Meta, the company behind Facebook, is set to face trial in April over allegations from the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that it stifled competition by acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp. The FTC’s lawsuit, filed in 2020, argues that Meta acted illegally to maintain dominance in personal social networks by purchasing potential competitors rather than innovating within the mobile ecosystem.
The case is scheduled to begin on 14 April, as ruled by Judge James Boasberg. Earlier this month, the judge rejected Meta’s request to dismiss the case, which argued that the FTC’s claims relied on a narrow definition of the social media market. Meta highlighted competition from TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn, and X as evidence that the FTC’s market analysis was outdated.
Judge Boasberg acknowledged the challenges facing the FTC, noting that shifts in technology and market dynamics complicate its claims. He described the agency’s approach as pushing antitrust law to its limits, raising doubts about whether its case could withstand trial.
The trial will examine whether Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014 were part of a deliberate strategy to eliminate competition. The outcome could have significant implications for the future of antitrust enforcement in the tech industry.
According to Morgan Adamski, executive director of US Cyber Command, Chinese hackers are embedding themselves in US critical infrastructure IT networks to prepare for a potential conflict with the United States. He announced that China-linked cyber operations aim to secure strategic advantages in the event of a major clash.
These operations involve compromising key networks and positioning themselves to execute disruptive attacks. Examples include manipulating heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems in server rooms or disrupting vital energy and water controls, officials said earlier this year.
Speaking at the Cyberwarcon security conference in Arlington, Virginia, Adamski emphasised the scale of the threat, noting that the US government has launched globally coordinated efforts to counter these operations. These efforts include offensive and defensive measures designed to degrade and disrupt China’s cyber activities worldwide. Actions range from exposing cyber campaigns to imposing sanctions and issuing cybersecurity advisories, with support from allied nations.
Earlier, US Senator Mark Warner described a suspected China-linked cyberespionage campaign, dubbed ‘Salt Typhoon,’ as the worst telecommunications hack in US history. Beijing has repeatedly denied conducting cyberattacks on US entities.
Wang Shouwen, China‘s vice commerce minister, held discussions with Jay Puri, Nvidia‘s executive vice president for worldwide field operations, in Beijing on Monday, according to China’s Ministry of Commerce.
Details of the meeting were not disclosed, but the talks underscore Nvidia’s growing significance in the global tech landscape and its potential role in China’s semiconductor sector.
The meeting comes amid heightened tensions over technology trade between China and the United States, where Nvidia is a leading player in advanced chip production. Both sides may seek to address mutual interests while navigating ongoing restrictions and competition in the semiconductor industry.
The US Supreme Court has decided to allow a class-action lawsuit against Meta, Facebook’s parent company, to move forward. The case stems from the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the political consulting firm accessed personal data from 87M Facebook users and used it for voter targeting in the 2016 US presidential election. Meta had sought to block the lawsuit, but the court dismissed its appeal.
Investors claim Meta failed to fully disclose the risks of data misuse, leading to two major drops in its stock price in 2018 when the extent of the privacy breach became public. Meta has already paid a $5.1B fine and a $725M settlement with users over related allegations.
The lawsuit is one of several legal challenges facing big tech firms. A separate case against Nvidia is under review, as investors allege the company misled them about its dependency on cryptocurrency mining.
The US government is expected to reduce Intel Corp‘s preliminary $8.5 billion federal chips grant to less than $8 billion, according to a report by The New York Times. The decision reflects Intel’s recent $3 billion contract to produce chips for the Pentagon, unnamed sources said.
Earlier this year, the Biden administration announced nearly $20 billion in grants and loans for Intel to expand its semiconductor manufacturing capabilities. The funding, part of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, supports building two new factories in Arizona and modernising an existing one.
The CHIPS Act allocated $52.7 billion to bolster US semiconductor production, including $39 billion for subsidies and $11 billion for research and development, as part of a national push to strengthen domestic chip manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign supply chains.
As the US prepares for Donald Trump’s second term, China is significantly increasing its semiconductor imports from the US, anticipating potential sanctions. In October, China imported $1.11 billion worth of microchips, a 60% rise from the previous year, and has already imported $9.61 billion in the first ten months of 2024, marking a 42.5% year-on-year increase. This surge reflects China’s growing demand for US semiconductors, particularly CPU-based processors and chips for storage and signal amplification, which align with its AI ambitions.
Despite these imports, China faces hurdles in advancing its chip technology. US sanctions have crippled Huawei’s ability to develop competitive AI chips, with the company’s upcoming processors lagging years behind NVIDIA’s offerings. This setback is largely due to restrictions on access to advanced lithography equipment, such as ASML’s EUV tools, essential for creating cutting-edge chips.
Meanwhile, China has been ramping up its chip manufacturing efforts, investing $25 billion in equipment in the first half of 2024, surpassing spending by Korea, Taiwan, and the US. However, as one-third of global semiconductor demand, China’s position remains critical for the industry. The impact of Trump’s potential tech restrictions, whether broad or selective, will likely influence the global semiconductor market, requiring careful balancing of US production and Chinese demand.
Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, has filed a motion to dismiss a New Mexico lawsuit accusing it of enabling child sexual exploitation on its platform. The lawsuit, brought by Attorney General Raul Torrez in September, claims Snapchat exposed minors to abuse and failed to warn parents about sextortion risks. Snap refuted the allegations, calling them ‘patently false,’ and argued that the state’s decoy investigation misrepresented key facts.
The lawsuit stems from a broader push by US lawmakers to hold tech firms accountable for harm to minors. Investigators claimed a decoy account for a 14-year-old girl received explicit friend suggestions despite no user activity. Snap countered that the account actively sent friend requests, disputing the state’s findings.
Snap further argued that the lawsuit violates Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which shields platforms from liability for user-generated content. It also invoked the First Amendment, stating the company cannot be forced to provide warnings about subjective risks without clear guidelines.
Defending its safety efforts, Snap highlighted its increased investment in trust and safety teams and collaboration with law enforcement. The company said it remains committed to protecting users while contesting what it views as an unjustified legal challenge.
OpenAI is reportedly considering developing a web browser integrated with its chatbot and is in talks to enhance search features for platforms like Conde Nast, Redfin, and Priceline, according to The Information. These moves could position OpenAI as a competitor to Google in both the browser and search markets, further challenging the tech giant’s dominance.
OpenAI, led by Sam Altman, has already dipped into the search market with SearchGPT and has explored AI-powered collaborations with Samsung, a key Google partner, and Apple for its “Apple Intelligence” features. Meanwhile, Google faces increasing pressure, with the US Department of Justice suggesting it divest its Chrome browser to curb its search monopoly.
Although OpenAI’s browser plans remain in the early stages, the potential competition highlights a shift in the AI landscape, with Google and OpenAI vying to lead the generative AI race. Alphabet shares fell sharply following the report, reflecting market concerns about Google’s ability to maintain its stronghold.
US prosecutors have urged a federal judge to impose sweeping changes on Google to dismantle its alleged monopoly on online search and advertising. Proposed remedies include forcing Google to sell its Chrome browser, share search data with competitors, and possibly divest its Android operating system. These measures could remain in place for up to a decade, overseen by a court-appointed technical committee.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and state antitrust enforcers argued that Google’s dominance, with a 90% share of US searches, has stifled competition by controlling critical distribution channels. The DOJ aims to end deals where Google pays companies like Apple billions annually to make its search engine the default on their devices. Prosecutors also want restrictions on Google’s acquisitions in search, AI, and advertising technology, as well as provisions for websites to opt out of training Google’s AI systems.
Google has called the proposals extreme, warning they would harm consumers and the economy. Alphabet’s legal chief, Kent Walker, said the measures represent “unprecedented government overreach.” Google will present alternative proposals in December, while a trial to decide the remedies is scheduled for April.
If implemented, the proposals could reshape the tech landscape, lowering barriers for competitors like DuckDuckGo. The case highlights broader global efforts to curb the power of tech giants and promote fair competition.
A new study has revealed that 75% of news-related social media posts are shared without being read, highlighting the rapid spread of unverified information. Researchers from US universities analysed over 35 million Facebook posts from 2017 to 2020, focusing on key moments in American politics. The study found that many users share links based on headlines, summaries, or the number of likes a post has received, without ever clicking to read the full article.
The study, published in Nature Human Behaviour, suggests this behavior may be driven by information overload and the fast-paced nature of social media. Users are often pressured to quickly share content without fully processing it, leading to the spread of misinformation. The research also pointed out that political partisans are more likely to share news without reading, though this could also be influenced by a few highly active, partisan accounts.
To mitigate the spread of misinformation, the authors suggest social media platforms implement warnings or alerts to inform users of the risks involved in sharing content without reading it. This would help users make more informed decisions before reposting news articles.
