Malaysia has cautioned that US President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on BRICS nations could disrupt the global semiconductor supply chain. Trump has warned of 100% tariffs on BRICS members unless they halt efforts to create a new currency or reduce reliance on the US dollar, a move Malaysia’s trade minister, Tengku Zafrul Aziz, says could harm both sides.
The United States is Malaysia’s third-largest trade partner, and US firms are key investors in Malaysia’s semiconductor industry, which handles 13% of global chip testing and packaging. Tengku Zafrul emphasised that supply chain stability depends on cooperation, not protectionist measures.
While BRICS countries have discussed alternatives to the dollar, no official decision has been made. Malaysia has applied to join the bloc but is not yet a member. Meanwhile, Russia argued that US pressure would only accelerate global moves toward national currencies in trade.
Republican Senator Ted Cruz has called for an investigation into whether European governments have improperly influenced US policies on AI. Cruz’s concerns stem from growing international collaborations on AI regulation, including treaties and partnerships initiated by the Biden administration.
Cruz criticised European regulations as overly restrictive, claiming they target American AI companies and could shape US policies unfairly. He also accused the Centre for the Governance of Artificial Intelligence (GovAI), a UK-based nonprofit, of political activities without registering as a foreign agent, though GovAI has denied any wrongdoing.
The European Union has taken a leading role in AI regulation, recently passing the AI Act, the world’s first comprehensive law for governing technology. Cruz has framed these efforts as part of what he describes as ‘radical left’ interference, urging transparency about foreign involvement in shaping US AI laws.
Dutch semiconductor equipment maker ASM International (ASMI) said that the new US export controls align with its earlier 2025 revenue outlook. The updated restrictions, which include limits on semiconductor equipment exports to China, are not expected to significantly affect the company’s financial targets. ASM’s larger peer, ASML, has also indicated that the new regulations will not disrupt its financial guidance.
While the export controls include new limits on chip-manufacturing tools and equipment production in countries like Singapore and Malaysia, ASM believes that these changes will have only an indirect impact on its business. The company reaffirmed its 2025 revenue goal of between 3.2 billion and 3.6 billion euros ($3.4 billion to $3.8 billion) and expects a moderate sales decline in China in the first half of 2025, with year-on-year declines in its full-year sales in China.
ASM maintained its fourth-quarter sales guidance for 2024, expecting between 770-810 million euros, with a rise of more than 15% in sales from July to December compared to the first half of the year. Following the announcement, ASM’s shares rose by 1.5%.
New US export rules targeting China’s semiconductor sector are not expected to affect ASML’s financial outlook. The Dutch chip equipment maker reaffirmed its guidance for 2025 group sales of €30-35 billion, with China’s share declining to 20%, down from around 50% in 2023.
The updated US restrictions, Washington’s third crackdown in as many years, limit exports to 140 Chinese companies, including key industry players. ASML acknowledged potential impacts on its deep ultraviolet lithography system exports if enforced by Dutch authorities. However, the company emphasised its long-term demand projections remain intact, driven by global needs.
The Dutch government aligned with US security concerns but stressed independent threat assessments guide its export controls. New rules also impose tighter regulations on computational lithography software, vital for chip yield and quality, a field where ASML holds a leading position.
ASML shares rose modestly in Amsterdam trading, closing 0.9% higher at €664.10. Despite geopolitical headwinds, the firm reiterated confidence in the semiconductor industry’s overall growth trajectory.
Trade tensions between the USA and China are escalating in the semiconductor sector, as four of the top Chinese industry associations warned against purchasing US chips, claiming they are ‘no longer safe’ and they threaten national security principles. The response follows the latest US crackdown, restricting exports to 140 Chinese companies, including prominent chip equipment makers like Naura Technology Group.
However, the US semiconductor trade group dismissed these concerns, arguing that US chips remain safe and reliable. It called for more targeted export controls aimed at national security rather than broad, punitive measures.
Despite these assurances, the Chinese associations, which represent major industries from telecommunications to the digital economy, opted for a considerable change of course in the mindset of Chinese businesses. They are now advised to consider non-US suppliers to safeguard their operations and reduce reliance on US technology.
China has also imposed restrictions, notably a ban on exports of critical rare minerals used in military applications, solar cells, and fibre optic cables. The measure is seen as Beijing’s attempt to exert leverage and retaliate against the US actions, showing a more aggressive stance in this tech export war. Experts suggest that while the warnings from Chinese associations may be largely advisory, the new mineral export bans are a far more significant measure that could have a lasting impact on the global supply chain.
The recent crackdown and the retaliatory moves have also raised alarms in Washington, with the US National Security Council vowing to take necessary steps to deter further ‘coercive actions’ from China. The US is also working on diversifying its supply chains away from China, particularly in the semiconductor sector, where China’s growing self-reliance is seen as a challenge to American dominance.
Dutch semiconductor company Nexperia confirmed its commitment to comply with US restrictions following the addition of its Chinese parent company, Wingtech, to the US Department of Commerce’s entity list. Wingtech now faces licensing requirements for accessing US technology, a move targeting companies seeking sensitive chip manufacturing technologies.
A Nexperia spokesperson clarified that the restrictions imposed on Wingtech do not directly impact Nexperia or its subsidiaries. However, Nexperia will ensure compliance where its interactions with Wingtech are concerned, reflecting its commitment to adhere to international trade regulations.
As one of the largest manufacturers of basic computer chips, including diodes and transistors, Nexperia has been expanding its global footprint. Earlier this year, the company increased its operations in Hamburg, Germany, signalling continued growth despite challenges linked to its parent company.
The US Commerce Department added Wingtech to the list, citing concerns over its efforts to acquire technologies crucial to the defence industries of the US and its allies.
China has imposed a ban on exports of key minerals, including gallium, germanium, and antimony, to the US, citing national security concerns. The new restrictions, which take immediate effect, are part of Beijing’s broader effort to control dual-use materials that have both civilian and military applications. These minerals are critical in semiconductor production and military technology, such as infrared systems and night vision goggles. The export ban also includes graphite items, which will face stricter end-use reviews.
This move follows the US’s recent crackdown on China’s semiconductor industry, which included new export curbs targeting 140 Chinese companies. The escalation is part of the ongoing trade tensions between the two economic giants. While the US has not been a major market for these minerals this year, China’s dominance in their production, accounting for over 90% of gallium and germanium, makes the move significant for global supply chains.
Experts warn that the restrictions could further tighten access to these essential materials, particularly as prices for antimony have surged by over 200% this year. With the US also imposing its own tariffs and export controls, the situation is expected to intensify as both countries brace for continued economic rivalry, especially with President-elect Donald Trump’s stance on China.
Washington’s latest restrictions on semiconductor exports to China have heightened trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies, fueling concerns about potential Chinese countermeasures. Beijing, which has vowed to protect its interests, possesses several tools to retaliate against US firms, including tightened security reviews and trade restrictions.
China has already wielded security reviews against US companies, such as barring government purchases of Micron products in 2022. Analysts warn Intel, a significant player in China’s chip market, could face similar scrutiny. Additionally, US firms have historically reported bureaucratic hurdles like customs delays and intensified inspections during strained relations, underscoring the broader risks of doing business in China.
Beijing also maintains its ‘unreliable entities list,’ targeting foreign companies that are seen as violating Chinese interests. Actions under this framework include probes into firms like PVH Corp for compliance with US restrictions on Xinjiang cotton. Meanwhile, export controls on critical minerals, such as gallium and graphite—key to chipmaking and electric vehicles—are emerging as another leverage point in the escalating trade conflict.
China’s expanded oversight of dual-use technologies, effective December 1, adds another layer of control. By regulating items with civilian and military applications, Beijing aims to monitor US reliance on its supply chains. As tensions rise, both sides face economic and technological repercussions that could redefine global trade dynamics.
Chinese semiconductor firms targeted by new US export controls are doubling down on localising their supply chains and leveraging stockpiled resources to maintain production. The restrictions, the third major US crackdown in three years, impact 140 companies and focus on chipmaking equipment, software, and high-bandwidth memory. Despite the curbs, Chinese chip stocks saw slight gains as analysts noted the measures were less severe than expected.
Key companies like Naura Technology and Empyrean have vowed to accelerate domestic technology development. Some, such as Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology, reported fully localised supply chains. While the measures hit China’s reliance on foreign manufacturing equipment, imports of semiconductor machinery surged by a third this year, showing resilience in the face of external pressures.
The exclusion of ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), a major AI chip component maker, surprised analysts. The move eased concerns for South Korean suppliers reliant on Chinese revenue, with shares of key partners like Jusung Engineering and Mirae Corp rebounding. The latest curbs reflect ongoing efforts to balance US security goals with the global semiconductor market’s interdependencies.
A new lawsuit accuses Apple of illegally surveilling employees’ personal devices and iCloud accounts while restricting discussions about pay and workplace conditions. Filed in California by Amar Bhakta, a digital advertising employee, the suit claims Apple mandates software installations on personal devices used for work, enabling access to private data such as emails, photos, and health information. The lawsuit also alleges Apple enforces confidentiality policies that hinder whistleblowing and discussions about working conditions.
Bhakta asserts he was instructed to avoid discussing his work on podcasts and remove job-related details from LinkedIn. The complaint argues these practices suppress employee rights, including whistleblowing and job market mobility. Apple denies the claims, stating they lack merit and emphasising its commitment to employee training on workplace rights.
This case joins other legal challenges faced by Apple, including allegations of underpaying female employees and discouraging discussions about workplace bias and pay disparity. Filed under a California law allowing workers to sue on behalf of the state, the lawsuit could lead to penalties, with a portion allocated to employees bringing the claims.
