Network security

Experts discuss internet growth and the multistakeholder model at the IGF in Riyadh

At the 2024 Internet Governance Forum in Riyadh, experts convened to assess two decades of internet governance since the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). Discussions focused on key achievements, persistent challenges, and principles shaping the future digital landscape. The success of the multistakeholder model, credited with increasing global internet usage from 16% to 67% since WSIS, was a central theme.

Milestones such as the introduction of internationalised domain names, the expansion of internet exchange points, and the IANA stewardship transition were highlighted. Challenges including cybersecurity threats, misinformation, internet fragmentation, and the digital divide were also discussed. Experts agreed on the need for collaborative approaches to maintain a unified, resilient internet.

Speakers included Brendan Dowling, Australia’s ambassador, Kurtis Lindqvist, ICANN President and CEO, and Raquel Gatto, VP of ISOC Brazil and Head of Legal at NIC.br. Tripti Sinha, Chair of the ICANN Board, called for strengthened collaboration among governments, civil society, and the private sector. Ian Sheldon, Vice Chair of ICANN’s Governmental Advisory Committee, also shared insights, emphasising the importance of engaging smaller countries in governance discussions.

The technical community’s contributions were recognised as vital to mitigating risks and building trust. Innovations like DNSSEC and RPKI were highlighted as frameworks for enhancing security and ensuring stability. Discussions explored the potential of technical solutions to address future challenges, such as artificial intelligence governance.

Riyadh’s role as host of IGF 2024 provided an opportunity to reflect on the past and prepare for WSIS+20. Experts stressed that preserving the multi-stakeholder model is crucial for maintaining trust and fostering innovation in the digital age. Continued collaboration among all stakeholders will be essential to creating a secure, inclusive, and open internet for future generations.

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Dynamic Coalitions: Bridging digital divides and shaping equitable online governance

The session ‘Dynamic Coalitions and the Global Digital Compact’ at IGF 2024 in Riyadh highlighted the significant role of Dynamic Coalitions (DCs) in advancing the Global Digital Compact’s (GDC) objectives. Moderated by Jutta Croll, the discussion served as a platform to illustrate the alignment of DC efforts with the GDC’s goals, emphasising the need for broader collaboration and inclusion.

One of the pressing topics addressed was bridging digital divides, as emphasised by June Paris, an experienced nurse engaged in research on nutrition in pregnant women and a business development expert. She underscored the challenges faced by Small Island Developing States (SIDS), noting their increased vulnerability to digital marginalisation. Paris called on DCs to prioritise policies that combat polarisation and promote equitable internet access for underrepresented regions.

The conversation also delved into expanding the benefits of the digital economy. Muhammad Shabbir, a member of the Internet Society’s Accessibility Special Interest Group, a member of the Pakistan ISOC chapter, and a member of the Digital Coalition on Accessibility and Disability (DCAD), detailed the contributions of coalitions like the DC on Financial Inclusion, which advocates for accessible financial services, and the DC on Open Education, which focuses on enhancing learning opportunities. Shabbir also highlighted the DC on Accessibility’s work towards digital inclusivity for persons with disabilities and the DC on Environment’s initiatives to address the environmental impacts of digitalisation.

Founder and investor of the WAF lifestyle app and chair of Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values, Olivier Crepin-Leblond, provided insights on fostering safe and inclusive digital spaces, stressing the pivotal work of DCs like the DC on Internet Rights and Principles, which champions human rights online, and the DC on Child Online Safety, which ensures the protection of children in the digital realm. He highlighted the significant proportion of under-18 internet users, linking their rights to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Data governance and AI regulation also featured prominently. Tatevik Grigoryan, co-chair of Dynamic Coalition on Interoperability, Equitable and Interoperable Data Governance and Internet Universality Indicators, discussed frameworks for responsible data management. At the same time, Yao Amevi Amnessinou Sossou, a research fellow for innovation and entrepreneurship, spotlighted AI-related initiatives. These included tackling gender biases through the DC on Gender and Internet Governance and exploring AI’s potential in healthcare and connected devices through other coalitions. Their contributions underscored the need for ethical and inclusive governance of emerging technologies.

The session’s open dialogue further enriched its value. The lead of three dynamic coalitions – Digital Economy, Digital Health and Environment, Dr Rajendra Pratap Gupta, highlighted the urgency of job creation and digital inclusion, while audience members raised critical points on data integrity and the transformative potential of gamification. Mark Carvell’s (co-moderator of the session) mention of the WSIS+20 Review added a forward-looking perspective, inviting DCs to contribute their expertise to this landmark evaluation.

By showcasing the diverse initiatives of Dynamic Coalitions, the session reinforced their essential role in shaping global internet governance. The call for greater inclusion, tangible outcomes, and multistakeholder collaboration resonated throughout, marking a clear path forward for advancing the GDC’s objectives.

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Balancing regulation, innovation, and rights in the digital space

Global experts gathered at the Internet Governance Forum in Riyadh to explore collaborative solutions for addressing online harms, emphasising the importance of multistakeholder approaches. Jordan Hadfield of the FBI highlighted international partnerships like Interpol’s specialist groups and the Violent Crimes Against Children Task Force, while Australia’s Cyber Affairs Ambassador Brendan Dowling stressed government accountability measures, such as social media age restrictions.

Nighat Dad, representing the Oversight Board, called for culturally sensitive content moderation and independence in oversight to ensure balanced regulation. Protecting vulnerable groups, especially children and women, took centre stage.

Dowling shared Australia’s initiative to ban under-16s from social media, while Rajnesh Singh from the APNIC Foundation detailed programs empowering women in Southeast Asia’s tech sector. Nighat Dad highlighted how Meta’s Oversight Board advises on issues like the cultural implications of certain terms, such as the Arabic word ‘Shaheed.’

Parliamentarians Auhoud Al-Shehail (Member of Parliament from the Saudi Shura Council) and Jehad Abdulla Al Fadhel (Second Deputy Speaker of the Shura Council of Bahrain) advocated for intensified penalties against harmful practices and stronger educational campaigns to build digital literacy.

Balancing innovation with regulation was another focus, with Hadfield and Dowling urging proactive ‘safety by design’ principles in technology development. Singh emphasised fostering local innovation over dependency on foreign digital products, while Al-Shehail called for policies that evolve alongside technology.

Closing the digital divide, particularly between developed and developing nations, also emerged as a priority, with the president of Guinea’s parliament emphasising global digital solidarity. The discussion underscored the complexity of online harms and the need for flexible, inclusive solutions that respect diverse cultural contexts.

As Brendan Dowling noted, ‘Safety must be integrated at every stage,’ while Singh stressed, ‘We need creators, not just consumers.’ The consensus was clear – a safer, more equitable digital world can be achieved only through collaboration, innovation, and ongoing dialogue.

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Protecting children’s rights in the digital age: Balancing opportunities and risks through collaboration

Experts from governments, tech companies, and civil society came together to address the growing challenge of protecting children’s rights in the digital age. While the internet offers immense opportunities for learning and development, it also exposes children to serious risks, including cyberbullying, privacy violations, deepfakes, and data exploitation.

‘The digital world can be both a playground and a battlefield,’ remarked Eugene Kaspersky, CEO of Kaspersky Lab, who emphasised that educating adults is just as crucial as teaching children about online safety.

This Internet Governance Forum (IGF) panel also discussed the limitations of relying solely on technology, highlighting tools like parental controls, age assurance protocols, and safety features on platforms like Meta, which has adopted a ‘best interests of the child framework.’ However, they stressed that technological measures must be complemented by robust education and digital literacy initiatives.

Syed Munir Khasru, chairman of the Institute for Policy, Advocacy and Governance, underscored the role of parents, saying, ‘We have to train, educate, and inspire the children. And in my opinion, they are very smart.’ Andrei Zarenin, Russia’s Deputy Minister of Digital Development, Communications, and Mass Media, added that fostering trust and communication between children and parents is key to navigating the digital landscape.

Collaboration was a recurring theme, with panellists calling for governments, private companies, and civil society to work together on standards and protocols for child safety online. Cross-platform projects like Project Lantern were cited as examples of tackling online harms on a broader scale.

Despite advancements, unresolved issues remain, such as effective age verification, balancing privacy with protection, and addressing the digital divide. Marleni Cuellar, the moderator of this session, concluded that the goal is simple yet profound: ‘the importance of all children and wanting the best for them in the digital world.’

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Britain enforces new online safety rules for social media platforms

Britain‘s new online safety regime officially took effect on Monday, compelling social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok to combat criminal activity and prioritise safer design. Media regulator Ofcom introduced the first codes of practice aimed at tackling illegal harms, including child sexual abuse and content encouraging suicide. Platforms have until March 16, 2025, to assess the risks of harmful content and implement measures like enhanced moderation, easier reporting, and built-in safety tests.

Ofcom’s Chief Executive, Melanie Dawes, emphasised that tech companies are now under scrutiny to meet strict safety standards. Failure to comply after the deadline could result in fines of up to £18 million ($22.3 million) or 10% of a company’s global revenue. Britain’s Technology Secretary Peter Kyle described the new rules as a significant shift in online safety, pledging full support for regulatory enforcement, including potential site blocks.

The Online Safety Act, enacted last year, sets rigorous requirements for platforms to protect children and remove illegal content. High-risk sites must employ automated tools like hash-matching to detect child sexual abuse material. More safety regulations are expected in the first half of 2025, marking a major step in the UK’s fight for safer online spaces.

Digital futures at a crossroads: aligning WSIS and the Global Digital Compact

The path toward a cohesive digital future was the central theme at the ‘From WSIS to GDC: Harmonising Strategies Towards Coordination‘ session held at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2024 in Riyadh. Experts, policymakers, and civil society representatives converged to address how the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) framework and the Global Digital Compact (GDC) can work in unison. At the heart of the debate lay two critical imperatives: coordination and avoiding fragmentation.

Panelists, including Jorge Cancio of the Swiss Government and David Fairchild of Canada, underscored the IGF’s central role as a multistakeholder platform for dialogue. However, concerns about its diminishing mandate and inadequate funding surfaced repeatedly. Fairchild warned of ‘a centralisation of digital governance processes,’ hinting at geopolitical forces that could undermine inclusive, global cooperation. Cancio urged an updated ‘Swiss Army knife’ approach to WSIS, where existing mechanisms, like the IGF, are strengthened rather than duplicated.

The session also highlighted emerging challenges since WSIS’s 2005 inception. Amrita Choudhury from MAG and Anita Gurumurthy of IT for Change emphasised that AI, data governance, and widening digital divides demand urgent attention. Gurumurthy lamented that ‘neo-illiberalism,’ characterised by corporate greed and authoritarian politics, threatens the vision of a people-centred information society. Meanwhile, Gitanjali Sah of ITU reaffirmed WSIS’s achievements, pointing to successes like digital inclusion through telecentres and distance learning.

Amid these reflections, the IGF emerged as an essential event for harmonising WSIS and GDC goals. Panellists, including Nigel Cassimire from the Caribbean Telecommunications Union, proposed that the IGF develop performance targets to implement GDC commitments effectively. Yet, as Jason Pielemeier of the Global Network Initiative cautioned, the IGF faces threats of co-optation in settings hostile to open dialogue, which ‘weakens its strength.’

Despite these tensions, hope remained for creative solutions and renewed international solidarity. The session concluded with a call to refocus on WSIS’s original principles—ensuring no one is left behind in the digital future. As Anita Gurumurthy aptly summarised: ‘We reject bad politics and poor economics. What we need is a solidarity vision of interdependence and mutual reciprocity.’

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Safeguarding democracy: Strategies to combat disinformation in electoral contexts

Disinformation during elections is a growing threat to democracy and human rights, according to a global panel of experts who convened at the Internet Governance Forum 2024 in Riyadh to discuss this issue. Giovanni Zagni, director of Pagella Politica and Facta.news, highlighted the European Union’s approach with its voluntary Code of Practice on Disinformation, which has 34 signatories, including major tech platforms.

The collaborative strategy contrasts with stricter regulatory models, raising questions about the balance between platform accountability and government intervention. Juliano Cappi from the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee underscored the importance of digital sovereignty and public infrastructure, introducing concepts like ‘systemic risk’ and ‘duty of care’ in platform regulation.

Collaboration among stakeholders was a recurring theme, with experts stressing the need for partnerships between fact-checkers, tech companies, and civil society organisations. Nazar Nicholas Kirama, president of the Internet Society Tanzania (ISOC Tanzania) called for platforms to adopt transparent algorithms and assume greater accountability, comparing their influence to that of electoral commissions.

However, Cappi warned about the risks of bias in platforms’ business models and advocated for a ‘follow the money’ approach to trace disinformation campaigns. Aiesha Adnan, co-founder of the ‘Women in Tech Maldives’ and Poncelet Ileleji from the Information Technology Association of the Gambia emphasised media literacy and grassroots empowerment as crucial tools, calling for initiatives like UNESCO-backed fact-checking and community radio programs to counter misinformation.

The tension between regulation and free speech was a central point of debate. While some participants, like Zagni, noted the challenge of addressing disinformation without infringing on freedoms, others warned against government overreach.

Adnan highlighted smaller nations’ unique challenges, urging for culturally sensitive interventions and localised strategies. The session closed with a call for global cooperation and continued dialogue to safeguard democratic processes while respecting diverse regional contexts and fundamental rights.

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Cambodian ministry and APLE team up to enhance online safety education through a new initiative

The Cambodian Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS) and Action Pour Les Enfants (APLE) have signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to implement the ‘Promoting Internet Safety in Education’ project. That initiative promotes child online safety by integrating lessons on recognising and reporting online threats, such as grooming and coercion, into school curricula.

The project also aims to strengthen the capacities of educational institutions, including ministry departments and schools, while providing tailored resources and training for teachers to deliver online safety content. It involves collaboration with key stakeholders, including school administrations, teachers, education officials, parents, community members, and children, to foster a safer digital environment.

However, challenges such as limited resources and low awareness among parents and children pose significant barriers to implementation. The initial phase focuses on seven provinces, with plans for further expansion based on the project’s success.

Why does it matter?

APLE’s strong commitment to combating online sexual abuse and human trafficking reflects the urgency of addressing these critical issues in today’s digital society. The initiative aligns with national education strategies and ensures sustainability by equipping educators and students with the tools to navigate the internet safely.

Additionally, the project includes a comprehensive evaluation after three years to assess its impact and inform potential expansion to other provinces. That effort underscores the importance of empowering communities to prevent and report online exploitation effectively, creating a lasting effect on child safety.

Trump administration plans stronger response to cyber attacks

The incoming Trump administration is set to explore ways to impose higher costs on adversaries and private actors behind cyber attacks, according to Representative Mike Waltz, the pick for national security adviser. Waltz’s statement follows US allegations that a widespread Chinese cyberespionage operation, known as Salt Typhoon, targeted senior American officials and stole significant amounts of metadata.

The White House has revealed that at least eight telecommunications and infrastructure firms in the US were compromised during this campaign. While Waltz did not specify potential actions against Salt Typhoon, he emphasised the need to go beyond defensive measures and start taking offensive actions to deter cyber threats.

Waltz also highlighted the role of the US tech industry in strengthening national defence and exposing vulnerabilities in adversaries. Meanwhile, Chinese officials continue to deny involvement, dismissing the accusations as disinformation and asserting that Beijing opposes cyber attacks in all forms.

Serbian spyware targets activists and journalists, Amnesty says

Serbia has been accused of using spyware to target journalists and activists, according to a new Amnesty International report. Investigations revealed that ‘NoviSpy,’ a homegrown spyware, extracted private data from devices and uploaded it to a government-controlled server. Some cases also involved the use of technology provided by Israeli firm Cellebrite to unlock phones before infecting them.

Activists reported unusual phone activity following meetings with Serbian authorities. Forensic experts confirmed NoviSpy exported contact lists and private photos to state-controlled servers. The Serbian government has yet to respond to requests for comment regarding these allegations.

Cellebrite, whose phone-cracking devices are widely used by law enforcement worldwide, stated it is investigating the claims. The company’s representative noted that misuse of their technology could violate end-user agreements, potentially leading to a suspension of use by Serbian officials.

Concerns over these practices are heightened due to Serbia’s EU integration programme, partially funded by Norway and administered by the UN Office for Project Services (UNOPS). Norway expressed alarm over the findings and plans to meet with Serbian authorities and UNOPS for clarification.