Chinese robotaxi firm Pony AI secured $260 million in a US IPO, valuing the startup at $4.55 billion. This marks a resurgence in US investor confidence for Chinese tech companies, with the IPO reflecting renewed interest in autonomous driving technologies despite ongoing geopolitical tensions.
The company’s move follows a period of uncertainty for Chinese firms in US markets, notably after Didi Global’s delisting. Regulatory disputes between China and the US have eased, bolstering opportunities for companies like Pony AI. However, the robotaxi sector faces challenges, including public concerns about autonomous vehicles’ safety, data privacy, and stiff competition from rivals such as Tesla, which plans to launch similar services in the US next year.
Pony AI sold 20 million American depositary shares at $13 each and raised an additional $153.4 million through private placements. Backed by Toyota, the company’s valuation has declined from $8.5 billion two years ago, highlighting the competitive and uncertain nature of the market. Analysts note widespread robotaxi adoption may take years due to safety and reliability hurdles.
The IPO follows a trend of other Chinese firms, including Zeekr and WeRide, also going public in the US. While Pony AI’s operations in the US remain limited, its public listing underscores growing investor interest in technology startups despite profitability challenges and intense market competition.
T-Mobile and SpaceX have secured Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approval to offer satellite-powered mobile coverage, targeting areas with little or no connectivity. This innovative partnership aims to eliminate mobile ‘dead zones’ by using satellites equipped with direct-to-cell technology to expand T-Mobile’s network.
The FCC’s decision is a first, allowing collaboration between a satellite operator and a wireless carrier to deliver telecommunications services via flexible-use spectrum bands originally reserved for terrestrial use. SpaceX launched the initial batch of satellites for this project in January 2023, marking a significant step forward in bridging coverage gaps.
Over 500,000 square miles in the US remain unreachable by traditional towers due to terrain and land-use constraints. The FCC introduced a new framework earlier this year to promote satellite use in extending 4G and 5G networks without compromising service quality. Chair Jessica Rosenworcel emphasised the agency’s commitment to fostering competition and innovation in the space economy.
Other firms have similar applications under review, but the T-Mobile-SpaceX initiative stands out as a promising solution for connecting underserved regions. Last month, the FCC permitted these satellites to assist disaster-stricken areas in North Carolina, further highlighting the technology’s potential.
South Korea announced plans to provide 14 trillion won ($10 billion) in low-interest loans next year to support its chip sector amid growing competition from China and uncertainty over US trade policies under President-elect Donald Trump. The funds, managed by state-run banks, will include 1.8 trillion won for infrastructure like power lines at a new high-tech chip complex in Yongin and Pyeongtaek, designed to attract advanced chipmakers.
The government highlighted challenges posed by rapid advancements in China’s semiconductor industry and potential changes to US policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and Chips Act, which could alter global trade incentives. Trump has also pledged new tariffs on goods from China, Mexico, and Canada, raising additional concerns for South Korean exporters.
While South Korea leads in memory chip manufacturing through giants like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, it faces setbacks in chip design and contract manufacturing, where rivals are gaining ground. The government vowed to use all available resources to help the industry overcome its current challenges and maintain global competitiveness.
Vietnam’s Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh called on the United States to remove export restrictions on certain technologies during an event in Hanoi hosted by the American Chamber of Commerce. Chinh emphasised Vietnam’s interest in satellite communications development and revealed ongoing talks with SpaceX to boost aerospace cooperation. He also urged the US to recognise Vietnam as a market economy, a step that could lower trade tariffs.
The US currently restricts Vietnam’s access to technologies deemed critical to national security, though Vietnam is allowed to import conventional weapons and some advanced technologies. Chinh questioned the necessity of the embargo, stating, “We are not fighting anyone, so why do you keep the embargo?”
Despite potential US tariffs of up to 20% on imports under the next Trump administration, Chinh avoided addressing the issue directly. He instead highlighted Vietnam’s $25 billion in expected foreign investment this year and stressed the importance of maintaining strong US-Vietnam relations to tackle global challenges.
Samsung Electronics made significant leadership changes on Wednesday, aiming to strengthen its position in the competitive AI chip market. Semiconductor chief Jun Young-hyun was named co-CEO, gaining direct control of the struggling memory chip business, while US chip head Han Jin-man was promoted to lead the foundry division. The moves reflect Samsung’s strategy to address declining profits and regain its edge against rivals SK Hynix and Taiwan’s TSMC.
The reshuffle comes amid growing investor concerns over Samsung’s lagging performance in AI chip supply, particularly to key client Nvidia. Samsung’s semiconductor profits dropped sharply in the third quarter, attributed to delays with a major customer. Despite some progress since, analysts remain sceptical about the leadership structure, with Chung Hyun-ho retaining his influential role in the Business Support Task Force.
Chairman Jay Y. Lee acknowledged public and investor concerns during a hearing this week, emphasising the need to navigate business uncertainty and intensifying competition, particularly from Chinese chipmakers. Samsung hopes the leadership overhaul will drive innovation and stabilise its chip business in a rapidly evolving market.
Intel’s expected $8.5 billion subsidy for expanding its United States chip manufacturing facilities is likely to be reduced, sources revealed. The grants, part of a broader semiconductor funding initiative under the CHIPS and Science Act, will still represent a significant investment but may drop below $8 billion. The adjustment is reportedly linked to Intel’s separate $3 billion Pentagon contract funded through the same programme.
The US government aims to bolster domestic semiconductor production through the CHIPS Act, allocating $52.7 billion overall, including $39 billion in subsidies. Intel’s planned projects in Arizona include building two new chip factories and upgrading an existing facility. Despite these efforts, Intel faces industry challenges, with slumping share prices and restructuring moves under CEO Pat Gelsinger.
Other companies, such as TSMC and GlobalFoundries, have also benefited from preliminary CHIPS Act agreements. Intel’s revised funding agreement is expected soon, with the US Commerce Department declining to comment on the final subsidy figure.
Chinese big tech companies have emerged as some of the most influential players in the global technology landscape, driving innovation and shaping industries across the board. These companies are deeply entrenched in everyday life in China, offering a wide range of services and products that span e-commerce, social media, gaming, cloud computing, ΑΙ, and telecommunications. Their influence is not confined to China, they also play a significant role in global markets, often competing directly with US tech giants.
The rivalry between China and the US has become one of the defining geopolitical struggles of the 21st century. This competition oscillates between cooperation, fierce competition, and confrontation, influenced by regulatory policies, national security concerns, and shifting political priorities. The geopolitical pendulum of China-US tech firms, totally independent from the US election outcome, reflects the broader tensions between the two powers, with profound implications for global tech industries, innovation, and market dynamics.
The Golden Shield Project
In 2000, under Chairman Jiang Zemin’s leadership, China launched the Golden Shield Project to control media and information flow within the country. The initiative aimed to safeguard national security and restrict the influence of Western propaganda. As part of the Golden Shield, many American tech giants such as Google, Facebook, and Netflix were blocked by the Great Firewall for not complying with China’s data regulations, while companies like Microsoft and LinkedIn were allowed to operate.
At the same time, China’s internet user base grew dramatically, reaching 800 million netizens by 2018, with 98% using mobile devices. This rapid expansion provided a fertile ground for Chinese tech firms, which thrived without significant competition from foreign players. Among the earliest beneficiaries of this system were the BATX companies, which capitalised on China’s evolving internet landscape and rapidly established a dominant presence in the market.
The powerhouses of Chinese tech
The major Chinese tech companies, often referred to as the Big Tech of China, include Alibaba Group, Tencent, Baidu, ByteDance, Huawei, Xiaomi, JD.com, Meituan, Pinduoduo, and Didi Chuxing.
Alibaba Group is a global e-commerce and technology conglomerate, operating platforms such as Taobao and Tmall for e-commerce, AliExpress for international retail, and Alipay for digital payments. The company also has significant investments in cloud computing with Alibaba Cloud and logistics.
Tencent, a massive tech conglomerate, is known for its social media and entertainment services. It owns WeChat, a widely used messaging app that offers payment services, social media features, and more. Tencent also has investments in gaming, owning major stakes in Riot Games, Epic Games, and Activision Blizzard, as well as interests in financial services and cloud computing.
Baidu, often called China’s Google, is a leading search engine provider. In addition to its search services, Baidu has a strong presence in AI development, autonomous driving, and cloud computing, particularly focusing on natural language processing and autonomous vehicles.
ByteDance, the company behind TikTok, has made a name for itself in short-form video content and AI-driven platforms. It also operates Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, along with Toutiao, a popular news aggregation platform. ByteDance has expanded into gaming, e-commerce, and other AI technologies.
Huawei is a global leader in telecommunications equipment and consumer electronics, particularly smartphones and 5G infrastructure. The company is deeply involved in cloud computing and AI, despite facing significant geopolitical challenges.
Xiaomi is a leading smartphone manufacturer that also produces smart home devices, wearables, and a wide range of consumer electronics. The company is growing rapidly in the Internet of Things (IoT) space and AI-driven products.
JD.com, one of China’s largest e-commerce platforms, operates similarly to Alibaba, focusing on direct sales, logistics, and tech solutions. JD.com has also made significant strides in robotics, AI, and logistics technology.
Meituan is best known for its food delivery and local services platform, offering everything from restaurant reservations to hotel bookings. The company also operates in sectors like bike-sharing, travel, and ride-hailing.
Pinduoduo has rapidly grown in e-commerce by focusing on group buying and social commerce, particularly targeting lower-tier cities and rural markets in China. The platform offers discounted products to users who buy in groups.
Didi Chuxing is China’s dominant ride-hailing service, offering various transportation services such as ride-hailing, car rentals, and autonomous driving technology.
But what are the BATX companies we mentioned earlier?
BAXT
The term BATX refers to a group of the four dominant Chinese tech companies: Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, and Xiaomi. These companies are central to China’s technology landscape and are often compared to the US “FAANG” group (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) because of their major influence across a range of industries, including e-commerce, search engines, social media, gaming, ΑΙ and telecommunications. Together, BATX companies are key players in shaping China’s tech ecosystem and have a significant impact on global markets.
China’s strategy for tech growth
China’s technology development strategy has proven effective in propelling the country to the forefront of several high-tech industries. This ambitious approach, which involves broad investments across both large state-owned enterprises and smaller private startups, has fostered significant innovation and created a competitive business environment. As a result, it has the potential to serve as a model for other countries looking to stimulate tech growth.
A key driver of China’s success is its diverse investment strategy, supported by government-led initiatives like the “Made in China 2025” and the “Thousand Talents Plan“. These programs offer financial backing and attract top talent from around the globe. This inclusive approach has helped China rapidly emerge as a global leader in fields like AI, robotics, and semiconductors. However, critics argue that the strategy may be overly aggressive, potentially stifling competition and innovation.
Some have raised concerns that China’s government support unfairly favours domestic companies, providing subsidies and other advantages that foreign competitors do not receive. Yet, this type of protectionist approach is not unique to China; other countries have implemented similar strategies to foster the growth of their own industries.
Another critique is that China’s broad investment model may encourage risky ventures and the subsidising of failures, potentially leading to a market that is oversaturated with unprofitable businesses. While this criticism holds merit in some cases, the overall success of China’s strategy in cultivating a dynamic and competitive tech landscape remains evident.
Looking ahead, China’s technology development strategy is likely to continue evolving. As the country strengthens its position on the global stage, it may become more selective in its investments, focusing on firms with the potential for global leadership.
In any case, China’s strategy has shown it can drive innovation and foster growth. Other nations hoping to advance their technological sectors should take note of this model and consider implementing similar policies to enhance their own competitive and innovative business environments.
But under what regulatory framework does Chinese tech policy ultimately operate? How does it affect the whole project? Are there some negative effects of the tight state grip?
China’s regulatory pyramid: Balancing control and consequences
China’s regulatory approach to its booming tech sector is defined by a precarious balance of authority, enforcement, and market response. Angela Zhang, author of High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy, proposes a “dynamic pyramid model” to explain the system’s intricate dynamics. This model highlights three key features: hierarchy, volatility, and fragility.
The top-down structure of China’s regulatory system is a hallmark of its hierarchy. Regulatory agencies act based on directives from centralised leadership, creating a paradox. In the absence of clear signals, agencies exhibit inaction, allowing industries to flourish unchecked. Conversely, when leadership calls for stricter oversight, regulators often overreach. A prime example of this is the drastic shift in 2020 when China moved from years of leniency toward its tech giants to implementing sweeping crackdowns on firms like Alibaba and Tencent.
This erratic enforcement underscores the volatility of the system. Chinese tech regulation is characterised by cycles of lax oversight followed by abrupt crackdowns, driven by shifts in political priorities. The 2020 – 2022 crackdown, which involved antitrust investigations and record-breaking fines, sent shockwaves through markets, wiping out billions in market value. While the government eased its stance in 2022, the uncertainty created by such pendulum swings has left investors wary, with many viewing the Chinese market as unpredictable and risky.
Despite its intentions to address pressing issues like antitrust violations and data security, China’s heavy-handed regulatory approach often results in fragility. Rapid interventions can undermine confidence, stifle innovation, and damage the very sectors the government seeks to strengthen. Years of lax oversight exacerbate challenges, leaving regulators with steep issues to address and markets vulnerable to overcorrection.
This model offers a lens into the broader governance dynamics in China. The system’s centralised control and reactive policies aim to maintain stability but often generate unintended economic consequences. As Chinese tech firms look to expand overseas amid domestic challenges, the long-term impact of these regulatory cycles remains uncertain, potentially influencing China’s ability to compete on the global stage.
The battle for tech supremacy between the USA and China
The incoming US President Donald Trump is expected to adopt a more aggressive, unilateral approach to counter China’s technological growth, drawing on his history of quick, broad measures such as tariffs. Under his leadership, the USA is likely to expand export controls and impose tougher sanctions on Chinese tech firms. Trump’s advisors predict a significant push to add more companies to the US Entity List, which restricts US firms from selling to blacklisted companies. His administration might focus on using tariffs (potentially up to 60% on Chinese imports) and export controls to pressure China, even if it strains relations with international allies.
The escalating tensions have been further complicated by China’s retaliatory actions. In response to US export controls, China has targeted American companies like Micron Technology and imposed its own restrictions on essential materials for chipmaking and electric vehicle production. These moves highlight the interconnectedness of both economies, with the US still reliant on China for critical resources such as rare earth elements, which are vital for both technology and defence.
This intensifying technological conflict reflects broader concerns over data security, military dominance, and leadership in AI and semiconductors. As both nations aim to protect their strategic interests, the tech war is set to continue evolving, with major consequences for global supply chains, innovation, and the international balance of power in technology.
Huawei has launched its Mate 70 smartphone series, signalling a major step in its comeback to premium devices while showcasing HarmonyOS NEXT, its Android-free operating system. Priced from 5,499 yuan ($758), the Mate 70 challenges Apple’s iPhone 16 in China, boasting features like satellite paging, an advanced processor, and a 40% performance boost over previous models.
HarmonyOS NEXT represents Huawei’s bid for software independence after US export restrictions cut off access to Google services. The company announced that all new devices starting in 2025 will run the new system, while current Mate 70 users can choose between HarmonyOS 4.3 (Android-compatible) and the new HarmonyOS NEXT 5.0. Despite this shift, Huawei has retained Android compatibility as a backup while growing its app ecosystem, which already includes 15,000 applications.
The Mate 70 also highlights China’s advancing chipmaking capabilities, reportedly featuring SMIC-produced Kirin 9100 processors in higher-end models. This achievement underscores Huawei’s resilience despite ongoing US export controls and the addition of Chinese firms to trade blacklists. Huawei’s rebound is reflected in its rising market share, now ranked as China’s second-largest smartphone vendor with over 10 million units shipped in recent quarters.
The launch of the Mate 70 marks Huawei’s increasing competition with Apple and other global players in the world’s largest smartphone market, fueled by patriotic support for its technological breakthroughs.
Meta, the company behind Facebook, is set to face trial in April over allegations from the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that it stifled competition by acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp. The FTC’s lawsuit, filed in 2020, argues that Meta acted illegally to maintain dominance in personal social networks by purchasing potential competitors rather than innovating within the mobile ecosystem.
The case is scheduled to begin on 14 April, as ruled by Judge James Boasberg. Earlier this month, the judge rejected Meta’s request to dismiss the case, which argued that the FTC’s claims relied on a narrow definition of the social media market. Meta highlighted competition from TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn, and X as evidence that the FTC’s market analysis was outdated.
Judge Boasberg acknowledged the challenges facing the FTC, noting that shifts in technology and market dynamics complicate its claims. He described the agency’s approach as pushing antitrust law to its limits, raising doubts about whether its case could withstand trial.
The trial will examine whether Meta’s acquisitions of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014 were part of a deliberate strategy to eliminate competition. The outcome could have significant implications for the future of antitrust enforcement in the tech industry.
According to Morgan Adamski, executive director of US Cyber Command, Chinese hackers are embedding themselves in US critical infrastructure IT networks to prepare for a potential conflict with the United States. He announced that China-linked cyber operations aim to secure strategic advantages in the event of a major clash.
These operations involve compromising key networks and positioning themselves to execute disruptive attacks. Examples include manipulating heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems in server rooms or disrupting vital energy and water controls, officials said earlier this year.
Speaking at the Cyberwarcon security conference in Arlington, Virginia, Adamski emphasised the scale of the threat, noting that the US government has launched globally coordinated efforts to counter these operations. These efforts include offensive and defensive measures designed to degrade and disrupt China’s cyber activities worldwide. Actions range from exposing cyber campaigns to imposing sanctions and issuing cybersecurity advisories, with support from allied nations.
Earlier, US Senator Mark Warner described a suspected China-linked cyberespionage campaign, dubbed ‘Salt Typhoon,’ as the worst telecommunications hack in US history. Beijing has repeatedly denied conducting cyberattacks on US entities.
