US Judiciary confirms cyberattack, moves to reinforce systems

The US Judiciary has confirmed suffering a cyberattack and says it is reinforcing systems to prevent further breaches. In a press release, it described ‘escalated cyberattacks of a sophisticated and persistent nature’ targeting its case management system and sensitive files.

Most documents in the judiciary’s electronic system are public; however, some contain confidential or proprietary information that is sealed from public view. The documents, it warned, are of interest to threat actors, prompting courts to introduce stricter controls on access under monitored conditions.

The Administrative Office of the US Courts is collaborating with Congress, the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and other relevant agencies on security measures. No details were given on the exact methods of reinforcement.

The US court system has been a frequent target of cybercrime. Previous incidents include a 2020 federal court breach, a 2024 attack on Washington state courts, and a ransomware strike on the Los Angeles Superior Court in summer 2024.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Tesla seeks approval to supply electricity in the UK

Tesla has applied for a licence to supply electricity to homes and businesses across Britain, challenging the dominance of major energy firms. Ofgem could take up to nine months to decide, with operations potentially starting next year.

Known for electric vehicles, Tesla also runs solar and battery storage divisions, with more than 250,000 EVs and tens of thousands of home batteries already sold in the UK. The company’s experience in Texas, where it rewards customers for feeding surplus power to the grid, could inform its UK plans.

The move comes as Tesla’s European car sales decline sharply, with July registrations falling almost 60% in the UK and over 55% in Germany. Increased competition from Chinese manufacturer BYD has added to the pressure.

Tesla has faced public criticism linked to Elon Musk’s political positions, yet the energy push signals a strategic shift towards broader utility services in its key markets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google signs groundbreaking deal to cut data centre energy use

Google has become the first major tech firm to sign formal agreements with US electric utilities to ease grid pressure. The deals come as data centres drive unprecedented energy demand, straining power infrastructure in several regions.

The company will work with Indiana Michigan Power and Tennessee Valley Authority to reduce electricity usage during peak demand. These arrangements will help divert power to general utilities when needed.

Under the agreements, Google will temporarily scale down its data centre operations, particularly those linked to energy-intensive AI and machine learning workloads.

Google described the initiative as a way to speed up data centre integration with local grids while avoiding costly infrastructure expansion. The move reflects growing concern over AI’s rising energy footprint.

Demand-response programmes, once used mainly in heavy manufacturing and crypto mining, are now being adopted by tech firms to stabilise grids in return for lower energy costs.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Weak cyber hygiene in smart devices risks national infrastructure

The UK’s designation of data centres as Critical National Infrastructure highlights their growing strategic importance, yet a pressing concern remains over vulnerabilities in their OT and IoT systems. While IT security often receives significant investment, the same cannot be said for other technologies.

Attackers increasingly target these overlooked systems, gaining access through insecure devices such as IP cameras and biometric scanners. Many of these operate on outdated firmware and lack even basic protections, making them ideal footholds for malicious actors.

There have already been known breaches, with OT systems used in botnet activity and crypto mining, often without detection. These attacks not only compromise security in the UK but can destabilise infrastructure by overloading resources or bypassing safeguards.

Addressing these threats requires full visibility across all connected systems, with real-time monitoring, wireless traffic analysis, and network segmentation. Experts urge data centre operators to act now, not in response to a breach, but to prevent one entirely.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Largest Bitcoin transactions in history spark quantum security talk

Eight long-dormant Bitcoin wallets from the early days of the network moved a combined 80,000 BTC in early July 2025. Each wallet sent roughly 10,000 BTC to new SegWit addresses, which offer enhanced security against future quantum computing threats.

These transfers mark the most significant single Bitcoin transactions ever recorded, attracting intense speculation across the crypto community.

Shortly after the transfer, around 28,600 BTC were sent to Galaxy Digital, with about 9,000 BTC sold, likely contributing to a 5% price drop from Bitcoin’s recent all-time high of $123,000.

Experts believe the security upgrade was a precaution against quantum computing risks, threatening Bitcoin’s cryptographic foundations in the coming decades. Developers are working on proposals to protect vulnerable wallets and strengthen network security.

Blockchain analysis shows all eight wallets belong to one entity, with some suspecting Roger Ver, aka ‘Bitcoin Jesus,’ because of his early role and recent legal troubles. Around that time, OP_RETURN messages appeared on the blockchain, possibly a spam campaign pressuring the wallet owner to prove control.

While no evidence of hacking has emerged, these events have heightened attention on dormant Bitcoin holdings and quantum security.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US court mandates Android app competition, loosens billing rules

Long-standing dominance over Android app distribution has been declared illegal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, reinforcing a prior jury verdict in favour of Epic Games. Google now faces an injunction that compels it to allow rival app stores and alternative billing systems inside the Google Play Store ecosystem for a three-year period ending November 2027.

A technical committee jointly selected by Epic and Google will oversee sensitive implementation tasks, including granting competitors approved access to Google’s expansive app catalogue while ensuring minimal security risk. The order also requires that developers not be tied to Google’s billing system for in-app purchases.

Market analysts warn that reduced dependency on Play Store exclusivity and the option to use alternative payment processors could cut Google’s app revenue by as much as $1 to $1.5 billion annually. Despite brand recognition, developers and consumers may shift toward lower-cost alternatives competing on platform flexibility.

While the ruling aims to restore competition, Google maintains it is appealing and has requested additional delays to avoid rapid structural changes. Proponents, including Microsoft, regulators, and Epic Games, hail the decision as a landmark step toward fairer mobile market access.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU AI Act oversight and fines begin this August

A new phase of the EU AI Act takes effect on 2 August, requiring member states to appoint oversight authorities and enforce penalties. While the legislation has been in force for a year, this marks the beginning of real scrutiny for AI providers across Europe.

Under the new provisions, countries must notify the European Commission of which market surveillance authorities will monitor compliance. But many are expected to miss the deadline. Experts warn that without well-resourced and competent regulators, the risks to rights and safety could grow.

The complexity is significant. Member states must align enforcement with other regulations, such as the GDPR and Digital Services Act, raising concerns regarding legal fragmentation and inconsistent application. Some fear a repeat of the patchy enforcement seen under data protection laws.

Companies that violate the EU AI Act could face fines of up to €35 million or 7% of global turnover. Smaller firms may face reduced penalties, but enforcement will vary by country.

Rules regarding general-purpose AI models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok also take effect. A voluntary Code of Practice introduced in July aims to guide compliance, but only some firms, such as Google and OpenAI, have agreed to sign. Meta has refused, arguing the rules stifle innovation.

Existing AI tools have until 2027 to comply fully, but any launched after 2 August must meet the new requirements immediately. With implementation now underway, the AI Act is shifting from legislation to enforcement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Italy investigates Meta over AI integration in WhatsApp

Italy’s antitrust watchdog has investigated Meta Platforms over allegations that the company may have abused its dominant position by integrating its AI assistant directly into WhatsApp.

The Rome-based authority, formally known as the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM), announced the probe on Wednesday, stating that Meta may have breached European Union competition regulations.

The regulator claims that the introduction of the Meta AI assistant into WhatsApp was carried out without obtaining prior user consent, potentially distorting market competition.

Meta AI, the company’s virtual assistant designed to provide chatbot-style responses and other generative AI functions, has been embedded in WhatsApp since March 2025. It is accessible through the app’s search bar and is intended to offer users conversational AI services directly within the messaging interface.

The AGCM is concerned that this integration may unfairly favour Meta’s AI services by leveraging the company’s dominant position in the messaging market. It warned that such a move could steer users toward Meta’s products, limit consumer choice, and disadvantage competing AI providers.

‘By pairing Meta AI with WhatsApp, Meta appears to be able to steer its user base into the new market not through merit-based competition, but by ‘forcing’ users to accept the availability of two distinct services,’ the authority said.

It argued that this strategy may undermine rival offerings and entrench Meta’s position across adjacent digital services. In a statement, Meta confirmed cooperating fully with the Italian authorities.

The company defended the rollout of its AI features, stating that their inclusion in WhatsApp aimed to improve the user experience. ‘Offering free access to our AI features in WhatsApp gives millions of Italians the choice to use AI in a place they already know, trust and understand,’ a Meta spokesperson said via email.

The company maintains its approach, which benefits users by making advanced technology widely available through familiar platforms. The AGCM clarified that its inquiry is conducted in close cooperation with the European Commission’s relevant offices.

The cross-border collaboration reflects the growing scrutiny Meta faces from regulators across the EU over its market practices and the use of its extensive user base to promote new services.

If the authority finds Meta in breach of EU competition law, the company could face a fine of up to 10 percent of its global annual turnover. Under Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, abusing a dominant market position is prohibited, particularly if it affects trade between member states or restricts competition.

To gather evidence, AGCM officials inspected the premises of Meta’s Italian subsidiary, accompanied by Guardia di Finanza, the tax police’s special antitrust unit in Italy.

The inspections were part of preliminary investigative steps to assess the impact of Meta AI’s deployment within WhatsApp. Regulators fear that embedding AI assistants into dominant platforms could lead to unfair advantages in emerging AI markets.

By relying on its established user base and platform integration, Meta may effectively foreclose competition by making alternative AI services harder to access or less visible to consumers. Such a case would not be the first time Meta has faced regulatory scrutiny in Europe.

The company has been the subject of multiple investigations across the EU concerning data protection, content moderation, advertising practices, and market dominance. The current probe adds to a growing list of regulatory pressures facing the tech giant as it expands its AI capabilities.

The AGCM’s investigation comes amid broader EU efforts to ensure fair competition in digital markets. With the Digital Markets Act and AI Act emerging, regulators are becoming more proactive in addressing potential risks associated with integrating advanced technologies into consumer platforms.

As the investigation continues, Meta’s use of AI within WhatsApp will remain under close watch. The outcome could set an essential precedent for how dominant tech firms can release AI products within widely used communication tools.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Aeroflot cyberattack cripples Russian flights in major breach

A major cyberattack on Russia’s flagship airline Aeroflot has caused severe disruptions to flights, with hundreds of passengers stranded at airports. Responsibility was claimed by two hacker groups: Ukraine’s Silent Crow and the Belarusian hacktivist collective Belarus Cyber-Partisans.

The attack is among the most damaging cyber incidents Russia has faced since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Past attacks disrupted government portals and large state-run firms such as Russian Railways, but most resumed operations quickly. This time, the effects were longer-lasting.

Social media showed crowds of delayed passengers packed into Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, Aeroflot’s main hub. The outage affected not only Aeroflot but also its subsidiaries, Rossiya and Pobeda.

Most of the grounded flights were domestic. However, international services to Belarus, Armenia, and Uzbekistan were also cancelled or postponed due to the IT failure.

Early on Monday, Aeroflot issued a statement warning of unspecified problems with its IT infrastructure. The company alerted passengers that delays and disruptions were likely as a result.

Later, Russia’s Prosecutor’s Office confirmed that the outage was the result of a cyberattack. It announced the opening of a criminal case and launched an investigation into the breach.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described the incident as ‘quite alarming’, admitting that cyber threats remain a serious risk for all major service providers operating at scale.

In a Telegram post, Silent Crow claimed it had maintained access to Aeroflot’s internal systems for over a year. The group stated it had copied sensitive customer data, internal communications, audio recordings, and surveillance footage collected on Aeroflot employees.

The hackers claimed that all of these resources had now either been destroyed or made inaccessible. ‘Restoring them will possibly require tens of millions of dollars. The damage is strategic,’ the group wrote.

Screenshots allegedly showing Aeroflot’s compromised IT dashboards were shared via the same Telegram channel. Silent Crow hinted it may begin publishing the stolen data in the coming days.

It added: ‘The personal data of all Russians who have ever flown with Aeroflot have now also gone on a trip — albeit without luggage and to the same destination.’

The Belarus Cyber-Partisans, who have opposed Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko’s authoritarian regime for years, said the attack was carefully planned and intended to cause maximum disruption.

‘This is a very large-scale attack and one of the most painful in terms of consequences,’ said group coordinator Yuliana Shametavets. She told The Associated Press that the group spent months preparing the strike and accessed Aeroflot’s systems by exploiting several vulnerabilities.

The Cyber-Partisans have previously claimed responsibility for other high-profile hacks. In April 2024, they said they had breached the internal network of Belarus’s state security agency, the KGB.

Belarus remains a close ally of Russia. Lukashenko, in power for over three decades, has permitted Russia to use Belarusian territory as a staging ground for the invasion of Ukraine and to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on Belarusian soil.

Russia’s aviation sector has already faced repeated interruptions this summer, often caused by Ukrainian drone attacks on military or dual-use airports. Flights have been grounded multiple times as a precaution, disrupting passenger travel.

The latest cyberattack adds a new layer of difficulty, exposing the vulnerability of even the most protected elements of Russia’s transportation infrastructure. While the full extent of the data breach is yet to be independently verified, the implications could be long-lasting.

For now, it remains unclear how long it will take Aeroflot to fully restore services or what specific data may have been leaked. Both hacker groups appear determined to continue using cyber tools as a weapon of resistance — targeting Russia’s most symbolic assets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

China issues action plan for global AI governance and proposes global AI cooperation organisation

At the 2025 World AI Conference in Shanghai, Chinese Premier Li Qiang urged the international community to prioritise joint efforts in governing AI, making reference to a need to establish a global framework and set of rules widely accepted by the global community. He unveiled a proposal by the Chinese government to create a global AI cooperation organisation to foster international collaboration, innovation, and inclusivity in AI across nations.

China attaches great importance to global AI governance, and has been actively promoting multilateral and bilateral cooperation with a willingness to offer more Chinese solutions‘.

An Action Plan for AI Global Governance was also presented at the conference. The plan outlines, in its introduction, a call for ‘all stakeholders to take concrete and effective actions based on the principles of serving the public good, respecting sovereignty, development orientation, safety and controllability, equity and inclusiveness, and openness and cooperation, to jointly advance the global development and governance of AI’.

The document includes 13 points related to key areas of international AI cooperation, including promoting inclusive infrastructure development, fostering open innovation ecosystems, ensuring high-quality data supply, and advancing sustainability through green AI practices. It also calls for consensus-building around technical standards, advancing international cooperation on AI safety governance, and supporting countries – especially those in the Global South – in ‘developing AI technologies and services suited to their national conditions’.

Notably, the plan indicates China’s support for multilateralism when it comes to the governance of AI, calling for an active implementation of commitments made by UN member states in the Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact, and expressing support for the establishment of the International AI Scientific Panel and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance (whose terms of reference are currently negotiated by UN member states in New York).

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!