The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of delaying the disclosure of his 2022 Twitter stake, which violated federal securities laws. According to the complaint, Musk waited 11 days beyond the required 10-day window to reveal his 5% ownership of Twitter, enabling him to purchase over $500 million worth of shares at lower prices before disclosing his 9.2% stake on April 4, 2022. Twitter’s stock price surged by more than 27% following the announcement.
The SEC seeks civil penalties and a repayment of profits it claims Musk gained unfairly. Musk’s attorney, Alex Spiro, dismissed the lawsuit as a ‘sham,’ arguing it stems from a minor administrative oversight. Musk has previously clashed with the SEC, including a 2018 settlement over misleading tweets about taking Tesla private, which resulted in a $20 million fine and other conditions.
This lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges Musk faces over his $44 billion purchase of Twitter, now rebranded as X. Musk, who is worth $417 billion, according to Forbes, has also been sued by former Twitter shareholders in Manhattan federal court for the delayed disclosure, which they claim caused them financial harm. The SEC’s action comes just days before Chair Gary Gensler’s scheduled departure, marking another chapter in Musk’s contentious history with the regulatory body.
TikTok plans to disable its app for all US users on Sunday if the Supreme Court does not block a federal ban, according to a report by The Information. This action would go beyond the law’s requirement, which mandates a ban only on new downloads from Apple and Google app stores while allowing existing users to continue using the app temporarily.
Under TikTok’s plan, users attempting to access the app will be redirected to a website explaining the ban. The company also intends to allow users to download their data for future use. TikTok and its parent company ByteDance have yet to comment on these developments.
The ban stems from a law signed by President Joe Biden in April 2024, requiring ByteDance to sell its US assets by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. TikTok has challenged the law, arguing that it violates First Amendment protections. In a recent court filing, the company warned that a month-long ban could result in one-third of its 170 million US users leaving the platform permanently.
This potential shutdown reflects the escalating tensions surrounding TikTok’s operations in the United States, as debates over data security and free speech continue.
Indonesia plans to implement interim guidelines to protect children on social media as it works toward creating a law to establish a minimum age for users, a senior communications ministry official announced on Wednesday. The move follows discussions between Communications Minister Meutya Hafid and President Prabowo Subianto, aiming to address concerns about online safety for children.
The proposed law will mirror recent regulations in Australia, which banned children under 16 from accessing social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok, penalising tech companies that fail to comply. In the meantime, Indonesia will issue regulations requiring platforms to follow child protection guidelines, focusing on shielding children from harmful content while still allowing access to some degree.
Public opinion on the initiative is divided. While parents like Nurmayanti support stricter controls to reduce exposure to harmful material, human rights advocates, including Anis Hidayah, urge caution to ensure children’s access to information is not unduly restricted. A recent survey revealed nearly half of Indonesian children under 12 use the internet, with many accessing social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok.
This regulatory push reflects Indonesia’s broader efforts to balance digital innovation with safeguarding younger users in its rapidly growing online landscape
Apple’s latest charges for app developers are under fresh scrutiny from the European Union’s antitrust regulators. Concerns have been raised over the company’s new ‘core technology fee,’ which requires developers to pay €0.50 per installed app. Regulators are investigating whether the fee could increase costs for software makers or force them to change their business models.
The European Commission has circulated new questionnaires to developers, seeking insights on the financial impact of the fee and Apple’s claim that the changes will lower costs for most developers. The inquiry comes as major US tech companies urge President-elect Donald Trump to challenge EU regulations targeting American firms. Apple has not yet responded to the EU’s latest investigation.
Under the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple must comply with stricter rules on how it operates its App Store. The legislation allows regulators to fine major tech platforms up to 10% of their annual revenue for non-compliance. Apple, which has faced ongoing scrutiny in both the US and Europe over developer fees, says that 85% of developers using its App Store do not pay any commission.
Allstate is facing a lawsuit from the state of Texas over claims that it secretly tracked millions of drivers through their mobile phones without consent. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton alleges that the insurer collected location data through apps like GasBuddy and Life360 to create a vast driving behaviour database. The data was then used to raise insurance premiums, deny coverage, or sell to other insurers for profit.
The lawsuit also claims Allstate recently started purchasing vehicle location data directly from manufacturers, including Toyota, Mazda, and Stellantis brands like Jeep and Dodge. Texas accuses the company of violating state laws on data privacy and deceptive insurance practices. Prosecutors are seeking financial penalties, consumer restitution, and the destruction of unlawfully obtained data.
General Motors faced a similar lawsuit from Texas last year over allegations of secretly collecting and selling driver data. Allstate, headquartered in Illinois, has yet to respond to the claims. If found guilty, the company could face significant fines and legal consequences.
The European Commission is reassessing its investigations into major tech companies, including Apple, Meta, and Google, under its landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), according to the Financial Times. The review, which covers cases initiated since March 2024, comes as tech giants urge President-elect Donald Trump to push back against EU regulatory scrutiny. Sources suggest Trump’s presidency has influenced the review, though it was not the direct trigger.
The DMA, implemented in 2022, seeks to curb the dominance of Big Tech by imposing strict rules on their practices and fines of up to 10% of annual revenue for violations. The review may lead to narrowing or altering the scope of current probes, with all decisions and potential fines paused during this process. Technical work on the cases, however, will continue.
This development coincides with Meta’s recent overhaul of its US fact-checking program and CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s signals of a more conciliatory stance toward the Trump administration. Meanwhile, EU regulators are also examining whether Elon Musk’s social media platform X has violated content moderation rules, further highlighting the tech industry’s complex regulatory challenges.
The US Supreme Court has rejected Meta’s attempt to block a massive class action lawsuit by advertisers accusing the company of inflating audience metrics. Advertisers claim Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, overstated the number of potential ad viewers, resulting in significant overcharges.
A lower court ruled that advertisers could seek damages collectively, stating Meta’s conduct was consistent across all affected parties. Plaintiffs, led by DZ Reserve and Cain Maxwell, argue Meta exaggerated potential audience figures by as much as 400%, focusing on social media accounts rather than unique users.
Meta challenged the decision, stating courts have rejected the ‘common course of conduct’ standard and that individual advertisers may not have relied on the figures. The company further criticised the court for excessive leniency when certifying class actions.
Potential damages could exceed $7 billion, covering millions of advertisers since 2014. Advertising remains Meta’s primary revenue source, with $116.1 billion generated in the first nine months of 2024.
Apple is defending itself against a $1.8 billion mass lawsuit in a London tribunal, accused of abusing its market dominance by charging app developers a 30% commission through its App Store. The lawsuit, brought on behalf of around 20 million UK iPhone and iPad users, claims the fees have unfairly inflated app costs for consumers.
Rachael Kent, the academic leading the case, argues Apple has leveraged its monopoly to exclude competition and impose restrictive terms on app developers. Apple’s lawyers counter that the fees reflect the benefits of its iOS ecosystem, emphasising its focus on security, privacy, and innovation. They also noted that most developers are exempt from paying commissions.
This trial marks the UK’s first class-action-style lawsuit against a tech giant under its evolving legal framework. Similar cases against Google, Meta, and Amazon are in progress, including a $1.1 billion lawsuit against Google over Play Store fees scheduled for later this year. The trial is expected to last seven weeks, with testimony from Apple’s CFO anticipated soon.
The European Union is considering expanding its investigation into Elon Musk’s social media platform X over potential content moderation breaches. The probe, launched in late 2023 under the Digital Services Act (DSA), relates partly to posts following Hamas’ attacks on Israel.
EU Commission Vice President Henna Virkkunen indicated the bloc is evaluating whether the investigation’s current scope is sufficient. Concerns have grown following Musk’s endorsement of far-right figures, including Germany’s Alternative for Germany candidate Alice Weidel, ahead of the country’s February elections.
The commission is also examining whether a live-streamed discussion between Musk and Weidel on X was unfairly promoted, potentially violating DSA rules by giving political advantage. X and the European Commission have yet to comment on the matter.
In July, EU regulators concluded that X breached the DSA, citing deceptive practices related to the platform’s blue checkmark system. Musk responded by welcoming a public legal confrontation to reveal the facts to European citizens.
Britain’s antitrust regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), has launched an investigation into Google’s search operations to assess their impact on consumers, businesses, and competition. With Google handling 90% of UK online searches and supporting over 200,000 businesses through advertising, the CMA aims to ensure fair competition and innovation in search services, said CMA chief Sarah Cardell.
The probe will evaluate whether Google’s dominant position restricts market entry and innovation, as well as whether it provides preferential treatment to its own services. The CMA will also investigate the company’s extensive collection and use of consumer data, including its role in AI services. The findings, expected within nine months, could lead to measures such as requiring Google to share data with rivals or giving publishers more control over their content.
Google has defended its role, stating that its search services foster innovation and help UK businesses grow. The company pledged to work constructively with the CMA to create rules that benefit both businesses and users. The investigation follows similar scrutiny in the US, where prosecutors have pushed for major reforms to curb Google’s dominance in online search.
