The head of US cybersecurity, Jen Easterly, announced Monday that, despite an increase in disinformation targeting the 2024 presidential election, there has been no evidence of interference capable of affecting the election outcome. Easterly noted the unprecedented levels of false information spreading across online platforms, much of which has been attributed to foreign actors aiming to sow division among voters.
US authorities have pointed to Russia as one of the primary sources of election-related disinformation, including a widely circulated fake video in Georgia showing an immigrant falsely claiming to have voted multiple times. Officials say that similar tactics are expected to continue beyond Election Day, targeting trust in the electoral process through to January.
Easterly assured voters that election security is stronger than ever, thanks to enhanced protective measures and improved preparedness across voting jurisdictions. Her message emphasised the government’s ongoing commitment to maintaining safe, secure, and reliable elections for all Americans.
Meta is expanding the reach of its AI models, making its Llama AI series available to US government agencies and private sector partners involved in national security projects. Partnering with firms like Lockheed Martin, Oracle, and Scale AI, Meta aims to assist government teams and contractors with applications such as intelligence gathering and computer code generation for defence needs.
Although Meta’s policies generally restrict using Llama for military purposes, the company is making an exception for these government partners. This decision follows concerns over foreign misuse of the technology, particularly after reports revealed that researchers affiliated with China’s military had used an earlier Llama model without authorisation for intelligence-related applications.
The choice to integrate open AI like Llama into defence remains controversial. Critics argue that AI’s data security risks and its tendency to generate incorrect outputs make it unreliable in military contexts. Recent findings from the AI Now Institute caution that AI tools could be misused by adversaries due to data vulnerabilities, potentially putting sensitive information at risk.
Meta maintains that open AI can accelerate research and enhance security, though US military adoption remains limited. While some big tech employees oppose military-linked projects, Meta emphasises its commitment to strengthening national security while safeguarding its technology from unauthorised foreign use.
SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Elon Musk, is urging its Taiwanese suppliers to relocate manufacturing operations off the island due to rising geopolitical tensions between China and Taiwan. This shift, aimed at reducing risk amid China’s increased military drills around Taiwan, has led some suppliers to transfer parts of their production to countries such as Vietnam and Thailand. Notable Taiwanese companies, including Chin-Poon Industrial and Wistron NeWeb Corporation (WNC), confirmed that SpaceX requested they move production, citing geopolitical concerns.
In response, WNC has already started producing network equipment for SpaceX’s Starlink project in Vietnam, with plans to double its workforce there. Similarly, Universal Microwave Technology has expanded in Southeast Asia, investing in new factories in Vietnam and Thailand, while Shenmao Technology is establishing a $5 million unit in Vietnam. These shifts align with Taiwanese tech companies’ broader efforts to diversify their operations outside Taiwan, aiming to insulate their supply chains from potential disruptions.
SpaceX’s approach underscores Musk’s complicated relationship with Taiwan, heightened after his comments last year calling Taiwan an “integral part” of China, which sparked backlash from the Taiwanese government. The company’s interest in building a manufacturing hub in Vietnam reflects an increasing trend of high-tech industries seeking stability amid geopolitical tensions, with Southeast Asia emerging as a crucial alternative for production.
The 34th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent has adopted a new resolution to protect civilians and essential infrastructure from the potential risks posed by ICT activities during armed conflict. Recognising the increased likelihood of information and communication technologies (ICTs) being used in future conflicts, the resolution addresses the need to safeguard civilian lives and critical systems from the unintended human costs of these operations.
The resolution highlights concerns over the malicious use of ICT capabilities by parties in conflict, noting that such activities could impact protected persons and objects, including essential infrastructure like power, water, and healthcare systems. It underscores that these civilian objects are crucial for survival and should remain unaffected during hostilities. The resolution further emphasises the importance of preventing these activities from crossing international borders, which could inadvertently impact civilians in other regions.
Acknowledging the limited resources and capacities of some states and humanitarian organisations, the resolution also draws attention to the vulnerability this may create. Without adequate defences, states and components of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement could face greater risks from cyber incursions during the conflict.
Another focus of the resolution is the potential for civilians to become involved in cyber activities related to conflict, either by conducting or supporting operations. It points to the need for greater awareness of the risks and legal implications, as civilians may need to fully understand the consequences of their involvement in ICT-related activities in conflict situations.
The resolution also calls for further study and dialogue on how international humanitarian law (IHL) applies to ICT activities in warfare. It acknowledges that while IHL traditionally protects civilians and critical infrastructure during conflict, the unique characteristics of cyberspace may require additional interpretation and understanding.
By adopting this resolution, the Red Cross aims to ensure that, as the nature of conflict changes, a strong international framework remains to protect civilians and essential infrastructure from the emerging threats posed by cyber activities in armed conflict.
China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has adapted Meta’s open-source AI model, Llama, to create a military-focused tool named ChatBIT. Developed by researchers from PLA-linked institutions, including the Academy of Military Science, ChatBIT leverages an earlier version of Llama, fine-tuned for military decision-making and intelligence processing tasks. The tool reportedly performs better than some alternative AI models, though it falls short of OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4.
Meta, which supports open innovation, has restrictions against military uses of its models. However, the open-source nature of Llama limits Meta’s ability to prevent unauthorised adaptations, such as ChatBIT. In response, Meta affirmed its commitment to ethical AI use and noted the need for US innovation to stay competitive as China intensifies its AI research investments.
China’s approach reflects a broader trend, as its institutions reportedly employ Western AI technologies for areas like airborne warfare and domestic security. With increasing US scrutiny over the national security implications of open-source AI, the Biden administration has moved to regulate AI’s development, balancing its potential benefits with growing risks of misuse.
Canada’s signals intelligence agency has identified China’s hacking activities as the most significant state-sponsored cyber threat facing the country, according to a new threat assessment. The Communications Security Establishment (CSE) highlighted China’s advanced and aggressive cyber campaigns, describing them as highly sophisticated and primarily targeting political and commercial objectives, including espionage, intellectual property theft, and influence operations. This announcement comes amid strained relations between Ottawa and Beijing, fueled by past allegations of Chinese interference in Canada’s electoral process.
The CSE report also noted that Russia’s cyber operations are active in attempts to destabilise Canada and its allies, while Iran poses an additional cyber threat. These findings underscore the ongoing cyber challenges Canada faces from multiple state actors seeking influence and intelligence. The Chinese embassy in Ottawa has not yet commented on the CSE report, and Beijing has historically rejected similar accusations.
Canadian authorities have grown increasingly vocal about foreign interference, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau previously accusing China of election meddling. Security experts warn that Canada will need to strengthen defenses as geopolitical tensions continue to heighten cyber risks.
China’s Ministry of State Security announced the discovery of foreign spying devices in its waters, including underwater ‘lighthouses’ that could potentially guide foreign submarines. The ministry revealed on its official WeChat account that it had retrieved several types of devices hidden on the ocean floor, gathering real-time data from within China’s claimed territorial waters.
This revelation comes amid rising tensions in the South China Sea, where China and the Philippines dispute territory, increasing the risk of a broader confrontation potentially involving the US. China’s recent military drills around Taiwan have also heightened concerns, as the US and Taiwan have condemned Beijing’s actions.
China claims nearly all of the South China Sea, overlapping areas claimed by other Southeast Asian nations, and has maintained it will not renounce using force over Taiwan. A new phase in the submarine arms race between China and the US and its allies is underway, with Beijing projected to field nuclear-armed submarines by the decade’s end. The ministry affirmed its commitment to defending China’s maritime sovereignty and addressing threats of foreign espionage in its waters.
Linux creator Linus Torvalds has expressed support for removing several Russian maintainers from the Linux kernel project. This decision, announced by prominent developer Greg Kroah-Hartman, has sparked debate within the Linux community. The removals affect 11 Russian developers, largely due to compliance with new sanctions, though specific details of the removals still need to be fully clarified.
Responding to the concerns, Torvalds stated, “If you haven’t heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try reading the news sometime,” emphasising that the changes will not be reversed.
The Linux kernel, the operating system’s core, is managed by maintainers who oversee code submissions and updates. Kroah-Hartman noted that those removed may return if they provide documentation proving independence from sanctioned entities, especially organisations associated with the Russian government.
This action has stirred reactions among developers, with some accusing the decision-makers of acting contrary to Linux’s open-source principles. Others warned that the decision could lead to future uncertainties about the participation of maintainers in sanctioned regions.
Responding to criticism, Torvalds dismissed the objections as originating from “Russian troll factories” and reaffirmed his stance, citing his opposition to Russian aggression. The move follows broader trends in the tech industry, where major US companies, like Docker Hub and GitHub, have imposed restrictions on Russian users, reflecting the impact of international sanctions on open-source software projects.
Chinese hackers infiltrated Verizon’s phone systems to target devices used by individuals connected to Kamala Harris’s campaign, according to a source. Reports also indicated attempts to breach phones linked to Donald Trump and JD Vance, although Reuters could not confirm this.
Investigators are working to establish whether any communications from Trump or Vance were compromised. While the Trump campaign did not verify the targeting, it acknowledged the issue and criticised Harris, claiming her leadership emboldened cyberattacks from China and Iran.
The Chinese embassy in Washington denied involvement, asserting that China does not interfere in US elections and opposes cyberattacks in any form. The Harris campaign did not provide an immediate response to requests for comment.
The FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are currently investigating the incident. Verizon confirmed it was aware of a sophisticated cyberattack aimed at US telecommunications and said it is cooperating with law enforcement.
Georgia‘s secretary of state’s office recently thwarted a cyberattack aimed at crashing the website used by voters to request absentee ballots. The attack, believed to have originated from a foreign entity, involved hundreds of thousands of IP addresses flooding the system with fake traffic. Despite briefly slowing the site, the attack did not disrupt the ability of voters to request ballots, thanks in part to support from cybersecurity firm Cloudflare.
Officials have yet to confirm the foreign origin, though Gabe Sterling, an election official in Georgia, suggested the attack had “the hallmarks of a foreign power.” The FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are involved in the investigation. This incident highlights ongoing attempts by hackers, including foreign-linked groups, to interfere with the democratic process as the US presidential election approaches.
Georgia has previously dealt with cyber threats, including a cyberattack in Coffee County earlier this year, underscoring the continuous risk to election infrastructure. However, no cyber activity has affected the actual casting or counting of votes so far.
