South Korean court reinstates Han Duck-soo as acting president

Prime Minister Han Duck-soo has been reinstated as South Korea’s acting president after the Constitutional Court struck down his impeachment in a seven-to-one ruling.

Han, who briefly held the position before being suspended in December, pledged to stabilise the country and prioritise national interests amid rising tensions over US trade policies.

The court’s decision returns Han to power during a time of heightened political instability, sparked by President Yoon Suk Yeol’s controversial declaration of martial law last year.

Yoon’s actions led to mass protests and a wave of impeachments, resignations, and criminal charges across the political spectrum.

While Yoon awaits a separate ruling and trial over charges of leading an insurrection, Han expressed gratitude to the court and vowed to put an end to ‘extreme confrontation in politics.’

As one of South Korea’s most experienced officials, Han’s return is seen as a move towards continuity in governance. He has served under five presidents from both major parties and is regarded as a figure capable of bridging political divides.

Despite opposition criticism that he failed to prevent Yoon’s martial law move, Han denied any wrongdoing and has committed to guiding South Korea through external economic challenges, especially those posed by the United States.

The court’s pending decision on President Yoon’s fate remains a focal point of national attention. Lee Jae-myung, leader of the opposition Democratic Party and a potential successor, has urged the court to act swiftly to end the uncertainty.

With rallies continuing across the country both in favour of and against Yoon, the outcome could trigger a snap election within 60 days if the president is removed.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Whistle-blower claims Meta is hindering legislative engagement

Former Facebook executive turned whistle-blower Sarah Wynn-Williams says Meta is preventing her from speaking to lawmakers about her experiences at the company following the release of her memoir Careless People. Meta filed for emergency arbitration the day her book was published, claiming it violated a non-disparagement agreement she signed upon leaving.

An arbitrator then temporarily barred her from promoting the book or making any critical remarks about Meta. As a result, Wynn-Williams says she cannot respond to requests from US, UK, and the EU lawmakers who want to speak with her about serious public interest issues raised in her memoir.

These include Meta’s alleged ties with the Chinese government and the platform’s impact on teenage girls. Her lawyers argue the arbitration order unfairly blocks her from contributing to ongoing investigations and legislative inquiries.

Meta maintains it does not intend to interfere with Wynn-Williams’ legal rights and insists the claims in her book are outdated or false. The company also points out that she can still file complaints with government agencies.

Wynn-Williams has filed whistle-blower complaints with the SEC and the Department of Justice. Her memoir, which describes internal controversies at Meta — including sexual harassment claims and the company’s ambitions in China — debuted on the New York Times best-seller list.

Despite Meta’s legal pushback, her legal team argues that silencing her voice is a disservice to the public and lawmakers working to address the social media giant’s influence and accountability.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

RFE/RL sues Trump administration over grant cuts

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), the US-funded news outlet established during the Cold War to reach people under Communist regimes, filed a lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s administration on Tuesday.

The lawsuit aims to block the termination of its federal grant, which was recently cut by the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM).

The cuts affect not only RFE/RL, which broadcasts to Eastern Europe, Russia, and Ukraine, but also Radio Free Asia, which serves China and North Korea.

The decision to cut funding has been widely criticized by press freedom advocates and human rights organizations. Additionally, over 1,300 employees of Voice of America were placed on leave after Trump ordered cuts across USAGM and several other federal agencies.

In its lawsuit, RFE/RL argued that terminating the grant violates federal laws, including the US Constitution, which grants Congress the exclusive authority over federal spending.

RFE/RL President and CEO Stephen Capus called the move a dangerous step towards ceding influence to adversaries’ propaganda and censorship. The case was filed in US District Court for the District of Columbia.

While the Trump administration justified the cuts as part of its broader cost-reduction efforts, the action has drawn backlash from those who view it as an attack on free speech and independent journalism.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Meta cracks down on misinformation in Australia

Meta Platforms has announced new measures to combat misinformation and deepfakes in Australia ahead of the country’s upcoming national election.

The company’s independent fact-checking program, supported by Agence France-Presse and the Australian Associated Press, will detect and limit misleading content, while also removing any material that could incite violence or interfere with voting.

Deepfakes, AI-generated media designed to appear real, will also face stricter scrutiny. Meta stated that any content violating its policies would be removed or labelled as ‘altered’ to reduce its visibility.

Users sharing AI-generated content will be encouraged to disclose its origin, aiming to improve transparency.

Meta’s Australian policy follows similar strategies used in elections across India, the UK and the US.

The company is also navigating regulatory challenges in the country, including a proposed levy on big tech firms profiting from local news content and new requirements to enforce a ban on users under 16 by the end of the year.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

House Committee pushes Google to restore free speech on YouTube

Rep. Jim Jordan, Chairman of the US House Judiciary Committee, has subpoenaed Alphabet, the parent company of Google, demanding documents that show whether YouTube removed content due to requests from the Biden administration.

Jordan has long argued that Big Tech companies, including Google, have collaborated with the US government to suppress conservative speech. He believes that these actions constitute unlawful censorship, with YouTube allegedly playing a role.

This subpoena comes after the Committee’s successful investigation into Meta, which led the company to admit that it had bowed to pressure from the Biden administration, adjusting its content moderation policies and promising to restore free speech on its platforms.

Jordan is now pushing Alphabet to follow Meta’s lead and provide transparency on its own content moderation practices.

Google has responded by stating that its content policies are enforced independently, asserting its commitment to free expression.

However, the company has yet to provide a detailed response to Jordan’s subpoena or the claims of governmental influence. Also, this ongoing investigation signals that the scrutiny of Big Tech’s role in content moderation is far from over.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Telegram faces regional ban in Russia amid security fears

Authorities in the Russian regions of Dagestan and Chechnya have moved to block Telegram, citing security concerns.

The decision was made after the messaging app was reportedly used by enemies to organise unrest, including the October 2023 anti-Israel riots at Makhachkala airport.

During these riots, protesters, spurred by Telegram channels, attempted to attack passengers arriving from Israel. Telegram condemned the attack and stated that it had blocked the related channels.

Dagestan’s digital development minister, Yuri Gamzatov, stated that the decision to block Telegram came from the federal government. He acknowledged that Telegram might be unblocked in the future but encouraged users to switch to other messaging platforms in the meantime.

Telegram, which has nearly 1 billion users, has faced tensions with the Russian government before. Despite previous attempts by Moscow to block the platform, it remains widely used in Russia and other former Soviet republics.

Telegram did not respond immediately to requests for comment on the regional bans.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

X faces major outage in the US and UK

Social media platform X is experiencing widespread outages in the US and the UK, with thousands of users reporting issues, according to outage tracking website Downdetector.

Reports indicate over 21,000 incidents in the US and more than 10,800 in the UK, suggesting significant disruptions.

Downdetector, which gathers status reports from various sources, noted that the actual number of affected users may be higher.

Many have turned to other platforms to discuss the outage, but X has not yet responded to requests for comment.

The cause of the disruption remains unclear, and there is no official timeline for when full service will be restored. Users continue to face difficulties accessing the platform, impacting communication and social media activity globally.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

UK artists raise alarm over AI law proposals

A new proposal by the UK government to alter copyright laws has sparked significant concern among artists, particularly in Devon. The changes would allow AI companies to use the content found on the internet, including artwork, to help train their models unless the creators opt-out. Artists like Sarah McIntyre, an illustrator from Bovey Tracey, argue that such a shift could undermine their rights, making it harder for them to control the use of their work and potentially depriving them of income.

The Devon Artist Network has expressed strong opposition to these plans, warning that they could have a devastating impact on creative industries. They believe that creators should retain control over their work, without needing to actively opt out of its use by AI. While some, like Mike Phillips from the University of Plymouth in the UK, suggest that AI could help artists track copyright violations, the majority of artists remain wary of the proposed changes.

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology has acknowledged the concerns and confirmed that no decisions have yet been made. However, it has stated that the current copyright framework is limiting the potential of both the creative and AI sectors. As consultations close, the future of the proposal remains uncertain.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Silent album released to challenge UK AI copyright reforms

More than 1,000 musicians have joined forces to release a silent album as part of a protest against the UK government’s proposed changes to copyright laws. The changes would allow AI companies to use artists’ work to train models without needing permission, a move critics argue would undermine creators’ rights. The silent album, titled ‘Is This What We Want?’, features empty studios and performance spaces, symbolising the potential loss of control over their work.

The changes have sparked outrage from high-profile artists such as Kate Bush, who warned that this could lead to the exploitation of musicians by tech companies. The protest album, which includes contributions from other major artists like Ed Sheeran and Dua Lipa, aims to highlight the negative impact of such reforms on the livelihoods of creators.

The UK government argues that these changes will help boost the AI and creative industries, allowing them to reach their full potential. However, the controversy over copyright law is growing, with many in the music industry urging a rethink before any new regulations are finalised.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Digital time travel on social media

Recent weeks have seen a surge in AI-generated videos that transport viewers to historical eras, from the medieval streets during the Black Death to the dramatic eruption of Vesuvius. Creators Dan from the UK and Hogne from Norway, behind the accounts POV Lab and Time Traveller POV, have produced these first-person narratives to bring history to life in a unique and engaging manner.

While the videos have attracted millions of views and sparked widespread fascination, several historians have raised concerns over their historical accuracy. Experts such as Dr Amy Boyington and Dr Hannah Platts point out numerous inaccuracies, including anachronistic details like modern bread rolls and train tracks in medieval scenes, that risk misrepresenting historical facts. They caution that such artistic interpretations, though visually striking, could mislead young viewers and distort their understanding of history.

The creators defend their work as a means to spark curiosity and encourage further research, openly acknowledging that their videos are not intended to be strict documentaries. They label their content as AI-created and urge audiences to verify historical details independently. Despite the debate, these innovative videos are opening up new ways for the public to engage with the past, even as calls for greater accuracy and transparency grow louder.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu