Jurisdiction

TikTok users react to looming US Shutdown

Disappointment and confusion swept across TikTok users in the United States as news broke that ByteDance, the app’s Chinese owner, plans to shut down the platform for its 170 million US users by Sunday. The move comes in response to a federal ban requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US assets by January 19 due to national security concerns. While some users hold out hope for a last-minute reprieve, many are preparing for the worst.

Content creators, many of whom have built careers and followings on TikTok, expressed frustration and sadness. Some vowed to boycott rival platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and X, while others scrambled to save their content. True crime creator Amber Goode, from Colorado, criticised the government for “playing with us,” while other users shared instructions on migrating to alternative platforms, including China-based apps like RedNote.

TikTok has maintained that it does not and would never share US user data with China, arguing that the ban violates First Amendment rights. Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, users attempting to open the app on Sunday will be redirected to a shutdown information page. President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly exploring executive actions to delay the ban, but the outcome remains uncertain.

The shutdown has sparked mixed emotions globally, with some international users relieved that American social media issues may no longer dominate their feeds. However, for US creators like Ishpal Sidhu, who stands to lose her livelihood, the uncertainty has cast a shadow over what was once a thriving platform.

Noyb challenges Chinese data practices in Europe

Austrian advocacy group Noyb has filed privacy complaints against six Chinese companies, including TikTok, Shein, and Xiaomi, alleging illegal transfers of European user data to China. The group, known for targeting US tech giants like Apple and Meta, said this is its first case against Chinese firms. Complaints have been filed in four EU countries, seeking fines of up to 4% of each company’s global revenue.

Noyb claims that companies such as Alibaba’s AliExpress and Tencent’s WeChat transfer EU citizens’ data either directly to China or undisclosed ‘third countries,’ which are likely China. Under EU data protection laws, such transfers are prohibited if the destination country fails to meet the bloc’s strict privacy standards. A Noyb lawyer emphasised that China’s status as a ‘surveillance state’ makes such transfers clearly unlawful.

The allegations add to mounting regulatory challenges for Chinese tech firms. TikTok, already under scrutiny in Europe for election interference concerns, faces a potential US ban starting Sunday over national security fears. Regulators in multiple regions continue to ramp up pressure on Chinese companies amid growing global concerns over data privacy and security.

Big tech CEOs set to attend Trump inauguration

Several prominent tech leaders, including Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, and Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, are scheduled to attend US President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Monday, according to sources familiar with the event’s planning. This marks a significant moment as top executives from the tech industry, including Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, are also expected to be in attendance. The move signals ongoing engagement between the tech sector and the incoming administration, despite various regulatory and political challenges that have shaped recent interactions between Silicon Valley and the US government.

The participation of these influential figures has attracted attention, especially given the politically charged atmosphere surrounding Trump’s presidency. While there have been tensions between Big Tech companies and the outgoing administration, with issues like data privacy, antitrust concerns, and platform regulation, the CEOs’ attendance at the inauguration may reflect an attempt to foster relationships with the new president and his team.

Apple has not yet responded to a request for comment on the reports of Tim Cook’s attendance, and the full list of attendees is still evolving. The inauguration will serve as a crucial occasion for shaping future dialogues between the tech sector and government officials. The presence of these key leaders also raises questions about how the next administration will approach regulations affecting the rapidly evolving technology industry.

TikTok prepares for possible US shutdown

TikTok is preparing to shut down its US operations on Sunday unless a federal ban is averted at the last minute, according to sources. The ban, stemming from a law signed last April, requires TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell its US assets by January 19 or face nationwide restrictions. The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on whether to uphold or pause the ban, but no ruling has been made yet.

President-elect Donald Trump, set to take office the day after the ban would take effect, is reportedly considering a temporary suspension of the shutdown. However, legal uncertainty clouds the possibility of such action. Meanwhile, the Biden administration, in its final days, has signalled it will not block the ban without a credible divestment plan from ByteDance. TikTok has argued that the law violates First Amendment rights and warned that a prolonged ban could lead to significant user loss and global disruptions to its services.

If the ban proceeds, TikTok plans to display a pop-up message informing users of the shutdown and allow them to download their data. The app would become largely inoperable as US companies would no longer be permitted to provide critical services for its maintenance. TikTok has emphasised its ability to restore operations quickly if the ban is reversed but warned that the shutdown would impact not just American users but its global platform due to its reliance on US-based infrastructure.

The political and legal standoff has sparked widespread public and corporate reactions. Social media users have expressed disappointment at the impending ban, while TikTok’s US operations, employing over 7,000 workers, hang in the balance. Despite ongoing efforts to delay the enforcement, the platform faces an uncertain future as Sunday’s deadline looms.

Apple and Amazon avoid UK lawsuit over reseller dispute

Apple and Amazon have successfully defeated a UK lawsuit accusing them of colluding to remove resellers of Apple products from Amazon’s platform. The Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled on Tuesday that the case, valued at £494 million, could not proceed.

Consumer law expert Christine Riefa had filed the lawsuit on behalf of around 36 million British consumers who purchased Apple or Beats products. Her legal team alleged the companies agreed in 2018 to block most resellers from Amazon’s UK marketplace, limiting competition for those products.

The tribunal rejected the case, citing Riefa’s failure to prove sufficient independence and robustness to represent the claimant class, particularly concerning third-party litigation funding. Apple and Amazon had previously argued the lawsuit lacked merit and requested its dismissal.

Riefa’s legal team and representatives for Apple and Amazon did not respond to requests for comment following the tribunal’s decision.

US Supreme Court to hear challenge to Texas pornography age verification law

The US Supreme Court will hear a challenge on Wednesday regarding a Texas law that mandates adult websites verify the age of users before granting access to potentially harmful material. The law, which is part of a broader trend across Republican-led states, requires users to submit personal information proving they are at least 18 years old to access pornographic content. The case raises significant First Amendment concerns, as adult entertainment industry groups argue that the law unlawfully restricts free speech and exposes users to risks such as identity theft and data breaches.

The challengers, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Free Speech Coalition, contend that alternative methods like content-filtering software could better protect minors without infringing on adults’ rights to access non-obscene material. Texas, however, defends the law, citing concerns over the ease with which minors can access explicit content online.

This case is significant because it will test the balance between state efforts to protect minors from explicit content and the constitutional rights of adults to access protected expression. If the Supreme Court upholds the law, it could set a precedent for similar age-verification measures across the US.

TikTok vows to support US employees amid legal uncertainty

TikTok has reassured its 7,000 US employees that their jobs, pay, and benefits will remain secure even if the Supreme Court upholds a law requiring the sale or ban of the platform in the United States. In an internal memo seen by Reuters, the company emphasised its commitment to employee wellbeing and maintaining operations, despite the looming January 19 deadline for the law to take effect.

The law, passed in April, targets the US operations of TikTok, owned by China-based ByteDance, amid concerns over data security and national security. Although President-elect Donald Trump has called for an extension to seek a ‘political resolution,’ the Supreme Court appears inclined to uphold the legislation. If the court does not intervene, TikTok downloads from app stores will be banned, and the app’s functionality could degrade over time as companies are prohibited from supporting its services.

TikTok’s leadership stated that the law impacts only the US user experience, not the employment of its staff, and reaffirmed its dedication to protecting employees and the platform’s 170 million American users. ‘Our leadership team remains laser-focused on planning for various scenarios and navigating the path forward,’ the memo said.

For now, TikTok’s offices will remain open, and the company continues to explore strategies to adapt to the evolving situation while ensuring continuity for its employees and users.

Meta faces new challenge in India over data sharing

Meta may be forced to halt or modify features in India after an antitrust ruling banned its WhatsApp messaging service from sharing user data with Meta for advertising purposes. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a $24.5 million fine and a five-year ban on the practice, accusing the company of abusing its dominance and coercing WhatsApp users into accepting a 2021 privacy policy that allegedly expanded data sharing unfairly.

India, Meta’s largest market with over 500 million WhatsApp users and 350 million Facebook users, is crucial for the company’s operations. The data-sharing ban could impact Meta’s ability to offer personalised ads on Facebook and Instagram, the company said in its court filing. Meta argued that this restriction could harm businesses, such as fashion brands, that rely on personalised ads to connect with customers. The US firm also warned the ruling could threaten its commercial viability in the region.

Meta has publicly defended its 2021 policy changes but criticised the CCI’s decision in a 2,000-page tribunal appeal, claiming the watchdog lacks the technical expertise to assess the implications of its ruling. The Indian appeals tribunal is set to hear Meta’s case, with the possibility of pausing the CCI directive while the legal process unfolds.

This challenge in India adds to Meta’s global struggles, including prior accusations in the EU over unclear privacy policy changes. The CCI’s ruling now requires WhatsApp to give users the choice to opt out of data sharing with Meta, signaling a broader push for greater transparency and user control in data practices worldwide.

SEC takes legal action against Musk for Twitter shares

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of delaying the disclosure of his 2022 Twitter stake, which violated federal securities laws. According to the complaint, Musk waited 11 days beyond the required 10-day window to reveal his 5% ownership of Twitter, enabling him to purchase over $500 million worth of shares at lower prices before disclosing his 9.2% stake on April 4, 2022. Twitter’s stock price surged by more than 27% following the announcement.

The SEC seeks civil penalties and a repayment of profits it claims Musk gained unfairly. Musk’s attorney, Alex Spiro, dismissed the lawsuit as a ‘sham,’ arguing it stems from a minor administrative oversight. Musk has previously clashed with the SEC, including a 2018 settlement over misleading tweets about taking Tesla private, which resulted in a $20 million fine and other conditions.

This lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges Musk faces over his $44 billion purchase of Twitter, now rebranded as X. Musk, who is worth $417 billion, according to Forbes, has also been sued by former Twitter shareholders in Manhattan federal court for the delayed disclosure, which they claim caused them financial harm. The SEC’s action comes just days before Chair Gary Gensler’s scheduled departure, marking another chapter in Musk’s contentious history with the regulatory body.

TikTok prepares to halt operations in the US, The Information reports

TikTok plans to disable its app for all US users on Sunday if the Supreme Court does not block a federal ban, according to a report by The Information. This action would go beyond the law’s requirement, which mandates a ban only on new downloads from Apple and Google app stores while allowing existing users to continue using the app temporarily.

Under TikTok’s plan, users attempting to access the app will be redirected to a website explaining the ban. The company also intends to allow users to download their data for future use. TikTok and its parent company ByteDance have yet to comment on these developments.

The ban stems from a law signed by President Joe Biden in April 2024, requiring ByteDance to sell its US assets by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. TikTok has challenged the law, arguing that it violates First Amendment protections. In a recent court filing, the company warned that a month-long ban could result in one-third of its 170 million US users leaving the platform permanently.

This potential shutdown reflects the escalating tensions surrounding TikTok’s operations in the United States, as debates over data security and free speech continue.