The European Commission has concluded its preliminary investigation into social media platform X and is poised to decide on a fine amounting to millions of euros, according to reports from Germany’s Handelsblatt newspaper. The probe’s findings and implications are expected to be revealed soon.
The investigation, conducted under the European Union‘s strict digital regulations, signals the bloc’s commitment to ensuring compliance from major tech companies operating within Europe. Details about the specific breaches or concerns raised during the probe have not yet been disclosed.
The European Commission has not commented on the report. The decision to impose a substantial fine would mark a significant move in enforcing its Digital Services Act, aimed at holding tech platforms accountable.
The European Commission has invited major social media platforms, including Facebook, TikTok, and X, to participate in a “stress test” on 31 January to assess their efforts in combating disinformation ahead of Germany‘s election next month. The test is part of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which requires companies to implement measures mitigating risks on their platforms. Similar tests were successfully conducted for the European Parliament elections last year.
EU spokesperson Thomas Regnier explained that the exercise would involve various scenarios to evaluate how platforms respond to potential challenges under the DSA. Senior compliance officers and specialists from companies such as Microsoft, LinkedIn, Google, Snap, and Meta have been invited to collaborate with German authorities in the closed-door session.
TikTok has confirmed its participation, while other platforms have yet to comment. The initiative underscores the European Union‘s commitment to ensuring transparency and accountability from tech giants in safeguarding democratic processes during elections.
Germany’s interior minister, Nancy Faeser, has called on social media companies to take stronger action against disinformation ahead of the federal parliamentary election on 23 February. Faeser urged platforms like YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, X, and TikTok to label AI-manipulated videos, clearly identify political advertising, and ensure compliance with European laws. She also emphasised the need for platforms to report and remove criminal content swiftly, including death threats.
Faeser met with representatives of major tech firms to underline the importance of transparency in algorithms, warning against the risk of online radicalisation, particularly among young people. Her concerns come amidst growing fears of disinformation campaigns, possibly originating from Russia, that could influence the upcoming election. She reiterated that platforms must ensure they do not fuel societal division through unchecked content.
Calls for greater accountability in the tech industry are gaining momentum. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez criticised social media owners for enabling algorithms that erode democracy and “poison society.” Faeser’s warnings highlight the growing international demand for stronger regulations on social media to safeguard democratic processes.
South Sudan has suspended access to social media platforms for at least 30 days following violent riots triggered by videos allegedly showing the killings of South Sudanese nationals in Sudan’s El Gezira state. The decision, announced by the National Communications Authority on Wednesday, aims to curb the spread of extreme content and prevent further unrest. Mobile operators MTN South Sudan and Zain confirmed that platforms like Facebook and TikTok would be inaccessible for up to 90 days.
The riots, which erupted in the capital, Juba and other cities, led to the deaths of at least 16 Sudanese nationals. Angry youths looted shops, vandalised property, and burned homes belonging to Sudanese nationals, believing Sudan’s military and its allies were involved in the El Gezira killings. South Sudanese authorities have condemned the violence, urging calm and restraint.
The Sudanese army has also criticised what it described as ‘individual violations’ in El Gezira. The social media ban is part of a broader effort to restore order and prevent further acts of retaliation, as tensions remain high between the neighbouring nations.
Instagram has been facing backlash after a technical issue caused search results for the terms ‘Democrat’ and ‘Democrats’ to be hidden. Users searching for these terms have encountered a message stating that the results may contain sensitive content. In contrast, hashtags such as ‘Republican’ continue to display posts without such issues. Meta, the parent company of Instagram, has stated that the problem is not politically motivated, as it has also affected other political hashtags.
Social media experts have warned that the glitch could harm Meta’s reputation, particularly in a highly partisan political climate. Matt Navarra, a social media consultant, described the situation as embarrassing for Instagram, suggesting it could fuel conspiracy theories and further divisions among users. Meta has confirmed it is working urgently to fix the issue.
This incident comes at a time of increased scrutiny over Meta’s handling of political content on its platforms. The company has faced criticism from various sides of the political spectrum, and its recent changes to content moderation policies have attracted further attention.
President Donald Trump’s executive order delaying the enforcement of a US TikTok ban has created new legal uncertainties for the platform and its service providers, including Google and Apple. Signed on Monday, the order pauses for 75 days a law requiring TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest the app over national security concerns.
While the order directs the Justice Department to halt enforcement and assures app distributors of no liability during the review period, legal experts warn that the promise offers little protection. Courts do not consider executive orders binding, and Trump could alter or selectively enforce the policy at any time, potentially exposing companies to massive penalties.
The ban, passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court days before Trump’s order, imposes steep fines of $5,000 per user for violations, making compliance a high-stakes gamble for service providers. Critics argue that the legal ambiguity could also open companies to shareholder lawsuits if they ignore the ban based solely on Trump’s directive.
Trump’s move has reignited tensions between the White House and lawmakers, who overwhelmingly supported the ban over fears of Chinese influence. The coming weeks may bring further legal battles and political manoeuvring as the future of TikTok in the US hangs in the balance.
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday aimed at safeguarding free speech and ending online censorship. The move comes amid allegations by Trump and Republican allies that the Biden administration suppressed speech on social media platforms. Critics argue, however, that many of these accusations centred on government actions against misinformation about vaccines and elections, which courts have upheld as lawful.
Despite his push for free speech protections, Trump’s history complicates the message. Over the years, he has threatened and sued critics, including journalists, political opponents, and media organisations. Most notably, his lawsuits against Hillary Clinton and several major media outlets have either been dismissed or remain unresolved. Additionally, Trump faced social media restrictions following the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, which was fueled by false election claims.
Legal experts, such as David Kaye, have dismissed Trump’s order as symbolic. Kaye criticised the move as contradictory, pointing to Trump’s labelling of the press as the “enemy of the people” while claiming to champion free speech. He argued the federal government is already prohibited from interfering with First Amendment rights, rendering the order largely redundant.
Spanish Labour Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Díaz announced her decision to leave Elon Musk’s social media platform X, citing concerns over its promotion of xenophobia and far-right ideologies. In a TV interview, Díaz criticised Musk’s behaviour during events linked to Donald Trump’s inauguration, as well as his recent speeches and gestures, which some interpreted as controversial.
Díaz’s departure follows backlash against Musk for raising his arm in a gesture at an inauguration-related event. While critics compared it to a Nazi salute, the Anti-Defamation League dismissed the claim, calling it an awkward moment of enthusiasm. Musk himself rejected the criticism as baseless.
The Spanish minister said her decision extends to personal and political posts and noted that members of her left-wing Sumar party would also leave the platform. This move aligns with other recent departures, including Germany’s Defence and Foreign Ministries, which cited dissatisfaction with X’s direction, joining universities in Germany and the UK in distancing themselves from the platform.
Donald Trump has approved a 75-day delay in banning TikTok in the US through an executive order signed on Monday 20 January. The popular video app, owned by China’s ByteDance, faced potential closure due to national security concerns, but Trump suggested the US government should take a 50% stake in TikTok’s US business to secure its future. He also warned of possible tariffs on China if Beijing failed to endorse a deal.
The executive order, announced hours after Trump’s inauguration, sparked legal and political debates about its validity. Congress had previously mandated ByteDance to divest TikTok, a law upheld by the Supreme Court. Critics, including Representative Frank Pallone, argued Trump’s order bypassed bipartisan legislation. ByteDance has not confirmed any binding agreements to sell TikTok, leaving uncertainty over the app’s fate.
Tensions between the US and China underpin the TikTok saga, with Trump’s proposal for government ownership raising eyebrows. The idea would set a precedent, as no major social media platform has faced a ban or such a demand before. While Trump credited TikTok for engaging younger voters, his earlier efforts to ban the app had failed.
China expressed openness to discussions, emphasising that companies should make independent decisions about operations. Meanwhile, Trump’s order directed the Justice Department to assure companies like Google and Apple of no penalties during the delay. Whether the app will return to US app stores remains uncertain as talks continue.
Major tech platforms, including Facebook, YouTube, and X, have pledged to strengthen efforts to combat online hate speech under an updated European Union code of conduct. The revised framework, part of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), mandates stricter measures to reduce illegal and harmful content online.
Companies will collaborate with public and non-profit experts to monitor their responses to hate speech notifications, aiming to review at least two-thirds within 24 hours. Advanced detection tools and transparency regarding recommendation systems will also play key roles in reducing the reach of harmful content before removal.
The EU plans to track compliance closely, requiring platforms to provide country-specific data on hate speech classifications, including race, gender identity, and religion. These measures align with broader efforts to ensure accountability in tech governance.
EU officials emphasised that adherence to the revised code will influence regulatory enforcement under the DSA, marking a significant step in the battle against online hate.
