IGF 2024 panellists highlight infrastructure, literacy, and fair digital access

The Internet Governance Forum 2024 (IGF) brought together global stakeholders to discuss the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC), aiming to address digital inequalities and foster cross-sector partnerships. The session spotlighted key challenges such as funding gaps, cultural adaptation of digital initiatives, and sustainability concerns in infrastructure development.

Isabel De Sola from the Office of the Tech Envoy emphasised stakeholder collaboration and revealed plans for an upcoming GDC implementation roadmap. Roy Eriksson, Finland‘s Ambassador for Global Gateway, shared successes from AI strategy projects in African nations, illustrating how capacity-building partnerships can close technology gaps. Kevin Hernandez of the Universal Postal Union presented the Connect.Post programme, which aims to connect global post offices to digital networks by 2030.

Discussions also underscored energy efficiency and sustainability in digital infrastructure. Nandipha Ntshalbu highlighted the need to balance technological growth with environmental considerations. Data governance and cybersecurity frameworks were identified as critical, with Shamsher Mavin Chowdhury stressing the importance of inclusive frameworks to protect the interests of developing countries.

Innovative projects demonstrated local impact, such as Damilare Oydele’s Library Tracker for African libraries and Patricia Ainembabazi’s efforts promoting regional knowledge-sharing platforms. However, Alisa Heaver of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs raised concerns about aligning GDC objectives with existing frameworks to avoid redundancy.

The IGF session concluded with a unified call for continued collaboration. Despite challenges, there was optimism that effective partnerships and targeted initiatives can ensure secure, inclusive, and sustainable digital progress worldwide.

Open Forum #77 ROAMX Indicators: Advancing Inclusive Digital Transformation

Open Forum #77 ROAMX Indicators: Advancing Inclusive Digital Transformation

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on UNESCO’s revised Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs) and their role in advancing inclusive digital transformation. The speakers highlighted the importance of these indicators in guiding national digital assessments and informing policy decisions across 40 countries worldwide. The revised IUIs aim to address emerging challenges such as environmental impact, gender equality, and artificial intelligence while making the assessment process more user-friendly.

Key themes emerged around the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, ownership, and trust-building in implementing the IUIs effectively. Speakers emphasized the need for awareness-raising, capacity building, and stakeholder engagement throughout the assessment process. Challenges in implementation were discussed, including political will, fragmented internet governance frameworks, and limited resources in some countries.

The discussion highlighted the particular relevance of IUIs for small island developing states (SIDS), addressing their unique challenges and cultural contexts. Speakers from Pacific island nations stressed the importance of community engagement, cultural relevance, and building local technical expertise. The potential of IUIs to strengthen digital development strategies in SIDS by facilitating regional cooperation and knowledge sharing was emphasized.

Overall, the discussion underscored the value of the IUIs as a tool for fostering inclusive digital transformation, with a focus on human rights, openness, and accessibility. The speakers agreed on the need for continued collaboration, innovative approaches to implementation, and regular monitoring of progress to maximize the impact of the IUIs across diverse global contexts.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The revised UNESCO Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs) and their role in advancing inclusive digital transformation

– Challenges and lessons learned from implementing IUIs in different countries and regions

– The importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration and local ownership in implementing IUIs

– Particular challenges and considerations for small island developing states (SIDS)

– Using IUIs to inform policy and drive digital development strategies

Overall purpose:

The goal of this discussion was to introduce the revised UNESCO Internet Universality Indicators and explore how they can be effectively implemented to advance inclusive digital transformation across diverse contexts, with a focus on multi-stakeholder approaches and addressing emerging challenges.

Tone:

The overall tone was informative and collaborative. Speakers shared experiences and insights in a constructive manner, emphasizing shared challenges and opportunities for cooperation. The tone remained consistent throughout, with all participants contributing to a forward-looking dialogue on improving digital ecosystems globally.

Speakers

– Moderator: Moderator of the discussion

– Tatevik Grigoryan: Coordinator of the IUI work at UNESCO

– Fabio Senne: ICT survey project coordinator and senior specialist at CETIC NIC.br

– Najib Mokni: Implemented IUI assessments in Tunisia and several African countries

– Tenanoia Simona: CEO at Tuvalu Telecommunications Corporation

– Seluvaia Kauvaka: Consultant on ICT, cyber security and IT management, co-led IUI assessment in Tonga

– Alexandre Barbosa: Head of the Regional Center for Studies on the Development of Information Society (CETIC.br)

Full session report

UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators: Advancing Inclusive Digital Transformation

This discussion focused on UNESCO’s revised Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs) and their role in advancing inclusive digital transformation globally. The speakers, representing diverse backgrounds and regions, explored the implementation, challenges, and potential of IUIs across various contexts, with particular emphasis on developing countries and Small Island Developing States (SIDS).

Revision and Purpose of IUIs

UNESCO recently revised the IUI framework, reducing the number of questions and adding new themes such as environmental impact, gender equality, and artificial intelligence. The UNESCO Assistant Director-General (ADG) emphasised that IUIs are not intended for ranking or comparing countries, but rather to provide guidance for national digital assessments. The ultimate goal is to identify gaps through digital assessment and develop actions to remedy shortcomings within a multi-stakeholder framework.

Tatevik Grigoryan, Coordinator of IUI work at UNESCO, highlighted that the IUI framework helps countries identify gaps and inform policy decisions. This sentiment was echoed by Seluvaia Kauvaka, a consultant from Tonga, who described IUIs as a toolkit for measuring digital economy progress. The overarching aim, as noted by the Moderator, is to reduce inequalities and bridge the digital divide.

Implementation Experiences and Challenges

Speakers identified several challenges in implementing IUIs across different regions:

1. Political Will: Najib Mokni emphasised the need for political will and high-level commitment, noting that without this, advancement in implementation is difficult in many countries.

2. Trust: Mokni also highlighted that a lack of trust between stakeholders can hinder engagement in the IUI process.

3. Language Barriers: Seluvaia Kauvaka pointed out the challenge of communicating technical concepts locally, particularly in translating international terminology into local languages.

4. Resource Constraints: Tenanoia Simona noted the limited resources and capacity in small island nations, which can impede comprehensive implementation of IUIs.

5. Fragmentation: Mokni mentioned the fragmentation of internet governance frameworks as a challenge in some countries.

6. Shrinking Civic Spaces: The reduction of civic spaces in certain regions was identified as an obstacle to inclusive implementation.

Multi-stakeholder Collaboration and Local Ownership

A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the critical importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration and local ownership in implementing IUIs effectively. Najib Mokni stressed that the IUI process fosters multi-stakeholder collaboration and requires shared ownership among all stakeholders. Fabio Senne emphasised the engagement of diverse stakeholders throughout the assessment process and highlighted the importance of creating a network of implementing countries for collaboration.

Relevance for Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

The discussion highlighted the particular relevance of IUIs for SIDS, addressing their unique challenges and cultural contexts. Tenanoia Simona emphasised that IUIs help address the specific challenges faced by SIDS and can enhance environmental preparedness for climate-vulnerable nations. She also mentioned Tuvalu’s recent achievement of landing its first submarine cable and the country’s ambition to become the first digital nation, as noted by the moderator.

Seluvaia Kauvaka added that the IUI framework enables sharing of best practices across the SIDS region, facilitating knowledge transfer and collaboration. Additionally, the indicators help identify areas needing investment in SIDS, supporting targeted development efforts.

Regional Perspectives and Future Directions

Fabio Senne highlighted the importance of addressing specific regional challenges, particularly in the Global South, including persistent digital divides across rural areas and genders, as well as gaps in media and information literacy. Najib Mokni emphasized the potential of ICT and artificial intelligence for structural transformation in Africa and other developing countries.

The discussion identified several areas for future focus:

1. Monitoring and Evaluation: Developing performance indicators to monitor the implementation of IUI recommendations.

2. Regular Reviews: Implementing regular updates of IUI assessments to reflect ongoing changes in the digital landscape.

3. Environmental Impacts: Exploring how digital transformation initiatives can address climate change challenges, particularly in vulnerable SIDS.

4. Advanced Technologies: Effectively implementing new indicators on environmental impacts and advanced digital technologies.

5. Capacity Building: Addressing resource constraints and building local capacity for IUI implementation.

Conclusion

The discussion underscored the value of UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators as a tool for fostering inclusive digital transformation, with a focus on human rights, openness, and accessibility. The moderator’s closing remarks emphasized the main indicators moving forward: empowering people, safeguarding rights, and fostering collaboration. While challenges remain, particularly in implementation and addressing diverse regional needs, there was broad consensus on the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, local ownership, and ongoing adaptation of the IUI framework to meet evolving digital challenges.

The session concluded with an acknowledgment of Alexandre Barbosa’s presence and special thanks to CETIC, NIC.br, and CETIC.br for their instrumental role in the IUI process, highlighting the collaborative nature of this global initiative.

Session Transcript

Moderator: Good afternoon to all of you, and thank you for coming to this session which we are organizing on the revised ROM-X indicators, the Internet Universality Indicators, and their contribution to advancing inclusive digital transformation. As Tatevic mentioned, we had on Sunday afternoon a panel which launched officially the new indicators. This is for us very important, and I want first, before I proceed, to show you how the report looks like, and if you don’t have your own copy, we brought with us a number of copies, so you can take your copy, but if you are traveling, this will add weight to your luggage, therefore you can connect to the UNESCO website and you can find the same report in English, but it will be soon available in many languages. So before I proceed, I want to thank some major contributors to this work, starting of course with the Brazilian Network Information Center, NIC.br, but also the Regional Center for Studies on the Development of the Information Society, CETIC.br, and we’ll hear from a member of CETIC, Fabio Seni, who is here seated to my left. I tried to increase a bit his stress level before the session by saying, you are going to be a main speaker. He said, no, don’t call me a main speaker. One of the speakers in the session, and he has first-hand knowledge, he has contributed to this work. I believe this revised version is very important, because it does include to the earlier version, which we put into action back in 2019, it does include the new issues that were not incorporated then, such as environmental impact, gender equality. but also emerging technologies like artificial intelligence. So these are important developments that have happened since the initial version was put together. And I’m glad that we believe this is more relevant. Hopefully the set of indicators, which are both quantitative and qualitative, are more useful, more value-adding to each member state. And let me here clarify something that I was asked about. These indicators lead to national digital assessments by countries around the world. And the initial set of indicators were used by 40 countries around the world. So that’s our base, and hopefully now we’ll have more countries involved. But this is not about coming up with a comparative study, and it is not about ranking countries along these criteria and these indicators. UNESCO is not in the business of rankings, nor of making comparisons about countries. UNESCO has been around for 80 years, that’s eight zero. We provide guidances, this is a guidance, hopefully to inform policy makers and decision makers at government level, but also in a multi-stakeholder approach to define the gaps they see through this digital assessment and then to come up with the actions which will remedy to these gaps or will overcome the shortcomings. This is the purpose of these guidelines, and I think as we proceed, you should take them or consider them in this context. I mentioned 40 implementations worldwide, and let me give you some specificities here. We had 17 countries from Africa who have implemented the UNESCO Internet Universality Indicators. It’s the leading contingent, Africa. 12 countries in Asia Pacific, five countries in Latin America, and the Caribbean. Arabian, three countries in Europe, and three countries in Arab states. So it’s definitely the five corners of the world, but we hope, of course, to have more member states embracing this. We had seven small island-developing states, which we call SIDs, seven SIDs, who have also completed their assessment. And I must say that the feedback we received and the lessons learned from these 40 implementations of the indicators and their related national digital assessments, the learnings have informed us in revising the indicators to know what worked best, what maybe needed to be revised, revisited. And I know the new set of indicators contain fewer, much fewer questions, to make it easier, simpler, more comprehensive for the parties to carry out these assessments. So again, it’s a guidance for national digital assessment, as I said, towards a digital strategy. And I want to mention here a region like the South Pacific, where these indicators have informed key priorities and supported the achievement or advancing on the achievement towards the sustainable development goals. These are among our objectives, how to reduce inequalities, how to bridge the digital divide, and how to foster economic development in each one of the countries where these were used. Now, when I mentioned digital divide, I mean, the statistic that I’m sure many of you, if not all of you, are aware of, we have 93% of high-income populations connected online, and we have only 27% in low-income countries connected online. So I see the gap between 93% in developed economies. and only 27% in developing economies. That’s the type of digital gap that we talk about. And, of course, how we can go forward, not only UNESCO brings a modest brick to the construction of a more equitable digital future, but we need to work together, so we call for more partnerships, more collaboration across different stakeholders, governments, civil society, academic research institutions, the technical community. This is very, very important if you want to achieve trust, inclusion, but also prosperity, since we all know that digital technologies are not only an important lever, but sometimes a unique lever for value creation and value adding. Thank you for being here. And now that I warmed up the audience, I think it’s time for the speakers to take it forward.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Thank you very much, IDG, for your welcoming remarks and also highlighting some of the key and important issues that we’re facing and the statistics or facts that IUIs have and are trying to address. I know, IDG, that you will need to leave soon to your next meeting. Thank you so much for joining us. Welcome, people. We’ll carry on with the discussion, and I want to mention that we have key people here. Okay, Fabio, you look alone. I’ll move towards you so that you’re not lonely. Also with the gender balance. Yes, I think we have good gender balance. So we have key people here. We have Fabio Sene, who works for the CETIC NIC.br. Fabio is an ICT survey project coordinator, and he’s a senior specialist who has helped us throughout the IUI, not only for the revision, as IDG was mentioning, but CETIC was the one to pilot the first IUI assessment in Brazil, and they have been instrumental in supporting and giving technical guidance to countries who are implementing the IUIs. We have my colleague, Nejib Mokni, who is bringing the experience of the Arab states where he implemented the IUIs and also Africa, where he still did the IUIs, so I’ll allow him to elaborate. And I think the first time in the past few years we have two representatives from the South Pacific, and I’m very proud and happy that we’ve completed the assessments in five South Pacific countries, and we had the first ever regional, sub-regional report on the internet development for the South Pacific, which highlighted, which did not do any ranking, as IDG said, or comparison, but it looked at common trends and learning experiences and showcased the sub-regional priorities, which can help the governments and other stakeholder groups to better advance their digital strategies, digital policies, and actions, but also to help guide other international organizations and key donors to prioritize their support when it comes to the region. So this is the panel of the speaker, and before we go to the speakers, I just wanted to give a few very quick facts as a moderator. I would not normally do it, but just to say why UNESCO is doing what it’s doing on ROMEX indicators. The simple answer is because UNESCO has the mandate to ensure the free flow of ideas. And Romex focuses, while it has indicators on technical aspects, infrastructures, infrastructure, it mainly focuses on the contents on human rights online, open educational resources online, openness, accessibility, and multi-stakeholder participation while also addressing cross-cutting issues such as gender equality online, safety and security, and a few of recent themes were advanced technologies such as AI and the environmental impact of the internet. So, okay, it’s not working, but these are the core principles. This is UNESCO’s position on the internet. As I mentioned, the core principles that the internet should be based on, and these are the principles that were endorsed by UNESCO’s General Conference. And while revising the indicators, as ADG said, we had the aim to gather the lessons learned and try and make revisions to ensure that it’s easier to implement. The indicators are easier to implement, faster to conduct the assessment, and also take into consideration the ongoing processes around the digital transformation. And here it’s highlighted. Here are how the assessments look like. These are so far the published assessments, but of course we have many more which you could… Here, ADG mentioned the countries. You can see the division, distribution. I will not talk about all of this for the sake of time, but I hope Fabio will mention a few of these things. But as ADG said, if you’re interested, you’re more than welcome to contact me. I’m coordinating the IUI work at UNESCO. And of course, you’re more than welcome to join our dynamic coalition and visit our website for further information and to read some of the reports. Now I would like to give the floor to Fabio. Fabio Setik, as I said, has been keen supporting us throughout this pathway of implementing the IUIs and also revising the IUIs. I would like to invite you to speak about how do the revised indicators tackle the challenges, the emerging challenges, and address the gaps that were identified during the revision process since you conducted all these interviews and surveys and consultations with countries that implemented, but also with the wider public.

Fabio Senne: Thank you very much, Tatavik. Thank you all for participating. It’s a pleasure to be here. For us at Setik, it was, we participate in the… the process of IY since the very beginning. So we were one of the first countries that conducted the methodology and also pilot this back in 2018, 19. And then we were invited as a category to UNESCO Center to participate in this process of revision. Regarding your question, Tatavic, I think the process was designed by UNESCO and SETIC participated in the process as a highly collaborative and inclusive process. So we try to not only ensure that the multiple sectors participate in the consultations, but also from a regional perspective. So we try to consider regional perspectives in this. So several open consultations were conducted along with a survey, including all those. We try to speak with all these 40 countries that participated and tried to have feedbacks from the research teams on how they implemented the indicators. So I think this approach was critical in developing the new version. And the challenge here is to have indicators that are globally relevant and are still relevant in the new context, but also adaptable, flexible to a wide range of socioeconomic and cultural and political contexts that we have for different countries. So I would like to highlight at least two of this process. First, from a multi-stakeholder perspective, I think we try to engage different governments, civil society, and also the private sector in the process. As that we had a few open consultations on very strategic multi-stakeholder events, such as the NET Mundial that happened in Sao Paulo in April this year, and also the WSIS Forum that happened in Geneva. then counting on open consultations on the matter. Sorry, are you listening? And during this forum, we have, for instance, from the private sector, a lot of worry and concerns about emerging technology and also market trends that were considered in the case. Is it going? While civil society, for instance, highlighted lots of intentions of investigating more the digital inequalities and human rights processes online. So we have to combine all these interplays and viewpoints to the review IOI. So it was considered in the process. From a regional perspective, I think it was also interesting to understand that we had to address specific challenges that we have in each region. For instance, from the global south, and we have lots of comments regarding still how to face the digital divides, the rural divides, the gender divides, and all the gaps in media information literacy in those countries. So I think we came out with more indicators that uses more or less the framework of the meaningful connectivity or how to have a connectivity that really is useful to change people’s lives, especially in the global south. While in countries that the connectivity was higher, we had more discussion on trust, security, and human rights. And we also benefit from the UNESCO discussion on information integrity or the governance of digital platforms to be also incorporated in this process. And this feedback was fundamental. We have lots of lessons from the 40 countries that already implemented. the process, so we interviewed all these countries. And it’s interesting to say that the indicators were relevant in very different countries, being from G20 big economies, such as Germany, Argentina, and Brazil, but also to, as we said, in small islands and other countries, the indicators has proven to be very relevant. And in the end, I think we came out with a model that is more user-friendly also. So we received this feedback from the field that we needed to have indicators that are more easy to implement, and questions that are more straightforward to be comprehensive in the process. So I do think that these are the main, to say in a few words, the main issues. And then I can comment more on different aspects of it. Thank you.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Thank you so much, Fabio. I hope we will indeed have time to have your impactful comments on the different aspects. But now I would like to move to Nejib. Nejib, you implemented the IUI assessments in Tunisia in three countries, in Central Africa, in Cameroon, in Burundi, in the two Congos, actually. So it’s four countries in Africa. And I think we’ve had very successful collaboration there from different stakeholders. But I wanted to invite you to actually speak about while we had effective communication with different stakeholders, what were the main barriers? So what were the success? And what were the lessons learned in terms of the main barriers to effective collaboration between all these different stakeholders, government, civil society, and the private sector in Africa? And what are the barriers in this collaboration for Africa’s internet policy development? And from your experience, how can this be overcome through multi-stakeholder approach, bearing in mind that we put so much emphasis not only on the findings of the assessment, but also on the process, which is truly multi-stakeholder and cooperative throughout the assessment process, which then leads to multi-stakeholder cooperation in implementing. the recommendations. Please, Nejib.

Nejib Mokni: Thank you so much for the question. Let me first of all congratulate all of us for this second generation of IOIs. I was pleased to support the first generation since the consultations, so since the adoption process of the IOIs and then their implementations in at least three or four countries. It was difficult also to implement them in other countries. We tried a lot, so that’s why there is a lot of challenges, but there is a lot of lessons learned we can share also. So, I think that integrating the IOIs into, and IOIs is the Internet Universality Integrator, sorry, at UNESCO we like to use acronyms, into regional and national framework policy making processes can of course enhance effectiveness and inclusivity of Internet governance and so on. And here we are not discussing the relevance of those IOIs, but how we can use this framework to change the reality, to improve the policies and so on. So, I think there is a keyword here, the ownership by all the stakeholders. This is very important at the national and the regional levels. So, we have to work with all the stakeholders, they need to be aware about this framework and the importance of this framework. It’s not a ranking in countries and this is not very clear for many governments. So, we have to work with governments, of course, civil society, academia, regulators, media, private sector, regional organizations and NGOs and the ownership of these IOIs. is very important. The process should be led by those actors and they need to understand this framework and the objective and the purpose of the assessment and then they could contribute to its implementation. So, this needs a lot of actions. The first one is the awareness raising, capacity building and the public awareness campaigns. It’s very important and even before conducting the assessments, because there is a need to understand this framework and its implications. So, before even conducting assessment, it’s very important to organize information sessions, workshops, training workshops, etc. The second key element for this ownership is the stakeholders engagement. And the stakeholders engagement is the engagement of all the stakeholders during the whole process, not at the beginning or during. So, it’s not easy to maintain this dynamic and create this dynamic among stakeholders and maintain it during one year or two years to prepare the assessment, conduct the data collection and analysis and develop the recommendations and, of course, implementing the recommendations and I’ll talk about that later. So, this is very important and we need to agree on the role of each actor before, during and at the implementation phase of the recommendations as well. So, it’s important to do this mapping at the regional but especially at the national levels with all concerned stakeholders and under each domain and area, the right, the openness, access, etc. It’s very important because we don’t have specialists on all of those fields, so it’s very important that we work with all of them and together during the whole process. The third key element for this ownership and I mean for a successful implementation is, and this is the most important component, the assessments, the data collection, analysis and recommendations. This is very important and we need to think about an innovative approach to better involve stakeholders at this phase. And we have also to showcase, I mean, transformative impact after this assessment is developed. So of this assessment and it’s important also to monitor the implementation of the recommendation in a participatory and inclusive manner as well. This is very important and this leads to the other element, the monitoring and evaluation. This is very important. It should be based on the performance indicators for each component of the Rome X indicators to track progress and measure outcomes. And also we need regular reviews because we did some assessment under the previous generation and in the meantime there is improvements and developments. So it’s important that we do a kind of regular review or updates of the assessment to reflect change and development and improvement. And it’s very important for the national counterparts because it’s also a kind of recognition about their efforts that they are following this framework and they are advancing. And I think the regional cooperation is very important to exchange best practices when we see, for example, the success stories, etc. It’s very important for implementation of IUI. We have to think also about some fora, for example annual IUI forum or regional forums. Also IGF could be a platform to enhance this regional cooperation and this

Tatevik Grigoryan: annual follow-up. Thank you so much. Thank you very much Naajiba. Actually I have a follow-up question but very briefly you mentioned you drew up on your experience in five countries actually. I wanted to ask you when it comes to the challenges of multi-stakeholder cooperation do you see patterns of challenges that are relevant to any country or the challenges in each country are rather unique? What’s your take on this? Yeah there is some, I mean

Nejib Mokni: we can find both. So we have some shared challenges or challenges where we find everywhere. The first one is the political will of course because if we don’t have this high level commitment, the political commitment on that we cannot advance on the implementation and this is I mean the case of many most countries. I try to implement the IUI there and there is for example another common barrier or challenge is the effective collaboration between partners and also the lack of trust. So and the lack of trust between partners, I mean it’s leading to reluctance of engagement I mean of actors and we have also sometimes a problem of a weak communication between actors. We have in some countries we have many very limited resources and also sometimes the impact of civil society or the I mean there is the role of civil society sometimes it’s very limited and sometimes also we find the kind of a shrinking civic space so it’s also very difficult to identify all the concerned actors and to work with them. So and this limits the scope of the assessment and also the data collection and everything. Of course another challenge it’s also common is the fragmentation of the internet governance framework. So you have I mean pieces of and here and this is very difficult for the data collection. So the lack of comprehensive frameworks and processes for internet governance can also complicate the collaboration effort. So those are the main it’s I mean it depends on the context of the of the country but we found those challenges I mean with difference of course but we found them

Tatevik Grigoryan: in all countries. Thank you. Thank you very much Nejib and now we’ll go to another region to the South Pacific. actually where I had the pleasure and honor to visit to conclude the IUI assessments and see the strong willpower and cooperative approach to changing the country and driving the digital transformation forward. And Tenanoia Simonas, CEO at Tuvalu Telecommunications Corporation. Tuvalu, Noja, you’ve been instrumental in not only in driving the IUI assessment forward but in driving the digital transformation in Tuvalu forward. And by the way congratulations on this huge achievement of finally having the undersea cable shipped to Tuvalu. This is a huge achievement and I know you’ve had an instrumental input in this. I wanted to invite you to speak about the relevance, first of all relevance of IUIs for small countries like Tuvalu and islands like Tuvalu. But also I wanted to ask you to reflect on your experience of implementing the IUI assessments and talk a little bit about how governments from the perspective of telco, how could the governments better engage with all these diverse stakeholders, telecoms, private sector, civil society and all the other essential actors to collaboratively create a more inclusive digital ecosystem and drive this digital transformation. Thank you.

Tenanoia Simona: Thank you so much Tatevik. Thanks for those kind words. Tuvalu just landed its first submarine cable I think four days ago and it is a milestone in a historic moment for our country. And coming back to your question, I mean government in a small Pacific island countries, government is very important and we need to engage government with private sector and other stakeholders because it is critical for building more, like you said, more inclusive and sustainable digital economy ecosystem in the Pacific. And I would like to take you into how we see the IUI framework strategizing and guiding government in a few points I want to mention. Some of the points was echoed by our other speakers which is a very important point when it comes to share ownership because share ownership of digital development goals can really build that trust between stakeholders and get that working together. The other thing that I wanted to highlight here, a strategy that I feel because we are a small Pacific Island countries, we are communal base. Community is very strong in our countries and engaging local community and civil society is very, very important and government should collaborate with civil society organizations and to make sure and ensure that digital initiative really address local needs. By saying how to engage, you have to engage community leaders. Government can improve digital literacy from a very the grassroot level accessibility and take into account we value our cultures and traditions so it’s very important that we have that cultural relevance in this approach. The other point that I really want to mention is how to prioritize capacity building and skill development. We are very small in size and we depend so much on partnership and private sector bringing that training programs and knowledge sharing opportunities to build our local technical expertise because of our remoteness and we are very far from developed countries and building capacity is a challenge and I think on day zero I talked a little bit on the challenges. In the Pacific, we have very, very unique challenges and I mentioned a couple of them and I think we need to prioritize how we can build that capacity and skills development and the role of the government in that is very important. The other last point I want to mention, I want to I will leave others to my colleague, Selu. The other strategy that I feel that government should do is to drive innovation through local businesses. Government can really encourage entrepreneurship in SMEs, small and medium enterprises. I think the way to do that is to do startup friendly digital ecosystem because our small Pacific Island countries, as I said, it’s communal based and we are very friendly. So building that kind of a startup friendly digital ecosystem can really, the adoption will be very, very fast, I will say. And one of the, an example that I will say, we just developed a mobile money solution just recently and from experience and from experience from other countries they said that it will take a long time to adopt a mobile app in such context. But in the case of Tuvalu, because we, our approach is different and we like to do it in a more friendly way because that trust is very, it’s very much in our community. So we promote that kind of inclusion and economic participation in that context. Thank you.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Very much, Noia, you mentioned this mobile money solutions. I hope I’ll have time to come back to you to also inquire a little bit about this Tuvalu’s ambition and project on becoming the first digital nation country, which is related to unfortunate environmental impact, which impacts small islands a lot. And Tuvalu is one of them, which is at risk, but perhaps you could think about that to say a few points. Well, in the meantime, I would like to give the floor to Selu. Selu, I would like to actually build on what Noya said about the values. So it was very interesting for me to see that, for example, some small island nations, countries have values listed or defined in their constitution. But I just wanted overall to talk about the polarities of the SEADs, small island developing countries when it comes to the… Can you hear me? Yeah, I can. Sorry. Sorry, it’s weird. So I just wanted you to… We know that there are particularities about different digital challenges and also particularities of values, cultures for SEADs. I wanted to see your perspective on how do you think ROMEX indicators can help strengthen the digital development strategies for SEADs, taking into consideration the particularities and values, diverse challenges. Thank you.

Selu Kauvaka: Thank you, Tatevic. Maloilele, I’m kind of struggling here. It’s 2 a.m. in Tonga, so I’ll keep it short and sweet. Firstly, I’d like to thank you for the opportunity to share today. Just a little, because two of us is from the same region, so I’ll just share quite a few from the experience of implementing the IUI’s assessment in Tonga. I was part of the team on the ground in Tonga conducting this assessment, this national assessment for Tonga, and from a civil society organization, we conducted this IUI in Tonga. So a few… pointers from there. We identified it as a toolkit for measuring Tonga’s digital economy, playing a crucial role in strengthening and identifying where Tonga is digitally. Another indicator that we pinpointed was internet access at its weakest. This was a data-driven tool, so it was something that we highlighted and it was good to share. As mentioned by Noya, it’s community-based, so it was something good to share amongst Tonga to know and identify areas that we need to invest more in. The IOI was specifically awesome because it was data-driven and that was a bit difficult from a CSO conducting the IOIs. One thing that we learned was, though challenging for us to conduct this being a civil society, but government support was very crucial. Amongst all this, there is the multi-stakeholder advisory board and to make government share, that will push everything easier for us. From Small Islands Developing State and Tonga, the biggest thing that FROMEX can indicate is to share progress across the region, share best practices, advocate and monitor so that we could align. Most of us in this region are very familiar with risks. Earlier along the year, Tonga had volcanic eruptions. This morning, there’s a big tsunami earthquake in Vanuatu. So I think climate change and all that, these are risks that us in the small island developing states face every day. So cross-cutting and bringing Romex indicators into our region, we can easily just share best practices instead of Tonga doing their own and Tuvalu doing their own. Since we are kind of very familiar, very same, we can share and advocate more on this. Two more points. In my experience in implementing this IUI and having digital inclusion initiatives, as mentioned by the speakers earlier, is the multi-stakeholder approach inquires and tailors solutions to our region. So solutions are tailored specifically for us in the region. For example, us in Tonga, we found some success, big success in involving community. So when you go down to grass level and involving community directly, you can shape technology policies there. And you can also deliver and conduct more around digital literacy, online safety and connectivity. Just two challenges besides all this that I wanted to highlight during this program for us is, one, the digital divide and the challenge in aligning policies in our region with the fast-moving technology changes due to the gap around there. And one thing that was not mentioned was we found it quite difficult. conducting this assessment and indicators and interviews the language, trying to indicate to the local communities in the Tongan language from a context that is mostly tech language or mostly international language, we had a little challenge there around interpreting to community level in Tongan. Thank you.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Thank you very much, Selu. Selu, as she mentioned, she’s from the civil society. She’s a consultant on ICT, cyber security and IT management and she co-led the assessment in Tonga. Actually, I would have wanted to reflect on the implementation of the recommendations, but because of time, I think we’ve got only six minutes left and I wanted to give the floor to each of the speakers to say one minute, any remarks, final remarks you have. Please, let’s start with Fabio.

Fabio Senne: Thank you, Tatevic. No, just to say that I really like what my colleagues mentioned about, first about ownership and collaboration. I think these are two key words that I want to remind when using this. This is not for ranking or for just classifying countries, but how to create a conversation, a conversation that is based on sound principles. This is why it’s good to have UNESCO on board establishing main principles such as human rights, openness and accessibility among stakeholders. I think now the process and I would like to see the next steps in the countries that already implemented to see, for instance, these new indicators on environmental impacts, on digital adversity. advanced digital technologies can be very impactful for the new assessments. And finally, I think I really liked also this comment on how to create a network of implementing countries and collaboration between countries. I think this is not planned in the beginning of the process, but naturally it came out as a key tool, and I think we have international fora and other spaces to keep this as a key as a collaborative of different stakeholders and researchers that implemented the indicators. So thank you very much.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Thank you very much, Fabio and Nejib.

Nejib Mokni: Thank you so much. Maybe I will, it’s relevant for Africa countries, but also most of developed countries. I think ICT and artificial intelligence, they are among the most promising sectors, I mean, structure transformation in Africa and other developed countries in terms of employability and in terms of contribution of their funding and creating, and of course, the know-how of young, etc. So it’s very important to use the AUI framework, but it’s time to think about innovative approach and TOR for all those stakeholders to conduct this, to implement. And to discuss there and build the trust through the engagement of all those sectors before conducting the assessment, and after also the assessment is done to implement the framework, the recommendations, and we need a framework for the implementation with the performance indicators. It’s very important to monitor and so we can also re-evaluate and update those evaluations. It will be easier for us to monitor this. Thank you so much.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Thank you so much, Nejib. Noia, please.

Tenanoia Simona: Yeah, I will just have a few remarks. It’s just that, you know, Leveraging the revised frameworks emphasize on resilience, affordability, and inclusion, and small island nations like Tuvalu and other Pacific island countries can address this in digital divides and enhance environmental preparedness because we are very, very vulnerable to climate change. I think the multi-stakeholder approach should combine with international cooperation to ensure that the small island developing states navigate the path for digital development journey more sustainably and inclusive in a way. So I think I’m thankful to the UNESCO for bringing that over to our South Pacific islands. Thanks.

Tatevik Grigoryan: Thank you so much, Noya. These are all points that we could talk about for an extended period of time, but we have only one minute left. Thank you. I think just ending for me is the main indicator moving forward for all of us here is empowering people, safeguarding rights, and fostering collaboration. Malo. Thank you so much to all of you for the discussion and excellent points raised. I hope we can carry forward the conversation and continue the conversation, including through our dynamic coalition. Unfortunately, our time is up and I have to conclude by showing again our new indicator framework. And I must say that you discussed different challenges, new challenges and technologies, and in the revised indicators, enhanced indicators, we took this into consideration, like Fabio said, and it’s not coincident that it is now more inclusive of these challenges and it’s now internet universality, advancing inclusive digital transformation with Romex indicators. So thank you so much again and I should I would like to thank once again to all of you, but also special thanks to CETIC, nick.br and CETIC.br for being with UNESCO throughout all these years, through the inception of the original indicators and also through the implementation of the indicators and of course for the revision for the instrumental role. I would like to acknowledge the presence of Alexandre Barbosa here, who is the head of the regional studies on the development of information CETIC.br, UNESCO category two institute and Fabio, of course, for our years of work, which has been a delight. With this, I would like to thank the audience for coming and I’m truly sorry we didn’t have time for questions. You can catch us in the corridors now if you have any questions or any remarks to make, but thank you so very much for coming and being with us. Thank you so much.

M

Moderator

Speech speed

135 words per minute

Speech length

934 words

Speech time

414 seconds

IUIs provide guidance for national digital assessments, not for ranking countries

Explanation

The moderator emphasizes that UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs) are meant to guide countries in conducting national digital assessments. They are not intended to be used for ranking or comparing countries against each other.

Evidence

UNESCO has been around for 80 years, that’s eight zero. We provide guidances, this is a guidance, hopefully to inform policy makers and decision makers at government level, but also in a multi-stakeholder approach to define the gaps they see through this digital assessment and then to come up with the actions which will remedy to these gaps or will overcome the shortcomings.

Major Discussion Point

Purpose and Implementation of UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs)

Agreed with

Tatevik Grigoryan

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Agreed on

IUIs as a guidance tool for national digital assessments

IUIs aim to reduce inequalities and bridge the digital divide

Explanation

The moderator states that one of the main objectives of the IUIs is to address digital inequalities and bridge the digital divide between developed and developing economies. This is seen as a crucial step towards creating a more equitable digital future.

Evidence

We have 93% of high-income populations connected online, and we have only 27% in low-income countries connected online.

Major Discussion Point

Purpose and Implementation of UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs)

T

Tatevik Grigoryan

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

1860 words

Speech time

917 seconds

IUIs framework helps identify gaps and inform policy decisions

Explanation

Tatevik Grigoryan explains that the IUIs framework is designed to help countries identify gaps in their digital development and inform policy decisions. This allows governments and stakeholders to prioritize areas for improvement in their digital strategies.

Major Discussion Point

Purpose and Implementation of UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs)

Agreed with

Moderator

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Agreed on

IUIs as a guidance tool for national digital assessments

N

Najib Mokni

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

1217 words

Speech time

618 seconds

IUIs process fosters multi-stakeholder collaboration

Explanation

Najib Mokni emphasizes that the IUIs process promotes collaboration among various stakeholders. This multi-stakeholder approach is crucial for effective implementation of the framework and for addressing internet governance issues comprehensively.

Major Discussion Point

Purpose and Implementation of UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs)

Agreed with

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Tenanoia Simona

Fabio Senne

Agreed on

Importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration

Need for political will and high-level commitment

Explanation

Najib Mokni points out that political will and high-level commitment are essential for successful implementation of IUIs. Without strong support from government leadership, it becomes challenging to advance the implementation process.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in Implementing IUIs

Lack of trust between stakeholders can hinder engagement

Explanation

Najib Mokni highlights that a lack of trust between different stakeholders can be a significant barrier to effective collaboration. This mistrust can lead to reluctance in engagement and limit the scope of the assessment.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in Implementing IUIs

Need for shared ownership among all stakeholders

Explanation

Najib Mokni stresses the importance of shared ownership of the IUIs process among all stakeholders. This shared responsibility ensures that all parties are invested in the success of the assessment and implementation of recommendations.

Major Discussion Point

Importance of Multi-stakeholder Approach

S

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Speech speed

103 words per minute

Speech length

559 words

Speech time

324 seconds

IUIs serve as a toolkit for measuring digital economy progress

Explanation

Seluvaia Kauvaka describes the IUIs as a toolkit for measuring a country’s digital economy progress. This data-driven approach allows countries to identify strengths and weaknesses in their digital development.

Evidence

We identified it as a toolkit for measuring Tonga’s digital economy, playing a crucial role in strengthening and identifying where Tonga is digitally.

Major Discussion Point

Purpose and Implementation of UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs)

Agreed with

Moderator

Tatevik Grigoryan

Agreed on

IUIs as a guidance tool for national digital assessments

Language barriers in communicating technical concepts locally

Explanation

Seluvaia Kauvaka points out the challenge of translating technical concepts and international terminology into local languages. This can make it difficult to effectively communicate the assessment process and results to local communities.

Evidence

We found it quite difficult conducting this assessment and indicators and interviews the language, trying to indicate to the local communities in the Tongan language from a context that is mostly tech language or mostly international language.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in Implementing IUIs

Multi-stakeholder collaboration tailors solutions to regional needs

Explanation

Seluvaia Kauvaka emphasizes that multi-stakeholder collaboration allows for tailoring solutions to specific regional needs. This approach ensures that digital initiatives are relevant and effective for local contexts.

Evidence

For example, us in Tonga, we found some success, big success in involving community. So when you go down to grass level and involving community directly, you can shape technology policies there.

Major Discussion Point

Importance of Multi-stakeholder Approach

Agreed with

Najib Mokni

Tenanoia Simona

Fabio Senne

Agreed on

Importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration

IUIs help address unique challenges faced by SIDS

Explanation

Seluvaia Kauvaka highlights that the IUIs framework is particularly useful for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in addressing their unique digital challenges. The framework allows these countries to identify and focus on their specific areas of need.

Major Discussion Point

Relevance of IUIs for Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

Framework enables sharing of best practices across SIDS region

Explanation

Seluvaia Kauvaka points out that the IUIs framework facilitates the sharing of best practices among SIDS. This collaboration allows these countries to learn from each other’s experiences and avoid duplicating efforts.

Major Discussion Point

Relevance of IUIs for Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

Indicators help identify areas needing investment in SIDS

Explanation

Seluvaia Kauvaka notes that the IUIs help SIDS identify specific areas that require investment in their digital development. This targeted approach allows for more efficient use of limited resources.

Evidence

Another indicator that we pinpointed was internet access at its weakest. This was a data-driven tool, so it was something that we highlighted and it was good to share.

Major Discussion Point

Relevance of IUIs for Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

T

Tenanoia Simona

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

683 words

Speech time

310 seconds

Importance of involving local communities and civil society

Explanation

Tenanoia Simona emphasizes the importance of engaging local communities and civil society in the IUIs process. This engagement ensures that digital initiatives address local needs and are culturally relevant.

Evidence

Community is very strong in our countries and engaging local community and civil society is very, very important and government should collaborate with civil society organizations and to make sure and ensure that digital initiative really address local needs.

Major Discussion Point

Importance of Multi-stakeholder Approach

Agreed with

Najib Mokni

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Fabio Senne

Agreed on

Importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration

Limited resources and capacity in small island nations

Explanation

Tenanoia Simona highlights the challenge of limited resources and capacity in small island nations. This constraint affects their ability to implement digital initiatives and conduct comprehensive assessments.

Evidence

We are very small in size and we depend so much on partnership and private sector bringing that training programs and knowledge sharing opportunities to build our local technical expertise because of our remoteness and we are very far from developed countries and building capacity is a challenge.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in Implementing IUIs

IUIs can enhance environmental preparedness for climate-vulnerable nations

Explanation

Tenanoia Simona points out that the IUIs framework can help small island nations enhance their environmental preparedness. This is particularly important for countries that are vulnerable to climate change impacts.

Evidence

Leveraging the revised frameworks emphasize on resilience, affordability, and inclusion, and small island nations like Tuvalu and other Pacific island countries can address this in digital divides and enhance environmental preparedness because we are very, very vulnerable to climate change.

Major Discussion Point

Relevance of IUIs for Small Island Developing States (SIDS)

F

Fabio Senne

Speech speed

135 words per minute

Speech length

873 words

Speech time

386 seconds

Engagement of diverse stakeholders throughout the assessment process

Explanation

Fabio Senne emphasizes the importance of engaging diverse stakeholders throughout the IUIs assessment process. This inclusive approach ensures that multiple perspectives are considered and enhances the relevance of the assessment outcomes.

Evidence

So we try to not only ensure that the multiple sectors participate in the consultations, but also from a regional perspective. So we try to consider regional perspectives in this.

Major Discussion Point

Importance of Multi-stakeholder Approach

Agreed with

Najib Mokni

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Tenanoia Simona

Agreed on

Importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration

Agreements

Agreement Points

IUIs as a guidance tool for national digital assessments

Moderator

Tatevik Grigoryan

Seluvaia Kauvaka

IUIs provide guidance for national digital assessments, not for ranking countries

IUIs framework helps identify gaps and inform policy decisions

IUIs serve as a toolkit for measuring digital economy progress

The speakers agree that IUIs serve as a guidance tool for countries to assess their digital development, identify gaps, and inform policy decisions without ranking or comparing countries.

Importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration

Najib Mokni

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Tenanoia Simona

Fabio Senne

IUIs process fosters multi-stakeholder collaboration

Multi-stakeholder collaboration tailors solutions to regional needs

Importance of involving local communities and civil society

Engagement of diverse stakeholders throughout the assessment process

The speakers emphasize the crucial role of multi-stakeholder collaboration in implementing IUIs effectively and addressing specific regional needs.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers highlight the importance of shared ownership and collaboration among stakeholders to ensure effective implementation of IUIs and tailored solutions for regional needs.

Najib Mokni

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Need for shared ownership among all stakeholders

Multi-stakeholder collaboration tailors solutions to regional needs

Both speakers emphasize the relevance of IUIs for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in addressing their unique challenges, including environmental preparedness and digital development.

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Tenanoia Simona

IUIs help address unique challenges faced by SIDS

IUIs can enhance environmental preparedness for climate-vulnerable nations

Unexpected Consensus

Language barriers in implementing IUIs

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Language barriers in communicating technical concepts locally

While not explicitly mentioned by other speakers, Seluvaia Kauvaka’s point about language barriers in communicating technical concepts locally is an unexpected but significant challenge in implementing IUIs, especially in diverse linguistic regions.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The speakers generally agree on the importance of IUIs as a guidance tool for national digital assessments, the significance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, and the relevance of IUIs for addressing unique challenges faced by Small Island Developing States.

Consensus level

There is a high level of consensus among the speakers on the core purposes and benefits of IUIs. This consensus suggests a strong foundation for implementing IUIs across different regions, particularly in developing countries and SIDS. However, there are also shared concerns about challenges in implementation, such as limited resources and capacity, which may require additional support and strategies to address.

Differences

Different Viewpoints

Unexpected Differences

Overall Assessment

summary

The main areas of disagreement were related to the specific challenges faced in implementing IUIs and the focus of multi-stakeholder collaboration.

difference_level

The level of disagreement among the speakers was relatively low. Most speakers agreed on the overall importance and benefits of IUIs, but had different perspectives on implementation challenges and priorities based on their regional experiences. These differences do not significantly impact the overall support for IUIs but highlight the need for flexible implementation strategies that can be adapted to different contexts.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agreed on the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, but they emphasized different aspects. Nejib Mokni focused on shared ownership, Tenanoia Simona stressed the involvement of local communities, and Seluvaia Kauvaka highlighted tailoring solutions to regional needs.

Najib Mokni

Tenanoia Simona

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Need for shared ownership among all stakeholders

Importance of involving local communities and civil society

Multi-stakeholder collaboration tailors solutions to regional needs

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers highlight the importance of shared ownership and collaboration among stakeholders to ensure effective implementation of IUIs and tailored solutions for regional needs.

Najib Mokni

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Need for shared ownership among all stakeholders

Multi-stakeholder collaboration tailors solutions to regional needs

Both speakers emphasize the relevance of IUIs for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in addressing their unique challenges, including environmental preparedness and digital development.

Seluvaia Kauvaka

Tenanoia Simona

IUIs help address unique challenges faced by SIDS

IUIs can enhance environmental preparedness for climate-vulnerable nations

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

UNESCO’s Internet Universality Indicators (IUIs) provide guidance for national digital assessments without ranking countries

IUIs aim to reduce digital inequalities and foster inclusive development

The IUI assessment process promotes multi-stakeholder collaboration

IUIs are particularly relevant for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to address unique challenges

Challenges in implementing IUIs include lack of political will, limited trust between stakeholders, and resource constraints

Multi-stakeholder engagement and shared ownership are crucial for successful IUI implementation

Resolutions and Action Items

Continue to promote and implement the revised IUI framework across more countries

Foster regional cooperation and knowledge sharing among countries that have implemented IUIs

Develop performance indicators to monitor the implementation of IUI recommendations

Consider organizing annual or regional IUI forums to enhance collaboration

Unresolved Issues

Specific strategies for overcoming language barriers when communicating technical concepts locally

Detailed plans for addressing the digital divide in developing countries

Methods for aligning rapidly changing technology with policy development in SIDS

Suggested Compromises

Balancing global relevance of indicators with flexibility for diverse socioeconomic and cultural contexts

Combining multi-stakeholder approaches with international cooperation to support SIDS in digital development

Thought Provoking Comments

UNESCO is not in the business of rankings, nor of making comparisons about countries. UNESCO has been around for 80 years, that’s eight zero. We provide guidances, this is a guidance, hopefully to inform policy makers and decision makers at government level, but also in a multi-stakeholder approach to define the gaps they see through this digital assessment and then to come up with the actions which will remedy to these gaps or will overcome the shortcomings.

speaker

UNESCO ADG

reason

This comment clarifies the purpose and approach of the UNESCO indicators, emphasizing guidance over ranking.

impact

It set the tone for the discussion by emphasizing collaboration and improvement rather than competition between countries.

From a regional perspective, I think it was also interesting to understand that we had to address specific challenges that we have in each region. For instance, from the global south, and we have lots of comments regarding still how to face the digital divides, the rural divides, the gender divides, and all the gaps in media information literacy in those countries.

speaker

Fabio Senne

reason

This insight highlights the importance of regional context in addressing digital challenges.

impact

It broadened the discussion to consider how the indicators need to be flexible and adaptable to different regional contexts.

The first one is the political will of course because if we don’t have this high level commitment, the political commitment on that we cannot advance on the implementation and this is I mean the case of many most countries.

speaker

Najib Mokni

reason

This comment identifies a crucial factor in the successful implementation of digital strategies.

impact

It shifted the conversation to consider political and governance aspects of digital transformation, not just technical ones.

Community is very strong in our countries and engaging local community and civil society is very, very important and government should collaborate with civil society organizations and to make sure and ensure that digital initiative really address local needs.

speaker

Tenanoia Simona

reason

This insight emphasizes the importance of community engagement in small island nations.

impact

It introduced a new perspective on the role of community and cultural context in digital development strategies.

From Small Islands Developing State and Tonga, the biggest thing that FROMEX can indicate is to share progress across the region, share best practices, advocate and monitor so that we could align.

speaker

Seluvaia Kauvaka

reason

This comment highlights the potential for regional collaboration among small island states.

impact

It expanded the discussion to consider how the indicators could facilitate knowledge sharing and collaboration between similar countries.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by emphasizing several important themes: the non-competitive nature of the UNESCO indicators, the need for regional and cultural contextualization, the importance of political will and community engagement, and the potential for regional collaboration. They moved the conversation beyond technical aspects of digital transformation to consider broader societal, political, and cultural factors that influence the success of digital initiatives.

Follow-up Questions

How can the implementation of IUI recommendations be monitored and evaluated?

speaker

Najib Mokni

explanation

Monitoring and evaluation is important to track progress, measure outcomes, and ensure the effectiveness of the IUI framework.

How can regular reviews and updates of IUI assessments be conducted to reflect ongoing changes and developments?

speaker

Najib Mokni

explanation

Regular reviews are necessary to keep the assessments current and recognize countries’ efforts in following the framework.

How can regional cooperation and best practice sharing be enhanced for IUI implementation?

speaker

Najib Mokni

explanation

Regional cooperation can improve the effectiveness of IUI implementation across countries.

How can Tuvalu’s project on becoming the first digital nation country address environmental impacts?

speaker

Tatevik Grigoryan

explanation

This relates to the unique challenges faced by small island nations due to climate change and their digital transformation efforts.

How can the language barrier be addressed when conducting IUI assessments in local communities?

speaker

Seluvaia Kauvaka

explanation

Interpreting technical and international language into local languages is crucial for effective communication and implementation of the IUI framework.

How can a network of implementing countries be created to foster collaboration?

speaker

Fabio Senne

explanation

A collaborative network could enhance the sharing of experiences and best practices among countries implementing the IUI framework.

How can the new indicators on environmental impacts and advanced digital technologies be effectively implemented in countries that have already conducted assessments?

speaker

Fabio Senne

explanation

Understanding the impact of these new indicators is important for countries that have previously implemented the IUI framework.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Digital futures at a crossroads: aligning WSIS and the Global Digital Compact

The path toward a cohesive digital future was the central theme at the ‘From WSIS to GDC: Harmonising Strategies Towards Coordination‘ session held at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2024 in Riyadh. Experts, policymakers, and civil society representatives converged to address how the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) framework and the Global Digital Compact (GDC) can work in unison. At the heart of the debate lay two critical imperatives: coordination and avoiding fragmentation.

Panelists, including Jorge Cancio of the Swiss Government and David Fairchild of Canada, underscored the IGF’s central role as a multistakeholder platform for dialogue. However, concerns about its diminishing mandate and inadequate funding surfaced repeatedly. Fairchild warned of ‘a centralisation of digital governance processes,’ hinting at geopolitical forces that could undermine inclusive, global cooperation. Cancio urged an updated ‘Swiss Army knife’ approach to WSIS, where existing mechanisms, like the IGF, are strengthened rather than duplicated.

The session also highlighted emerging challenges since WSIS’s 2005 inception. Amrita Choudhury from MAG and Anita Gurumurthy of IT for Change emphasised that AI, data governance, and widening digital divides demand urgent attention. Gurumurthy lamented that ‘neo-illiberalism,’ characterised by corporate greed and authoritarian politics, threatens the vision of a people-centred information society. Meanwhile, Gitanjali Sah of ITU reaffirmed WSIS’s achievements, pointing to successes like digital inclusion through telecentres and distance learning.

Amid these reflections, the IGF emerged as an essential event for harmonising WSIS and GDC goals. Panellists, including Nigel Cassimire from the Caribbean Telecommunications Union, proposed that the IGF develop performance targets to implement GDC commitments effectively. Yet, as Jason Pielemeier of the Global Network Initiative cautioned, the IGF faces threats of co-optation in settings hostile to open dialogue, which ‘weakens its strength.’

Despite these tensions, hope remained for creative solutions and renewed international solidarity. The session concluded with a call to refocus on WSIS’s original principles—ensuring no one is left behind in the digital future. As Anita Gurumurthy aptly summarised: ‘We reject bad politics and poor economics. What we need is a solidarity vision of interdependence and mutual reciprocity.’

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Global connectivity takes centre stage at the IGF 2024 in Riyadh

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2024 day first in Riyadh opened with one of the key sessions titled ‘Global Access, Global Progress: Managing the Challenges of Global Digital Adoption’, bringing together prominent panellists from government, private sectors, and civil society to address one of the world’s most pressing issues—bridging the digital divide. Moderated by Timea Suto, Global Digital Policy Lead at the International Chamber of Commerce, the session explored the need for universal internet connectivity, its life-changing impact, and the challenges of ensuring meaningful participation in the digital age.

Gbenga Sesan, Executive Director at Paradigm Initiative, highlighted the transformative power of connectivity with inspiring stories. ‘Connectivity is not just a privilege; it can mean life or death,’ he emphasised, sharing the success of individuals in underserved communities who leveraged digital access to escape poverty and access vital healthcare. Thelma Quaye of Smart Africa echoed his sentiment, stressing that affordability remains a significant barrier, particularly in Africa, where only 40% are connected despite wide mobile coverage. ‘Governments must invest in infrastructure to reach the last mile,’ she urged, citing the need for public-private partnerships and relevant content that empowers users economically.

The discussion expanded to community-driven solutions, with Sally Wentworth, President of the Internet Society, showcasing the successes of locally managed networks. She highlighted a project in Tanzania that trained thousands in digital skills, demonstrating the potential of bottom-up connectivity.

Japan’s Vice Minister, Dr Takuo Imagawa, shared Japan’s achievements in near-universal broadband coverage, pointing to combining government subsidies and competitive policies as a scalable model. Emerging technologies like AI were discussed as necessary tools to reduce the digital divide, but speakers cautioned that they must remain inclusive and address societal needs.

On the economic front, Shivnath Thukral, VP for Public Policy at Meta India, highlighted open-source AI technologies as solutions for education, agriculture, and linguistic inclusion. ‘AI can bridge both the connectivity and knowledge gaps, delivering localised, affordable solutions at scale,’ he said. Meanwhile, Tami Bhaumik of Roblox underscored the importance of digital literacy and safety, particularly for young users. ‘Technology is powerful, but education is key to ensuring people use it responsibly,’ she noted, advocating for collaboration between governments, tech companies, and educators.

Why does it matter?

The panellists expressed clearly that global digital adoption requires cooperation across sectors, inclusive policymaking, and a focus on empowering local communities. As stakeholders debated solutions, one message emerged clearly: connectivity alone is not enough. For the digital world to deliver real progress, investments in skills, affordability, and digital literacy must go hand-in-hand with technological innovation. That’s why IGF remains a vital platform to unite diverse perspectives and drive actionable solutions to bridge the digital divide.

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

Global stakeholders chart the course for digital governance at the IGF in Riyadh

Global digital governance was the main topic in a key discussion led by moderator Timea Suto, gathering experts to tackle challenges in AI, data management, and internet governance. At the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, speakers emphasised balancing innovation with regulatory consistency while highlighting the need for inclusive frameworks that address societal biases and underrepresented voices.

Thomas Schneider of Ofcom Switzerland underscored the Council of Europe‘s AI convention as a promising standard for global interoperability. Meta’s Flavia Alves advocated for open-source AI to drive global collaboration and safer products. Meanwhile, Yoichi Iida from Japan‘s Ministry of Communications outlined the G7 Hiroshima AI code as an international step forward, while concerns about dataset biases were raised from the audience.

Data governance discussions focused on privacy and trust in cross-border flows. Maarit Palovirta of Connect Europe called for harmonised regulations to protect privacy while fostering innovation. Yoichi Iida highlighted OECD initiatives on trusted data sharing, with Amr Hashem of the GSMA stressing the need to develop infrastructure alongside governance, particularly in underserved regions.

The future of internet governance also featured prominently, with Irina Soeffky from Germany‘s Digital Ministry reinforcing the multi-stakeholder model amid calls to update WSIS structures. Audience member Bertrand de La Chapelle proposed reforming the Internet Governance Forum to reflect current challenges. Jacques Beglinger of EuroDIG stressed the importance of grassroots inclusion, while Desiree Milosevic-Evans highlighted gender representation gaps in governance.

Canada‘s Larisa Galadza framed the coming year as critical for advancing the Global Digital Compact, with priorities on AI governance under Canada’s G7 presidency. Maria Fernanda Garza of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) called for alignment in governance while maintaining flexibility for local needs amid ongoing multilateral challenges.

Speakers concluded that collaboration, inclusivity, and clear mandates are key to shaping effective digital governance. As technological change accelerates, the dialogue reinforces the need for adaptable, action-oriented strategies to ensure equity and innovation globally.

All transcripts from the Internet Governance Forum sessions can be found on dig.watch.

UK social media platforms criticised over safety failures

Nearly a quarter of children aged 8-17 in the UK lie about their age to access adult social media platforms, according to a new Ofcom report. The media regulator criticised current verification processes as insufficient and warned tech companies they face heavy fines if they fail to improve safety measures under the Online Safety Act, which takes effect in 2025.

The law will require platforms to implement ‘highly effective’ age assurance to prevent underage users from accessing adult content. Ofcom’s findings highlight the risks children face from harmful material online, sparking concerns from advocates like the Molly Rose Foundation, which warns that tech companies are not enforcing their own rules.

Some social media platforms, including TikTok, claim they are enhancing safety measures with machine learning and other innovations. However, BBC investigations and feedback from teenagers suggest that bypassing current systems remains alarmingly easy, with no ID verification required for account setup. Calls for stricter regulation continue as online safety concerns grow.

The EU plans major funding to advance tech and AI

The European Union has announced plans to invest €1.4B into its deep tech sector in 2025, aiming to strengthen Europe’s position in the global technology market. The investment, an increase of €200M from last year, will be funded by the European Innovation Council (EIC) under the Horizon Europe research and innovation program. The boost is part of Europe’s strategic move to narrow the tech gap with global leaders like the US and China.

EU Commissioner Iliana Ivanova highlighted the importance of deep tech innovation for Europe’s economic progress, emphasising that the EIC has become essential in supporting groundbreaking advancements. This increased funding reflects the EU’s commitment to fostering high-impact technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, to drive economic growth and global competitiveness.

By targeting tech innovation, the EU aims to position itself as a leader in AI and deep tech, focusing on revitalising its economy through significant advancements in these areas. As the EU steps up its support for deep tech, officials believe this investment will yield long-term benefits and keep Europe at the forefront of technological progress.

ITU and UNDP join forces to harness digital technology for sustainable development

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the UN Development Programme (UNDP) have forged a powerful alliance to highlight the transformative potential of digital technology in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). By combining their unique strengths, these organisations aim to establish a comprehensive framework that promotes innovation and fosters inclusivity within the digital realm.

Moreover, their partnership is dedicated to addressing critical global challenges by leveraging emerging technologies, ensuring that digital advancements are accessible and beneficial to all sectors of society, particularly marginalised communities. In addition to their commitment to innovation, ITU and UNDP prioritise enhancing digital infrastructure and connectivity in developing regions, fully aware that reliable and affordable internet access is fundamental to sustainable development.

They strive to bridge the digital divide through strategic investments and capacity-building initiatives, empowering local communities with the tools and knowledge to effectively utilise digital technologies. Consequently, this collaborative endeavour is essential for driving economic growth, improving educational opportunities, and enhancing health outcomes in underserved areas, ultimately fostering a more equitable digital ecosystem.

Furthermore, beyond infrastructure development, ITU and UNDP advocate for robust digital governance and policy frameworks that ensure the responsible use of technology. Their initiatives focus on promoting transparency and accountability and prioritise safeguarding privacy and security in the digital age. By emphasising digital literacy and skills development, they are rolling out training programs designed to equip individuals with the confidence to navigate the digital landscape effectively.

(Day 6) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session

(Day 6) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: morning session

Session at a Glance

Summary

This transcript covers the final day of the 79th United Nations General Assembly general debate, featuring speeches from various national representatives and concluding remarks from the Assembly President. The central themes were global challenges like climate change, sustainable development, armed conflicts, and the need for multilateral cooperation. Many speakers emphasized the importance of reforming international institutions, particularly the UN Security Council, to better reflect current global realities. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the situation in Gaza were frequently mentioned, with calls for an immediate ceasefire and a two-state solution. Several African nations highlighted regional security concerns, particularly terrorism in the Sahel. Climate change was widely discussed as an existential threat requiring urgent action and increased financing for developing countries. The debate also touched on issues of gender equality, digital technology, and human rights. In his closing remarks, the Assembly President stressed the need for unity in addressing global challenges and expressed disappointment at the low representation of women speakers. The session concluded with several countries exercising their right of reply to address specific accusations or statements made during the debate, particularly regarding territorial disputes and regional conflicts.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– Ongoing conflicts and crises in various regions, including Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan, and the Sahel

– Climate change and sustainable development challenges

– Calls for reform of the UN Security Council and international financial institutions

– Debates over territorial disputes and sovereignty claims

– Nuclear proliferation and disarmament concerns

Overall purpose/goal:

The overall purpose of this General Assembly debate was for countries to address pressing global challenges, advocate for their national interests, and discuss ways to strengthen international cooperation and the multilateral system. Many speakers emphasized the need for unity and collective action to tackle shared threats.

Overall tone:

The tone was largely serious and at times confrontational, with many countries criticizing others or defending themselves against accusations. There were frequent calls for peace and cooperation, but also sharp disagreements on various issues. The tone became more adversarial during the right of reply segment, with countries directly rebutting each other’s claims. Overall, the discussion reflected deep divisions on many global issues while also emphasizing the continued importance of the UN as a forum for dialogue.

Speakers

– President: President of the General Assembly

– Bassam Sabbagh: Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of the Syrian Arab Republic

– Valdrack Ludwing Jaentschke Whitaker: Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua

– Osman Saleh Mohammed: Minister for Foreign Affairs of Eritrea

– Bakary Yaou Sangare: Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of Cooperation, and Nigerien Abroad of Niger

– Karamoko Jean Marie Traore: Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Cooperation and Burkina Bay Abroad of Burkina Faso

– Jean-Claude Garkosso: Minister of Foreign Affairs, Francophonie and Congolese Abroad of Congo

– Ahmed Attaf: Minister of Foreign Affairs and National Community Abroad of Algeria

– Albert Shingiro: Minister of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation of Burundi

– Melanie Joly: Minister for Foreign Affairs of Canada

– Sean Fleming: Minister of State of Ireland

– Manuel Jose Gocalves: Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Mozambique

– Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan: Minister of State for the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates

– Peter Mohan Maithri Pieris: Head of the Delegation of Sri Lanka

– Song Kim: Head of the Delegation of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

– Teburoro Tito: Head of the Delegation of Kiribati

– Mohamed Siad Doualeh: Head of the Delegation of Djibouti

– Ernest Rwamucyo: Head of the Delegation of Rwanda

– Jose Javier De La Gasca: Head of the Delegation of Ecuador

Additional speakers:

– Antonio Guterres: Secretary-General of the United Nations

Full session report

The 79th United Nations General Assembly general debate concluded with national representatives addressing pressing global challenges and advocating for their countries’ interests. The discussion centered on several key themes: international peace and security, climate change and sustainable development, multilateralism and UN reform, regional issues and conflicts, and human rights and dignity.

International Peace and Security

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinians was a major focus, with several speakers condemning Israeli actions in Gaza and calling for an immediate ceasefire. The Syrian Arab Republic’s representative, Bassam Sabbagh, strongly criticised Israeli aggression and advocated for a two-state solution. Canada’s Foreign Minister, Melanie Joly, also called for an immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, emphasizing the broader regional implications of the conflict and reiterating Canada’s support for a two-state solution. The United Arab Emirates’ Minister of State, Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan, called for the establishment of a Palestinian state and expressed support for its full UN membership.

The situation in Ukraine was another point of contention, with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) representative, Song Kim, accusing the United States and Western countries of escalating the conflict. This perspective contrasted sharply with that of many Western nations, who view Russia as the aggressor.

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Climate change was widely recognised as an existential threat requiring urgent action. Teburoro Tito, representing Kiribati, emphasized the severe impacts on small island states, detailing the existential threat posed by rising sea levels and calling for immediate global action, including increased climate financing and support for adaptation measures. The UAE stressed the need for climate financing and support for developing countries, a sentiment echoed by many representatives from the Global South.

The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda featured prominently in discussions. Mozambique’s Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs, Manuel José Gonçalves, called for renewed commitment to these goals. Several African nations promoted regional development initiatives as a means to achieve the SDGs while addressing security challenges.

Multilateralism and UN Reform

A recurring theme was the need to reform and strengthen the multilateral system, particularly the United Nations. Eritrea’s Foreign Minister, Osman Saleh Mohammed, criticised the ineffectiveness of the current multilateral system and called for significant reforms. Burundi’s Albert Shingiro specifically advocated for reform of the UN Security Council to include African representation. Multiple speakers, including Ireland’s representative, called for a revitalisation of multilateralism through a Summit of the Future and a Pact for the Future.

Djibouti called for reform of international financial institutions, while Sri Lanka emphasized the need for debt relief and reform of the global financial architecture. The Congo’s representative advocated for a more just and balanced world order.

Regional Issues and Conflicts

The Western Sahara dispute emerged as a significant regional issue, with Algeria supporting a peaceful resolution through a UN-led process, while Morocco defended its sovereignty over the region. This disagreement led to a heated exchange during the right of reply session.

Several African nations highlighted regional security concerns, particularly terrorism in the Sahel. Burkina Faso’s Foreign Minister, Karamoko Jean Marie Traore, condemned terrorism and external interference in the region. Niger and Burkina Faso representatives discussed the formation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) as a response to regional security challenges.

Rwanda’s representative, Ernest Rwamucyo, called for international support for Somalia’s stabilisation efforts and emphasized the importance of African-led solutions to the continent’s development and security challenges.

The Korean Peninsula remained a point of tension, with the DPRK defending its nuclear programme as a necessary deterrent against perceived US hostility. The DPRK representative strongly criticized US and South Korean policies, accusing them of increasing military threats and destabilizing the region. This stance was strongly contested by the Republic of Korea, which accused the DPRK of violating UN Security Council resolutions and threatening regional stability.

A right of reply exchange between Egypt and Ethiopia highlighted ongoing tensions over the Nile River dispute and water resource management.

Human Rights and Dignity

Human rights issues were addressed by several speakers, with Canada’s Mélanie Joly condemning human rights violations globally and calling for gender equality. Ireland also emphasized the importance of human rights in international relations. Burundi’s representative stressed the importance of respecting cultural diversity and values in international relations.

Transnational Issues

Ecuador’s representative, José Javier De La Gasca, emphasized the importance of UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation in addressing transnational organized crime and drug trafficking.

Conclusion

The General Assembly debate revealed deep divisions on many global issues while also emphasizing the continued importance of the UN as a forum for dialogue. The discussions reflected the complex and interconnected nature of global challenges, the persistent tensions between national interests and international cooperation, and the urgent need for reform and action to address pressing issues such as climate change, conflict resolution, and sustainable development.

The Assembly President, in closing remarks, stressed the need for unity in addressing global challenges and expressed disappointment at the low representation of women speakers, calling for greater gender equality in future sessions. The debate concluded with several countries exercising their right of reply, highlighting ongoing tensions and unresolved issues that continue to challenge the international community.

Session Transcript

President: The 17th plenary meeting of the General Assembly is called to order. The Assembly will continue its consideration of agenda item 8 entitled General Debate. I now give the floor to His Excellency Bassam Sabbagh, Minister of Foreign Affairs and expatriates of the Syrian Arab Republic.

Bassam Sabbagh – Syrian Arab Republic: Thank you Mr. President. I congratulate you on your election as President of the General Assembly at its current session and I thank your predecessor, His Excellency Dennis Francis, for presiding over the previous session. I also thank the Secretary General for the efforts exerted to fulfill his mandate under the United Nations Charter. Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, as this session of the General Assembly is taking place tensions internationally have reached a boiling point and efforts to maintain international peace and security are confronted with real challenges and threats. Clashes are intensifying, crises are multiplying, conflicts are escalating, chaos is spreading, terrorism is gaining ground, the global economy is faltering, poverty rates are rising, climate change is accelerating and development indicators are falling. These are the unfortunate results of eight decades of multilateral action that have followed the establishment of the United Nations. While we previously sought to promote preventive diplomacy and a peaceful settlement of disputes, we are witnessing today more direct wars and proxy wars waged using terrorist tools. Instead of harnessing scientific advancement for the benefit and well-being of all people, we are witnessing this graceful use of modern technologies as deadly tools to solve death and destruction. Instead of investing efforts and resources in achieving sustainable development for all, some are flagrantly draining the resources of other countries, stealing from their people, and imposing unilateral coercive measures that impoverish and destroy nations. Mr. President, for more than a decade, Syria has experienced unparalleled suffering. It fell victim to a fierce terrorist war, direct attacks on its terrorist territories that continue to this day, a multifaceted and stifling economic blockade, and an unprecedented political and media incitement campaigns. Billions of dollars were spent to erode the development progress that Syria has worked over decades to achieve. Billions more were spent to spread chaos and undermine security and stability, and to force millions of Syrians to leave their homes, only to become internally displaced or refugees in other countries. Ladies and gentlemen, nevertheless, rest assured that despite everything, we have remained faithful to our strong beliefs, our firm positions, and to the choices we made as a nation. Syria never hesitated to protect and defend its people, and never faltered in its war on terrorism. Economic hardships did not prevent us from meeting the needs of our people. All that has happened has revealed the true intentions of the collective West, which completely contradict with the principles and purposes that form the pillars and foundation and function of this international organization. Mr. President, the ongoing Israeli occupation of Arab territory since 1967, including the Syrian Arab Golan and the genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity it commits, are a glaring example of the failure of this organization and, namely, the Security Council, to end this expansionist and racist occupation and the ongoing aggression. It is a damning proof that the United States has prevented the Council from fulfilling its responsibility to confront threats to international peace and security. Since the 7th of October, 2023, the Israeli occupation has continued to commit bloody and terrorist crimes, adding another chapter to its seven-decade-long criminal record. Over the past months, the occupying forces and settler gangs have been carrying out a savage aggression on the Palestinian people and committing a genocide before the eyes of the whole world, which has claimed the lives of more than 42,000 Palestinians, most of whom are children and women. The Syrian Arab Republic strongly condemns the Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people and renew its solidarity with the legitimate struggle to liberate their occupied land and establish their independent state on their entire national territory with Jerusalem as its capital, while ensuring the right of the Palestinian refugees to return to their homeland in line with international law and relevant UN resolutions. Syria also condemns all attempts to liquidate UNRWA and suspend the services it provides to Palestinians on their land and in neighboring countries. We stress the need to hold Israel accountable for its direct targeting of more than 200 personnel working for UNRWA and other UN and humanitarian agencies. In an attempt to cover the failure of its war against the Palestinian people and to escape its internal crisis, the Israeli occupying forces implicate others in their internal crises and distract from the failed war against the Palestinian people. Hence, they have chosen to drag the region into a serious escalation while benefiting from the immunity, impunity, and unlimited support provided by certain countries, in particular the U.S., in a clear case of hypocrisy and double standards. On the 27th of July, 2024, Israeli occupying forces committed another heinous crime against our people in the occupied Syrian Golan, when they targeted the Syrian town of Majdal Shams, claiming the lives of 12 Syrian children. The criminal Israeli forces went even further, blaming others for this tragedy and exploiting the death of innocent Syrians for propaganda purposes. The open Israeli aggression has also extended to our brotherly Lebanon. Two weeks ago, the Israeli occupation authorities committed an unprecedented crime against Lebanese by using the means of communication as a tool to kill unarmed civilians in a collective manner. A few days ago, the Israeli occupation authorities targeted the southern suburb of Beirut with a treacherous and cowardly aggression, destroying an entire residential block using tons of explosive bombs to assassinate Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrullah, who for more than three decades led an honorable Lebanese national resistance against the Israeli occupation. This large-scale Israeli aggression, which is unfettered by any restrictions and limitations, is pushing the region to the brink of a dangerous escalation and confrontation whose consequences cannot be predicted and causing disastrous effects on peace and security, not only in our region but also beyond it. The Syrian Arab Republic calls on all member states of the United Nations to work towards ending the Israeli aggression against Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon and hold the occupation authorities accountable for their crimes as well as prevent impunity. The Syrian Arab Republic reiterates that the Golan is an occupied Syrian territory and that its inhabitants are Syrian Arab citizens who are and will always be an integral part of the people of Syria. They have struggled over decades against the occupation. Syria stresses that regaining the full Syrian occupied Golan Line with UN Resolution 242338 and 497 is an inalienable right and shall never be subject to compromise and will never be affected by the passage of time or be subject to the statute of limitation. Mr. President, the crimes and attacks of the Israeli occupying forces against Syria cannot be seen in separation from the subversive role played by certain Western countries, especially the U.S., the United States of America, corrects the interpreter. In my country, Syria, these countries have continued to violate Syria’s sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity by illegally deploying their military forces inside Syria’s territory, allowing their officials to sneak into Syria, and supporting separatist militia and terrorist groups. These countries have also worked to exacerbate the humanitarian situation of the Syrian people by depriving them of the benefit of their resources as a result of their systematic looting of Syria’s national riches as well, and by imposing inhumane, unilateral, coercive measures whose disastrous effects have affected all aspects of the daily lives of Syrians. These measures targeted various vital sectors, most notably the public health sector, energy sector, banks, financial transactions and transfers, transport, as well as the agriculture sector that has been affected by these measures that has led to reduced levels of food security. All the unfounded allegations made by Western countries to justify such illegal measures and to deny or downplay their catastrophic impacts have been laid bare in multiple recent U.N. reports in this regard. My country reiterates its call for the immediate, full, and unconditional lifting of unilateral coercive measures as they amount to a collective Mr. President, since the beginning of the terrorist war on my country, Syria, the Syrian government has responsibly and constructively engaged with all initiatives aimed at preserving Syria’s sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity, protecting its people from terrorism, improving the living conditions of Syrians. Many measures have been taken to that end which can be summed up as follows. One, mobilizing all efforts to eradicate terrorist groups that are enlisted by the Security Council and putting an end to their dark thinking extremist ideology, practices based on killing, torture, enforced disappearance, restriction of freedom, recruitment of children, discrimination, and violence against women and girls. The Syrian government continues to confront the remaining organizations to end the suffering of Syrians and we call upon all countries to repatriate their citizens currently detained in illegal centers in northeastern Syria to end and close them due to the danger they pose to them in the future. Two, pursuing national reconciliation and local settlement agreements where 23 amnesty decrees have been issued which facilitated the social reintegration of those who had lost their way. The most recent of these was legislative decree number 27 of 22 September 2024. Three, supporting humanitarian access by granting the UN multiple authorizations to use three border crossings to deliver humanitarian assistance to eligible Syrian civilians in northwest Syria and by granting the necessary approvals for humanitarian deliveries from inside Syria despite all of the attempts by terrorist groups to obstruct humanitarian access and steal or divert the aid. Four, continuing the efforts of the Syrian state institutions to enhance their role and increase their efficiency by holding on time all constitutionally mandated entitlements and following up on the process of economic and administrative development and reform and moving forward with efforts to modernize legislative structures including those related to strengthening the rule of law, developing media work, social protection programs and empowering women, protecting the rights of children and persons with disability as well as implementing the strategic plan for gender equality and developing legislation regulating conscription. Five, sparing no effort to support the dignified return of refugees and displaced people to their areas. An agreement was reached with the Office of UNHCR on several measures which are being implemented accurately. Discussions are also underway with a number of neighboring countries to launch innovative projects that allow the provision, which will be a model to assist and facilitate the return and accelerated. Six, openly engaging with all the efforts and initiatives made at the political level, including we have been taking part in the Astana meetings, which have achieved concrete results. The Syrian government is also in constant contact with the UN Special Envoy for Syria and is cooperating with him in line with his mandated role as a facilitator of a Syrian-led and Syrian-owned political process. Seven, committing to dialogue and diplomacy as a basis to a course for correcting relations with other countries. The Syrian government has positively engaged with the various initiatives put forward in this regard in line with our firm belief that the interests of countries must be built on sound relations based on specific principles and clear grounds to achieve the desired objectives. In particular, mutual respect for state sovereignty and territorial unity, joint action to address threats to security and stability, and pursuing common interests without interfering in internal affairs. Ladies and gentlemen, as Syria is healing from the wounds of what it’s been exposed and subjected to, it looks to the future with a sense of hope and optimism. However, the success of its efforts necessarily requires the collective West to stop politicizing humanitarian work and linking it to political conditionality. Donors need to fulfill their pledges in humanitarian funding and provide sustainable solutions for livelihoods and supporting resilience, including by working to strengthen early recovery projects and the immediate complete and unconditional lifting of unilateral coercive measures. Mr. President, Syria reiterates its demand for a Middle East zone free of weapons of mass destruction, in particular nuclear weapons, and to compel Israel to eliminate its arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, join relevant international treaties and conventions, and place its institutions under international monitoring. Syria expresses its support and solidarity with Arab countries, especially those facing challenging circumstances resulting from foreign interference, natural events, or climate change. Syria reiterates its support to the right of the Russian Federation to defend itself and to maintain its national security in response to the West’s hostile policies and in rejection of the logic of hegemony and unipolarism. Syria also condemns attempts to confiscate Russian financial assets. Syria expresses once again its full support to the Islamic Republic of Iran and its legitimate right to defend its national security and the peaceful use of nuclear energy, and we commend Iran’s constructive and responsible approach in this regard. Syria renews its support to the One China principle and the stances of the People’s Republic of China as it faces external attempts to interfere in its internal affairs and deems it necessary to defend its sovereignty and confront escalation. Syria condemns the decades-long U.S. economic embargo on Cuba and rejects the issuance of the infamous list called the country-sponsoring terrorism. Syria calls for an end to the U.S. military drills and exercises on the Korean Peninsula as they contribute to raising tensions in this region. My country reiterates its solidarity with Venezuela in the face of the flagrant interference in its internal affairs and the hostile policies against it. Syria calls for the immediate lifting of all unilateral coercive measures imposed by Western countries on Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Belarus, Cuba, Nicaragua, and the DPRK, Eritrea, and others, as well as on my country, Syria. Mr. President, in conclusion, I would like to call on the countries of the world to summon the courage and make the right choice to guarantee a better present and future for present and future generations and save humanity from the scourge of all out wars looming on the horizon by supporting the establishment of a more just and balanced, through the reform of political and financial institutions, to end the state of hegemony and unipolarity and better attempts to undermine the charter of the UN and replace it with a so-called rules-based order. The Syrian Arab Republic, while looking forward to the current session of the General Assembly, under your leadership, to be able to fulfill the promise of its theme, we stress that success in translating this theme into a practical reality requires abandoning the policies of hegemony, exclusion, blockade, and collective punishment of peoples and adhering to the charter of our organization, respecting international law, multilateral diplomacy, and granting developing countries the freedom to choose their own destiny.

President: I thank the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of the Syrian Arab Republic. I now give the floor to His Excellency Valdrack Ludwing Jaentschke Whitaker, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua.

Valdrack Ludwing Jaentschke Whitaker – Nicaragua: Thank you, Mr. President. Members of the House of Representatives, After hearing so much analysis, the description of so much misfortune, so many calamities, and after hearing detailed descriptions of the Holocaust that afflict us as a human family, after watching so much intelligence sparkle before our eyes, we are left in silence, contemplating the void. Because, whilst we have knowledge, or whilst we think we have knowledge, we do not find, we cannot detect, common responses to the weaknesses and pains that beset our society. There are no responses being found to the abuses, aberrations, the aggressions of global powers, to the unjust global order that, from every angle, seems to increasingly suffocate And that is how in spite happening,knowledge and the spirit we have as human beings, the spirit that we must nourish to better light our way forward. The tragedies of injustice, supremacist ambitions, the perverse appetites for domination, subjugation, and barbarism were those seen in the worst times that were known as periods of colonization or conquests. These phenomena seem to be worsening, keeping humankind perpetually enslaved to the basest sentiments, avarice, greed, and the imposition of models by some on others. This is all causing us to stray further and further from the principles and values of equality and rights that, with sweat and tears, humanity and intelligence thought they had won. Disaster after disaster, we continue to sow as the savage M.O. of imperialism and capitalism. They, too, are savage, barbaric, and fierce, and we’re walking towards the extinction of all human beings. We are refusing to accept that only peace can triumph. That is true because peace is justice. Peace is peaceful coexistence. Peace is respectful cooperation. It is the furtherance of freedom, dignity, and the sovereignty of all peoples. Those philosophies, those principles will guarantee that we can live a life better than ever before. But today, peace stands before us as one of the most distant illusions. We’re not on a journey to peace. And, incidentally, we’re not acquainting ourselves with this just and lasting peace that could place us on a path towards a world of brotherhood, happiness, and solidarity. Every morning, in so many corners of our planet, we wake up to death and more death. We wake up to people being sacrificed on the bonfires of the insipid supposed superiority of some over others. We wake up before killings and massacres which should mark the consciences of warlords, magnates, and And those that traffic in apocalyptic wars. These wars are imposed by some people on others and they lay waste to beings, cultures, lands. They crucify and they do all of this to ensure that life meets their tastes, whims and interests. In these daily massacres, how much do we lose, particularly when it comes to the most deeply rooted human emotions that we have, love, brotherhood and hope? These are values that human beings seem to be casting aside. These values are undoubtedly victims of the hell that they sell to us as a heaven. Victims of the satanic kings that dismiss the tragedies they visit upon us. And in so doing, they forget the core principle of civilization, which should be power enjoyed by all for the good of all of us. Every day we lose heart, we lose our soul, not because we sell it to the devil and his satanic underlings, but rather because our generations that should have learned so much from the millions of human beings that have sacrificed throughout history on the bonfires of vanity and ambitions. These people are the victims of deadly selfishness, lessons that they fail to learn from. We forget all of that and instead enemies of peace try to convert the world into the most arid of deserts, spiritually arid. And we ignore all of this and we fail to harness our human strength. We’re faced with so much aggression, barbarism, attacks, crimes, satanic assaults are being waged on all of us. Evil seems to be trumping good, but in the face of all of that, peoples are left. Those peoples that know how to fight, peoples of culture, spiritual experience and dignity and national decorum. That is our great asset. That is our most invaluable heritage. That is the kingdom of God on earth. This is the beginning, the dawning of a new world, which is being born, rising from the ashes of anguish, suffering and pain. All of these things have been imposed upon us by sick minds that do not see, do not. wish to see the arrival of this other good world. They continue to try and live in the past, centuries past for their own benefit. They try to stay living in the old and blood-soaked world. How much pain, how many battles, how many chains, how much enslavery are we going to suffer? Because on the other hand, we have our human condition that goes from strength to strength, from truth to truth. We’re increasingly waking up to the truth. We show more and more courage, more and more valor. And every day, in the face of suffering, we enjoy more glory. We see more and more victories of the truth. And our human spirit is prevailing, just as it must. No one can strip us of our certainty of a new world. No one can deprive us of the reality of a brotherly world, a world of understanding, solidarity, and respectful cooperation in the present and for the well-being of all. In the old world designed by the conquistadores, those conquistadores will remain with their ambitions thwarted, sad and alone. They will be condemned and rejected by those of us that have learned to revere love, learned to root out hatred and what it imposes upon us. We’ve learned to bury humiliation, indignity, and we’ve learned to dismiss terror, the fear that they use to pressure us and intimidate us, those as the evil of the earth. We will never yield. We will never bow to the enemies of peace or the enemies of common good. We will never be enslaved by selfishness and avarice. And we will never be blind to the atrocities committed by those who sew the mendacious narrative of their hypocritical acolytes, those that use artificial techniques and tactics, and who use technical afilm to sell us a childish world, a fictional world that pretend to be blind, deaf, and mute, paralyzed. And we will never bow to those that acquit those that are guilty of so many crimes against humanity. We will not be silent, ever. We denounce and condemn the genocide that the government of Israel and its first world allies have committed, commit and continue to commit against the glorious people of Palestine, against the courageous people of Lebanon, and against so many other brave, valiant, dignified people. None of us will yield to brutality. We are not silent. We will never be silent. We denounce and condemn the aggressions against Syria, Iran, and against all other great peoples in their struggles. We stand with our brothers on all continents. We will never be silent. We denounce and condemn the occupation and hijacking of the rights of peoples such as Haiti. We are not silent. We will never be silent. We denounce and condemn the systematic policy of extermination of cultures and rights that colonial imperialist powers visit upon peoples, governments, and countries who, like Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, are members of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of our America. ALBA is a strategic unit with which we defend our sovereignty, independence, and legitimate models of institutions, our models of self-governance, and direct and participative democracy. We stand shoulder to shoulder with all countries and peoples affected by barbarism and the brutality which was unleashed and is being unleashed against our Mother Earth and our resources. That is causing what we know today as climate change. Climate change is none other than selfishness and the pillaging of our earthly resources. That pillaging has created myriad disasters, disasters which are not natural, disasters which require climate justice, disasters that have been imposed upon us by selfish slave masters, the pillagers of our world, the filibusters. They’ve done all of that without regard for what we’re losing, without compensation, redress, or reparation for what we’ve lost. We stand shoulder to shoulder in brotherliness, solidarity, in just struggles for food security, health security, education, rights, human security. These are all rights that we will never give up on. Of course, we are fighting an urgent, daily struggle against terrorism in all its forms, against drug trafficking, organized crime, all vices and criminal activities that have been imposed upon us to weaken our institutions, models, and practices, and in order to increase interference. We are people rich in culture, resources, and community models. We are rich in values that have been distorted, slandered, or worn down. We will not allow ourselves to be converted into needy beggars, because we’re not beggars. And we’ll not allow you to pretend that we are, just because you want to be falsely kind and generous. Your interests are patently clear, and you’re using them to interfere in our own affairs. That’s not only unacceptable, it’s despicable and unbecoming. We have a right to our freedoms and the supreme dignity of our spirit and culture. We have a right to our own conscience and our own convictions. We are allowed to learn and continue on our humble pilgrimage, a pilgrimage that means that we learn from everyone. We’re able to incorporate the good into how we live, to cast aside and reject everything that seeks to make us into servile machines, divided by the strategies of the imperialists of the earth. We defend our highest dreams. We do so alongside Bolívar, Martí, Sandino, Morazán, and alongside so many great figures that preceded us and led the way for our struggles, so that we would win, vanquish, and triumph. Nothing is free in this world. We must become more aware, and our heart must grow bigger every day. We must be absolutely lucid, clear, and coherent in our action, because it is only the union of the peoples of the planet that will be able… We are one with Bolivia and its laudable path forward. We are one with Honduras and its challenges. We are one with Mesoamerica and the challenges it faces. We are one with Asia, with the Arab peoples, with the peoples of that black Africa, the peoples that live among us. We are one with the Russian Federation in its major struggles against the beast of fascism, battles that we will win. About this there can be no doubt. We are one with the People’s Republic of China, a country that teaches us so much, that bestows upon us their wisdom and experience in developing their people’s well-being. They bring to us lessons of global solidarity for a community of the future. We stand with all the fighters and warriors of the world and with the strength and dignity that we’ve always had. And today we will not allow ourselves to be crucified for these values. On the contrary, we will rise up with pride and happiness. We will fly our flags and standards proud, because we know that humanity and the human spirit must conquer all. We will prevail. It is only by prevailing that we will spread and preserve the highest, loftiest values of the humanity that we all inhabit. Our Nicaragua is blessed, dignified, always sovereign, Christian, socialist, solidarity-based. And from that Nicaragua, we embrace you all, all of you in this world that want peace, affection, respect, rights and well-being. We will always stand together and together we will go forward. The Great Flight of Crows Stains the Blue Sky, A Thousand-Year-Old Breath Threatens Plague, In the Far East Men Are Being Murdered, Has the Apocalyptic Antichrist Been Born? Omens have been witnessed and wonders seen. The return of Christ seems imminent. The earth is pregnant with pain so deep that the dreamer, imperious, lost in thought, suffers all the anxieties of the heart of the world. Executioners of ideals afflict the earth, locking up humanity in a shadowy pit, along with the brutes of hatred and war. O Lord Jesus Christ, why do you take so long? Why wait to spread your hand of light over these wild beasts and make your divine banners brilliant in the sun? It rises suddenly, pouring out life’s essence over so many crazed, sad or hardened souls, so in love with darkness as to forget your sweet dawn. Come, Lord, show us in all your glory. Come with trembling stars and the dread of cataclysm. Come bringing love and peace across the abyss. Let your white horse, which the visionary witnessed, come in and let that divine, extraordinary clarion sound, and may my heart be an ember of your swaying incense. Today we remember the Nicaraguan father, priest, ambassador of the dignity and decorum of our peoples, Miguel de Escoto Brockman. He fought and he bequeathed upon us the responsibility to fight for the remodeling of the United Nations so that the United Nations could serve the cause of debate and the struggle for justice, the right to harmony and happiness of the people. The United Nations as an instrument belonging precisely to nations themselves, an instrument to denounce, condemn, reject and repudiate all abominations and aberrations perpetrated against all of us. It is an instrument to encourage good, affection, to root out evil, opprobrium and hatred in our relations. Our relations, our ties, should be those of brotherly coexistence. The goals of the world go forward. The earth must be the paradise of all of humankind. The world will be different and better. That’s what we’re working for. That’s why we are united, and that is what we believe in. Allow me to bring to you the affection of all of Nicaragua’s people, that of President-Commander Daniel Ortega and Vice-President Rosario Murillo. Many thanks indeed.

President: I now give the floor to His Excellency Osman Saleh Mohammed, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Eritrea.

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea: Your Excellency Philemon Yang, President of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Your Excellency Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, Honorable Heads of Delegation, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen. Mr. President, allow me to join previous speakers to congratulate Your Excellency for your I welcome the election to the Presidency of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. The current session is taking place at a crucial juncture of transition in the architecture of global governance. Before delving into the main subject, allow me to digress a bit and dwell on some historical perspectives. As it will be recalled, maintenance of global peace was indeed the overarching mantra and proclaimed objective when the League of Nations was established one century ago, in January 1920, in the immediate aftermath of the First World War. But in spite of the lofty, pronounced objectives, the League of Nations could not fully measure up to the noble task and deter the eruption of the Second World War. Twenty-five years later, in October 1945, the United Nations was solemnly established to prevent another world war and guarantee durable global peace. But again, our global community was plunged into the era of the Cold War, whose hallmark was a controversial, bipolar international world order. As all its dynamics and deleterious consequences to global peace and stability, the Cold War era culminated after 45 years in 1991 and the collapse of the former Soviet bloc. As it happened, this later phase ushered in a new, precarious epoch of the unipolar world order, which was, in essence, bereft of any new ideology. As a matter of fact, the new dispensation represented a retrograde relapse to and revival of centuries-old colonialism and slavery. Indeed, the resources and wills of others were usurped to mollify the insatiable greed of the few through Foucault, and other tools of repression. The manifestations of this policy are mirrored and include pronounced policies of containment by the architects and proponents of a unipolar world order in the European theatre and especially reckless acts in Ukraine, provocative containment policies against China’s pursuit in Asia for analogous objectives and considerations, trends that these policies portend to global peace. In our neighbourhood, the ramifications of this policy include the perilous war unleashed to stifle the Palestinian cause and evict them from their land, the commotion that it continues to engender and the wider regional conflagration that it may trigger, acts of subversion conducted and multiple crises fomented in several parts in Africa under various pretexts to preserve and maintain colonial slavery, overt interventions carried out in the same manner in Latin America to install surrogate regimes, various subterfuges conducted to stifle and vocal bargaining, public protests in Europe and the United States against the backdrop of fragmentation of traditional coalitions. All these distressing developments and trends amplify the innate flaws and dysfunctionality of the reckless policies of the unipolar world order. Ladies and gentlemen, efforts exerted during the various epochs to imbue institutional structure and mandate to the global architecture were not ultimate aims and objectives in themselves. As it is indeed palpable, institutional formats are mere mechanisms and modalities for achieving the desired goals and objectives. Peace and stability constitute indispensable prerequisites for the promotion of prosperity and growth and the attainment of the ultimate human aspirations of justice and the prevalence of a just political order. In other words, the assertion and guarantee of a just global order where domination, deceit, coercion and intimidation, plunder and monopolization are not countenanced or tolerated. nd others. On the other hand, the logical corollary to failure is not despondency but redoubled and more vigorous commitment and resilience in order to achieve the cherished objectives and goals. Ladies and gentlemen, allow me now to revert to the predicament of the Eritrean people, which epitomizes in all respects the typical ordeal of numerous other peoples. Three generations of Eritreans were doomed to pay preciously and inordinately huge sacrifices for almost 80 years since the end of the Second World War, merely because the Dallas brothers determined that Eritrea does not serve the United States’ strategic interests. As it happened, the people of Eritrea were compelled to wage political and armed struggle of liberation for 50 long years. And even when they achieved their hard-won independence in 1991, they were denied respite and the opportunity to funnel their energies for nation-building. Indeed, the same hegemonic policy considerations and defunct ploys were ramped up to foment an unremitting crisis and instability by instigating border conflicts and other ruses. The suffering and economic damage that was inculcated, the opportunity loss incurred, have been enormous by any standards. Still, and in the face of unwarranted onslaught, the resilience of the Eritrean people was not dampened. And yet the spiral of mindless hostility continued to intensify without letting up. In 2009, Eritrea was subjected to sanctions on the basis of unsubstantiated and trumped-up charges. As it happened, the forces of hegemony plotted to destroy Eritrea. To further punish the people of Eritrea and invoke a preposterous pretext for a people and countries that have waged a relentless struggle against terrorism and domination for decades. The sanctions were ultimately lifted in 2018, but the question remains, why was it imposed in the first place? Furthermore, it must be borne in mind that illicit unilateral sanctions, futile demonization campaigns as well as subversive acts to instigate conflicts in the region still continue unabated. Ladies and gentlemen, the ordeals meted out to the people of Eritrea is only the tip of the iceberg. The tribulations imposed on other peoples in Africa, Latin America, Asia, Europe and the Americas are severe indeed. In the event, we urge for the categorical lifting of the unilateral coercive measures and sanctions imposed on countries like Eritrea, Zimbabwe, Venezuela and Cuba, including the six-year-long embargo against Cuba and its unjust placement on the dubious list of state sponsors of terrorism. Meanwhile, we need to pause and ask what is the relevance and impact of the fundamental principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter against the backdrop of the law of the jungle that the hegemonic powers are bent on imposing? This reality amplifies the imperative and the urgency for the peoples of the world to strive with higher vigor, fortitude and enhanced solidarity than what has transpired for one hundred years, to install a global order that guarantees peace and stability. This is not an opinion that can be left to circumstances. The forces of Germany must also be made accountable for their crimes, for the dispensation of justice. Let me conclude my brief address by reiterating our best wishes for success in our current endeavors. I thank you.

President: I thank the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Eritrea. I now give the floor to His Excellency Bakary Yaou Sangare, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Minister of Cooperation, and Nigerien Abroad of the Niger.

Bakary Yaou Sangare – Niger: Distinguished President, distinguished Heads of State and Government, distinguished Heads of Delegations, ladies and gentlemen, at the outset, I would like to warmly congratulate Mr. Philemon Yang on his election. I also would like to express to his predecessor, Mr. Dennis Francis of Trinidad and Tobago, my sincere thanks for his outstanding work during his mandate, despite the turbulent global context. Unfortunately, I will not go any further in my congratulations, and you’ll understand why. Ladies and gentlemen, exactly one year ago, in this same hall, from this very same podium, my country, Niger, was unjustly and unjustifiably deprived of its right to speak. That wasn’t the worst of it. This decision was debated at the time. But the worst was that at the same time, representatives from other countries in the same situation as we were, were authorized to speak. And they were even received with honors by the Secretary General of the United Nations. You can easily understand and agree with me that we’re looking at double standards. Double standards that tarnish the credibility of our common organization. My country accepted that decision with dignity, but we did feel left behind. That is why my remarks today will focus on those left behind and on human dignity. Human dignity, ladies and gentlemen, is perfectly in keeping with the ideals behind our transformation in Niger. Those left behind, on the other hand, result from conflict, violence in many forms, inequality, and lack of solidarity, as well as the marginalization of a large portion of the population of our planet, people who aspire for a better world. Before continuing, I would like to welcome into this session the presence of Palestine, which has been left behind. We hope that its presence, so richly deserved among us, will represent a decisive step toward the emergence of a free, independent, sovereign Palestinian state, living in peace with its neighbors within the borders of the Pacific. Niger reaffirms its support to the Palestinian cause. We believe only a two-state solution can end the cycle of violence and can guarantee peace and security in the region. My country also laments the situation in Lebanon and calls for an immediate cessation of hostilities. Ladies and gentlemen, every year we engage in the ritual of lamenting the situation of poor countries and pleading for a more equitable world. But we’re forced to observe that we are holding too many meetings and taking too little action. We are stagnating. Poor countries see what is happening. While they founder, the rich are lining their pockets with our resources, continuing to support corrupt and subservient regimes, regimes that rig elections and plunge their people into total suffering. Meanwhile, the international community stands aside in silent complicity, which once again demonstrates their double standards. Ladies and gentlemen, from this podium, I call upon the exploited peoples, peoples left behind, to tell them that it is not the affluent countries that will be finding solutions for us. I affirm that these solutions are within us. They consist in refusing to demean ourselves by begging for aid. They consist in building worthy partnerships in which our natural resources are paid for at the price that they deserve and benefits invested for our population. It is in this spirit that my country is using its own funds to address the damages and humanitarian crisis caused by unprecedented flooding that occurred this year. We don’t need any lessons about democracy. What is important is the interests, the choices, and the aspirations of our brave peoples. As stated by the President of the National Council for the Salvation of the Homeland and Head of State, His Excellency Brigadier General Abdurrahman Ghani, no state and no interstate organization shall dictate to my country what conduct to adopt, let alone its agenda in terms of strategic or diplomatic partnership. Ladies and gentlemen, As you know, the Sahel region for more than a decade now has been suffering a severe security crisis that jeopardizes the very existence of its states and which represents an ignominious attack on international peace and security. To present a united front against the common challenges that we are facing, especially security challenges, the three states led by their excellencies, Captain Ibrahim Traore, President of Burkina Faso, Colonel Asimi Goita, President of the Transition, Head of State of Mali, and Brigadier General Abdurrahman Tiani, President of the National Council for the Salvation of the Homeland, Head of State of Niger, signed on September 16th, 2023, the Lipta Kogurma Charter, thus establishing the Alliance of Sahel States, or AES, today. We can see the strong support of the population as well as the military successes won on the ground by the AES defense and security forces in their battle against terrorism and crime. Here I would like to commend the creation of the unified force of the AES and the excellent coordination the units have demonstrated. I pay a sincere tribute to all of the civilian and military victims of the violence in the Sahel. Ladies and gentlemen, at the historic summit of the heads of state of the AES held in Niamey on July 6th, 2024, the alliance became a confederation, a confederation based on three pillars, namely defense and security. This new strategic framework for integration has the ultimate goal of becoming a federation. It boasts a wealth of natural resources to attain its goals. This wealth has caught the covetous eye of certain Western powers, which are financing and arming terrorist groups in order to destabilize our countries. And Niger reaffirms its strong condemnation of these hostile acts and rejects all forms of support for terrorism, especially the active and public support of Ukraine for the terrorist coalition that perpetrated a cowardly attack on Tindzawaten in Mali. But I also would like to condemn the subversive actions and new strategy of recolonization espoused and pursued by France, which trains, finances, arms, and provides intelligence to the terrorist groups of the Sahel. It provides food and lodging to its local lackeys, some of which occupy the diplomatic premises of Niger in Paris in flagrant violation of the Vienna Convention of 1961 on diplomatic relations. So far from halting the momentum underway in the Sahel, these attempts at destabilization are only strengthening our country’s resolve to forge ahead as we pursue our goals. In spite of all these adversities, the AES caravan goes on. Mr. President, the Confederation of Sahel States is now, as much as some might be displeased by it, a new new geopolitical deal, which will fully play its role in the international arena while respecting the sovereignty and the freedom of choice of its partners. As stated by His Excellency Colonel Asimi Goyta, President of the Confederation of the AES, on the first anniversary of the alliance, quote, in our spirit of independence and regained sovereignty, we remain open to cooperation with brotherly and friendly peoples based on fraternity and mutual respect. Ladies and gentlemen, on the national level, the inclusive vision of the President of the CNSP and Head of State, Brigadier General Abdurrahman Tiyani, is based on four strategic pillars as follows, bolstering security and social cohesion, promoting good governance, developing production bases, and accelerating social reforms. These pillars aim to ensure the security, political, and socioeconomic sovereignty of our countries. They inform all of the actions of the state and its partners to pave the way for a structural transformation of the Nigerian economy and to improve the population’s well-being. To guide this transformation, especially in the mining and oil sectors, my country is willing to sign partnership agreements with foreign investors based on the principle of win-win cooperation and while respecting the dignity of our peoples, which have until now been left behind. The goal is to make the Sahel a region of peace and prosperity, as affirmed by President Tiyani. In closing, I would like to thank our brotherly countries are friends Burkina Faso, Mali, Togo, Morocco, Turkey, Russia, China, Iran and all others who have supported Niger as it transforms itself. I would like to conclude by asking the diaspora of our countries, wherever they may be, to continue to pray for God to protect the AES, to protect our peoples and our governments. Long live solidarity between peoples. Long live the AES Confederation. Thank you.

President: I thank the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Cooperation and Nigerien Abroad of the Niger. I now give the floor to His Excellency Karamoko Jean Marie Traore, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Cooperation and Burkina Bay Abroad of Burkina Faso.

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso: Mr. President, Secretary General of the United Nations, Distinguished Delegates, I have the great privilege and the honor of conveying to you on behalf of His Excellency Captain Ebrahim Traore, President of Burkina Faso, Head of State, the brotherly and friendly greetings of the valiant people of Burkina Faso. Bikina Faso. A people who, in the face of adversity, namely the heinous acts of aggressors and enemies of peace, machinations and interference in its many forms, a people that, in spite of all of the above, have developed a resilience to continue its glorious journey towards inclusive social and economic development. I’m also delighted to bring to you, on behalf of the people and government of Bikina Faso, my warm congratulations, Mr President, on your brilliant election to steer this 79th session of the General Assembly. I also wish to convey the congratulations of my delegation to Mr Dennis Francis, your predecessor, for the achievements garnered over the course of his mandate in an international context marked by deep division. Secretary General, Bikina Faso quite rightly appreciates the work done by the UN system and its partners under your leadership, work that they continue to do on the ground to support my government’s efforts. In this connection, indeed, my country is delighted at the choice of the theme for the 79th session of the General Assembly, which calls us to action. It is Leaving No One Behind, Acting Together for the Advancement of Peace, Sustainable Development and Human Dignity for Present and Future Generations. How evocative that title is! By referring to that theme, allow me, first of all, to convey to you the aspirations of all strata of Sahelian society in general and the aspirations of Bikina Faso’s people in particular. One account reads as follows, I am a peasant from Bikina Faso. I look to Protect Traditions and Customs. I passionately farm my land that’s been bequeathed to me by ancestors to feed my family and guarantee their well-being. I want to live free, proud and in dignity. Another account reads, I am a woman, a mother, a dignified descendant of the Yenager Gwimbi Oetara princesses. Like other brave Sahelian women, I have an unparalleled strength of character. I would give my life to guarantee that my children, my brothers and sisters and my compatriots can survive and thrive in a society of peace and love. I wish to live free, proud and in dignity. Another account reads, I am a young Burkina Faso citizen. I am a farmer, a livestock rearer, a trader, a civil servant, an artist, a craftsman, a student. I am a young person. I am one of the young people from many regions with many different backgrounds. I come from a brave group of young people, a strong, struggling group of young people, and I am committed to contributing to Burkina Faso’s development. I wish to live free, proud and in dignity. Another account reads, I am a child. I might be a girl or a boy from towns or villages, internally displaced person sites. I want to live free, proud and in dignity. Someone else, I am a young citizen of Burkina Faso living abroad. I am a conscientious, courageous, honest worker from the land of honourable people. Far from my beloved homeland, I wish to enthusiastically fight for the stability and peace of my country and my sub-region. I want to live free, proud and in dignity. Another account, I am a soldier from Burkina Faso, Mali Niger, or a volunteer for the defence of the homeland, a husband, a mother, a son. I took an oath to defend my homeland and I will sacrifice myself on the battlefield to protect my co-citizens. Mr. President, I wish to live free, proud and in dignity. I am contributing to the development of my sub-region. Mr. President, These aspirations are the beacons which guide my government’s action. The struggle of that government is to create a society in which the men and women of the Sahel can live free, proud and in dignity. The theme of our session is one we highly appreciate because it is so relevant. In reality, it unveils a concern as crucial and long-standing as the United Nations itself, a theme which is tackled by almost all of the debates that occur here. What the theme really conveys is that now we’re no longer simply thinking about what to do or how to do it. What we need to do now is give life to our speeches through tangible actions. We must go beyond words and finally take action to usher in a fairer world, rid of prejudice and stereotypes, which seek to treat certain peoples or certain parts of the planet as second class, treat them as people doomed to wait in the prisons of isolation and scorn, waiting for handouts, living at the mercy and whims of great powers that claim to be the only ones able to indicate the path that others must follow, and they dictate how others must live. We must focus our efforts on the common goals of our organization, an organization whose primary goal is to promote the well-being of peoples by guaranteeing that they can live in peace and security. This is why we have this urgent and overriding need to build a new… the world together and work together to create a fairer world is entirely valid in the current context. A context dominated by protracted crises, complex conflicts and unequal economic governance which further divides states and exacerbates differences between people. The consequences of such division are human tragedy. This disastrous state of affairs is the result of a multilateralism standing at a crossroads, a multilateralism which is exhausted, a multilateralism whose reputation has been neutered time and time again by predatory actions by certain member states who have decided that they are the masters of the world and, as such, that they have built their foreign policy on subjugating and exploiting other states. We need to be properly concerned by this issue because the harmony and the cohesion of our world is at stake. For that reason, Burkina Faso would like to take this opportunity to once again appeal to reason, to the wisdom of all of us. We would like to appeal to the powers of our world to prioritize an inclusive global governance which is rid of hegemonizing visions. And if we can do that, the UN’s glory will once again be restored. Mr. President, restoring the integrity of our territory by ensuring our people can live safe and enjoy their property, remodeling political, administrative, economic and financial governance so that they can further their ambitions is one of our goals. We also need to usher in reforms and development initiatives which will lead to shared prosperity and economic and social progress which is sustainable. These are all areas of focus. Baccarat, and the President of the Sahel. With his leadership and foresight, we will prevail. The people of Bikino Faso have decided to affirm and embrace their sovereignty, putting an end to their subjugation. They have demonstrated extraordinary resilience, just as all the people of the Sahel have done. They have understood the importance and magnitude of our struggle and, as such, have joined the ranks of our defence and security forces. With this tireless support, thanks to patriotism, the genius, the bravery and the spirit of sacrifice of the sons and daughters of Bikino Faso, our country has notched up success we couldn’t even have hoped for. We’ve also had significant successes in our committed fight against terrorists, terrorists instrumentalised, deployed from resistance and financed by neo-colonial powers. Here, I wish to pay a much-deserved tribute to civilians and members of our military who have fallen on the battlefield, and I bow down before their memory. Mr President, we’re seeing strategic reforms and visionary reforms where our troops are concerned. We’ve built their capacity, we’ve reorganised our fighting forces on the ground and, in so doing, we’ve increased our means of resources to act, and that has been our salvation because, ultimately, we have won back all of the areas that were overrun by criminals and their allies. Turning now to statistics, almost 70% of our territory is now under state control. That compares to 40% in 2022. That turning tide has allowed actions to return. Schools have been able to reopen in less than two years. Our taking back of our territory has allowed more than 700,000 people to return to their villages. and the unfailing solidarity that we have seen. The patriotic mobilization of our nation has enabled us to collect an estimated 1.9 billion dollars from the current financial crisis, in 2023, which is far exceeding our initial estimates. That is highly dramatic. In other words, you can see here how determined our people are to finance and wage a struggle against terrorists and their allies. Mr. President, at this very moment, we are notching up successes in our offensive against obscurantist forces, against the acolytes that have a questionable, shady reputation. At the same time, we’re seeing that we are the victims of a defamation and smear campaign being waged against our soldiers. They are being accused of violating human rights without the slightest smidge of evidence being brought forward. This propaganda has been cobbled together and aims to lower the morale of Burkinabe patriots and to sabotage their legitimate struggles. That’s happening quite simply because the acolytes of chaos have not yet understood the dynamic underway. They haven’t yet understood our desire to free ourselves of all paternalism and condescending guardianships. My country would like to take I want to take this opportunity to convey its deep gratitude to all countries and sincere partners who have supported us in our glorious journey towards inclusive social and economic development. Here, I’d like to invite all UN member states to pay no heed whatsoever to this media smear campaign which, and this is patently clear, is none other than the expression of the distress of terrorists and their sponsors, because they have been thwarted. I’d also like to reassure you of the professionalism and stellar conduct of our defence and security forces that has been demonstrated through their participation in peacekeeping operations and recognised time and time again at this very podium. The ongoing training and examination of our defence and security forces and volunteers in international humanitarian law guarantee that our professional conduct is unimpeachable when it comes to respecting human rights. Mr President, we all seem to agree that we need to combat international terrorism. And as such, my country is deeply concerned by the support which state entities seem to be granting to terrorists. This sponsoring is something we have decried time and time again. Some people say that it’s a simple matter of perspective, but this sponsoring has been brought before the eyes of the world recently through the paradoxical attitude shown by Ukraine, a member state of our organisation. Indeed, Ukraine has unambiguously confirmed its involvement in the terrorist attacks which claimed the lives of members of the Malian defence and security forces in Tizawatin in Mali last July. Ukraine has confessed that it supports international terrorism, particularly in the Sahel, and as such, this country has shone a light on the subversive activities it wages in the Sahel, following in the footsteps of other states who have made made betrayal their bread and butter. We reiterate our staunch condemnation of these acts of aggression and this apology for terrorism which violate the United Nations Charter and the relevant international conventions. These particularly serious events reveal desires and whims which have time and time again peppered the history of our continent, balkanization, the killing of leaders, interference in the domestic policies of African states, and with the ultimate aim of getting hands on our resources. What means to achieve these nefarious ends range from the manipulation of national leaders and regional and sub-regional organizations, the waging of proxy wars, as is the case in Sahel and Ukraine, and other countries financing and arming terrorists with total impunity. I am vindicated in this interpretation by the worrying proliferation of military bases in our sub-region, and this interpretation also explains how it is that criminal gangs are coming into possession of sophisticated weapons, that this is a new type of terrorism, and as such, the stability and very foundations of our state and our organizations are in peril. So we need to take resolute action. Turning now to the Ukrainian aggression, and in light of it, the countries of the Confederation of Sahel States already referred this matter to the Security Council. We did so on the 20th of August, and we await an unequivocal response. Mr. President, there is a need to ensure security in Sahel. As such, Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger took the sovereign decision on the 16th of September 2023, through the Lipto-Gurma Charter, to create the Alliance of Sahel States. This is a military alliance. It is a military alliance. la Traite Alliance for Collective Defense and Mutual Assistance to Combat Terrorism and Organized Crime Across Our Territory. To also appropriately address the complex challenges of development, the countries of the Alliance of Sahel States, the AES, have decided to extend their cooperation to other key areas. It was with this in mind that in Niamey, in Niger, on the 6th of July 2024, we held the first summit of the Heads of State of the AES. Following this historic summit, Their Excellencies Captain Ibrahim Traore, President of Burkina Faso, Colonel Asimi Goita, President of the Transition, Head of State of Mali, and Brigadier General Abdourahman Tiani, President of the National Council for the Protection of the Fatherland, Head of State of Niger, adopted the treaty creating the Confederation of Sahel States, the aforementioned AES. The enthusiasm sparked by the creation of the AES can be explained by the fact that sub-regional institutions and mechanisms have proven unable to respond to the legitimate security concerns harbored by our people. The creation of this organization will be our salvation, and its primary aim is to protect the people of the Sahel, who have already been dealt such a heavy blow by the security and humanitarian crises. The measures have already been taken by others to exacerbate their suffering in this regard, and that is why they place such hope in the AES. This session calls upon us to leave no one behind, and nevertheless, the international arena, alas, remains marked by increasingly rife tensions which seriously threaten peace and security, and the UN is standling impotently by. We have always called for diplomacy to prevail in order to peacefully Sahara led under the aegis of the UN Secretary General with a view to reaching a mutually acceptable and negotiated solution as recommended by the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. In the Middle East, Burkina Faso reaffirms its solidarity with the Palestinian people that are in the midst of an unprecedented tragedy. The two-state solution, having Israel and Palestine living side by side with good neighborly relations, remains the only objective alternative that Burkina Faso continues to support. We accept Palestine as a member state of this organization, and that stance is a natural continuation of our beliefs. There is unspeakable suffering being visited upon the most vulnerable peoples by unilateral coercive measures, which are imposed by states. These must be forbidden if we wish to give real meaning to and achieve the goals of this current session. Consequently, we call for the immediate lifting of economic, commercial and financial sanctions imposed upon certain states. The only thing these states have done wrong is seek freedom for their peoples. That is the case of Cuba. It is also the case for the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Nicaragua, Iran and many other countries. Repair the Historic Injustice, which continues to be done to Africa. Mr. President, to conclude, I wish to make it clear that Burkina Faso has deep faith in the U.N. However, this organization must take action with full respect for the sovereignty of member states, for their strategic choices and their fundamental interests. In the Sahel, we’re seeing renewal and hope burn bright, and that has been born of the AES confederation. We remain convinced that this new sub-regional community, which is not taking aim at any country or any people, can contribute, working together with sincere partners, to move forward without any hypocrisy and fight against terrorism and insecurity in the Sahel. May God bless Burkina Faso. May God bless the AES confederation. May God bless Africa. Fatherland or death, we will prevail.

President: I thank the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Cooperation and Burkinabe Abroad of Burkina Faso. And I give the floor to His Excellency Jean-Claude Garkosso, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Francophonie and Congolese Abroad of the Congo.

Jean-Claude Garkosso – Congo: President of the General Assembly, Secretary-General of the United Nations, Distinguished Heads of State and Governors. Distinguished Communities, Dear Friends First and foremost, I would like to convey my deep admiration for Mr. Philemon Yang, a man of great renown on the African continent, with the brilliant election as President, of our Assembly, and who has led our debate with outstanding skill. Mr. President, our world, as most speakers have said from this very podium, is indeed standing at a crossroads. It is facing a sort of deadly spiral of overlapping crises and dangerous conflicts, which one might think are all but unresolvable. Indeed, situations involving war and armed violence of all forms – in Ukraine, in Palestine, in Lebanon, in Sudan, in the Sahel, in the Horn of Africa, in the east of the DRC – are situations that I could unfortunately continue to list for quite some time. And that is on top of the climate crisis, crippling debt burdens and, of course, the apocalyptic spectre of nuclear war. These are all existential challenges, Mr. President, that will require what remains of our human Human Wisdom All these situations, all of us in this hall know it, are profoundly revealing at the same time that they are enthrall to human vanity. They faithfully reflect the irrepressible desire of some of us to dominate absolutely and to possess absolutely. This is an insidious vice, surely rooted in the very origin of humanity, which we have yet to eradicate completely. From this podium, speaking for peace, I call for all those with political power throughout the world to hear me. For the sake of peace, I call upon their collective wisdom, this cardinal virtue that was taught by the ancients in all of our societies, in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Americas and the Pacific. For the sake of peace, I am calling upon the conscience of all of us to awaken to the fact that we are one single human race, travelling on the same ship, linked as a community of destiny bound by reciprocal obligations and by shared duties. I call upon universal fraternity, human fraternity. This generous utopia that emerged during the Enlightenment and which, in 1948, led to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which has become the credo of all humanists. Mr. President, our world is in dire need of rediscovering peace, otherwise it is rushing toward its own perdition. Peace is not just an option, it is not an alternative. Peace is an imperative, and this imperative falls upon all of us, everywhere. It is this imperative toward peace, Mr. President, that drives the mediation efforts today of the African Union in Libya, a country where President Denis Sassou Nguesso, on behalf of whom I speak, has been striving tirelessly for years for general peace and for inclusive reconciliation. Through perseverance and force of will, the High-Level Committee of the African Union on Libya, which he presides, has been able to bring these enemy brothers around the same table. This committee encouraged them to speak to each other, encouraged them to forgive each other, and convinced them to yield to justice that foundation of the rule of law which Libya has been aspiring to, Libya which is now emerging from its ashes like the invincible phoenix. This peace, so diligently sought and so patiently cultivated, which underlies the pact for the future which we just adopted, clearly will require the affirmation of a multipolar world, a paragon of the diversity of cultural expressions. It will require a just, stable, equitable world in which all peoples can coexist on an equal footing without discrimination based on race, tradition, or religion. Whence the urgent need to reform international institutions that emerged after the Second World War, beginning with the UN Security Council, which must reflect our modern cosmopolitan world through a more just representation of the world’s peoples. Here I repeat Africa’s legitimate demand for two seats among the permanent members of the Security Council with veto rights. My country reaffirms the central and lasting role of the African common position as laid out in the Ezzouini Consensus and the CERT Declaration. Mr. President, the time has come. For Africa, to take up its rightful place in the community of nations, and thus it is up to us, representatives of the allied nations present here, to choose, to make the honorable choice, to enter history through the front door, and to once and for all eradicate medieval prejudices and obsolete stereotypes on Africa. It is up to us to consolidate and magnify our many convergences, those same convergences that light the true paths in the history of man. Mr. President, there can be sustainable development on any continent if our country, if our planet, is not protected from the destruction of the environment. Climate change has now become an existential threat. And this threat, as we know, is multifaceted. Rising temperatures, melting glaciers, disastrous flooding, rampant desertification, the destruction of biodiversity, epidemic outbreaks, and the exodus of populations caused by all of the aforementioned factors, all of these clearly illustrate the fragility of our beautiful blue planet. The community of nations has no choice. It must take action here and now. It must act without hesitation, with rigor, with responsibility, to save our world from an irreversible cataclysm. One of the pillars of this action, of course, is intelligent reforestation. We must all contribute as far as we can. The Republic of Congo and the African Union have come to the 79th General Assembly with a well-developed strategy, which my delegation has already registered as a draft resolution for the upcoming work of our committees. This strategy, for which I here call for the support of our Assembly, aims at a significant, steady and irreversible increase of global forest cover based on international cooperation, which combines reforestation and forest rehabilitation activities throughout the world. All of this will be based on a cooperative, coordinated, concerted, consensus-based approach between states. Mr. President, before leaving the podium, I would like to speak about a situation that is pricking our conscience, a situation that will not allow us morally to stand idly by. I’m speaking of the protracted blockade inflicted on Cuba, this embargo which will soon have lasted a century, an embargo that is causing unthinkable suffering to the innocent people of this country. Mr. President, this embargo, which many Americans themselves find archaic, this embargo should long ago have been simply abolished. Once again, I would like to call upon the wisdom of the people and leaders of the United States, most of whom, as we know, have had nothing to do with this lingering phantom of the Cold War. I urge the government of the United States to once and for all turn the page on this painful history of two peoples, two peoples both born of a melting pot, the miraculous cultural osmosis between Europe and Africa. In closing, Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, I speak on behalf of all the peoples of the world in hoping that we can staunchly fight for the emergence of a new humanity, a peaceful humanity, which turns its back upon war and death, and which stands side by side with each other, an authentic humanity, which tirelessly combats endemic poverty, a poverty that is ravaging developing countries, which is a real cancer upon our global society, which is one of the root causes of the frustration and violence that is darkening the horizons or horizons of hope, a fraternal humanity as imagined in this very city by the great artist John Lennon, and lastly, a humanity as rainbow, as dreamed of from the depths of his prison cell by the great Nelson Mandela.

President: I thank the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Francophonie and Congolese Abroad of the Congo. I now give the floor to His Excellency Ahmed Attaf, Minister of Foreign Affairs and National Community Abroad of Algeria.

Ahmed Attaf – Algeria: Thank you Mr. President. We are once again meeting at the United Nations, and our world is at a critical, sensitive and dangerous juncture. A juncture characterized by the accumulation of conflicts, crises, wars and a widening gap of development disparities between the North and the South, as well as worsening climate change and environmental risks of all kinds. A juncture that reveals the magnitude of the shortcomings that have afflicted the collective security system in light of the tendency to resolve differences by force and the excessive and selective use of unilateral punitive measures. The failure to fulfill the commitments undertaken and the disregard for international legitimacy, as well as the increasing polarization and accompanying absence of the role of the Security Council and the erosion of multilateral international action as a whole. Last but not least, it is a juncture that puts at stake the entire system of international relations, with the rules, principles and controls that has been codified in the Charter of the United Nations, and the mechanisms, structures and institutions that it is based on that have been put in place to serve the aspirations and purposes and ambitions that bind our countries. From this perspective, looking ahead to the eighth decade of the United Nations Organization must be an opportunity to renew our commitment to the system that brings us together, that is based on the rule of law, not the rule of force. That is based on the power of the law, not the law of power. That is based on the power of reason, not the logic of power. We are in a dire need today to restore our commitment to and respect for the United Nations Charter and the rules of international law, before which we are all equal. We all have a duty to respect and abide by those rules. The ongoing genocide in Gaza that has continued for almost one year, and the recent spillover of this war into the West Bank and Lebanon, and the sharp, multi-faceted, multi-front Israeli escalation in the entire region, all of which could not have happened if the international community at the time had taken a firm stand. that forces the Israeli settlement occupation what has been imposed on others, namely punitive and deterrent measures, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations under Chapter 7. The international community today should hasten to put an end to the inferno against the Palestinian and Lebanese peoples, and to rein in the Israeli occupier and its desire to engulf the Middle East region into a state of crisis, conflict and endless war. The international community should also realize that it is facing a decisive phase in the history of the Palestinian question, a phase that does not accept a return to the status quo ante, a phase that does not accept hesitation or inaction in supporting the national Palestinian project, a phase that does not allow for procrastination in supporting the move towards the establishment of an independent and sovereign Palestinian state as a just, lasting and final solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. From this podium at its previous session, the President of the Republic, Mr. Abdel-Majid Tabun, appealed to our United Nations organization to expedite the admission of the full membership of the State of Palestine. This has been done in a less volatile, tense and tragic circumstance in the occupied Palestinian territory and throughout the neighborhood. Today, the question of Palestine is at its darkest historical chapter ever. This approach is inevitable and urgent and self-evident. The full membership of the State of Palestine in this organization remains a crucial step towards the preservation of the two-state solution, towards addressing what the Israeli occupation is gearing up to thwart, a step towards safeguarding the tenets of resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict and the pillars of security and stability in the region. With regard to developments in our regional neighborhood, Algeria’s conviction remains firm that in order to address the diverse challenges facing the states and peoples of the region require an international support and global commitment to address the different challenges that weigh heavily on our Pan-African space. This is fully the case for the Sahel region. In this same vein, we look forward to ending colonization by turning the last page of colonization, which we see on the territory of the Western Sahara. We provide all support for the Secretary General and his personal envoy in their efforts to enable the two parties, the Kingdom of Morocco and the Polisario Front, to resume the path of direct negotiation to reach a political solution that will guarantee for the Sahrawi people the exercise of its inalienable right of self-determination that is not subject to the statute of limitation. As for those that seek to entrench the status quo of colonization by falsifying the clear facts and through desperate maneuvers to distract attention from what is clear, we would like to reaffirm that colonization must end no matter how long the time passes and that legitimate rights of the Sahrawi people will be implemented sooner or later. As for Libya, Algeria calls for the expeditious addressing of the scourge of foreign interference which is sowing discord in that brotherly country and fueling clashes and conflicts among its people. Only then can our Libyan brothers come together on a consensus that begins to achieve the goals of national reconciliation and fosters a trend towards the organization of fair and free and transparent elections. All of this in the service of the high purpose that we desire from the bottom of our hearts which is the unification of Libya, its people, its territory, its government and its institutions. At the continental level, Algeria is continuing its efforts and endeavors to make a qualitative contribution to the African overarching action in light of the priorities firmly set by the continental agenda. Africa, first and foremost, looks forward to the activation of African-led solutions as well as development and implementation to put an end to conflicts. and to address the different crises and conflicts that the different peoples and countries of the continent are afflicted by. Further, Africa looks forward to addressing economic development and join the revolutions in artificial intelligence, digitization, and renewable energy. Third, Africa is looking forward to advancing its strategic priorities which are at the heart of the reform of international financial, monetary, and banking institutions to improve African representation at these institutions as well as the structural reform of global indebtedness as well as international financing that is appropriate to the requirements of development at the Continent Eleven. Four, and finally, Africa looks forward to correcting the historic injustice imposed on it at the Security Council and enabling it to occupy its rightful place in this central body of the United Nations as it is currently, as it has recently joined the G20 as a permanent member. With the same commitment at the Continental Level, Algeria continues its endeavors to establish a balanced, beneficial, and meaningful partnership in the Sahel region, which is currently undergoing a fragile situation as countries in that region are struggling. and many others who are suffering from an escalation of political unrest and an increase in the threat of terrorism and the absence of sustainable development, as well as the spread of the phenomenon of climate change. Algeria, in the face of all this, reiterates its solidarity with the peoples and countries of the Sahel region. We stress our firm belief that our security and stability and prosperity is part of that of the security, prosperity and stability of its neighboring African region. A representative of a country from this region and from this space have, in brazen language, attacked my country with base language that should not be dignified with a reply. A reply of this level should not be becoming of this noble podium. This base language, impolite language, will not be met by my country except by a polite language, one that truly reflects our loyalty and sincerity to the deep-rooted, unwavering bonds and deep-seated desires and links in the region, which cannot be shaken by transit circumstances and the triviality of those who are behind it. My country has a firm and long-standing will, and our hands are extended to our brothers as we seek to build with our brothers a Sahel edifice that enjoys security and prosperity. Syria today is taking firm steps on the clear path set forth by our President, Abdel-Majid Taboun, to enhance political stability and institutions and to build a strong and diverse economy that would end our dependence on the oil sector and to promote the social character of our state and as a solid legacy of our noble revolution of liberation. This approach has yielded its first results in the consolidation of the country’s security and stability and consolidation of its democratic course, particularly during the recent presidential elections, as well as by laying the foundations for a comprehensive economic renaissance which has restored our national economy’s position at the African level among the powerful economies on the continent and has opened up opportunities for profitable cooperation and partnership for all parties. In light of these achievements, Algeria is endeavoring to strengthen its relations with all brotherly, friendly and partner states in and outside these areas of affiliation. My country also seeks to continue to work closely with all member states of our United Nations, which share our same commitment and concern to uphold the principles and values enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. The current situation in our world is difficult and dangerous, which breaks the strongest of wills and erodes the most solid of determination. We are very confident that hope will survive and that ambition will remain available. From the womb of crises, opportunities are born, and from the depths of suffering, wills are sharpened. And from the heart of hardship, hope is born. We hope from the bottom of our hearts that we will have a better world for present and future generations. I thank you, Mr. President.

President: I thank the Minister for Foreign Affairs and National Community Abroad of Algeria. I now give the floor to His Excellency Albert Shingiro, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation of Burundi.

Albert Shingiro – Burundi: Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Heads of State and Government, Excellencies, Ministers, Dear Colleagues, Mr. Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the United Nations, Distinguished Guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, All protocol observed. It is a great honor and a privilege for me to address this August assembly on behalf of the President, His Excellency Evariste Ndishamie, President of the Republic of Burundi. He was not able to be with you this morning, and he entrusted me with the task of representing him here to bring to you the voice and position of Burundi regarding the global challenges facing today’s world. Allow me now, Mr. President, to convey to you my warm congratulations on your brilliant election to the presidency of this session. Your wisdom, Mr. President, your long and rich political and diplomatic career, your qualities as a keen listener, and your experience as a seasoned negotiator are, for us, all things that will guarantee the success of this session. You can always count on the full support and cooperation of Burundi as you discharge your mandate, Mr. President. Mr. President, your predecessor, Ambassador Dennis Francis, deserves just as much admiration and recognition because he discharged his mandate with devotion, skill, and brilliance during the session that we have just closed. Allow me also, Mr. President, to pay equally deserved tribute to the Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Antonio Guterres, for his service to humankind, service rendered through his courageous action, still underway to make the United Nations an organization close to the peoples of the world, despite the complex global arena in which the organization works. Mr. President, the theme chosen for this session, namely, Leaving No One Behind, Acting Together for the Advancement of Peace, Sustainable Development and Human Dignity for Present and Future Generations, is particularly fitting, given that today’s world is hurtling full throttle towards fragmentation, and we’re seeing values of peace, solidarity and mutual comprehension being called into question. This fragmentation seems to go hand in hand with a new form of radicalization, which is drawing member states further and further away from reaching an understanding about how to address the global challenges facing us in a spirit of compromise and mutual trust. Today, more than ever before, Mr. President, it would seem that the majority of us act as if we were alone in this world. We act as if others did not exist or did not count. Solidarity has become a rare commodity at the very moment where we need it the most. Values are being eroded throughout the world, and yet we know that all conflicts, be these direct or proxy conflicts that the world has experienced, are born of the same seed. That is the denial of others’ interests, whether those interests, that identity, be cultural, religious or civilizational. In other words, all conflicts arise from the loss of trust, geopolitical jostling and deliberate misinformation. All of these polarize countries and paralyze societies in a situation which which is increasingly worrying. As is only right and proper, Mr. President, my country staunchly condemns all of those who wish to impose their points of view, their practices or their values or schools of thought upon others. Using the diplomacy of might is right. We condemn all of those who attach political conditions to development aid, whilst at the same time forgetting that the world is multipolar, that a difference in diversity is a driving force for development, economic growth and the very thriving of our societies. If embraced as the asset that it is, diversity in all its dimensions is a mine of opportunity, possibilities and a source of great inspiration. Many points of view in all their richness, experiences and practices create a wealth of ideas, knowledge, understanding and tools to accept the other. All of these can significantly increase a society’s ability to prosper, to understand the various points of view in today’s world and allow us to consequently live in peace and harmony with our environment, be this our immediate neighbourhood or further afield. As you know, Mr. President, cultural diversity and the diversity of values are a powerful lever to create ties that are stronger than our differences. Cultural diversity brings people together and as such supports social cohesion, peace, security and peaceful coexistence. Despite its unifying power, the unifying power of culture, the last twenty years have been marked by a growing instrumentalisation of culture and values in order to sow tension and division. Precisely because it is so heavy with meaning and intrinsically bound to people themselves. and many others. The cultural diversity and values which we hold dear have increasingly been placed on the front line of conflicts and used as a tool of division, even a weapon of war. Used, first and foremost, Mr. President, to subjugate weakened societies, particularly in the most fragile regions of our world. This narcissistic exploitation of culture and values has contributed to extending crises and conflicts, but it has also led to human rights being eroded, namely economic, social and cultural rights. Today, more than ever before, narrowing the divide between cultures, values and civilizations is urgent and necessary in order to establish peace, stability, solidarity and allow inclusive development, which leaves no one behind. Mr. President, the world that we live in today needs now more than ever before a consensus-based approach to major challenges such as the conflicts which continue to rage, natural disasters, climate change which is worsening, poverty and inequality which are omnipresent, mistrust and discord which are dividing the world. Our spirit of compromise is fading, international solidarity is losing momentum and, of course, there are the sustainable development goals which are very far indeed from being achieved. In terms of its role in building a better future and a global order based on the rule of law, a peaceful, equitable, prosperous and solidarity-based world, Burundi, my country, continues to pursue its ambition of building relations of friendship and cooperation based on the principle of sovereignty. already said as much, quite rightly indeed. In this regard, Burundi opposes unilateral measures imposed by certain stakeholders. These measures can unravel and destroy social fabric in the countries and societies targeted. Turning now to the implementation of UN Agenda 2030, Mr. President, if nothing is done to reverse current trends, we are slowly heading towards a situation where we fail to uphold the promise that we made to humankind in 2015 in this very same hall. We stand only six years from our deadline. The Secretary-General’s report on the SDGs and their achievement clearly demonstrates that only 17% to 18% of the SDGs are on track to be achieved. Almost half have seen only scant or moderate progress. More than a third have seen no progress at all, or progress has even been undone. In the face of such an alarming situation, we the people have no time to waste. We need to act together and quickly to save future generations who will judge us by our actions or by our inaction, as appropriate. Like all other nations, it is working night and day to significantly improve its people’s quality of life. The people of Burundi firmly believe that the only path towards genuine political independence involves economic independence. And to achieve that, Mr. President, the government of Burundi, under the leadership of the President of the Republic, has implemented an ambitious vision, but a feasible one. That vision looks to make Burundi an emerging country in 2040 and a developed country in 2016. The goal sought in the reference document of our President here is to build a nation where its population enjoys full well-being. Our goal is to see a sustained continuation of production and structural changes, leading to longer life expectancy and the meeting of fundamental needs. We’re also looking, through this document, to reduce unemployment and poverty in all its forms and manifestations. By 2040, Mr. President, Burundi intends to stand as a country of peace, a country in which everyone lives in decent conditions, where no one dies from preventable diseases. We will be a competitive economy, driven by the agri-food sector and our industry, which will be high in added value. will also be driven by mining for the benefit of our people and all of this will be done by whilst protecting our natural environment and by paying due attention to equity and gender balance. Burundi will always stand on the side of solutions and we reiterate our commitment to the peaceful resolution of disputes throughout the world using tools which preventive diplomacy makes available to us, namely dialogue, cooperation, joint work and negotiation. You are of course aware, Mr. President, distinguished delegates, that no developing country, or rather, says the Speaker, no development is possible without development, and peace cannot be possible without development. Peace without development is a mere pipe dream. Peace and development are two sides of the same coin. The terrorist threat, Mr. President, and the dangers linked to violent extremism have increased greatly in number in recent years and this is having an ever more bitter impact at a local, regional and international level. In the face of this existential threat, Burundi has committed to continuing and strengthening its cooperation with other nations to prevent and combat terrorism and violent extremism. We are doing this by making a substantial contribution to peace operations and counter-terrorism operations, namely in Somalia, Central Africa and in the east of the DRC. Our goal is to support these three brotherly countries in their legitimate efforts to restore state authority across the full extent of their territory. Mr. President, the climate crisis is pummeling our planet. There are many problems and challenges before our very eyes and sustainable solutions are taking their time because of a lack of financing and climate action in order to help the countries of the global south to face this three pronged planetary crisis, namely climate change, pollution and biodiversity loss. Burundi, like all other nations in the sub-region, is increasingly affected by climate change, despite the fact it contributes only minimally to global greenhouse gas emissions. The frequency of adverse climate phenomena, such as floods, landslides, droughts, the rising levels of Lake Tanganyika, are all demonstrations of how we’re facing climate change. These events are affecting agricultural cycles, causing harvest loss, food insecurity and the erosion of local ecosystems. We’re calling for quicker progress to be made to allow countries gravely affected to receive green financing to limit the adverse effects of climate change on the implementation of the SDGs. Mr. President, in order to do its part to stop climate change, Burundi, like other nations that signed the Paris Agreement, made a commitment through its nationally determined contributions document, a commitment to incorporate environmental protection, building resilience to climate change and food security into national policies and the vision of Burundi as an emerging country in 2040 and a developed country in 2060. As you are aware, Mr. President, climate change do not only have an impact on our physical environment, it also affects the environment that we live in. the Health of Our People. With that in mind, Mr. President, Burundi has established healthcare measures and public health measures and incorporated these into our climate change mitigation plan. And we beat the record set in the recent report of the Global Alliance for Climate Change, because we’re now at the top of the list in terms of countries that have given the most attention to their population’s health in their mitigation plans. Mr. President, several initiatives to protect and restore landscapes have also been taken, namely a far-reaching national reforestation program called Eau Burundi Arambaye, or Covered Burundi in French. This plan looks to promote agroforestry and the tracing of forest cover, and this plan seeks to involve all sectors of society. I’d like now to look at human rights. One of the challenges to be addressed for Burundi, dignity, as referred to in the theme of this session, begins by promoting and protecting human rights. These are universal, indivisible, interdependent, and inextricably linked. My country, Burundi, firmly believes that human rights must be strengthened and fully incorporate the fundamental principles of universality, transparency, impartiality, non-selectivity, non-politicization, and objectivity, as well as the rejection of two standards as a principle. Special mechanisms, sometimes imposed to deal with geopolitical tensions in certain areas of the world, must be sacrificed in favour of dialogue and cooperation. In this connection, Burundi must be given fair treatment within the Human Rights Council in Geneva. We call upon certain stakeholders to avoid continually clobbering The overriding conclusion is that in spite of its limits, of which the world is well aware, the multilateralism has served to significantly improve global problems. The most recent evidence that multilateralism is not dead and buried was the adoption by consensus in this very hall on the 22nd of September of our pact for the future and its annexes. This is a concise and action-oriented document. However, Mr. President, despite this encouraging result, there are signs that portend the gradual weakening of our spirit of compromise. There are harbingers of indifference when it comes to collective rules. In an increasingly globalized world where we are increasingly interdependent, no state, however powerful that state might be, can alone hope to address the challenges it faces. States must strengthen mutual commitment, must adopt a coordinated approach based on fair rules of the game to avoid unilateral actions which, as you are aware, take the form of clear interference in the domestic affairs of other countries in clear violation of the principles and values of the UN Charter. Mr. President, I wish to turn now to Security Council reform. Negotiations on this matter have finally become more flexible. We’re seeing movement. Through me, Burundi reaffirms its commitment to the common African position reflected in the Eselwini consensus. Mr. President, we will never be able to hammer home enough the following fact. The multilateral system is demonstrating that its capacity is limited to effectively guarantee proper global governance. Injustice, unprecedented injustice is being done to Africa. It’s the only continent absent from the Security Council among the permanent members, and we are underrepresented among the elected members. That injustice must stop now. The desire to perpetuate the exclusion, Mr. President, of more than 1,200,000 inhabitants from the table around which we take our major decisions is quite simply unacceptable. Mr. President, universal, equitable and affordable access to information, as well as to information infrastructure, is also one of the major challenges of our age. The Internet can be a tool to bring people and spaces together, and that’s why it was designed. However, the spiderweb, as we seem to call it, prioritizes rich countries, while at the same time developing countries have low levels of Internet connectivity. This is particularly true in Africa. Today in our world, our trade and our exchanges are becoming increasingly digital, Mr. President, and as such it’s vital that all countries have access to Internet, including AI, that is revolutionizing our world. There is a growing gaping gap between the countries of the Global North and the Global South, and that’s meaning that many people in the Global South are losing out on social, scientific and economic opportunities. Leaving no one behind is one of the pillars of the UN actions. So, as a matter of absolute urgency, this digital gap must be closed in the interests of current and future generations. Mr. President, I would be remiss if I did not inform this August assembly that our country is committed to implementing the theme of our assembly, that is…

President: Mélanie Joly, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Canada

Mélanie Joly – Canada: Mr. Vice-President, Distinguished Colleagues, It is an honour for me to take the floor before you today on behalf of Canada and the Canadians. I would like to underscore that I am meeting with you here on the traditional territory of the Lenape people. This recognition is important because today, in Canada, we are celebrating the National Day of Truth and Reconciliation, during which we recognize and commemorate the Indigenous peoples who were here before us and continue to live among us, recognize the pain caused by decades of abuse, negligence and racism. Here is where we would like to commit to doing better and to rectifying the errors of the past so we can move forward together. Canada is a country based on the rights and freedoms that are enshrined in our constitutional charter. A core reason Canada is a prosperous society is that, beyond offering the freedom to pursue a better life for you and your family, it is also a way for us to provide freedom from the barriers that prevent you from enjoyment. a Better Life, Freedom from Fear, Violence, Intimidation and Discrimination, Freedoms that Foster a Sense of Inclusivity and Belonging, Freedom that Protects the Vulnerable and Builds Stronger Communities. Far too often though, some of the loudest voices claiming to speak for freedom are the ones trying to redefine that word for their own purposes. They claim freedom as an excuse to do as they wish without any regard for the freedoms of others. This is certainly not how we should define freedom. They hide behind the word to tell us everything is broken, to spread disinformation and parrot the lines fed to them by those who wish to interfere in our elections and undermine our democracy. They weaponize the term freedom to further marginalize those in the most vulnerable situations, to justify spreading hate, and even deny people their right to make choices about their own bodies, including limits on reproductive rights. At the end of the day, through all of the noise, what they really mean to say is freedom for some, not freedom for all. Often the people who claim to speak for freedom are the same people who want the government to decide who people can love, who they are, or even what they can wear. We see it in our country. We see it around the world. At the international level, we see it when groups or countries make clear that international law doesn’t apply to them. In Afghanistan, we see it taken to its extreme. The Taliban continue to impose inhumane rules against women and girls, banning them from being in public so they are invisible, robbing young girls of the fundamental right to an education. How is that respecting human dignity? How is that protecting the best interests of their people? They need to be held accountable. Last week, Canada joined Australia, Germany and the Netherlands, with the support from 22 other countries, to take steps to hold Afghanistan accountable under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. The Taliban cannot make international law disappear through simple decrees. Canada is a country that values freedom from oppression, not the freedom to oppress others. There should be nothing controversial about protecting human rights, including the dignity of all men and women alike. On Haiti, the world cannot sit idly by as people suffer. Gang violence and unchecked corruption in Haiti have created a disaster for the population, which has plunged into deep insecurity, with civilians being shot and children dying of hunger. Canada has always maintained that this crisis must be resolved by Haitians for Haitians. Therefore, the Presidential Council for the Transition and the Government of Transition is striving to restore order, but they cannot do so alone. The Haitian people need a multinational support and security mission that works together with the Haitian National Police, not only to help the police restore order, but also to meet the I would also like to thank CARICOM and Kenya for the crucial role they are playing in the response to this crisis. We can bring about lasting peace and stability in Haiti. Mr. President, what is happening in the Middle East is an unspeakable tragedy. Thousands have been killed in Israel, in Gaza, and in Lebanon, including many Canadians. This is a senseless war that goes against the dignity of human beings. The suffering on all sides must end. What the world continues to witness is a repeated cycle of violence where civilians pay the heaviest price. Canada is joining those urging Israel and Hezbollah to accept an immediate ceasefire. We need to create space for peace talks and save lives. There cannot be war in Lebanon, full stop. UN Security Council resolutions must be respected. Families in southern Lebanon and families in northern Israel must be able to safely return to their homes. We have, and always will, insist that civilians be protected wherever they are from. Next week marks one year since the terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel. And last March, I visited Kibbutz Kfar Aza, one of the communities attacked on October October 7. I met Ayelet, a mother grieving her son who was brutally murdered in the attack and he died protecting his fiancé. Ayelet recounted the terror of that day, the search for loved ones in burnt homes. As she spoke about the horrors of October 7, we heard the bombs as they landed in Gaza nearby and felt the ground shudder. In that moment, the duality of the tragedy befalling the Israeli and Palestinian people was profound and it is a moment I will never forget. The situation in Gaza is inhumane. The level of suffering is unacceptable and it must stop. Innocent Palestinians, women and children cannot pay the price of defeating Hamas. It must end and a ceasefire is needed immediately. Hostages must be released. This requires both sides making real efforts. Mr. President, for a lasting peace, Canada has long advocated for a two-state solution. We believe both Israelis and Palestinians have the right to exist. We all know a negotiated agreement is the best chance for Israelis and Palestinians to live side by side in peace and security. Unfortunately, Hamas, a terrorist organization, continues to operate in Gaza, refuses to release hostages and refuses to lay down its weapons. Meanwhile, the government of Israel is against the creation of a Palestinian state. Violence against Palestinians by extremist settlers and expansion of settlements by Israel and the West Bank continue unabated. This is unacceptable. Canada supports the creation of a Palestinian state. That is why we are providing security and development support to Palestinians themselves. We will efficiently recognize the State of Palestine at the right time, when it is the most conducive to building a lasting peace, and not necessarily as the last step of a negotiated process. More than anything, this conflict has led to unspeakable pain. Communities are hurting. People have the right to protest peacefully, but nobody has the freedom to intimidate others. Polarization is a real problem, and division is real. We have a collective responsibility to bring people together. Mr. President, it has now been two years and a half since Russia launched its illegal invasion of Ukraine. The human cost continues to grow. No country has the right and the freedom to invade its neighbor, and there is no freedom to impose your will on others. This aggression is a blatant violation of the UN Charter. Russia needs to get out of Ukraine, now. The Ukrainian people have the right to be free from fear and aggression. They have the right to decide what their own future should be. Mr. President, we all know that if Russia’s aggression goes unchecked here, it will continue. Many countries in the region and the hemisphere are wondering if they will be next, and the world must not back down in denouncing this unjustifiable aggression, and Canada will not back down from its support for Ukraine. At the end of October, Canada will host a conference co-organized with Norway and Ukraine on the human dimension of Ukraine’s 10-point peace formula. We will focus on the return of children to their families, as well as deported civilians and prisoners of war. Everyone those affected by this war is entitled to freedom from violence and from being forced from their home. Mr. President, the issues I have just spoken about have to do with massive challenges and this institution has a key role to play to bring us toward solutions together. The UN’s detractors accuse it of being unable to resolve the problems that the world is facing today. And worse, some, one might call them conspiracy theorists, even think that the UN is the cause of some of these problems. Both of these groups are ignorant of reality and the strength of this organization. The UN is a unique platform allowing us to come together and speak to each other on an equal footing, to try to reconcile our differences, sometimes profound, through discussion and through seeking consensus. And that is why Canada supported the adoption of the Pact for the Future during the Summit of the Future held last week. The pact is a starting point, allowing us to work together to ensure the lasting place of this organization. The UN is not perfect, true, but progress is possible. As said by Secretary General, we simply cannot build a future for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents. So let us build that future together. Mr. Vice President, for almost 80 years now, no woman has occupied the post secretary general. That is unacceptable. Last week I had the great honor to have my colleague from Jamaica to host in Toronto about 15 women ministers of foreign affairs from throughout the world. Our intention is clear. The next leader of this great institution must be a woman. It is high time for us to be able to say proudly from this podium and throughout the world Madam Secretary General. And I will say the same thing for the post of President of the General Assembly. Mr. Vice President, with all due respect, which you inspire in me as well as the President, I hope that next year delegates will be speaking to a Madam President. And I think that many of us here today share that desire. Mr. President, let me speak to you about my mother. She will be so pleased to know that I am speaking about her here at the United Nations. You know, my mother and my grandmother are among millions of women throughout the world who fought fiercely for equal rights. They did so alongside the mothers and grandmothers of many of those present here today in this room. Recently my mother said that we are now part of the consolidation generation and she’s quite right. Being part of our generation means that we need to consolidate the gains that have been made over time and fight against those who are trying to roll back this progress. It also means that we need to continue to fight so that women and girls everywhere have the right to make choices about their own bodies and their own lives. We see the difference this gap in freedoms creates. When women are robbed of the right to decide when to have children, they lose out on education and job opportunities. When women don’t have access to safe abortions, their lives are put at risk. When women are denied access to safe contraception and fertility treatment, they lose the power to make choices that have the most profound impacts on their lives. Attacks on sexual and reproductive health rights are an attack on equality rights, and they are an attack on basic dignity. We must all have the right to choose for ourselves what kind of birth control to use, and we must be able to choose for ourselves whether to resort to abortion or assisted reproduction. We women have the right to be equal in everything, education, employment, and every other opportunity. We are women, and we are proud of being women. We will never back down. Together, we will continue to move forward for our sisters, our daughters, and our granddaughters. Mr. President, two years ago, I stood here and said countries around the world were faced with a choice, and we still have that choice today. We can choose a world where rules can be broken by the powerful, bring us back to darker times of tension and conflicts, or we can choose a world to uphold human rights, opportunities for all, peace and prosperity, where people work together to solve problems. Canada will work with partners to move us beyond this moment of crisis. A new future is being shaped. We must not fail. Thank you very much.

President: My thanks go to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada. I now give the floor to His Excellency Charles Fleming, Minister of State of Ireland. Sean Fleming, you have the floor.

Sean Fleming – Ireland: President of the General Assembly, distinguished Heads of State and Government, Secretary General and Excellencies, We gather here at a very important moment. World leaders have agreed a pact for the future, which charts a way forward to meet the challenges facing us as a global community. To do so, we must honour existing commitments, including the Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda, and be ready to adapt to new and emerging challenges. It requires us to address the interlocking crises of climate change, conflict, hunger, injustice and underdevelopment. And it requires us to protect the means to achieve progress. For generations, the multilateral system, with the UN Charter at its heart, has driven our best advances. I believe we have a shared responsibility to bring about a world in which each of us can thrive in safety, dignity and peace. We are accountable to those who will follow us, and accountable to each other to uphold the UN Charter, to stand up for international law, to ensure the peaceful settlement of disputes, to defend the universal and indivisible nature of human rights. And to pass on to the next generation a functioning multilateral system. Mr. President, The rules-based international order and the international human rights system are our greatest assets in achieving and sustaining peace. Human rights provide a common binding framework. We believe every state has a duty to support and strengthen the international human rights regime and to defend it where it is challenged. That is why Ireland is seeking membership of the Human Rights Council for the period 2027 to 2029. We are doing so because we deeply are committed to human rights. We wish to further contribute to the UN human rights system and the valuable work of the Human Rights Council. We hope that we can count on the support of many of you in this room here today who share our belief in the values and principles we have collectively established. We also have a duty to uphold international law and international legal order. Ireland is fully committed to supporting the essential work of the International Court of Justice and calls on all states to abide by its rulings. Ireland is also wholly committed to the international criminal justice system. The International Criminal Court is a cornerstone of that system and must be allowed to pursue its mandate without fear or favour. We strongly condemn all attempts to intimidate or threaten the ICC. Its officials are those cooperating with the court. There can be no impunity for the most serious crimes of international concern. Mr President, we are seeing a global backlash against the Human Rights Council. of Women and Girls. The gender persecution in Afghanistan stands out for its cruelty and must be denounced. In too many parts of our world, we see hard-won progress threatened and even reversed. We cannot accept this. Our commitment to gender equality must be non-negotiable. We must also address the unacceptable rise in attacks on the right to life, liberty and security of LGBTQI people in all corners of the world. And we must unequivocally condemn all forms of racism, intolerance and hatred, including anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim hatred and the persecution of Christians. Mr President, we are already seeing the destructive impact of climate change. It is clear that climate change is the driver and multiplier of instability and conflict. Ireland worked hard to address this during our recent term on the Security Council. Climate change threatens each and every one of us. From small island developing states in the Pacific, the Caribbean and elsewhere, to countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Those who have contributed least to climate change are among the most vulnerable to its impacts. This is an enormous injustice. As we approach COP29, we must do everything we can to reduce fossil fuel emissions. As a fellow Ireland state, Ireland is working to support adaptation and not undamaged activities. We need collective action, at speed and at scale, to avert the most catastrophic impacts of the climate crisis. Ireland and our EU partners will play our role. At the UN last year and again at the Pact for the Future, we have recommitted to the Sustainable Development Goals. Now we need to act with urgency as progress on these targets falters. Ireland’s international development budget is at record levels and per capita. We are one of the strongest providers of humanitarian assistance on this planet. We are firmly committed to global solidarity and to reaching the furthest behind first. We will maintain our focus on action to end hunger and malnutrition, and especially the needless global scandal of child wasting and stunting. We will remain champions of gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls. We face the very real prospect of a regional war in the Middle East. I am deeply concerned at the spiralling violence and the situation in Lebanon. Hezbollah has long been a malign actor in Lebanon and in the region. We have consistently condemned its attacks. But massive and ongoing Israeli airstrikes on densely populated areas are causing indiscriminate deaths of civilians and destruction on a vast scale. Hundreds of thousands have been forced to flee. A ground war would be truly catastrophic. All parties to conflict have an obligation to abide by the international humanitarian law. There can be no exceptions. I call on all parties to immediately de-escalate, to step back from the brink and to exercise restraint. And I call on all states that have influence, including Iran, to use it constructively. We need to create the space for political and diplomatic solutions and to ensure urgent humanitarian assistance can get to those in desperate need. The violence must stop now. horrific and completely unacceptable. Ireland has consistently condemned Hamas for its heinous attacks in Israel on 7 October. The taking of hostages is unconscionable. However, Israel’s response has been and is completely disproportionate. We need an immediate ceasefire and hostage deal, followed by a massive surge of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Instead, we are seeing an alarming escalation of the conflict in the West Bank and now in Lebanon. The violence and killing must stop. It has long been clear that the only viable basis for a lasting peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians is a two-state solution. The recent adoption by the General Assembly of a resolution on the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice is a step in the right direction. The international community must now act to implement it. Ireland supports the global initiative launched last week here in New York to support the two-state solution. I encourage states to join in this shared effort. Mr President, Russia’s unjustifiable war of aggression against Ukraine represents a severe threat to the global multilateral system. A challenge to the norm that borders cannot be changed by force should concern us all very deeply. We should all be deeply concerned by the defiance of the UN Charter by a permanent member of the Security Council. Undermining the rules-based order on which each of us of our security depends should concern us all. The transfer of ballistic missiles by Iran to North Korea to Russia for use in Ukraine is totally unacceptable. These transfers are unlawful and threaten international peace and security, and they must stop. This is not just a European security concern, this is a war with global impacts on food security and on energy and commodity prices. Too often it is those who are least able to respond who suffer the most. And it is a colonial war about annexing the territory and destroying the identity of a United Nations Member State. That is why Ireland is committed to holding Russia accountable for its actions and to bringing about a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine. As the global community reaffirmed at the first Summit on Peace in Ukraine, the UN Charter can and must serve as the basis to achieve that peace. It is shocking that Russia has threatened the use of nuclear power in this conflict. The mere possession of nuclear weapons brings the risk of human and environmental disaster. That is why Ireland will propose a resolution to this General Assembly to further our collective scientific understanding of the dangers of these weapons. I urge all countries to join in this resolution. We cannot allow a new nuclear arms race. We must also act to prevent another arms race for weapons beyond human control, and to do so urgently given the pace of technological development. Ireland supports the Secretary General’s call to conclude a treaty on autonomous weapons systems by the end of 2026. Mr. President, the Horn of Africa and the Seychelles region are beset by multiple overlapping crises, from food insecurity, drought and flooding to actual conflict. Addressing them means working for sustainable development and human rights. The situation in Sudan is appalling. Twelve million people are forced from their homes. Widespread reports of abuse against civilians, particularly against women and girls. Twenty-five million people face crisis levels of hunger, and they are now fed up. Tracing Famine. We need to see urgent action. We demand a ceasefire, humanitarian access, protection of civilians and accountability for human rights abuses. We must do whatever it takes to pressure the parties to come back to the negotiating table and to bring an end to this destructive cycle of violence. And we need to see accountability for those who have committed these atrocities. Mr. President, as we witness these harrowing conflicts, we must not accept this situation. The world as it is now is not the world as it should be. We have seen what can be achieved by cooperation through this organisation, that the fundamental international community has managed to come together in a time of heightened tension to endorse that vision, to agree a way forward, a pact for the future, shows us what can be achieved. We continue to be united in our shared humanity. Ireland will work hard with others during this General Assembly to follow through on our words with action. Thank you very much for listening to me on behalf of Ireland.

President: I thank His Excellency the Minister of State of Ireland and I now give the floor to His Excellency Mr. Manuel José Gonçalves, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Mozambique.

Manuel José Gonçalves – Mozambique: Thank you. Mr. President. of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, Mr. Secretary General of the United Nations, distinguished Heads of Delegations, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen. It is with great honor that I address this august assembly and convey to Your Excellencies and all participants in this session a special greeting from His Excellency Felipe Jacinto Nuzzi, President of the Republic of Mozambique. We congratulate His Excellency Philemon Yang on his election as President of this session and wish him success in fulfilling his mandate. Our greetings are extended to the other members of the Bureau. We assure you of our full support in carrying out your duties. We also commend the positive work carried out by your predecessor, His Excellency Ambassador Dennis Francis, which contributed to the strengthening of our organization towards a greater approach to the peace and development agenda. We extend a word of great appreciation to the Secretary General of the United Nations, His Excellency Antonio Guterres, for his tireless dedication and advocacy in promoting multilateralism for global peace and security. Mr. President, the current session of the General Assembly constitutes a sovereign opportunity to reinforce multilateralism. We therefore welcome the theme of our general debate, which has particular importance due to its connection with the future, which requires urgency in strengthening international cooperation so that together we can face the challenges faced by humanity today to build a prosperous present and a promising future for humanity. We are aware that in just six years, the 2030 agenda will expire and the progress made on its implementation is still tenuous. It is urgent to mobilize the necessary resources for its financing as well as for other internationally agreed development objectives in order to achieve the sustainable development goals. Therefore, we encourage all member states to accelerate the materialization of the commitments made, including the reinforcement of mutually beneficial cooperation to respond to prevailing challenges, including the fight against poverty, conflicts, terrorism, and climate change. Mr. President, Excellencies, we express our optimism about our collective Like the future, where an environment of peace and security reigns, the functioning of our global institutions must keep up with the current dynamics that are imposed upon us. Thus we align ourselves with the voices that defend the urgency of the reform of the United Nations, especially at the level of the Security Council, for greater inclusion, particularly giving a permanent voice to the African continent, thereby correcting the historical injustice to which it has been subjected. We are encouraged by the continued collaboration between the United Nations and the African Union to overcome conflicts within the context of maintaining a peace, international peace and security. Resolution 2719 adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 21 December 2023 is a significant milestone for African Union-led peace support operations. It strengthens collaboration between the United Nations and the African Union, promoting greater regional and national ownership of peace initiatives. We hope that it will effectively ensure access to adequate, predictable and sustainable financing required for the operations of the African Union. We believe that this collaboration will contribute to giving greater strength to efforts to prevent and resolve conflicts towards a prosperous and peaceful Africa, the Africa we want, as established in Agenda 2063 of the African Union. Mr. President, Excellencies. The concert between nations has been feasible throughout these times, due to the collective observance of the sacrosanct objectives and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, including the defense of the right to self-determination of peoples, respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states. It is deeply concerning the escalation of conflicts and tensions in various parts of the world. In Ukraine, unfortunately, there is still no encouraging signs for an end to the conflict. We believe that the safest path is dialogue between the parties. It is up to all of us, as members of the United Nations, to persuade the parties to the conflict, to end hostilities, and opt for a dialogue towards peace between these two countries. In the Middle East, in violation of the principles of international law and international humanitarian law, the conflict continues to take human lives among the civilian population, particularly children, women, and the elderly, as well as destroying civilian infrastructure, causing the tragedy that we, unfortunately, witness. We call for the cessation of hostilities and the protection of innocent civilians from the conflict. The vision of the existence of two sovereign states, Israel and Palestine, as full members of the United Nations, is the fairest formula that will ensure sustainable peace and stability in this region. In Africa, we are also concerned about the conflict in Sudan, which has killed thousands of innocent civilians, including refugees, causing an unprecedented humanitarian disaster. We reiterate our calls to the parties to the conflict to end hostilities and the need for dialogue in order to restore peace and stability. Mr. President, the use of sanctions and other unilateral coercive measures does not contribute to the preservation of peace, security, and sustainable economic and social development. Unilateralism is contrary to the multilateralism enshrined in the Charter. In this context, we reiterate our firm call for the total lifting of unilateral coercive measures imposed on Zimbabwe and Cuba, which may have significant negative impacts on the populations of these countries, harming their rights and well-being so as to allow for more fair and equitable development. Mr. President, Excellencies, As of January 2023, Mozambique assumed the biannual 2023-2024 term as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. With three months remaining until its end, we would like to reiterate the honor and privilege we have had in serving in that United Nations body responsible for making this possible. Maintaining International Peace and Security In the last two years, Mozambique has made its direct contribution to peace and security in the world, collaborating in addressing all topics on the Security Council’s agenda, amongst which we would like to highlight peace and security in Africa, combating terrorism, women, peace and security, and the nexus between climate, peace and security. We presided over the body in March 2023 and in May 2024. We are leading the ad hoc working group for preventing and resolution of conflicts in Africa. We will soon end our mandate. We reaffirm our commitment to continue collaborating with a view to pursuing the goals that guide the United Nations Security Council to strengthen international peace and security. We therefore thank all member states for the support provided to Mozambique during its mandate and reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and the principles and objectives set out in the United Nations Charter, which have guided our mandate since the beginning. Mr. President, Excellencies, in Mozambique, we continue to consolidate our young democracy and citizenship, strengthening dialogue and seeking consensus in the various fora of participatory representation. In this spirit, the seventh presidential and legislative elections and for the provincial assemblies will take place on the 9th of October. In the fight against terrorism in the province of Cabo Delgado, our vigorous action Sadek and Rwanda, and international cooperation partners, despite the prevailing challenges. In this regard, we would like to reiterate our appreciation and gratitude to all bilateral and multilateral partners who have spared no effort in supporting us in the fight against terrorism and for the restoration of peace and tranquility to the victim populations and for the reconstruction of economic and social infrastructures in areas affected by terrorist actions. Furthermore, our country has faced multiple and complex challenges that include exposure to risks associated with climate change, such as cyclical cyclones, droughts and floods. These phenomena cause, on average, economic losses of around 1.1 percent of GDP per year. Mr. President, Excellencies, finally, we reiterate the commitment of the Government of the Republic of Mozambique to international peace and security, which are essential factors for the well-being of humanity and a prosperous world. I thank you very much.

President: I thank the Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs and Cooperation of Mozambique. And I now give the floor to His Excellency Sheikh Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan, Minister of State for the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates.

Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan – United Arab Emirates : May the peace, mercy, and blessings of God be upon you. Mr. President, at the outset, I would like to thank His Excellency Dennis Francis for his outstanding leadership of the previous session. I also congratulate His Excellency Philemon Yang on assuming the presidency of the 79th session of the General Assembly, and I wish him success in this endeavor. From the podium of this General Assembly, a place that has always embraced our ambitions and agonies, we call upon all of you to join hands and work together to create a better world for our sons and daughters and for future generations, a better world in which they can enjoy a decent, prosperous, and stable life, a world in which all political, diplomatic, and economic capabilities and the latest technological and scientific advancements are harnessed to preserve life in all its forms. In the United Arab Emirates, we have focused on this vision. We have unleashed the wheel of progress in every field, from development, economy, and education, to technology and industry. Since its inception, the UAE has adopted a transparent foreign policy based on credibility and building balanced relations with all countries. This includes supporting regional and international efforts aimed at achieving stability and reducing escalations, encouraging dialogue and building bridges, as well as resolving crises instead of merely managing them. As our world stands at a dangerous crossroads, we must redirect the compass of our international action to focus on a set of fundamental and non-negotiable principles. Most importantly, we must stand united in the face of contentious issues, support all peoples without applying double standards, ensure the protection of civilians, uphold the rule of law, as well as commit to human rights and respect the principles of good neighborliness. Returning to these basic principles has become more urgent than ever, particularly with the serious violations committed in conflicts raging in our region and around the world. These violations have deepened human suffering, erased decades of progress, and caused widespread displacement, creating massive refugee crises. This has also increased the burdens on concerned and neighboring countries, particularly with the ongoing bloody wars on the Gaza Strip, the wars in Sudan and Ukraine, and the crises taking place in Yemen, Syria, Libya, Sahel, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Haiti, and other countries. It must be recalled that even wars in the Middle East and the Middle East can be a source of peace. have rules. Parties must respect international law, including international humanitarian law. In Gaza, an immediate and lasting ceasefire must be reached. Rapid, full and unimpeded access of humanitarian assistance at large scale must be allowed, and the hostages and detainees must be released. The relevant Security Council resolutions must also be implemented. We must act wisely in response to the rapid developments threatening our region. It is evident that what we have warned about is now unfolding beyond our control. We regret to see the war spread to Lebanon at a time when we were hoping for an announcement about reaching a deal to end the war on Gaza. It is unacceptable to ignore the decisions and advisory opinions issued by the highest judicial body of the United Nations, namely the International Court of Justice. This includes the provisional measures issued by the Court regarding the war on Gaza. In this context, we call for maintaining the security and safety of people. We must safeguard regional and international stability, including the security of international navigation, trade routes, and energy supplies. This is especially crucial in light of continued attempts by terrorist and extremist groups to exploit people’s suffering for their own political goals. In the Sudan, the The warring parties must stop the fighting immediately and permanently, and allow unhindered and sustainable access to humanitarian assistance across borders and conflict lines. We completely reject the continued targeting by the warring parties of civilians and their obstruction of the delivery of humanitarian assistance. We strongly condemn the blatant attack launched by the Sudanese Armed Forces on the residence of the Ambassador of the United Arab Emirates in Khartoum on 29 September 2024, in flagrant violation of the fundamental principle of the inviolability of diplomatic premises and of international conventions and norms, particularly the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. We call on the warring parties to engage seriously in peace talks. In this regard, we emphasize the importance of building on the positive outcomes achieved in the meetings of the Working Group of the Aligned for Advancing Life-Saving and Peace in Sudan Group, ALPS. We commend all initiatives aimed at finding a comprehensive solution to the crisis. We must all continue working with regional and international partners to alleviate the suffering of the Sudanese people to ensure a safer and more prosperous life for them. In Ukraine, the impact of the and many others who have contributed to the release of a report on the ongoing war have transcended seas and continents. Therefore, it is imperative to find a peaceful solution to end this conflict, which has increased global polarization, created refugee and prisoners crises, and affected global food security. The country contributed to the release of around 2,000 prisoners of war through mediation efforts between the Russian Federation and Ukraine. We continue to push for dialogue and de-escalation, and we support recovery and reconstruction. As we speak of resolving protracted crises, we must reiterate our full support of Morocco’s sovereignty over the Moroccan Sahara region, as well as for the autonomy initiative to maintain the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Morocco. Mr. President, in numerous crises, my country refused to allow the international response to be obstructed by growing global polarization or obstacles imposed by warring parties. To this end, my country has sought to overcome these challenges and has utilized all available means to enable humanitarian work to continue, to help all those in need around the world, in line with our commitment to the legacy of Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan, the founder of the UAE. His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahyan. Al Nahyan, President of the UAE, may God protect him, directed 100 million US dollars in urgent relief aid to the brotherly people of Lebanon to support them in facing the current challenges. When the war intensified in the Sudan, pushing millions of people towards a multidimensional humanitarian disaster, the UAE devoted its efforts to supporting the Sudanese people. We recently contributed 100 million US dollars to support UN efforts to address the humanitarian repercussions of this war in the Sudan and neighboring countries. In addition, we established two field hospitals in Chad to provide medical services to all those in need, including Sudanese refugees. Similarly, we spared no effort in supporting the innocent people besieged in Gaza. To this end, we have sent urgent aid by land, air, and sea, and provided treatment to the sick and injured Palestinians through the field hospital we established in Rafah and the floating hospital in Al Arish. The UAE also continues to help in evacuating the wounded and sick and their families from Gaza, most of whom are children and cancer patients, to receive the necessary treatment in UAE hospitals. We also maintained our support to UNRWA, which plays a vital role in Gaza. We welcome its recent launch of preparatory programs to resume its educational services. We applaud the humanitarian workers for all their efforts, who provide a ray of hope in the dark shadow of war. If we want to bring an end to this seven-decade long vicious cycle of the Palestinian issue, then we must take concrete steps towards the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital, based on the two-state solution. We must also consider the establishment of a temporary international mission in the Gaza Strip, upon an official request from the Palestinian government to address the humanitarian crisis, re-establish security and law, and reunite Gaza and the West Bank under a reformed Palestinian Authority. This would enable the Palestinian Authority, after it is reformed, to take firm steps towards reaching a comprehensive and just political solution for the Palestinian issue. My country believes that the State of Palestine, which just a couple of weeks ago took its new seat in this hall like every other nation, has fulfilled the requirements for full membership in this organization. It deserves to be recognized by all states as a fully-fledged state under occupation. Mr. President, in parallel with our efforts in these files, my country renews its demand to Iran to end its occupation of the three UAE islands. We will continue to urge Iran to respond to our repeated calls to resolve this issue either through direct negotiations or by resorting to the International Court of Justice. In all other issues, the UAE believes that the best way to resolve crises is through diplomacy. We cannot fight fire with fire. When traditional approaches are no longer effective, it is our duty to renew these approaches to be able to move forward during the darkest moments of our history. Mr. President, building a secure and prosperous future requires renovating the mechanisms of multilateralism to better address the serious challenges surrounding us. Therefore, we must undertake important roles in finding solutions for conflicts and crises, particularly as the current international system has proven ineffective in preventing the most serious crimes or holding its perpetrators accountable. This requires, in the first place, reforming the Security Council through a comprehensive effort that includes all member states of the United Nations. This would allow the Security Council to restore its credibility, fulfill its mandate of maintaining international peace and security, and combat impunity, even in situations where polarization and political considerations prevent the Council from taking action. Developing and poor countries must also be at the center of any international effort. We also must ensure that women and young people are empowered to play their critical and meaningful roles in all aspects of collective action. While we are preoccupied with addressing the current reality, we must not lose sight of the importance of crisis prevention efforts. The deadliest wars in history did not break out overnight. They were a result of extremism, hate speech and intolerance accumulating over years, if not decades. This requires taking concrete steps to uphold the principles of tolerance and peaceful coexistence and coordinate regional and international efforts to extinguish the sparks of conflict before they even start. Furthermore, collective action is the only way to address the challenges threatening the future of humanity and our planet, including climate change. The outcomes of the 28th session of the United Nations Climate Change Conference hosted by the UAE demonstrated what we can achieve when we work together. The historic UAE consensus adopted by 198 countries embodies a global consensus on developing measures to prevent global warming above 1.5 degrees Celsius and operationalize the Loss and Damage Fund to compensate the countries most affected by climate change. We will continue to cooperate with everyone to support climate action in the United States and around the world. And clean and renewable energy solutions, including through the Troika of the Presidencies of the Conference of the Parties initiative with Azerbaijan and Brazil to provide a concrete response that continues, that contributes to the achievement of the objectives of international climate agreements. We will also continue our efforts to address the issue of water scarcity and provide sustainable clean water for all, including through the UN Water Conference, which we intend to host in the UAE in 2026 in partnership with Senegal. Our other initiatives in this field, most notably, is or our other initiative in this field is most notably the Mohammed bin Zayed Water Initiative launched this year. With this forward-looking spirit, we seek to explore and harness the potential opportunities provided by advanced technologies, as well as transform emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, to find innovative solutions for our businesses, lives and government services. We believe that international attention and investments should be directed towards these technologies to accelerate sustainable development and achieve transformative shifts in addressing the challenges we face in different fields. This will enable or this will allow the bridging development gaps and supporting progress for all. Mr. President, let us seize this opportunity to reform international collective action. Our refuge in difficult times. Let us work together.

President: I thank the Minister of State for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United Arab Emirates. I now give the floor to His Excellency Peter Mohamed Meche Perez, Head of the Delegation

Peter Mohan Maithri Pieris – Sri Lanka: Mr. President, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen, Sri Lanka felicitates His Excellency Philemon Yang of Cameroon on his election as the President of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Mr. President, Against the background of global turmoil, setbacks and transformations, the aspirations of this year’s Assembly for a better global future resonate with those of the people of Sri Lanka. On the 23rd of September, following a transparent and peaceful electoral process, and a dignified was sworn in as the 9th Executive President of Sri Lanka. The people of Sri Lanka have vested in him the mandate to realize the people’s aspirations for the future and to build a sustainable foundation for future generations. His Excellency President Disanayake has outlined to the nation his determination to put in place a united Sri Lanka and a transformed ethical political culture. A political culture echoing the wishes of the people, his future trajectory combines nation building based on public trust in governance and in the political system through accountability, integrity and the elimination of waste and corruption. In the words of his Excellency President Anurag Kumar Disanayake, quote, we are launching a unified Sri Lankan nation that respects diversity, fully ending an era of division based on race, religion, caste and class, close quotes. In order to achieve these objectives, the government has recognized that it is crucial to reinforce stability and confidence in the economy and stimulate growth. The government will work within commitments to reach macroeconomic stability through the framework of international financial institutions and in negotiations. The Government is acutely aware of the hardships that have been faced by the people in the process of economic transition. Measures will therefore be put in place to generate greater resources for enhanced public expenditure and welfare to raise the living standards of our people with equity and justice. Mr. President, the recent vote for change by the people of Sri Lanka presents us with a renewed opportunity, and we are determined to succeed, including with the support of our friends in the international community. Mr. President, despite our consensus on the pact of the future, this year’s UNGA takes place at a moment of profound global crisis on multiple fronts. In the Middle East, we are closer to wider regional conflagration than when we convened last week, and the humanitarian suffering in Gaza gets worse by the day. The achievements of the SDGs now appear beyond our reach, and we are off target on the Paris Climate Goal to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees centigrade above pre-industrial levels. Big power rivalries and geopolitical tensions have reignited and widened, and new rifts are reappearing on North-South lines. Racism, intolerance, discrimination, and xenophobia against migrants are on the rise. Theatres of conflict and tension have opened up on land and in oceans. The developments in the digital realm provides a fertile ground for proliferation of disinformation and hate speech with the potential of violence. Mr. President, the lingering impacts of the pandemic have reverberated throughout the global economy, creating profound economic insecurities, threatening free trade and leading to protectionist barriers. We are spending more on weapons than ever before. of developing countries, including my own, face a debt crisis of unprecedented proportions. This debt distress severely impedes our ability to invest in sustainable development, as we are unable to meet these financial obligations while simultaneously investing in the future and the well-being of our people. It is a fact that financing challenges remain at the heart of the sustainable development crisis. As per the Financing for Sustainable Development Report of 2024, the SDG financing gap is between U.S. dollars 2.5 to 4 trillion. Staggering, isn’t it? Mr. President, given these immense challenges, the need for comprehensive reform of the global financial architecture has never been more pressing. The current international debt resolution framework has failed to respond adequately and efficiently to contemporary challenges. The global landscape has changed dramatically, with global debt, particularly in the developing world, increasingly controlled by international bond markets and non-Paris Club lenders. Think about it. It is, therefore, time that we review the architecture’s traditional moorings. We must urgently reform this system to reflect the new economic landscape. It is, therefore, necessary, we say, to find a more efficient, comprehensive and equitable way to address the debt crisis. Mr. President, other institutions of global governance that reflect the world of the past century need to be reformed to meet the challenges of the present and the future. The composition of the Security Council must be expanded to be representative of current global diversity and decision-making. In parallel, the role of the United Nations General Assembly, the most representative primary organ of the United Nations, where all countries have an equal voice, must be strengthened and revitalized. Mr. President, Sri Lanka’s commitment to maintaining global peace and security has been unwavering. We recognize that peacekeeping is one of the most effective tools to the United Nations to help member states to manage the difficult phase of transitioning from conflict to peace. Sri Lanka has been contributing to United Nations peacekeeping operations in some of the most hostile and demanding deployments. Over 23,000 men and women from Sri Lanka armed forces and police have contributed to ensuring international peace and security under the UN banner over the past six decades and have been commended for high-caliber service. Mr. President, beyond economic recovery, we face an even greater existential threat, the ongoing We need their support in mitigation and adaptation efforts, as well as compensation for loss and damage. Without a concerted international effort, to bridge the climate financing gap, the burden of climate impacts will continue to fall most heavily on those least responsible for the crisis. Sri Lanka is committed to phase out coal by 2040 and reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. As a climate-vulnerable country, Sri Lanka has been advocating for operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund and called for climate justice. There is therefore an urgent need for increased climate financing, especially for vulnerable developing nations like Sri Lanka. Two other critical issues which are also relevant to Sri Lanka as an island nation were part of the discourse during this year’s High-Level Week. Sea-level rise is an imminent reality affecting millions. While Sri Lanka has taken mitigatory measures nationally, as included in the National Adaptation Plan for Climate Change, it is through concerted international action that solutions can be implemented to halt the global warming that is the cause of sea-level rise. Sri Lanka initiated the UNGA Resolution on declaring 1 March as the World Seagrass Day. to bring international attention and awareness on a small but significant aspect of universal importance of combating climate change. Sri Lanka has further been recognized for its contribution to mangrove regeneration programs as a 2024 World Restoration Flagship by the United Nations under the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Mr. President, antimicrobial resistance has become a critical public health issue the world over, with bacterial resistance linked to around 5 million deaths worldwide annually, alarming. AMR, if not contained, has the potential to spiral into a development issue, as well with life expectancies declining worldwide. We welcome the target of mobilizing U.S. $100 million through the Antimicrobial Resistance Multi-Partner Trust Fund to ensure that 60% of countries have funded action plans by 2030. However, international cooperation and sustainable financing must increase to meet this goal. Mr. President, as we seek solutions to global challenges, we must harness the power of technology and innovation. Digital technologies and artificial intelligence offer unprecedented opportunities to accelerate sustainable development. Sri Lanka aims for sustained growth by innovation and envisages an equitable digital transformation through the establishment of accessible digital public infrastructure. At the same time, we call for increased capacity building and technical assistance to bridge the global digital divide and empower all countries to leverage these tools for the betterment of their people. Mr. President, the General Assembly’s theme calls on us to leave no one behind and to act together for the advancement of peace, sustainable development, and human dignity for present and future. and many others. In Sri Lanka, 38% of our total population is youth, which is the most capable and dynamic resource that can contribute to our future development. Sri Lanka advocates for increased youth participation in decision-making processes. After all, the Declaration on Future Generations is theirs. Simultaneously, the new Sri Lanka will realize the aspirations of a just society with greater empowerment for women, who make up 52% of our population. Mr. President, as we look towards the future, we must also address one of the gravest injustices that this Assembly has inherited from the past. Sri Lanka has repeatedly voiced its concern over the dire humanitarian situation in the occupied Palestinian territories. We reiterate our support for the recognition of the legitimate and inalienable right of the Palestinian people to statehood and join the call for a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, in line with all UN resolutions. As a country that has suffered separatist terrorism for decades, we condemn the terrorist attacks in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world. Sri Lanka calls for complete and unconditional lifting of all unilateral coercive measures imposed against any country, as they hinder free trade, right to development, and have unintended humanitarian consequences. Mr. President, as an island country, we are concerned about the present environmental and geopolitical aspects relating to the oceans. We want our oceans to be free of rivalry, free of conflicts, free of terrorism. We must recognize that global challenges demand global solutions. In our interconnected world, no country can solve these complex problems in isolation. We must strengthen our international institutions, enhance knowledge sharing, and foster strong relationships. We must work together equitably, ensuring all voices are heard in shaping our shared future. It is encouraging, I say, that several developing countries are on the cusp of becoming the leading economies of tomorrow. We must bolster South-South cooperation to foster economic growth, social progress, and sustainable development among us. However, South-South cooperation is not a substitute, we appreciate, for the responsibilities of the Global North, as set out in the Addis Ababa Action Agenda and the Paris Agreement. In conclusion, as Sri Lanka embarks on a path of national unity, ethical governance, economic recovery, and growth with justice and equity under a new leadership, we reiterate our commitment to multilateral cooperation in pursuit of peace, prosperity, and sustainability. We must harness the power of international solidarity.

President: I thank the heads of the delegation of Sri Lanka. I now give the floor to His Excellency Mr. Song Kim, head of the delegation of the Democratic People Republic of Korea.

Song Kim – DPR Korea: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, distinguished representatives, allow me first of all to congratulate you, Mr. Philemon Yang, on your election as president of the 79th session of the UN General Assembly. I am confident that your able stewardship will lead this session to an excellent fruition. Mr. President, the current session of the UNGA is convened at a time when the existence and development of humanity is faced with unprecedented serious crises and challenges. Armed conflicts and bloodshed continue unabated in various parts of the world, with the situation in Gaza still going on for almost a year, taking the lives of the tens of thousands of innocent civilians and creating the most appalling humanitarian crisis since the World War II. To make matters worse, ever-worsening abnormal weather conditions, like extreme high temperature, drought, torrential rain and flood, cause massive human and material losses, coupled with such problems as flooding. In addition, confrontation, block forming and unilateralism prevail over the spirit of cooperation, unity and multilateralism which run through the UN Charter, thus creating obstacles to tidying up the international crisis. Therefore, I expect that this general debate, true to its theme and spirit, will serve as a significant occasion in overcoming the challenges and crisis threatening humanity’s existence and development, defending the UN-centered multilateral system and promoting peace and advancement of the present and future generations. Mr. President, I consider it important for each and every UN member state to fully discharge its responsibility with a view to overcoming present crisis and promoting social progress and better standards of living as stated in the UN Charter. From this viewpoint, I’d like to outline the principle stand of the DPRK government and its efforts directed to achieving socio-economic development, defending regional peace and stability and realizing international justice. Today, the world is faced with challenges with no exception to the DPRK as well. However, valuable successes are being recorded in the socio-economic field thanks to the correct line of the government and its steady implementation. First, the DPRK government puts it as the primary state policy to keep supplying the children under school age with dairy products and provide school children with essential stationery at state expense. As a result of the strenuous execution of the policy, we witness continued improvement in the quality of child care and education. We also find an outcome of our effort. The DPRK Government newly adopted the Policy for Regional Development and is paying prime attention to its practical implementation. The DPRK Government’s Regional Development Policy aims to effect epoch-making enhancement in socio-economic, material and cultural standards on a nationwide scale by bridging the gap between the capital and provincial cities, between urban and rural areas, and develop all sectors and regions of the country in a balanced and simultaneous way within a 10-year timeframe. This will be an effective contribution of the DPRK to the attainment of the SDGs on achieving sustainable development for everyone, ensuring no one is left behind. The DPRK’s Regional Development Policy is firmly assured of its feasibility as it is based on scientific accuracy and justness. In 10 years’ time, the world will witness a completely changed development of the DPRK. Mr. President, aforementioned work for socio-economic development in the DPRK is never done in a peaceful and normal security environment. Peaceful and stable external environment is very dear to us who aspire to overall development and prosperity of the state. And yet, the security threat forced upon us from the outside is all the more increasing with the passage of time. Last year, I stated on this podium that the situation on the Korean Peninsula was near One year has passed since then. Now the security landscape of the Korean Peninsula is quite different from that time and becoming much more acute. From the beginning of this year, the U.S. and its allies have staged joint military exercises one after another with various code names such as Freedom Shield, Freedom Edge, and Combined Air Drill in the vicinity of the DPRK, thus heightening military tension and hostile atmosphere in the region. Much more serious is the fact that the anti-DPRK nuclear war machine, Nuclear Consultative Group, engineered by the U.S. and ROK last year, is now in full operation and simulation nuclear war drills are conducted to put into practice an actual attempt to use nuclear weapons against the DPRK. Joining here are the member states of NATO, which is an outside force beyond the region and an exclusive military bloc. They are strengthening military cooperation with the U.S. and ROK, abusing the signboard of a U.N. command which should have been dismantled decades ago in accordance with the UNGA resolution. They are stirring up military confrontation still further by deploying warships and aircraft in the hotspot region of the Korean Peninsula. Such being the case, they blame us for threatening them and the peace and stability of the region and beyond with nuclear weapons. Then who had developed and used nuclear weapons against humanity for the first time in history? Who has introduced nuclear weapons into the Korean Peninsula in the last century and posed nuclear threat to the DPRK over the century? Who on earth is talking unhesitatingly about the end of regime of a sovereign state and maintaining forced use of nuclear weapons against the DPRK as its national policy? It is not that the DPRK’s position of nuclear weapons makes the U.S. hostile towards us. The truth is that the U.S. is not hostile towards the DPRK. The U.S. is not hostile towards the DPRK. The U.S. hostility and nuclear threat to the DPRK for over 70 years compelled us to make a historic decision to possess nuclear weapons. Our nuclear weapons were just made and exist to defend ourselves. As such, any talk about our nuclear threat only proves a conceived hostility towards the DPRK. The security environment of the Korean Peninsula is bound to be intricately complicated through to the next generation as well, unless the U.S. and its followers change their confrontational and aggressive nature. Under such circumstances, it is an indispensable exercise of sovereign rights for the DPRK to maintain powerful strength capable of defending national security interests and guaranteeing peaceful development. The situation on the Korean Peninsula has not entered into war, even though it is fraught with extreme tension. It is totally attributable to our country’s powerful war deterrence, which helps stave off threat of aggression and keep the balance of power in the region. Therefore, we continue to increase our war deterrence capabilities, not only from our obligation to ensure national security, but also from our mission to maintain peace and security in the region and beyond. Comrade Kim Jong-un, President of the State Office of the DPRK, said that we can choose either dialogue or confrontation, but we should go further in getting ourselves fully prepared for confrontation. This is the review and conclusion drawn from the 30-year-long DPRK-U.S. relations. When it comes to the right to self-defense, a legitimate right of a sovereign state, we will never go back to the point in the far-off past. When it comes to the national prestige, we will never bargain over it with anyone, for it was gained through the bloody struggle of the entire Korean people. Whoever takes office in the United States, we will only deal with a state entity called the U.S., not the mere administration. Likewise, any U.S. administration will have to face the DPRK, which is different from what the U.S. used to think. Mr. President, it is the invaluable external policy of the DPRK government to champion justice and peace, aspire after progress and development, and promote friendship and solidarity. This is also the idea running through the UN Charter. From this viewpoint, the DPRK government stands strongly against the acts of dividing international political arena into two camps with unlawful double standards, giving precedence to their hegemonic interests and disturbing peace and stability. At the present, many factors obstruct attainment of the SDGs set forth by the UN. The most critical among them are the high-handedness, arbitrariness, and double standards of the U.S. and certain UN member states. Since October last year, the indiscriminate massacre by Israeli authorities has claimed more than 40,000 Palestinian civilian lives in Gaza Strip, including many children and women, and thus exposed a nation to a complete extinction. The UN exists to prevent the recurrence of the scourge of war that had inflicted untold sufferings to mankind. It is really shameful and deplorable that such act against humanity has persisted for one year. It is highly imaginable that one state is immune to any sanction and sanction, even after committing such a horrible massacre. This is entirely The U.S. has vetoed U.N. SEC resolutions on bringing peace to the Middle East on as many as five occasions, overriding the wishes of the international community to see the ethnic cleansing stopped by its ally. This is how the U.S. has discredited the authority of the U.N. and incited crime against humanity. With nothwithstanding, the U.S. is branding as a threat and provocation the legitimate exercise of the right to self-defense by a sovereign state, which did not do any harm to anyone. As for the Ukrainian situation dragged on for almost three years by the U.S. and Western countries, they are shifting the responsibility on other countries, even though it was the result of eastward expansion of NATO and provision of lethal equipment, amounting to astronomical sums of money to their ally. The reason behind the U.S.’s abusive invectives about the normal development of relations between other countries is, in fact, to vindicate its unprincipled political and military support to its ally and justify the forming of military alliances on a global scale. Justice or injustice is judged according to whether the actor is pro-U.S. or an independent country, and the United Nations is misused for political aims of an individual country. Such a reality should no longer be tolerated and allowed. I once again express a serious concern with a strong denunciation over the fact that peace and security in many parts of the world are seriously threatened, and the spirit of the U.N. Charter is debased by the arbitrariness and high-handedness of a single, arrogant permanent member-state of the U.N. Security Council. I also express deep condolences to the Palestinian victims of the Israeli genocide and their The United Nations will regain its sacred image only when it strictly adheres to the principles of sovereign equality, non-interference in internal affairs, impartiality and objectivity, and eliminates high-handedness and arbitrariness, as well as biases the double standards practices in all activities in conformity with the purposes and principles enshrined in the UN Charter. Mr. President, a just, peaceful and prosperous world remains the desire of the DPRK as ever. It is the consistent stand of the DPRK government to make a positive effort with independence against imperialism as its immutable first national policy to realize international justice based on the respect for sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs, equality and mutual benefit, and establish a new international order. The DPRK will in the future to cooperate with all the countries and nations which oppose and reject oppression, interference, domination and subordination, and aspire to independence and justice, transcending differences in ideals and systems. We will also develop diversified exchanges and cooperation with the countries that respect our country and take a friendly attitude to us. Thank you.

President: I thank the head of the delegation of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. And I now give the floor to His Excellency Teburoro Tito, head of the delegation of the Republic of Kiribati.

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati: Thank you. President of the General Assembly, Secretary-General of the United Nations, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am happy to greet you all on behalf of the President, the Government, and the people of the Republic of Kiribati. At the outset, I wish to join other delegations in congratulating Your Excellency Mr. Philomena Young, the Government, and the people of Cameroon on your election as the President of the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly. And to assure you of Kiribati’s full support and cooperation as you steer our work over the next 12 months. We also acknowledge, with gratitude, the effort and work of the outgoing President of the 78th session, His Excellency Dennis Francis of Trinidad and Tobago, for his leadership for the past year. It is with immense pride and a deep sense of responsibility that Kiribati stands before the Assembly, marking the 25 years of its membership of the United Nations. A quarter of a century ago, on 14 September 1999, Kiribati joined this esteemed body and became the 186th member of this UN family. Believing that the challenges we face as a small island nation are inextricably linked to the fate of the global community. As we celebrate this milestone, We honor the path that we have walked with our global partners, and we reaffirm our commitment to the core principles of the United Nations, peace, justice, human rights, responsibility, and respect, and sustainable development. Mr. President, the theme for us now, leaving no one behind, and acting together for the advancement of peace, sustainable development, and human dignity for present and future generations cannot be more relevant and timely. As global conflicts escalate, causing widespread destruction, displacing people, and leaving millions neglected and marginalized, the theme reminds us that despite the ongoing crisis, we must stand firmly together as responsible leaders and representatives of the 193 member nations of this greatest multinational organization, and that we commit ourselves to do together whatever is necessary to get the world back on the path of peace, progress, and prosperity. Mr. President, what we witness in the world today, and for the past 79 years, suggests that the Founding Fathers’ inspiration for lasting peace is far from being realized. The theme is therefore a timely reminder not to lose hope over the heartbreaking scenes before us, but to re-energize our unity, solidarity, and collective It is my great honor and great determination to overcome the forces that stand against multilateralism that our United Nations family emboldens. This is why Gilbert reaffirms the critical importance of re-engaging multilateralism. The United Nations must remain the central platform for collective and global action, as no single nation can address the complexities of today’s challenges on its own, be it pandemics, terrorism, conflict, human trafficking, climate change, to name a few. Mr. President, it cannot be disputed that the UN that was created in 1945 by 51 founding members to restore and maintain world peace and security out of the ash and devastation of World War II has now become the largest international organization on Earth that deals with all aspects of human livelihood and well-being to such an extent that its core function of maintaining world peace and improving living standards has been greatly thwarted. This is further exacerbated by the lack of unity and solidarity among member states, coupled with a persistent lack of respect for the UN Charter and for the rights and sovereignty of nations under the Charter. The apparent lack of unity and solidarity within the membership of this family is very much evident in the inability of members to stand united on issues of common concern, the increasing polarization of global issues, and the proliferation of exclusive groupings which tend to breed more disunity and distrust among members. Mr. President, the success or failure of the UN Charter So, to maintain our collective deliberation at this 79th session must shape a more effective path for the United Nations, ensuring it meets the pressing challenges of our time and serves all nations equitably. Considering the significant disparity between the United Nations’ intended mission and its actual outcomes, an in-depth analysis is needed to explore why the organization has not been successful in preventing and resolving conflicts. It is important that the root causes of these failures are identified and addressed. Equally important is the need to stress the crucial role of the UN Secretary-General, jointly with the P5 members of the Security Council, in putting a stop to ongoing conflicts and in preventing new ones from erupting. On the Security Council reform, Mr. President, in order to make the United Nations fit to deal effectively with new and complex challenges confronting humanity at this time, Kiribati supports the call for an overdue reform of the Security Council to ensure that it reflects the realities of today’s world. We believe the permanent membership of the Council should be expanded to be more inclusive and representative, including allowing seats for small island developing states. Mr. President, my country firmly believes that members’ respect for the UN Charter and for each other’s rights and sovereignty is key to the peace of the world and to the efficient and effective functioning of the United Nations multilateralism. It is therefore of paramount importance that each one of us recommit ourselves now to fully respect the Charter and each other’s rights and sovereignty. Of equal importance is a renewal of faith and trust in each other as members of this United Nations family. On peacekeeping and international security, Mr. President, peacekeeping remains a cornerstone of international cooperation for maintaining global security and stability. Kiribati is grateful to have contributed to this effort by deploying police personnel to support the United Nations peacekeeping mission in South Sudan. Kiribati remains steadfast in its belief that global peace can only be achieved through collective action, and we will continue to play our part in this regard. Mr. President, Kiribati firmly believes that a country without peace, as is now seen in the case of countries that are currently devastated by wars and conflicts, cannot undertake any meaningful development while their people are deprived of enjoying a normal way of life and forced to live in refugee camps or as homeless people surviving through charity and humanitarian donations. People living in such dire conditions have no way of becoming economically productive in order to feel a sense of human pride and dignity, and cannot voluntarily free themselves out of such predicament until the conflict has been resolved. Peace restored and life is back to normal. In other words, development and human dignity are not achievable without peace. Peace must be achieved first. On the treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, Mr. President, Kiribati’s unwavering commitment to global peace is deeply rooted in the tragic history with nuclear weapons. As a nation that has witnessed harsh and destructive, with long-lasting consequences of nuclear testing, Kiribati remains steadfast in our support for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. A landmark agreement that represents the collective effort to eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons from our world through complete nuclear disarmament. And we stand in solidarity with the other states in advocating for a world free of nuclear weapons. Mr. President, Kiribati recently launched its first-ever foreign policy during its 45th National Day celebration on 12 July this year. This landmark document principally seeks to enhance the policy objectives that the co-appealers of Kiribati vision for 20 years. It captures the ways forward on how we seek to engage Effectively and strategically with our partners in areas of shared and mutual interest and it seeks to develop our nation and people while at the same time protecting our right to self-determination over our huge ocean and airspace territory. Mr. President, let me at this juncture highlight key best views and perspectives on some pertinent issues for small islands such as climate change and sea level rise, the 2020-30 Sustainable Development Goals, marine conservation and protection, and the pact of the future, and on the crucial link between peace, sustainable development, human dignity, and the concept of leaving no one behind, as highlighted in the theme. Mr. President, Kiribati’s designation as a least developed country reflects not only our economic challenges but also our acute vulnerability to climate change. Kiribati’s geographical isolation from world major markets, coupled with the volatility of global commodity prices and the increasing frequency of extreme weather patterns, exacerbates our development challenges. The high cost of imports, limited export opportunities, and reliance on fluctuating external markets further strain our efforts to achieve sustainable growth and development. Our graduation status from the LDC category, which had been deferred to a later date, remains at the back of our minds and what it would mean for us in the future, given these unprecedented challenges. It is for this reason, Mr. President, among others, that we recognize the multi- Dimensional Vulnerability Index, MVI, potential as a more fitting measure of vulnerability for all developing states. On climate change, Mr. President, we believe that humanity must be well informed about the riches and the resources of the planet that are finite and must not be overexploited to the extent that the planet’s health and wealth is compromised, as is now evident in the climate crisis caused by the overexploitation of the planet’s resources during the past century of industrialization. While the international dialogue on climate change has been extensive, Kiribati urges that we move beyond words to concrete action. The commitment made in the international forums, including the COP meetings, must translate into tangible results on the ground. As we continue to advocate for mitigation, it is clear that adaptation and resilience building are critical for low-lying atolls like Kiribati. Coastal protection remains a priority for Kiribati, and while adaptive measures such as the planting of mangroves and demarcating of seagrass continues, there is a dire need for interventions in large infrastructure, such as resilient seawall. Climate change is undeniably the driving force behind sea-level rise. Kiribati continues to grapple with the challenges posed by sea-level rise, which endangers our land, agriculture, and our way of life. The OASIS declaration on sea-level rise and statehood encourages our dedication to building Resilience Against Climate Impact and Emphasizes the Urgent Need for Global Action The United Nations’ recognition of the profound impact of climate change and sea-level rise through the establishment of high-level platforms to address sea-level rise during this session is a notable and welcome step. It reflects the urgency of addressing climate change and its devastating consequences on vulnerable communities worldwide. In line with the commitment of the 2050 Blue Pacific Strategy, we strongly advocate for global climate action, including maintaining the 1.5°C goal and addressing sea-level rise as essential to safeguarding the livelihoods, identity, sovereignty, and security of the Pacific Island communities, especially low-lying atolls, which are only two or three metres above sea level. On sustainable development goals, Mr. President, as we continue our journey towards achieving sustainable development goals by 2030, Kiribati has localized SDGs in a 20-year development roadmap or vision called KV20, with its primary aim to make Kiribati our healthiest, wealthiest, and most peaceful nation by 2036. This localization effort ensures that the SDGs are not merely theoretical goals that are embodied in our national policy projects and initiatives. Sustainable development is crucial for the long-term resilience and prosperity of Kiribati and other small island developing states. However, the realization of these goals requires enhanced capacity development, technology transfer, and stronger data support. Access to Financing, Biodiversity Conversation, to name a few. APAAS reflects the need for tailored solutions that recognize the unique circumstances of seas while promoting sustainable development and resilience against external shocks. On Marine Conservation and Protection, Mr. President, fisheries continues to hold prominence as a priority sector within our gay-blessed vision for 20 years plan, given that ocean resources are significantly very, contribute largely to our economy. Kiribati’s huge reliance on the Tuna Fishing License revenue, which finances about 70% of the government’s annual expenditure budget, makes it mandatory for the government to take special care of the health of the marine environment, as evidenced in its adoption of the marine spatial planning of its entire 3.5 million square kilometer of its tuna-rich ocean resource. In order to promote public awareness and participation in marine protection and conservation, a number of programs have been launched in some villages and communities in which people are encouraged to make village-based rules protecting fisheries in the areas against over-exploitation and sanctioning offenders in accordance with well-accepted cultural practice. However, our limited Kilibes calls upon the international community to strengthen cooperation and action to combat IUU fishing, ensuring that sustainable fisheries management becomes a reality for all nations, especially those most vulnerable to its impact. Kilibes is acutely aware of the profound significance of the ocean to our livelihood, culture and environment. This is why we have invested a lot of effort in the preservation and protection of our marine environment. On the pact of the future, Mr. President Kilibes applauded the Secretary-General for his great initiative for bringing the whole world together to re-energize the United Nations as it approaches its 80th year anniversary, so that it remains relevant and vital for the peace, progress and prosperity of humanity in the future. The proposed pact for the future offers an essential road map We are strengthening global cooperation on key issues, including climate change, digital transformation and peace building. We fully support the development of the Global Digital Compact, which will help bridge the digital divide and ensure that small island developing states like Ibis are not left behind in the digital age. It is vital that the international community takes bold steps to strengthen global governance mechanisms, fostering inclusive multilateralism that benefits all countries, particularly the most vulnerable. We believe that the success of these initiatives will be key to achieving sustainable development, peace and security for future generations. Mr. President, as I conclude, I express our hope for the future Kiribati family believes that together we can unite in action and commitment, ensuring that no country is left behind in our pursuit of a more sustainable and in a world where peace, sustainable development and human dignity are advanced for the present and future generations. Let us make this 79th session a time to renew our unity, solidarity and togetherness for the advancement of peace, sustainable development and human dignity for present and future generations. We believe that together we can make it and together we can do it. Thank you.

President: I thank the head of the delegation of Kiribati. And I now give the floor to His Excellency Mr. Mohamed Siad Doualeh, head of the delegation of Djibouti.

Mohamed Siad Doualeh – Djibouti: Thank you. Mr. President, at the outset, I wish to very warmly congratulate His Excellency Mr. Philemon Yang, President of the General Assembly, for the 79th session, and I assure him of the full support of the Republic of Djibouti as he implements his mandate. The topic that you have chosen for this session, Acting Together for the Advancement of Peace, Sustainable Development, and Human Dignity for Present and Future Generations, encapsulates and reveals what millions of human beings are calling for all around the world, a world that is less unequal, more cohesive, more peaceful and prosperous, a world where unity is not mistaken for the negation of individuality, and where the recognition of a common destiny channels everyone’s energy into forging a better common future. We reiterate our gratitude to your predecessor, Mr. Dennis Francis, for his outstanding work as well. Mr. President, the world is undergoing a perilous period, a period characterized by disorder and uncertainty. We see the crisis at several levels. Conflicts have proliferated and have become increasingly violent. The conflicts in Ukraine and in Gaza continue to rage without us being able to agree on the conditions to conclude a ceasefire agreement. Deforestation has gained ground in several parts of the world, including on the African continent, where the way that it has metastasized is a source of concern for us. The deficit in annual financing for the SDGs has deepened. The crisis of confidence among member states has affected the multilateral system while sapping its credibility. The risk of geoeconomic fragmentation and trade wars are a set of factors that negatively impact world economic growth. They produce a chaos that drowns out the interests and the voices of developing countries. We have already taken stock of this situation during the discussions for the celebration of the 75th anniversary of the United Nations. We will not return to that assessment. The question now is to know whether we are capable of utilizing the window of opportunity for renewal that is open to us because, fortunately, such windows of opportunity do exist. We must redouble our efforts, overcome our divisions, and undertake collective action to put an end to conflicts, to put in place policies, investment programs, and partnerships to make up for the delays in the implementation of the SDGs and to reform international financial institutions so that they are able to respond promptly and effectively to the emergencies and the systemic shocks facing many countries in the world. Mr. President, financial institutions must provide developing countries with greater subsidies and access to financing under favorable conditions while maintaining their risk tolerance for investments in sustainable development. This includes the use of innovative risk instruments. These solutions need to be discussed, and their implementation should be addressed in greater depth at the Economic and Social Council, whose role and position must be strengthened. The United Nations, as stated in the Charter, must play a major role in the work of world I remarked regarding the suicide of a mohijani family member and mentioned that it’s a very important issue. I also want to express my gratitude to the member states of the United Nations for the trust that they have placed in my country, Djibouti, by electing it last June as a member country of ECOSOC for the period 2025 to 2027. You may count on Djibouti to champion the priority areas in ECOSOC throughout its mandate. Mr. President, like many developing states, Djibouti faces major challenges due to climate change, including rising temperatures, dwindling water resources, and rising sea levels. Given these persistent threats, the government of Djibouti has put in place a series of ambitious multidimensional measures aiming to mitigate the effects of climate change and to strengthen the resilience of the country. The COP29 will be another window of opportunity for the international community to avoid a situation where the delay in fulfillment of climate change commitments becomes too great to overcome. This is a vital opportunity to elevate adaptation to the level of an absolute priority and to marshal the required resources. The promise of paying out $100 billion per year has not been kept. It is urgent to reestablish trust by moving toward the swift disbursement of the billions of dollars needed to put in place measures for adaptation and for an equitable transition toward renewable energies in low-income countries. We welcome the adoption of the Pact of the Future and its annexes, the Global Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations. We live in an era of disruptive technological advances and complex challenges. Djibouti is grateful to the United States for having spearheaded the effort that led to the unanimous adoption by the General Assembly of the first-ever Resolution on Artificial Intelligence to promote safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development. We in Djibouti are convinced that preparing for the future requires optimizing our country’s human capital as the most sustainable key to economic growth. Like many other African countries, Djibouti’s population is young. Its population is a tremendous asset and a huge competitive advantage if it is harnessed through investment in skills development and new technologies to promote quality job and workforce competitiveness. We have the ambition to vigorously pursue education systems focused on accessing advanced technological skills. Mr. President, Djibouti welcomes the progress achieved by Somalia in its efforts to stabilize the country as well as the holistic approach developed by the government of President Hassan Sheikh Mohammed to deepen peace. We welcome the efforts of the Peace and Security Council to produce a joint strategic evaluation of the situation in Somalia and to produce the draft of a general concept of operations. We need to intensify discussions to agree on the best option for financing the mission. The mandate given to the future post-atmos mission Ndidiye, and Anwar Jalali. The security threat posed by the terrorist attacks of Al-Shabaab constitutes a major stumbling block to our joint efforts, which must be cleared away as quickly as possible. There is a need to guarantee that the future mission has adequate resources and the equipment that it needs, including force multipliers. We must lend our unstinting support to the efforts of the Government of Somalia as it seeks to advance the mission. Its mandate and its term in the Security Council, which will begin next January, will certainly serve as a platform for it to share the lessons it has learned and the experience it has gained throughout these decades of conflict. Djibouti remains disturbed by the attacks carried out by the Houthi against merchant and commercial shipping. These attacks are a disturbing disruption of maritime traffic and commercial flows. This crisis has already brought about an exponential increase in maritime transport costs, which is reflected in the price index for consumer goods. If this situation continues, the impact on the economy of Djibouti, as well as the environmental repercussions of these repeated attacks, will be devastating. We call for solutions to be found to ease the regional tensions, which are causing the deterioration of the situation in the Red Sea. And we want to make sure that these solutions are found to ease the regional tensions, which are causing the deterioration of the situation in the Red Sea. And we want to see diplomatic efforts stepped up to reach a favorable outcome to the peace process in Yemen under UN auspices. President, we are profoundly alarmed by the continued deterioration of the situation in the Middle East and Gaza, and the West Bank in particular. The violence continues unabated. We are profoundly saddened by the continuous loss of lives, in particular children in Gaza. We are deeply saddened by the loss of the Palestinian people, the indiscriminate and continued bombings, and the unlawful occupation in the form of a total siege. The attack on Lebanon has accelerated the regional conflagration we all fear. We express hope that the parties would agree to the 21-day ceasefire called for by the U.S. and France. We must avoid at all costs an all-out war. We welcome the resolution recently adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations. We welcome the resolution recently adopted by the United Nations. the leadership of President Gele, current chairman of IGAD, has held many meetings at summit level to explore avenues for a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Djibouti reaffirms its commitment to the territorial integrity, sovereignty, political independence and unity of Sudan. In line with African Union Peace and Security Council decisions, we underscore the importance of ensuring the protection of the Sudanese state, its institutions and its people. We just recently held in Djibouti, in partnership with the United Nations, a retreat of mediators with the ultimate goal of harmonizing the various initiatives aimed at ending the conflict. We call on the Sudanese armed forces and the rapid support forces to honor the commitments made in Jeddah and subsequent negotiations, and further urge them to guarantee full, safe, rapid and unhindered humanitarian access. We call on Sudanese leaders to have the Sudanese people’s best interests at heart. We need to act determinedly and in unison. We cannot, we must not, give up on the prospect of peace in the Sudan. Mr. President, Djibouti stands ready to complete the normalization process with our neighbor Eritrea, and we stand ready to find a negotiated settlement to the conflict on the basis of international law, including the unresolved border dispute and other outstanding issues. The fate of our missing combatants is uppermost in our hearts. Their families need closure. To conclude, at UNGA79 we have made significant commitments. We have adopted the Pact of the Future, a bold and ambitious document which bestows important responsibilities to our organization and strengthens it. It also calls for a reformed global governance structure. We did it to reject the return to an older order, devoid of justice, where the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must, where there is no rule of law and might triumphs over right. We did it for our own sake and for the sake of our posterity, because we have no choice but to stand up and stand together to prevent a descent into the morass. We now have to honor the commitments made. The stakes are high, because if you don’t, the United Nations will continue to be reduced to a symbolic space where nonbinding commitments are made but never implemented. Thank you for your attention. Thank you. Thank you for your attention.

President: I thank the head of delegation of Djibouti. And I’ll give the floor to His Excellency Mr. Ernest Ramussio, head of the delegation of Rwanda.

Ernest Rwamucyo – Rwanda: At the outset, I would like to congratulate Ambassador Philemon Young on assuming the presidency of the 79th UN General Assembly and assure him of Rwanda’s full support. As we conclude the 79th United Nations General Assembly debate, unity has been a central theme throughout this year’s high-level week, and rightly so. Rwanda is of the view that in today’s increasingly fractured world, unity is central to addressing pressing issues, most of which transcend borders and national interests. Contemporary challenges require ambitious and coordinated action that paves the way for equal access to opportunity, ensures sustainable development, and contributes to global peace and security. As we approach the second half of this decade, solidarity is key to achieving targets under Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. Rwanda strongly endorses the UN Secretary-General’s Trimulus Package as a timely and necessary intervention to address the pressing challenges facing the global economy and the most vulnerable populations. The package represents a crucial step towards creating a more equitable and resilient global financial system, particularly as developing nations continue to grapple with the impacts of climate change and widening economies. Inequality. For too long, African countries and other marginalized regions have borne the brunt of global economic shocks without sufficient support from the international community. This stimulus package not only acknowledges these disparities, but also seeks to collect them through targeted financial aid, debt relief, and sustainable development initiatives. By addressing structural inequalities and ensuring that resources reach those who need them most, the Secretary-General’s proposal is a call to action for global solidarity. It will empower nations to rebuild more sustainably with a renewed focus on green energy, digital transformation, and poverty eradication. Rwanda believes that now is the time for bold multilateral action, and this package is an essential step towards ensuring a more just, inclusive, and sustainable future for all. Mr. President, Rwanda commends the efforts by the Secretary-General and member states for convening the Summit of the Future. This summit and the adoption of the Pact of the Future are crucial steps in boosting action to protect the interests of present and future generations. Rwanda knows firsthand what division and fracture can do to a society, let alone a community of nations. In the aftermath of the genocide against the Tutsi in 1994, we Rwandans found ourselves at a crossroads, where we chose unity over division for our own survival. This choice was not an easy one, but it was the right one and has defined Rwanda’s post-genocide nation-building ever since. The world now stands at a similar crossroads with a choice to make, to choose the Unity for the Collective Good. This is what the Kwibuka frame of hope monument in memory of the 1994 Genosagene de Tutsi, decently built in the gardens of this United Nations building, stands to remind the world. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, reports show that Africa is set to be the engine of future global growth in the decades to come. With the world’s fastest growing nation, Africa is already in the middle class, estimated to encompass 1.1 billion people by 2060, Africa will take the center stage of global affairs. However, this feat cannot be achieved without the adequate tools to both finance the decarbonization of our economies and mitigate the effects of climate change. Building resilient economies in the global south is an urgent priority, which goes hand-in-hand with increased solidarity from those who are most responsible for carbon pollution. The pay-to-pollute model is not a viable option. Solidarity and investment are. Consequently, advanced economies should reduce their emissions faster and invest more in African autonomous transition. In a few weeks, the world will gather in different parts of the world to discuss how to tackle climate change. In a few weeks, the world will gather in Baku, Azerbaijan for COP29. The international community should seize this opportunity to pledge more green investments in Africa. Additionally, Rwanda encourages nations to join hands and conclude an ambitious global plastics treaty based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastics at the global level in Busan. We have a historic opportunity to demonstrate our collective resolve to end plastic pollution by 2030. Thank you. for the benefit of current and future generations. Rwanda stands ready to play a positive role in that direction. Excellencies, esteemed delegates, the year 2024 marks two decades since Rwanda’s first deployment of troops under the United Nations peacekeeping banner. Today, Rwanda is among the top contributors with deployment in missions across Africa. And yet, insecurity in our region has reached unprecedented levels. This is evidenced by the rising threat of radicalized insurgency in the southern part of the continent, terrorism in the Sahel, or the presence of state-spotted genocide militias right by our border. Mr. President, no more than ever, cosmetic fixes must be avoided in favor of long-term solutions addressing the root cause of these conflicts. Security is not only achieved by silencing the guns. It is also achieved by building a fit-for-purpose global governance system capable of quickly adapting to crises. Reform of multilateral financial institutions is complementary to the reform of the United Nations Security Council, as both are crucial for creating a more equitable and effective global governance system. The financial institutions which shape global economic policies and the UN Security Council, which ensures peace and security, must evolve to better address the diverse needs of today’s world. Without reform, these bodies risk perpetuating inequalities, particularly for Africa, which has historically been underrepresented in decision-making processes. Improving both the financial institutions and the UN Security Council is vital to ensure fair representation, foster trust among nations, and effectively respond to the pressing challenges of the modern era, such as nd others, economic instability, climate change, and conflict. In this regard, Rwanda fully supports the reform of the UN Security Council to enhance its effectiveness and efficiency. Such reforms are necessary to address long-standing injustices faced by Africa, ensuring that the Council becomes more responsive to contemporary global challenges and dynamics. Only through these changes can we build a system grounded in equitable rules, unity, and solidarity. As we conclude this General Assembly, let us remember that history will judge us not by the challenges we face, but how we respond to them. The reforms we seek are not just necessary, but inevitable to ensure a future grounded in justice, equity, and solidarity. Rwanda stands ready to work with all nations, and we believe together we can build the world we want, one where no nation or continent is left behind. Let us seize this moment, for the future of humanity depends on it. I thank you for your kind attention.

President: I thank the head of delegation of Rwanda, and I’ll give the floor to His Excellency José Javier De La Gasca, head of delegation of Ecuador.

José Javier De La Gasca – Ecuador: I begin by bringing you the regards of the President of the Republic of Ecuador, Daniel Noborazín, who is the leader of a young government and is a young leader who has sought to break the patterns that prevented us from delivering the change that his generation was calling for and that my country is calling for. Ecuador is a country of 18 million inhabitants with huge potential in which young people are fighting on a daily basis for a better future, changing the reality that they inherited. They believed in the transformational project that President Nobor put forward, and now they see a country of opportunities and progress based on the respect for human rights, in which there was a firm commitment to root out corruption and impunity. Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, despite the fact that it may seem that the global and multidimensional crises are overwhelming us, international law and the principles and aspirations of the United Nations Charter must remain our guiding light. Therefore, I reiterate Ecuador’s commitment to multilateralism, peace and sustainable development, a peaceful resolution of disputes and respect for individual freedoms and human rights. I reaffirm the unshakable commitment and respect of Ecuador to the ideals and principles that gave life to nations. We must implement the Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations that were adopted last week. This will help the UN from moving on, from no longer being a photograph taken 79 years ago, and rather for it to better reflect the contemporary world. Ecuador welcomes any initiative that encourages inclusive prosperity and democracy because we know that its sustainability is closely linked to the peace of a nation because there’s An inextricable link between peace and development and between development and peace Therefore Ecuador is working to achieve the sustainable development goals and we have shown that the so aspired to objective 16, which is peace justice and strong institutions is being met with synergy and is interlinked with 125 of the 169 goals of the 2030 agenda We must understand it when we strengthen democracy and institutionality. We fight violence in all of its manifestations Tackling corruption we achieve better justice and peace for our citizens. We bring about an impact on the Reactivation of the economy and providing decent jobs reduction of poverty hunger and malnutrition Mr. President building a future of better prosperity and peace requires combating organized crime Transnational organized crime and drug trafficking that undermine Institutionality and a road to the social fabric of our democracies in December 2023 president no boa in the framework of the Ecuadorian presidency of the Security Council warned members about a wave of transnational and narco-terrorist organized crime Threatening the rule of law state control and border security faced with this challenge the national government of my country has adopted responsible decisions and is waging an Unshakeable unrelenting fight that past governments avoided however, national actions are not enough when it comes to the threat of transnational organized crime that has resources that Significantly go above the ones that are used to fight it Only by strengthening efforts and working in a coordinated and effective way with the international community. Can we defeat this phenomenon? As an elected member of the Security Council, Ecuador has shown its commitment to international peace and security. We have risen to this historic challenge that pushed us to act with a sense of responsibility and consciousness in the face of the geopolitical tensions between large powers that are limiting compliance with the collective responsibility to act in response to situations of conflict that affect humanity. In the case of Ukraine, we were co-penholders on the humanitarian file, and on the situation in Palestine, we voted in favor of all resolutions adopted by the Security Council to halt the hostilities, to free hostages, to allow a proper flow of humanitarian aid, and to advocate for the respect of international humanitarian law. In my region, we are leading the authorization of the Security Council to deploy the multidimensional support mission for security in Haiti that was adopted by way of Resolution 2699 in October 2023, and today has just been renewed up to 2025, just a few minutes ago. The role of CARICOM has been key in the supports provided to Kenya as leader of the MSS. This first step forward must contribute to the sister republic of Haiti blazing its own trail towards peace and sustainable development. President, Excellencies, colleagues, to the very end of our term, we will honor the commitment made at this assembly that elected us with 190 votes to promote the strengthening and maintenance of peace, keeping of peace, respect to the United Nations Charter, prioritizing the peaceful resolution of disputes and democracy and dialogue, protection of civilians as the best way to honor the 75th anniversary of the Geneva Convention. The fight against transnational organized crime and terrorism, the non-proliferation of and fight against the illicit trafficking of arms, the Women, Peace and Security Agenda to move to eliminate the stumbling blocks that prevent women from participating and making decisions in the whole cycle of prevention, construction and maintenance of sustainable peace. Those are all of the commitments we made. Furthermore, Ecuador underscores the fact that we have contributed constantly to peacekeeping operations of the UN with military personnel in various missions, supporting initiatives that strengthening them also with the historic resolution 2719 of 2023 that was adopted during our presence here at the Security Council. This resolution opens the way for sustainable financing for missions mandated by the Council for Peace and Security of the African Union. This brings me on now to another challenge that we face in Latin America, the absolute need to preserve the rule of law and respecting the will of the people. The escalation of tensions in Venezuela, the systematic violations of human rights and the persecution of political leaders and the daily violent repression by a totalitarian government against its own citizens who are calling for their right to be respected to be able to express their popular will at the ballot box. We’re seeing a direct threat to regional security and regional stability with possible repercussions on peace and security internationally. The critical humanitarian, political and human rights situation and security situation in Venezuela has caused 7.7 million Venezuelans to leave the country seeking better opportunities. Many of them have been welcomed with open arms in other countries in Latin America, including in Ecuador that is host to the largest number of Venezuelans. Faced with the ongoing deterioration, gravity and complexity of this crisis, Ecuador has shown leadership for the Venezuelan people and will not relent in its insistence before all international fora for there to be a peaceful and democratic transition for all of the Venezuelan people. The international community must give a clear and timely response here. President, migration is one of the most complex and pressing challenges that the world faces. Behind irregular migration we see the operation of human trafficking networks and illegal smuggling of migrants, putting the lives and integrity of millions of people at risk and of course unaccompanied children and women are the most vulnerable. This is intolerable and fighting against this phenomenon requires joint and coordinated actions with a comprehensive approach. Ecuador experiences all dimensions of migration because we are a country of origin, destination, transit and even return and we even host refugees. Therefore, we call for safe, orderly and regular migration in all areas of human mobility and this requires decisive support from the international community that must be clear on the fact that this can be achieved without criminalising it. The international community must also be united in facing the devastating effects of climate change. Today, Ecuador is suffering from the worst drought in the most recent decades and this shows how important it is to care for our ecosystems and to invest in infrastructure to deal with this issue. As a mega diverse country with unique ecosystems that are also fragile like the Amazon, the Andes and the Galapagos Islands, we are committed to conservation of biodiversity and we are updating the National Biodiversity Strategy and we have The Paris Agreement and the Principle of Shared but Differentiated Responsibilities must not be undermined. In fact, they must be strengthened. Ecuador also supports initiatives in the realms of protection, conservation and sustainable use of the ocean. And we should see this through the entry into force soon of the agreement, the BBNJ agreement, and the organization of the third UN Oceans Conference in 2025. Our commitment is further reflected in the efforts that the Ecuadorian Presidency of the Committee Tasked with Drafting a Legally Binding Instrument to Eliminate Plastic Pollution is pressing on with. The Ecuadorian Presidency is pressing on with that. We hope that this will be delivered soon and that the Galapagos Islands, which are a World Heritage Site, will be the venue for the signature of this instrument. President, security, transnational organized crime and climate change are just some of the challenges that we face as humanity, and they require a better use of global cooperation mechanisms and development finance mechanisms. Ecuador is convinced of the need for a true transformation of global governance and its institutions to provide them with legitimacy and thereby avoid them being condemned to irrelevance. And this includes the Bretton Woods institutions and this very organization. Perfecting the bodies of the UN system, not So, this is not the ultimate goal, but rather just one step forward to achieve the ultimate goal, which is peace and security in the world. Therefore, bearing in mind the relations between the main organs, in order to benefit from a stronger and more effective Security Council, we also require a more modern and effective General Assembly. We must reaffirm the role of this General Assembly so that it can bring about the necessary reform of the Security Council. Ecuador is clear on the fact that we are a non-permanent member of the Council and we are finishing our term in December this year, but we also know the role of the elected members when we act together is fundamental and we must continue on this front. An essential part of the transformation is the participation of women in leadership positions. Ecuador reaffirms its support for a woman from the Latin American and Caribbean region to be the next United Nations Secretary General. I conclude by recalling that crises can be overcome with political decisions, willingness and bravery, the courage to make the right decisions, and this will be achieved by strengthening multilateralism, not by weakening it. Therefore, we can achieve the dream of a better world, a world that is more peaceful with more opportunities for all. Thank you very much.

President: I thank the Chair of the Delegation of Ecuador. We have had the last speaker in the General Debate. Excellences, Mesdames et Messieurs. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. As we conclude the General Debate, I extend my sincere congratulations to all of you. My sincere gratitude to all the Member States for their active participation in the debate. The discussions that we had this week show the importance of multilateral cooperation, which we need to overcome the challenges our world faces. In this month of September, we came together for the general debate in a period that was particularly tumultuous. Delegations addressed the pressing challenges that face us, the climate – the crisis of climate change, the sustainable development goals, abject poverty, and a global international financial architecture that is ineffective, persistent gender inequality, and the adverse impacts of digital technology. These are the main challenges that have emerged from our discussions. We need to continue to build on the summit of the future. This summit was marked by the adoption of the pact for the future and its annex, which aimed to revitalize our multilateral system and international cooperation. The pact for the future and the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations appear as a solid promise to galvanize our efforts toward the achievement of the 2030 agenda. for Sustainable Development. Our Pact for the Future essentially aims to address the challenges that are impediments to international cooperation and have been for many years. These challenges are what make it problematic to achieve solutions, which solutions can be achieved through this agreement and its annex. I call upon all states and stakeholders to work toward effective implementation of the Pact for the Future and of its annex. My office has also instituted an awareness-raising program in this regard to be applied throughout the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly. We stand ready to receive any advice or any assistance to facilitate our actions. Ladies and gentlemen, while we are meeting in New York, violent conflicts are raging in Gaza, Lebanon, Sudan, and Ukraine. This is unfortunately not an exhaustive list of the conflicts and crises affecting member states of the United Nations. In the last few days, the world has seen an extremely dramatic escalation of violence between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. That escalation risks causing war in the entire Middle East region. As we speak, peace in the Middle East is hanging delicately on a shoestring. There is pervasive tension and uncertainty in the region. Thousands of people have lost their lives. Many others have been displaced. Infrastructure has been destroyed. This must stop, and it must stop now. The world must not allow an all-out war to happen in this volatile region. We call on all parties – Israel, Hamas, and Hezbollah – to urgently conclude a ceasefire and for all remaining hostages to be freed immediately and unharmed. I also call on all those with influence on the parties to demand an immediate ceasefire and dialogue. I further call on all states supplying weapons to the region to desist from such actions and give peace a chance, for no sustainable peace will be achieved militarily. Negotiations and diplomatic solutions must take precedence over brutal force. The Charter of the United Nations instructs that member states settle their disputes peacefully so as not to endanger international peace and security. As you heard me saying at the opening of the general debate, only a two-state solution based on relevant UN resolutions can guarantee lasting peace and security for both the people of Israel and Palestine, and indeed for the rest of the region. Excellencies, during the general debate we heard from 190 member states, including contributions from 71 heads of state, 42 heads of government, six vice presidents and crown princes, eight deputy prime ministers, 53 ministers, three vice ministers, and seven chairs of delegations. Moreover, we heard from three or Observers. Ladies and gentlemen, during the general debate this September, it was disappointing and frankly unacceptable that only about 10% of the speakers were women. This glaring disparity speaks to a deeper issue that we cannot ignore. We must do far better on gender equality, and this cannot simply be a talking point. It must remain a priority on our agenda, demanding action, not just acknowledgment, as we move forward. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, in my opening remarks of the general debate, I emphasized that only by working together, despite our differences, can we confront and overcome the complex and discouraging challenges before us. Only through dialogue, listening, and collective action can we find solutions that benefit all of us. The theme I chose for the 79th session, unity and diversity for the advancement of peace, sustainable development, and human dignity for everyone everywhere, is not just a guiding principle. It is a call to action. The theme reminds us that our strength lies in our diversity and our ability to unite stakeholders around our common goals. Let us all move forward together with this spirit of unity and shared responsibility. Let us continue our work with the clear aim of building a peaceful, just, and dignified future for all. Thank you. The exercise of the right of reply has been requested. May I remind members that statements in the exercise of the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and to 5 minutes for the second intervention and should be made by delegations from their seats. I call on the representative of Egypt.

Egypt: Mr. President. Egypt categorically rejects the reply delivered by Ethiopia’s representative to Egypt’s statement during the general debate. If Ethiopia were to reflect on its own conduct and behavior in the region, Ethiopia would recognize that it is the party that is the principal source of threats to peace, security, and stability in the region. It was Ethiopia that concluded a memorandum of understanding that infringed on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a sisterly neighboring African state, Somalia. It is Ethiopia that has repeatedly violated cardinal rules of international law and undermines the principle of sanctity of international borders, which is established in African laws and practice. It is also Ethiopia that is under the illusion that it will establish control over the Nile River, and it will deprive the two downstream rivarian states, Egypt and Sudan, of their established historical rights to the Nile waters. Ethiopia ought to relinquish its aspiration of regional hegemony. Ethiopia also ought to realize that fabricating baseless allegations against other states and inventing fictional external enemies are nothing but futile attempts that are meant for internal consumption to distract attention from Ethiopia’s many domestic challenges that are of its own making. Egypt, which is an ancient civilization, a responsible state in Africa, and a voice of peace and prosperity globally, does not engage in diplomatic conduct of this nature. We call upon Ethiopia to exercise responsibility and to desist from threatening its neighbors and from engaging in conduct that undermines stability in Africa. We also invite Ethiopia to return to the African family as a contributor to peace and stability in the region.

President: I call on the representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Iran: Mr. President, I take the floor to exercise the right of reply of my delegation in response to the disinformation and baseless statement delivered by the Prime Minister of the Republic of Albania during the General Debate in this hall. The alleged refugees who have been sheltered by the Republic of Albania belong to the terrorist people’s Mujahideen organization, also known as MKO, of which violence and terror form an integral element of their eclectic ideology. They never dismiss the ideology of violence and recourse to arms. Rather, they have always been looking to revert to their hate-mongering nature and do commit violent acts of terrorism. The Islamic Republic of Iran rejects the disinformation delivered by the representative of the Republic of Albania. In the meanwhile, it is the obligation of Albania to bring to justice or extradite members of this cult for their role in organizing, supporting, and perpetrating terrorist attacks in Iran. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes that the failure of the government of Albania to take appropriate and necessary measures against this terrorist cult constitutes a grave threat to international peace and security. Moreover, the Islamic Republic of Iran categorically rejects and denounces any kind of unwarranted attribution for the alleged cyber attack on Albania’s infrastructure. This accusation is completely unfounded and is hereby rejected and condemned. We have already expressed our readiness to cooperate in enlightenment to Albanian government and we repeat it once again. Mr. President, exercising our right of reply in response to the unfounded allegations and irreverent reference to my country by the representative of the United Arab Emirates, while my delegation strongly rejects those baseless allegations, would like to reiterate its sovereignty over the Iranian islands of Abu Musa, the Greater Tom and the Lesser Tom in the Persian Gulf. We consider the statement by the delegate of the United Arab Emirates as a flagrant violation of the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as an interference in Iran’s domestic affairs, in violation of the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of the state as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, and is categorically rejected. The Islamic Republic of Iran has always pursued a policy of friendship and good neighborliness towards all its neighboring countries. It is obvious that the territorial integrity as well as the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran over the said islands are not negotiable. We invite the delegation of the United Arab Emirates to stick to the principle of good neighborliness and refrain from raising issues that are based on unsubstantiated accusations. I thank you.

Republic of Korea: More to exercise its right of reply in response to the statement by the DPRK. I vividly remember a year ago here in this hall that I did point out how preposterous and absurd the allegation the DPRK made in her statement, particularly on the situation in and around the Korean Peninsula. Today having listened carefully to the DPRK’s statement and hearing no change made to their position, my delegation feels deeply distressed that we have to repeat our position so that every delegation in this hall understands the facts and truth accurately. The DPRK in her statement demonized the U.S. and its allies to justify their pursuit of nuclear weapons. To be short, it is a totally groundless claim. The root cause of the problem is the DPRK’s continued advancement of its unlawful nuclear and ballistic missiles in direct violation of relevant UN Security Council resolutions, threatening to undertake a preemptive nuclear attack, thus heightening tensions throughout the Korean Peninsula and in the region. It should not confuse the cause and effect where put the carts before the horses. As a responsible government, it is our duty, like any member state, to protect the lives and safety of our people from the DPRK’s military threats by maintaining a robust Republic of Korea-U.S. combined defense and deterrence posture. Again, contrary to the DPRK’s claim, the Republic of Korea-U.S. defense and deterrence posture is in response to the DPRK’s military threat. In the same context, under the recent Republic of Korea-U.S. extended deterrence cooperation, the DPRK’s ever-growing unlawful nuclear and missile threats are the very reason why we are strengthening extended cooperation with the United States, not the other way around. Let us make one thing clear, the DPRK’s illegal nuclear weapons program is by no means maintaining the regional balance of power as they claim today. In fact, it is the very reason for the regional security turbulence. Lastly, my delegation would like to remind that it is the UN Security Council resolutions, all of which were unanimously adopted, that prohibit the DPRK’s nuclear and ballistic missile program. The DPRK should respect and abide by the Security Council resolution as stated in the Charter if it genuinely wishes to be a responsible member of the United Nations. I thank you, Mr. President.

President: I call on the representative of Morocco.

Morocco: Merci, Monsieur le Président. Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, this is an exercise that we are engaging in in this room, and I am exercising my right of reply. In particular, this is important when it comes to a brother country, a neighbouring country. You can’t change your neighbours, however, at the same time you cannot remain silent when you are accused of things that are not true. That’s why I requested this right of reply to set the record straight. And to make a comment, His Excellency the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Algeria stated this morning that the Sahara needed to be decolonized. I must say that Algeria needs to wake up from its sleep. They’re still stuck in the Cold War, and they need to wake up to realize that Moroccan Sahara is independent in terms of its integration in the motherland, the Kingdom of Morocco, and that has been the case for 50 years. Algeria has perhaps forgotten, or perhaps they’re pretending to have forgotten, that in this very room here, a resolution was adopted in Algeria’s presence, Resolution 345B, which was adopted almost half a century ago, and this attests to the end of the Spanish colony and the return of the Sahara to its motherland. It’s the Madrid Agreement that is a truth, it’s the reality. This is an agreement that was struck in line with international law. This is an agreement I’d like to recall historic agreement, and the late President Boumediene, during the Arab League summit in Rabat, talking to his brother princes and heads of state, stated that he would support any formula that would allow the Sahara to be decolonized. Well, one year later… One year after that Moroccan Sahara was indeed decolonized That’s the first counter truth. I wanted to respond to the second one. Mr. President The Algerian minister stated that his country supported The efforts of the secretary-general in that regard I’d like regard I’d like to say that it’s absolute nonsense It’s not true. Mr. President just because And a lot of people must know the envoy was nominated three years ago He was appointed three years ago. Why hasn’t there been a single meeting here or anywhere else? Well, the reason is because Algeria is refusing to return to the negotiating table. It’s refusing to take a seat at the negotiating table It’s renouncing the political process and Algeria is rejecting the Resolution that is based on a political process and the minister said this morning that he supports the political process It’s really quite bizarre that Algeria say that they want to support the efforts of the Personal envoy and the efforts of the secretary-general however, they are Imposing the Conditions who can come who’s allowed to participate who’s not and it’s quite strange that Algeria Who claims to support the political process? Are opposed to their name being cited in rejecting the resolution even though they are cited in all the Security Council resolutions as a main stakeholder in this regional disputes and That they must return to their seats at the negotiating table We hope that when the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Algeria will meet the Personal envoy this afternoon. He’ll be able to tell him finally That Algeria is returning to the negotiating table that they’ll be able to give him that good news So, we have news that they’ll be doing that in line with the Security Council resolution and in line with the statement made by that very minister this morning from that rostrum up there. The third mistruth, Mr. President, the minister accused Morocco of falsifying an immutable reality. We sometimes say that there’s nothing worse than a blind man that doesn’t want to see. What is Morocco trying to change or falsify? Well, nothing, actually. We’re doing everything in broad daylight in the eyes of the international community, and we’re doing it here in this very room. We’re doing it with friendly countries, and I’d just like to tell the Algerian delegation and His Excellency, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, that the truth that Algeria refuses to see is that over 100 members of the international community support the Moroccan Autonomy Initiative. Many of them are members of the European Union, France, Spain, Germany, Denmark, Slovenia, Finland, just to cite a few that have recognized this over the last few months. Furthermore, this room has heard the voices of many heads of state and government who have not only supported the Initiative of Moroccan Autonomy, but also supported Morocco’s sovereignty over its Sahara. The next truth that the Algerian delegation is pretending to ignore is that 29 consulates have been opened in Moroccan Sahara, and the 30th one is currently being built and will be opened soon, and there will be others. And I hope the Algerian delegation will put on a different lens so they can finally see the light, see what exactly is happening. good morning. Another reality is economic development, that is something that Algeria does not want to see in the Moroccan Sahara. Motorways, the longest bridge in Africa, we have 4,000 trucks crossing at the Gilgit Passage, we have hospitals, universities, excellent schools, we have foreign investment, solar energy. That is the reality that Algeria does not want to see, and we hope that soon they will realize the truth, they will see the light that we are not trying to hide what is happening in the Moroccan Sahara. The last thing I wanted to say, Mr. President, is more of a comment, it is more of a remark. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Algeria talked about the threats that weigh on the Sahel Sahara region, terrorist threats, separatist threats, lack of development. For once, I agree with him. I agree with his prognosis. However, His Excellency the Minister forgot to mention the remedy and also the causes. What is the cause of this? It is Algeria. Algeria is responsible for all of the problems that the Sahel and the Sahara face. Where do the terrorists and extremists hide? Where do they seek refuge? Where do these separatists seek refuge? The answer is in Algerian territory. It is true, Mr. President, there is a terrorist threat in the Sahel Sahara region. There is a separatist threat. And my last observation, re-listen to the speech of the eminent minister made on Saturday from this rostrum here at the General Assembly. The minister that talked about this situation, that exposed the relationship. I’ll stop there, Mr. President. Thank you.

President: I call on the representative of the United Arab Emirates.

United Arab Emirates: As we practice our right of reply, on the right of reply by the Islamic Republic of Iran, I would like to note the following. The UAE believes that the three islands, Greater Tum, Lesser Tum, and Abu Musa, are in the Arabian Gulf. They are part and parcel of the UAE. They are occupied by the Iran for this reason. Iran is an occupation force in this field. Any Iranian claims will not change this reality. It is unacceptable. el-Lah to resolve this issue through bilateral negotiations or by resorting to the ICJ. And I would like to stress that the UAE has great relationships and has good relationships and close cooperation with the Iran. We would like to promote this cooperation and our bilateral cooperation. However, this issue, the UAE Islands, will remain a conventious issue until a good, peaceful solution is reached in line with international law and good neighborliness. Thank you, Mr. President.

President: I call on the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

DPR Korea: Thank you, Mr. President, for giving me the floor. My delegation is taking the floor to exercise the right of reply in response to the provocative statement leveled against my country during the general debate and the right of reply. Some days ago, the ROK foreign minister abused this August UN platform to commit a grave political provocation against the DPRK, a dignified UN member state. We categorically condemn and reject his reckless statement as a blatant affront to the sovereignty of the DPRK and wanton interference in its internal affairs. The ROK foreign minister shall pay a high price for his despicable attempt to tarnish the dignity and prestige of the DPRK. It is an undeniable fact in history. The U.S. nuclear threat, which has lasted for more than half a century, triggered off the DPRK’s access to nuclear weapons, and the hostile acts of military blackmail by the U.S. and ROK have been a decisive factor compelling the DPRK to steadily advance the enhancements of nuclear force. As of today, various U.S.-led military blocs exist throughout the Asia-Pacific region, including the Korean Peninsula, and a nuclear consultative group aimed at using nuclear weapons against the DPRK is in operation. Furthermore, the U.S. and its vassal countries’ aggressive war threats continue unabated. The whole world knows who are to blame for having turned the Korean Peninsula and the rest of the region into the world’s hottest spot and a touch-and-go compound depot by staging war threats of aggressive nature almost every day throughout the year while raving about the end of regime and the DPRK. ROK is frantically engaged in waging military threats and strengthening military alliance of aggressive nature with the U.S., thereby bringing closer a grave security crisis to the Korean Peninsula and the Northeast Asian region. Given the above fact, it is a mockery and trickery on regional countries and the rest of the international community that ROK is clamoring for the alleged threats as well as peace and stability. The ROK foreign minister’s outburst clearly shows that it is impossible to exist or live together in the least with the forces distraught with inveterate hostility and repugnancy towards the DPRK, and that the regional situation can never restore stability as long as they resist the U.S., the evil source and root cause of instability of the Korean Peninsula and the ROK-Korea-Norway trade. On the other hand, recently the U.S. and its followers are often holding conference on Alleged Human Rights Issues at the UN Arena. Such a performance is prompted by their sinister intention to tarnish the image of the DPRK at any cost by resorting to the despicable smear campaign, since they could not subdue the DPRK by military force. Moreover, ROK has no elementary qualification to talk about a human rights issue, and is cesspool of human rights abuses caused by its pro-U.S. sycophancy, fascist dictatorship, and anti-people misgovernment. It is pressing for the ROK to clean its human rights garbage at home. ROK is seriously mocking and insulting our people by scattering political agitation rubbish off leaflets, defaming our ideology and system due to our people, and dirty notes and stuff. ROK scums deserve a counteraction accordingly. No matter how desperately the ROK may try to disguise itself as a victim by racking its brain and playing on words to turn black into white, no one will be fooled into believing it anymore. ROK, obsessed with inveterate hostility towards the DPRK, is strongly urged to read carefully the UN Charter. Article 24 of the UN Charter stipulates that the Security Council shall act in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations, namely principles of sovereign equality, self-determination, and refraining in international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity. Accordingly, we have never acknowledged and will never do so the alleged Security Council resolutions which deny our rights, existence and development, and flagrant contravention of the UN Charter itself. Under the prevailing circumstances, it is a priority for the DPRK to preserve its right to security in terms of safeguarding and exercising its sovereignty. The DPRK will Never Connived at Military Hostile Acts and Strengthening of Military Blocks Detrimental to the Security Environment of the Korean Peninsula and World Peace and Stability. We Remain Firmly Committed to Fully Safeguarding the Sovereignty and Security Interests of the State and the Regional Peace through Offensive and Overwhelming Counteractions.

President: I call on the representative of Algeria to take the floor.

Algeria: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for giving me the possibility to exercise my right of reply after the allegations made by my Moroccan colleague following the speech of my minister this morning to you. And I would like to remind us all that since Algeria’s independence in 1962, so 62 years ago, there has not been one General Assembly of the United Nations where my country has not claimed the inalienable right of self-determination of peoples still under colonial rule. And I ask myself the question, a lot of states or delegations have referred to the issue of the Western Sahara from this very forum. Why? The distinguished delegate of Morocco, does he want to single out the declaration of my minister from this rostrum? Why would he want to do this? Why would he mention the name of Algeria more than 20 times in 10 minutes? I wonder. This attempt to take a subject on the agenda of this General Assembly and act as if it’s just the concern of two countries will not work. And I’d like to stress here three points. Firstly, we should reread my minister’s statement on the issue of the Western Sahara. The General Assembly might learn something, and I think my Moroccan colleague might learn something in so doing. And I quote, my country aspires to put an end to the colonization once and for all by turning the final page of this chapter, as we unfortunately see in the Western Sahara. The Secretary General of the United Nations and his special envoy may count on our full support. In their efforts to enable the two parties to the conflict, Morocco and the Polisarian Front, to resume the process of negotiations, in order to arrive at a political solution that will guarantee the Sahrawi people the full exercise of their inalienable rights to self-determination. And to those who want to impose a colonial fait accompli by gaining time, by falsifying facts nobody can argue with, and by attempting by various manoeuvres to turn attention away from what is clear and established, if we Algeria reaffirm that colonization, sooner or later, will end up disappearing and the legitimate rights of the Sahrawi people will undeniably be recognized. That’s the first point. The second point, Mr. President, is that the United Nations, through the General Assembly, through the Security Council, have indeed begun this process of decolonization by creating MINOSO, the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara. But that work is currently being blocked by the occupying power, which is Morocco, and which uses all kinds of maneuvering to postpone this referendum, including with the rather shady project of supposed autonomy. And if that project was really such a hot deal, why not put that forward further? Are you afraid of the call for freedom of the Sahrawi people? Algeria, for its part, and all those that support the right to self-determination of the people of Western Sahara, call for a consultation, a referendum of the Sahrawi people. Thirdly, the political process. Yes, a political process is part of negotiations between the legitimate representatives of the Sahrawi people and the occupying power, Morocco. And if they reach a political agreement under the inalienable right of self-determination, Algeria would be very happy about that. Mr. President, I don’t want to prolong this session, but I would like to recall that the right of the people of Western Sahara to self-determination is solidly anchored in international law and resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council. And my country, Algeria, based on our history and values and our fundamental principles, will never fail to stand alongside oppressed peoples, peoples under colonial occupation, which is the case of the people of Western Sahara. And it is with that determination that will never change and this deep-seated conviction that we, for our part, will continue with our unfailing support for the people of Western Sahara. so that they are able to fully access their inalienable right to self-determination. I thank you.

President: I now call on the representative of Morocco for a second intervention.

Morocco: Thank you very much, President. I’m very grateful, my brother, Ambassador of Algeria, for having re-read the part of his minister’s intervention on Morocco and Sahara. Now, it means that those that didn’t hear it or who weren’t here in the room will understand why my country wished to exercise its right of reply. Because the Algerian ambassador, what did he do? Well, all he did was confirm with more aggression and with more virulence and more detail what was said. And more the better, really, because now the international community can understand why Morocco referred to Algeria 20 times. Why 20 times? Well, quite simply, because every day that passes, you drag in the separatists, you train the separatists of the Polisario Front. Every god-given day for half a century, you’ve been hosting terrorists, militia. Every day, every god-given day for half a century, you are letting them cross borders to come and attack us. Thousands of Moroccans have died because of you, Ambassador, because of your country. Suffering has been inflicted. And there are even foreign citizens who have been killed too. I think I respect the freedom of expression of course and if you let me conclude I will conclude now you understand why Morocco mentioned Algeria 20 times and you asked a question ambassador also why are we mentioning the name Algeria not other countries well the other country no other countries because we’re in a building here where there is law in place where each country is free to express themselves to say what they want to say all of course respecting the others the realities that I referred to should have be no injury to you thank you mr. president I’m sorry to interrupt the distinguished representative of Morocco but as president could you please ask him to address himself to you as president of this meeting and and not to me thank you Morocco the representative of Morocco continue your second intervention and I may ask that you address yourself to the president who I am thank you merci thank you president and I will do be happy to do so. All I was doing was responding to accusations that were made against my country by my brother from Algeria. But given that he doesn’t wish me to address him, I will speak to Algeria. Algeria. Why is Morocco addressing Algeria and not the other delegations who discuss self-determination here in the UN? Well, quite simply, President, because we believe in the principle of the right and freedom of expression. We are here in a place where international law rules. Everyone can say what they wish. But why are we addressing Algeria? Well, because Algeria is the source of all our problems, because Algeria created the Polisario, because it’s Algeria who’s financing the Polisario, because it’s Algeria who’s paying the Polisario, because it’s with Algerian passports that the separatists from the Polisario Front are travelling around the world. It’s in Algeria that there are the camps. It’s the Algerians who are misappropriating monetary assistance with the Polisario Front. So that’s why we’re addressing Algeria. The other countries aren’t financing this. They’re not giving them passports. The other countries, we respect, we don’t agree, we respect them. We respect their position. We don’t agree with them. We try to enter a dialogue with them. And dozens of countries actually have withdrawn their acknowledgement and support for the Polisario Front. They’ve closed their embassies that Algeria was paying for the political process, President. It’s unfortunate that my brother from Algeria, and I hope he will let me call him my Algerian brother, we can’t let him falsify the reality of the political process. It’s at a dead end, because Algeria simply does not want to, as I said, is rejecting the resolution, does not want to…

President: I now call on the representative of Algeria for a second intervention.

Algeria: Thank you, Mr. President. I’ll be brief. I’ve got two questions to put to my brother, the ambassador of Morocco. The first question is, if this territory of the Western Sahara is so unchangeably property of Morocco, why did the International Court of Justice not recognise it? And why has Morocco accepted to share it with the neighbouring republic of Mauritania? I ask myself that question. Why would you share what is your own? That’s the first question. The second question… My question is why be afraid of democracy? Why are you afraid of the referendum? Why are you afraid of, freely and frankly, asking the population of Western Sahara what they feel? Minoso is in Western Sahara and it’s waiting for authorization to organize this referendum for the good of the entire region. Thank you.

President: May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to conclude its consideration of Ethiopia’s second intervention? I now call on the representative of Ethiopia for a second intervention.

Ethiopia: I thank the President. Mr. President, I’m exercising the right of reply on what the representative of Egypt has said just before. Egypt is dumping arms in the region, in the Horn of Africa, that could potentially fall in the hands of the terrorist groups Al-Shabaab. Still, Egypt is trying to stick to colonial policy of monopolizing the waters of the Nile River. Ethiopia is known for respecting international principles, particularly equitable and reasonable use of its own natural resources. I thank you, Mr. President.

President: I now call on the representative.. I am sorry, of Egypt. I now call on the representative of Egypt for a second intervention. I’m sorry.

Egypt: Mr. President, once again, Ethiopia has just proven what we said before regarding its approach, is dealing with the Somali government, now a support for terrorist groups. We know well who is exporting weapons and who is supporting terrorist groups and who is working on spreading instability in the horde of Africa. Ethiopia is the one who is doing this. We have never heard from the Ethiopian delegation any clear example that supports their claims. They follow the approach of hiding the truth. The real case here is respect for international law in terms of trans-border water sources. Egypt has always adhered to respecting the international law and despite this, Ethiopia, through their policies, are always trying to veto issues related to the Nile and they have turned all issues related to it to controversial issues. We retain and reserve our right, as given to us by the United Nations, to take any approach to maintain, to protect our resources and maintain our rights. Thank you.

President: I call on the representative of Iraq.

Iraq: Thank you. Mr. President, I’d like to thank you for your excellent presidency of the general debate. I’d like to thank the United Nations and member states and those states who have rejected the Israeli actions and attacks on civilian infrastructure and violated the sovereignty of member states in flagrant violation of international law and international humanitarian law. We denounce these criminal acts committed by the Israeli occupying forces, and we also reject what we have heard from the prime minister of this occupation force. And the accusations made against countries in the region, and really to all members of the United Nations, we call upon the United Nations and its various bodies to act quickly in order to put an end to these acts of Israeli aggression and to protect the region from the results of this aggression. Indeed, the inability of the Security Council to put an end to this aggression has encouraged the occupation forces to continue their attacks on Palestinian territory. The conflict has now spread to Lebanon, as well as other countries in the region. These ongoing acts of aggression and barbarous crimes of the Israeli occupying force, and particularly the attack against Mr. Nasrallah, will lead to total war in the region, which will fully destabilize the region and which will also have an effect on international peace and security. Thank you, Mr. President.

President: May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to conclude its consideration of Agenda Item 8. It is so decided. This meeting is adjourned.

B

Bassam Sabbagh – Syrian Arab Republic

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

2445 words

Speech time

1209 seconds

Condemning Israeli aggression against Palestinians and calling for two-state solution

Explanation

The speaker strongly condemns Israeli aggression against Palestinians, particularly in Gaza. He calls for a two-state solution as the only viable basis for lasting peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.

Evidence

The speaker cites over 42,000 Palestinian deaths, mostly children and women, and the destruction of civilian infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

S

Song Kim – DPR Korea

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

1922 words

Speech time

905 seconds

Criticizing U.S. and Western countries for escalating Ukraine conflict

Explanation

The speaker accuses the U.S. and Western countries of escalating the conflict in Ukraine. He claims they are shifting responsibility to other countries despite causing the conflict through NATO expansion and provision of weapons.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Defending DPRK’s nuclear program

Explanation

The speaker justifies DPRK’s nuclear weapons program as a response to U.S. hostility and nuclear threats. He argues that DPRK’s nuclear weapons are for self-defense and to maintain regional balance of power.

Evidence

The speaker cites decades of U.S. hostility and nuclear threats against DPRK as the reason for developing nuclear weapons.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Conflicts

Disagreed with

Mélanie Joly – Canada

Disagreed on

Approach to nuclear weapons and regional security

M

Mélanie Joly – Canada

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

2165 words

Speech time

1065 seconds

Calling for immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah

Explanation

The speaker urges Israel and Hezbollah to accept an immediate ceasefire. She emphasizes the need to create space for peace talks and save lives, warning against the risk of all-out war in the region.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Condemning human rights violations and calling for gender equality

Explanation

The speaker condemns human rights violations globally, particularly against women and LGBTQI people. She calls for gender equality and protection of reproductive rights.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the situation in Afghanistan as an extreme example of human rights violations against women and girls.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Dignity

Disagreed with

Song Kim – DPR Korea

Disagreed on

Approach to nuclear weapons and regional security

A

Ahmed Attaf – Algeria

Speech speed

91 words per minute

Speech length

1688 words

Speech time

1105 seconds

Supporting peaceful resolution of Western Sahara dispute through UN-led process

Explanation

The speaker expresses support for a peaceful resolution of the Western Sahara dispute through a UN-led process. He calls for negotiations between Morocco and the Polisario Front to reach a political solution guaranteeing the Sahrawi people’s right to self-determination.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Disagreed with

Morocco

Disagreed on

Western Sahara dispute

T

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Speech speed

111 words per minute

Speech length

2445 words

Speech time

1320 seconds

Urging reform of UN Security Council to be more representative

Explanation

The speaker calls for reform of the UN Security Council to make it more inclusive and representative of today’s world. He argues for expanding permanent membership and including seats for small island developing states.

Major Discussion Point

Multilateralism and UN Reform

Agreed with

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea

Albert Shingiro – Burundi

Agreed on

UN Security Council Reform

Highlighting climate change impacts on small island states and calling for climate action

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the severe impacts of climate change on small island developing states like Kiribati. He calls for urgent global action to address climate change, including maintaining the 1.5°C goal and addressing sea-level rise.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Kiribati’s vulnerability to sea-level rise and other climate impacts, as well as its efforts to implement climate adaptation measures.

Major Discussion Point

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan – United Arab Emirates

Agreed on

Climate Change Action

S

Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan – United Arab Emirates

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

2705 words

Speech time

1239 seconds

Need for climate financing and support for developing countries

Explanation

The speaker stresses the importance of climate financing and support for developing countries to address climate change. He calls for increased investment in green energy and climate adaptation in Africa.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the upcoming COP29 in Azerbaijan as an opportunity to pledge more green investments in Africa.

Major Discussion Point

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Agreed on

Climate Change Action

M

Manuel José Gonçalves – Mozambique

Speech speed

94 words per minute

Speech length

1330 words

Speech time

846 seconds

Calling for implementation of SDGs and 2030 Agenda

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the urgency of implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda. He calls for mobilizing necessary resources and reinforcing mutually beneficial cooperation to achieve the SDGs.

Evidence

The speaker notes that progress on SDG implementation is still tenuous with only six years left until 2030.

Major Discussion Point

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

M

Mohamed Siad Doualeh – Djibouti

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

1760 words

Speech time

775 seconds

Advocating for reform of international financial institutions to support developing countries

Explanation

The speaker calls for reform of international financial institutions to better respond to the needs of developing countries. He argues for greater access to financing under favorable conditions and use of innovative risk instruments.

Major Discussion Point

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

B

Bakary Yaou Sangaré – Niger

Speech speed

99 words per minute

Speech length

1392 words

Speech time

842 seconds

Promoting regional development initiatives to achieve SDGs

Explanation

The speaker highlights Niger’s commitment to regional development initiatives aimed at achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. He emphasizes the importance of these initiatives for addressing security and development challenges in the Sahel region.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the creation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) and its transformation into a confederation focused on defense, security, and development.

Major Discussion Point

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Disagreed with

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso

Disagreed on

Approach to regional security in the Sahel

O

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea

Speech speed

98 words per minute

Speech length

1122 words

Speech time

680 seconds

Criticizing ineffectiveness of current multilateral system and calling for reform

Explanation

The speaker criticizes the current multilateral system for its ineffectiveness in addressing global challenges. He calls for reform of international institutions, including the UN Security Council, to reflect the current global diversity.

Evidence

The speaker cites ongoing conflicts, climate change, and economic disparities as examples of the system’s failure.

Major Discussion Point

Multilateralism and UN Reform

Agreed with

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Albert Shingiro – Burundi

Agreed on

UN Security Council Reform

J

Jean-Claude Garkosso – Congo

Speech speed

90 words per minute

Speech length

1294 words

Speech time

857 seconds

Supporting strengthening of UN and multilateralism to address global challenges

Explanation

The speaker expresses support for strengthening the UN and multilateralism to address global challenges. He emphasizes the need for collective action and cooperation to tackle issues such as climate change, conflicts, and sustainable development.

Major Discussion Point

Multilateralism and UN Reform

A

Albert Shingiro – Burundi

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Advocating for reform of UN Security Council to include African representation

Explanation

The speaker calls for reform of the UN Security Council to include permanent representation for Africa. He argues that this is necessary to correct historical injustice and ensure fair representation of the continent in global decision-making.

Evidence

The speaker references the African Union’s common position on Security Council reform, known as the Ezulwini Consensus.

Major Discussion Point

Multilateralism and UN Reform

Agreed with

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea

Agreed on

UN Security Council Reform

S

Seán Fleming – Ireland

Speech speed

128 words per minute

Speech length

1705 words

Speech time

798 seconds

Calling for revitalization of multilateralism through Pact for the Future

Explanation

The speaker supports the revitalization of multilateralism through the Pact for the Future. He emphasizes the importance of collective action to address global challenges and strengthen the multilateral system.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Ireland’s commitment to supporting the essential work of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

Major Discussion Point

Multilateralism and UN Reform

Highlighting importance of human rights in international relations

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the crucial role of human rights in international relations and peace-building. He calls for supporting and strengthening the international human rights regime.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Ireland’s candidacy for membership in the Human Rights Council for 2027-2029.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Dignity

J

José Javier De La Gasca – Ecuador

Speech speed

132 words per minute

Speech length

1813 words

Speech time

818 seconds

Emphasizing importance of UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation

Explanation

The speaker reaffirms Ecuador’s commitment to the principles of the UN Charter and multilateral cooperation. He stresses the importance of these principles in addressing global challenges and maintaining international peace and security.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Ecuador’s role as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council and its efforts to promote peaceful resolution of conflicts.

Major Discussion Point

Multilateralism and UN Reform

K

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso

Speech speed

133 words per minute

Speech length

2792 words

Speech time

1258 seconds

Condemning terrorism and external interference in Sahel region

Explanation

The speaker strongly condemns terrorism and external interference in the Sahel region. He accuses certain Western powers of financing and arming terrorist groups to destabilize countries in the region.

Evidence

The speaker cites the creation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES) as a response to regional security challenges.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Conflicts

Disagreed with

Bakary Yaou Sangare – Niger

Disagreed on

Approach to regional security in the Sahel

E

Ernest Rwamucyo – Rwanda

Speech speed

137 words per minute

Speech length

1120 words

Speech time

489 seconds

Supporting Somalia’s stabilization efforts and calling for international support

Explanation

The speaker expresses support for Somalia’s efforts to stabilize the country and combat terrorism. He calls for international support to address security challenges in Somalia and the broader Horn of Africa region.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the need for adequate resources and equipment for the future post-ATMIS mission in Somalia.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Conflicts

A

Algeria

Speech speed

82 words per minute

Speech length

813 words

Speech time

589 seconds

Rejecting Morocco’s claims over Western Sahara and supporting self-determination

Explanation

The speaker rejects Morocco’s claims of sovereignty over Western Sahara and supports the right to self-determination for the Sahrawi people. He calls for a UN-led referendum to allow the people of Western Sahara to decide their future.

Evidence

The speaker cites UN resolutions and the existence of MINURSO (UN Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara) as support for the self-determination process.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Conflicts

M

Morocco

Speech speed

116 words per minute

Speech length

1739 words

Speech time

898 seconds

Defending Morocco’s sovereignty over Sahara and criticizing Algeria’s role

Explanation

The speaker defends Morocco’s sovereignty over the Sahara region and criticizes Algeria’s role in the conflict. He accuses Algeria of creating, financing, and supporting the Polisario Front, which Morocco considers a separatist group.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the opening of consulates in the Sahara region and economic development projects as evidence of Morocco’s control and development of the area.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Conflicts

Disagreed with

Ahmed Attaf – Algeria

Disagreed on

Western Sahara dispute

V

Valdrack Ludwing Jaentschke Whitaker – Nicaragua

Speech speed

145 words per minute

Speech length

2350 words

Speech time

966 seconds

Criticizing unilateral coercive measures against countries

Explanation

The speaker condemns the use of unilateral coercive measures against countries, particularly by Western powers. He argues that these measures violate international law and cause suffering to innocent populations.

Evidence

The speaker calls for the immediate lifting of sanctions imposed on countries such as Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Dignity

D

DPR Korea

Speech speed

142 words per minute

Speech length

741 words

Speech time

311 seconds

Criticizing U.S. hostile policy and defending DPRK’s nuclear program

Explanation

The speaker criticizes the U.S. for its hostile policy towards DPRK and defends the country’s nuclear program as a necessary measure for self-defense. He argues that DPRK’s nuclear weapons are a response to decades of U.S. threats and aggression.

Evidence

The speaker cites joint military exercises by the U.S. and its allies near DPRK’s borders as evidence of ongoing threats.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Conflicts

I

Iraq

Speech speed

109 words per minute

Speech length

230 words

Speech time

126 seconds

Calling for protection of civilians in conflicts

Explanation

The speaker calls for the protection of civilians in conflicts, particularly in the context of Israeli aggression. He urges the international community and the UN to take action to end Israeli attacks and protect civilians in the region.

Evidence

The speaker mentions recent Israeli attacks on civilian infrastructure and violations of sovereignty of member states.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Dignity

Agreements

Agreement Points

UN Security Council Reform

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea

Albert Shingiro – Burundi

Urging reform of UN Security Council to be more representative

Criticizing ineffectiveness of current multilateral system and calling for reform

Advocating for reform of UN Security Council to include African representation

Multiple speakers called for reform of the UN Security Council to make it more representative and inclusive, particularly emphasizing the need for African representation.

Climate Change Action

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan – United Arab Emirates

Highlighting climate change impacts on small island states and calling for climate action

Emphasizing need for climate financing and support for developing countries

Speakers emphasized the urgent need for global action on climate change, particularly in supporting developing countries and small island states.

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers from African countries shared concerns about regional security challenges, particularly terrorism, and emphasized the need for regional cooperation and international support to address these issues.

Bakary Yaou Sangare – Niger

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso

Ernest Rwamucyo – Rwanda

Promoting regional development initiatives to achieve SDGs

Condemning terrorism and external interference in Sahel region

Supporting Somalia’s stabilization efforts and calling for international support

Unexpected Consensus

Multilateralism and UN Reform

Sean Fleming – Ireland

José Javier De La Gasca – Ecuador

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea

Calling for revitalization of multilateralism through Pact for the Future

Emphasizing importance of UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation

Criticizing ineffectiveness of current multilateral system and calling for reform

Despite representing diverse regions and interests, these speakers showed unexpected consensus on the need to strengthen multilateralism and reform the UN system, indicating a shared concern about the effectiveness of current global governance structures.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement among speakers included the need for UN Security Council reform, urgent action on climate change, addressing regional security challenges (particularly in Africa), and strengthening multilateralism. There was also broad support for sustainable development and achieving the SDGs.

Consensus level

The level of consensus on these issues was moderate to high, particularly on the need for UN reform and climate action. This suggests potential for progress on these issues if member states can translate their shared concerns into concrete actions. However, significant differences remain on specific regional conflicts and the approach to international security, which could impede comprehensive agreement on global challenges.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to nuclear weapons and regional security

Song Kim – DPR Korea

Mélanie Joly – Canada

Defending DPRK’s nuclear program

Condemning human rights violations and calling for gender equality

DPRK justifies its nuclear program as self-defense against US threats, while Canada condemns nuclear proliferation and emphasizes human rights.

Western Sahara dispute

Ahmed Attaf – Algeria

Morocco

Supporting peaceful resolution of Western Sahara dispute through UN-led process

Defending Morocco’s sovereignty over Sahara and criticizing Algeria’s role

Algeria supports self-determination for Western Sahara through a UN-led process, while Morocco claims sovereignty over the region and accuses Algeria of supporting separatists.

Approach to regional security in the Sahel

Bakary Yaou Sangare – Niger

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso

Promoting regional development initiatives to achieve SDGs

Condemning terrorism and external interference in Sahel region

Niger focuses on regional development initiatives, while Burkina Faso emphasizes combating terrorism and external interference.

Unexpected Disagreements

Role of external powers in regional conflicts

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso

Ernest Rwamucyo – Rwanda

Condemning terrorism and external interference in Sahel region

Supporting Somalia’s stabilization efforts and calling for international support

While both countries face regional security challenges, Burkina Faso strongly condemns external interference, while Rwanda calls for international support in Somalia, highlighting different approaches to external involvement in African conflicts.

Overall Assessment

Summary

Main areas of disagreement include regional conflicts (Western Sahara, Korean Peninsula), approaches to multilateralism and UN reform, and strategies for addressing climate change and sustainable development.

Disagreement level

High level of disagreement on key issues, particularly regional conflicts and the role of external powers. This reflects deep-seated geopolitical divisions and differing national interests, making consensus on global challenges difficult to achieve within the UN framework.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agree on the urgency of addressing climate change and implementing SDGs, but differ on specific priorities (e.g., small island states vs. broader developing country needs).

Teburoro Tito – Kiribati

Shakhboot Nahyan Al-Nahyan – United Arab Emirates

Manuel Jose Goncalves – Mozambique

Highlighting climate change impacts on small island states and calling for climate action

Emphasizing need for climate financing and support for developing countries

Calling for implementation of SDGs and 2030 Agenda

All speakers support strengthening multilateralism, but Ireland and Ecuador focus on working within existing frameworks, while Eritrea calls for more radical reform.

Sean Fleming – Ireland

José Javier De La Gasca – Ecuador

Osman Saleh Mohammed – Eritrea

Calling for revitalization of multilateralism through Pact for the Future

Emphasizing importance of UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation

Criticizing ineffectiveness of current multilateral system and calling for reform

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers from African countries shared concerns about regional security challenges, particularly terrorism, and emphasized the need for regional cooperation and international support to address these issues.

Bakary Yaou Sangare – Niger

Karamoko Jean Marie Traore – Burkina Faso

Ernest Rwamucyo – Rwanda

Promoting regional development initiatives to achieve SDGs

Condemning terrorism and external interference in Sahel region

Supporting Somalia’s stabilization efforts and calling for international support

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

There are deep divisions and ongoing conflicts threatening international peace and security, particularly in the Middle East, Ukraine, and Africa

Climate change and sustainable development remain major challenges, especially for developing countries and small island states

Many countries are calling for reform of the UN system, particularly the Security Council, to be more representative

Regional issues like the Western Sahara dispute and tensions in the Korean peninsula remain unresolved

Human rights and human dignity are emphasized as important principles, though there are disagreements on specific situations

Resolutions and Action Items

Adoption of the Pact for the Future to strengthen multilateralism and international cooperation

Call for immediate ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah

Support for Somalia’s stabilization efforts

Proposal to conclude a treaty on autonomous weapons systems by 2026

Call to implement the UN Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals

Unresolved Issues

Ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinians

Dispute over Western Sahara’s status

North Korea’s nuclear program

Reform of the UN Security Council

Climate financing for developing countries

Venezuela’s political crisis

Suggested Compromises

Two-state solution for Israel-Palestine conflict

Negotiated settlement for Western Sahara dispute through UN-led process

Peaceful dialogue to resolve tensions on Korean peninsula

Balanced approach to UN Security Council reform to include more representation

Increased climate financing and support for developing countries in exchange for emissions reductions

Thought Provoking Comments

The world is undergoing a perilous period, a period characterized by disorder and uncertainty. We see the crisis at several levels. Conflicts have proliferated and have become increasingly violent.

Speaker

Mohamed Siad Doualeh – Djibouti

Reason

This comment succinctly captures the overarching global challenges being discussed by many speakers, framing the context for the debate.

Impact

It set the tone for subsequent speakers to address specific crises and conflicts, anchoring the discussion in the current geopolitical reality.

Justice or injustice is judged according to whether the actor is pro-U.S. or an independent country, and the United Nations is misused for political aims of an individual country. Such a reality should no longer be tolerated and allowed.

Speaker

Song Kim – DPR Korea

Reason

This provocative statement challenges the perceived bias in international relations and the role of the UN, introducing a critical perspective.

Impact

It sparked responses from other countries defending the UN system and addressing allegations of bias, deepening the debate on international governance.

The UN exists to prevent the recurrence of the scourge of war that had inflicted untold sufferings to mankind. It is really shameful and deplorable that such act against humanity has persisted for one year.

Speaker

Song Kim – DPR Korea

Reason

This comment pointedly criticizes the UN’s effectiveness in preventing conflicts, particularly referencing the ongoing situation in Gaza.

Impact

It prompted other speakers to address the UN’s role in conflict resolution and peacekeeping, leading to a broader discussion on UN reform and effectiveness.

We must do far better on gender equality, and this cannot simply be a talking point. It must remain a priority on our agenda, demanding action, not just acknowledgment, as we move forward.

Speaker

President of the General Assembly

Reason

This statement highlights a critical issue of representation and equality within the UN system itself.

Impact

It shifted focus to internal UN reforms and representation issues, prompting reflection on how the organization embodies its own principles.

The root cause of the problem is the DPRK’s continued advancement of its unlawful nuclear and ballistic missiles in direct violation of relevant UN Security Council resolutions, threatening to undertake a preemptive nuclear attack, thus heightening tensions throughout the Korean Peninsula and in the region.

Speaker

Republic of Korea

Reason

This comment directly challenges the DPRK’s earlier statements, providing a contrasting perspective on regional security issues.

Impact

It intensified the debate on nuclear proliferation and regional security in East Asia, leading to further exchanges between the DPRK and ROK.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting major global challenges, questioning the effectiveness and impartiality of international institutions, and bringing attention to specific regional conflicts. They prompted debates on UN reform, nuclear proliferation, and the role of major powers in international relations. The exchanges, particularly between opposing nations like DPRK and ROK, or Morocco and Algeria, demonstrated how the UN General Assembly serves as a forum for airing grievances and presenting conflicting narratives on international issues. The discussion ultimately underscored the complexities of addressing global challenges through multilateral institutions and the persistent tensions between national interests and international cooperation.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

(Day 5) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session

(Day 5) General Debate – General Assembly, 79th session: afternoon session

Session at a Glance

Summary

This transcript covers the general debate of the 79th session of the UN General Assembly, featuring speeches from various national representatives. The central themes included international peace and security, climate change, sustainable development, and UN reform.

Many speakers emphasized the importance of multilateralism and adherence to international law, particularly in light of ongoing conflicts like the war in Ukraine and the situation in Gaza. There were calls for immediate ceasefires and peaceful resolutions to these conflicts. Several nations, including Saudi Arabia and Zambia, stressed the need for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Climate change was a major focus, with countries like Azerbaijan, which will host COP29, calling for urgent action and increased climate finance. The challenges faced by small island developing states due to climate change were highlighted by nations like Trinidad and Tobago.

Sustainable development and the implementation of the SDGs were discussed, with many countries noting the slow progress and calling for increased efforts and resources. The need for reform of the international financial architecture was emphasized by several speakers.

UN reform, particularly of the Security Council, was a recurring topic. Many nations advocated for a more representative and effective Council that reflects current global realities. The importance of inclusive governance and shared responsibility in addressing global challenges was stressed by countries like Japan.

Regional issues were also addressed, including the situation in Myanmar, Haiti, and various African conflicts. The debate also touched on topics such as nuclear disarmament, artificial intelligence governance, and the rights of marginalized groups.

Overall, the discussion reflected a shared concern for global challenges and a call for strengthened international cooperation, while also highlighting the diverse perspectives and priorities of UN member states.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– Calls for UN Security Council reform to make it more representative and effective

– Concerns about ongoing conflicts, especially in Ukraine, Gaza/Israel, and other regions

– Climate change and the need for climate action, including financing for developing countries

– Strengthening multilateralism and the UN system to address global challenges

– Economic development, poverty reduction, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Overall purpose/goal:

The overall purpose of this General Assembly debate was for countries to present their views on major global issues, call for international cooperation to address challenges, and outline their national priorities and positions on key topics.

Tone:

The overall tone was formal and diplomatic, with countries advocating for their interests while emphasizing the need for multilateral cooperation. However, there were moments of tension and sharper rhetoric, particularly around territorial disputes and ongoing conflicts. The tone became more confrontational during the right of reply segment at the end, with countries directly rebutting each other’s claims.

Speakers

– President: President of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly

– Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud: Minister for Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia

– Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe: Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Zambia

– Maxim Ryzhenkov: Minister for Foreign Affairs of Belarus

– Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd: Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iceland

– Sayyid Badr bin Hamad bin Hamood Albusaidi: Foreign Minister of Oman

– Lars Løkke Rasmussen:

– Maris Sangiampongsa:

– Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov: Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan

– Amery Browne: Minister for Foreign and Caricom Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago

– Francis Fonseca: Minister for Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade of Belize

– Olushegun Adjadi Bakari:

– Yamazaki Kazuyuki: Chair of the delegation of Japan

Additional speakers:

– Antonio Guterres: Secretary-General of the United Nations

– Alicia Barcena: Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico

– Dennis Francis: President of the 78th session of the United Nations General Assembly

Full session report

Expanded Summary of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly General Debate

The 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly general debate brought together representatives from nations worldwide to discuss pressing global issues and present their countries’ perspectives on international affairs. The debate covered a wide range of topics, with several key themes emerging throughout the discussions.

International Peace and Security

A primary focus of the debate was the ongoing conflicts and security challenges facing the international community. Many speakers emphasised the importance of peaceful conflict resolution and adherence to international law. The situation in Gaza and the broader Middle East received significant attention, with Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud, calling for an immediate ceasefire and peaceful resolution. He notably stated, “The world is seeing a high pace of crises and unfortunately we are just looking at managing these crises rather than finding concrete solutions,” highlighting the need for more effective international responses.

The war in Ukraine was another significant point of discussion, with Denmark’s representative, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, strongly condemning Russia’s aggression. In contrast, Belarus’s Foreign Minister, Maxim Ryzhenkov, advocated for peaceful resolution of conflicts through dialogue, potentially indicating a different stance on the Ukraine situation.

Zambia’s Foreign Minister, Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe, stressed the need for strengthening UN peacekeeping efforts. Nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation were addressed by Japan’s delegation chair, Yamazaki Kazuyuki, underscoring the continued relevance of these issues in global security discussions.

UN Reform and Multilateralism

A recurring theme throughout the debate was the need for reform within the United Nations, particularly concerning the Security Council. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister, Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov, explicitly called for reform of the UN Security Council, a sentiment echoed by representatives from Zambia and Thailand. These calls for reform reflect a widespread desire for a more representative and effective Security Council that better reflects current global realities.

Speakers consistently emphasised the importance of strengthening multilateralism and the UN system as a whole. Iceland’s Foreign Minister, Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd, expressed support for UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation. Japan’s representative stressed the importance of inclusive global governance and the need for international cooperation on emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence.

Sustainable Development and Climate Change

Climate change and sustainable development featured prominently in the discussions. Azerbaijan, which will host COP29, called for urgent action on climate change and increased climate finance for developing countries, highlighting their own initiatives in this area. This call was supported by other nations, including Denmark, which emphasised the need for equitable climate action.

Zambia’s representative highlighted national efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and combat climate change, while Benin advocated for sustainable development in Africa. The challenges faced by small island developing states due to climate change were brought to the fore by Trinidad and Tobago’s Foreign Minister, Amery Browne.

Many speakers noted the slow progress on implementing the SDGs and called for increased efforts and resources. The need for reform of the international financial architecture was emphasised by several speakers as crucial for supporting sustainable development in developing countries.

Human Rights, Equality, and Cultural Heritage

Several speakers addressed human rights and equality issues. Iceland’s Foreign Minister advocated for women’s rights, gender equality, and the rights of LGBTQI+ persons. Japan’s representative emphasised the importance of protecting human dignity. Belize’s Foreign Minister, Francis Fonseca, called for self-determination for Palestinians and expressed support for Palestine’s full UN membership.

Trinidad and Tobago’s representative discussed the rights of people of African descent and called for reparatory justice for the history of chattel slavery. Benin’s representative, Olushegun Adjadi Bakari, spoke about pan-Africanism and their initiative to grant nationality to people of African descent.

The importance of protecting cultural heritage and the rights of indigenous peoples was also highlighted by some speakers, reflecting a growing awareness of these issues in the international community.

Regional Issues and Governance

The debate provided a platform for nations to address specific regional issues and bilateral relations. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister discussed the normalisation of relations with Armenia, while representatives from China and the Philippines addressed the ongoing South China Sea dispute, revealing continuing tensions over the 2016 arbitration ruling.

Trinidad and Tobago called for the lifting of the embargo against Cuba and discussed the situation in Haiti, highlighting the diverse regional concerns brought before the General Assembly. Ethiopia raised the issue of Nile River water rights, underscoring the complex nature of regional water management challenges.

Conclusion

The 79th session of the UN General Assembly general debate reflected a shared concern for global challenges and a call for strengthened international cooperation. While there was broad agreement on the importance of multilateralism, peaceful conflict resolution, and sustainable development, specific approaches to these issues and regional concerns showed more divergence. The debate highlighted the complex nature of international relations and the differing priorities of nations based on their geographical, economic, and political contexts. It also underscored the ongoing need for dialogue, negotiation, and collective action in addressing the world’s most pressing challenges, including UN reform, climate change, human rights, and regional conflicts.

Session Transcript

President: The 16th Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly is called to order. The Assembly will continue its consideration of Agenda Item 8 entitled General Debate. I now give the floor to His Highness Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia.

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia: In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate. President of the United Nations General Assembly, ladies and gentlemen, may the peace of God and the blessing of God be upon you. Please allow me to congratulate, first of all, His Excellency Mr. Philemon Yang upon his election to head up the 79th session of the UN General Assembly. We also congratulate Mr. Dennis Francis for the efforts that he made during the previous session. I also wish to seize this opportunity to thank the United Nations Secretary General, Mr. Antonio Guterres, for the tireless efforts that he’s making in order to achieve the goals and aspirations of the UN Charter. President, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, since we participated in the creation of this organisation, has been striving to make efforts to make the promises of the UN Charter an absolute reality, establishing the respect for international law, achieving international peace and security, and supporting channels for international multilateral actions in many different areas. In this regard, the Kingdom participated in the drafting of the Pact for the Future that was agreed on by the leaders of the world this week. We believe that this pact and the summit for the future in general is an opportunity to renew our collective principles to strengthen cooperation, to achieve peace and security and sustainable development for future generations. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia we are seeking to strengthen the role of international financial institutions to ensure an economic recovery. President, the world is seeing a high pace of crises and unfortunately we are just looking at managing these crises rather than finding concrete solutions. This is a situation of laxism in international efforts and also a situation of selectivity in the application of international law and international humanitarian law which has led to an exacerbation of violence and conflicts and is threatening the principles of the UN Charter and undermining common actions to find peaceful solutions. Peaceful solutions that will enable us to spare the lives of civilians and to put an end to fighting and ensure peace and international and regional development. In this context of tensions between countries we wish to warn against political polarisation. We need to open up dialogue and strengthen dialogue and cooperation between states, enabling us to strengthen international peace and security. In this regard we categorically reject all crimes perpetrated by Israel against the kindred Palestinian people. The most recent crimes committed against civilians, defenceless civilians, is just one chapter in the story of suffering by this brother people who have been suffering for decades now. These barbaric Israeli practices that started last year has cost the lives of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, in particular women and children. We are seeing bombing, murder and destruction. This is a real humanitarian catastrophe and it is continuing to get worse. It is necessary to halt this aggression. For this reason, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia hosted the joint Arab-Israeli summit in November 2023. We saw the participation of heads of state and government of member countries of the Arab League and the Organisation for Islamic Cooperation. We worked to adopt resolutions and decisions that reflect the will of Arab and Muslim people and to stop the bloodshed, to ensure unhindered humanitarian access and to realise the legitimate demands of the Palestinian people, in particular the creation of an independent state. The ministerial committee tasked by this summit to engage in visits has called upon the international community to put an end to Israeli aggression and protect civilians. That’s why we welcome the adoption by the General Assembly on the 10th of May 2024 of a resolution that states that the state of Palestine fulfils all the conditions to become a fully-fledged member state of our organisation and we welcome the decision of Norway, Spain, Ireland, Slovenia and Armenia who have recognised the brother country of Palestine. We call upon other states to bilaterally recognise the state of Palestine and to act together in order to recognise the state of Palestine as an independent state. That’s why we announced with our partners and ministerial committees with Norway and the European Union, we have announced the creation of a coalition to promote the two-state solution. We call upon all states to join us in this initiative. Mr President, we have provided more than five billion American dollars in aid to the kindred Palestinian people since the bombing of the Gaza Strip with the King Salman project. We have committed to even more, several million dollars in humanitarian aid and we are working with many different international and UN humanitarian aid agencies to bring in humanitarian projects. to the tune of $106 billion. We are also working with UNRWA to provide services, to provide food, medications, and meet other needs of the brother Palestinian people. The support provided by the Kingdom to UNRWA has gone above $1 billion. We welcome the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice regarding Israeli practices in occupied Palestinian territories that has confirmed the illegal nature of Israeli presence in occupied Palestinian territories for now 75 years. It’s essential to find a fair solution to the Palestinian crisis based on resolutions of international equality and enabling the Palestinian people to establish an independent state with pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. The prevalence of impunity, the lack of respect of legal obligations is encouraging Israel to continue its escalation. This escalation will have no positive impact on any party at all. It also risks having negative repercussions for the entire region. That’s why we affirm the fact that it is necessary to preserve the stability of Lebanon and to respect its sovereignty in line with international law and in line with relevant UN Security Council resolutions. We are aligning with international efforts to bring in an immediate ceasefire and to find a lasting diplomatic solution. We call upon all parties to show wisdom and to show restraint in order to avoid a true war from breaking out in the region. Mr. President, the Kingdom has taken key measures in order to ensure appeasement and development in our region. We have concluded an agreement with Iran to restore our diplomatic relations based on the respect of sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs, also on the respect of the UN Charter. working with the Organisation for Islamic Cooperation also to establish peace and security in our region. We hope that Iran will cooperate with the international community, in particular vis-à-vis its nuclear programme and its ballistic missile programme. We have also resumed relations with the Syrian Arab Republic to strengthen our cooperation on common issues, because we are convinced that finding a solution to this crisis will enable us to entrench peace and stability in our region. We also reaffirmed the need to preserve the security of Syria, its stability and the integrity of its territory. Furthermore, in Yemen, we are supporting all efforts to find a solution to this crisis and to appease the human suffering of the brotherly Yemeni people. It’s essential to find political solutions to reinstall peace and stability in the region. We reiterate our initiative that seeks to find a just and lasting solution. When it comes to the situation in the Red Sea, this is a situation that is undermining security of shipping routes, and in response to that, we need to show a sense of wisdom and support international efforts to establish peace and stability in that area. In Sudan, we reaffirm our staunch position to preserve peace and stability in Sudan and to strengthen the state and its institutions and avoid its breaking down. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia hosted the Sudanese peace talks in Jeddah to this end. We call to appease the situation, put an end to military operations and to provide humanitarian aid. We are working to continue the Jeddah talks, engaging in Jeddah talks three, the third round. In terms of peace and stability in Afghanistan, Afghanistan cannot be left by the wayside of its region and the international community or be prey to terrorists. That’s why it’s necessary to put an end to the humanitarian and security situation in Afghanistan that is providing fertile ground to different groups and militias to continue their activities. Now moving on to the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, we must put an end to this crisis and contain its repercussions. His Royal Highness the Crown Prince, may God protect him, is continuing to work to this end and we have announced the freeing of several prisoners of different nationalities. We hosted a meeting of different officials from different countries with the participation of several different states and international organizations. We stand ready to continue our mediation efforts between the parties to the conflict. President, drawing on our vision 2030, we aspire to fulfill the needs of future generations to empower women and youth and to build bridges with the world. Through our development approach, we aspire to achieve global development, focusing on people, preserving their rights, their dignity, and allowing them to achieve their aspirations. Mr. President, on the energy front, we are working to achieve energy security and to guarantee access to energy at reasonable prices and to mitigate the effects of climate change. We seek to ensure stability in international markets, the international oil markets, and to guarantee access to this energy and guarantee security in the supply chains in order to ensure a prosperous international economy. We are also fighting against climate change, in particular by adopting a holistic approach to the energy transition. In that regard, we seek to respect the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, making the most of all the techniques we have available to us in order to limit our greenhouse gas emissions. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is one of the best placed countries according to carbon and methane emissions, and we are working to set up a carbon transfer and storage facility in the city of Al-Jubeirah. This has the capacity to store 9,000 tonnes within a few years and 44,000 tonnes by 2030. We are working with the international community to fight climate change, and that’s why in the summit between Saudi Arabia and Africa, we announced a participation of $50 billion to support these efforts. We have also launched initiatives such as the Green Saudi Arabia Initiative, the Green Middle East Initiative, and we are also investing in techniques to reduce carbon density and to strengthen electricity and green hydrogen production. The Kingdom furthermore supports projects to optimise the consumption of energy. and to preserve sea life and water. That’s why we celebrated the International Environment Day in 2024 and we will soon be hosting the COP16 of the United Nations Convention Against Desertification, which is reaffirming our commitment to preserve the future and fight against desertification. We also intend to host the International Water Forum in 2027. The Crown Prince, may God protect him, announced the creation of an international organization for water resources last September to fight against the challenges we face when it comes to water resources. Mr. President, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is working to create a world free of nuclear weapons. For this reason, we call upon all states to preserve the non-proliferation regime while protecting the rights of states to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. We support efforts being made to fight against terrorism and it’s necessary to bolster our joint actions by continuing cooperation with our international partners in order to fight against this threat. It’s necessary to make more effort to fight against the campaigns being launched by terrorist groups. It’s further necessary to continue our work to fight against the financing of terrorism. Mr. President, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was chosen to host the 2030 Global Exposition. This exposition is allowing us to focus on the Sustainable Development Goals. This is an event that is an opportunity to find political solutions when it comes to sustainability and also to honour our commitments to developing countries. By way of conclusion, we hope that the efforts being made will enable us to establish a common principle with mutual respect to build a better future for the whole of humanity, and may the peace and blessing of God be upon you.

President: I now give the floor to His Excellency Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Zambia. Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe, MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia: Your Excellency Philemon Yang, President of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Antonio Guterres, distinguished Heads of State and Government, Honourable Ministers, Heads of Intergovernmental Organizations, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, I congratulate you, Your Excellency, on the assumption of the Presidency of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly and assure you of Zambia’s cooperation during your tenure. We extend Zambia’s sincere gratitude to His Excellency, Mr. Dennis Francis, for the exemplary work exhibited during the 78th Session. Leaving no one behind, acting together for the advancement of peace, sustainable development and human dignity for present and future generations, presents an opportunity for us to re-examine our priorities, redefine our mission and sharpen our vision as we approach the 80th anniversary of the United Nations. Namibia therefore joins the UN Secretary General in congratulating Member States for successfully adopting the Pact for the Future, which includes the Digital Global Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations. We further appreciate the work of Namibia and Germany in co-facilitating this process. It is our hope that the implementation of the Pact for the Future will address the multiple crises facing the world today. Mr. President, Zambia firmly believes that multilateralism is the only viable approach to solving regional and international challenges. In this regard, the creation of the United Nations almost 80 years ago provided new hope for the international community in the maintenance of international peace and security, promotion of justice and improvement of living conditions for all people. However, this ideal is rapidly slipping away as global peace is increasingly threatened by the growing and sustained geopolitical tensions. As Member States that share the ideals upon which the United Nations was founded, we must resolve to correct this course and uphold the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. The impact of conflict in some parts of the world has been felt across Africa through disruption, soaring prices of key commodities such as energy and other inputs of trade and production, resulting in increased cost of living. Zambia, like many other developing countries which are predominantly import dependent, has not been spared. It is therefore crucial that we address the root causes and structural drivers of conflict and promote peace building efforts. We call for all warring parties to exercise restraint and flexibility for the sake of millions of civilians who are casualties of war and conflict. This call is particularly relevant for the raging conflict in the Sudan, the Middle East and Ukraine. Mr. President, at regional level, Zambia held the chairmanship of the Southern Africa Development Community, SADC, Organ on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation, for the period August 2023 to August 2024, and therefore played a crucial role in the region in that capacity. Overall, the security and political situation in the region remains stable. However, there are still pockets of security challenges in some of our member states, such as the situation in the eastern parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo, the DRC, and in the Cabo Delgado province in Mozambique, which SADC remains seized with. We implore the international community to support the various peace building efforts in the DRC. We further call for support to the Government of Mozambique in order to ensure that the exit of the SADC mission in Mozambique does not result in reversal of the gains made by the DRC. by that mission. Furthermore, Zambia recognizes the efforts of His Excellency Mr. João Manuel Lourenço, President of the Republic of Angola, as the African Union mediator in the facilitation of the Rwanda process aimed at restoring peace and security in the Eastern DRC, as well as the Nairobi process that equally aims at fostering peace in that country. Mr. President, climate change and extreme weather conditions threaten the very existence and balance of the world as we know it. It is clear that efforts to raise the standard of living for the world’s poor are being adversely affected by the effects of climate change. For instance, this year Zambia experienced the worst drought in recent times. This led the government to declare the drought as a national disaster and emergency to save the lives and safeguard livelihoods. We take this opportunity to thank our bilateral and multilateral partners who graciously responded to the clarion call to support Zambia’s drought response strategy. This and similar scenarios in our region underscore

President: the need to build local resilience and climate adaptation through various interventions, including, among others, climate financing from both private and public sources. In this regard, the need for the full actualization of the loss and damage fund to help developing countries cope with climate-related disasters and extreme weather events cannot be overemphasized. We urge member states to focus their energies on achieving measurable outcomes at the forthcoming COP 29 accordingly. Mr. President, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the SDGs

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia: may not be met by 2030. Furthermore, Zambia joins other SADCG member states in the call for a review of the use of unilateral economic instruments that curtail developing countries’ access to development finance. Aggressive tax avoidance and tax evasion have a corrosive effect on public trust, financial integrity, the rule of law and sustainable development across the globe. International tax cooperation could significantly reduce illicit financial flows, a scourge that deprives economies, especially those in the developing world, of funding for development. Zambia therefore calls for the urgent conclusion of negotiations on the proposed UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. This will enable developing countries to enhance their domestic resource mobilization. As co-facilitator of the negotiations of the outcome document for the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in the coming months, we look forward to actively engaging with member states in the reform of the international financial architecture. Mr. President, science and technology are critical to achieving the SDGs. Developing countries’ lack of access to technology has hindered the implementation of sustainable development practices, thus perpetuating the cycle of poverty and inequality. Hence, there is a need to bridge the gap in digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, to promote efficiencies in health, climate, sustainable infrastructure, energy, agriculture and other global development priorities. In this regard, we call for enhanced international cooperation to support developing countries to integrate technology through capacity building, technology transfer on mutually agreed terms, information exchange and investment in research and development. Alongside the Pact for the Future, Member States adopted a Global Digital Compact. Zambia was honored to partner with Sweden in leading negotiations of this historical document. Mr. President, as part of its efforts to accelerate the attainment of the SDGs by 2030, Zambia has been implementing policies and programs aimed at creating a strong and resilient health system, reducing inequalities, eradicating poverty and empowering women and girls. This is also consistent with the implementation of the International Conference on Population and Development Program of Action. Zambia welcomes the Declaration on Future Generations, which seeks to secure the well-being of future generations, in particular their participation in decision-making. To reap the demographic dividend, Zambia continues to call for significant investments in the growing youth population, currently standing at 82 percent below the age of 35. Increased investments are needed in education, health and empowerment of young people, so that they can meaningfully contribute to the achievement of the SDGs. Mr. President, child and early forced marriage is a harmful practice that disproportionately affects girls, hindering their education, health and overall well-being. In this regard, Zambia continues to make strides in the campaign to end child marriage. Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation However, more needs to be done. We call on all partners to join efforts and raise our voices to protect our children to end this harmful practice by 2030. Mr President, In the face of the present geopolitical realities and calls to strengthen multilateralism, the need to reform the UN Security Council cannot be overemphasized. Reforms are necessary to make the Security Council better equipped and strengthened in its capacity to discharge its responsibilities of monitoring and safeguarding international peace and security. The representation of African states in the permanent category would correct this historical injustice that has marginalized Africa’s voice and would provide a vital perspective to the Council. Time has come for the Security Council to be representative, democratic, and accountable to all member states, irrespective of status. This is essential for its integrity as the custodian of international peace. Given that Africa constitutes the second largest block of the UN membership, proposals to reform the Security Council should heed Africa’s core as espoused in the Common Africa position as enshrined in the Ezulwini Consensus. and the CETA declaration. In this regard, we are pleased to note that the African Union Committee of 10, the C10, and the five permanent members, the P5, of the United Nations Security Council held a meeting during this session of the United Nations General Assembly. Such interactions should be encouraged in order to narrow the gap on the Security Council reforms. Finally, Mr. President, I wish to reaffirm that Zambia remains committed to strengthened multilateralism as a means of addressing the numerous global challenges affecting our people, including ending poverty and creating wealth in a sustainable manner. To this end, Mr. President, we should not remain indecisive and indifferent to this serious issue, nor should we forgo this opportunity to make the world a better place for all humanity. In conclusion, I would like to reiterate the need for us to seriously consider the call for massive investment and scaled-up action if we are to make meaningful progress in achieving the SDGs, including implementation of the Pact for the Future. I thank you, Mr. President.

President: I thank the Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Zambia. I now give the floor to His Excellency Maxim Ryzhenkov, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Belarus.

Maxim Ryzhenkov – Belarus: Mr President, distinguished delegates, colleagues, for 79 years now, our countries have met in this chamber in order to speak their own truth, to exchange best practices and to support important initiatives. And we do this with the motto of making the world a better place. But is the world becoming a better place? Is it more predictable, safer? Is it more stable? There are some veterans in the room who probably remember the time when the UN did have a special role to play. Us less seasoned participants only heard about this or read about this in textbooks. Back then, many years ago, the UN Chamber, the UN Charter was something unshakable, a true guarantor of compromise, forward-looking solutions. We remember the horrors of World War II. No one wants a repetition of that tragedy. That’s why we created a singular instrument for collective dispute settlement and for strengthening the architecture of international cooperation. Indeed, history has shown us that the instrument we came up with is not perfect, just like we’re not perfect. But without a doubt, it’s the best we have and the best we had back then, the best we have now. Not all issues which were decided on equivocally were implemented, and blood continues to spill as a result. For instance, Palestine, what’s unfolded there is a truly, a true humanitarian catastrophe, and tens of thousands of civilians continue to die. But this does not diminish the achievements of the past century. We shattered the colonial system. Many people finally got the right to develop themselves, and new hubs, economic, industrial, and financial, appeared across all continents. Entire regions came out of the shadows of hunger and epidemics. The UN’s peacekeeping activities helped to prevent bloody conflicts or to put an end to them. UN Blue could be seen everywhere where development problems were being resolved. But what’s happening now? Why did we have to establish a group of friends in defense of the UN Charter? Why today are we compelled to defend this document, the Charter, which should be of overriding legal importance for all of us? Why can we not use the entire UN toolkit to put the world in order? The answer is patently obvious. Because a number of countries do not abide by the norms enshrined in the Charter, nor do they want to. Because for them, abiding by international law is equivalent to slowly being extinguished. Of course, when they speak from this rostrum, they do recall the Charter, but not universally so, but only to serve their egotistical interests and claims. And often they claim that others are flouting the Charter. Let me remind you, the UN law is universal. It gives everyone equal rights to develop and the rights to various benefits and technologies and resources on a non-discriminatory basis. Is this approach acceptable to the West? Clearly no. What they’re interested in is maintaining their dominance and the prosperity of their elites. In order to achieve this, they’re exploiting entire nations and the resources of others, holding the rest of the world back. They’re employing that principle, which is as old as the world itself, divide and conquer. It’s one of the roots of many of modernity’s conflicts. All of the UN’s principles are being put at the bottom of the pile, in the interests of the vital interests of the US and their closest satellites. But if a state dares to enact their own policy to protect their people, if they try to throw off the yoke of external control over their resources, the West all of a sudden remembers all of these conventions, these paragraphs, and even the tiniest references at the bottom of them. And what’s most important Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and many people have been living under such conditions for decades, whereas peace-loving Cuba has been in this situation for over half a century. This instrument is one that flagrantly violates entire sections of the UN Charter and international law. It scuppers sustainable development, undermines food and energy security, restricts access to world markets, and violates the right to the freedom of movement. It also has a boomerang effect on the countries who impose these measures. We’re seeing in neighbouring EU countries, people complain about ever-higher prices on food prices, energy prices, as well as concomitant social upheavals. What do we have as a result? From the point of view of the collective West, and here I have some information taken from US sources, 72% of the world’s people live in what the West calls autocracies. Twenty years ago, this figure stood at 46%, again, according to their data. So has the West managed to force humanity to live according to their templates? Clearly no. We see a clear trend. Free countries in the global South who do not accept sanctions will see others meddle in their domestic affairs and so-called democratisation will be foisted upon them. They want to develop on the basis of their own social traditions, their vision of the world, to protect their people. And today we have a global majority within which new ideas and new projects are springing up. They’re strictly peaceful. They’re in the interests of the entire global community, and they do not seek to restrict anyone’s interests. The Chinese initiative, the Belt and Road Initiative put forward by Xi Jinping, the initiative on global security and globalization, the Russian and Belarusian initiative of multi-polarity and diversity in the 21st century, the Indian Voice of the Global South initiative, and many others. All of these projects are geared toward establishing an entire, a unified international community in which the fate of all of the people of our planet is united, not just the fate of the golden billion. The planet united and all of its diversity, it enriches all of us. This is the way forward. This is the way chosen for the president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, for our people. It’s underpinned by respect, trust, sincerity, reliance and responsibility. And in fact, when a new package of illegal sanctions was imposed on Belarus, we responded with openness and transparency, unilaterally waiving visas for EU citizens. Thousands of Europeans have used this right coming to Belarus, and they were not disappointed. If we place more trust in the UN, most peace-loving initiatives would be born and would grow within the organization, not outside it. At the same time, the world would not be threatened by fragmentation into political and economic blocks. A few words about the conflict of potential of our planet. It might be somewhat unusual what I’m about to say. We’re all used to third-rate series and YouTube videos. We’re being taught to receive information in this simplistic way, forcing us to forget the truths which many humanists and great authors penned in the past. Therefore, I’d like to cite three Western authors. and I’d like to draw parallels with what’s going on right now. A quote from Kings and Cabbages, O Henry, The little opera-booth nations play at government and intrigue until someday a big silent gunboat glides into the offing and warns them not to. An American ship. Next example, Graham Greene, The Quiet American, written not that long ago. A CIA undercover operative working as a staffer at the U.S. Embassy in Vietnam sought to enact terrorist acts so as to achieve a coup d’etat in that state, in Vietnam, and install a government loyal to the U.S. And last but not least, Kurt Vonnegut. Roughly 50 years ago he wrote this, A Man Without a Country. He did not understand why the U.S. and the U.K. at the very end of World War II, when everything was already over, why they had to carpet bomb Dresden, raising it to the ground and burying in the rubble, under the rubble, roughly, in fact, several hundred thousand people, children, women, and the elderly. We know why they did this, to make them fear the future. And this is very similar to what we’re seeing these days. Meddling provocations, however, we now see real American warships, and not just one but many. This is why we need a strong and impartial universal international organization which can guarantee that a balance is struck in our world in which no one country or group of countries can do as it fits, imposing its will on the U.N. to stoke its egotism at the expense of the global majority. A strong organization wouldn’t allow transnational capital to benefit the collective West. It wouldn’t allow for Ukraine to fight to the last Ukrainian. And if everyone, like Belarus today, understood what’s actually happening in the conflict zone, what risks we’re running, when, well then we’d want to put an end to this bloody confrontation between these two brotherly nations. Long ago, Ukraine and Russia would be sitting around the negotiating table, not out on the battlefield. There are many timely initiatives, such as the Brazil-China peace plan, and yet without Russia’s participation, they won’t be successful. A new security architecture in our region is also impossible without Belarus’s participation. NATO is bolstering military capabilities at our borders, many times over. Tens of thousands of soldiers, thousands of units of military equipment, and we’re seriously disquieted by the fact that these games might get out of control, resulting in the conflict spreading throughout the region and throughout the world, which would have catastrophic repercussions for us all. Europe has its share of nuclear weapons. Thus, escalating these tensions is a path straight to World War Three. Ten years ago, in Minsk, fruitful agreements were penned so as to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. Today, we continue to propose our efforts as we understand Russians and Ukrainians best of all, and we’re doing everything we can to achieve peace in long-suffering Ukraine. We’re very much interested in this, more than anyone. And just for your general edification, since the start of the conflict, over 250,000 Ukrainians crossed the border into Belarus. Of the last few months, 12,000 to 15,000 a year have been entering Belarus. These are official figures. So we’re seeing people running away from prosperous Europe. And in fact, these figures are much greater than the number of refugees who have gone to the EU across our border. Shameless efforts are being made to push migrants into Belarus. This is a dirty page in the book of European democracy on our border with the EU. soldiers from certain EU countries are beating and torturing refugees from Asia, Africa and the Middle East with impunities. Dozens have died. This has been reported by independent sources. Some have been buried without identification. In fact, the Council of Europe recently condemned such actions and criticized a new Polish law which broadens the legal scope for Polish soldiers using firearms against refugees. This is what so-called enlightened Europe is doing to welcome those fleeing the horrors which resulted from the policies of intervention of the collective West, intervention in the sovereign affairs of other countries. These actions are flagrant violation of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees. All of the facts have been recorded and will be sent to the relevant bodies for investigation, although these bodies should have started investigating them of their own accord long ago. That’s why we’re concerned. We’re concerned by how we see the path towards strengthening the UN. First, the UN should throw off the diktat of a number of states, states who are doing as they see fit, feeling themselves to be exceptional. The UN is all of us. Secretariat staff should remember that when they become secretariat staff, they should serve the interests of the organization as a whole, not of their fellow nationals. They should be objective, impartial and independent. Second, the organization should support regional processes, because regionalism is a key reality in today’s times. We constantly see regional integration bodies going from strength to strength, and this across the world. We’re seeing the global majority, regional projects, rising BRICS, SCO, CIS, the Eurasian Economic Union, the African Union, ASEAN, many others. I talked about this earlier. The UN must align itself with these processes, helping them to interlock and develop. Third, last year, Western countries waged a dirty campaign to prevent Belarus being elected to serve on on the Security Council. That’s what we saw, that they fear our honest voice being represented on the Security Council. However, we’ll continue speaking openly and directly about a whole host of global issues. We’ll continue insisting that Security Council reform is enacted, that this reform is fair, because the voice of the Global South on the Security Council, it’s our voice. This is why we believe what’s necessary is Security Council reform by including developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. These countries are at the heart of global problems. They know better than anyone else how to resolve wars and conflicts in the developing world. Their weight in global affairs is much greater than it was 80 years ago as well. Fourth, the UN should adopt a principled stance regarding the unacceptability of unilateral measures. We can expect, we should expect the organisation to take serious and objective measures to assess the negative impact of sanctions on sustainable development. What’s more is the UN’s work to counter illicit sanctions should be systematic. A principled objective assessment of all instances of their use needs to be given. Fifth, we need to use the UN as a platform for effectively resolving growing transboundary threads. Belarus has always been in favour of a collective approach to these global problems, such as migration, pandemics, natural disasters, human trafficking, the list goes on. Outside this chamber, there is a counter which shows how much is being spent on arms in real time, trillions of dollars. And that’s only the money that the UN knows about. We think the golden billion countries should use these trillions of dollars not to fuel yet more wars and conflicts, but to resolve vital problems. Many global problems would be resolved in a flash. The UN would get the resources to help development, which it currently lacks. It keeps saying that President, this year is a special year for the Republic of Belarus. Recently we marked the 80th anniversary of our liberation from the Nazis. This marks the start of a new chapter in our history. We stand proud that we created a people-centred state where people are at the core of our national policies. Next year we’ll mark the 80th anniversary of the United Nations. We’ll do this together. How will the world approach this milestone? Will it be entangled in disagreements and conflicts? This is why the President of the Republic of Belarus, Mr Lukashenko, put forward the initiative of a global dialogue on security, and it very much dovetails with the proposals put forward by many delegates from this rostrum today. We will continue knocking on the doors of peace and constructive action, the doors of security and development. Starting last year, we began holding an international conference on Eurasian security in Minsk, the goal being to consolidate political, economic and other processes in greater Eurasia for the benefit of our states and people. This year it will be held on the 31st of October. We invite all of you to attend. We must breathe the spirit of San Francisco into the UN’s lungs. After all, that is the spirit that gave life to our organisation. We stand convinced that this is absolutely necessary right now. It’s necessary to secure the interests of all people on our planet. I thank you for your kind attention.

President: Thank you, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belarus. I now give the floor to Her Excellency Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd, Guildford Auteur, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iceland.

Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd – Iceland: Mr. President, Excellencies, First, I would like to once again thank all those whose daily work is dedicated to the United Nations and its ideals. All across the globe, people work in the name of the United Nations, wearing the colors and emblems of the UN, giving their effort to make our world a better place, often doing work that only the UN is capable of doing. And in these headquarters and other UN offices, hundreds of people show up every day to ensure that the nations of the world can count on this organization to be the forum where the biggest challenges facing humanity can be discussed, debated, and hopefully set on a path of resolution. Thank you. Mr. President, next year will mark the 80th anniversary of the United Nations. The UN emerged out of calamity, holding the promise of a brighter future, a promise of peaceful settlements of disputes, universal human rights, and the opportunity for all to enjoy peace and prosperity. Despite setbacks, wrong turns, and many bad decisions, these past 80 years have indeed been the most peaceful and prosperous that humankind has experienced. For my own nation, 1944 also marked a new beginning, with Iceland becoming a republic. Iceland’s status as an independent nation has been defended not primarily by weapons or alliances, but by a robust system of international law, mutually beneficial cooperation, and strong and universally respected international institutions. For us, it is paramount to safeguard this multilateral system. When the US was founded, it was a time of change and a time that demanded decisions. It was also, it seems to me, a time of creativity in the face of destruction, a time of determination despite despair, a time for hope to triumph over horror. By founding the United Nations, the leaders of the world’s nations set a path guided by a shared vision for a peaceful and prosperous world, a faith in fundamental human rights and the equality of nations, large and small. But as Secretary General Antonio Guterres recently stated when speaking about the Summit for the Future, we cannot build a future fit for our grandchildren with systems built for our grandparents, or in the case of a person my age, a system created for my great-grandparents to build a future fit for my own generation and my children. Mr. President, these are also times of profound change. All around the world, technology is fundamentally changing how people experience reality. And to quote Mr. Guterres again, these technologies are being developed in a moral and legal vacuum, without governance or guardrails. This is no small thing. And it is not something that leaders and politicians can treat as trivial or unconnected to other policy issues. While elected representatives and leaders debate how to address challenges that we face, while we attempt to guide our societies towards a better future, there is an ongoing battle for people’s attention, convictions, and beliefs being weighed through increasingly addictive technologies, often self-guided by overwhelmingly powerful and completely unprincipled algorithms. And this battle will not necessarily be won by those who share a belief in peace and prosperity, or have faith in fundamental human rights. and the equality of nations, large and small. As these staggering changes are taking place in our information environment, the world is facing the greatest number of armed conflicts since World War II. And democratic institutions worldwide are facing a loss of trust. These developments are not happening in a vacuum. In her address accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo in 2021, Philippine journalist Maria Ressa pointed out that without facts, you cannot have truth. And without truth, you cannot have trust. Ressa continued, without trust, we have no shared reality, no democracy, and it becomes impossible to deal with our world’s existential problems. Sadly, to an ever more obvious extent, this prospect of a lack of shared reality has now become fact. Malign actors are actively undermining social order across the globe. They are spreading suspicion and fear, fueling despair and rage. They may use technology, but their target is always the very essence of what we are as human beings. The individual rights that have proven vital for the functioning of democratic societies are being subverted. This is why I said in my address to this body one year ago that human rights are for human beings, and that freedom of expression is not for programmed bots that spread hate, lies, and fear. This is a challenge that we have not yet solved. Freedom cannot exist without accountability. And to paraphrase American historian Timothy Snyder, it must always involve some risk. We know that sacrificing individual rights because of these risks is an unacceptable act. proposition akin to burning down the house to kill a spider. An individual, even one with questionable and dangerous opinions, has the right to be heard. In a true democracy, we accept these risks, associated with freedom of speech, but we must be careful not to let our freedom be hijacked by those who evade accountability and take no risk. The current danger does not come from free individuals who advocate for their own misguided, crazy or evil ideas, but vast networks of both paid and unpaid agents, made-up trolls hiding in the shadows, entirely unaccountable for their poisonous contribution to public discourse. This sort of speech is no more a manifestation of the freedom of expression than a forced gathering to salute a dictator is an example of freedom of assembly. Mr. President, these are issues that exemplify the urgent need for a strong multilateral system. However, this system cannot be left to provide answers to how to maintain itself. The real power lies with national governments and leaders across the world. All of us who are entrusted with positions of authority and influence in our own societies must shoulder our responsibility to maintain and strengthen a multilateral system based on the UN Charter. For this, we need more interaction, more humanity, and much more unscripted interactions at the highest level. Mr. President, Russia’s full-scale aggression against Ukraine, southern civil war, and the devastating conflicts in the Middle East all rage on while other longer-running conflicts grow protected. One thing that all have in common is that innocent civilians bear the highest cost. By invading Ukraine and violently seizing its territory, the Russian Federation has committed a flagrant breach of the UN Charter and derogated from its primary obligations as a permanent member of the Security Council to uphold international peace and security. The Russian Federation’s repeated threats of using nuclear weapons are reckless and dangerous. In the case of the Russian Federation’s actions, there should be no doubt who is in the right and who is in the wrong. It is Mr. Putin who has concocted a false narrative around his invasion of Ukraine’s territory. It is he who started this senseless war, and it is in the Kremlin’s power to end it at any time by withdrawing its forces from all the territory that is internationally recognized as belonging to Ukraine. The Russian Federation’s disdain for the principles of the UN Charter is on full display in Ukraine, but it is also pervasive in many other parts of the world with ongoing insidious efforts to subvert democratic norms and incite violence and chaos. Mr. President, Israel’s right to exist is beyond debate. Iceland condemned in the strongest terms the horrific attack on Israel on October 7. We continue to call for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. But no country is above the law. And the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination is also beyond debate. In the current conflict, the world has witnessed limitations of humanitarian aid, water, and power to Gaza. This is simply unacceptable. There have been reports of civilian infrastructure and hospitals being used for purposes that can deprive them of their protection under international Humanitarian Law. This is also unacceptable. And we have witnessed unacceptable losses of civilian lives, children, aid and health care workers, journalists and UN staff. And journalists are being denied access to the war zone and silenced. Iceland condemns all violation of international law, including international humanitarian law. International law provides states with rights and obligations. Both are sacred. Again, we call on all parties to agree to an immediate ceasefire and avoid any action that could lead to further escalation. A clear political path to peace must follow a ceasefire, entailing the establishment of two states living side by side in peace and security. With that aim, and as confirmed by the International Court of Justice, Israel must immediately cease all new settlements activities and bring its unlawful presence to an end. Our worst fears of an escalation have now been realized with the bloodiest days that Lebanon has seen in years. And still, we must brace ourselves for even worse, with the conflict spiraling further out of control. The parties have been warned of the cost and the danger of this development. It must stop. For the sake of humanity. Mr President, in ten days, the General Assembly will convene to elect 18 new members to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the term 25 to 27. Iceland is a candidate in these elections, hoping to serve for a second time on this important body. We submitted our candidature out of a deep conviction that respect for human rights and and the rule of law, justice and fairness are key to a prosperous society. Mr. President, in his opening address to this Assembly on Tuesday, Secretary General Guterres pointed out that less than 10% of all speakers this week would be female. In our estimate, I am one of only 19 women speaking from this podium during the opening session. I thought we had come further than this. But of course, I am truly one of the lucky ones. Mr. President, it is beyond my comprehension that there exist in this world, in these enlightening times, societies of human beings where little girls and women are not allowed to go to school. But there exist in this world of ours a society where little girls are not allowed to laugh in public, and women are not allowed to take part in conversations outside the confines of their homes. A teenage girl in Afghanistan who sings a happy song in public runs the risk of being arrested, of being humiliated, of being ostracized, of being beaten, or even worse. Mr. President, how has the world come to this? And this is why Iceland supports the cross-regional action announced this week here in New York to hold the Taliban to account for their grave violations of SITO. Mr. President, those whose sexual orientation differs from the common norm are suffering backlash too. While we have thankfully seen a significant shift towards decriminalization of consensual same-sex relations, we are also witnessing laws adopted to establish or expand criminal sanctions contrary to the basic universal norms that all states have agreed. I do not understand why people should not be allowed the freedom to love and be loved for who they are. Increased individual freedom and happiness should never worry politicians or governments that have real problems to solve. I am proud to confirm that if elected to the Human Rights Council, Iceland will include LGBTI plus rights among a list of priorities during our term on the Council. Mr. President, Iceland strongly emphasizes global actions against climate change, both mitigation and adaptation. Climate change is not a distant threat. It is a reality already impacting the lives and livelihoods of millions of people. Climate change threatens the health of the ocean, which Iceland is highly dependent on. A healthy ocean and a healthy planet are matters of economic prosperity and well-being. One of the main meetings I attended this week was a high-level meeting on sea level rise, which strongly indicates that our ocean’s environment is destabilizing. This is yet another challenge we must address, and we believe that only through more determined climate change mitigation can we limit the effects of sea level rise. Taking on this challenge, as well as ensuring that respect is shown for rules and regulations that we have agreed to abide by concerning our behavior at sea, is of great importance to a nation like Iceland that relies heavily on the ocean around us. The United Nations has proven record in this arena, primarily with the Convention for the Law of the Sea. a particularly important agreement in our view, and all maritime nations. Therefore, it is of great concern that the law of the sea is being challenged and undermined, including in the South China Sea. We call on all Member States to honour their commitments and act in accordance with the law of the sea. Mr. President, we must work together for a more stable and prosperous world, and Iceland is set on contributing to more sustainable development. Our recently adopted policy for international development cooperation supports this, with the overarching goals of poverty eradication, respect for human rights, and improved living standards. It foresees a significant increase in official development assistance. Given our experience, we will continue our firm focus on gender equality, women’s empowerment, sexual and reproductive health and rights, and eradicating gender-based violence. Crucially, we will increase our efforts to strengthen civil rights and improve social and legal protection of LGBTQI plus persons. It falls on all of us to support the vital work of the United Nations and other partners in addressing the dire status of humanitarian affairs. The number of refugees and internally displaced persons has never been higher as increasing levels of fragility know geographical boundaries. Mr. President, we are meeting at a time when the multilateral system is under the greatest pressure it has faced since the establishment of the United Nations. Meanwhile, it is abundantly clear that without multilateralism, without international cooperation, and without respect for international law, the downward spiral of crisis and conflict and International Law, or we succumb to a world of might makes right, which surely will only lead us to disaster. So the choice is clear. We must work together to protect and promote the fundamental principles and values underpinning the vision of the UN’s founders and on which this great organization is built. We must ensure that the UN system, including the Security Council, keeps up with the times and reforms and adapts to changing realities. Taking this step will require courage and strong political will. Mr. President, over and beyond, we must recognize that the world needs the United Nations more than ever before, and we cannot and must not fail to make our organization the best possible version of itself. The multilateral system deserves to be defended in the same spirit of creativity, under the same promise of hope, and with the same steadfast determination that guided the hands of those who brought this organization into existence almost 80 years ago. I thank you.

President: I now give the floor to His Excellency. Sayyid Badr bin Hamad bin Hamood Albusaidi, Foreign Minister of Oman.

Sayyid Badr bin Hamad bin Hamood Albusaidi – Oman: His Excellency Philemon Yang, President of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly, it’s a pleasure to extend to you and your friendly country, the Republic of Cameroon, our sincere congratulations on your election as President of the 79th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. We also express our deep appreciation for the efforts made by your predecessor from the friendly nation of Trinidad and Tobago during his tenure. We take this opportunity to also express our deep appreciation to His Excellency Antonio Gutierrez, Secretary General of the United Nations, for his tireless efforts in leading the United Nations and his unwavering pursuit of upholding and implementing international law and the pursuit of justice and peace, reflecting the United Nations vision of a world where security, stability, peace and prosperity prevail for all. The Sultanate of Oman reaffirms its full support for your endeavors and those of the United Nations in promoting international peace and security. We express our strong commitment to the UN Charter, recognizing the importance of the United Nations in embodying the people’s hopes and aspirations for development and a dignified and prosperous life. Mr. President, Oman’s foreign policy is founded on a steadfast vision that embraces dialogue and tolerance as a means to address all challenges and issues. This vision aims to achieve peace and build relations based on mutual respect, positive cooperation and harmony among nations. The leadership, government and people of the Sultanate of Oman believe in the legitimate and peaceful means to resolve conflicts. Accordingly, Oman calls for an immediate ceasefire and cessation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip, Lebanon and the Red Sea region. We emphasize the need to address the root causes of these conflicts by ending the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. and achieving justice for the Palestinian people based on a two-state solution and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital along the 1967 borders. Oman underlines the need to grant Palestine full membership in the United Nations and the genocidal policies carried out by the Israeli occupation forces against the Palestinian people and alleviate their humanitarian suffering. We believe in the importance of stepping up efforts to de-escalate tension and end bloodshed by adhering to reasonable dialogue, the rules of international law, the UN Charter and international legitimacy resolutions, respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states, and non-interference in their internal affairs ensures that all nations and peoples can live in peace, security, and dignity. Mr. President, Oman continues to advance its social protection programs through a comprehensive system that supports various segments of society, including women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities, in addition to social insurance and job security programs. This reflects the progress we have made in sustainable development and our ongoing efforts to develop these programs in line with the global best practices while continuing to provide educational, health and social care for all members of society. Our nation remains committed to supporting and empowering youth, whom we consider the cornerstone of the future and the key to sustainable development. We believe that young people are the driving force behind innovation, growth and progress. We are dedicated to creating opportunities that enable them to apply their skills and contribute effectively to building a brighter future. Mr. President, Oman underscores the importance of promoting respect and peaceful coexistence among peoples. We call for fighting all forms of discrimination, racism, hatred and violence. Oman also exerts significant efforts in addressing climate change challenges, reducing emissions and scaling up investment in renewable energy projects. Our net zero carbon strategy for 2050 is driven by clean energy projects, green hydrogen initiatives and nature-based solutions. This commitment stems from our belief in the importance of protecting the environment and preserving natural resources for future generations while balancing economic development and environmental sustainability. Mr. President, Oman’s development efforts are in line with our national vision Oman Vision 2040, which serves as the foundation for achieving economic and social development goals and addressing future challenges. In this context, Oman has submitted a second voluntary national report reflecting its deep commitment to the global principles and objectives of sustainable development, highlighting the progress made in various developmental areas. In this regard, we welcome the adoption of the Pact for the Future this year. We commend the collective international efforts that led to this achievement, which outlines a road map for the world to enhance international cooperation and effectively address global challenges. Therefore, we urge all Member States to commit to implementing this pact, its vision and goals through fruitful cooperation and joint efforts. and Knowledge Exchange as a path towards achieving a better, safer, and more prosperous future for generations to come. Thank you for your attention. We sincerely hope that this session will be successful and fruitful. Peace, mercy, and blessings be upon you.

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, Distinguished Delegates, Colleagues and Friends, The High-Level Week is a welcome reminder that the vast majority of nations, large and small, do seek global unity. That the division we talk so much about is only sought by the few, and this gives me great hope. Yet, as we open the 79th General Assembly, we cannot close our eyes for the fact that conflicts and war are raging across the world. Mr. President, It is utterly unacceptable that a permanent member of the Security Council continues to violate the most basic principles of the UN Charter. Wars of aggression and altering borders is, and should remain, a thing of the past. an imperial practice that has absolutely no place in the 21st century. Denmark will persist to stand by Ukraine, and we will do it as long as it takes, and we will support a just and lasting peace. The Summit on Peace that was held in Switzerland in June clearly showed that there is strong global support for peace based on the UN Charter. Therefore, we must all use our influence to further the cause of peace. But it must be a peace that does not reward the aggressor for his brute use of force. Otherwise, we set a very, very bad precedent. Otherwise, we undermine the very principle on which the UN was founded. Mr. President, almost a year has passed since Hamas’s horrendous attack on Israel the 7th of October. The cruelty and barbarity we witnessed that day was shocking, and I think none of us are able to really comprehend the shock and trauma this day has caused upon Israel, and which will forever symbolize the darkest chapter of the country’s history. The terrorism of Hamas sparked a downward spiral of human suffering and regional instability. The humanitarian situation in Gaza is catastrophic, and the human suffering unbearable. Hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced all over the region, and there is a very, very real risk of an all-out regional war. which would affect not only the people in the region, but all of us. This must end. And this must end now. A ceasefire is urgently needed. All parties should exercise restraint and contribute to de-escalation. And then we should start thinking about tomorrow, thinking about the future. Not tomorrow. Not next week. But right now. The current horrible situation may also contain the seeds of a new beginning. A new beginning leading to a just and lasting peace for all. Unleashing the potentials of the whole region. Allowing everybody to see a future for themselves and their children. Breaking with the vicious circle of violence that has lasted much too long. Such a more promising future can only be based on the two-state solution. And we all need to work together to create the conditions for that two-state solution to materialize. By building the capacity of the Palestinian Authority to take on the role of legitimate and effective government in the future Palestinian state. By stabilizing the West Bank. And by already now start preparing for early recovery and reconstruction of Gaza. I call on all parties to make such a development possible. To the benefit of the people of Israel. To the benefit of the people in Palestine. and thereby to the benefit of the whole region and the world at large. Mr. President, we often talk about Ukraine and Gaza in these halls. But sadly, people are dying and people are suffering from conflicts in many other countries. I am deeply concerned with the continued fighting in Sudan and the humanitarian consequences for the civilian population. More than 10 million people have been displaced. In Sudan, there is an urgent need for political dialogue and for putting a halt to the conflict. As there is in Yemen, in Haiti, Syria, Afghanistan, Myanmar, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the list tragically goes on and goes on. And in the wake of our collective inability to stop the wars, the respect for international law is slowly undermined. Mr. President, as a small country, Denmark is conscious that our safety and security depend on international rule of law. The respect for basic UN principles – sovereign equality, territorial integrity, and political independence – for all states is fundamental to international peace and security. And as we uphold these principles, the respect for human rights and international humanitarian law must be at the core. Denmark is a strong supporter of the international justice system and the work and independence of the ICC and the ICJ. The ICJ has an important role in the peaceful settlement of disputes and in the peace and security of the world. And the ICC is crucial for the global fight against impunity. Without respect for international law, we are looking at a world where might makes right and brute force rules. And this is very, very dangerous. Mr. President, I began by stating that the vast majority of nations, luckily, seek unity and international cooperation. Earlier this week, in the Pact for the Future, we all reaffirmed our commitment to the UN Charter. And we outlined a clear direction towards a transformed system of global governance. The existing system has enabled nations to lift people out of poverty, millions of people, to eradicate diseases, and to advance better education for children around the globe. This is indeed big, big achievement. But after almost 80 years of service, that system is in need of a serious update. Mr. President, it is urgent to reform the international financial architecture. It needs to be more representative. It needs to be more effective. Denmark supports a stronger representation of African countries in the Bretton Woods institutions. We agree that global financial safety nets must support all countries, including the poorest, when a major crisis hit. This should not be dependent on voluntary donors’ contributions. We agree that all countries, on an equal basis, must be subject to independent, transparent, and accurate credit ratings. And we agree that we need to find sustainable solutions to the high levels of debt faced by many countries. Debt treatment through the Common Framework needs to be accelerated. All creditors and all lenders should act transparently. And concessional financing be made available. The multilateral development banks have mobilized billions already through reforms. But reforms need to deepen to move from billions to trillions. Looking forward towards the Financing for Development Conference in Spain next year, the COP29 and beyond, reform tracks must be made tangible. Solutions should be developed not just for the future, but also for the present. So I wish to take this opportunity to praise Barbados for suggesting concrete actions to help fix some of the more systematic errors of the international financial architecture. We are happy to support the Bridgetown Initiative, and we are proud to work alongside Barbados on greening international financing. We encourage others, including the UN and the international financial institutions, to work together, to be bold, and to achieve the necessary progress on the reform of the international financial architecture. Mr. President, while we reform for a more just financial architecture, we need to sustain levels of development assistance to the poorest countries. So therefore, Commitments made should be honoured. Denmark remains a member of a club that is absolutely far too exclusive. The club of countries that meet the UN targets of providing 0.7% of our gross national income for official development assistance. It is a good club, but we have too few members, so we invite others to join. In April this year, African heads of state met in Nairobi to call for an ambitious replenishment of the World Bank’s International Development Association’s IDA. And we have decided to respond to that call. Denmark intends to increase our contribution to IDA with 40%. For the IDA 21 replenishment, we will contribute with 479 million US dollars. And we encourage all, whether it’s current or new donors, whether they are big and small, to help us reach an ambitious replenishment. Mr. President, in June this year, Denmark was proudly elected to the UN Security Council for the term 25-26. I was personally present and voting here in this Grand Hall that day. And I wish to thank member states for their strong show of confidence and support. It will be an honor to serve on the Council. As we look forward to our membership, I cannot help but wish that the Council were in better shape, more accountable, more effective, more transparent, and above all, more inclusive and representative. The world needs a Security Council that reflects the world of today, that is able to respond to the security concerns of people all around the globe. To Denmark, it is evident that this calls for an expansion of the Council. We wish to see both more permanent and more elected members. And we wish to limit the use of the veto. Both aspects are long overdue. Mr. President, time is of the essence. The year 2030, that once seemed like a distant dot on the horizon, is now only six years away. Yet only 70 percent of the SDGs are on track to be realized. And we are far, far from on track to fulfill our climate targets. The accelerating climate crisis must be met with accelerating climate actions. We need more ambitious reductions. We need more support for climate change adaption. And we need to speed up, and we need to scale up, climate financing. No country can solve these global challenges alone. But no country is too small or too big to contribute. Everyone is needed. As a longstanding and dedicated supporter of global cooperation, I am confident that we will succeed. Denmark, I can assure you, will continue to do our part. We will deliver on promises made and we will push for more ambitious targets and for concrete actions. And we will do that for the present and for the future. Thank you very much.

Maris Sangiampongsa – Thailand: Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, allow me to begin by congratulating His Excellency, Mr. Philemon Yang, on his election to preside over the 79th session of the United Nations General Assembly. I am here today representing Thailand’s new government, led by Prime Minister Phaethongtharn Chinnawat, to reiterate Thailand’s determination to continue our people-centered, economic-oriented policies to achieve stability and sustainable development for our people. Mr. President, in an increasingly fragmented and complex world, Thailand reaffirms our support for a rule-based, multilateral system, with the United Nations at its core. When the United Nations was founded seven decades ago, we did not envision challenges. from technological disruptions, pandemics and climate crisis. In view of present reality, the United Nations must step up and respond to the evolving challenges of our time to remain relevant. It must be agile and adaptable to new and emerging threats and to ensure that multilateral system is fit for purpose. Global governance and the United Nations must undertake comprehensive reforms, including that of Security Council. With this year’s Summit of the Futures and General Debate, Thailand looks to the United Nations we all need. A United Nations with increased convenient power to sustain and strengthen international peace and security. A United Nations that effectively address global challenges. A United Nations that improve the life, equality and dignities of people around the world. And a United Nations that speaks for the aspirations and interests for all nations, not just the most powerful. Mr. President, Thailand believes that in order for the United Nations to truly sustain and strengthen international peace and security, member states must uphold their disarmament and non-proliferation obligations to rebuild trust and ensure a safe and secure world. Moreover, various flashpoints around the globe continue to challenge the credibility of the United Nations to resolve conflict. We are deeply concerned about increasing armed conflict in Ukraine and different parts of the world, as well as the escalations, violence and worsening humanitarian situations in Gaza. These situations have far-reaching implications on any smallest nation. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to find peaceful solutions that respect the United Nations Charter and human rights. In our own neighbourhood, Thailand faces challenges from the situation in Myanmar. As Thailand shares the longest land border with Myanmar, we are directly affected by the spillover effect of the situation in the country. We wish to see a peaceful and prosperous Myanmar, which will also bode well for peace and prosperity in the region at large. We believe that the peaceful political solutions in Myanmar must be Myanmar-led, Myanmar-owned. This is why we are engaging with all sides, and we will continue to work closely with ASEAN and international communities to facilitate dialogue among different parties to drive forward the five-point consensus. As part of this effort, we are stepping up humanitarian assistance to the people of Myanmar through various channels, including the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management and relevant United Nations organisations. Thailand will continue to support a peaceful and prosperous Myanmar, not just because of its pragmatic approach. but it is the right way forward. Mr. President, sustainable peace, security and development are closely linked. And to secure a sustainable future, we must accelerate the attainment of the sustainable development goal. On Thailand’s part, we have been sharing our locally driven people-centered development approach known as Sufficiency Economy Philosophy or SEP. To advance implementation of the SDGs, the SEP for SDGs partnership is known widely and as a best practice on SDGs localization. We are concerned with the slow pace in the implementation of SDGs goal at the global level, which is only 17 percent on track. We must ensure that countries have adequate means and resources to achieve the SDGs, especially through financing for development. The Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development next year provides a key opportunity to address the large and growing SDGs financing gap. In this regard, Thailand reiterates the call for a reform of the international financing architecture. In addition to ensure a just and inclusive financing system, we must also strengthen trade, investment and development cooperation, especially through South-South and triangular cooperation. Thailand is committed to forging stronger partnerships, particularly with least-developed countries, landlocked developing countries, and small island developing states. Moreover, Thailand’s aspirations to become a member of BRICS and OECD is driven by our desire to build bridges to promote north-south development cooperation, which is also critical in addressing urgent challenges such as climate change. Indeed, Thailand is among the top 10 countries most affected by climate change. Earlier this month, Thailand and many countries in Southeast Asia were faced with destructive floods caused by Typhoon Yangi. We therefore advocate a balanced and equal emphasis on both mitigations and adaptations for climate action. To achieve concrete results, we must scale up climate finance. Thailand looks forward to the COP29 in Baku this November, where member states will commit to a new collective quantified goal, grounded on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. At the same time, we hope to see the full operationalization of the lost and damaged funds soon. Climate disasters have taught us that failure to address this matter will delay the achievement of the SDGs and have a widespread impact on human rights and human security. For these reasons, the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Reduction is crucial. Mr. President, the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was an achievement that met the highest aspirations of the people. And today, amid rising inequalities and vulnerability, Thailand believes that the United Nations must remain the bedrock of fundamental truth enshrined in declarations to protect the life and ensure the equalities and dignity for all. For Thailand, protecting and promoting human rights for all does not only mean guaranteeing basic human dignity, but it also aims at providing opportunity to advance social justice and equality. With our longstanding policies to protect all persons and groups, especially the most vulnerable, we have made concrete progress in ensuring equal rights for all, those living in Thailand, regardless of their origins, belief, sex, or gender. Based on this commitment, Thailand is presenting our candidature to the Human Rights Council for the term 2025 to 2027. At the council, we will serve as bridge builders to connect different perspectives and work with all stakeholders. We will ensure that all countries are equipped and supported in their human rights actions through experienced sharing and technical cooperation. Moreover, we will also continue to push for the creation of a safe and secure society for all. Recently, we adopted the Marriott Equality Act. On health, we will continue to advance the right to health by advocating for universal health coverage and the conclusions of the pandemic treaty, as well as steer forward the foreign policies and global health agenda, which Thailand serves as chair this year. On crime prevention, we will work closely with our partners to combat increasing drug trafficking and transnational crimes in the regions and beyond, especially those enabled by digital technologies and underground economies. Mr. President, Thailand welcomes the successful conclusions of the Summit of the Future. In the next step, we have to work together to make the Pact for the Future high on impact and high on action by translating the Pact into tangible outcomes. And to realize this, I outline Thailand’s vision to achieve this future through what I call the Four Ps, whether it will be building a future where all are protected, where all can prosper, and which is promising for all. It is essential that we give our collective political will. This means harnessing our political will to promote the power of technologies to help accelerate the SDGs and taking steps to close the digital divide among countries through the Global Digital Compact. We support technology cross-flow and transfer. capacity building, as well as digital literacy development to enhance the ability of countries to promote people-centered and planet-centric development. This also means giving importance to the declarations of future generations. For our actions or inactions of today will determine a future for them. Everywhere, youth and future generations deserve to have big dreams and even bigger doors of opportunities. Mr. President, 78 years ago, Thailand looked towards the United Nations as a guarantor of a more peaceful and prosperous future. And at present, Thailand carries onward the same belief of the United Nations that is pioneers of the prevailing peace and drives our peacekeepers and aid workers to serve in remote regions of the globe. And in this very same spirit, Thailand pledges to continue to serve as a bridge builder, fostering dialogue and trust among nations. We may be nations with different and diverse culture and traditions, but we are united by our common humanity and aspirations for the future we want. And for that, we must together build the United Nations we need.

President: Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan.

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary-General, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. I congratulate His Excellency Mr. Philemon Yang on assuming the presidency of the 79th session of the General Assembly, and thank the outgoing President, His Excellency Mr. Dennis Francis, for his outstanding efforts in leading the previous session. I also thank His Excellency Mr. Antonio Guterres, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, for his continuous efforts to achieve the noble objectives of the UN. Ladies and gentlemen, the world continues to grapple with a wide range of challenges that no single country can overcome alone. The worsening global climate crisis, rising inequalities, emerging divides, and heightened tensions affect us all, irrespective of background or location. It is high time to demonstrate that multilateralism works and can deliver, with a unified voice leaving no one behind. The current state of international politics is divisive, with universally accepted fundamental norms and principles of international law being disregarded and misinterpreted. In the face of continued erosion of multilateralism, it is paramount that the United Nations continues to foster international solidarity and cooperation. The UN Charter principles and purposes constitute the foundational normative framework in international relations and must be applied consistently, not selectively. The UN is mandated to ensure that every nation has an equal voice. and it treated on the same footing. In this regard, Azerbaijan advocates for a re-immigrated and reformed multilateral system with the UN at its core, underpinned by strict adherence to and non-selective application of the universally accepted norms and principles of international law. Urgent progress is needed on the UN Security Council reforms, based on the work done and the gains achieved in good faith and a spirit of flexibility, constructiveness, and cooperation. We view the pivotal summit of the future held a week ago as a renewal of our common commitment to international law, the UN Charter, multilateralism, and international cooperation. The Pact for the Future, its negotiated outcome, is a blueprint for building a better, more sustainable and prosperous world for everyone. It is time for our collective commitments to turn into real and decisive action. Ladies and gentlemen, The global climate crisis threatens decades of progress, imperils humanity’s future, and disproportionately affects vulnerable countries. Growing divisions in international relations should not distract us from the imperative to address climate change, the greatest transnational challenge of the century. What has been done so far remains insufficient to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 Celsius. For the sake of the future, the time has come for urgent, concerted, and sustained efforts to give effect to our commitments to a global vision for sustainable development. In November 2024, Azerbaijan will host the 29th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Guided by the call in solidarity for a green world, Azerbaijan will spare no effort to bridge developed and developing countries and foster a collaborative spirit to tackle climate challenges as a common commitment and moral. The confidence placed in us by the international community to host and precise over COP29 this year is a testament and recognition to Azerbaijan’s readiness to lead the climate agenda and contribute to global climate action. As the incoming presidency, Azerbaijan reaffirms its commitment to delivering COP29 in a transparent, impartial, inclusive and party-driven manner. We have presented our vision based on two parallel pillars to enhance ambition and enable action, with climate finance as our top priority this year. These pillars are mutually reinforcing. Progress on each sends a strong signal supporting the other. The primary expectation for the COP29 presidency is an agreement on a fair and ambitious new collective quantified goal on climate finance. This will be the first major climate finance goal after adopting the Paris Agreement, and we have been working tirelessly to support the parties in landing a deal. The COP29 presidency made it clear that agreeing on a fair and ambitious NCQG that is adequate to the urgency and scale of the problem and takes into account the needs and priorities of developing countries is the ultimate test of the parties’ commitment to the Paris Agreement and climate action in the years ahead. We need to continue to work constructively on the NCQG and steer the process to a successful outcome at COP29. COP29 presidency also works with the parties to deliver an outcome on the carbon market this year. Fully functioning carbon markets will be a significant step in implementing nationally determined contributions, cost-effectively and bolstering ambition in mitigation. Moreover, we have put forward 14 initiatives covering topics such as the link between climate action and sustainable development goals, green energy zones and corridors, energy storage. Harmony for Climate Resilience, Agriculture, Green Hydrogen, Metal Reduction from Organic Waste, Green Digital Action, and more. One of the initiatives under COP29 Action Agenda includes the establishment of the Climate Finance Action Fund, an innovative source for climate finance to be voluntarily supported by fossil fuel-producing countries and companies. COP29 will also be an opportunity to set differences aside and contribute to global peace and the climate agenda. Given the intersection of conflicts and the increasingly challenging climate crisis, Azerbaijan introduced a flagship COP29 Truth Initiative embedded in the joint Solon appeal announced a few days ago. More than thousands of NGOs, faith leaders, and prominent personalities, as well as many parties have already joined this appeal. We call on everyone to transcend political divergences, stand in unity, and respect the truth during the months of COP29. Excellencies, Azerbaijan has always been at the forefront of promoting international peace and security, inter-religious and inter-cultural dialogue, contributing to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, and fostering global solidarity and multilateralism. Azerbaijani chairmanship of the Non-Allied Movement in 2019-2023 has marked by the movement’s enhanced role and increased contributions to a collaborative spirit in international relations. Under visionary leadership of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, His Excellency Mr. Ilham Aliyev, decisive steps were taken to enhance international solidarity and galvanize collective response to global challenges at a time of erosion of multilateralism. Guided by a noble call to leave no one behind, Azerbaijan continues to lend its support to developing countries in need. Since 2020, we have provided humanitarian, economic, and technical assistance. U.S.$330 million to over 140 nations. Ladies and gentlemen, As we pass the halfway mark of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, we observe stagnation in the implementation. With only 17% of SDG targets on track, we need an urgent and accelerated progress. At a national level, we are taking necessary measures to implement the SDGs and setting an example for others to follow. We have fully embraced the SDGs nationally, prioritizing 17 goals, 88 targets and 119 indicators. This has been achieved through a collaborative and inclusive process involving civil society, the business community youth and other key stakeholders. Azerbaijan’s GDP has risen four times in less than two decades’ span. Poverty has gone down from 49% to 5%. The external public debt is expected to be some 7% of the GDP for 2024, one of the lowest globally. Clean environment and green growth became one of five priority areas of our new national development strategy. In line with this, Azerbaijan is looking into ways of further greenhouse gas emission reduction and working on its 1.5 Celsius aligned NDC. A few months ago, we have joined the 2030 Global Methane Pledge. We will also establish green energy zones and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 in the Karabakh and eastern Zangezur regions. Azerbaijan will continue to play an essential role in global energy security, contributing to sustainable development, eradication of poverty and helping millions to transition to clean energy in the region and beyond. Share of renewables of the total installed electrical capacity in Azerbaijan will reach 30% by 2030. This high target is established primarily to improve energy efficiency and introduce innovative solutions in urban environment, transport system and industry. The projected increase in renewable electricity production in the coming years will allow Azerbaijan to become an exporter of green electricity to European countries through the landmark transregional Black Sea submarine cable project. Mr. President, In the face of increasing challenges, coming together in unity and solidarity and fostering dialogue and mutual understanding is an absolute necessity. With a centuries-long tradition of diversity and multiculturalism, Azerbaijan firmly believes in a dialogue and collaborative spirit, mutual understanding and respect among different cultures and religions. Azerbaijan put particular focus to the promotion of a culture of peace and encouraging intercultural and interreligious dialogue worldwide, including through the Baku process and Peace for Culture initiatives. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, The end of the armed conflict with Armenia and restoration of Azerbaijan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity created a substantially new environment in the South Caucasus. For the first time since decades, stability has been achieved on the ground, de facto peace is established. By putting an end to military occupation, it is Azerbaijan that created conditions for both parties to eventually turn the page of enmity and embark on good neighborly relations. This process was launched by Azerbaijan in the immediate aftermath of its victory in the 44-day Patriotic War. This offer was made despite unhealed wounds of the conflict, still persists today in the form of razing to the ground of dozens of cities and hundreds of towns and villages. the destruction and desecration of each and every piece of historical and cultural heritage and barbaric pillage of natural resources. Azerbaijan demonstrated political wisdom and will by offering Armenia peace on equal terms, fully in line with norms and principles of international law on the basis of mutual recognition of and respect for each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Over the past year, Azerbaijan and Armenia have registered significant progress in the normalization process through direct bilateral negotiations, in particular with respect to drafting a bilateral agreement, the limitation and demarcation of state border, as well as elaboration of a set of confidence-building measures. Azerbaijan will continue to take this process forward, acting with strong sense of responsibility for not only its national security and well-being, but also for ensuring a better future for the entire region. Our commitment and determination remain intact to bring this process to its logical conclusion. For the finalization of the normalization process, Armenia has yet to legally abandon territorial claims against Azerbaijan once and for all through implementing constitutional amendments. Armenia’s negligence with respect to implementation of constitutional amendments, combined with its dramatic increase in military budget, acquisition of a large amount of offensive weaponry from both traditional and new suppliers, and attempts to maintain obsolete conflict-driven narratives and structures derails the normalization process. Establishment of peace and good neighborly relations cannot be sustainable and irreversible if recognition of sovereignty and territorial integrity of Azerbaijan remains in legal limbo, is contingent on domestic legal or political scenarios. Partial peace is not an option after so much pain and sufferings. inflicting by irredentism and territorial claims against neighbors. At this critical moment, Azerbaijan calls for expeditious steps to address remaining impediments for finalization of the normalization process with full sense of responsibility. Along with Armenia’s responsibility to honor its international obligations and previously undertaking commitments, it is also incumbent on the entire international community to encourage the sites for the establishment of genuine, sustainable, and irreversible peace. Such a peace should outweigh any dividend that might be expected by manipulating one side against another or building dividing lines between them. Practices that brought devastations in other parts of the globe must be ceased to be projected to the South Caucasus by feeding revanchism. Excellencies, ensuring justice with respect to serious war crimes and crimes against humanity is of vital importance in terms of healing the wounds of the past conflict. While accountability and redress serve to ensure the rights and interests of the victims, they are also key prerequisites on the path to genuine post-conflict normalization and reconciliation. In this regard, it is of paramount importance to shed light to the fate of about 4,000 Azerbaijanis who went missing due to the conflict. Resolving this issue is essential not only in terms of accountability and the rights of the victims and their families, but also for post-conflict reconciliation and normalization. Around 300,000 Azerbaijanis expelled from Armenia continue to be deprived of their ancestral homeland in blatant violation of international law. Despite repeated calls by the Western Azerbaijani community to launch a dialogue and ensure a safe and dignified return to the homeland, the government of Armenia denies them exercising their fundamental right of return. Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and the United States of America. I am pleased to announce that we are officially signing an agreement with the United States to temporarily and eventually exercise their violated right to safe and dignified return to their homes. Thanks to the tireless efforts taken by the government, life now returns to the territories that have witnessed unprecedented destruction during military occupation. Regretfully, the massive contamination of territories of Azerbaijan with landmines and other explosive devices remains a significant obstacle to the smooth progress of rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts. Since the end of the conflict in 2020, 377 individuals, among them civilians, have fallen victim to landmines. With this in mind, Azerbaijan has introduced a national goal, SDG 18, focusing on mine action. Given the scale of the problem, there is an urgent need for increased international support to strengthen Azerbaijan’s humanitarian mine action capacity. Taking this opportunity, I thank all countries and other stakeholders who have generously contributed to humanitarian demining in Azerbaijan and reiterate our call for increased international support and solidarity. Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, I wish to reaffirm Azerbaijan’s commitment to further contribute to international peace and security through promoting respect for international law and investing in international solidarity and cooperation. We remain to be a strong proponent of combined efforts to overcome challenges and pave the way for a brighter future for ourselves. and the generations to come. I thank you.

Amery Browne – Trinidad and Tobago: To first extend to you congratulations on behalf of the government and people of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on your election as President of this session of the United Nations General Assembly. We are confident that you will be equal to the task, and I assure you of Trinidad and Tobago’s full support and cooperation. Allow me to also extend, on behalf of the proud people and government of Trinidad and Tobago, our sincerest appreciation to your predecessor and our fellow countryman, His Excellency Dennis Francis, for his astute and exemplary leadership as President of the 78th session. which was underpinned by the principles of peace, prosperity, progress and sustainability. Mr President, I applaud you on your chosen theme for this 79th session, as our global community finds itself at an inflection point which will determine the fate of future generations. Our planet rarely should have been in better shape in the year 2024. But instead, we are deeply disturbed and dismayed by fresh divisions, the flouting of international law, gross violations of human rights and the flourishing of illegal settlements and oppression, which threaten peace and security around the world. Further, the alarm bells on the climate crisis have long been sounded, and yet we race toward a point of no return. The dream of ending persistent inequality remains a challenge to the global community, and hard-earned progress on gender equality appears to have stagnated in some parts of the world. It is for these reasons, Mr President, that Trinidad and Tobago welcomed the convening of the Summit of the Future and joined with the international community in the adoption of the Pact for the Future. The adoption of this pact represents a renewal of our commitment as Member States to multilateralism. as the best way forward. Mr. President, since the dawn of civilization, humankind has endeavored to become an improved version of itself in the pursuit of a better quality of life, human rights, equality, dignity, and prosperity. Our ingenuity as human beings has paved the way for some of the world’s greatest inventions and advancements. Regrettably, in our quest to find the best version of ourselves, we have discovered some of the worst aspects of humanity. Our planet and its people have been subjected to misuse and abuse, the effects of which have placed the majority of the global population facing some version of a doomsday scenario. Now more than ever, we must summon a spirit of cooperation and collectively put our shoulders to the wheel for the benefit of all humanity. We used to say that our future depends on it, but now we have to say that our existence depends on it. It is very well established and accepted that there can be no sustainable development without peace. If we fail to find credible solutions to the global challenges, humanitarian crises, and conflicts around the world, the international community would have squandered its responsibility and would have perpetuated a vicious downward cycle of repression. One example is the Russia-Ukraine war, which is still ongoing almost three years after Russia’s initial invasion, which we condemned, with profound implications to the world order. Mr. President, Trinidad and Tobago is deeply troubled by the escalation of conflict and tensions in the Middle East. We remain distressed by the ongoing war on Gaza and by the chilling flashpoints of expansion that are being deployed on a daily basis. Only someone absolutely bereft of humanity would think that it is lawful and just and even godly to respond to atrocities committed on one awful day of terror by in turn committing atrocities after atrocities. How else are we to describe the killing of over 200 UN staff members, the highest death toll in United Nations history, and the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians, including women and children? And this is not being done in secret. The entire world is watching, and the global south in particular is appalled. The question remains, If innocent civilians, including women, children and United Nations staff, were being killed at this record rate in the developed world, how would the world’s big powers have reacted? Not likely with euphemisms and platitudes. The double standards and continued resourcing of these ongoing violations of international law send a chilling message to the global south. And that message is this. There are some powerful people in this world who are of the view that a Palestinian child is less worthy of defence, protection, food, water and life than another child. I am not of that view. The people of my country are not of that view. Karakum is not of that view. And decent people all over the world, including in Israel, are not of that view. International law is not a tool of mere convenience to be muted for friends and trumpeted against enemies. Mr President, international law is not a tool of mere convenience to be muted for our friends and trumpeted against our enemies. In this regard, Trinidad and Tobago has joined the call for an immediate, full and complete ceasefire, and for the unconditional release of every single hostage. The truth is, there is no military solution to this conflict, as peace will only be achieved through negotiations in good faith and constructive dialogue among all concerned parties. Trinidad and Tobago has consistently expressed our support for a two-state solution, where Israelis can live without the daily threat of terror, and Palestinians can live without the daily weight of occupation, coexisting side by side as responsible members of the international community. We firmly believe that this is the only credible pathway to end this cycle of violence, culminating in the establishment of a sovereign and peaceful State of Palestine, alongside a sovereign and peaceful State of Israel within secure borders. Rooted in this belief, Trinidad and Tobago took the decision to recognize the State of Palestine in our contribution to the two-state solution, and in support of the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for self-determination. I can report that just six days ago, Trinidad and Tobago and the State of Palestine officially established diplomatic relations. We look forward to the day when the State of Palestine would be welcomed to take its seat in the General Assembly as a full member of the United Nations. Mr. President, I now turn to the issue affecting the International Criminal Court. Despite its detractors, the evidence before us clearly shows the value and effectiveness and necessity of the International Criminal Court. As a country that advocated for the establishment of the ICC via the tireless work of our former Prime Minister and President Eanor Robinson, Trinidad and Tobago remains resolute in our support of the Court’s mandate to help put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of the most heinous crimes, and to provide a glimmer of hope to all victims of those crimes seeking justice within the jurisdiction of the Court. To this end, we continue to encourage all states that have not yet done so to ratify and fully implement the Rome Statute of the ICC. It was the late Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. who once said, It is not possible to be in favor of justice for some people and not be in favor of justice for all people. For this reason, Mr. President, Trinidad and Tobago condemns, rejects, and repudiates any and all attempts to impede, intimidate, or improperly influence the court and its very courageous officials. Mr. President, we are mindful that the illicit trafficking in small arms and light weapons in our own region poses an intolerable threat to national security and to the lives of our citizens. The proliferation of illegal arms and ammunition has contributed to unacceptable increases in the level of gun-related violence and fatalities in our small society and indeed across CARICOM. In addition to our own efforts domestically, we continue to work with regional and international partners to free our citizens from the horrific human cost associated with the easy access to small arms and light weapons and their vicious use against citizens and families. Following the hosting by Trinidad and Tobago of our first regional symposium on crime and violence as a public health safety issue in 2023, CARICOM heads met in Guyana earlier this year to further elaborate innovative strategies on this matter of grave regional concern. Trinidad and Tobago welcomes the renewed efforts of our partners, including the United States of America in particular. to work with us constructively to help solve this deadly challenge which respects no borders. Mr. President, we also remain deeply concerned by the humanitarian and security crisis affecting the nation of Haiti. Earlier this year, from this very rostrum, Professor Sir Hilary Beckles, Chairman of the CARICOM Reparations Commission, stated, and I quote, We are calling for justice for the people of Haiti, who should have been held aloft for being the first nation to end the evil of slavery. They should have been held aloft for being the most noble exemplars of freedom and the celebration of democratic possibilities in Western modernity. Instead, for their audacity of action, they were punished by the Western world and demonized rather than deified. End quote. We acknowledge that the path toward a stable and secure Haiti requires indigenous, Haitian-led, Haitian-owned solutions that are ably supported by the United Nations and the international community. In this regard, we welcome the news of the appointment of an interim Prime Minister and Cabinet. We believe that these are important steps in confronting the political, security, and humanitarian challenges in Haiti. And I salute the role of CARICOM. its hard-working Secretariat and the Eminent Persons Group in helping the Haitians to achieve some of this progress for themselves. Trinidad and Tobago also joins in commending the Kenyan government for its deployment and leadership of the Multinational Security Support Mission, and we extend our appreciation to all states that have contributed to that operation, including Jamaica, the Bahamas, and several others in our region. But an essential component for the success of this Multinational Security Support Mission is funding. In this regard, the Government of the United States of America has led by example and has contributed the lion’s share. And Canada has stepped up as well. But some relatively wealthy countries have either contributed drips and drabs or nothing at all. We appeal to the international community to contribute the necessary funding to support this crucially important venture. Mr. President, our quest to achieve human dignity within the context of sustainable development cannot be divorced from the legitimate calls for reparatory justice for the history of chattel slavery and native genocide in the Caribbean and elsewhere. The brutality of our colonial experience, the trauma of which still affects us to this day, has contributed significantly to underdevelopment. All four parents were rooted out and dehumanized, and their blood and sweat and tears and labor were extracted to build empires and beautiful castles and bridges and treasures, which some of us pay money today to visit and photograph and admire. Mr. President, we have been leveraging our collective voice to call for restitution for the historical evil injustices and crimes against humanity committed against our four parents, crimes which still affect us today. In reaffirming our commitment to this regional campaign, the Government of Trinidad and Tobago appointed last year a reconstituted National Committee on Reparations to provide additional energy and support to the CARICOM Reparations Commission and its work with the African Union and other like-minded bodies. And on a related note, we wish to join with those who are committed to and would welcome the proclamation of a second international decade for people of African descent. Mr. President, it is indeed troubling that as we approach the 30th anniversary of the Beijing Platform of Action, women and girls in some parts of this world are still being denied basic human rights and freedoms. And in some quarters, there have been erosions of gains previously made. Trinidad and Tobago continues to be a strong advocate for the meaningful participation of women and girls in all aspects of society as we recognize and value their critical role in the promotion and protection of human rights and the building of peaceful and sustainable societies. This is important to us and as we have done biannually since the year 2010, Trinidad and Tobago will table in the first committee this year our resolution on women, disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control and we encourage member states to support this forward-looking resolution. Mr. President, the fourth International Conference on Small Island Developing States was held in Antigua earlier this year and underscored the critical nature of the next decade for SIDS. We are very proud of what our fellow CARICOM member state achieved in successfully hosting that impactful conference. Trinidad and Tobago anticipates that the robust implementation of the Antigua and Barbuda agenda for SIDS will bring us closer to sustainable development with the necessary means of support from the international community. Mr. President, we all acknowledge the adverse effects of climate change. We anticipate decisive outcomes regarding the new collective quantified goal at the upcoming COP 29. Baku, Azerbaijan, which should catalyze much-needed reform of the international financial architecture. Effective climate finance mechanisms are essential for the provision of accessible, adequate and predictable funding, and this requires the operationalization and capitalization of the Loss and Damage Fund. Climate finance goes well beyond project funding. It is an investment in the resilience and sustainability of the most vulnerable nations. The future beckons, a future in which SIDS have the capacity and resources to build infrastructure that can withstand severe climate events. That future would enable a just transition to renewable energy sources and the full protection of our natural ecosystems. Mr. President, like many others, Trinidad and Tobago has long called for the application of new multidimensional parameters for decision-making on access to financing. In this regard, we welcome the recent adoption by the General Assembly of the Resolution on the Multidimensional Vulnerability Index. We encourage the international community and the relevant financial and development institutions to utilize the MVI as it takes into account the realities that undermine sustainable development. and Tobago stands in full solidarity with the people of Cuba, who have been subjected to an unjust embargo for more than six decades. This embargo severely undermines Cuba’s prospects for attaining economic stability, growth and sustainable development. Whatever the objectives may have been 60 years ago, these measures have clearly not achieved any desirable results, only the pain and suffering of ordinary Cuban people. The collective punishment of an entire citizenry through unilateral, coercive measures is not only unconscionable, but also inconsistent with international law and the Charter of the United Nations. Trinidad and Tobago therefore renews its call for the unconditional lifting of the economic, commercial and financial embargo against Cuba. Additionally, we have seen no justification for the designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism. We call for the removal of that unjust categorization as well. So Mr President, I conclude as I started. This world, our world, is at a point of inflection. With tension and division rising to a crescendo, small states have to be clear-eyed about their future. Trinidad and Tobago is small, but we are proud of that which makes us unique and special. We may not be a superpower, but we have super powers. And these are our creativity and our diversity. Our cultural milieu is indescribably vibrant, as our people are drawn from the first peoples of our hemisphere, as well as the best of India, the best of Africa, the best of China, and yes, the best of Europe, too. We are blessed beyond measure. Some of you had a taste of it at the reception when we introduced our President of the last session, and you enjoyed some of our delicacies, including our delicious doubles and bacon shark, and you were delighted by performances on our national musical instrument, the steel pan, and by the magical rhythms of our tassel drums. We have proven that we can be great leaders, including leaders of this very assembly, and we will continue to give more value to this world than we extract from it. We are strong, proud, staunch advocates of the UN system and multilateralism. In the end, unity and togetherness is the key. for these United Nations, as well as for my own society. Om Shanti Shanti Shanti. Assalamu alaikum. Shalom alaikum. And may God richly bless you and your families. Mr. President, I thank you.

President: I thank the Minister for Foreign and Caricom Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago. I now give the floor to His Excellency Francis Fonseca, Minister for Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade of Belize.

Francis Fonseca – Belize: Mr. President, the self-determination of a people is sacrosanct. It is because of the exercise of that right to self-determination that each nation enjoys the privilege of sitting in this hall. Our nations exist by the will of our people, by virtue of their right to determine their political status and pursue their economic, cultural and social development. To borrow words from Nelson Mandela, our people are the real and others. Their participation in every decision about the future is the only guarantee of true democracy and freedom. If we look at the challenges that our people confront today, we must ask whether that sacrosanct principle of self-determination is in fact secure. Riz is a member of the Alliance of Small Island States, EOSIS, one of 39 countries that have been on the front lines of the climate crisis. The genesis of this crisis lies with the industrialized nations. Its perpetuation and acceleration rests with the wider membership of the Group of 20. Currently, the G20 accounts for some 80% of global emissions. EOSIS members contribute less than 1% of global emissions. This is the tale of two worlds, but we only have one planet to share. The extent to which G20 economies are advancing and contributing to global economic output and world trade is impressive and promising for their people. It is important that their growth should be calibrated to a world where SIDS also have a secure future. This is still possible, but it is urgent. As SIDS, our people’s livelihoods have long depended on traditional sectors such as agriculture, Biter, fisheries, and tourism which are climate-sensitive. Opportunities for diversification have been limited given our size, population, and location. Climate change is forcing us to break with tradition and to transition despite the limited options to do so. Each step forward is met with yet another hurdle to overcome, and with increasing probability we face the likelihood of setbacks as climate change impacts worsen. The costs are multiplying, fiscal space is shrinking, and the opportunities to equitably share in global prosperity are diminishing. The right of CIDs to define their own future must be protected and secured. The severe impacts of sea-level rise have irreversible consequences for CIDs. Our people have gone beyond their duty to protect and preserve our environment, yet some are being forced to relocate from their homelands. To this, we reiterate that no matter the physical changes that climate change may bring to our territory, our sovereignty and our right to self-determination remain intact. Mr. President, the perpetual suffering of a people can never just be a matter of national concern. The United Nations rose up from the ashes of war to restore faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person. in the equal rights of men and women, and of nations large or small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom. All members of the United Nations have a duty to give effect to these words. Conflicts should not be allowed to fester. The war in Ukraine is now two years running, and we are concerned that the end is still not near. Haiti has seized our attention once again. For Belize, the international response must be enduring for long-lasting peace and security of our sister country. We are working through the Caribbean community to reinforce and strengthen Haiti, and we commend the Haitian people in their resolve to define their own pathway forward. We are pleased to be contributing personnel to the multinational security support mission. Belize is extremely worried that up to now, the international community has not fully delivered on its commitments for the MSS, nor the UN Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan for Haiti. This jeopardizes all the efforts towards establishing political stability, but more than that, puts the future at risk. and the United States of America. Mr President, Cuba should no longer be subject to an unjust and illegal economic embargo imposed by the United States. It is imperative that Cuba be removed from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. This arbitrary and unilateral designation has created an unnecessary barrier to global cooperation, constructive engagement, and the promotion of peace and stability in our region. Mr President, Belize rejects the continued denial of self-determination of the Palestinian people and calls for the eradication of the system of colonial domination and apartheid being imposed upon them. As Belize stated to the International Court of Justice in the recent advisory opinion, Israel cannot be permitted to continue flouting one of the most fundamental principles of international law, with impunity. Impunity breeds inhumanity. Just two weeks ago, this Assembly approved a resolution proposed by Palestine affirming the ICJ’s advisory opinion and called on members to act to reinforce the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination. The war, the oppression, and the inhumanity must end. Mr. President, Taiwan is a nation that espouses democracy, development and innovation. The challenges we are tackling as an international community requires Taiwan’s full inclusion and participation in the international system. Belize calls for this to be done immediately. The people of Western Sahara should be granted their long-overdue referendum to decide their own future. Belize continues its repeated call for the United Nations and the international community to take the necessary steps to allow the Sahrawi people to finally exercise their right to self-determination. Mr. President, I submit to you and this Assembly that the foundation of leaving no one behind requires that we actively promote and protect the right of self-determination in its most basic form, in the context of peace and security. Now we must also do so in the context of sustainable development. We have adopted a rescue plan to steer the SDGs back on course. We have a pact for the future. We must use every opportunity to put in place the systems and financing necessary to turbocharge our sustainable development and climate goals. In this effort, we must ensure equal opportunity for all to share. and others. Mr. President, the Declaration on Sea Level Rise and Statehood adopted by the leaders of the Alliance of Small Island States on 23 September affirms that the sovereignty or statehood of small island developing states cannot be challenged under any circumstances of climate change-related sea level rise. We invite all UN member states to support the implementation of this declaration and to use it as the basis of international cooperation. To further guarantee that SIDS will be spared the gravest climate threats, global warming must be limited to well below 1.5 degrees Celsius. Belize urges the G20 to enhance their emission reduction targets to achieve this temperature limit. For SIDS, adaptation is imperative, and loss and damage associated with climate change is inevitable. The new climate finance goal to be decided in Baku must contain specific recommendations for minimum allocation to SIDS in relation to grant-based and concessional finance for adaptation and grants for loss and damage. It must also give effect to the provisions of the Paris Agreement, which require enhanced access for SIDS and LDCs. and the United Nations. The Multidimensional Vulnerability Index should be incorporated into existing practices and policies for debt sustainability and development support to expand SIDS’ access to effective development finance. Belize is moving ahead. We are on a transformative development trajectory. We have dramatically improved our credit profile through the Belize Blue Bond Project, a debt for marine conservation swap. We are reforming and modernizing our legislative and policy frameworks for investments and activating our orange and blue economies, including beyond our national jurisdiction. In partnership with the United States of America, we have signed a five-year U.S. $125 million grant agreement with the Millennium Challenge Corporation, intended to help reduce poverty in Belize by addressing the country’s energy and education sectors. We are making targeted investments to ensure that every child has access to education. to quality education and opportunities. One key example is the Belize Education Upliftment Project, Together We Rise, which provides half of Belizean secondary school students with the resources they need to succeed, including free tuition, uniforms, school supplies and healthy meals. Belize has extended the compulsory school age to 16 years to improve school retention rates and increase the likelihood of transitioning to higher education. We are working tirelessly to expand vocational training, digital access and life skills development, ensuring that young people are prepared for the evolving job market and capable of driving innovation in sectors such as agriculture, climate change and technology. We are aggressively closing the digital divide as technology holds the promise of progress. But we depend on multilateral efforts to ensure that all nations, regardless of size or wealth, have the infrastructure and capacity to participate in the digital economy. Education and capacity building alone are not enough. Addressing inequalities and fostering inclusion are equally critical to achieving lasting change. The achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls is central to this effort. Belize has made important progress in this area, marked by the recent launch of its revised National Gender Policy Framework. 2024-2030, which aims to end discrimination and violence against women while promoting their full participation in all aspects of society, social, economic and political. Belize continues its work to ensure that every Belizean has access to high-quality, affordable and efficient health care services. By January 2025, we will achieve full national health insurance coverage. We are also strengthening our mental health support systems with the goal of improving and expanding access to quality care, addressing the stigma surrounding mental health, and enhancing outreach programs, particularly in rural and underserved areas. Mr. President, Belize is committed to the final settlement of Guatemala’s territorial, insular and maritime claim. We welcome Guatemala’s stated commitment to respecting and abiding by the ruling of the International Court of Justice. At the political level, we are actively engaged with Guatemala to strengthen our bilateral relationship. A definitive solution will bring greater opportunities for both of our nations in the areas of trade, investment and cooperation. Mr. President, Belize reaffirms its commitment to the United Nations as the central platform. for Coordinated Global Action. But its decision-making processes need to be more inclusive, more responsive and representative. Its institutions cannot be held back by the world as it was 80 years ago. Reform is urgent and necessary to reflect the world as it is. Mr President, the youth of today have given us a clear, undeniable mandate. They demand action, accountability and a future where they are heard, seen and respected. We ignore them at our own peril. We must not fail them. It is our responsibility to heed their calls for change. We must deliver on our commitments and build a world that present and future generations deserve.

Olushegun Adjadi Bakari – Benin: Ladies and Gentlemen, It is a great honour for me to speak to you today from this iconic rostrum of the United Nations, on behalf of His Excellency, President Patrice Talon, President of the Republic of Benin. I would like, at the outset, to reaffirm the unwavering commitment of the Benin people to democracy, to political stability and to the principle of the peaceful transfer of power. Since the historic national conference involving all stakeholders in February 1990, Benin has chosen the path of democracy. Under the successive leadership of our successive presidents and President Patrice Talon, we have been able to preserve and strengthen our institutions. Our defence and security forces, courageously upholding the values of our republic, continue to protect our territory and our institutions every day. Any attempt at destabilization, whether from within or without, will be overcome. Our journey towards development is now irreversible. Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen, Today the world is confronted with growing tensions, and uncertainty becomes an everyday feature of our times. Each day we can see an increase in polarization, with crises that undermine social cohesion everywhere and mortgage off the future of our humanity, be this in the Sahel. in Sudan, in Ukraine, in the South China Sea or in the Middle East, conflicts which crop up undermine peace and global stability. These tensions bring but suffering and despair, causing waves of poverty that affect the most fragile economies and exacerbate people’s vulnerability. Although Africa is often far from the source of these crises, it nonetheless remains deeply affected by them. The Sahel region in particular is today the theatre of increasing tensions, exacerbated by tensions taken without the consent of African countries. This instability seriously compromises our sustainable development. Even more worrisome, some external forces are seeking to bring in their geopolitical rivalries into our region. Benin firmly condemns all attempts to make the Sahel into a new epicentre of geopolitical struggle. This type of interference provides fertile ground for terrorism. Terrorism is an abomination that we unreservedly condemn, be this in Africa or elsewhere. Terrorism is unacceptable. No cause can justify terror, suffering and the destruction that it causes. Today, we reaffirm our commitment to African unity. More particularly in our region, West Africa, we have the historic responsibility to preserve the centuries-old fraternal ties that link our people. Benin is ready to play its role in this fight against terrorism and in favour of development. Our unity of action is crucial. irrespective of which organizations we decide to belong to. This is also an opportunity for us to reaffirm our commitment to non-violence and it’s because of this attachment and commitment to non-violence that we condemn the war in Ukraine. It is because of this commitment to non-violence that we have condemned the terrorist attacks of the 7th of October and also the escalating violence that ensued in the Middle East and in the same way we condemn all forms of violence that each day plunge into mourning our brother and sister countries in the Sahel. We call on the international community to step up efforts to bring stability through dialogue, be this in the Middle East where the two-state solution is the only viable option or in Ukraine in the Great Lakes region, in Sudan, in Libya or in our sisterly Republic of Haiti. Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, despite these hotbeds of tension we must never lose sight of another major challenge that threatens the future of our world, poverty in all its forms. Five years from the deadline of 2030 it is painfully clear that we will not achieve the sustainable development goals but we must not give up the fight. The fight against poverty is one of the major challenges of our time. Without this there will be neither real peace or lasting stability. Africa, ladies and gentlemen, is the future of the world. In just a few decades our continent will be home to a quarter of humanity. Our young people who are incredibly creative and our natural resources are an indispensable asset for the Moderator for the US Department of State for the Future of our Planet But for this potential to be truly tapped into, we need to eradicate poverty in our continent There is an urgent need to act, because each year of delay compromises this future In 25 years when our country, or our country’s rather, for the most part will be at least 100 years old Will we still have to discuss access to drinking water, to electricity, to healthcare and education? Or will we finally have turned the page which will enable each African to live in dignity? These are the essential questions that we need to respond to The time for action is now Since 2016, Benin has opted for progress under the leadership of President Patrice Talon We have taken our destiny into our own hands We’ve initiated major reforms, be this in the area of education, healthcare or infrastructure Today, we are focused on transformation and development It’s important for the world to recognize the efforts of African nations, just like mine, just like Benin Who are striving for the future and who are taking their future into their own hands Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, for Africa truly to take off It should reconcile itself with its own history and its real inner identity Just like it’s impossible to understand Europe without taking into consideration the influence of the Christian Church And just like it’s impossible to understand the Middle East without striving to understand Islam It’s also impossible to grasp the essence of Africa without fully embracing its beliefs, its traditions and its civilization This is a spirit that guided Benin Benin, which is the motherland of the Wudang culture, that Benin took the initiative to correct negative perceptions of this culture, of our culture. We want to show the world the great richness and wealth of our civilisation. By understanding and respecting our history, our beliefs and our culture, the world will be able to understand who we are and why Africa is crucial for global balance and development. However, respect for Africa does not just stop at recognising its past, it also involves modern pan-Africanism focused on action. Pan-Africanism engaged in poverty reduction, in building a prosperous continent, a pan-Africanism that goes over and beyond words and moves into action. This pan-Africanism must be reflected by specific action. How can we promote African unity when it is easier for a European to travel throughout Africa than it is for an African, him or herself, to do so? Benin has made a bold, courageous pan-African choice by abolishing visas for all African citizens. This gesture is not simply symbolic, it also reflects our revolve to build an Africa where each African can feel at home throughout the entire continent. Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, more than ever, the respect for Africa involves recognising and acknowledging its children dispersed throughout the world, our brothers and sisters of the diaspora uprooted by force during the dark days of the transatlantic slave trade must find their place once again within the African community. It is high time to heal these wounds. to rebuild this sacred link with those who, albeit physically far away, carry Africa in their hearts. People of African descent are not just distant relatives of our family, they are our children, they are our brothers, they are our sisters, they incarnate an essential essence of our collective identity. By recognizing their right to return, we say to them, you have never ceased belonging to this land. Africa is your home and we are waiting for you with open arms. 2024 marks the end of the first international decade of people of African descent. On this occasion, Benin has taken a historic measure by adopting unanimously at the National Assembly a law which grants the Benin nationality to all persons of African descent who so wish. This is more than just a simple symbolic gesture. It is an invitation to a joint future, a vibrant call for unity and for solidarity. Together, Africans and people of African descent from the continent and the diaspora, we will meet the challenges of tomorrow. Together, we will build a strong, prosperous and respected Africa. Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, Benin is ready to pave the way for a unified Africa, dynamic and open to the world, an Africa which takes itself into its own hand, engaged in addressing its own future. The century of Africa is within reach. It depends on our ability to seize this opportunity to build an Africa where each citizen, be he or she born on the continent or not, or part of the diaspora, plays a key role in our common rebirth. We stand ready. Thank you.

President: I thank the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Benin. I now give the floor to His Excellency Yamazaki Kazuyuki, Chair of the delegation of Japan.

Yamazaki Kazuyuki – Japan: Mr. President, allow me to deliver this statement on behalf of the Prime Minister of Japan, Mr. Kishida Fumio. Mr. President, Excellencies, the world stands at a historical inflection point. These extremely shifting histories have become distinctive features of the past three years and will continue to define the years to come. I have stressed that at times like these, we must overcome divisions and confrontations and promote international cooperation by going back to the basic foundations. In 2022, I have called for defending the principles of the UN Charter and the rule of law, and 2023, multilateralism with the United Nations at its core by shedding a light on human dignity. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine still rages on, and we are witnessing the dire situation in Palestine and Gaza. Unfortunately, divisions and confrontations are deepening. In these difficult times, Japan’s position remains unwavering. We should go back to the basic foundations to unite the international community and deepen solidarity. The rule of law and human dignity remain the key to international cooperation. Today I would like to highlight the importance of strengthening governance at both national and international levels as another foundation for uniting the international community to strengthen the rule of law and protect human dignity. At the Summit of the Future, we made a commitment to take action for the benefit of present and future generations. Building inclusive societies across the international community where youth, future generations and women can thrive and achieving the SDGs, leaving no one behind, are overarching goals that resonate with us. We believe the international community would also agree the role of governance is critical in achieving these goals. Such empathy among us provides a common ground for all members of the international community to share and fulfill their responsibilities. My message for this year can be summarized in a simple phrase, inclusive governance with shared responsibility. Mr. President, to address unprecedented crises and challenges and to protect and strengthen the rule of law and human dignity, Japan, as a member of the international community, is determined to play a role for stronger governance. First and foremost, we must strengthen the governance to work towards international peace and security, which is the foundation for a prosperous society. Next year marks the 80th anniversary of the United Nations. It is time to transform the United Nations to address the most pressing challenges in peace and security. and meet the needs of a new era. Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, which has continued for more than two and a half years, poses a blatant challenge to the international order based on the rule of law and shakes its very foundations. There are a host of issues that need to be addressed, including North Korea’s nuclear missile development, the situation in Gaza, and conflict and terrorism in Africa. The international community is in need of a United Nations, in particular the Security Council, that is credible and carries out its responsibility effectively. At the summit of the future, world leaders issued a clear and strong message on the urgent need to reform the Security Council. In order to respond in good faith, it is essential to begin the development of a consolidated reform model and text-based negotiations as soon as possible. In this regard, it should be underscored that the majority of member states, including African groups, are calling for the expansion of both permanent and non-permanent membership of the Council. Japan will work with others to achieve a Security Council that is more representative with developing countries included and effective, reflecting the realities of the international community. Japan also attaches great importance to the role of the General Assembly in the area of international peace and security. For the sake of future generations, it is necessary to maintain and strengthen a free and open international order based on the rule of law and to ensure peace, stability and prosperity in the world. It is with this conviction that I have promoted the Free and Open Indo-Pacific. The vision of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific is in line with the goals of the United Nations. Japan will continue to expand our circle of partners who share this vision and together we will address various challenges facing the international community in a spirit of cooperation. Strengthening domestic governance is also essential for international peace and security and prosperity. Japan has continued to spearhead human-centered international cooperation based on the concept of human security. We need to accelerate the efforts of the international community as a whole towards achieving the SDGs. It is also vital to address the root causes of conflict by interlinking humanitarian development and peace efforts in order to curb the deterioration of humanitarian situations due to protracted conflicts. In March this year, during Japan’s Presidency of the Security Council, Japan held an open debate on peacebuilding and conflict prevention. We should strengthen the functions of the Peacebuilding Commission, which has a unique convening power, and increase cooperation with the Security Council to further promote the humanitarian development peace nexus. In promoting these initiatives, the perspectives of women, youth and rural areas must be taken into account. The Women, Peace and Security Agenda seeks to achieve sustainable peace through women’s participation and leadership in peacebuilding and disaster recovery processes. When there is governance that enables women’s active participation, the WPS Agenda becomes even more meaningful. In order to build this type of inclusive society, it is important to nurture the future generation so that they can take a lead in various initiatives. To this end, Japan… To this end, Japan plans to launch a program to nurture the next generation of leaders in the field of gender. In order to achieve a flexible, resilient future society that is rich in diversity and able to respond to new challenges, Japan will work on promoting youth, supporting research and building networks for young researchers, and holding a forum for the next generation. Rural perspective is also important. Japan is trying to utilize the remarkable technology of companies and rural areas, including active and long-established companies and start-ups, to promote projects that can contribute to solving social issues and create a robust virtuous cycle in both the economies of rural areas and overseas. Domestic governance is the bedrock of sustainable development, as it underpins countries’ ability to mobilize private investment and domestic financing. At the same time, each country achieving sustainable growth would amount to the sustainability of the international community as a whole, a process which would then be supported by international governance. The focus should therefore be on governance at all levels. Second, we should all share the responsibility for responding to new challenges facing the international community and work together with a new approach. I’d like to start by addressing the challenge of nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation, my lifelong work as a politician hailing from Hiroshima. Secretary General Guterres put his challenge as the very first recommendation in his new Agenda for Peace, launched last year. Despite the extended efforts of the international community, the world is now on the cusp of a reversal. in the decreasing trend of a global number of nuclear arsenals. We must face up to the situation that nuclear weapons are once again becoming an apparent global risk due to changing geopolitical circumstances and deepening divisions and confrontations in the international community. With these serious concerns in mind, I have been steadily taking nuclear disarmament initiatives under the Hiroshima Action Plan to strengthen realistic and practical efforts to realize a world without nuclear weapons. In March this year, as President of the Security Council, Japan chaired the Ministerial Meeting of the Security Council on Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. Following this effort, on the 23rd of this month, I hosted a high-level meeting to launch the Friends of FMCT here in New York. Next year marks 80 years since the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As the only country to have ever suffered atomic bombings during war, Japan will further strengthen efforts to promote accurate understanding on the realities of nuclear weapons use as a starting point for all nuclear disarmament measures. Japan will also act to further advance nuclear disarmament as we head toward the 2026 NPT Review Conference. Japan will also work even more closely with the international community towards the denuclearization of North Korea, including through implementation of relevant UN security resolutions. Japan will continue to seek to normalize its relationship with North Korea in accordance with the Japan DPRK Pyongyang Declaration through comprehensively resolving outstanding issues of concern. such as abductions, nuclear and missile issues, as well as settlement of the unfortunate past. The rapid development of emerging technologies is bringing new challenges to disarmament and non-proliferation efforts. Focusing on the further development of emerging technologies, Japan intends to actively and constructively participate in international rulemaking on leader autonomous weapon systems through balanced discussions, taking into account humanitarian security perspectives so that a common understanding can be reached among the international community, including stakeholder states. In discussing new challenges, we must also include aspects of digital technologies, especially considering the global digital compact was just adopted at the Summit of the Future. Digital technologies have the power to transform the future of the world, thereby making digital cooperation an essential part of protecting and enhancing human dignity. Among such digital technologies, there is an urgent need to establish international governance on artificial intelligence in order to maximize the opportunities brought by AI while mitigating its risks. Japan has been working through the Hiroshima AI process to achieve safe, secure and trustworthy AI. We will continue to actively contribute to the discussions of AI at the United Nations. In tackling global issues, the evolution of multilateral development banks has emerged as a new issue. Japan will continue to further progress in the MDP evolution in a way that reflects the specificities of each institution and the discussions of their boards, increasing lending capacity to developing countries. Through utilizing existing capital and private capital mobilization, and addressing debt restructuring faced by those countries, are also pressing issues. Transparent and fair development finance, in line with international rules and standards, is needed now more than ever. Climate change is a common challenge to all humankind and a critical issue that the international community collectively needs to address. Japan has identified climate change as the greatest challenge that needs to be overcome by bringing about a new form of capitalism. We are steadily taking actions and are on track to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. It is important that all countries come together to achieve the common goal of net zero through various pathways that are compatible with economic growth and energy security. As an initiative to embody these areas, Japan has proposed the concept of Asia Zero Emission Community. We are working with other Asian countries to simultaneously achieve decarbonization, economic growth, and energy security in the region. What I would like to highlight this year is the importance of inclusive governance upheld by shared responsibility. This requires solidarity among diverse countries. At last year’s G7 Hiroshima summit, I said the strengthening of engagement with partners beyond G7 as one of the pillars of the summit. Since then, Japan has been supporting stronger domestic governance in developing countries to protect human dignity through the exchanging of opinions with ASEAN, India, Pacific countries, as well as with Latin American countries, including Brazil, which holds the G20 presidency this year. Africa is a region that is experiencing experience in dynamic growth, supported by a younger generation population, and the fruits of its efforts to strengthen their inclusive governance. At the same time, Africa continues to face challenges related to human dignity, such as poverty, job creation, and fragile economic and social infrastructures, as well as challenges related to peace and stability, such as conflict, terrorism, refugees, and displaced persons. Strengthening governance is important as a lever for change to achieve peace, stability, and sustainable development. Investing in human resources and mobilizing domestic and international resources for this purpose are essential for economic transformation that leads to growth. As a long-standing partner of Africa, Japan has been supporting the strengthening of equal systems and governance conducive to domestic and international resource mobilization, including through assistance for fiscal management and trade facilitation. Japan has also supported elections to consolidate and strengthen democracy, and assisted in the capacity building of administrative and judicial personnel. Furthermore, we have promoted international community dialogue to foster a shared future encouraged by participation of citizens, including youth and women, in the political and construction process, and supported the strengthening of their livelihoods. Next year, we will host TICAT 9 in Yokohama. Together with our African friends and the United Nations, we will find innovative solutions to Africa’s and global challenges. As a part of these efforts, Japan will consider further preferential measures in light of the WTO decision so that the least developed countries can achieve smooth and sustainable development under graduation from the LDC category. Mr. President, At this year’s UN General Assembly, let us all look towards the same vision for our future and joint forces to strengthen governance across the international community. Let us work together for inclusive society where the rule of law and human dignity are upheld. The United Nations has an important role to play and the international community is counting on it to fulfill its mandate. As a member state of the United Nations, Japan will also contribute to this progress. Thank you for your attention.

President: I thank the Chair of the Delegation of Japan. Colleagues, we’ve heard the last speaker in the general debate for this evening, but before you can all escape and enjoy your Saturday night, the exercise of the right of reply has been requested. May I remind members that statements in the exercise of the right of reply are limited to 10 minutes for the first intervention and to five minutes for the second intervention and should be made by delegations from their seats. The next speaker exercising the right of reply is Ecuador. You have the floor.

Ecuador: Gracias. Thank you very much, Mr. President. My delegation is taking the floor for the right of reply given the statement made by the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the current Mexican government, Ms. Alicia Barcena, regarding the incident which took place in the Mexican embassy in Quito on the 5th of April, 2024. Ecuador is a country which respects international law and the principles and values enshrined in the UN Charter. In her statement, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the government of Mexico omitted to mention that this incident is the subject of a process before the ICJ. that the court has disregarded the request by Mexico for provisional measures to be taken regarding the protection of its embassy. As to the events prior to the 5th of April 2024, it has shed light on the exceptional circumstances under which the Ecuadorian authorities were obligated to enter the Mexican embassy to arrest a fugitive from justice, an isolated event, and we did so to combat impunity. That needs to be said. The current government of Mexico allowed a citizen of our country with two sentences against him for corruption and other crimes, including, one, gender-based violence, to enter and stay in the embassy in Quito as a guest. The government of Mexico, the current government of Mexico, despite the multiple diplomatic efforts by Ecuador, did not hand over this fugitive, as it was obligated to, to the Ecuadorian authorities and ultimately illegally gave that individual political asylum. In proceeding in that way, the current government of Mexico did not comply with international conventions, the 1933 Convention and the 1954 Caracas Convention, which clearly state that it is not legal to grant asylum to individuals who are charged with common crimes by competent courts, as is the case here. The government of Mexico also violated the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which imposes the obligation to respect the laws and rules of the host state and the obligation not to interfere in internal affairs of the host state. and not to use diplomatic premises in a manner incompatible with their functions. At the same time, the government of Mexico violated the principles of sovereign integrity, territorial integrity, and non-interference in the internal affairs of states, enshrined in the UN Charter and the Charter of the OAS and customary international law. The government of Mexico also violated its obligation to cooperate in corruption matters in accordance with the Inter-American Convention of 1966 on Corruption and the UN 2003 Convention. This violation of international law should not be normalized or accepted. And for that reason, Ecuador on the 29th of April this year submitted a case to the ICJ against Mexico. Thank you.

President: I thank the delegation of Ecuador. Next speaker on my list is China, followed by Pakistan, Ethiopia, and Armenia. I give the floor to China.

China: Mr. President, in response to yesterday’s statement by Australia and today’s statement by the Philippines, China exercises its right of reply. China always believes that the United Nations is not the appropriate place for discussing the South China Sea issue. However, it is necessary for us to make a solemn response, given that erroneous remarks have been made. The South China Sea Arbitration was unilaterally initiated by the Philippines, which violated the principle of state consent and contravenes international law, including UNCLOS. And the tribunal exceeded its authority and made unjust ruling, and the award is illegal and invalid. China does not accept or recognize the ruling, nor does it accept any claims or actions based on that. China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea are not affected by the ruling under any circumstances. China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent waters, and a sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant waters. China’s regular patrols, law enforcement and production activities in waters under its jurisdiction are compliant with international law, including UNCLOS. The recent escalation of the South China Sea issue between China and the Philippines is entirely the responsibility of the Philippines. China will continue to resolve the disputes in the South China Sea through negotiations and consultations with directly concerned parties, including the Philippines, on the basis of respecting facts and in accordance with international law. China will also continue to work with ASEAN countries to safeguard peace and stability in the South China Sea. Thank you.

President: Thank you. I now call on the representative of Pakistan.

Pakistan: India, engaging in sponsoring terrorism abroad, is portraying itself as the victim. It is a familiar ploy of all occupiers and colonizers to paint legitimate struggles for freedom and liberation as terrorism. India is failing to grasp the enormity of the indigenous Kashmiri resistance against its strange hold and wrongly blaming it on cross-border terrorism. It must introspect and reflect and immediately implement the Security Council resolutions which provide for the Kashmiris to exercise their right to self-determination. which supports and finances terrorism against Pakistan using its proxies. Pakistan has provided irrefutable evidence to the UN Security Council of India’s involvement in terrorist activities against my country. India’s campaign to damage and destroy Pakistan’s economy is no secret, including by impeding the China-Pakistan economic corridor. Through the sponsorship of terrorist groups such as the Baloch Liberation Army and the Majid Brigade, India is also supporting terrorism in the Balochistan province of Pakistan. Mr. President, India’s assassination campaign against its dissidents residing overseas has been exposed in Canada and the United States, while its leaders publicly boast of murdering their citizens abroad. It is India which seeks expansion of territory through unilateral measures to consolidate its occupation of Jammu and Kashmir in gross violation of international law and crass threats to cross the line of control to take over the liberated territory of Azad, Jammu and Kashmir. India’s military buildup in nuclear, conventional, new and destabilizing weapons are mainly deployed against Pakistan. India is pursuing highly dangerous war-fighting doctrines to engage in a conventional military confrontation with Pakistan under the nuclear overhang. This, despite the humiliation suffered by India during its last ill-advised military adventurism against Pakistan in February 2019, with two fighter jets lost and a captured pilot, who was released by Pakistan after Indian pleas. Mr. President, India’s quest for regional hegemony is not limited to posturing against Pakistan only. but is also evident by its meddling in the internal affairs of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Maldives. The hubris and the grandiose perception being harboured by India, coupled with its fast-growing aggressive military capabilities, are a clear and present danger for international and regional peace and security. India needs to be reined in before it’s too late. India must be held accountable for its violations of international law in occupied Jammu and Kashmir, for state terrorism in the occupied territory, and for sponsoring terrorism against Pakistan. I thank you.

Ethiopia: The extensive statement by Egypt’s representative can be summarised in short as categorically a rejection of our efforts to ensure dignified life to our people. While we share no border, Ethiopia is linked with Egypt through the Nile. We believe the Nile is a solemn nexus between our countries that ought to create shared peace and prosperity to the people of our sisterly countries. It’s never Ethiopia’s intention or conduct to create tension and hostility towards Egypt. The Speaker, as stated from his statement, and made it clear to this Assembly, Egypt’s position against the universally accepted principle of permanent sovereignty of states over their natural resource and their right to use it for the benefit of their people. The people of Ethiopia, using their own finances, built the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. The dam is built over the River Abbai, which, as correctly explained by the representative of Egypt, is a tributary to the River Nile. It is bringing light to millions of Ethiopians deprived of such basic necessity. It is bringing integration to our region through energy, trade, and connectivity. The River Abbai transverses two-thirds of Ethiopia’s territory and makes up 70 percent of Ethiopia’s water resource. While having the resource, the people of Ethiopia continue to live in food and energy insecurity. More than half of our 120 million population needs access to clean water and electricity. Ethiopia will not be told to hold its effort to alleviate this unacceptable circumstance. We will not be told our people do not deserve a dignified life. Ethiopia recognizes the River Nile is a transboundary water resource that must be used by all riparian countries based on the principle of equitable and reasonable utilization. Transboundary resources are also best managed based on basin-wide arrangements agreed to by riparian countries. When it comes to these principles of international law, we see paradox in the Nile Basin. Ethiopia, an upper riparian country that contributes 85 percent of the flow to the Nile, and the other eight source countries, seeks cooperation based on international law. Egypt, the lower riparian country that contributes no flow to the resource, relentlessly works against cooperation and undermines international principles. It advocates for monopoly based on colonial-era arrangements, seeks a veto over the water development efforts of the countries that originate the water. Ethiopia will continue pursuing its development on the river Abbai on the basis of equitable and reasonable utilization of the resource. It is our hope, through time, Egypt will reorient its colonial-based policy on the Nile and work on integrated development on the basis of equity. Time will also come for Egypt to realize its best interest is intertwined with and best served by cooperation with the riparian countries of the Basin. More importantly, the old playbook that seeks to secure unfettered flow of the Nile by preoccupying the source countries with conflict and insurgencies will not work. On this basis, Ethiopia calls on Egypt to immediately stop its destabilization efforts in the whole of Africa. Time to negotiate and find a win-win solution is now. We urge Egypt to choose the path of negotiation and the path of international law. The cooperative framework agreement on the Nile River is entering into force on 13 October 2024. Egypt has the golden opportunity to return to peaceful conduct of its relations with the Nile River riparian states. Egypt is thus encouraged to ratify the CFA and play a constructive role in regional development. I thank you, Mr. President.

President: Thank you. I now call on the representative of Armenia.

Armenia: Thank you, Mr. President. I requested the floor to exercise the right to reply to the delegation of Azerbaijan. We regret that despite the forward-looking call of the Prime Minister of Armenia to normalize relations, despite the recent round of ministerial negotiations that took place just two days ago, Azerbaijan used this august body not only to express reluctance on normalizing relations with Armenia, but opted to propagate its usual distortions and allegations. Dear colleagues, nevertheless, let me once again reaffirm that Armenia is committed to achieving a just and lasting peace in the region and has engaged in negotiations to normalize the relations with Azerbaijan based on the international law, including the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. However, we are yet to see the same level of commitment and good faith from the Azerbaijani side. In response to all efforts toward the settlement of the long-term conflict, Azerbaijan continues to present new unsubstantiated and illegitimate claims to Armenia. The allegation that the constitution of Armenia contains territorial claims against Azerbaijan is entirely false and has been refuted on a number of occasions. It is strange to hear allegations on military build-up from a country that for decades has engaged in uncontrolled and unabated accumulation of offensive weaponry in violation of literally all its obligations under regional arms control treaties. The military build-up of Azerbaijan resulted in acts of aggression with heavy toll on the civilian population, atrocity crimes, mass displacement. and destruction of critical civilian infrastructure. Armenia is exercising its sovereign right to strengthen its defense capabilities in line with international law. We have stressed a number of times that we do not have territorial claims against any of our neighbors, and we do not plan any aggressive action against any of them. We regret that Azerbaijan continues to spread false allegations on mines as a sheer distortion and propaganda that was twice rejected by the International Court of Justice. Azerbaijan has consistently used the humanitarian demining activities to create a pretext to justify its aggressive actions against Armenia and numerous atrocity crimes. During the past four years, Armenia has unilaterally provided all available maps of mined areas in its possession as a humanitarian gesture. The Armenian side also has expressed readiness to support the decoding of the transferred maps in cooperation with international partners. By contrast, Azerbaijan continues to violate its obligations under the international humanitarian law and the orders of the International Court of Justice. The international community should be cognizant of the fact that the country hosting the COP-29 is yet to release the Armenian hostages held for more than one year in captivity and address the remaining humanitarian issues. At the same time, the issue of missing persons and enforced disappearances remains high on our agenda as well. There are more than 1,000 Armenians missing as a result of the conflict. We do believe that the issue of all missing persons should be addressed. The Armenian Relevant Commission on Missing Persons has numerously suggested to hold meetings to this end that were rejected by the Azerbaijani side. We call on Azerbaijan to abide by its illegal obligations under the international law and international humanitarian law, to release all the Armenian hostages held for more than one year in captivity, and to create a conducive environment for long-lasting regional peace and cooperation. We call upon the United Nations and its member states to firmly respond to the incompliance by Azerbaijan with its obligations, and ensure that the attempt of this country to whitewash gross violations of human rights and humanitarian law through holding international events will not be tolerated. Mr. President, The concept of so-called Western Azerbaijan reveals the territorial claims of Azerbaijan towards the sovereign territory of Armenia, including its capital. Through such fake historical contrasts and weaponizing history, Azerbaijan intends to create a pretext to continue its policy of use of force in the region. Through these manipulations, Azerbaijan attempts to distract the attention of the international community from the ethnic cleansing and forced displacement of 115,000 people, the entire indigenous population of Nagorno-Karabakh, from its ancestral homeland, one year ago. Interestingly, Azerbaijani ministers failed to mention that Azerbaijanis who left Armenia during the collapse of the Soviet Union did it voluntarily. Furthermore, they received compensations in comparison to 360,000 Armenians who were forced to leave their homes and property as a result of state-orchestrated pogroms in Baku, Sumgait, Kirovabad, and other cities of Azerbaijan. The baseless claims regarding cultural heritage are an attempt to divert attention from the destruction, desecration, appropriation of millennia-old Armenian cultural heritage. and acts of vandalism committed by Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh and prior to that in Nakhichevan. The delegation of Azerbaijan needs to be reminded that the International Court of Justice, in a legally binding order issued on 7 December 2021, mandated Azerbaijan to, and I quote, take all necessary measures to prevent and punish acts of vandalism and desecration towards Armenian cultural heritage, including churches and other places of worship, monuments, landmarks, cemeteries, and artifacts, end of the quote. Till now, Azerbaijan continues to deny the deployment of a UNESCO mission to conduct an inventory of the cultural property in Nagorno-Karabakh in an attempt to hide its state-led campaign of systemic destruction of the historic Armenian legacy of Nagorno-Karabakh. Following the ethnic cleansing and forced displacement of its entire indigenous population. And I thank you, Mr. President.

President: Thank you. I now call on the representative of the Philippines.

Philippines: Thank you, Mr. President. I wish to refer to the statement of a delegation referring to the South China Sea arbitration. We recall July 12, 2016, as the day that affirmed the community of nations that the role of law prevails and that stability, peace, and progress can only be attained when founded on a rules-based legal order on the oceans, as it should be everywhere else. The award and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS, are the twin anchors of the Philippines policy and actions on the West Philippine Sea. UNCLOS sets out the legal framework within which all activities in the oceans and seas must be carried out. There is no recourse to general international law on matters comprehensively covered by the UNCLOS. Compliance with UNCLOS, which represents a delicate balance of the rights and obligations of all states’ parties in its entirety, is key to ensuring global and regional peace and the fair and sustainable use of the oceans. The award, an affirmation of UNCLOS’ dispute resolution mechanisms, not only sets reason and right in the South China Sea, but is an inspiration for how matters should be considered through reason and right by states facing similarly challenging circumstances. It authoritatively ruled that the claim of historic rights to resources within the sea areas falling within the nine-dash line had no basis in law and is without legal effect. It upheld the Philippines’ sovereign rights and jurisdiction in its exclusive economic zone. It affirmed that certain actions within the Philippines’ EEZ violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights and were thus unlawful, that large-scale reclamation and construction of artificial islands caused severe environmental harm in violation of international conventions, that the large-scale harvesting of endangered marine species damaged the marine ecosystem, and that actions taken since the commencement of the arbitration had aggravated the disputes. These findings are no longer within the reach of denial and rebuttal, and are conclusive and they are indisputable. Mr. President, the award is final. We firmly reject attempts to undermine it, nay, even erase it from law, history and our collective memories. At the same time, we welcome the support of countries for the award. The award benefits the world across the board. We do not see it as directed at any other country, near or far. We see it as it should be seen, as favoring all which are similarly situated, by clarifying definitively a legal situation beyond the reach of arms to change. It puts this aspect of international law beyond the limit of prescription. And so we say once again, the present that we need and the future that we want is a peaceful South China Sea. The Philippines is committed to do this for as long as it exists. Thank you, Mr. President.

Azebaijan: Mutual recognition by their country and Azerbaijan of territorial integrity and inviolability of borders is a fundamental factor for establishing peace. However, we have heard no apology from Armenia for its persistent denial of this very principle for 30 years, as a result of which tens of thousands of people lost their lives. The genocide in Hoxhali and numerous other atrocities were committed against the Azerbaijani civilians. More than a million Azerbaijanis were expelled from their homes. and deprived of their property, and thousands of cities, towns, and villages in my country, not in Armenia, were plundered and razed to the ground. Indeed, it is ironic to hear accusations from Armenia, which violated every norm and principle of international law, and whose agenda throughout the past conflict was to read the formerly occupied territories of their Azerbaijani inhabitants by force, to prevent their return and to replace them with ethnic Armenians, thereby seeking to colonize these territories by changing their demography and character. The international community condemned these actions, qualifying them as amounting to ethnic cleansing and a scorched-earth policy. The counter-offensive operation and the local counterterrorism measures carried out by Azerbaijan in the fall of 2020 and in September last year, respectively, put an end to the unlawful occupation of its territories and ensured the restoration of my country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Azerbaijan fought not against a fictitious entity of civilian residence, as Armenia falsely claims, but against the regular armed forces of Armenia, as well as terrorist and mercenary groups under its command and control deployed in the then-occupied territories of Azerbaijan. The common in all actions that Azerbaijan was compelled to take in response to Armenia’s repeated unlawful use of force was their compliance with international law. the UN Charter, and the relevant resolutions of the Security Council. As to the residents who decided to migrate to Armenia or other countries, it was their choice, although Azerbaijan, by all available means, encouraged them to stay. If Armenia is genuinely interested in finding out the reasons of this, then it should look for their roots in its notorious doctrine of ethnic incompatibility, which it sought to impose as a model for our peoples to live next to each other, but not together. Set against the claims made by the representative of Armenia, the United Nations interagency mission that visited the region refuted the allegations that the local residents and their property were targeted during the security measures or thereafter. Another false assertion is that Azerbaijan holds Armenian hostages. There are no Armenian hostages in Azerbaijan. While those held accountable for war crimes, terrorist activity, and other serious offenses committed during the conflict do not enjoy such status by definition, these measures are fully consistent with the legislation and international obligations of Azerbaijan. This feigned concern for cultural property is easily exposed by numerous facts of destruction, desecration, and appropriation of Azerbaijani cultural heritage, both in Armenia itself and in the territories of Azerbaijan when they were under occupation. Armenia’s allegations about Azerbaijan’s territorial claims against Armenia are equally groundless, as they totally ignore the simple fact that, despite the ruinous consequences of the aggression, occupation and mass atrocities endured by the people of my country, it was Azerbaijan that extended the hand of peace and initiated the process of normalizing relations with Armenia based on mutual recognition and respect for each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It is due to Azerbaijan’s determined and consistent efforts that significant progress has been made in the bilateral negotiations on the draft peace agreement and the delimitation of the border between the two states over the past four years. The return of Azerbaijanis to their historical homeland in Armenia is a human right, not a territorial claim. Mr. Chairman, with the end of the conflict, the historical opportunity has indeed emerged for a long-awaited peace in our region. However, the challenges remain. During this High-Level Week, we have once again witnessed Armenia’s refusal to take practical steps at the national level to root out territorial claims from a number of its legal and political acts, and especially from its constitution, which laid the basis for the sustained denial of the principle of the inviolability of borders and ultimately underpinned the aggression against Azerbaijan in the past, and which constitute the main obstacle. to the normalization of interstate relations today. While the delegation of Armenians of view that there are no territorial claims against Azerbaijan in their constitution, the same constitution, however, proclaims that the Declaration of Independence of Armenia, which is based on the early act of annexation of part of the territory of Azerbaijan, enshrines the fundamental principles of the Armenian statehood and the nationwide objectives. If this is not a territorial claim, then what is it? Consequently, what Armenia is required to do as the main prerequisite for signing a viable and sustainable peace agreement is to bring its rhetoric about territorial integrity and inviolability of borders in conformity with general respect for these principles in its policies, practice, and laws, including in the first place by prior modification of its constitution. The unacceptable comments just made by the representative of Armenia, along with the ongoing anti-Azerbaijani smear campaign, including through some third countries, pseudo-experts, lobbyists, diaspora, and NGOs aligned with shared xenophobic aspirations, clearly contradict Armenia’s statements about its interests in creating an environment conducive to moving the peace process forward. Therefore, Armenia must demonstrate not only in words, but mainly in real deeds. that it is genuinely committed to international law and the peace agenda. Peace is indeed within reach. However, for this to happen, there is a pressing need to address the remaining issues responsibly and to legally ensure that a return to the past of irredentism and aggression is excluded forever. I thank you.

President: Thank you. I give now the floor to the representative of China for a second intervention.

China: Thank you, Mr. President. In response to a statement made by the delegate of the Philippines, China is compelled to make another response. China does not accept or recognize the so-called South China Sea Arbitration. This is precisely for the preservation of the international maritime rule of law. UNCLOS does not represent the entirety of international maritime law. The arbitration initiated by the Philippines boils down to the issue of territorial claims, which are not subject to regulation by the UNCLOS. The so-called arbitration award contains many grave fallacies with regard to issues such as historical rights, the outlying archipelago of continental states, as well as the regime of islands. For example, according to the ruling, the biggest island in Nansha Jundao, the Taipingdao, has been characterized as a rock. Such a fallacious ruling seriously undermines the credibility of the dispute resolution mechanism.

Philippines: With respect to the earlier intervention made, allow me to reaffirm. The 2016 South China Sea arbitration is a testament to the Philippines’ unwavering commitment to the rule of law and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Over the years, the Philippines has continued to demonstrate this commitment to peace even in the face of the unlawful actions which have caused serious incidents in the South China Sea, without ever diminishing our resolve to protect and promote our people’s interests and the full and responsible enjoyment of our legally settled maritime entitlements and its accompanying rights and jurisdictions. This determination has only been strengthened by the broadening affirmation of the legal value of the award as a positive and legitimate source of international law. We are encouraged by the expressions of support made by other states that confirm the final unbinding status of the award, including the G7’s consistent reaffirmation that it is a significant milestone and a useful basis for the peaceful management of and resolution of differences at sea. Thank you, Mr. President.

President: Thank you, colleagues. That was the last statement and the exercise of the right of reply. We will continue the general debate on Monday, 30th of September, at 9 a.m. in this hall. Have a good evening. This meeting is adjourned.

F

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia

Speech speed

135 words per minute

Speech length

2057 words

Speech time

911 seconds

Calls for ceasefire and peaceful resolution in Gaza and Middle East

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the need for an immediate ceasefire and cessation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip, Lebanon, and the Red Sea region. He stresses the importance of addressing the root causes of these conflicts by ending the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories.

Evidence

The speaker mentions hosting the joint Arab-Israeli summit in November 2023 and working to adopt resolutions to stop the bloodshed and ensure humanitarian access.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Disagreed with

Francis Fonseca – Belize

Disagreed on

Approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict

L

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Condemns Russia’s aggression against Ukraine

Explanation

The speaker strongly condemns Russia’s full-scale aggression against Ukraine, which has continued for more than two years. He emphasizes that this action poses a blatant challenge to the international order based on the rule of law.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Emphasizes need for equitable climate action

Explanation

The speaker stresses the importance of addressing the climate crisis and calls for more ambitious reductions in emissions. He emphasizes the need for increased support for climate change adaptation and scaling up of climate financing.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Denmark’s commitment to meet the UN target of providing 0.7% of gross national income for official development assistance.

Major Discussion Point

Sustainable Development and Climate Change

Agreed with

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Agreed on

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

M

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

1545 words

Speech time

801 seconds

Advocates for strengthening UN Security Council and peacekeeping

Explanation

The speaker calls for reforms to make the UN Security Council better equipped and strengthened in its capacity to discharge its responsibilities. He emphasizes the need for the Security Council to be representative, democratic, and accountable to all member states.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the Common Africa position as enshrined in the Ezulwini Consensus and the CETA declaration.

Major Discussion Point

UN Reform and Multilateralism

Agreed with

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Maris Sangiampongsa – Thailand

Agreed on

UN Security Council Reform

Highlights efforts to achieve SDGs and combat climate change

Explanation

The speaker discusses Zambia’s efforts to implement the SDGs and set an example for others to follow. He mentions Zambia’s commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and working on its 1.5 Celsius aligned NDC.

Evidence

The speaker cites Zambia’s GDP rising four times in less than two decades and poverty reduction from 49% to 5%.

Major Discussion Point

Sustainable Development and Climate Change

Agreed with

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Agreed on

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

O

Olushegun Adjadi Bakari – Benin

Speech speed

123 words per minute

Speech length

1481 words

Speech time

720 seconds

Criticizes Western interference in the Sahel region

Explanation

The speaker condemns attempts to make the Sahel into a new epicentre of geopolitical struggle. He argues that such interference provides fertile ground for terrorism and undermines regional stability.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Advocates for sustainable development in Africa

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the importance of eradicating poverty in Africa and tapping into the continent’s potential. He calls for recognizing the efforts of African nations striving for development and taking their future into their own hands.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Benin’s reforms in education, healthcare, and infrastructure under President Patrice Talon’s leadership.

Major Discussion Point

Sustainable Development and Climate Change

M

Maxim Ryzhenkov – Belarus

Speech speed

153 words per minute

Speech length

2625 words

Speech time

1025 seconds

Supports peaceful resolution of conflicts through dialogue

Explanation

The speaker advocates for resolving conflicts through dialogue and peaceful means. He emphasizes the importance of respecting international law and the UN Charter in addressing global challenges.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Belarus’s efforts to promote peace in Ukraine, including hosting negotiations in Minsk.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Y

Yamazaki Kazuyuki – Japan

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

2266 words

Speech time

1066 seconds

Emphasizes need for nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation

Explanation

The speaker stresses the importance of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation efforts. He highlights Japan’s initiatives to promote these goals and calls for strengthened international cooperation in this area.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Japan’s hosting of a high-level meeting to launch the Friends of FMCT and its efforts to promote understanding of the realities of nuclear weapons use.

Major Discussion Point

International Peace and Security

Emphasizes importance of inclusive global governance

Explanation

The speaker calls for strengthening governance at both national and international levels as a foundation for uniting the international community. He stresses the importance of inclusive societies where youth, future generations, and women can thrive.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Japan’s initiatives to nurture the next generation of leaders in the field of gender and promote youth participation.

Major Discussion Point

UN Reform and Multilateralism

J

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

2342 words

Speech time

1043 seconds

Calls for reform of UN Security Council

Explanation

The speaker advocates for urgent progress on UN Security Council reforms. He emphasizes the need for a more representative and effective Security Council that reflects the realities of the international community.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the majority of member states, including African groups, calling for the expansion of both permanent and non-permanent membership of the Council.

Major Discussion Point

UN Reform and Multilateralism

Agreed with

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Maris Sangiampongsa – Thailand

Agreed on

UN Security Council Reform

Calls for climate finance and support for developing countries

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the need for climate finance and support for developing countries to address climate change. He calls for a fair and ambitious new collective quantified goal on climate finance at COP29.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Azerbaijan’s initiatives as the incoming COP29 presidency, including the establishment of the Climate Finance Action Fund.

Major Discussion Point

Sustainable Development and Climate Change

Agreed with

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Agreed on

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Discusses normalization of relations with Armenia

Explanation

The speaker addresses the process of normalizing relations with Armenia following the end of the conflict. He emphasizes Azerbaijan’s efforts to achieve peace and calls on Armenia to take practical steps to remove territorial claims from its legal and political acts.

Evidence

The speaker mentions progress made in bilateral negotiations on the draft peace agreement and the delimitation of the border between the two states over the past four years.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Bilateral Relations

M

Maris Sangiampongsa – Thailand

Speech speed

98 words per minute

Speech length

1489 words

Speech time

903 seconds

Advocates for strengthening multilateralism and UN system

Explanation

The speaker reaffirms Thailand’s support for a rule-based, multilateral system with the United Nations at its core. He calls for the UN to be agile and adaptable to new and emerging threats to remain relevant.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Thailand’s support for comprehensive reforms of global governance and the United Nations, including the Security Council.

Major Discussion Point

UN Reform and Multilateralism

Agreed with

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Agreed on

UN Security Council Reform

T

Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd – Iceland

Speech speed

135 words per minute

Speech length

2511 words

Speech time

1113 seconds

Supports UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the multilateral system and upholding the principles of the UN Charter. She stresses the need for more interaction and unscripted interactions at the highest level to maintain and strengthen the multilateral system.

Major Discussion Point

UN Reform and Multilateralism

Advocates for women’s rights and gender equality

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the importance of women’s and girls’ participation in all aspects of society. She highlights Iceland’s efforts to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Iceland’s resolution on women, disarmament, non-proliferation, and arms control, which they have tabled biannually since 2010.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Equality

A

Amery Browne – Trinidad and Tobago

Speech speed

98 words per minute

Speech length

2779 words

Speech time

1695 seconds

Calls for lifting of embargo against Cuba

Explanation

The speaker expresses solidarity with the people of Cuba and calls for the unconditional lifting of the economic, commercial, and financial embargo against Cuba. He argues that the embargo severely undermines Cuba’s prospects for economic stability, growth, and sustainable development.

Evidence

The speaker mentions that the embargo has been in place for more than six decades and has only resulted in pain and suffering for ordinary Cuban people.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Bilateral Relations

Discusses rights of people of African descent

Explanation

The speaker addresses the issue of reparatory justice for the history of chattel slavery and native genocide in the Caribbean. He emphasizes the need for restitution for historical injustices and their ongoing effects.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Trinidad and Tobago’s appointment of a reconstituted National Committee on Reparations to support the CARICOM Reparations Commission.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Equality

F

Francis Fonseca – Belize

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Calls for self-determination for Palestinians

Explanation

The speaker rejects the continued denial of self-determination for the Palestinian people and calls for the eradication of the system of colonial domination and apartheid imposed upon them. He emphasizes the need for a two-state solution and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Belize’s statement to the International Court of Justice in the recent advisory opinion on the matter.

Major Discussion Point

Human Rights and Equality

Disagreed with

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia

Disagreed on

Approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict

P

Philippines

Speech speed

124 words per minute

Speech length

644 words

Speech time

309 seconds

Addresses South China Sea dispute and arbitration ruling

Explanation

The speaker reaffirms the Philippines’ commitment to the 2016 South China Sea arbitration ruling. He emphasizes the importance of the ruling in clarifying maritime entitlements and rights in the region.

Evidence

The speaker mentions the G7’s consistent reaffirmation of the ruling as a significant milestone and useful basis for peaceful management of differences at sea.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Bilateral Relations

Disagreed with

China

Disagreed on

South China Sea dispute

E

Ethiopia

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

582 words

Speech time

287 seconds

Discusses Nile River water rights

Explanation

The speaker addresses the issue of water rights and usage of the Nile River. He emphasizes Ethiopia’s right to use its water resources for development while advocating for cooperation based on international law and equitable utilization.

Evidence

The speaker mentions Ethiopia’s construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and its contribution of 85% of the flow to the Nile.

Major Discussion Point

Regional Issues and Bilateral Relations

Disagreed on

Nile River water rights

Agreements

Agreement Points

UN Security Council Reform

Speakers

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Maris Sangiampongsa – Thailand

Arguments

Advocates for strengthening UN Security Council and peacekeeping

Calls for reform of UN Security Council

Advocates for strengthening multilateralism and UN system

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized the need for reforming the UN Security Council to make it more representative, effective, and accountable to all member states.

Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Speakers

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Arguments

Emphasizes need for equitable climate action

Highlights efforts to achieve SDGs and combat climate change

Calls for climate finance and support for developing countries

Summary

Several speakers stressed the importance of addressing climate change, achieving sustainable development goals, and providing support for developing countries in these efforts.

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers emphasized the importance of peaceful conflict resolution and adherence to international law in various global conflicts.

Speakers

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Maxim Ryzhenkov – Belarus

Arguments

Calls for ceasefire and peaceful resolution in Gaza and Middle East

Condemns Russia’s aggression against Ukraine

Supports peaceful resolution of conflicts through dialogue

Both speakers stressed the importance of strengthening multilateral cooperation and inclusive governance at the global level.

Speakers

Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd – Iceland

Yamazaki Kazuyuki – Japan

Arguments

Supports UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation

Emphasizes importance of inclusive global governance

Unexpected Consensus

Recognition of historical injustices and their ongoing effects

Speakers

Amery Browne – Trinidad and Tobago

Olushegun Adjadi Bakari – Benin

Arguments

Discusses rights of people of African descent

Advocates for sustainable development in Africa

Explanation

While representing different regions, both speakers highlighted the need to address historical injustices and their ongoing effects on people of African descent and African development, showing an unexpected alignment on this issue.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement among speakers included the need for UN Security Council reform, addressing climate change and sustainable development, peaceful conflict resolution, and strengthening multilateral cooperation.

Consensus level

There was a moderate level of consensus on broad principles such as the importance of multilateralism, peaceful conflict resolution, and sustainable development. However, specific approaches and regional issues showed more divergence. This level of consensus suggests potential for cooperation on global challenges, but also highlights the need for continued dialogue and negotiation on specific implementation strategies and regional concerns.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict

Speakers

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia

Francis Fonseca – Belize

Arguments

Calls for ceasefire and peaceful resolution in Gaza and Middle East

Calls for self-determination for Palestinians

Summary

While both speakers advocate for a resolution to the conflict, Saudi Arabia emphasizes the need for an immediate ceasefire and peaceful resolution, while Belize more strongly condemns Israel’s actions and calls for the eradication of what it terms a system of colonial domination and apartheid.

South China Sea dispute

Speakers

China

Philippines

Arguments

Addresses South China Sea dispute and arbitration ruling

Summary

China rejects the 2016 South China Sea arbitration ruling, while the Philippines reaffirms its commitment to the ruling and emphasizes its importance in clarifying maritime entitlements and rights in the region.

Nile River water rights

Speakers

Ethiopia

Arguments

Discusses Nile River water rights

Summary

Ethiopia asserts its right to use Nile River water resources for development, particularly through the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, while implying disagreement with Egypt’s position on water rights and usage.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement among speakers centered on regional issues such as the Israel-Palestine conflict, the South China Sea dispute, and Nile River water rights. There was also variation in approaches to climate action and UN reform, though these showed more partial agreement than outright disagreement.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among speakers was moderate. While there were clear differences on some regional issues, there was also significant common ground on broader global challenges such as climate change and the need for UN reform. These disagreements reflect the complex nature of international relations and the differing priorities of nations based on their geographical, economic, and political contexts. The implications of these disagreements suggest ongoing challenges in resolving regional conflicts and achieving consensus on global governance issues, but also indicate potential areas for cooperation and negotiation.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agree on the importance of addressing climate change and achieving sustainable development goals. However, they differ in their emphasis, with Denmark focusing on ambitious emissions reductions, Zambia highlighting national efforts, and Azerbaijan calling for increased climate finance for developing countries.

Speakers

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Arguments

Emphasizes need for equitable climate action

Highlights efforts to achieve SDGs and combat climate change

Calls for climate finance and support for developing countries

All speakers agree on the need for UN reform, particularly of the Security Council. However, they may have different specific proposals or priorities for how this reform should be implemented.

Speakers

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Jeyhun Aziz oglu Bayramov – Azerbaijan

Maris Sangiampongsa – Thailand

Arguments

Advocates for strengthening UN Security Council and peacekeeping

Calls for reform of UN Security Council

Advocates for strengthening multilateralism and UN system

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers emphasized the importance of peaceful conflict resolution and adherence to international law in various global conflicts.

Speakers

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia

Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Maxim Ryzhenkov – Belarus

Arguments

Calls for ceasefire and peaceful resolution in Gaza and Middle East

Condemns Russia’s aggression against Ukraine

Supports peaceful resolution of conflicts through dialogue

Both speakers stressed the importance of strengthening multilateral cooperation and inclusive governance at the global level.

Speakers

Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd – Iceland

Yamazaki Kazuyuki – Japan

Arguments

Supports UN Charter principles and multilateral cooperation

Emphasizes importance of inclusive global governance

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

There are widespread calls for strengthening multilateralism and reforming the UN system, especially the Security Council, to better address global challenges.

Many countries emphasized the need for peaceful resolution of conflicts, including in Ukraine, Gaza, and other regions.

Climate change and sustainable development remain top priorities, with calls for increased climate finance and support for developing countries.

Regional issues and bilateral relations, such as the South China Sea dispute and Armenia-Azerbaijan normalization, were prominent topics of discussion.

Human rights, gender equality, and self-determination were highlighted as important global issues by several speakers.

Resolutions and Action Items

Adoption of the Pact for the Future, which outlines a roadmap for enhancing international cooperation

Commitment to implement the Global Digital Compact

Azerbaijan to host COP29 in 2024, focusing on climate finance as a top priority

Japan to launch a program to nurture the next generation of leaders in the field of gender

Benin adopted a law granting nationality to people of African descent

Unresolved Issues

Ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and other regions

Reform of the UN Security Council

Equitable distribution of climate finance

South China Sea territorial disputes

Palestinian statehood and self-determination

Nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation efforts

Suggested Compromises

Two-state solution for Israel-Palestine conflict

Peaceful negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan for normalization of relations

Equitable and reasonable utilization of Nile River resources among riparian countries

Balanced discussions on lethal autonomous weapon systems, considering both humanitarian and security perspectives

Thought Provoking Comments

The world is seeing a high pace of crises and unfortunately we are just looking at managing these crises rather than finding concrete solutions. This is a situation of laxism in international efforts and also a situation of selectivity in the application of international law and international humanitarian law which has led to an exacerbation of violence and conflicts and is threatening the principles of the UN Charter and undermining common actions to find peaceful solutions.

Speaker

Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud – Saudi Arabia

Reason

This comment insightfully critiques the international community’s approach to crisis management, highlighting a lack of proactive problem-solving and selective application of international law.

Impact

It set a critical tone for the discussion, prompting other speakers to address the need for more effective international cooperation and consistent application of international law.

We used to say that our future depends on it, but now we have to say that our existence depends on it. It is very well established and accepted that there can be no sustainable development without peace.

Speaker

Amery Browne – Trinidad and Tobago

Reason

This statement powerfully emphasizes the urgency of addressing global challenges and the intrinsic link between peace and sustainable development.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards the critical importance of peace as a prerequisite for addressing other global issues, influencing subsequent speakers to address this connection.

Digital technologies have the power to transform the future of the world, thereby making digital cooperation an essential part of protecting and enhancing human dignity. Among such digital technologies, there is an urgent need to establish international governance on artificial intelligence in order to maximize the opportunities brought by AI while mitigating its risks.

Speaker

Yamazaki Kazuyuki – Japan

Reason

This comment highlights the transformative potential of digital technologies while also recognizing the need for international governance, particularly in AI.

Impact

It introduced a forward-looking perspective on technological governance into the discussion, prompting consideration of how to balance innovation with responsible regulation.

The concept of so-called Western Azerbaijan reveals the territorial claims of Azerbaijan towards the sovereign territory of Armenia, including its capital. Through such fake historical contrasts and weaponizing history, Azerbaijan intends to create a pretext to continue its policy of use of force in the region.

Speaker

Armenia

Reason

This statement brings attention to how historical narratives can be manipulated to justify territorial claims and aggression.

Impact

It sparked a heated exchange between Armenia and Azerbaijan, highlighting the complexity of long-standing regional conflicts and the challenges of achieving peace.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting critical global challenges, from crisis management and the importance of peace for sustainable development to the need for governance in emerging technologies. They also brought attention to ongoing regional conflicts and the complexities involved in resolving them. The discussion evolved from broad global concerns to specific regional issues, demonstrating the interconnected nature of international relations and the diverse challenges facing the global community. The exchanges, particularly between conflicting nations, underscored the difficulties in achieving consensus and the persistent tensions that the UN must navigate in its pursuit of global peace and cooperation.

Follow-up Questions

How can the UN Security Council be reformed to be more representative and effective?

Speaker

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Explanation

The speaker emphasized the need for Security Council reform to make it more representative of developing countries and better equipped to address current global challenges.

What steps can be taken to operationalize and capitalize the Loss and Damage Fund for climate change?

Speaker

Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia

Explanation

The speaker highlighted the importance of making this fund functional to address climate change impacts on vulnerable nations.

How can the international community support the implementation of the Multinational Security Support Mission in Haiti?

Speaker

Amery Browne – Trinidad and Tobago

Explanation

The speaker called for increased international support, particularly funding, for this mission to address the security crisis in Haiti.

What measures can be taken to reform the international financial architecture to better support developing countries?

Speaker

Multiple speakers including Mulambo Hamakuni Haimbe – Zambia and Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark

Explanation

Several speakers emphasized the need for reforming global financial institutions to be more inclusive and responsive to the needs of developing nations.

How can the international community effectively address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and work towards a two-state solution?

Speaker

Multiple speakers including Lars Løkke Rasmussen – Denmark and Thórdís Kolbrún Reykfjörd – Iceland

Explanation

Many speakers expressed concern about the situation in Gaza and called for renewed efforts towards a peaceful resolution and a two-state solution.

What steps can be taken to strengthen global governance on artificial intelligence?

Speaker

Yamazaki Kazuyuki – Japan

Explanation

The speaker highlighted the urgent need to establish international governance on AI to maximize opportunities while mitigating risks.

How can the international community support the peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea?

Speaker

Multiple speakers including representatives from China and the Philippines

Explanation

The conflicting claims and interpretations regarding the South China Sea arbitration suggest a need for further diplomatic efforts and research on peaceful dispute resolution mechanisms.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.