Digital cooperation Archives | Page 2 of 207

France pushes EU AI gigafactories to support European technology

In the EU, France is calling for planned European AI ‘gigafactories’ to focus on testing and scaling European technologies rather than primarily increasing demand for hardware from companies such as Nvidia.

The large computing facilities are intended to provide the infrastructure needed to train advanced AI systems. However, officials in France argue that the projects should strengthen Europe’s technological capabilities rather than reinforce reliance on foreign suppliers.

Several EU countries, including Poland, Austria and Lithuania, support using the infrastructure to improve Europe’s digital resilience.

The initiative forms part of the European Commission’s wider plans to expand computing capacity and support the development of a stronger European AI ecosystem.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Major tech firms pledge to fight online fraud

Major technology and consumer-facing companies, including Google, Amazon, and OpenAI, have signed the ‘Industry Accord Against Online Scams and Fraud’ to share threat intelligence and strengthen defences against online fraud.

The voluntary pact brings together 11 signatories: Amazon, Adobe, Google, Levi Strauss & Co., LinkedIn, Match Group, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, Pinterest, and Target. It aims to improve coordination among companies and strengthen cooperation with governments, law enforcement, and NGOs.

The accord commits to sharing intelligence on criminal networks, using AI to detect fraud, and strengthening verification for financial transactions. Participating companies will also provide clearer reporting channels for users and encourage governments to prioritise scam prevention.

Executives emphasised that tackling scams requires collective effort. Meta’s Nathaniel Gleicher said the accord enables companies to share insights beyond individual cases, while Microsoft’s Steven Masada highlighted the need for faster collaboration to disrupt scams and track perpetrators globally.

The move comes as online scams grow in scale and sophistication, aided by AI-generated content and cross-platform operations. Consumers lost over $16 billion to online scams in 2024, prompting firms to boost safety features and push for stronger regulations and law enforcement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK government and Microsoft support digital skills growth

Microsoft UK is the first industry partner in the UK government’s TechFirst program, offering 500 work placements and 5,000 volunteering hours over four years. The collaboration aims to develop AI and technology skills nationwide.

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said the partnership will expand digital capabilities in education and the workforce. Microsoft UK CEO Darren Hardman will serve as Social Mobility Champion, linking students and early-career talent with technology-sector opportunities.

TechFirst aims to reach one million secondary students and over 4,000 graduates and researchers, providing school programs, scholarships, doctoral support, and regional funding to connect businesses with local talent.

Microsoft’s commitment includes mentoring and placements to support students entering technology careers.

Scholarships include TechGrad for undergraduates and master’s students, and the Spärck AI Scholarship, supporting AI degrees at nine UK universities, including Cambridge, Oxford, Imperial College, and UCL.

Doctoral researchers benefit from the TechExpert initiative, while the Turing AI Fellowships attract top AI talent to UK institutions.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI technology set to reshape farming and rural life in South Korea

South Korea has launched a national agenda to expand AI across agriculture, aiming to boost productivity and improve living standards in rural communities. Officials from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the Ministry of Science and ICT presented the strategy as part of a wider digital transformation effort.

Plans include expanding smart farm models that reduce labour-intensive tasks and allow more farmers to benefit from automated technologies. Shared machinery centres and autonomous farming tools such as drones will be developed with support from the Rural Development Administration.

Authorities also intend to apply AI to agricultural distribution through smart logistics facilities that manage receiving, sorting and shipping processes. Around 300 smart Agricultural Products Processing Centres are expected to operate nationwide by 2030.

Livestock grading systems using AI will be introduced to improve accuracy and consumer trust across pork and beef processing facilities. Officials aim to raise the share of AI-graded meat from 19.4 percent in 2025 to 70 percent by 2030.

Beyond production, the programme seeks to expand ‘smart rural communities’ offering AI-based services such as transport, daily living support and farming assistance. Policymakers believe that a stronger digital infrastructure will help rural regions respond to climate pressures and an ageing population.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Deepfake attacks push organisations to rethink cybersecurity strategies

Organisations are strengthening their cybersecurity strategies as deepfake attacks become more convincing and easier to produce using generative AI.

Security experts alert that enterprises must move beyond basic detection tools and adopt layered security strategies to defend against the growing threat of deepfake attacks targeting communications and digital identity.

Many existing tools for identifying manipulated media are still imperfect. Digital forensics expert Hany Farid estimates that some systems used to detect deepfake attacks are only about 80 percent effective and often fail to explain how they determine whether an image, video, or audio recording is authentic. The lack of explainability also raises challenges for legal investigations and public verification of suspicious media.

Cybersecurity companies are creating new technologies to improve the detection of deepfake attacks by analysing slight signals that are difficult for humans to notice. Firms such as GetReal Security, Reality Defender, Deep Media, and Sensity AI examine lighting consistency, shadow angles, voice patterns, and facial movements. Environmental indicators such as device location, metadata, and IP information can also help security teams spot potential deepfake attacks.

However, experts say detection alone cannot fully protect organisations from deepfake attacks. Companies are increasingly conducting internal red-team exercises that simulate impersonation scenarios to expose weaknesses in verification procedures. Multi-factor authentication techniques can reduce the risk of employees responding to fraudulent communications.

Another emerging defence involves digital provenance systems designed to track the origin and modification history of digital content. Initiatives such as the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) embed cryptographically signed metadata into media files, allowing organisations to verify whether content linked to suspected deepfake attacks has been altered.

Recent experiments highlight how testing these threats can be. In February, cybersecurity company Reality Defender conducted an exercise with NATO by introducing deepfake media into a simulated military scenario. The findings showed how easily even experienced officials can struggle to identify manipulated communications, reinforcing calls for automated systems capable to detecting deepfake attacks across critical infrastructure.

As generative AI tools continue to advance, organisations are expected to combine detection technologies, stronger verification procedures, and provenance tracking to reduce the risks posed by deepfake attacks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Tesla moves to enter the British household electricity market

A licence that would allow Tesla to supply electricity directly to households and businesses across Great Britain has been applied for.

The application was submitted to the national energy regulator Ofgem, which oversees energy suppliers in England, Scotland and Wales.

Approval would enable the company to enter the retail electricity market as early as next year. The service is expected to operate under the brand ‘Tesla Electric’, extending the company’s strategy of combining electric vehicles, battery storage and energy supply into a single ecosystem.

Tesla’s UK energy subsidiary, Tesla Energy Ventures, filed the application through its Manchester-based operation. Regulatory review may take several months, as Ofgem typically requires up to nine months to evaluate electricity supplier licences.

A future electricity offer could primarily target households that already use Tesla technologies, including home batteries and electric vehicle charging systems.

The company sells Powerwall storage batteries in the UK, which allow homeowners to store electricity generated by solar panels or purchased during off-peak hours.

Such systems also allow surplus energy stored in batteries to be sold back to the grid.

Similar services are already available in the US, where Tesla launched a residential electricity supply programme in Texas in 2022.

The expansion into the energy supply market comes amid pressure on Tesla’s automotive business in Europe. Sales of Tesla vehicles in the UK declined significantly during 2025, reducing the company’s share of the national car market.

Diversifying into energy services could therefore represent a broader strategic shift for the company led by Elon Musk. Integrating electricity supply with electric vehicles and home energy systems could allow Tesla to build a more comprehensive energy platform for consumers.

If approved, the initiative would position Tesla as both a technology manufacturer and a direct energy supplier in the British market.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

DIGITALEUROPE urges changes to EU AI Act rules for industry

European industry representatives are urging policymakers to reconsider parts of the EU AI Act, arguing that the current framework could impose significant compliance costs on companies developing AI tools for industrial and medical technologies.

According to Cecilia Bonfeld-Dahl, director-general of DIGITALEUROPE, manufacturers of high-tech machines, medical devices, and radio equipment are already subject to strict product safety regulations. Adding AI-specific requirements could create unnecessary administrative burdens for companies already heavily regulated. She argues that policymakers should aim for balanced AI regulation that encourages innovation while maintaining safety standards.

Industry groups warn that classifying certain AI systems as high-risk under Annex I of the AI Act could be particularly costly for smaller firms. DIGITALEUROPE estimates that a company with around 50 employees developing an AI-based product could incur initial compliance costs of €320,000 to €600,000, followed by annual expenses of up to €150,000. According to the organisation, such costs could reduce profits significantly and discourage smaller companies from pursuing AI innovation.

Manufacturing and medical technology sectors across Europe employ millions of workers and increasingly rely on AI to improve product performance and safety. Industry representatives argue that many applications, such as AI systems used to enhance industrial equipment safety or improve medical devices, already operate under established regulatory frameworks. These existing frameworks could be adapted rather than introducing additional layers of regulation.

The broader regulatory landscape is also contributing to concerns among technology companies. Over the past six years, the EU has introduced nearly 40 new technology-related regulations, some of which overlap or impose similar compliance requirements. DIGITALEUROPE estimates that compliance with the AI Act could cost companies approximately €3.3 billion annually, while cybersecurity and data-sharing regulations add further financial obligations.

Industry leaders warn that rising compliance costs could affect investment in AI development across Europe. Current estimates suggest that the EU accounts for about 7.5% of global AI investment, significantly behind the United States and China.

DIGITALEUROPE has called on the EU institutions to consider postponing parts of the AI Act’s implementation timeline to allow further discussion on how high-risk AI systems should be defined. Supporters of this approach argue that additional consultation could help ensure the regulatory framework protects consumers while also enabling European companies to compete globally in the rapidly evolving AI sector.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU lawmakers move forward on AI Act changes

Members of the European Parliament have reached a preliminary political agreement on amendments to the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The compromise will be reviewed by parliamentary committees before a scheduled vote in Brussels.

Lawmakers in the EU agreed to extend compliance deadlines for some high risk AI systems. The changes aim to give companies and regulators more time to prepare technical standards and enforcement frameworks.

The proposed amendments also include a ban on AI systems that create non consensual explicit deepfakes. Officials in the EU say the measure aims to strengthen consumer protection and improve online safety for children.

Industry groups in the EU have raised concerns about compliance burdens linked to the revised rules. Policymakers in the EU continue negotiations as the legislation moves toward committee approval.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Civil society urges stronger EU digital fairness rules

More than 200 civil society organisations have urged the European Commission to deliver strong consumer protections through the upcoming Digital Fairness Act. Advocacy groups in the EU say the proposal must address risks created by modern online platforms.

Campaigners argue that many existing EU consumer laws were designed decades ago and no longer reflect the realities of the digital market. The coalition warned policymakers in the EU not to treat regulatory simplification as a path toward deregulation.

Advocates are pushing for binding rules targeting deceptive design practices and addictive digital features. Survey responses across the EU show broad public support for stronger protections against dark patterns and unfair personalisation.

The European Commission is expected to present the Digital Fairness Act later this year. Officials in the EU are also considering expanding enforcement powers to strengthen consumer safeguards online.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI-powered Copilot Health platform introduced by Microsoft

Microsoft has introduced Copilot Health, a new feature that uses AI to help users interpret personal health data and prepare for medical consultations.

The tool will operate as a separate and secure environment within Microsoft’s Copilot ecosystem, allowing users to combine health records, wearable data, and medical history into a single profile. The system then uses AI to analyse patterns and generate personalised insights intended to support conversations with healthcare professionals.

Microsoft said the feature aims to help people better understand existing medical information rather than replace clinical care. Users can review trends such as sleep patterns, activity levels, and vital signs gathered from wearable devices, alongside test results and visit summaries from healthcare providers.

Copilot Health can integrate data from more than 50 wearable devices, including systems connected through platforms such as Apple Health, Fitbit, and Oura. The platform can also access health records from over 50,000 US hospitals and provider organisations through HealthEx, as well as laboratory test results from Function.

According to Microsoft, the system builds on ongoing research into medical AI systems, including work on the Microsoft AI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO). The company said future publications will explore how such systems could assist in analysing complex medical cases.

Privacy and security are central elements of the design. Microsoft stated that Copilot Health data and conversations are stored separately from standard Copilot interactions and protected through encryption and access controls. The company also noted that health information used in the service will not be used to train AI models.

Development of the system involves Microsoft’s internal clinical team and an external advisory group of more than 230 physicians from 24 countries. The company said Copilot Health has also achieved ISO/IEC 42001 certification, a standard focused on the governance of AI management systems.

The feature is being introduced through a phased rollout, beginning with a waitlist for early users who will help shape the service as it develops.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!