Jurisdiction

Eswatini advances digital vision with new laws, 5G and skills training

Eswatini is moving forward with a national digital transformation plan focused on infrastructure, legislation and skills development.

The country’s Minister of ICT, Savannah Maziya, outlined key milestones during the 2025 Eswatini Economic Update, co-hosted with the World Bank.

In her remarks, Maziya said that digital technology plays a central role in job creation, governance and economic development. She introduced several regulatory frameworks, including a Cybersecurity Bill, a Critical Infrastructure Bill and an E-Commerce Strategy.

Additional legislation is planned for emerging technologies such as AI, robotics and satellite systems.

Infrastructure improvements include the nationwide expansion of fibre optic networks and a rise in international connectivity capacity from 47 Gbps to 72 Gbps.

Mbabane, the capital, is being developed as a Smart City with 5G coverage, AI-enabled surveillance and public Wi-Fi access.

The Ministry of ICT has launched more than 11 digital public services and plans to add 90 more in the next three years.

A nationwide coding initiative will offer digital skills training to over 300,000 citizens, supporting wider efforts to increase access and participation in the digital economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Creative industries raise concerns over the EU AI Act

Organisations representing creative sectors have issued a joint statement expressing concerns over the current implementation of the EU AI Act, particularly its provisions for general-purpose AI systems.

The response focuses on recent documents, including the General Purpose AI Code of Practice, accompanying guidelines, and the template for training data disclosure under Article 53.

The signatories, drawn from music and broader creative industries, said they had engaged extensively throughout the consultation process. They now argue that the outcomes do not fully reflect the issues raised during those discussions.

According to the statement, the result does not provide the level of intellectual property protection that some had expected from the regulation.

The group has called on the European Commission to reconsider the implementation package and is encouraging the European Parliament and member states to review the process.

The original EU AI Act was widely acknowledged as a landmark regulation, with technology firms and creative industries closely watching its rollout across member countries.

Google confirmed that it will sign the General Purpose Code of Practice elsewhere. The company said the latest version supports Europe’s broader innovation goals more effectively than earlier drafts, but it also noted ongoing concerns.

These include the potential impact of specific requirements on competitiveness and handling trade secrets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US federal appeals court renews scrutiny in child exploitation suit against Musk’s X

A federal appeals court in San Francisco has reinstated critical parts of a lawsuit against Elon Musk’s social media platform X, previously known as Twitter, regarding child exploitation content. 

While recognising that X holds significant legal protections against liability for content posted by users, the 9th Circuit panel determined that the platform must address allegations of negligence stemming from delays in reporting explicit material involving minors to authorities.

The troubling case revolves around two minors who were tricked via SnapChat into providing explicit images, which were later compiled and widely disseminated on Twitter. 

Despite being alerted to the content, Twitter reportedly took nine days to remove it and notify the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, during which the disturbing video received over 167,000 views. 

The court emphasised that once the platform was informed, it had a clear responsibility to act swiftly, separating this obligation from typical protections granted by the Communications Decency Act.

The ruling additionally criticised X for having an infrastructure that allegedly impeded users’ ability to report child exploitation effectively. 

However, the court upheld the dismissal of other claims, including allegations that Twitter knowingly benefited from sex trafficking or deliberately amplified illicit content. 

Advocates for the victims welcomed the decision as a step toward accountability, setting the stage for further legal scrutiny and potential trial proceedings.

Source: Reuters

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK Online Safety Act under fire amid free speech and privacy concerns

The UK’s Online Safety Act, aimed at protecting children and eliminating illegal content online, is stirring a strong debate due to its stringent requirements on social media platforms and websites hosting adult content.

Critics argue that the act’s broad application could unintentionally suppress free speech, as highlighted by social media platform X.

X claims the act results in the censorship of lawful content, reflecting concerns shared by politicians, free-speech campaigners, and content creators.

Moreover, public unease is evident, with over 468,000 individuals signing a petition for the act’s repeal, citing privacy concerns over mandatory age checks requiring personal data on adult content sites.

Despite mounting criticism, the UK government is resolute in its commitment to the legislation. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle equates opposition to siding with online predators, emphasising child protection.

The government asserts that the act also mandates platforms to uphold freedom of expression alongside child safety obligations.

While X criticises both the broad scope and the tight compliance timelines of the act, warning of pressures towards over-censorship, it calls for significant statutory revisions to protect personal freedoms while safeguarding children.

The government rebuffs claims that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech, with assurances that the law equally protects freedom of expression.

Meanwhile, Ofcom, the UK’s communications regulator, has initiated investigations into the compliance of several companies managing pornography sites, highlighting the rigorous enforcement.

Source: Reuters

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US court mandates Android app competition, loosens billing rules

Long-standing dominance over Android app distribution has been declared illegal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, reinforcing a prior jury verdict in favour of Epic Games. Google now faces an injunction that compels it to allow rival app stores and alternative billing systems inside the Google Play Store ecosystem for a three-year period ending November 2027.

A technical committee jointly selected by Epic and Google will oversee sensitive implementation tasks, including granting competitors approved access to Google’s expansive app catalogue while ensuring minimal security risk. The order also requires that developers not be tied to Google’s billing system for in-app purchases.

Market analysts warn that reduced dependency on Play Store exclusivity and the option to use alternative payment processors could cut Google’s app revenue by as much as $1 to $1.5 billion annually. Despite brand recognition, developers and consumers may shift toward lower-cost alternatives competing on platform flexibility.

While the ruling aims to restore competition, Google maintains it is appealing and has requested additional delays to avoid rapid structural changes. Proponents, including Microsoft, regulators, and Epic Games, hail the decision as a landmark step toward fairer mobile market access.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Delta’s personalised flight costs under scrutiny

Delta Air Lines’ recent revelation about using AI to price some airfares is drawing significant criticism. The airline aims to increase AI-influenced pricing to 20 per cent of its domestic flights by late 2025.

While Delta’s president, Glen Hauenstein, noted positive results from their Fetcherr-supplied AI tool, industry observers and senators are voicing concerns. Critics worry that AI-driven pricing, similar to rideshare surge models, could lead to increased fares for travellers and raise serious data privacy issues.

Senators like Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner, and Richard Blumenthal, highlighted fears that ‘surveillance pricing’ could utilise extensive personal data to estimate a passenger’s willingness to pay.

Despite Delta’s spokesperson denying individualised pricing based on personal information, AI experts suggest factors like device type and Browse behaviour are likely influencing prices, making them ‘deeply personalised’.

Different travellers could be affected unevenly. Bargain hunters with flexible dates might benefit, but business travellers and last-minute bookers may face higher costs. Other airlines like Virgin Atlantic also use Fetcherr’s technology, indicating a wider industry trend.

Pricing experts like Philip Carls warn that passengers won’t know if they’re getting a fair deal, and proving discrimination, even if unintended by AI, could be almost impossible.

American Airlines’ CEO, Robert Isom, has publicly criticised Delta’s move, stating American won’t copy the practice, though past incidents show airlines can adjust fares based on booking data even without AI.

With dynamic pricing technology already permitted, experts anticipate lawmakers will soon scrutinise AI’s role more closely, potentially leading to new transparency mandates.

For now, travellers can try strategies like using incognito mode, clearing cookies, or employing a VPN to obscure their digital footprint and potentially avoid higher AI-driven fares.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU AI Act oversight and fines begin this August

A new phase of the EU AI Act takes effect on 2 August, requiring member states to appoint oversight authorities and enforce penalties. While the legislation has been in force for a year, this marks the beginning of real scrutiny for AI providers across Europe.

Under the new provisions, countries must notify the European Commission of which market surveillance authorities will monitor compliance. But many are expected to miss the deadline. Experts warn that without well-resourced and competent regulators, the risks to rights and safety could grow.

The complexity is significant. Member states must align enforcement with other regulations, such as the GDPR and Digital Services Act, raising concerns regarding legal fragmentation and inconsistent application. Some fear a repeat of the patchy enforcement seen under data protection laws.

Companies that violate the EU AI Act could face fines of up to €35 million or 7% of global turnover. Smaller firms may face reduced penalties, but enforcement will vary by country.

Rules regarding general-purpose AI models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok also take effect. A voluntary Code of Practice introduced in July aims to guide compliance, but only some firms, such as Google and OpenAI, have agreed to sign. Meta has refused, arguing the rules stifle innovation.

Existing AI tools have until 2027 to comply fully, but any launched after 2 August must meet the new requirements immediately. With implementation now underway, the AI Act is shifting from legislation to enforcement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

China demands Nvidia explain security flaws in H20 chips

China’s top internet regulator has summoned Nvidia to explain alleged security concerns linked to its H20 computing chips.

The Cyberspace Administration of China stated that the chips, which are sold domestically, may contain backdoor vulnerabilities that could pose risks to users and systems.

Instead of ignoring the issue, Nvidia has been asked to submit technical documents and provide a formal response addressing these potential flaws.

The chips are part of Nvidia’s tailored product line for the Chinese market following US export restrictions on advanced AI processors.

The investigation signals tighter scrutiny from Chinese authorities on foreign technology amid ongoing geopolitical tensions and a global race for semiconductor dominance.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Apple’s $20B Google deal under threat as AI lags behind rivals

Apple is set to release Q3 earnings on Thursday amid scrutiny over its Google search deal dependencies and ongoing struggles with AI progress.

Typically, Apple’s fiscal Q3 garners less investor attention, with anticipation focused instead on the upcoming iPhone launch in Q4. However, this quarter is proving to be anything but ordinary.

Analysts and shareholders alike are increasingly concerned about two looming threats: a potential $20 billion hit to Apple’s Services revenue tied to the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) antitrust case against Google, and ongoing delays in Apple’s AI efforts.

Ahead of the earnings report, Apple shares were mostly unchanged, reflecting investor caution rather than enthusiasm. Apple’s most pressing challenge stems from its lucrative partnership with Google.

In 2022, Google paid Apple approximately $20 billion to remain the default search engine in the Safari browser and across Siri.

The exclusivity deal has formed a significant portion of Apple’s Services segment, which generated $78.1 billion in revenue that year, making Google’s contribution alone account for more than 25% of that figure.

However, a ruling expected next month from Judge Amit Mehta in the US District Court for the District of Columbia could threaten the entire arrangement. Mehta previously found Google guilty of operating an illegal monopoly in the search market.

The forthcoming ‘remedies’ ruling could force Google to end exclusive search deals, divest its Chrome browser, and provide data access to rivals. Should the DOJ’s proposed remedies stand and Google fails to overturn the ruling, Apple could lose a critical source of Services revenue.

According to Morgan Stanley’s Erik Woodring, Apple could see a 12% decline in its full-year 2027 earnings per share (EPS) if it pivots to less lucrative partnerships with alternative search engines.

The user experience may also deteriorate if customers can no longer set Google as their default option. A more radical scenario, Apple launching its search engine, could dent its 2024 EPS by as much as 20%, though analysts believe this outcome is the least likely.

Alongside regulatory threats, Apple is also facing growing doubts about its ability to compete in AI. Apple has not yet set a clear timeline for releasing an upgraded version of Siri, while rivals accelerate AI hiring and unveil new capabilities.

Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan noted this week that persistent delays undermine confidence in Apple’s ability to deliver innovation at the pace. ‘Apple’s ability to drive future growth depends on delivering new capabilities and products on time,’ he wrote to investors.

‘If deadlines keep slipping, that potentially delays revenue opportunities and gives competitors a larger window to attract customers.’

While Apple has teased upcoming AI features for future software updates, the lack of a commercial rollout or product roadmap has made investors uneasy, particularly as rivals like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI continue to set the AI agenda.

Although Apple’s stock remained stable before Thursday’s earnings release, any indication of slowing services growth or missed AI milestones could shake investor confidence.

Analysts will be watching closely for commentary from CEO Tim Cook on how Apple plans to navigate regulatory risks and revive momentum in emerging technologies.

The company’s current crossroads is pivotal for the tech sector more broadly. Regulators are intensifying scrutiny on platform dominance, and AI innovation is fast becoming the new battleground for long-term growth.

As Apple attempts to defend its business model and rekindle its innovation edge, Thursday’s earnings update could serve as a bellwether for its direction in the post-iPhone era.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

White House launches AI Action Plan with Executive Orders on exports and regulation

The White House has unveiled a sweeping AI strategy through its new publication Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan.

Released alongside three Executive Orders, the plan outlines the federal government’s next phase in shaping AI policy, focusing on innovation, infrastructure, and global leadership.

The AI Action Plan centres on three key pillars: accelerating AI development, establishing national AI infrastructure, and promoting American AI standards globally. Four consistent themes run through each pillar: regulation and deregulation, investment, research and standardisation, and cybersecurity.

Notably, deregulation is central to the plan’s strategy, particularly in reducing barriers to AI growth and speeding up infrastructure approval for data centres and grid expansion.

Investment plays a dominant role. Federal funds will support AI job training, data access, lab automation, and domestic component manufacturing, instead of relying on foreign suppliers.

Alongside, the plan calls for new national standards, improved dataset quality, and stronger evaluation mechanisms for AI interpretability, control, and safety. A dedicated AI Workforce Research Hub is also proposed.

In parallel, three Executive Orders were issued. One bans ‘woke’ or ideologically biased AI tools in federal use, another fast-tracks data centre development using federal land and brownfield sites, and a third launches an AI exports programme to support full-stack US AI systems globally.

While these moves open new opportunities, they also raise questions around regulation, bias, and the future shape of AI development in the US.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!