Ethical governance at centre of Africa AI talks

Ghana is set to host the Pan African AI and Innovation Summit 2026 in Accra, reinforcing its ambition to shape Africa’s digital future. The gathering will centre on ethical artificial intelligence, youth empowerment and cross-sector partnerships.

Advocates argue that AI systems must be built on local data to reflect African realities. Many global models rely on datasets developed outside the continent, limiting contextual relevance. Prioritising indigenous data, they say, will improve outcomes across agriculture, healthcare, education and finance.

National institutions are central to that effort. The National Information Technology Agency and the Data Protection Commission have strengthened digital infrastructure and privacy oversight.

Leaders now call for a shift from foundational regulation to active enablement. Expanded cloud capacity, high-performance computing and clearer ethical AI guidelines are seen as critical next steps.

Supporters believe coordinated governance and infrastructure investment can generate skilled jobs and position Ghana as a continental hub for responsible AI innovation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI visibility becomes crucial in college search

Growing numbers of students are using AI chatbots such as ChatGPT to guide their college search, reshaping how institutions attract applicants. Surveys show nearly half of high school students now use artificial intelligence tools during the admissions process.

Unlike traditional search engines, generative AI provides direct answers rather than website links, keeping users within conversational platforms. That shift has prompted universities to focus on ‘AI visibility’, ensuring their information is accurately surfaced by chatbots.

Institutions are refining website content through answer engine optimisation to improve how AI systems interpret their programmes and values. Clear, updated data is essential, as generative models can produce errors or outdated responses.

College leaders see both opportunity and risk in the trend. While AI can help families navigate complex choices, advisers warn that trust, accuracy and the human element remain critical in higher education decision-making.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI in Africa accelerates a critical shift in economic development

AI is being positioned as a transformative driver of Africa’s economic future. A roadmap unveiled by the African Development Bank estimates that AI could generate up to $1 trillion in additional GDP by 2035, representing nearly one-third of the continent’s current output.

However, the opportunity is time-sensitive. Delays in implementation risk widening digital inequalities and increasing dependence on technologies developed elsewhere. Early progress, particularly by 2026, is considered essential to sustain momentum and attract long-term investment.

Rather than distributing AI evenly across the economy, the roadmap prioritises five sectors expected to capture most gains: agriculture, wholesale and retail, manufacturing, finance, and health. This targeted approach reflects resource constraints and the need to demonstrate measurable impact in high-employment and high-growth industries.

Despite its potential, Africa faces structural constraints. The continent accounts for only a small share of global AI compute capacity, while data infrastructure and cloud presence remain limited. Without expanded data centres, affordable computing resources, and improved connectivity, AI deployment may remain uneven.

The strategy rests on five core enablers: data, compute, skills, trust, and capital. Each pillar presents challenges, particularly in ensuring data accessibility, building technical expertise, and mobilising sustainable investment. Skills development is especially critical, as Africa represents a small portion of the global AI talent pool and significant literacy gaps persist.

The roadmap outlines three implementation phases between 2025 and 2035: ignition, consolidation, and scale. Success will depend on coordinated action, early infrastructure development, and cross-border collaboration.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Portugal moves to tighten teen access to social media

Portugal’s parliament has approved a draft law that would require parental consent for teenagers aged 13 to 16 to use social media, in a move aimed at strengthening online protections for minors. The proposal passed its first reading on Thursday and will now move forward in the legislative process, where it could still be amended before a final vote.

The bill is backed by the ruling Social Democratic Party (PSD), which argues that stricter rules are needed to shield young people from online risks. Lawmakers cited concerns over cyberbullying, exposure to harmful content, and contact with online predators as key reasons for tightening access.

Under the proposal, parents would have to grant permission through the public Digital Mobile Key system of Portugal. Social media companies would be required to introduce age verification mechanisms linked to this system to ensure that only authorised teenagers can create and maintain accounts.

The legislation also seeks to reinforce the enforcement of an existing ban prohibiting children under 13 from accessing social media platforms. Authorities believe the new measures would make it harder for younger users to bypass age limits.

The draft law was approved in its first reading by 148 votes to 69, with 13 abstentions. A PSD lawmaker warned that companies failing to comply with the new requirements could face fines of up to 2% of their global revenue, signalling that the government intends to enforce the new requirements seriously.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU decision regulates researcher access to data under the DSA

A document released by the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee revived claims that the EU digital rules amount to censorship. The document concerns a €120 million fine against X under the Digital Services Act and was framed as a ‘secret censorship ruling’, despite publication requirements.

The document provides insight into how the European Commission interprets Article 40 of the DSA, which governs researcher access to platform data. The rule requires huge online platforms to grant qualified researchers access to publicly accessible data needed to study systemic risks in the EU.

Investigators found that X failed to comply with Article 40.12, in force since 2023 and covering public data access. The Commission said X applied restrictive eligibility rules, delayed reviews, imposed tight quotas, and blocked independent researcher access, including scraping.

The decision confirms platforms cannot price access to restrict research, deny access based on affiliation or location, or ban scraping by contract. The European Commission also rejected X’s narrow reading of ‘systemic risk’, allowing broader research contexts.

The ruling also highlights weak internal processes and limited staffing for handling access requests. X must submit an action plan by mid-April 2026, with the decision expected to shape future enforcement of researcher access across major platforms.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI governance becomes urgent for mortgage lenders

Mortgage lenders face growing pressure to govern AI as regulatory uncertainty persists across the United States. States and federal authorities continue to contest oversight, but accountability for how AI is used in underwriting, servicing, marketing, and fraud detection already rests with lenders.

Effective AI risk management requires more than policy statements. Mortgage lenders need operational governance that inventories AI tools, documents training data, and assigns accountability for outcomes, including bias monitoring and escalation when AI affects borrower eligibility, pricing, or disclosures.

Vendor risk has become a central exposure. Many technology contracts predate AI scrutiny and lack provisions on audit rights, explainability, and data controls, leaving lenders responsible when third-party models fail regulatory tests or transparency expectations.

Leading US mortgage lenders are using staged deployments, starting with lower-risk use cases such as document processing and fraud detection, while maintaining human oversight for high-impact decisions. Incremental rollouts generate performance and fairness evidence that regulators increasingly expect.

Regulatory pressure is rising as states advance AI rules and federal authorities signal the development of national standards. Even as boundaries are debated, lenders remain accountable, making early governance and disciplined scaling essential.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

India’s AI market set to surge to over $130 billion by 2032

The AI market in India has expanded from roughly $2.97 billion in 2020 to $7.63 billion in 2024, and is projected to reach $131.31 billion by 2032 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 42.2 percent.

The growth outlook is underpinned by systematic progress across five layers of AI architecture, encompassing models, applications, chips, infrastructure and energy, with strong foundational infrastructure such as data centres and widespread internet connectivity enabling cloud adoption and data-driven services across sectors.

India’s acceleration in AI adoption aligns with broader digital trends and policy pushes, with readiness indices and talent penetration indicating that the nation is better positioned than many emerging economies to scale AI across industries.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Half of xAI’s founding team has now left the company

Departures from Elon Musk’s AI startup xAI have reached a symbolic milestone, with two more co-founders announcing exits within days of each other. Yuhuai Tony Wu and Jimmy Ba both confirmed their decisions publicly, marking a turning point for the company’s leadership.

Losses now total six out of the original 12 founding members, signalling significant turnover in less than three years. Several prominent researchers had already moved on to competitors, launched new ventures, or stepped away for personal reasons.

Timing coincides with major developments, including SpaceX’s acquisition of xAI and preparations for a potential public listing. Financial opportunities and intense demand for AI expertise are encouraging senior talent to pursue independent projects or new roles.

Challenges surrounding the Grok chatbot, including technical issues and controversy over its harmful content, have added internal pressure. Growing competition from OpenAI and Anthropic means retaining skilled researchers will be vital to sustaining investor confidence and future growth.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Russia signals no immediate Google ban as Android dependence remains critical

Officials in Russia have confirmed that no plans are underway to restrict access to Google, despite recent public debate about the possibility of a technical block. Anton Gorelkin, a senior lawmaker, said regulators clarified that such a step is not being considered.

Concerns centre on the impact a ban would have on devices running Android, which are used by a significant share of smartphone owners in the country.

A block on Google would disrupt essential digital services instead of encouraging the company to resolve ongoing legal disputes involving unpaid fines.

Gorelkin noted that court proceedings abroad are still in progress, meaning enforcement options remain open. He added that any future move to reduce reliance on Google services should follow a gradual pathway supported by domestic technological development rather than abrupt restrictions.

The comments follow earlier statements from another lawmaker, Andrey Svintsov, who acknowledged that blocking Google in Russia is technically feasible but unnecessary.

Officials now appear focused on creating conditions that would allow local digital platforms to grow without destabilising existing infrastructure.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

EU faces tension over potential ban on AI ‘pornification’

Lawmakers in the European Parliament remain divided over whether a direct ban on AI-driven ‘pornification’ should be added to the emerging digital omnibus.

Left-wing members push for an explicit prohibition, arguing that synthetic sexual imagery generated without consent has created a rapidly escalating form of online abuse. They say a strong legal measure is required instead of fragmented national responses.

Centre and liberal groups take a different position by promoting lighter requirements for industrial AI and seeking clarity on how any restrictions would interact with the AI Act.

They warn that an unrefined ban could spill over into general-purpose models and complicate enforcement across the European market. Their priority is a more predictable regulatory environment for companies developing high-volume AI systems.

Key figures across the political spectrum, including lawmakers such as Assita Kanko, Axel Voss and Brando Benifei, continue to debate how far the omnibus should go.

Some argue that safeguarding individuals from non-consensual sexual deepfakes must outweigh concerns about administrative burdens, while others insist that proportionality and technical feasibility need stronger assessment.

The lack of consensus leaves the proposal in a delicate phase as negotiations intensify. Lawmakers now face growing public scrutiny over how Europe will respond to the misuse of generative AI.

A clear stance from the Parliament is still pending, rather than an assured path toward agreement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!