Bluesky updates rules and invites user feedback ahead of October rollout

Two years after launch, Bluesky is revising its Community Guidelines and other policies, inviting users to comment on the proposed changes before they take effect on 15 October 2025.

The updates are designed to improve clarity, outline safety procedures in more detail, and meet the requirements of new global regulations such as the UK’s Online Safety Act, the EU’s Digital Services Act, and the US’s TAKE IT DOWN Act.

Some changes aim to shape the platform’s tone by encouraging respectful and authentic interactions, while allowing space for journalism, satire, and parody.

The revised guidelines are organised under four principles: Safety First, Respect Others, Be Authentic, and Follow the Rules. They prohibit promoting violence, illegal activity, self-harm, and sexualised depictions of minors, as well as harmful practices like doxxing and non-consensual data-sharing.

Bluesky says it will provide a more detailed appeals process, including an ‘informal dispute resolution’ step, and in some cases will allow court action instead of arbitration.

The platform has also addressed nuanced issues such as deepfakes, hate speech, and harassment, while acknowledging past challenges in moderation and community relations.

Alongside the guidelines, Bluesky has updated its Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy to comply with international laws on data rights, transfer, deletion, takedown procedures and transparency reporting.

These changes will take effect on 15 September 2025 without a public feedback period.

The company’s approach contrasts with larger social networks by introducing direct user communication for disputes, though it still faces the challenge of balancing open dialogue with consistent enforcement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Age checks slash visits to top UK adult websites

Adult site traffic in the UK has fallen dramatically since the new age verification rules were enacted on 25 July under the Online Safety Act.

Figures from analytics firm Similarweb show Pornhub lost more than one million visitors in just two weeks, with traffic falling by 47%. XVideos saw a similar drop, while OnlyFans traffic fell by more than 10%.

The rules require adult websites to make it harder for under-18s to access explicit material, leading some users to turn to smaller and less regulated sites instead of compliant platforms. Pornhub said the trend mirrored patterns seen in other countries with similar laws.

The clampdown has also triggered a surge in virtual private network (VPN) downloads in the UK, as the tools can hide a user’s location and help bypass restrictions.

Ofcom estimates that 14 million people in the UK watch pornography and has proposed age checks using credit cards, photo ID, or AI analysis of selfies.

Critics argue that instead of improving safety, the measures may drive people towards more extreme or illicit material on harder-to-monitor parts of the internet, including the dark web.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Russia restricts Telegram and WhatsApp calls

Russian authorities have begun partially restricting calls on Telegram and WhatsApp, citing the need for crime prevention. Regulator Roskomnadzor accused the platforms of enabling fraud, extortion, and terrorism while ignoring repeated requests to act. Neither platform commented immediately.

Russia has long tightened internet control through restrictive laws, bans, and traffic monitoring. VPNs remain a workaround, but are often blocked. During this summer, further limits included mobile internet shutdowns and penalties for specific online searches.

Authorities have introduced a new national messaging app, MAX, which is expected to be heavily monitored. Reports suggest disruptions to WhatsApp and Telegram calls began earlier this week. Complaints cited dropped calls or muted conversations.

With 96 million monthly users, WhatsApp is Russia’s most popular platform, followed by Telegram with 89 million. Past clashes include Russia’s failed Attempt to ban Telegram (2018–20) and Meta’s designation as an extremist entity in 2022.

WhatsApp accused Russia of trying to block encrypted communication and vowed to keep it available. Lawmaker Anton Gorelkin suggested that MAX should replace WhatsApp. The app’s terms permit data sharing with authorities and require pre-installation on all smartphones sold in Russia.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Netherlands regulator presses tech firms over election disinformation

The Netherlands’ competition authority will meet with 12 major online platforms, including TikTok, Facebook and X, on 15 September to address the spread before the 29 October elections.

The session will also involve the European Commission, national regulators and civil society groups.

The Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), which enforces the EU’s Digital Services Act in the Netherlands, is mandated to oversee election integrity under the law. The vote was called early in June after the Dutch government collapsed over migration policy disputes.

Platforms designated as Very Large Online Platforms must uphold transparent policies for moderating content and act decisively against illegal material, ACM director Manon Leijten said.

In July, the ACM contacted the platforms to outline their legal obligations, request details for their Trust and Safety teams and collect responses to a questionnaire on safeguarding public debate.

The September meeting will evaluate how companies plan to tackle disinformation, foreign interference and illegal hate speech during the campaign period.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Crypto wallet apps must now comply with new Google Play rules

Google Play is introducing new policies for cryptocurrency wallet applications. The new rules will require them to be licensed in more than fifteen countries, including the United States and the European Union.

The changes, which come into effect on 29 October, will require providers in the US to register as a money services business or money transmitter. Those in the EU, meanwhile, must register as a crypto-asset service provider.

The updated rules, which aim to ensure compliance with industry standards, will not apply to non-custodial wallets. Following initial concerns from the crypto community, Google clarified the policy on X, stating that non-custodial apps are not in scope.

The new regulations could lead to a broader adoption of Know Your Customer checks and other anti-money laundering measures for the affected apps.

Google Play has a mixed history with cryptocurrency, having previously banned crypto mining apps in 2018 and removed several crypto news and video games. In 2021, the company removed several deceptive apps for allegedly tricking users into paying for an illegitimate cloud service.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Cyber-crime group BlackSuit crippled by $1 million crypto seizure

Law enforcement agencies in the United States and abroad have coordinated a raid to dismantle the BlackSuit ransomware operation, seizing servers and domains and approximately $1 million in cryptocurrency linked to ransom demands.

The action, led by the Department of Justice, Homeland Security Investigations, the Secret Service, the IRS and the FBI, involved cooperation with agencies across the UK, Germany, France, Canada, Ukraine, Ireland and Lithuania.

BlackSuit, a rebranded successor to the Royal ransomware gang and connected to the notorious Conti group, has been active since 2022. It has targeted over 450 US organisations across healthcare, government, manufacturing and education sectors, demanding more than $370 million in ransoms.

The crypto seized was traced back to a 2023 ransom payment of around 49.3 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $1.4 million. Investigators worked with cryptocurrency exchanges to freeze and recover roughly $1 million of those funds in early 2024.

While this marks a significant blow to the gang’s operations, officials warn that without arrests, the threat may persist or re-emerge under new identities.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google patches critical Chrome bugs enabling code execution

Chrome security update fixes six flaws that could enable arbitrary code execution. Stable channel 139.0.7258.127/.128 (Windows, Mac) and .127 (Linux) ships high-severity patches that protect user data and system integrity.

CVE-2025-8879 is a heap buffer overflow in libaom’s video codec. CVE-2025-8880 is a V8 race condition reported by Seunghyun Lee. CVE-2025-8901 is an out-of-bounds write in ANGLE.

Detection methods included AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer, UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer, Control Flow Integrity, libFuzzer, and AFL. Further fixes address CVE-2025-8881 in File Picker and CVE-2025-8882, a use-after-free in Aura.

Successful exploitation could allow code to run with browser privileges through overflows and race conditions. The automatic rollout is staged; users should update it manually by going to Settings > About Chrome.

Administrators should prioritise rapid deployment in enterprise fleets. Google credited external researchers, anonymous contributors, and the Big Sleep project for coordinated reporting and early discovery.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI browsers accused of harvesting sensitive data, according to new study

A new study from researchers in the UK and Italy found that popular AI-powered browsers collect and share sensitive personal data, often in ways that may breach privacy laws.

The team tested ten well-known AI assistants, including ChatGPT, Microsoft’s Copilot, Merlin AI, Sider, and TinaMind, using public websites and private portals like health and banking services.

All but Perplexity AI showed evidence of gathering private details, from medical records to social security numbers, and transmitting them to external servers.

The investigation revealed that some tools continued tracking user activity even during private browsing, sending full web page content, including confidential information, to their systems.

Sometimes, prompts and identifying details, like IP addresses, were shared with analytics platforms, enabling potential cross-site tracking and targeted advertising.

Researchers also found that some assistants profiled users by age, gender, income, and interests, tailoring their responses across multiple sessions.

According to the report, such practices likely violate American health privacy laws and the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation.

Privacy policies for some AI browsers admit to collecting names, contact information, payment data, and more, and sometimes storing information outside the EU.

The study warns that users cannot be sure how their browsing data is handled once gathered, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in AI-enhanced browsing.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU targets eight members states over cybersecurity directive implementation delay

Eight EU countries, including Ireland, Spain, France, Bulgaria, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden, have been warned by the European Commission for failing to meet the deadline on the implementation of the NIS2 Directive.

What is the NIS2 Directive about?

The NIS2 Directive, adopted by the EU in 2022, is an updated legal framework designed to strengthen the cybersecurity and resilience of critical infrastructure and essential services. Essentially, this directive replaces the 2016 NIS Directive, the EU’s first legislation to improve cybersecurity across crucial sectors such as energy, transport, banking, and healthcare. It set baseline security and incident reporting requirements for critical infrastructure operators and digital service providers to enhance the overall resilience of network and information systems in the EU.

With the adoption of the NIS2 Directive, the EU aims to broaden the scope to include not only traditional sectors like energy, transport, banking, and healthcare, but also public administration, space, manufacturing of critical products, food production, postal services, and a wide range of digital service providers.

NIS2 introduces stricter risk management, supply-chain security requirements, and enhanced incident reporting rules, with early warnings due within 24 hours. It increases management accountability, requiring leadership to oversee compliance and undergo cybersecurity training.

It also imposes heavy penalties for violations, including up to €10 million or 2% of global annual turnover for essential entities. The Directive also aims to strengthen EU-level cooperation through bodies like ENISA and EU-CyCLONe.

Member States were expected to transpose NIS2 into national law by 17 October 2024, making timely compliance preparation critical.

What is a directive?

There are two main types of the EU laws: regulations and directives. Regulations apply automatically and uniformly across all member states once adopted by the EU.

In contrast, directives set specific goals that member states must achieve but leave it up to each country to decide how to implement them, allowing for different approaches based on each member state’s capacities and legal systems.

So, why is there a delay in implementing the NIS2 Directive?

According to Insecurity Magazine, the delay is due to member states’ implementation challenges, and many companies across the EU are ‘not fully ready to comply with the directive.’ Six critical infrastructure sectors are facing challenges, including:

  • IT service management is challenged by its cross-border nature and diverse entities
  • Space, with limited cybersecurity knowledge and heavy reliance on commercial off-the-shelf components
  • Public administrations, which “lack the support and experience seen in more mature sectors”
  • Maritime, facing operational technology-related challenges and needing tailored cybersecurity risk management guidance
  • Health, relying on complex supply chains, legacy systems, and poorly secured medical devices
  • Gas, which must improve incident readiness and response capabilities

The deadline for the implementation was 17 October 2024. In May 2025, the European Commission warned 19 member states about delays, giving them two months to act or risk referral to the Court of Justice of the EU. It remains unclear whether the eight remaining holdouts will face further legal consequences.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!