President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Andrew Ferguson as the next chair of the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), signaling a dramatic policy shift for the agency. Ferguson, who joined the FTC as a commissioner earlier this year, is set to take over on ‘day one’ of Trump’s administration, replacing Lina Khan. Khan’s tenure focused on regulating Big Tech, earning praise for her aggressive antitrust stance.
Ferguson promises to reverse what he calls Khan’s ‘anti-business agenda’ and tackle what he terms ‘Big Tech censorship’ and ‘wokeness.’ He emphasises a commitment to protecting free speech and ensuring America’s leadership in technology and innovation. Ferguson’s policy blueprint, revealed in a document obtained by Punchbowl News, also includes plans to counter the ‘trans agenda’ as part of broader cultural battles tied to his vision for the FTC.
Trump also announced Mark Meador, an antitrust lawyer, as a nominee for FTC commissioner. Together, Ferguson and Meador aim to reshape the FTC into a body that prioritises competition, innovation, and what they describe as the restoration of free-market principles. These appointments mark a significant pivot from the current US administration’s regulatory approach to Big Tech.
Italian prosecutors have concluded an investigation into alleged tax evasion involving Facebook owner Meta, focusing on unpaid VAT worth €887.6 million. Two executives from the company’s Irish subsidiary are implicated in the case. This marks the final step before a potential trial unless the suspects can demonstrate their innocence.
The dispute centres on whether Meta’s provision of free access to platforms like Facebook and Instagram, in exchange for users’ personal data, qualifies as a taxable transaction. Italian tax police argue that user registrations represent a non-monetary exchange that should incur VAT. Meta disputes these claims, maintaining that it has met all tax obligations and cooperated fully with Italian authorities.
Italy’s Revenue Agency has supported the findings of an earlier police investigation, alleging Meta failed to declare €4 billion in taxable income between 2015 and 2021. Meta now has 60 days to address these observations, potentially leading to either a settlement or a judicial tax dispute.
The case, involving consultations with the European Commission’s VAT Committee, could set significant precedents for digital taxation. A final resolution remains pending, with Meta standing firm against the notion of applying VAT to user access.
Chinese drone manufacturers DJI and Autel Robotics face potential bans in the US under a proposed military bill. The legislation requires a national security review within a year to assess risks posed by their drones. If no review occurs, the companies will automatically join the Federal Communications Commission’s ‘Covered List,’ effectively blocking the sale of new models.
DJI, the world’s largest drone producer, claims the process is unfair, citing extensive security audits and enhanced privacy features. Autel Robotics, also impacted by the proposal, has previously been flagged for investigation over national security concerns.
US lawmakers remain concerned about potential surveillance risks and data vulnerabilities linked to Chinese drones. DJI has refuted these claims, emphasising that no forced labour is involved in its production, despite customs citing related concerns to block imports.
The controversy reflects escalating tensions in US-China relations, particularly in technology and national security domains. The outcome of the proposed bill could reshape the landscape of the commercial drone market in the United States.
A federal court ruling on December 4 has bolstered the Justice Department’s (DOJ) position that algorithm-driven price-fixing constitutes a clear antitrust violation. Judge Robert S. Lasnik of the US District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that claims against Yardi Systems Inc., a property management software firm, could proceed under the “per se” theory of antitrust law. This theory automatically deems certain actions, like price-fixing, illegal without requiring additional proof of harm.
The case alleges that Yardi’s RENTmaximizer tool facilitated collusion among property managers to inflate rents. The decision marks a significant departure from earlier rulings where similar claims involving pricing algorithms were dismissed. Experts see this as a pivotal moment for antitrust litigation, enabling plaintiffs to pursue cases by demonstrating that shared algorithm use facilitated price collusion.
This ruling aligns with the DOJ’s broader push against anticompetitive practices in algorithm-driven pricing, a growing area of concern across industries like home rentals and hospitality. While the decision strengthens the DOJ’s stance, legal experts anticipate continued debates over whether traditional antitrust principles can adapt to emerging technologies, signaling years of legal uncertainty ahead.
Apple Pay has faced its first real competition on iPhones, thanks to Norway’s mobile payment app, Vipps. Leveraging new EU regulations, Vipps now allows iPhone users to make tap-to-pay transactions, shop online, and even set it as their default payment app. This is a significant milestone as Apple, under pressure from EU regulators, has opened its NFC chip to third-party developers with the release of iOS 18.1.
For a decade, Apple Pay was the exclusive method for tap-to-pay functionality on iPhones. That changed after EU rulings deemed Apple’s practices anti-competitive, prompting the company to commit to a more open ecosystem. In addition to enabling NFC access, Apple has also introduced RCS messaging support and expanded app deletion options in response to regulatory pressure.
Vipps’ debut as Apple Pay’s first competitor signals a shift toward a more diverse iPhone experience. While this development could usher in innovative payment solutions, it also raises concerns about potential fragmentation in mobile payment systems. For now, Norway is leading the charge in this new era of digital payments.
Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) are calling for an investigation into potential antitrust violations by FanDuel and DraftKings. In a joint letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice, the lawmakers accused the two sports betting giants of collaborating to suppress competition in the online sports betting market. The issue centres around their 2016 merger attempt, which was blocked by the FTC due to concerns about market dominance.
Since the merger was scrapped, Lee and Welch argue that FanDuel and DraftKings have used their dominance in fantasy sports to stifle smaller competitors in the online betting space. They claim that the companies, through the Sports Betting Alliance trade group, have intimidated rivals, blocked access to technology, and undermined marketing opportunities, which could harm innovation and prevent new players from entering the market.
FanDuel and DraftKings have not publicly commented on the allegations, and the Justice Department has acknowledged receipt of the letter but has not provided further details. The news has caused a drop in DraftKings’ stock, with Sen. Lee highlighting the potential societal impacts of the companies’ actions.
Google has filed a lawsuit against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) over its decision to place the company’s payment division under federal supervision. The legal dispute arises from the CFPB’s claims that Google’s handling of its payment products, including a discontinued peer-to-peer payment service, posed risks to consumers.
The lawsuit, lodged in the Washington, DC district court, argues that the CFPB’s actions constitute government overreach. Google asserts the decision was based on limited and unverified user complaints, stating that a discontinued product cannot pose consumer risks. The CFPB, however, maintains that its supervisory authority is essential to enforcing compliance with financial laws, even for defunct services.
Google spokesperson José Castañeda described the agency’s oversight as unnecessary, reiterating that the company’s payment products have always prioritised user safety. Google also claims the CFPB set an unreasonably low standard for determining consumer risks, leading to undue regulatory burdens.
The CFPB’s authority to oversee nonbank financial institutions, announced in 2022, allows it to conduct examinations and intervene against potential risks to consumers. Google contends that applying such measures to its payments division is unjustified and aims to challenge the agency’s approach in court.
President-elect Donald Trump‘s transition team has invited tech giants, including Google, Microsoft, Meta, Snap, and TikTok, to a mid-December meeting focused on combating online drug sales, according to a report by The Information. The meeting aims to gather insights from these companies about challenges and priorities in addressing illegal drug activity on their platforms.
Trump has pledged to tackle the fentanyl crisis, emphasising stricter measures against its flow into the US from Mexico and Canada. He has also proposed a nationwide advertising campaign to educate the public about the dangers of fentanyl. Tech companies have faced scrutiny in the past for their platforms’ roles in facilitating drug sales, with Meta under investigation and eBay recently settling a case for failing to prevent the sale of devices used to make counterfeit pills.
The transition team has not commented publicly on the meeting, but it underscores the growing intersection between technology and public health issues, particularly as the US grapples with the devastating impact of fentanyl addiction and trafficking.
Google’s newest AI, the PaliGemma 2 model, has drawn attention for its ability to interpret emotions in images, a feature unveiled in a recent blog post. Unlike basic image recognition, PaliGemma 2 offers detailed captions and insights about people and scenes. However, its emotion detection capability has sparked heated debates about ethical implications and scientific validity.
Critics argue that emotion recognition is fundamentally flawed, relying on outdated psychological theories and subjective visual cues that fail to account for cultural and individual differences. Studies have shown that such systems often exhibit biases, with one report highlighting how similar models assign negative emotions more frequently to certain racial groups. Google says it performed extensive testing on PaliGemma 2 for demographic biases, but details of these evaluations remain sparse.
Experts also worry about the risks of releasing this AI technology to the public, citing potential misuse in areas like law enforcement, hiring, and border control. While Google emphasises its commitment to responsible innovation, critics like Oxford’s Sandra Wachter caution that without robust safeguards, tools like PaliGemma 2 could reinforce harmful stereotypes and discriminatory practices. The debate underscores the need for a careful balance between technological advancement and ethical responsibility
Microsoft has introduced Copilot Vision, an AI-powered feature available in a limited US preview for users of Microsoft Edge. This experimental tool, part of the Copilot Labs program, can read web pages to answer user queries, summarise and translate content, and even assist with tasks like finding discounts or offering gaming tips. For example, it can provide recipes from a cooking site or strategic advice during an online chess game.
To address privacy concerns, Microsoft emphasises that Copilot Vision deletes all processed data at the end of each session and does not store information for model training. The feature is initially restricted to a pre-approved list of popular websites, excluding sensitive or paywalled content, though Microsoft plans to expand compatibility over time.
Microsoft’s cautious rollout reflects ongoing efforts to balance innovation with publisher concerns over AI’s use of web data. The company is collaborating with third-party publishers to ensure the tool benefits users without compromising website content or functionality.
