Consumer protection

YouTube’s AI flags viewers as minors, creators demand safeguards

YouTube’s new AI age check, launched on 13 August 2025, flags suspected minors based on their viewing habits. Over 50,000 creators petitioned against it, calling it ‘AI spying’. The backlash reveals deep tensions between child safety and online anonymity.

Flagged users must verify their age with ID, credit card, or a facial scan. Creators say the policy risks normalising surveillance and shrinking digital freedoms.

SpyCloud’s 2025 report found a 22% jump in stolen identities, raising alarm over data uploads. Critics fear YouTube’s tool could invite hackers. Past scandals over AI-generated content have already hurt creator trust.

Users refer to it on X as a ‘digital ID dragnet’. Many are switching platforms or tweaking content to avoid flags. WebProNews says creators demand opt-outs, transparency, and stronger human oversight of AI systems.

As global regulation tightens, YouTube could shape new norms. Experts urge a balance between safety and privacy. Creators push for deletion rules to avoid identity risks in an increasingly surveilled online world.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK-based ODI outlines vision for EU AI Act and data policy

The Open Data Institute (ODI) has published a manifesto setting out six principles for shaping European Union policy on AI and data. Aimed at supporting policymakers, it aligns with the EU’s upcoming digital reforms, including the AI Act and the review of the bloc’s digital framework.

Although based in the UK, the ODI has previously contributed to EU policymaking, including work on the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice and consultations on the use of health data. The organisation also launched a similar manifesto for UK data and AI policy in 2024.

The ODI states that the EU has a chance to establish a global model of digital governance, prioritizing people’s interests. Director of research Elena Simperl called for robust open data infrastructure, inclusive participation, and independent oversight to build trust, support innovation, and protect values.

Drawing on the EU’s Competitiveness Compass and the Draghi report, the six principles are: data infrastructure, open data, trust, independent organisations, an inclusive data ecosystem, and data skills. The goal is to balance regulation and innovation while upholding rights, values, and interoperability.

The ODI highlights the need to limit bias and inequality, broaden access to data and skills, and support smaller enterprises. It argues that strong governance should be treated like physical infrastructure, enabling competitiveness while safeguarding rights and public trust in the AI era.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK minister defends use of live facial recognition vans

Dame Diana Johnson, the UK policing minister, has reassured the public that expanded use of live facial recognition vans is being deployed in a measured and proportionate manner.

She emphasised that the tools aim only to assist police in locating high-harm offenders, not to create a surveillance society.

Addressing concerns raised by Labour peer Baroness Chakrabarti, who argued the technology was being introduced outside existing legal frameworks, Johnson firmly rejected such claims.

She stated that UK public acceptance would depend on a responsible and targeted application.

By framing the technology as a focused tool for effective law enforcement rather than pervasive monitoring, Johnson seeks to balance public safety with civil liberties and privacy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI browsers accused of harvesting sensitive data, according to new study

A new study from researchers in the UK and Italy found that popular AI-powered browsers collect and share sensitive personal data, often in ways that may breach privacy laws.

The team tested ten well-known AI assistants, including ChatGPT, Microsoft’s Copilot, Merlin AI, Sider, and TinaMind, using public websites and private portals like health and banking services.

All but Perplexity AI showed evidence of gathering private details, from medical records to social security numbers, and transmitting them to external servers.

The investigation revealed that some tools continued tracking user activity even during private browsing, sending full web page content, including confidential information, to their systems.

Sometimes, prompts and identifying details, like IP addresses, were shared with analytics platforms, enabling potential cross-site tracking and targeted advertising.

Researchers also found that some assistants profiled users by age, gender, income, and interests, tailoring their responses across multiple sessions.

According to the report, such practices likely violate American health privacy laws and the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation.

Privacy policies for some AI browsers admit to collecting names, contact information, payment data, and more, and sometimes storing information outside the EU.

The study warns that users cannot be sure how their browsing data is handled once gathered, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in AI-enhanced browsing.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Crypto crime unit expands with Binance

Tron, Tether, and TRM Labs have announced the expansion of their T3 Financial Crime Unit (T3 FCU) with Binance as the first T3+ partner. The unit has frozen over $250 million in illicit crypto assets since its launch in September 2024.

The T3 FCU works with global law enforcement to tackle money laundering, investment fraud, terrorism financing, and other financial crimes. The new T3+ programme unites exchanges and institutions to share intelligence and tackle threats in real time.

Recent reports highlight the urgency of these efforts. Over $3 billion in crypto was stolen in the first half of 2025, with some hacks laundering funds in under three minutes. Only around 4% of stolen assets were recovered during this period, underscoring the speed and sophistication of modern attacks.

Debate continues over the role of stablecoin issuers and exchanges in freezing funds. Tether’s halt of $86,000 in stolen USDt highlights fast recovery but raises concerns over decentralised principles amid calls for stronger industry-wide security.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Data breach hits cervical cancer screening programme

Hackers have stolen personal and medical information from nearly 500,000 participants in the Netherlands’ cervical cancer screening programme. The attack targeted the NMDL laboratory in Rijswijk between 3 and 6 July, but authorities were only informed on 6 August.

Data includes names, addresses, birth dates, citizen service numbers, possible test results and healthcare provider details. For some victims, phone numbers and email addresses were also stolen. The lab, owned by Eurofins Scientific, has suspended operations while a security review occurs.

The Dutch Population Screening Association has switched to a different laboratory to process future tests and is warning those affected of the risk of fraud. Local media reports suggest hackers may also have accessed up to 300GB of data on other patients from the past three years.

Security experts say the breach underscores the dangers of weak links in healthcare supply chains. Victims are now being contacted by the authorities, who have expressed regret for the distress caused.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Elderly patient hospitalised after ChatGPT’s dangerous dietary advice

Hospital records show that a man in his sixties ended up hospitalised with neurological and psychiatric symptoms after replacing table salt with sodium bromide, based on AI-generated advice from ChatGPT. The condition, known as bromism, includes paranoia, hallucinations and coordination issues.

Medical staff noted unusual thirst and paranoia around drinking water. Shortly after admission, the patient experienced auditory and visual hallucinations and was placed under an involuntary psychiatric hold due to grave disability.

The incident underscores the serious risks of relying on AI tools for health guidance. In this case, ChatGPT did not issue warnings or ask for medical context when recommending sodium bromide, a toxic alternative.

Experts stress that AI should never replace professional healthcare consultation, particularly for complex or rare conditions.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Rollout of GPT-5 proves bumpier than expected

OpenAI’s highly anticipated GPT-5 has encountered a rough debut as users reported that it felt surprisingly less capable than its predecessor, GPT-4o.

The culprit? A malfunctioning real-time router that failed to select the most appropriate model for user queries.

In response, Sam Altman acknowledged the issue and assured users that GPT-5 would ‘seem smarter starting today’.

To ease the transition, OpenAI is restoring access to GPT-4o for Plus subscribers and doubling rate limits to encourage experimentation and feedback gathering.

Beyond technical fixes, the incident has sparked broader debate within the AI community about balancing innovation with emotional resonance. Some users lament GPT-5’s colder tone and tighter alignment, even as developers strive for safer, more responsible AI behaviour.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Musk threatens legal action against Apple over AI App rankings

Elon Musk has announced plans to sue Apple, accusing the company of unfairly favouring OpenAI’s ChatGPT over his xAI app Grok on the App Store.

Musk claims that Apple’s ranking practices make it impossible for any AI app except OpenAI’s to reach the top spot, calling this behaviour an ‘unequivocal antitrust violation’. ChatGPT holds the number one position on Apple’s App Store, while Grok ranks fifth.

Musk expressed frustration on social media, questioning why his X app, which he describes as ‘the number one news app in the world,’ has not received higher placement. He suggested that Apple’s ranking decisions might be politically motivated.

The dispute highlights growing tensions as AI companies compete for prominence on major platforms.

Apple and Musk’s xAI have not responded yet to requests for comment.

The controversy unfolds amid increasing scrutiny of App Store policies and their impact on competition, especially within the fast-evolving AI sector.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Musk and OpenAI CEO Altman clash over Apple and X

After Elon Musk accused Apple of favouring OpenAI’s ChatGPT over other AI applications on the App Store, there was a strong response from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

Altman alleged that Musk manipulates the social media platform X for his benefit, targeting competitors and critics. The exchange adds to their history of public disagreements since Musk left OpenAI’s board in 2018.

Musk’s claim centres on Apple’s refusal to list X or Grok (XAI’s AI app) in the App Store’s ‘Must have’ section, despite X being the top news app worldwide and Grok ranking fifth.

Although Musk has not provided evidence for antitrust violations, a recent US court ruling found Apple in contempt for restricting App Store competition. The EU also fined Apple €500 million earlier this year over commercial restrictions on app developers.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT currently leads the App Store’s ‘Top Free Apps’ list for iPhones in the US, while Grok holds the fifth spot. Musk’s accusations highlight ongoing tensions in the AI industry as big tech companies battle for app visibility and market dominance.

The situation emphasises how regulatory scrutiny and legal challenges shape competition within the digital economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!