An Australian court has upheld a ruling requiring Elon Musk’s X, previously known as Twitter, to pay a $418,000 fine. The fine was issued for failing to cooperate with a request from the eSafety Commissioner regarding anti-child-abuse measures on the platform.
X had contested the penalty, arguing that it was no longer bound by regulatory obligations following a corporate restructure under Musk’s ownership. However, the court ruled that the platform was still required to respond to the request made by the Australian internet safety regulator.
The eSafety Commissioner stated that accepting X’s argument could have set a worrying precedent for foreign companies merging to avoid regulatory responsibilities. Civil proceedings against X have also begun due to its noncompliance.
Musk’s platform has clashed with authorities in Australia before, notably in a case where X refused to remove content showing a stabbing incident. The company claimed that one country should not dictate global online content.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against TikTok, accusing the platform of violating children’s privacy laws. The lawsuit alleges that TikTok shared personal information of minors without parental consent, in breach of Texas’s Securing Children Online through Parental Empowerment Act (SCOPE Act).
The legal action seeks an injunction and civil penalties, with fines up to $10,000 per violation. Paxton claims TikTok failed to provide adequate privacy tools for children and allowed data to be shared from accounts set to private. Targeted advertising to children was also a concern raised in the lawsuit.
TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, is being held responsible for allegedly prioritising profits over child safety. Paxton stressed the importance of holding large tech companies accountable for their role in protecting minors online.
The case was filed in Galveston County court, with TikTok yet to comment on the matter. The lawsuit represents a broader concern about the protection of children’s online privacy in the digital age.
The European Commission has requested information from YouTube, Snapchat, and TikTok regarding the algorithms used to recommend content to users. Concerns have been raised about the influence of these systems on issues like elections, mental health, and protecting minors. The inquiry falls under the Digital Services Act (DSA), aiming to address potential systemic risks, including the spread of illegal content such as hate speech and drug promotion.
TikTok faces additional scrutiny about measures to prevent bad actors from manipulating the platform, especially during elections. These platforms must provide detailed information on their systems by 15 November. Failure to comply could result in further action, including potential fines.
The DSA mandates that major tech companies take more responsibility in tackling illegal and harmful content. In the past, the EU has initiated similar non-compliance proceedings with other tech giants like Meta, AliExpress, and TikTok over content regulation.
Bank of Montreal (BMO) has appointed Kristin Milchanowski as its chief AI and data officer, effective October 15. Formerly with EY, Milchanowski will lead the bank’s AI initiatives, focusing on data, robotics, and analytics. This new role builds on BMO’s ongoing investments in AI, aiming to enhance data management and governance while fostering a culture of innovation.
The financial sector views AI as a major opportunity, with potential uses like streamlining compliance tasks and enhancing customer service. However, integrating AI brings challenges, especially for firms managing sensitive data. Analysts suggest that AI-driven solutions could simplify processes and improve data-driven decision-making across the industry, offering significant benefits to financial services.
As AI adoption expands, US regulators seek public feedback to ensure these technologies foster fair and equitable access to financial services. Earlier this year, Morgan Stanley emphasised AI’s transformative potential, noting it could save financial advisers up to 15 hours of work per week, highlighting the significant impact AI could have on the industry.
The European Commission has revealed ongoing disagreements between general-purpose AI providers and other stakeholders during the first Code of Practice plenary on 30 September. The Code will play a key role in interpreting the EU AI Act’s risk and transparency requirements until formal standards are finalised in 2026.
Nearly 1,000 participants, including industry, civil society, and academia, attended the virtual plenary. Feedback from a multi-stakeholder consultation and workshops will guide the drafting of the Code, with the first AI provider workshop scheduled for mid-October. A draft of the Code is expected by early November.
Key disagreements include how much data transparency should be required. Non-provider stakeholders support disclosing data sources such as licensed content and scraped data, while AI providers are less inclined to share information about open datasets. Differences also emerged on strict risk measures like third-party audits.
Given the large number of participants, including experts from academia, the drafting process will need careful management to ensure smooth progress. The final version of the Code of Practice is expected in April 2025.
The Indian government has recently redefined the roles of key ministries concerning telecom network security, cybersecurity, and cybercrime through amendments to the business allocation rules. As a result, this strategic reorganisation ensures that each ministry is assigned clear responsibilities, streamlining efforts to manage these vital areas more effectively.
The roles have been precisely delineated to enhance governance. Specifically, the Ministry of Communications is responsible for telecom security under the Telecommunication Act of 2023, which enables authorities to access traffic data, including from OTT services like WhatsApp. Meanwhile, cybersecurity falls under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), as outlined in the IT Act of 2000, with strategic guidance provided by the National Security Council Secretariat.
Furthermore, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) oversees cybercrime, working closely with the Department of Telecommunications to address fraud and utilising tools such as Pratibimb to track mobile numbers involved in cybercriminal activities.
There is an ongoing debate on regulating OTT communication services. While telecom companies continue to push to regulate these services under the Telecom Act, the government in India has reiterated that OTT services like WhatsApp and Telegram fall under the Information Technology Act. This differentiation reflects the broader scope of the IT Act in handling digital communication services, even as pressure mounts for more stringent telecom-specific regulations.
Augmented Intelligence, a new AI startup, has emerged from stealth with $44 million in funding and a bold claim that its AI platform, Apollo, can outperform traditional chatbots by combining symbolic AI and neural networks. While neural networks excel at language generation, symbolic AI uses task-specific rules to solve complex problems. Apollo, the company says, uses both approaches to power more efficient and “agentic” chatbots capable of not just answering questions but performing tasks like booking flights.
CEO Ohad Elhelo argues that most AI models, like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, struggle when they need to take actions or rely on external tools. In contrast, Apollo integrates seamlessly with a company’s systems and APIs, eliminating the need for extensive setup. Unlike many competitors, it doesn’t require training on a company’s private data, appealing to businesses concerned about data security. Augmented Intelligence also touts its explainability, offering logs that help companies understand and improve the AI’s performance.
The company has already secured a partnership with Google Cloud and claims its technology outperforms purely neural network-based models. While some of CEO Elhelo’s claims, such as eliminating AI ‘hallucinations’ remain unproven, Augmented Intelligence’s novel approach and recent $350 million valuation highlight growing interest in AI solutions that blend symbolic reasoning with neural processing.
China has announced new regulations on network data security management, representing a significant step forward in its efforts to govern data processing activities effectively. Scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2025, these regulations establish a comprehensive framework that ensures organisations comply with legal standards and adopt best practices in data handling.
The regulations aim to bolster compliance and accountability across various sectors by clearly defining expectations for network data processing and fostering a safer digital environment. Additionally, they refine mechanisms for managing sensitive data, ultimately enhancing overall governance in this vital area. A primary focus of these regulations is the protection of the rights of individuals and organisations, guaranteeing that personal information is handled with the utmost care.
Moreover, China has introduced explicit guidelines for cross-border data transfers, recognising the complexities of international data flows in today’s interconnected economy. These regulations specify the conditions under which personal information can be shared with overseas entities, striking a balance between data security and global business and cooperation facilitation.
Furthermore, they impose rigorous obligations on internet platform service providers and third-party entities, mandating adherence to stringent data protection standards. These regulations cultivate a culture of responsibility in data management practices by holding service providers accountable for their data protection efforts. Overall, this comprehensive regulatory framework addresses critical issues of individual rights, national security, and global data flow, significantly enhancing data security management in China.
Russia has ordered Discord to delete nearly 1,000 posts that are deemed illegal. The communication regulator, Roskomnadzor, highlighted that the posts include content related to child pornography, extremism, drug abuse, and LGBT promotion.
Discord, a San Francisco-based platform, and the regulator have yet to respond to queries regarding the order. Previous actions have seen Discord fined 3.5 million roubles for failing to remove illegal material.
Russia’s demands follow a long-standing policy of controlling content on foreign technology platforms. Regular fines are issued for non-compliance, with social media platforms even facing bans in some instances.
President Vladimir Putin continues to emphasise traditional values, particularly with stricter rules on LGBT promotion. Moscow’s broader push aims to restrict content that contradicts the state’s values and regulations.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a groundbreaking bill aimed at enhancing protections for domestic abuse survivors in internet-connected vehicles. As car manufacturers increasingly incorporate advanced technology, incidents of stalking and harassment through features like location tracking have surfaced. The bill passed with strong support in the California legislature and is part of a broader effort to safeguard victims of domestic violence.
One key provision of the new law mandates that automakers create a process for drivers to submit restraining orders and request the termination of another driver’s remote access within two business days. The legislation also requires manufacturers to enable drivers to easily disable location access from within the vehicle. This could establish a precedent for similar regulations across the country, as automakers generally produce uniform models for all markets.
The legislation follows reports indicating that some car manufacturers have failed to address complaints from women who experienced stalking through their vehicles’ technology. A notable case involved a woman suing Tesla for inaction despite having a restraining order. Although no automaker opposed the bill, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation supported victim protection but raised concerns about the law’s technical implementation. The alliance intends to seek solutions to these challenges in the future.
