The Chinese government “has never and will never” require companies or individuals to collect or transfer data in ways that violate the law, China’s foreign ministry declared on Friday. The statement was issued in response to a privacy complaint filed by Austrian advocacy group Noyb, which accuses six Chinese companies, including TikTok, Shein, and Xiaomi, of unlawfully sending European Union user data to China.
Noyb, an organisation focused on data protection and privacy rights, alleges that the companies breached the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by transferring user data without proper safeguards. The complaint has sparked concerns in Europe about how personal information is handled by Chinese firms operating within the EU. If proven, the violations could result in significant fines and further scrutiny of these companies.
In defending the nation’s stance, a foreign ministry spokesperson emphasised that China operates within the bounds of international laws and rejects any claims of illegal data practices. “China strictly upholds its legal and regulatory framework and will never engage in or endorse actions that violate laws regarding data collection or transfer,” the spokesperson said. The spokesperson also criticised what they described as “unfounded accusations” aimed at tarnishing Chinese businesses.
This case is the latest in a series of global concerns about data privacy and the practices of technology firms. It underscores the growing tension between nations over data security, cross-border data flows, and regulatory compliance, particularly as Chinese companies expand their presence in foreign markets. The outcome of Noyb’s complaint could have far-reaching implications for data governance and corporate practices in both Europe and China.
TikTok’s future in the US grew more uncertain this week as officials suggested its Chinese owner, ByteDance, should have more time to sell the app and prevent a ban. With the clock ticking toward Sunday’s deadline, key figures from both political sides urged for a 90-day extension to allow for a divestiture. US Representative Mike Waltz, who was appointed as Trump’s national security adviser, indicated that the new administration would take steps to keep TikTok operational if substantial progress is made in securing a deal.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, traditionally a supporter of the law forcing TikTok to sell its US assets, also called for an extension, citing concerns over the app’s potential shutdown disrupting the lives of millions of users. The law, passed in April, mandates ByteDance either sell TikTok’s US assets by Sunday or face a ban on national security grounds. However, it’s now unclear whether the app will be allowed to stay active in the US without an official extension.
TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is reportedly set to attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration, further hinting at a shift in relations between the app and the Trump administration. While concerns about Chinese ownership and its potential for data collection remain, Schumer and other lawmakers are signalling a growing bipartisan desire to avoid the political and economic fallout of a TikTok ban. The situation remains fluid, with decisions expected to unfold in the coming days.
As the deadline approaches, TikTok’s potential shutdown has already caused some users to explore alternatives, with RedNote, another Chinese social media platform, seeing a surge in US users. Meanwhile, with more than 170 million American users and substantial ad revenue at stake, the clock is ticking for a resolution before the app faces a permanent ban.
President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly considering an executive order that would postpone the enforcement of the TikTok sale-or-ban law for up to 90 days. According to sources cited by the Washington Post, the order would temporarily halt the requirement for TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to divest its US operations or face a ban.
The delay could provide more time for negotiations and potential deals to resolve security concerns raised by United States lawmakers. The law, passed under the Biden administration, aimed to address fears over TikTok’s links to China, but Trump has taken a more open stance towards the platform during his campaign.
A suspension of enforcement would offer relief to TikTok’s 170 million American users and businesses that rely on the app for advertising and engagement. The move, however, is likely to spark debate in Washington, where concerns over data security and Chinese influence remain key political issues.
Republican officials at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are preparing to overhaul the agency’s cryptocurrency policies following the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump. Commissioners Hester Peirce and Mark Uyeda, who will soon hold the majority at the SEC, are expected to begin reviewing crypto enforcement cases and initiating rule-making efforts to clarify when digital assets are considered securities. Trump’s pick for SEC chair, Paul Atkins, is widely expected to roll back the tough regulatory approach taken under outgoing chair Gary Gensler.
Gensler’s SEC pursued 83 crypto-related enforcement actions, targeting companies like Coinbase and Kraken. Many of these cases argued that cryptocurrencies function as securities and should comply with SEC regulations. Peirce and Uyeda are expected to review and potentially freeze some litigation that does not involve fraud. Industry leaders have long called for clearer regulations, and the new SEC leadership may start a public consultation process to shape future crypto policies.
Trump’s administration is also expected to issue executive orders directing financial regulators to reassess their crypto policies. Bitcoin surged past $100,000 in December amid optimism about a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment. Legal experts caution that dismissing numerous enforcement actions would be unprecedented and could set a controversial precedent. However, settlement negotiations may offer a pathway to resolving disputes while maintaining accountability for fraudulent activities in the sector.
TikTok faces an uncertain future as the US government’s 19 January 2025 deadline approaches, demanding ByteDance divest its US operations or face a nationwide ban. The ultimatum, backed by the Supreme Court’s apparent readiness to uphold the decision, appears to be the culmination of years of scrutiny over the platform’s data practices and ties to China. Amid this mounting pressure, reports suggest Elon Musk, the owner of X (formerly Twitter), could acquire TikTok’s US operations, a proposal that has sparked debates about its feasibility and geopolitical implications.
Now, let’s see how it began..
How did the TikTok odyssey begin?
The story of TikTok began in 2014 with Musical.ly, a social media app enabling users to create and share lip-sync videos. Founded in Shanghai, it quickly gained traction among US and European teenagers. By 2017, Musical.ly had over 100 million users and caught the attention of ByteDance, a Chinese tech giant that acquired it for $1 billion. In 2018, ByteDance merged Musical.ly with its domestic app Douyin, launching TikTok for international audiences. Leveraging powerful machine-learning algorithms, TikTok’s ‘For You Page’ became its defining feature, captivating users with an endless stream of personalised content.
The US clock strikes 'ban or divest TikTok' 8
By 2018, TikTok had become one of the most downloaded apps globally, surpassing giants like Facebook and Instagram. Its cultural influence exploded, reshaping how content was created and consumed. From viral dance challenges to comedic skits, TikTok carved out a unique space in the digital world, particularly among younger users. However, its meteoric rise also brought scrutiny. Concerns emerged over user data privacy and potential manipulation by its parent company ByteDance, which critics claimed had ties to the Chinese government.
The ‘ban or divest’ saga
The incipit of the current conflict can be traced back to 2020 when then-President Donald Trump attempted to ban TikTok and Chinese-owned WeChat, citing fears that Beijing could misuse US data or manipulate public discourse through the platforms. The courts blocked Trump’s effort, and in 2021, President Joe Biden revoked the Trump-era orders, but initiated its review of TikTok’s data practices, keeping the platform under scrutiny. Despite challenges, TikTok continued to grow, surpassing 1 billion active users by 2021. It implemented community guidelines and transparency measures to address content moderation and concerns about misinformation. It also planned to store US user data on Oracle-operated servers to mitigate fears of Chinese government access. However, bipartisan concerns over TikTok’s influence persisted, especially regarding its ties to the Chinese government and the potential data misuse. Lawmakers and US intelligence agencies have long raised alarms about the vast amount of data TikTok collects on its US users and the potential for Beijing to exploit this information for espionage or propaganda. Therefore, last year, Congress passed a bill with overwhelming support requiring ByteDance to divest its US assets, marking the strictest legal threat the platform has ever faced.
The 19 January 2025 deadline and the rumours about Elon Musk’s potential acquisition of TikTok
By 2024, TikTok was at the centre of a geopolitical storm. The US government’s demand for divestment or a ban by 19 January 2025 intensified the platform’s challenges. Amid these disputes, Elon Musk, owner of X (formerly Twitter), has emerged as a potential buyer for TikTok’s US operations. Musk’s ties to US and Chinese markets via Tesla’s Shanghai production hub position him as a unique figure in this debate. If Musk were to acquire TikTok, it could bolster X’s advertising reach and data capabilities, aligning with his broader ambitions in AI and technology. However, such a sale would involve overcoming numerous hurdles, including ByteDance’s valuation of TikTok at $40–50 billion and securing regulatory approvals from both Washington and Beijing. On the other hand, ByteDance, backed by Beijing, is resisting the sale, arguing that the conditioning violates free speech and poses significant logistical hurdles.
The US clock strikes 'ban or divest TikTok' 9
TikTok has attempted to safeguard its US user base of 170 million by planning to allow users to download their data in case the ban takes effect. It has also reassured its 7,000 US employees that their jobs and benefits are secure, even if operations are halted. While new downloads would be prohibited under the ban, existing users could retain access temporarily, although the platform’s functionality would degrade over time.
The looming deadline has sparked a surge in alternative platforms, such as RedNote (known in China as Xiaohongshu), which has seen a significant influx of US users in anticipation of TikTok’s potential exit.
TikTok’s cultural legacy and future
The fate of TikTok in the US hangs in the balance as President-elect Donald Trump considers an executive order to delay the enforcement of the ‘ban or divest’ law by up to 90 days. The potential extension, supported by figures from both political sides, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Trump’s incoming national security adviser Mike Waltz, aims to provide ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese owner, additional time to divest its US operations and avoid a nationwide ban. With over 170 million American users and substantial ad revenue at risk, lawmakers are increasingly wary of the disruption a ban could cause, signalling bipartisan support to keep the app operational while addressing national security concerns. TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew’s attendance at Trump’s inauguration further hints at a shift in relations between the platform and the new administration. Meanwhile, the uncertainty has already driven US users to explore alternatives like RedNote as the clock ticks down to the Sunday deadline.
Either way, TikTok’s impact on culture and technology is undeniable. It has redefined digital content creation and inspired competitors like Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. Yet, its journey highlights the challenges of navigating geopolitical tensions and concerns over data privacy in a hyper-connected world. As the 19 January deadline looms, TikTok stands at a crossroads. Whether it becomes part of Musk’s tech empire, succumbs to a US ban, or finds another path, its legacy as a trailblazer in short-form video content remains secure. The platform’s next chapter, however, hangs in the balance, as these TikTok developments underscore the broader implications of its struggles, including the reshaping of the social media landscape and the role of government intervention in regulating digital platforms.
Disappointment and confusion swept across TikTok users in the United States as news broke that ByteDance, the app’s Chinese owner, plans to shut down the platform for its 170 million US users by Sunday. The move comes in response to a federal ban requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US assets by January 19 due to national security concerns. While some users hold out hope for a last-minute reprieve, many are preparing for the worst.
Content creators, many of whom have built careers and followings on TikTok, expressed frustration and sadness. Some vowed to boycott rival platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and X, while others scrambled to save their content. True crime creator Amber Goode, from Colorado, criticised the government for “playing with us,” while other users shared instructions on migrating to alternative platforms, including China-based apps like RedNote.
TikTok has maintained that it does not and would never share US user data with China, arguing that the ban violates First Amendment rights. Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, users attempting to open the app on Sunday will be redirected to a shutdown information page. President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly exploring executive actions to delay the ban, but the outcome remains uncertain.
The shutdown has sparked mixed emotions globally, with some international users relieved that American social media issues may no longer dominate their feeds. However, for US creators like Ishpal Sidhu, who stands to lose her livelihood, the uncertainty has cast a shadow over what was once a thriving platform.
Austrian advocacy group Noyb has filed privacy complaints against six Chinese companies, including TikTok, Shein, and Xiaomi, alleging illegal transfers of European user data to China. The group, known for targeting US tech giants like Apple and Meta, said this is its first case against Chinese firms. Complaints have been filed in four EU countries, seeking fines of up to 4% of each company’s global revenue.
Noyb claims that companies such as Alibaba’s AliExpress and Tencent’s WeChat transfer EU citizens’ data either directly to China or undisclosed ‘third countries,’ which are likely China. Under EU data protection laws, such transfers are prohibited if the destination country fails to meet the bloc’s strict privacy standards. A Noyb lawyer emphasised that China’s status as a ‘surveillance state’ makes such transfers clearly unlawful.
The allegations add to mounting regulatory challenges for Chinese tech firms. TikTok, already under scrutiny in Europe for election interference concerns, faces a potential US ban starting Sunday over national security fears. Regulators in multiple regions continue to ramp up pressure on Chinese companies amid growing global concerns over data privacy and security.
Several prominent tech leaders, including Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, and Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, are scheduled to attend US President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday, according to sources familiar with the event’s planning. This marks a significant moment as top executives from the tech industry, including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, are also expected to be in attendance. The move signals ongoing engagement between the tech sector and the incoming administration, despite various regulatory and political challenges that have shaped recent interactions between Silicon Valley and the US government.
The participation of these influential figures has attracted attention, especially given the politically charged atmosphere surrounding Trump’s presidency. While there have been tensions between Big Tech companies and the outgoing administration, with issues like data privacy, antitrust concerns, and platform regulation, the CEOs’ attendance at the inauguration may reflect an attempt to foster relationships with the new president and his team.
Apple has not yet responded to a request for comment on the reports of Tim Cook’s attendance, and the full list of attendees is still evolving. The inauguration will serve as a crucial occasion for shaping future dialogues between the tech sector and government officials. The presence of these key leaders also raises questions about how the next administration will approach regulations affecting the rapidly evolving technology industry.
TikTok is preparing to shut down its US operations on Sunday unless a federal ban is averted at the last minute, according to sources. The ban, stemming from a law signed last April, requires TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell its US assets by January 19 or face nationwide restrictions. The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on whether to uphold or pause the ban, but no ruling has been made yet.
President-elect Donald Trump, set to take office the day after the ban would take effect, is reportedly considering a temporary suspension of the shutdown. However, legal uncertainty clouds the possibility of such action. Meanwhile, the Biden administration, in its final days, has signalled it will not block the ban without a credible divestment plan from ByteDance. TikTok has argued that the law violates First Amendment rights and warned that a prolonged ban could lead to significant user loss and global disruptions to its services.
If the ban proceeds, TikTok plans to display a pop-up message informing users of the shutdown and allow them to download their data. The app would become largely inoperable as US companies would no longer be permitted to provide critical services for its maintenance. TikTok has emphasised its ability to restore operations quickly if the ban is reversed but warned that the shutdown would impact not just American users but its global platform due to its reliance on US-based infrastructure.
The political and legal standoff has sparked widespread public and corporate reactions. Social media users have expressed disappointment at the impending ban, while TikTok’s US operations, employing over 7,000 workers, hang in the balance. Despite ongoing efforts to delay the enforcement, the platform faces an uncertain future as Sunday’s deadline looms.
Apple and Amazon have successfully defeated a UK lawsuit accusing them of colluding to remove resellers of Apple products from Amazon’s platform. The Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled on Tuesday that the case, valued at £494 million, could not proceed.
The tribunal rejected the case, citing Riefa’s failure to prove sufficient independence and robustness to represent the claimant class, particularly concerning third-party litigation funding. Apple and Amazon had previously argued the lawsuit lacked merit and requested its dismissal.
Riefa’s legal team and representatives for Apple and Amazon did not respond to requests for comment following the tribunal’s decision.
