Global experts gather for CPDP 2026

The CPDP Conference 2026 has released its detailed programme, outlining a multi-day agenda of panels, workshops and cultural sessions focused on AI, data protection and digital governance. The conference will run from 19 to 22 May 2026, bringing together global experts across policy, academia and industry.

Across the programme, a wide range of panels and debates will explore key themes including AI regulation, digital governance, workplace data rights and platform power. Alongside panels and discussions, there will also be short movies and workshops offering conference topics in different formats.

Workshops are scheduled throughout each day, with structured breaks including coffee sessions and lunch intervals offering networking moments for participants. Topics range from AI in healthcare and advertising to digital conflict, governance under pressure and privacy-preserving technologies.

The programme also includes specialised tracks and cultural sessions, such as film screenings and artistic discussions on algorithmic systems, alongside academic panels and policy debates. The event will conclude after a final series of workshops and sessions on 22 May in Brussels, Belgium.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

ITU Radiocommunication Bureau outlines key aspects future connectivity

ITU Radiocommunication Bureau has highlighted the critical role of radio-frequency spectrum in ensuring digital resilience, emphasising that reliable connectivity underpins essential services such as healthcare, transport and emergency communications.

According to the Bureau, resilience begins before disruption through coordinated spectrum management, international standards and regulatory frameworks. These systems enable wireless networks and satellite services to operate reliably and avoid harmful interference.

The organisation stressed that growing demand for connectivity, including 5G, satellite broadband and AI-enabled systems, increases pressure on spectrum resources. Technical standards and global coordination are therefore essential to maintain interoperability and support innovation.

ITU also pointed to the importance of satellite systems and early warning technologies in responding to climate risks and disasters. Future decisions at the World Radiocommunication Conference 2027 in China will further shape how resilient digital infrastructure develops globally.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

AI governance priorities outlined by EU at UN dialogue

The European Union has called for the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance to focus on responsible innovation, human rights, capacity-building and stronger interoperability between AI governance frameworks.

In a statement delivered on behalf of the EU and its member states, the bloc said the dialogue should examine AI’s social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic, technical and environmental implications. It also argued that responsible AI innovation should be framed not only as a risk-management challenge, but also as an opportunity for public benefit in areas such as education and government.

The EU urged participants to address who controls the data, compute and value chains behind AI systems. It also highlighted linguistic and cultural diversity, warning that AI systems trained mainly on a limited number of languages can produce less accurate and more costly outputs for speakers of underrepresented languages.

Capacity-building was presented as a core condition for effective AI governance, particularly for developing countries. The EU said countries and institutions need the skills, systems and human capacity to evaluate, question and deploy AI responsibly, while treating AI infrastructure as a matter of public interest rather than only market access or proprietary control.

The statement also identified agentic AI as an emerging governance frontier, arguing that such systems raise new questions around accountability, oversight and control that existing frameworks do not yet adequately address.

On safe and trustworthy AI, the EU called for greater compatibility between governance approaches to prevent regulatory arbitrage and support responsible cross-border deployment. It said trust should not rely only on self-assessment or voluntary disclosure, but also on auditability, traceability, validation mechanisms, certification approaches and evaluation frameworks for high-risk systems.

The EU also urged a human-centric, human rights-based approach grounded in international law. It identified AI-facilitated gender-based violence, harmful AI-generated content affecting children and older persons, manipulative algorithmic systems, data exploitation and AI-enabled surveillance as areas requiring dedicated attention.

The statement called for the UN dialogue to build on existing initiatives, including those led by UNESCO, ITU, UNDP, OHCHR, GPAI, the Council of Europe, the Hiroshima Process and AI summit processes. The EU also supported more interactive thematic sessions, continuity between dialogue editions and a co-chairs’ summary reflecting both converging and diverging views.

Why does it matter?

The EU statement shows how global AI governance debates are moving beyond broad principles towards questions of implementation, institutional capacity and interoperability between frameworks. By linking AI infrastructure, human rights, auditability and agentic AI, the EU is signalling that future international coordination will need to address both today’s deployment risks and the governance challenges posed by more autonomous systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

ICO warns organisations about growing AI cyber threats

The UK Information Commissioner’s Office has warned that AI is enabling faster, more advanced and harder-to-detect cyberattacks, urging organisations to strengthen their defences against emerging threats.

In a blog post, the regulator highlighted risks such as AI-generated phishing emails, deepfake social engineering, automated vulnerability scanning, AI-powered malware, credential attacks, data poisoning and indirect prompt injection. The ICO said cybersecurity must be treated as a shared responsibility, with organisations expected to take proactive steps to protect the personal data they hold.

The ICO said strong foundational security measures remain essential, but should be reinforced with layered defences to counter AI-powered threats. It pointed to practical steps such as patching systems, restricting access through multi-factor authentication, applying least-privilege principles and managing supplier risks.

The recommendations also include monitoring systems for unusual activity, carrying out vulnerability scanning and penetration testing, and maintaining regularly tested incident response plans. The ICO said AI can also support cyber defence, but should operate within a clear framework of human oversight and accountability.

Organisations are further advised to minimise data collection, conduct regular data audits and train staff to recognise AI-powered social engineering attacks. The ICO said AI tools processing high-risk personal data should be supported by data protection impact assessments and appropriate safeguards.

Why does it matter?

The ICO’s warning links AI-powered cyber threats directly to data protection obligations. As attackers use AI to scale phishing, exploit vulnerabilities and impersonate trusted contacts, organisations are expected not only to improve technical security, but also to limit the personal data they hold, strengthen governance and prepare for faster-moving incidents.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Google outlines AI-driven measures against online scams and fraud

Google has outlined new and existing measures to tackle online scams and fraud ahead of the second EMEA Anti-Scams and Fraud Summit, hosted by the Google Safety Engineering Centre in Zurich.

The company said the summit brings together representatives from governments, technology companies, consumer groups and academia to discuss collective responses to increasingly sophisticated scams. Google said its approach combines AI-driven protections across its products with wider cooperation involving industry and public authorities.

Google highlighted the use of AI-powered systems in services including Gmail, Chrome, Search, Ads and Phone by Google. The company said Gmail blocks more than 99.9% of spam, phishing and malware, while Search filters out hundreds of millions of spam-related pages daily. It also said its systems caught more than 99% of policy-violating ads before they reached users in 2025.

User-facing tools are also part of the company’s anti-scam strategy. Google pointed to Security Checkup, Passkeys, 2-Step Verification, Circle to Search and Google Lens as tools that can help users strengthen account protection and verify suspicious messages or content.

The company also highlighted public awareness and education initiatives, including Be Scam Ready, a game-based programme that uses simulated scam scenarios to help users recognise common tactics. Google said a previous Google.org commitment of $5 million is supporting anti-scam initiatives in Europe and the Middle East, including work by the Internet Society and Oxford Information Labs.

Google also referred to cooperation through the Global Signal Exchange, a threat-intelligence sharing platform for scams and fraud. As a founding partner, Google said it both contributes to and draws from the platform, which now stores more than 1.2 billion signals used to identify and disrupt criminal activity.

The company said it also works with law enforcement agencies, including the UK’s National Crime Agency, and participates in the Industry Accord Against Online Scams and Fraud. Google also pointed to legal actions against scam operations and botnets, including cases involving Lighthouse and BadBox.

Why does it matter?

Online scams are increasingly industrialised, cross-platform and supported by AI-enabled tactics, making them difficult to address through product-level security alone. Google’s approach shows how major technology companies are combining automated detection, user education, threat-intelligence sharing and law enforcement cooperation to respond to fraud. The wider policy issue is how much responsibility large platforms should bear for detecting and disrupting scams before they reach users.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Norway and Romania expand EEA cooperation with anti-disinformation funding

Romania and Norway have signed a new EEA and Norway Grants agreement that introduces dedicated cooperation measures against disinformation, reflecting growing European concerns over information manipulation, democratic resilience and geopolitical instability.

Norwegian Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide signed the agreement in Bucharest alongside Romania’s Minister for European Investments and Projects, Dragoș Pîslaru. The agreement forms part of the wider 2021-2028 EEA and Norway Grants framework, which supports social, economic and institutional development across Europe.

The new cooperation programme will fund initiatives aimed at strengthening resilience against disinformation through partnerships involving public institutions, specialist communities and civil society organisations in both countries.

The agreement also supports broader programmes covering justice and police cooperation, green transition projects, energy efficiency, and measures designed to strengthen the rights and living conditions of Roma communities.

Romania will receive €596.3 million under the current funding cycle, making it the second-largest beneficiary after Poland. Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein together provide €3.268 billion through the EEA and Norway Grants programme, with Norway contributing approximately 97% of the overall funding.

Why does it matter?

The agreement shows how disinformation is becoming part of broader European cooperation on democratic resilience and institutional capacity, not only a media or platform issue. By funding partnerships between public institutions, expert communities and civil society, the programme links information integrity with governance, security and social cohesion at a time of heightened geopolitical pressure in Europe.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

South Africa and China expand digital education ties

South Africa and China have agreed on measures to deepen cooperation in digital education, technical skills development and student mobility following bilateral talks at the World Digital Education Conference in Hangzhou.

The talks brought together South Africa’s Minister of Higher Education and Training, Buti Manamela, and China’s Vice Minister of Education, Xu Qingsen. According to SAnews, the meeting produced a framework for stronger cooperation in areas including AI, vocational training and industry-linked education pathways.

Planned measures include a structured cooperation framework on AI in education and digital transformation, as well as a Joint Technical Working Group to oversee the rollout of China-South Africa Vocational and Technical Centres across all nine South African provinces.

Both countries also committed to expanding technical and vocational education and training cooperation, aligning programmes with industrial sectors such as AI, robotics, renewable energy and advanced manufacturing. Scholarship programmes are also expected to be more closely linked to South Africa’s industrial priorities, including AI, engineering, green energy and the development of TVET lecturers.

The cooperation will include expanded postgraduate study opportunities and joint research initiatives. Future short-term training programmes are expected to focus on AI governance, digital learning systems, industrial policy and digital public infrastructure, to strengthen institutional capacity across government and the post-school education sector.

Officials also highlighted the goal of linking education more directly with employment. Existing cooperation includes a partnership with Beijing Polytechnic College, where South African TVET students completed specialised training in new energy vehicles and hybrid technologies, with Chinese automaker BYD committing to provide internships and employment opportunities.

Why does it matter?

The cooperation links digital education with industrial policy, skills development and employment pathways, rather than treating AI education as a standalone technology issue. By focusing on vocational centres, scholarships, AI governance and digital public infrastructure, South Africa and China are positioning education cooperation as part of broader workforce and institutional capacity-building for the digital economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Wikimedia Foundation joins Digital Public Goods Alliance

The Wikimedia Foundation has joined the Digital Public Goods Alliance, a UN-endorsed multi-stakeholder initiative that promotes open-source software, datasets, AI models, and content as digital public goods.

The foundation, which operates Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, said the membership reflects its commitment to open knowledge as a public good that remains accessible, rights-based, and governed in the public interest.

Jan Gerlach, Public Policy Director at the Wikimedia Foundation, said: ‘ ‘Wikipedia, Wikidata, and other Wikimedia projects show how hundreds of thousands of people working together across borders can create and maintain free and open knowledge infrastructure built in the public interest. As the host of these projects, we look forward to sharing our learnings and collaborating more closely with fellow DPGA members who share our vision of an internet that protects and promotes community-led spaces.’

The foundation joins DPGA members, including UNESCO, UNICEF, GitHub, the Inter-American Development Bank, and several governments. As part of its membership, it will report activities linked to digital public goods and the sustainable development goals through the annual State of the DPG Ecosystem Report and the DPGA Roadmap.

Planned activities include strengthening Wikimedia Cloud Services, which supports volunteer-developed tools used across Wikimedia projects. The foundation said around 30% of all edits to Wikimedia projects rely on tools hosted on the service, and that future work will focus on scalability, security, usability, contributor access, and innovation.

The Wikimedia Foundation also plans to continue advocating for open knowledge infrastructure in digital policy, including open-source-first approaches, responsible use of open data for public interest AI, information integrity, and protection of digital public goods.

The move follows the DPGA’s 2025 recognition of Wikipedia and Wikidata as digital public goods. It also builds on the foundation’s 2024 Global Digital Compact advocacy, which called for protecting online public-interest projects and for AI to support people rather than replace them.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UN invites leaders for AI governance dialogue

The co-chairs of the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance have invited member states and stakeholders to express interest in co-chairing thematic discussions during the meeting, which will take place in Geneva on 6–7 July 2026 alongside the ITU AI for Good Global Summit under UN General Assembly resolution 79/325.

The discussions will be organised around four themes: the social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic, and technical implications of AI; bridging AI divides through capacity-building and digital access; safe, secure, and trustworthy AI, including interoperability between governance approaches; and human rights issues such as transparency, accountability, and human oversight.

Each thematic session will be jointly chaired by one member state and one stakeholder representative, with the aim of fostering multistakeholder exchanges on experiences, best practices, and policy cooperation. Governments are asked to nominate high-level representatives, while stakeholders are encouraged to nominate senior experts relevant to the selected theme.

Selected co-chairs will support dialogue design, facilitate exchanges, and contribute to inclusive and balanced participation.

According to the UN, the initiative aims to bring together diverse perspectives from governments, industry, academia and civil society. The process is intended to strengthen collaboration and inform future AI governance approaches.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

AI working group revived by New Environment Canterbury of New Zealand

Environment Canterbury, the regional council for Canterbury in New Zealand, has approved the re-establishment of its Artificial Intelligence Working Group to examine how AI is being used to analyse data, support decision-making, and serve local communities.

Canterbury Regional Councillors approved the group at a Regional Delivery Committee meeting. The working group will provide an informal forum for councillors to explore AI applications, analyse trends, share knowledge, promote digital democracy, and develop informed views on the technology.

The Artificial Intelligence Working Group will be chaired by Councillor Joe Davies and is expected to meet up to four times a year. Workshops will generally be open to the public and will give local developers and AI start-ups opportunities to present their work.

Davies said the decision reflects a proactive approach to governance as AI becomes part of everyday public sector work. He stated: ‘AI is already part of everyday public sector work, and by leaning into these conversations now, we’re making sure we understand what’s happening, what’s coming, and what good governance looks like in this space.’

The group builds on work undertaken during the previous triennium, including discussions with external experts on AI use, regulation, and risk.

Insights from the working group will be reported back to the Regional Delivery Committee to inform future council discussions. Davies said the initiative would help Canterbury engage with technological change openly and responsibly rather than simply reacting to it.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!