China has announced plans to intensify measures against unauthorised data handling, targeting black and grey markets involved in illegal data sales and distribution. New regulations aim to improve governance over data circulation security while curbing systemic risks.
Authorities emphasised the need for stronger data security risk monitoring across critical industries to safeguard national security and maintain social stability. Measures will focus on preventing widespread misuse and addressing vulnerabilities in data handling practices.
Chinese courts also committed to enhancing market order by applying the rule of law. Legal actions will target activities disrupting the socialist economy, following a rise in economic crimes.
The US Justice Department has removed malware from over 4,200 computers worldwide in an operation targeting a hacking group linked to the Chinese government. The malware, known as ‘PlugX,’ was used to steal information and compromise systems across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Investigators identified the cybercriminals behind the attack as ‘Mustang Panda’ and ‘Twill Typhoon,’ groups believed to have received financial support from China.
Court documents filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania allege that the Chinese government paid Mustang Panda to develop PlugX. The malware has been active since at least 2014 and was used not only to target governments and businesses but also Chinese political dissidents. Officials described the operation as a critical step in neutralising cyber threats backed by foreign states.
Authorities emphasised the growing risks posed by state-sponsored hacking groups and their ability to infiltrate global networks. The Justice Department remains committed to dismantling cyber threats and preventing adversaries from exploiting sensitive information. The scale of the attack highlights the persistent threat of cyber espionage and the need for international cooperation in addressing cybersecurity challenges.
With the potential TikTok ban in the US drawing near, thousands of users are migrating to the Chinese app RedNote, making it the most downloaded app on Apple’s US App Store. Dubbed ‘TikTok refugees,’ these users are rapidly building new communities on the platform, which combines features of TikTok and Instagram to share lifestyle content.
RedNote, known as Xiaohongshu in China, has around 300 million monthly users and is popular among young urban women for sharing tips on fashion, travel, and more. The app has welcomed its new users from the US with open arms, with thousands of posts guiding them on navigating the platform and even learning basic Mandarin phrases.
While TikTok continues to resist demands to sell its US operations, RedNote has seen a surge of interest from users looking to preserve their online presence. Many users, like school canteen worker Sarah Fotheringham and fashion designer Marcus Robinson, say the platform is giving them fresh opportunities to connect and grow their followings.
Despite security concerns surrounding Chinese apps, RedNote’s growing popularity shows that TikTok’s future may face challenges even without a formal ban. Some users report spending more time on RedNote than on TikTok and plan to continue building their presence there regardless of the outcome.
OpenAI has called for increased US investment and supportive regulations to ensure leadership in AI development and prevent China from gaining dominance in the sector. Its ‘Economic Blueprint’ outlines the need for strategic policies around AI resources, including chips, data, and energy.
The document highlights the risk of $175 billion in global funds shifting to China-backed projects if the US fails to attract those investments. OpenAI also proposed stricter export controls on AI models to prevent misuse by adversarial nations and protect national security.
CEO Sam Altman, who contributed $1 million to President-elect Donald Trump’s inaugural fund, seeks stronger ties with the incoming administration, which includes former PayPal executive David Sacks as AI and crypto czar. The company will host an event in Washington DC this month to promote its proposals.
Microsoft-backed OpenAI continues to seek further investment after raising $6.6 billion last year. The startup plans to transform into a for-profit entity to secure additional funding necessary for competing in the expensive AI race.
The US government has announced new restrictions on exporting AI chips and technology, seeking to safeguard its dominance in AI development while limiting China’s access to advanced computing capabilities. The regulations, unveiled during the final days of President Biden’s administration, impose strict caps on AI chip exports to most countries, with exemptions for close allies such as Japan, the UK, and South Korea. Countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea remain barred from accessing this critical technology.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo emphasised the importance of maintaining US leadership in AI to support national security and economic interests. The regulations, which build on a four-year effort to block China’s acquisition of advanced chips, also close existing loopholes and enforce tighter controls. New limits target advanced graphics processing units (GPUs), essential for training AI models, and introduce worldwide licensing requirements for cutting-edge AI technologies. Major cloud providers like Microsoft and Amazon will face new authorisation processes to establish data centres globally under stringent conditions.
Industry leaders, including Nvidia, have expressed concerns over the broad scope of the rules, warning of potential harm to innovation and market dynamics. Nvidia called the restrictions an “overreach,” while Oracle cautioned that the measures could inadvertently benefit Chinese competitors. Despite this criticism, US officials argue the rules are vital for maintaining a competitive edge, given AI’s transformative potential in sectors like healthcare, cybersecurity, and defence. China’s Commerce Ministry condemned the move, vowing to protect its interests in response to the escalating technology standoff.
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) announced plans to strengthen regulations on online platforms and the growing livestream e-commerce sector. The move aims to foster fair competition, protect smaller businesses, and improve consumer trust, according to SAMR Deputy Head Shu Wei.
At a press briefing, Shu highlighted plans to enhance transparency, reduce merchants’ operational costs, and address concerns over platform practices that disrupt fair competition. The regulator aims to improve existing frameworks to safeguard merchants’ and consumers’ rights against platform rule abuse.
The SAMR also intends to crack down on deceptive marketing in livestream e-commerce, a sector experiencing rapid growth but facing criticism for misleading tactics. The initiative is expected to address dishonest practices while ensuring a healthier and more balanced market environment.
Chinese state-sponsored hackers, identified as the Salt Typhoon group, have breached multiple US telecommunications companies, including AT&T, Verizon, Charter Communications, and T-Mobile. These cyber-espionage operations exploited vulnerabilities in network devices from vendors such as Fortinet and Cisco Systems.
US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan has stated that the United States has taken steps in response to these intrusions, sending clear messages to China about the consequences of disrupting American critical infrastructure.
The breaches have raised significant concerns about national security and the resilience of US critical infrastructure against sophisticated cyber threats. While companies like AT&T and Verizon have reported that their networks are now secure and are collaborating with law enforcement, the extent and impact of these breaches continue to be scrutinised.
China has denied involvement in these cyber activities, accusing the United States of disseminating disinformation. Nonetheless, the revelations have intensified discussions about the need for enhanced cybersecurity measures to protect sensitive communications and infrastructure from state-sponsored cyber espionage.
The US Supreme Court on Friday appeared inclined to uphold a law requiring a sale or ban of TikTok in the United States by January 19, citing national security risks tied to its Chinese parent company, ByteDance. Justices questioned TikTok’s potential role in enabling the Chinese government to collect data on its 170 million American users and influence public opinion covertly. Chief Justice John Roberts and others expressed concerns about China’s potential to exploit the platform, while also probing implications for free speech protections under the First Amendment.
The law, passed with bipartisan support and signed by outgoing President Joe Biden, has been challenged by TikTok, ByteDance, and app users who argue it infringes on free speech. TikTok’s lawyer, Noel Francisco, warned that without a resolution or extension by President-elect Donald Trump, the platform would likely shut down on January 19. Francisco emphasised TikTok’s role as a key platform for expression and called for at least a temporary halt to the law.
Liberal and conservative justices alike acknowledged the tension between national security and constitutional rights. Justice Elena Kagan raised historical parallels to Cold War-era restrictions, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh highlighted the long-term risks of data collection. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, argued that TikTok’s foreign ownership poses a grave threat, enabling covert manipulation and espionage. She defended Congress’s right to act in the interest of national security.
With global trade tensions and fears of digital surveillance mounting, the Supreme Court’s decision will have wide-ranging implications for technology, free speech, and US-China relations. The court is now considering whether to grant a temporary stay, providing Trump’s incoming administration an opportunity to address the issue politically.
President Joe Biden is preparing to introduce a new executive order aimed at strengthening cybersecurity standards for federal agencies and contractors. The proposed measures address growing threats from Chinese-linked cyber operations and criminal cyberattacks, which have targeted critical infrastructure, government emails, and major telecom firms. Under the draft order, contractors must adhere to stricter secure software development practices and provide documentation to be verified by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
The order highlights vulnerabilities exposed by recent cyber incidents, including the May 2023 breach of US government email accounts, attributed to Chinese hackers. New guidelines will also focus on securing access tokens and cryptographic keys, which were exploited during the attack. Contractors whose security practices fail to meet standards may face legal consequences, with referrals to the attorney general for further action.
While experts like Tom Kellermann of Contrast Security support the initiative, some criticise the timeline as insufficient given the immediate threats posed by adversaries like China and Russia. Brandon Wales of SentinelOne views the order as a continuation of efforts across the past two administrations, emphasising the need to enhance existing cybersecurity frameworks while addressing a broad range of threats.
The order underscores Biden’s commitment to cybersecurity as a pressing national security issue. It comes amid escalating concerns about foreign cyber operations and aims to solidify protections for critical US systems before the transition to new leadership.
Nvidia has voiced strong opposition to a reported plan by the Biden administration to impose new restrictions on the export of AI chips, urging the outgoing president to avoid making a decision that could impact the incoming Trump administration. The company warned that such measures would harm the US economy, hinder innovation, and benefit adversaries like China. Nvidia’s Vice President, Ned Finkle, called the policy a “last-minute” move that would leave a legacy of criticism from both US industry and the global community.
The proposed restrictions, as reported by Bloomberg, aim to limit AI chip exports to certain countries, particularly targeting China to prevent the enhancement of its military capabilities. While some nations would face outright bans, the rules would also cap the computing power that can be exported to others. The Biden administration has yet to confirm the details, and requests for comment from the White House and the Commerce Department went unanswered.
Industry groups, including the Information Technology Industry Council, which represents major tech firms like Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta, have expressed concern about the policy. They argue that it would impose arbitrary limitations on US companies’ global competitiveness and risk ceding market leadership to foreign rivals. Nvidia warned that these restrictions could push international markets toward alternative technologies, undermining the US technology sector.
President-elect Donald Trump, who begins his second term on January 20, previously enacted technology export restrictions to China during his first term, citing national security concerns. Nvidia’s statement reflects apprehension about the continuity of US policy on AI chip exports under the new administration.
