Good morning, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, and dear colleagues. I declare open the organizational session of the Global Mechanism on Developments in the Field of ICTs and Advancing Responsible State Behavior in the Use of ICTs, which was established by the General Assembly pursuant to Resolution 80 -16, adopted on 5th of December, 2025. I wish to draw your attention to the provisional agenda. of the organizational session, which is contained in the document A -AC304 -2026 -1, an advanced copy of which was circulated to states on 19th of March, 2026. I would now turn to item 2 of the provisional agenda, entitled Election of Officers. On 6 February 2026, the Office for Disarmament Affairs received a notary bow from the Permanent Mission of Costa Rica to the United Nations, in its capacity as Chair of the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States for the month of February 26, conveying the nomination of Her Excellency Ms.

Egriselda López of El Salvador to serve as Chair of the Global Mechanism for its first two -year cycle. A letter from the Office for Disarmament Affairs, informing states of this nomination and seeking agreement to propose Ambassador López for election as Chair, was circulated to all states on 13 March. No objections to this proposal were raised within the designated time frame. Ambassador Yuselda Lopez has served as the permanent representative of El Salvador to the United Nations in New York since July 2019. Ambassador Lopez has held prominent roles within the United Nations. Most recently, during the last session of the General Assembly, she chaired the Fifth Committee, successfully steering the adoption of the United Nations 2025 Regular Budget and the 2025 -26 Peacekeeping Budget.

She has also co -chaired three iterations of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Revitalization of the General Assembly and chaired the Fourth Committee in 2022. Ambassador Lopez has consistently championed issues related to the rights of a child and gender equality. She is currently serving as co -chair of the Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance, and I am confident that she will steer the global mechanism towards a successful first biennium. Given that there is only one candidate for the position of chair, may I take it that it is the wish of the global mechanism to dispense with a secret ballot in accordance with Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly. It is so decided.

I see that the Russian Federation is asking for the floor. You have the floor Sir.

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Thank you. USG distinguished colleagues the Russian Federation does not intend to hinder the consensus based appointment of the candidate that is the permanent representative of the Republic of El Salvador at the UN in New York Her Excellency Ms. Egrizalda Gonzalez -Lopez her appointment to the position of Chair of the Global Mechanism we won’t be hindering the process to ensure swift launch and implementation of the mandate of this newly established body having said that we wanted to express our deep disquiet regarding the way in which the pre -election process was organized on the 13th of March of this year UNODA kick -started an informal silence procedure so as to approve Ms.

Lopez’s candidature however this was done in a rather official way by circulating a UNODA note These procedural steps were not discussed nor worked on with member states in advance. The Russian Federation sees this as unauthorized action. In other words, action not authorized or governed by UNGA Resolutions 79 -237 and 80 -16. These resolutions refer solely to the election of the global mechanism chair at the organizational session. As a result, we have a situation whereby other states have essentially been deprived of an opportunity to submit a nomination for this leadership role in the run -up to the session. This could be interpreted as an attempt to prejudge the outcome of the election. We know that this silence procedure practice exists in other UN fora as well.

However, it does not set the norm for the global mechanism. Especially given that in Nigeria, the UN is negotiating fora. under the First Committee Agenda Item, developments in the field of information and telecommunications in the context of international security, that is, at the UN Group of Governmental Experts, at the UN Open -Ended Working Groups, consultations among states on reaching a consensus candidate for chair have traditionally continued right up until the moment of the candidate’s official approval. The Russian Federation very much values the years -long constructive cooperation that’s been established with UNODA. We note UNODA’s contribution to helping the negotiations process on international information security. We expect that such cooperation between UNODA and member states, strictly in keeping with existing UNGA decisions, will continue within the framework of the global mechanism.

In light of the above, we call on UNODA to make a decision on the future of UNODA. as well as the elected chair to ensure that the process is as transparent and democratic as possible going forward when it comes to electing chairs without interfering in intergovernmental consultations. On a separate note, we’d like to speak to the issue of the appointment of co -facilitators of the thematic groups. We’d like to underscore that the principle of consensus also applies, a principle that is enshrined in relevant UNGA resolutions, a principle that is applicable to all aspects of the global mechanism’s work, both political and procedural. The thematic groups are structural units which make up the mechanism. The appointment of co -facilitators is a decision which rests with member states.

This decision cannot be delegated to the head of the global mechanism. We deem any other interpretations an attempt to rewrite the modalities for the work of the global mechanism, which were decided upon in GA resolutions. I thank you.

I thank the Russian Federation for your statement, in particular your intention not to hinder the election of the chair. So may I take it that the global mechanism wishes to elect Her Excellency Ms. Griselda Lopez, Ambassador Extraordinary Employment Potentially, and the Permanent Representative of El Salvador to the United Nations as its chair for the BINM 2026 -27 by acclamation. It is so decided. I wish to congratulate Ambassador Lopez for her election. I wish to assure her of the full support of the Office for Disarmament Affairs. It is my pleasure now to invite Ambassador Lopez to the podium to assume her position as the chair of the global mechanism. Ambassador Lopez.

Thank you. Thank you. I would like to first thank the Undersecretary General and High Representative for Disarmament Affairs for opening this meeting. I would also like to thank all of you for electing me as Chair of the first Biennium of the Global Mechanism. You can be sure that I will make every effort, every effort to fulfill my responsibility to successfully guide the mechanism through these next two years in accordance with its mandate. And before moving on to various organizational matters, I would like to make some brief remarks in my capacity as Chair. It is an honor to address you as Chair of the Global Mechanism on Progress when it comes to ICTs. in the context of international security and fostering responsible behavior by states in the use of ICTs.

And I take on this responsibility fully aware of its scope, but also of the expectations for this process. The trust of member states is clear. Making this mechanism move forward seriously with balance and looking toward producing concrete results that are action -oriented. And you can be sure that I will carry out my functions based on the principle of consensus, thus ensuring a process that is inclusive, transparent, and fully impartial. Allow me to recognize the work of the Office. The Office of Disarmament Affairs, the secretariat of the mechanism, whose support will be absolutely essential in this new phase that I am now opening up this chair. I would also like to underline that this mechanism is yours.

It belongs to member states. This is and should continue to be an intergovernmental process in essence as well as in practice. Distinguished Delegations, The road to this chairmanship has not been circumstantial. My country, El Salvador, participated actively and in a sustained fashion in the open -ended working group, thus reflecting our constant commitment to this agenda. And, as is widely known by all, this process is the result of broad consultations with member states that were held in the spirit of dialogue and understanding, which allowed us to build trust and consolidate a clear space for this proposal. My team and I assume full responsibility for leadership in this process. Along with me are Julia Rodriguez and Ligia Flores.

They are experts in cybersecurity and international law, respectively. I am sure that their technical and diplomatic experience for this important task will make sure that this mechanism is successful and allow me to say it quite clearly, this is also an important message for the multilateral system. A small country such as mine can be the leader of complex process. It can create trust and substantially contribute to international security. This is the spirit with which we assume our responsibility. Now, it is time. To provide continuity for the work that has been done, the work that you have done. Allow me to especially recognize the leadership of my dear friend and colleague, Ambassador Burhan Ghaffur from Singapore. His leadership in the open -ending working group was key to reach agreements that will help us move forward today.

Today, the consensus achieved under his leadership is a solid basis on which this presidency will work to consolidate our gains, but also to move towards effective implementation. And the context in which we are inaugurating this mechanism demands precisely that, moving from agreements to implementation and from commitments. From commitments to results, concrete results, distinguished delegations. The work of this mechanism is more relevant today than ever before. it is being done in a complex geopolitical context characterized by growing concerns over the use of ICTs in context of conflict and we are facing a sphere of evolving threats we see attack vectors that are diversified and the use of techniques and procedures that are increasingly sophisticated as well as the continuous impact of attacks with ransomware and disruptions in digital supply chains as well as attacks against critical infrastructures and all of this demands collective responses the interconnected nation of cyberspace makes it clear that no state can face these challenges on their own and that is why capacity building and cooperation are not optional They are essential to detect, respond to, mitigate, and create resilience in the ICT space.

Moreover, emerging technologies such as AI and quantum computing are redefining the risk and opportunities landscape. These issues were broadly discussed in the framework of the Open -Ended Working Group, and we hope that this mechanism will continue to be a space to analyze new developments, but also to prepare member states to face them adequately. We are fully aware of the challenges that we have ahead. Politics has an impact on our discussions. However, at the same time, we know that member states have a true interest in the ICT space and the ICT space in the ICT space. We are committed to moving forward and achieving results that will contribute to a cyberspace that is safer, more stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable.

distinguished delegations this is not merely an exercise in declarations the value of this mechanism will be measured in its capacity to generate understanding, strengthen trust and produce specific and concrete results consensus will continue to be our lodestar but I would like to be very clear consensus is not automatic consensus is built it requires commitment, flexibility and political will in terms of fears of convergence it also requires recognizing that in a context where there is a growing sense of mistrust building bridges is in and of itself a wonderful achievement moreover, our work begins at a moment where the relevance of the multilateral system is questioned citizens of our countries do not ask about processes they ask about specific results that have impact and that benefit their lives and international peace and security are not abstract concepts they are principles and they are foundational purposes of this organization as enshrined in the charter this is the time to prove with results that the mechanism is an intergovernmental platform that is inclusive, transparent and effective to strengthen cooperation when it comes to ICT security and allow me to highlight a central element capacity building without this there is no implementation without capacity building there is no trust And without capacity building, we also cannot have effective participation.

Last week, as chair, I had the opportunity of interacting with the participants of the Grand Fir Women in International Cybersecurity, and I give them a most warm welcome. And in my opinion, this initiative specifically reflects how capacity building can strengthen inclusive participation. And that is why we welcome initiatives that have been announced already, such as training, support in policymaking, processes and national structures, and even technology transfer. We know that capacity building is a very important part of our lives. And it should always address the needs and priorities that have been. previously identified by member states themselves, distinguished delegations. My commitment is clear to facilitate an orderly, substantive, and, as I have said throughout my statement, results focused for this process.

I will listen attentively to all states, but I will also guide this process in order to move forward. For me, this is a standing goal and this is a standing mechanism. And what we do in this first biennium will define its very basis, its credibility, and its long -term impact. So, I invite you all to work together with pragmatism, but also with a sense of purpose in order to consult. I would like to consolidate this space as an effective platform to strengthen ICT security in the context of international security. Know that your chairmanship is committed, ready, and fully, fully, fully committed to this goal. Thank you very much. I would now like to turn to Item 3 of the Provisional Agenda for the Organizational Session, as contained in Document A -AC .304 -2026 -1.

An advanced copy of this document was circulated under cover of my letter of March 19. Along with its annotations, this document provides the basic framework for the decisions that we will need to take in order to prepare our session. Substantive work. May I take it that the Global Mechanism wishes to adopt the Provisional Agenda for the Organizational Session, as contained in Document A -AC .304 -2026 -1? I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Uruguay.

sorry chair my light was on by accident we agree with your program and everything you said

thank you for that clarification well may I take it that it is the wish of the global mechanism to adopt the provisional agenda in the document that I just indicated it is so decided may I take it that it is the wish of the global mechanism to conclude its consideration of agenda 3 agenda item 3 it is so decided thank you We will now turn to Agenda Item 4, entitled General Exchange of Views. As I mentioned in my letter dated March 19th, a General Exchange of Views is envisaged to hear general views of delegations on the process as it commences its work. I would like to invite delegations that wish to speak to add themselves to the list of speakers by pressing the microphone button on their consoles.

I would also like to invite states to comment on practical aspects as well as the organizations of our work in procedural matters rather than substantive elements. Members of the Board of Trustees. Members of the Board of Trustees. I invite delegations to send their statements to the email address estatements at un .org. And moreover, they may also share their statements with the chair’s team. We have an email address now. It is cybergmecchair at gmail .com. Bearing in mind that we have a limited amount of time for our organizational session, I would invite delegations to observe a… reasonable time limit for their statements to allow for the participation of all delegations that wish to speak. Now, bearing in mind all of the prior statements, I now invite delegations that wish to make a general statement.

I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Nigeria.

Thank you Madam Chair. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the African group and we warmly congratulate Your Excellency Ambassador Lopez on your election as the Chair of the Global Mechanism for the first biannual meeting of 2026-2027. The group expresses its full confidence in your leadership and pledges its constructive and committed cooperation as you guide this important process. The African group look forward to working closely with you and with the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs in support of the successful organization of the Global Mechanism. The group welcomed the convening of this organization’s session of the Global Mechanism, which represents a significant milestone in multilateral diplomacy on the security of and the use of information and communication technologies, marking the operationalization of the permanent mechanism building on the consensual outcomes of the Open Ended Working Group on security of and in the use of ICT 2021-2027 Open Ended Working Group.

The African group recalled with deep appreciation the successful work of the Open Ended Working Group on the security of and in the use of ICT, including the consensual adoption of the Global Mechanism, which represents a significant milestone in multilateral diplomacy on the security of and in the use of ICT. The group paid tribute to the exemplary leadership and dedication of His Excellency Ambassador Ghaffar of Singapore, who heavily guided the Open Ended Working Group through its 11 successful sessions. The consensus-based outcomes of the open-ended working group encompasses the cumulative and involving framework for responsible state behavior in the use of ICT provide a solid and legitimate foundation upon which the global mechanism will build its future work.

The group underscores that the global mechanism must preserve the inclusive, transparent, and consensus-based character that guided the work of the open-ended working group while ensuring continuity of the multilateral process. In this regard, the group stresses that the single-track nature of the process remains essential, as well as the principle of consensus in decision-making and reaffirms its firm commitment to this principle. Madam Chair, we reaffirm our concern regarding the increasing scale. sophistication and diversification of ICT threats which continue to affect all member states and regions with particular severe implications for developing countries. The group underscores that attacks against critical infrastructure and critical information infrastructure constitute serious threats for African member states, given the substantial investment made in such infrastructure from limited national resources as well as the continent’s ongoing digital transformation in support of achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal.

Beyond attacks against critical infrastructure and critical information infrastructure, the African group draws attention to the broader… spectrum of ICT security threat that disproportionately affect African member states. This includes the targeting of supply chains and undersea cable infrastructure, business email compromise, the malicious exploitation of emerging technologies including artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, means cloud computing and quantum computing, the proliferation of disinformation and misinformation campaign, including the use of deepfake, aim of state institution, and design to undermine governance, particularly in post -conflict context and during period of political transition, ransomware attack, attack targeting electoral infrastructure and democratic processes. And cyber incidents that disrupt the functioning of state institution and regional organizations. The African group emphasizes that these threats are not only harmful in themselves but also fundamentally undermine the capacity of African member states to advance their development priorities In this regard, the group calls for more in -depth focus and action -oriented discussion on these threats within dedicated semantic group one of the global mechanism The African group reaffirms the consensus framework of voluntary non -binding norms of responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs as reflected in the successful report of the group of government experts and the open -ended working group The group underscores that the effective implementation of existing norms is the immediate priority The African group remains open to considering whether additional norms may be needed in light of involving threats and technological developments The group further supports the continued use and further development of voluntary checklists of practical action to support the implementation of this norm.

At the same time, it recognizes that member states should retain the flexibility to structure their national implementation efforts in accordance with respective national circumstances, capacity, and priorities. The African group reaffirms that international law, in particular in the Charter of the United Nations, is applicable without the minimum threshold for sovereignty violation to an essential for maintaining peace, security, stability in the ICT environment. In this regard, the group recalls the common African position on the application of international law to the use of information. The group also recalls the common African position on the application of international law to the use of information and communication technology in Sabah, Switzerland, which represents African consolidated and constructive contribution to the ongoing global discussion on this issue.

Consistent with common African position the African group places particular emphasis on the principle of state sovereignty including territorial sovereignty in cyber space sovereignty, equality of state, due diligence the prohibition of intervention in the internal and external affairs of state the peaceful settlement of disputes and the prohibition of the threat or use of force The group further underscores the opportunity of the applicability of international humanitarian law in situations of armed conflict as well as the full applicability of international human rights law in the ICT environment The African group notes that the agreed structure of the global mechanism comprising two dedicated thematic groups and substantive plenary sessions organized by the African group around the five pillars of the framework provide a solid basis for continued discussion on the application of international law to the use of ICT.

In this regard, the group considered that dedicated thematic group one, together with substantive preliminary session, will provide a potent avenue for advancing this discussion. The African group underscores the importance of speeding up the process of appointing co -facilitators of DTG1 and DTG2 as they represent the real powerhouses for our global mechanism and the importance of ensuring equal and balanced representation among developing and developed countries within the overall structure. The group expresses its strong support for the operationalization and further development of the global point of view. Contact Directory launched in May 2024. The group encourages all African member states that have not yet done so to designate their national points of contact. It further calls upon states and relevant organizations in a position to do so to provide targeted capacity building support to enable the full, effective, meaningful participation of developing countries in the global POC directory.

Madam Chair, the African group further underscores the importance of confidence building measures for the protection of critical infrastructure and critical information infrastructure and calls for all continued discussion on how such measures can be effectively operationalized in response to severe ICT incidents affecting critical infrastructure. The group also supports the continuation of stimulation exercise conducted by the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs in partnership with interested member states and relevant United Nations entities as a practical tool for strengthening preparedness, cooperation, and trust among states. The African group considers capacity building to be a central cross -cutting priority and an issue of the utmost strategic importance for Africa. The group emphasizes that capacity building must be approached in pragmatic, practical, and action -oriented manner rather than remaining at the level of conceptual discussion.

Sustainable, effective, and needed -based capacity building is essential to enable African member states to develop the resources, skills, institutional framework, and technical infrastructure requirements. The group considers capacity building to be a central cross -cutting priority and an issue The group considers capacity building to be a central cross -cutting priority and an issue of the utmost strategic importance for Africa. of the utmost strategic importance for Africa. The group considers capacity building to be a central cross -cutting priority and an issue of the utmost strategic importance for Africa. The group considers capacity building to be a central cross -cutting priority and an issue The group considers capacity building to be a central cross -cutting priority and an issue implement the framework for responsible state behavior, and enhance the opportunity presented by digital technology in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

In the African context, such efforts should be designed with implementation of AU Convention on Cybersecurity and Personal Data Protection, in accordance with Malabo Convention. The African group supports the establishment of dedicated global ICT security cooperation and capacity building portal, and calls for its early and effective operationalization. The group further underscores the importance of developing a United Nations fellowship program dedicated to ICT security, modellized on existing fellowship programs in order to in order to determine the fit with a view to equipping diplomats, policy makers, technical experts and other relevant officials from developing countries with particular attention to least developed countries and small island developing states with the knowledge, skill and tools necessary to engage effectively in this domain.

We reaffirm our support for the establishment of a United Nations Voluntary Fund dedicated to ICT security capacity building and call upon the global mechanism to advance discussions on this proposal as a matter of priority. Such a fund will help ensure that all states, in particular developing countries, possess the necessary capacity to participate fully and meaningfully in the work of the global mechanism and to effectively… implement the framework for responsible state behavior in the use of ICT. Madam Chair, the African group also… commend existing sponsorship initiatives, including the Women in International Security and Cyberspace Fellowship, and call upon the global mechanism to ensure their continuity and further expansion in order to promote inclusive and diverse participation in discussion of ICT security.

The group reiterates the intergovernmental and state -led nature of the global mechanism, while the group acknowledges the value of contribution from civil society, academia, and private sector in enriching discussions. It underscores that stakeholder engagement should be structured in a manner that supports the intergovernmental process and enhances the quality of deliberation. In this regard, the group supports the continuation of the existing modality for stakeholder participation as successfully applied. During the open -ended working group, At the same time, the African group remains open to further discussions on ways to enhance such engagement, particularly on the margins of formal session and during inter -sessional periods. In conclusion, Madam Chair, the African group reiterates its unwavering commitment to a multilateral, inclusive, transparent, and consensus -based process on ICT security under the auspices of the United Nations.

The group affirms its readiness to engage constructively across all aspects of work of the global mechanism and expresses its determination to contribute actively to the successful advancement of this important process. The African voice is essential in shaping the global governance of information and communication technologies. The African group will continue to advocate for an equitable development -oriented, and right -respected approach to ICT security. to ICT security, ensuring that all member states, regardless of their level of development, are able to safely, securely, and meaningfully benefit from the opportunities presented by digital technologies. The group looks forward to the substantive work of the dedicated thematic groups and the first plenary session and stands ready to contribute African expertise, expertise, continental instrument, and practical experience to advancing tangible outcome.

I thank you all. I thank you, Madam Chair.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Nigeria on behalf of the African group. I will now read the speakers that have added themselves to the group on behalf of Group Solomon Islands, on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum States, Algeria, on behalf of the Arab group, and the European Union. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Solomon Islands.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of the Solomon Islands on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Algeria on behalf of the Arab Group

Thank you Madam President I have the honor to deliver the statement on behalf of the Arab Group At the outset, the Arab Group expresses its support for Your Excellency’s assumption of the chairmanship of the future mechanism for cybersecurity for the period 2026 -2027 The Group has full trust in your effective leadership of the mechanism’s work over the next two years The mechanism would be the most comprehensive and important platform for consultations on cybersecurity issues This foundational phase is significant as it is then that the mechanism’s core principles and future working modalities will be established. In this context, the Arab group looks forward to the mechanism adopting a comprehensive and objective approach to all issues of concern to different countries and regions.

We would like to highlight the following seven priorities, which are the Arab group’s main expectations for the mechanism’s work in the coming two years. First, we must work towards creating a safe, well -governed, and sustainable digital environment that supports the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. This should ensure that the Arab group’s work is a success. The use of ICT fully aligns with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law. especially the principles of sovereignty, non -interference in the internal affairs of states, and peaceful coexistence. The group also notes the recommendations of the Ministerial Council on Cybersecurity of the League of Arab States. These recommendations stress the importance of concerted efforts to build a safe and sustainable cyber environment in light of current geopolitical tensions and threats.

Second, we emphasize the centrality of international cooperation to support states, particularly developing countries, in strengthening their national capacities. This should include enabling universal, non -discriminatory digital access and providing the tools needed to address growing cyber threats. Threats. The group values the creation of a UN -based fellowship program dedicated to cybersecurity capacity building for developing countries, inspired by the existing fellowship programs under the UN Program of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons and the Global Framework for Through -Life Conventional Ammunition Management. The group also notes the relevance of the existing Singapore UN training program as a potential model for providing sustained capacity building for developing countries. The establishment of a permanent fund under UN auspices for this purpose should also be considered.

It is important to address the full spectrum of cybersecurity threats in a comprehensive and objective manner. These threats include inter alia, attacks against strategic infrastructure, large -scale indiscriminate destructive attacks, especially when perpetrated by state actors, threats targeting value -added supply chains, which are threats of no less importance, also disinformation and misinformation campaigns, and ransomware attacks and cyber attacks targeting electronic systems of national institutions and regional organizations. Those attacks undermine operational continuity in those institutions. Addressing these challenges requires developing appropriate tools and response frameworks, taking into account their context. Cross -border nature. Fourth, confidence -building measures in cybersecurity are vital for effective communication among states and for achieving convergence of views to reduce tensions and prevent escalation.

The Arab group views confidence -building measures as complementary to the implementation of the existing normative framework and not as substitutes for efforts to elaborate additional principles, norms, and norms, including through legally binding instruments. The group welcomes the consensual adoption of the proposal to establish a global points of contact directory, which is the first practical step endorsed by the working group. Fifth, we struggle. Trust the importance of sustained dialogue and consultations. bilateral, regional and multilateral within the mechanism on how international law applies to cyber security. Discussions have not yet reached the desired level of maturity or comprehensiveness. This should proceed in parallel with identifying gaps in the current consensual normative framework and exploring possibilities for developing the existing framework whether through new legally binding norms or strengthening the implementation of existing ones.

The mechanism should operate as a single, inclusive, permanent, flexible track under UN auspices. Its decisions should be consensus -based. We recognize the benefits of engaging stakeholders in the discussions on cybersecurity as they contribute technical expertise. However, it is essential to preserve the intergovernmental nature of the platform always and the leadership role of UN member states. Participation by stakeholders should therefore remain consistent with the modality adopted in the final report of the Open Energy Act. which has proven effective in recent years. And finally, the group underscores the importance of promptly appointing co -facilitators for the working groups on challenges and capacity building, DTG 1 and 2. These appointments should take into account appropriate geographic representation and ensure that facilitators possess the necessary substantive and technical expertise.

Given their crucial role in steering the mechanism’s work and formulating recommendations for adoption. Thank you, Madam Chair.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Algeria on behalf of the Arab group. And I now give the floor to the representative of the European Union. The European Union.

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. I’m honored to deliver this statement on behalf of the UN. As member states, the candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the EFTA country Norway, member of the European Economic Area, align themselves with this statement. Madam Chair, let me first, on behalf of us all, congratulate you for your election as Chair. We have full confidence in your ability to ensure a smooth transition from the open-ended working group to the global mechanism, creating a solid and stable ground for our work. The EU and its member states will, as always, work in a constructive, open, and inclusive manner with the aim to enhance international security and stability.

Thank you. With the consensus reports of the UNGGEs and the open-ended working groups and the establishment of this permanent single-track UN platform on ICT security, we believe it’s time to put our words into action on the ground and enhance our understanding about the best practices to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s cyber threats and to make actionable and tangible progress on the implementation of the UN Framework for Responsible State Behavior in Cyberspace. The UN as member states look forward to the UN Global Mechanism being a transparent, inclusive, and consensus-driven environment for states to elaborate, express, and exchange views as regards to practical implementation of the Framework. Our efforts should focus on raising awareness on the expectation as set by the Framework, including with all actors in the cyber ecosystem, enhance our common understanding of, exchange best practices, and enable peer-to-peer learning on, and enhance our common understanding of, exchange best practices, and identify practical measures to support the implementation of the Framework.

such efforts should include concrete exchanges on current and emerging cyber threats including those posed to critical infrastructure ransomware as well as cyber threats related to new technologies such as artificial intelligence challenges that keep us and our leaders awake at night our exchanges including in the dtg should include discussions on how international law including international humanitarian law and human rights law applies on how to implement the norms of responsible state behavior how confidence building measures could be operationalized effectively and how capacity building efforts need to be developed to be inclusive effective and needs-based our discussions should be integrated action oriented and policy oriented and cross-cutting in their nature including by building upon relevant expertise experiences by member states regional organizations as well as stakeholders can feed into our discussion enhancing our common efforts to effectively tackle the most pertinent security challenges in cyberspace and enhance global cyber resilience the mechanism gives us us an opportunity to make our work more concrete and zoom in on details, including how international law applies.

And the final Open End Working Group provides us with a clear roadmap for our work in this area. We call for continuing the work on the application of international law, building on the efforts done by many states in developing national and regional positions, as well as by cross -regional groups in the Open End Working Group. Over 100 states now have expressed their views in this regard, which is valuable input for our continued discussions and which should be reflected in the conclusions by the UN Global Mechanism on how international law applies. The work under the Global Mechanism should in addition continue to elaborate on the norms of responsible state behavior, particularly by enhancing our common understanding of these norms and their implementation.

This should include discussions on guidance and implementation of international law. This should include guidance for national legislation, policies, structures, mechanisms, in which the voluntary checklist for practical excellence for the implementation of the norms as contained in Annex A of the third Open End Working Group APR could play an essential role. We could, for instance, further develop the checklist and could consider having it as a basis for a tool to facilitate voluntary reporting on the progress made, which is similar to what is done in under -YUM processes. Similar efforts should be made as regards confidence -building measures. We should focus our discussions on raising awareness of and elaborating on the CBMs, both at global and regional level, learning also from the experiences of regional organizations in this context.

Practical tools, best practices, and examples could feed our engagements and allow us to practically reflect the CBMs into our national and regional structures. In this context, the UN member states welcome simulation exercises that could support the identification of such practical measures. Simulation exercises can also help to identify the capacities needed to implement the UN framework and to enhance cyber resilience. As set out in the final Open Ended Working Group report, cybercapacity building is a priority of the international community and should continue to be a central issue under the global mechanism, complementing the efforts at regional and bilateral level, as well as with the multi -stakeholder community, while minimizing duplication of efforts. The main added value of the United Nations is in its coordinating role and its inclusivity.

It appears, therefore, as an ideal forum to streamline existing initiatives and to synchronize them with the aim of strengthened efficiency. Currently, many developing and emerging economies lack the technical expertise, the institutional policies and frameworks necessary to address cyber threats effectively. And concrete delivery of sustainable and needs -based cybercapacity building is essential to enable states to ensure and secure their digital development goals. therefore the work under the global mechanism should enable exchanges that allow for the identification of concrete gaps and needs for capacity building efforts as well as facilitate matchmaking efforts between donors and recipients such exchanges could take place in the DTGs more concretely but also in the plenary to enable continued discussions on the overall framework of cyber capacity building also the global roundtable on ICT security on capacity building in the context of international security could further enhance the exchanges including with the multi -stakeholder community and capacity building implementers the EU and its member states will continue to substantially contribute to these efforts by not only sharing best practices and practical measures but moreover by continuing to invest in concrete capacity building projects at this moment we have 33 projects with a value of 134 million being implemented in the world and some EU member states have been carrying out substantial projects in this domain for many years with many partners around the globe We look forward to having a more detailed discussion on how cyber capacity building could be discussed in an inclusive and effective manner in all of the mechanisms and structures in view of sustained investment in the cyber resilience of our partners.

Madam Chair, please allow me to congratulate you and your team again and to reiterate that the EU, its member states and our aligning partners stand ready to constructively engage on the global mechanism and to contribute with concrete ideas for a joint endeavor in view of advancing international security and stability of us all. Thank you very much.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of the EU for her statement. We have concluded statements on behalf of groups. If this is not the case, please approach the Secretariat in order to be able to give you the floor. Having said this, I will now read out the list. We have a list of countries that will be taking the floor to make statements. Tonga, Uruguay, Colombia, Costa Rica and Argentina. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Tonga. Ambassador, please.

Madam Chair, I have the honor of delivering this statement on behalf of the Kingdom of Tonga. Allow me to align our statement with that delivered by Solomon Islands on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum. I join others in congratulating you on your election as Chair of this process. We are confident that under your guidance and able leadership, this process will reach a successful and fruitful conclusion, and I assure you of my delegation’s full support. Madam Chair, I wish to thank you and your team and the Secretariat for the provision of this statement. The constitutional agenda provided… and the helpful guidance provided in your letter. Allow me to offer Tonga’s general views. Cybersecurity is essential to the economic resilience, digital inclusion, and national security of the Kingdom of Tonga.

As such, our engagement in this process is vital, not only as recipients of support, but also contributors with practical experience in resilience, resilience, regional cooperation, and operating under significant resource constraint. In this regard, the rules of procedure must establish a framework that enables equitable and meaningful participation of small island developing states like the Kingdom. Secondly, on agenda items, it is fundamental that we move beyond structural debates with resilience. This is a critical issue that we must address and push for an agenda grounded in operational realities. The global mechanism is new and offers the international community an opportunity to build a more action -oriented process that keeps the focus on practical implementation. In this regard, a clearly sequenced program of work for the plenary and the DTGs will provide the necessary foundation for its work.

Madam Chair, thirdly, capacity building is indeed a priority for the Kingdom and must be integrated in all thematic areas as a cross -cutting issue. Capacity constraints in cybersecurity personnel and the growing digitalization of government services, financial systems, and critical infrastructure has expanded the potential impact of cyber incidents. As such, the PIF joint working paper provides an important basis upon which capacity building discussions should be centered upon. In particular, principles of context specific nationally owned coordination and complementarity with existing regional and international initiatives. Accordingly, we recommend that capacity building discussions focus on prevention, detection, and response as an operational framework, enabling states to systematically identify gaps and determine whether support is most critically required. Furthermore, the structure and modalities of the global mechanism, particularly the dedicated support, and its thematic groups should support action -oriented operational outcomes that are relevant to national contexts.

Finally, the discussions on the application of international law should remain grounded in the UN Charter and existing obligations and be supported by strengthened legal capacity building. Madam Chair, as I conclude, it would be remiss of me to acknowledge the assistance of our partners and the capacity building opportunities we have benefited from, including the Women in Cyber Fellowship and Pacific Cyber Diplomacy. Madam Chair, Tonga is committed to this process and we look forward to engaging constructively on this topic. Thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished Permanent Representative Tonga for his statement and I now give the floor to the Representative of Uruguay.

Thank you, Madam Chair. First, I would like to congratulate you for assuming this major challenge. It is truly a joy and a source of pride to see you in this important role and, of course, you can count on my delegation to work constructively. Madam Chair, as we begin the work of the global mechanism, it is indispensable to think about the path we’ve traveled. The last OEWG from 2019 and continued by its successor in 2021 unified distinct approaches on the governance of cyberspace in a single coherent framework that’s universally accepted. The Uruguayan delegation, specifically my country, believes cybersecurity, digital inclusion, emerging technologies, and AI are very important topics. And in this sense, our country has made huge gains in parallel to different processes held within the OEWG.

This group was extremely important for networking with different agencies in order to strengthen cooperation. And also, provide training to our experts. This is why we deem that this global standing mechanism is a huge step forward for our states. and some key results that we would like to highlight is the development of a directory on global points of contact designed to facilitate direct communication and coordination among states, especially in the context of possible cyber incidents, as well as the template for communication that supports timely and effective information exchange. These initiatives point to a practical commitment to operationalizing cyber diplomacy, moving towards tangible mechanisms for interaction amongst member states. Our task now is to make the most out of this impetus and consolidate it.

And in this line, our delegation would like to underline the importance of substantive work. They should reflect the priorities as identified by our region, specifically, as you mentioned, capacity building. For us, this is a fundamental pillar. Without solid technical capacities, our goal of having safe and stable ICTs will be difficult to achieve. We reaffirm the importance of… …consolidating the dedicated thematic group number… to DTG2 that was designed specifically to accelerate capacity building when it comes to ICT security. It’s important that we set ourselves up so that it has a clear mandate in agile methodology and active participation from our experts. Our vision is that DTG2 will be a practical engine to link specific needs to tangible solutions.

We value the chair’s proposal for the thematic groups. We think that good organization from the very beginning is necessary with a clear division of labor amongst the groups in a cross -cutting way on the five pillars for DTG1 and DTG2 should be focused on capacity building. It will be fundamental in order to carry out our mandate ahead of the review conference in 2030. Chair, to wrap up, I would like to reiterate the commitment of our delegation to work with a spirit of cooperation. focused on capacity building to make sure this global mechanism is a useful tool for international peace and security in cyberspace and to promote cooperation amongst regions. And in this sense, we also value and underline the related activities in the framework of OAS when it comes to training as well as, I previously mentioned, inter -regional cooperation, which has really boosted capacity buildings in cybersecurity and ICTs in our region.

Thank you very much.

I would like to thank the distinguished permanent representative of Uruguay for her statement, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Colombia.

Senora Presidenta. Madam Chair, my delegation would like to congratulate you for your election to the chairmanship of the global mechanism, and we recognize El Salvador’s active role in other multilateral forums, such as the Global Dialogue on AI. We would like to express our support, and we welcome the beginning of this new phase in our multilateral dialogue on how to… foster responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. We are convinced that the global mechanism should be action -focused and make the most out of gains achieved in prior processes. In this sense, Colombia would like to highlight three thematic areas that we consider to be a priority. First, my delegation considers that it is necessary to continue moving forward in building common understandings on how international law applies in cyberspace with the goal of preventing escalation, avoiding legal gaps, and strengthening the framework for responsible behavior in the use of ICTs on the basis of clear expectations.

Second, Colombia deems it is important to delve into our understanding of the risks that new and emerging technologies such as AI may pose for the safe and responsible use of ICTs. Thank you. These technologies can contribute to strengthening cybersecurity, but its properties and characteristics, which are constantly evolving, generate new vulnerabilities that could be exploited to malicious ends. Last, ransomware against critical infrastructure and state entities for Colombia is one of the greatest threats. This phenomenon demands comprehensive responses that articulate prevention, resilience, international cooperation, and information exchange, paying special attention to how we could possibly affect the supply of essential services. Madam Chair, we would also like to highlight the creation of the two thematic groups, and specifically the one dedicated to capacity building, whose work will be as important as ever.

It is absolutely essential to provide practical and effective support to develop the technology. developing states in the implementation of norms for responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. Colombia considers that this group could be constituted in a special space in order to share experiences, lessons learned, and best practices, and also identify specific needs of member states, taking into account the particularities of each region. Moreover, the group could also provide information on existing capacity -building opportunities such as those offered in the framework of the Organization of American States. This would foster a true inter -regional dialogue that recognizes the diversity of context and existing capacities. It would facilitate the mobilization of technical and financial resources with a gender perspective, and it would promote, North -South cooperation as well as South -South and triangular cooperation.

groups to be effective from the very beginning, my delegation considers that it is important to define clear mandates, bound by time and with specific results that may be presented to the plenum. Without this clarity, we run the risk that our discussions replicate our general debates rather than moving towards specific results. To conclude, Colombia would like to reaffirm its support to participation modalities that preserve the intergovernmental character of our decisions but that also allow for technical and capacity -building contributions from non -state actors which is linked to specific topics for each discussion in the plenum as well as in the thematic groups. We are committed to creating a global mechanism that is truly functional, inclusive, and results -oriented that will translate our commitments into specific benefits for peaceful, meaningful coexistence among states.

This focus is consistent with our vision on human security that places the protection of people at the very center, as well as the need to address emerging risks from a comprehensive, preventative, and multi -sectorial perspective. We trust that under your leadership, this new forum will meet all of the expectations of our international community. Thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Colombia for her statement, and I now give the floor to the representative of Costa Rica.

Madam Chair, Costa Rica congratulates you on your designation to preside over the first biennial period of the Global Mechanisms on Advancements in the field of information and communication technologies. We wish you success in the exercise of your responsibilities and reiterate Costa Rica’s support in this vital undertaking for international security. Costa Rica recognizes… the establishment of the Global Mechanism as a permanent form of… for dialogue, negotiation, and consensus building, one called upon to preserve the progress achieved and to ensure an orderly, substantive, and uninterrupted transition from the work carried out by the open -ended working group. Madam Chair, allow me to offer five observations regarding the proposed structure for the substantive work of the mechanism. First, the global mechanism must be resolutely oriented toward concrete results, both in general discussions as well as within the framework of the specialized thematic groups.

Given the close interrelationship among the various topics on this agenda, it is essential to clearly delineate the mandates and competencies of each working forum in order to avoid duplication and redundancy, strengthen the coherence of the process, and optimize the use of time and resources. Only in this way will substantive progress be made regarding norms, confidence -building measures, and the application of international law. Second, capacity building must be consolidated as an essential pillar of future work. For Costa Rica, capacity building constitutes a sine qua non condition for inclusive participation in the global debate and for the effective implementation of the commitments that states have been building throughout this process. This is particularly important for advancing toward an ICT environment that is open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable.

Capacity building makes it possible to translate into practice the advancements made regarding norms, confidence -building measures, and international law. For many developing countries which face structural limitations in strengthening our national capacities, this issue remains a priority. Third, we wish to highlight that paragraph 11 of Annex C to the Third Annual Progress Report and paragraph 55 of the Final Report of the Open -Ended Working Group underscore the importance of engagement and cooperation with the United States. all interested stakeholders, including the private sector, civil society, and academia. This recognition must be concretely reflected in the organization of the mechanism’s work. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to provide adequate spaces, both during the substantive session and within the framework of the dedicated thematic groups that facilitate the effective, meaningful, and orderly participation of these stakeholders.

Fourth, inclusivity must serve as a cross -cutting principle of the mechanism. In this regard, Costa Rica will continue to advocate for greater participation by women in this dialogue and in decision -making processes related to ICTs in the context of international security. Furthermore, it is essential that the mechanism pay due attention to the specific circumstances and vulnerabilities faced by women, adolescents, and children in their interactions with ICTs. A comprehensive international security agenda cannot be divorced from these realities. In conclusion, we wish to draw attention to paragraph 43a of the final report, the Open -Ended Working Group, which reflects the request by member states to continue engaging in a dialogue regarding the application of international alliance principles to the use of ICTs with the participation of experts.

A more structured dialogue on this issue will help clarify applicable legal frameworks and encourage the development and publication of national positions, thereby strengthening transparency, predictability, and the building of common understandings. Thank you very much.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Costa Rica for his statement, and I now give the floor to the representative of Argentina.

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. The Argentine delegation would like to first congratulate you for your election to the chairmanship of this mechanism. We would like to express… Our delegation is full… support for your work, and it is truly a pleasure to see you at the helm of this important process. In relation to pending aspects related to the methods of work of the global mechanism, my delegation would like to share the following comments. We consider that it is essential to ensure there is adequate coordination between the annual plenary and the dedicated thematic groups. We should differentiate their roles to avoid overlaps and promote a process that is efficient in this sense. The thematic working groups should focus on a substantive technical debate and to draft recommendations or projects that will be submitted to the plenary.

In terms of the status of these recommendations or draft decisions, my delegation considers that these should not constitute documents authored by the facilitators, but rather they should reflect the agreements achieved among the members of their group. Respect dedicated thematic working groups. This ensures transparency and predictability and allows delegations to come to the plenary with clarity on the content that will be addressed in the aforementioned plenary and that will eventually feed into the mechanism’s final report. Following this premise, the task of the co -facilitators should include the inherent responsibility and not discretional to send to the plenary projects that were approved before. My delegation considers that the chair and the co -facilitators should jointly craft a draft agenda for each thematic group which should be submitted to the plenary for consideration and agreement.

Given that meetings of the dedicated thematic groups are carried out in informal format without verbatim records, my delegation considers that it is imperative for the plenary to keep the final decision when it comes to the final decision. to the agenda. This way, we avoid that the facilitators come to define them. We also need an initial work program that is balanced and results -oriented. It should be based on the issues that structure our plenaries. This will allow the debates in the working groups to focus on specific issues which facilitate concrete recommendations, and that way, we avoid being dispersed in terms of our thematic discussions. When it comes to working group number one, Argentina would like to strengthen the effective implementation of the principles for responsible state behavior that are already in existence and were adopted by consensus through the exchange of good practices and experiences before we consider the adoption of new voluntary principles.

Group number two focused on capacity building, something that my delegation considers to be key. We believe that this group should have the necessary autonomy to develop an agenda with its own substantive identity based on the priorities of member states. The working groups complement each other, but dedicated thematic group number two should not replicate nor should it be bracketed by the thematic priorities of group number one. By being its own entity and not a subsidiary organ, this group demands flexibility to include capacity -building issues in the broadest sense of the word. It should feed upon its own inputs. When it comes to the participation, of non -state actors in all four of the mechanism, formal and informal, Argentina would like to reiterate its position.

It should stick to what was agreed upon in the final report of July 2025 of the OEWG. Finally, Argentina would like to highlight the importance of making sure that the global directory of points of contact is fully operational. We consider that it is essential to ensure that it is accessible, safe, and permanently updated, as well as functional. Madam Chair. Argentina would like to reaffirm its commitment to strengthening this mechanism as a central space for international cooperation when it comes to ICT security in the framework of international security, and we fully support your chairmanship. We believe that through your leadership, Madam Chair, the mechanism will be able to move towards transparent, impartial, and solid and tangible results in its working methods.

Thank you. I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Argentina, and I will now read out the list of speakers. We will start with South Africa, then we will hear the Republic of Moldova, Senegal, Mexico, Indonesia, Thailand, and Brazil. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of South Africa.

Thank you, Chair. South Africa aligns with the statement delivered by Nigeria on behalf of the African group. We join other delegations in congratulating you, Ambassador, on your election as Chair of the Global Mechanism. We wish to express our sincere appreciation to His Excellency, Ambassador Gafur of Singapore, for his exemplary leadership in advancing the mandate of the OEWG 2021-2025. His efforts culminated in the adoption of four consensual reports, including Annex C of the third APR and Annex I to the final report, thereby ensuring a smooth and seamless transition of the OEWG into the global mechanism. Both OEWG and OEWG are the same. Both Annex C and OEWG provide essential foundational elements for the operationalization of the global mechanism.

Madam Chair, South Africa supports the proposed structure for the organization of work for the first substantive plenary session and the organization of work of its dedicated thematic groups, including the provisional program of work. We underscore the importance of avoiding duplication between the work conducted in plenary sessions and within the dedicated thematic groups. In this regard, we support the notion of focused discussions centered on specific themes identified and agreed upon by all members. member states. The participation of stakeholders, including experts from ICT sector, academia, and NGOs, is essential for facilitating the exchange of information on developments in ICT security. Chairperson, in conclusion, please rest assured of South Africa’s support for you as the chair of the global mechanism, as well as our commitment to engage constructively in discussions.

I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of South Africa, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Moldova.

Madam Chair, Excellency, distinguished delegates, the Republic of Moldova aligns with the statement delivered by the President of the United States of America on the basis of the ICT by the European Union, and would like to deliver some remarks in its own capacity. Madam Chair, my delegation welcomes the convening of this organizational session of the Global Mechanism on Development in the Field of ICTs in the Context of International Security. This marks an important milestone following the conclusion of the Open -Ended Working Group 2021 -2025 and reflects our shared commitments to ensuring continuity and progress in this critical domain. At the outset, we would like to express our sincerest appreciation for the nominations presented and extend our warm congratulations to you, Ambassador Griselda Lopez, on your election as Chair.

We are confident that under your able leadership, the Global Mechanism will advance in an inclusive, transparent, and action -oriented manner. We further extend our sincere appreciation to Ambassador Burhani. Thank you, Ambassador Burhani, of Singapore, for its outstanding leadership. of the OEWG on security of and in the use of ICTs, and for the professionalism and expertise with which he guided our collective efforts to this important milestone. Madam Chair, we support the adoption of the agenda as presented. The structure before us provides a solid and balanced basis for advancing discussions across all five pillars of the framework for responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. We also welcome the proposed organization of work, including the combination of substantive plenary sessions and dedicated thematic groups.

This dual -track approach offers a valuable opportunity to move beyond general exchanges and engage in more focused technical and action -oriented discussions. Chair, as we begin this new phase, it is essential that the global mechanism builds on the achievements of the OEWG while addressing its key challenges. In our view, the central challenge ahead is not the absence of norms or commitments. Rather, it lies in their effective implementation and enforcement. We have collectively developed a robust framework of voluntary, non -binding norms, confidence -building measures, and understanding on international law. The priority now must be to operationalize these commitments to a practical and measurable way. In this regard, we underline the importance of ensuring the discussions remain action -oriented and implementation -focused, promoting accountability in the use of ICTs, strengthening cooperation among states and with other relevant stakeholders.

We also stress the size of the ICTs and the importance of the ICTs in the use of ICTs. We also stress the size of the ICTs and the importance of the ICTs in the use of ICTs. We also stress the size of the ICTs in the use of ICTs. Cyberspace is not owned or controlled by governments alone. Much of the infrastructure, expertise and innovation resides with the private sector, academia and the technical community Therefore, a meaningful multi -stakeholder approach will be essential to the success of this mechanism Finally, we emphasize the importance of inclusivity, particularly for developing countries Ensuring equitable participation and addressing capacity gaps will be critical to achieving a secure, stable and resilient ICT environment for all We look forward to engaging constructively with all delegations in the spirit of cooperation and consensus And Madam Chair, you have all the support of my delegation during this organizational session and to the work that we look forward to it Thank you very much

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Moldova and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Senegal

Thank you very much Madam Chair The Senegalese delegation would like to extend a heartfelt congratulations to you on your election to preside over the mechanism for the 2026 -2027 biennium You can count on our full support as you steer the work of the session to a successful conclusion We fully align ourselves with the statement delivered by Nigeria on behalf of the African group We’d now like to make some comments in a national capacity Madam President The use of ICTs in recent conflicts demonstrates the persistent challenges thrown up by ICTs for state security infrastructure, public services and civilian infrastructure as well This contrasts with the fast -paced advances of the ICTs in the past as well as the technological advances the contrast being with the time necessary for inclusive deliberations between states.

That’s why the progress made at the last working group consolidating the outcomes of the two working groups and the six groups of government experts working since 2004, these attest to our ability to overcome divergences on thorny issues to advance on ICT governance. We welcome the adoption of the final report of the OEWG 2021 -2025, which paved the way for the permanent mechanism which brings us together today. While we welcome the intensive and constructive work which prevailed throughout our previous work, it’s vital for us to continue working towards our stated objective, that is promoting an ICT environment that’s secure, open, stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable. Senegal recalls the ambition of strengthening the capacity of all states as regards ACTs and the endeavor of implementing and continuing the development of a cumulative and also evolutionary, framework for responsible behavior of states in the use of ICTs.

Another objective is facilitating integrated policy -oriented and cross -cutting discussions across all five pillars. Madam President, it’s worth recalling that the adoption of the final report of the group, although consensus -based, was achieved at the cost of approximative compromises, which have been hitherto unresolved. Indeed, for each of the pillars, there are stumbling blocks which we have to discuss in depth at the permanent mechanism. Specifically, on threats, we need to assess all threats in a balanced fashion, taking into account all the risks. We would like to recall the necessity to paying particular attention to threats hanging over ICT security, especially as regards developing states, which are particularly affected. As regards norms, principles, and rules for responsible behavior in cyberspace, Senegal attaches particular importance to their promotion and implementation.

On the application of international law, we believe… There remains a lot of… work to be done, especially as regards the application of ICTs to international humanitarian law. Our delegation regrets that the adoption of the report did not give us an opportunity to delve further into this topic. As regards confidence -building measures and capacity building, we hope that exchanges within the DTGs will continue and deepen, especially as regards the establishment of a UN fund. Madam President, Madam Chair, to continue making headway on these issues, it’s essential for the global mechanism to remain inclusive, transparent, and consensus -based. This is the spirit that has guided our work so far. This is why we invite delegations to exhibit diplomacy and make compromises to give this process every chance of being successful, starting from this organizational session.

This is the spirit that has animated previous OEWGs, and this is the spirit we need more of to achieve the objectives of the mechanism. In other words, continuously discussing the threats thrown up by ICTs, threats to the peace and security, we need to create a framework for responsible behavior for states. I thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Senegal, and I now give the floor to Mexico.

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. First, allow me to express our congratulations for your election. To the helm of this process, we are convinced that under your leadership and that of your team, we will continue making strides based on agreements reached by the six groups of government experts and the two OEWGs that were held prior to this forum. For my country, the priority in this process should be the operational implementation of the existing framework of the United Nations on cybersecurity, which includes norm for responsible safe behavior, as well as confidence -building measures and the use of the directory of points of contact in order to show early results that are action -oriented. We consider that it is important to prioritize coordination to…

to promote capacity building and inclusivity, ensuring that our discussions and results respond to the needs of developing countries, and at the same time, they should integrate the relevant expertise of the technical community, academia, and civil society. Mexico has argued that the principle of consensus is important for multilateral work. Nevertheless, it should not be interpreted as a veto that blocks discussions and blocks reaching agreements. It should also not be interpreted that consensus means unanimity. The effectiveness of the global mechanism will depend in large part on its capacity to make decisions on the operative side as well as when it comes to implementation. In this sense, we reiterate our position, which is known to all, on the inadequacy.

The ultimate use of consensus for decision -making. From our perspective, the global mechanism should have a decision -making focus that is more dynamic, flexible, and realistic in order to move forward with critical issues. This would not only keep the necessary impetus in our deliberations, but it would also ensure that our decisions truly reflect our collective interests and are not hindered by individual positions. Given that this is the first session of the global mechanism, Mexico would like to underline the importance of agreeing on a substantive program of work which is balanced and results -oriented. A program of work that will help us work in a structured manner in our upcoming sessions. This includes defining how we will organize the work of the DTGs and also ensuring that intersessional consultations contribute to facilitating prior agreements in order to avoid delays in our discussions.

Last, we would like to reiterate the importance of opening up spaces that promote structured interaction with different interested parties. This includes academia. Industry and civil society. Their technical expertise can contribute to more informed debates and preserve the intergovernmental nature of the process. In this sense, we would like to endorse the support to the full and substantive participation of interested parties in all issues, and this includes plenary sessions and the DTGs. Thank you very much, Madam Chair.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Mexico for her statement, and I now give the floor to the delegation of Indonesia.

Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, Indonesia congratulates you on your appointment as Chair of the Global Mechanism. We assure you of our full support and stand ready to work constructively with you and all delegations to ensure the success of your chairmanship. Indonesia welcomes the convening of this organizational session as an important step towards ensuring a smooth transition from the OEWG. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. In this regard, we attach particular importance to the consensus adoption of the OEWG final report and trust that this mechanism will build upon and advance the work undertaken through the OEWG processes.

Madam Chair, first, Indonesia welcomes the establishment of the two dedicated thematic groups, particularly the group on capacity building. In our view, capacity building remains essential to assist states in addressing gaps in national capabilities in the area of ICT security. Such efforts must be guided by states’ needs and priorities, taking into account differing national circumstances and levels of development. We also see value in advancing practical initiatives already agreed, including the Global ICT Security Cooperation and Capacity Building Portal. Second, Indonesia underlines the importance of continuing discussions across all five pillars of the framework. This is essential to ensure that the work of the global mechanism remains comprehensive and reflects the full scope of what has been agreed by consensus.

We also reiterate that cyberspace must not become a lawless space. International law, including the Charter of the United Nations, remains fully applicable in the cyber domain. As digital technologies increasingly shape how our societies communicate and interact, it is imperative that the shared space remain secure and predictable. Third, Indonesia recognizes the importance of collaborative approaches, including with the private sector and regional partners. At the same time, modalities for such participation must remain consistent with established UN practices and procedures. agreed modalities, and the intergovernmental nature of this process. This is important to ensure that stakeholder participation remains constructive, meaningful, transparent, and supportive of member states’ work. Madam Chair, in closing, Indonesia hopes that this organizational session will lay a solid foundation for the work of the global mechanism in a manner that is inclusive, balanced, and firmly grounded in the consensus framework agreed by member states.

We remain ready to engage constructively with all delegations as this process moves forward, including at the first substantive session in July. Thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Indonesia, and I now give the floor to Thailand.

Okay. Hi. Madam Chair, my delegation congratulates you on your election as Chair of the Commission. Thank you. Thailand would like to thank all member states and partners for their valuable contributions throughout the OEWG on security of and in the use of ICTs and looks forward to continuing our partnerships to ensure a seamless transition to the global mechanism. In this regard, Thailand reaffirms its consistent support for the establishment of the global mechanism as the first and only UN permanent mechanism dedicated to addressing cyber threats which are of growing global concern. Thailand envisions the global mechanism as action -oriented in nature with open, inclusive, transparent, sustainable, and flexible process. It should foster trust and confidence building among states, strengthen security, resilience against emerging cyber threats, facilitate common understandings on the application of international law in cyberspace, and effective implementation of existing norms, and support needs -based capacity building.

In advancing the global mechanism, allow me to highlight Thailand’s three national priorities. First, international law. We reiterate long -standing consensus that international law applies in cyberspace. We believe that enhanced international dialogue will promote common understandings and consensus on lawful and responsible state behavior in the cyber domain, thereby reducing the risk of misunderstandings and escalation. Second. Confidence -building measures . We underscore the important role of CBMs in building trust, enhancing transparency, and reducing risk among states, especially in today’s increasingly volatile geopolitical environment. Thailand reiterates its commitment to the Global Points of Contact POC directory and supports ongoing efforts to further strengthen the directory. Third, capacity building. We reiterate the need for capacity building to help states mitigate cyber threats, enhance resilience, and facilitate effective implementation of international law and norms.

We hope that capacity building remains at the core of our cooperation and deliberation in both the plenary and the dedicated thematic groups. We look forward to the full and effective operationalization of the Global ICT Security Corporation and Capacity Building Portal, TSCCP. Our priority areas for further capacity building include, first, enhancing capacity to address advanced cyber threats, for example, ransomware, supply chain attacks, and cross -border threats. Second, strengthening capabilities in incident response and digital forensics to enable effective detection, response, and investigation of incidents. Third, providing support on legal and policy frameworks, including the application of international law in cyberspace. Thank you, Madam Chair.

I would like to thank the distinguished representatives of Thailand, and I now give the floor to the representative of Brazil.

Thank you very much, Chair. Before I begin, I would like to congratulate you on your election to lead the work of this global mechanism. It is truly a pleasure to see you represented from my region in this position, and you can rest assured of the support of my delegation to this mechanism and to you in your work in this forum that is extremely important for Brazil. The malicious use of ICTs is one of the most complex challenges to international peace and security of our times. The pervasive use of these technologies, now present in nearly all dimensions of our lives and societies, has proportionately increased our vulnerability to malicious cyber operations. This is why agreeing by consensus on the creation of this global mechanism, the first permanent structure within the UN framework to address these challenges, was such an important achievement by the multilateral system.

The experience of the two OEWGs under the variable leadership of Ambassadors Lauber and Gafour showed that it was past time for the entire international community to be involved on equal standing on discussing issues that affect us all. Making this universal space permanent within the UN structure is a natural continuation of that process. The establishment of dedicated thematic groups within the global mechanisms structure is a welcome innovation, as this will foster more concrete and in -depth discussions on the issues within their mandate. For the DTGs to perform their functions most effectively, they should focus their discussions on a limited number of priority topics on each cycle, the first of which should be agreed upon at our first substantive plenary in July.

They should also feed on the expertise of a wide variety of sources, including stakeholders, with due regard for geographic balance. For DTG1, some options could be the further development of initiatives which started at the AWG, such as more in -depth discussions of the voluntary checklists on norms implementation, the continued operationalization of the point -of -contact directory, or further discussions on the application of international law in cyberspace, taking into account the growing number of national and regional positions that have been published. We are currently engaged in internal consultations and may suggest additional topics for both DTGs ahead of the July plenary. The creation of a DTG on ICT security capacity building was of particular importance to my country.

The interconnected and transnational nature of cyberspace means that security is even more of a collective endeavor than in other arenas. No country can be safe from threats in the digital domain in isolation. We are only as strong as our weakest link. My country, along with many others, has long advocated for greater United Nations involvement in this domain. Centralizing the many existing capacity building initiatives under the UN umbrella would facilitate access by those who need them the most and ensure a closer alignment with the priority issues identified first by the UAWG and now by the GMAC plenary and better compliance with the capacity building principles adopted by the UAWG. In this regard, it would be beneficial for the DTG on capacity building to commence its work with a diagnostic assessment of the current landscape in the field, identifying existing initiatives, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, and fostering a systematic matchmaking effort between providers and potential recipients of capacity building.

This diagnostic assessment should facilitate access to these initiatives, which is often hindered by their fragmentation. While it will be important to ensure synergy between both DTGs, they are each autonomous bodies, and DTG 2’s mandate should not be formally tied to DTG 1’s. Madam Chair, it will be key to ensure that discussions within the DTGs adequately feed into the work of the plenary. For that to happen, we must establish a clear procedure to elevate DTG reports and negotiate the recommendations to the plenary so that they may be formally adopted. This is why, while DTG discussions should be mostly informal, the DTGs should have a short formal segment for the adoption of decisions. My delegation looks forward to working with you and your team and to engage constructively with all delegations as we embark on this new chapter in the pursuit of our common goal of an open, secure, stable, peaceful, accessible, and interoperable ICT environment.

I thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Brazil for her statement, and I now give the floor to the Russian Federation, followed by Malaysia, Ukraine, the Republic of Korea.

Thank you, Madam Chair. At the outset, I’d like to congratulate you, Madam Chair, on your election to the position of Chair of the Global Mechanism. The Russian Federation stands ready to engage constructively with you and also to work constructively with all UN member states within the framework of this new mechanism. The Russian Federation welcomes the… establishment to replace the OEWG, the establishment of the global mechanism, as a permanent negotiations forum where we can discuss all aspects of the secure use of ICTs. This decision, enshrined in the consensus-based UNGA resolution 80-16, attests to the fact that the global community does desire to develop and to deepen global dialogue on international information security. We stand convinced that the launch of the global mechanism will further strengthen the central role of the United Nations in international information security issues.

We are particularly proud for the following reasons. First, we were the country initiating the negotiations process which paved the way for the establishment of the mechanism. This work began in 1998. Second, we also helped establish many of the predecessor negotiating formats and we were one of the active proponents of permanently institutionalizing these discussions. Russia supports the… Mandate of the Future Body Approved by Consensus. This body is the link between the global mechanism and the OEWG. It ensures continuity of the negotiations process. We believe that the mechanism’s parameters approved following the negotiations at the final OEWG session, that these parameters satisfy the interests of the global majority. They also help to strengthen trust among states. It’s important to note that this new body will operate exclusively on the basis of the principle of consensus, consensus-based decision-making across the board, covering both political and procedural issues.

As OEWG discussions showed, consensus helps us to agree on specific practical initiatives, such as the establishment of the UN Global Intergovernmental POC Directory, taking into account the opinions of all member states, not just that of an arbitrary majority. It’s significant to note that the intergovernmental nature of negotiations has been reaffirmed, as has the exclusively consultative status of NGOs. States have had their sovereign right guaranteed, their sovereign right not to allow access to the global mechanism for those non-government entities who either engage in politicization or lack the requisite expertise. As for the possibility for representatives of NGOs to speak in plenary after government delegates, we call on the Chair to place the absolute priority on member state delegations, which, as the OEWG experience has shown, regularly lack the time to fully participate in discussions.

Russia is committed to active and constructive participation in the work of this new body. Our priority within the framework of the global mechanism is continuing in keeping with the… The mandate that’s been approved, continuing discussions about the international legal aspects of international information security, including the prospects of crafting an internationally legally binding agreement or agreements on this topic. The first step down this path has already been taken. In December of 2024, we adopted, and then in October of 2025, we signed the first global treaty in the digital sphere. This is the UN Treaty on Cybercrime proposed by the Russian Federation. We’d like to use this opportunity to call on member states to sign and to ratify the treaty so it can enter into force as soon as possible.

The process is already underway. We welcome the first ratification of the convention by Qatar. Russia, much like many of our partners, has also begun the ratification process, and we are dead set on completing it as swiftly as possible. The next step, the way we see it, is developing international legal instruments on other aspects of international information security, and this on the basis of compliance with the founding principles of the UN Charter, and with a view to preventing… and settling intergovernmental conflicts. in the information space. The concept of such a treaty was put forward by the Russian Federation together with a group of like -minded states as an official document of the 77th session of the UN General Assembly.

Now this concept reflects an understanding of the applicability of generally recognized principles of international law in the ICT sphere. It also locks in provisions based on the recommendations contained in annual UNGA resolutions on the relevant agenda item as well as consensus -based reports issued by the OEWG as well as groups of government experts. This is something we can take into account in future discussions on this issue within the framework of the global mechanism. We intend to pay particular attention to the issue of capacity building and the strengthening of digital sovereignty that we have developed. In developing countries, we plan to move from word to deed. as part of this work. Right now, the Russian Federation is working on specific initiatives so as to implement them within the framework of the UN.

We will be announcing these as part of the work of the global mechanism. We deem it important to make every effort to further develop and universalize the point -of -contact directory. Despite the experience of using the directory in practice, we shouldn’t let our attention pay to this topic diminish. It’s important to enhance the parameters of this useful instrument, which can be used for investigating incidents in a depoliticized fashion with an emphasis on developing a standardized template for communications. We’ll continue to assist foreign partners who lack personnel and resources so that they can actively partake in the directory. This includes the holding of relevant seminars together with the UN Institute for Disaster Prevention. Armament Research, UNIDEA.

I thank you for your kind attention.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation and I now give the floor to the delegation of Malaysia followed by the Republic of Korea and then Ukraine Malaysia, you have the floor

Thank you Madam Chair, Excellencies, distinguished colleagues Malaysia wishes to join other colleagues in this room and congratulate you on taking up this important role as the Chair of the Global Mechanism We have full confidence in you and your team in steering this process for its first biennium We believe that this inaugural biennium cycle of the Global Mechanism will play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory and strategic direction of its subsequent cycles In this regard, please be assured of Malaysia’s unwavering support and commitment to you and towards this process Madam Chair As we commence the first cycle of the Global Mechanism Malaysia wishes to underscore the importance of ensuring a smooth and coherent transition from the open -ended working group to the Global Mechanism In this regard, we believe our work should build firmly upon the painstaking process achieved through the OEWG process as well as the UN group of governmental experts before it, including the agreed framework and accumulated understandings developed over many years.

Malaysia, therefore, encourages an approach that preserves continuity, consolidates consensus outcomes, and sustains forward momentum so that our collective efforts continue to progress rather than regress, instructing responsible state behavior and international stability in the use of ICTs. We thank you for convening this organizational session and providing a structured basis for our general exchange of views across the five pillars of the framework and the organization of work cycles. Thank you. A digital domain must not become a space where insecurity is normalized. Instead, it should remain a domain where states, consistent with the purpose and principles of the UN Charter, work collectively to reduce risk, prevent conflict, and build trust. Madam Chair, Malaysia is concerned by the growing scale and sophistication of malicious ICT activities that can undermine international peace and security.

These include activities that target critical infrastructure, essential services, supply chains, and public institutions, and those that could disrupt economic stability and social cohesion. We are particularly mindful that the impact of such threats is often disproportionate for developing countries, which may have limited resources to prevent, detect, and respond effectively. Malaysia, therefore, supports continued efforts to improve shared understanding of the evolving threat, including through practical activities. We have exchanged on threat vectors, trends, and recent scenarios. Malaysia is hopeful that through the global mechanism, we could further advance rules, norms and principles of responsible state behaviour. We believe these norms are essential to setting expectations, reducing miscalculation and strengthening predictability. Malaysia supports a practical, implementation -oriented approach that encourages states to internalise these norms through national policies, operational guidance and clear domestic lines of responsibility.

Malaysia looks forward to the substantive and enhanced discussion under the two dedicated thematic groups in December 2026, following the plenary sessions to be convened in July 2026. As agreed in Annex 1 of A -80 -257, the TGs are to provide focused, action -oriented discussions and transmit recommendations to the plenary. In this regard, we will encourage continued consideration of an appropriate methodology to ensure that the TGs, deliberations can feed into the plenary in a transparent and fully inclusive manner, consistent with an intergovernmental process. Malaysia looks forward to an action -oriented set of outcomes. or recommendations at the conclusion of this inaugural cycle, one that reflects our shared commitment to practical progress and strengthens implementation on the ground. In our view, the value of the process will ultimately be measured by its ability to deliver a conceptual outcome that is realistic, implementable, and responsive to the diverse capacities and priorities of all Member States.

Malaysia stands ready to engage constructively and with flexibility to help build convergence and ensure that the agreed results command broad confidence across the membership. Madam Chair, Malaysia believes that this opportunity should be taken to make significant progress across the five pillars of the framework, all of which must be pursued in a balanced manner. We remain committed to engaging constructively and in good faith during this process to advance a stable, secure, open, and peaceful ICT environment that benefits all Member States. Thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Malaysia, and I now give the floor to the Republic of Korea.

Madam Chair, distinguished delegates, I would like to start by expressing my government’s warm congratulations to your election as chair. We highly appreciate your willingness to take on this very important and challenging work. You can count on Korea’s full support and close cooperation. We also welcome the successful transition from the OEWG to the global mechanism. We believe this marks an important step forward in building a more structured and sustainable framework for meaningful discussion and cooperation on ICT security. In this regard, we express our sincere gratitude to Ambassador Gafur of Singapore for his outstanding leadership in guiding us to this point. The consensus we reached at the OEWG was the product of long and difficult negotiations. It will be important for the global mechanism to uphold and build upon that outcome, including on mechanisms for ensuring the inclusive and substantive participation of stakeholders.

As we organize the plenary and thematic groups, the focus should be on avoiding duplication between the works of the two thematic groups and also between the thematic groups and the plenary. In this regard, we find value in the French paper emphasizing thematic continuity between the dedicated thematic groups. While also recognizing the need to ensure autonomy of DTG2, as some delegates have mentioned, centering the DTG2 discussions on one or two specific challenges identified in DTG1 could help narrow down the discussions to concrete actionable items. We hope the Chair will appoint the co -facilitators. We will appoint the co -facilitators as soon as possible so that we can proceed expeditiously with the substantive work. including on agreeing on the topics of the thematic groups.

Another priority would be to continue following up on the concrete discussions and outcomes of the OEWG, such as the voluntary checklist and norms, through the plenary meetings. The RRK will continue to actively engage in discussions on international law and capacity building. On capacity building, Korea continues to support projects in various regions, ranging from cyber exercises to cyber crime forensics capacity building. We would be interested in ensuring that discussions at the global mechanism do not duplicate such existing efforts, but rather make them more efficient. The RRK remains committed to working closely with all member states to advance the implementation of the framework for responsible state behavior and to promote an open, secure, and peaceful ICT environment.

I thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much.

Ukraine fully aligns itself with the statement made by the European Union, but would like to make some remarks in our national capacity. We welcome the launch of the global mechanism as a significant step forward in strengthening ICT security globally. This process builds on the solid foundation established by the previous OEWG and GGE processes and provides us with a structured, inclusive and forward -looking platform for dialogue and cooperation. We also welcome the fact that the work of the global mechanism will be organized around the five well -established pillars of the responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs, namely threats, norms, international law, confidence -building measures, and capacity building. We support the proposed structure of work, including annual substantive plenary sessions and dedicated thematic groups.

We expect that the global mechanism will serve as an effective and result -oriented platform firmly focused on tangible, practical, and actionable deliverables that contribute to strengthening stability and security in cyberspace. Madam Chair, in our view, the priorities of the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security.

We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. We also expect that the global mechanism should include addressing existing and emerging ICT threats in the context of international security. contravention of the framework for responsible state behavior. Facing persistent and large -scale malicious ICT activities, Ukraine has first -hand experience on how malicious cyber activities can target critical infrastructure and undermine resilience. We cannot but underline the importance of further examining how international law applies in cyberspace in practice.

Ukraine emphasizes the need to ensure the effective implementation of voluntary norms. We attach particular importance to confident building measures, being a practical tool to enhance transparency, reduce risks of misperception and miscalculation, and strengthen the trust among states. We also underline the importance of capacity building, particularly to support states in effectively implementing the agreed norms and enhancing their resilience to the ICT threats. In this regard, the capacity building efforts should be demand -driven and tailored to the specific needs. needs and priorities of the beneficiary states. We note the importance of the support provided through the Women in Cyber Fellowship that, on top of its gender balancing component, also fosters inclusivity and cross -regional exchange of views, which is crucial for the common understanding of the Responsible State Behaviour Framework.

With regard to the work of the dedicated thematic groups, Ukraine fully supports the views proposed by France in its working papers submitted for this organizational session. Madam Chair, we hope that, under your leadership, the process will be guided with the necessary resolve, impartiality and commitment to delivering meaningful results. Experience has demonstrated that certain states require a distinct approach, including effective restraint, which demands both resolve and courage. In these circumstances, building bridges between the aggressor and the victim is inherently challenging, and priorities should instead be given to ensuring the effective deterrence of the aggressor. Ukraine stands ready to work constructively within the global mechanism. I thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Ukraine. I will read out the following speakers. Iran, France, Singapore, Morocco, Finland, and Nigeria. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iran. You may go ahead, please.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, at the outset, I congratulate you on your election as the first chair of the global mechanism. I also thank you, your team, and the Secretary for the preparation for this organizational session. We stand ready to engage constructively with you and all delegations to ensure that the global mechanism delivers concrete and balanced outcomes. In this regard, we count on your leadership to steer this process, in full accordance with the agreed mandate. I also wish to acknowledge Ambassador Ghafoor for his dedicated and professional leadership throughout the OEWG process, which enabled a smooth transition to the global mechanism. Madam Chair, the OEWG process has enabled useful exchanges and produced several consensus reports.

However, it is clear that the key issues across all pillars remains unresolved. These gaps must be addressed in a substantive and structured manner. On threats, there is still no comprehensive and shared understanding that adequately reflects the realities of all countries and regions. A consolidated compilation of threats identified by states during the OEWG process prepared under your authority is therefore necessary to ground future discussions. On norms, the development of new norms remains outstanding. Without a structured basis for negotiations, progress will remain limited. A comprehensive compilation of all proposed rules, norms, and principles submitted by states during the OEWG deliberations is an essential first step. On international law, the question of developing legally binding obligations cannot be deferred indefinitely.

It remains a central issue for many delegations and must be addressed accordingly. On capacity building, agreed recommendations must now be operationalized without delay. In particular, the establishment of a United Nations Voluntary Fund for ICT Security Capacity Building should be prioritized. Madam Chair, these outstanding issues were precisely what guided delegations, especially during the eight substantive sessions of the OEWG, in carefully defining the map. The mandate of the global mechanism. This mandate was not incidental. It was deliberately negotiated to ensure that these issues would be taken forward. In this context, paragraph 9 of Annex C to the Third Annual Progress Report is of particular importance. It reflects a carefully negotiated and delicate balance among member states and must be treated as authoritative.

It is therefore a matter of concern that the current formulation of the five pillars under Agenda Item 5 of the Provisional Agenda for Substantive Plenarization of the Global Mechanism does not fully reflect the agreed language of paragraph 9. This discrepancy must be corrected. From both a procedural and legal standpoint, there is no basis for deviation from agreed language. The pillars must be reproduced exactly as negotiated. This is not a technical issue. Any inconsistency risks altering the balance among the pillars and may affect how the interrelationship and equal standing are interpreted and implemented. We therefore expect that the provision agenda will be revised to ensure full and precise alignment with the agreed language. This is essential to preserve the integrity of the framework and to prevent any unintended interpretation of the mandate.

The mandate of the global mechanism has already been agreed by consensus and is not open for renegotiation. Any attempt to revisit or reinterpret it would undermine the balance achieved and risk derailing the substantive work before us. Madam Chair, concerning the facilitators of the discussion, dedicated thematic groups, we underscore the importance of ensuring equitable geographical representation in their selection. Their election should be undertaken by member states and should not be delegated to the chair of the global mechanism. We further emphasize that the groups should adopt a ruling text approach in the preparation of their draft recommendations. A ruling text is a dynamic and evolving document that reflects the full range of views expressed by member states and incorporates revisions made throughout the negotiation process.

This format reflects the ongoing nature of discussions and serves as an essential tool for advancing toward consensus. I thank you, Madam Chair.

I’d like to thank the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Director -General of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mr. Khamenei. And I now give the floor to France, followed by Singapore. France?

Merci, Madam. Thank you, Madam Chair. my delegation aligns itself with this statement delivered by the EU we would like to make the following remarks in a national capacity at the outset we’d like to congratulate you Madam Chair on your appointment as Chair of the new global mechanism we extend you our best wishes as you discharge your duties you can count on France’s support long standing support that has also been thrown behind the establishment of this mechanism for some time now as you all know ladies and gentlemen in a strategic context marked by the acceleration of tensions between states cyberspace is no exception the increasing number and scale of cyber attacks a consequence of malicious actors losing their inhibitions pose growing risks to international security and stability the targets of these malevolent actors are well known they are determined to steal our secrets they seek to destabilize our societies they seek to destabilize our societies they seek to destabilize our societies They are even attempting to sabotage our critical infrastructure.

No state can tackle all of these challenges alone. These challenges call for a pressing, collective, coordinated and confidence -based response. This is why this newly established mechanism is not simply an additional institutional mechanism, not just another institutional mechanism. It should bring us together around ways of tackling collective cybersecurity challenges. There are three objectives as part of this. First, better information sharing and greater transparency. On the one hand, to bolster predictability in cyberspace and to reduce the risk of escalation. And on the other hand, to learn from one another, so as to be able to better protect the critical infrastructure on which all of our societies hinge. From this vantage point, the mechanism is not an abstract framework It is an instrument for communications between states which needs to be more systematic both through the directory of contact points but also through the newly established thematic groups The second objective is promoting responsible behaviour in cyberspace The mechanism is intended to be an inclusive platform where all states can partake in implementing the normative framework which we developed together and all agreed upon France reaffirms its commitment to this framework and to its two cornerstones First, existing international law in all of its aspects whether that be human rights law and international humanitarian law as well as voluntary standards of conduct The sharing of best practices and experience especially in the field of human rights through the dedicated thematic groups will be, the way France sees it the foundation for collective progress towards a better implementation of this framework for responsible behaviour.

France has published a paper on the global mechanism website to this end. The third objective is capacity building for the most vulnerable states. The importance of supporting these states in building and structuring their national capacities is something that’s already been proven. This is why this dimension will be a fundamental aspect of the newly minted mechanism. Nonetheless, we must create the conditions for better, more effective capacity building together. This can be done by ensuring that the United Nations plays its proper role as a platform for dialogue. The capacity building on offer will also need to adapt to the real needs of countries, focusing on putting forward concrete solutions. Indeed, conference rooms are excellent chambers for advancing political priorities at the national level.

However, out in the field, when practitioners exchange with one another, well, that’s where effective capacity -building programs are built. The EU statement referred to a number of projects we’re implementing on this front. I won’t repeat those. Ladies and gentlemen, the launch of this mechanism sends a strong signal. It bears witness to our shared determination to make cyberspace a space of stability, security, and cooperation. It embodies our commitment to protecting not only our own states but also our citizens, our economies, and our values. The path to success, however, will require a conscious and deliberate shift in paradigm. It’s vital that we take care not to repeat the mistakes of the past, not to go down the same blind alleys which we encountered in the past.

The global mechanism must be a structured get towards… concrete action and the delivery of results. Against the backdrop of heightened rivalries, multilateralism is not merely a luxury. It’s a sine qua non precondition for stability. The mechanism is a concrete expression of that.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of France for his statement. And before giving the floor to the representative of Singapore, allow me once again to recognize the valuable work and leadership of Permanent Representative Burhan Gafoor, as I did at the beginning of this meeting. Thank you for your leadership, definitely, and for spearheading the OEWG to a safe harbor. Now I give the floor to the representative of Singapore.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Firstly, Singapore would like to congratulate El Salvador, and particularly yourself, on being elected chair of this process. Please be assured of my delegation’s strong commitment to and continued support for the discussions, and we look forward to working with the chair as you take on this important role. Singapore sees a great importance in the discussions we will have as part of the global mechanism. Madam Chair, we meet at a time of heightened geopolitical tensions and strategic mistrust. The rise in cyber threats, including attacks by APTs, or advanced persistent threats, the increase in ransomware, as well as threats to emerging technology, continue to threaten not just national security, but also the economic quality, well-being, and ability of many small and developing states.

While cybersecurity is the key enabler of a thriving digital economy, it is also an imperative for security and resilience. Digitalization has brought many opportunities but has also increased our exposure to risks and vulnerabilities. These risks and vulnerabilities make international cooperation on ICT security and discussions such as those that we will see at the global mechanism even more urgent today, especially in an environment where we face intense geopolitical pressures and their voices calling for a reframing of the international rules-based multilateral order. However, building consensus in a fractured world is difficult but not impossible. Even in a challenging international climate, the OEWG that concluded its work last year was able to achieve consensus on concrete outcomes, the first of which was, of course, the establishment of this global mechanism.

Singapore strongly believes that an inclusive… platform like this global mechanism that allows the voices of all states, large and small, to be heard on a transboundary problem like cyber security is especially important for a time such as this. The multilateral system based on international law ultimately provides the architecture of norms, standards and institutions that help safeguard the global commons and gives all states, including Singapore, a say. Broadly, we would like to see substantive and pragmatic discussions on key cyber security issues and emphasize that these discussions should not be politicized. Madam Chair, we should also focus on the 80% of things that we can agree on, not on the 20% that we cannot. In particular, we would like to see further discussions on the implementation of norms, capacity building and discussions on emerging threats.

It is fortunate that over the last 25 years, the General Assembly has gradually but resolutely developed a cumulative and evolving framework for responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. In this regard, much more work is still required both to further develop the framework as well as to ensure the full implementation of what has already been agreed at the OEWG on ICT security. In this, we join our voice to the states before us who have called for a strong focus on implementation during the discussions of this global mechanism. Madam Chair, Singapore remains concerned about current emerging cyber threats which remain transboundary in nature and cannot be effectively addressed by any state acting alone. Our concerns are not theoretical.

In July last year, Singapore announced that our critical infrastructure has been attacked by an advanced persistent threat actor. Apart from APT attacks, like many small and developing states around the room, Singapore also faces various other cyber security threats including ransomware and online scams. Apart from the rise in such attacks globally, emerging technology, including AI, presents new challenges for us to consider. For many of us in the room today, AI is a tool, AI is a target, and AI is a threat, which presents new and multifaceted issues for us to discuss. In light of these emerging multifaceted challenges, we must ensure that we continue to work together for a secure, stable, and interoperable cyberspace. Madam Chair, we look forward to more focused discussions on this in DTG 1 on drawing upon the five pillars of the framework to promote an open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful and interoperable ICT environment Precisely because of these challenges, it is important that we continue to support action -oriented capacity building in ICT security which can equip states to deal with and respond effectively to these emerging threats We look forward to more focused discussions on how to accelerate capacity building during DTG 2 On the matter of DTGs, we welcome the decision from the OEWG to conduct the DTGs in a hybrid manner For many small and developing states, participation in multiple meetings each year places real demands on limited resources and capacity It is therefore important that meetings of the global mechanism are organized in a manner that enhances accessibility facilitates broad participation and reduces the risk of infection and reduces the burden on smaller delegations If possible, it would be good to have a more inclusive and inclusive ICT environment It would be good if the DTGs could be held back -to -back with plenary meetings to allow the global mechanism to be more accessible to small developing states.

Madam Chair, Singapore will continue to support our discussions through continuing to organise the UN -Singapore Cyber Fellowship, among other programmes organised by the ASEAN -Singapore Cyber Security Centre of Excellence. We are also working with our colleagues at the UN Office of Disarmament Affairs to update the Cyber Diplomacy e -learning module on the UNOD Disarmament Education Dashboard to refresh the content of the module. Madam Chair, we look forward to a fruitful and productive discussion within the global mechanism. Thank you.

Hi there. I would like to thank the Distinguished Representative of Singapore for his statement. I will now read out the next five speakers. Morocco, Finland, Nigeria. Latvia and New Zealand. I now give the floor to the Moroccan delegation.

Thank you, Madam Chair. Allow me at the outset to warmly congratulate you for your nomination as Chair of the Global Mechanism on ICTs and wish to assure you of Morocco’s full engagement throughout this inaugural biennium. We also take this opportunity to commend Salvador’s leadership, expertise, and valuable contribution throughout all these years to the discussions on safety in cyberspace. Madam Chair, the creation of the Global Mechanism was the result of a long and complex process initiated and successfully carried out by the open -ended working group under Singapore’s leadership. It was the result of extensive negotiations between member states that led to important consensus -based results and decisions that laid the foundations for today. The modalities for the creation of the Global Mechanism were clearly defined and set out in Annexy of the ICTs.

The third annual progress report. and Annex 1 of the final report. They constitute a complete, concessually agreed procedural framework. They are the floor, not the ceiling. In that sense, we believe that the working methods of the global mechanism must be at least as inclusive as those of the open -ended working group. Any procedure that would narrow the aperture of participation must be firmly resisted. As for the substantive plenary sessions, we welcome the proposed provisional agenda by the chairmanship, organized around the five pillars. We wish to flag the following priorities. On threats, Pillar A, Africa’s direct experience of ransomware attacks and disruption to telecommunications infrastructure represents a primary input for the dedicated technical group, DTG1. This lived experience must be reflected in the group’s agenda.

On international law, Pillar C, the common African position on the application of… international law in cyberspace, affirming sovereignty, non -intervention, due diligence, and peaceful settlements of disputes in cyberspace should be recognized by the global mechanism as a substantive regional contribution. On capacity building pillar E, Morocco emphasizes that this must be treated as a cross -cutting imperative under both DTGs, not a standalone pillar. In this regard, we call for the rapid operationalization of the global ICT security cooperation and capacity building portal and the UN voluntary fund with adequate and predictable resources. Madam Chair, Morocco believes that the two DTGs should operate in a manner that is complementary, not duplicative, in accordance with the agreed functions and scopes set out in Annex 1 of the APR4.

The outputs of the two DTGs to the plenary should reflect the views of all participating member states through inclusive deliberations. Morocco encourages to consider a structured but flexible program that allows each DTG to identify at its opening the specific subtopics it will address within its mandate, drawing on member states’ own express priorities. This bottom -up approach would ensure ownership and balance across regional groups. Madam Chair, the work of the global mechanism would not be complete and as relevant without the participation of a diverse number of stakeholders from different backgrounds. Subject to agreement by other member states, we suggest to the chairmanship to organize a separate meeting before holding the substantive session in order to convene the modalities of participation of other stakeholders.

Moreover, we recommend to allocate one meeting during the substantive week in July for stakeholders to come share their views with member states, which could also include an informal exchange. It is important to underline that this meeting should not coincide with other meetings of the conference. To conclude, Madam Chair, Morocco stands ready to walk this path together with you on all delegations in the shared conviction that a safer, more peaceful digital world is within our collective reach. Thank you, Madam Chair.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Morocco and I now give the floor to the delegation of Finland.

Madam Chair, I wish to congratulate you on the assumption of the chairmanship of this mechanism. You can count on Finland’s constructive engagement. We are confident that under your able stewardship, we can move closer to our shared objective of free, open and secure cyberspace. Madam Chair, Finland aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union. The need for global capacity building efforts. has been amply highlighted by the GGE and the OEWG. Cyber security capacity building is not only a matter of time. only indispensable for digital development, but it can also serve as a unifying topic among the UN membership. As we have consistently underscored previously in the OEWG, there is a clear need for meaningful dialogue between all relevant stakeholders, including private sector, civil society and academia, to foster better understanding of the opportunities and challenges related to global capacity building.

Ensuring a free, open and secure cyberspace where fundamental freedoms are guaranteed is not only our common interest, but also a shared responsibility. We look forward to actively engaging with all relevant stakeholders in the global mechanism to explore various ways and means for global capacity building. In addition, I want to emphasize the international and international that international law is essential in maintaining peace, security and stability, also in cyberspace. As unequivocally affirmed by the OEWG and endorsed by the General Assembly on multiple occasions, international law, including the UN Charter, applies fully in cyberspace. The application of international law does not depend on the technological means employed. But the fast pace of technological development underlines the need to discuss how existing international law applies.

The dedicated thematic groups provide a suitable forum to continue these discussions and to deepen our common understanding of how international law, including IHL, applies in cyberspace. As more than half of the UN member states have elaborated their positions on the application of international law in cyberspace, this broad support should also be reflected in the conclusions of the global mechanism. I thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Finland for her statement and I now give the floor to the delegation of Nigeria.

Madam Chair at the onset, Nigeria congratulates Your Excellency Ambassador Griselda Lopez on your election as the Chair of the Global Mechanism for its first biennium and also assure you of our full support and constructive engagements We also express appreciation to the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs for its continued stewardship in advancing this important agenda Nigeria aligns itself with the African Group Statement and reiterates the importance of preserving the inclusive, transparent, intergovernmental and consensus -based nature of this process The single -track approach remains essential to ensuring coherence, unity and effectiveness We welcome the convening of this organization session marking a significant milestone in the evolution of multilateral efforts on ICT security and the operationalization of global mechanism following the successful conclusion of the 2021 -2025 Open -Ended Working Group.

In this regard, my delegation prays tribute to the sterling leadership of Ambassador Gafor of Singapore and commends Member States for the consensus adoption of three Open -Ended Working Group Annual Progressive Reports and the final document would legitimize our collaborative efforts in ensuring an open, safe, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable ICT environment. Nigeria takes cognizance of the cumulative work of the Group of Governmental Experts and the First OEWG as the normative framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace. Now is the time for transition from documented recommendation on paper to actual implementation. Madam Chair, the credibility and success of the global mechanism will depend on our collective ability to translate agreed norms, principles and rules of international law into practical outcomes, strengthening national capacities and resilient institutions capable of effectively safeguarding cyber space for all member states, particularly developing countries.

The increasing scale and sophistication of ICT threats, including attack on critical infrastructure, remain deeply concerning. Vulnerabilities in ICT hardware supply chains, ransomware, phishing, identity theft, criminal hacking, disinformation and misinformation, as well as the malicious use of artificial intelligence and deep fakes are now part of our daily reality. For many developing countries, these challenges pose both security, mobility and development risks with far -fetching implications for stability, economic growth and the attainment of… the Sustainable Development Goals. These realities reinforce our commitment to reaching consensus with other member states on mitigating evolving cyber threats, including through effective application of domestic law as deterrent against malicious actors. Nigeria, therefore, supports scenario -based discussions within the global mechanism, particularly under the dedicated thematic groups as a means to address these emerging threats and advance practical responses.

The sharing of experience during the DTG meetings provide valuable insights into threat detection and response while enhancing collective understanding of how to counter malicious cyber activities. Madam Chair, my delegation reaffirms that international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, applies to the use of ICT. We underscore the principles of state sovereignty, sovereign equality, non -intervention, due diligence, and peaceful settlement of disputes are essential for maintaining peace and security in the cyberspace. We also recognize the applicability of international humanitarian law in situations of armed conflict, as well as international human rights law within the ICT environment. Capacity building remains a central and cross -cutting priority. It narrows digital divides, reduces vulnerabilities in malicious activities, and ensures that all states can effectively implement agreed norms and respond to ICT threats.

To maximize the benefits of capacity building, Nigerians support the early operationalization of global ICT security cooperation and capacity building portal. The establishment of a dedicated UN voluntary fund for ICT security capacity the development of a UN fellowship program on ICT, and strengthening meet -based and sustainable ICT. sustainable support for developing countries. Nigeria also advocates the further development of confidence -building measures, including the Global Point of Contact Directory, and encourages broader participation by member states. We reiterate that this process must be state -led, while allowing constructive stakeholder engagement in support of intergovernmental deliberations. Madam Chair, in conclusion, the success of the global mechanism will be measured by tangible results, strengthening national capacities, effective implementation tools, and enhanced global cyber resilience.

Nigeria remains committed to working with all partners to ensure an open, secure, stable, and peaceful cyberspace. I thank you all.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Nigeria for her statement. And before we continue, I would like to point out that we have ten minutes left for our morning. Thank you. our intention to close the list of speakers. So I would kindly ask those delegations that have still not expressed an interest in taking the floor that they may now be able to do so, so that we can have clarity on how many delegations will be taking the floor this afternoon. At 1 p .m., we will close our list of speakers. I would like to thank you in advance for taking this into account so we may continue our work this afternoon and make the most out of our time.

I now give the floor to the delegation of Latvia.

Madam Chair, at the outset, please let me congratulate you on your election as the chair of the global mechanism and assure you of full support and cooperation of my delegation. We aligned ourselves with the statement by European Union and would like to offer some additional points. That will be important for our delegation throughout our work. Madam Chair, Latvia has consistently supported efforts aimed at enhancing security and stability in cyberspace. We believe that the global mechanism has a potential to play an important and instrumental role in advancing these efforts and facilitating implementation of the UN Framework of Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace. Latvia fully supports the norms of responsible state behaviour in the use of ICTs and calls on all states to adhere to these norms in order to ensure a safe, secure and predictable cyberspace, reducing the risk of misperception and preventing conflict.

As said by several delegations before, it’s not about lack of norms but about their implementation. Latvia is of the view that norms of responsible state behaviour are important to ensure the safety and stability of the cyberspace. Latvia is of the view that norms of responsible state behaviour are without prejudice and contribute to exercising states’ rights and obligations under international law, international human rights law and international humanitarian law, which apply fully in cyberspace. While norms of responsible state behavior must govern state actions in cyberspace to ensure international peace, security, and stability, we have seen increasing amounts of non -state actors proliferating malicious cyber activities against critical infrastructure, government institutions, and electoral systems. States must not knowingly allow their territory to be used for internationally wrongful acts using ICTs, whether these are state -sponsored, proxy, or hacktivist malicious cyber activities.

Further exchanges and discussions on these norms are vital to promote security in cyberspace and ensure international stability. Furthermore, the increasing use of AI in cyber attacks is a worrying trend that is likely to be a problem for the future. This will significantly undermine operations of critical ICTs at a much larger scale than before, with potentially unpredictable and devastating consequences. At the same time, AI tools can also contribute to efforts aimed at strengthening resilience in cyberspace. We see the global mechanism, including the DTGs, as a fundamental forum for continuing focused, inclusive, and action -oriented discussions and exchanges on these and other themes, as agreed in the consensus final report of the OEWG. We urge all delegations to act in a constructive spirit to consider the outstanding organizational matters today and tomorrow, which would allow us to proceed smoothly with substantial work in July.

I thank you, Madam Chair.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Latvia, and I now give the floor to the delegation of New Zealand.

Thank you, Chair. We associate ourselves with this statement on behalf of the Pacific Islands Forum and now speak in our national capacity. First, congratulations to you on your appointment to lead us in this process. We look forward to working with you and your team. At a time of strain on the UN system, it’s significant that there was consensus to establish this new global mechanism. It reflects our shared interests in an open, secure and stable cyberspace. This in turn is essential to our economic prosperity, the functioning of critical infrastructure, the delivery of public services and much more. As the first ever permanent UN structure on this subject, we see three factors as being key to the global mechanism’s success.

First, we must build from our consensus foundation. Cyber issues are fast changing and complex. It’s therefore not surprising that different views existed in the OEWG on a range of topics. Those differences did not define the OEWG, but they certainly consumed much of its energy. The creation of the global mechanism is a chance for a reset. It’s an opportunity to work differently and to move forward in new ways in a new mechanism. At the UN, such opportunities do not come along that often. The priority of the global mechanism should be positively implementing initiatives that enjoy consensus, taking the agreed outcomes of the OEWG as our foundation. There are plenty of common concerns for us to get on with tackling, and many of these have been mentioned here today, from the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure, combating ransomware, and many more.

The second key to success is, as you put it, Chair, moving from commitment to concrete results. The best way to build confidence in the global mechanism will be to demonstrate that it can deliver real benefit to member states. That means spending less time on process, like negotiating reports, and more time on substantive engagement. Less time dwelling on a few well -known points of difference. and more time building understanding of common cyber threats and developing best practice in addressing them. More time supporting states to practically implement the agreed norms of responsible state behaviour in cyberspace. More time building a shared understanding of how existing international law applies in cyberspace. And more time finding better ways to match capacity -building opportunities to identified needs.

The new dedicated thematic groups can generate momentum for a results -driven global mechanism. But this will only be possible if we empower the groups to focus on a limited number of priority subjects that enjoy the broadest possible support. Trying to do too much simultaneously in these groups risks them doing nothing at all. The two thematic groups should also complement and mutually reinforce each other’s work. Finally, the third key to success will be implementing the agreed modalities on stakeholder participation. An inclusive approach to stakeholders will ensure that cybersecurity solutions are both technically viable and human rights respecting. Chair, at a time when optimism may be in short supply, the creation of the global mechanism is an opportunity to demonstrate the value of multilateralism.

Under your leadership, we look forward to seizing this opportunity. Thank you.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of New Zealand for his statement. And I now give the floor to the last delegation that will speak for our morning session, and that is the delegation of Cuba. You may go ahead.

Madam Chair, the Cuba delegation would like to congratulate you for assuming your role as chair of the new global mechanism on developments in the field of information and communications technologies in the context of the new global mechanism. Thank you. and advancing responsible state behavior in the use of information and communication technologies. Our delegation has taken due note of the provisional program for this session, as well as the organization of work of the specialized thematic groups. Madam Chair, the establishment of this new intergovernmental mechanism which will continue working by consensus and provide continuity to our periodic institutional dialogue under the aegis of the United Nations is a significant achievement. The Cuban delegation worked actively in order to contribute to this success on the basis of our solid commitment to the open -ended Working Group 2021 -2025, which was established.

The Cuban delegation worked actively in order to contribute to the open -ended Working Group 2021 -2025, based on Russia’s proposal and a group of like -minded countries, including Cuba. For us, this was very important, especially as developing countries. We would like to thank delegations for their collaboration, which allowed for the establishment of the new global mechanism. Madam Chair. Bearing in mind the discussions in the framework of this new mechanism, we would like to reiterate that there is no common understanding on the supposed neutrality of ICTs. At the very same time, we should not try to force the notion of the applicability of international humanitarian law in cyberspace. We are concerned that some states are developing offensive capacities through the use of ICTs, so we consider that rather than giving our…

tacit consent to the possibility of armed conflict in cyberspace, we should actually focus on the main purpose of ensuring that ICTs are used for exclusively peaceful means and to support development. We hope that in this new phase that begins now, we can move forward in the creation of legally binding obligations when it comes to the safety of ICTs and their use. This would facilitate common understandings on how international law applies in this space by addressing legal gaps and establishing clear obligations for all states. Cuba remains committed to actively contributing to this goal. Thank you very much.

I would like to thank the distinguished representative of DPR of Cuba for his statement. We have heard thus our final speaker for this morning and we have also closed our list of speakers. We will continue with our list for the general debate this afternoon in this room at 3 p .m., and I will read out the list of upcoming speakers. They are Chile, Nauru, Japan, Portugal, and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. See you at 3 p .m. Thank you.