Bechtle has secured a significant framework agreement with the German government to provide up to 300,000 iPhones and iPads, all equipped with approved Apple security software. The contract, valued at €770 million ($835.22 million), will run until the end of 2027, according to an announcement on Thursday.
This deal aligns with Germany’s recent IT security law aimed at restricting untrustworthy suppliers and ensuring robust security measures for government officials. Bechtle’s partnership with Apple underscores the importance of reliable technology and security in government operations.
The agreement comes some time after Apple’s legal challenges in Germany, including an injunction from a German court over a patent case back in 2018. Despite these hurdles, the collaboration with Bechtle demonstrates Apple’s continued commitment to providing secure and trusted devices for essential functions within the public sector.
Meta Platforms is facing its first EU antitrust fine for linking its Marketplace service with Facebook. The European Commission is expected to issue the fine within a few weeks, following an accusation over a year and a half ago that the company gave its classified ads service an unfair advantage by bundling it with Facebook.
Allegations include Meta abusing its dominance by imposing unfair trading conditions on competing classified ad services advertising on Facebook and Instagram. The potential fine could reach as much as $13.4 billion, or 10% of Meta’s 2023 global revenue, although such high fines are rarely imposed.
A decision is likely to come in September or October, before EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager leaves office in November. Meta has reiterated its stance, claiming the European Commission’s allegations are baseless and stating its product innovation is pro-consumer and pro-competitive.
In a separate development, Meta has been charged by the Commission for not complying with new tech rules due to its pay or consent advertising model launched last November. Efforts to settle the investigation by limiting the use of competitors’ advertising data for Marketplace were previously rejected by the EU but accepted by the UK regulator.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), UK’s financial regulatory body, has fined CB Payments Limited (CPBL), a Coinbase subsidiary, £3.5 million ($4.5 million) for inadequate anti-money laundering controls, marking it FCA’s first action against a crypto trading firm.
CBPL is a platform for trading cryptoassets within Coinbase Group and the FCA stated how after an FCA visit in October 2020, it voluntarily agreed to enhance its financial crime controls. The agreement required CBPL to halt accepting new high-risk customers until the issue was resolved. Nevertheless, the company continued providing e-money services to 13,416 such customers, with nearly a third of them depositing $24.9 million. The fund in turn facilitated various cryptoasset transactions through other Coinbase entities, amounting to approximately $226 million in total. The FCA reported that this repeated breaches of the voluntary agreement went undetected for about two years.
Despite these breaches, CBPL agreed to a resolution, receiving a 30% reduction on its fine—lowering it from £5 million to £3.5 million. Coinbase, for its part, reiterated its commitment to working with top financial regulators like the FCA to ensure their platform remains compliant, secure, and trusted by customers.
Spain’s antitrust regulator, the CNMC, has launched an investigation into Apple’s App Store for potentially anti-competitive behaviour. The investigation focuses on Apple’s alleged imposition of unequal commercial conditions on developers of mobile applications sold through its platform.
The CNMC has suggested that these practices could constitute a serious violation of competition law. If Apple is found guilty, it could face a substantial fine of up to 10% of its global revenues. The following investigation in Spain highlights ongoing concerns about Apple’s dominance in the app store market and its impact on competition and developers.
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a probe into eight companies using AI-powered ‘surveillance service pricing’ to evaluate its impact on privacy, competition, and consumer protection. The companies under scrutiny include Mastercard, JPMorgan Chase, Revionics, Bloomreach, Task Software, PROS, Accenture, and McKinsey & Co. These firms use AI to adjust pricing based on consumer behaviour, location, and personal data, potentially leading to different prices for different customers.
The FTC’s investigation aims to uncover the types of surveillance pricing services developed by these companies and their current applications. The agency seeks to understand how these AI-driven pricing models affect consumer pricing and whether they exploit personal data to charge higher prices. FTC Chair Lina M. Khan emphasised the risks to privacy and the potential exploitation of personal data in her statement, highlighting the need for transparency in how businesses use consumer information.
This inquiry reflects growing concerns about using AI and other technologies to set personalised prices based on detailed consumer data. The FTC’s actions aim to shed light on these practices and ensure consumer protection in an increasingly data-driven market.
Top competition authorities from the EU, UK, and US have issued a joint statement emphasising the importance of fair, open, and competitive markets in developing and deploying generative AI. Leaders from these regions, including Margrethe Vestager of the European Commission, Sarah Cardell of the UK Competition and Markets Authority, Jonathan Kanter of the US Department of Justice, and Lina M. Khan of the US Federal Trade Commission, highlighted their commitment to ensuring effective competition and protecting consumers and businesses from potential market abuses.
The officials recognise the transformational potential of AI technologies but stress the need to safeguard against risks that could undermine fair competition. These risks include the concentration of control over essential AI development inputs, such as specialised chips and vast amounts of data, and the possibility of large firms using their existing market power to entrench or extend their dominance in AI-related markets. The statement also warns against partnerships and investments that could stifle competition by allowing major firms to co-opt competitive threats.
The joint statement outlines several principles for protecting competition within the AI ecosystem, including fair dealing, interoperability, and maintaining choices for consumers and businesses. The authorities are particularly vigilant about the potential for AI to facilitate anti-competitive behaviours, such as price fixing or unfair exclusion. Additionally, they underscore the importance of consumer protection, ensuring that AI applications do not compromise privacy, security, or autonomy through deceptive or unfair practices.
Nigeria’s Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has imposed a fine of $220 million on Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook, for ‘multiple and repeated’ breaches of local consumer data protection laws in a move to enforce data privacy regulations.
The FCCPC’s investigation into Meta began last year following Nigerian consumers’ complaints regarding personal data mishandling. The investigation revealed that Meta had failed to comply with several provisions of Nigeria’s data protection regulations, including obtaining proper consent from users before collecting their data and ensuring the security of the information gathered, a direct violation of the Nigeria Data Protection Regulation (NDPR), following a 38 months investigation. The NDPR, enacted in 2019, mandates that organisations must seek explicit consent from individuals before collecting their personal information, aiming to safeguard the privacy of their citizens.
The fine is one of the largest penalties imposed by an African regulator on a global tech company. It signals a growing trend among nations to assert digital sovereignty and enforce stringent data protection measures. The action against Meta is expected to have far-reaching implications, prompting other multinational companies to reassess their data practices in Nigeria and potentially other African markets.
The following development highlights the regulatory pressure on technology companies to prioritise data protection. As digital services expand globally, enforcing stringent data privacy laws is becoming more critical. For Nigeria, the fine against Meta expresses the country’s commitment to holding multinational companies accountable and protecting the rights of its citizens in the digital landscape.
A South Korean court is reviewing a prosecution request to arrest Brian Kim, the billionaire founder of Kakao Corp, for alleged stock manipulation during a 2023 acquisition. The development follows a hearing last year involving Kakao and an executive over similar accusations. Prosecutors claim Kim manipulated the stock price of SM Entertainment to obstruct Hybe’s acquisition attempt. Kim, not formally charged, denies any wrongdoing.
Kim, the largest shareholder of Kakao Corp, holds a 24% stake through his entities. The court’s decision, expected late Monday or early Tuesday, will determine the necessity of a warrant without ruling on the allegations. Analysts warn that a conviction could jeopardise Kakao group’s control over KakaoBank Corp, as financial crime rules restrict ownership stakes in banks.
Regulatory and social scrutiny might impact Kakao’s bold investment decisions, including plans for AI services and fundraising through IPOs. Kim chairs a council coordinating Kakao group’s 128 affiliates, guiding their business focus. The outcome of the case could influence the company’s strategic moves in the near future.
Kakao plans to launch new AI services this year, amid growing challenges from legal and regulatory pressures. The decision on Kim’s arrest warrant will be crucial for the future direction of the tech giant and its numerous affiliates.
A recent study has revealed that AI chatbots pose significant risks to children, who often view them as lifelike and trustworthy. Dr Nomisha Kurian from the University of Cambridge calls for urgent action to prioritise ‘child-safe AI’ in the development of these technologies.
Kurian’s research highlights incidents where AI chatbots provided harmful advice to children, such as Amazon’s Alexa instructing a child to touch a live electrical plug and Snapchat’s My AI giving tips on losing virginity.
These cases underscore the ’empathy gap’ in AI, where chatbots fail to respond appropriately to children’s unique needs and vulnerabilities.
The study proposes a 28-item framework to help developers create safer AI by working closely with educators and child safety experts. Kurian argues that AI has great potential if designed responsibly, but proactive measures are essential to protect young users.
The French competition authority has officially launched an investigation into chipmaker Nvidia for suspected anti-competitive behaviour, confirming ongoing scrutiny of the company’s practices. Benoit Coeure, the agency’s president, affirmed during a press briefing that Nvidia could face charges pending the outcome of the investigation.
Earlier reports, based on insider information, indicated that Nvidia was likely to be formally charged by the antitrust regulator in France. The investigation focuses on allegations of practices that may hinder competition within the market.
Nvidia, a prominent player in the semiconductor industry, faces increasing regulatory scrutiny globally amid concerns over its market dominance and business practices. The outcome of the investigation by the French authority could have significant implications for Nvidia’s operations and market strategy moving forward.
