Spain reports higher removal of online hate speech content

Spain’s Observatory on Racism and Xenophobia identified 31,003 pieces of hate speech and discriminatory content on social media in May 2026, according to its monthly monitoring report.

The Observatory, known as OBERAXE, said digital platforms removed 65% of notified content, up from 56% in April. TikTok, X and Instagram recorded the highest removal rates, while the Trusted Flagger route continued to perform better than ordinary user reporting.

Trusted Flagger notifications accounted for 53% of removed content, compared with 48% in April. Content reported through ordinary user channels reached a removal rate of 12%, up from 8% the previous month.

The report found that 73% of detected content presented targeted groups as a threat, while dehumanising and severely degrading messages increased sharply compared with April. It also recorded frequent use of aggressive language and growing reliance on images, videos, memes and coded expressions.

People from North Africa remained the main target of online hate speech, followed by African and Afro-descendant people and Roma people. Narratives linked to citizen insecurity accounted for the largest share of detected content, followed by content related to social benefits and access to public resources.

OBERAXE said continued cooperation with digital platforms is essential to improve detection, removal procedures and policies aimed at combating discrimination online.

Why does it matter?

The report shows how hate speech monitoring is becoming part of platform governance and anti-discrimination policy. Spain’s data suggest that trusted reporting channels can improve removal rates, but the scale and persistence of hostile narratives show the limits of reactive moderation. The findings also raise wider questions about transparency, platform accountability and how governments can address online hate while protecting freedom of expression.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Cybercriminals exploit World Cup hype with phishing schemes

Cybercriminals are exploiting World Cup interest through fake streaming platforms, phishing campaigns, counterfeit online stores and betting-related scams, according to Kaspersky researchers.

The security company said it had identified more than 336 fake websites designed to imitate official World Cup pages. Many scams target fans looking for cheaper tickets, free match streams or tournament merchandise.

Some fake streaming sites ask users to register and pay for access to matches, sometimes using cryptocurrency. Others collect personal data that can later be used in further phishing attacks.

Kaspersky also identified counterfeit merchandise shops, fraudulent betting schemes and phishing emails promoting fake offers or paid predictions. Some scams rely on urgency, limited-time claims and professional-looking websites to pressure users into sharing payment or personal information.

The company warned that AI-generated websites and more polished scam designs are making fraudulent pages harder to distinguish from legitimate services during high-demand events.

Kaspersky advised fans to use official sources, check website addresses carefully and avoid offers that promise free access, unrealistic discounts or guaranteed betting results.

Why does it matter?

Major sporting events create ideal conditions for online fraud because demand, urgency and emotion are all high. World Cup scams show how criminals combine phishing, fake e-commerce, streaming fraud and social engineering to steal money and personal data. The use of polished or AI-generated websites also reflects a wider challenge for consumer protection: scams are becoming easier to create at scale and harder for users to recognise.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Ofcom fines adult site over age check failures

Ofcom has imposed an £80,000 fine on pornography provider First Time Videos LLC after finding that the company failed to implement legally required age assurance measures under the Online Safety Act.

The regulator concluded that the provider failed to implement the ‘highly effective’ age assurance measures required to prevent children from accessing pornographic content. According to Ofcom, robust age assurance measures are a central requirement of the UK’s online safety framework and play a key role in protecting minors online.

Alongside the enforcement action, Ofcom announced its provisional view that xgroovy.com may also have failed to comply with age assurance obligations under the legislation. The regulator further expanded an existing investigation into Sun Social Media Inc. to cover an additional adult website operated by the company.

Ofcom said the penalty was determined with regard to the size and turnover of the service, ensuring that the sanction remained proportionate while reinforcing compliance expectations across the sector.

Why does it matter?

The decision marks an important milestone in the implementation of the UK’s Online Safety Act, demonstrating that age assurance requirements are moving beyond policy commitments into active regulatory enforcement. By imposing financial penalties on non-compliant providers, Ofcom is signalling that online platforms hosting adult content will be expected to adopt effective measures to prevent children’s access.

The case also reflects a broader international trend towards stronger child online safety regulation. Governments and regulators increasingly view age assurance technologies as a key tool for protecting minors in digital environments, while balancing concerns around privacy, proportionality and implementation. Future enforcement actions could shape how platforms design and deploy age verification systems both in the UK and beyond.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Apple expands app distribution options in Brazil

Apple will introduce changes to iOS in Brazil following an agreement with the country’s competition regulator, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica.

The changes, beginning with iOS 26.5, will give developers new options to distribute apps through alternative app marketplaces, operate those marketplaces and process payments for digital goods and services outside Apple’s In-App Purchase system.

Apple said the changes reflect a recent agreement with CADE and are intended to create new options for developers in Brazil. The agreement follows competition scrutiny of Apple’s App Store rules in the country.

The company warned that alternative app distribution and payment options may create new risks, including malware, fraud, scams and privacy and security concerns. It said it has worked with CADE on measures designed to reduce those risks, including app notarisation, marketplace authorisation and protections for children.

Apple also said all current members of the Apple Developer Program must agree to updated licence terms by 6 July 2026 to access the new options in Brazil. The company has made online appointments available for developers seeking more information.

Why does it matter?

The changes show how competition enforcement is reshaping closed app ecosystems beyond the EU. Brazil’s intervention adds pressure on Apple to allow alternative distribution and payment models while preserving security and privacy safeguards. The case also highlights a recurring policy tension: regulators want more competition and developer choice, while Apple argues that opening iOS can increase risks for users.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

UNESCO assessment supports ethical AI roadmap in El Salvador

El Salvador has advanced its national AI agenda following the presentation of a Readiness Assessment Methodology (RAM) report developed by UNESCO in cooperation with the National Artificial Intelligence Agency (ANIA). The initiative brings together government institutions, international organisations, academia and the private sector to assess the country’s preparedness for ethical, inclusive and sustainable AI development.

The assessment is grounded in the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, which establishes principles for safe and responsible AI deployment. According to the assessment, El Salvador’s legal and institutional framework, including measures related to data protection, cybersecurity and AI governance, has strengthened its position in regional AI readiness indicators.

The report highlights AI deployments already being used in public services, including digital health diagnostics, automated legal processes and large-scale digitisation of government records. Education systems are also integrating AI tools to expand access to learning, while projected economic gains suggest significant growth potential if ethical adoption continues to scale.

Alongside the findings, authorities outlined priorities aimed at reducing inequalities in access to technology, expanding participation in STEM education and ensuring that AI-related benefits reach both urban and rural communities.

The new National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2026 sets out these priorities as part of a broader human-centred development model.

Why does it matter?

The initiative positions El Salvador as a test case for how emerging economies can align rapid AI adoption with structured governance and ethical safeguards. By embedding human-centred principles into national strategy and law, the country aims to prevent AI-driven gains from widening social or geographic inequalities while strengthening long-term digital readiness.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

EDPS and EU data protection officers focus on AI, cybersecurity and compliance

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and data protection officers (DPOs) from EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies met in Brussels on 18 June to discuss emerging data protection priorities and compliance challenges.

The 58th meeting of the EDPS-DPO network was hosted by the Executive Agencies of the European Commission. The meeting brought together DPOs from across the EU administration at a time of significant regulatory and technological change.

European Data Protection Supervisor Wojciech Wiewiórowski opened the meeting by emphasising the importance of safeguarding DPO independence in practice. He pointed to recent EDPS action, guidance, and procedures intended to safeguard the role of DPOs across EU institutions.

Wiewiórowski also reviewed key developments from 2025, including the closure of the EDPS investigation into the European Commission’s use of Microsoft 365, a rise in complaints, and the growing impact of AI-generated submissions. He noted that regulatory simplification should reduce unnecessary administrative burdens without undermining fundamental rights protections.

Thomas Zerdick, Head of the EDPS Supervision and Enforcement Unit, introduced a follow-up tracker designed to maintain continuity between EDPS-DPO meetings. The first tracker focused on EDPS supervisory guidance on the role of DPOs in EU institutions and the EDPS decision on prior consent to DPO dismissal.

Zerdick also presented recent developments in supervision and enforcement, including complaint handling, compliance issues affecting several EU institutions, and practical guidance on international transfers and data protection impact assessments. The update also covered work linked to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, including audits, opinions, and preparations for upcoming systems.

Luis Velasco, Head of the EDPS Technology and Privacy Unit, outlined initiatives to help EU institutions meet compliance requirements for automated systems and AI. He announced that an updated version of the EDPS guidance on risk management for AI systems is expected to be published later this summer.

Velasco also referred to a practical checklist on human intervention, intended to help organisations establish effective safeguards for automated systems. He warned that cyberattacks targeting EU institutions pose a growing threat and pose serious risks to individuals’ personal data.

The discussion also addressed the response to a personal data breach. Velasco stressed that individuals affected by a personal data breach should be informed without undue delay when a breach is likely to pose a high risk to their rights and freedoms.

A practical workshop focused on developing a common data protection impact assessment template under the EU Data Protection Regulation. Participants tested a draft template through a case study and discussed issues, including necessity, proportionality, and risk assessment.

The afternoon sessions included a discussion of the 2024 data breach at the European Agency for Law Enforcement Training. The CEPOL DPO and the EDPS Data Breach Notification Team shared lessons with the wider DPO community, highlighting that major data breaches create organisational and human challenges as well as compliance obligations.

The meeting also included a session on privacy and data protection case law, presented by Zerdick. The session focused on the EDPS’s interpretation of recent judgments and their practical implications for supervisory work and controllers.

Participants also received an update on the EDPS Website Compliance Awareness Campaign. Following pilot phases in 2024 and 2025, the Technology and Privacy Unit presented preliminary findings from the first wave of the campaign’s second phase, which involved automated scans of public-facing websites of EU institutions.

The EDPS said the meeting demonstrated the value of bringing together the EU’s DPO community to address shared challenges, exchange practical experience and strengthen compliance across institutions. The discussions focused on practical cooperation, support for compliance, and stronger data protection safeguards across the EU administration.

Why does it matter?

The meeting highlights how data protection within EU institutions is evolving beyond traditional compliance issues toward broader challenges involving AI governance, cybersecurity, automated decision-making and digital service oversight. As public administrations increasingly adopt AI-enabled systems and process larger volumes of personal data, data protection officers are playing a more strategic role in managing operational and regulatory risks.

The discussions also illustrate a growing emphasis on practical implementation. Common templates, coordinated guidance and shared lessons from data breaches can help institutions apply data protection rules more consistently across the EU administration. This is particularly important as regulators seek to align privacy requirements with emerging frameworks governing AI, cybersecurity and digital public services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Eurostat report highlights online hate speech exposure in the EU

More than half of young internet users in the EU encountered hostile or degrading online content in 2025, according to Eurostat data published to mark the International Day for Countering Hate Speech.

Eurostat said 54.0% of internet users aged 25 to 34 and 53.7% of those aged 16 to 24 had encountered hostile or degrading messages during the previous three months. Exposure declined with age, falling to 46.4% among people aged 35 to 44, 38.9% among those aged 45 to 54, 32.8% among those aged 55 to 64, and 28.1% among people aged 65 to 74.

Among internet users aged 16 to 24, young women reported higher exposure than young men, at 57.2% compared with 50.4%. Eurostat said the pattern was observed across all types of hostile or degrading messages.

For both young women and young men, the most commonly reported hostile messages related to political or social views and racial or ethnic origin. The largest gender gaps were recorded for messages concerning sexual orientation, sex and disability.

Eurostat said hostile or degrading content may be directed at respondents or at other people, and can include messages, comments, photos, memes, videos and other online material.

The findings underline the scale of online hostility facing younger internet users in the EU and the continuing challenge for policymakers, platforms and civil society organisations working on digital safety and content governance.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU court weighs GDPR and digital evidence in employment dispute

The Court of Justice of the European Union has clarified that the GDPR does not require national courts to automatically exclude evidence containing personal data solely because it was previously obtained unlawfully by one of the parties.

The case, C-484/24 NTH Haustechnik v EM, concerns a dispute between a German employer and a former employee. The employer sought damages over the alleged unauthorised sale of company property and relied on information obtained through access to the former employee’s private eBay account.

The referring German court asked whether judicial use of such evidence would itself amount to personal data processing under the GDPR and whether the EU data protection law required the evidence to be excluded.

The CJEU found that a court’s handling of evidence containing personal data can constitute data processing. However, such processing may be lawful where the court must perform its judicial duties and decide the dispute before it.

The Court also clarified that the GDPR does not create an automatic exclusionary rule for evidence obtained in breach of privacy or data protection rules. National courts must instead assess whether the processing is necessary and proportionate, while respecting GDPR principles and the rights protected by the EU Charter.

The ruling is relevant to civil and employment proceedings because it clarifies the relationship among data protection law, the right to evidence, and the right to effective judicial protection.

Why does it matter?

The case clarifies an important boundary in GDPR litigation: unlawful collection of personal data does not automatically make evidence unusable in court, but it also does not give parties a free pass to gather evidence unlawfully. Courts must balance privacy and data protection rights with the right to effective judicial protection. The ruling could affect employment disputes, civil claims and digital evidence cases where emails, platform accounts, logs or other personal data are submitted as proof.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Spain’s data protection authority issues privacy guidance for video game industry

The Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) has published a new guide outlining data protection recommendations for the video game industry, urging companies to embed privacy safeguards throughout the entire game lifecycle.

According to the AEPD, modern video games have evolved into complex digital ecosystems that collect, analyse and process significant volumes of personal data. This may include account information, gameplay activity, behavioural data and other user-generated information, creating potential privacy and security risks.

The guide notes that AI-enabled and online gaming services increasingly rely on data-driven business models, making compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) particularly important. The agency emphasised that privacy protections are especially important for children and other vulnerable groups, given their significant participation in online gaming environments.

The recommendations span the entire development process, from pre-production and design to post-launch operations, covering transparency obligations, data minimisation, profiling controls and cybersecurity measures. Privacy and responsible data practices should be integrated into games from design through to end-of-life in Spain.

Why does it matter?

The guidance reflects the growing importance of data protection in the gaming industry as video games increasingly function as connected digital platforms rather than standalone entertainment products. Online services, in-game economies, AI-powered features and behavioural analytics have expanded the volume and sensitivity of personal data processed by game developers and publishers.

The recommendations also highlight broader regulatory concerns around children’s privacy and responsible data use. As gaming platforms become more immersive and data-driven, regulators are placing greater emphasis on privacy-by-design principles, transparency and user control. The AEPD’s guidance signals that compliance with data protection rules is becoming an integral part of game development, not simply a legal requirement applied after products are launched.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Anthropic and South Korea partner on AI safety and cybersecurity

Anthropic has opened an office in Seoul and announced a series of partnerships across South Korea’s AI ecosystem, alongside a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Ministry of Science and ICT on AI safety.

The company said the Seoul office will serve as a long-term hub for collaboration with South Korean enterprises, startups, researchers and developers using Claude. Senior Anthropic leaders travelled to Seoul this week to open the office and meet partners, customers, and developers.

Anthropic said the MOU with South Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT will support the safe and responsible adoption of AI across the public sector. The cooperation will focus on AI safety and cybersecurity, including Korean-language model safety evaluations with the Korea AI Safety Institute and information sharing on AI-enabled cyber threats.

KiYoung Choi, Representative Director of South Korea at Anthropic, said South Korean organisations understand that innovation and safety are linked. He said the Seoul office provides a long-term base for collaboration with organisations helping shape South Korea’s AI leadership.

Anthropic also highlighted broader adoption of Claude among South Korean companies. NAVER has deployed Claude Code across its engineering organisation, while Nexon engineering teams are using Claude Code to write, review, and ship code for live-service games.

Large South Korean business groups are also using Claude. LG CNS plans to deploy it across LG Group, Hanwha Solutions is using Claude through AWS Bedrock to meet in-region data residency and security requirements, and Samsung SDS is deploying Claude across Samsung Electronics for knowledge work, agentic workflows, and software development.

South Korean startups are also integrating Claude into products. Channel Corp uses Claude to power Channel Talk, a customer AI platform used by more than 230,000 companies across South Korea, Japan, and the United States.

Anthropic said it will also work with the National AI Research Lab, a consortium spanning KAIST, South Korea University, Yonsei University, and POSTECH. Anthropic will provide Claude access to up to 60 affiliated researchers to support work on AI safety, model evaluation, alignment, robustness and frontier AI research.

In the nonprofit sector, Good Neighbors Korea is deploying Claude to help staff analyse programme outcomes, navigate social welfare law and internal guidelines, and reduce administrative work for frontline social workers.

Anthropic said South Korea ranks among the top dozen countries globally for Claude.ai usage, with activity concentrated in technical and creative work. The company has launched Claude for Startups in South Korea and has held Claude Meetups for South Korean developers since September 2025.

The company also co-hosted Claude Build Day with BASS Ventures, bringing together more than 100 South Korean founders and developers. Anthropic will also co-host a Push to Prod hackathon with Replit, Korea Investment Partners, and Korea Investment Accelerator.

Why does it matter?

The announcement highlights South Korea’s growing importance in the global AI landscape. Beyond being a major market for AI products, the country is increasingly positioning itself as a centre for AI research, safety evaluation, enterprise adoption and public-sector deployment.

The expansion also illustrates how frontier AI companies are combining commercial growth with governance initiatives. Anthropic’s cooperation with the Ministry of Science and ICT and the Korea AI Safety Institute suggests that AI safety, cybersecurity and model evaluation are becoming integrated into broader ecosystem-building efforts. As competition among leading AI companies intensifies, partnerships that combine research, regulation, enterprise adoption and developer engagement are likely to play an increasingly important role in shaping national AI ecosystems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!