Japan and US deepen AI science collaboration under Genesis Mission

Japan and the United States are expanding cooperation on AI-enabled scientific research, with Japan reported to become the first international partner in the US-led Genesis Mission.

The five-year initiative is expected to mobilise around $1 billion, with funding reportedly split between the two governments. The collaboration will focus on using AI to accelerate research in advanced fields, including quantum technologies, nuclear fusion, biotechnology, and other strategically important areas.

The Genesis Mission is a US Department of Energy initiative designed to use AI, scientific datasets, national laboratories, universities, and industry partners to accelerate discovery science, energy innovation, and national security research.

Japan’s participation builds on earlier cooperation between the US Department of Energy and Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology on AI-enabled scientific discovery, high-performance computing, and quantum technologies.

Joint projects are expected to involve US national laboratories and Japanese research institutions, including RIKEN and the University of Tokyo. The collaboration is also expected to support AI and robotics-powered autonomous laboratories capable of conducting experiments with limited human intervention.

The partnership reflects a broader shift towards AI for Science, where AI systems are used to generate hypotheses, analyse complex data, automate research workflows, and shorten development timelines in frontier research fields.

Why does it matter?

The collaboration shows how AI for Science is becoming part of strategic technology competition and international research diplomacy. By linking AI, high-performance computing, quantum technologies, fusion, and biotechnology, Japan and the United States are trying to accelerate scientific discovery while strengthening technological leadership in fields with economic, security, and industrial importance.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

EU and India deepen digital cooperation through Tech Business Forum

The European Union and India have concluded the first EU-India Tech Business Forum in New Delhi, advancing digital and trade cooperation under the framework of the EU-India Trade and Technology Council (TTC). The forum brought together businesses, policymakers, researchers, think tanks, and civil society to strengthen private-sector collaboration and identify opportunities for joint innovation.

The forum was organised by the EU Delegation to India and Bhutan and India’s Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, with support from industry organisations including the Federation of European Business in India and the National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM).

More than 100 European and Indian technology companies participated in discussions covering semiconductors, AI, cybersecurity, data governance and digital public infrastructure.

Participants explored opportunities to strengthen interoperability, advance cooperation on technical standards and improve market access for companies operating in both markets. The forum also aimed to operationalise wider EU-India cooperation, including the recently concluded Free Trade Agreement and the Administrative Arrangement on Advanced Electronic Signatures and Seals signed under the Trade and Technology Council in January 2026.

Speaking at the forum, EU Ambassador to India Hervé Delphin said:

In today’s fragmented world, working with trusted partners like India is essential to diversify supply chains and reduce over-reliance on certain sources and geographies.

He said Europe brings strengths in advanced technology, innovation, and regulation, while India offers scale, talent, and technological applications.

The forum’s outcomes are expected to shape the next steps in EU-India digital and trade cooperation. The Trade and Technology Council remains the primary framework for EU-India cooperation on strategic technologies, digital governance and connectivity, covering areas such as digital public infrastructure, semiconductors, data governance and emerging technologies.

Why does it matter?

The EU and India are seeking to deepen cooperation on strategic technologies at a time when governments are prioritising supply chain resilience, digital sovereignty and secure technology partnerships. Closer collaboration in areas such as AI, semiconductors and cybersecurity could help both sides reduce dependencies and strengthen innovation ecosystems.

The forum also demonstrates the growing role of technology diplomacy in trade relations, with policymakers and businesses working together to address standards, interoperability and market access challenges that increasingly shape the global digital economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU proposes Chips Act 2.0 to strengthen semiconductor ecosystem

The European Commission has proposed Chips Act 2.0, a new framework intended to strengthen Europe’s semiconductor ecosystem and build on the original European Chips Act.

The proposal aims to boost the EU’s competitiveness, technological sovereignty, and resilience while improving crisis preparedness in semiconductor supply chains. It forms part of the Commission’s wider European Technological Sovereignty Package, alongside the Cloud and AI Development Act, an Open Source Strategy, and a roadmap for digitalisation and AI in the energy sector.

The Commission says the EU remains structurally dependent on third countries for semiconductor design and manufacturing, including advanced and leading-edge chips needed for AI. It also points to gaps in crisis preparedness, noting that existing mechanisms rely heavily on voluntary information sharing outside crises and do not provide sufficient, timely supply-chain intelligence.

Chips Act 2.0 would support both mainstream and advanced semiconductors, including AI chips. Measures are expected to include stronger research and innovation support, faster permitting, supply-chain information tools, Semiconductor Regions of Excellence, skills investment, strategic projects, and innovation procurement.

The proposal also places greater emphasis on demand-side measures, including support for public procurement and industrial uptake of European semiconductor technologies. The Commission argues that stronger local demand can reinforce local supply, shorten supply chains, and better align European production capacity with the needs of strategic sectors.

The initiative complements the EU’s broader technological sovereignty agenda. The Commission says Chips Act 2.0 should help reduce strategic dependencies, improve security of supply, support industrial scale-up, and strengthen Europe’s role in semiconductor technologies needed for AI, cloud, defence, automotive, energy, and other critical sectors.

Why does it matter?

The Chips Act 2.0 shows how the EU is shifting from an emergency response to the global chip shortage to a broader semiconductor industrial strategy. The proposal links chip policy directly to AI competitiveness, cloud infrastructure, defence, energy, automotive supply chains, and technological sovereignty. Its emphasis on demand-side measures also matters: Europe is not only trying to attract semiconductor production, but also to create stronger domestic markets for European chip technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

European Union unveils tech sovereignty plan to boost digital independence

The European Commission has presented a European Technological Sovereignty Package aimed at strengthening Europe’s capacity in semiconductors, AI, cloud infrastructure, and open source technologies.

The package includes two legislative proposals, the Chips Act 2.0 and the Cloud and AI Development Act, alongside an Open Source Strategy and a Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy.

The Commission said the measures are designed to support Europe’s ambition to become an AI continent, strengthen digital autonomy, build a more sustainable digital future, and widen choice in core technologies for businesses, citizens, and public administrations.

Rising global demand for computing capacity, driven by the spread of AI, has intensified concerns over Europe’s dependence on non-EU suppliers for core digital technologies. The Commission said the package is intended to reduce structural dependencies and ensure Europe can develop, deploy, and secure the technologies it relies on.

The proposed Chips Act 2.0 aims to strengthen Europe’s semiconductor capabilities, while the Cloud and AI Development Act focuses on expanding cloud and AI infrastructure. The Open Source Strategy is intended to support Europe’s software ecosystem, and the energy roadmap links digitalisation and AI to a more sustainable energy system.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Europe cannot afford to depend on others for technologies that keep hospitals running, energy grids stable, and services secure. She said the package is about protecting citizens, defending European interests, and making independent technological choices.

Why does it matter?

The package brings several major EU technology priorities under one sovereignty agenda. By linking chips, cloud, AI infrastructure, open source, and energy digitalisation, the Commission is trying to reduce structural dependencies while strengthening Europe’s capacity to build, deploy, and secure critical technologies. The key test will be whether legislative proposals and strategies translate into investment, infrastructure, and industrial scale.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

NGI Commons outlines expectations for the EU Tech Sovereignty Package

NGI Commons has outlined expectations for the European Union’s forthcoming Tech Sovereignty Package, a policy initiative aimed at strengthening Europe’s control over critical digital technologies and reducing reliance on non-European providers.

The initiative is expected to focus on semiconductors, cloud computing, AI and open-source software. According to NGI Commons, the package aims to align and simplify existing policies rather than introduce a new layer of regulation.

The framework builds on recommendations from Mario Draghi’s report on European competitiveness and seeks to support innovation, competitiveness and the EU’s broader objective of open strategic autonomy. A central element of the proposal is the recognition of open technologies as digital commons that underpin Europe’s digital ecosystem.

The analysis argues that open-source software should be treated as strategic infrastructure and supported through long-term funding, coordinated development efforts and greater public-sector adoption to strengthen digital resilience and security.

The report notes that challenges remain, including securing long-term funding, managing the growing energy demands of AI infrastructure and attracting investment, as policymakers seek to balance technological sovereignty with competitiveness.

Why does it matter?

The Tech Sovereignty Package is expected to shape how Europe approaches critical technologies such as semiconductors, cloud services, AI and open-source software in the coming years.

By treating open technologies as strategic infrastructure, policymakers could strengthen digital resilience, reduce external dependencies and support the EU’s broader goal of technological sovereignty while maintaining competitiveness in the global digital economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

China tightens controls on technology leaks with updated secrecy laws

China has updated its trade secret protection rules to formally include data, algorithms, computer programs, code, and other technical information, reflecting the growing importance of digital assets in commercial competition.

The Provisions on the Protection of Trade Secrets, issued by the State Administration for Market Regulation, took effect on 1 June 2026 and replaced rules dating back to 1995. The framework defines trade secrets as technical, business, and other commercial information that is not publicly known, has commercial value, and is protected through corresponding confidentiality measures.

The new rules encourage companies to strengthen internal compliance and trade secret management systems. They identify reasonable confidentiality measures, including confidentiality agreements, employee training, access restrictions, data classification, encryption, isolation, and limits on copying, storing, or accessing sensitive information.

The regulations also address digital working environments. For remote work and cross-border collaboration, companies are encouraged to implement measures such as permission tiering, data masking, and operational logging to protect confidential information.

The rules prohibit acquiring trade secrets through theft, bribery, fraud, coercion, electronic intrusion, or other improper means. They also cover unauthorised access to digital office systems, servers, email accounts, cloud storage, and application accounts, as well as the use of malware or the exploitation of vulnerabilities to obtain trade secrets.

The framework applies to trade secret infringements committed outside China where they disrupt domestic market competition or harm the lawful rights and interests of Chinese business operators.

Alongside the new rules, SAMR has launched the fourth Enterprise Trade Secret Protection Capacity Enhancement Service Month in June 2026. The campaign will focus on compliance guidance, stronger enforcement, regional cooperation, and support for key industries, including biomedicine, integrated circuits, and AI.

Why does it matter?

The updated rules show how trade secret protection is being adapted to digital and data-driven industries. By explicitly covering data, algorithms, software and code, China is treating digital knowledge assets as core components of commercial competitiveness. The framework also raises compliance expectations for companies operating in China, especially those working across remote teams, cloud environments, cross-border collaboration, AI, semiconductors, and other high-value technology sectors.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

European Commission prepares Chips Act 2.0 to boost semiconductor resilience

The European Commission is preparing a Chips Act 2.0 aimed at strengthening Europe’s semiconductor resilience, reducing strategic dependencies, and supporting technological sovereignty.

The initiative builds on earlier legislation introduced after pandemic-related supply chain disruptions, but seeks to address persistent gaps in advanced chip manufacturing and fragmented governance across Member States.

A key focus of the revised framework is expanding Europe’s capacity in advanced semiconductors, particularly chips below 10 nanometres that are used in AI, high-performance computing, defence and advanced automotive systems.

The proposal also aims to improve monitoring of supply chains and market actors, while simplifying regulatory processes and enhancing investment conditions for strategic semiconductor projects.

Alongside production capacity, the initiative is expected to strengthen oversight of supply chain risks and improve crisis preparedness within the EU semiconductor ecosystem. Policymakers have identified limited visibility into supply-chain risks, including technology leakage and dependence on suppliers outside the EU, as a structural weakness.

The initiative is also expected to form part of the EU’s broader digital sovereignty agenda, including support for semiconductor research, chip design capabilities and cross-border industrial coordination.

Why does it matter? 

Semiconductors are essential components in technologies ranging from AI systems and telecommunications networks to defence equipment, energy infrastructure and vehicles. The concentration of advanced chip production in a small number of global locations has heightened concerns about supply-chain resilience and strategic dependencies.

By expanding manufacturing capacity and improving oversight of supply chain risks, the EU aims to strengthen its ability to withstand disruptions while supporting long-term competitiveness in a critical technology sector.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

EuroDIG 2026 debates Europe’s path towards digital sovereignty

European policymakers, technical experts, and civil society representatives debated how Europe can reduce its dependence on foreign digital technologies without fragmenting the open internet during a EuroDIG 2026 session on digital sovereignty.

The discussion reflected growing concern in Europe that heavy reliance on non-European cloud providers, AI systems, platforms, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure has become a strategic vulnerability affecting not only the economy but also democratic resilience and political self-determination.

Fabrizia Benini, head of unit for the Future Internet at the European Commission’s DG CONNECT, argued that Europe’s dependencies across the digital stack are the result of years of choosing to buy technologies rather than build them domestically. According to Benini, digital sovereignty should not mean isolation or digital nationalism, but ensuring that citizens, businesses, and governments retain meaningful choice and control over digital technologies, data, and infrastructure.

She stressed that Europe remains committed to an open, global, secure, and interoperable internet while seeking to manage strategic dependencies through partnerships with trusted countries and stronger European technological capacity.

Benini also pointed to upcoming EU initiatives, including a Sovereign Tech Package covering semiconductors, cloud and AI infrastructure, and open-source technologies. She described Europe’s regulatory framework, including the GDPR, DSA, DMA, and AI Act, as an important long-term foundation, while acknowledging that regulation alone cannot deliver sovereignty.

Several participants echoed that concern, arguing that Europe has become highly effective at regulating digital systems while still depending heavily on technologies built elsewhere.

João Gomes from YouthDIG said younger Europeans increasingly want opportunities not only to regulate technology, but also to build competitive European alternatives. He warned that Europe risks becoming ‘the world’s most sophisticated regulator’ without developing sufficient industrial and technological capacity of its own.

Open source, interoperability, and trusted infrastructure emerged repeatedly as key pillars of the European approach. Frank Kruger from Germany’s Federal Ministry for Digital Transformation and Government Modernization argued that maintaining critical open-source infrastructure is essential for Europe’s resilience, security, and innovation capacity.

Peter Janssen, general manager of EURid, linked digital sovereignty to practical user control over online identities and infrastructure. Using the .eu domain as an example, he said European users should be able to retain control over their digital presence, providers, and data through open standards and interoperable systems.

At the same time, several speakers warned against allowing digital sovereignty to become a justification for internet fragmentation or excessive state control. Elonnai Hickok, Managing Director at Global Network Initiative, stressed that Europe should continue supporting open standards, interoperability, portability, and multistakeholder governance while avoiding surveillance-heavy or protectionist approaches.

The terminology itself also generated debate. Some participants preferred terms such as ‘strategic autonomy’ or ‘digital autonomy’, arguing that ‘sovereignty’ can sound nation-centric or exclusionary. Others defended the term as necessary to describe Europe’s ability to preserve democratic self-determination in a more contested geopolitical environment.

Despite differences over terminology and emphasis, the session ended with broad agreement that Europe needs a long-term strategy combining regulation, industrial policy, open standards, digital skills, infrastructure investment, and support for European alternatives.

Participants also agreed that Europe’s approach should aim for what the session’s final draft messages described as ‘resilient openness and strategic autonomy’ rather than isolation or protectionism.

EuroDIG 2026 took place on 26 and 27 May at the Charlemagne Building of the European Commission in Brussels under the theme ‘European Voices for the Future of the Internet – Celebrating 20 Years of .eu and the Beginning of a New Internet Governance Era’.

Digital Watch Observatory followed EuroDIG 2026 through a dedicated event page, featuring session information and reporting from Brussels.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot 

Study says AI is rewiring global trade and reshaping economic power

A new Allianz Research report argues that AI is transforming global trade, supply chains, digital infrastructure, and geopolitical influence.

The report says AI growth increasingly depends on global semiconductor production, cloud infrastructure, hyperscale data centres, and cross-border digital services. It also argues that trade is increasingly shaped by who controls AI infrastructure, data flows, and cloud capacity.

Allianz Research says exports of AI-enabling goods rose from USD 1 trillion in 2014 to USD 3.8 trillion in 2025, accounting for 15% of global trade and far outpacing overall goods trade growth. Asia dominates the supply side, accounting for 65% of global AI-related exports and seven of the top ten exporters, led by China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.

The report also highlights the United States’ role as a centre of hyperscale AI infrastructure. It says the US has tripled its AI-related imports since 2023 and is home to 5,427 operational data centres, equivalent to 45% of the global total.

Europe faces a different challenge. According to Allianz Research, the region has less than 10GW of operational data-centre capacity, compared with 60GW in the US, while US hyperscalers already control 35% of European computing capacity and are consolidating a 70% share of the cloud market. The report points to fragmented regulation, complex permitting processes, grid connection delays, limited funding, and the absence of a domestic hyperscaler as factors that reinforce European dependence.

The study also warns that AI diffusion could widen EU-US service imbalances by requiring recurring payments to American AI providers and cloud platforms. In a high-adoption scenario, annual payments by eurozone users to US AI services providers could rise from EUR 2.7 billion to EUR 34 billion, according to the report.

Allianz Research concludes that AI governance, industrial policy, export restrictions, subsidies, and digital trade regulation are becoming central components of global economic competition. Governments are increasingly treating semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, data centres, and AI services as strategic assets linked to national security, economic resilience, and geopolitical influence.

Why does it matter?

The report frames AI as a trade and industrial policy issue, not only a technology story. Its findings suggest that control over semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, data centres, and AI services could shape which economies capture AI-driven productivity gains and which become more dependent on foreign platforms, supply chains, and infrastructure. For Europe, the key concern is a possible double dependence on US cloud and AI services and Asian hardware supply chains.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Taiwan says power supply ready for AI growth

Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs said the country is prepared to meet increasing electricity demand linked to the AI data centre expansion. The comments followed remarks by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang regarding the growing energy requirements of AI infrastructure development. Huang stated that sufficient power availability would be important for continued AI-related economic growth.

Construction of Nvidia’s planned Taiwan headquarters at Taipei’s Beitou–Shilin Technology Park is scheduled to begin this week.

According to officials, four gas-fired power plants are expected to gradually enter operation by the end of 2026, adding approximately 5.2 gigawatts of electricity capacity. Additional public and private power generation projects are also planned between 2027 and 2031.

The ministry said Taiwan’s experience supporting energy-intensive semiconductor industries has informed existing infrastructure planning. Officials stated that anticipated energy demand from AI-related industries had already been incorporated into long-term planning processes.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!