Streaming platforms face pressure over AI-generated music

Musicians are raising the alarm over AI-generated tracks appearing on their profiles without consent, presenting fraudulent work as their own. British folk artist Emily Portman discovered an AI-generated album, Orca, on Spotify and Apple Music, which copied her folk style and lyrics.

Fans initially congratulated her on a release she had not made since 2022.

Australian musician Paul Bender reported a similar experience, with four ‘bizarrely bad’ AI tracks appearing under his band, The Sweet Enoughs. Both artists said that weak distributor security allows scammers to easily upload content, calling it ‘the easiest scam in the world.’

A petition launched by Bender garnered tens of thousands of signatures, urging platforms to strengthen their protections.

AI-generated music has become increasingly sophisticated, making it nearly impossible for listeners to distinguish from genuine tracks. While revenues from such fraudulent streams are low individually, bots and repeated listening can significantly increase payouts.

Industry representatives note that the primary motive is to collect royalties from unsuspecting users.

Despite the threat of impersonation, Portman is continuing her creative work, emphasising human collaboration and authentic artistry. Spotify and Apple Music have pledged to collaborate with distributors to enhance the detection and prevention of AI-generated fraud.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Study warns that LLMs are vulnerable to minimal tampering

Researchers from Anthropic, the UK AI Security Institute and the Alan Turing Institute have shown that only a few hundred crafted samples can poison LLM models. The tests revealed that around 250 malicious entries could embed a backdoor that triggers gibberish responses when a specific phrase appears.

Models ranging from 600 million to 13 billion parameters (such as Pythia) were affected, highlighting the scale-independent nature of the weakness. A planted phrase such as ‘sudo’ caused output collapse, raising concerns about targeted disruption and the ease of manipulating widely trained systems.

Security specialists note that denial-of-service effects are worrying, yet deceptive outputs pose far greater risk. Prior studies already demonstrated that medical and safety-critical models can be destabilised by tiny quantities of misleading data, heightening the urgency for robust dataset controls.

Researchers warn that open ecosystems and scraped corpora make silent data poisoning increasingly feasible. Developers are urged to adopt stronger provenance checks and continuous auditing, as reliance on LLMs continues to expand for AI purposes across technical and everyday applications.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Google boosts Translate with Gemini upgrades

Google is rolling out a major Translate upgrade powered by Gemini to improve text and speech translation. The update enhances contextual understanding so idioms, tone and intent are interpreted more naturally.

A beta feature for live headphone translation enables real-time speech-to-speech output. Gemini processes audio directly, preserving cadence and emphasis to improve conversations and lectures. Android users in the US, Mexico and India gain early access, with wider availability planned for 2026.

Translate is also gaining expanded language-learning tools for speaking practice and progress tracking. Additional language pairs, including English to German and Portuguese, broaden support for learners worldwide.

Google aims to reduce friction in global communication by focusing on meaning rather than literal phrasing. Engineers expect user feedback to shape the AI live translation beta across platforms.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Building trustworthy AI for humanitarian response

A new vision for Humanitarian AI is emerging around a simple idea, and that is that technology should grow from local knowledge if it is to work everywhere. Drawing on the IFRC’s slogan ‘Local, everywhere,’ this approach argues that AI should not be driven by hype or raw computing power, but by the lived experience of communities and humanitarian workers on the ground. With millions of volunteers and staff worldwide, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement holds a vast reservoir of practical knowledge that AI can help preserve, organise, and share for more effective crisis response.

In a recent blog post, Jovan Kurbalija explains that this bottom-up approach is not only practical but also ethically sound. AI systems grounded in local humanitarian knowledge can better reflect cultural and social contexts, reduce bias and misinformation, and strengthen trust by being governed by humanitarian organisations rather than opaque commercial platforms. Trust, he argues, lies in people and institutions behind the technology, not in algorithms themselves.

Kurbalija also notes that developing such AI is technically and financially realistic. Open-source models, mobile and edge computing, and domain-specific AI tools enable the deployment to functional systems even in low-resource environments. Most humanitarian tasks, from decision support to translation or volunteer guidance, do not require massive infrastructure, but high-quality, well-structured knowledge rooted in real-world experience.

If developed carefully, Humanitarian AI could also support the IFRC’s broader renewal goals, from strengthening local accountability and collaboration to safeguarding independence and humanitarian principles. Starting with small pilot projects and scaling up gradually, the Movement could transform AI into a shared public good that not only enhances responses to today’s crises but also preserves critical knowledge for future generations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI tools enable large-scale monetisation of political misinformation in the UK

YouTube channels spreading fake and inflammatory anti-Labour videos have attracted more than a billion views this year, as opportunistic creators use AI-generated content to monetise political division in the UK.

Research by non-profit group Reset Tech identified more than 150 channels promoting hostile narratives about the Labour Party and Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The study found the channels published over 56,000 videos, gaining 5.3 million subscribers and nearly 1.2 billion views in 2025.

Many videos used alarmist language, AI-generated scripts and British-accented narration to boost engagement. Starmer was referenced more than 15,000 times in titles or descriptions, often alongside fabricated claims of arrests, political collapse or public humiliation.

Reset Tech said the activity reflects a wider global trend driven by cheap AI tools and engagement-based incentives. Similar networks were found across Europe, although UK-focused channels were mostly linked to creators seeking advertising revenue rather than foreign actors.

YouTube removed all identified channels after being contacted, citing spam and deceptive practices as violations of its policies. Labour officials warned that synthetic misinformation poses a serious threat to democratic trust, urging platforms to act more quickly and strengthen their moderation systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Indonesia fines Platform X for pornographic content violations

Platform X has paid an administrative fine of nearly Rp80 million after failing to meet Indonesia’s content moderation requirements related to pornographic material, according to the country’s digital regulator.

The Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs said the payment was made on 12 December 2025, after a third warning letter and further exchanges with the company. Officials confirmed that Platform X appointed a representative to complete the process, who is based in Singapore.

The regulator welcomed the company’s compliance, framing the payment as a demonstration of responsibility by an electronic system operator under Indonesian law. Authorities said the move supports efforts to keep the national digital space safe, healthy, and productive.

All funds were processed through official channels and transferred directly to the state treasury managed by the Ministry of Finance, in line with existing regulations, the ministry said.

Officials said enforcement actions against domestic and global platforms, including those operating from regional hubs such as Singapore, remain a priority. The measures aim to protect children and vulnerable groups and encourage stronger content moderation and communication.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Universities back generative AI but guidance remains uneven

A majority of leading US research universities are encouraging the use of generative AI in teaching, according to a new study analysing institutional policies and guidance documents across higher education.

The research reviewed publicly available policies from 116 R1 universities and found that 63 percent explicitly support the use of generative AI, while 41 percent provide detailed classroom guidance. More than half of the institutions also address ethical considerations linked to AI adoption.

Most guidance focuses on writing-related activities, with far fewer references to coding or STEM applications. The study notes that while many universities promote experimentation, expectations placed on faculty can be demanding, often implying significant changes to teaching practices.

US researchers also found wide variation in how universities approach oversight. Some provide sample syllabus language and assignment design advice, while others discourage the use of AI-detection tools, citing concerns around reliability and academic trust.

The authors caution that policy statements may not reflect real classroom behaviour and say further research is needed to understand how generative AI is actually being used by educators and students in practice.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

New law requires AI disclosure in advertising in the US

A new law in New York, US, will require advertisers to disclose when AI-generated people appear in commercial content. Governor Kathy Hochul said the measure brings transparency and protects consumers as synthetic avatars become more widespread.

A second law now requires consent from heirs or executors when using a deceased person’s likeness for commercial purposes. The rule updates the state’s publicity rights, which previously lacked clarity in the context of the generative AI era.

Industry groups welcomed the move, saying it addresses the risks posed by unregulated AI usage, particularly for actors in the film and television industries. The disclosure must be conspicuous when an avatar does not correspond to a real human.

Specific expressive works such as films, games and shows are exempt when the avatar matches its use in the work. The laws arrive as national debate intensifies and President-elect Donald Trump signals potential attempts to limit state-level AI regulation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OpenAI outlines safeguards as AI cyber capabilities advance

Cyber capabilities in advanced AI models are improving rapidly, delivering clear benefits for cyberdefence while introducing new dual-use risks that require careful management, according to OpenAI’s latest assessment.

The company points to sharp gains in capture-the-flag performance, with success rates rising from 27 percent in August to 76 percent by November 2025. OpenAI says future models could reach high cyber capability, including assistance with sophisticated intrusion techniques.

To address this, OpenAI says it is prioritising defensive use cases, investing in tools that help security teams audit code, patch vulnerabilities, and respond more effectively to threats. The goal is to give defenders an advantage in an often under-resourced environment.

OpenAI argues that cybersecurity cannot be governed through a single safeguard, as defensive and offensive techniques overlap. Instead, it applies a defence-in-depth approach that combines access controls, monitoring, detection systems, and extensive red teaming to limit misuse.

Alongside these measures, the company plans new initiatives, including trusted access programmes for defenders, agent-based security tools in private testing, and the creation of a Frontier Risk Council. OpenAI says these efforts reflect a long-term commitment to cyber resilience.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

RightsX Summit 2025: Governing technology through human rights

Human Rights Day takes place on 10 December each year to commemorate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the UN in 1948. It functions as a reminder of shared international commitments to dignity, equality and freedom, and seeks to reaffirm the relevance of these principles to contemporary challenges.

In 2025, the theme ‘Human Rights: Our Everyday Essentials’ aimed to reconnect people with how rights shape daily life, emphasising that rights remain both positive and practical foundations for individual and collective well-being.

 Text, Newspaper, Adult, Male, Man, Person, Accessories, Jewelry, Necklace, Eleanor Roosevelt

Human Rights Day also serves as a moment for reflection and action. In a world shaped by rapid technological change, geopolitical instability and social inequalities, the day encourages institutions, governments and civil society to coordinate on priorities that respond to contemporary threats and opportunities.

In this context, the RightsX Summit was strategically scheduled. By centring discussions on human rights, technology, data and innovation around Human Rights Day, the event reinforced that digital governance issues are central to rights protection in the twenty-first century. The alignment elevated technology from a technical topic to a political and ethical concern within human rights debates.

The RightsX Summit 2025

 Advertisement, Poster, Purple

The summit brought together governments, the UN system, civil society, private sector partners and innovators to explore how technology can advance human rights in the digital age. Its aim was to produce practical insights, solution-focused dialogues and discussions that could inform a future human rights toolbox shaped by technology, data, foresight and partnerships.

Central themes included AI, data governance, predictive analytics, digital security, privacy and other emerging technologies. Discussions analysed how these tools can be responsibly used to anticipate risks, improve monitoring, and support evidence-based decision-making in complex rights contexts.

The summit also examined the challenge of aligning technological deployment with internationally recognised human rights norms, exploring the mechanisms by which innovation can reinforce equity, justice and accountability in digital governance.

The summit emphasised that technological innovation is inseparable from global leadership in human rights. Aligning emerging tools with established norms was highlighted as critical to ensure that digital systems do not exacerbate existing inequalities or create new risks.

Stakeholders were encouraged to consider not only technical capabilities but also the broader social, legal and ethical frameworks within which technology operates.

The 30x30x30 Campaign

 Astronomy, Outer Space, Planet, Globe, Earth, Sphere

The 30x30x30 initiative represents an ambitious attempt to operationalise human rights through innovation. Its objective is to deliver 30 human rights innovations for 30 communities by 2030, aligned with the 30 articles of the UDHR.

The campaign emphasises multistakeholder collaboration by uniting countries, companies and communities as co-creators of solutions that are both technologically robust and socially sensitive. A distinctive feature of 30x30x30 is its focus on scalable, real-world tools that address complex rights challenges.

Examples include AI-based platforms for real-time monitoring, disaster tracking systems, digital storytelling tools and technologies for cyber peace. These tools are intended to serve both institutional responders and local communities, demonstrating how technology can amplify human agency in rights contexts.

The campaign also highlights the interdependence of innovation and human rights. Traditional approaches alone cannot address multidimensional crises such as climate displacement, conflict, or systemic inequality, and innovation without human-rights grounding risks reinforcing existing disparities.

‘Innovation is Political’

 Body Part, Finger, Hand, Person, Baby, Network, Accessories

Volker Türk, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, emphasised that ‘innovation is political’. He noted that the development and deployment of technology shape who benefits and how, and that decisions regarding access, governance and application of technological tools carry significant implications for equity, justice and human dignity.

This framing highlights the importance of integrating human rights considerations into innovation policy. By situating human rights at the centre of technological development, the summit promoted governance approaches that ensure innovation contributes positively to societal outcomes.

It encouraged multistakeholder responsibility, including governments, companies and civil society, to guide technology in ways that respect and advance human rights.

Human Rights Data Exchange (HRDx)

HRDx is a proposed global platform intended to improve the ethical management of human rights data. It focuses on creating systems where information is governed responsibly, ensuring that privacy, security and protection of personal data are central to its operation.

The platform underlines that managing data is not only a technical issue but also a matter of governance and ethics. By prioritising transparency, accountability and data protection, it aims to provide a framework that supports the responsible use of information without compromising human rights.

Through these principles, HRDx highlights the importance of embedding ethical oversight into technological tools. Its success relies on maintaining the balance between utilising data to inform decision-making and upholding the rights and dignity of individuals. That approach ensures that technology can contribute to human rights protection while adhering to rigorous ethical standards.

Trustworthy AI in human rights

The government has withdrawn the mandate for Sanchar Saathi, responding to public backlash and industry resistance.

AI offers significant opportunities to enhance human rights monitoring and protection. For example, AI can help to analyse large datasets to detect trends, anticipate crises, and identify violations of fundamental freedoms. Predictive analytics can support human rights foresight, enabling early interventions to prevent conflicts, trafficking, or discrimination.

At the same time, trust in AI for decision-making remains a significant challenge. AI systems trained on biassed or unrepresentative data can produce discriminatory outcomes, undermine privacy and erode public trust.

These risks are especially acute in applications where algorithmic decisions affect access to services or determine individual liberties. That requires governance frameworks that ensure transparency, accountability and ethical oversight.

In the human rights context, trustworthy AI means designing systems that are explainable, auditable and accountable. Human oversight remains essential, particularly in decisions with serious implications for individuals’ rights.

The Summit highlighted the importance of integrating human rights principles such as non-discrimination, equality and procedural fairness into AI development and deployment processes.

Ethics, Accountability and Governance

AI, justice, law,

Aligning technology with human rights necessitates robust ethical frameworks, effective governance, and transparent accountability. Digital systems must uphold fairness, transparency, inclusivity, and human dignity throughout their lifecycle, from design to deployment and ongoing operation.

Human rights impact assessments at the design stage help identify potential risks and guide responsible development. Engaging users and affected communities ensures technologies meet real needs.

Continuous monitoring and audits maintain compliance with ethical standards and highlight areas for improvement.

Effective governance ensures responsibilities are clearly defined, decisions are transparent, and corrective actions can be taken when rights are compromised. By combining ethical principles with robust governance and accountability, technology can actively protect and support human rights.

Future pathways for rights-centred innovation

Image of UN Human Rights Council

The integration of human rights into technology represents a long-term project. Establishing frameworks that embed accountability, transparency and ethical oversight ensures that emerging tools enhance freedom, equality and justice.

Digital transformation, when guided by human rights, creates opportunities to address complex challenges. RightsX 2025 demonstrated that innovation, governance and ethical foresight can converge to shape a digital ecosystem that safeguards human dignity while fostering progress.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!