Meta AI adds pop-up warning after users share sensitive info

Meta has introduced a new pop-up in its Meta AI app, alerting users that any prompts they share may be made public. While AI chat interactions are rarely private by design, many users appeared unaware that their conversations could be published for others to see.

The Discovery feed in the Meta AI app had previously featured conversations that included intimate details—such as break-up confessions, attempts at self-diagnosis, and private photo edits.

According to multiple reports last week, these were often shared unknowingly by users who may not have realised the implications of the app’s sharing functions. Mashable confirmed this by finding such examples directly in the feed.

Now, when a user taps the ‘Share’ button on a Meta AI conversation, a new warning appears: ‘Prompts you post are public and visible to everyone. Your prompts may be suggested by Meta on other Meta apps. Avoid sharing personal or sensitive information.’ A ‘Post to feed’ button then appears below.

Although the sharing step has always required users to confirm, Business Insider reports that the feature wasn’t clearly explained—leading some users to publish their conversations unintentionally. The new alert aims to clarify that process.

As of this week, Meta AI’s Discovery feed features mostly AI-generated images and more generic prompts, often from official Meta accounts. For users concerned about privacy, there is an option in the app’s settings to opt out of the Discovery feed altogether.

Still, experts advise against entering personal or sensitive information into AI chatbots, including Meta AI. Adjusting privacy settings and avoiding the ‘Share’ feature are the best ways to protect your data.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google warns against weak passwords amid £12bn scams

Gmail users are being urged to upgrade their security as online scams continue to rise sharply, with cyber criminals stealing over £12 billion in the past year alone. Google is warning that simple passwords leave people vulnerable to phishing and account takeovers.

To combat the threat, users are encouraged to switch to passkeys or use ‘Sign in with Google’, both of which offer stronger protections through fingerprint, face ID or PIN verification. Over 60% of Baby Boomers and Gen X users still rely on weak passwords, increasing their exposure to attacks.

Despite the availability of secure alternatives, only 30% of users reportedly use them daily. Gen Z is leading the shift by adopting newer tools, bypassing outdated security habits altogether.

Google recommends adding 2-Step Verification for those unwilling to leave passwords behind. With scams growing more sophisticated, extra security measures are no longer optional, they are essential.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

China’s robotics industry set to double by 2028, led by drones and humanoid robots

China’s robotics industry is on course to double in size by 2028, with Morgan Stanley projecting market growth from US$47 billion in 2024 to US$108 billion.

With an annual expansion rate of 23 percent, the country is expected to strengthen its leadership in this fast-evolving field. Analysts credit China’s drive for innovation and cost efficiency as key to advancing next-generation robotics.

A cornerstone of the ‘Made in China 2025’ initiative, robotics is central to the nation’s goal of dominating global high-tech industries. Last year, China accounted for 40 percent of the worldwide robotics market and over half of all industrial robot installations.

Recent data shows industrial robot production surged 35.5 percent in May, while service robot output climbed nearly 14 percent.

Morgan Stanley anticipates drones will remain China’s largest robotics segment, set to grow from US$19 billion to US$40 billion by 2028.

Meanwhile, the humanoid robot sector is expected to see an annual growth rate of 63 percent, expanding from US$300 million in 2025 to US$3.4 billion by 2030. By 2050, China could be home to 302 million humanoid robots, making up 30 percent of the global population.

The researchers describe 2025 as a milestone year, marking the start of mass humanoid robot production.

They emphasise that automation is already reshaping China’s manufacturing industry, boosting productivity and quality instead of simply replacing workers and setting the stage for a brighter industrial future.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

CISOs warn AI-driven cyberattacks are rising, with DNS infrastructure at risk

A new report warns that chief information security officers (CISOs) are bracing for a sharp increase in cyber-attacks as AI continues to reshape the global threat landscape. According to CSC’s report, 98% of CISOs expect rising attacks over the next three years, with domain infrastructure a key concern.

AI-powered domain generation algorithms (DGAs) have been flagged as a key threat by 87% of security leaders. Cyber-squatting, DNS hijacking, and DDoS attacks remain top risks, with nearly all CISOs expressing concern over bad actors’ increasing use of AI.

However, only 7% said they feel confident in defending against domain-based threats.

Concerns have also been raised about identity verification. Around 99% of companies worry their domain registrars fail to apply adequate Know Your Customer (KYC) policies, leaving them vulnerable to infiltration.

Meanwhile, half of organisations have not implemented or tested a formal incident response plan or adopted AI-driven monitoring tools.

Budget constraints continue to limit cybersecurity readiness. Despite the growing risks, only 7% of CISOs reported a significant increase in security budgets between 2024 and 2025. CSC’s Ihab Shraim warned that DNS infrastructure is a prime target and urged firms to act before facing technical and reputational fallout.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Workplace deepfake abuse: What employers must know

Deepfake technology—AI-generated videos, images, and audio—has entered the workplace in alarming ways.

Once difficult to produce, deepfakes are now widely accessible and are being used to harass, impersonate, or intimidate employees. These synthetic media attacks can cause deep psychological harm, damage reputations, and expose employers to serious legal risks.

While US federal law hasn’t yet caught up, new legislation like the Take It Down Act and Florida’s Brooke’s Law require platforms to remove non-consensual deepfake content within 48 hours.

Meanwhile, employers could face claims under existing workplace laws if they fail to act on deepfake harassment. Inaction may lead to lawsuits for creating a hostile environment or for negligent oversight.

Most workplace policies still don’t mention synthetic media and something like this creates blind spots, especially during investigations, where fake images or audio could wrongly influence decisions.

Employers need to shift how they assess evidence and protect both accused and accuser fairly. It’s time to update handbooks, train staff, and build clear response plans that include digital impersonation and deepfake abuse.

By treating deepfakes as a modern form of harassment instead of just a tech issue, organisations can respond faster, protect staff, and maintain trust. Proactive training, updated policies, and legal awareness will be crucial to workplace safety in the age of AI.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Anubis ransomware threatens permanent data loss

A new ransomware threat known as Anubis is making waves in the cybersecurity world, combining file encryption with aggressive monetisation tactics and a rare file-wiping feature that prevents data recovery.

Victims discover their files renamed with the .anubis extension and are presented with a ransom note warning that stolen data will be leaked unless payment is made.

What sets Anubis apart is its ability to permanently erase file contents using a command that overwrites them with zero-byte shells. Although the filenames remain, the data inside is lost forever, rendering recovery impossible.

Researchers have flagged the destructive feature as highly unusual for ransomware, typically seen in cyberespionage rather than financially motivated attacks.

The malware also attempts to change the victim’s desktop wallpaper to reinforce the impact, although in current samples, the image file was missing. Anubis spreads through phishing emails and uses tactics like command-line scripting and stolen tokens to escalate privileges and evade defences.

It operates as a ransomware-as-a-service model, meaning less-skilled cybercriminals can rent and use it easily.

Security experts urge organisations to treat Anubis as more than a typical ransomware threat. Besides strong backup practices, firms are advised to improve email security, limit user privileges, and train staff to spot phishing attempts.

As attackers look to profit from stolen access and unrecoverable destruction, prevention becomes the only true line of defence.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Judge halts OPM data sharing with DOGE amid privacy concerns

A federal judge in New York ordered the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to stop sharing sensitive personal data with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) agents.

The preliminary injunction, issued on 6 June by Judge Denise Cote, cited a strong likelihood that OPM and DOGE violated both the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Administrative Procedures Act.

The lawsuit, led by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and several advocacy groups, alleges that OPM unlawfully disclosed information from one of the largest federal employee databases to DOGE, a controversial initiative reportedly linked to billionaire Elon Musk.

The database includes names, social security numbers, health and financial data, union affiliations, and background check records for millions of federal employees, applicants, and retirees.

Union representatives and privacy advocates called the ruling a significant win for data protection and government accountability. AFGE President Everett Kelley criticised the involvement of ‘Musk’s DOGE cronies’, arguing that unelected individuals should not have access to such sensitive material.

The legal action also seeks to delete any data handed over to DOGE. The case comes amid ongoing concerns about federal data security following OPM’s 2015 breach, which compromised information on more than 22 million people.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Crypto scandal sparks no-confidence vote in Czech Parliament

The Czech government faced pressure as Parliament debated a no-confidence motion over a scandal tied to a Bitcoin donation. The Justice Ministry sold a crypto donation worth nearly 1 billion koruna ($47 million), triggering outrage over the donor’s criminal record for drug offences.

Justice Minister Pavel Blazek resigned in May, stating he wanted to avoid further damage to the coalition. Prime Minister Petr Fiala accepted his resignation and praised him for acting responsibly.

Eva Decroix, also from the Civic Democratic Party, took over the post and announced an independent investigation into the ministry’s donation handling.

Opposition leaders, including Andrej Babis of the ANO movement, accused the government of possibly laundering money. The organised crime unit is investigating, but the origin and reason for the Bitcoin donation remain unclear.

The four-party coalition still holds a majority, making it unlikely that the no-confidence motion will succeed. However, the affair arrives just months before crucial elections in October, with polls predicting a win for Babis.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Hacktivists target Iran’s Bank Sepah in major cyberattack

A cyberattack has reportedly hit Iran’s Bank Sepah by the hacktivist group Predatory Sparrow. The group announced on Tuesday that it had ‘destroyed all data’ at the bank, which is closely linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Iran’s military.

Several Bank Sepah branches were closed, and customers reported being unable to access their accounts.
The attack coincided with broader banking disruptions in Iran, affecting services at Kosar and Ansar banks, both associated with military entities and subject to US sanctions.

Authorities in Iran have yet to publicly acknowledge the attack, though the IRGC-linked Fars news agency claimed the issues would be resolved in a few hours.

Predatory Sparrow said it targeted Bank Sepah for its alleged role in financing Iran’s missile and nuclear programmes and in helping the country circumvent international sanctions.

The group has previously claimed responsibility for attacks on Iranian steel plants and fuel stations and is widely believed by Tehran to receive foreign support, particularly from Israel.

Bank Sepah, one of the country’s oldest financial institutions, operates around 1,800 branches within Iran and maintains offices across Europe. The United States sanctioned the bank in 2019 following Iran’s withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Indonesia’s cyber push faces capacity challenges in the provinces

Indonesia is decentralising its approach to cybersecurity, launching eight regional Cyber Crime Directorates within provincial police forces in September 2024.

These directorates, located in areas including Jakarta, East Java, Bali, and Papua, aim to boost local responses to increasingly complex cyber threats—from data breaches and financial fraud to hacktivism and disinformation.

The move marks a shift from Jakarta-led cybersecurity efforts toward a more distributed model, aligning with Indonesia’s broader decentralisation goals. It reflects the state’s recognition that digital threats are not only national in scope, but deeply rooted in local contexts.

However, experts warn that regionalising cyber governance comes with significant challenges. Provincial police commands often lack specialised personnel, digital forensics capabilities, and adaptive institutional structures.

Many still rely on rotations from central agencies or basic training programs—insufficient for dealing with fast-moving and technically advanced cyberattacks.

Moreover, the culture of rigid hierarchy and limited cross-agency collaboration may further hinder rapid response and innovation at the local level. Without reforms to increase flexibility, autonomy, and inter-agency cooperation, these new directorates risk becoming symbolic rather than operationally impactful.

The inclusion of provinces like Central Sulawesi and Papua also reveals a political dimension. These regions are historically security-sensitive, and the presence of cyber directorates could serve both policing and state surveillance functions, raising concerns over the balance between security and civil liberties.

To be effective, the initiative requires more than administrative expansion. It demands sustained investment in talent development, modern infrastructure, and trusted partnerships with local stakeholders—including the private sector and academia.

If these issues are not addressed, Indonesia’s push to regionalise cybersecurity may reinforce old hierarchies rather than build meaningful local capacity. Stronger, smarter institutions—not just new offices—will determine whether Indonesia can secure its digital future.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!