Freedom of expression

Meta’s oversight board seeks public input on immigration posts

Meta’s Oversight Board has opened a public consultation on immigration-related content that may harm immigrants following two controversial cases on Facebook. The board, which operates independently but is funded by Meta, will assess whether the company’s policies sufficiently protect refugees, migrants, immigrants, and asylum seekers from severe hate speech.

The first case concerns a Facebook post made in May by a Polish far-right coalition, which used a racially offensive term. Despite the post accumulating over 150,000 views, 400 shares, and receiving 15 hate speech reports from users, Meta chose to keep it up following a human review. The second case involves a June post from a German Facebook page that included an image expressing hostility toward immigrants. Meta also upheld its decision to leave this post online after review.

Following the Oversight Board’s intervention, Meta’s experts reviewed both cases again but upheld the initial decisions. Helle Thorning-Schmidt, co-chair of the board, stated that these cases are critical in determining if Meta’s policies are effective and sufficient in addressing harmful content on its platform.

Microsoft warns of rising cyber threats from nations

A recent Microsoft report claims that Russia, China, and Iran are increasingly collaborating with cybercriminals to conduct cyber espionage and hacking operations. This partnership blurs the lines between state-directed activities and the illicit financial pursuits typical of criminal networks. National security experts emphasise that this collaboration allows governments to amplify their cyber capabilities without incurring additional costs while offering criminals new profit avenues and the security of government protection.

The report, which analyses cyber threats from July 2023 to June 2024, highlights the significant increase in cyber incidents, with Microsoft reporting over 600 million attacks daily. Russia has focused its efforts primarily on Ukraine, attempting to infiltrate military and governmental systems while spreading disinformation to weaken international support. Meanwhile, as the US election approaches, both Russia and Iran are expected to intensify their cyber operations aimed at American voters.

Despite allegations, countries like China, Russia, and Iran have denied collaborating with cybercriminals. China’s embassy in Washington dismissed these claims as unfounded, asserting that the country actively opposes cyberattacks. Efforts to combat foreign disinformation are increasing, yet the fluid nature of the internet complicates these initiatives, as demonstrated by the rapid resurgence of websites previously seized by US authorities.

Overall, the evolving landscape of cyber threats underscores the growing interdependence between state actors and cybercriminals, posing significant risks to national security and public trust.

Reach criticised over fake AI-generated adverts of Alex Jones and Rachel Reeves

The publisher Reach has faced criticism for running disturbing adverts on its WalesOnline app, featuring fake AI-generated images of TV presenter Alex Jones and Chancellor Rachel Reeves. The images, which showed both figures with visible blood and bruises, directed users to fake BBC News articles promoting cryptocurrency.

Users of the app expressed outrage at the adverts, with Cardiff council’s cabinet member for culture, Jennifer Burke, describing them as ‘disturbing’. She questioned whether the publisher had a duty to vet the content advertised on their platform. Other users criticised the ads, labelling them ‘dystopian’.

The adverts appeared among genuine news articles on the app, which is part of Reach’s operation in Wales. Reach also publishes major United Kingdom news outlets, including the Mirror and the Express.

Both Alex Jones and Rachel Reeves have been contacted for comment, and Reach has been asked to address the situation.

UK police scale back presence on X over misinformation worries

British police forces are scaling back their presence on X, formerly known as Twitter, due to concerns over the platform’s role in spreading extremist content and misinformation. This decision comes after riots broke out in the UK this summer, fueled by false online claims, with critics blaming Elon Musk’s approach to moderation for allowing hate speech and disinformation to flourish. Several forces, including North Wales Police, have stopped using the platform altogether, citing misalignment with their values.

Of the 33 police forces surveyed, 10 are actively reviewing their use of X, while others are assessing whether the platform is still suitable for reaching their communities. Emergency services have relied on X for more than a decade to share critical updates, but some, like Gwent Police, are reconsidering due to the platform’s tone and reach.

This shift is part of a larger trend in Britain, where some organisations, including charities and health services, have also moved away from X. As new online safety laws requiring tech companies to remove illegal content come into effect, digital platforms, including X, are facing growing scrutiny over their role in spreading harmful material.

Meta takes action against Russian-linked accounts in Moldova

Meta Platforms announced it had removed a network of accounts targeting Russian speakers in Moldova ahead of the country’s October 20 election, citing violations of its fake accounts policy. Moldovan authorities have also blocked numerous Telegram channels and chatbots allegedly used to pay voters to cast “no” votes in a referendum on EU membership being held alongside the presidential election. Pro-European President Maia Sandu, seeking a second term, has made the referendum central to her platform.

The deleted Meta accounts targeted President Maia Sandu, pro-EU politicians, and the strong ties between Moldova and Romania while promoting pro-Russia parties. This network featured fake Russian-language news brands masquerading as independent media across various platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, OK.ru, and TikTok. Meta’s actions involved removing multiple accounts, pages, and groups to combat coordinated inauthentic behaviour.

Moldova’s National Investigation Inspectorate has blocked 15 Telegram channels and 95 chatbots that were offering payments to voters, citing violations of political financing laws. Authorities linked these activities to supporters of fugitive businessman Ilan Shor, who established the ‘Victory’ electoral bloc while in exile in Moscow. In response, Moldovan police have raided the homes of Shor’s associates, alleging that payments were funnelled through a Russian bank to influence the election. Shor, who was sentenced in absentia for his involvement in a significant 2014 bank fraud case, denies the bribery allegations. Meanwhile, President Maia Sandu accuses Russia of attempting to destabilise her government, while Moscow claims that she is inciting ‘Russophobia.’

X returns to Brazil as court clears path for resumption

Social media giant X, formerly known as Twitter, became accessible to some Brazilian users on Wednesday, just one day after the country’s Supreme Court cleared the platform to resume operations by complying with court rulings. Brazil’s telecommunications regulator, Anatel, announced that it had begun instructing internet providers to restore access to X. Many users celebrated the return of the platform, with topics like ‘we’re back’ trending across Latin America’s largest country.

Despite the reopening, some Brazilians still encountered difficulties accessing X, as Anatel indicated that the restoration time would depend on the procedures of individual internet providers. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who had been engaged in a lengthy dispute with billionaire Elon Musk, granted approval for X’s return on Tuesday afternoon. He instructed Anatel to ensure the platform was operational within 24 hours, affirming that X had fulfilled all necessary requirements to resume its services.

X had been suspended in Brazil since late August due to its failure to comply with court orders related to hate speech moderation and the absence of a designated legal representative in the country, as mandated by law. As the platform’s sixth-largest market worldwide, Brazil accounted for approximately 21.5 million users as of April, making the resumption of service a crucial step for X’s growth and presence in the region.

Discord banned in Turkey following court ruling

Turkey has blocked access to the messaging platform Discord after the company refused to share information requested by the government. A court in Ankara issued the decision, citing concerns over child sexual abuse and obscene content being shared by users on the platform. The Information Technologies and Communication Authority confirmed the ban.

The action follows outrage after a 19-year-old in Istanbul murdered two women, with Discord users allegedly praising the incident online. Justice Minister Yilmaz Tunc explained that there was sufficient suspicion of illegal activity linked to the platform, which prompted the court to intervene.

Transport Minister Abdulkadir Uraloglu added that monitoring platforms like Discord is difficult, as security forces can only act when users report content. Discord’s refusal to provide data, such as IP addresses, further complicated the situation, leading to the decision to block the service.

The ban in Turkey coincides with a similar action in Russia, where Discord was blocked for violating local laws after failing to remove prohibited content. The platform has faced growing scrutiny over its handling of illegal activity.

Russia blocks Discord over content violations

Russia‘s communications regulator, Roskomnadzor, has blocked the messaging platform Discord for alleged violations of Russian law, according to the TASS news agency. The San Francisco-based company becomes the latest foreign tech platform to face restrictions in Russia. Discord has yet to respond to the decision.

For years, Russia has pressured foreign tech companies to remove content it deems illegal, imposing frequent, though generally small, fines for non-compliance. Last week, Roskomnadzor ordered Discord to delete nearly 1,000 pieces of content it classified as illegal and had previously fined the platform for failing to remove banned material.

Moscow has also blocked other major platforms, including Twitter (now X), Facebook, and Instagram, shortly after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Brazil lifts ban on Elon Musk’s X platform

Brazil’s Supreme Court has lifted the suspension of Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, allowing it to resume operations in the country after the company finally complied with local court rulings. The resolution marks the end of a prolonged dispute between Musk and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who had previously blocked the platform for refusing to follow legal orders. In his ruling, Moraes stated that X had met the conditions to return online, paving the way for its swift restoration.

The conflict began when Musk, a vocal advocate of free speech, resisted Brazilian court orders to block accounts flagged for spreading misinformation, calling the directives censorship and labelling Moraes a ‘dictator.’ However, in recent weeks, Musk’s platform reversed course, appointing a local representative, paying outstanding fines, and complying with the court’s requests to block certain accounts. By doing so, X earned back its legal right to operate in Brazil.

Brazilian users could not access X on Tuesday evening despite the platform’s return, even though the country’s telecommunications regulator, Anatel, has been instructed to restore the service within 24 hours. Through its Global Government Affairs account, X expressed pride in returning to the Brazilian market, emphasising its commitment to upholding free speech within legal boundaries. Brazil remains X’s sixth-largest market globally, with about 21.5 million users as of April, according to Statista.

Why does it matter?

The dispute between Musk and the Brazilian government is part of a broader struggle Musk has faced with international authorities seeking to regulate online platforms. Brazil’s communication minister, Juscelino Filho, hailed the decision as a victory, stressing that all companies operating in the country must respect its laws regardless of size or influence. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva echoed this sentiment, remarking that the world should not have to endure Musk’s ideology simply because of his wealth.

Many users migrated to rival platforms like Bluesky and Meta’s Threads during the suspension, especially with Brazil’s municipal elections underway.

While X remained offline for the election’s first round, the platform could be reinstated just in time for the run-offs, set to take place in late October, including in São Paulo, Latin America’s largest city.

Independent body in Ireland empowers EU social media users to challenge content moderation decisions

A new independent body in Ireland will allow social media users in the European Union to challenge content moderation decisions made by platforms like Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube. Established under the EU Digital Services Act (DSA), this Appeals Centre aims to provide users with an alternative to the courts when disputing content decisions. Supported by Meta’s Oversight Board Trust and certified by Ireland’s media regulator, the centre is expected to begin operations by the end of the year. It will expand to include more platforms over time.

Thomas Hughes, CEO of the Appeals Centre, emphasised the body’s independence from governments and companies, ensuring that social media content policies are applied fairly. The centre’s team of experts will review cases within 90 days to determine if the platforms’ actions align with their stated policies. The European Commission has expressed support for the initiative, with spokesperson Thomas Regnier highlighting the importance of uniform development across the EU to strengthen online user rights.

Located in Dublin, the Appeals Centre will operate on a funding model that charges social media companies fees for each case. At the same time, users will incur a nominal fee that is refundable if their appeal is successful. However, platforms are not obligated to participate, as the centre lacks the power to enforce binding settlements. The centre will be governed by a board of seven non-executive directors.