Orange has entered a groundbreaking multi-year partnership with OpenAI, becoming the first European telecom company with direct access to pre-release versions of the company’s AI models. This collaboration will allow Orange to influence OpenAI’s development roadmap while ensuring secure hosting of AI infrastructure in Europe, according to the group’s AI chief, Steve Jarrett.
The partnership highlights the strategic importance of OpenAI’s widely used models, with over 50,000 Orange employees already integrating them into their work. Jarrett emphasised the financial and technological advantages of a direct relationship with OpenAI, boosting Orange’s position in the AI race.
In addition to the partnership, Orange is working with Meta and OpenAI to translate African languages like Wolof and Pular for customer support and broader non-commercial uses. The initiative aims to support governments, universities, and startups, expanding accessibility to underserved linguistic communities.
MTN South Africa, China Telecom, and Huawei collaborate strategically to advance 5G, cloud, AI, and business solutions. The partnership combines China Telecom’s global expertise in network solutions, MTN’s extensive regional reach, and Huawei’s advanced technology to drive digital infrastructure development across Africa.
The Executive Vice President of China Telecom Global emphasised that the alliance will unlock new business opportunities and enhance technological offerings in the region. The collaboration is also set to promote the growth of the Internet of Things (IoT), enabling non-computer devices like fridges to connect to the internet.
Why does it matter?
MTN South Africa anticipates that improvements in network services will provide new possibilities for business customers, especially in sectors like smart mining and industrial applications.
Amazon has reportedly developed a new generative AI model, code-named Olympus, capable of processing images and videos alongside text. This innovation is expected to reduce Amazon’s reliance on Anthropic’s Claude chatbot, currently a prominent feature of Amazon Web Services (AWS), according to sources cited by The Information.
The Olympus model promises enhanced functionality, such as recognising scenes in visual content. For example, users could search for specific moments, like a game-winning basketball shot, using simple text prompts. This advancement aligns with Amazon’s strategy to solidify its position in the competitive generative AI landscape, currently dominated by Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI.
Amazon’s efforts come after its recent $4 billion investment in Anthropic, echoing a similar amount injected last year. These investments bolster Amazon’s generative AI capabilities, signalling its commitment to catching up with its tech rivals. An official announcement for Olympus may be made at the upcoming AWS re:Invent conference next week, according to insiders.
Amazon declined to comment on the matter when approached by Reuters. The e-commerce giant’s push for cutting-edge AI underscores its ambition to rival industry leaders and redefine user experiences through advanced AI tools.
South Korea announced plans to provide 14 trillion won ($10 billion) in low-interest loans next year to support its chip sector amid growing competition from China and uncertainty over US trade policies under President-elect Donald Trump. The funds, managed by state-run banks, will include 1.8 trillion won for infrastructure like power lines at a new high-tech chip complex in Yongin and Pyeongtaek, designed to attract advanced chipmakers.
The government highlighted challenges posed by rapid advancements in China’s semiconductor industry and potential changes to US policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and Chips Act, which could alter global trade incentives. Trump has also pledged new tariffs on goods from China, Mexico, and Canada, raising additional concerns for South Korean exporters.
While South Korea leads in memory chip manufacturing through giants like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, it faces setbacks in chip design and contract manufacturing, where rivals are gaining ground. The government vowed to use all available resources to help the industry overcome its current challenges and maintain global competitiveness.
OpenAI is allowing employees to sell up to $1.5 billion worth of shares to Japan’s SoftBank Group in a new tender offer, according to sources familiar with the deal. This follows SoftBank’s $500 million investment in OpenAI during an October funding round that valued the Microsoft-backed AI startup at $157 billion. Employees have until 24 December to decide whether to sell their shares, with the offer price matching the last funding round.
SoftBank’s Vision Fund 2 will finance the purchase, reflecting CEO Masayoshi Son’s strategy to increase his stake in AI ventures. Son has aggressively expanded his AI portfolio, including investments in OpenAI and chip startup Graphcore, as he positions the conglomerate to ride the AI boom.
OpenAI continues to attract global attention with its flagship product ChatGPT, which now boasts 250 million weekly active users. The company’s rapid growth and high valuation highlight its central role in shaping the AI revolution.
Huawei has announced plans to expand its Harmony operating system with a target of 100,000 apps in the next 6–12 months. Chairman Xu Zhijun emphasised the need for personalised applications to strengthen the ecosystem and meet consumer demands. Currently, Harmony has over 15,000 apps catering to basic needs.
The push comes amid United Statessanctions, which have restricted Huawei’s access to Google’s Android. Xu called on developers, government agencies, and organisations to support Harmony, stressing its maturity will depend on widespread adoption and user patience.
HarmonyOS was unveiled in 2019 after the US imposed trade restrictions upon China, citing security concerns. Huawei remains committed to investing in its development to achieve technological self-reliance, with Xu describing the initiative as essential for the company’s future success.
Qualcomm’s interest in acquiring Intel has reportedly cooled due to the complexities involved in such a massive deal, according to Bloomberg. While a full acquisition now appears unlikely, Qualcomm may consider pursuing specific parts of Intel’s business or revisiting the idea in the future. Neither company has commented publicly on the report.
Qualcomm initially approached Intel in September, sparking speculation about a potential acquisition. Any deal would face significant antitrust scrutiny as it would unite two of the semiconductor industry’s biggest players. Qualcomm had previously explored acquiring sections of Intel’s design business, but no formal offer materialised.
Intel, once a dominant chipmaking powerhouse, has struggled in recent years, losing market share to competitors like TSMC and missing key opportunities in generative AI. The company’s declining fortunes have been reflected in a 50% drop in its stock price this year and its recent removal from the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang reaffirmed the importance of global collaboration in technology during a visit to Hong Kong, even as potential United States policy shifts on export controls loom. Speaking to the media, Huang stressed that cooperation in science and technology underpins societal and scientific progress, a principle he believes will endure despite regulatory changes.
In a speech at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Huang celebrated the transformative potential of AI, calling it ‘the most important technology of our time.’ He urged graduates to embrace the opportunities presented by a rapidly evolving industry and highlighted Nvidia‘s contributions to advancing AI and computing over the past 25 years.
Huang received an honorary doctorate at the event alongside other distinguished honourees, noting that the emerging era of AI offers a unique chance for young innovators to tackle global challenges and revolutionise industries.
Biotech startup Cradle has raised $73 million to expand its labs and team, aiming to make AI-powered protein design more accessible. Founded in 2022, the company uses language models to analyse proteins, often described as “an alien programming language,” to suggest modifications that improve functionality, such as heat resistance or manufacturability.
Cradle’s software has gained traction among biotech and pharmaceutical companies by reducing the time and cost of experimental rounds, which can be both expensive and unpredictable. Its simple SaaS model eliminates concerns about royalties or intellectual property, offering a streamlined approach compared to competitors that co-develop drugs or processes.
Despite being a software provider, Cradle maintains a laboratory in Amsterdam to validate protein designs and build datasets to refine its models. The latest funding, led by IVP with participation from Index Ventures and Kindred Capital, will support lab expansion and further hiring. CEO Stef van Grieken aims to scale Cradle’s tools to reach a million scientists worldwide.
Chinese big tech companies have emerged as some of the most influential players in the global technology landscape, driving innovation and shaping industries across the board. These companies are deeply entrenched in everyday life in China, offering a wide range of services and products that span e-commerce, social media, gaming, cloud computing, ΑΙ, and telecommunications. Their influence is not confined to China, they also play a significant role in global markets, often competing directly with US tech giants.
The rivalry between China and the US has become one of the defining geopolitical struggles of the 21st century. This competition oscillates between cooperation, fierce competition, and confrontation, influenced by regulatory policies, national security concerns, and shifting political priorities. The geopolitical pendulum of China-US tech firms, totally independent from the US election outcome, reflects the broader tensions between the two powers, with profound implications for global tech industries, innovation, and market dynamics.
The Golden Shield Project
In 2000, under Chairman Jiang Zemin’s leadership, China launched the Golden Shield Project to control media and information flow within the country. The initiative aimed to safeguard national security and restrict the influence of Western propaganda. As part of the Golden Shield, many American tech giants such as Google, Facebook, and Netflix were blocked by the Great Firewall for not complying with China’s data regulations, while companies like Microsoft and LinkedIn were allowed to operate.
At the same time, China’s internet user base grew dramatically, reaching 800 million netizens by 2018, with 98% using mobile devices. This rapid expansion provided a fertile ground for Chinese tech firms, which thrived without significant competition from foreign players. Among the earliest beneficiaries of this system were the BATX companies, which capitalised on China’s evolving internet landscape and rapidly established a dominant presence in the market.
The powerhouses of Chinese tech
The major Chinese tech companies, often referred to as the Big Tech of China, include Alibaba Group, Tencent, Baidu, ByteDance, Huawei, Xiaomi, JD.com, Meituan, Pinduoduo, and Didi Chuxing.
Alibaba Group is a global e-commerce and technology conglomerate, operating platforms such as Taobao and Tmall for e-commerce, AliExpress for international retail, and Alipay for digital payments. The company also has significant investments in cloud computing with Alibaba Cloud and logistics.
Tencent, a massive tech conglomerate, is known for its social media and entertainment services. It owns WeChat, a widely used messaging app that offers payment services, social media features, and more. Tencent also has investments in gaming, owning major stakes in Riot Games, Epic Games, and Activision Blizzard, as well as interests in financial services and cloud computing.
Baidu, often called China’s Google, is a leading search engine provider. In addition to its search services, Baidu has a strong presence in AI development, autonomous driving, and cloud computing, particularly focusing on natural language processing and autonomous vehicles.
ByteDance, the company behind TikTok, has made a name for itself in short-form video content and AI-driven platforms. It also operates Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, along with Toutiao, a popular news aggregation platform. ByteDance has expanded into gaming, e-commerce, and other AI technologies.
Huawei is a global leader in telecommunications equipment and consumer electronics, particularly smartphones and 5G infrastructure. The company is deeply involved in cloud computing and AI, despite facing significant geopolitical challenges.
Xiaomi is a leading smartphone manufacturer that also produces smart home devices, wearables, and a wide range of consumer electronics. The company is growing rapidly in the Internet of Things (IoT) space and AI-driven products.
JD.com, one of China’s largest e-commerce platforms, operates similarly to Alibaba, focusing on direct sales, logistics, and tech solutions. JD.com has also made significant strides in robotics, AI, and logistics technology.
Meituan is best known for its food delivery and local services platform, offering everything from restaurant reservations to hotel bookings. The company also operates in sectors like bike-sharing, travel, and ride-hailing.
Pinduoduo has rapidly grown in e-commerce by focusing on group buying and social commerce, particularly targeting lower-tier cities and rural markets in China. The platform offers discounted products to users who buy in groups.
Didi Chuxing is China’s dominant ride-hailing service, offering various transportation services such as ride-hailing, car rentals, and autonomous driving technology.
But what are the BATX companies we mentioned earlier?
BAXT
The term BATX refers to a group of the four dominant Chinese tech companies: Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, and Xiaomi. These companies are central to China’s technology landscape and are often compared to the US “FAANG” group (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) because of their major influence across a range of industries, including e-commerce, search engines, social media, gaming, ΑΙ and telecommunications. Together, BATX companies are key players in shaping China’s tech ecosystem and have a significant impact on global markets.
China’s strategy for tech growth
China’s technology development strategy has proven effective in propelling the country to the forefront of several high-tech industries. This ambitious approach, which involves broad investments across both large state-owned enterprises and smaller private startups, has fostered significant innovation and created a competitive business environment. As a result, it has the potential to serve as a model for other countries looking to stimulate tech growth.
A key driver of China’s success is its diverse investment strategy, supported by government-led initiatives like the “Made in China 2025” and the “Thousand Talents Plan“. These programs offer financial backing and attract top talent from around the globe. This inclusive approach has helped China rapidly emerge as a global leader in fields like AI, robotics, and semiconductors. However, critics argue that the strategy may be overly aggressive, potentially stifling competition and innovation.
Some have raised concerns that China’s government support unfairly favours domestic companies, providing subsidies and other advantages that foreign competitors do not receive. Yet, this type of protectionist approach is not unique to China; other countries have implemented similar strategies to foster the growth of their own industries.
Another critique is that China’s broad investment model may encourage risky ventures and the subsidising of failures, potentially leading to a market that is oversaturated with unprofitable businesses. While this criticism holds merit in some cases, the overall success of China’s strategy in cultivating a dynamic and competitive tech landscape remains evident.
Looking ahead, China’s technology development strategy is likely to continue evolving. As the country strengthens its position on the global stage, it may become more selective in its investments, focusing on firms with the potential for global leadership.
In any case, China’s strategy has shown it can drive innovation and foster growth. Other nations hoping to advance their technological sectors should take note of this model and consider implementing similar policies to enhance their own competitive and innovative business environments.
But under what regulatory framework does Chinese tech policy ultimately operate? How does it affect the whole project? Are there some negative effects of the tight state grip?
China’s regulatory pyramid: Balancing control and consequences
China’s regulatory approach to its booming tech sector is defined by a precarious balance of authority, enforcement, and market response. Angela Zhang, author of High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy, proposes a “dynamic pyramid model” to explain the system’s intricate dynamics. This model highlights three key features: hierarchy, volatility, and fragility.
The top-down structure of China’s regulatory system is a hallmark of its hierarchy. Regulatory agencies act based on directives from centralised leadership, creating a paradox. In the absence of clear signals, agencies exhibit inaction, allowing industries to flourish unchecked. Conversely, when leadership calls for stricter oversight, regulators often overreach. A prime example of this is the drastic shift in 2020 when China moved from years of leniency toward its tech giants to implementing sweeping crackdowns on firms like Alibaba and Tencent.
This erratic enforcement underscores the volatility of the system. Chinese tech regulation is characterised by cycles of lax oversight followed by abrupt crackdowns, driven by shifts in political priorities. The 2020 – 2022 crackdown, which involved antitrust investigations and record-breaking fines, sent shockwaves through markets, wiping out billions in market value. While the government eased its stance in 2022, the uncertainty created by such pendulum swings has left investors wary, with many viewing the Chinese market as unpredictable and risky.
Despite its intentions to address pressing issues like antitrust violations and data security, China’s heavy-handed regulatory approach often results in fragility. Rapid interventions can undermine confidence, stifle innovation, and damage the very sectors the government seeks to strengthen. Years of lax oversight exacerbate challenges, leaving regulators with steep issues to address and markets vulnerable to overcorrection.
This model offers a lens into the broader governance dynamics in China. The system’s centralised control and reactive policies aim to maintain stability but often generate unintended economic consequences. As Chinese tech firms look to expand overseas amid domestic challenges, the long-term impact of these regulatory cycles remains uncertain, potentially influencing China’s ability to compete on the global stage.
The battle for tech supremacy between the USA and China
The incoming US President Donald Trump is expected to adopt a more aggressive, unilateral approach to counter China’s technological growth, drawing on his history of quick, broad measures such as tariffs. Under his leadership, the USA is likely to expand export controls and impose tougher sanctions on Chinese tech firms. Trump’s advisors predict a significant push to add more companies to the US Entity List, which restricts US firms from selling to blacklisted companies. His administration might focus on using tariffs (potentially up to 60% on Chinese imports) and export controls to pressure China, even if it strains relations with international allies.
The escalating tensions have been further complicated by China’s retaliatory actions. In response to US export controls, China has targeted American companies like Micron Technology and imposed its own restrictions on essential materials for chipmaking and electric vehicle production. These moves highlight the interconnectedness of both economies, with the US still reliant on China for critical resources such as rare earth elements, which are vital for both technology and defence.
This intensifying technological conflict reflects broader concerns over data security, military dominance, and leadership in AI and semiconductors. As both nations aim to protect their strategic interests, the tech war is set to continue evolving, with major consequences for global supply chains, innovation, and the international balance of power in technology.
