The EU’s Tech Sovereignty Package and the future of European digital power

On 3 June 2026, the European Commission presented the European Technological Sovereignty Package, a set of measures to strengthen Europe’s capacity in semiconductors, AI, cloud computing and open source software. The package comprises two legislative proposals, the Chips Act 2.0 and the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), alongside the new EU Open Source Strategy and the Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy.

The Commission framed the initiative as a fundamental shift in the EU’s approach to technology, underpinned by the recognition that digital dependence is no longer a market inefficiency to be tolerated, but a strategic vulnerability to be corrected through legislation.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that Europe cannot afford to depend on others for the technologies that keep its hospitals running, its energy grids stable, and its services secure, calling on the EU to convert its research excellence, industrial base and single market into technological sovereignty.

The package is designed to broaden choice in core technologies for EU businesses, citizens and public administrations, and to position Europe to capture a larger share of a global semiconductor market projected to reach EUR 1.37 trillion by 2030, with AI-related components accounting for roughly 70% of that growth.

The timing reflects a specific convergence of pressures. The rapid spread of AI applications is driving a sharp increase in demand for data centre and cloud capacity that EU infrastructure cannot currently meet at scale. At the same time, longstanding dependence on non-EU suppliers for advanced semiconductor manufacturing, chip design and cloud services has become increasingly difficult to ignore as geopolitical tensions have demonstrated the economic risk of concentrated supply chains.

The 2022 US CHIPS and Science Act, generous subsidy regimes in Asia and tightening export controls on advanced semiconductor equipment have accelerated the global race for technological self-sufficiency, prompting Europe to adopt a more active industrial policy response. 

Chips Act 2.0

 Electronics, Hardware, Printed Circuit Board, Mace Club, Weapon

The Chips Act 2.0 revises and expands the 2023 European Chips Act, which has mobilised more than EUR 52 billion in public and private investment, created an estimated 46,000 direct and indirect jobs and strengthened Europe’s research and innovation capacity in semiconductors. Despite this progress, the EU remains dependent on third countries for advanced chip manufacturing and semiconductor design.

The revised regulation is designed to accelerate Europe’s position across the entire semiconductor value chain, from raw materials and design to manufacturing and packaging, and to ensure that Europe captures a greater share of the growth in AI-related chip demand.

The proposal is structured around four objectives. On investment and competitiveness, the Act would cap permitting approvals at 12 months, introduce ‘Grand Challenges’ to support the development of strategically important chip types such as AI processors, and formalise Strategic Partnerships on Semiconductors with international allies.

To stimulate demand, it establishes Demand Accelerators to align new products with industry needs, expands innovation procurement, notably for European start-ups and scale-ups, and creates structural synergies with CADA to benefit from the data centre and AI Gigafactory buildout planned under that regulation.

On the supply side, the Act enables state aid for ‘First-of-a-Kind’ facilities not yet present in the Union, covering the full semiconductor value chain, designates strategic projects to unlock EU and member state co-investment, and creates a ‘Semiconductor Regions of Excellence’ label to attract investment at the regional level. To strengthen resilience, it establishes a business-to-business semiconductor supply chain platform and provides sector-specific guidance on risk assessment and mitigation.

The explicit linkage between Chips Act 2.0 and CADA reflects a deliberate industrial logic: European-made chips powering European cloud infrastructure, with demand from that infrastructure in turn supporting European chipmakers.

Cloud and AI Development Act

 Architecture, Building, Person, Security

The Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA) forms a central part of the Commission’s AI Continent Action Plan and simultaneously addresses two structural problems: insufficient EU cloud and data centre capacity to meet AI-driven demand, and strategic dependence on a small number of non-EU cloud providers.

The Act is designed to facilitate and accelerate the deployment of sustainable cloud and data centre infrastructure, while ensuring the EU accelerates the rollout of cloud and AI in critical sectors and retains meaningful control over the infrastructure on which that rollout depends.

The Act focuses on three main areas. On research, development and innovation, it supports next-generation cloud and AI technologies, including frontier AI, industrial AI, and physical AI, introduces grand challenges to drive R&D efforts, and promotes adoption in strategic sectors through national cloud and AI strategies and new Experience and Acceleration Centres for AI in member states.

On capacity, it targets at least a tripling of EU data centre capacity within five to seven years, simplifies and accelerates permitting, and improves access to energy, land, water and financing. On sovereignty and autonomy, it establishes a single EU-wide sovereignty classification framework, promotes open source solutions as a tool for resilience, and introduces a common EU-level procurement framework for public administrations.

The sovereignty classification system merits particular attention. It introduces four assurance levels for cloud and AI services, to be applied by public sector bodies based on their own risk assessments. Level 1 requires data to be processed and stored within the EU. Level 2 requires providers to demonstrate independence from third countries and transparency over their software supply chain.

Level 3 requires providers to be owned and controlled from within the EU and to meet additional criteria including personnel citizenship, although the Commission retains the ability to recognise third-country providers at this level. Level 4 requires full transparency and control over the software supply chain with no third-country interference.

Cloud service providers seeking recognition under this framework must undergo an independent audit conducted by member state authorities. The framework is significant because it creates, for the first time, a legally grounded and progressive definition of what it means for a cloud service to be sovereign, moving the concept from political rhetoric to a procurement-relevant standard.

EU Open Source Strategy

 Astronomy, Earth, Globe, Outer Space, Planet, Plate

The EU Open Source Strategy is the non-legislative pillar of the package most directly aimed at reducing dependence on proprietary, non-EU software. It places open source at the centre of the EU’s technological sovereignty approach, arguing that open ecosystems reduce supplier lock-in, increase transparency and give European developers and public administrations greater control over their digital infrastructure.

The strategy addresses a persistent structural weakness: the economic value generated by open source projects has historically been captured outside Europe, limiting the ability of European developers and companies to benefit fully from their own contributions.

The strategy is organised around four objectives. The first, Open Source for Tech Sovereignty, focuses on scaling the Open Internet Stack, a Commission-curated catalogue of EU-aligned open source solutions, and promoting alternatives to dominant proprietary products in areas such as cloud platforms, workplace tools, secure e-mail and decentralised social media.

The work will be carried out in cooperation with member states through the European Digital Infrastructure Consortium for Digital Commons. The second objective, Vibrant Open Source Ecosystem, targets start-up support through accelerators and procurement access, alongside a stewardship toolkit for critical open source assets and investment in digital skills across schools, universities, and civil services.

The third objective, Open Source in Public Administration, sets out procurement guidelines that favour open standards, reinforces the Commission’s Open Source Programme Office (OSPO) and the EU Public Sector OSPO Network, and seeks to embed openness and sovereignty-by-design in digital investment decisions across EU institutions and member states.

The fourth objective, Reinforced Standards and International Outreach, promotes EU open source developers and solutions internationally through the EU Tech Business Offer, supports uptake in partner countries and integrates open source communities into standardisation processes, including through a forthcoming revision of the EU Standardisation Regulation.

The strategy also intersects directly with the other package components. On semiconductors, it targets open hardware development through the Chips Joint Undertaking’s RISC-V programme. On AI, it supports the GenAI4EU initiative and promotes open source tooling for public sector AI adoption through the Apply AI Strategy.

On digital identity, it prioritises open source implementation of the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet) and the European Business Wallet. The strategy also interacts with the recently enacted Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), which imposes new security obligations on open source projects that have generated concern in the developer community. The Open Source Maintenance Instrument and critical dependency mapping exercises set out in the strategy are designed in part to address those obligations, though reconciling the CRA’s security requirements with the growth objectives of the strategy will be a key implementation challenge.

Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy

 Computer, Electronics, Hardware, Architecture, Building, Warehouse, Server, Factory

The Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy is the least legally binding element of the package but arguably the one that determines whether its ambitions are physically realisable. The targets set by CADA, particularly the goal of at least tripling EU data centre capacity within five to seven years, cannot be achieved without a corresponding expansion in reliable, affordable power supply.

Data centres are energy-intensive by nature, and the AI workloads they are increasingly required to process are even more demanding. The roadmap addresses this constraint by setting out how AI and digital technologies can improve the efficiency and flexibility of Europe’s energy systems while also enabling the energy infrastructure that these systems need.

The roadmap connects the package’s digital ambitions to the EU’s energy transition objectives, creating a mutually reinforcing relationship: cleaner, smarter energy systems create more viable conditions for data centre expansion, while AI-enabled demand management and grid optimisation tools reduce the cost and environmental impact of that expansion. The roadmap is also relevant as a governance document, since the deployment of AI in critical energy infrastructure raises its own questions about cybersecurity, data sovereignty and the concentration of control over systems on which entire economies depend.

Governance and policy implications

 Adult, Male, Man, Person, Text, Pen, Formal Wear, Clothing, Suit, Document, Computer, Electronics, Laptop, Pc

The Tech Sovereignty Package raises several governance issues that extend beyond its immediate legislative content. The most significant concerns the model it establishes for EU industrial policy. The package marks a clear departure from the long-standing assumption in EU competition policy that market mechanisms and trade openness are the primary tools for achieving efficient and innovative technology markets.

The explicit use of state aid for strategic semiconductor projects, the joint procurement frameworks in CADA and the deliberate promotion of EU-origin suppliers both in public procurement and sovereign cloud classification illustrate a greater role for public intervention in the technology sector. Whether the EU’s trading partners, particularly the United States and major Asian semiconductor producers, will treat these provisions as proportionate industrial policy or as market-distorting intervention is likely to become a significant diplomatic issue.

The package also has important implications for the governance of AI in Europe. It operates in parallel to the EU AI Act and the work of the EU AI Office, but addresses a different layer of the AI ecosystem. While the AI Act focuses on the risk profile and compliance obligations of AI systems once deployed, the Tech Sovereignty Package governs the infrastructure and supply chains that enable AI development in the first place.

The relationship between the two frameworks matters as decisions taken at the infrastructure layer, such as the cloud sovereignty level applied to a given public sector AI deployment, can have downstream consequences for compliance with AI Act requirements. The relationship between these frameworks will be an important area to monitor as implementation progresses.

A further coordination challenge arises internally. The package spans multiple policy domains and directorates-general within the Commission, including DG CONNECT for semiconductors, cloud and open source, and DG ENERGY for the energy roadmap.

It also interacts with DG COMP on State aid approvals and with DG TRADE on the trade implications of sovereignty-oriented procurement rules. Ensuring coherence across these areas during the legislative process, and subsequently during implementation, will require stronger-than-usual inter-institutional coordination.

Legislative process and upcoming milestones

 Scoreboard

The two legislative proposals, the Chips Act 2.0 and CADA, need to enter the ordinary legislative procedure, meaning they will be negotiated separately by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union before trilogue negotiations between the two institutions and the Commission can begin.

Given the political and economic stakes involved, and the number of member states with competing interests in semiconductor investment locations and cloud market access, the negotiations are likely to be protracted. The original European Chips Act took approximately two years from proposal to final adoption, and CADA, which touches on the politically sensitive question of digital sovereignty vis-à-vis key trading partners, may encounter comparable friction.

Several near-term milestones are already in view. The Commission is expected to launch a call for AI Gigafactories in July 2026, following the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) Governing Board’s agreement in principle on 1 June 2026. AI Gigafactories are large-scale, purpose-built AI training facilities and represent one of the most concrete and immediately actionable elements of the broader AI infrastructure agenda.

Their deployment is intended to provide European researchers, start-ups and industry with access to the kind of computing capacity currently concentrated in the United States, and the July call will be an early test of the Commission’s ability to move from legislative ambition to operational delivery.

The Commission will also launch a consultation with member states, the European Investment Bank Group and other key stakeholders to design a European equity capacity at scale for financing tech sovereignty ambitions. This implies that the Commission does not believe grant funding and state aid alone will be sufficient to mobilise the investment required, and that a blended finance model, combining public equity with private capital, will be needed.

The EIB Group’s involvement points towards the kind of risk-sharing instruments it has used in other strategic sectors, although the specific structures and governance arrangements have yet to be designed through the consultation process.

Broader context

The package does not emerge in isolation. It sits within a cluster of interconnected EU strategic frameworks that have, over the past two to three years, progressively shifted the EU’s economic policy stance from market liberalisation towards what the Commission calls ‘open strategic autonomy’: the maintenance of trade openness where possible, combined with targeted interventionism to reduce strategic dependencies where necessary.

The Competitiveness Compass, adopted earlier in 2025 and drawing heavily on the 2024 Draghi report on European competitiveness, identifies reducing strategic dependencies as one of three pillars for restoring European economic dynamism. The Tech Sovereignty Package is the most operationally specific expression of that pillar to date.

The Economic Security Strategy, adopted in 2023, provided the risk-assessment framework within which the package sits, identifying advanced semiconductors, AI, quantum computing and biotechnology as the technological areas posing the most significant dual-use and strategic dependency risks for the EU. The Tech Sovereignty Package translates that risk assessment into concrete legislative and policy instruments, with semiconductors and AI infrastructure receiving the most direct regulatory attention.

The Commission’s AI Continent Action Plan, which positions Europe to become a global AI leader by focusing on computing infrastructure, data, skills, and adoption, provides the most direct policy antecedent for CADA in particular. The Tech Sovereignty Package fast-tracks the infrastructure ambitions of the Action Plan and adds the supply chain governance dimension that the Action Plan did not fully address.

Taken together, these documents represent a sustained and internally consistent shift in EU digital and industrial policy, one in which technological leadership is treated not merely as an economic aspiration but as a precondition for political and regulatory autonomy in an increasingly contested global technological order.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google highlights rising online scam threats

Google has warned that online scams remain a major global challenge, citing estimates that fraud losses could reach nearly $580 billion in 2025.

In its latest fraud and scams advisory, the company said phishing attacks are becoming more sophisticated, with criminals using adversary-in-the-middle techniques and QR code phishing, also known as quishing, to steal credentials and bypass security measures.

The advisory also highlighted risks linked to cryptocurrency investment scams, malicious finance applications and police impersonation schemes. According to Google, scammers are using AI, social engineering and trusted digital services to deceive users, obtain money and collect sensitive information.

Google said its Trust & Safety teams are using AI tools, predictive analytics and policy enforcement to detect and disrupt fraudulent activity across its services. The company also pointed to measures such as stronger protections for session cookies, enforcement against deceptive crypto ads, monitoring of post-installation app behaviour and developer identity verification for apps installed on certified Android devices.

The company urged users to be cautious of unsolicited communications, unrealistic investment promises, unexpected QR codes and requests for personal or financial information.

Why does it matter?

The advisory shows how online fraud is becoming a cross-platform governance problem rather than a narrow cybersecurity issue. Scams now rely on trusted cloud services, mobile apps, messaging platforms, crypto infrastructure and impersonation of public authorities. That creates pressure on major technology companies to strengthen detection, app accountability and policy enforcement, while raising broader questions about consumer protection, platform responsibility and digital trust.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Crypto mixers gain recognition in US Treasury assessment

The US Treasury Department has acknowledged that cryptocurrency mixers may have lawful privacy uses, while warning that such tools remain vulnerable to abuse by illicit actors.

In a March 2026 report to Congress on innovative technologies to counter illicit finance involving digital assets, Treasury said lawful users may rely on mixers to protect sensitive financial information when transacting on public blockchains. The report said users may seek to conceal details about personal wealth, business payments, charitable donations or consumer spending habits.

Treasury distinguished between custodial digital asset services, including custodial mixers, and decentralised or non-custodial mechanisms that can operate without a central intermediary. Custodial services that accept and transmit value may be required to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network as money services businesses, maintain records and file suspicious activity reports.

The report nevertheless stressed that criminals commonly use mixers, bridges and swaps to make illicit digital asset flows harder to trace. Treasury said mixing is frequently used by North Korea-linked cyber actors, money launderers, ransomware actors and darknet market participants.

Treasury also warned that stablecoins can form part of complex laundering processes involving mixers and other obfuscation techniques. According to the report, illicit actors may move stolen or fraud-linked assets through mixers and then swap them into stablecoins to break the traceable link to the original criminal activity.

The assessment was prepared under the GENIUS Act, which required the Treasury to examine innovative tools for countering illicit finance involving digital assets, including the role of mixers, tumblers and similar services.

Why does it matter?

The report shows the regulatory tension at the centre of digital asset policy: privacy tools can protect legitimate users on transparent public blockchains, but the same tools can also weaken AML/CFT controls, sanctions enforcement and law enforcement tracing. Treasury’s framing matters because future rules on mixers, DeFi, blockchain analytics and stablecoin compliance will need to balance financial privacy with security and illicit finance risks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

UK to test AI legal assistants to help reduce court delays

The UK government will develop and test AI legal assistants as part of a broader set of technology initiatives aimed at reducing court delays and improving the efficiency of the justice system. The Ministry of Justice said the tools will support routine casework, including research and case analysis, before any possible use in the Crown Court.

The AI legal assistants will be developed in collaboration with legal professionals and AI developers, with initial testing taking place in controlled environments. The government said the trials will help establish standards for the safe and ethical use of AI in legal settings and ensure any future systems meet the expectations of judges and legal practitioners before wider deployment.

Judges are also preparing to test an AI tool designed to identify trial-ready cases and group similar hearings together. The government said the tool is intended to better use judicial, prosecutorial, and court resources, helping cases move more quickly for victims.

The announcement also covers Justice Transcribe, an AI tool now available to every probation officer in England and Wales. The tool records and transcribes conversations with offenders, reducing the administrative burden associated with transferring handwritten notes into digital systems.

According to the government, Justice Transcribe could free up the equivalent of 18,750 days annually, enabling probation officers to spend more time supervising offenders and supporting efforts to reduce reoffending. A similar transcription tool is being trialled in Immigration and Asylum Tribunals to support judges with case notes and reduce administrative pressure.

The projects form part of the Prime Minister’s AI Exemplars programme, which aims to accelerate the adoption of AI across public services. The government also pointed to AI Growth Labs, secure testing environments intended to help the UK lawtech sector develop and refine AI products before bringing them to market.

Why does it matter?

Justice systems around the world are exploring how AI can help address growing caseloads, administrative burdens and resource constraints. Applications such as legal research assistance, transcription services and case management tools have the potential to improve efficiency while allowing legal professionals to focus on higher-value tasks.

At the same time, the use of AI in judicial and legal contexts raises important questions about accountability, transparency, fairness and human oversight. The UK’s emphasis on controlled testing and ethical safeguards reflects growing recognition that AI deployment in the justice sector requires robust governance alongside technological innovation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Apple unveils next-generation Siri AI and expanded child safety features

Apple has unveiled the next generation of Apple Intelligence at WWDC26, introducing a significantly upgraded Siri designed to provide deeper personal context awareness, broader app integration and more advanced conversational capabilities.

The new assistant can search across messages, emails and photos, answer questions about on-screen content and access web information to provide more up-to-date responses while maintaining Apple’s privacy-focused approach.

Alongside its AI announcements, Apple announced major updates to parental controls and Screen Time features. Parents will be able to approve new contacts, manage app permissions more precisely and benefit from new safety features designed to respond when explicit or violent content is shared.

New screen time recommendations and scheduling tools are also intended to encourage healthier digital habits for children.

Software updates arriving later this year across Apple’s operating systems will also introduce a range of performance improvements.

Apple said app launches on iPhone and iPad are up to 30% faster, newly captured photos load up to 70% faster, and AirDrop transfers can be up to 80% quicker. Search functions across Spotlight, Photos, and Mail have also been redesigned to improve speed and accuracy.

Additional features include enhanced health tracking, expanded AirPods personalisation, improved Apple Watch functionality, cross-platform photo sharing through iCloud Shared Albums, and AI-powered upgrades to Apple Maps and Apple Vision Pro.

Public beta testing begins next month, with the full software release scheduled for autumn. Apple noted that some Apple Intelligence features will vary by device, language, and region, with regulatory requirements affecting availability in certain markets, including China and parts of the European Union.

Why does it matter?

Apple’s latest updates reflect a broader industry shift, especially towards embedding child safety and digital well-being features directly into operating systems, as governments and regulators worldwide increase scrutiny of how technology platforms protect young users online.

Enhanced parental controls, communication safeguards, and screen time management tools could help set new standards for online child protection, influencing future policies and product development across the technology sector.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

UK launches £200 million initiative to accelerate AI adoption across the economy

The UK government has unveiled a nationwide initiative to accelerate AI adoption, announcing more than £200 million in funding to help businesses deploy AI technologies while strengthening workforce skills.

The announcement was made at the inaugural AI Adoption Summit, which brought together technology companies, trade unions and industry leaders to discuss the practical deployment of AI across the economy.

The programme includes a £100 million expansion of the Bridge AI scheme to connect businesses with AI solutions and expertise, alongside £53 million for new AI innovation and adoption initiatives. Additional funding will support AI Growth Zones, scholarships, workforce training and sector-specific programmes aimed at helping organisations adopt AI responsibly and effectively.

A key element of the initiative is the creation of the AI Economics Institute, chaired by Nobel Prize-winning economist Simon Johnson. The institute will examine how AI affects employment, productivity and economic growth.

More than 30 companies have also committed to sharing data and experiences related to workplace AI adoption to help inform future policy development.

The UK government said the strategy seeks to increase AI adoption across businesses while ensuring workers gain the skills needed to benefit from technological change. Alongside public investment, several technology companies announced additional commitments focused on training, workforce development, research and business support.

Why does it matter?

Governments are increasingly shifting their focus from supporting AI research alone to encouraging widespread adoption across businesses and public services. Many policymakers see AI deployment as a key driver of productivity, competitiveness and economic growth, provided organisations and workers have the skills needed to use the technology effectively.

The UK’s initiative reflects this broader trend by combining investment in AI adoption with workforce development and evidence-based policymaking. The creation of the AI Economics Institute also signals growing interest in understanding how AI will affect jobs, productivity and economic performance as adoption accelerates.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Starlink enters European ultra-low-cost flights through Wizz Air

Wizz Air has announced plans to roll out Starlink connectivity across its fleet from 2027, bringing low-Earth-orbit satellite internet to the European ultra-low-cost airline market.

The airline said it would become the first European ultra-low-cost carrier to offer Starlink’s in-flight internet technology to passengers. The service is expected to provide high-speed, low-latency connectivity during flights.

The move is significant because high-quality in-flight internet has often been treated as a premium service or a paid add-on, rather than a standard feature for low-cost travel. Wizz Air said passengers should not have to choose between affordable fares and reliable onboard connectivity.

The rollout would place Wizz Air among a growing group of airlines using Starlink to upgrade in-flight internet. Several full-service and hybrid carriers have already announced or begun Starlink deployments, but low-cost airlines have been more cautious because of installation, operating, weight and fuel-cost concerns.

Wizz Air’s decision suggests that satellite-based connectivity is moving beyond premium cabins and long-haul carriers into mass-market aviation. If implemented across the fleet, the service could change passenger expectations for affordable short- and medium-haul travel.

Ian Malin, Wizz Air’s Chief Commercial Officer, said ultra-low-cost travel has been about making opportunities accessible to more people and that the airline now wants to extend that approach to connectivity.

Starlink, operated by SpaceX, uses low-Earth orbit satellites to provide broadband connectivity with lower latency than traditional satellite internet systems. Its growing use in aviation reflects the wider expansion of satellite internet into transport, consumer connectivity and digital infrastructure markets.

Why does it matter?

The story matters because Starlink is helping shift in-flight connectivity from a premium airline feature towards a broader digital access expectation. If ultra-low-cost carriers can offer reliable satellite internet without undermining their fare model, connected air travel could become more common across short- and medium-haul routes. The move also shows how low-Earth-orbit satellite networks are expanding into mainstream transport infrastructure, not just for rural broadband or emergency connectivity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU and Kenya deepen cooperation on digital transformation and connectivity

The European Union and Kenya are deepening their strategic partnership on trade, digital transformation, and sustainable investment.

The commitments were set out in Brussels, where European Commission Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy Henna Virkkunen welcomed Kenyan President William Ruto.

The Commission said the reinforced cooperation reflects Kenya’s role as a key EU partner in Africa and at the multilateral level.

Under the Global Gateway initiative, the EU and Kenya will support clean transport and trade facilitation along the Northern Corridor, a strategic route for East African trade.

Digital development is also central to the partnership. The two sides will support the rollout of high-speed connectivity to more than 3,000 public offices, schools, health centres, and digital hubs across Kenya.

The discussions also advanced cooperation under the EU-Kenya Strategic Dialogue and welcomed progress in the EU-Kenya data adequacy process. If completed, the adequacy process would facilitate safe data flows between the partners and support digital trade and innovation.

The EU said the assessment so far has been positive and that it intends to conclude the process as soon as possible.

Why does it matter?

The EU-Kenya partnership shows how digital infrastructure, connectivity, data flows, and trade facilitation are becoming central to international economic cooperation. The data adequacy process is especially important because it could create a trusted framework for cross-border data transfers, supporting digital trade, innovation, public services, and closer economic links between Kenya and the EU.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OECD calls for smarter regulation to boost competitiveness and innovation

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has published a report on regulatory simplification, warning that excessive and fragmented rules can undermine competitiveness, investment, and innovation. The report, titled ‘Smart Regulations, Strong Business’, was approved and declassified by the OECD Regulatory Policy Committee on 18 May.

The report draws on the OECD’s Simplifying for Success surveys, conducted between July and September 2025 among governments and business organisations across OECD Members, accession countries, and the European Union. Responses were received from 34 jurisdictions, with the analysis also drawing on OECD regulatory governance data and discussions from a 2025 high-level symposium.

The OECD emphasises that regulation remains essential for market functioning, public health and safety, and transparent government processes. However, the report argues that the accumulation of rules and administrative requirements has created increasingly complex systems that are more difficult for businesses to navigate, comply with and adapt to.

Survey findings show that government respondents in 72% of participating countries and business organisations in 90% of countries consider current levels of regulation and bureaucracy to be excessive. More than three-quarters of business organisations also said full compliance is too costly, while many linked the regulatory environment to negative effects on competitiveness, investment, and innovation.

The report says regulatory burdens often stem from reporting, record-keeping, permitting, inspections, and fragmented rules, rather than solely from substantive policy goals. The OECD recommends targeting areas where regulatory burdens are greatest, streamlining administrative procedures through risk-based and digital approaches, and making rulemaking more future-ready through evidence-based policymaking, stakeholder engagement and stronger coordination.

Why does it matter?

Governments around the world are seeking ways to improve competitiveness and stimulate innovation while maintaining high standards of consumer protection, safety and market oversight. As regulatory frameworks expand, concerns have grown about the cumulative costs of compliance and administrative complexity for businesses.

The OECD’s findings contribute to broader debates on regulatory reform, highlighting the importance of balancing effective regulation with efficiency. The report also reflects growing interest in digital tools, risk-based approaches and evidence-driven policymaking as ways to reduce unnecessary burdens without weakening regulatory objectives.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

New York passes child protection law targeting AI companion chatbots

New York State has approved legislation aimed at strengthening protections for minors interacting with AI chatbots, marking one of the first targeted regulatory efforts focused on AI companion technologies. The bill, known as S9051B, introduces restrictions on chatbot features that may encourage harmful emotional dependence or unsafe behaviour among young users.

The law prohibits AI systems from presenting themselves as real or fictional human beings in ways that could mislead minors and restricts outputs that encourage self-harm, disordered eating or other harmful behaviour. The legislation specifically targets design features that may foster emotional dependency between children and AI systems, reflecting growing concerns over their potential psychological effects.

Sponsored by Senator Kristen Gonzalez and Assemblymember Alex Bores, the legislation was developed in consultation with New York Attorney General Letitia James and child safety organisations, including Common Sense Media. Supporters of the bill argue that rapid advances in AI have outpaced existing safeguards, leaving young users vulnerable to emerging risks.

Supporters say the measure is part of a wider push for responsible AI governance in New York, focusing on transparency, accountability, and consumer protection. Advocacy groups involved in developing the legislation have pointed to real-world cases as evidence of the need for stronger oversight of emotionally interactive AI systems.

Why does it matter?

AI companion applications are becoming increasingly sophisticated and capable of sustaining long-term, emotionally engaging interactions with users. While these systems may provide entertainment, companionship or support, concerns have emerged about their potential influence on children and other vulnerable users.

By focusing on chatbot design features rather than solely on content moderation, New York’s legislation introduces a new approach to AI governance that could influence future regulatory efforts in the United States and beyond. The law also reflects growing attention to the psychological and social impacts of generative AI systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!