Cybercrime

EDPS and regulators unite to address misuse of AI imagery across jurisdictions

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and authorities from 61 jurisdictions issued a joint statement on AI-generated imagery, warning about tools that create realistic depictions of identifiable individuals without consent. The move underscores concerns over privacy, dignity and child safety.

Authorities said advances in AI image and video tools, especially when integrated into social media platforms, have enabled non-consensual intimate imagery, defamatory depictions, and other harmful content. Children and vulnerable groups are seen as particularly at risk.

The EDPS and the other signatories reminded organisations that AI content-generation systems must comply with applicable data protection and privacy laws. They stressed that creating non-consensual intimate imagery may constitute a criminal offence in many jurisdictions.

Organisations are urged to implement safeguards against misuse of personal data, ensure transparency about system capabilities and uses, and provide accessible mechanisms for swift content removal. Stronger protections and age-appropriate information are expected where children are involved.

Authorities signalled plans for coordinated responses, including enforcement, policy development and education initiatives. The EDPS and fellow signatories urged organisations to engage proactively with regulators and ensure innovation does not undermine fundamental rights.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

CrowdStrike warns of faster AI driven threats

Cyber adversaries increasingly used AI to accelerate attacks and evade detection in 2025, according to CrowdStrike’s 2026 Global Threat Report. The company described the period as the year of the evasive adversary, marked by subtle and rapid intrusions.

The average time to a financially motivated online crime breakout fell to 29 minutes, with the fastest recorded at 27 seconds. CrowdStrike observed an 89 percent rise in attacks by AI-enabled threat actors compared with 2024.

Attackers also targeted AI systems themselves, exploiting GenAI tools at more than 90 organisations through malicious prompt injection. Supply chain compromises and the abuse of valid credentials enabled intrusions to blend into legitimate activity, with most detections classified as malware-free.

China linked activity rose by 38 percent across sectors, while North Korea linked incidents increased by 130 percent. CrowdStrike tracked more than 281 adversaries in total, warning that speed, credential abuse, and AI fluency now define the modern threat landscape.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

OpenClaw users face account suspensions under Google AI rules

Google has suspended access to its Antigravity AI platform for numerous OpenClaw users, citing violations of its terms of service. Developers had used OpenClaw’s OAuth plugin to access subsidised Gemini model tokens, triggering backend strain and service degradation.

OpenClaw, launched in November 2025, gained more than 219,000 GitHub stars by enabling local AI agents for tasks such as email management and web browsing. Users authenticated through Antigravity to access advanced Gemini models at reduced cost, bypassing official distribution channels.

Google said the third-party integration powered non-authorised products on Antigravity infrastructure, triggering usage flagged as malicious. In February 2026, AI Ultra subscribers reported 403 errors and account restrictions, with some citing temporary disruptions to Gmail and Workspace.

Varun Mohan of Google DeepMind said the surge had degraded service quality and that enforcement prioritised legitimate users. Limited reinstatement options were offered to those unaware of violations, while capacity constraints were cited as the reason.

The move follows similar restrictions by Anthropic on third-party OAuth usage. Developers are shifting to alternative forks, as debate intensifies over open tooling, platform control, and the risks of agentic AI ecosystems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

NVIDIA drives a new era of industrial AI cybersecurity

AI-driven defences are moving deeper into operational technology as NVIDIA leads a shift toward embedded cybersecurity across critical infrastructure.

The company is partnering with firms such as Akamai Technologies, Forescout, Palo Alto Networks, Siemens and Xage Security to protect energy, manufacturing and transport systems that increasingly operate through cloud-linked environments.

Modernisation has expanded capabilities across these sectors, yet it has widened the gap between evolving threats and ageing industrial defences.

Zero-trust adoption in operational environments is gaining momentum as Forescout and NVIDIA develop real-time verification models tailored to legacy devices and safety-critical processes.

Security workloads run on NVIDIA BlueField hardware to keep protection isolated from industrial systems and avoid any interference with essential operations. That approach enables more precise control over lateral movement across networks without disrupting performance.

Industrial automation is also adapting through Siemens and Palo Alto Networks, which are moving security enforcement closer to workloads at the edge. AI-enabled inspection via BlueField enhances visibility in highly time-sensitive environments, improving reliability and uptime.

Akamai and Xage are extending similar models to energy infrastructure and large-scale operational networks, embedding segmentation and identity-based controls where resilience is most critical.

A coordinated architecture is now emerging in which edge-generated operational data feeds central AI analysis, while enforcement remains local to maintain continuity.

The result is a security model designed to meet the pressures of cyber-physical systems, enabling operators to detect threats faster, reinforce operational stability and protect infrastructure that supports global AI expansion.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Global privacy regulators warn of rising AI deepfake harms

Privacy regulators from around the world have issued a joint warning about the rise of AI-generated deepfakes, arguing that the spread of non-consensual images poses a global risk instead of remaining a problem confined to individual countries.

Sixty-one authorities endorsed a declaration that draws attention to AI images and videos depicting real people without their knowledge or consent.

The signatories highlight the rapid growth of intimate deepfakes, particularly those targeting children and individuals from vulnerable communities. They note that such material often circulates widely on social platforms and may fuel exploitation or cyberbullying.

The declaration argues that the scale of the threat requires coordinated action rather than isolated national responses.

European authorities, including the European Data Protection Board and the European Data Protection Supervisor, support the effort to build global cooperation.

Regulators say that only joint oversight can limit the harms caused by AI systems that generate false depictions, rather than protecting individuals’ privacy as required under frameworks such as the General Data Protection Regulation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Anthropic uncovers large-scale AI model theft operations

Three AI laboratories have been found conducting large-scale illicit campaigns to extract capabilities from Anthropic’s Claude AI, the company revealed.

DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax used around 24,000 fraudulent accounts to generate more than 16 million interactions, violating terms of service and regional access restrictions. The technique, called distillation, trains a weaker model on outputs from a stronger one, speeding AI development.

Distilled models obtained in this manner often lack critical safeguards, creating serious national security concerns. Without protections, these capabilities could be integrated into military, intelligence, surveillance, or cyber operations, potentially by authoritarian governments.

The attacks also undermine export controls designed to preserve the competitive edge of US AI technology and could give a misleading impression of foreign labs’ independent AI progress.

Each lab followed coordinated playbooks using proxy networks and large-scale automated prompts to target specific capabilities such as agentic reasoning, coding, and tool use.

Anthropic attributed the campaigns using request metadata, infrastructure indicators, and corroborating observations from industry partners. The investigation detailed how distillation attacks operate from data generation to model launch.

In response, Anthropic has strengthened detection systems, implemented stricter access controls, shared intelligence with other labs and authorities, and introduced countermeasures to reduce the effectiveness of illicit distillation.

The company emphasises that addressing these attacks will require coordinated action across the AI industry, cloud providers, and policymakers to protect frontier AI capabilities.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

AWS warns of AI powered cybercrime

Amazon Web Services has revealed that a Russian-speaking threat actor used commercial AI tools to compromise more than 600 FortiGate firewalls across 55 countries. AWS described the campaign as an AI-powered assembly line for cybercrime.

According to AWS, the attacker relied on exposed management ports and weak single-factor credentials rather than exploiting software vulnerabilities. The campaign targeted FortiGate devices globally and focused on harvesting credentials and configuration data.

AWS said the potentially Russian group appeared unsophisticated but achieved scale through AI-assisted mass scanning and automation. When encountering stronger defences, the attackers reportedly shifted to easier targets rather than persist.

The company advised organisations using FortiGate appliances to secure management interfaces, change default credentials and enforce complex passwords. Amazon said it was not compromised during the campaign.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Wikipedia removes Archive.today links

Wikipedia editors have voted to remove all links to Archive.today, citing allegations that the web archive was involved in a distributed denial of service attack.

Editors said Archive.today, which also operates under domains such as archive.is and archive.ph, should not be linked because it allegedly used visitors’ browsers to target blogger Jani Patokallio. The site has also been accused of altering archived pages, raising concerns about reliability.

Archive.today had previously been blacklisted in 2013 before being reinstated in 2016. Wikipedia’s latest guidance calls for replacing Archive.today links with original sources or alternative archives such as the Wayback Machine.

The apparent owner of Archive.today denied wrongdoing in posts linked from the site and suggested the controversy had been exaggerated. Wikipedia editors nevertheless concluded that readers should not be directed to a service facing such allegations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

OpenClaw exploits spark a major security alert

A wave of coordinated attacks has targeted OpenClaw, the autonomous AI framework that gained rapid popularity after its release in January.

Multiple hacking groups have taken advantage of severe vulnerabilities to steal API keys, extract persistent memory data, and push information-stealing malware instead of leaving the platform’s expanding user base unharmed.

Security analysts have linked more than 30,000 compromised instances to campaigns that intercept messages and deploy malicious payloads through channels such as Telegram.

Much of the damage stems from flaws such as the Remote Code Execution vulnerability CVE-2026-25253, supply chain poisoning, and exposed administrative interfaces. Early attacks centred on the ‘ClawHavoc’ campaign, which disguised malware as legitimate installation tools.

Users who downloaded these scripts inadvertently installed stealers capable of full compromise, enabling attackers to move laterally across enterprise systems instead of being confined to a single device.

Further incidents emerged on the OpenClaw marketplace, where backdoored ‘skills’ were published from accounts that appeared reliable. These updates executed remote commands that allowed attackers to siphon OAuth tokens, passwords, and API keys in real time.

A Shodan scan later identified more than 312,000 OpenClaw instances running on a default port with little or no protection, while honeypots recorded hostile activity within minutes of appearing online.

Security researchers argue that the surge in attacks marks a decisive moment for autonomous AI frameworks. As organisations experiment with agents capable of independent decision-making, the absence of security-by-design safeguards is creating opportunities for organised threat groups.

Flare’s advisory urges companies to secure credentials and isolate AI workloads instead of relying on default configurations that expose high-privilege systems to the internet.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Data breach at PayPal prompts password resets and transaction refunds

PayPal has notified some customers of a data breach linked to its Working Capital loan application, after unauthorised access between 1 July and 12 December 2025 exposed personal information. Letters dated 10 February confirm that around 100 customers were potentially affected.

The incident was linked to an error in the Working Capital application, described as a ‘code change’. PayPal said it ‘terminated the unauthorised access to PayPal’s systems’ after discovery.

In a statement sent following publication, a PayPal spokesperson said ‘When there is a potential exposure of customer information, PayPal is required to notify affected customers. In this case, PayPal’s systems were not compromised. As such, we contacted the approximately 100 customers who were potentially impacted to provide awareness on this matter.’

Data potentially accessed includes names, email addresses, phone numbers, business addresses, Social Security numbers, and dates of birth. PayPal confirmed a small number of unauthorised transactions and said refunds were issued. Affected users had passwords reset and were offered credit monitoring.

Previous incidents include a 2023 credential stuffing attack that affected nearly 35,000 accounts and phishing campaigns that abused legitimate infrastructure. The company said it continues to use manual investigations and automated tools to mitigate fraud.

Customers are advised to use unique passwords, avoid unsolicited links, verify urgent messages directly via their accounts, and enable passkeys where available. Even limited breaches can heighten risks of targeted phishing and identity theft, especially for small businesses.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!