Experts warn that the potential for disaster in the food and agriculture sector is immense. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) is tasked with preventing such crises by securing the sector’s infrastructure from physical and cyber threats. However, in today’s increasingly digital world, the USDA is alarmingly unprepared to fulfil this role, according to policymakers, independent experts, and even the department’s reports to Congress.
That crucial responsibility is handled by a small, underfunded office within the USDA, which is already stretched thin with other duties. The department’s leadership rarely highlights the serious cyber threats facing the food and agriculture industry. This industry contributed over 5% to the US economy and provided about 10% of the nation’s jobs last year. Despite these pressing risks, it remains uncertain whether the department has made meaningful progress in addressing them.
While other agencies that protect critical infrastructure have been proactive in confronting cyber threats, the USDA needs to be faster to act, even as industry stakeholders become increasingly anxious about their digital vulnerabilities. The food and agriculture sector has largely remained under the radar regarding cybersecurity, with hackers focusing on more profitable targets for now. But this reprieve is unlikely to last indefinitely. The 2021 ransomware attack on meat-processing giant JBS, which forced the closure of plants across the country and threatened to disrupt beef prices, served as a wake-up call about the sector’s vulnerabilities.
Over the past decade, the cyber risks to food and agriculture have escalated as automation has become more widespread across the industry. Technology has become deeply embedded in modern agriculture, from tractors guided by GPS and cloud-connected devices controlling planting patterns to drones (some manufactured in China) surveying and spraying crops and automated systems managing livestock feeding. That integration extends through the entire supply chain, from food processors to distributors, making it more vulnerable to cyberattacks.
However, these technological advancements were adopted mainly before the rise in cyber threats to critical infrastructure, leading to serious concerns about the security of the US food supply. Cyberattacks on the food system could manifest in various ways, and one of the most severe concerns involves manipulating food safety data, either by concealing a food-borne illness or by falsely creating evidence of one.
Why does this matter?
The USDA still needs to provide interviews. However, a spokesperson emphasised that the department remains ‘committed to enhancing our cyber capabilities, promoting cyber awareness across the sector, and raising the industry’s cyber profile, despite the limited funding allocated by Congress for this purpose.’
The department also stays engaged with the sector through biweekly email updates, periodic meetings with industry leaders, and organised threat briefings. Additionally, when pro-Russian hacktivists targeted the sector earlier this year, Detlefsen noted that USDA quickly brought in him and his colleagues to discuss the situation. According to Scott Algeier, executive director of the Food and Agriculture ISAC, the USDA is ‘doing well’ in its role as a policy coordinator, collaborator, and convener’ while allowing the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to handle the technical aspects of cybersecurity.
