflict might emerge… from the use of social media,” de Keulenaar explained. “These forms of conflict that it produces, from pluralistic ignorance to fragmentation to entrenchment, have a number of spiralling effects… all the way to offline conflict.”


She referenced examples including the Capitol Hill riots and conflicts over sustainability policies to illustrate how platform design decisions can either exacerbate or mitigate social tensions.


### Pro-Social Platform Design Solutions


To address platform-generated risks, de Keulenaar proposed pro-social platform design protocols including bridging systems that promote consensual content across political divides, balanced content recommendation algorithms, features facilitating cross-political dialogue, and multi-level governance approaches.


Rather than requiring complete platform redesign, de Keulenaar’s approach focuses on developing “bridging systems that can be plugged into existing social media platforms,” recognizing the entrenched nature of current platform ecosystems while providing pathways for incremental improvement.


## Key Areas of Agreement


### Multi-Level Approaches


The discussion revealed consensus around the need for multi-level, socio-ecological approaches to digital resilience. Ke Gong emphasized that “comprehensive socio-ecological approaches are needed for long-term empowerment in digital resilience,” supporting the Singapore team’s framework.


### Communication Infrastructure Resilience


Participants agreed on the critical importance of communication infrastructure resilience during disasters. This consensus emerged from different perspectives: Sezer’s emphasis on strengthening internet infrastructure, and Kremers’ comprehensive interoperability frameworks.


### Beneficiary-Centered Approaches


There was strong agreement on the requirement for beneficiary-centered technology solutions considering vulnerable groups. Zhang’s emphasis on “beneficiary-centered digital systems with attention to vulnerable groups” and Kremers’ advocacy for serving “all stakeholder groups” reflected this shared commitment.


## Implementation Challenges


### Operational Responsibility


Critical questions about operational implementation remained unresolved. Kremers’ questions about “who should be running your system after the project ends” and “how should the implementation be organized for ad hoc use in times of disaster” highlighted gaps between research feasibility studies and operational deployment.


### Technical Integration


The discussion identified technical challenges requiring further development: comprehensive interoperability standards, just-in-time information delivery mechanisms with quality guarantees, AI integration beyond current applications, and cross-platform integration for pro-social design features.


## Future Directions and Commitments


### International Working Group


The session concluded with Kremers’ call for establishing an international working group on “information society in times of risk” to continue collaboration beyond the immediate discussion. This working group would provide ongoing coordination among the diverse research teams and practitioners represented.


### Specific Deliverables


Participants committed to several deliverables: completion of the Turkey earthquake visual analysis by October 2025 with policy recommendations, development of policy recommendations addressing communication infrastructure gaps, creation of amendments for the 2030+ disaster risk reduction framework incorporating information society requirements, and maintenance of ongoing collaboration.


## Conclusion


Ke Gong’s closing remarks emphasized the importance of staying connected and exchanging ideas, practices, and research among participants. He stressed that “building resilient information society requires inclusive, proactive approaches grounded in solidarity across all stakeholder groups.”


The discussion successfully connected technical considerations about digital infrastructure and platform design to broader questions about social cohesion and civic responsibility. The commitment to sustained collaboration through an international working group and specific research deliverables provides mechanisms for maintaining momentum and achieving concrete outcomes.


The session established a foundation for addressing information society challenges during crises through multi-stakeholder coordination, socio-ecological approaches, and inclusive development, while identifying significant implementation challenges that require continued research and development efforts.


Session transcript

Horst Kremers: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, excellencies and distinguished participants. My name is Horst Kremers. I’m chairing this session together with Prof. Ke GONG from the Institute of the World Federation of Engineers. And this session has the topic of information society in times of risk. This has a, in the entrance of the session, I want to give a little bit an overview on the context of our work, and that is quite some years of activities in different fields, which aims to build a people-centric, inclusive, and development-oriented information society. In the context of an ever-changing world filled with various risks, this session focuses on the special demands that the information society faces during times of risk. These risks cover local, regional, national, cross-border, and global crises, as well as natural, technical, and humanitarian disasters, with special attention on highlighting demands, deficits, capabilities, and potential of actors and organizations. You already get the impression that there is a little bit of complexity behind that information scheme that we are talking about. United Nations’ all-of-society principle, which originated from the Agenda 21 in 1992, became a general principle starting from the data revolution activities of the United Nations in 2014, emphasizes the need for broad cooperation. The UN Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction further specifies the stakeholders such as women, children, youth, persons with disabilities, poor people, migrants, indigenous people, and so on, that should be involved in the design and implementation of policies, plans, and standards. It also calls for closer collaboration among the public and private sectors, civil society organizations, academia, scientific and research institutions, and encourages business to integrate disaster risk into their management practices. This session will cover contributions taking into account the special circumstances of information management in times of risk and the consequences for risk management, policies, anticipation, preparation, decision, and action in all phases of crisis and all types of disaster. Ladies and gentlemen, without further ado, I’d like to start with our first presentation. The presentation is by Professor Audrey Yu. Audrey Yu is a provost, chair, professor of media, culture, and critical theory, and deputy director at the NUS Center for Trusted Internet and Community at the National University of Singapore. You will have two presenters, and I will please introduce also, as appropriate, when you start the separate presentation. Thank you very much. Please take the floor. Okay.


Audrey Yue: Thanks, Horst, and thanks to the session, and thanks to everyone for coming here. It’s a pleasure to be part of this roundtable discussion. Today, we want to present our ongoing work, which is to develop an evaluation framework for digital resilience. So we call it DRIVE for short, and I am going toโ€”we have six minutes to talk for our presentation, and there will be three of us, myself, Audrey, and my colleague, Jun, who is online, but he will be speaking, and Renee, who is here. So the three of us will take turns to speak, and today we talk about our work from a larger project. This is the larger project on digital information resilience, but today we want to present only our work package, where we identify drivers to support the digital resilience of users. We want to present our design of this framework, introduce digital resilience as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments.


Renae Loh: Yes, thank you, Audrey. So we first sought to understand the current conceptualizations and operationalizations of digital resilience. This is done through a systematic review of peer-reviewed academic journal articles and grade literature, such as organizational reports and policy documents. So we gathered articles through basically keyword search, focusing on digital resilience, obviously, and related terms like digital skills, online safety, e-competences, just to name a few. So after a thorough screening and review process, we had a rich base of 68 academic articles and 31 pieces of grade literature, from which we would synthesize the very conceptualizations of digital resilience, identify key indicators, and current operationalizations. Now, on to the interesting part. From our review, we find that digital resilience is often conceptualized as an organizational capacity, focusing either on an organization’s information systems resilience or on employees’ and employers’ capacity to deal with digital disruptions. However, among the literature that does focus on individuals, the approach tends to center on personal skills and psychological capabilities, you know, what knowledge, attitudes, or behaviors individuals would need to develop in order to protect themselves and respond effectively in the face of digital challenges or threats. Now, this includes areas like digital literacy, coping strategies, and emotional regulation. More interestingly, our review also surfaced an emerging emphasis on the social-ecological approach, which recognizes that digital resilience is not just about individuals in isolation, but about the dynamic interplay between people and social formations and contexts, so like family, communities, and the broader society. It highlights the role of relationships, support structures, and the larger digital environment in driving resilience. Now, I’ll pass the time over to Jun, who is joining us online.


Jun Yu: Thank you very much, Renee, and I hope everyone can hear me properly. So, building on these foundations, yes, thank you. So, building on these foundations that Renee just discussed, our framework on digital resilience emphasizes that this isn’t just an individual trait. It is shaped by broader social, institutional, and technological contexts, and what does that mean? So, rather than seeing digital resilience in isolation, we would like to understand it as the capability of individuals to act and respond in relation to the systems and communities around them. For example, how someone copes with digital risks and harms is influenced not just by their own skills or awareness, but also by the support they receive from family and community, the policies in place, as well as the digital infrastructure available to them, of course. And importantly, we would like to bring this into dialogue with the concept of digital citizenship to highlight that digital resilience isn’t just about personal safety or protection. It is also about contributing to a healthier digital society. This adds a normative dimension that digital resilience becomes a shared responsibility and a core component of what it means to be a digital citizen in the 21st century. Next slide, please. Thank you. This approach informs our working definition of digital resilience as the capability of individuals to act, learn, understand, and make informed choices when faced with technological failures, changes, disruption, or challenges. So digital resilience, despite the term digital, isn’t actually just about technical or digital know-how or avoiding the digital harms and risk. It’s more broadly about maintaining one’s activities and goals, even when digital systems and tools falter. When facing a software failure, a new platform or app, or an unexpected online threat, resilience means responding thoughtfully and continuing to move forward. And we emphasize the four key capabilities, as you see in the presentation, to be able to anticipate and manage disruptions, to adapt to changing digital conditions, to recover in ways that foster growth, and to draw on support from families, peer networks, communities, institutions, including schools, of course, and wider social systems. So digital resilience in this view is as much collective as it is individual.


Audrey Yue: So our framework then is designed, as Jun mentioned, in a grid of horizontals and verticals, right? So at the vertical level, you will see the socio-ecological. So we map how different drivers of digital resilience are distributed across individual, family, community, and societal levels. So each level will contribute to a person’s ability to navigate digital disruptions. And then at the horizontal level you will see the drivers of digital resilience and we broke it down into comprising disposition and citizenship. So disposition then refers to habits, attitudes that we use to engage with technology in ways that are adaptive, critical, and ethically responsible. So then at the individual level you will see sort of indicators like personality, growth mindset, risk exposure, and informal learning. And then at the level of citizenship there are four domains on skills, competence, empowerment, and rights and responsibility. So here we talk about technical use, digital literacy, proactive coping, self-regulation, and ethical outlook. So more importantly, our grid cross-cuts the vertical and the horizontal. So if you look at the column on digital skills, for example, at the individual level is a bout technical use. And then you move down to the family, it’s about technical parenting. You move down to community, it’s about technology to foster social inclusion. And you move down to society, it’s about digital infrastructure provision and access. So to summarize then, our model develops digital resilience as a collective effort embedded in networks of relationships, systems, and shared values. So this, we believe, will provide a more dynamic understanding of what it means to be digitally resilient today. Thank you.


Horst Kremers: Yeah, thank you very much for this enlightening first presentation. I think there is a lot of topics you issued and showed. Are there questions from the audience here? Are there questions from the attending, virtually attending colleagues? Not to see here. I have a question on that one of the last slides was on the drive framework, socio-ecological levels with a table you showed. My question would be these requirements by society is a question how digital do you plan to have requirements put into digital way? Not only in a narrative way, but also in digital way. What kind of information would you need in digital for doing your analysis?


Audrey Yue: So if I understand your question correctly, you’re asking us about the kinds of digital resources that are required, right? So I think it’s before and after. So the before one is the behavioral traits and your mindset, your exposure to risk. So say, for example, if you have been exposed to online scams, I think you would be a bit more experienced and vigilant and you say, okay, I’m not going to do this again, right? So that’s the before part. And then the after part, right, the digital skills. I think we need to train people in technical use, but not just that, but for users to understand digital literacy and critical literacy in a broader dimension that is both digital and non-digital as well, and how the digital affects offline habits of life, right? And then after that, the citizenship part means, okay, then if we can navigate that, then we can actually have agency and be empowered. So how can we proactively cope? How can we behave online and in society in such a way that is ethical to ourselves and the users around us?


Horst Kremers: Yeah, fantastic. Thank you very much for this explanation. We certainly will, in the course of the presentations, we’ll touch some of these issues also, and I think this is a very good perspective of cooperation. So I will call the next presentation, please, that is from colleagues from Turkey. And his presentation will be by, the title is On the Role of Visuals in Digital Solidarity During Crisis, an Analysis of the 2023 Earthquake in Turkey. The presentation is by Bengui Sitser, lecturer of Mersin University in Turkey. Bengui Sitser graduated from Mersin University in Department of English Linguistics, completed an MA degree in Mersin University Institute of Social Sciences, and a PhD at the same institute. She has been working as a lecturer since 2006. On the other hand, she continues her work in the field of new media and social media. Bengui Sitser, are you online? Hi, it’s, oh, sorry.


Bengu Sezer: Hi, I’m here.


Horst Kremers: Yeah, we have, first we have the video presentation and then you’re available for questions. Yes, please. Please start the video presentation.


Bengu Sezer: Good morning, everyone. My name is Bengui Sitser. I’m going to present our project today, which is The Role of Visuals in Digital Solidarity during Crisis, an Analysis of 2023 Earthquakes in Turkey. This is a three year of, three years of project, which is funded by TรœBฤฐTAK, the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Dr. Kฤฑyam, who is our project coordinator, and Dr. Sezer and myself as researchers, we are carrying out this project with a team of six TรœBฤฐTAK funded scholarship holders. They are students, master’s and bachelor students. We are doing this all together. As We Are Social also states, information and communication technologies are widespread and have a high rate of usage in Turkey. And X, formerly Twitter, is tend to be used more often to reach news, especially in times of crisis in our country. We aim to investigate how citizens used visual content on social media, especially on X, to document and communicate during 2023 earthquakes in Turkey. By analyzing 54,859 earthquake-related visuals shared in the first week following the disaster, the project explores the role of images in shaping digital solidarity, crisis communication and cross-platform information flows in an increasingly visual-oriented media environment. Our project is composed of four work packages. Image annotation and analysis is only one work package, which I’m going to talk about today. First phase was data collection. We started to collect the data in the first week of the earthquakes. Then we separated visuals and the text data. For visuals, we created a codebook to annotate around 54,000 images. Once the codebook was ready, we designed the interface according to our requirements. As the last step, we trained our students to annotate the data. Here you see our annotation interface. We structured our annotation system so that each image is annotated by two different annotators. If they agree on each code, the image is automatically saved to the database. If not, as you see here, the red parts are the items on which annotators didn’t agree. In this case, an experienced annotator or one of the researchers checked the entry and decide what to do. As the items are not subjective, disagreement is generally a result of unintentional mistake. So we blocked this kind of mistakes by employing two different annotators. This section enables the tracking of finalized annotated images. Through frequency analysis and advanced queries on these visuals, it aims to establish a productive and scalable resource that can support a wide range of future research endeavors across disciplines. The annotation process is a labor-intensive task, which forms the backbone of our analytical framework, ensuring that each image is contextually and thematically categorized. Completion is expected by October 2025, paving the way for structured analysis. Secondly, following the annotation phase, the visual dataset will undergo both quantitative and qualitative analysis, including frequency patterns, thematic clustering, and platform-specific dissemination behaviors. These insights will be consolidated into academic publications, with initial findings expected to be released by the end of 2026. Based on the visual evidence and communication patterns observed in times of crisis, the study will offer concrete policy recommendations. These will address gaps in crisis communication, digital resilience, and participatory civic engagement tailored for use by governmental bodies, NGOs, and other stakeholders working in disaster response and digital governance. The initial findings of our project indicate that visual content produced during times of crisis strengthens digital solidarity. In this context, both the widespread availability of information and communication technologies and the maintenance of open and accessible communication channels are of great importance for effectively responding. Thank you very much, Dr. Bengรผ Sezer. Maybe you want to add some remarks to your presentation yourself? Thank you so much. Thank you for this opportunity. We are glad to be a part of this roundtable. We are really thrilled to be a part of this organization.


Horst Kremers: Yes, I think we have questions here from the auditorium, please. Please, Mr. Giacomo Mazzona.


Giacomo Mazzone: Yes, my question is, I see that you have a recommendation planned in your study. This recommendation will be for whom and for what? In which specific field will it be?


Bengu Sezer: The recommendation will be expected for the government, for NGOs to take precaution on what is important in the very first days of a disaster. We have seen a lot. We have seen that communication is really important and it was blocked in the very first days of the disaster here. We expect these kinds of contributions.


Giacomo Mazzone: Yes, the follow-up is, because we know what happened during this earthquake is that for two days there was no telecommunication in operation. The only way to communicate was broadcasting, mainly radio and then television. So, what are the lessons learned from this experience? That will be in the recommendation. Is the recommendation already prepared or are you still working on it? If you have an idea, where will you go with this recommendation?


Bengu Sezer: We think the internet structure should be strengthened. There should be mobile internet providers. As the communication was blocked, that was a real problem in the very first days.


Horst Kremers: Internet access. Okay, thank you very much for the question. I think that also we would like to have a specific, if it’s possible in your project, to make a specific remark. Also, on the kind of preparation of the organizational principles of the organization. I think that we have to the organizational principles that whosoever would do that service, would you do it from the institute in times of disaster or should all the service, you see that taking pictures or selecting pictures, analyzing social media, should that be done by some spot in government and so on. So, your recommendations also should cover these things and also preparation, what should be done in preparation of disaster, anticipation of crisis and so on. So, just to kick off and not to start working on elaborating how to do it in times of disaster.


Bengu Sezer: If I understood correctly, you asked how should the images collected, right?


Horst Kremers: No, not the images collected. Who should be running your system? You’re a science institution and you show the feasibility and the usefulness of your project work. After project, it should be implemented for ad hoc used in times of disaster. Maybe you find some ideas also to write in your project report how you think who should do it or who can do it or suggest to do it. We collected the data from the Twitter’s API.


Bengu Sezer: We personally took the step. I also think like you, governments should record these kinds of disasters. But in our case, we started this. We used Twitter API to collect the data with image and text messages. It was the very first days of the earthquake. We decided quickly so that no posts were missed, I think. We collected most of them. We are funded by TรœBฤฐTAK. TรœBฤฐTAK is the Scientific and Technological Research Council in Turkey. We couldn’t have done the rest of it without them. But the very first steps were taken


Horst Kremers: by us personally. Thank you very much. This is important work. And society and organizations certainly will benefit from your kind of analysis. Thank you very much for having that presentation and greetings also to your colleagues. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much, too. Okay. We call the next presentation. That is myself. I’m working, as I’ve said in the introduction, since the years of the Agenda 21 of the so-called Rio Declaration on Environmental Affairs. At that time, there was not much sustainable development terminology. But from that time, we had a lot of activity in all of society. United Nations-induced all-of-society activities. And in the environmental field, there was a time where it was very active. Also in Germany, I experienced that myself at that time. And since that time, now we go for all-of-society information demands in 2030 plus. Why 2030 plus? Because the Sendai Frameworks that I mentioned runs out in 2030, and we are already expecting what to suggest for writing in the next follow-up framework. The structure of my presentation is situation and complexity of current tax, the basic role of information management, some challenges, recommendations for action, disaster risk reduction 2030 plus. So I will be short because we don’t have very much time. So there is sometimes a lot of text in my slides. I will only note parts of that. There is a link and a QR code in the last file where you can download that presentation and read all the details. Following from the United Nations definition of mayor groups and other stakeholders, there is a scheme. You don’t have to read all this, but that is kind of the typical stakeholders definitions. In the course of time of my involvement with UNDRR, Stakeholder Engagement Mechanism, and also with observing what is going on, we have a collection of post-event reports of reporting on disaster. These are partly very voluminous documentations. And when you go through this and you see who is involved in disaster, then you see all these organizations. So I don’t want to read single one of them. I just want to mention, because we come back to this, that is the chambers of engineers should be here somewhere. Where did I put it? Engineers and architects. On the bottom, but for us is also very important. So situation and complexity about this. The massive complexity of cross-organizational cross-border information flows for decision support, operational management, and for emergency services, public administration, law enforcement agencies, critical infrastructure operators, the private sector, civil society organization institutions, and civil-military cooperation. Well, this is real complex when you know that all of them need vice versa information. And this is not running as quickly and as definite as we would wish. Also, that is experience from that post-disaster documentations. That requires comprehensive interoperability for information in all phases of disaster management. Don’t want to read all these phases, but it’s not only first response, but it’s also in the preparation and in the aftermath of the disaster. Very important, because people suffer so much also in months, in years, many years after a disaster. The situation is also defined for decision and action support of all these actors I listed. Not for general, somewhat only government, and they will care for their decisions. Government is absolutely important, but society is structured in a very… and Dr. Renae Loh, Dr. ZHAN ZHANG, Ms. Emillie de Keulenaar, Dr. Jun YU, Dr. ZHAN ZHANG, Ms. just in time in a definite predefined way of timestamp and periodicity every two minutes, every two hours, every two days or whatsoever to make that not just when the information comes we will use it but to negotiate for quality in organizational principles and make sure that you get the information just in time. That is what all these reports of aftermath of disaster are telling us and we need certainly it’s hard to implement. I tell you it’s not easy and I want to mention that here. One domain I want to mention in detail was a financial domain where where is the money gone? Is it there effectiveness in a synergy of spending money from the financial domain? We all know that there is a lot of money internationally sometimes moved. It’s important but sometimes people say well who knows where it really went. The role of media we have a special activity track together with Giacomo Mazzoni in risk journalism, media and radio and so on. So that is a special track of activities and there is also United Nations says about accountability, fraud, crime and last not least audits, independent audits of what happens. I just can recommend from the information point of view. The engineering and architecture in all phases of disaster management, this is only a list of what typically they are doing in first order. Very very rough scheme that can be detailed and has been detailed already by a report written by the world commission on engineering and so this is mentioned here on the side and we have to go on in that direction for in principle for all the stakeholder groups that we mentioned in the previous tables. The information management goes from these schemes especially from narrative to implementation I say and from data to decision and action. Selected challenges. I just want to mention the personnel, human resources, education and curricula. We are far behind what we need. Big data, standard operational procedures, service level agreements and so on. Creating a common European information space would be adequate because so many European standard information spaces are created and operating already. Disaster risk reduction 2030 would mean start now collecting amendments, extensions to be considered for shaping the 2030 plus reduction framework. Broadening the scope to existing pillars of societal resilience, that is what I call the society domain. Include requirements of information society, situations of exceptional needs, that is a terminology that the European Union used in recent times and central role of information management. Shaping resilient futures and empowering next generations. With that I come to our common goals, digital innovation, increasing and ensuring thematic humanitarian efficiency, cross organizational, cross border coherence, granting just in time information in line with all of society demands and in line with involving societal expectations. Society has its own expectations in terms of information management. Serving citizens just in time with technology methods and quality content. Thank you very much for your attention. Here you have the QR code for the download and there is also the link to download the PDF version. Keep in contact. We want this event also for kickoff of an international working group so we will continue especially on the topic of information society in times of risk. You’re welcome to join the discussion. Thank you. Urgent questions? Not at the moment so we are short in time and please we have the next speaker that is, oh we have the presentation of ZHAN ZHANG now that comes first.


Zhan Zhang: Good morning everyone. My apologies for not being able to join the session in person at this moment and I would like to say thanks to the organizers especially Mr. Horace Clemes for bringing us together for this important discussion. In my presentation I will briefly introduce one case study from Tencent, one leading tech company in China, focusing on how its digital initiatives and CSI efforts are shaping new pathway for technology-enabled disaster resilience. In an environmentally diverse country like China, natural disasters are a persistent reality. The country experiences multiple disasters each year causing significant harm to both human lives and the economy. A notable example was the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake which caused nearly 70,000 deaths and left millions displaced. Recent data from 2024 also reviews the continued situation highlighting the ongoing need for disaster risk reduction strategies, early warning systems, and sustainable recovery mechanisms in the country. If we look at the evolving engagement of Tencent in natural disaster support, it was clear that the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008 did push the company to develop an early version of its integrated disaster relief model and the multi-dimensional rescue framework. Today I will mainly focus on two digital initiatives during the past decade as part of the three-dimensional disaster relief initiative which leveraged Tencent’s digital infrastructure and products to support disaster response and recovery. First, Tencent’s 9i Gaming Day was launched in 2015 and has evolved into one of the largest online philanthropic events in China. Built on a fully digitized platform, the initiative allows Tencent users to easily access information about a wide range of charitable projects including natural disaster related projects, make donations with zero barriers, and track how their contributions are used. The initiative has seen remarkable growth in recent years with annual online donations exceeding 500 million dollars and active online participants reaching over 60 millions. Through Tencent’s flagship product WeChat, for example, all the projects related to natural disaster support have been accessible via a dedicated WeChat mini program since 2017. Tencent Docs were created, used, and shared through WeChat groups and WeChat moments during one of the natural disasters in 2021 Zhengzhou which allowed real-time reviews, updates over 6 million times and helped coordinating about 3,000 rescues during that local disaster. In 2023, Tencent introduced digital relief vouchers through WeChat Pay allowing disaster-affected families to purchase essential items based on their personalized needs and at the same time it also unleashes the power of a merchant system that local businesses could easily join such digital service. Building on these ongoing digital initiatives, Tencent announced earlier this year the launch of a digital disaster preparedness and relief support system. The system is beneficiary-centered with particular attention given to vulnerable groups, locally grounded, and technology-enabled. It addresses all the four phases of the disaster management cycle and outlines specific digital interventions at each stage with a strong emphasis on mobilizing and integrating local resources to establish a sustainable community driven model for disaster support that enhances local resilience and operational efficiency over the long term. Looking ahead, such frontline empowerment and localized integration are becoming central pillars in how Chinese tech companies approach digital and technological support for natural disaster management. The deployment of AI is also part of this blueprint. However, the current efforts mostly focus on building AI-powered knowledge base. Other AI applications are still in an early stage of development. with limited integration into real-time operational systems and the construction of cross-sector co-creation platforms. Thank you for your listening. And if you have further questions, feel free to contact me.


Horst Kremers: Yes, thank you very much. So we have this presentation because ZHAN ZHANG is not possible to have online because she is traveling at the very moment. So this could only be made as a presentation. Without further ado, I call the next speaker. That is Emillie de Keulenaar. She is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Copenhagen, a researcher at the University of Amsterdam’s Digital Methods Initiative and Open Intelligence Lab and a consultant of UNDPPA’s Innovation Cell. Her research is about the politics of speech moderation and the implementation of public dialogue processes in algorithmic systems. Thank you very much for being here and we were interested in your presentation.


Emillie de Keulenaar: I guess I have to use this? Yes. Sorry. Okay, so the case study here is a little bit different in that it focused more on the probability and the risk of conflict in social media environments. So there is this underlying critique that has started first in academic literature and now flows around a lot of public media, if you will, a lot of political discourse, which is that social media as a political information environment is a site of conflict and it produces lingering conflict in the sense that the way that it’s designed does not necessarily prioritize social cohesion or forms and processes of dialogue, but more so a number of special business interests. So the lingering risk in that sense is the possibility that conflict might emerge and other phenomena related to conflict might emerge from the use of social media. So that ranges from effective polarization to other forms of conflict that have been framed as, for example, the political entrenchment and the difficulty of crossing cross-political or social lines or pluralistic ignorance where we tend to consider or blame political opponents as more simplistically or caricaturely than what their arguments or positions actually are and so on and so forth. And it’s a source of risk in the sense that these forms of conflict that it produces, from pluralistic ignorance to fragmentation to entrenchment, have a number of spiraling effects. They can range from a loss of consensus or a shared reality amongst users all the way to the production of misinformation as a result of shared reality and consensus, or disinformation as a sort of instrumentalized way by state actors to tap into vulnerable and fragmented information ecosystems, to, as a result, a loss of trust in public institutions that’s particularly visible in the United States, to offline conflict, again, particularly visible in the United States, like in the Capitol Hill riots, to a number of key policies, especially for societal or even ecological resilience, for example, sustainability policies not being passed, not benefiting from popular support because of a fragmented information environment. And so some of the solution frameworks for this problem have been, let’s say, bundled up under one main agenda that’s been called pro-social platform design. And what that is about is essentially a collection of governance, design, and moderation protocols designed to facilitate and steer or produce social cohesion and societal dialogue through platform design. And in a sense, one can think about the notion of sustainability when one considers these pro-social platform design protocols in the sense that it’s based on the premise that if you tend to reduce online conflict, then you will tend to reduce a number of other phenomena that decur from conflict as a result. So, for example, the production of misinformation. And you tend to maintain the production of social cohesion as a result. One example is what we call bridging systems. So bridging systems can be seen as algorithms that you can plug in or plug out existing social media platforms like recommenders. So recommendation systems, and you might have seen this on YouTube, for example, they tend to prioritize very popular and sensationalistic content, whereas bridging systems will try to promote content that is consensual across political and social divides. And there may be an infinite number of different bridging systems in the sense that it’s just a framework, it’s an open problem, it’s not one specific solution, but it’s a framework through which to think of alternative platform design, if you will. And so one example, as I said, is bridging and balancing sources on social media Another is also facilitating social dynamism. So it’s facilitating the composition of different user groups based on political or social lines that facilitate cross-political, political crossovers. Another is giving social context. So features that facilitate understanding what are the premises and backgrounds and positions and lived experiences for other users that belong to other political divides and so on. And one can think in terms of a governance structure of kind of a stack. So how does one implement these sorts of policies and alternative design protocols? One can think first of, let’s say, high-level legislation or regulation or policies and standards that might first be deliberated on in public forums, such as this one, so OASIS or the Internet Governance Forum or other, where the method is through, let’s say, public consultations and deliberation with notable stakeholders, but also the public at large. And then operationalization is a key point of that in the sense that it’s all about transforming ideas or formulas for public dialogue into algorithmic systems. So this is the dialogue that goes from, let’s say, the political theorist to the computer scientist. This kind of crossover is operationalization. That can be done through a number of public hackathons and so on. The infrastructure, for example, there is this notion of middleware, which could be a public repository of alternative algorithms that one can plug in or plug out, decentralized social media platforms like BlueSky or Mastodon, and assessment protocols, so to look into, OK, what is the long-term sustainability of these alternative protocols that we’re recommending? And that’s it. Thank you.


Horst Kremers: Yeah, thank you very much. I apologize that we run a little bit out of time. But there are, like, recommender systems is something that we also would need for… One of the management principles in digital way is to make recommendations rather than decisions, to support decisions by making a lot of or a set of recommendations also to be documented, I say, on what kind of available decision alternatives can we act. So there is a lot of activities behind that. And I give the last word and the wrap-up to my friend Ke Guang.


Ke Gong: Thank you. Thank you so much. And I would like to thank all the participants for your active engagement and presenters. You talked about the information society’s responsibility and activities in the time of crisis from different aspects. For example, Emily has just provided a forward-looking vision for content moderation in high-conflict environments, advocating for sustainable consensus-based approaches that foster civic dialogue and societal cohesion. And also, our Turkish colleagues have analyzed how visuals shared on social media during the earthquake two years ago became a powerful tool for digital solidarity. And our Singapore team has provided a DRIVE project that stands for the Digital Resilience Indicators for Veritable Empowerment. I think that is a comprehensive approach, a comprehensive socio-ecological approach for long-term empowerment. And also, Zhang has offered in-depth cases from China. And Horst has reminded us of the fundamental principles from Agenda 21 and the CENTI framework highlighting the urgent need for all-society collaboration and integrated information management in disaster risk reduction. So with this, I think when we reflect on these insights, let us carry forward a shared commitment to build a resilient information society that is inclusive, proactive, and grounded in solidarity. I borrow the word used by our Turkish friends. So with this, we encourage all of you to stay connected beyond this forum and to exchange ideas, collaboration, good practices, and so on and so forth, and to carry out our responsibility as an information society to build a resilient world which is sustained and left no one behind. So with this, I declare the conclusion of this session. Thank you so much. Thank you.


A

Audrey Yue

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

623 words

Speech time

265 seconds

Digital resilience should be understood as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments rather than just individual skills

Explanation

Audrey Yue argues that digital resilience is not merely about individual technical capabilities but involves a complex interplay between personal disposition, available resources, and the broader environmental context. This approach recognizes that resilience emerges from the interaction between individuals and their social, technological, and institutional surroundings.


Evidence

The DRIVE framework development which maps digital resilience across multiple levels and dimensions, moving beyond traditional individual-focused approaches


Major discussion point

Digital Resilience Framework Development


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Renae Loh
– Jun Yu
– Ke Gong

Agreed on

Multi-level, socio-ecological approaches are essential for digital resilience


Disagreed with

– Renae Loh
– Jun Yu

Disagreed on

Individual vs. Collective Approach to Digital Resilience


Digital resilience requires mapping drivers across individual, family, community, and societal levels with cross-cutting elements of disposition and citizenship

Explanation

The framework design uses a grid structure with vertical socio-ecological levels (individual, family, community, societal) and horizontal drivers focusing on disposition and citizenship. This creates a comprehensive mapping system where different indicators operate at each level, such as technical use at individual level progressing to digital infrastructure provision at societal level.


Evidence

The DRIVE framework grid showing how digital skills manifest differently at each level – from technical use (individual) to technical parenting (family) to technology for social inclusion (community) to digital infrastructure provision (society)


Major discussion point

Digital Resilience Framework Development


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


R

Renae Loh

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

281 words

Speech time

125 seconds

Current conceptualizations focus too heavily on organizational capacity and individual psychological capabilities, missing the broader social context

Explanation

Through systematic review of academic literature, Renae Loh found that existing digital resilience research predominantly focuses on organizational information systems resilience or individual skills and psychological capabilities. This narrow focus overlooks the emerging social-ecological approach that recognizes the importance of relationships, support structures, and broader digital environments.


Evidence

Systematic review of 68 academic articles and 31 pieces of grey literature including organizational reports and policy documents, revealing the predominant focus on organizational capacity and individual psychological capabilities


Major discussion point

Digital Resilience Framework Development


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Audrey Yue
– Jun Yu
– Ke Gong

Agreed on

Multi-level, socio-ecological approaches are essential for digital resilience


Disagreed with

– Audrey Yue
– Jun Yu

Disagreed on

Individual vs. Collective Approach to Digital Resilience


J

Jun Yu

Speech speed

135 words per minute

Speech length

368 words

Speech time

163 seconds

Digital resilience must be viewed as collective capability involving dynamic interplay between people, social formations, and broader digital environments

Explanation

Jun Yu emphasizes that digital resilience is not an individual trait but emerges from the interaction between individuals and their social, institutional, and technological contexts. This includes support from family and community, existing policies, and available digital infrastructure, making it a shared responsibility and core component of digital citizenship.


Evidence

Examples of how coping with digital risks depends on support from family and community, policies in place, and available digital infrastructure, connecting digital resilience to digital citizenship concepts


Major discussion point

Digital Resilience Framework Development


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Audrey Yue
– Renae Loh
– Ke Gong

Agreed on

Multi-level, socio-ecological approaches are essential for digital resilience


Disagreed with

– Audrey Yue
– Renae Loh

Disagreed on

Individual vs. Collective Approach to Digital Resilience


B

Bengu Sezer

Speech speed

107 words per minute

Speech length

842 words

Speech time

470 seconds

Visual content on social media strengthens digital solidarity during disasters and serves as crucial documentation tool

Explanation

Based on analysis of the 2023 Turkey earthquakes, Bengu Sezer argues that visual content shared on social media platforms, particularly X (formerly Twitter), plays a vital role in creating digital solidarity and documenting crisis events. The research analyzes how citizens used visual content to communicate and coordinate during the disaster.


Evidence

Analysis of 54,859 earthquake-related visuals shared in the first week following the 2023 Turkey earthquakes, with annotation system involving multiple researchers and students


Major discussion point

Crisis Communication and Visual Documentation


Topics

Sociocultural | Development


Communication infrastructure must be strengthened with mobile internet providers to prevent communication blackouts during disasters

Explanation

Sezer identifies that communication infrastructure failures during the Turkey earthquake created significant problems in the first days of the disaster. She recommends strengthening internet infrastructure and ensuring mobile internet provider availability to maintain communication channels during emergencies.


Evidence

Experience from the 2023 Turkey earthquake where communication was blocked in the very first days of the disaster, creating real problems for coordination and response


Major discussion point

Crisis Communication and Visual Documentation


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


Agreed with

– Giacomo Mazzone
– Horst Kremers

Agreed on

Communication infrastructure resilience is critical during disasters


Disagreed with

– Giacomo Mazzone

Disagreed on

Communication Infrastructure Priorities During Disasters


Systematic analysis of crisis-related visuals can provide insights for policy recommendations to governments and NGOs

Explanation

The research project aims to offer concrete policy recommendations based on visual evidence and communication patterns observed during times of crisis. These recommendations will address gaps in crisis communication, digital resilience, and participatory civic engagement for use by governmental bodies and NGOs.


Evidence

Three-year TรœBฤฐTAK-funded project analyzing visual content with expected policy recommendations by 2026, involving systematic annotation of thousands of images


Major discussion point

Crisis Communication and Visual Documentation


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


G

Giacomo Mazzone

Speech speed

153 words per minute

Speech length

105 words

Speech time

41 seconds

Media and broadcasting remain critical when digital communication fails, as seen during earthquake communication blackouts

Explanation

Mazzone points out that during the Turkey earthquake, when telecommunications were down for two days, traditional broadcasting media (radio and television) became the only way to communicate. This highlights the continued importance of traditional media infrastructure as backup communication channels during digital failures.


Evidence

The experience during the Turkey earthquake where for two days there was no telecommunication in operation, with only broadcasting (radio and television) available for communication


Major discussion point

Crisis Communication and Visual Documentation


Topics

Infrastructure | Human rights


Agreed with

– Bengu Sezer
– Horst Kremers

Agreed on

Communication infrastructure resilience is critical during disasters


Disagreed with

– Bengu Sezer

Disagreed on

Communication Infrastructure Priorities During Disasters


H

Horst Kremers

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

2312 words

Speech time

1205 seconds

Comprehensive interoperability is required for information flows across all disaster management phases involving multiple stakeholder groups

Explanation

Kremers argues that the massive complexity of cross-organizational and cross-border information flows requires comprehensive interoperability systems. This involves emergency services, public administration, law enforcement, critical infrastructure operators, private sector, and civil society organizations all needing to exchange information effectively across all phases of disaster management.


Evidence

Analysis of post-event disaster reports showing the involvement of numerous organizations and the complexity of information flows between them, including chambers of engineers and architects


Major discussion point

All-of-Society Information Management


Topics

Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Bengu Sezer
– Giacomo Mazzone

Agreed on

Communication infrastructure resilience is critical during disasters


Information management must serve decision and action support for emergency services, public administration, private sector, and civil society organizations

Explanation

The information management system must provide decision and action support not just for government entities but for all societal actors involved in disaster response. This includes ensuring that all stakeholders receive the information they need to make effective decisions and take appropriate actions during crises.


Evidence

Reference to United Nations all-of-society principle from Agenda 21 (1992) and UN Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction specifying various stakeholders including women, children, youth, persons with disabilities, poor people, migrants, indigenous people


Major discussion point

All-of-Society Information Management


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Zhan Zhang
– Ke Gong

Agreed on

Technology-enabled solutions require beneficiary-centered approaches with attention to vulnerable groups


Just-in-time information delivery with predefined quality standards and organizational principles is essential for effective disaster response

Explanation

Kremers emphasizes that information must be delivered according to predefined schedules and quality standards rather than ad-hoc when information becomes available. This requires negotiating for quality in organizational principles and ensuring information arrives with specific timestamps and periodicity to support effective decision-making.


Evidence

Insights from post-disaster documentation reports indicating the need for structured information delivery with specific timing requirements (every two minutes, every two hours, every two days)


Major discussion point

All-of-Society Information Management


Topics

Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


The 2030+ disaster risk reduction framework should include requirements for information society and exceptional needs situations

Explanation

As the current Sendai Framework expires in 2030, Kremers advocates for the next framework to explicitly include information society requirements and address situations of exceptional needs. This would broaden the scope to include existing pillars of societal resilience and recognize the central role of information management in disaster risk reduction.


Evidence

Reference to the expiration of the UN Sendai Framework in 2030 and the European Union’s terminology of ‘exceptional needs situations’


Major discussion point

All-of-Society Information Management


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Z

Zhan Zhang

Speech speed

120 words per minute

Speech length

599 words

Speech time

298 seconds

Digital platforms can mobilize large-scale philanthropic responses, as demonstrated by Tencent’s 9i Gaming Day reaching 60 million participants

Explanation

Zhang presents Tencent’s digital philanthropic platform as an example of how technology can enable massive-scale disaster response coordination. The platform allows users to easily access information about charitable projects, make donations with zero barriers, and track contribution usage, demonstrating the potential for digital platforms to mobilize societal resources for disaster relief.


Evidence

Tencent’s 9i Gaming Day launched in 2015, evolved into one of China’s largest online philanthropic events with annual donations exceeding $500 million and over 60 million active participants, accessible through WeChat mini programs


Major discussion point

Technology-Enabled Disaster Response


Topics

Development | Economic


Beneficiary-centered digital systems with attention to vulnerable groups can enhance local resilience and operational efficiency

Explanation

Zhang describes Tencent’s approach to creating digital disaster preparedness systems that are beneficiary-centered with particular attention to vulnerable groups, locally grounded, and technology-enabled. This approach addresses all four phases of disaster management and emphasizes mobilizing local resources to establish sustainable community-driven models.


Evidence

Tencent’s 2023 announcement of a digital disaster preparedness and relief support system that addresses all four phases of disaster management cycle with specific digital interventions at each stage


Major discussion point

Technology-Enabled Disaster Response


Topics

Development | Human rights


Agreed with

– Horst Kremers
– Ke Gong

Agreed on

Technology-enabled solutions require beneficiary-centered approaches with attention to vulnerable groups


AI applications in disaster management are still in early development stages with limited real-time operational integration

Explanation

While AI deployment is part of Chinese tech companies’ disaster management blueprint, Zhang notes that current efforts mostly focus on building AI-powered knowledge bases. Other AI applications remain in early development with limited integration into real-time operational systems and cross-sector collaboration platforms.


Evidence

Current AI efforts in Chinese tech companies focusing primarily on AI-powered knowledge bases with limited real-time operational integration


Major discussion point

Technology-Enabled Disaster Response


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


E

Emillie de Keulenaar

Speech speed

156 words per minute

Speech length

873 words

Speech time

334 seconds

Social media platforms create lingering conflict risks through design that prioritizes business interests over social cohesion

Explanation

De Keulenaar argues that social media platforms are designed primarily to serve business interests rather than promote social cohesion or dialogue processes. This creates ongoing risks of conflict including affective polarization, political entrenchment, and pluralistic ignorance, which can spiral into loss of consensus, misinformation, institutional distrust, and offline conflict.


Evidence

Examples ranging from loss of shared reality to misinformation production, loss of trust in public institutions particularly visible in the United States, and offline conflict like the Capitol Hill riots


Major discussion point

Platform Design for Social Cohesion


Topics

Sociocultural | Human rights


Pro-social platform design protocols including bridging systems can reduce online conflict and maintain social cohesion

Explanation

De Keulenaar presents pro-social platform design as a solution framework involving governance, design, and moderation protocols to facilitate social cohesion. Bridging systems, for example, can be plugged into existing platforms to promote consensual content across political divides rather than sensationalistic content, along with features that facilitate cross-political understanding.


Evidence

Examples of bridging systems that prioritize consensual content across political divides instead of popular sensationalistic content, and features for social dynamism and providing social context about users from different political backgrounds


Major discussion point

Platform Design for Social Cohesion


Topics

Sociocultural | Legal and regulatory


Implementation requires multi-level governance from high-level policies to operational algorithmic systems

Explanation

De Keulenaar outlines a governance stack for implementing pro-social platform design, starting with high-level legislation and policies deliberated in public forums, followed by operationalization that transforms political theory into algorithmic systems. This includes infrastructure like middleware repositories and assessment protocols for long-term sustainability.


Evidence

Examples of public forums like OASIS and Internet Governance Forum for policy deliberation, public hackathons for operationalization, middleware repositories for alternative algorithms, and decentralized platforms like BlueSky and Mastodon


Major discussion point

Platform Design for Social Cohesion


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Infrastructure


K

Ke Gong

Speech speed

101 words per minute

Speech length

271 words

Speech time

160 seconds

Building resilient information society requires inclusive, proactive approaches grounded in solidarity across all stakeholder groups

Explanation

In his concluding remarks, Ke Gong synthesizes the session’s discussions to emphasize that building a resilient information society requires inclusive and proactive approaches based on solidarity. He calls for continued collaboration beyond the forum to exchange ideas and carry out responsibilities as an information society to build a resilient world that leaves no one behind.


Evidence

Synthesis of all presentations from the session, including the DRIVE project, Turkish earthquake analysis, Chinese tech company cases, and platform design approaches


Major discussion point

Integrated Approach to Information Society Resilience


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Zhan Zhang
– Horst Kremers

Agreed on

Technology-enabled solutions require beneficiary-centered approaches with attention to vulnerable groups


Comprehensive socio-ecological approaches are needed for long-term empowerment in digital resilience

Explanation

Ke Gong specifically highlights the Singapore team’s DRIVE project as providing a comprehensive socio-ecological approach for long-term empowerment in digital resilience. He emphasizes this as part of the broader need for integrated approaches that address multiple dimensions of resilience building in information society contexts.


Evidence

Reference to the Singapore team’s DRIVE project (Digital Resilience Indicators for Veritable Empowerment) as an example of comprehensive socio-ecological approach


Major discussion point

Integrated Approach to Information Society Resilience


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Agreed with

– Audrey Yue
– Renae Loh
– Jun Yu

Agreed on

Multi-level, socio-ecological approaches are essential for digital resilience


Agreements

Agreement points

Multi-level, socio-ecological approaches are essential for digital resilience

Speakers

– Audrey Yue
– Renae Loh
– Jun Yu
– Ke Gong

Arguments

Digital resilience should be understood as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments rather than just individual skills


Current conceptualizations focus too heavily on organizational capacity and individual psychological capabilities, missing the broader social context


Digital resilience must be viewed as collective capability involving dynamic interplay between people, social formations, and broader digital environments


Comprehensive socio-ecological approaches are needed for long-term empowerment in digital resilience


Summary

All speakers from the Singapore team and the session chair agree that digital resilience cannot be understood as merely individual technical skills but requires comprehensive socio-ecological frameworks that account for multiple levels of social organization and environmental factors.


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Communication infrastructure resilience is critical during disasters

Speakers

– Bengu Sezer
– Giacomo Mazzone
– Horst Kremers

Arguments

Communication infrastructure must be strengthened with mobile internet providers to prevent communication blackouts during disasters


Media and broadcasting remain critical when digital communication fails, as seen during earthquake communication blackouts


Comprehensive interoperability is required for information flows across all disaster management phases involving multiple stakeholder groups


Summary

These speakers agree that maintaining communication channels during disasters is essential, whether through strengthened digital infrastructure, backup traditional media systems, or comprehensive interoperability frameworks.


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


Technology-enabled solutions require beneficiary-centered approaches with attention to vulnerable groups

Speakers

– Zhan Zhang
– Horst Kremers
– Ke Gong

Arguments

Beneficiary-centered digital systems with attention to vulnerable groups can enhance local resilience and operational efficiency


Information management must serve decision and action support for emergency services, public administration, private sector, and civil society organizations


Building resilient information society requires inclusive, proactive approaches grounded in solidarity across all stakeholder groups


Summary

These speakers share the view that technology solutions must be designed with beneficiaries at the center, particularly considering vulnerable groups and ensuring inclusive approaches that serve all stakeholders in society.


Topics

Development | Human rights


Similar viewpoints

The Singapore research team shares a unified perspective on digital resilience as a collective, socio-ecological phenomenon that transcends individual capabilities and requires understanding of broader social, institutional, and environmental contexts.

Speakers

– Audrey Yue
– Jun Yu
– Renae Loh

Arguments

Digital resilience should be understood as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments rather than just individual skills


Digital resilience must be viewed as collective capability involving dynamic interplay between people, social formations, and broader digital environments


Current conceptualizations focus too heavily on organizational capacity and individual psychological capabilities, missing the broader social context


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Both speakers emphasize the need for systematic analysis of crisis communication to inform policy development and framework updates for disaster risk reduction.

Speakers

– Bengu Sezer
– Horst Kremers

Arguments

Systematic analysis of crisis-related visuals can provide insights for policy recommendations to governments and NGOs


The 2030+ disaster risk reduction framework should include requirements for information society and exceptional needs situations


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Both speakers recognize the potential of digital platforms to serve positive social functions, whether for disaster response mobilization or conflict reduction, when designed with pro-social objectives.

Speakers

– Zhan Zhang
– Emillie de Keulenaar

Arguments

Digital platforms can mobilize large-scale philanthropic responses, as demonstrated by Tencent’s 9i Gaming Day reaching 60 million participants


Pro-social platform design protocols including bridging systems can reduce online conflict and maintain social cohesion


Topics

Sociocultural | Development


Unexpected consensus

Integration of traditional and digital communication systems

Speakers

– Giacomo Mazzone
– Bengu Sezer
– Horst Kremers

Arguments

Media and broadcasting remain critical when digital communication fails, as seen during earthquake communication blackouts


Communication infrastructure must be strengthened with mobile internet providers to prevent communication blackouts during disasters


Comprehensive interoperability is required for information flows across all disaster management phases involving multiple stakeholder groups


Explanation

Despite coming from different professional backgrounds (media, academic research, and information management), these speakers unexpectedly converged on the need for hybrid communication systems that integrate both traditional broadcasting and digital infrastructure, recognizing that neither alone is sufficient for crisis communication.


Topics

Infrastructure | Human rights


Collective responsibility in digital environments

Speakers

– Jun Yu
– Emillie de Keulenaar
– Ke Gong

Arguments

Digital resilience must be viewed as collective capability involving dynamic interplay between people, social formations, and broader digital environments


Social media platforms create lingering conflict risks through design that prioritizes business interests over social cohesion


Building resilient information society requires inclusive, proactive approaches grounded in solidarity across all stakeholder groups


Explanation

These speakers from different research domains (digital resilience, platform design, and engineering) unexpectedly aligned on viewing digital challenges as collective rather than individual responsibilities, emphasizing the need for shared approaches to digital citizenship and social cohesion.


Topics

Sociocultural | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers demonstrated strong consensus around three main areas: the need for multi-level, socio-ecological approaches to digital resilience; the critical importance of communication infrastructure resilience during disasters; and the requirement for beneficiary-centered, inclusive technology solutions that consider vulnerable groups.


Consensus level

High level of consensus with significant implications for the field. The agreement across diverse professional backgrounds (academic researchers, tech industry representatives, media experts, and policy practitioners) suggests a maturing understanding of information society challenges during crises. This consensus points toward the need for integrated, multi-stakeholder approaches that combine technical infrastructure development with social resilience building, moving beyond siloed solutions toward comprehensive frameworks that address both individual and collective needs in times of risk.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Individual vs. Collective Approach to Digital Resilience

Speakers

– Audrey Yue
– Renae Loh
– Jun Yu

Arguments

Digital resilience should be understood as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments rather than just individual skills


Current conceptualizations focus too heavily on organizational capacity and individual psychological capabilities, missing the broader social context


Digital resilience must be viewed as collective capability involving dynamic interplay between people, social formations, and broader digital environments


Summary

While all three speakers from the Singapore team agree on moving beyond individual-focused approaches, they present this as disagreeing with existing literature and current practices that focus too heavily on individual psychological capabilities and organizational capacity rather than broader social-ecological approaches.


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Communication Infrastructure Priorities During Disasters

Speakers

– Bengu Sezer
– Giacomo Mazzone

Arguments

Communication infrastructure must be strengthened with mobile internet providers to prevent communication blackouts during disasters


Media and broadcasting remain critical when digital communication fails, as seen during earthquake communication blackouts


Summary

Sezer emphasizes strengthening internet infrastructure and mobile providers as the solution, while Mazzone highlights the continued importance of traditional broadcasting media as backup when digital systems fail.


Topics

Infrastructure | Human rights


Unexpected differences

Role of AI in Disaster Management

Speakers

– Zhan Zhang

Arguments

AI applications in disaster management are still in early development stages with limited real-time operational integration


Explanation

Zhang’s cautious assessment of AI capabilities contrasts with the generally optimistic tone about digital solutions presented by other speakers. This unexpected restraint about AI’s current limitations stands out in a discussion otherwise focused on digital innovation potential.


Topics

Infrastructure | Development


Overall assessment

Summary

The discussion showed remarkably high consensus on core principles with limited direct disagreements. Most differences were methodological rather than fundamental, focusing on different approaches to achieve shared goals of resilient information society.


Disagreement level

Low level of disagreement with high convergence on principles. The main tensions were between individual vs. collective approaches to resilience and different infrastructure priorities during disasters. This high level of agreement suggests strong foundational consensus in the field, but may also indicate need for more diverse perspectives to address potential blind spots in current thinking.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

The Singapore research team shares a unified perspective on digital resilience as a collective, socio-ecological phenomenon that transcends individual capabilities and requires understanding of broader social, institutional, and environmental contexts.

Speakers

– Audrey Yue
– Jun Yu
– Renae Loh

Arguments

Digital resilience should be understood as a socio-ecological process shaped by users’ disposition, resources, and environments rather than just individual skills


Digital resilience must be viewed as collective capability involving dynamic interplay between people, social formations, and broader digital environments


Current conceptualizations focus too heavily on organizational capacity and individual psychological capabilities, missing the broader social context


Topics

Development | Sociocultural


Both speakers emphasize the need for systematic analysis of crisis communication to inform policy development and framework updates for disaster risk reduction.

Speakers

– Bengu Sezer
– Horst Kremers

Arguments

Systematic analysis of crisis-related visuals can provide insights for policy recommendations to governments and NGOs


The 2030+ disaster risk reduction framework should include requirements for information society and exceptional needs situations


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Both speakers recognize the potential of digital platforms to serve positive social functions, whether for disaster response mobilization or conflict reduction, when designed with pro-social objectives.

Speakers

– Zhan Zhang
– Emillie de Keulenaar

Arguments

Digital platforms can mobilize large-scale philanthropic responses, as demonstrated by Tencent’s 9i Gaming Day reaching 60 million participants


Pro-social platform design protocols including bridging systems can reduce online conflict and maintain social cohesion


Topics

Sociocultural | Development


Takeaways

Key takeaways

Digital resilience must be understood as a socio-ecological process involving individual, family, community, and societal levels rather than just individual technical skills


Visual content on social media serves as a powerful tool for digital solidarity and crisis documentation, as demonstrated during the 2023 Turkey earthquake


Communication infrastructure resilience is critical – communication blackouts during disasters highlight the need for strengthened mobile internet and backup systems


All-of-society information management requires comprehensive interoperability across multiple stakeholder groups including government, private sector, NGOs, and civil society


Just-in-time information delivery with predefined quality standards is essential for effective disaster response across all phases of disaster management


Technology companies can play significant roles in disaster response through digital platforms that mobilize resources and support affected communities


Social media platform design creates risks of conflict and fragmentation that can undermine societal resilience and consensus-building


The post-2030 disaster risk reduction framework should incorporate information society requirements and address situations of exceptional needs


Resolutions and action items

Establish an international working group on ‘information society in times of risk’ to continue collaboration beyond this session


Complete the Turkey earthquake visual analysis project by October 2025 with policy recommendations for governments and NGOs


Develop policy recommendations addressing communication infrastructure gaps and digital governance for disaster response


Create amendments and extensions for the 2030+ disaster risk reduction framework incorporating information society requirements


Maintain ongoing collaboration and exchange of ideas, practices, and research among session participants


Unresolved issues

Who should operationally manage digital crisis response systems – whether academic institutions, government agencies, or other organizations


How to implement comprehensive interoperability standards across diverse stakeholder groups and organizational boundaries


Specific mechanisms for ensuring just-in-time information delivery with quality guarantees during crisis situations


How to balance business interests of social media platforms with pro-social design requirements for societal resilience


Integration challenges for AI applications in real-time disaster management operational systems


Funding and sustainability models for implementing digital resilience frameworks at scale


Standardization of visual content analysis methodologies for cross-disaster and cross-cultural applications


Suggested compromises

Multi-level governance approach for platform design that combines high-level policies with operational algorithmic systems


Hybrid approach to crisis communication using both digital platforms and traditional broadcasting when digital systems fail


Beneficiary-centered digital systems that balance technological capabilities with attention to vulnerable groups and local contexts


Bridging systems that can be plugged into existing social media platforms rather than requiring complete platform redesign


Thought provoking comments

Digital resilience isn’t just about personal safety or protection. It is also about contributing to a healthier digital society. This adds a normative dimension that digital resilience becomes a shared responsibility and a core component of what it means to be a digital citizen in the 21st century.

Speaker

Jun Yu


Reason

This comment is particularly insightful because it reframes digital resilience from an individual protective measure to a collective civic responsibility. It introduces the normative dimension that transforms the concept from merely defensive to actively constructive, connecting digital skills to citizenship and social contribution.


Impact

This comment elevated the entire discussion by establishing a philosophical foundation that connected individual capabilities to societal well-being. It influenced subsequent presentations to consider broader social implications rather than just technical solutions, and provided a framework that other speakers could reference when discussing community-level interventions.


We think the internet structure should be strengthened. There should be mobile internet providers. As the communication was blocked, that was a real problem in the very first days… We couldn’t have done the rest of it without them. But the very first steps were taken by us personally.

Speaker

Bengu Sezer


Reason

This comment reveals a critical gap between academic research capabilities and institutional disaster response. It highlights how researchers had to take personal initiative to capture crucial data during the earthquake, exposing the lack of systematic governmental or organizational frameworks for real-time crisis data collection.


Impact

This comment prompted Horst Kremers to push for more concrete recommendations about institutional responsibility and preparation. It shifted the discussion from theoretical frameworks to practical implementation questions about who should run such systems and how they should be prepared in advance, rather than improvised during crises.


The massive complexity of cross-organizational cross-border information flows for decision support… requires comprehensive interoperability for information in all phases of disaster management… just in time in a definite predefined way of timestamp and periodicity every two minutes, every two hours, every two days.

Speaker

Horst Kremers


Reason

This comment is thought-provoking because it quantifies the information challenge in disaster management with specific temporal requirements. It moves beyond general calls for ‘better coordination’ to articulate the precise, systematic nature of information flow needed across multiple organizational levels and timeframes.


Impact

This comment established the technical and organizational complexity that underlies all the theoretical frameworks discussed. It provided a reality check that influenced how other participants framed their solutions, emphasizing the need for systematic, pre-negotiated information protocols rather than ad-hoc responses.


The lingering risk in that sense is the possibility that conflict might emerge… from the use of social media… these forms of conflict that it produces, from pluralistic ignorance to fragmentation to entrenchment, have a number of spiraling effects… all the way to offline conflict.

Speaker

Emillie de Keulenaar


Reason

This comment is insightful because it introduces a completely different type of risk – not natural disasters or technical failures, but the risk that information systems themselves generate conflict. It challenges the assumption that digital platforms are neutral tools and highlights how platform design can either exacerbate or mitigate social tensions.


Impact

This comment broadened the scope of the entire session by introducing the concept that information systems can be sources of risk rather than just solutions to risk. It connected technical design decisions to social cohesion outcomes, influencing the final wrap-up to emphasize solidarity and inclusive approaches to information society development.


Digital resilience, despite the term digital, isn’t actually just about technical or digital know-how or avoiding the digital harms and risk. It’s more broadly about maintaining one’s activities and goals, even when digital systems and tools falter.

Speaker

Jun Yu


Reason

This comment is particularly thought-provoking because it paradoxically redefines ‘digital resilience’ as fundamentally about non-digital capabilities. It challenges the assumption that digital problems require digital solutions, instead emphasizing human adaptability and goal-oriented thinking as the core of resilience.


Impact

This redefinition influenced how subsequent speakers approached the relationship between technology and human agency. It provided a conceptual bridge that allowed the discussion to move fluidly between technical infrastructure concerns and human-centered approaches, ultimately supporting the session’s emphasis on socio-ecological frameworks.


Overall assessment

These key comments collectively transformed what could have been a technical discussion about crisis management tools into a nuanced exploration of the relationship between technology, society, and human agency. The Singapore team’s normative framing of digital citizenship established a philosophical foundation that elevated the entire discussion. The Turkish researcher’s candid admission about institutional gaps provided crucial practical grounding that prevented the session from remaining purely theoretical. Kremers’ systematic articulation of information complexity provided the technical reality check that informed all subsequent discussions. De Keulenaar’s introduction of platform-generated conflict risks broadened the scope to include information systems as potential sources of societal risk. Together, these comments created a multi-layered conversation that successfully integrated individual, community, institutional, and societal perspectives on information society resilience, ultimately supporting the session’s goal of fostering ‘all-of-society’ approaches to crisis management.


Follow-up questions

How digital do you plan to have requirements put into digital way? What kind of information would you need in digital for doing your analysis?

Speaker

Horst Kremers


Explanation

This question seeks clarification on the technical implementation and data requirements for the DRIVE framework’s digital resilience analysis, moving beyond narrative approaches to actual digital implementation.


Who should be running your system after the project ends? How should the implementation be organized for ad hoc use in times of disaster?

Speaker

Horst Kremers


Explanation

This addresses the critical gap between research feasibility studies and operational implementation, questioning organizational responsibility and preparedness structures for disaster response systems.


What are the lessons learned from the earthquake experience regarding telecommunication failures? Where will the recommendations go?

Speaker

Giacomo Mazzone


Explanation

This follows up on the practical implications of communication infrastructure failures during disasters and seeks clarity on how research findings will be translated into actionable policy recommendations.


How to ensure cross-organizational, cross-border information flows work effectively in real-time during disasters?

Speaker

Horst Kremers (implied)


Explanation

This addresses the complex challenge of coordinating information management across multiple stakeholders and jurisdictions during crisis situations, which was identified as currently inadequate.


How to implement ‘just-in-time’ information delivery with predefined timestamps and quality standards across all disaster management phases?

Speaker

Horst Kremers (implied)


Explanation

This technical challenge involves creating systematic information delivery protocols that go beyond ad-hoc information sharing to structured, quality-assured communication systems.


How to operationalize the transformation of public dialogue ideas into algorithmic systems for pro-social platform design?

Speaker

Emillie de Keulenaar (implied)


Explanation

This addresses the critical gap between political theory and computer science implementation in creating platforms that foster social cohesion rather than conflict.


How to assess the long-term sustainability of alternative platform design protocols?

Speaker

Emillie de Keulenaar (implied)


Explanation

This research area focuses on developing evaluation methods for measuring the effectiveness and durability of pro-social platform design interventions.


How to integrate AI applications beyond knowledge bases into real-time operational disaster management systems?

Speaker

Zhan Zhang (implied)


Explanation

This identifies a current limitation in AI deployment for disaster management, suggesting need for research into more sophisticated real-time AI integration.


How to develop comprehensive interoperability standards for information management across all phases of disaster management?

Speaker

Horst Kremers (implied)


Explanation

This addresses the technical challenge of ensuring different systems and organizations can effectively share and use information throughout the complete disaster management cycle.


What amendments and extensions should be considered for the post-2030 disaster risk reduction framework?

Speaker

Horst Kremers (implied)


Explanation

This forward-looking research area involves preparing recommendations for the next iteration of international disaster risk reduction frameworks beyond the current Sendai Framework.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Accelerating Structural Transformation and Industrialization in Developing Countries: Navigating the Future with Advanced ICTs and Industry 4.0

Accelerating Structural Transformation and Industrialization in Developing Countries: Navigating the Future with Advanced ICTs and Industry 4.0

Session at a glance

Summary

This discussion focused on how Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing technologies can accelerate structural transformation in developing countries, particularly in Africa. The session was co-organized by ESMA (Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing in Africa), UNIDO, and the Digital Transformation Alliance. Rafik Feki, UNIDO representative for several West African countries, explained that his organization provides comprehensive technical assistance to African nations seeking to adopt smart manufacturing, including ecosystem assessments, policy development, human capital preparation, and institutional support. He emphasized that Industry 4.0 represents a complete industrial revolution requiring changes in thinking and planning approaches, not merely technology adoption.


Professor Sama Mbang, CEO of the Digital Transformation Alliance and UNIDO expert, highlighted the transformative opportunities that Industry 4.0 presents for developing countries to leapfrog outdated production systems. He explained that these technologies enable increased productivity, improved quality standards for international markets, enhanced traceability, reduced production costs, and local value addition instead of merely exporting raw materials. The discussion revealed that several African countries including Tunisia, Kenya, Cameroon, and Morocco are already implementing Industry 4.0 programs.


A key challenge identified was the need for awareness-raising among policymakers who sometimes believe their countries must progress through earlier industrial revolutions before adopting Industry 4.0 technologies. Both experts stressed that digital transformation is not optional for Africa’s industrial development and competitiveness. The session concluded with announcements about an upcoming major conference in Morocco focusing on smart manufacturing in Africa, emphasizing the critical importance of building local technological expertise and capacity rather than simply importing advanced machinery.


Keypoints

## Major Discussion Points:


– **UNIDO’s comprehensive approach to Industry 4.0 implementation in Africa**: Rafik Feki outlined UNIDO’s multi-faceted strategy including ecosystem assessment, policy development, human capital preparation, institutional support, and enterprise-level assistance across multiple African countries including Senegal, Morocco, Tunisia, and others.


– **Industry 4.0 as a leapfrogging opportunity for developing countries**: Professor Sama Mbang emphasized how advanced digital technologies can help African nations bypass traditional industrial development stages, enabling direct adoption of smart manufacturing, improved quality standards, local value addition, and enhanced global competitiveness.


– **The African Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing (ESMA)**: Discussion of this collaborative initiative designed to create a knowledge-sharing platform across African countries, with key pillars including capacity building, technology transfer, policy support, and industry use cases.


– **Practical implementation challenges and solutions**: Addressing the need for awareness-raising among policymakers, comprehensive ecosystem mapping, digital transformation roadmaps, and the critical importance of developing local technological expertise rather than simply importing solutions.


– **Upcoming conference and collaboration opportunities**: Announcement of the “Next Generation for Smart Manufacturing in Africa” conference in Morocco (September-October), co-organized by UNIDO, ESMA, and international partners, aimed at bringing together African ministers, international experts, and industry stakeholders.


## Overall Purpose:


The discussion aimed to explore how Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing technologies can accelerate structural transformation in African developing countries, presenting concrete initiatives, strategies, and collaborative frameworks to help Africa catch up with and leapfrog traditional industrial development models.


## Overall Tone:


The discussion maintained a consistently optimistic and collaborative tone throughout. Speakers demonstrated enthusiasm for Africa’s potential in Industry 4.0 adoption, while acknowledging realistic challenges. The conversation was professional yet passionate, with participants showing genuine commitment to supporting African industrial transformation. The tone became increasingly energetic when discussing concrete initiatives like ESMA and the upcoming Morocco conference, ending on a strongly motivational note emphasizing urgency and opportunity.


Speakers

– **Adel Ben Youssef**: Professor of economics at the University Cรดte d’Azur, member of the ESMA think tank, session moderator


– **Rafik Feki**: UNIDO representative for Senegal, Togo, Mauritania, Cape Verde, Gambia, and Guinea-Bissau; responsible for digital transformation at UNIDO and implementation of the African Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing; previously worked at UNIDO headquarters in Vienna on digital transformation, smart manufacturing, and Industry 4.0 with focus on Africa and Middle East


– **Sama Mbang**: CEO and owner of Digital Transformation Alliance, expert in Industry 4.0 with 25 years of industry experience, professor in Karlsruhe, UNIDO expert for smart manufacturing projects, co-founder of Digital Transformation Alliance supporting Industry 4.0 adoption across Africa


– **Jimson Olufuye**: Principal consultant at Contemporary Consulting Limited based in Abuja, Nigeria; Chair of the advisory council of the Africa-ICT Alliance (private sector organization of ICT associations, companies, and professionals across Africa established in 2012)


– **Participant**: Identified as Amir from Iran (no additional role or expertise mentioned)


**Additional speakers:**


None identified beyond those in the speakers names list.


Full session report

# Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing: Accelerating Structural Transformation in Developing Countries


## Executive Summary


This discussion, moderated by Professor Adel Ben Youssef from the University Cรดte d’Azur and member of ESMA, examined how Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing technologies can accelerate structural transformation in developing countries, with particular focus on Africa. The session brought together representatives from UNIDO, private sector experts, and regional stakeholders to discuss implementation strategies, challenges, and opportunities for African industrial development through digital transformation.


## Key Participants


**Rafik Feki** – UNIDO representative for Senegal, Cape Verde, Mauritania, Gambia and Guinea-Bissau, who recently began his assignment two weeks prior to the discussion. He brings experience from UNIDO headquarters in Vienna working on digital transformation initiatives.


**Professor Sama Mbang** – CEO and owner of Digital Transformation Alliance and UNIDO expert with 25 years of industry experience in “introducing, developing new technologies in the area of industrialization, manufacturing, and also the digital technologies, AI, digital twin.”


**Jimson Olufuye** – Principal consultant at Contemporary Consulting Limited and Chair of the advisory council of the Africa-ICT Alliance, a private sector organization comprising ICT associations, companies, and professionals across Africa. The Alliance was established in 2012 with six country membership and now operates in 43 African countries.


**Amir (Iran)** – A participant who provided perspectives on South-South cooperation and technology transfer challenges.


## UNIDO’s Approach to Industry 4.0 in Africa


Rafik Feki outlined UNIDO’s comprehensive strategy for supporting Industry 4.0 implementation across Africa, emphasizing the urgency of adoption. “Please don’t consider this as a choice,” Feki stated. “If you want to industrialise your country, let’s do it with the appropriate way. There is no time to be lost. Policymakers have to understand that this is the only way and the only short way to industrialise Africa.”


UNIDO’s approach involves:


– Comprehensive ecosystem assessment covering education, vocational training, finance, and regulatory frameworks


– Policy development support for governments


– Human capital preparation and institutional support


– Collaboration with multiple UN agencies including ITU and UNECA


– Partnership with private sector organizations


Feki emphasized that successful implementation requires a fundamental shift in thinking: “Because we are talking about the fourth industrial revolution. It’s not about adopting a technology, it’s about an industrial revolution. It’s about changing our ways of thinking the industry, of planning the industry.”


UNIDO has initiated programmes in several African countries including Tunisia, Kenya, Cameroon, and Morocco, with plans for broader continental expansion.


## The Leapfrogging Opportunity


Professor Sama Mbang highlighted how Industry 4.0 presents unique opportunities for developing countries to bypass traditional industrial development stages. “Instead of replicating traditional industrial models with their limitations, as we know, we can design smarter, cleaner, and more connected industry from the ground up,” Mbang explained.


Key benefits identified include:


– Enhanced productivity and quality standards necessary for international markets


– Improved local value addition by processing raw materials domestically


– Better supply chain integration and compliance with international standards


– Support for economic diversification beyond traditional sectors


However, Mbang stressed a crucial prerequisite: “The most crucial prerequisite is the capacity to truly master the technologies and processes locally. Because it’s not enough to import advanced machinery or software. Countries need to invest in building local knowledge and expertise.”


## Regional Coordination and Challenges


Jimson Olufuye emphasized the importance of coordination among development partners and raised concerns about current collaboration levels. “There is need for stronger collaboration between UN agencies, particularly UNIDO and UNECA, to achieve SDG targets,” he noted, highlighting potential risks of Africa missing the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 targets.


The Iranian participant added a geopolitical dimension, noting that developing countries’ lack of unity weakens their position in technology transfer negotiations: “Sometimes they are not supporting each other in some views they should get from developed country, as like as in getting finance and getting technology transfer… we should have, I should say, more, more, more solidarity and more common view regarding these issues.”


## The ESMA Alliance


The African Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing (ESMA) was presented as a collaborative framework for knowledge-sharing across African countries. Mbang, whose Digital Transformation Alliance supports the initiative, described ESMA as operating on several key pillars including capacity building, technology transfer, policy support, and sharing industry use cases.


The alliance aims to make Industry 4.0 accessible and sustainable for Africa’s diverse economies, recognizing that different countries are at varying stages of industrial development. It serves as a platform for countries to learn from each other’s experiences and coordinate their Industry 4.0 efforts.


## Implementation Challenges


Several key challenges were identified:


**Awareness and Change Management**: Both Feki and Mbang noted the challenge of raising awareness among policymakers who may view their countries as not ready for Industry 4.0 transition.


**Comprehensive Ecosystem Development**: The need for systematic approaches covering education, finance, regulation, and institutional frameworks rather than focusing solely on technology acquisition.


**Local Capacity Building**: The priority of developing local expertise over simply importing advanced equipment.


**Coordination**: The challenge of achieving effective collaboration between different UN agencies and development partners.


## The Morocco Conference


The discussion highlighted an upcoming “Next Generation for Smart Manufacturing in Africa” conference scheduled for the end of September/beginning of October 2024 in Morocco. The event is co-organized by UNIDO, ESMA, the Phosphate company of Morocco (OCP), and Deutsche Messe (German Hannover Fair).


Professor Ben Youssef noted the conference’s significance as a major African smart manufacturing event with international participation, bringing together African ministers, international experts, and industry stakeholders. Organizers committed to ensuring remote participation options for broader African participation.


## Key Takeaways


The discussion revealed strong agreement among participants that:


1. **Industry 4.0 adoption is essential, not optional** for African countries to remain competitive and achieve meaningful industrialization


2. **Comprehensive approaches are necessary**, covering policies, human capital, institutions, and technology transfer rather than narrow technology-focused strategies


3. **Local capacity building is prioritized** over simply importing technology


4. **Multi-stakeholder collaboration is crucial** for successful implementation


5. **Regional cooperation mechanisms** like ESMA are important for sharing costs, risks, and benefits


## Conclusion


The discussion demonstrated alignment among diverse stakeholders about the importance of Industry 4.0 for African development. While challenges remain around coordination, financing, and capacity building, the collaborative frameworks being developed through initiatives like ESMA and events like the Morocco conference provide promising foundations for coordinated action. The emphasis on local capacity building and comprehensive ecosystem development reflects a sophisticated understanding of sustainable development principles that prioritizes long-term competitiveness over short-term technology acquisition.


Session transcript

Adel Ben Youssef: And welcome to this session. The session is co-organized by ESMA, Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing in Africa, UNIDO, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, and the DTA, Digital Transformation Alliance. So the session, we’ll try to challenge the theme of how we can accelerate the structural transformation, especially in developing country, but especially in Africa. And we think that these advanced technology, advanced information technologies, this industry 4.0 revolution, can help Africa and can help developing country to catch up and to leapfrog. And for this, I’m very happy to have my dear friends and experts with me today. Mr. Rafik Fkhie, he is a UNIDO representative nowadays in Senegal, Togo, and Mauritania, and Capo Verde. He is covering the entire region, and he is responsible also of this digital transformation at UNIDO, where he was in charge in the implementation of this alliance, the African Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing. I will let Mr. Rafik by himself present himself, and my dear friend Professor Saman Bang, who is CEO and owner ofโ€ฆ the Digital Transformation Alliance, but expert for the UNIDO for several projects about smart manufacturing and also professor in Karlsruhe. So let me start by asking you just the first question is to present yourself and how you are in touch with this industry 4.0 and these smart technologies. Sirafic, can you present yourself a little bit for our audience online


Rafik Feki: and offline? Thank you. Thank you, Professor Adel. Thank you for the invitation and good morning to all the participants. It’s a pleasure to be with you for this very important session. My name is Rafik Feki. I am currently UNIDO representative for Senegal, Cappadocia, Mauritania, Gambia and Guinea-Bissau. I just started my assignment two weeks ago, but for many, many years I was working in UNIDO headquarters in Vienna dealing with different topics related to digital transformation, smart manufacturing, industry 4.0 with a special focus on Africa and the Middle East. UNIDO is the specialized United Nations agency dealing with industrial development and with a special focus on the SDG9. SDG9 is the SDG dealing with industrial development, sustainable industrial development and infrastructure. And within my interventions, I will explain to you what UNIDO was doing. the last few years to promote smart manufacturing around the world, especially in the development countries. Thank you again and wishing you a very interesting discussion. Thank you.


Sama Mbang: Thank you very much Sirafiq. Let me go to Professor Samah to present yourself and how you are in touch with these technologies. Yeah, hello everyone. Thank you very much for this important session as well. So my name is Samah Mbah. I’m in my role an expert in Industry 4.0, having been working in industry for 25 years now, introducing, developing new technologies in the area of industrialization, manufacturing, and also the digital technologies, AI, digital twin. And based on this experience, I co-founded the association Digital Transformation Alliance with the mission to support Industry 4.0 adoption across Africa and other developing regions. So we work with governments, businesses, training institutions, and development partners to design strategies, to build skills, and more important, to implement practical projects such as smart factories, such as innovation labs, and digital skill programs. So my personal goal is to help local industries modernize, increase competitiveness, be part of this global challenge to support also the global prosperity. So I’m very happy to attend and then to share more insights.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you very much, Professor Sama. My name is Adel Ben Youssef. I’m a professor of economics at the University Cรดte d’Azur and I’m a member of the ESMA think tank. Let me start by first question to Serafik. Industry 4.0, digitalization are becoming hot topics for Africa and in Africa, and several countries are trying to implement industry 4.0 programs. I know at least Tunisia, Kenya, Cameroon, Morocco, among others. So what is the role of UNIDO and how you are helping these countries?


Rafik Feki: Thank you, Professor Adel. Yes, indeed, there is an increasing interest and motivation from different African countries to adopt smart manufacturing, industry 4.0 technologies. And we are seeing this with a very increasing path and this is bringing a lot of satisfaction for UNIDO because no one now is questioning the importance of the adoption of digital technologies for industry and how it become a pillar for industrial development. And in most of African countries in the recent few years, industry became the main interest of development of the countries and the policymakers in Africa understood very well that adoption of technologies and digital technologies is the only way to be able to reach out and overcome the gap that is existing currently. So we received several requests from different countries. And how you need with addressing those requests, we try usually to come up with a quite comprehensive package and technical assistance. Starting by assessing the existing ecosystem, because if you want to adopt such approach, you have to go with a comprehensive approach. You have to understand how the ecosystem would be ready to adopt those technologies, to support SMEs, to introduce the required changes, and very critical to implement what we call change management. Because if you don’t change the minds at all the levels, it’s extremely difficult to call for such change. Because we are talking about the fourth industrial revolution. It’s not about adopting a technology, it’s about an industrial revolution. It’s about changing our ways of thinking the industry, of planning the industry. So the first element would be to look at the existing ecosystem, then come up with the needed changes in terms of policies, in terms of regulation, because these might apply a lot of changes on the regulation, when you talk about information security, when we talk about access to some platforms, etc. there is a lot of work to be done about repairing the human capital. Because advanced technologies, AI, IoT, 3D printing, etc. would require that the human capital is ready to go with the same path. You can bring the technologies, but if you don’t have the technicians and the engineers on the ground, it will be extremely difficult to succeed in such a process. Then, you need as well to come up with the institutions that will be able to support this transformation. And here, for example, Professor Sama is working with UNIDO and Professor Adel as well, and some other experts in implementing what we call smart factories. In Morocco, in Tunisia, we got some requests from other countries, like South Africa. Only yesterday I was in a meeting with a minister here in Senegal, and he as well expressed the same request that we consider this entity as a pivotal entity to facilitate this transformation. Then, there is a lot of work to be done at the enterprise level. And here, we are talking about the support that we are bringing for those enterprises to acquire the technologies, to acquire the know-how, and to link them to… to some other network and some other companies so they can exchange experience, they can learn, and they can build together a new way of designing their production, selling their products, et cetera. So those are the different elements that you need to be trying to build. Of course, beyond the country level interventions, we are trying as well to come up with some comprehensive initiatives. You need to be co-organizing with the Swiss Smart Factory every year, the International Smart Manufacturing Summit, where we are bringing all the countries to come and exchange experiences and knowledge about smart manufacturing. I think we are talking as well about ESMA, the African, the Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing in Africa, where you both, Professor Shama and Dr. Adel, are part of it. So that’s an initiative supported as well by UNIDO. And those are just examples for what we are trying to bring to our member states to promote Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing. Thank you.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, Sirafiq. I remind that Sirafiq is in charge of several countries, including Senegal, Togo, Mauritania, Capo Verde, and Gambia for UNIDO. He’s a representative of UNIDO there and he’s responsible also for smart manufacturing in Africa. Let me move to Professor Sama and I would like to welcome the attendees, the last ones to this session. Professor Sama is… on the ground, already consultant in two big projects in Africa, in Tunisia and Morocco, implementing this smart manufacturing. So, Professor Sama, what are the real opportunities? We are seeing that there are opportunities, and you are on the ground. So, let me discuss these opportunities. You are muted. Unmute yourself, please.


Sama Mbang: Yeah, exactly. Thank you very much for this also important question. I mean, we talk a lot about Industry 4.0, of course, that we can leapfrog all the steps. But as Sarah Frick said, Industry 4.0 represents a transformative opportunity for developing countries. Because it’s about reimagining, to reimagine, let’s say, the economy in the 21st century. Of course, it allows us to leapfrog outdated and inefficient production systems by adopting these advanced digital and sustainable technologies. Instead of replicating traditional industrial models with their limitations, as we know, we can design smarter, cleaner, and more connected industry from the ground. For businesses, this means, of course, increased productivity through automation and data-driven decision-making, very key. It improves also quality and consistency. If you want to export your products, you have to demonstrate that you respect all of the quality rules and processes. And it enables developing countries to meet international standards. That is very important to access new markets or global markets. Because one of the key limitations in developing countries is that their products, semi-finished or finished, are not always at the level of the international standards. Industry 4.0 helps, therefore, to enhance traceability and transparency, which is crucial, as we said, if they want to export with compliance in a global value chain. And, of course, Industry 4.0, with these technologies, helps developing countries and businesses to reduce production costs over time by optimising also topics such as energy and waste. For the entire economy, if we speak about the regions, it creates the possibility of local value addition. Instead of exporting only raw materials and importing finished goods, countries can process and manufacture more locally. It can be the first step or the second step, and then export for the first step, it depends. But we can have more local value addition, retaining in this way greater economic value and creating skilled employment opportunities. And, on the other hand, it also strengthens supply chain resilience, which became an urgent priority after recent disruptions we faced with COVID and so on. By adopting digital tools for logistics, for example, and inventory management, businesses can better respond to market changes and reduce dependence on imports. Moreover, Industry 4.0 supports economic diversification. as well, helping countries move beyond commodity dependence into manufacturing, technology, services, and even digital exports. It can also play a role of smart urban development, supporting better infrastructure planning, resource management, and service delivery, for example, through smart city solutions. So in short, as we heard also before for Mr. Rafik, Industry 4.0 is not just about technology. It’s about structural transformation. It’s an opportunity to build more inclusive, sustainable, and competitive economies that create jobs, strengthen sovereignty as well, and improve the quality of life of people.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, Professor Sama. Before going further in the discussion and to deep dive on this, I would like to ask the attendees if you have any question of clarification, if you want to ask anything about what happened. So let it be more interactive, and then we move to the other questions. Please.


Jimson Olufuye: Thank you, Prof. Thank you very much for the presentation. My name is Jim Sindu Lufuye. I’m the principal consultant at Contemporary Consulting Limited based in Abuja, Nigeria. And I’m also the chair of the advisory council of the Africa-ICT Alliance, a private sector concern that is made up of ICT associations, companies, and other professionals across Africa. We established in 2012 with six country membership, and now we’re in 43 African countries. And we’re projecting by 2030, we can cover the rest of Africa. So I want to comment. proof for the efforts you made in the smart manufacturing setup you did, which is very important. And also to ask this question to Mr. Serafik of UNEDO. Yes, I’m really impressed with what I heard UNEDO is focused on doing, but it’s only UNECA that we have been seeing more and has reached out to us to work more with us with regard to development across Africa. And Industry 4.0 is very critical, so important. So are you in collaboration with UNECA? Are you working together to help African countries to leapfrog in this Industry 4.0? And then also to note that we are targeting Sustainable Development Goals 2030. We’re in WSIS. WSIS is about using WSIS Action Line targets to achieve SDG. So how can we achieve this SDG in Africa? We missed Millennial Development Goals. Will we still miss Sustainable Development Goals? Those are the two questions.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, and let’s be interactive. So you can address these questions, and then we can go further on my questions after. Serafik?


Rafik Feki: Yeah, thank you very much for the question. Of course, we are collaborating with several partners from UN like ITU. There are several initiatives. Maybe you have already the chance to collaborate with UNECA, but for example, we are collaborating with ITU. You know that ITU have has established a few years ago an alliance for innovation as well and UNIDO is part of this alliance. We’re collaborating with the private sector. We did as well have a small collaboration with UNICA to run some awareness sessions in some regions. You know that UNICA is working on a regional basis. For the consultancy in Africa, we are in touch with the African chapter of the World Association of Engineering. Maybe this will be discussed later. The ESMA alliance that I mentioned so far earlier is going to organize its first conference in almost two months. Ten weeks in Morocco. So that’s a call as well for all the participants to join this conference where we are bringing all our partners from the international and African community. We are talking with AUDANIPAD. So we are collaborating with several partners to promote Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing. You know digital transformation is covering different angles. So we are really targeting the smart manufacturing, the industrial angle in view of our specialized mandate while some other UN agencies are dealing with the digital transformation from different topics and different angles. So again, I think everybody will have a specific role to play in this area and all what is done by UNICA, by UNDP, by FAO, by all the UN and non-UN


Adel Ben Youssef: partners is contributing to achieving the SDGs. Thank you so much Serafik. Perhaps Sama, interacting? You are in mute Sama. Unmute yourself. Sorry, yes. Yeah, I think


Sama Mbang: as Serafik said, especially in this ISMA group we’ll talk about, this is a very good opportunity to connect different key stakeholders and actors in driving common efforts in this N2C 4.0 adoption. So that, as he said, less staying in touch and then especially during the next conference in Morocco in September, it will be a great opportunity at least for Africa to see exactly what are the key stakeholders and how to build a resilient, let’s say, ecosystem. And of course, this will also be a very good opportunity to connect with other developing countries or regions.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, Sama, Professor Sama. Let me move to Serafik. You are helping countries, we know that the digital technologies and this industry, smart industry, need regulation policies and in order to take advantage of this technology. So what are you doing in matter of policies, regulation, standards? like this with the UNIDO in order to help the countries? And let me say, what is the agenda for UNIDO in Africa for the next years, if you have some announcement to make here? Given the timing, I would like that short answer in order to be interactive with the president at the end.


Rafik Feki: Thank you. Thank you for the question. I think that’s a big, let me be frank, that’s a big challenge because talking to some ministers, some policymakers in some countries in Africa, sometimes, I mentioned some countries where this element is brought to the priority, the higher priority level. But in some other countries, when you talk about smart manufacturing and transformation, the answer would be that our industry is still maybe at the stage of the second or the third industrial revolution, how we want to bring them to the fourth industrial revolution. So, there is a lot of work to be done on awareness raising. And my point is usually, please don’t consider this as a choice. If you want to industrialize your country, let’s do it with the appropriate way. There is no time to be lost. Policymakers have to understand that this is the only way and the only short way to industrialize Africa. And that’s why we are doing a lot of awareness raising efforts and change management element to bring this dimension and to clarify how important is and this intelligent technologies and digital technologies for industry. The second element is we are trying as well to work on assessing the different ecosystems when we talk about assessing and mapping ecosystems and considering the complexity of this element, we try usually to look at this from several dimensions, not only from the current situation of industry and technology adoption, it goes to looking at the education system, the national education system, it goes as well to understand the vocational training system, it goes to look at the financial element because it’s critical to ensure access to finance to those technologies, the regulation and all the incentive, the existing incentive schemes, so the mapping is an essential element that help us and this is the third element to develop what we call the digital transformation roadmap and this defines the main milestones that need to be implemented on a country level or on a regional level to understand and to adopt those technologies. So that’s in short, the policy level intervention that we are trying to… promote within our interventions. Our plans is to duplicate and replicate this intervention to the maximum number of African countries in the five next years. And this is the idea behind establishing ESMA is really to establish a platform that would help to create a benchmark and motivate all the countries to come together and move together for the ones which didn’t start this process yet. And ESMA, the philosophy behind ESMA was let’s develop a think tank that would enable the countries that didn’t make start any action to learn from the others and then we can bring this change to the maximum number of countries and that’s why when we thought about ESMA we said let’s do it in partnership with the African Union and with some other continental operators like the African Development Bank and others and that would be our comprehensive answer to tackle this element. Thank you.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, Sir Rafiq. Sama, ESMA was mentioned by Sir Rafiq, so what are you doing and how you are helping the countries and let me talk a little bit about and how to join because we have people in the room and how to interact with ESMA.


Sama Mbang: Thank you very much, but you can hear me, right? It’s okay. It’s okay. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Thank you very much to allow me to talk about ISMA. So ISMA, first of all, stands for the African Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing for Africa. It’s an initiative designed to support Industry 4.0 and more consistently is about implementing smart manufacturing in Africa. As you know that for a lot of people, a lot of countries in regions, let’s say the economic or commercial balance is negative. They import more than they export because there is no real, let’s say, local value addition. And the local value addition comes from a productive ecosystem from industries and at least from manufacturing. That’s why we think that manufacturing and completely smart manufacturing, meaning that using advanced digital solutions will help developing countries increase their production capacity to be able to be in the, let’s say, in the global ecosystem and the global market. Concretely, the role is then to build a collaborative ecosystem where best practices, experiences and resources are shared. among countries and industries. ASMA has defined key pillars that includes capacity building, that means training programs to develop, let’s say, skills professionals in N2C 4.0, technologies and processes, including also technology transfer and localization, because it’s about adapting these advanced technologies to local needs and context. These pillars include also policy support and partnership development. So concretely, we have the pillar of industry use cases, where we discuss together what are the key industry use cases, country by country or region by region, that are very important. And then the second pillar is about technologies, where we develop technologies, where we talk about how to master these technologies, how to adapt these technologies to local needs. The third pillar is about training, as already said, it’s about, let’s say, creating advanced training environment to allow regions, businesses to get, let’s say, first knowledge, also remotely using techniques like virtual reality or augmented reality. And then also very important, pillar regarding policy supports to help government design strategies, incentives and regulations that enable smart manufacturing. So the aim is to make industry 4.0, and as we said, more smart manufacturing, accessible, relevant and sustainable for Africa’s diverse economies.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, Professor Sama. Thank you so much, Professor Rafiq. Let me interact with the room if someone wants to pose a question or to interact. Any remark and a question request, please go ahead.


Participant: Thank you. Thank you, Chair. Is your name? I’m Amir from Iran. Thank you. Thank you so much for this convening, this I should say side event. And thank you for our panelists for giving the insight regarding development. Development is a real issue for, you know, developing countries, and it has been discussed in many forums. But unfortunately, what I have seen in my experience in involving in the, I should say, United Nations forums, mostly in any forums that there was developing country as developed country, both of them, what I have seen, unfortunately, is that the view of the developing country in some cases is not the same. And sometimes they are not supporting each other in some views they should get from developed country, as like as in getting finance and getting technology transfer. They are the important issue we are trying to put in the document in United Nations system. And we should have, I should say, more, more, more solidarity and more common view regarding these issues, especially in the field of technology transfer, and also in the financial mechanism that we should ask from developed countries who they are mostly use, I should say, the resources from developing countries to develop earlier than us. Is the case for the, sorry to interrupt, for the smart manufacturing? for this kind of technology, really? Yeah, I should say, I’m talking in general, general developing issues. So I would urge everybody to be supportive in this field. Thank


Adel Ben Youssef: you. Thank you. So the point is well noted to support for this initiative for technology transfer and for the financial mechanism. So any other questions? Yeah, please. Yes, this event coming up in September, I think is an important event. Would that be remote participation? Because you know, Africa is diverse and you want to get more people to be there. You need to make provision for virtual participation. Professor Sama, if you want to, are we going to make some session remotely or can we have the access remotely to the conference in Morocco? It will be, of course, one of the biggest conference and the first about smart manufacturing. Are we planning to do so? In all cases, we are going to, we are in the organizing committee. So we will try to ensure that at least participation remotely can be ensured. Other comments, questions? Otherwise, I will, please, feel free if you want. No. So the last comment or two minutes, the last minute for the last minute for yourself, Sama. Message, key message from this session to the audience.


Rafik Feki: Yeah, yeah. Thank you, Professor. Yeah, maybe 30 minutes to, 30 seconds, not minutes. Sorry, 30 seconds. Yes. For the conference in Morocco, that would be. It’s called Next Generation for Smart Manufacturing in Africa. We are inviting all the operators around the world to share experience, like Hannover Fair, Hannover Messe, inside the owner of Siri, and all our partners, Swiss Smart Factory, and some people from Malaysia, Singapore. So we are trying, really, to bring the best experiences to share them with Africa. Of course, we are inviting all the ministers of industry and digital transformation from African countries. It’s co-organized with the Fosfate company of Morocco, OCP, and the Deutsche Messe, the German Hannover Fair. And it’s taking place end of September, beginning of October. Yes, all the logistics will be taken as well to consider online participation. So we are going to announce and to promote, we are finalizing the last touches, and we are going to promote the details about the conference and the agenda. ESMA is, of course, a co-organizer, as UNIDO initiative, with all its experts. And I think that would be a very, very important event for smart manufacturing for Africa. The last word, again, digital transformation and smart manufacturing is not a choice for Africa. We have to play the game. We have to adopt the approach, and we have to take it as seriously as we can. as fast as we can every day is bringing a new change. We are watching all what is happening now in terms of competition, for instance, for AI and other technologies between the different developed countries. So we should not stay on the side and watch what is going around. We should be part of this change. We should be part of this game as African member states. And UNIDO and a lot of partners are available and are here to support this process. So UNIDO will continue with its network and partners and experts like the two experts we are having today to support member states. And we will bring our part of the change and we stay very optimistic vis-a-vis these existing challenges. Thank you very much for your attendance.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you, Seraphic. Last minute, last comment, Sama.


Sama Mbang: Well, thank you very much. Very, very short. And I would like to point one thing is about prerequisites. You know, we always talk about prerequisite like we need a digital infrastructure, we need policies and so on. These are very important. But for me, the most crucial prerequisite is the capacity to truly master the technologies and processes locally. Because it’s not enough to import advanced machinery or software. Countries need to invest in building local knowledge and expertise. And this requires creating strong training environment, best practices. like smart manufacturing schools or labs, as we are working together in Morocco, Tunisia, and so on, are very key to embrace this change, as they connect all the stakeholders to drive in the same direction. So this is what I wanted to point out. This is one of the key points, because digital infrastructure needs technology. So if you don’t master these technologies, you will always import this knowledge in all other prerequisites you will put in place. And EIZMA is ready to support this structural transformation as we talked about. Thank you.


Adel Ben Youssef: Thank you so much, both the two, Serafik, Professor Sama, for your comment, insight, and for sharing this knowledge and recommendations. Yeah, definitely we need cooperation with other country. We need to adopt technology. And technology nowadays is diverse. And we need really intra-cooperation in Africa more. And we need to involve all the people, especially in our conference, next conference. And it’s a start of something. This talk is just a start. It’s just to open some venues. And let we see the future, how we can build it together. So thank you very much. And I will close this session today. And hopefully, we’ll organize many others in the future. Bye, and take care. Thank you. Bye. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. You Recording stopped Recording resumed Recording resumed Recording resumed Recording resumed Recording resumed


R

Rafik Feki

Speech speed

105 words per minute

Speech length

1995 words

Speech time

1138 seconds

UNIDO provides comprehensive technical assistance including ecosystem assessment, policy development, human capital preparation, and institutional support

Explanation

UNIDO offers a comprehensive package of technical assistance that starts with assessing existing ecosystems to understand readiness for technology adoption. This includes evaluating policies, regulations, human capital capabilities, and implementing change management processes since Industry 4.0 represents a complete industrial revolution requiring changes in thinking and planning approaches.


Evidence

Examples include work in Morocco, Tunisia, South Africa, and recent meetings with ministers in Senegal. UNIDO implements smart factories and supports enterprises in acquiring technologies and connecting to networks for knowledge exchange.


Major discussion point

Comprehensive approach to Industry 4.0 implementation


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Sama Mbang

Agreed on

Local value addition is crucial for economic transformation


UNIDO collaborates with multiple UN agencies like ITU and UNECA, plus private sector partners to promote smart manufacturing

Explanation

UNIDO works with various UN agencies including ITU through innovation alliances, and has collaborations with UNECA for awareness sessions. The organization also partners with private sector entities and engineering associations to promote Industry 4.0 across different angles of digital transformation.


Evidence

Specific partnerships mentioned include ITU’s innovation alliance, collaboration with African chapter of World Association of Engineering, and partnerships with AUDANIPAD. Each agency focuses on different aspects of digital transformation while contributing to SDG achievement.


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder collaboration for Industry 4.0


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Sama Mbang
– Jimson Olufuye
– Adel Ben Youssef

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder collaboration is essential for success


UNIDO organizes international events like the Smart Manufacturing Summit and supports regional initiatives like ESMA

Explanation

UNIDO co-organizes the annual International Smart Manufacturing Summit with Swiss Smart Factory, bringing countries together to exchange experiences and knowledge. The organization also supports ESMA (Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing in Africa) as a platform for African countries to collaborate and learn from each other.


Evidence

The Smart Manufacturing Summit is held annually with Swiss Smart Factory. ESMA is designed as a think tank to help countries that haven’t started Industry 4.0 processes learn from others, with plans for partnership with African Union and African Development Bank.


Major discussion point

Knowledge sharing and regional cooperation


Topics

Development | Economic


Major challenge exists in raising awareness among policymakers who may view their industries as not ready for Industry 4.0

Explanation

UNIDO faces significant challenges when policymakers in some African countries believe their industries are still at the second or third industrial revolution stage and question jumping to the fourth. This requires extensive awareness raising and change management efforts to help leaders understand that Industry 4.0 is the only viable path for industrialization.


Evidence

Conversations with ministers and policymakers reveal this mindset, requiring UNIDO to emphasize that this is not a choice but the only way to industrialize Africa efficiently without losing time.


Major discussion point

Policy and awareness challenges


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Comprehensive ecosystem mapping is essential, covering education, vocational training, finance, and regulatory frameworks

Explanation

UNIDO conducts thorough ecosystem assessments that go beyond current industry and technology adoption to examine national education systems, vocational training, financial access, regulations, and existing incentive schemes. This mapping considers the complexity of Industry 4.0 implementation across multiple dimensions.


Evidence

The mapping process looks at education systems, vocational training systems, financial elements for technology access, regulations, and incentive schemes to understand the full ecosystem readiness.


Major discussion point

Holistic ecosystem assessment


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Agreed with

– Sama Mbang

Agreed on

Capacity building and local expertise development are fundamental


Disagreed with

– Sama Mbang

Disagreed on

Prerequisites for Industry 4.0 implementation


Digital transformation roadmaps with clear milestones are necessary for country-level implementation

Explanation

Based on ecosystem mapping, UNIDO develops digital transformation roadmaps that define main milestones for implementation at country or regional levels. These roadmaps help countries understand and adopt Industry 4.0 technologies systematically.


Evidence

The roadmaps are developed as the third element following awareness raising and ecosystem assessment, providing structured guidance for technology adoption.


Major discussion point

Strategic planning for implementation


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Industry 4.0 adoption is not optional but necessary for Africa to remain competitive in the global economy

Explanation

UNIDO emphasizes that digital transformation and smart manufacturing is not a choice for Africa but a necessity. African countries must participate in this technological revolution to avoid being left behind in global competition, especially given rapid changes in AI and other technologies among developed countries.


Evidence

Reference to current competition in AI and other technologies between developed countries, emphasizing that Africa should not stay on the sidelines but be part of this global change.


Major discussion point

Urgency of Industry 4.0 adoption


Topics

Economic | Development


Agreed with

– Sama Mbang

Agreed on

Industry 4.0 is essential and not optional for African development


S

Sama Mbang

Speech speed

104 words per minute

Speech length

1298 words

Speech time

743 seconds

Industry 4.0 allows developing countries to leapfrog outdated production systems and adopt advanced digital technologies from the ground up

Explanation

Industry 4.0 represents a transformative opportunity for developing countries to reimagine their economies in the 21st century. Instead of replicating traditional industrial models with their limitations, countries can design smarter, cleaner, and more connected industries from the beginning using advanced digital and sustainable technologies.


Evidence

The concept of leapfrogging allows countries to skip inefficient traditional production systems and move directly to advanced digital manufacturing approaches.


Major discussion point

Leapfrogging opportunity through Industry 4.0


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki

Agreed on

Industry 4.0 is essential and not optional for African development


Smart manufacturing enables local value addition, reducing dependence on raw material exports and creating skilled employment

Explanation

Industry 4.0 creates possibilities for local value addition, allowing countries to process and manufacture more locally instead of only exporting raw materials and importing finished goods. This approach retains greater economic value within the country and creates skilled employment opportunities.


Evidence

The shift from raw material export to local processing and manufacturing represents a fundamental change in economic structure, moving countries up the value chain.


Major discussion point

Economic transformation through local value addition


Topics

Economic | Development


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki

Agreed on

Local value addition is crucial for economic transformation


Digital technologies improve product quality, traceability, and compliance with international standards for global market access

Explanation

Industry 4.0 helps businesses achieve increased productivity through automation and data-driven decision-making while improving quality and consistency. This enables developing countries to meet international standards and access global markets, addressing a key limitation where products often don’t meet international quality requirements.


Evidence

Enhanced traceability and transparency are crucial for export compliance and participation in global value chains, addressing the common problem of substandard products from developing countries.


Major discussion point

Quality improvement for global competitiveness


Topics

Economic | Legal and regulatory


Industry 4.0 supports economic diversification and strengthens supply chain resilience

Explanation

Industry 4.0 helps countries move beyond commodity dependence into manufacturing, technology, services, and digital exports. It also strengthens supply chain resilience through digital tools for logistics and inventory management, which became urgent after recent disruptions like COVID-19.


Evidence

Recent supply chain disruptions highlighted the need for better resilience, and digital tools for logistics and inventory management help businesses respond better to market changes and reduce import dependence.


Major discussion point

Economic diversification and resilience


Topics

Economic | Development


ESMA serves as a collaborative platform for sharing best practices and resources among African countries

Explanation

ESMA (African Alliance for Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing for Africa) is designed to support Industry 4.0 implementation by building a collaborative ecosystem where best practices, experiences, and resources are shared among countries and industries. The initiative addresses the negative trade balance many African countries face due to lack of local value addition.


Evidence

Many African countries import more than they export because there is no real local value addition, which comes from productive ecosystems and manufacturing capabilities.


Major discussion point

Regional collaboration through ESMA


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki
– Jimson Olufuye
– Adel Ben Youssef

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder collaboration is essential for success


The alliance focuses on four key pillars: capacity building, technology transfer, policy support, and industry use cases

Explanation

ESMA has defined key pillars including capacity building through training programs, technology transfer and localization to adapt advanced technologies to local needs, policy support and partnership development, and industry use cases to identify key applications by country or region.


Evidence

Specific pillars include industry use cases (country/region specific), technologies (mastering and adapting to local needs), training (using virtual and augmented reality), and policy support (helping governments design strategies and regulations).


Major discussion point

Structured approach to Industry 4.0 implementation


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki

Agreed on

Comprehensive ecosystem approach is required for successful Industry 4.0 implementation


ESMA aims to make Industry 4.0 accessible and sustainable for Africa’s diverse economies

Explanation

The goal of ESMA is to make Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing accessible, relevant, and sustainable for Africa’s diverse economic contexts. This involves adapting advanced technologies and approaches to fit the varied needs and capabilities across different African countries.


Evidence

Recognition of Africa’s diverse economies requires tailored approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions for Industry 4.0 implementation.


Major discussion point

Accessibility and sustainability of Industry 4.0


Topics

Development | Economic


The most crucial prerequisite is building local capacity to master technologies and processes, not just importing equipment

Explanation

While prerequisites like digital infrastructure and policies are important, the most crucial requirement is the capacity to truly master technologies and processes locally. Simply importing advanced machinery or software is insufficient; countries need to invest in building local knowledge and expertise.


Evidence

Emphasis on creating strong training environments and smart manufacturing schools or labs, as being implemented in Morocco and Tunisia, to connect stakeholders and drive coordinated change.


Major discussion point

Local capacity building as key prerequisite


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki

Agreed on

Capacity building and local expertise development are fundamental


Disagreed with

– Rafik Feki

Disagreed on

Prerequisites for Industry 4.0 implementation


Smart manufacturing schools and labs are essential for connecting stakeholders and driving coordinated change

Explanation

Creating smart manufacturing schools or labs is crucial for embracing Industry 4.0 change because they connect all stakeholders to work in the same direction. These facilities serve as training environments that build local expertise and coordinate efforts across different actors.


Evidence

Current work in Morocco and Tunisia demonstrates the importance of these training facilities in building local capacity and coordinating stakeholder efforts.


Major discussion point

Infrastructure for capacity building


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


J

Jimson Olufuye

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

240 words

Speech time

117 seconds

There is need for stronger collaboration between UN agencies, particularly UNIDO and UNECA, to achieve SDG targets

Explanation

While UNECA has been more visible in reaching out to private sector organizations like the Africa-ICT Alliance, there’s a question about collaboration between UNIDO and UNECA for Industry 4.0 development. Given the importance of Industry 4.0 and the approaching 2030 SDG deadline, stronger inter-agency collaboration is needed to avoid missing targets like the Millennium Development Goals.


Evidence

Africa-ICT Alliance has worked more extensively with UNECA and has grown from 6 to 43 African countries since 2012, projecting full Africa coverage by 2030. The concern about missing SDG targets is based on the previous failure to achieve Millennium Development Goals.


Major discussion point

UN agency collaboration for SDG achievement


Topics

Development


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang
– Adel Ben Youssef

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder collaboration is essential for success


P

Participant

Speech speed

133 words per minute

Speech length

252 words

Speech time

113 seconds

Developing countries need more solidarity and common views on technology transfer and financial mechanisms from developed nations

Explanation

There’s a concern that developing countries don’t always support each other when seeking technology transfer and financial mechanisms from developed countries. This lack of solidarity weakens their negotiating position in UN forums, particularly regarding resources that developed countries previously extracted from developing nations for their own development.


Evidence

Experience in UN forums shows developing countries sometimes have different views and don’t support each other on crucial issues like technology transfer and finance, which are important topics in UN documentation.


Major discussion point

Developing country solidarity for technology transfer


Topics

Development | Economic


A

Adel Ben Youssef

Speech speed

113 words per minute

Speech length

1070 words

Speech time

563 seconds

The upcoming conference in Morocco will be the first major smart manufacturing event for Africa with international participation

Explanation

The Next Generation for Smart Manufacturing in Africa conference, taking place end of September/beginning of October, represents a significant milestone as the first major smart manufacturing conference for Africa. It will bring together international expertise and African stakeholders to share experiences and knowledge.


Evidence

The conference is co-organized with Morocco’s OCP (phosphate company) and Deutsche Messe (German Hannover Fair), with participation from Hannover Messe, Swiss Smart Factory, and experts from Malaysia and Singapore. All African ministers of industry and digital transformation are invited.


Major discussion point

First major African smart manufacturing conference


Topics

Development | Economic


Strong partnerships between governments, businesses, training institutions, and development partners are vital

Explanation

The success of Industry 4.0 implementation requires collaboration across multiple stakeholders including governments, businesses, training institutions, and development partners. This multi-stakeholder approach is essential for designing strategies, building skills, and implementing practical projects.


Evidence

The session itself demonstrates this partnership approach, with UNIDO, ESMA, and Digital Transformation Alliance working together, and the upcoming Morocco conference bringing together diverse international and African partners.


Major discussion point

Multi-stakeholder partnerships for success


Topics

Development | Economic


Agreed with

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang
– Jimson Olufuye

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder collaboration is essential for success


Agreements

Agreement points

Industry 4.0 is essential and not optional for African development

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

Industry 4.0 adoption is not optional but necessary for Africa to remain competitive in the global economy


Industry 4.0 allows developing countries to leapfrog outdated production systems and adopt advanced digital technologies from the ground up


Summary

Both speakers strongly emphasize that Industry 4.0 is not a choice but a necessity for African countries to remain competitive and achieve meaningful development. They agree that this represents the only viable path forward for industrialization in Africa.


Topics

Development | Economic


Comprehensive ecosystem approach is required for successful Industry 4.0 implementation

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

UNIDO provides comprehensive technical assistance including ecosystem assessment, policy development, human capital preparation, and institutional support


The alliance focuses on four key pillars: capacity building, technology transfer, policy support, and industry use cases


Summary

Both speakers agree that successful Industry 4.0 implementation requires a holistic approach covering multiple dimensions including policies, human capital, institutions, and technology transfer rather than focusing on technology alone.


Topics

Development | Legal and regulatory


Local value addition is crucial for economic transformation

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

UNIDO provides comprehensive technical assistance including ecosystem assessment, policy development, human capital preparation, and institutional support


Smart manufacturing enables local value addition, reducing dependence on raw material exports and creating skilled employment


Summary

Both speakers emphasize the importance of moving beyond raw material exports to local processing and manufacturing, which creates more economic value and skilled employment opportunities within African countries.


Topics

Economic | Development


Multi-stakeholder collaboration is essential for success

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang
– Jimson Olufuye
– Adel Ben Youssef

Arguments

UNIDO collaborates with multiple UN agencies like ITU and UNECA, plus private sector partners to promote smart manufacturing


ESMA serves as a collaborative platform for sharing best practices and resources among African countries


There is need for stronger collaboration between UN agencies, particularly UNIDO and UNECA, to achieve SDG targets


Strong partnerships between governments, businesses, training institutions, and development partners are vital


Summary

All speakers agree that successful Industry 4.0 implementation requires collaboration across multiple stakeholders including UN agencies, governments, private sector, and development partners.


Topics

Development | Economic


Capacity building and local expertise development are fundamental

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

Comprehensive ecosystem mapping is essential, covering education, vocational training, finance, and regulatory frameworks


The most crucial prerequisite is building local capacity to master technologies and processes, not just importing equipment


Summary

Both speakers emphasize that building local capacity and expertise is more important than simply importing technology, requiring investment in education, training, and knowledge development.


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Similar viewpoints

Both speakers view ESMA and similar platforms as crucial mechanisms for knowledge sharing and regional cooperation, enabling African countries to learn from each other and coordinate their Industry 4.0 efforts.

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

UNIDO organizes international events like the Smart Manufacturing Summit and supports regional initiatives like ESMA


ESMA serves as a collaborative platform for sharing best practices and resources among African countries


Topics

Development | Economic


Both speakers advocate for structured, systematic approaches to Industry 4.0 implementation with clear frameworks, milestones, and organized pillars rather than ad-hoc technology adoption.

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

Digital transformation roadmaps with clear milestones are necessary for country-level implementation


The alliance focuses on four key pillars: capacity building, technology transfer, policy support, and industry use cases


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Both speakers recognize that Industry 4.0 is essential for meeting international standards and global competitiveness, while acknowledging the challenge of convincing policymakers who may feel their countries aren’t ready.

Speakers

– Sama Mbang
– Rafik Feki

Arguments

Digital technologies improve product quality, traceability, and compliance with international standards for global market access


Major challenge exists in raising awareness among policymakers who may view their industries as not ready for Industry 4.0


Topics

Economic | Legal and regulatory


Unexpected consensus

Urgency of Industry 4.0 adoption despite perceived readiness gaps

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

Major challenge exists in raising awareness among policymakers who may view their industries as not ready for Industry 4.0


Industry 4.0 allows developing countries to leapfrog outdated production systems and adopt advanced digital technologies from the ground up


Explanation

Despite acknowledging that many African countries may feel their industries are still at earlier industrial revolution stages, both speakers unexpectedly agree that this should not delay Industry 4.0 adoption. Instead, they advocate for leapfrogging directly to advanced technologies, which represents a bold consensus on bypassing traditional industrial development stages.


Topics

Development | Economic


Technology mastery over technology acquisition

Speakers

– Sama Mbang
– Rafik Feki

Arguments

The most crucial prerequisite is building local capacity to master technologies and processes, not just importing equipment


UNIDO provides comprehensive technical assistance including ecosystem assessment, policy development, human capital preparation, and institutional support


Explanation

There is unexpected consensus that the focus should be on mastering and adapting technologies locally rather than simply acquiring advanced equipment. This represents a sophisticated understanding that goes beyond the common assumption that importing technology is sufficient for development.


Topics

Development | Infrastructure


Overall assessment

Summary

The speakers demonstrate remarkably high consensus across all major aspects of Industry 4.0 implementation in Africa, including its necessity, comprehensive implementation approaches, the importance of local capacity building, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and regional cooperation through platforms like ESMA.


Consensus level

Very high consensus with strong alignment on strategic approaches and priorities. This high level of agreement among international development experts, regional representatives, and private sector stakeholders suggests a mature understanding of Industry 4.0 challenges and opportunities in Africa. The consensus implies strong potential for coordinated action and successful implementation of Industry 4.0 initiatives across the continent, particularly through the collaborative frameworks being established.


Differences

Different viewpoints

Prerequisites for Industry 4.0 implementation

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

Comprehensive ecosystem mapping is essential, covering education, vocational training, finance, and regulatory frameworks


The most crucial prerequisite is building local capacity to master technologies and processes, not just importing equipment


Summary

Rafik Feki emphasizes a comprehensive approach covering multiple systemic elements (education, finance, regulation), while Sama Mbang prioritizes local capacity building and technology mastery as the most crucial prerequisite above other infrastructure elements


Topics

Development | Infrastructure | Legal and regulatory


Unexpected differences

Overall assessment

Summary

The discussion showed remarkable consensus among speakers on the importance and urgency of Industry 4.0 adoption for Africa, with only minor disagreements on implementation priorities and collaboration approaches


Disagreement level

Very low level of disagreement. The speakers were largely aligned on goals and strategies, with differences mainly in emphasis rather than fundamental opposition. The main disagreement was on whether comprehensive ecosystem mapping or local capacity building should be prioritized as the most crucial prerequisite. This low level of disagreement suggests strong consensus in the development community about Industry 4.0’s importance for Africa, which could facilitate coordinated implementation efforts.


Partial agreements

Partial agreements

Similar viewpoints

Both speakers view ESMA and similar platforms as crucial mechanisms for knowledge sharing and regional cooperation, enabling African countries to learn from each other and coordinate their Industry 4.0 efforts.

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

UNIDO organizes international events like the Smart Manufacturing Summit and supports regional initiatives like ESMA


ESMA serves as a collaborative platform for sharing best practices and resources among African countries


Topics

Development | Economic


Both speakers advocate for structured, systematic approaches to Industry 4.0 implementation with clear frameworks, milestones, and organized pillars rather than ad-hoc technology adoption.

Speakers

– Rafik Feki
– Sama Mbang

Arguments

Digital transformation roadmaps with clear milestones are necessary for country-level implementation


The alliance focuses on four key pillars: capacity building, technology transfer, policy support, and industry use cases


Topics

Legal and regulatory | Development


Both speakers recognize that Industry 4.0 is essential for meeting international standards and global competitiveness, while acknowledging the challenge of convincing policymakers who may feel their countries aren’t ready.

Speakers

– Sama Mbang
– Rafik Feki

Arguments

Digital technologies improve product quality, traceability, and compliance with international standards for global market access


Major challenge exists in raising awareness among policymakers who may view their industries as not ready for Industry 4.0


Topics

Economic | Legal and regulatory


Takeaways

Key takeaways

Industry 4.0 adoption is essential, not optional, for Africa to achieve structural transformation and remain globally competitive


UNIDO provides comprehensive support through ecosystem assessment, policy development, human capital preparation, and institutional frameworks


Local capacity building and technology mastery are more critical than just importing advanced equipment or software


Industry 4.0 enables developing countries to leapfrog traditional industrial stages and build smarter, cleaner production systems from the ground up


The ESMA Alliance serves as a collaborative platform for African countries to share best practices and coordinate Industry 4.0 implementation


Smart manufacturing can enable local value addition, reduce raw material export dependence, and improve compliance with international standards


Comprehensive ecosystem mapping covering education, finance, regulation, and vocational training is essential for successful implementation


Strong partnerships between governments, businesses, training institutions, and development partners are vital for success


Resolutions and action items

UNIDO will continue expanding Industry 4.0 interventions to maximum number of African countries over the next five years


The first major African smart manufacturing conference will be held in Morocco in late September/early October 2024


Conference organizers will ensure remote participation options are available for broader African participation


ESMA will organize its first conference in Morocco with international partners including Hannover Fair and Swiss Smart Factory


UNIDO will continue promoting awareness and change management efforts among African policymakers


Development of digital transformation roadmaps with clear milestones for country-level implementation will continue


Unresolved issues

How to achieve stronger collaboration and coordination between different UN agencies (UNIDO, UNECA, ITU, etc.) for more effective SDG achievement


Addressing the challenge of policymakers who believe their countries are not ready for Industry 4.0 transition


Securing adequate financial mechanisms and technology transfer support from developed countries


Ensuring developing countries maintain solidarity and common positions in international forums on technology transfer


Bridging the gap between countries at different stages of industrial development within Africa


Specific details and logistics for the upcoming Morocco conference were not fully finalized


Suggested compromises

None identified


Thought provoking comments

Please don’t consider this as a choice. If you want to industrialize your country, let’s do it with the appropriate way. There is no time to be lost. Policymakers have to understand that this is the only way and the only short way to industrialize Africa.

Speaker

Rafik Feki


Reason

This comment reframes Industry 4.0 from an optional upgrade to an existential necessity for African industrialization. It challenges the common assumption that countries must progress sequentially through industrial revolutions and introduces urgency to the discussion.


Impact

This shifted the conversation from discussing ‘how’ to implement Industry 4.0 to ‘why’ it’s unavoidable. It elevated the stakes and provided a compelling rationale that influenced subsequent discussions about policy priorities and resource allocation.


Instead of replicating traditional industrial models with their limitations, as we know, we can design smarter, cleaner, and more connected industry from the ground… Industry 4.0 helps developing countries to enhance traceability and transparency, which is crucial, as we said, if they want to export with compliance in a global value chain.

Speaker

Sama Mbang


Reason

This comment introduces the concept of ‘leapfrogging’ as a strategic advantage rather than just catching up. It connects local industrial development to global market access through quality standards and traceability, showing how Industry 4.0 solves multiple challenges simultaneously.


Impact

This deepened the discussion by linking technological adoption to economic competitiveness and export potential. It moved the conversation beyond internal benefits to external market opportunities, influencing how participants viewed the global implications of local industrial transformation.


Because we are talking about the fourth industrial revolution. It’s not about adopting a technology, it’s about an industrial revolution. It’s about changing our ways of thinking the industry, of planning the industry.

Speaker

Rafik Feki


Reason

This comment fundamentally redefines the scope of the challenge from technical implementation to paradigmatic transformation. It emphasizes that success requires mental model shifts, not just technological upgrades.


Impact

This comment broadened the discussion to include change management, human capital development, and institutional transformation. It influenced subsequent discussions about comprehensive ecosystem approaches and the importance of mindset changes at all levels.


The most crucial prerequisite is the capacity to truly master the technologies and processes locally. Because it’s not enough to import advanced machinery or software. Countries need to invest in building local knowledge and expertise.

Speaker

Sama Mbang


Reason

This challenges the common approach of technology transfer through equipment imports and emphasizes knowledge sovereignty. It identifies a critical gap between having technology and mastering it, introducing the concept of technological dependency vs. technological autonomy.


Impact

This comment redirected the final discussion toward capacity building and local expertise development as the foundation for sustainable Industry 4.0 adoption. It influenced the emphasis on training programs and smart manufacturing labs as essential infrastructure.


Sometimes they are not supporting each other in some views they should get from developed country, as like as in getting finance and getting technology transfer… we should have, I should say, more, more, more solidarity and more common view regarding these issues.

Speaker

Amir (participant from Iran)


Reason

This comment introduces a critical geopolitical dimension often overlooked in technical discussions. It highlights how developing countries’ lack of unity weakens their negotiating position for technology transfer and financing, adding a strategic cooperation element to the conversation.


Impact

This intervention broadened the scope to include international relations and South-South cooperation strategies. It influenced the discussion toward collective bargaining power and solidarity among developing nations as prerequisites for successful Industry 4.0 adoption.


Overall assessment

These key comments fundamentally elevated the discussion from a technical implementation conversation to a strategic transformation dialogue. Rafik Feki’s urgency framing and paradigm shift emphasis established Industry 4.0 as an existential imperative rather than an optional upgrade. Sama Mbang’s leapfrogging concept and local mastery emphasis provided both the strategic rationale and the practical foundation for sustainable adoption. The Iranian participant’s solidarity comment added crucial geopolitical context often missing from technical discussions. Together, these comments created a multi-dimensional framework encompassing technological, economic, political, and social transformation aspects. The discussion evolved from ‘what is Industry 4.0’ to ‘why it’s unavoidable’ to ‘how to achieve technological sovereignty’ to ‘how developing countries can cooperate strategically.’ This progression created a comprehensive understanding that influenced the session’s conclusion emphasizing cooperation, local capacity building, and the upcoming Morocco conference as a platform for collective action.


Follow-up questions

How can UNIDO better collaborate with UNECA and other UN agencies to avoid duplication and maximize impact in Industry 4.0 initiatives across Africa?

Speaker

Jimson Olufuye


Explanation

This addresses the need for better coordination among UN agencies working on digital transformation and Industry 4.0 in Africa to ensure comprehensive coverage and avoid overlapping efforts.


Will Africa miss the Sustainable Development Goals 2030 targets like it did with the Millennium Development Goals, and how can Industry 4.0 help achieve these targets?

Speaker

Jimson Olufuye


Explanation

This raises concerns about Africa’s track record in meeting international development goals and seeks to understand how Industry 4.0 can be leveraged to ensure SDG achievement by 2030.


How can developing countries achieve better solidarity and common positions on technology transfer and financial mechanisms from developed countries?

Speaker

Amir from Iran


Explanation

This addresses the challenge of developing countries not always supporting each other in negotiations with developed countries for technology transfer and financing, which is crucial for smart manufacturing adoption.


What are the specific details, agenda, and logistics for remote participation in the upcoming Next Generation Smart Manufacturing conference in Morocco?

Speaker

Unnamed participant


Explanation

This seeks practical information about accessing the important upcoming conference, recognizing that virtual participation is needed to ensure broader African participation given the continent’s diversity and travel constraints.


How can countries build local capacity to truly master Industry 4.0 technologies and processes rather than just importing them?

Speaker

Sama Mbang


Explanation

This addresses the critical need for developing local expertise and knowledge rather than remaining dependent on imported technology and external expertise, which is essential for sustainable Industry 4.0 adoption.


What specific financial mechanisms and incentive schemes are most effective for supporting SMEs in adopting Industry 4.0 technologies?

Speaker

Implied from Rafik Feki’s discussion


Explanation

While mentioned as important, the specific details of how to ensure access to finance for Industry 4.0 adoption by SMEs was not fully explored and requires further research.


How can the assessment and mapping of national ecosystems for Industry 4.0 readiness be standardized across African countries?

Speaker

Implied from Rafik Feki’s discussion


Explanation

The complexity of assessing readiness across multiple dimensions (education, vocational training, finance, regulation) suggests need for standardized methodologies that can be applied consistently across different African contexts.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.