Brazil is witnessing a rapid rise in online sports betting, attracting foreign companies but raising alarms over its economic impact. While the government anticipates increased tax revenue, experts are concerned that gambling diverts money from consumer spending. Gabriel Galipolo, the incoming central bank governor, noted that this surge may hinder the benefits of rising incomes, as savings and consumption growth appear to be stalling due to the increased focus on betting.
Brazilians spent more than $12 billion on foreign betting platforms in the past year, placing the country among the world’s largest sports betting markets. Despite laws prohibiting the use of credit cards for betting, critics warn that gambling is taking a toll on household budgets, particularly among lower-income families. An increasing share of family income is being funnelled into betting, reducing spending on essentials like food, clothing, and healthcare.
The rapid growth of the gambling industry in Brazil has attracted major players like Betfair, Betsson, and Caesars Sportsbook, all keen to tap into the country’s 200 million sports enthusiasts. However, research from the U.S. indicates that legalised betting can lead to serious long-term consequences, such as rising credit card debt, bankruptcies, and economic instability for struggling families. Brazil now faces the challenge of balancing the potential economic benefits of the betting sector with the risks of increasing financial pressure on its citizens.
Telegram apparently decided to alleviate its policy restrictions and to provide users’ IP addresses and phone numbers to authorities in response to valid legal requests. The shift in policy, announced by CEO Pavel Durov, marks a significant change for the platform, which has long been known for its resistance to government data demands. The update comes in the wake of Durov’s recent legal troubles in France, where he is facing charges related to the spread of child abuse materials on the platform.
Durov, under investigation since his arrest in France last month, says the new measures are part of broader efforts to deter criminal activity on Telegram. Historically, Telegram has been criticised for its lax approach to moderation, often ignoring government requests to remove illegal content or share information on suspected criminals. Now, with AI and human moderators, the app conceals problematic content from search results.
Telegram has long been a tool for activists and dissidents, especially in countries like Russia and Iran, where it has been used to challenge authoritarian regimes. However, the platform has also attracted extremists, conspiracy theorists, and white supremacists. In some cases, Telegram has been used to coordinate real-world attacks, leading to mounting pressure on the company to take greater responsibility.
Xiaomi has urged India’s competition authority to recall an antitrust report concerning Walmart’s Flipkart. The Chinese smartphone maker claims the document contains confidential business information, which should have been redacted. The move could slow the ongoing investigation that began in 2021.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has previously responded to similar concerns, such as with Apple, leading to the recall of an antitrust report. Xiaomi is concerned that sensitive data, like model-specific sales figures, was shared without proper redaction, potentially harming its business.
The CCI report also found that e-commerce platforms, such as Amazon and Flipkart, gave preferential treatment to certain sellers, launching exclusive products from companies like Xiaomi. The commission has asked involved parties to return the report, allowing it to be reviewed again for necessary redactions.
Xiaomi’s concern with the report focuses on Flipkart’s involvement, while its dealings with Amazon remain unaffected. The CCI’s broader investigation includes various smartphone companies, with Samsung, Vivo, and Motorola also named for participating in exclusive online product launches.
A Kenyan court has determined that Meta, the parent company of Facebook, can be sued in Kenya over the dismissal of several content moderators by a contractor. The moderators, who worked for Sama, alleged they were fired for trying to organise a union and were later blacklisted from applying at Majorel, another firm. Efforts to reach a settlement with Meta last October were unsuccessful.
The Court of Appeal upheld earlier rulings allowing Meta to face trial over the dismissals and allegations of poor working conditions. This decision could have significant implications for Meta’s global relationships with content moderators. Meta has claimed it mandates that its partners provide industry-leading working conditions.
Lawyers for the moderators see this case as a pivotal moment for Big Tech, highlighting the need for accountability in human rights along supply chains. Supporters, including the British tech rights group Foxglove, are optimistic about the case advancing to court.
Russian retailers have started pre-sales of Apple’s iPhone 16, despite the company’s export ban after Moscow invaded Ukraine. Leading stores M.Video-Eldorado and mobile operator MTS are the first to offer the new devices, with M.Video planning deliveries next week. However, Russian consumers face significantly higher prices, paying hundreds of dollars more than U.S. customers.
Despite Apple halting product sales and services like Apple Pay in Russia in 2022, the iPhone 16 is still available through parallel imports from countries that have not enforced sanctions, such as Turkey, Kazakhstan, and China. The Kremlin has endorsed this grey market system to keep foreign goods accessible. However, prices are much higher in Russia, with the 128GB iPhone 16 starting at 112,999 roubles ($1,225) and the 1TB iPhone 16 Pro Max priced at 249,999 roubles ($2,710), significantly more than U.S. prices.
Despite sanctions, Western technology remains highly sought after in Russia. However, the Russian government has urged officials to stop using iPhones, claiming they are compromised by Western intelligence agencies, a claim Apple denied.
Several tech companies, including Meta and Spotify, have criticised the European Union for what they describe as inconsistent decision-making on data privacy and AI. A collective letter from firms, researchers, and industry bodies warned that Europe risks losing competitiveness due to fragmented regulations. They urged data privacy regulators to deliver clear, harmonised decisions, allowing European data to be utilised in AI training for the benefit of the region.
The companies voiced concerns about the unpredictability of recent decisions made under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Meta, known for owning Facebook and Instagram, recently paused plans to collect European user data for AI development, following pressure from EU privacy authorities. Uncertainty surrounding which data can be used for AI models has become a major issue for businesses.
Tech firms have delayed product releases in Europe, seeking legal clarity. Meta postponed its Twitter-like app Threads, while Google has also delayed the launch of AI tools in the EU market. The introduction of Europe’s AI Act earlier this year added further regulatory requirements, which firms argue complicates innovation.
The European Commission insists that all companies must comply with data privacy rules, and Meta has already faced significant penalties for breaches. The letter stresses the need for swift regulatory decisions to ensure Europe can remain competitive in the AI sector.
European antitrust regulators will not take action against Microsoft’s acquisition of staff from AI startup Inflection, including its co-founders, following the withdrawal of requests from seven European Union countries. These countries dropped their requests for the European Commission to investigate, due to a recent court ruling that limits the regulator’s ability to examine mergers below the EU’s revenue threshold.
The court ruling has been viewed by some as a correction against regulatory overreach. The European Commission, in response, stated it would not pursue the case further. Despite this, the Commission acknowledged the Microsoft-Inflection deal as a merger due to its restructuring of Inflection’s business focus towards AI development.
The agreement between Microsoft and Inflection represents a significant market shift. Under the EU’s merger rules, it is considered a concentration, reflecting the ongoing transformations in the AI industry.
Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, has moved to address legal requirements in Brazil by appointing a new legal representative, Rachel de Oliveira Conceicao. Musk’s step follows orders from Brazil’s Supreme Court, which had previously blocked the platform after it failed to comply with local regulations, including naming a legal representative after its office closure in mid-August. X’s decision to appoint Conceicao aims to fulfil Brazilian law, which requires foreign companies to establish local legal representation to operate in the country.
The platform faced a complete shutdown in Brazil when mobile and internet providers were ordered to block X in late August. The order came after months of disputes between Musk and Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, centring around X’s reluctance to remove content spreading hate speech and misinformation. Musk had criticised the court’s demands, calling them censorship, and the platform’s refusal to comply escalated tensions.
X’s legal team in Brazil announced that the company has begun complying with court orders to remove harmful content, a key demand from the country’s top court. The decision signals a shift in Musk’s approach to Brazil’s strict content regulations and could pave the way for the platform to resume full operations.
The legal battles between X and Brazil highlight the broader tension between free speech and government regulation as nations like Brazil take stronger stances on monitoring harmful content online. At the same time, platforms face the challenge of balancing compliance with global standards.
Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, is set to appoint a legal representative in Brazil as it fights a Supreme Court order. The platform faced suspension in August over concerns about hate speech, and despite a temporary workaround, remains under scrutiny.
Brazil’s Supreme Court recently ordered the platform to stop bypassing the block, threatening fines if X continues to circumvent the ruling. Lawyers for the platform have clarified that they are working to comply, including naming a local representative as required.
In a months-long legal dispute between Musk and Brazilian Justice Alexandre de Moraes, X’s offices in Brazil closed in mid-August. The company, however, says it is making efforts to restore full operations soon.
The firm has begun complying with content removal orders issued by courts in Brazil, addressing previous concerns over the spread of misinformation. X insists it is focused on resolving the legal issues and working with the government.
Philippines has introduced Joint Administrative Order No. 24-03, Series of 2024, which outlines the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) for the Internet Transactions Act (ITA) of 2023. The new regulatory framework is designed to govern all business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) internet transactions under the jurisdiction of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).
Specifically, it applies to transactions involving parties within the Philippines or businesses targeting the Philippine market. To clarify the scope of the ITA, the IRR defines key terms such as ‘availment of the Philippine market,’ which includes activities like advertising, soliciting orders, and providing support within the country. Additionally, ‘minimum contacts’ refers to any interaction with customers in the Philippines, including allowing access to digital platforms and facilitating the exchange of goods or services.
Philippines has also specified specific exclusions from the ITA’s coverage through the IRR. For instance, it does not apply to Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C) transactions, purely offline transactions, or foreign entities not targeting the Philippine market. Furthermore, while most online media content is excluded, live selling is considered a form of advertising.
Consequently, the IRR outlines different obligations for various online entities, such as digital platforms that do not oversee transactions, e-marketplaces that retain oversight, and e-retailers or online merchants who must adhere to specific compliance requirements.
Philippines has made the IRR effective immediately; however, it allows for an 18-month transition period for businesses to comply. During this time, companies must submit detailed information to the E-Commerce Bureau and ensure that online merchants provide their registration details. Additionally, digital platforms must disclose information about product origins. Furthermore, the IRR includes Codes of Conduct for businesses and consumers to ensure fair and ethical e-commerce practices.
