Jurisdiction

India uses AI to catch crypto tax evaders

India’s Income Tax Department is using AI and data tools to identify tax evasion in cryptocurrency transactions. The government collected ₹437 crore in crypto taxes in 2022-2023 using machine learning and digital forensics to spot suspicious activity.

Tax authorities match deducted at source (TDS) data from crypto exchanges to improve compliance. The introduction of the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) also enables automated sharing of tax information, aligning India’s efforts with international tax agreements.

These moves mark a push for greater transparency in India’s digital asset market. Enhanced wallet visibility and automatic data exchange aim to reduce anonymity and curb tax evasion in the crypto space.

India continues to develop regulations focused on consumer protection, cross-border cooperation, and tax compliance, demonstrating a commitment to a more traceable and accountable crypto industry.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Tech giants back Trump’s AI deregulation plan amid public concern over societal impacts

Donald Trump recently hosted an AI summit in Washington, titled ‘Winning the AI Race,’ geared towards a deregulated atmosphere for AI innovation. Key figures from the tech industry, including Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang and Palantir’s CTO Shyam Sankar, attended the event.

Co-hosted by the Hill and Valley Forum and the Silicon Valley All-in Podcast, the summit was a platform for Trump to introduce his ‘AI Action Plan‘, comprised of three executive orders focusing on deregulation. Trump’s objective is to dismantle regulatory restrictions he perceives as obstacles to innovation, aiming to re-establish the US as a leader in AI exportation globally.

The executive orders announced target the elimination of ‘ideological dogmas such as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)’ in AI models developed by federally funded companies. Additionally, one order promotes exporting US-developed AI technologies internationally, while another seeks to lessen environmental restrictions and speed up approvals for energy-intensive data centres.

These measures are seen as reversing the Biden administration’s policies, which stressed the importance of safety and security in AI development. Technology giants Apple, Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet have shown significant support for Trump’s initiatives, contributing to his inauguration fund and engaging with him at his Mar-a-Lago estate. Leaders like OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Nvidia’s Jensen Huang have also pledged substantial investments in US AI infrastructure.

Despite this backing, over 100 groups, including labour, environmental, civil rights, and academic organisations, have voiced their opposition through a ‘People’s AI action plan’. These groups warn of the potential risks of unregulated AI, which they fear could undermine civil liberties, equality, and environmental safeguards.

They argue that public welfare should not be compromised for corporate gains, highlighting the dangers of allowing tech giants to dominate policy-making. That discourse illustrates the divide between industry aspirations and societal consequences.

The tech industry’s influence on AI legislation through lobbying is noteworthy, with a report from Issue One indicating that eight of the largest tech companies spent a collective $36 million on lobbying in 2025 alone. Meta led with $13.8 million, employing 86 lobbyists, while Nvidia and OpenAI saw significant increases in their expenditure compared to previous years. The substantial financial outlay reflects the industry’s vested interest in shaping regulatory frameworks to favour business interests, igniting a debate over the ethical responsibilities of unchecked AI progress.

As tech companies and pro-business entities laud Trump’s deregulation efforts, concerns persist over the societal impacts of such policies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

China issues action plan for global AI governance and proposes global AI cooperation organisation

At the 2025 World AI Conference in Shanghai, Chinese Premier Li Qiang urged the international community to prioritise joint efforts in governing AI, making reference to a need to establish a global framework and set of rules widely accepted by the global community. He unveiled a proposal by the Chinese government to create a global AI cooperation organisation to foster international collaboration, innovation, and inclusivity in AI across nations.

‘China attaches great importance to global AI governance, and has been actively promoting multilateral and bilateral cooperation with a willingness to offer more Chinese solutions‘.

An Action Plan for AI Global Governance was also presented at the conference. The plan outlines, in its introduction, a call for ‘all stakeholders to take concrete and effective actions based on the principles of serving the public good, respecting sovereignty, development orientation, safety and controllability, equity and inclusiveness, and openness and cooperation, to jointly advance the global development and governance of AI’.

The document includes 13 points related to key areas of international AI cooperation, including promoting inclusive infrastructure development, fostering open innovation ecosystems, ensuring high-quality data supply, and advancing sustainability through green AI practices. It also calls for consensus-building around technical standards, advancing international cooperation on AI safety governance, and supporting countries – especially those in the Global South – in ‘developing AI technologies and services suited to their national conditions’.

Notably, the plan indicates China’s support for multilateralism when it comes to the governance of AI, calling for an active implementation of commitments made by UN member states in the Pact for the Future and the Global Digital Compact, and expressing support for the establishment of the International AI Scientific Panel and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance (whose terms of reference are currently negotiated by UN member states in New York).

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK enforces age checks to block harmful online content for children

The United Kingdom has introduced new age verification laws to prevent children from accessing harmful online content, marking a significant shift in digital child protection.

The measures, enforced by media regulator Ofcom, require websites and apps to implement strict age checks such as facial recognition and credit card verification.

Around 6,000 pornography websites have already agreed to the new regulations, which stem from the 2023 Online Safety Act. The rules also target content related to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and online violence, instead of just focusing on pornography.

Companies failing to comply risk fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue, and senior executives could face criminal charges if they ignore Ofcom’s directives.

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle described the move as a turning point, saying children will now experience a ‘different internet for the first time’.

Ofcom data shows that around 500,000 children aged eight to fourteen encountered online pornography in just one month, highlighting the urgency of the reforms. Campaigners, including the NSPCC, called the new rules a ‘milestone’, though they warned loopholes could remain.

The UK government is also exploring further restrictions, including a potential daily two-hour time limit on social media use for under-16s. Kyle has promised more announcements soon, as Britain moves to hold tech platforms accountable instead of leaving children exposed to harmful content online.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Trump pushes for ‘anti-woke’ AI in US government contracts

Tech firms aiming to sell AI systems to the US government will now need to prove their chatbots are free of ideological bias, following a new executive order signed by Donald Trump.

The measure, part of a broader plan to counter China’s influence in AI development, marks the first official attempt by the US to shape the political behaviour of AI in services.

It places a new emphasis on ensuring AI reflects so-called ‘American values’ and avoids content tied to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) frameworks in publicly funded models.

The order, titled ‘Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government’, does not outright ban AI that promotes DEI ideas, but requires companies to disclose if partisan perspectives are embedded.

Major providers like Google, Microsoft and Meta have yet to comment. Meanwhile, firms face pressure to comply or risk losing valuable public sector contracts and funding.

Critics argue the move forces tech companies into a political culture war and could undermine years of work addressing AI bias, harming fair and inclusive model design.

Civil rights groups warn the directive may sideline tools meant to support vulnerable groups, favouring models that ignore systemic issues like discrimination and inequality.

Policy analysts have compared the approach to China’s use of state power to shape AI behaviour, though Trump’s order stops short of requiring pre-approval or censorship.

Supporters, including influential Trump-aligned venture capitalists, say the order restores transparency. Marc Andreessen and David Sacks were reportedly involved in shaping the language.

The move follows backlash to an AI image tool released by Google, which depicted racially diverse figures when asked to generate the US Founding Fathers, triggering debate.

Developers claimed the outcome resulted from attempts to counter bias in training data, though critics labelled it ideological overreach embedded by design teams.

Under the directive, companies must disclose model guidelines and explain how neutrality is preserved during training. Intentional encoding of ideology is discouraged.

Former FTC technologist Neil Chilson described the order as light-touch. It does not ban political outputs; it only calls for transparency about generating outputs.

OpenAI said its objectivity measures align with the order, while Microsoft declined to comment. xAI praised Trump’s AI policy but did not mention specifics.

The firm, founded by Elon Musk, recently won a $200M defence contract shortly after its Grok chatbot drew criticism for generating antisemitic and pro-Hitler messages.

Trump’s broader AI orders seek to strengthen American leadership and reduce regulatory burdens to keep pace with China in the development of emerging technologies.

Some experts caution that ideological mandates could set a precedent for future governments to impose their political views on critical AI infrastructure.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Democratising inheritance: AI tool handles estate administration

Lauren Kolodny, who early backed Chime and earned a spot on the Forbes Midas list, is leading a $20 million Series A funding round into Alix, a San Francisco-based startup using AI to revolutionise estate settlement. Founder Alexandra Mysoor conceived the idea after spending nearly 1,000 hours over 18 months managing a friend’s family estate, highlighting a widespread, emotionally taxing administrative gap.

Using AI agents, Alix automates tedious elements of the estate process, including scanning documents, extracting data, pre-populating legal forms, and liaising with financial institutions. This contrasts sharply with the traditional, costly probate system. The startup’s pricing model charges around 1% of estate value, translating to approximately $9,000–$12,000 for smaller estates.

Kolodny sees Alix as part of a new wave of startups harnessing AI to democratise services once accessible only to high-net-worth individuals. As trillions of dollars transfer to millennials and Gen Z in the coming decades, Alix aims to simplify one of the most complex and emotionally fraught administrative tasks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google’s AI Overviews reach 2 billion users monthly, reshaping the web’s future

Google’s AI Overviews, the generative summaries placed above traditional search results, now serve over 2 billion users monthly, a sharp rise from 1.5 billion just last quarter.

First launched in May 2023 and widely available in the US by mid-2024, the feature has rapidly expanded across more than 200 countries and 40 languages.

The widespread use of AI Overviews transforms how people search and who benefits. Google reports that the feature boosts engagement by over 10% for queries where it appears.

However, a study by Pew Research shows clicks on search results drop significantly when AI Overviews are shown, with just 8% of users clicking any link, and only 1% clicking within the overview itself.

While Google claims AI Overviews monetise at the same rate as regular search, publishers are left out unless users click through, which they rarely do.

Google has started testing ads within the summaries and is reportedly negotiating licensing deals with select publishers, hinting at a possible revenue-sharing shift. Meanwhile, regulators in the US and EU are scrutinising whether the feature violates antitrust laws or misuses content.

Industry experts warn of a looming ‘Google Zero’ future — a web where search traffic dries up and AI-generated answers dominate.

As visibility in search becomes more about entity recognition than page ranking, publishers and marketers must rethink how they maintain relevance in an increasingly post-click environment.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

VPN interest surges in the UK as users bypass porn site age checks

Online searches for VPNs skyrocketed in the UK following the introduction of new age verification rules on adult websites such as PornHub, YouPorn and RedTube.

Under the Online Safety Act, these platforms must confirm that visitors are over 18 using facial recognition, photo ID or credit card details.

Data from Google Trends showed that searches for ‘VPN’ jumped by over 700 percent on Friday morning, suggesting many attempt to sidestep the restrictions by masking their location. VPN services allow users to spoof their device’s location to another country instead of complying with local regulations.

Critics argue that the measures are both ineffective and risky. Aylo, the company behind PornHub, called the checks ‘haphazard and dangerous’, warning they put users’ privacy at risk.

Legal experts also doubt the system’s impact, saying it fails to block access to dark web content or unregulated forums.

Aylo proposed that age verification should occur on users’ devices instead of websites storing sensitive information. The company stated it is open to working with governments, civil groups and tech firms to develop a safer, device-based system that protects privacy while enforcing age limits.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US lawmaker proposes to train young Americans in AI for cyberwarfare

In a Washington Post opinion piece, Rep. Elise Stefanik and Stephen Prince, CEO of TFG Asset Management, argue that the United States is already engaged in a new form of warfare — cyberwarfare — waged by adversaries like China, Russia, and Iran using tools such as malware, phishing, and zero-day exploits. They assert that the US is not adequately prepared to defend against these threats due to a significant shortage of cyber talent, especially within the military and government.

To address this gap, the authors propose the creation of the United States Advanced Technology Academy (USATA) — a tuition-free, government-supported institution that would train a new generation of Americans in cybersecurity, AI, and quantum computing. Modelled after military academies, USATA would be located in upstate New York and require a five-year public service commitment from graduates.

The goal is to rapidly develop a pipeline of skilled cyber defenders, close the Pentagon’s estimated 30,000-person cyber personnel shortfall, and maintain US leadership in strategic technologies. Stefanik and Prince argue that while investing in AI tools and infrastructure is essential, equally critical is the cultivation of human expertise to operate, secure, and ethically deploy these tools. They position USATA not just as an educational institution but as a national security imperative.

The article places the academy within a broader effort to outpace rivals like China, which is also actively investing in STEM education and tech capacity. The authors call on the President to establish USATA via executive order or bipartisan congressional support, framing it as a decisive and forward-looking response to 21st-century threats.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta tells Australia AI needs real user data to work

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, has urged the Australian government to harmonise privacy regulations with international standards, warning that stricter local laws could hamper AI development. The comments came in Meta’s submission to the Productivity Commission’s review on harnessing digital technology, published this week.

Australia is undergoing its most significant privacy reform in decades. The Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024, passed in November and given royal assent in December, introduces stricter rules around handling personal and sensitive data. The rules are expected to take effect throughout 2024 and 2025.

Meta maintains that generative AI systems depend on access to large, diverse datasets and cannot rely on synthetic data alone. In its submission, the company argued that publicly available information, like legislative texts, fails to reflect the cultural and conversational richness found on its platforms.

Meta said its platforms capture the ways Australians express themselves, making them essential to training models that can understand local culture, slang, and online behaviour. It added that restricting access to such data would make AI systems less meaningful and effective.

The company has faced growing scrutiny over its data practices. In 2024, it confirmed using Australian Facebook data to train AI models, although users in the EU have the option to opt out—an option not extended to Australian users.

Pushback from regulators in Europe forced Meta to delay its plans for AI training in the EU and UK, though it resumed these efforts in 2025.

Australia’s Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has issued guidance on AI development and commercial deployment, highlighting growing concerns about transparency and accountability. Meta argues that diverging national rules create conflicting obligations, which could reduce the efficiency of building safe and age-appropriate digital products.

Critics claim Meta is prioritising profit over privacy, and insist that any use of personal data for AI should be based on informed consent and clearly demonstrated benefits. The regulatory debate is intensifying at a time when Australia’s outdated privacy laws are being modernised to protect users in the AI age.

The Productivity Commission’s review will shape how the country balances innovation with safeguards. As a key market for Meta, Australia’s decisions could influence regulatory thinking in other jurisdictions confronting similar challenges.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!