AI/Gen AI for the Global Goals

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to accelerate sustainable development and empower Africa’s youth. The panel explored how AI can be leveraged to address challenges in various sectors, including agriculture, education, and finance, while also considering the ethical implications and necessary infrastructure.

Speakers emphasized the importance of collaboration between governments, private sector companies, and youth-led startups in implementing AI-driven initiatives. They highlighted the need for policies that support AI integration into youth development programs and educational systems across Africa. The discussion also touched on the challenges of implementing digital innovation in Africa, including regulatory hurdles and the high cost of AI technology.

A key point raised was the importance of African ownership in the AI value chain, from hardware development to data ownership. Panelists stressed the need for African countries to participate beyond the service layer of AI to ensure long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness. The discussion also addressed the ethical considerations in implementing AI technology, particularly in preventing a widening digital divide.

The panel highlighted ongoing efforts to integrate AI skills into educational curricula and create platforms for young innovators to access funding and support. They emphasized the potential of AI to create job opportunities and drive economic growth in Africa, while also acknowledging the need to address potential job displacements.

Overall, the discussion underscored the transformative potential of AI for Africa’s development, while emphasizing the importance of inclusive, ethical, and collaborative approaches to its implementation. The panelists called for increased investment in AI education, infrastructure, and local innovation to ensure that Africa can fully harness the benefits of this technology.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The potential of AI to accelerate progress on sustainable development and the UN Sustainable Development Goals

– The need for collaboration between governments, private sector, and other stakeholders to responsibly develop and implement AI

– Challenges around AI access, infrastructure, and skills gaps, particularly in developing countries and Africa

– Ethical considerations and risks associated with AI development and deployment

– The role of youth and innovation in driving AI adoption and solutions in Africa

The overall purpose of the discussion was to explore how AI, particularly generative AI, can be leveraged as a tool to accelerate sustainable development and empower youth in Africa, while addressing challenges and ethical concerns.

The tone of the discussion was generally optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers highlighting the transformative potential of AI. However, there was also a pragmatic acknowledgement of significant challenges that need to be overcome, particularly around access, skills, and ethical implementation. The tone became more action-oriented towards the end, with calls for concrete partnerships and initiatives to move the agenda forward.

Speakers

Speakers:

– Sanda Ojiambo – CEO and Executive Director of the UN Global Compact

– Shea Gopaul – Permanent Representative for the International Board Organization of Employers

– Chido Cleopatra Mpemba – African Union Youth Envoy

– Christopher P. Lu – Deputy Command Representative of the UN for Management Reform from the U.S. government

– Gerbrand Haverkamp – Executive Director of the World Benchmarking Alliance

– Henry Kipponen – Chief Innovation Officer from Unite AI Companies

– Dr. Jamila Bio Ibrahim – Nigeria’s Minister of Youth

– Priscilla Boa-Gue – Google’s head for pan-African institutions, government affairs and public policy

– Kolawole Olajide – CEO and co-founder of Sava (fintech company)

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Amelia (no last name given) – Moderated first panel discussion

– Farai Gundan – Moderator for second panel, inspirational youth leader at Harvard University

– Tonilyn Lim – Chief of Programs of the UN Global Conference, facilitated transitions between panels

Areas of expertise varied among speakers, covering topics such as:

– UN initiatives and global partnerships

– Business and employment

– Youth development in Africa

– AI and technology policy

– Sustainable development

– Government affairs

– Fintech and entrepreneurship

Full session report

Expanded Summary of AI and Sustainable Development Discussion

This comprehensive discussion explored the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to accelerate sustainable development and empower Africa’s youth. The panel, comprising experts from various sectors, delved into how AI can address challenges in agriculture, education, finance, and other key areas, while also considering ethical implications and necessary infrastructure.

Potential of AI for Sustainable Development

Speakers unanimously agreed on AI’s significant potential to drive progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sanda Ojiambo, CEO of the UN Global Compact, emphasized that AI, particularly generative AI, can be a “true game-changer for sustainability progress”. She highlighted its ability to democratize access to information, accelerate innovation through cross-disciplinary thinking, and increase productivity. Ojiambo also discussed the UN Global Compact’s recent report on AI for sustainable development, which outlines how AI can contribute to each of the 17 SDGs and provides guidance for businesses on responsible AI implementation.

However, the discussion also acknowledged the need for a balanced perspective. Ojiambo cautioned that while AI could help solve global goals, gaps in technology access could exacerbate global inequalities. This nuanced view set the tone for a broader exploration of both opportunities and challenges.

Challenges and Risks in AI Implementation

The panel identified several significant hurdles to AI implementation in Africa:

1. Infrastructure limitations: The lack of basic infrastructure such as internet access and electricity in many areas was highlighted as a major challenge.

2. Cost barriers: Kolawole Olajide, CEO of Sava, pointed out the high costs of AI development and implementation for African startups.

3. Ethical considerations: Priscilla Boa-Gue from Google stressed the need for responsible AI principles and ethical guidelines.

4. Informal sector challenges: Dr. Jamila Bio Ibrahim, Nigeria’s Minister of Youth, discussed the difficulties of implementing AI solutions in Africa’s large informal sector, where traditional data collection and digital integration are limited.

These challenges underscored the complexity of leveraging AI for development in Africa, prompting discussions on potential solutions and strategies.

African Initiatives and Strategies

The discussion highlighted several initiatives aimed at harnessing AI for Africa’s development:

1. African Union’s AI Strategy: Chido Cleopatra Mpemba discussed the African Union’s efforts to develop a comprehensive AI strategy and policy brief to guide the continent’s approach to AI adoption and regulation.

2. Make Africa Digital Campaign: Mpemba also mentioned this initiative, which aims to promote digital literacy and skills across the continent.

3. Google’s AI Research Centers: Priscilla Boa-Gue detailed Google’s investments in AI research centers in Ghana and Kenya, focusing on developing locally relevant AI solutions and supporting African AI researchers.

4. Nigeria’s Youth Empowerment Initiatives: Dr. Jamila Bio Ibrahim outlined Nigeria’s efforts to support youth in technology and AI, including plans to integrate AI and digital skills into educational curricula and provide funding for youth-led AI initiatives.

Empowering African Youth through AI

A key focus of the discussion was how to harness AI to benefit Africa’s youth. Strategies discussed included:

1. Investing in talent development and digital skills training for youth

2. Integrating AI and digital skills into educational curricula

3. Providing funding and investment opportunities for youth-led AI initiatives

4. Creating enabling policy environments to support AI startups

Importance of Collaboration and Partnerships

Speakers consistently emphasized the crucial role of multi-stakeholder collaboration in effectively developing and implementing AI technologies. Ojiambo called for partnerships between governments, private sector, and civil society. Boa-Gue highlighted the potential of collaborations between tech companies and African institutions to develop localized AI solutions. Olajide stressed the importance of cooperation between youth-led startups, established businesses, and governments.

African Ownership in the AI Value Chain

Kolawole Olajide raised a thought-provoking point about the need for African countries to participate beyond the service layer of AI: “If as a continent, we only participate in that service layer, we have a big problem in the long-term. We will continue to, it will be very expensive for us.” This insight highlighted the importance of building local AI capabilities and infrastructure in Africa, including manufacturing and hardware development.

Ethical Considerations and Governance

The panel addressed the importance of ethical AI development and deployment. Gerbrand Haverkamp, Executive Director of the World Benchmarking Alliance, emphasized the role of international bodies like the UN in AI governance, stating, “If we do not do it here in the UN, it will either be decided in the US, in Europe, or in China, and then we know which other countries will not be at the table.” This comment led to discussions on the need for inclusive global governance structures for AI.

Unresolved Issues and Future Considerations

Despite the productive discussion, several issues remained unresolved, including:

1. Ensuring AI benefits reach rural and marginalized communities

2. Ownership and control of African data used to develop AI systems

3. Increasing African participation in hardware development and other parts of the AI value chain

4. Balancing innovation with ethical concerns and responsible AI development

The discussion also touched on the upcoming UN Summit of the Future, which will focus on youth engagement and the role of emerging technologies in shaping global futures.

In conclusion, the discussion underscored the transformative potential of AI for Africa’s development, while emphasizing the importance of inclusive, ethical, and collaborative approaches to its implementation. The panelists called for increased investment in AI education, infrastructure, and local innovation to ensure that Africa can fully harness the benefits of this technology, while also addressing the significant challenges and ethical considerations that lie ahead.

A notable contribution came from a young Indian speaker who mentioned writing an AI book for African children, highlighting the growing global interest in promoting AI education for youth across continents.

Session Transcript

Sanda Ojiambo: Good afternoon, everybody, and thank you so much for making the time to be here. My name is Sanda Ojiambo. I’m the CEO and Executive Director of the UN Global Contact. It’s really great to welcome you to our offices. First, I just want to say sincere apologies. I know we’ve had to make some changes on venue. On the positive side, we’re now being streamed live on UN Web TV, so we do have a much larger and global following, which I think is great for the opportunity that we have. But just to say, yes, the negotiations for the pact for the future, which will be central to the summit of the future, happened to be, should I say, protracted. And so essentially, most available space, there was a request to avail space so that member states or governments could conclude this piece of negotiation and discussion. So thank you for being accommodating. I know we’re all here to rally behind the pact and what we want to achieve for the summit of the future, which includes a lot of the important work that we want to do around technology and AI. So thank you for accommodating that. I know a few of our guests are on the way. They had engagements at the United Nations, so they need to make their way over here. But we will certainly kick off. I will just make some comments to start. I know there’s a lot that we want to talk about. This has been a really exciting report that we’ve been able to compile with our partners and really marks, I think, for the Global Compact, a great launchpad into looking at the world of Gen AI for the global goals. I want to first just thank the African Union Office of the Youth Envoy. I know she’s on the way. She was a dear friend, a strong advocate for everything future looking and a great youth envoy. So I appreciate her and her effort. I know colleagues from her office are here. I’d also like to thank the International Organization of Employees. Who’s also a great friend and strong advocate for private sector and all the transformative work that it does in all of its phases. Your collaboration has allowed us to drive this conversation forward. So thank you very much. Cleo and Shiv for your support on this. The Summit and indeed the Pact of the Future, we will see by the end of the week, put a strong focus on young people. There’s a declaration by the youth that will come out and it’s really the opportunity to look at new solutions, chart a new vision of what the world can look like after these four years that have been particularly hard from an economic perspective, a social perspective and certainly in terms of governance and society functioning. So the Summit and the Pact call us to imagine a new future that is really grounded in multilateralism, that has strong global governance underpinning it, that embraces the global digital compact that I’m sure you’ll hear about over the next couple of days and certainly has young people and driving forward the sustainable development goals. And so then therefore technology and AI is so central to making sure that we can get there because as we reflected on last year at this time, as you know, we’re so far behind on where we need to be with the global goals. Business is uniquely positioned to drive this forward as we know. Business was called to the table in 2015 when the goals were being designed to look at the goals of a strong investment opportunity, an opportunity not only to bridge markets but really to bridge the gaps that exist between communities, people, societies and the world. So business still remains core to the work that we need to do for the remaining years till 2030. Gen AI gives us the opportunity to crunch large data sets, to find the insights that we need and to truly deliver the solutions to move the goals forward. We interviewed about 30 executives to put this report together and all of them recognized the capacity and the potentials for Gen AI to truly transform industry and what we need to do. A larger survey of about 1,600 CEOs revealed that 75% of those companies, admittedly large companies, are in the process of embedding AI into their work and their strategies. According to this new report, and thank you to Accenture, our partners, for working with us on this, Gen AI can be a true game-changer for sustainability progress because it will democratize access to information, it will accelerate innovation through the solutions, through cross-disciplinary thinking, and certainly by increasing productivity. Schools can help navigate complex and sustainable development problems, such as circular business, more productive supply chains, and I’m truly wishing I had Gen AI when I was in school. I’m told it solves a lot of the challenges I face trying to do my homework and my assignments. But imagine Gen AI combined with robotics and what the future would look like for many. I come from Kenya, the African continent, often referred, Kenyan specifically, no offense to the other African world, the Silicon Savannah, sometimes called the hotbed of innovation. You know, what do we need? We need scale, we need technology, we need access to crunch those data sets and make solutions that make sense, not only for those small startup entrepreneurs, but for the big issues that a lot of the developing and the emerging world needs to solve. At best, AI will help us solve the global goals, and that’s really important, but we must take a reality check because we realize that gaps in technology are really what keeps the world separate. On the one hand, we’re moving forward with large language models. On the other hand, the people who still don’t have access to connectivity can’t afford it or simply are still working using a feature phone. So, you know, there’s a lot of work that will go on around looking at what Gen AI can and should look like, how we bridge those technology gaps from a policy perspective, from an infrastructure perspective, from a device perspective, from a content perspective, from a pricing perspective. So much work to be done, even while we accelerate forward on this. Additionally, and under that, we need to look at issues such as rights, bias, ethics, complex areas because we’re really charting uncharted waters. Lots of work going on on this. Allow me to just mention the Secretary General’s high level advisory body on technology and AI that is doing some groundbreaking work on supporting efforts. and discussions on global governance, very important. Regional efforts are also key. We will hear from the African Union about how it’s building a vibrant and inclusive AI startup ecosystem. We must look at each region’s priorities and needs. Technology is not applied agnostically or across many different infrastructure and policy areas as well. This report, as you’ll see, will outline tangible actions to help companies use technology as it should and for the global goals. Companies, as we always say in the Global Compact, must work in partnership with governments, with civil society, with communities, empower young people, empower SMEs, empower innovators to really drive technology forward. Gen AI is already shaping the global landscape. Every day, I sense something new and really wonder where the future may lie. It’s really interesting that we’re here gathering the summit of the future, where we can really look at what a combined future for the world can look like. So really important. So I just want to say thank you so much to all those who helped put the report together. Many from my team here, who I know thoroughly enjoyed the exercise. I enjoyed reading the report, debating about some of the critical issues that were in there. And we’re very hopeful that this report will provide value, not just for Global Compact members, for anybody in the private sector and our broad stakeholder ecosystem, who’s really looking to see how we can get to 2030 and really deliver on the Sustainable Development Goal. So thank you so much to all of you for coming. I know we have a few people walking in also. They come over from the UN office, but welcome and we really look forward to an energizing discussion. Thank you.

Moderator: Great. Thank you, Sanda. I think we can hand it to Shea. Yeah. Great.

Shea Gopaul: So thank you, Sanda. And like Sandra, I’d like to thank the African Union, as well as Global Compact. is a co-sponsor with us today. My name is Shea Gopaul, I’m the permanent rep for the International Board Organization of Employers. For those of you that don’t know us, we are an organization representing 50 million companies with our employers federations and our members in over 150 different countries. We focus on social employment issues from policy to advocacy, to really capacity building at country level. So we too undertook a study with Deloitte and looking at G20 countries where we looked at their AI readiness and how prepared are countries as we embark on this new world of AI. And while there’s a dual nature to AI and its impact on the labor market and society, obviously there are some very positive significant points in particularly productivity and efficiency gains, but there’s also an awful lot and people are very worried about is job displacements and social disparities. The recent IMF report has said that AI will affect 40% of jobs around the world, but in advanced economies where we’re moving so quickly on this, it could be actively 60%. Now there will be job losses, but there will be job gains. And I think there’s some really interesting numbers, but they’re not all saying the same thing. If you look at MIT, some of the numbers are a bit alarming because they’re using also historical data. You have the ILO coming out, the West says 14 million jobs could be lost, that’s 2%. Whereas the OECD is saying, no, let’s look at this, it could be more positive. No matter what is happening in the AI world, there will be job loss and people need to be trained and retrained into these new positions. Women in particular are being very affected by this. And the first round, particularly in gen AI, is a lot of the administrative positions which are being taken by many women. And unfortunately, some of those are the jobs where they need to be re-skilled immediately so that they can move in and fit into other jobs. But women also have a disadvantage. And if you look at the statistics, they are not as much in STEM education. They’re at a disadvantage, and therefore men are much more educated and trained, and they will be able to move forward. But AI will not take your job away, but the person with AI skills will. So there are a lot of gains in productivity, as I said, and particularly in sectors like manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare, we see a lot of tasks being automated. And there is an increase in productivity, particularly, as I said, in these advanced economies. Routine tasks are being removed, and then people are being able to spend more time on creativity, strategic work, and overall productivity. So in general, in G20 countries, they all say that they’re well-prepared and positioning themselves for AI. And there are many opportunities, and they are all, however, at very different stages. Everyone says that they’re looking at a strategy, and they have actually set up ministries and groups that are really looking at AI governance and all the other issues around it. But as Sandra said, the current digital infrastructure is very serious. And while we’re talking about this and saying it’s so great in many advanced economies, you shouldn’t forget that 33% of the world is without access so you’re not gonna be using generative AI. There are various forms and levels of investment. AI takes investment and particularly private investment. And that’s where it’s very unevenly distributed. 81% of the private investment in AI is in two countries and that’s China and the US. That means that there are a lot of countries that don’t have the resources. And so therefore there’s a push by governments to be putting more of public funds into this. The skills gap is very serious, but most importantly there’s something called the skills mismatch. Particularly in South Africa, Brazil and Mexico, they have the largest skills mismatch. And this could cause some serious problems because young people who are educated and want to work but do not have the skills for a job that can cause very serious frustrations and eventually unrest, which is what we saw a lot in 2012 when we had a lot of the youth unemployment problems we’re dealing with. But also the IMF looked at several factors when you’re looking at readiness. And there’s things like doing business in a country, the startup environment, the human capital, again, investment. But there are common efforts across countries and everyone recognizes its importance. However, the infrastructure development is recognized as being serious. Digital infrastructure is the cornerstone. However, they are all putting prioritization on high-speed internet, cloud computing, advanced technologies in order to be able to integrate their AI. Workforce development and skills enhancement is a very serious issue and they’re trying to tackle it and R&D becomes very important in these G20 countries. However, there are some serious issues and I’m going to point to a few of them which I sort of raised. But there needs to be an equitable distribution of the AI benefits. And this is where there’s really serious concern. Because many countries are not ready with the infrastructure, and this is really going to cause even worse income inequalities. Private sector and public sector must come together on this to become a leader in AI. They’re working on workforce development, but they’re also looking at AI integration into the economy. The skills gap, I said, is huge, the mismatch, but we do see that a lot of countries are very quickly taking on targeted programs and efforts, and private sector is assisting with this in modernizing the educational curricula. And for instance, Brazil has a strategy right now where they’re putting a strong AI workforce development together with financial resources, scholarships, and AI degrees. But there needs to be the balance between innovation and ethical concerns. Strategies should really adapt to the address of emerging ethical concerns, such as algorithms and the implication of AI on privacy. So just to conclude, we have the study, it’s out there, lots is happening, but we need to share. Those that are at the advantage and those who are doing well really need to share with others to bring everyone up to the same level. To conclude, we need a human-centric approach, where we consider the workplace, education, misinformation, and ethics are absolutely critical for any strategy. We know we can’t do it alone, and we know that many could be left behind even more. The Global Compact Study is great because we know that we can achieve great outcomes in their examples, but we also know that we can’t do it alone, and we know that many could be left behind even more. of coming together, but we need to share, complement, and work in partnership. So, thank you.

Sanda Ojiambo: I just have an additional job with the MC, but allow me to welcome the delegates from the African Union. Welcome. I know you had to do a walk-off. Sincere apologies for the change of venue. Thank you for being accommodating. We kicked off the program. I provided my remarks. My dear colleague shared spoken from the international organization before us. So, if you’re ready, we’d very much welcome your remarks from the African Union and the President, Madam, the youth envoy. Thank you very much. Would you like to come up front?

Chido Cleopatra Mpemba: Thank you, everyone. First of all, my apologies for being late. This is my fifth event for the day. There’s one more to go. So, I’ve just come from the UN, where we’re closing an event on gender equality for young girls and adolescents. As you’re aware that today’s also the UN Summit of the Future Youth Action Day, but I’m happy to be here. First of all, to my sister, Sanda. Thank you for doing this in collaboration with the African Union, the Minister of Youth for Nigeria, the Minister of Youth Development for Nigeria, my dear sister, Dr. Jamila. Everyone, thank you for being with us today, and I see a lot of familiar faces that we have in the room, young professionals like Kola, like Melvin, just to name a few that have joined us here today. I’m going to speak mostly about the work in the Office of the Youth Envoy, and the reason I’m going to mention this is because knowing that UN Global Contact works with the private sector, I think it’s important that we raise the best practices of the private sector working with young people in Africa. So at the African Union with the Digital Transformation Strategy, and within this, the Office of the Youth UNWRADE launched a campaign, which is the Make Africa Digital campaign. This campaign is in partnership with Google and AfriZim Bank, and we also have the support from UN Global Compact in launching a policy brief. We’ve taken this campaign to seven countries with the partnership of the private sector because we believe it’s important that we have a digital literate, you know, future generation. So, you know, we’ve been going across the continent, partnering with local tech hubs and ensuring that young people get to learn about digital literacy and we prepare them for the future of work. But not only that, we realized when we went about this campaign, that some of the communities that we visited, for example, when we were in Ghana, we’re in a community just far up from Accra. And, you know, some of the people raised a concern when we’d gone there for the training and they said, actually, you’re here to train us, but we don’t have the digital access. So you might come and talk about digital literacy, but we don’t have the technology. And as a result, we then decided to actually start having consultations with young people in different communities to say, this is actually working. What more would you like within the context of Africa and the support from the private sector and the African Union? Because we all know that AI is a new thing, right? It’s a new buzz. Recently, the African Union actually launched an AI strategy, which was adopted by our member states at the AU Head of State Assembly in June. We know that the UN is also launching an AI strategy. I’m not sure if it’s been launched and it’s coming up very soon. And as a result, we came up with this policy brief. The policy brief is on AI and user sustainability in Africa. And we’re really excited for, you know, different stakeholders to get to appreciate this policy brief from the private sector to the member states and the governments. and ensuring that we do better really for African youth. When we talk to the youth in Africa, what comes up the most is unemployment is such an issue. A lot of young people are unemployed and we need to address that. We can address that through education, through working with the private sector as well, but we can also address this by raising entrepreneurs. How can we ensure that we capacitate our young people? How do we ensure that we raise funding for young people? Because it’s one thing if we capacitate them and if we train them, and there’s no funding, to further accelerate the initiative. So I think that’s what I would like to leave in the room. I hope my team will pardon me because I didn’t get a chance to read all their hard work and their research in this, but appreciating, and acknowledging my team really. I’m here with a delegation of a women-led delegation from across the continent that are here with me today from Cameroon. We have a delegation from Zimbabwe, Nigeria. We have a delegation from Mali. We have a delegation of young women that are with me in this room. And the reason I’m not missing it is because in as much as we talk about youth representation, it’s also important that we include those that are marginalized. And often the young women are marginalized. So let us also think about that. If we talk about AI, we talk about young people, but let us not forget the marginalized, the people in non-urban areas, that are often left behind. I was literally in the session I was in just now at the U.S. and I was just raising awareness of a statistic on young girls that are out of school compared to the ratio to boys. And it’s quite huge. The gap is quite huge in Africa. We need to do something about that. But in closing, just to appreciate everyone’s here and I’m looking forward to the discussions that will be ongoing in this room and for everyone to further contribute really in building and developing the Africa that we want and meeting the SDG goals, but also the Agenda 2063. So thank you very much.

Sanda Ojiambo: Thank you so much Chido, really for your leadership and as you said, bringing forward that generation of both, you know, marginalized young people as well as women and everything that is so important for the world that we live in. You don’t have a t-shirt. Thank you. You’re absolutely welcome. It’s good to have you here and sincere apologies, you might know more about the levels of negotiation that are going on within the United Nations. So please accept our apologies to everybody, once again, having to make a very last minute change of venue. As I mentioned before, here on The Positive, we’re now being streamed live on UN Web TV, so we are, you know, globally visible, but more importantly, I think it’s just great to be able to have this discussion as we continue to stream in. I just want to say a special welcome to the Ambassador. Thank you so much for all of your support in all that we do. I know we move on to an interactive panel and they’ve put these painfully high seats for all of you. But lovely to be able to welcome the panel and have you up here for this interactive panel. Allow me also to recognize, indeed, the Minister for Youth from Nigeria. Madam, thank you so much for joining us and all of our special guests who are making the time to come over. I’d love to be able to introduce the panel. The other Ambassador, Christopher Lu, is the Deputy Command Representative of the UN for Management Reform from the U.S. government. We have Gerbrand Haverkamp, the Executive Director of the World Benchmarking Alliance, to be here. And certainly Henry Kipponen, the Chief Innovation Officer from Unite AI Companies. Please, you are all welcome to join. And I’ll be moderated by Amelia. And we have moderation from Amelia.

Amelia: Thank you. I know there’s a little bit of shuffling, so I’ll let everyone find their seats. All right. Thank you all so much for joining us, and thank you to all the wonderful speakers for being here. And thank you all for joining me. I’m excited to have you all here. As we discussed, we are at a crossroads. As I discussed, we are at a crossroads. On the one hand, we are desperately behind where we need to be when it comes to the SDGs, with only 17% on-track spending. And on the other hand, as we discussed, we have exciting, amazing technology, such as Gen-AI, that can help accelerate the progress that we need, that can help close some of the gaps and really get us to where we need to be by 2030. Please speak up. Oh, I apologize here. I will try. As I said, we’re at a crossroads where we need to, on the one hand, accelerate our progress on the SDGs, and look at really taking advantage of the tools at our disposal, such as Gen-AI. Can you all hear me now? I’ll try and project more. So I’m really excited to have our three panels today, where we’re going to be talking about different perspectives, from government to private sector, on how Gen-AI can really be used to accelerate sustainable development and accelerate the global goals. And for those who might be interested, there are reports and postcards outside to read more. But during this panel, I really want to touch on three things. The first is innovation, the excitement around Gen-AI, really expanding on what Sanda already talked about at the beginning of the opening session. The second is some of the risks that Sherry touched on, from employment to misinformation to bias and more. And the third is the real importance of collaboration. When it comes to both enabling that acceleration, but also mitigating and managing those risks. I’d love to start off with innovation. So, we all know that, I’m sorry, I’m going to turn my back to you now, so we all know that several companies around the world have really made commitments when it comes to sustainability. Yet they’re facing headwinds, the geopolitical conflict, to the economy, and more. So, I’m curious, from your perspective, how can GEN-AI be used as a tool to really help accelerate some of this, to help overcome the challenges and accelerate some sustainability progress? I’ll open up with Henry.

Henry Kipponen: Yeah, so there are many cases, and we’ve heard here that AI is a new thing. I think I founded my first AI company in 2012 or 2013, so from that moment, it was pretty clear where things are going. So, for example, the private sector hasn’t done a very good job of implementing that, neither has the governments. And so, there are many things, for example, starting from precision farming, that’s a very obvious case. Then there are, for example, in construction, what you can do with algorithmic planning is to, for example, create structures that are as strong as done by using a lot of material like concrete and metals, but you can chip away some of the materials in those uses. You can reduce food waste, for example, by predicting the demand, and we’re not doing that currently. Like, 50% of everything that comes from farms goes to trashcans somewhere, and it doesn’t make any sense. Also, there are some other things that, for example, people usually tend to think that if algorithms make decisions based on, for example, who is hired where, then it’s always biased. But that’s just like, that’s humans who are doing the bias in that. So they are now like, understanding how to build the data sets. Because I mean, it’s about the data sets and how the algorithm works. But I would assume that if we would do that, for example, like, like, we would like make algorithms make all those decisions, for example, for jobs, then we would audit them. Everyone who’s the decision didn’t like the decision might ask from the corporation or whoever, and ask to show that how did the algorithm work. And that would actually create transparency. But those are like very obvious use cases. And we don’t need any technology. Technology was there like 10 years ago for doing that. But we just don’t have the way to do that.

Amelia: I think we all know that sometimes there’s a gap between having a tool and actually implementing it for good. But I do like the example of really taking away that bias and implementing more transparency. That brings me to the next one. From benchmarking perspective, that is a lot of essentially enabling transparency on the action that companies are taking. Will Jen and I be able to help with that transparency? How are you thinking about evaluating companies more?

Gerbrand Haverkamp: Yeah, so first, we look at the world’s 2000 most influential companies from a perspective of the Sustainable Development Goals. So what can these companies do to make sure that we achieve the SDGs? And I don’t want to be the parsley pooper here. But I’m going to be anyway a little bit. There is a lot of excitement. But if you look at what companies are actually doing, that’s what we know from benchmarking is they’re falling massively behind. And so I can be excited about precision agriculture. But I’m going to be excited when it’s in the hand of smallholder farmers, because that’s what is going to make a difference. And this is where we constantly see those challenges. So I am and I want to be and I am excited about new technologies. But it’s always a question about how do we make that available? Because right now, it’s quite what it is. something simple as internet access is a reflection of inequality, but it also widens inequality if we don’t fix it. I think for us as an organization, like we, so therefore we are constantly interested in how can we measure the impact that companies have on people and planets. And whilst these companies operate in a world of big data, when it comes to the data on their actual impact, we have mainly data gaps. So I’m really, really interested in, I think someone made a joke about data centers, right? There’s not a lot of data about data centers and their energy use, et cetera. So these are sort of the discrepancies that we need to start fixing. Like how do we actually start to deploy these solutions to get clarity and data on issues where we now don’t have sight? So I hope for us as an organization, that also means technological development in terms of how do we then utilize that? We’re an NGO, so we’re not the best at that kind of stuff, but we need to figure it out and how do we work with that? But I think that’s, for me, it’s really the critical bit, like how, with every new wave of technology, how are we going to make it accessible?

Amelia: I think absolutely we’ve touched on themes of accessibility and that is critical. I’m curious, Ambassador Lu, from the standpoint of both it being a innovative, nascent technology, but also having these issues of accessibility, et cetera, what’s the perspective of governments to be able to make it accessible to the people?

Christopher P. Lu: Yeah, I mean, look, AI is new, but it’s actually really not that new. I mean, we’ve been having this conversation for the last two years since the advent of chat GPT, but AI goes way before that. Every time you go online and you do a search and it suggests something to you, that’s AI. Every time you go on Google Maps to try to figure out how long it’s going to take you, that’s AI. I think the difference is the power and what it can do. And I think the challenge that governments have is how do we ensure that these benefits flow to everyone while mitigating the risks? And we know about some of the risks, this information. I think in some ways, the greatest risk that we face is that the benefits don’t flow to everybody and that it has the potential to both decrease inequality, but widen inequality. there’s a major capacity challenge right now. I mean, AI is like a very fancy sports car and a lot of countries don’t even have paved roads. So the question is, how do you connect people to the internet? How do you even give them reliable electricity so they can connect to the internet? So that’s kind of one challenge, but then it’s also understanding that countries don’t need to have the capability, particularly in the developing world to develop AI. They just need to be able to take advantage of it. So when you’ve got AI tools that help, you know, farmers better grow crops or that can predict floods or that can assess the credit worthiness for microloans, all of that can help the developing world. We just need to get those tools into the hands of people. And often you could do that through a smartphone connection. And so this is something we in the U.S. government have been thinking a lot about. The challenge that I think for the perspective of the U.S. is we often think about these as problems that governments can solve. And yes, governments have capacity to solve them. Truthfully, these will ultimately be solved by the private sector. The private sector and U.S. tech companies, European tech companies, will have the ability to lay the cable that will connect people to the internet and will provide the skilling. Government can provide an impetus to this, but government alone can’t solve it, nor can the U.N. solve this problem.

Amelia: Absolutely, and that actually takes us to the topic of collaboration. Because we do think, as you mentioned, Ambassador Liu, that collaboration is the key between the private sector and government to be able to really utilize the technology, the skills, the finances at our fingertips to be able to implement that change. So I’m sure it’s a big thing about collaboration from initially the private sector. What more would you both like to see from global cross-sector partnerships? How can we help close that gap in terms of access, in terms of potential employment changes, et cetera?

Henry Kipponen: Well, what I see is like, I look at it from the perspective of innovation. It’s something that’s like… This technological change is huge because now it’s democratized. So basically, anyone can create, for example, a learning algorithm using Gen AI and large language models and code that, for example. But unless you have access to the Internet, if you don’t have the devices, it doesn’t make any sense. But again, I’m a little bit skeptical about organizations or governments deciding on what to innovate, because we just don’t know. And this is where young people and this collaboration comes in, because I mean, this is the most important part. What I think is that since the future is not created, maybe we want to include all of those people who will be living this planet after, for example, I’m born. I’m young in Europe, by the way. European youth convoy looks like this. That’s how it is. But again, I think that is the part that when we’re trying to direct innovation to somewhere, it goes usually wrong, and especially with new technologies. We must create the platform, have the resources, as has been said here, have the access for that. And then, for example, funding it in a way that maybe there are some projects that the who gives the money decides what to do. But like it’s done in research that like you just give money to people who have some ideas and some of them might be groundbreaking, which are solving actual problems. But I’m very interested in about this point of like, in 2015 happened a big thing when Google democratized some of the tools, that was a huge thing that happened. And now it’s democratized for like all who have the access to the Internet and for these devices. And that, for me, is a creative revolution. And especially when people who have not been taken away from taking part of some of the things get access to that, then we’re going to see change. But it’s not going to be the change that we’re now protecting. It is going to be something totally different. And I’m just like hoping that it will be the sort of like the good people now doing it because, I mean, there are so many bad uses for AI and usually it’s the bad people who like take it first and do it to, for example, like reduce trust between people. So we have a crisis of democracy and we’ve seen that happening already. So now it’s the for the good people time to like move in.

Gerbrand Haverkamp: I think it’s, of course, absolutely right that it’s ultimately companies that deliver and I would not want to make any suggestions to change that. But I think if there’s one role for the UN, it is to spell out what the responsibility of business is when it comes to the deployment of technology. And because once we have clear norms and guidance, within parameters, we actually want to deploy this technology, we want to develop it. That’s different from saying what to develop, but it is giving the guardrails for how we do it. And the UN has done it before, right, with the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. It sets out principles within business, which business can operate. And I think there’s now an opportunity, starting with the Global Digital Compact, to spell out for nations, and therefore for companies, what the ethical principles are that we want to apply when developing and deploying these new technologies. And I think the UN is really the only place where that can be done. Because if we do not do it here in the UN, it will either be decided in the US, in Europe, or in China, and then we know which other countries will not be at the table. So if we really want, if we’re talking about inclusivity, and we want this to be available for all, then we need to be able to set the norms and standards and parameters at a place and the UN is the only place where that can be done. Because otherwise, it will be set by the world’s biggest economies, or the world’s biggest economies will choose not to do it. And therefore, I think it’s really, really unique not to undermine that position of the UN, because the UN is the only place that has the legitimacy to do that. So if there’s one thing that I hope will come out of this Global Digital Compact, is articulation of what the responsibility of business is. That’s very different from saying what business should be doing, but it’s saying within these parameters is how we’re going to work. And we’ve done it before with human rights, and I think we have an opportunity to do it now as well for the generative AI and other new technologies.

Amelia: Absolutely. What are those ethical principles and frameworks that we need to be thinking about? Anything to add?

Christopher P. Lu: Yeah, it’s actually one of the reasons why we in the US led the effort on the first ever UN resolution on AI that passed in March. And it was to begin to set out some of these rules of the road for how AI should be operated and governed and how it should be developed. And I mean, the miraculous aspect of this is that we were able to get 193 countries to agree with this, even though, candidly, there’s only a couple dozen that have the capability of actually meaningfully developing AI. But it was essentially to start putting down some basic rules of the road that countries could adopt if they adopt their own regulatory scheme. And obviously, the US scheme is much different than the Chinese scheme, which is much different than the EU scheme. But there’s a basic set of principles that should guide it. And I do agree with the both panels. The UN has an important role in this. But what’s important to understand is that the importance of bringing every stakeholder to the table. And that’s a point of distinction within the UN. There are countries right now who do think the only people that should discuss AI are country to country conversations. And I think that’s short-sighted. I mean, other than China right now, if you look at the other major countries that are developing AI, the vast majority of the investments in AI are happening in the private sector. These are not government-funded investments. They’re private sector investments. So not to include those companies in the conversation leaves it both player, frankly, not including civil society NGOs, who can be the important check to ensure that human rights and civil liberties are all being protected. That’s an oversight as well. So those are some of the broad guiding principles of how we’ve tried to negotiate global digital compact.

Amelia: Thank you. I’m going to wrap up with one final quick question before we get applauded off the stage. I think it’s very exciting to hear about what we need coming out. Just very curiously, what, if I may ask you each, what do you find most exciting in the next five to 10 years about the potential of Gen AI to unlock sustainable development? what’s the one thing that you’re most excited about? And I’ll start, and that’s early.

Christopher P. Lu: I mean, it’s, I’m not even trying. I mean, you know, when you look at breast cancer detection, education, skilling, agriculture, I mean, sustainability, it’s all really exciting. And yet, we know what the risks are. And so I think that balance of how we get the benefits and mitigates them, the risk is both exciting and scary. I know that’s not an answer, but that’s about it.

Henry Kipponen: There are many interesting venues with that, but I’m still wondering all the time, the food waste part, because that doesn’t make any sense to anyone. Because our food system is not producing money for anyone. So it doesn’t make sense in that. And then we’re wasting resources, and people are starving, and that kind of stuff. And I think that would be at least partially solvable with AI technologies. And it’s not like DNA and AI, it’s like some of the basic machine learning algorithms that can do that too.

Amelia: Yeah, addressing that, I believe 40% of food waste, that doesn’t even help feed the population. Yeah. Absolutely.

Gerbrand Haverkamp: I hope climate change, my hope is on climate change. I mean, generally, AI will contribute hugely to the energy, but it will try to deal with its own problem. And in dealing with that, I hope it gets some breakthroughs on climate change.

Amelia: That’d be very exciting. Well, I would like to invite you all to thank your panelists.

Tonilyn Lim: Good afternoon, I’m Tonilyn Lim, Chief of Programs of the UN Global Conference. I’m not Sanda’s AI. I’m taking over. She has to go to another meeting. But anyway, I’d like to thank the panel who really gave us a very rich explanation. of the possibilities in many applications, the role of the private sector in providing infrastructure, skills development and support of the public sector’s initiatives, as well as how to get technology more accessible, especially to farmers, SMEs, small businesses and individuals as such, and the role of the UN in providing the guardrails and also partnerships on the ground as countries continue to develop their own regulations and how private sector can also support in that undertaking and all the other sectors of society. So we’ll now go on to the second panel. It will be an interactive dialogue on also empowering Africa’s future, AI as a catalyst for youth development. So I’d like to call on the moderator, Farai Gundan, from the inspirational youth leader at Harvard University. All right, thank you. And maybe also call to the stage now our other panelists from Bren Chiliabogwe, head of Pan-African institutions, government institutions and public policy of Google, Kolawole Olajide, CEO and co-founder of Sava, and Rodney Njika, UNESCO liaison head to the United Nations Economic Commission in Africa.

Farai Gundan: Sorry, the Honorable Minister of Youth from Nigeria will be joining us.

Tonilyn Lim: Okay, thank you. Honorable Minister, may we also invite you to the stage? Thank you.

Farai Gundan: Thank you so much. Good afternoon to all the parties in the room and the minister made some way to the chairs here. All protocol observed. I’m honored to be here today. I must say getting everyone in the room in one place is almost as rare as catching a New York cab during rush hour. So that was actually me going to AI to ask, okay, give me a joke that will fit this room. Africa boasts the youngest population in the world with over 60% of its population under the age of 25. So to the gentleman who said. and that’s European, this is Africa’s youth here. This is how young we look and how young we are. This dynamic youth demographic holds immense potential as a driving force for innovations, economic growth and social change. With proper investment in education, skills development and entrepreneurship, Africa’s youth could transform the continent into a global leader in technology, sustainable development, creative industries and unleashing the best energy and talent of its next generation. And no, that wasn’t AI, that came from my heart. This panel, Empowering Africa’s Youth, AI as a Catalyst for Youth Development, seeks to amplify our voices, the voice and role of youth, business, government as ethical stewards of AI development and guide the private sector as we make advances with Gen AI. Against the backdrop of the policy brief that was mentioned earlier, Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Youth Development in Africa, a multi-stakeholder collaboration including member states and the private sector. A sheet has gone around the room with a QR code for the link to the policy brief. I’m hoping we’ve all had a chance to actually scan it. So I’ll give a moment to figure out where the sheet is. It’s important that we actually scan and have access to this policy brief. I do want to congratulate you, Chido and Sandra in her absence and your various teams as well as your partners in the role and the work that you have done in putting together this policy brief. So can we just put our hands together for the equity? I certainly look forward to digging into it and sharing with my network. And I challenge all of us in the room to do the same. Now that is out of the way, I’m honored to introduce a very representative panel that reflects the promise and the potential of Africa. Her Excellency, Dr. Jamila Ibrahim, who’s a Nigerian medical doctor, development specialist and politician, currently serving as Nigeria’s minister of youth. She was appointed to the minister, to the position by President Bula to be in September, 2023. So please help me welcome your honours. To her right is Priscilla Boa-Gue. She currently serves as Google’s head for pan-African institutions, government affairs and public policy, where she oversees policy engagement with the African Union Commission, EU Economic Commission for Africa, African Development Bank, amongst other regional organizations. And then, right next to me is a fellow entrepreneur. It turns out that Paula and I are both Spintech founders and he is co-founder and CEO of Saba, and he has co-founded Bridge Labs, driven by his passion for creating high-quality tech solutions that empower organizations to excel in the modern era, while providing employment for young professionals across the continent. I’m so delighted to have this amazing panel and we’re going to be discussing, the title of our panel is, again, Empowering Africa’s Future, AI as a Catalyst for Youth Development. And I’m going to start with the minister herself. I know you’re new to the role. A significant portion of Africa’s youth is employed in the informal sector. How can AI be leveraged to support youth working in the sector? And what steps are actually being taken to formalize and optimize their contributions towards technology? And I want to also reflect on the ambassador. You mentioned that the fundamentals have to be in place for us to take advantage of AI, particularly on the continent. So I would love to hear your views on. on what, how can we leverage our AI, given the backdrop of no power in some instances, no water, and the infrastructure needs to be expanded.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: Thank you. Thank you very much for having me on the panel. Well, looking at the infrastructure gaps in Africa and in Nigeria in context, we’re in the process of speaking, I’ll just speak in the context of what the Nigerian government is doing. We’re very committed to investing in young people. And of course, speaking out on talents, because we reflect, you know, from the recent past, most of the tech, we have about six of the tech influence that emerged from Africa are actually Nigerians. We have the founders of, the founder of Andela, Flutterwave, which is a fintech company, I’m sure you’re familiar with. We have this talents that are yet untapped, and we’re very aware of that. And we’re working very hard to ensure that we invest in these talents, regardless of the infrastructure gaps. And we’re also, in our part, at the Ministry of Youth Development, we’re tasked with the responsibility to ensure that we create a new environment for young people to thrive. And education, intelligence, and of course, the digital technology space, even though we have a Ministry of Digital Communications and Digital Technology, this ministry drives the policy of, you know, technology and digital communications. However, as a ministry of youth, we have a very robust collaboration. to ensure that we have this, we really identify young people and because we are the first point of contrast between young people and governments, right, and leveraging on a fund that we supervise or we superintend, the Mutual Investment Fund, which is about 17 million U.S. dollars, equivalent that has been approved by the Federal Executive Council to ensure that we empower or rather invest in young people across various sectors, including sectors that were earlier mentioned, the green and green economy and agriculture space. Of course, for us as well, we have an emerging space for that, for the view economy, right, and for extractive as well. And I was very excited when the previous panelists mentioned the deployment of technology to address waste and of course, when they mentioned agriculture. So, the Mutual Investment Fund is, we hope to empower young people in various sectors, including agriculture. And looking at agriculture alone and seeing that reference was made particularly to agriculture and how we can use young people’s creativity to create solutions in that space. And I believe that with efficient intentions and digital technology improvement in digital technology, we will be able to achieve a lot if we are leveraging on agriculture alone, which is our lowest-priority food experience for income from Nigeria. So, beyond that, we really want to invest in young people who are doing remarkable, you know, things in this space. And as a ministry, we’re also in the process of design or rehabilitating our youth development centres and making them up to standard, where we have various devices and all that young people require to, you know, design. softwares and just to create, basically to be digitally creative and as a matter of fact, we’re also going down to the grassroots to ensure that we’re very inclusive and ensure that we do not leave young people in these communities behind. We want to work with the private sector and telecoms companies to ensure that these communities have access and then reach the sub-divide in Nigeria. And you also are aware that a not very recent policy direction or statement was made by Nigeria or commitment rather, the cost of the main band cables for internet infrastructure was actually crushed. It was crushed a great deal. I think it’s about one and a half per metre now to leave fibre optic cables for the tech companies in order to ensure that we give access to rural communities and to people in rural communities to technology. So I think that is a very, it’s a remarkable achievement for us as a government. And we’re also ensuring that, I mean, if this policy comes to fruition and the private sector leverages on it, I think that’s enabling the environment to ensure that we increase access. Yeah, I’m excited about the TIFO administration. I also see that they also liberalise access to power as well. So that has been some exciting development, ensuring that even the most rural communities are able to access it.

Farai Gundan: Thank you so much for your remarks, Dr. Jamila. Over to you, Priscilla. You are over at Google. How should policies evolve to support the integration of AI into youth development? programs in Africa. And then I also want to add to that, who then owns that data? Because it’s one thing to actually begin to develop these training models with the data, but who should own data? Does it reside on the continent or does it reside here in the U.S. with the various companies?

Priscilla: Thank you so much. I’m humbled to be here next to the minister who is also a doctor on the side in your spare time. I think you’re a tremendous example of our African community. Google has been on the continent for about 17 years and we invest $1 billion. And we are in four countries across the continent, Nigeria, Ghana, South Africa, and Kenya. And I bring this up because two of those countries actually host our African AI research centers. So we already employ PhD students, researchers, engineers who are African, who are from Africa, who are deploying and developing technologies for Africa. So the technology exists and we have researchers and experts who focus on how do we identify solutions to the pressing problems that we have on the continent. And they’ve been doing this since 2018. So now we have a new center in Kenya that focuses on food security, some of the agricultural precision, and some of the different food security issues that we mentioned. But it’s important to note that Africa is a regionally diverse space, right? And so is our digital ecosystem. It is very diverse. Now we have some very strong digital economies like Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, and Ghana. So we have a lot of work to do to distribute from some of that world, right? And this is where I think that young people have a really important role to play because they are developing some of this innovation, like our both of you are deploying some of these technologies. But we need to have supportive and enabling systems in place. So, what I’ve been doing is working with the African Union, with our colleagues at the Commission to see how do we do this at scale? How do we take a really positive example to expand it to those 55 member countries? And I think one of the greatest examples that we have is African Startup Policy Framework that recently just came out. And so, this will enable all of the member states to develop policies that incentivize founders to go and take a leap from work, to then go and start their startups, to have incubators in place, to have grants, and to really be able to have a community that supports the development of startups. Because Google was once a startup, once upon a time as well. And so, we think about what was in place in order for a company like Google to thrive? And how do we create more of those that are African, that are African-based? And so, policy is really, really critical. In addition to putting in place policies to support our young people, we also have to get our policymakers at a level where they are literate and really conversant in subjects that we are discussing, right? It’s hard to have a conversation with someone who’s not speaking the same language, right? We’re speaking past each other. And this is globally, not just in Africa. My colleagues in the EU face some of the same issues. And I think the advantage that we have is that we can take some of the lessons from the other regions and then choose what will be best and what will work for the continent. So that we can determine how we leapfrog, because we don’t have some of the same legacy issues that some of the developing countries have, right? So I think in some spaces, we actually have some advantages when it comes to policy. And then we have some disadvantages that we know about, but we’re doing a lot in this space. And I would love to invite everyone here, actually, to our AI policy training, short plug, at the Global Africa Business Initiative. So it will be on Wednesday. Right here in the city. We hope you can come. It’s basically an AI policy training course for policymakers and government officials. If you’re not a government official, you can still reach out to me. We have other programs. But it’s basically intended to make sure that our policymakers are literate in this domain and that they also can see the value and how we can help them in the delivery of government services to citizens. And then can also feel empowered to regulate AI.

Farai Gundan: Amazing. I love the fact that it is centralizing, at least at a policy development level. I actually was involved in the market entry for a flood away in South Africa. And so that is part of my journey as a FinTech founder. So I’m so excited. But essentially what happens and speaks to this is we literally have to go to every central bank in Africa, 55, and ask for permission and understand the regulatory environment in each marketplace. And then begin to build our API stack for each marketplace. So you can imagine how challenging this can be, but excited about what Gen AI can do for us. So to you, Kola, founder to founder, FinTech founder to founder, from your experience as CEO of Sava, a FinTech payment system, what are the main challenges facing the implementation of digital innovation in Africa? And I’ll let you share the pain, what keeps us up at night. And hopefully they’re quite similar.

Kolawole Olajide: Thank you so much. So at Sava we built the smartest bank card in Africa. And, you know, with the partnership with MasterCard and raising $5 million from investors. The goal was, you know, how do we enable investment in Africa in the next 20 pages. We built software that allows businesses to issue cards and write rules. You can write rules across four verticals, budget, time, location, and merchant. You could write a rule to say, hey, Conrad business of Africa is traveling to the United States. This card will only work on these days. This card will only work on these merchants, and these merchants, this card will only work at this time of the day. If Conrad will submit certain receipts on time, he wouldn’t be able to use the card anymore. So now you might have so many merchants coming up every day on the continent, and we need these rules to be active in real time. There’s just so much computing power going to be keeping this system active. And, you know, building this solution has opened my eyes to, I mean, deeply into the world of AI. And I’ll start with the point on the regulations, right? With this solution now, with the MasterCard partnership, we can basically operate in any country, MasterCard operates in the United States today, but we still need regulatory approval in each country to be able to go live. Right now, we have approvals in South Africa, and we have approvals in Kenya, and we’re growing. But I think what’s really important for me, I mean, in this, for my experience, was the cost of training this machine. I think there’s a lot of conversations we’re having around at the service layer, which is what can we do with these tools? But if as a continent, we’re not, you know, intentional about being in the value chain of what creates these tools, it would always continue to be a barrier for entry, even if we have the best centers on the continent. Right. And, you know, I’ll just quickly talk you through the value chain of, you know, AI, before it gets into your hands on certificate. Yeah. There’s a specialized hardware that needs to be developed. And a lot of that is designed with resources from the continent, but made in China. Then because of high demand for computing power, these devices, and then this specialized hardware is already fully bought out by two to three companies, Google, Microsoft. Then there are some intellectual property models, proprietary models, called the foundational models that hosts the machine learning ops. And then we have custom layers for different applications, and then we have the services. If as a continent, we only participate in that service layer, we have a big problem in the long-term. We will continue to, it will be very expensive for us. And I think it’s important that for government, we need to be intentional about being participating in this chain. How do we get Google and Microsoft and some of these players to localize some of the technology and help bring down the costs, so that the top talent on the continent can deal with better solutions at an affordable price and also scale up.

Farai Gundan: Thank you so much. And it is definitely a pipeline issue, it’s definitely a value chain issue, where we have to play and own, I’m really big on ownership, ownership of the data, because it comes from us, right? So we have to own that data, even where the data resides, it has to reside on the continent. I was in Rwanda, and President Parker Ghani has said, Rwanda is a proof of concept country. And so come in and play and try all these things, but we retain that knowledge, we retain our failures, we retain our successes, because we understand our people. When talking about value chain, Minister Jamila, Dr. Jamila, what is being done to integrate AI and digital skills at the inter-educational systems across Nigeria, but also across the continent? And I have a two-part question for you. And the second part is, how can governments and the private sector work together to put young people with the necessary AI skills to thrive in the future economy? Taking what Paula has said in mind, that we’re not at the service level, so we’re not creating like fun games, service level games, but really at a hardware. Can we create the hardware that’s necessary to capture this data? Can we play at every level? So what are we doing from an educational perspective? And it’s a pipeline question.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: Yes, very, very interesting question. Integrating AI at government level, in the schools and curriculum and all of that. I had engagements with the Minister of Education, because that’s the responsibility. Yes, policy mandates of the Ministry of Education. And I’m very excited to tell you that earlier this year, we had the EdTech conference in Abuja, in partnership with Mastercard Foundation. It was fully collaborated with the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Youth and Ministry of Education. And then there’s also an ongoing review of the curriculum at the national level to ensure that we integrate AI into our learning model. Right. And that’s, I mean, the direction, that’s the policy direction for this administration to ensure that we capacitate young people for learning, to think of AI within ethical limits. And, well, partnerships, I was just going to speak to how to engage and see how we can collaborate, yes, with Google, see how we can work together, even beyond the software, the games and the hardware. I mean, I have set some stages here, but I just went on the floor around some of the government offices in Nigeria, and realized that there were a lot of these components that were only here. So it raised a lot of concern here, and I had to talk to some of the heads of government to see how we can leverage the power of creativity and the potential of young Nigerians to actually start designing and fabricating and creating these components. So for local consumption.

Farai Gundan: So manufacturing.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: Manufacturing.

Farai Gundan: On the continent.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: On the continent.

Farai Gundan: So our inputs from the continent, beneficiation has to go on the continent.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: That’s right. So there is the call to all partners to come to the table to work with us. I mean, we may not have all the resources, but we have a little change we can use to invest in new materials.

Farai Gundan: I don’t think Nigeria, you can put a little of Nigeria.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: Well, I really, really think it’s time. I mean, who doesn’t invest in presidential initiatives to develop enterprises across the various digital technologies space, creative industry, agriculture, extractive industry as well. And there are also opportunities for investment in health sector as well. I mean, we have tech solutions in health as well. The continent has over 100 million young people who are unemployed and underemployed. Yes. And 53 million of these young people are Nigerians.

Farai Gundan: Yeah. So 100 million across the continent, 53 are Nigerian.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: That is correct. So that leaves me with sleepless nights at the wedding to ensure that we continue to create opportunities to replace the youth capacity of these young people. and place them in meaningful employment. And that’s what, you know, inspired us to create or to design the initiative called the Co-exemption Initiative on Regions and Vice-Versa. I mean, all the sectors we’ve mentioned and we’ve been passing it on to people beyond just faculty, field and health, we’re handing it on to people through that process, the process of ideation of their, you know, conception of their ideas, all the way down to the creation of, I mean, access to markets and to the point of return on investment. We’re highly committed to that. And we’re, I mean, what’s it called? Partners, general and board and private sector, I mean, governments. Inquilus here, and Google is here.

Farai Gundan: So I do want to quickly jump in. You mentioned that you want to pull our sister to the side and maybe talk about collaboration. And I’m really excited to see that already, you know, partnerships are coming out of this. So talking about that, well, on the Google side, should a partnership or collaboration come out of this? The question would be, AI is one of Google’s priority areas in Africa. What ethical considerations should be taken into account when implementing AI technology? So here you are, the minister wants to talk to you about a collaboration. What should, what ethical consideration from your side, from your perspective, that should go into this? Just a quick answer to that.

Priscilla: I’ll just say there are many ethical considerations. We have ethical, responsible AI principles that we developed in 2018, actually, that we use to guide our company’s deployment of AI. But particularly in Africa, some of the things we think about a lot is how do we prevent a widening digital divide? Right. So, we’re deploying these amazing technologies. How do we make it more accessible and useful to more people on the continent? And how do we make sure that we’re not left behind in a lot of these conversations? A lot of that, for us, will have to do with having African data, African data sets, like you were saying, and making sure that we have local languages included as part of the development of data. And so, we’re doing a lot more partnerships with African universities and African researchers in this particular context.

Farai Gundan: Excellent. Thank you so much. In the interest of time, I’m going to move over to Kola. And I want you to wrap up our panel by answering this question. How can collaboration between youth-led startups, such as Atlas, because we are the youth, private sector, and governments be beneficial for the implementation of AI-driven initiatives?

Kolawole Olajide: Great question. So, yeah, I think technology would always move faster than innovation. We would always have both entrepreneurs trying to push the boundaries, right? But I think it’s, we need to be intentional about, you know, shortening that gap. And instead of solving for the perfect framework, because this moves so fast, let’s solve for having the right people in the room, right? And believe me, if we have the right people in the room, no matter how fast technology moves, you know, with the right people in the room, we’ll be able to catch up much faster, and hopefully at some point, we will be ahead, right? You know, and with that being said, I think, you know, sharing my experience, we would need a lot more, you know, private, you know, I would say investors in Africa to take the startup scene seriously, right? Now, a lot of the funding is international, and then you come to a lot of, you know, foreign PCs, and that also influences, you know, our goals. And yeah, of course, and also investment in education, right? We need the right talent to be able to take this forward on the continent. And yeah, I think it’s a super exciting time. You know, I remember when cloud was the hottest thing, right? And everyone, you know, we were late to that game. Now we’re paying so much to get, you know, great, I mean, good quality access to stable cloud. Let’s just make sure the same doesn’t happen with AI.

Jamila Bio Ibrahim: I really think it’s important to encourage young innovators and creators. I really think I need to just let you know that there’s a lot of hope, you know, that the Ministry of Youth is bringing to young people in that space. And in the coming months, we hope to actually create a platform where through venture capital funding, I mean, young people can have access to, you know, some form of an investment. So we have a platform where we’re working very hard to see, we bring young people across the states to teach potential investors. And of course, we leverage as well on the youth development bank that we hope to establish. And that’s in the long term. But in the interim, we can leverage temporarily in the short term, yes, on the youth investment fund and just, you know, do this venture capital thing where people can teach their ideas. And we’re calling on partners to work with us to achieve this.

Farai Gundan: Yes. Thank you so, so much. Thank you for indulging us. To the Honorable Minister, thank you. Priscilla, thank you. Kola, thank you. Thank you to the partners, to Chido, and to everyone else at the A&E.

Moderator: In lieu of a full question and answer, since we’re running out of time, but please, you have the floor. Thank you so much for all these panels and information. I want to make a reflection about who could be involved in this especially too. I’m just coming back from Africa, precisely from the people in Dava, I’m sure some of you know it. It’s an amazing organization of grassroots researchers from all over Africa. They’re doing an amazing work on AI for good. In fact, I think they are leading the AI for good research in the world and we have a lot to learn internationally from what’s happening there. And so all this to say that I think academia and research, it’s not just a discussion, it seemed to me that it was a little bit discussion of private sector startups and government trying to put some regulation of what’s happening from the private sector. Maybe we have to think deeper. What are the goals of AI? Is it just innovation? Innovation for what, right? We are working on many different uses of generative AI and other types of AI, simulations for new policies, informing new global development indicators. This is also AI. And this is happening in Africa too. So this is just what I wanted to say. Let’s include all the stakeholders, especially in Africa. They’re doing an amazing work and we all have to learn from what’s happening there, especially in Dava.

Tonilyn Lim: Thank you very much. I think that was also a message that we got from the other panelists, the partnership, the involvement of different stakeholders from the UN to the private sector and certainly also academia and the research community certainly have to come together all to make this work, scale it for better adoption while respecting freedoms and rights as such. So anyway, I would like to close this session. I actually am not happy to do that, but we have to close at some point. Oh, sorry. We have a youth representative. I can’t, I just have to give like everything. Yes. Oh, okay. Do you want to come here?

Little boy: I just want to say that I am, I’m from India. I’m the world’s youngest speaker on technology and innovation. I’ve written a book on AI and I feel that can impact many lives of African kids who cannot be educated. Thank you. Sorry, I’m his father. No, thank you. It was a pleasure to be reading this book.

Tonilyn Lim: Yes. Thank you very much. So, along with the publication of Ranveer, please also have a chance to download publications from the UN Global Conference on AI for the Global Goals and also publications from IOE and our partners from AU. Thank you very much. And thank you all for attending this session. Thank you.

S

Sanda Ojiambo

Speech speed

183 words per minute

Speech length

1832 words

Speech time

598 seconds

AI can accelerate innovation and increase productivity to drive SDG progress

Explanation

Sanda Ojiambo argues that AI has the potential to accelerate innovation and increase productivity, which can help drive progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This suggests that AI can be a powerful tool for achieving global sustainability targets.

Evidence

A survey of about 1,600 CEOs revealed that 75% of large companies are in the process of embedding AI into their work and strategies.

Major Discussion Point

The potential of AI for sustainable development and achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Gerbrand Haverkamp

Agreed on

AI has significant potential for sustainable development and achieving SDGs

Disagreed with

Kolawole Olajide

Disagreed on

Focus of AI development and implementation

Gen AI can help solve complex sustainability problems like circular business models and food waste reduction

Explanation

Sanda Ojiambo suggests that Generative AI can be used to address complex sustainability challenges. This includes developing circular business models and reducing food waste, which are important aspects of sustainable development.

Major Discussion Point

The potential of AI for sustainable development and achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Gerbrand Haverkamp

Agreed on

AI has significant potential for sustainable development and achieving SDGs

AI has potential to transform industries and deliver solutions for the global goals

Explanation

Sanda Ojiambo argues that AI has the capability to revolutionize various industries and provide solutions that can help achieve global sustainability goals. This implies that AI can have a wide-ranging impact across different sectors.

Evidence

Interviews with about 30 executives revealed recognition of AI’s capacity to truly transform industry and drive progress towards global goals.

Major Discussion Point

The potential of AI for sustainable development and achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Gerbrand Haverkamp

Agreed on

AI has significant potential for sustainable development and achieving SDGs

Need for multi-stakeholder collaboration including governments, private sector, and civil society

Explanation

Sanda Ojiambo emphasizes the importance of collaboration between various stakeholders, including governments, private sector, and civil society. This multi-stakeholder approach is seen as crucial for effectively developing and implementing AI technologies for sustainable development.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of collaboration and partnerships

Agreed with

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Kolawole Olajide

Agreed on

Importance of collaboration and partnerships in AI development and implementation

C

Christopher Lu

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Lack of basic infrastructure like internet access and electricity in many areas

Explanation

Christopher Lu points out that many areas, particularly in developing countries, lack basic infrastructure such as internet access and electricity. This poses a significant challenge to the implementation and adoption of AI technologies in these regions.

Evidence

Lu mentions that 33% of the world is without internet access, making it impossible for them to use generative AI.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and risks of AI implementation in Africa

Risk of widening inequality if AI benefits don’t reach everyone

Explanation

Christopher Lu warns that if the benefits of AI are not distributed equally, it could lead to increased inequality. This highlights the importance of ensuring that AI technologies are accessible and beneficial to all segments of society.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and risks of AI implementation in Africa

K

Kolawole Olajide

Speech speed

157 words per minute

Speech length

807 words

Speech time

306 seconds

High costs of AI development and implementation for African startups

Explanation

Kolawole Olajide highlights the significant costs associated with AI development and implementation for African startups. This financial barrier can hinder innovation and adoption of AI technologies in the African context.

Evidence

Olajide mentions the high costs of training AI models and the need for specialized hardware, which is often bought out by large tech companies.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and risks of AI implementation in Africa

Disagreed with

Sanda Ojiambo

Disagreed on

Focus of AI development and implementation

Collaboration between youth-led startups, private sector and governments

Explanation

Kolawole Olajide emphasizes the importance of collaboration between youth-led startups, the private sector, and governments. This collaborative approach is seen as crucial for the successful implementation of AI-driven initiatives in Africa.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of collaboration and partnerships

Agreed with

Sanda Ojiambo

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Agreed on

Importance of collaboration and partnerships in AI development and implementation

P

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Need for ethical considerations and responsible AI principles

Explanation

Priscilla Boa-Gue emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations and responsible AI principles in the development and deployment of AI technologies. This ensures that AI is used in a way that respects human rights and societal values.

Evidence

Boa-Gue mentions Google’s ethical and responsible AI principles developed in 2018 that guide the company’s deployment of AI.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and risks of AI implementation in Africa

Creating enabling policy environments to support AI startups

Explanation

Priscilla Boa-Gue argues for the creation of supportive policy environments to foster AI startups. This includes developing policies that incentivize founders and provide necessary support structures for startup growth.

Evidence

Boa-Gue mentions the African Startup Policy Framework as an example of an initiative to enable member states to develop policies that support startups.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies for empowering African youth through AI

Partnerships between tech companies and African institutions to develop local AI solutions

Explanation

Priscilla Boa-Gue highlights the importance of partnerships between tech companies and African institutions. These collaborations aim to develop AI solutions that are tailored to local needs and contexts in Africa.

Evidence

Boa-Gue mentions Google’s partnerships with African universities and researchers to develop AI solutions with African data and local languages.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of collaboration and partnerships

Agreed with

Sanda Ojiambo

Kolawole Olajide

Agreed on

Importance of collaboration and partnerships in AI development and implementation

J

Jamila Bio Ibrahim

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

1415 words

Speech time

651 seconds

Investing in talent development and digital skills training for youth

Explanation

Jamila Bio Ibrahim emphasizes the importance of investing in talent development and digital skills training for youth. This strategy aims to prepare young people for the AI-driven future and enable them to contribute to technological innovation.

Evidence

Ibrahim mentions the Nigerian government’s commitment to investing in young people and tapping into untapped tech talents.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies for empowering African youth through AI

Integrating AI and digital skills into educational curricula

Explanation

Jamila Bio Ibrahim discusses the integration of AI and digital skills into educational curricula. This approach aims to ensure that young people are equipped with the necessary skills to thrive in an AI-driven economy from an early age.

Evidence

Ibrahim mentions an ongoing review of the curriculum at the national level in Nigeria to integrate AI into the learning model.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies for empowering African youth through AI

Providing funding and investment opportunities for youth-led AI initiatives

Explanation

Jamila Bio Ibrahim discusses the importance of providing funding and investment opportunities for youth-led AI initiatives. This strategy aims to support young innovators and creators in developing AI solutions.

Evidence

Ibrahim mentions plans to create a platform for venture capital funding and leverage the youth investment fund to support young people’s ideas.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies for empowering African youth through AI

G

Gerbrand Haverkamp

Speech speed

202 words per minute

Speech length

808 words

Speech time

239 seconds

AI can contribute to breakthroughs on climate change

Explanation

Gerbrand Haverkamp expresses hope that AI can lead to significant breakthroughs in addressing climate change. This suggests that AI technologies could play a crucial role in developing solutions to one of the world’s most pressing environmental challenges.

Major Discussion Point

The potential of AI for sustainable development and achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Sanda Ojiambo

Agreed on

AI has significant potential for sustainable development and achieving SDGs

U

Unknown speaker

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Inclusion of academia and grassroots researchers in AI development

Explanation

An audience member argues for the inclusion of academia and grassroots researchers in AI development. This suggests that a broader range of perspectives and expertise should be involved in shaping AI technologies and their applications.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the work of Dava, an organization of grassroots researchers from Africa, as an example of important contributions to AI for good research.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of collaboration and partnerships

Agreements

Agreement Points

AI has significant potential for sustainable development and achieving SDGs

Speakers

Sanda Ojiambo

Gerbrand Haverkamp

Arguments

AI can accelerate innovation and increase productivity to drive SDG progress

Gen AI can help solve complex sustainability problems like circular business models and food waste reduction

AI has potential to transform industries and deliver solutions for the global goals

AI can contribute to breakthroughs on climate change

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized AI’s potential to drive progress towards sustainable development goals through innovation, productivity increases, and addressing complex sustainability challenges.

Importance of collaboration and partnerships in AI development and implementation

Speakers

Sanda Ojiambo

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Kolawole Olajide

Arguments

Need for multi-stakeholder collaboration including governments, private sector, and civil society

Partnerships between tech companies and African institutions to develop local AI solutions

Collaboration between youth-led startups, private sector and governments

Summary

Speakers agreed on the crucial role of collaboration between various stakeholders, including governments, private sector, civil society, and academic institutions, in effectively developing and implementing AI technologies.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers highlighted significant challenges in implementing AI in Africa, particularly related to infrastructure and cost barriers.

Speakers

Christopher Lu

Kolawole Olajide

Arguments

Lack of basic infrastructure like internet access and electricity in many areas

High costs of AI development and implementation for African startups

Both speakers emphasized the importance of creating supportive environments for AI startups and youth-led initiatives through policy and funding mechanisms.

Speakers

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Jamila Bio Ibrahim

Arguments

Creating enabling policy environments to support AI startups

Providing funding and investment opportunities for youth-led AI initiatives

Unexpected Consensus

Importance of local data and context in AI development

Speakers

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Unknown speaker

Arguments

Partnerships between tech companies and African institutions to develop local AI solutions

Inclusion of academia and grassroots researchers in AI development

Explanation

Despite representing different sectors (tech industry and academia), both speakers emphasized the importance of involving local institutions and researchers in AI development, highlighting a shared recognition of the value of local context and expertise.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement centered around AI’s potential for sustainable development, the need for collaboration and partnerships, and the importance of addressing infrastructure and cost challenges in AI implementation in Africa.

Consensus level

There was a moderate level of consensus among speakers on key issues. This consensus suggests a shared understanding of AI’s potential benefits and challenges in the African context, which could facilitate more coordinated efforts in AI development and implementation. However, the diversity of perspectives also highlights the complexity of the issues and the need for continued dialogue and collaboration among various stakeholders.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Focus of AI development and implementation

Speakers

Sanda Ojiambo

Kolawole Olajide

Arguments

AI can accelerate innovation and increase productivity to drive SDG progress

High costs of AI development and implementation for African startups

Summary

While Sanda Ojiambo emphasizes the potential of AI to drive progress towards SDGs, Kolawole Olajide highlights the financial barriers that African startups face in developing and implementing AI technologies.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the challenges of implementing AI in Africa, including infrastructure limitations, costs, and the need for ethical considerations.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers acknowledge both the potential benefits and challenges of AI implementation in Africa. The differences in their arguments mainly stem from their different areas of expertise and focus, rather than fundamental disagreements. This suggests a generally aligned perspective on the topic, which could facilitate collaborative efforts in addressing the challenges and leveraging the opportunities of AI for sustainable development in Africa.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the need to address potential negative impacts of AI, but they focus on different aspects. Christopher Lu emphasizes the risk of widening inequality, while Priscilla Boa-Gue focuses on the need for ethical considerations and responsible AI principles.

Speakers

Christopher Lu

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Arguments

Risk of widening inequality if AI benefits don’t reach everyone

Need for ethical considerations and responsible AI principles

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers highlighted significant challenges in implementing AI in Africa, particularly related to infrastructure and cost barriers.

Speakers

Christopher Lu

Kolawole Olajide

Arguments

Lack of basic infrastructure like internet access and electricity in many areas

High costs of AI development and implementation for African startups

Both speakers emphasized the importance of creating supportive environments for AI startups and youth-led initiatives through policy and funding mechanisms.

Speakers

Priscilla Boa-Gue

Jamila Bio Ibrahim

Arguments

Creating enabling policy environments to support AI startups

Providing funding and investment opportunities for youth-led AI initiatives

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

AI has significant potential to accelerate sustainable development and progress on the SDGs, particularly in areas like agriculture, healthcare, and climate change mitigation

There are major challenges to AI implementation in Africa, including lack of infrastructure, high costs, and risks of widening inequality

Empowering African youth through AI requires investment in education, skills training, supportive policies, and funding opportunities

Multi-stakeholder collaboration between governments, private sector, academia, and civil society is crucial for responsible and inclusive AI development in Africa

Resolutions and Action Items

Google to host an AI policy training for African policymakers and government officials

Nigerian Ministry of Youth to create a platform for young innovators to pitch ideas to potential investors

Nigerian government to review and update educational curricula to integrate AI

African Union to implement the African Startup Policy Framework to support AI startups

Unresolved Issues

How to ensure AI benefits reach rural and marginalized communities

Ownership and control of African data used to develop AI systems

How to increase African participation in hardware development and other parts of the AI value chain

Balancing innovation with ethical concerns and responsible AI development

Suggested Compromises

Partnering with tech companies to localize AI technology development in Africa to reduce costs

Balancing government regulation with allowing space for innovation in AI startups

Combining international investment with local African investment in AI initiatives

Thought Provoking Comments

Gen AI can be a true game-changer for sustainability progress because it will democratize access to information, it will accelerate innovation through the solutions, through cross-disciplinary thinking, and certainly by increasing productivity.

Speaker

Sanda Ojiambo

Reason

This comment highlights the transformative potential of AI for sustainable development in multiple dimensions.

Impact

It set the tone for the discussion by emphasizing AI’s positive potential, leading to further exploration of specific use cases and applications.

At best, AI will help us solve the global goals, and that’s really important, but we must take a reality check because we realize that gaps in technology are really what keeps the world separate.

Speaker

Sanda Ojiambo

Reason

This balanced perspective acknowledges both the potential and challenges of AI adoption, particularly in developing regions.

Impact

It shifted the conversation to address issues of access and equity, prompting discussion on infrastructure needs and policy considerations.

AI will not take your job away, but the person with AI skills will.

Speaker

Shea Gopaul

Reason

This succinct statement captures a key concern about AI’s impact on employment in a memorable way.

Impact

It focused attention on the critical need for AI skills development and education, which became a recurring theme in later discussions.

If we do not do it here in the UN, it will either be decided in the US, in Europe, or in China, and then we know which other countries will not be at the table.

Speaker

Gerbrand Haverkamp

Reason

This comment underscores the importance of inclusive global governance for AI.

Impact

It emphasized the role of international bodies like the UN in AI governance, leading to discussion of ethical principles and regulatory frameworks.

If as a continent, we only participate in that service layer, we have a big problem in the long-term. We will continue to, it will be very expensive for us.

Speaker

Kolawole Olajide

Reason

This insight highlights the need for African countries to participate in all layers of the AI value chain, not just as end-users.

Impact

It shifted the discussion towards strategies for building local AI capabilities and infrastructure in Africa, including manufacturing and hardware development.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting both the transformative potential of AI for sustainable development and the critical challenges that need to be addressed, particularly in developing regions. The conversation evolved from general optimism about AI’s potential to a more nuanced exploration of access issues, skills development needs, governance challenges, and the importance of building local AI capabilities across the entire value chain. This led to a rich discussion of practical strategies and policy considerations for leveraging AI to benefit youth and drive sustainable development in Africa while addressing equity concerns.

Follow-up Questions

How can AI be made more accessible and affordable for developing countries and rural communities?

Speaker

Sanda Ojiambo, Christopher P. Lu, Jamila Bio Ibrahim

Explanation

Multiple speakers emphasized the need to bridge the digital divide and ensure AI benefits reach all communities, not just advanced economies.

What ethical principles and governance frameworks should guide AI development and deployment globally?

Speaker

Gerbrand Haverkamp, Christopher P. Lu

Explanation

Speakers highlighted the need for clear ethical guidelines and governance structures for AI, potentially developed through UN-led efforts.

How can African countries participate more in the AI value chain beyond just the service layer?

Speaker

Kolawole Olajide

Explanation

Olajide stressed the importance of Africa being involved in hardware development and other upstream aspects of AI, not just applications.

What steps are needed to integrate AI and digital skills into educational curricula across Africa?

Speaker

Farai Gundan, Jamila Bio Ibrahim

Explanation

Speakers discussed the need to update education systems to prepare youth for an AI-driven future economy.

How can governments and private sector collaborate to create more local manufacturing of AI hardware in Africa?

Speaker

Jamila Bio Ibrahim

Explanation

Ibrahim expressed interest in developing local manufacturing capabilities for AI components currently imported.

What measures can be taken to ensure African data used for AI development remains owned and stored on the continent?

Speaker

Farai Gundan

Explanation

Gundan raised concerns about data ownership and storage location for AI systems trained on African data.

How can more African private investors be encouraged to fund local AI and tech startups?

Speaker

Kolawole Olajide

Explanation

Olajide noted the reliance on foreign investors and the need for more local investment in African tech startups.

What role can academia and research institutions play in shaping AI development in Africa?

Speaker

Audience member

Explanation

An audience member highlighted the importance of including academic and research perspectives in AI discussions, not just private sector and government.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

UN issues final report with key recommendations on AI governance

In a world where AI is rapidly reshaping industries, societies, and geopolitics, the UN advisory body has stepped forward with its final report – ‘Governing AI for Humanity,’ presenting seven strategic recommendations for responsible AI governance. The report highlights the urgent need for global coordination in managing AI’s opportunities and risks, especially in light of the swift expansion of AI technologies like ChatGPT and the varied international regulatory approaches, such as the EU’s comprehensive AI Act and the contrasting regulatory policies of the US and China.

One of the primary suggestions is the establishment of an International Scientific Panel on AI. The body, modelled after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, would bring together leading experts to provide timely, unbiased assessments of AI’s capabilities, risks, and uncertainties. The International Scientific Panel on AI would ensure that policymakers and civil society have access to the latest scientific understanding, helping to cut through the hype and misinformation that can surround new technological advances.

The AI Standards Exchange implementation would form a standard exchange bringing together global stakeholders, including national and international organizations, to debate and develop AI standards. It would ensure AI systems are aligned with global values like fairness and transparency.

AI Capacity Development Network is also one of the seven key points that would address disparities. The UN here proposes building an AI capacity network that would link centres of excellence globally, provide training and resources, and foster collaboration to empower countries that lack AI infrastructure.

Another key proposal is the creation of a Global AI Data Framework, which would provide a standardised approach to the governance of AI training data. Given that data is the lifeblood of AI systems, this framework would ensure the equitable sharing of data resources, promote transparency, and help balance the power dynamics between big AI companies and smaller emerging economies. The framework could also spur innovation by making AI development more accessible across different regions of the world.

The report further recommends forming a Global Fund for AI to bridge the AI divide between nations. The fund would provide financial and technical resources to countries lacking the infrastructure or expertise to develop AI technologies. The goal is to ensure that AI’s benefits are distributed equitably and not just concentrated in a few technologically advanced nations.

In tandem with these recommendations, the report advocates for a Policy Dialogue on AI Governance, emphasising the need for international cooperation to create harmonised regulations and avoid regulatory gaps. With AI systems impacting multiple sectors across borders, coherent global policies are necessary to prevent a ‘race to the bottom’ in safety standards and human rights protections.

Lastly, the UN calls for establishing an AI Office within the Secretariat, which would serve as a central hub for coordinating AI governance efforts across the UN and with other global stakeholders. This office would ensure that the recommendations are implemented effectively and that AI governance remains agile in rapid technological change.

Through these initiatives, the UN seeks to foster a world where AI can flourish while safeguarding human rights and promoting global equity. The report implies that the stakes are high, and only through coordinated global action can we harness AI’s potential while mitigating its risks.

YouthLead: Inclusive digital future for all

YouthLead: Inclusive digital future for all

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on creating an inclusive digital future, addressing the digital divide, and empowering youth through technology. Speakers emphasized the importance of bridging digital gaps, particularly for marginalized communities and developing countries. They highlighted the need for universal internet access, digital literacy, and affordable devices to ensure equal opportunities in the digital age.

The conversation touched on the potential of AI and emerging technologies to drive innovation and sustainable development, while also acknowledging associated risks such as bias and privacy concerns. Speakers stressed the importance of responsible AI development that reflects diverse cultures and languages.

Government representatives shared initiatives to engage youth in digital policymaking and foster innovation. The importance of intergenerational cooperation and mentorship was emphasized to nurture young leaders in the tech sector. Speakers also discussed the role of space technology in expanding connectivity and the need for policies that support innovative solutions.

The discussion highlighted the critical role of education in closing the digital divide, with examples of peer learning platforms and initiatives to improve digital skills. Intellectual property rights were addressed as a means to empower youth innovation and entrepreneurship.

Throughout the session, there was a strong emphasis on youth leadership and inclusion in shaping digital policies and technologies. Speakers called for greater representation of young voices in decision-making processes and the development of digital solutions that address local needs. The discussion concluded with a reminder of the challenges faced by youth in conflict zones and a call for inclusive thinking in technological development.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The need to bridge the digital divide and ensure inclusive access to technology, especially for youth in underserved areas

– The importance of engaging and empowering youth in digital policymaking and governance

– Leveraging AI and emerging technologies responsibly to advance sustainable development goals

– Promoting digital skills, literacy and innovation among young people

– Addressing ethical challenges like AI bias and online safety

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to explore how to create an inclusive, equitable and youth-led digital future that harnesses technology to achieve sustainable development while addressing challenges like the digital divide.

Tone:

The tone was largely optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers emphasizing the potential for youth to drive positive change through technology. There was also a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape an inclusive digital future. The tone became more somber at the very end when conflicts and hardships faced by youth in some regions were highlighted.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Moderator: Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla, Major Group of Children and Youth, Science Policy, Tech Focal Point

Speakers:

Sara Sabry – First Female African Astronaut; Executive Director of Deep Space Initiative

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro – ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board, GDirector of Innovation at the Government Office of Information and Communication Technologies of the Dominican Republic

Zubair Junjunia – Social Entrepreneur and founder of ZNotes and UNDP & Samsung Generation17 Young Leader 

Mohamed Orman Bangura – Minister of Youth Affairs, Sierra Leone

Eylul Ercin – Global Teen Advisor, Girl Up, United Nations Foundation

Hamza Hameed – ITU SG Youth Advisory board member; Senior Practice Manager for Space & Connectivity, Access Partnership Singapore

Emra Mian – Director General for Digital Technologies and Telecom, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Yurii Romashko – CEO of the think tank Institute of Analytics and Advocacy

Daniella Darlington – ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board member

Anatola Araba – Artist, futurist, and award-winning filmmaker

Doreen Bogdan-Martin – ITU Secretary General

Nchimunuya Munyama – CEO at Netagrow Technologies

Marcos Athias Neto – Assistant Administrator and Director, for Bureau for Policy and Programme Support (BPPS) UNDP

Clara Brown – Observer Constituency Representative, UNFCCC

Edward Kwakwa – Assistant Director General, Global Challenges and Partnerships Sector, WIPO

Priscilla Efe Johnson – Founder of XariAfrica Academy and UNDP & Samsung Generation17 Young Leader 

Tayma Abdalhadi – Innovator of User-centric, Digital Solutions

Areas of expertise cover digital inclusion, AI, space technology, youth empowerment, sustainable development, innovation, and intellectual property rights.

Full session report

Expanded Summary of Discussion on Creating an Inclusive Digital Future

Introduction

This discussion brought together a diverse group of speakers, including youth leaders, government officials, and representatives from international organisations, to explore the creation of an inclusive digital future. The conversation centred on addressing the digital divide, empowering youth through technology, and leveraging emerging technologies for sustainable development. Throughout the session, there was a strong emphasis on youth leadership and inclusion in shaping digital policies and technologies, with the audience repeatedly affirming their desire for a “youth-led” digital future.

Key Themes and Discussion Points

1. Bridging the Digital Divide

A primary focus of the discussion was the persistent digital divide and its disproportionate impact on youth and marginalised communities. Speakers highlighted various aspects of this divide:

– Infrastructure gaps: Emra Mian emphasised the limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas.

– Digital skills gap: The need to improve digital literacy and skills, especially for youth, was stressed.

– Gender gap: Doreen Bogdan-Martin pointed out the disproportionate impact on women and girls.

– Rural-urban divide: Clara Brown highlighted the lack of access in rural and remote areas.

– Economic barriers: Yurii Romashko discussed the high costs of devices and internet access.

While there was consensus on the existence and importance of the digital divide, speakers differed in their emphasis on specific aspects. This suggests a need for multifaceted approaches to address the issue comprehensively.

2. Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

The discussion strongly advocated for increased youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking:

– Youth representation: Mohamed Bangura stressed the need for youth voices in digital policymaking.

– Mentorship: Doreen Bogdan-Martin highlighted the importance of intergenerational cooperation and guidance through initiatives like ITU’s Generation Connect movement.

– Youth innovation: Marcos Athias Neto emphasised supporting youth-led digital solutions and entrepreneurship, mentioning UNDP’s Youth CoLab program.

– Youth engagement: Creating opportunities for youth participation in governance was discussed, including the importance of voting as mentioned by ASG Marcos Neto.

– Youth advisory boards: The involvement of youth in shaping digital strategies was proposed.

3. Space Technology and Innovation

A significant portion of the discussion focused on the role of space technology in creating an inclusive digital future:

– Satellite connectivity: Hamza Hameed discussed using lower earth orbit satellites to bridge digital divides in remote areas.

– Global perspective: Sara Sabry, the first Egyptian astronaut, shared her unique viewpoint on global interconnectedness from space, noting that “From space there are no lines separating countries, no divisions between people.”

– Innovation potential: Speakers explored how space technology could drive innovation and contribute to sustainable development goals.

4. Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

The potential of digital innovation to drive sustainable development was a key theme:

– AI for social good: Clara Brown explored leveraging AI to address global challenges.

– Digital entrepreneurship: Supporting youth-led digital businesses was emphasised.

– Localised solutions: Priscilla Efe Johnson stressed customising digital innovations for specific community needs.

– Intellectual property: Edward Kwakwa discussed WIPO’s initiatives to make IP rights more accessible to young innovators.

5. Mentorship and Tools for Innovation

Rather than focusing solely on formal education, the discussion emphasized the importance of mentorship and providing tools for innovation:

– Peer learning: Examples of peer learning platforms were shared.

– Innovation tools: Nchimunuya Munyama emphasized the need to provide tools for innovation to young people in underserved areas.

– Customised approaches: The need for tailored digital skills programmes was discussed.

6. Artistic Representation of the Digital Future

Anatola Araba’s performance provided an artistic perspective on the digital future, emphasizing themes of connectivity, innovation, and youth empowerment. This creative element added depth to the discussion and highlighted the importance of diverse forms of expression in envisioning the future.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The discussion concluded with Priscilla Efe Johnson and Tayma Abdalhadi emphasizing the need for inclusive thinking and remembering youth in conflict zones. Key takeaways included:

1. The need for multifaceted approaches to address the digital divide.

2. The importance of youth empowerment and inclusion in digital policymaking.

3. The potential of space technology and digital innovation to contribute to sustainable development goals.

4. The necessity of localised and customised digital solutions.

5. The value of mentorship and providing tools for innovation.

Suggested action items included implementing the ITU’s IP Youth Empowerment Strategy, scaling up promising youth-led digital solutions, and developing modern tech policies to accelerate innovative technologies like lower earth orbit satellites for connectivity.

The discussion also touched on the Global Digital Compact, highlighting its importance in shaping the future of digital governance. The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape an inclusive digital future. The diverse perspectives shared by the speakers, informed by a consultation process described by Yurii Romashko, highlighted the complexity of the challenges ahead, but also the wealth of innovative ideas and commitment to creating a more equitable digital world.

Session Transcript

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): So, thank you so much for being here. That was an excellent, excellent session. Thank you so much to the gender session for setting the context. We request and invite everyone in the room to please take a seat. We will get started with our digital session. We will focus on a lot of interesting things and we have an amazing panel of experts and speakers lined up for the session. Again, maybe start to move and center yourself and find a spot to sit down and we’ll get the show started. Thank you.

Official Summit Video: In our accelerating digital age, incredible opportunities exist. But many young people continue to face major barriers. Poor connectivity, a lack of digital skills and limited access to devices are just some of the challenges that deepen the digital divide and prevent young people from sharing their voices. From participating in the digital economy and from accessing vital resources. As technologies evolve, new digital risks emerge, including online safety, security and privacy, misinformation, deep fakes, tech-facilitated gender-based violence and the mental health toll of social media. So, what kind of digital future do we want? How can we minimize these risks while harnessing the power of digital technology to build an inclusive, safe and equitable digital world for all? Young people are navigating these questions and shaping the digital future today.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Awesome, nothing like an AI-generated video to kick off the digital session. Thank you so much again for being here today. We appreciate your presence. And again, it was a real. important question. How many of you paid attention to the video? Raise your hand because there were a lot of people moving around. What kind of digital future do we want? And the goal is youth led. I know we’re halfway through the session for today. I’m gonna scream what kind of digital future do we want and I want to hear back youth led. What kind of digital future do we want? That was pretty good. I thought I would have to do a second time. Thank you so much again. Again, as the video has shared, the digital revolution is an unprecedented opportunity for global development and connectivity. But it also highlights a lot of inequalities. The previous session did touch upon them and we will explore them much more deeply in the context of digital divide. Furthermore, exclusion from digital technology policymaking sidelines youth voices and documents and policies and frameworks that define the future of digital cooperation on various levels often miss that youth engagement component. The Global Digital Compact, which we will hopefully agree on in the next 48 hours, is an agreement that aims to establish a framework for a secure, free, and open digital future. There are six main objectives for the Global Digital Compact and I know many of you are really aware and well-versed in the document, but for those who are joining us for the first time, the objectives are closing all digital divides and accelerating progress across the sustainable development goals. Expand inclusion in and benefits for the digital economy for all. Foster an inclusive, open, safe, and secure digital space that respects, protects, and promotes human rights. Advance responsible, equitable, and interoperable data governance approaches. Enhance international governance of artificial intelligence for the benefit of all. And then there’s a lot of follow-up and mechanisms and reviews that we will also explore more. But when we talk about digital and AI, something that a lot of people do not think about is how digital is enabling space. And how many of you wanted to be an astronaut when you were growing up? Raise your hand. No? I had dreams of being an astronaut till I found out I had glasses in my seventh grade. But here we have today someone who is inspiring and who has done it. She thought about it and done it, did it. We have the first female African astronaut. Her ability to discuss the themes of future space and sustainability will set the agenda for today and how we can explore more on the topics of digital and AI divide and what the future can potentially look like. I would like to invite onto the stage the CEO of Deep Space Initiative and the first Egyptian astronaut, Sara Sabry.

Sara Sabry: Distinguished guests, esteemed leaders, and fellow citizens of the world. My name is Sara Sabry. I am proud to stand before you today as the first Egyptian astronaut and the first Arab woman and the first woman from the African continent to go to space. I’ve had the rare privilege of seeing our planet from a perspective that few experience. A vantage point that transcends borders, cultures, and divisions. From space there are no lines separating countries, no divisions between people. They’re just one earth, our shared home. And it is more interconnected, more united, and more hopeful than we often realize. But here on the ground I’ve seen something very different. As a woman from Africa and the Middle East, I have witnessed firsthand the devastating impact of oppression and injustice. From gender inequality, to suppression of free speech, to the denial of basic human rights. These are challenges that people in my region and around the world confront every single day. Too often it is the most vulnerable, especially women and children, who bear the brunt of these struggles. But there is hope. Because we, the people of this world, have the power to change these realities. But hope is not a passive emotion, it is an act of choice. It is the belief that the future is in our hands and that the problems we face, no matter how overwhelming, are solvable. As an engineer, I always approach problems by breaking them down into manageable parts. It’s how I design solutions, step-by-step, piece-by-piece. And this is how we must approach our biggest challenges facing humanity today. Whether it’s protecting human rights or confronting climate change, we can and we must solve these issues one step at a time. Let me tell you about the view from space. From up there, you see Earth as it truly is. A single living organism covered by a thin blue line, the atmosphere, that protects us all. It’s so fragile, yet incredibly powerful. Just like our own role on this planet. Fragile, but capable of immense impact. Climate change is a direct threat to that thin blue line, to the very system that sustains life on Earth. And though the problem seems enormous, the solution is within our grasp. But it starts with us, with the choices we make every day, and the actions we demand from our leaders. I stand here as part of a generation that refuses to accept a broken world. Young people today are not just calling for change, we are leading it. We are pushing for justice, for equality, for the rights of every person to be respected. We are fighting for this Earth, knowing that it is not just a fight for nature, but a fight for humanity’s future. We understand that these issues, human rights, environmental protection, equality, are not separate struggles. They are all part of the same mission, to build a future where every person can thrive. Each of us has a role to play. No matter where you come from, no matter what position you hold, or the resources you have, we have a responsibility to act. And if we work together, we can address these problems step by step. It starts with breaking them down and focusing on solutions. We have the ability to dismantle oppression, protect human rights, and reverse the tide of climate change, but only if we choose to act now. As the first Egyptian, the first Arab woman, and the first African woman to travel to space, I am living proof that barriers can be broken. Change is possible. Our world is more interconnected than we think, and our actions ripple across borders. The challenges we face may be great, but so is our capacity for innovation, resilience, and hope. We can choose hope. We can choose action. We can create the future we deserve, one where human rights are upheld, one where the Earth is protected, and where no one is left behind. Let us take responsibility for this planet. Let us protect the thin blue line that shields us. And let us unite in our shared mission to safeguard the rights and future of all people. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much, Sara. I think it’s truly important for us to recognize that the digital divide is not a phenomenon that is an isolated event. It exists because of the broken systems and structures that exist within our society. And it’s also really important to understand the role of government’s policy and education in bridging this digital divide. Our next two speakers are going to be talking about government perspectives on digital and AI divide, and how education and skills can be a key to bridging the digital divide. I want to invite onto the stage Ms. Melissa Michelle Munoz-Suro, who is on the ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board, and is also on the Government Office for ICT in the Dominican Republic. And also Zubair Junjunia, who is the founder of Z-Notes, and also a Generation 17 youth leader. Melissa and Zubair, the stage is yours.

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro: When I was 25, I found myself standing in a room full of policymakers, developers, designers tasked with a monumental responsibility, leading the development of the Dominican Republic national AI strategy. The first one in Latin America, Central America, and the Caribbean. And I knew this was much bigger than me. It wasn’t just about policy or technology, it was about the future of millions of Dominicans who were left behind in the digital age. You see, 2.6 billion people around the world are still not connected. While we’re here talking about the latest AI breakthroughs, the vast part of the world is just struggling to lock on. I was 19 when I first entered the public sector, and I saw right in front of me all the challenges our community faced. Rural areas without internet, studying without access to digital education, or even electricity. And it was clear to me that this digital and AI divide was not just a technical issue, but a social one. I believe that digital transformation wasn’t just for Silicon Valley or Beijing, it has to be for everyone, from my home country to the most remote communities on the planet. And how do we bridge this divide? One powerful answer is you. In my work, I have seen how my team of 33 young people bring creativity, passion, and perspective into policymaking. That’s why, for example, we launched initiatives like Semillero Digital, where we’re turning 100 young people who were neither studying or working into skilled developers ready to shape the future of AI in the Dominican Republic. We have the opportunities to use AI to enhance education, drive economic growth, and solve the environmental challenges, but AI will only be as good as the data we fit into it. If the training data, the languages, and the perspective behind AI are biased or incomplete, we risk developing an AI system that… and amplify these biases. The DRAI strategy is a bold commitment to regional integration in Latin America with a clear message. AI will be regional or it will not be. Everything we develop will be in and on Spanish with our scientists, ensuring that AI reflects all culture. To build responsible AI, we must focus on inclusion, not just in theory, but in real concrete ways. The UN has unique capacity to champion what I call AI inclusion. And this means including our data, our problems, our language in the development of AI. The AI for Good Summit show AI’s potential to face the global challenges. But for success, we need standards and interoperability. At the UN’s AI Governance Day, the work set the foundation for responsible AI. AI need of creating guidelines, UN values, and support for developing skills in developing countries. In AI governance, we are still focused on regulation, but the world is starting to ask what now? It’s not enough to regulate, we need to implement AI that truly benefits everyone. My message is clear. Young leaders, make me sure this future isn’t just driven by technology, it’s driven by people. Thank you.

Zubair Junjunia: 10 years ago, I chose not to accept the status quo, the uneven playing of education. Everyone has a right to access quality education. And at the age of 16, in my own small way, I wanted to make a difference. And I started a website, ZNotes, to share my own study notes. Today, ZNotes is the world’s largest peer learning community that has reached over five and a half million students in 190 countries. And it is thanks to thousands of young people who have joined this as a global movement. Our community powered learning platform has proven to improve students’ self-efficacy, their sense of global citizenship, and their willingness to contribute towards social development. And it leverages three of our greatest assets in our fight against educational inequality. Number one, the power of youth. Young people are not just passive beneficiaries, and we need to flip the script. Empower them to be agents of change, to be creators of education, to be proponents of education, and you can see the difference that happens. The power of community. Many of you will remember learning from each other after break, after school, in coffee shops. Peer learning is proven to be an incredible way of improving academic learning outcomes. And the third one, the power of technology. We have the opportunity to learn from the best teachers, from accessing cutting-edge research, and connect with others across the globe. Emerging technologies like AI are now having the opportunity to personalize learning, empower educators, and enable inclusive learning assessments. And so, it is more important than ever before in our fight against educational inequality that we think about the barrier of the digital divide. To our heads of states convening next week, an inclusive digital world is integral to an inclusive global society. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Thank you, Melissa and Zubair. And I think I want to touch upon something that they both mentioned, is that we live in a world that has significantly changed over the last two decades. There are many things that are the same. We’re still fighting against those same things, but the context has changed. And with the change in the context, we need new leaders. AI policy, digital policy, cannot have young people as participants. We need youth leaders in digital and AI governance and policy plans. With that, it is my pleasure to invite… on our first panelists who are expert speakers and representatives from government. I would like to invite Minister Mohamed Orman Bangura from the Minister of Youth from Sierra Leone. Eylul Ercin, who is a youth leader, AI developer, and global teen advisor at GirlUp. Hamza Hameed, lawyer, Access Partnership, and a member of the ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board. And Dr. Emra Mian, who is the Director General for Digital Technologies and Telecom, Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology UK. Please, a round of applause for our panelists. Thank you so much again for joining us today, and we appreciate the different perspectives you bring. My first question is for His Excellency Mohamed Bangura. Can you share any examples of how Sierra Leone is empowering young people through digital inclusion policies and initiatives? What role do you believe governments, particularly in low-income countries, should play in closing that digital divide?

Mohamed Bangura: Yeah, thank you very much. As a government, I was blessed to serve under the presidency of retired Brigadier General Smotherbill six, seven years ago. And one thing we believe governments everywhere, especially in low-income countries, should do is that the presidency has to believe in young people. I happened to serve in a government that he was head of state at 28, and he left, he came back after 20 years, happens to be a president. And the first time of his service, which I served before, I was appointed as minister at 32. He, our flagship program happens to be human capital that says you feed the brain, you feed the tummy, try to be very healthy. And the presidency has to be deliberate in digital investment and believe in young people. That’s because of the youth bulge, government leadership has to be deliberative in bringing young people at the table. one of the youngest cabinets, you have a Minister of Foreign Affairs, 33, you have a Minister of Communication and Innovation, 27, Chief Minister, Dr. David Sengeh, happens to be around 36, 37, and it’s deliberate that government has to believe in young people, and by so doing, for you to enable young people to reach their potential, you bring them on the table. Innovation technology, the Presidency also believes that our current challenges, our current problems can only be solved by innovation and technology. As a result of that, he appointed a Chief Minister, a Chief Innovation Officer from MIT, Dr. Sengeh, who happens to be a Minister of Basic Education, and now he’s the Chief Minister. The Chief Minister is like the Prime Minister of a country. And deliberately, he also created a space, Directorate of Science and Technology, under his Presidency, that he supervised directly. And that notwithstanding, he created a Ministry of Communication and Innovation, appointed a young lady at the age of 27, to ensure that she leads that area. So, from the area of government, what we believe is that young people, I mean, they’re not asking for favor, they’re in the majority. I remember creating the space for every young individual from achievement level, district level, national level, they should be at the center of every stage. And when you’re serving in cabinets, you should ensure that you don’t see young people as coming for your job. It’s like you’re just creating the space to ensure that they have access to the Presidency. It’s as a result of that, every year we have what we call the Tech Summit. You bring innovators, you bring young people, you bring the Presidency, you bring entrepreneurs, you bring potential investors in the youth space, in the digital space, to meet and discuss the challenges, solutions, and how do they want it to be. So what we believe as a government is that women, especially female youth, should not just be at the back end, they should also reach at the cabinet area. So the only way we believe that things will change, having more young people in cabinet, especially more women, we’ll have the GIBI Act that says every position, parliament, appointment, should be 30 percent. The last cabinet before this, we have the Safe Abortion Bill, which was presented by the Minister of Health, Deputy Minister of Health, Dr. Angelika, to possibly just 28 years. So we still believe that young people should be at the center, young people should be role model, and they should be given the space by the presidency, and every facet, they should be the key decision-making table.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): I appreciate that message a lot. And everybody here has heard it. You need to run for parliament. And taking the insights from you, you shared, young women also need to be a leader, leadership positions, and kind of share their message. And we have a young female leader on our panel. Elul, can you share a little bit about how AI both promises solutions and presents risks for the marginalized communities? And what do you think are some of the most pressing ethical, technical challenges facing young people in digital age? And don’t on the hat of if you were the parliamentarian, and you could wave a magic wand.

Eylul Ercin: Thank you for this question. That’s really great and really current. I think we’ve been seeing more and more on the news about legislation regarding AI, and it’s gaining momentum, especially discussions around privacy concerns or ownership of intellectual property. Something that I want to emphasize, an issue that I think goes relatively unnoticed is biased data sets that lead to biased algorithms. I’m going to try to demonstrate with an example. So there is a case where Amazon actually stopped using a discontinued hiring algorithm because they discovered after a while that the algorithm was favoring certain words on resumes that were used more commonly, overwhelmingly more commonly by men, like executed. Certain algorithms that feed on data sets can lead to the amplification of existing inequalities. But that is not to say that we want to kind of, you know, stop with what we’re doing with AI because actually there is so much more potential to it. So it’s a blank canvas, basically. It’s not evil inherently. It’s just what we teach it. So if we use AI the way we want it to be, if we feed data sets to it that are inclusive and diverse, then AI holds so much potential for the future.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And I think it’s really important to understand who is the creators, who are the creators and who is influencing the creators. And I think I was talking to Dr. Emra a little bit about AI and everything, and something that he brought up was it’s important to focus on emerging technologies, but many in the world also lack access. We need to simultaneously talk about how do we get more research in emerging technologies, but also focus on bridging the digital divide simultaneously because this is a once in a lifetime movement and point for us to change the course. Dr. Emra, and given this context, what are some of the most persistent digital divides for you that you’ve observed from the government perspective? Can you share some impactful initiatives that the UK government has supported to engage young people in digital policymaking?

Emra Mian: Sure, thanks very much. I mean, first of all, just to say that I think a lot of what’s been said in the last few minutes about AI and data, I think there’s a lot there to reflect on and a lot there for us to act on in concert. Just three other things that I wanted to pull out very quickly. I think first is the point that you’ve just introduced about digital infrastructure. An inclusive digital future for all will be hampered if people don’t have equal access to high quality digital infrastructure. And in the UK, this manifests itself with young people who grow up in rural or remote areas not having that access. But even sometimes in urban areas where you might only be a few streets away from very high quality digital infrastructure, but where you live, perhaps because people may have lower incomes, you don’t have that same access. This is something that we’re acting on within the UK, but I think this is clearly something we need to act on in lots of other places and in concert as well. The second thing I just wanted to very quickly pull out was the way in which we also need to improve digital skills, and that’s such an important part of inclusivity. And again, this is something that government, business, and civil society can act together on. In fact, some of the very effective ways in which people learn digital skills online is when they’re trying to do things that a commercial provider is doing. So a lot of people’s knowledge about and confidence of doing things online comes from, for example, making or receiving payments. And so financial institutions have got a responsibility here alongside governments and civil society. And then the third thing I just wanted very quickly to mention is online safety. I think we face a real risk that people who are not safe online will retreat from these digital spaces, and for that reason, we will fail to have an inclusive digital future. Government clearly has a role here in terms of regulation. Civil society has a role here in terms of showing where people are not safe and helping to bring transparency to that. And clearly businesses, including technology companies, have a responsibility here to ensure that their spaces are as safe as possible.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And again, it’s so interesting you share that message because for many in the room who are young people, they’ve had pictures taken of them from the moment they started walking. And there’s albums and albums of pictures, and all of that is data. And what happens when the digital space that you are born into doesn’t feel like you belong there, where do you go? And a lot of you mentioned a lot of those themes. Hamza, as a lawyer, I’m gonna ask on you to kind of tie the knots on the different themes we’ve heard here. From your perspective, how can innovative technologies bridge the digital divide with support from policy, but also ensure that perspectives from underserved communities are represented?

Hamza Hameed: Thanks a lot for that question, and a big thank you to all the facilitators of the Action Days for organizing this fantastic occasion and dialogue. Look, imagine a young mind brimming with ideas and thoughts and not being able to express them or share them with anyone simply because of a lack of internet. Now, this is reality for approximately 2.6 billion people all around the world, more than 50% of whom are young people. So 1.3 billion young people around the world don’t have access to good internet or internet at all to be able to really share their voices online. I think bridging the digital divide isn’t just about access to technology, it’s really about empowering young people to come online, share their voices, and shape their futures, whether that be through access to education, whether that be access to healthcare, or whether that be the ability to set up a business. I think a lot of my work revolves around promoting space technology and connectivity through space, and I think innovative technologies like that present a fantastic opportunity to bridge the digital divide and contribute to connecting more and more people to the internet. Organizations like the ITU play a critical role here by setting standards and facilitating multilateral dialogue to really get these people on the internet and to enable policymakers to put in place policies and regulations that are conducive to innovation and facilitate growth and connectivity for all. I think new technologies, for example, the rise of lower earth orbit satellites that provide internet where terrestrial networks have to. traditionally not been able to provide it, have already illustrated and connected people in the most remote parts of the world. And it’s really important for policymakers to develop modern tech policies that can accelerate the development and implementation of these innovative technologies. Space technologies like this not only help with connectivity but also promote remote sensing and disaster management, whether that be precision farming or other innovative activities that allow young people to grow their livelihoods and be more expressive online. I think bridging that digital divide will be a concerted effort. And for that, I encourage all policymakers, especially those that are here in this room today, to really think about the progressive and innovative policies that they need to put in place to bring these technologies to the people who need them the most so that we can promote and shape a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable digital future for all. Thanks.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much, Hamza. And a round of applause for our expert panelists. Thank you so much for your messages. We appreciate it. And you’ve seen it here first. Member states and youth are on the same page. And hopefully we’ll see more of that as the pad continues. Thank you so much for joining us. And as a part of the consultation for today’s session, I know many of you are watching live on the UN Web TV. As a part of the consultation planning and design of this session, we organized a consultation with various UN entities supported by the UN Youth Office, the ITU, UNDP, UNFPA, WIPO, and the Major Group for Children and Youth. And I would like to invite Yurii Romashko, who is a Generation 17 leader and the CEO of the Institute of Analytics and Advocacy to present a summary of the consultations and to represent you all watching live.

Yurii Romashko: Today, there are thousands of young leaders from all of the world here. Not everybody was able to join the summit in person. To ensure that voices of young people are heard, a global informal consultations on youth lead and inclusive digital future was open from the 3rd to 9th of September. A total of 100 global contributors joined the consultations from around the world and shared their experience. So I have the special and honorable mission to be the voice of youth and present the key takeaways from the consultations which you can see on the screen. Youth accurately identify the main barriers in accessing digital technologies among which limited infrastructure, limited digital literacy, high cost of devices and internet access. Therefore global effort and collective action are needed for universal use digital connectivity. This connectivity must provide inclusive technologies that ensure fair access for all young people to use them in a fair way. This is important because IA and technologies are essential to make a real chance to advance global goals. In this global context policy actors must engage in accessible dialogue with young people and amplify youth voices in decision-making. This requires implementation of decision-making structures at all levels for greater involvement of young people. To accelerate progress it’s necessary to focus policies on closing the digital divide and integrate digital literacy into education systems. All of this can provide extraordinary opportunities for youth driven digital innovations and sustainable development in communities. And last but not least to build just safe and inclusive artificial intelligence systems requires youth inclusion, access, transparency and governance leadership. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank You Yuri. And, again, as we’ve all heard, space does not necessarily mean the only way you get engaged with space is to be an astronaut, and we wanted to hear what you all think about what space is and technologies are and AI is. I would like to invite Daniella Darlington, who is a responsible AI leader and also a member of the ITU Secretary General, to share some perspectives about young people that she’s heard about space and AI.

Daniella Esi Darlington: Distinguished guests, fellow advocates for youth empowerment, and digital innovators. So ahead of International Youth Day, ITU, UNDISA, IGF, and UN Habitats conducted a series of quizzes with input from the Youth Advisory Board and other youth groups on space, technology, AI, and sustainable development. Now, let me invite you into the minds of the 270 young people surveyed. While questions on AI, digital divide, among others, garnered significant interest, space technology received lower interest. So according to our survey, while 95% of youth actually felt that they are more connected than ever before, only 66% could identify where the biggest digital gaps exist. Imagine a young person in a hyper-connected urban center, unaware that their fellow peers lack access to basic internet. In fact, 77% of our responders correctly understood this gap. Now consider in Africa, only 53% of youth aged between 15 and 24 are connected online, compared to a staggering 98% in Europe. This stark contrast is even more pronounced when looking at the overall population. We found a high level of awareness. among youth regarding AI and its ethical implications. An impressive 100% of the responders recognized key ethical principles in AI development among others. However, it appears that young people are unaware of how space technologies can contribute to combating hunger, with only 62% making the connection in the survey. It appears that the full potential of space data and in combating hunger among others is not known. This lack of awareness is a missed opportunity for innovation, so what do we do with this information? Our call to action is simple. Let’s bridge not just the digital divide, but the awareness divide. Let’s empower our youth, not just with the technology, but with the digital skills to solve global problems. The next breakthrough in climate action, the next breakthrough in sustainable development or agriculture, the next innovation in disaster resilience is not in a satellite or service. It’s in the minds of our youth, ready to be unlocked. Distinguished leaders, we’ve connected our youth to the world, now it’s time to connect them to its future. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much, Daniela. I feel like time is just disappearing as we hear to all these amazing expert speakers. It’s like tiny pills of knowledge that are being sent your way. It’s really important when we’re talking about digital AI, technology, infrastructure, to also recognize that all of these technologies are the end of the day human experience. And what else, if nothing, art that talks about the human experience most. And I’m privileged to invite an amazing filmmaker, futurist, Anatola Araba, who has collaborated with me. collaborated with another amazing cinematographer and advocate Malik Malik Afegbua on a performance that you’re about to experience now, and I will say it this will be a treat for your eyes and ears Anatola

Anatola Araba: Hello Thank you for joining me for a brief creative interlude this poem is about the UN’s sustainable development goals and whether we will reach them by 2030 and The importance of each voice in shaping the future. It was written by me Anatola Araba with visuals by Malik Afegbua, so please enjoy Please Keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle because we are about to embark on a journey where no one has gone before Where you may ask to the future, of course My name is Anatola and I’ll be your conductor on this enchanting voyage Thank you for choosing the quantum Express the only train that travels through space and time to visit our possible shared futures Sound like science fiction Allow me to explain You see the one thing about the future is that it’s not a physical place rather the future exists as a spectrum of possibilities And every action that we take sends a ripple effect into that spectrum, shaping the timelines of tomorrow. Anyways, seatbelts on. The train is leaving the station. Chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga. Gaze out of the window. Time starts to speed up. We flash past 2025, then 2027, 2030, then 2034, until we grind to a halt in the spring of 2035. We arrive in New York City, five years after the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals were first slated to be achieved. This used to be the city that never slept, but now it barely treads water. The Empire State Building has been destroyed by recent hurricanes. There have been more and more of these devastating storms due to the effects of climate change. Oh, and Lower Manhattan is about 11 inches underwater. What happened here, you ask, horrified? We were supposed to have sustainable cities by 2030. Well, in this future, it appears that that was just another dream deferred. But have no fear. The future is full of possibilities, and this here was just one. Let’s head to the next stop on our voyage, one where technology and innovation were embraced to enable humans to thrive. I sure hope it’s better than this, you say. All aboard! The train is leaving this station. Chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga. We flash across time like lightning through a cloud. We fly past 2035, then 2050, 2065. Until we crash. Welcome to the Nile, Egypt. Only in this future, the water that once nourished entire civilizations is almost entirely dried up. It appears that everyone was surprised when artificial superintelligence declared that the best way to protect humanity was by destroying all of nature. But by then, it was too late to stop it. This is outrageous, you cry. New technology was supposed to help bridge the digital divide, not turn our greatest nations into a wasteland. Hang your head, defeated. What are we all fighting for then, if the future is doomed to be this way? May I ask, if you would not like the world to be this way then, what is the world you imagine? The one you’d like to see if there was no limitation. Perhaps this vision could help lead us to a more hopeful destination. It doesn’t matter, you say. It’s already too late. Remember, the future is not a physical place. It exists as a spectrum of possibilities. Every action you take sends a ripple effect into that spectrum, shaping the timelines of tomorrow. But I’m not a world leader or a tech billionaire, you argue. My actions are like a tiny drop in the ocean that is tomorrow. But that’s where you’re wrong. You only need a tiny drop of food coloring. to turn the worlds of green into green. So, I will ask you once more. What needs the world to imagine if there is no limitation? Let me begin with what if. What if. What if we actually did develop sustainable cities by 2030 and communities could gather in safe, green, public spaces and gardens grew food in abundance on lawns and rooftops? What if our algorithms were guided by a north star of diversity and innovation? What if technology worked entirely with nature and AI was designed for everyone, not just the select few? What if historically marginalized voices were heard and valued and the imagination of black, indigenous, and people of color were allowed to blossom to their fullest potential? What if this were the beginning of a new era? A blinding flash washes over the parts of its friends. The light of a new possibility can be seen far in the distance. What more shines brighter than the others? A new future. One that will outboard make noise with seas to boast. What are we waiting for? Now, let’s go! All aboard! The train is approaching a new timeline. Chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga. Hey, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle because we are about to embark on a journey we’re known for. Where, you may ask? To the future! Reimagined.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): I feel like I simultaneously saw the Marvel Avengers endgame scenario and the Stephen King movie at the same time. How many of you felt goosebumps? Raise your hand. Yes, that’s the power of art and for the future that you saw and the future that we want to avoid, it’s not going to be enough to take a group of people of this size room. It’s going to take everybody out there on the planet. It’s going to take multiple generations and I am so honored to invite a panel of experts who are going to show how multiple generations are going to work together and solve this problem and steer us on the right direction. I would like to invite on to the stage our ITU Secretary General, Ms. Doreen Bogdan-Martin. Youth Activist, Nchimunuya Munyama. The ASG for UNDP, Mr. Marcos Neto. Science Policy Interface Focal Point, Ms. Clara Brown. And the Assistant Secretary General for WIPO, Mr. Edward Kwakwa. I would want to call this the star panel of the session. I want to jump in super quick since I know we value your time and your presence here. Ms. Doreen, we’ve heard from multiple members of your advisory panel. Thank you so much for that initiative. A round of applause. You’ve done a lot for empowering youth at ITU. Could you please elaborate more about your vision for bridging the digital divide, making technology and AI more accessible to young people, but also centering the feminist movement and the experiences of girls and young people from rural and remote areas. And I’ve heard you are the songbird of hope in the digital world, so I hope you can inject some of that is into us today.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you so much Yash and it’s slightly intimidating I think to be in this crowd because when you’re surrounded by smart young people you know much more than than we do and congratulations to Anatole that was just amazing. Thank you. I think it’s important for young people to remember that you are the most connected demographic in history but I think it’s also important to remember that you shouldn’t or we shouldn’t take that for granted and so I thought I’d kind of pick up a little bit from what Anatola just just showed amazingly with with that screen and ask you I know it’s late but close your eyes for a second everybody open your eyes and don’t fall asleep okay it’s 2013 not 2030 2013 the UN has just done and this is actually true the world that we want consultation it was amazing because at the time a million people answer answered that survey from around the world and we thought that’s incredible but what we at the ITU found kind of shocking that in the million people that were surveyed and asked about their priorities for the future internet access to the internet to connectivity was at the bottom of the list why because every single person that answered it had access to the internet now I know time is bracing but close your eyes again open okay it’s 2030 so what does 2030 look like I think Anatola said it well in the second part 2030 and this depends on you you said we need young people to lead if you lead if you help us lead in 2030 we can have an inclusive just safe fair, sustainable future for all. That’s where we need to focus. That’s where I’m focused at the ITU with my amazing youth advisory board, with my young professionals program, with our Generation Connect movement, with all the work that we’re specifically targeting for girls, for women and girls to close that digital gender gap. We have lots of skilling programs. I’ve heard that mentioned as well before. We’re also very focused on participation. We need you. We need you at AI for Good. We need you at the WSIS Forum. We need you at our Space Sustainability Forum where we did have a number of our space youth there. So we need you at the table. Because with you, we can shape a digital future that meets your needs and that is inclusive and makes the world a better place and helps us to achieve those SDGs that are way off track. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And I know you didn’t say the word, but a key part of the formula is mentorship. And that’s what you’re doing, I think, even though we’re not using the word. And even in the previous panel, we’re not just gonna have young parliamentarians show up in a week. They require a lot of mentorship and it requires every generation to work together. And Nchimunuya, you’ve had an impressive journey as an innovator in sustainable technology. And you’ve heard the different ways in which young people can stay engaged and engage in policy. What do you think is the role of digital inclusion in fostering innovation in those who do not have access to fill out that survey, the people who are underserved?

Nchimunuya Munyama: Okay, thank you so much. Once again, it’s a privilege to be here, to be among the powerful panel. Thank you so much. I will start by speaking about my experience, having been coming from the underserved area of those that do not have access to technology itself. I grew up in a farm where I had to learn how to create my own tools and how to actually grow. my own tomatoes. So I can, I think all I had was just creativity but I never had the tools itself, I mean like the tool itself to actually build what I wanted to do. So bringing it to this session, I think my main focus, as she has mentioned mentorship, but my main focus is also what if we could create a system that every young person out there can be given the tools to innovate. If it be, let’s say if it’s the tech itself, it can be the tool itself to help them create what they want to create. Just like my parents taught me morals, etiquette, safety, discipline, what if we could do that to the young generations, those who are upcoming in this sector itself. So I think for me mentorship has played a key role in my upbringing in this tech industry and also like how I was involved in the space of actually getting to know about these tools and my journey actually has been inspired by that experience and I am here because I have a team of young people in my country that believe in me and also I have supported people that actually want to follow my path. So to me I see myself as a beacon of hope for others and I believe that if we create the necessary tools for the young people to create what they want to create, definitely we will have an inclusive community. And lastly I would say that we also need to be creators, we need to be creators of our own technology and not passive consumers. I believe that every young person has the knowledge and the how to create their own tools to actually thrive in that area itself. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much and you make growing tomatoes super easy, it was not. I tried in COVID, I got like three tomatoes of like a big plant that was the size of like six foot. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. And I remember the first time I was in the UN at a science event was at the SDG Digital last year. It was a full day of sessions. People were committing and ITU and UNDP are pivotal for that initiative. ASG Neto, in your experience with UNDP, how critical is digital inclusion in achieving sustainable development goals, particularly for young people in least developed countries? And how are you supporting young people get more engaged in the processes? And we see such a good work you’re doing. How are you empowering them more?

Marcos Athias Neto: Thank you. And it’s a pleasure to be here. It’s great. You know, I want the Quantum Express, but just the last stop. I do not want to see the first two stops of the Quantum Express. But it can happen. There is no reason why it should happen. If we do what Doreen said, if we do it while we’re talking here, we will have the last stop. Now, two thirds of youth under 25 years old do not have internet at home. They can’t connect it to the Z nodes that we saw the colleague talk about earlier and get an increased education or open a business. One of the things we are doing, for example, in the Asia-Pacific region, we have a program partnership with Citibank Foundation called Youth CoLab. And we’ve actually supported 19,000 young people over 28 countries to actually improve or create 2,600 business, entrepreneurship. That is the innovation that needs to come in. The technology is essential to make those innovations go forward faster than we need to do right now. We have in our Africa Bureau at UNDP, we have a program of bringing young African women. We get about 20, 40, I don’t remember how many, every year and bring to New York, put work in my office for one year, all trying to build the best capabilities in those SKUs. The important point about closing the digital divide, and we fundamentally believe, is that young people must have a voice in closing the digital divide. Right, so being on our, we are dealing with a super election year, right? We as UNDP together with other members of the UN system are huge in doing election. Almost every day we are involved in an election around the world. One of the things that are very clear for us is to make sure that young people have a voice, and engage in those elections. And that I say, are actually competing, are actually running for office, and are being elected. So for us, those are a few of the things that matters. Across from entrepreneurship, to mentorship, to governance, and good citizenship in elections. Across the gamut, the future belongs to the young, belongs to you. Please, join in. Don’t sit on the side, don’t hope that my generation is going to fix it. It’s your time. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And the key message to everybody viewing this live, is go vote, wherever you are. That’s how you show your priorities and share feedback to policymakers. Thank you so much, ASG Marcos. Clara, as a young leader in this space, being a representative for adolescent girls, what challenges do you see for youth in accessing and utilizing digital tools to make an impact?

Clara Brown: Thank you so much. So, I’d first like to start by saying that my motivation to become a voice for youth in technology started with one line of code. And then it expanded from there to become eight coding languages and quantum computing. Some of the challenges that I foresee is a lack of intergenerational cooperation moving forward. And I think that’s something that this really showcases well that we are addressing this these challenges. I had the honor of helping to select some incredible youth innovators as nominees for the innovation showcase of the STI forum and these inspiring youth led initiatives are harnessing the power of technology for sustainable and inclusive development for vulnerable communities. In other areas I have helped fund youth led local solutions to bridge the digital divide that disproportionately affects youth and again the digital divide a crucial piece of the puzzle that we are still trying to solve. So the digital divide it disproportionately affects youth particularly young women in rural communities and it is crucial that we continue to sustainably fund and support work towards gender and socio-economic digital equity for youth and a safe equitable future for all people and our planet. As an observer constituency representative to the technology executive committee of the UNFCCC I have witnessed the power of innovation such as AI for climate action and AI for good to stimulate youth led innovation for climate action and social change. It’s time to scale up promising youth solutions. We need more international cooperation connecting young leaders in the tech and innovation space to each other as well. Raising awareness of opportunities and improving digital access democratizing the development and deployment of technology and AI to advance the SDGs globally.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you I apologize for cutting you Clara but I also know we’re running out of time and actually that’s a great segue into I saved the last question for you because a big part of scaling up is going to be policy and is intellectual property rights, whether it be AI, data, even the compact, it’s a core component that many member states are discussing and debating. ASG, Kwakwa, can you just share a little bit about what steps is WIPO taking to make intellectual property rights more accessible to young people who are driving to change through digital innovation, entrepreneurship, and are trying to take these solutions and scale them up?

Edward Kwakwa: Thank you very much, Yash. So great question. I mean, I could take up 10 minutes of your time, but I know you are in a hurry, so I’ll be very quick. At WIPO, what we’ve tried to do, first thing, this year we launched what we call an IPS strategy. It’s IP Youth Empowerment Strategy. And that strategy aims to explain to the young people how best they can incorporate themselves in the intellectual property ecosystem. So we try and instill passion in them, we try and instill action in them, and we provide support to the young people so they use their intellectual property assets. Let me give you an example. We do things like, we call it IP in a box, in countries such as Zambia or Uganda. And what we do there is we try and use the intellectual property system and show the youth how it can be a fun thing to do, in addition to owning the intellectual property. So I know not everyone here is a football enthusiast, but let me give an example. Kylian Mbappe, what he’s done is he has trademarked his celebratory iconic stance. So this is with the European Patent Office to ensure no one uses it without his authorization. This is an important intellectual property asset. And when you have a celebrity such as. as Kylian Mbappe, exposing the benefits of the intellectual property system, you get the majority of the youth in the world also interested in the IP system. So WIPO, we are doing everything we can to make sure the youth, the most important constituents we have. And Clara, I could explain to you how this year, last year, our World IP Day theme was on IP and women. And the year before, it was on IP and the youth. So clearly all these two years, we spent the time explaining to the international community why intellectual property is important and how effective and important the role of women as well as youth is in the intellectual property ecosystem.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Thank you so much. That’s important. Again, I think we started with a gender session and we see that key message running throughout every session. And a big round of applause to our star panelists. We appreciate your time. Thank you so much. Thank you so much again. And I’m going to make our ITUSG proud by saying that our closing is going to be about how the digital future is going to be woman-led. And I have two amazing speakers to share the closing remarks. I have Priscilla Efe Johnson, who is a Generation 17 leader, and Tayma Abdalhadi, who is a technologist and a digital rights advocate from Palestine. The stage is yours.

Priscilla Efe Johnson: Thank you so much everyone for your time and for being here with us. Thank you to all our panellists and to all our speakers for sharing their insights. Just to give a brief summary, we’ve heard from our panellists, we’ve heard from our youth activists and I think I would like to emphasise that technology can be leveraged as a tool to accelerate holistic development but we must emphasise the need for inclusion in bridging the digital divide. When talking about leveraging technology, especially for marginalised communities, we must understand that creating impactful digital solutions is not just about introducing fancy new tech, AI models or platforms. If we truly want to ensure that leaving no one behind is not just a catchphrase, then we must push for basic computer literacy for primary school girls in rural Nigeria as much as we push for new AI models. I pose this as an urge to leaders, innovators and activists that as we embrace innovation, we must ensure the customisation and localisation of innovation to the specific needs of underserved communities by ensuring inclusion of language, gender identities and the unique context of each individual to bridge the digital and development divide, leaving no girl, no woman and no one behind. Thank you.

Tayma Abdalhadi: Thank you so much, Efe. With this, we close today but as representatives of our youth, it would not be right not to put on the forefront and remember our heroes, our people under conflicts, under rockets, our youth who are fighting every day in Gaza, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, every day to make this future happen while we discuss it here safely in this room. We would also want to invite you all to put this mindset, this inclusive mindset that you are one accident, one gene, one born in a geographical area away from being in the position of those youth under rockets, under hunger, under censorship. So, this is an invitation from me and all the youth that spoke today to think before we speak, to think before we develop the technology, to think before we make any resolution, whether it was the president of the country or the youngest student in the education. Every person can make a difference and every person can convey this message of inclusivity, justice and support. Thank you, everyone. This is Tayma from Palestine and see you tomorrow.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Thank you so much, everyone. going to end it the way we started. I’m going to ask, what kind of digital future do you want? What kind of digital future do you want? Thank you.

E

Emra Mian

Speech speed

183 words per minute

Speech length

396 words

Speech time

129 seconds

Infrastructure gaps – Limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas

Explanation

Emra Mian highlights that an inclusive digital future is hindered by unequal access to high-quality digital infrastructure. This manifests in both rural areas and some urban areas where people may have lower incomes.

Evidence

In the UK, young people in rural or remote areas often lack access to digital infrastructure. Even in urban areas, some neighborhoods may have limited access despite being close to high-quality infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Disagreed with

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Digital skills gap – Need to improve digital literacy and skills, especially for youth

Explanation

Mian emphasizes the importance of improving digital skills as a crucial part of digital inclusivity. He suggests that this requires collaborative efforts from government, business, and civil society.

Evidence

Many people gain digital skills and confidence through everyday online activities, such as making or receiving payments through financial institutions.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

D

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

437 words

Speech time

176 seconds

Gender gap in digital access – Disproportionate impact on women and girls

Explanation

Bogdan-Martin highlights the need to focus on closing the digital gender gap. She emphasizes the importance of targeting programs specifically for girls and women to ensure their inclusion in the digital world.

Evidence

ITU has implemented various programs targeting women and girls, including skilling programs and initiatives to close the digital gender gap.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Emra Mian

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

C

Clara Brown

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

291 words

Speech time

142 seconds

Rural-urban divide – Lack of access in rural and remote areas

Explanation

Clara Brown points out that the digital divide disproportionately affects youth in rural communities. She emphasizes the need for sustainable funding and support to work towards digital equity for youth in these areas.

Evidence

As an observer constituency representative to the Technology Executive Committee of the UNFCCC, Brown has witnessed the power of innovation such as AI for climate action and social change.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Emra Mian

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Yurii Romashko

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Disagreed with

Emra Mian

Yurii Romashko

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Y

Yurii Romashko

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

270 words

Speech time

120 seconds

Economic barriers – High costs of devices and internet access

Explanation

Romashko identifies high costs of devices and internet access as major barriers to digital inclusion. This economic factor prevents many young people from accessing digital technologies and participating fully in the digital world.

Evidence

This insight was derived from global informal consultations on youth-led and inclusive digital future, which gathered input from 100 global contributors.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Emra Mian

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Clara Brown

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Disagreed with

Emra Mian

Clara Brown

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

M

Mohamed Bangura

Speech speed

153 words per minute

Speech length

601 words

Speech time

234 seconds

Youth representation – Need for youth voices in digital policymaking

Explanation

Bangura emphasizes the importance of including young people in key decision-making positions, particularly in government. He argues that governments should be deliberate in bringing young people to the table, especially in areas of innovation and technology.

Evidence

In Sierra Leone, the government has appointed young people to key positions, including a 27-year-old Minister of Communication and Innovation, and a 33-year-old Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

Agreed with

Marcos Athias Neto

Agreed on

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

M

Marcos Athias Neto

Speech speed

147 words per minute

Speech length

397 words

Speech time

161 seconds

Youth innovation – Supporting youth-led digital solutions and entrepreneurship

Explanation

Neto highlights UNDP’s efforts to support young people in creating and improving businesses through digital entrepreneurship. He emphasizes the importance of technology in accelerating these innovations.

Evidence

UNDP’s Youth CoLab program in the Asia-Pacific region has supported 19,000 young people over 28 countries to create or improve 2,600 businesses.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

Agreed with

Mohamed Bangura

Agreed on

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

Youth engagement – Creating opportunities for youth participation in governance

Explanation

Neto stresses the importance of ensuring young people have a voice in governance, particularly in elections. He emphasizes the need for young people to not only engage in elections but also to run for office and be elected.

Evidence

UNDP is involved in elections around the world and focuses on ensuring young people have a voice and engage in these elections.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

Agreed with

Mohamed Bangura

Agreed on

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

E

Eylül Erçin

Speech speed

99 words per minute

Speech length

208 words

Speech time

125 seconds

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Explanation

Eylül highlights the risk of biased datasets leading to biased algorithms, which can amplify existing inequalities. She emphasizes that AI is not inherently problematic, but rather reflects the data it’s trained on.

Evidence

Eylül cites an example of Amazon discontinuing a hiring algorithm that favored words commonly used by men, such as ‘executed’, leading to gender bias in hiring.

Major Discussion Point

Ethical Considerations in AI and Technology

Data inclusivity – Need for diverse and representative datasets

Explanation

Eylül stresses the importance of using inclusive and diverse datasets when training AI. She argues that by feeding AI diverse and inclusive data, we can harness its potential for a better future.

Major Discussion Point

Ethical Considerations in AI and Technology

S

Sara Sabry

Speech speed

163 words per minute

Speech length

704 words

Speech time

259 seconds

Humanity’s interconnectedness and responsibility – Joint action to address climate change, rights violations, and inequality

Explanation

Sabry highlights humanity’s shared responsibility in tackling climate change, inequality, and human rights violations, using her space perspective to emphasize global unity. She argues that problems, though complex, can be solved with hope and collective action. Hope is an active choice that requires responsibility from everyone.

Major Discussion Point

Joint action for a better future for all

M

Melissa Michelle Muñoz Suro

Speech speed

165 words per minute

Speech length

516 words

Speech time

187 seconds

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Explanation

Munoz Suro discusses the importance of developing governance frameworks for responsible AI use. She emphasizes the need for regional integration in AI development to ensure it reflects diverse cultures and languages.

Evidence

Munoz Suro contributed to development of the Dominican Republic’s national AI strategy, the first in Latin America, Central America, and the Caribbean. The strategy emphasizes regional integration and development of AI in Spanish.

Major Discussion Point

Ethical Considerations in AI and Technology

H

Hamza Hameed

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

421 words

Speech time

151 seconds

Space technology – Using satellite connectivity to bridge digital divides

Explanation

Hameed highlights the potential of space technology, particularly lower earth orbit satellites, to provide internet connectivity in remote areas where terrestrial networks are not feasible. He emphasizes the need for policymakers to develop modern tech policies to accelerate the implementation of these innovative technologies.

Evidence

Hameed mentions that lower earth orbit satellites have already connected people in the most remote parts of the world.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

P

Priscilla Efe Johnson

Speech speed

149 words per minute

Speech length

212 words

Speech time

85 seconds

Localized solutions – Customizing digital innovations for specific community needs

Explanation

Johnson emphasizes the need to customize and localize digital solutions to the specific needs of underserved communities. She argues that truly inclusive innovation must consider language, gender identities, and the unique context of each individual.

Evidence

Johnson gives an example of pushing for basic computer literacy for primary school girls in rural Nigeria as much as pushing for new AI models.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

E

Edward Kwakwa

Speech speed

152 words per minute

Speech length

344 words

Speech time

135 seconds

Intellectual property – Making IP rights accessible to young innovators

Explanation

Kwakwa discusses WIPO’s efforts to make intellectual property rights more accessible to young people. He emphasizes the importance of educating youth about how to incorporate themselves into the intellectual property ecosystem.

Evidence

WIPO launched an IP Youth Empowerment Strategy to explain to young people how to best incorporate themselves in the intellectual property ecosystem. They also run programs like ‘IP in a box’ in countries such as Zambia and Uganda.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

Agreements

Agreement Points

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Emra Mian

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Infrastructure gaps – Limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas

Gender gap in digital access – Disproportionate impact on women and girls

Rural-urban divide – Lack of access in rural and remote areas

Economic barriers – High costs of devices and internet access

Multiple speakers highlighted various aspects of the digital divide, emphasizing its disproportionate impact on youth, women, rural communities, and those facing economic barriers.

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

Mohamed Bangura

Marcos Athias Neto

Youth representation – Need for youth voices in digital policymaking

Youth innovation – Supporting youth-led digital solutions and entrepreneurship

Youth engagement – Creating opportunities for youth participation in governance

Both speakers emphasized the importance of including young people in decision-making processes, particularly in government and digital policymaking, as well as supporting youth-led innovations and entrepreneurship.

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers all emphasized the importance of ethical considerations in AI development, including the need for diverse datasets, responsible development practices, and governance frameworks to ensure AI aligns with human rights and ethics.

Eylul Ercin

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Data inclusivity – Need for diverse and representative datasets

Responsible AI development – Aligning AI with human rights and ethics

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Unexpected Consensus

Space technology for digital inclusion

Hamza Hameed

Sara Sabry

Space technology – Using satellite connectivity to bridge digital divides

While coming from different perspectives (technology and astronautics), both speakers highlighted the potential of space technology to address global challenges, including digital inclusion. This unexpected connection between space exploration and digital rights showcases a novel approach to bridging the digital divide.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement centered around addressing the digital divide, empowering youth in digital policymaking, ensuring ethical AI development, and leveraging innovative technologies (including space technology) for digital inclusion.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on the importance of addressing the digital divide and involving youth in digital policymaking. This strong agreement suggests a unified direction for future efforts in digital inclusion and youth empowerment. However, the specific approaches and focus areas varied among speakers, indicating a need for diverse strategies to address these complex issues.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Emra Mian

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Infrastructure gaps – Limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas

Rural-urban divide – Lack of access in rural and remote areas

Economic barriers – High costs of devices and internet access

While all speakers agree on the existence of a digital divide, they emphasize different aspects as the primary barrier: Mian focuses on infrastructure gaps, Brown highlights the rural-urban divide, and Romashko emphasizes economic barriers.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around prioritizing different aspects of the digital divide and approaches to ethical AI development.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the overall goals but differ in their emphasis on specific aspects or approaches. This suggests a general consensus on the importance of addressing the digital divide and ensuring ethical AI development, which is positive for advancing these issues. However, the different emphases may lead to challenges in prioritizing specific actions or allocating resources.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agree on the need for ethical AI development, but they propose different approaches: Ercin focuses on addressing algorithmic bias through diverse datasets, and Munoz Suro advocates for developing governance frameworks.

Eylul Ercin

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Responsible AI development – Aligning AI with human rights and ethics

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers all emphasized the importance of ethical considerations in AI development, including the need for diverse datasets, responsible development practices, and governance frameworks to ensure AI aligns with human rights and ethics.

Eylul Ercin

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Data inclusivity – Need for diverse and representative datasets

Responsible AI development – Aligning AI with human rights and ethics

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The digital divide remains a significant challenge, with infrastructure gaps, skills gaps, and economic barriers limiting access for many, especially in underserved areas.

Youth empowerment and inclusion in digital policymaking is crucial for shaping an inclusive digital future.

Ethical considerations in AI and technology development, including addressing algorithmic bias and ensuring online safety, are critical.

Digital innovation, including space technology and AI, has significant potential to contribute to sustainable development goals.

Localized and customized digital solutions are needed to address the specific needs of different communities.

Intergenerational cooperation and mentorship are important for bridging the digital divide and fostering youth innovation.

Resolutions and Action Items

Implement the ITU’s IP Youth Empowerment Strategy to engage young people in the intellectual property ecosystem

Scale up promising youth-led digital solutions and innovations

Integrate digital literacy into education systems

Increase youth participation in digital policymaking and governance

Develop modern tech policies to accelerate innovative technologies like lower earth orbit satellites for connectivity

Unresolved Issues

Specific strategies for addressing the digital gender gap in different regions

Detailed plans for ensuring AI governance frameworks are implemented globally

Methods for balancing rapid technological advancement with ethical considerations and human rights protection

Concrete steps for making intellectual property rights more accessible to young innovators in developing countries

Suggested Compromises

Balancing the focus on advanced technologies like AI with efforts to provide basic digital access and literacy in underserved areas

Combining top-down policy approaches with bottom-up youth-led initiatives to address the digital divide

Integrating both global standards and localized solutions in digital development efforts

Thought Provoking Comments

From space there are no lines separating countries, no divisions between people. They’re just one earth, our shared home. And it is more interconnected, more united, and more hopeful than we often realize.

Speaker

Sara Sabry

Reason

This comment provides a unique perspective from someone who has seen Earth from space, challenging typical views of national borders and divisions.

Impact

It set a tone of unity and interconnectedness for the discussion, encouraging participants to think globally rather than locally about digital issues.

Young people are not just passive beneficiaries, and we need to flip the script. Empower them to be agents of change, to be creators of education, to be proponents of education, and you can see the difference that happens.

Speaker

Zubair Junjunia

Reason

This comment challenges the traditional view of youth as recipients of education and policy, instead positioning them as active creators and change agents.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards discussing ways to actively involve youth in shaping digital policies and educational initiatives.

Something that I want to emphasize, an issue that I think goes relatively unnoticed is biased data sets that lead to biased algorithms.

Speaker

Eylul Ercin

Reason

This comment highlights a critical but often overlooked issue in AI development, bringing attention to the ethical implications of data bias.

Impact

It deepened the discussion on AI ethics and prompted consideration of the need for diverse and inclusive data sets in AI development.

I think bridging the digital divide isn’t just about access to technology, it’s really about empowering young people to come online, share their voices, and shape their futures, whether that be through access to education, whether that be access to healthcare, or whether that be the ability to set up a business.

Speaker

Hamza Hameed

Reason

This comment reframes the digital divide issue from mere access to technology to a broader concept of empowerment and opportunity.

Impact

It expanded the conversation beyond technical solutions to consider the broader societal impacts of digital inclusion.

If we truly want to ensure that leaving no one behind is not just a catchphrase, then we must push for basic computer literacy for primary school girls in rural Nigeria as much as we push for new AI models.

Speaker

Priscilla Efe Johnson

Reason

This comment provides a concrete example of how to balance cutting-edge technology with basic digital literacy, emphasizing true inclusivity.

Impact

It grounded the discussion in practical realities and highlighted the importance of addressing foundational digital skills alongside advanced technologies.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by consistently emphasizing themes of inclusivity, youth empowerment, and the need for a holistic approach to digital development. They challenged participants to think beyond technological solutions and consider the broader societal implications of digital policies. The comments also highlighted the importance of diverse perspectives in shaping the digital future, from the view from space to the needs of rural schoolgirls. This led to a rich, multifaceted discussion that balanced aspirational goals with practical considerations for achieving true digital inclusion.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI and technology development includes diverse data sets and perspectives to avoid bias?

Speaker

Eylul Ercin

Explanation

Important to prevent AI from amplifying existing inequalities and ensure inclusive development

What policies and initiatives can improve digital infrastructure access in both rural and urban low-income areas?

Speaker

Emra Mian

Explanation

Critical for addressing persistent digital divides and ensuring equal access

How can governments, businesses, and civil society work together to improve digital skills, especially for underserved populations?

Speaker

Emra Mian

Explanation

Necessary for true digital inclusion and empowerment

What steps can be taken to enhance online safety and prevent marginalized groups from retreating from digital spaces?

Speaker

Emra Mian

Explanation

Essential for creating an inclusive digital future where all feel safe to participate

How can innovative space technologies be leveraged to bridge the digital divide in remote areas?

Speaker

Hamza Hameed

Explanation

Offers potential solutions for connecting underserved populations globally

What policies are needed to accelerate the development and implementation of innovative connectivity technologies?

Speaker

Hamza Hameed

Explanation

Crucial for enabling widespread access to digital tools and opportunities

How can we create systems to provide young people, especially in underserved areas, with the tools and resources to innovate?

Speaker

Nchimunuya Munyama

Explanation

Important for fostering innovation and empowering youth in all communities

What strategies can increase youth participation in governance and policymaking, particularly around digital issues?

Speaker

Marcos Athias Neto

Explanation

Critical for ensuring young people’s voices shape the digital future

How can we improve international cooperation to connect young leaders in tech and innovation globally?

Speaker

Clara Brown

Explanation

Necessary for scaling up promising youth-led solutions to global challenges

What steps can be taken to make intellectual property rights more accessible and understandable to young innovators?

Speaker

Edward Kwakwa

Explanation

Important for empowering youth to protect and benefit from their innovations

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

High Level Dialogue with the Secretary-General

High Level Dialogue with the Secretary-General

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on youth participation in global decision-making, particularly within the United Nations system. The conversation involved UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and several youth representatives, exploring challenges and potential solutions for meaningful youth engagement.

The discussion began with a poll revealing that many perceive current youth participation as tokenistic. Youth representatives emphasized the need for systemic change, moving beyond mere consultation to active involvement in decision-making processes. They called for decentralization of youth offices, removal of barriers to UN employment, and protection for young activists.

Secretary-General Guterres acknowledged past failures of his generation in addressing global challenges and stressed the importance of involving youth in shaping a better future. He committed to reforms aimed at increasing youth participation in UN bodies and reversing the aging trend in UN staff.

Participants highlighted the importance of including marginalized youth voices, such as indigenous youth and young refugees. They also discussed innovative approaches young people are using to tackle global issues, emphasizing the need for empowerment, trust, and funding.

The conversation concluded with a visioning exercise, contrasting two potential futures: one where youth remain excluded from decision-making, and another with transformative change enabling youth participation. Participants overwhelmingly favored the latter, with Guterres emphasizing the need to actively build this preferred future to address critical challenges like climate change and technological disparities.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The current state of youth participation in the UN and global decision-making is largely tokenistic and needs to shift to more meaningful engagement

– There is a need for concrete reforms and actions to give young people real power and influence, not just consultation

– Intergenerational collaboration and accountability is necessary to address global challenges created by past generations

– Innovation and empowerment of youth, especially marginalized groups, is critical for solving global issues

– Two potential futures were envisioned – one of continued challenges vs. one of transformative change led by youth

Overall purpose/goal:

The discussion aimed to have an honest, frank conversation about the state of youth engagement in global governance, particularly at the UN, and explore ways to make youth participation more meaningful and impactful going forward.

Tone:

The tone was largely serious and earnest, with participants speaking candidly about shortcomings in current youth engagement practices. However, there were also moments of inspiration and hope, particularly when discussing potential positive futures and youth-led innovations. The Secretary-General’s frank acknowledgment of past failures added gravity to the conversation. Overall, the tone balanced critical analysis with forward-looking optimism.

Speakers

Based on the transcript, there were 6 main speakers participating in the discussion:

– Moderator: Hajer Sharief, Co-founder, Together We Build It

– Antonio Guterres: United Nations Secretary-General

– Caleb Brathwaite: President of the Barbados Youth Development Council

– Daphne Frias: Youth activist, Organizer, Story-teller

– Josefa Tauli: Policy Co-ordinator of the Global Youth Biodiversity Network

– Amani Joel Mafigi: Co-founder of Unleashed (Potentials in Motion)

The speakers represented various youth perspectives and organizations focused on issues like climate change, indigenous rights, disability inclusion, and youth empowerment.

Full session report

Youth Participation in Global Decision-Making: A Critical Dialogue

This comprehensive discussion brought together UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and youth representatives to explore the challenges and potential solutions for meaningful youth engagement in global decision-making, particularly within the United Nations system. The session began with a visual scribe exercise, setting the stage for an interactive and dynamic conversation.

Current State of Youth Participation

A Mentimeter poll revealed that many perceive current youth engagement as largely tokenistic, with this option ranking highest among participants. This sentiment was echoed by several speakers. Daphne Frias, a disability and climate justice organiser, emphasised that youth voices are often heard but not acted upon, highlighting the prevalence of tokenism in current practices. Caleb Brathwaite, President of the Barbados Youth Development Council, argued that the system needs updating to better impact young people, suggesting that current structures are outdated and ineffective.

Secretary-General Guterres acknowledged that his generation had “messed up in relation to the world today”, setting a tone of accountability and urgency for change. He stated that the UN is in transition from merely listening to youth to including them in decision-making processes, but recognized the need for significant improvements.

Barriers to Meaningful Participation

Speakers identified several obstacles to meaningful youth engagement. Frias highlighted educational and language barriers that prevent many young people from working within the UN system. She also emphasized the extreme risks faced by young activists, particularly in Latin America and the Global South, where some youth are “giving up our lives” to defend the planet. Josefa Tauli, Indigenous youth policy coordinator of the Global Youth Biodiversity Network, shared personal experiences, mentioning her father’s criminalization as an environmental defender.

Proposed Reforms and Solutions

The conversation shifted to concrete reforms and actions needed to give young people real power and influence. Brathwaite proposed decentralising UN youth offices globally to better implement youth engagement initiatives. Secretary-General Guterres committed to integrating youth systematically into UN decision-making processes and increasing the number of young people working within the organisation to reverse the trend of an ageing staff.

Tauli emphasised the need to shift power dynamics to be led by marginalised youth voices, including indigenous youth, youth with disabilities, and young refugees. She argued that unless institutions and processes are being led by these groups, efforts at inclusion would be failing.

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Amani Joel Mafigi, Co-founder of Unleashed Potentials in Motion, highlighted the innovative approaches young people are using to tackle global issues. He called for support for youth-led initiatives solving global challenges and proposed creating a Youth Empowerment Fund for climate action, social justice, and innovation.

Secretary-General Guterres echoed this sentiment, stressing the importance of unleashing the potential of young people to lead and contribute to society. He made a provocative statement that “Power is never given. Power is taken”, challenging young people to actively claim their place in decision-making processes rather than waiting for it to be granted.

Envisioning the Future

The conversation concluded with a visioning exercise contrasting two potential futures. Tauli envisioned a world where children are not afraid of the future and environmental defenders are protected. Secretary-General Guterres framed the choice as between a world of climate crisis and inequality versus one of sustainability and fairness.

Participants overwhelmingly favoured a future with transformative change enabling youth participation. Guterres emphasised the need to actively build this preferred future to address critical challenges like climate change and technological disparities. He also highlighted the importance of preserving truth, referencing the book “The Death of Truth” and stressing the need to ensure truth survives in our society.

Personal Reflections and Challenges

Throughout the discussion, speakers shared personal insights. Frias expressed the weight of responsibility felt by young activists, stating that sometimes she just wants to be 26 years old without the burden of fixing global problems. This sentiment highlighted the complex emotions and pressures faced by youth engaged in global issues.

Conclusion

This frank and earnest discussion highlighted the urgent need for systemic change in how the UN and global institutions engage with youth. It balanced critical analysis of current shortcomings with forward-looking strategies for youth-led solutions to global challenges. The conversation underscored the importance of moving beyond tokenism to meaningful engagement, empowering marginalised youth voices, and actively building a more sustainable and equitable future through intergenerational collaboration and accountability.

The moderator closed the session by thanking the participants and announcing three upcoming sessions focused on inclusion, equity, and trust, indicating an ongoing commitment to these crucial themes in youth engagement and global decision-making.

Session Transcript

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Thank you very much for being here today. Everyone in the room, thank you for coming. And for those who are joining us online as well, thank you so much for joining. And for those who planned on being here and couldn’t come, thank you so much also. So I must say I had the privilege to facilitate many discussions in the previous years, but this one feels a little bit different, especially given the current state of the world. I mean, we’re seeing armed conflicts, we’re seeing wars, we’re seeing record high of displacements, record high of temperatures, heat waves across the world, climate crisis, natural crisis, lots of crises. But then I must also say sometimes it seems that the consequences of what we’re seeing in terms of challenges are not felt equally around the world, if I must say. To use a metaphor, sometimes it feels that there are parts of the world where people are relatively having a comfortable, safe lives, and other parts of the world where people are struggling. And maybe a more explicit metaphor, personally for me, sometimes I wake up in the morning and I look at the world and I feel like some parts of the world really feels like a barbie house, while other parts of the world feels like the real Hunger Games. And then we have the UN, right, our primary global organization, global leader, that seems a little bit stuck, maybe, maybe not. There is many young people around the world who maybe think that the UN is not fit for purpose, after all it was established in 1945. But there are also many people around the world who support the UN, believe in the mission of unity. And many of these people are here today, are joining us online as well. So all of this is to say, and I personally do believe that the UN have an important role to play as a global leader in this world, in tackling challenges and finding solutions and in leading all of us to really come together. So to do that, I would really want us to have an honest and frank conversation. I know the title of this session is dialogue, but what a dialogue really means is a conversation among equals, right? A conversation among people who believes and have shared values and have a shared vision. So I would ask everyone, us here on stage, but also everyone in the room, everyone online, to for an hour or two, a day or two, or for the rest of our lives, to put our titles a little bit aside, our affiliations a little bit aside, and let’s come together and have a conversation as individuals and as we, the people. Because you know what I really find fascinating? This is the charter of the United Nations, right? And in the permeable of the charter, I find it fascinating that it says, we, the peoples of the United Nations. And I think this says it all. We, the people of the United Nations have determined, and today the people also are coming together to determine. So if you all agree that this is gonna be a honest, frank conversation, again, not only among us, but with everyone in the room and a conversation that should continues, then I would want to hear a yes. So do we agree on that? Honest, frank conversation. Yes. Yes. What about you? Okay, everyone is excited. And to kick off this honest and frank conversation, we have an incredible group of people here. We have Daphne, who is a disability and a climate justice organizer. Thank you so much for joining us. We have the United Nations Secretary General. Thank you so much for joining us. And we have Caleb, President of the Barbados Youth Development Council. Thank you for joining us. So, a few things. We have an exercise going on, which is a visual scribe. I don’t know if we have some of the photos up here. Okay, that’s cool. We started. We started. And then we’re going to come back to this later on at the end of the session. But, again, since this is a conversation between everyone, we will start with an interactive poll. So, basically, what we want to do is we want you to answer a question. And this is based on the Heart’s Ladder of Participation, which ranks youth engagement from non-participation to participation. And it has different levels. So the first thing I would want everyone to do is to pick up your phone. Everyone pick up their phones. And go to menti.com. And that’s how you’re going to log into the question, which, as you see up here, in your opinion. What is the current stage of youth participation? So again, go to menti.com and then you have to enter a code, which is, I don’t know if you can see it on the screen, it’s all the way up there, but it’s 99409443. So again, for those who can’t see it on the screen, it’s 99409443. And we are already getting answers. Oh wow, that’s many answers, that’s great. So we have different levels, as you see on the screen. We have tokenism, we have youth-informed, we have youth-consulted, we have shared decision with youth, we have youth and adult-initiated, and we have youth-initiated and directed. Okay, so maybe while the answers are coming in, Caleb, maybe I can start with you. What do you think of the results? Are you surprised?

Caleb Brathwaite: Well, first and foremost, thank you very much for inviting me to speak briefly and to be in the presence of Changemakers of the World. Looking at the results, I see in terms of tokenism, tokenism is coming in rather high, and following that is youth-informed. Closest is youth-consulted, but what we should have been seeing is that of youth-initiated and directed. And it paints a bigger picture of how young people view youth engagement with United Nations. As the Secretary General rightfully said in one of his speeches, in relation to that, this system here was built by our grandparents, and how therefore can it really better impact us as young people and that of our grandchildren. And what really needs to happen is that there needs to be, the system needs to be updated, and the system needs to be able to better care for us now in 2024 as young people and beyond.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Yeah. So the system needs to be updated. And then for you, what does the pact of the summit of the future means to you? The pact of the future and the summit of the future, what does it mean for you?

Caleb Brathwaite: The pact for the future, which essentially brings us here, all of us here, for the summit of the future. What it means for me is that of a mere agreement, and agreements on top of agreements we have seen come out of these hallowed walls, agreements on top of agreements, but what we need now is action. How can we achieve action? And I’d like to commend the work of His Excellency, the Secretary General, in establishing the youth affairs and having that of the Assistant Secretary General, because it is forward thinking, and I believe that we have to give a round of applause. You have been doing excellent work. But we need to go further. How can we go further? There’s already established the UN youth office, and what needs to happen is that it needs to be decentralized. Establishing UN youth offices around the world and already established multi-country offices so that the UN can play a better role in terms of ensuring what the part of the future in Chapter 4, which looks at youth engagement, can be really achieved, and so that there can be a better life for young people around the world. We must hold our governments accountable, we must keep our governments feet to the fair to ensure that that part of the future in relation to Chapter 4 is really actualized and realized for young people around the world. That is how we will turn this mere agreement, Chapter 4 and the path for the future, into action.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Into action. That’s the key word today and moving forward, right? Thank you so much, Caleb. Daphne, we’ve seen a lot of developments when it comes to youth engagements. We’ve seen more mechanisms, more processes for youth engagement within the UN system or also, generally speaking. But do you think there are still obstacles when it comes to meaningful and equal youth engagement and participation?

Daphne Frias: Definitely. And again, as Caleb mentioned, I am so excited and grateful to be part of this conversation. But I don’t think the question is necessarily if there are obstacles, it’s more what are the obstacles and how can we remove them? So much so that as we saw in the Mentimeter poll, the highest ranking selection was tokenism. And the most sort of insidious thing about tokenism is that our stories got to be shared with others, but they don’t actually inform action going forward. Our voices occupy rooms, but then they fall on silent ears. And truly, it’s time for the people who do so much of the talking to do less of the talking. And for the people who don’t get to do as much of that talking to take center stage and to have the voices of my generation, the generation that has fueled the Summit of the Future, that has fueled the UN Youth Office to lead. I think we have to also talk about the fact that not only is the UN an entity that many young people don’t feel connected to, but when trying to achieve positions, employment or positions of engagement within the UN, there are so many barriers in terms of educational obstacles, language obstacles, and things of that nature. When it comes to the criteria for what is required for UN employees and getting young people into the forum of the UN, it is so few and far between. I also didn’t want to take a second to say some words in Spanish. I am a climate organizer and the background of my work is really highlighting the injustices that marginalized communities face, especially in the global south and especially as a visibly disabled Latina woman. Young people in countries of Latin America and the global south have always been fighting, but we are, some of us, giving up our lives in order to do this and this should not be the case. Fighting for our planet should not be something that is prohibited. It should be something that we do happily together with our community. What I said a little bit, so many young people, especially in the global south, are losing their lives trying to defend our planet, trying to fight for a better future, and simply it should not be controversial to defend and fight for our planet. We need, thank you, we need to expand the enforcement of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We need to make sure that young people’s voices are protected in that declaration. And, unless that changes, what you see reflected in that poll is going to stay exactly the same. Tokenism is going to continue to be at the top, and youth engagement is not going to be fully realized.

Moderator: Yeah. And, yeah, she deserves a round of applause, for sure. And then, Daphne, in your opinion, have you seen gaps in the lead-up to the summit of the future when it comes to youth engagement?

Daphne Frias: I think that in creating Chapter 4, in creating our guidelines and conventions, it was more youth-influenced and less youth-led, in terms of we’ve compiled things from the major group for youth and children, we’ve compiled things from member states and the young people from member states, but it was less allowing youth to really build, brick by brick, what Chapter 4 should look like. And I think that we really need to push the boundaries of our ideas of reverse mentorship, where it’s not adults only teaching young people, but having adults understand that they can learn from us, as well. And how can we open those pathways so that it isn’t a hierarchical relationship, but it is a symbiotic relationship where we can continuously share our ideas with one another. And as we gather here today for the first summit of the future, I want there to be many summits of the future, but also work that happens outside of these summits, in UN offices, in member states, in places of community, because that’s really where the power happens.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): 100% agreed. So, Mr. Secretary General, if I would refer again to… to the UN Charter, where it says, we the peoples of the United Nations. And I must say, I’m fascinated by this sentence, although it’s been there since the establishment of the UN. And I’m fascinated by it because I find it very interesting that it says, we the peoples of the United Nations. It doesn’t necessarily say, we the governments of the world. This doesn’t say, we the people representing the other people. It really says, we the people. So for me, it sounds that it really centers us as a collective of individuals. And when it comes to youth participation and youth engagement, we’ve seen the results. We’ve heard from Caleb. We’ve heard from Daphne. In your opinion, what are the concrete steps and reforms that the UN should undertake to really ensure that we are centering the sentence, we the peoples, which include we the young people of the world?

Antonio Guterres: Well, thank you very much for your question. I think one needs to look into the history. In the beginning, when I was quite young, the attitudes of political leaders, but also of organizations like the UN in relation to the youth was grow up. There was no interest at all to have a discussion with young people. Then there was this idea that, I mean, young people is relevant. So we better try to make sure that young people does what we would like them to do. Let’s not forget that facing this attitude of rejection, young people revolted. May 68, remember, I’m talking about my young people’s time. And so. people started at these organizations to talk to young people, to try to communicate things to young people, not to listen to young people, but to tell things to young people, to try to convince young people to do this or to do that. Then we discovered that that wouldn’t lead anywhere. Young people became more and more assertive and so the third stage in which we are now is a stage in which there is a growing interest and the creation of some mechanisms to listen to young people. And there is a lot yet to be done. I think what this demonstrated is that we are somewhere, somewhere in the development of this phase, listening to young people, not listening systematically, not listening in an organized way always, but starting to listen. But what we need is the fourth phase and the fourth phase is to have young people participating in decision-making processes. And that is what requires a number of reforms and let’s be clear, that is something that is not easy in an organization like the UN that is still, even if it is with the peoples, an intergovernmental organization. And so a central aspect of the summit of the future and the central aspect of the reforms you talk about is how can we guarantee that the civil society, how can we guarantee that cities and the local authorities and especially how can we guarantee that young people participate in the different processes of decision of the UN. Now this is the task that our office now has to engage very strongly. which means looking into all the bodies of the UN work, General Assembly, how does the Economic and Social Council work. Security Council will be more difficult. We need to find ways in which, with the office totally committed to that, to make sure that in the decision-making processes of these bodies, there are moments in which there is an active intervention of young people. Not only that there is a consultation of young people, but moments of active intervention of young people. As we need to have moments of active intervention of the civil society, and as we need to have in some aspects moments of active intervention of the regional and local authorities that know better than governments at national level what’s really happening with we the people on the ground. Now, these are the reforms that we intend to accelerate now, and it means discussing with the leaders of the different bodies how to make sure that in the work of each of the bodies, there are moments in the different processes in which the young people have a systemic participation and not one like those that are there in that picture. And we are totally committed to do it. But there is another thing that is essential, is to have more young people working inside the organization. Unfortunately, many organizations in the world, and the UN is one of them, for different reasons, but especially for budgetary constraints, tend to have an aging population. is to reverse that trend. We need to have much more young people working daily. There where the dossiers are prepared, there where the decisions are studied, there where the ideas are born, to make sure that the kind of product that comes from the different areas and departments of the organization is much more adapted to the needs and to the interests of young people than what it is the case today. So, two main objectives. Organize the processes of the bodies of the UN to give young people a clear, interfering voice in decisive moments when things are being decided, not when things have already happened. And second, make a huge effort with all the budgetary difficulties that we have, a huge effort to reverse the trend of the aging nature of the UN staff.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): And in the spirit that this is an honest conversation and a frank conversation, do you think this would be enough to move and change this from moments to lasting moments?

Antonio Guterres: We need to persevere. We will face many resistances. So, if we want to have a lasting moment, we must be determined to overcome the obstacle. The obstacles will appear, but we must be determined to overcome these obstacles. And there is a fundamental reason for that. I mean, look at the world today. We have to recognize that my generation messed up in relation to the world today. There was a critical moment. I was at the time in government, in the 90s. We had the end of the Cold War, we had globalization that appeared to be the solution of all problems and there was a sense that the world was moving in the right direction and the generation that was in charge did nothing to correct the negative aspects that were going to appear. And then we saw that the globalization indeed produced richness but it produced inequality. And then we saw that the end of the Cold War meant a multiplication of hot wars and we see them now everywhere in the world. And then we discovered that the economic model that was in place had forgotten that there is nature, had forgotten that there is planet and started to use resources that were limited and started to have an impact of destruction of the planet itself. So this is the product of the model that my generation put in place. Taking profit of the end of the Cold War and of the globalization and its enormous potential, instead of transforming it in a world of peace and in a world of prosperity for everybody and in a world with peace with nature, developed a world of multiplication of warm conflicts, a world in which we have war with nature and a world in which we have an enormous increase of inequality that of course makes the situation of the use in large parts of the world absolutely dramatic. Now, if my generation recognizes that we failed, and that we need to revert things, and that we need a new model that takes place of the enormous potential of new technologies, that takes place of the enormous energy that has been generated in the world, makes peace with nature, creates true mechanisms of participation and equality at global level, and overcomes the contradictions that lead to the conflicts of today, for that we need a new generation, a digital generation, I’m still an analogic, a digital generation, that is able to understand that we are leading to a disaster, and that is able to revert things, and take profit of the enormous potential that exists in the world, to build something in which the next generation will feel comfortable. And we cannot do that if your generation is not part of the decision-making process that is still controlled by my generation, that messed up in the way it has happened. You said you wanted a frank conversation.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Yes, did I expect that? No. But thank you so much, because I know you’ll have to deal with this. Daphne, I saw you nodding your head a lot. What were you thinking?

Daphne Frias: It’s very rare where the generation before ours takes responsibility for the harms that have been caused, and I’m 26 years old. Sometimes I just want to be 26 years old. I don’t want to have to fix the climate crisis. I don’t want to have to stop wars. I just want to watch Netflix.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): We all do.

Daphne Frias: I just want to pet my dog and eat some cookies and live my life. But unfortunately, that is not our reality, but it can be. It can be if we not necessarily push for intergenerational collaboration, but make that the standard where it isn’t one young person representing millions of young people. I cannot possibly speak for a young person in Kenya, speak for a young person going through genocide in Palestine, speak for speak for a young person. Thank you. In Australia, I can only speak for me and I can only share my story. But the more of us that we have and the more of our stories that get shared, that is where the true change happens. So I hope that more of the older generation can follow the SG’s example and take responsibility and say, okay, we understand and we’re ready to do the hard work because it’s gonna take a lot.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Thank you, Daphne, for this. Caleb, just in a sentence, what were your thoughts?

Caleb Brathwaite: My initial thoughts are, whoa, and as Daphne said, take someone from the generation past taking responsibility for how this generation is now is incredible. I also laid hope, as Daphne also said, that he also lays solutions. I’m coming from a small developing state that reaches on the brink of the climate crisis, hurricanes that you’ve never seen before. You know, as a small developing state, we are not the world’s largest emitters, but we face the greatest threats, and that for the SG taking responsibility for what would have transpired years ago is incredible. We know what lies ahead. We know what the mission, and it’s for all of us in this room to collectively work to achieve that mission, and it’s prosperity for all young people.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Amazing. For all of us in this room, thank you so much, Caleb. Thank you so much, Daphne. We will continue the conversation with another two amazing young people, Amani and Josefa. So Caleb and Daphne, thank you so much for joining us, and please keep the conversation going. That was very honest, Mr. Secretary General. That was very honest. Thank you for sharing that.

Antonio Guterres: That is simply the truth.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): That is simply the truth. Yeah, that deserves a round of applause. That is simply the truth.

Antonio Guterres: You know, there is a book that was published called The Death of Truth, and we see a lot of things being done in misinformation, especially social media, to kill the truth. You must make sure that the truth survives.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): And is heard.

Antonio Guterres: The truth wins.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator) Thank you so much. Josefa, thank you so much for joining us. You are an indigenous youth policy coordinator of the Global Youth Biodiversity Network. Amani, thank you so much for joining us, the co-founder of Unleashed Potentials in Motion. So Josefa, if I would start with you. In your opinion, what are the strategies that can be used and deployed today to ensure a meaningful youth participation in the decision-making processes, also taking into account what DSG has shared?

Josefa Tauli: Thank you so much, and I absolutely agree. Because among the young people, I just really, really want to emphasize that there are among them indigenous youth, youth with disabilities, young refugees, who are marginalized. And I think that unless our systems, our institutions, our decision-making processes, unless those work for them, and unless they listen to them and are led by them, that I think we would not only be failing at leaving no one behind, we would also be failing at listening to the voices and values and lived experiences that are very, very central to really healing the world that we live in. And I really say this also as an indigenous young woman who is constantly being shaped and molded by the young people, the indigenous people that I interact with every day at home and in the work that I do, these are people who really continue to be caring, caring for each other, caring for the land, caring for nature, and remain compassionate and kind, you know, even as they fight a system that is harming them and oppressing them and even killing them. So unless our institutions and processes are being led by them, then we would be failing at what we need to do, really. Just to add, I think what we need then is a shift, really, the shift in who holds power and space to speak and to lead, a shift in who gets resources, a shift in whose expertise we are listening to and whose values are guiding decision-making. For me, this needs to happen for transformation to really happen if we are sincere about really shifting and changing the system.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): That’s That’s very well put, especially if we are sincere and I hope everyone here is sincere about making that shift. Amani, what are some of the examples of innovative approaches that youth utilize in tackling the global challenges?

Amani Joel Mafigi: Thank you so much for the question and for the opportunity to speak. First of all, we have mentioned a lot of challenges and I know the world is currently facing a lot of them. You mentioned about innovation. Innovation is one way that we can assure a better future, but this innovation should be innovation for good. There are a lot of challenges and all these challenges can be really solved if we are to change the way we are doing things for better. I will share briefly about my story. I am a displaced person for the last 16 years. I’ve been living in Uganda as a firstly displaced person from the Democratic Republic of Congo. My life has been with a lot of adversities, but also great choices to make the world a better place. In 2018, I co-founded a youth-led organization called Unleashed Potentials in Motion, where we empower young people in leadership, potential discovery, business development, and social entrepreneurship. We have seen how this innovation can support young people to realize their future goals, because for anyone who has experienced a displacement, you know how it comes with traumas, having left your home behind. having left your story behind, some of your family members. So, and right now we have over 120 displaced people, 20 million displaced people. And it is such a huge, it’s such a huge opportunity that we have to tap in their talents, their skills, without leaving anyone behind. One of the youth that we trained called Basia Baraka. Let me finalize with this little story. Basia left his home in 2016. He tried to join school, but failed because of language barrier and lack of scholarship opportunities. He learned that Unleashed had opened up its doors, he applied quickly, and then he gained a scholarship at the organization. He started there through mentorship, he made research and realized that in the settlement, malaria was killing quite a big number of young people. So, he thought, which innovation could I create to reduce on the risk of this problem? He realized that he could use organic materials found in the settlement, in the community, to make a mosquito repellent jelly. Basia made the mosquito repellent jelly that is currently solving big challenges. And he’s supporting quite a number of young people to get jobs through his innovation. Now, this is one of the many innovations that young people are making. Like in this room, there are quite a lot of bright minds that are having a lot of innovations that they are creating to solve the challenge that face our world today. When youth are empowered, trusted, and funded, major breakthroughs that will shape our world to solve the challenges of today and the challenges of tomorrow is a guarantee. Thank you.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Thank you so much, Caleb. Mr. Secretary General, we. We heard Josefa, she talked about the shift and the need for a genuine shift, right? A genuine shift, a genuine interest in making the shift for meaningful and equal youth participation. And Amani shared with us his story and also made a very incredible remark about the need to have youth empowered, trusted and funded. What are your thoughts on this?

Antonio Guterres: I believe that one of the things that is essential at country level, as in international organizations, is to unleash the potential of young people. I mean, things are organized in a way in which to a certain extent young people has no opportunity to develop their own capacities and to be able to have an active engagement and contribution to the society as a whole. So one of the key reforms that needs to be done, that needs to be implemented at all levels is to free the young people, to let young people strive, to let the potential of young people be multiplied. And what we see today, if one thinks about how technology is evolving, this is a need even for the future economy. The future economy requires a level of youth in the capacity to understand the new technologies and to use the new technologies. That it’s absolutely essential to create the space, create the environment in which young people can assume leadership in their lives, in their activities. and more and more in the lives and activities of the community. This is, I think, the main objective of my generation, is to let the next generation be able to take the power that we are still misusing.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Wow. Is that a commitment?

Antonio Guterres: Yes, it is. But I mean, let’s be clear, power is never given. Power is taken. Which means young people need to have an exigent approach to their participation in countries, in organizations, in the life of our planet. So, I encourage young people not to be afraid to fight for their rights.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Power is never given, it’s taken. That’s quite a statement of inspiration for young people to continue the determination. There’s two words that you said that sparked a thought for me. Unleash and free. And in the spirit that this is a conversation among all of us, as I said, not only the four of us here on stage with the other two young colleagues, but this is a conversation among all of us, I would want us to try to unleash our creativity and our imagination and free our minds a bit. discussions, we’ve been discussing challenges here, we’ve been discussing strategies, gaps and so on. But we also want to have a moment to think, to reflect and to imagine a little bit. So the first thing I’ll ask everyone is to make sure that you’re sitting comfortably in your chairs, you know, just sit comfortably and think a little bit about the future, about the world we want to live in. Maybe take a deep breath, maybe another deep breath. And if you feel comfortable, close your eyes. If you don’t, just try to think and connect with yourself a little bit. And while we do that, I want you to think and imagine two different worlds. One world where nothing changes, no reforms are done to ensure youth meaningful participation, a world where everyone goes business as usual, and a world where the status quo right now, where young people do not have the power to influence or to participate. That’s the first world. Now, I want you to imagine a second world where we adopt transformative change, where young people are able to unleash. unleash their power, unleash their potential, where young people can be free to participate and able to influence the decision-making processes. So maybe just take another deep breath and think about these two different worlds. Just for a second, imagine how they look like. And then now we have created two different worlds. And my question to you, Josefa, if I can start with you. Which world would you want to live in? Which one would you want your future? The future generation to live in, and what stood out for you about that world?

Josefa Tauli: So of course, it’s the one where transformation really happens. And I’ll share two aspects that are really personal to me. First is in this future, children and young people are not afraid of the future that’s facing them and don’t have to fight as hard as we’re fighting now. Even as we speak, there is a big climate march going on outside these halls who are calling to stop funding extractivism and the climate crisis. So one where children and young people are not afraid of the future. And the second aspect is thinking of my family at home in the Philippines, because my father is an environmental defender and he’s facing a difficult situation with criminalization. So in this world that I envision in the future, I really hope that environmental defenders are safe and fully protected.

Moderator: Thank you so much. And Amani, what about you and what action do we need to take for that world or maybe not take?

Amani Joel Mafigi: More than ever, young people are more than committed to create change in their communities. We want to bring our energy, our talents, and our skills. One action that could be taken to achieve a world where we are able to solve challenges that we face at this moment and for the future to come, we could create a Youth Empowerment Fund that supports initiatives that are solving challenges in climatic action, social justice, and innovation because this way we can indeed be able to project the future and see a light, to project the future and want to be there, not a world where we don’t want to be. And I was talking to someone yesterday who mentioned that at times when they look into the future, they feel like they do not want to be into that future. And it is us. It is one by one to take action. Like the Secretary General mentioned, the seat is not given, it is taken. So it is for every individual to take their actions in whichever way possible that they can to create that change and to have that world. Thank you.

Moderator: Thank you so much, Caleb. Now, I have the same question to the audience. So raise your hand if you want to be in World 1. There is one hand over there. There is another hand. Was that a third hand? No? Okay. And raise your hand if you want to be in World 2. That’s many hands, more than what I can count. Mr. Secretary General, which world would you want to be in?

Antonio Guterres: It’s not a matter of wanting to be, it’s a matter of building it. We need to build Number 2. What is Number 1? Number 1 means the temperature will rise to 2.5 to 3 degrees. It means that we will have devastating impacts caused by high-level sea rise, by storms, drought, by all kinds of natural phenomena. There will be no more glaciers. There will be no more corals. Biodiversity will be largely eliminated. Is this the world where we want to live? Of course, a few people will live well in this world. There will be a group of privileged people, because inequalities will grow, that will live in a kind of air-conditioning igloo and go on enjoying the good things of life. But the overwhelming majority of the population of the world will be in big trouble. And then it will be the world in which the enormous potential of the technologies that we are developing, especially artificial intelligence, will be in the hands of a small group of great companies, and the capacity… of transforming this world in a world in which human agency will be less and less relevant, in which we will be controlled by a system that we don’t even understand, where we will not even be able to know what is true and what is false. This is the world that will be world number one. But world number two is possible. We can fight climate change now. We can reduce the emissions drastically in this decade, and we can guarantee that we stick to the 1.5 degrees, and that the peace with nature is reestablished in the world and biodiversity is preserved, and the experience of indigenous communities demonstrates that it is possible. And on the other hand, we can use artificial intelligence to make it a fantastic instrument of development in a way that is much more fair, with much less inequality in the world, because it’s something that, with adequate investment in literacy, with adequate investment in the youth, the youth will be able to use it everywhere. So, I mean, the world number two is a world that will respond to the dramatic challenges that the world number one is creating. Destruction of nature with climate change reversed by a world in which we all can live normally.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Indeed.

Antonio Guterres: Technology to divide, technology to unite. And then, one thing that is very important that was said, we see more and more young people today with a lot of anxiety about the future. We have a serious mental health problem developing in the world today because of this perception. that we are going in the wrong direction and that the world is becoming more and more difficult and more and more dangerous. That is why it is absolutely essential to go to model number two.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Model number two, world number two is possible and I really like how you challenged me on my question that it’s not the world we want to live in but which one we can build and that’s something that we will continue discussing today, especially in the sessions. Now, after this session, we’re going to have a half an hour break and then there are three sessions that are focused on inclusion, equity and trust which I think are essential to build world number two. Before we close, in the beginning, we saw the visual that was shown on the screen and maybe now we can take a look at it. That’s such an amazing visual, I must say, and it captures very well this honest and frank conversation. Thank you, everyone, for joining us. Thank you, Josefa. Thank you, Secretary General. Thank you, Amani. And I hope this is a conversation that will continue. Thank you so much, everyone.

D

Daphne Frias

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

863 words

Speech time

368 seconds

Tokenism is prevalent – youth voices heard but not acted upon

Explanation

Daphne Frias argues that tokenism is a significant issue in youth engagement with the UN. While young people’s stories are shared, they don’t actually inform action, and their voices fall on silent ears.

Evidence

The Mentimeter poll showed tokenism as the highest-ranking selection for youth participation.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

Agreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Disagreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Disagreed on

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Obstacles remain in meaningful youth engagement, including educational and language barriers

Explanation

Frias points out that there are significant barriers for young people trying to engage with or work for the UN. These include educational requirements and language obstacles that limit access and participation.

Evidence

She mentions criteria for UN employees and the difficulty for young people to get into UN forums.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

C

Caleb Brathwaite

Speech speed

157 words per minute

Speech length

543 words

Speech time

207 seconds

System needs updating to better impact young people

Explanation

Caleb Brathwaite argues that the UN system, built by previous generations, needs to be updated to better serve and impact young people today and in the future. He emphasizes the need for the system to adapt to the current needs of youth in 2024 and beyond.

Evidence

He references a speech by the Secretary General about the system being built by grandparents.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Disagreed with

Daphne Frias

Antonio Guterres

Disagreed on

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Explanation

Brathwaite proposes decentralizing UN youth offices around the world. He suggests establishing these offices in already existing multi-country offices to improve the UN’s role in youth engagement.

Evidence

He mentions the existing UN youth office and the need to expand it globally.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Antonio Guterres

Agreed on

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

A

António Guterres

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

2043 words

Speech time

968 seconds

UN is in transition from just listening to youth to including them in decision-making

Explanation

Antonio Guterres describes the evolution of youth engagement at the UN, from initially ignoring young people to now listening to them. He argues that the next phase should be youth participation in decision-making processes.

Evidence

He outlines the historical stages of youth engagement, from rejection to communication to listening, and now moving towards participation.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Disagreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Disagreed on

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Integrate youth into UN decision-making processes systematically

Explanation

Guterres proposes reforming UN bodies to systematically include youth in decision-making processes. He emphasizes the need for active intervention of young people at decisive moments in various UN bodies.

Evidence

He mentions looking into all UN bodies’ work, including the General Assembly and Economic and Social Council, to find ways for active youth intervention.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Agreed on

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Explanation

Guterres argues for increasing the number of young people working inside the UN organization. He sees this as essential to reverse the trend of an aging UN staff and to ensure that the organization’s output is more adapted to the needs and interests of young people.

Evidence

He mentions the current aging nature of UN staff and the need to have more young people working where decisions are prepared and ideas are born.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Agreed on

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

Unleash potential of young people to lead and contribute to society

Explanation

Guterres emphasizes the need to unleash the potential of young people at all levels. He argues that current systems often limit young people’s opportunities to develop their capacities and actively engage in society.

Evidence

He mentions the importance of youth potential for the future economy, especially in understanding and using new technologies.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Empower youth to take power and fight for their rights

Explanation

Guterres encourages young people to actively fight for their rights and take power, rather than waiting for it to be given. He emphasizes the need for an exigent approach from youth in their participation in various spheres of life.

Evidence

He states, “Power is never given. Power is taken.”

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Choice between a world of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and fairness

Explanation

Guterres presents two possible future worlds: one with devastating climate impacts and increased inequality, and another where climate change is mitigated and technology is used for fair development. He argues for the necessity of building the second, more sustainable and equitable world.

Evidence

He describes potential consequences of inaction, such as temperature rise, sea level rise, loss of biodiversity, and technological control by a small group of companies.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

Need to build a world with climate action and equitable use of technology

Explanation

Guterres emphasizes the possibility and necessity of building a world that addresses climate change and uses technology for fair development. He argues that this future is achievable with adequate investment in youth and literacy.

Evidence

He mentions the potential of artificial intelligence as a tool for development if used equitably.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

J

Josefa Tauli

Speech speed

147 words per minute

Speech length

421 words

Speech time

171 seconds

Shift power dynamics to be led by marginalized youth voices

Explanation

Josefa Tauli argues for a fundamental shift in power dynamics within institutions and decision-making processes. She emphasizes the need for marginalized youth, including indigenous youth and those with disabilities, to lead and guide these processes.

Evidence

She mentions the importance of listening to the voices and values of those who continue to care for each other and the land, even while fighting oppressive systems.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

A world where children are not afraid of the future

Explanation

Tauli envisions a future where children and young people are not afraid of what’s facing them and don’t have to fight as hard as current generations. This represents a world where the challenges of climate change and social injustice have been addressed.

Evidence

She mentions the ongoing climate march outside the UN halls calling to stop funding extractivism and the climate crisis.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

A future where environmental defenders are protected

Explanation

Tauli hopes for a future where environmental defenders are safe and fully protected. This reflects her personal connection to the issue and highlights the current dangers faced by those working to protect the environment.

Evidence

She mentions her father, an environmental defender facing criminalization in the Philippines.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

A

Amani Joel Mafigi

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

664 words

Speech time

292 seconds

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

Explanation

Amani Joel Mafigi argues for supporting youth-led initiatives that are working to solve global challenges. He emphasizes the commitment of young people to create change in their communities and their readiness to bring their energy, talents, and skills to address global issues.

Evidence

He shares his personal story of co-founding a youth-led organization called Unleashed Potentials in Motion, which empowers young people in leadership, potential discovery, business development, and social entrepreneurship.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Create a Youth Empowerment Fund for climate action, social justice, and innovation

Explanation

Mafigi proposes the creation of a Youth Empowerment Fund to support initiatives addressing climate action, social justice, and innovation. He sees this as a concrete action to achieve a world where young people can solve current and future challenges.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Agreements

Agreement Points

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Tokenism is prevalent – youth voices heard but not acted upon

System needs updating to better impact young people

UN is in transition from just listening to youth to including them in decision-making

Shift power dynamics to be led by marginalized youth voices

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

All speakers emphasized the importance of moving beyond tokenism to meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making processes.

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Integrate youth into UN decision-making processes systematically

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Both speakers argued for structural changes within the UN to better incorporate youth perspectives and participation.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the importance of empowering youth to take leadership roles and contribute to solving global challenges.

Antonio Guterres

Amani Joel Mafigi

Unleash potential of young people to lead and contribute to society

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

Both speakers envisioned a future where current global challenges, particularly climate change, are addressed to create a more sustainable and equitable world for future generations.

Josefa Tauli

Antonio Guterres

A world where children are not afraid of the future

Choice between a world of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and fairness

Unexpected Consensus

Acknowledgment of past failures and need for youth leadership

Antonio Guterres

Daphne Frias

Empower youth to take power and fight for their rights

It’s very rare where the generation before ours takes responsibility for the harms that have been caused

The UN Secretary-General’s frank admission of his generation’s failures and encouragement for youth to take power was unexpectedly aligned with the youth representative’s call for accountability from older generations.

Overall Assessment

Summary

There was broad agreement on the need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making, structural changes within the UN to facilitate this, and the importance of empowering youth to address global challenges. Speakers also shared a vision for a more sustainable and equitable future.

Consensus level

High level of consensus among all speakers on the core issues of youth participation and empowerment. This strong agreement implies a shared recognition of the urgency for change in how the UN engages with youth, which could potentially lead to more concrete actions and reforms in the near future.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Tokenism is prevalent – youth voices heard but not acted upon

System needs updating to better impact young people

UN is in transition from just listening to youth to including them in decision-making

While all speakers agree that youth participation needs improvement, they differ in their assessment of the current state. Frias emphasizes tokenism, Brathwaite focuses on systemic outdatedness, and Guterres presents a more optimistic view of transition towards inclusion.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the current state of youth participation in the UN and the specific approaches to improve it. While there is a general consensus on the need for change, speakers differ in their assessment of the current situation and the most effective strategies for improvement.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is moderate. While there are differing perspectives on the current state and specific strategies, there is a strong underlying agreement on the need for increased and meaningful youth participation. This level of disagreement is constructive as it provides diverse viewpoints and approaches to addressing the issue, which can lead to more comprehensive and effective solutions.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both Brathwaite and Guterres agree on the need for structural changes to increase youth participation, but they propose different approaches. Brathwaite suggests decentralizing UN youth offices, while Guterres focuses on integrating youth into existing decision-making processes and increasing youth employment within the UN.

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Integrate youth into UN decision-making processes systematically

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the importance of empowering youth to take leadership roles and contribute to solving global challenges.

Antonio Guterres

Amani Joel Mafigi

Unleash potential of young people to lead and contribute to society

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

Both speakers envisioned a future where current global challenges, particularly climate change, are addressed to create a more sustainable and equitable world for future generations.

Josefa Tauli

Antonio Guterres

A world where children are not afraid of the future

Choice between a world of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and fairness

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Youth participation in UN processes is currently at the level of tokenism and consultation, not true decision-making power

Meaningful youth engagement requires systemic reforms to UN structures and processes

Young people are innovating solutions to global challenges but need more support and resources

A transformative shift in power dynamics is needed to center marginalized youth voices

Two potential futures were envisioned – one of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and equity

Resolutions and Action Items

Integrate youth systematically into UN decision-making processes

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Create a Youth Empowerment Fund for youth-led initiatives

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for integrating youth into UN decision-making bodies

How to overcome budgetary constraints to hire more young UN staff

Ways to protect environmental defenders and activists

How to address youth mental health and anxiety about the future

Suggested Compromises

Implement reverse mentorship programs where adults learn from youth

Balance between consultation and direct youth participation in decision-making

Thought Provoking Comments

We the peoples of the United Nations have determined, and today the people also are coming together to determine.

Speaker

Hajer Sharief (Moderator)

Reason

This comment set the tone for the entire discussion by emphasizing the importance of collective action and participation from all people, not just governments or representatives.

Impact

It framed the subsequent conversation around the need for greater youth engagement and participation in UN processes.

The system needs to be updated, and the system needs to be able to better care for us now in 2024 as young people and beyond.

Speaker

Caleb Brathwaite

Reason

This comment directly challenged the current UN system and called for significant reforms to better serve young people.

Impact

It sparked a discussion about concrete steps and reforms needed to ensure meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making processes.

Young people in countries of Latin America and the global south have always been fighting, but we are, some of us, giving up our lives in order to do this and this should not be the case.

Speaker

Daphne Frias

Reason

This powerful statement highlighted the extreme risks faced by young activists in certain parts of the world, bringing attention to global inequalities in youth engagement.

Impact

It deepened the conversation by introducing the critical issue of safety for young activists and the need for global protection of youth voices.

We have to recognize that my generation messed up in relation to the world today.

Speaker

Antonio Guterres

Reason

This candid admission from the UN Secretary-General was strikingly honest and set a tone of accountability for past failures.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards a more frank discussion of intergenerational responsibility and the need for systemic change led by younger generations.

Unless our institutions and processes are being led by them, then we would be failing at what we need to do, really.

Speaker

Josefa Tauli

Reason

This comment emphasized the need for not just inclusion, but leadership from marginalized youth groups in decision-making processes.

Impact

It pushed the discussion towards considering more radical changes in power structures within global institutions.

Power is never given. Power is taken. Which means young people need to have an exigent approach to their participation in countries, in organizations, in the life of our planet.

Speaker

Antonio Guterres

Reason

This provocative statement challenged young people to actively claim their place in decision-making processes rather than waiting for it to be granted.

Impact

It energized the discussion and shifted the focus towards actionable steps young people can take to increase their influence and participation.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by progressively deepening the analysis of youth participation in global decision-making. The conversation evolved from identifying problems to proposing solutions, and ultimately to challenging young people to take an active role in claiming their power. The frank admissions from the Secretary-General added gravity to the discussion and opened space for more radical proposals for change. Overall, the comments pushed the dialogue beyond surface-level considerations of youth inclusion towards a more nuanced examination of power structures, global inequalities, and the need for fundamental systemic changes.

Follow-up Questions

How can the UN youth office be decentralized to better engage young people globally?

Speaker

Caleb Brathwaite

Explanation

Caleb suggested establishing UN youth offices around the world in multi-country offices to better implement youth engagement initiatives

How can barriers to youth employment and engagement within the UN system be reduced?

Speaker

Daphne Frias

Explanation

Daphne highlighted obstacles like educational and language requirements that prevent many young people from working at the UN

How can the Universal Declaration of Human Rights be expanded to better protect young people’s voices?

Speaker

Daphne Frias

Explanation

Daphne suggested this as a way to address issues of tokenism and improve meaningful youth participation

What concrete reforms are needed to ensure youth participation in UN decision-making processes?

Speaker

Moderator

Explanation

The moderator asked this of the Secretary-General to understand specific steps for improvement

How can the UN reverse the trend of an aging staff and incorporate more young people?

Speaker

Antonio Guterres

Explanation

The Secretary-General identified this as a key area to address to improve youth representation within the organization

What strategies can ensure meaningful participation of marginalized youth groups in decision-making?

Speaker

Josefa Tauli

Explanation

Josefa emphasized the need to include indigenous youth, youth with disabilities, and young refugees in processes

How can resources and power be shifted to amplify youth voices and leadership?

Speaker

Josefa Tauli

Explanation

Josefa suggested this was necessary for true transformation of systems and institutions

What innovative approaches are youth using to tackle global challenges?

Speaker

Moderator

Explanation

The moderator asked this to highlight youth-led solutions and initiatives

How can a Youth Empowerment Fund be created to support youth initiatives in climate action, social justice, and innovation?

Speaker

Amani Joel Mafigi

Explanation

Amani proposed this as a concrete action to empower youth to solve global challenges

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Worker unrest at Samsung plant in India sparks new union efforts

A labour strike at a Samsung plant in southern India has disrupted production for five days, drawing attention to a politically-backed union seeking to strengthen its foothold in the country’s growing electronics sector. The protests, sparked by low wages, come as India aims to boost its electronics manufacturing under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘Make in India’ initiative, which hopes to triple production to $500 billion within six years.

The striking workers, backed by the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU), are demanding wage increases, citing long-standing issues with low pay and lack of collective bargaining opportunities. This unrest highlights growing concerns about labour conditions in India’s manufacturing sector, which has attracted global giants like Samsung, Foxconn, and Micron with business-friendly policies and cheap labour. CITU, a union historically active in the auto sector, now aims to expand its influence in the electronics industry.

Samsung workers are demanding a raise from their current average wage of 25,000 rupees (€260/$300) to 36,000 rupees (€386/$430) over three years. Despite ongoing protests, Samsung has begun discussions with workers to resolve the situation, while experts warn that strikes could be reduced if multinational companies better adhered to labour laws and ensured fair wages.

Telegram’s Pavel Durov faces criminal probe in France under LOPMI law

France has taken a bold legal step with its new law, targeting tech executives whose platforms enable illegal activities. The pioneering legislation, enacted in January 2023, puts France at the forefront of efforts to curb cybercrime. The law allows for criminal charges against tech leaders, like Telegram CEO Pavel Durov, for complicity in crimes committed through their platforms. Durov is under formal investigation in France, facing potential charges that could carry a 10-year prison sentence and a €500,000 fine. He denies Telegram’s role in facilitating illegal transactions, stating the platform complies with the EU regulations.

The so-called LOPMI (Loi d’Orientation et de Programmation du Ministère de l’Intérieur) 2023-22 law, unique in its scope, is yet to be tested in court, making France the first country to target tech executives in this way directly. Legal experts point out that no similar laws exist in the US or elsewhere in the Western world.

While the US has prosecuted individuals like Ross Ulbricht, founder of the Silk Road marketplace, those cases required proof of active involvement in criminal activity. However, French law seeks to hold platform operators accountable for illegal actions facilitated through their sites, even if they were not directly involved.

Prosecutors in Paris, led by Laure Beccuau, have praised the law as a powerful tool in their fight against organised cybercrime, including child exploitation, credit card trafficking, and denial-of-service attacks. The recent high-profile arrest of Durov and the shutdown of other criminal platforms like Coco highlight France’s aggressive stance in combating online crime. The J3 cybercrime unit overseeing Durov’s case has been involved in other relevant investigations, including the notorious case of Dominique Pelicot, who used the anonymous chat forum Coco to orchestrate heinous crimes.

While the law gives French authorities unprecedented power, legal and academic experts caution that its untested nature could lead to challenges in court. Nonetheless, France’s new cybercrime law seriously escalates the global battle against online criminal activity.

DPA urges action to combat digital poverty

The Digital Poverty Alliance (DPA) highlights the urgent need for comprehensive action to address digital poverty in the UK, stressing that millions of individuals and families lack access to essential digital resources. According to recent data, up to 19 million adults and 1 in 5 children are affected, underscoring a significant gap in digital inclusion that needs immediate attention. The DPA’s CEO, Elizabeth Anderson, emphasises that as digital technology becomes more integral to everyday life, access to digital devices, broadband connectivity, and digital skills should be considered fundamental rights.

DPA’s recent initiatives, including Tech4Families and Tech4Youth, focus on bridging the digital divide by providing access to devices, internet connectivity, and essential digital skills training. These programs are crucial for supporting underserved communities and helping them overcome the barriers posed by digital poverty. By targeting families, young people, and young carers, the DPA aims to ensure that those most in need receive the support required to participate fully in the digital world.

DPA’s End Digital Poverty Day raises awareness and drives action against digital exclusion. In collaboration with Currys and Virgin Media O2, the DPA emphasises the urgency of eliminating digital poverty by 2030, underscoring digital access as a fundamental right and calling for broad support to bridge the digital divide.

EU scrutinises Google over AI model data use

Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), the leading privacy watchdog for many US tech firms in the EU, is investigating Google’s handling of user data. The inquiry will examine whether Google sufficiently protected the personal information of the EU citizens before using it to develop its advanced AI model, Pathways Language Model 2 (PaLM 2). The investigation is part of a broader effort by the DPC, working alongside other EU regulators to ensure compliance with data protection laws, especially in developing AI technologies.

Why does this matter?

The investigation is the fruit of growing concerns in the EU over how tech giants handle personal data, particularly in the context of AI, which relies heavily on large datasets. The DPC’s inquiry into Google’s data practices follows a recent agreement by social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter) not to use personal data from the EU users for AI training without first offering them the option to withdraw consent.

Russia to invest $660 million in modernising internet censorship

Russia is ramping up its efforts to control the internet by allocating nearly 60 billion roubles ($660 million) over the next five years to upgrade its web censorship system, known as TSPU. The system, developed by state regulator Roskomnadzor, is designed to filter and block content deemed harmful or illegal by the government. The funding, part of a broader ‘Cybersecurity Infrastructure’ project, will acquire new software and hardware and expand the system’s capabilities.

The initiative is seen as part of Moscow’s broader crackdown on online freedoms, which has intensified since Russia‘s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The government has been targeting independent media and social media platforms, blocking websites, and cracking down on using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), which many Russians use to bypass government restrictions. Roskomnadzor has been increasingly influential in blocking access to these tools, with officials planning to enhance the system’s efficiency further.

The TSPU system was introduced under a 2019 law that requires internet service providers to install government-controlled equipment to monitor and manage web traffic. As of late 2022, over 6,000 TSPU devices had been deployed across Russian networks. The new funding will modernise this infrastructure and improve the system’s ability to detect and block VPN services, making it harder for Russians to access uncensored content.

Why does this matter?

While the Kremlin continues to position these measures as necessary for national security, critics see them as a blatant attack on free speech. Digital rights activists, including those from Roskomsvoboda, warn that while new investments in censorship technology will tighten government control, it is unlikely to eliminate access to independent information. Developers of VPNs and other circumvention tools remain determined, stating that innovation and motivation are essential in the ongoing struggle between censorship and free access.

Russia’s battle with VPNs and independent media is part of a broader campaign against what it calls Western information warfare. Despite the government’s efforts to clamp down, demand for alternative ways to access the internet remains high. Developers are working on more resilient tools, even as the state pours resources into strengthening its censorship apparatus. This tug-of-war between government control and free access to information seems set to continue, with both sides ramping up their efforts.

US DoJ takes Google to court over monopoly

Google is facing another antitrust battle in a Virginia court, where the US Justice Department has accused the tech giant of monopolising the online advertising industry. Prosecutors argue that Google controls the infrastructure that handles hundreds of thousands of ad sales each second, using its size and dominance to push out competitors and restrict customer choice.

The trial, which US District Judge Leonie Brinkema is hearing, focuses on claims that Google acquired rivals and manipulated market transactions to gain control over both advertisers and publishers. The government’s case highlights how Google allegedly stifled competition and locked customers into its products, tactics reminiscent of traditional monopolies.

Google’s defence, led by attorney Karen Dunn, refuted the accusations by arguing that the case is based on outdated market conditions. She noted that Google now faces significant competition from other major tech companies like Amazon and Comcast and that its tools have evolved to work alongside its rivals.

As the trial progresses, prosecutors push for Google to be forced to sell off essential parts of its ad business, including Google Ad Manager. The case is part of a broader effort by US authorities to curb the dominance of Big Tech, with other lawsuits targeting companies such as Apple, Meta, and Amazon.