Competition regulation

TikTok users react to looming US Shutdown

Disappointment and confusion swept across TikTok users in the United States as news broke that ByteDance, the app’s Chinese owner, plans to shut down the platform for its 170 million US users by Sunday. The move comes in response to a federal ban requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US assets by January 19 due to national security concerns. While some users hold out hope for a last-minute reprieve, many are preparing for the worst.

Content creators, many of whom have built careers and followings on TikTok, expressed frustration and sadness. Some vowed to boycott rival platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and X, while others scrambled to save their content. True crime creator Amber Goode, from Colorado, criticised the government for “playing with us,” while other users shared instructions on migrating to alternative platforms, including China-based apps like RedNote.

TikTok has maintained that it does not and would never share US user data with China, arguing that the ban violates First Amendment rights. Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, users attempting to open the app on Sunday will be redirected to a shutdown information page. President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly exploring executive actions to delay the ban, but the outcome remains uncertain.

The shutdown has sparked mixed emotions globally, with some international users relieved that American social media issues may no longer dominate their feeds. However, for US creators like Ishpal Sidhu, who stands to lose her livelihood, the uncertainty has cast a shadow over what was once a thriving platform.

iGenius unveils new AI model for regulated industries

Italian startup iGenius has launched Colosseum 355B, a large language model built using the latest Nvidia technology, designed for industries with strict data protection and compliance needs. CEO Uljan Sharka highlighted the challenges that tight regulations pose for AI adoption in sectors like finance, heavy industry, and government, where data security is paramount.

Unlike major competitors like OpenAI, iGenius offers open-source AI models that allow companies to run the technology on their own infrastructure, ensuring that sensitive data remains in-house. The startup is already in talks with potential clients in the financial services and industrial sectors.

Sharka also traveled to Brussels to present the new model to the European Commission, aiming to gain regulatory approval and foster wider adoption in Europe’s heavily regulated markets.

China launches inquiry into US chip funding

China’s Commerce Ministry announced plans to investigate US government subsidies to its semiconductor sector following requests from China’s mature node chip industry. The ministry stated on Thursday that these subsidies, introduced under the Biden administration, allegedly provide American companies with an unfair competitive advantage in the global market.

According to the Chinese government, US firms have exported mature node chip products to China at reduced prices, causing harm to the interests of China’s domestic semiconductor industry. Beijing views these practices as a threat to its industry’s rights and competitive balance.

The investigation reflects rising tensions between the two nations over technology and trade, particularly as both seek to bolster their semiconductor sectors amid growing geopolitical competition.

Noyb challenges Chinese data practices in Europe

Austrian advocacy group Noyb has filed privacy complaints against six Chinese companies, including TikTok, Shein, and Xiaomi, alleging illegal transfers of European user data to China. The group, known for targeting US tech giants like Apple and Meta, said this is its first case against Chinese firms. Complaints have been filed in four EU countries, seeking fines of up to 4% of each company’s global revenue.

Noyb claims that companies such as Alibaba’s AliExpress and Tencent’s WeChat transfer EU citizens’ data either directly to China or undisclosed ‘third countries,’ which are likely China. Under EU data protection laws, such transfers are prohibited if the destination country fails to meet the bloc’s strict privacy standards. A Noyb lawyer emphasised that China’s status as a ‘surveillance state’ makes such transfers clearly unlawful.

The allegations add to mounting regulatory challenges for Chinese tech firms. TikTok, already under scrutiny in Europe for election interference concerns, faces a potential US ban starting Sunday over national security fears. Regulators in multiple regions continue to ramp up pressure on Chinese companies amid growing global concerns over data privacy and security.

TikTok prepares for possible US shutdown

TikTok is preparing to shut down its US operations on Sunday unless a federal ban is averted at the last minute, according to sources. The ban, stemming from a law signed last April, requires TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell its US assets by January 19 or face nationwide restrictions. The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on whether to uphold or pause the ban, but no ruling has been made yet.

President-elect Donald Trump, set to take office the day after the ban would take effect, is reportedly considering a temporary suspension of the shutdown. However, legal uncertainty clouds the possibility of such action. Meanwhile, the Biden administration, in its final days, has signalled it will not block the ban without a credible divestment plan from ByteDance. TikTok has argued that the law violates First Amendment rights and warned that a prolonged ban could lead to significant user loss and global disruptions to its services.

If the ban proceeds, TikTok plans to display a pop-up message informing users of the shutdown and allow them to download their data. The app would become largely inoperable as US companies would no longer be permitted to provide critical services for its maintenance. TikTok has emphasised its ability to restore operations quickly if the ban is reversed but warned that the shutdown would impact not just American users but its global platform due to its reliance on US-based infrastructure.

The political and legal standoff has sparked widespread public and corporate reactions. Social media users have expressed disappointment at the impending ban, while TikTok’s US operations, employing over 7,000 workers, hang in the balance. Despite ongoing efforts to delay the enforcement, the platform faces an uncertain future as Sunday’s deadline looms.

US chip industry criticises Biden’s export control policies

Several chip and manufacturing industry groups have criticised the Biden administration’s new export controls, arguing they were implemented without sufficient consultation. A private letter sent to President Joe Biden on January 13 expressed concerns that the rules could harm US companies and shift market share to global competitors.

The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) and SEMI, representing chipmakers and manufacturing equipment firms, objected to the new licensing requirements for AI chip exports, including advanced high-bandwidth memory. They argued the lack of public input ignored the regulations’ economic and international consequences.

High-bandwidth memory, essential for AI chip production, is primarily manufactured by US and South Korean companies. The new rules could restrict its sale to China, further tightening controls on advanced technology exports.

A separate source suggested the restrictions may also affect companies like Lam Research, which previously benefited from a rule interpretation allowing expanded sales in China. Neither the SIA, SEMI, nor Lam Research commented immediately.

Meta faces new challenge in India over data sharing

Meta may be forced to halt or modify features in India after an antitrust ruling banned its WhatsApp messaging service from sharing user data with Meta for advertising purposes. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) imposed a $24.5 million fine and a five-year ban on the practice, accusing the company of abusing its dominance and coercing WhatsApp users into accepting a 2021 privacy policy that allegedly expanded data sharing unfairly.

India, Meta’s largest market with over 500 million WhatsApp users and 350 million Facebook users, is crucial for the company’s operations. The data-sharing ban could impact Meta’s ability to offer personalised ads on Facebook and Instagram, the company said in its court filing. Meta argued that this restriction could harm businesses, such as fashion brands, that rely on personalised ads to connect with customers. The US firm also warned the ruling could threaten its commercial viability in the region.

Meta has publicly defended its 2021 policy changes but criticised the CCI’s decision in a 2,000-page tribunal appeal, claiming the watchdog lacks the technical expertise to assess the implications of its ruling. The Indian appeals tribunal is set to hear Meta’s case, with the possibility of pausing the CCI directive while the legal process unfolds.

This challenge in India adds to Meta’s global struggles, including prior accusations in the EU over unclear privacy policy changes. The CCI’s ruling now requires WhatsApp to give users the choice to opt out of data sharing with Meta, signaling a broader push for greater transparency and user control in data practices worldwide.

SEC takes legal action against Musk for Twitter shares

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk, accusing him of delaying the disclosure of his 2022 Twitter stake, which violated federal securities laws. According to the complaint, Musk waited 11 days beyond the required 10-day window to reveal his 5% ownership of Twitter, enabling him to purchase over $500 million worth of shares at lower prices before disclosing his 9.2% stake on April 4, 2022. Twitter’s stock price surged by more than 27% following the announcement.

The SEC seeks civil penalties and a repayment of profits it claims Musk gained unfairly. Musk’s attorney, Alex Spiro, dismissed the lawsuit as a ‘sham,’ arguing it stems from a minor administrative oversight. Musk has previously clashed with the SEC, including a 2018 settlement over misleading tweets about taking Tesla private, which resulted in a $20 million fine and other conditions.

This lawsuit is the latest in a series of legal challenges Musk faces over his $44 billion purchase of Twitter, now rebranded as X. Musk, who is worth $417 billion, according to Forbes, has also been sued by former Twitter shareholders in Manhattan federal court for the delayed disclosure, which they claim caused them financial harm. The SEC’s action comes just days before Chair Gary Gensler’s scheduled departure, marking another chapter in Musk’s contentious history with the regulatory body.

TikTok prepares to halt operations in the US, The Information reports

TikTok plans to disable its app for all US users on Sunday if the Supreme Court does not block a federal ban, according to a report by The Information. This action would go beyond the law’s requirement, which mandates a ban only on new downloads from Apple and Google app stores while allowing existing users to continue using the app temporarily.

Under TikTok’s plan, users attempting to access the app will be redirected to a website explaining the ban. The company also intends to allow users to download their data for future use. TikTok and its parent company ByteDance have yet to comment on these developments.

The ban stems from a law signed by President Joe Biden in April 2024, requiring ByteDance to sell its US assets by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. TikTok has challenged the law, arguing that it violates First Amendment protections. In a recent court filing, the company warned that a month-long ban could result in one-third of its 170 million US users leaving the platform permanently.

This potential shutdown reflects the escalating tensions surrounding TikTok’s operations in the United States, as debates over data security and free speech continue.

Russia slaps Google with $78 million fine

A Russian court has imposed an 8 billion rouble ($78 million) fine on Google for failing to comply with previous penalties related to administrative offences, according to the Moscow courts’ press service. The fine marks a sharp increase from the usual smaller penalties issued to foreign tech companies operating in Russia.

Russia has repeatedly demanded that foreign platforms, including YouTube, remove content it deems illegal. Critics argue that the government’s pressure on YouTube, once a major platform in Russia, is aimed at limiting access to dissenting voices. YouTube’s daily users in Russia have plummeted from 50 million to 12 million amid growing restrictions and alleged speed disruptions.

The Kremlin denies any deliberate interference with YouTube, instead blaming Google for failing to upgrade its infrastructure in the country, a claim the tech giant disputes. Meanwhile, President Vladimir Putin has accused Google of acting as a tool for US political influence, further straining relations.