Jurisdiction

Apple’s $2 billion iPhone airlift from India dodges Trump’s tariffs

Apple has airlifted nearly $2 billion worth of iPhones from India to the US, dodging President Trump’s looming tariffs with a clever sidestep. 

Customs data reveals that in March 2025, Apple’s key Indian partners, Foxconn and Tata, shipped a record-breaking haul to ensure the tech giant’s shelves stay stocked in one of its biggest markets. 

Foxconn, Apple’s primary supplier in India, exported $1.31 billion worth of iPhones—models 13, 14, 16, and 16e—in March alone, matching the combined total of January and February. 

Tata Electronics wasn’t far behind, sending $612 million worth of iPhone 15 and 16 models, a 63% surge from the previous month. 

Together, their efforts pushed Foxconn’s year-to-date shipments from India to the US to $5.3 billion, a testament to India’s growing role as a manufacturing hub amid Apple’s pivot away from China.

The operation was a logistical feat, with Apple chartering at least six cargo jets to ferry 600 tons of iPhones from Chennai’s air cargo terminal to US cities like Los Angeles, New York, and Chicago, which took the lion’s share. 

To pull it off, Apple worked with Indian authorities to slash customs clearance times at Chennai airport from 30 hours to just six, ensuring the iPhones beat the tariff clock. 

One source described the move as a strategic play to ‘beat the tariffs,’ a gambit to keep costs down as Trump’s trade policies tighten the screws.

Trump’s tariffs tell a tale of their own—while April 2025 saw a 26% duty on Indian imports, far lighter than the 100 %+ rates slapped on China, the president later paused most duties except for China’s for three months. 

Yet, he also granted temporary exemptions for smartphones and electronics from Chinese imports, though he hinted those breaks might not last.

Apple’s reliance on India signals a deeper strategy to diversify production and outmanoeuvre the unpredictable winds of US trade policy in a global market fractured by high tax impositions.

Trump’s tech tariffs spare smartphones, computers and other electronics

President Donald Trump’s administration has granted exemptions from steep tariffs on smartphones, laptops, and other electronics, providing relief to tech giants like Apple and Dell. 

Announced on 5 April 2025 by US Customs and Border Protection, the exemptions cover 20 product categories, including semiconductors, and exclude these goods from Trump’s 10% baseline tariffs on non-Chinese imports, easing costs for items like iPhones made in India. 

Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives hailed the move as ‘the most bullish news’ for the tech sector, coinciding with efforts by companies like Apple, which has shipped 1.5 million iPhones from India to sidestep tariffs.

However, the exemptions don’t fully shield tech from Trump’s trade war. His 125% reciprocal tariffs on Chinese imports remain, alongside earlier 20% duties tied to the fentanyl crisis, and a new national security probe into semiconductors looms. 

Trump, speaking on 9 April, teased more details while claiming the US is reaping tariff revenue, but the decision hints at his awareness of inflation risks, with iPhone prices potentially hitting $2,300 under full tariffs. 

The partial reprieve reflects Trump’s balancing act between trade promises and economic stability, especially after his campaign focused on lowering prices amid inflation concerns.

The backdrop is a volatile global market, with China retaliating by matching Trump’s 125% tariffs, sending US stocks on a rollercoaster and pushing gold to record highs. 

Trump’s cosy ties with tech CEOs like Apple’s Tim Cook, who have embraced him since his 20 January inauguration, contrast with his tariff-driven agenda, which has sparked recession fears and Republican criticism ahead of next year’s midterms. 

The exemptions offer tech a breather, but the broader US-China trade conflict threatens supply chains and global stability. 

This tariff carve-out underscores Trump’s high-stakes gamble: reshaping trade to favour American interests while risking economic fallout at home. 

With smartphones and laptops leading US imports from China at $41.7 billion and $33.1 billion in 2024, the exemptions may temper consumer price hikes, but the looming semiconductor probe and escalating tensions signal more turbulence ahead. 

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta faces landmark antitrust trial

An antitrust trial against Meta commenced in Washington, with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) arguing that the company’s acquisitions of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014 were designed to crush competition instead of fostering innovation.

Although the FTC initially approved these deals, it now claims they effectively handed Meta a monopoly. Should the FTC succeed, Meta may be forced to sell off both platforms, a move that would reshape the tech landscape.

Meta has countered by asserting that users have benefited from Instagram’s development under its ownership, instead of being harmed by diminished competition. Legal experts believe the company will focus on consumer outcomes rather than corporate intent.

Nevertheless, statements made by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, such as his remark that it’s ‘better to buy than to compete,’ may prove pivotal. Zuckerberg and former COO Sheryl Sandberg are both expected to testify during the trial, which could span several weeks in the US.

Political tensions loom over the case, which was first launched under Donald Trump’s presidency. Reports suggest Zuckerberg has privately lobbied Trump to drop the lawsuit, while Meta has criticised the FTC’s reversal years after approving the acquisitions.

The recent dismissal of two Democratic commissioners from the FTC by Trump has raised concerns over political interference, especially as the commission now holds a Republican majority.

While the FTC seeks to challenge Meta’s dominance, experts caution that proving harm in this case will be far more difficult than in the ongoing antitrust battle against Google.

Unlike the search engine market, which is clearly monopolised, the social media space remains highly competitive, with platforms like TikTok, YouTube and X offering strong alternatives.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Gerry Adams targets Meta over use of his books

Gerry Adams, the former president of Sinn Féin, is considering legal action against Meta for allegedly using his books to train AI. Adams claims that at least seven of his books were included in a large collection of copyrighted material Meta used to develop its AI systems.

He has handed the matter over to his solicitor. The books in question include his autobiography Before the Dawn, prison memoir Cage Eleven, and reflections on Northern Ireland’s peace process Hope and History, among others.

Adams is not the only author voicing concerns about Meta’s use of copyrighted works. A group of writers filed a US court case in January, accusing Meta of using the controversial Library Genesis (LibGen) database, which hosts over 7.5 million books, many believed to be pirated.

The discovery followed a searchable database of titles from LibGen being published by The Atlantic, which led several authors to identify their works being used to train Meta’s Llama AI model.

The Society of Authors has condemned Meta’s actions, with chair Vanessa Fox O’Loughlin calling the move ‘shocking and devastating’ for authors.

Many authors are concerned that AI models like Llama, which power tools such as chatbots, could undermine their work by reproducing creative content without permission. Meta has defended its actions, claiming that its use of information to train AI models is in line with existing laws.

Adams, a prolific author and former MP, joins other Northern Irish writers, including Booker Prize winner Anna Burns, in opposing the use of their work for AI training without consent.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

EU plans new law to tackle online consumer manipulation

The European Commission is preparing to introduce the Digital Fairness Act, a new law that aims to boost consumer protection online instead of adding more regulatory burden on businesses.

Justice Commissioner Michael McGrath described the upcoming legislation as both pro-consumer and pro-business during a speech at the European Retail Innovation Summit, seeking to calm industry concerns about further EU regulation following the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act.

Designed to tackle deceptive practices in the digital space, the law will address issues such as manipulative design tricks known as ‘dark patterns’, influencer marketing, and personalised pricing based on user profiling.

It will also target concerns around addictive service design and virtual currencies in video games—areas where current EU consumer rules fall short. The legislation will be based on last year’s Digital Fairness Fitness Check, which highlighted regulatory gaps in the online marketplace.

McGrath acknowledged the cost of complying with EU-wide consumer protection measures, which can run into millions for businesses.

However, he stressed that the new act would provide legal clarity and ease administrative pressure, particularly for smaller companies, instead of complicating compliance requirements further.

A public consultation will begin in the coming weeks, ahead of a formal legislative proposal expected by mid-2026.

Maria-Myrto Kanellopoulou, head of the Commission’s consumer law unit, promised a thoughtful approach, saying the process would be both careful and thorough to ensure the right balance is struck.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu

EU refuses to soften tech laws for Trump trade deal

The European Union has firmly ruled out dismantling its strict digital regulations in a bid to secure a trade deal with Donald Trump. Henna Virkkunen, the EU’s top official for digital policy, said the bloc remained fully committed to its digital rulebook instead of relaxing its standards to satisfy American demands.

While she welcomed a temporary pause in US tariffs, she made clear that the EU’s regulations were designed to ensure fairness and safety for all companies, regardless of origin, and were not intended as a direct attack on US tech giants.

Tensions have mounted in recent weeks, with Trump officials accusing the EU of unfairly targeting American firms through regulatory means. Executives like Mark Zuckerberg have criticised the EU’s approach, calling it a form of censorship, while the US has continued imposing tariffs on European goods.

Virkkunen defended the tougher obligations placed on large firms like Meta, Apple and Alphabet, explaining that greater influence came with greater responsibility.

She also noted that enforcement actions under the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act aim to ensure compliance instead of simply imposing large fines.

Although France has pushed for stronger retaliation, the European Commission has held back from launching direct countermeasures against US tech firms, instead preparing a range of options in case talks fail.

Virkkunen avoided speculation on such moves, saying the EU preferred cooperation to conflict. At the same time, she is advancing a broader tech strategy, including plans for five AI gigafactories, while also considering adjustments to the EU’s AI Act to better support small businesses and innovation.

Acknowledging creative industries’ concerns over generative AI, Virkkunen said new measures were needed to ensure fair compensation for copyrighted material used in AI training instead of leaving European creators unprotected.

The Commission is now exploring licensing models that could strike a balance between enabling innovation and safeguarding rights, reflecting the bloc’s intent to lead in tech policy without sacrificing democratic values or artistic contributions.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

TikTok affair, China disagrees with Trump over $54B deal due to tariffs rise

The fate of TikTok hangs in the balance as China and the US trade moves over a potential deal to keep the app alive for its 170 million American users. 

On 9 April 2025, China’s commerce ministry declared that any sale of TikTok must pass its government’s strict review, throwing a wrench into negotiations just as President Donald Trump hinted that a deal remains within reach.

China’s stance is clear: no deal gets the green light without approval. 

The ministry stressed that TikTok’s sales must comply with Chinese laws, particularly those governing technology exports, a nod to a 2020 regulation that gives Beijing veto power over the app’s algorithm, the secret ingredient behind its viral success. 

The disagreement comes after Trump’s recent tariff hikes, which slapped a 54% duty on Chinese goods, prompting Beijing to push back hard. 

China had already signalled it wouldn’t budge on the deal following Trump’s tariff announcement, a move that doesn’t seem to give TikTok too much significance in a broader trade war.

Meanwhile, Trump, speaking on 9 April 2025, kept hope alive, insisting that a TikTok deal is ‘still on the table.’ He extended the deadline for ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent, to find a non-Chinese buyer by 75 days, pushing the cutoff to mid-June after a near-miss on 5 April. 

The deal, which would spin off TikTok’s US operations into a new entity majority-owned by American investors, could have been nearly finalised before China’s objections stalled it. 

Investors, too, are on edge, with the US entity’s future clouded by geopolitical sparring. 

Trump’s optimism, paired with his earlier willingness to ease tariffs, shows he’s playing a long game, balancing national security fears with a desire to keep the app functional for its massive US audience.

Washington has long worried that TikTok’s Chinese ownership makes it a conduit for Beijing to spy on the Americans or sway public opinion, a concern that led to a 2024 law demanding ByteDance divest the app or face a ban. 

That law briefly shuttered TikTok in January 2025, only for Trump to step in with a reprieve. Now, with ByteDance poised to hold a minority stake in a US-based TikTok, the deal’s success hinges on China’s nod, a nod that looks increasingly elusive as trade tensions simmer. 

If China blocks the deal, it could set a precedent for other nations to tighten their grip on digital exports, radically reshaping governmental interdisciplinary approaches and cyberspace, posing a final question: will the internet, as we know it, remain as a globally unified societal enabler or it will divide into national space with new monopolies?

AI feud intensifies as OpenAI sues Elon Musk

OpenAI has filed a countersuit against Elon Musk, accusing the billionaire entrepreneur of a sustained campaign of harassment intended to damage the company and regain control over its AI developments.

The legal filing comes in response to Musk’s lawsuit earlier this year, in which he claimed OpenAI had strayed from its founding mission of developing AI for the benefit of humanity.

In its countersuit, OpenAI urged a federal court to block Musk from taking further ‘unlawful and unfair actions’ and hold him accountable for the alleged damage already inflicted.

The company cited press attacks, legal pressure, and social media posts to Musk’s 200 million followers as tactics aimed at undermining its operations and reputation.

It also described Musk’s demands for corporate records and attempted acquisition efforts as part of a broader scheme to derail OpenAI’s progress.

The legal conflict highlights the growing rivalry between OpenAI and xAI, the AI firm Musk launched in 2023.

OpenAI maintains that Musk’s actions are motivated by self-interest and a desire to slow down a competing organisation. A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026 to resolve the escalating dispute.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Former Facebook executive says Meta misled over China

Former Facebook executive Sarah Wynn-Williams has accused Meta of compromising US national security to grow its business in China.

Testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Wynn-Williams alleged that company executives misled employees, lawmakers, and the public about their dealings with the Chinese Communist Party.

Wynn-Williams claimed Meta aimed to gain favour in Beijing while secretly pursuing an $18 billion venture there.

In her remarks, Wynn-Williams said Meta removed the Facebook account of Chinese dissident Guo Wengui under pressure from Beijing. While the company maintains the removal was due to violations of its policies, she framed it as part of a broader pattern of submission to Chinese demands.

She also accused Meta of ignoring security warnings linked to the proposed Pacific Light Cable Network, a project that could have allowed China access to United States user data. According to her, the plans were only halted after lawmakers intervened.

Meta has denied the claims, calling her testimony false and out of touch with reality. A spokesperson noted that the company does not operate in China and that Mark Zuckerberg’s interest in the market had long been public.

The allegations arrive days before Meta’s major antitrust trial, which could result in the breakup of its ownership of Instagram and WhatsApp.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Apple challenges UK government over encrypted iCloud access order

A British court has confirmed that Apple is engaged in legal proceedings against the UK government concerning a statutory notice linked to iCloud account encryption. The Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), which handles cases involving national security and surveillance, disclosed limited information about the case, lifting previous restrictions on its existence.

The dispute centres on a government-issued Technical Capability Notice (TCN), which, according to reports, required Apple to provide access to encrypted iCloud data for users in the UK. Apple subsequently removed the option for end-to-end encryption on iCloud accounts in the region earlier this year. While the company has not officially confirmed the connection, it has consistently stated it does not create backdoors or master keys for its products.

The government’s position has been to neither confirm nor deny the existence of individual notices. However, in a rare public statement, a government spokesperson clarified that TCNs do not grant direct access to data and must be used in conjunction with appropriate warrants and authorisations. The spokesperson also stated that the notices are designed to support existing investigatory powers, not expand them.

The IPT allowed the basic facts of the case to be released following submissions from media outlets, civil society organisations, and members of the United States Congress. These parties argued that public interest considerations justified disclosure of the case’s existence. The tribunal concluded that confirming the identities of the parties and the general subject matter would not compromise national security or the public interest.

Previous public statements by US officials, including the former President and the current Director of National Intelligence, have acknowledged concerns surrounding the TCN process and its implications for international technology companies. In particular, questions have been raised regarding transparency and oversight of such powers.

Legal academics and members of the intelligence community have also commented on the broader implications of government access to encrypted platforms, with some suggesting that increased openness may be necessary to maintain public trust.

The case remains ongoing. Future proceedings will be determined once both parties have reviewed a private judgment issued by the court. The IPT is expected to issue a procedural timetable following input from both Apple and the UK Home Secretary.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.